Notice of Court's Loss of Jurisdiction, Daniel Eric Jay — United States v. Maurice Fayne (Document 292)

Summary

A filing captioned in part Notice of Court's Loss of Jurisdiction, made by the defendant in United States of America v. Daniel Eric Jay, Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, filed July 22, 2022 as Document 292. The declarant, Daniel-Eric, described as a member by sanguinity of the Jay family, states that he proceeds sui juris by special appearance as beneficiary, non-adverse party and original grantor of the trust DANIEL ERIC JAY. Its numbered declarations assert that the defendant named in the case is a legal entity, a trust, citing 28 USC 3002 (15)(a). The filing is six pages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

FILED IN CLERK'S OFFICE 
U.S.D.C. -Atlanta 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
ATLANTA DIVISION 
JUL 2 2 2022 
KE·~m::Clerk 
By:(§Yv~"'""tv Clerk 
UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICA) 
) 
V. 
) 
) 
DANIEL ERIC JAY 
) 
CASE #1:20-CR-000228 
NOTICE OF FNMWHFIT/ 
NOTICE OF SUCCESSORSHIP/ 
NOTICE OF NON-ADVERSE PARTY/ 
NOTICE OF INTEREST/ 
STATEMENT OF INTEREST 
NOTICE OF COURT'S LOSS OF JURISDICTION 
The undersigned declarant, Daniel-Eric, a member by sanguinity of the Jay family, being first 
duly sworn, hereby deposes and says: 
I am proceeding sui juris, via special appearance, reserving all rights, waiving none, as 
Beneficiary, non-adverse party and original grantor of the trust: DANIEL ERIC JAY. 
I am over the age of eighteen, suffer no legal disabilities, have personal knowledge of the facts 
set forth below, and am competent to testify. 
Declaration 1. 
The Defendant in the above named action is a legal entity, a trust, incorporated 
into the UNITED STATES corporation (see 28 USC 3002 (15)(a)) on or about July 21, 1976. 
Declarant has no record or evidence that Daniel-Eric: Jay is not CFR 26 Subtitle A Chap 1 
Subchapter J Part 1 Subpart E Section 672 (b) non-adverse party and believes no such evidence 
exists. 
Declaration 2. Declarant has no record or evidence that on the Nativity date of July 21, 1976, 
the mother, acting as agent for Daniel-Eric: Jay, did not grant the State, a corporation known as 
PENNSYLVANIA, a sub corporation of THE UNITED STATES, a sub corporation 
(incorporated in 1871 by The Act to Incorporate the District of Columbia) of the UNITED 
KINGDOM, a name/birth for the documentation and to form a corpus resulting in a certain 
FNMWHFIT (Fungible Non Mortgage Widely Held Fixed Income Trust) as defined in section 
301.7701-4c of the regulations of the Internal Revenue Service, 26 CFR, and believes no such 
evidence exists. 
Declaration 3. Declarant has no record or evidence that DANIEL ERIC JAY, a trust, Account 
#174-64-9418, did not become a United States person under the Internal Revenue Service 
regulation 7701 (a) (30) (e) and did not become a corpus in fact from the granting by the mother, 
acting as agent at birth for baby boy, grantor of the boy baby, and believes no such evidence 
exists. 
Declaration 4. Declarant has no record or evidence that a Trust Interest Holder (TIH) is not a 
grantor, co-trustee or co-beneficiary holding at least one interest, including but not limited to that 
of middleman, in the Trust as applies per IRS General Instructions for forms 1098/1099/5490 
and W2G, and believes no such evidence exists. 
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 292     Filed 07/22/22     Page 1 of 6

