Court filing
Exhibit 13 — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 130.13)
No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 130-13 · Docket on CourtListener
Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-13 Filed 11/09/22 Page 1 of 5
EXHIBIT 13
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-13 Filed 11/09/22 Page 2 of 5
1 Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567 Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com GGallego@perkinscoie.com
2 Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice PERKINS COIE LLP
NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com 3150 Porter Drive
3
Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
4 EEarl@perkinscoie.com Telephone: 650.838.4300
Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice Facsimile: 650.838.4350
5 AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
6 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
7
Telephone: 206.359.8000
8 Facsimile: 206.359.9000
9 Attorneys for Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
16 SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated, DEFENDANT THOMSON REUTERS
17 CORPORATION’S ANSWERS AND
Plaintiffs, OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST
18 SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
v. TO DEFENDANT
19
20 THOMSON REUTERS
CORPORATION,
21
Defendant.
22
23 PROPOUNDING PARTY: Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz
24 RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant Thomson Reuters Corporation
25 SET NO: One
26
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC THOMSON REUTERS’ ANSWERS AND
OBJECTIONS TO FIRST SET OF RFAS
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-13 Filed 11/09/22 Page 3 of 5
1 Thomson Reuters Corporation (“Thomson Reuters”), by its counsel, hereby answers
2 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36 Plaintiffs’ First Set of Requests for Admission
3 (the “Requests”). Thomson Reuters’ answers and objections (“Answers”) are based on
4 information currently available to Thomson Reuters, as discovery is not complete and Thomson
5 Reuters’ investigation is ongoing.
6 ANSWERS AND OBJECTIONS
7 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 1:
8 Admit that the document produced at TR-BROOKS020865-TR-BROOKS020890 is
9 identical or substantially similar to the document referenced in Thomson Reuters’ letter to the
10 House Oversight and Reform Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy, produced as
11 TR-BROOKS020853-TR-BROOKS020857, which Thomson Reuters described as “an example
12 of the data elements that can be delivered in a typical report…[and] is representative of all the
13 data available on CLEAR[.]” See TR-BROOKS020853.
14 ANSWER TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 1:
15 Thomson Reuters objects to the Request as improper because it is compound in that it
16 could be interpreted to ask Thomson Reuters both to admit (a) that the document produced at TR-
17 BROOKS020865-TR-BROOKS020890 is identical or substantially similar to the document
18 attached to the letter produced as TR-BROOKS020853-TR-BROOKS020857, and (b) that the
19 letter describes the document in the manner stated in the Request. Thomson Reuters therefore
20 interprets the Request to ask only (a) and, subject to and without waiving its objection, answers
21 the Request as follows.
22 Thomson Reuters ADMITS that the document produced at TR-BROOKS020865-
23 TR-BROOKS020890 is identical or substantially similar to the document identified in the
24 April 28, 2021 letter from Thomson Reuters to the House Oversight and Reform Subcommittee
25 on Economic and Consumer Policy, the document produced as TR-BROOKS020853-
26 TR-BROOKS020857 (the “Letter”), as “a sample of a CLEAR report template, which is an
27 example of the data elements that can be delivered in a typical report.” The next sentence in the
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -1 - THOMSON REUTERS’ ANSWERS AND
OBJECTIONS TO FIRST SET OF RFAS
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-13 Filed 11/09/22 Page 4 of 5
1 Letter was: “While this is representative of all of the data available on CLEAR, not every report
2 will include all of this information or have all data fields populated.” TR-BROOKS020853.
3 Except as expressly admitted, Thomson Reuters DENIES this Request.
4
5 Dated: May 23, 2022 PERKINS COIE LLP
6
7 By: /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567
8 SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
9 Attorneys for Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -2 - THOMSON REUTERS’ ANSWERS AND
OBJECTIONS TO FIRST SET OF RFAS
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 130-13 Filed 11/09/22 Page 5 of 5
1 PROOF OF SERVICE
2 I, Anna Mouw Thompson, declare:
3 I am a citizen of the United States and employed in Seattle, Washington. I am over the age
4 of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is 1201 Third
5 Avenue, Ste. 4900, Seattle, WA 98110. On May 23, 2022, I served a copy of the within
6 document(s):
7
DEFENDANT THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION’S ANSWERS AND
8 OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR
ADMISSION TO DEFENDANT
9
10 by transmitting via my e-mail address (AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com) the
document listed above to the persons at the e-mail addresses set forth below.
11
Andre M. Mura
12 David Stein
Mark Troutman
13 Jeffrey B. Kosbie
14 Ezekiel S. Wald
GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
15 505 14th Street, Suite 1110
Oakland, CA 94612
16 amm@classlawgroup.com
ds@classlawgroup.com
17 mht@classlawgroup.com
18 jbk@classlawgroup.com
zsw@classlawgroup.com
19 service@classlawgroup.com
20
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
21
above is true and correct.
22
Executed on May 23, 2022, at Bainbridge Island, WA.
23
24
25 Anna Mouw Thompson
26
27
28
-1- PROOF OF SERVICE
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.130.13.pdf
- Size
- 160,356 bytes
- SHA-256
- b31d416d538a94565b6e27a48ddfbe05ca5d0e4c83317b4b2e14dd7f2e7e6f62
- Original
- PACER (login required)