Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. McCabe United States v. Dustin Sean McCabe — S.D. Fla., No. 9:24-cr-80103-AMC Joint Motion to Continue Trial (Final Request) and to Hold Trial in West Palm Beach — USA v. McCabe (Dkt. 24, S.D. Fla.)

Court filing

Joint Motion to Continue Trial (Final Request) and to Hold Trial in West Palm Beach — USA v. McCabe (Dkt. 24, S.D. Fla.)

Filed December 11, 2024 in USA v. McCabe; one of 219 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Filed2024-12-11

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 9:24-cr-80103-AMC · Doc. 24 · 2024-12-11 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
 
CASE NO.  24-CR-80103-CANNON 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DUSTIN SEAN McCABE, 
 
 
Defendant. 
_________________________________/ 
 
STATUS REPORT AND JOINT MOTION FOR FINAL CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL 
DATE AND FOR TRIAL TO BE HELD AT WEST PALM BEACH COURTHOUSE 
 
 
The United States of America, through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, 
and Defendant Dustin Sean McCabe, by and through undersigned counsel, jointly move for a final 
continuance of 28 days or, alternatively, 14 days from the current date of trial and a corresponding 
extension of any associated plea and pretrial motions deadlines, with the expectation that we move 
forward to trial at the date the Court sets here. The parties also respectfully move for the case to 
be set for trial in the Paul G. Rogers Federal Building and Courthouse in West Palm Beach. In 
support, the parties state the following: 
BACKGROUND AND CASE STATUS 
1. 
Mr. McCabe is charged with one count of seaman’s manslaughter, in violation of 
18 U.S.C. § 1115, one count of making a false statement within the jurisdiction of an agency of 
the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2), and three counts of wire fraud, in 
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. DE 3.  
2. 
Mr. McCabe made his initial appearance in this District and was arraigned on 
September 20, 2024, and he remains on bond in the Middle District of Florida, where he lives. See 
DE 13.  
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 24   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2024   Page 1 of 6

2 
 
3. 
On September 24, 2024, this Court entered its trial order setting trial for November 
4, 2024. DE 14. The Government filed its first response to the Standing Discovery Order (“SDO”) 
on October 6, 2024, which consisted of videos, photos, and other documentation that made up over 
3,000 Bates number entries. See DE 19. While the Government has an additional report it recently 
produced to the defense for which it will file an SDO response soon, it does not anticipate 
producing substantial additional discovery in this case.  
4. 
On October 17, 2024, the parties filed their first joint motion to continue the trial 
date in this matter, noting that the parties “have been discussing resolution since the case’s 
inception anticipate the case being resolved by plea.” DE 20 at 1. This Court granted the parties’ 
motion on October 21, 2024, continuing trial to December 16, 2024. DE 21. The parties then 
moved for a second 60-day continuance on December 2, 2024, again noting that the parties were 
discussing resolution and intended to negotiate further and determine whether the case would, in 
fact, resolve by plea as they had anticipated. DE 22 at 2. This Court granted the motion in part, 
continuing the trial to January 13, 2024.  
5. 
In granting these motions, the Court has excluded the time from October 17, 2024, 
through January 13, 2025. See DE 20 & 23. Based on those orders, only 25 of the 70 days permitted 
under the Speedy Trial Act have passed, which leaves 55 days remaining. 
6. 
On the afternoon of December 10, 2024, the defense informed the Government that 
Mr. McCabe would be proceeding to trial, though with a different counsel working with Mr. Musca 
than Ms. Calisha Francis, who had been Mr. McCabe’s plea negotiation counsel. Since that time, 
the Government has ramped up trial preparations in anticipation of trial in January or February as 
this Court rules in response to this Motion. 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 24   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2024   Page 2 of 6

3 
 
7. 
The parties file this Motion a week after the Court’s prior ruling on the parties’ 
second motion to continue for two purposes: (a) to notify the Court that this matter will proceed to 
trial and (b) to secure a trial date that will permit the parties adequate time to prepare, including 
through making flight, hotel, and scheduling arrangements for the parties and witnesses.  
REQUESTS AND BASIS FOR REQUESTS 
8. 
Through this Motion, the parties respectfully make two discrete requests: (a) a final 
continuance of 28 days or, alternatively, 14 days, with the expectation that the parties proceed to 
trial on the date this Court sets, and (b) that the trial be held at the West Palm Beach federal 
courthouse. In support of these requests, the parties submit the following:  
9. 
Continuance to February 10 or January 27 Trial Calendar. While the parties 
acknowledge and understand that the Court was previously inclined to continue this matter to 
January 13 instead of the requested February date, see DE 22 & 23, the parties respectfully make 
this request for additional time now that trial is a certainty to give the parties time to prepare this 
complex case. Five considerations support this request: 
a. First, additional time will give defense counsel, including new trial counsel, time 
to prepare Mr. McCabe’s case in light of his recent decision to proceed to trial. 
b. Second, the parties anticipate that this trial will take approximately two weeks (8-
11 days), with the Government anticipating approximately 23 witnesses at this time 
and the defense potentially calling its own witnesses. Some witnesses will need to 
travel from outside the district, which will require flight and hotel arrangements. 
Additional time and a firm trial date will facilitate securing all witnesses for trial. 
c. Third, this case involves unusual legal issues, such as the proper negligence 
standard for seaman’s manslaughter. The Government will be filing a motion in 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 24   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2024   Page 3 of 6

