Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Torjagbo United States v. Carl Delano Torjagbo — N.D. Ga., No. 1:22-cr-171-MLB Order granting 175 Consent Motion to Continue Trial as to Carl Delano Torjagbo — USA v. Torjagbo (Dkt. 176, N.D. Ga. No. 1:22-cr-00171)

Court filing

Order granting 175 Consent Motion to Continue Trial as to Carl Delano Torjagbo — USA v. Torjagbo (Dkt. 176, N.D. Ga. No. 1:22-cr-00171)

Filed March 3, 2025 in USA v. Torjagbo; one of 189 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2025-03-03

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC · Doc. 176 · 2025-03-03 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
ATLANTA DIVISION 
 
 
United States of America, 
 
v. 
 
Carl Delano Torjagbo, 
 
Defendant. 
 
________________________________/ 
 
 
 
Case No. 1:22-cr-171-MLB 
 
ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL 
 
Before the Court is Defendant’s Consent Motion to Continue Trial 
(Dkt. 175).  For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the motion.  The 
Court continues the jury trial to July 21, 2025, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 
1906.  A jury trial in another criminal case is set for this same date.  If 
the jury trial in that case goes forward, then the jury trial in this case 
shall be reset for October 27, 2025 at 9:00 a.m.  The Court will notify the 
parties regarding the status of the jury trial at the pretrial conference.  A 
pretrial conference is set for June 18, 2025, at 3:00 p.m., in Courtroom 
1906.  At that conference, the Court will address motions in limine, the 
process the Court proposes for selecting a jury, and any outstanding 
issues.   
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 176     Filed 03/03/25     Page 1 of 5

 
2
The parties shall meet and confer in a serious, good faith effort to 
obviate the need for—or at least narrow the scope of—any new or 
supplemental motions in limine.  These discussions shall take place no 
later than April 8, 2025.  At least some of the discussions shall be in 
person.  If the parties still believe new or supplemental motions in limine 
are necessary after these discussions, any such motions in limine shall 
be filed on or before April 22, 2025; responses to motions shall be filed on 
or before May 6, 2025; and any replies shall be filed on or before May 20, 
2025.  Only one consolidated motion in limine shall be filed by each party 
and the motion shall not exceed 25 pages.  The response brief to the 
motion in limine shall not exceed 25 pages.  The reply brief shall not 
exceed 15 pages. 
Amended proposed voir dire, if necessary, shall be filed no later 
than May 20, 2025.  Before proposing voir dire questions to the Court, 
the 
parties 
shall 
go 
to 
the 
district 
court’s 
website 
at 
www.gand.uscourts.gov.  On the home page, select the “Individual Judge 
Instructions” link, and then select the “Cases before Judge Brown” link.  
Here, the Court has provided its standard Qualifying Questions and 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 176     Filed 03/03/25     Page 2 of 5

 
3
Background Jury Questions to be asked of prospective jurors at trial.  
Please do not duplicate these questions in your proposed voir dire. 
 
No later than noon on June 17, 2025, the parties shall file and email 
to the Courtroom Deputy Clerk in Microsoft Word format a single, unified 
set of requests to charge and proposed verdict forms.  The proposed jury 
instructions must clearly identify those instructions to which both 
parties agree and those instructions to which the parties do not agree.  
For those instructions that are not agreed upon, the parties should 
indicate in consolidated fashion (using redline or different fonts) precisely 
what language is contested and the grounds for any objection.  In other 
words, the Court requires a consolidated set of jury instructions to which 
all parties agree.  Following the agreed-upon jury instructions, the 
parties should include those instructions to which opposing counsel 
objects.  Where an instruction is not agreed upon, the parties should 
indicate who is proposing the instruction and the legal basis for the 
instruction and for the other party’s opposition to the instruction.  Where 
a proposed instruction is not agreed upon, the parties should indicate 
who is proposing the instruction and the legal basis for the instruction 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 176     Filed 03/03/25     Page 3 of 5

 
4
and for the other party’s opposition to the instruction.  Counsel must use 
the Eleventh Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions, if applicable. 
 
Each party shall email a witness and exhibits list to the Courtroom 
Deputy Clerk by noon on July 18, 2025.  The parties shall use the Court’s 
form exhibits and witness list (AO Form 187).1  The witness list may be 
submitted ex parte.  The list shall contain the case caption and an 
identifying description of each exhibit to the right of the exhibit numbers.  
Additionally, the parties are required to deliver to chambers the morning 
of trial two tabbed exhibit notebooks or two thumb drives with their 
marked exhibits for the Court’s use.  Counsel shall comply with the 
Local Rules of this Court regarding exhibits. 
Any party requiring the assistance of an interpreter at trial must 
notify the Court immediately. 
Any plea of guilty must be entered no later than May 20, 2025.  
Failure to do so will be considered by the Court in assessing 
 
1The 
parties 
may 
obtain 
the 
form 
here: 
https://www.uscourts.gov/services-
forms/forms?k=exhibit+and+witness+list&c=All. 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 176     Filed 03/03/25     Page 4 of 5

 
5
Defendant’s acceptance, or lack of acceptance, pursuant to 
Section 3E1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. 
A court order is required to bring boxes of exhibits, projectors, 
laptops—virtually anything necessary for use at trial—into the 
courthouse.  A party who needs to bring such materials into the 
courthouse shall file a motion, with proposed order, detailing the 
equipment that party wishes to bring into the courtroom.  This should be 
done not less than three (3) business days prior to the trial, to allow for 
proper notification to the United States Marshals Service. 
 
The time between April 28, 2025 and October 27, 2025 shall be 
excluded in calculating the date on which the trial of this case must 
commence under the Speedy Trial Act.  The Court finds that the delay is 
for good cause and the interests of justice outweigh the right of the public 
and the right of the defendant to a speedy trial, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 
3161, et seq. 
 
SO ORDERED this 3rd day of March, 2025. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 (1 
1 (1 
M I C H " K E L L . B R O W N 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 176     Filed 03/03/25     Page 5 of 5

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.303267.176.0.pdf
Size
159,942 bytes
SHA-256
65620ef59d049d05c0d9184e76a629e0a5185ce7ed196a4caf26174fd9f598f9
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.303267.176.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top