Court filing
Indictment as to Heath Gauthier (1) counts 1-3, 4-6 — USA v. Gauthier (Dkt. 1)
Filed February 15, 2023 in USA v. Gauthier; one of 37 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | D.N.H. |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2023-02-15 |
D.N.H. · No. 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM · Doc. 1 · 2023-02-15 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
HEATH GAUTHIER,
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Criminal Case No. 1:23-cr-15-JL-01
Count 1-6: Wire Fraud and Attempted Wire
Fraud
(18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1349)
Counts 7-9: Aggravated Identity Theft
(18 U.S.C. § 1028A)
INDICTMENT
The Grand Jury charges:
At all times material to this indictment:
COUNTS ONE THROUGH SIX
Wire Fraud and Attempted Wire Fraud
[18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1349]
1.
The defendant, HEATH GAUTHIER, was a resident of New Hampshire with a
residence in Rochester.
2.
Itria Ventures LLC was a non-bank lender located in New York.
3.
Harvest Small Business Finance LLC was a non-bank lender located in
California.
4.
Fountainhead Small Business Finance LLC was a non-bank lender located in
Florida.
5.
ReadyCap Lending LLC was a non-bank lender located in New Jersey.
6.
WebBank was an FDIC insured bank headquartered in Utah.
Case 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM Document 1 Filed 02/15/23 Page 1 of 9
2
7.
Cross River Bank was an FDIC insured bank headquartered in New Jersey.
8.
Northeast Bank was an FDIC insured bank with corporate offices in Maine,
Massachusetts, and New York.
9.
Customers Bank was an FDIC insured bank headquartered in Pennsylvania.
CARES Act Payroll Protection Program
10.
The United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) is an executive-
branch agency of the United States government that provides support to entrepreneurs and small
businesses.
11.
In or around March 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security
(“CARES”) Act was enacted to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of
Americans suffering adverse economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES
Act established several new temporary programs and expanded existing programs, including
programs created or administered by the SBA.
12.
One source of relief provided by the CARES Act was the authorization of
forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses, through a
program referred to as the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”).
13.
To obtain a PPP loan, the authorized representative of a business was required to
state the business’s average monthly payroll expenses and number of employees. These figures
were used to calculate the amount of money the small business was eligible to receive under the
PPP.
14.
A participating lender would then process the PPP loan application. If the PPP
loan application was approved, the participating lender funded the PPP loan using its own
monies, which were fully guaranteed by the SBA.
Case 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM Document 1 Filed 02/15/23 Page 2 of 9
3
15.
Itria Ventures LLC, Harvest Small Business Finance LLC, Fountainhead Small
Business Finance LLC, ReadyCap Lending LLC, WebBank, Cross River Bank,Northeast Bank,
and Customers Bank (the “Lenders”) participated in the PPP as lenders to small businesses.
16.
PPP loan applications were received by Lenders through server locations located
outside of New Hampshire.
CARES Act Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program
and Economic Injury Disaster Grants
17.
The Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) program was another source of
financial assistance provided by the CARES Act. It provided low-interest financing to small
businesses, renters, and homeowners in regions affected by declared disasters. The EIDL
program was administered by the SBA.
18.
The CARES Act authorized the SBA to provide EIDLs to eligible small
businesses experiencing substantial financial disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In
addition, the CARES Act authorized the SBA to issue advances of up to $10,000 to small
businesses, known as Economic Injury Disaster Grants (EIDGs). The amount of the advance
was determined by the number of employees the applicant certified having. The advances did
not need to be repaid.
19.
To obtain an EIDL and/or EIDG, a qualifying business was required to apply to
the SBA and provide information about its operations, such as the number of employees, the
entity’s gross business revenues, and cost of goods sold in the 12 months prior to January 31,
2020. The amount of the loan, if approved, was determined based, in part, on the information
provided concerning the number of employees, gross revenue, and cost of goods.
20.
Any funds issued under an EIDL or EIDG were issued directly by the SBA.
EIDL funds could be used for payroll expenses, sick leave, production costs, and business
Case 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM Document 1 Filed 02/15/23 Page 3 of 9
4
obligations, such as debts, rent, and mortgage payments.
21.
EIDL and EIDG applications were received by a cloud-based platform through a
server located in Des Moines, Iowa.
The Scheme and Artifice to Defraud
22.
Between in or around February, 2020, and continuing through in or around
March, 2021, in the District of New Hampshire and elsewhere, the defendant,
HEATH GAUTHIER,
knowingly and willfully executed and attempted to execute a scheme and artifice to defraud the
Lenders and the SBA and to obtain money by means of false and fraudulent pretenses,
representations, and promises.
23.
GAUTHIER applied for approximately 10 PPP loans from the Lenders. The total
requested loan amount of these PPP loans was approximately $990,000.
24.
GAUTHIER applied for four EIDLs from the SBA. The total requested loan
amount of these EIDLs was approximately $130,000.
25.
GAUTHIER electronically signed and submitted each PPP and EIDL application
form over the internet.
26.
For some applications, GAUTHIER applied as a sole proprietor in his own name.
For others, he applied for loans for one of three fictitious businesses: Sellingham Farm, Lilac
City Home Care, and New England Power and Light (the “Companies”).
27.
Though they purport to be New Hampshire companies, none of the Companies
are registered with the New Hampshire Secretary of State, and the Internal Revenue Service
(“IRS”) does not have records related to the Companies.
28.