4 
 
limine as well as a trial brief outlining these issues, and additional time will permit 
the parties to fully brief these matters, which is appropriate in light of Mr. McCabe 
only having fully decided to go to trial yesterday. 
d. Fourth, Mr. McCabe is and will remain on bond, the parties respectfully submit that 
he is not prejudiced by the additional time the parties use to prepare for trial. 
e. Fifth, the parties have year-end holiday travel booked, which will delay trial 
preparation. While the parties appreciate that this reason is not as compelling as the 
others, we respectfully submit that it favors a continuance in light of Mr. McCabe’s 
bond status and his first appearance in this case occurring in late September. 
10. 
Holding Trial at West Palm Beach Courthouse.  In addition to a final continuance, 
the parties also respectfully request that this Court move the trial from the Fort Pierce federal 
courthouse to the West Palm Beach federal courthouse. Three considerations lead us to make this 
request: 
a. First and most importantly, this case involves many civilian fact witnesses, most of 
whom resided in the West Palm Beach area at the time of the instant offense and 
who were still West Palm Beach last time we interviewed them.1 Holding the trial 
in West Palm Beach will facilitate their appearing with minimal interference.  
b. Second, the conduct in this case occurred in West Palm Beach, so there is an interest 
in trying the case in the community where the conduct occurred.2  
c. Third, and of concededly far less importance, the undersigned Assistant United 
States Attorney notes that two of the prosecutors live in Miami and have children 
 
1 The Government is still in the process of re-confirming their addresses but have no reason to 
believe them to have moved.  
2 This matter was noticed as a “WPB” case in the Certificate of Trial Attorney. See DE 3 at 11. 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 24   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2024   Page 4 of 6

5 
 
under the age of two, so holding the trial in West Palm Beach will make it more 
feasible to continue assisting with childcare during trial. 
11. 
As a result of the foregoing considerations, the parties respectfully submit that an 
additional continuance will permit the parties adequate time to prepare for trial. In light of Mr. 
McCabe’s remaining on bond and the complexity of the case, the parties respectfully submit that 
this additional time would serve the interests of justice by ensuring an efficient and fair trial. 
12. 
This request is made in good faith and not for purposes of unnecessary delay. It is 
in the interests of justice and would not interfere with the public or Mr. McCabe’s interest in a 
speedy resolution of this matter. 
13. 
The undersigned Assistant United States Attorney has conferred with Mr. 
McCabe’s counsel, Ms. Calisha Angeline Francis, who advised that Mr. McCabe joins in this 
request. In addition, Mr. McCabe agrees to the exclusion from the speedy trial period of the time 
from the filing of this motion until a new trial date is set. 
14. 
A proposed order is attached and will be emailed to chambers. 
WHEREFORE, the United States, joined by Mr. McCabe, respectfully requests that the 
Court continue trial by either 28 or 14 days from the current date of trial, grant a corresponding 
extension of the pretrial motions deadline, and set the trial for the West Palm Beach federal 
courthouse. 
Dated: December 11, 2024 
 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
    
 
 
MARKENZY LAPOINTE 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:   /s/Calisha A. Francis 
 
 
By:   /s/ Zachary A. Keller  
 
 
 
CALISHA ANGELINE FRANCIS  
ZACHARY A. KELLER 
 Attorney for the Defendant  
 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Florida Bar No. 96348 
 
 
U.S. Attorney’s Office – SDFL 
P.O. Box 590714 
 
 
 
Court No: A5502767 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 24   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2024   Page 5 of 6

6 
 
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33359 
 
99 NE 4th Street, 6th Floor 
954-612-6126  
 
 
 
Miami, Florida 33132 
Email: CthomLaw@aol.com  
 
Tel: (305) 961-9023 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email: zachary.keller@usdoj.gov 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
 
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 11, 2024, I electronically filed the foregoing 
document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Zachary A. Keller                        0                         
 
 
 
 
 
 
Zachary A. Keller 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Case 9:24-cr-80103-AMC   Document 24   Entered on FLSD Docket 12/11/2024   Page 6 of 6

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.673624.24.0.pdf
Size
167,650 bytes
SHA-256
1206e8194b868296f3a1c2aa7f71463c976e156fcb4532ade6f8faf7887ca5c4
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.673624.24.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top