Order for Service of 128 Report and Recommendation — USA v. Torjagbo (Dkt. 129, N.D. Ga. No. 1:22-cr-00171)

Summary

Document 129, filed 11/26/24 in Criminal Action No. 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, is an Order for Service of Report and Recommendation in United States of America v. Carl Delano Torjagbo, dated the 26th day of November, 2024 by United States Magistrate Judge Regina D. Cannon. It directs that the attached Report and Recommendation be filed and served on counsel, and gives each party fourteen (14) days from service to file written objections specifying the alleged errors. The order warns that failure to object waives the right to review and excludes the fourteen (14) days from Speedy Trial Act computation. The text does not describe the contents of the Report and Recommendation.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA  
ATLANTA DIVISION  
  
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CARL DELANO TORJAGBO, a/k/a 
KARL LUCIUS DELANO, 
 
 
Defendant.  
 
 
 
 
 
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 
1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ORDER FOR SERVICE OF 
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 
 
 
Attached is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States 
Magistrate Judge made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and N.D. Ga. CrR. 
58.1(A)(3). Let the same be filed and a copy of the R&R, together with a copy of this 
Order, be served upon counsel for the parties. 
 
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), each party may file written objections to the 
R&R within fourteen (14) days of service of this Order.  Should objections be filed, 
they shall specify with particularity the alleged error(s) made (including reference 
by page number to the transcript if applicable) and shall be served upon the opposing 
party. See United States v. Gaddy, 894 F.2d 1307, 1315 (11th Cir. 1990). The party 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 129     Filed 11/26/24     Page 1 of 2

 
2 
 
filing objections will be responsible for obtaining and filing the transcript of any 
evidentiary hearing for review by the District Court.  Failure to object in accordance 
with this rule waives a party’s right to review. FED. R. CRIM. P. 59(b)(2).  
 
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(H), the   above-referenced   fourteen 
(14) days allowed for filing objections is EXCLUDED from the computation of 
time under the Speedy Trial Act (“the Act”), whether or not objections are 
actually filed. If objections to this R&R are filed, the Clerk is DIRECTED to 
EXCLUDE from the computation of time all time between the filing of the R&R and 
the submission of the R&R, along with any objections, responses and replies thereto, 
to the District Judge. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D), (H); Henderson v. United States, 
476 U.S. 321, 331 (1986); United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1337 (11th Cir. 
1983). The Clerk is DIRECTED to submit the R&R with objections, if any, to the 
District Court after expiration of the above time period. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED and DIRECTED, this 26th day of November, 2024.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REGINA D. CANNON 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Magistrate Judge  
  
 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 129     Filed 11/26/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.gand.303267.129.0.pdf

Size

117,890 bytes

SHA-256

6a0356972e6f702f61d99f4bde96259d014c8f582370c4584f31e7d8813f4029

Our copy

gov.uscourts.gand.303267.129.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)