VIDEO CONSENT ORDER as to BUTHERDE DARIUS — USA v. DARIUS (Dkt. 5, No. 2:22-mj-10018-MAH, filed 2022-01-27)

Summary

Order regarding use of video conferencing/teleconferencing in United States v. Butherde Darius, Case 2:22-mj-10018-MAH in the District of New Jersey, filed as Document 5 on 01/27/22. In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, the court finds that the defendant consented, after consultation with counsel, to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing for that day's proceeding; United States Magistrate Judge Michael A. Hammer signed it on 1/27/2022.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
UNITED STATES
*
*
v.
*
C$6(NO.
*
*
*
*****
ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING
In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds: 
That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video 
teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation 
with counsel; and
The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by: 
Video Teleconferencing
Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the 
following reason: 
The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video 
teleconferencing capability.
Other:
Date:
United States Magistrate Judge
BUTHERDE DARIUS
22-10018
✔
✔
Honorable Michael A. Hammer 
1/27/2022
s/Michael A. Hammer
Case 2:22-mj-10018-MAH     Document 5     Filed 01/27/22     Page 1 of 1 PageID: 17

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.njd.489962.5.0.pdf

Size

118,078 bytes

SHA-256

a29a3ea819f55c0fd405cc970f16478aa66eeba0c21a4e0ff102bec7efeb2377

Our copy

gov.uscourts.njd.489962.5.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)