Declaration S. Declarant has no record or evidence that any outside approval is needed for the 
grantor to appoint by will the income of the Trust as per 26 CFR Subtitle A Chap 1 Subchapter J 
Part 1 Subpart E Section 674 (b) (3) and believes no such evidence exists. 
Declaration 6. Declarant has no record or evidence that he does not have an Interest in the 
cestui que trust established by the application for, and resulting issuance of, a Social Security 
number and also the foreign situs trust as evidenced by the birth certificate being on file/in the 
possession of, as a registered United States security, the Depository Trust Company in New Y orlc 
City, and believes no such evidence exists. 
Declaration 7. 
Declarant has no record or evidence that declarant's long since acquired 
knowledge of the trust formed at the reading of 26 CFR 300.7701 and 26 USC 671 through 679 
(partially from which the Plaintiff's claim derives) did not also put the now alleged, and 
mistaken, defendant in the position of grantor and beneficiary of said trust, and believes no such 
evidence exists. Declarant has now expressed the trust mentioned and modifies/changes the 
terms of said trust to include a provision that private funds/credit may be accepted as lawful 
payment and/or payment may be directed from the above described Fungible Non-Mortgage 
Widely Held Fixed Income Trust. As grantor/beneficiary, the declarant, using his administrative 
powers of a beneficial owner, appoints, the Court to assist in settling the account(s) by providing 
details/instructions as to the preparation and submission of, to the Court, the proper 
documentation and paperwork required for settlement/closure in EQUITY. 
Declaration 8. Declarant has no record or evidence that declarant may not direct a 
disbursement/payment, by simple signature of acceptance of balance owed, to equitably settle 
any and all controversy before the Court, and believes that, in accordance with Declaration 5 
above, no such evidence exists. 
Declaration 9. Declarant is absent capacity to make any decisions for the Trust such as entering 
a "plea" for he is NOT the Trustee, and is absent capacity, as Beneficial owner and non-adverse 
party to take responsibility for the trust known as: DANIEL ERIC JAY. 
Declaration 10. Attorney Meghan Cambre constructively took upon herself the duty of Trustee 
and entered a plea of NOT GUILTY, without the approval of this beneficial owner and became 
responsible for the debts of the Trust. A trustee is absent capacity to confer responsibility of a 
trust upon a beneficiary and to do so is a dereliction of duty (crime). 
Declaration 11. The Trustee of the trust known as DANIEL ERIC JAY is THE UNITED 
STATES, therefore, the Beneficiary Daniel-Eric can only accept from the Trustee any charge 
made to the Trust, DANIEL ERIC JAY, and return the charges for settlement and discharge 
against the corpus/res of the Trust which is in the possession and control of the Trustee, THE 
UNITED STATES. Daniel-Eric rescinded all controversy and accepted all documents, bills, and 
writings from the UNITED STATES but Attorney's for the Trust had them struck from the 
record, without the permission or approval and against the wishes of the Beneficiary. 
Declaration 12. Whereas there is NO controversy before this Court regarding the above 
captioned action, ALL subject matter jurisdiction is lost. The Court remains with the inherent 
jurisdiction to recognize these truths and further declare the same. 
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 292     Filed 07/22/22     Page 2 of 6

