BRADY ORDER as to BUTHERDE DARIUS — USA v. DARIUS (Dkt. 6, No. 2:22-mj-10018-MAH, filed 2022-01-27)

Summary

An Order in United States of America v. Butherde Darius, Case No. 2:22-mj-10018-MAH, in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, filed 01/27/22 as Document 6. Under Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as set forth at the defendant's initial appearance on January 27, 2022, the Court confirms the United States' continuing obligation under Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States to timely disclose information favorable to the defense. It lists possible consequences for violations, including exclusion of evidence, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings and disciplinary referral. It is signed by the United States Magistrate Judge (s/Michael A. Hammer).

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 2:22-mj-10018-MAH Document6 - Filed 01/27/22 Page 1of1PagelD: 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

22-10018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No.
V. ORDER
BUTHERDE DARIUS
Defendant.

Pursuant to Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as set forth on

the record during the initial appearance of the defendant on this 27th day of January ,

2022, in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel in this matter, the Court
confirms the United States’ continuing obligation, pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83
(1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and subsequent cases, to timely disclose
information favorable to the defense as to criminal liability on the charged offense(s) or
mitigation of any punishment that may be imposed. Such favorable information includes
information that may cast doubt on the credibility of government witnesses. Possible
consequences for violating this order include exclusion of evidence, dismissal of charges,

contempt proceedings, disciplinary referral, and any other relief authorized by law.

s/Michael A. Hammer

Hon. Michael A. Hammer
United States Magistrate Judge


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.njd.489962.6.0.pdf

Size

155,712 bytes

SHA-256

01095fbd313b222903488e20eeb62e16f0bc3b74f45e0806105caaeb3d329e4a

Our copy

gov.uscourts.njd.489962.6.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)