Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Thomas - Chad Brandon Thomas USA v. Thomas — U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee Order denying 34 Motion to Dismiss — USA v. Thomas (Dkt. 36, E.D. Tenn.)

Court filing

Order denying 34 Motion to Dismiss — USA v. Thomas (Dkt. 36, E.D. Tenn.)

Summary

A one-page order of United States District Judge J. Ronnie Greer in United States v. Chad Brandon Thomas, No. 2:22-CR-76, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Greeneville, filed 01/11/23 as Document 36. Thomas had filed a pro se motion asking the court to dismiss his case and order the return of money seized by the Secret Service. Because he is represented by appointed counsel, Jefferson B. Fairchild, the court ruled under E.D. Tenn. L.R. 83.4(c) that he cannot file motions on his own behalf and that any such motion must come from counsel. The motion was denied.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed January 11, 2023 in USA v. Thomas; one of 92 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Filed2023-01-11

Cite this document

“Order denying 34 Motion to Dismiss — USA v. Thomas (Dkt. 36, E.D. Tenn.).” U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, No. 2:22-cr-00076-JRG-CRW, Doc. 36, filed 2023-01-11. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-chad-b-thomas-tned-105535/2023-01-11-gov-uscourts-tned-105535-36-0-doc-36/, SHA-256 9d6e5ff2be9eec6ca5a567bf744b876449e4cb2074f0d812127b9f8cdd61b456.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

1 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE 
AT GREENEVILLE 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  
 
) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
) 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
) 
No.  2:22-CR-76 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
) 
CHAD BRANDON THOMAS 
 
 
) 
 
ORDER 
 
Before the Court is Defendant’s pro se Motion to Dismiss the Indictment [Doc. 34]. 
Specifically, Defendant asks the Court to “dismiss [his] case completely out of criminal court [and] 
put an order in to return the money that was seized by the [Secret] Service[.]” [Id. at 2]. 
Defendant is represented by attorney Jefferson B. Fairchild in this district court action. 
E.D. Tenn. L.R. 83.4(c) states that “[w]henever a party has appeared by attorney, that party may 
not thereafter appear or act in his or her own behalf in the action or proceeding, unless an order of 
substitution shall first have been made by the Court, after notice by the party to the attorney and 
to the opposing party.” Since Defendant has appointed counsel, he cannot file a pro se motion on 
his own behalf. If Defendant wishes to move to have his case dismissed, his counsel must file a 
motion seeking this relief. Defendant’s Motion [Doc. 34] is therefore DENIED. 
So ordered. 
 
ENTER: 
 
            s/J. RONNIE GREER 
   UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 
 
 
Case 2:22-cr-00076-JRG-CRW     Document 36     Filed 01/11/23     Page 1 of 1     PageID
#: 141

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.tned.105535.36.0.pdf
Size
94,857 bytes
SHA-256
9d6e5ff2be9eec6ca5a567bf744b876449e4cb2074f0d812127b9f8cdd61b456
Our copy
gov.uscourts.tned.105535.36.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top