Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Maurice Fayne (GAND 278523) Criminal Complaint — United States v. Maurice Fayne (Dkt. 61, N.D. Ga. No. 1:20-cr-00228, GAND 278523)

Court filing

Criminal Complaint — United States v. Maurice Fayne (Dkt. 61, N.D. Ga. No. 1:20-cr-00228, GAND 278523)

Filed August 12, 2020 in United States v. Maurice Fayne related docket; one of 163 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2020-08-12

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL · Doc. 61 · 2020-08-12 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

FILED IN CHAMBERS
U.S.D.C--Atlanta
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AUG 1 2 2020
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA JAMES NWTTEN cierk
ATLANTA DIVISION By ^
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff,
CRIMINAL ACTION
V.
MAURICE FAYNE,
FICTITIOUS DEFENDANT
Defendant,
CASE NO. 1:20-CR-228
CASE NOs. 1:20-MJ-370, 364,
361, 360, 355 and 1:20-MC-833,
1:20-CR-228-MHC-JKL,
1:20-CR-228-MHC-JKL
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
AND MOTION TO COMPEL
DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC DISCOVERY
COMES NOWfayne, marurice johnson el, real party in interest, a Moor
American National, but not a citizen of the UNITED STATES demands specific
discovery Under THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA.
1. The search and seizure warrant as specifically required and outlined in
detailed in THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
4TH AMENDMENT. The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall
not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 61     Filed 08/12/20     Page 1 of 7

supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
2. The arrest warrant as specifically required and outlined in detailed in THE
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 4TH
AMENDMENT. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by
Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and
the persons or things to be seized
3. Dash Cam, Body Cam and all recording devices audio and video related to
the above mentioned case.
4. Electronic communications i.e. (email(s), text messages, records of phone
calls by cell phones, wiretaps, wiretap warrant, internal land lines related to
the above mentioned case.
5. List of names of all Law Enforcement officers, including Federal, State and
local involved, directly or indirectly with the above mentioned case.
6. Complaint records of all law enforcement involved with the above
mentioned case.
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 61     Filed 08/12/20     Page 2 of 7

7. Statements of all witnesses involved, directly or indirectly involved with the
above mentioned case.
8. Bill of Particulars from the Grand Jury
9. The signed Affidavit under oath that accompanied the search and seizure
warrant.
10. The signed Affidavit under oath that accompanied the arrest warrant.
11. The signed Affidavit under oath that accompanied the original criminal
complaint.
12. Grand Jury testimony of all jurors.
13. Field notes of all Agents of the United States involved at the time of
indictment.
14. Federal Rules and Guide Lines of CARES ACT OF PPP LOAN at the time
the application in this case was filed which was April 4th, 2020.
15. Character Evidence; Crimes or other Acts of the victim.
REQUEST TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
Federal Rules does not require a defendant or alleged defendant to file a motion for
discovery,
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 61     Filed 08/12/20     Page 3 of 7

nor does it require the government to file a motion for reciprocal discovery. The
parties are therefore expected to provide discovery promptly and to do so without
an order. A pre-trial conference has been requested multiple times by the alleged
defendant.
JENCKS ACT
Jencks Act material may not be ordered disclosed until a witness has
testified. Nevertheless, the government is encouraged to disclose this material as
early as possible to avoid delays.
BRADY/GIGLIO
The government must comply with its Constitutional obligation to disclose
any information known to it that is material to the guilt or punishment of the
defendant whether or not the defendant requests it. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83
(1963); Giglio v. United States, 405 US. 150 (1972). Brady and Giglio
information must be disclosed in time for effective use at trial. In re United States
(United States v Coppa), 267 F3d 132, 142 (2d Cir.2001); United States v. Olson,
697 F.2d 273 (8th Cir. 1983). Cf. United States v Higgs. 713 K2d 39, 44 (3d Cir.
1983).
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 61     Filed 08/12/20     Page 4 of 7

NEWLY DISCOVERED INFORMATION
It is the continuing duty of the UNITED STATES ATTORNEY(s) and alleged
defendant to disclose to opposing counsel or alleged defendant in propia persona
all newly discovered information or other material within the scope of the rules.
PRE- TRIAL MOTIONS
Motions that arise from Jencks Act material are excluded from the deadline set by
the court, pursuant to the mles.
I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
United States of America that the foregoing is tme and correct
Respectfully submitted this_/^_day of Aj^-i- 2020, by:
^M.'U )C^/?^-] f^u,-^ - ^
maurice johnson fayne el
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion to Suppress Criminal Affidavit and all
other Evidence has been formatted in Times New Roman 14 pt., in accordance
with Local Rule 5.1B, and was electronically filed this day with the Clerk of Court
using CM/ECF system which will automatically send email notification of such
filing to the following counsel of record:
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 61     Filed 08/12/20     Page 5 of 7

James N. Hatten Clerk of Court
Attorney John Russell Phillips
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Richard B. Russell Federal Building
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA United States Attorney's Office
Richard B. Russell Federal Building
75 Ted Turner Drive, SW #600
2211 United States Courthouse
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3309
75 Ted Turner Drive, SW
(404)581-6000
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3309
Email :mssell.phillips @usdoj .gov
(404)215-1600
Attorney Bernita Malloy
Attorney Byung J. Pak
Richard B. Russell Federal Building
Richard B. Russell Federal Building
United States Attorney's Office
United States Attorney's Office
75 Ted Turner Drive, SW #600
75 Ted Turner Drive, SW #600
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3309
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3309
(404) 581-6000
Email: Bemita.Malloy@usdoj.gov
Attorney Michael John Brown
Richard B. Russell Federal Building
United States Attorney's Office
75 Ted Turner Drive, SW #600
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 61     Filed 08/12/20     Page 6 of 7

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3309
Email: Michael j .brown2 @ usdoj .gov
mauricejohnson fayne-el
c/o 6608 N Western Avenue # 1307
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma [73116] U.SA
770-846-1034
Email: mauricclohnson'uivnc.el trust @si^ai1.con^
Case 1:20-cr-00228-MHC-JKL     Document 61     Filed 08/12/20     Page 7 of 7

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.278523.61.0.pdf
Size
1,202,980 bytes
SHA-256
0b006db30a700beae63d039c6fa4732a7eede74dd44042a5a6a012a97203336f
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.278523.61.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top