Court filing
The Government's Proposed Voir Dire Questions — United States v. Te Dora Brown (N.D. Ill.)
Summary
The Government's Proposed Voir Dire Questions, filed 05/06/26 as Document 133 in United States of America v. Te Dora Brown, No. 23 CR 97 in the Northern District of Illinois before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Filed by U.S. Attorney Andrew S. Boutros's office, it says the case involves an investigation by the United States Secret Service and the Small Business Administration and that the defendant is charged with wire fraud and has pleaded not guilty. The questions ask prospective jurors about dealings with those agencies, prior arrests or victimization, ties to prosecutors or defense lawyers, the podcasts and television they follow, and prior jury service.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed May 6, 2026 in USA v. Brown, et al.; one of 102 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2026-05-06 |
Cite this document
“The Government's Proposed Voir Dire Questions — United States v. Te Dora Brown (N.D. Ill.).”
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, No. 1:23-cr-00097, Doc. 133, filed 2026-05-06. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-christopher-scott-ilnd-430448/2026-05-06-gov-uscourts-ilnd-430448-133-0-doc-133/
, SHA-256 5f2c9d98452eb60eccd49d971e8160b0b866304ec60ed6e853a2120031fd7300.Full text
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TE DORA BROWN No. 23 CR 97 Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo THE GOVERNMENT’S PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS The United States of America, through its attorney, ANDREW S. BOUTROS, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, respectfully proposes the Court ask the following questions to all potential jurors, in addition to the Court’s set of general voir dire questions: 1. Do you have any problem with your hearing, vision, or health that would make it difficult for you to serve as a juror? 2. Do you have difficulty reading, speaking, or understanding English? 3. Do you hold any religious, philosophical, moral, or other beliefs that would prevent you from returning a verdict in this case? 4. This case involves an investigation by the United States Secret Service and the United States Small Business Administration. Have you, a family member, or a close friend had any experiences or dealings with the United States Secret Service, the United States Small Business Administration, the federal government, or any law enforcement entity that might affect your ability to evaluate the evidence, to deliberate with the jury, or to return a verdict in this case? Case: 1:23-cr-00097 Document #: 133 Filed: 05/06/26 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:542 2 5. Have you, a family member, or a close friend ever been arrested for, charged with, or convicted of any criminal offense other than a minor traffic violation? If yes, please indicate the nature of the offense; the law enforcement organization responsible for the arrest; the prosecutor’s office responsible for pursuing the charges; what happened in the case; and whether anything about that experience might affect your ability to evaluate the evidence, to deliberate with the jury, or to return a verdict in this case. 6. Have you, a member of your family, or a close friend, ever been the victim of a crime? If so, please indicate the victim’s relationship to you; the nature of the offense; whether charges were brought against the offender; the disposition of those charges; and whether anything about that experience might affect your ability to evaluate the evidence, to deliberate with the jury, or to return a verdict in this case. 7. Have you ever worked in the criminal justice system? If yes, please explain the circumstances. 8. Do you have any close friends or relatives who are prosecutors or criminal defense attorneys? Is there anything about your relationships with them that would prevent you from evaluating the evidence, deliberating with the jury, or returning a verdict in this case? 9. Defendant in this case is charged with wire fraud. She has pleaded not guilty to these charges. Is there anything about the nature of these charges that Case: 1:23-cr-00097 Document #: 133 Filed: 05/06/26 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:543 3 might affect your ability to evaluate the evidence, to deliberate with the jury, or to return a verdict in this case? 10. At various times during the case, the Court will instruct you about the applicable law. It is your obligation to follow the Court's instructions about the law, whether you agree with the law or not. If you were to find that you disagreed with the law as given to you by the Court, would you still be able to follow that law and reach a verdict by applying that law to the evidence in this case? 11. What podcasts and/or radio programs you listen to regularly? 12. What television shows do you watch regularly? 13. Are there any other facts or circumstances that you believe the Court or the parties should know about concerning your ability to serve as a juror in this case? Case: 1:23-cr-00097 Document #: 133 Filed: 05/06/26 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:544 4 To the Court’s general voir dire question regarding prior jury service, the government proposes the following additions: 14. If you have previously served on a jury, please let us know the following: (a) whether the case was in federal court or state court; (b) whether it was a criminal case or civil case; (c) without disclosing to us what the verdict was, whether the jury was able to reach a verdict in the case; (d) whether you were the foreperson; and (e) whether your experience being on a jury left you with an impression of the legal system, judges, or attorneys—positive or negative—that might affect your ability to evaluate the evidence, to deliberate with the jury, or to return a verdict in this case. Respectfully submitted, ANDREW S. BOUTROS United States Attorney By: /s/ Mary Katherine McClelland MARY KATHERINE McCLELLAND QUINN FORD Assistant United States Attorneys 219 South Dearborn Street, 5th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60604 (312) 353-5300 Dated: May 6, 2026 Case: 1:23-cr-00097 Document #: 133 Filed: 05/06/26 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:545
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.ilnd.430448.133.0.pdf
- Size
- 115,607 bytes
- SHA-256
- 5f2c9d98452eb60eccd49d971e8160b0b866304ec60ed6e853a2120031fd7300
- Original
- PACER (login required)