Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. David Antonetti — M.D. Fla., Tampa Division Unopposed MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically for Order Allowing Pretrial… —…

Court filing

Unopposed MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief, specifically for Order Allowing Pretrial… — USA v. Antonetti (Dkt. 29)

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Filed2024-08-28

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida · No. 8:24-cr-00317-VMC-AEP · Doc. 29 · 2024-08-28 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

An unopposed motion by defendant David Antonetti in United States v. Antonetti, No. 8:24-cr-00317-VMC-AEP, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, filed August 28, 2024 as Document 29. The motion asks the court to allow Pretrial Services to produce to defense counsel an evaluation the defendant underwent as a condition of pretrial release ordered at Doc. 18. It states that Pretrial Services would not release the evaluation without a court order and that counsel needs it to assess competency, treatment and possible mitigating factors. The motion states that the Assistant U.S. Attorney has no objection. The three-page filing is signed by defense counsel Diego M. Pestana and includes a certificate of service.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

1 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
TAMPA DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
                  Case No. 8:24-cr-317-VMC-AEP 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
DAVID ANTONETTI 
_______________________________/ 
 
DEFENDANT DAVID ANTONETTI’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ALLOW 
PRETRIAL SERVICES TO PRODUCE PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION TO 
DEFENSE COUNSEL 
 
Defendant David Antonetti respectfully moves for an order allowing Pretrial 
Services to produce to defense counsel the psychiatric evaluation Mr. Antonetti 
underwent. To support this motion, Mr. Antonetti states the following: 
1. 
Mr. Antonetti is charged with wire fraud. (Doc. 1).  
2. 
As part of his pretrial conditions of release, the Court ordered Mr. 
Antonetti to undergo a mental-health evaluation and receive any appropriate 
treatment. (Doc. 18 at 2).  
3. 
Before the undersigned was appointed, Mr. Antonetti underwent a 
psychiatric evaluation, which recommended psychiatric medication and counseling.  
4. 
The undersigned obtained that information about the results of the 
evaluation by emailing the Intensive Supervision Specialist from Pretrial Services 
(Kadi Murray) assigned to Mr. Antonetti.  
5. 
But Ms. Murray advised that she could not share the actual psychiatric 
evaluation with the undersigned without a Court order.  
Case 8:24-cr-00317-VMC-AEP     Document 29     Filed 08/28/24     Page 1 of 3 PageID 63

2 
 
6. 
The undersigned needs Mr. Antonetti’s actual evaluation to determine 
whether any competency issues exist, ensure that Mr. Antonetti receives necessary 
treatment, determine whether mitigating factors exist for the government’s 
consideration, and to otherwise evaluate this case.  
7. 
The undersigned conferred with Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher 
Poor, who has no objection to Mr. Antonetti’s requested relief.  
Therefore, Mr. Antonetti respectfully requests that the Court enter an order 
allowing Pretrial Services to produce a copy of Mr. Antonetti's psychiatric evaluation 
to defense counsel.  
Respectfully submitted, 
/s/ Diego M. Pestana_________  
Diego M. Pestana 
Florida Bar #1004436 
THE SUAREZ LAW FIRM, P.A. 
1011 West Cleveland Street 
Tampa, FL  33606 
Telephone: (813) 229-0040 
Facsimile: (813) 229-0041 
dpestana@suarezlawfirm.com 
Counsel for Defendant David Antonetti 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Case 8:24-cr-00317-VMC-AEP     Document 29     Filed 08/28/24     Page 2 of 3 PageID 64

3 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
The undersigned hereby certifies that on August 28, 2024, a copy of this 
document was filed electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the 
Court’s electronic filing system to all parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt. 
Parties may access this filing through the Court’s electronic filing system. 
 
/s/ Diego M. Pestana 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Diego M. Pestana  
 
 
Case 8:24-cr-00317-VMC-AEP     Document 29     Filed 08/28/24     Page 3 of 3 PageID 65

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flmd.429938.29.0.pdf
Size
79,584 bytes
SHA-256
010999602aff5899b98a75344a2185c72145a7b285a3c5cddedccc92fe15d4a1
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flmd.429938.29.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top