Court filing
Order Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act — USA v. Thomas et al. (Dkt. 103, N.D. Ga.)
Filed March 15, 2021 in USA v. Thomas et al.; one of 58 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2021-03-15 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS · Doc. 103 · 2021-03-15 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
MAGISTRATE'S CRIMINAL MINUTES REVOCATION PROCEEDINGS FILED IN OPEN COURT DATE: 3/15/2021 @ 1:38 pm TAPE: FTR Time In Court: Hr 4 Min MAGISTRATE JUDGE: JOHN K. LARKINS III COURTROOM DEPUTY: Cynthia Mercado CASE NO: 1:20-cr-296-JPB-AJB DEFENDANT'S NAME Darrell Thomas AUSA: Tel Chaiken DEFENDANT'S ATTY Ben Alper USPO: Leslie Hopkins Type Counsel (X) Retained ( ) CJA ( ) FDP BOND REVOCATION PROCEEDINGS X Initial Appearance HELD. Order appointing Federal Defender Program. Preliminary hearing SET FOR - Waiver filed. X Final Revocation Hearing set for Wed. March 17 at 4pm before Judge Vineyard. Bond Revocation Hearing HELD Defendant ADMITS the allegations as set forth in the petition. Court finds defendant HAS violated terms of release/probation. Court ordered defendant's release / probation to be: Revoked Terminated Reinstated/Continued Vacated Modified Written Order to follow BOND/DETENTION PROCEEDINGS X Government's Oral Motion for Detention filed. X Temporary Commitment ORDERED. Order of Detention Pending Final Revocation Hearing. BOND SET Non-surety Surety ( ) Cash ( ) Property ( ) Corporate surety ONLY SPECIAL CONDITIONS: BOND FILED; defendant RELEASED. Bond NOT EXECUTED. Defendant to remain in Marshal's custody. Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS Document 103 Filed 03/15/21 Page 1 of 2 PAGE 2 Defendant: Darrell Thomas Case No.: 1:20-cr-296-JPB-AJB Date: 3/15/2021 MINUTES: Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the United States' obligation to disclose to the defendant all exculpatory evidence- that is, evidence that favors the defendant or casts doubt on the United States' case, as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and ORDERS the United States to do so. The government has a duty to disclose any evidence that goes to negating the defendant's guilt, the credibility of a witness, or that would reduce a potential sentence. The defendant is entitled to this information without a request. Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, disciplinary action, or sanctions by the Court. WITNESSES: EXHIBITS: Original Exhibits RETAINED by the Court RETURNED to counsel Case 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS Document 103 Filed 03/15/21 Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.gand.279863.103.0.pdf
- Size
- 75,610 bytes
- SHA-256
- 811274ee75c0ec9b8d77f894ea2ddcf084c4d00c6e5c288faf16bc008f46caaa
- Original
- PACER (login required)