GAUTHIER used the identities of deceased persons to support many of his
Case 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM Document 1 Filed 02/15/23 Page 4 of 9
5
applications. For example, GAUTHIER submitted three PPP loan applications and two EIDL
applications in the names of two deceased persons, DP-1 and DP-2. In these applications
GAUTHIER used the real name and social security number of DP-1 and DP-2 and included PDF
images of counterfeit driver’s licenses purporting to be DP-1 and DP-2 but with pictures of other
people.
29.
GAUTHIER also used the identities of DP-1, DP-2 and other deceased persons in
supporting documentation for several of his PPP loan applications—approximately eight of
whom died in or before 2011. For example, in several PPP applications GAUTHIER listed these
deceased persons in false tax and payroll documents for the Companies.
30.
As part of the PPP loan applications, the defendant was required to provide
supporting documents substantiating his request for funds. For most PPP applications, the
defendant presented tax documents that were purportedly filed with the IRS. The supporting tax
documents were fraudulent because they were never filed with the IRS.
31.
GAUTHIER also submitted altered municipal and bank records in support of
several of his PPP applications.
32.
As part of the EIDL applications, the defendant was required to provide certain
information about the Companies. For each EIDL application, the defendant provided false
financial and payroll information. Sometimes, the defendant also provided tax documents that
were purportedly filed with the IRS. The supporting tax documents were fraudulent because
they were never filed with the IRS.
33.
The fraudulent documents provided in the loan applications were capable of
influencing the Lenders and the SBA in making their determinations about whether to approve
the loans.
Case 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM Document 1 Filed 02/15/23 Page 5 of 9
6
The Wire Fraud Offenses
34.
On or about the dates listed below, in the District of New Hampshire and
elsewhere, for the purpose of executing the scheme to defraud, the defendant transmitted and
caused the transmission of writings, signs, and signals in interstate commerce by sending the
wire transmissions listed below to the Lenders listed below and the SBA to and through locations
outside of New Hampshire.
Count
Date
PPP/
EIDL
Listed
Applicant
Listed
Business
Lender
Wire
Amount
Awarded
1
5/19/2020 PPP
Gauthier
Heath R
Gauthier
Itria Ventures
Application
to lender
$70,000
2
2/9/2021
PPP
Gauthier
Sellingham
Farm
Harvest Small
Business
Finance
Application
to lender
$116,007
3
4/15/2020
EIDL
Gauthier
New England
Power and
Light
SBA
Application
to SBA
$6,500
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343.
Case 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM Document 1 Filed 02/15/23 Page 6 of 9
7
The Attempted Wire Fraud Offenses
35.
On or about the dates listed below, in the District of New Hampshire and
elsewhere, for the purpose of attempting to execute the scheme to defraud, the defendant
transmitted and caused the transmission of writings, signs, and signals in interstate commerce by
sending the wire transmissions listed below to the Lenders listed below and the SBA to and
through locations outside of New Hampshire.
Count
Date
PPP/
EIDL
Listed
Applicant
Listed
Business
Lender
Wire
Approx.
Amount
Sought
4
8/4/2020
PPP
DP-1
Sellingham
Farm
Itria Ventures
Application
to lender
$99,000
5
8/11/2020 PPP
DP-2
Sellingham
Farm
Fountainhead
Small
Business
Finance
Application
to lender
$99,000
6
6/18/2020
EIDL
DP-1
Heath
Gauthier
SBA
Application
to SBA
$43,500
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343, 1349.
Case 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM Document 1 Filed 02/15/23 Page 7 of 9
8
COUNTS SEVEN THROUGH NINE
Aggravated Identity Theft
18 U.S.C. § 1028A
36.
The Grand Jury realleges paragraphs 1 through 33.
37.
On or about the dates charted below, in the District of New Hampshire and
elsewhere, the defendant,
HEATH GAUTHIER,
during and in relation to a felony violation of wire fraud and attempted wire fraud in violation
of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and1349, knowingly possessed and used,
without lawful authority, means of identification of another person—including the name and
social security number—on applications for CARES Act loans.
Count
Date of
Application
Type of
Application
Means of
Identification Used
7
8/4/2020
PPP
DP-1
8
8/11/2020
PPP
DP-2
9
6/18/2020
EIDL
DP-1
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A.
Case 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM Document 1 Filed 02/15/23 Page 8 of 9
9
NOTICE OF FORFEITURE
Upon conviction of one or more of the offenses set forth in Counts One through Nine of
this Indictment, the defendants shall forfeit to the United States pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§§ 981(a)(1)(C), 982(a)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), any property, real or personal, which
constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the offense, including a sum of money equal
to the proceeds of the charged offenses.
Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), the United States of America shall be entitled to
forfeiture of substitute property if any of the property described above, as a result of any act or
omission of the defendants: (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been
transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction
of the court; (d) has been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with
other property which cannot be divided without difficulty.
A TRUE BILL
Dated: February 15, 2023
/s/ FOREPERSON
FOREPERSON
JANE E. YOUNG
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
By:
/s/ Matthew T. Hunter
Matthew T. Hunter
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Case 1:23-cr-00015-JL-TSM Document 1 Filed 02/15/23 Page 9 of 9File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.nhd.60810.1.0.pdf
- Size
- 136,456 bytes
- SHA-256
- 7993c3f51aaacb791b1bc2a97aaafea71b85b890ecd219074d2a82de5c5e3a52
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.nhd.60810.1.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)