ORDER GRANTING 239 PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 252)

Summary

Order Re: Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Materials Should Be Sealed, Document 252, filed 09/27/24 in Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW, Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Northern District of California, three pages, Hon. Edward M. Chen. The caption still carries the word [PROPOSED], and the text reads "IT IS HEREBY ORDERED" that listed portions of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement and supporting documents may be filed under seal. The table gives page and line locations in the Motion at pages 19 and 26, passages of the Mura and Graber declaration, and the Total Potential Exposure cell of the Comparator Table in Exhibit 2, each with Defendant as the designating party. The date line reads September 27, 2024 above the name Edward M. Chen.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

          Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC       Document 252   Filed 09/27/24   Page 1 of 3




 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
10                        NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
                              SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12   CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,            Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
     individually and on behalf of all others
13
     similarly situated,                        [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’
14                                              ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
                               Plaintiffs,      CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
15                                              PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
           v.
16                                              SEALED
     THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
17                                              Hon. Edward M. Chen
18                           Defendant.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

      [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER
            WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                          Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
           Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC        Document 252        Filed 09/27/24   Page 2 of 3




 1          Having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another
 2   Party’s Materials Should Be Sealed, relating to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval
 3   of Class Action Settlement (“Motion”), materials in support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative
 4   Motion, and any responses from the designating party, pursuant to Local Rule 79-5;
 5         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
 6          The following portions of Plaintiffs’ Motion and supporting documents may be filed
 7   under seal:
 8    Portion of Motion or Portion of Material               Designating      Ruling
      Supporting Motion                                      Party
 9
      Motion, page 19, line 17 (between “period, is” and     Defendant
10    end of sentence”)
      Motion,     page     26,    line   21     (between     Defendant
11
      “approximately” and “of Plaintiffs’ maximum
12    recovery”)
      Motion, page 26, line 26 (between “$27,500,000 is”     Defendant
13
      and “% of”)
14    Motion, page 26, line 26 (between “% of” and end       Defendant
      of sentence)
15
      Motion,     page     26,    line   28     (between     Defendant
16    “approximately” and end of sentence)
      Declaration of Andre M. Mura and Geoffrey              Defendant
17
      Graber in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
18    Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement,
      Page 1 line 24 to Page 2 line 8 (between “First,”
19    and end of sentence)
20    Declaration of Andre M. Mura and Geoffrey              Defendant
      Graber in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
21    Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement,
22    Page 5, line 11 (between “to be” and end of
      sentence)
23    Declaration of Andre M. Mura and Geoffrey              Defendant
24    Graber in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for
      Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement,
25    Exhibit 2, Comparator Table, second from the
26    bottom row of table, far right cell (entire cell for
      the row “Total Potential Exposure” and column
27    “This Settlement”)
28
                                            1
       [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER
             WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                           Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
          Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC    Document 252   Filed 09/27/24   Page 3 of 3




 1
     IT IS SO ORDERED.
 2
 3
     DATED: September 27, 2024
           ______________________            ___________________________
 4
                                             EDWARD M. CHEN
 5                                           United States District Judge

 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
                                           2
      [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER
            WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE SEALED
                          Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW


File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.252.0.pdf

Size

195,195 bytes

SHA-256

69bb62c2a9c04f23bbc585e0ef4cc7376ce3501995de8fc1e8cd0eee2fa65182

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.252.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)