Government's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement — USA v. Tisone (M.D. Fla. No. 2:22-mj-01043, docketed in No. 2:22-cr-00039)

Summary

Document 126, a four-page Government's Disclosure Statement under Local Rule 3.03 filed 02/11/25 in the Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division, Case No. 2:22-CR-39-SPC-KCD, United States v. Daniel Joseph Tisone. The checked answers say the filer is not a non-governmental corporate party, jurisdiction is not based on diversity, there is no other person or entity with an interest in the outcome, and the action is not a bankruptcy. In the criminal-case question, the persons arguably eligible for restitution are listed as None identified at this time. The government certifies that it is unaware of anything affecting the district or magistrate judge and will tell the judge in writing if that changes. Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick L. Darcey signs.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 
FORT MYERS DIVISION 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
 
 Plaintiff, 
 
v. 
  
 
 
 
 
 
          CASE NO. 2:22-CR-39-SPC-KCD 
 
DANIEL JOSEPH TISONE 
 
 
 Defendant. 
 
 
 
GOVERNMENT’S DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 
UNDER LOCAL RULE 3.03 
  
 
 
1. 
Is the filer a non-governmental corporate party or non-governmental corporation 
moving to intervene? 
 
☒ 
No. 
 
☐ 
Yes, and 
 
☐ 
These 
parent 
corporations 
and 
publicly 
held 
corporations own 10% or more of the filer’s shares: []. 
 
☐ 
The filer has no parent corporation. 
 
☐ 
No publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of the 
filer’s shares. 
 
 
2. 
Is the court’s jurisdiction based on either 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) or 28 U.S.C. 
§ 1332(d)? 
 
☒ 
No. 
 
Case 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM     Document 126     Filed 02/11/25     Page 1 of 4 PageID 1110

2 
☐ 
Yes, and this is the name and citizenship of each person or entity 
whose citizenship is attributed to the filer: []. 
 
 
a. 
Is the court’s jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) and the filer a 
limited liability company or other unincorporated entity? 
 
☒ 
No. 
 
☐ 
Yes, and the filer has identified each member and the 
citizenship of each member and, if a member is another 
unincorporated entity, each member of that entity and 
that member’s citizenship, and so on. 
 
 
b. 
Is the court’s jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d) and the filer a 
limited liability company or other unincorporated entity? 
 
☒ 
No. 
 
☐ 
Yes, and the filer has identified citizenship in accord 
with 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(10). 
 
 
c. 
Is the filer an insurer? 
 
☒ 
No. 
 
☐ 
Yes, and the filer has identified citizenship in accord 
with § 1332(c)(1). 
 
 
d. 
Is the filer a legal representative? 
 
☒ 
No. 
 
☐ 
Yes, and the filer has identified citizenship in accord 
with 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(2). 
 
 
e. 
Has the filer identified any corporation? 
Case 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM     Document 126     Filed 02/11/25     Page 2 of 4 PageID 1111

3 
 
☒ 
No. 
 
☐ 
Yes, and for each, the filer has identified citizenship in 
accord with 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). 
 
 
f. 
Has the filer identified any natural person? 
 
☒ 
No. 
 
☐ 
Yes, and for each, the filer has identified citizenship in 
accord with the person’s domicile, which does not 
necessarily correspond to the person’s residence. 
 
 
3. 
Is there any other person or entity that has or might have an interest in the outcome 
of the action, including any interested or potentially interested lawyer, association, 
firm, 
partnership, 
corporation, 
limited 
liability 
company, 
subsidiary, 
conglomerate, affiliate, member, and other identifiable and related legal entity? 
 
☒ 
No. 
 
☐ 
Yes. These additional persons and entities have or might have an 
interest in the outcome of the action: [] 
 
 
4. 
Might the outcome of this action affect any entity, not yet identified, with publicly 
traded shares or debt? 
 
☒ 
No. 
 
☐ 
Yes, and this is the entity: []. 
 
 
 
 
Case 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM     Document 126     Filed 02/11/25     Page 3 of 4 PageID 1112

4 
5. 
Is this a bankruptcy action?  
 
☒ 
No. 
 
☐ 
Yes, and the debtor is []. 
 
☐ 
Yes, and the members of the creditors’ committee are []. 
 
 
6. 
Is this a criminal case? 
 
☐ 
No. 
 
☒ 
Yes, and these persons are arguably eligible for restitution:  
None identified at this time. 
 
 
7. 
Is there an additional entity likely to actively participate in this action? 
 
☒ 
No. 
 
☐ 
Yes, and this is the entity: []. 
 
 
8. 
Does the filer certify that, except as disclosed, the filer is unaware of an actual or 
potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in 
this action, and the filer will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen 
days after the filer knows of a conflict? 
 
☒ 
Yes. 
Signed: 
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Patrick L. Darcey        
_______ 
Patrick L. Darcey 
Assistant United States Attorney 
United States Attorney No. 212 
2110 First Street, Suite 3-137 
Fort Myers, Florida 33901 
Telephone: (239) 461-2232  
Facsimile: (239) 461-2219  
E-mail: Patrick.Darcey@usdoj.gov  
 
Case 2:22-cr-00039-SPC-NPM     Document 126     Filed 02/11/25     Page 4 of 4 PageID 1113

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.flmd.401005.126.0.pdf

Size

175,757 bytes

SHA-256

1df8b567faae9652c6072f954457aeb3b6fe6651fb18e9467b6b469f8f1e9ed9

Our copy

gov.uscourts.flmd.401005.126.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)