Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 198.1)

Court filing

Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 198.1)

Summary

Document 198-1, filed 04/11/23 in Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, is a proposed order submitted by Perkins Coie LLP for Defendant Thomson Reuters that would grant its Motion to Exclude Testimony of Joseph Turow. The proposed order would state that Professor Turow's opinion fails to meet the criteria of the Federal Rules of Evidence and that his testimony constitutes mere personal opinion not supported by scientifically valid principles. It would exclude his testimony and report to date. The date line and the signature line for Hon. Edward M. Chen are blank.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 198.1).” Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 198-1. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2023-04-11-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-198-1-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-198-1/, SHA-256 7cc2f62fc69431dc2e9f815ac169f38f4d118eab0e13486d4fdc8e702f9e30a6.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC         Document 198-1     Filed 04/11/23    Page 1 of 2



 1    Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567              Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
      SFahringer@perkinscoie.com                     GGallego@perkinscoie.com
 2    Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice                PERKINS COIE LLP
 3    NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com                       3150 Porter Drive
      Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice                     Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
 4    EEarl@perkinscoie.com                          Telephone: 650.838.4300
      Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice                 Facsimile: 650.838.4350
 5    AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
      Tyler S. Roberts, pro hac vice                 Hayden M. Schottlaender, pro hac vice
 6    TRoberts@perkinscoie.com                       HSchottlaender@perkinscoie.com
 7    PERKINS COIE LLP                               PERKINS COIE LLP
      1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900                  500 N. Akard Street, Suite 3300
 8    Seattle, WA 98101-3099                         Dallas, TX 75201-3347
      Telephone: 206.359.8000                        Telephone: 214.965.7700
 9    Facsimile: 206.359.9000                        Facsimile: 214.965.7799
10
      Attorneys for Defendant
11    Thomson Reuters Corporation

12                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13                                 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14

15   CAT BROOKS and RASHEED                      Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
     SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
16   all others similarly situated,              [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
                                                 DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE
17                         Plaintiffs,           TESTIMONY OF JOSEPH TUROW
18          v.
19   THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
20                         Defendant.
21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                               [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEF.’S
                                                                MOTION TO EXCLUDE PROF. TUROW
     Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC         Document 198-1        Filed 04/11/23     Page 2 of 2



 1                                        [PROPOSED] ORDER

 2          Defendant Thomson Reuters has filed a Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiffs’

 3   Expert, Joseph Turow (the “Motion”). Plaintiffs oppose that Motion. Having considered the

 4   Motion, Plaintiffs’ Opposition, and all associated briefing, documents, and evidence on the record

 5   at the time of this Order, Defendant’s Motion is hereby GRANTED. The Court finds that the

 6   opinion offered by Professor Joseph Turow fails to meet the criteria of Federal Rule of Evidence

 7   702. Prof. Turow’s testimony constitutes mere personal opinion and is not supported by

 8   scientifically valid principles. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 43 F.3d 1311, 1319 (9th

 9   Cir. 1995). His testimony and report to date are therefore excluded.

10   IT IS SO ORDERED.

11

12    DATED: ____________________                        __________________________________
                                                         Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
13                                                       United States District Judge
14

15   Submitted by:

16   PERKINS COIE LLP
17

18   By: /s/ Hayden M. Schottlaender
     Hayden M. Schottlaender
19
     Attorneys for Defendant
20   Thomson Reuters Corporation
21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
     Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC                    -2-            [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEF.’S
                                                                    MOTION TO EXCLUDE PROF. TUROW


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.198.1.pdf
Size
123,350 bytes
SHA-256
7cc2f62fc69431dc2e9f815ac169f38f4d118eab0e13486d4fdc8e702f9e30a6
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.198.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top