Court filing
Declaration of Andre M. Mura — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 169.2)
No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 169-2 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 169-2 Filed 03/09/23 Page 1 of 3
1 Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658) Geoffrey A. Graber (SBN 211547)
Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541) Karina G. Puttieva (SBN 317702)
2 Amy M. Zeman (SBN 273100) COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL
3 Mark H. Troutman (pro hac vice) PLLC
Ezekiel S. Wald (SBN 341490) 1100 New York Ave. NW, Fifth Floor
4 Hanne Jensen (SBN 336045) Washington, DC 20005
GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP Telephone: (202) 408-4600
5 1111 Broadway, Suite 2100 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
6 Oakland, CA 94607 ggraber@cohenmilstein.com
Telephone: (510) 350-9700 kputtieva@cohenmilstein.com
7 Facsimile: (510) 350-9701
ehg@classlawgroup.com
8 amm@classlawgroup.com
amz@classlawgroup.com
9
mht@classlawgroup.com
10 zsw@classlawgroup.com
hj@classlawgroup.com
11
12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
13
14
15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17 CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ, Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
18 individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, DECLARATION OF ANDRE M. MURA IN
19 SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’
Plaintiffs, ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
20 v. CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
21
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, SEALED
22
Defendant. Hon. Edward M. Chen
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF ANDRE M. MURA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
SEALED
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 169-2 Filed 03/09/23 Page 2 of 3
1 I, Andre M. Mura, declare:
2 1. I am a member in good standing of the Bar of California and the bar of this Court. I am
3 a partner at Gibbs Law Group LLP in Oakland, California, and represent Plaintiffs in this matter.
4 2. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein and, if called as a witness, could
5 and would testify competently to them.
6 3. I submit this declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider
7 Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed.
8 4. Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(f), I hereby state that the following documents, which are
9 exhibits to the Declaration of Andre M. Mura Supporting Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’
10 Motion for Class Certification (“Reply”), have been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
11 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” by Defendant under the operative Stipulated
12 Protective Order in this action. See ECF No. 70:
13
Exhibits Portion Designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
14 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” by
Defendant
15 Ex. 1 (Gerhard Dep.) Entire document
16
17 5. The following portions of Plaintiffs’ Reply quote from or otherwise refer to the exhibits
18 referenced in Paragraph 4 above and so may also be potentially considered confidential by Defendant:
19 Provisionally Sealed Portion of Reply
20 Page 1, line 12 (between “CLEAR had” and “—which”)
21 Page 1, line 12 (between “potentially” and “and”)
22 Page 1, line 13 (between “and” and “information”)
23 Page 1, line 13 (between “that” and end of sentence)
24
25 6. The following portions of Plaintiffs’ Reply quote from or otherwise refer to expert
26 reports or other documents that were submitted under seal or designated under the parties’ protective
27 order by Defendant and so may also be potentially considered confidential by Defendant:
28
DECLARATION OF ANDRE M. MURA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
SEALED
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
1
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 169-2 Filed 03/09/23 Page 3 of 3
1 Provisionally Sealed Portion of Reply
2 Page 10, lines 15-17 (entire sentence)
Page 10, lines 17-18 (between “benefits” and end of parenthetical)
3
Page 10, lines 18-19 (between “benefits as” and end of parenthetical)
4 Page 10, lines 19-20 (entire parenthetical)
Page 10, lines 21-22 (between “claiming” and end of parenthetical)
5 Page 10, lines 22-23 (entire parenthetical)
Page 10, lines 23-25 (between “benefits from” and end of parenthetical)
6
Page 10, lines 27-27.5 (between “suggests” and “based on”)
7 Page 10, line 27.5 (between “based on” and “due to”)
Page 10, line 27.5 (between “due to” and end of sentence)
8 Page 11, line 13 (between “keep” and “of dollars”)
9
10 I declare that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 9, 2022, in Oakland,
11 California.
12
13 /s/ Andre M. Mura
Andre M. Mura
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF ANDRE M. MURA IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIALS SHOULD BE
SEALED
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC-KAW
2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.169.2.pdf
- Size
- 249,951 bytes
- SHA-256
- 23643b8882d7e4e931de84bc39fe66aa48fc04b229f9e4c3227fe12bfcf24fe6
- Original
- PACER (login required)