Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Torjagbo United States v. Carl Delano Torjagbo — N.D. Ga., No. 1:22-cr-171-MLB Order for Service of 128 Report and Recommendation — USA v. Torjagbo (Dkt. 129, N.D. Ga. No. 1:22-cr-00171)

Court filing

Order for Service of 128 Report and Recommendation — USA v. Torjagbo (Dkt. 129, N.D. Ga. No. 1:22-cr-00171)

Filed November 26, 2024 in USA v. Torjagbo; one of 189 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Filed2024-11-26

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia · No. 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC · Doc. 129 · 2024-11-26 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA  
ATLANTA DIVISION  
  
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
v. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CARL DELANO TORJAGBO, a/k/a 
KARL LUCIUS DELANO, 
 
 
Defendant.  
 
 
 
 
 
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 
1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ORDER FOR SERVICE OF 
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 
 
 
Attached is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States 
Magistrate Judge made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and N.D. Ga. CrR. 
58.1(A)(3). Let the same be filed and a copy of the R&R, together with a copy of this 
Order, be served upon counsel for the parties. 
 
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), each party may file written objections to the 
R&R within fourteen (14) days of service of this Order.  Should objections be filed, 
they shall specify with particularity the alleged error(s) made (including reference 
by page number to the transcript if applicable) and shall be served upon the opposing 
party. See United States v. Gaddy, 894 F.2d 1307, 1315 (11th Cir. 1990). The party 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 129     Filed 11/26/24     Page 1 of 2

 
2 
 
filing objections will be responsible for obtaining and filing the transcript of any 
evidentiary hearing for review by the District Court.  Failure to object in accordance 
with this rule waives a party’s right to review. FED. R. CRIM. P. 59(b)(2).  
 
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(H), the   above-referenced   fourteen 
(14) days allowed for filing objections is EXCLUDED from the computation of 
time under the Speedy Trial Act (“the Act”), whether or not objections are 
actually filed. If objections to this R&R are filed, the Clerk is DIRECTED to 
EXCLUDE from the computation of time all time between the filing of the R&R and 
the submission of the R&R, along with any objections, responses and replies thereto, 
to the District Judge. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D), (H); Henderson v. United States, 
476 U.S. 321, 331 (1986); United States v. Mers, 701 F.2d 1321, 1337 (11th Cir. 
1983). The Clerk is DIRECTED to submit the R&R with objections, if any, to the 
District Court after expiration of the above time period. 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED and DIRECTED, this 26th day of November, 2024.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
REGINA D. CANNON 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States Magistrate Judge  
  
 
Case 1:22-cr-00171-MLB-RDC     Document 129     Filed 11/26/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.303267.129.0.pdf
Size
117,890 bytes
SHA-256
6a0356972e6f702f61d99f4bde96259d014c8f582370c4584f31e7d8813f4029
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.303267.129.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top