Court filing
Order denying 34 Motion to Dismiss — USA v. Thomas (Dkt. 36, E.D. Tenn.)
Summary
A one-page order of United States District Judge J. Ronnie Greer in United States v. Chad Brandon Thomas, No. 2:22-CR-76, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee at Greeneville, filed 01/11/23 as Document 36. Thomas had filed a pro se motion asking the court to dismiss his case and order the return of money seized by the Secret Service. Because he is represented by appointed counsel, Jefferson B. Fairchild, the court ruled under E.D. Tenn. L.R. 83.4(c) that he cannot file motions on his own behalf and that any such motion must come from counsel. The motion was denied.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed January 11, 2023 in USA v. Thomas; one of 92 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2023-01-11 |
Cite this document
“Order denying 34 Motion to Dismiss — USA v. Thomas (Dkt. 36, E.D. Tenn.).”
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, No. 2:22-cr-00076-JRG-CRW, Doc. 36, filed 2023-01-11. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-chad-b-thomas-tned-105535/2023-01-11-gov-uscourts-tned-105535-36-0-doc-36/
, SHA-256 9d6e5ff2be9eec6ca5a567bf744b876449e4cb2074f0d812127b9f8cdd61b456.Full text
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT GREENEVILLE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
)
)
)
v.
)
No. 2:22-CR-76
)
CHAD BRANDON THOMAS
)
ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant’s pro se Motion to Dismiss the Indictment [Doc. 34].
Specifically, Defendant asks the Court to “dismiss [his] case completely out of criminal court [and]
put an order in to return the money that was seized by the [Secret] Service[.]” [Id. at 2].
Defendant is represented by attorney Jefferson B. Fairchild in this district court action.
E.D. Tenn. L.R. 83.4(c) states that “[w]henever a party has appeared by attorney, that party may
not thereafter appear or act in his or her own behalf in the action or proceeding, unless an order of
substitution shall first have been made by the Court, after notice by the party to the attorney and
to the opposing party.” Since Defendant has appointed counsel, he cannot file a pro se motion on
his own behalf. If Defendant wishes to move to have his case dismissed, his counsel must file a
motion seeking this relief. Defendant’s Motion [Doc. 34] is therefore DENIED.
So ordered.
ENTER:
s/J. RONNIE GREER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:22-cr-00076-JRG-CRW Document 36 Filed 01/11/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID
#: 141File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.tned.105535.36.0.pdf
- Size
- 94,857 bytes
- SHA-256
- 9d6e5ff2be9eec6ca5a567bf744b876449e4cb2074f0d812127b9f8cdd61b456
- Original
- PACER (login required)