Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Carl Delano Torjagbo — N.D. Ga., No. 1:22-cr-171-MLB MOTION for Bill of Particulars by Carl Delano Torjagbo — USA v. Torjagbo (Dkt. 130)

Court filing

MOTION for Bill of Particulars by Carl Delano Torjagbo — USA v. Torjagbo (Dkt. 130)

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2024-12-06

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC · Doc. 130 · 2024-12-06 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

Defendant Carl Delano Torjagbo's motion for bill of particulars, filed December 6, 2024 as Doc. 130 in United States v. Torjagbo, No. 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The motion quotes Count Two of the superseding indictment, which charges possession and use of another person's means of identification on or about February 16, 2021 in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1028A(a)(1), and argues that the indictment does not specify which means of identification is at issue. Citing Rule 7(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and cases including United States v. Sharpe, 438 F.3d 1257, it asks that the government be directed to identify that means of identification. The motion is signed by Kendal D. Silas of the Federal Defender Program, Inc.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
 
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 
 
ATLANTA DIVISION 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
 
) 
    
 
) 
 
 
vs. 
 
 
    
 
) 
CRIMINAL ACTION 
 
)    NO. 1:22-CR-171-MLB-RDC 
CARL DELANO TORJAGBO  
 
)  
 
 
MOTION FOR BILL OF PARTICULARS 
 
COMES NOW the Defendant, CARL DELANO TORJAGBO, by and 
through his undersigned counsel, and files this motion for bill of particulars.  In 
support thereof, Mr. Torjagbo states the following: 
(1) 
  
Count Two of the superseding indictment charges that: 
[o]n or about February 16, 2021 in the Northern District of Georgia 
and elsewhere, the Defendant, Carl Delano Torjagbo, a/k/a Karl 
Lucius Delano, aided and abetted by others unknown to the Grand 
Jury, knowingly possessed and used, without lawful authority, a 
means of identification of another person, that person being M.S., 
during and in relation to the bank fraud scheme charged in Count 1 of 
the Superseding Indictment[,] [a]ll in violation of Title 18, United 
States Code, Section 1028A(a)(1) and Section 2. 
 
The indictment does not specify the means of identification of M.S. that Mr. 
Torjagbo allegedly possessed and used. 
(2) 
A defendant is entitled to know sufficient specifics of the offense with which 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 130     Filed 12/06/24     Page 1 of 5

 
 
2 
he is charged in order to prepare a defense.  Pursuant to Rule 7(f) of the Federal 
Rules of Criminal Procedure, the District Court may direct the government to file a 
bill of particulars so that the defendant may be sufficiently apprised of the nature and 
scope of the offense with which he is charged, that he may avoid and minimize the 
danger of surprise at trial, and that he may be protected from the possibility of being 
charged with the same offense a second time. See United States v. Mackey, 551 F.2d 
967, 970 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Martinez, 466 F.2d 679, 686 (5th Cir. 
1972).  “A bill of particulars amplifies the indictment by providing additional 
information.” United States v. Johnson, 575 F.2d 1347, 1356 (5th Cir. 1978).   It 
adds sufficient precision to the charge and provides the defendant with information 
necessary for trial preparation. See United States v. Anderson, 799 F.2d 1438, 1441 
(11th Cir. 1986); United States v. Adams, Unpublished, 2012 WL 12620849, *2 
(N.D. Ga. July 24, 2012).  Whether to order a bill of particulars is a separate 
question from legal sufficiency of the indictment. United States v. Cheatham, 500 
F.Supp. 528, 532 (W.D. Pa. 2007). 
(3) 
Whether to grant a motion for bill of particulars is vested to the sound 
discretion of the trial court. Adams, supra at *2.  However, if the information is 
essential to the defense, failure to grant the motion for bill of particulars may be 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 130     Filed 12/06/24     Page 2 of 5

 
 
3 
reversible error. United States v. Sharpe, 438 F.3d 1257, 1263 (11th Cir. 2006). 
(4) 
 
To allow for adequate trial preparation, to prevent undue surprise, and to 
protect himself from subsequent prosecution for alleged offense conduct that is 
covered by the instant indictment, Mr. Torjagbo seeks additional information 
regarding the particulars of Count Two.  Mr. Torjagbo asks that the Government be 
directed to identify the particulars means of identification of M.S. that he is alleged 
to have possessed and used in furtherance of the bank fraud scheme charged in Count 
One of the superseding indictment.     
WHEREFORE, Mr. Torjagbo requests that this motion be granted. 
Dated: This 6th day of December, 2024. 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
S/ Kendal D. Silas                            
KENDAL SILAS 
State Bar No. 645959 
Attorney for CARL TORJAGBO 
 
Federal Defender Program, Inc. 
Centennial Tower, Suite 1500 
101 Marietta Street, N.W. 
Atlanta, GA 30303 
(404) 688-7530 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 130     Filed 12/06/24     Page 3 of 5

 
 
4 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion for Bill of Particulars was formatted 
in Times New Roman 14pt., in accordance with Local Rule 5.1C, and was 
electronically filed this day with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which 
will automatically send email notification of such filing to the following: 
John Russell Phillips, Esq. 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Northern District of Georgia 
600 Richard B. Russell Building 
75 Ted Turner Drive, S.W. 
Atlanta, GA 30303 
 
Dated: This 6th day of December, 2024. 
 
 
s/ Kendal Silas                                   
KENDAL SILAS, Esq. 
Attorney for CARL TORJAGBO 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 130     Filed 12/06/24     Page 4 of 5

 
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
 
I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion for Bill of Particulars was 
electronically filed this day with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which 
will automatically send email notification of such filing to the following: 
 
John Russell Phillips, Esq. 
 
Assistant United States Attorney 
Northern District of Georgia 
Federal Courthouse, Ste. 600  
75 Ted Turner Drive, S.W. 
Atlanta, GA 30303 
 
Dated: This 6th day of December, 2024. 
 
 
s/ Kendal D. Silas                           
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
KENDAL D. SILAS, Esq. 
Attorney for CARL TORJAGBO 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 130     Filed 12/06/24     Page 5 of 5

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.303267.130.0.pdf
Size
187,644 bytes
SHA-256
70f90fc9f932d176ccedc4be2711e5ac0bd74f6d215bb291c10f4d3b85c58955
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.303267.130.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top