Declaration 13. Whereas the Beneficiary, as a flesh and blood, living man, recognized by the 
Court, has numerous "due process" rights that have been refused to be recognized by this same 
District Court in the above captioned case, the en personum/personal jurisdiction over the man, 
Daniel-Eric: Jay has been lost. 
Declaration 14. 
Whereas Declarant has previously accepted and returned for settlement and 
discharge all offers, writings, documents, sent to him by the UNITED STATES, the controversy 
was settled pursuant to Declaration 11, Declaration 8 and Declaration 5 aforementioned above 
Declaration 15. The District Court, when asked, has refused to inform the Beneficiary/ 
Declarant Daniel-Eric, of the nature and the cause of the allegation as required by the Sixth 
Amendment to the Constitution for The United States of America and the US CONSTITUTION. 
Whereas, the allegation has been repeated to this Declarant, the nature has been withheld by all 
judges including Mark Cohen. Therefore, the Declarant can only assume that this court is 
operating under a secret, foreign enemy jurisdiction, and has lost all personal jurisdiction over 
the Beneficiary and Declarant Daniel-Eric: Jay. 
Declaration 16. Declarant/ Beneficiary Daniel- Eric: Jay does NOT reside within the U.S. nor 
any federal corporate zone. Daniel- Jay is domiciled on the land more commonly known as 
Pennsylvania in contradistinction to THE COMMONWEAL TH OF PENNSYLVANIA. 
Declaration 17. The Declarant Daniel-Eric: Jay has not seen any evidence nor has any been 
presented to him that the corpus/res of the Trust, known as DANIEL ERIC JAY, is not the entire 
account receivable owed by THE UNITED STATES to the Beneficiary, Daniel-Eric: Jay, where 
THE UNITED ST ATES is the debtor/ Trustee and the Beneficiary is the creditor to THE 
UNITED STA TES, and he believes no evidence to the contrary exists. 
Declaration 18. Declarant has not seen any evidence nor has any been presented to him that 
agents of the Trustee of the Trust known as DANIEL ERIC JAY have NOT attempted to raid 
and plunder the res of this Trust, arrest and incarcerate the Beneficial owner in an effort to 
deprive the Beneficiary of his beneficial enjoyment of the corpus/res of the Trust, force upon him 
while in prison a dangerous gene therapy drug ( a death jab) and thus, unjustly enrich these rogue 
agents with no further interference from the Beneficiary, and the Declarant believes no evidence 
exists to the contrary. 
Declaration 19. The Declarant has not seen any evidence nor has any ever been presented to 
him where a Debtor can rule over and charge a Creditor with true bill, invoice, or check that 
cannot be simply offset and discharged with an accounting adjustment, and he believes no 
evidence to the contrary exists. 
Declaration 20. The Declarant has not seen any evidence nor has any been presented to him that 
these same rogue agents, including but not limited to Mark Cohen, Alan Baverman and John 
Larkins have not attempted to criminally raid and plunder this Trust, DANIEL ERIC JAY, 
expecting to receive $95,000 and $55,000 per count on the indictment, respectfully, and he 
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 292     Filed 07/22/22     Page 3 of 6

believes no such evidence to the contrary exists. 
( see attached CRIS report) 
I, Daniel- Eric:Jay do hereby declare and affirm that the foregoing document was authored by me 
and is true, accurate, complete and not misleading under the penalty of perjury to the best of my 
knowledge and belief. 
FURTHER DECLARANT SAYETH NOT 
Respectfully submitted: 
Daniel-Eric: Jay, proceeding as Sui Juris 
Beneficiary of DANIEL ERIC JAY 
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 292     Filed 07/22/22     Page 4 of 6

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this DEFENDANT'S DECLARATION AND 
NOTICE OF COURT'S LOSS OF JURISDICTION in this case has, on the __ day 
of 
2022, been served via US Postal Service to counsel of record for the Prosecutor 
---
in this case: 
MICHAEL J. BROWN 
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
GEORGIA BAR No. 064437 
600 U.S. COURTHOUSE 
75 TED TURNER DRIVE, SW 
ATLANTA, GA 30303 
(404) 581-6000 
Daniel- Eric: Jay 
21 Bestview Ave 
Bessemer, PA 16112 
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 292     Filed 07/22/22     Page 5 of 6

J;>. -1--,J Ave-
& I .B..sf111•M,-I lo II 2-
.... 11} 
~~-
~ 
, ~'-" ::r 8lt>J'1 
A~f U~ .+"'t_ 
, 
La,\ us C,ourl1tt111c-
7("' kd. TW'IIW /J,: sw 
CLEARF.O IJ'ATE -1 
Mh•kA, & A- 3ffi/O '22 
U.S Marsnals Service 
Atlanta, GA 30303 
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 292     Filed 07/22/22     Page 6 of 6

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.gand.278523.292.0.pdf

Size

506,974 bytes

SHA-256

e0b4cab32b41e60d392cab569304e062a0e5654ae97000338cdd5d3e60e6d945

Our copy

gov.uscourts.gand.278523.292.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)