Court filing
Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 113.3)
Summary
A proposed order granting Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Modify the Case Schedule in Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC (N.D. Cal.), for Hon. Edward M. Chen, under Civil Local Rule 6-3. A table compares current dates with proposed amended dates. The deadlines to amend pleadings and for plaintiffs' class certification motion move from November 9, 2022 to December 22, 2022, opposition moves from January 26, 2023 to March 10, 2023, and replies to May 8, 2023. The hearing on class certification and Daubert motions moves from April 20, 2023 to June 19, 2023, or another date the Court deems appropriate, and the close of fact discovery stays at June 14, 2023. The signature date is blank.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 113.3).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 113-3. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2022-10-07-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-113-3-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-113-3/
, SHA-256 aa1597c0bd88d01883628c867817a036bf7b4fc28a6c58cfddb0aa032d4f1040.Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 113-3 Filed 10/07/22 Page 1 of 4
1 Eric H. Gibbs (SBN 178658)
Andre M. Mura (SBN 298541)
2 Amy M. Zeman (SBN 273100)
3 Ezekiel S. Wald (SBN 341490)
GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
4 505 14th Street, Suite 1110
Oakland, California 94612
5 Telephone: (510) 350-9700
Facsimile: (510) 350-9701
6 ehg@classlawgroup.com
7 amm@classlawgroup.com
amz@classlawgroup.com
8 zsw@classlawgroup.com
9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
10
[Additional counsel on signature page]
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ, Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
16 individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
17 PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
Plaintiffs, MOTION TO MODIFY THE CASE
18
v. SCHEDULE
19
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
20
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO MODIFY
THE CASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 113-3 Filed 10/07/22 Page 2 of 4
1 Having considered Plaintiffs’ administrative motion under Civil Local Rule 6-3, good cause
2 appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case schedule be modified as reflected in the below
3 table.
4
Current schedule Event Proposed Amended Schedule
5
6 October 10, 2022 Close of Class Certification Expert No change proposed
Discovery
7
October 24, 2022 Deadline to pursue private mediation No change proposed
8
9
November 8, 2022 Status Conference, 2:30 pm No change proposed
10
11
November 9, 2022 Deadline to Amend Pleadings December 22, 2022
12
13
14 November 9, 2022 Deadline for Plaintiff to File Class December 22, 2022
Certification Motion
15
16 No date previously Deadline for Plaintiffs to file any December 22, 2022
provided Daubert motions/motions to strike
17 Defendant’s Class Certification
Rebuttal Experts
18
19 January 26, 2023 Deadline for Opposition to Class March 10, 2023
Certification
20
No date previously Deadline for Defendant to file any March 10, 2023
21 provided Daubert motions/motions to strike
22 Plaintiffs’ Class Certification
Experts
23
No date previously Deadline for Defendant to file March 10, 2023
24 provided Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Daubert
motions/motions to strike
25
No date previously Deadline for Plaintiffs to file May 8, 2023
26 provided Opposition to Defendant’s Daubert
motions/motions to strike
27
1
28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO MODIFY
THE CASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 113-3 Filed 10/07/22 Page 3 of 4
1 March 9, 2023 Deadline for Plaintiffs’ Reply May 8, 2023
Supporting Class Certification
2
3 No date previously Deadline for Plaintiffs’ Reply in May 8, 2023
4 provided support of Daubert motions/motions
to strike
5
No date previously Deadline for Defendant’s Reply in May 29, 2023
6 provided support of Daubert motions/motions
to strike
7
8 June 14, 2023 Close of Fact Discovery No change proposed
9
10 April 20, 2023, or such Hearing on Motion for Class June 19, 2023, or such other
other date as the Court Certification and any Daubert date as the Court deems
11 deems appropriate motions/motions to strike—time for appropriate
each argument will be allotted in a
12 No date previously future Order; the parties should
provided for Daubert remain available on July 6, 2023,
13
hearing should the Court conclude that it
14 requires additional time
15 The parties shall meet and
confer within 14 days of a
16 ruling on the motion for
class certification to set
17 Disclosure of Trial Experts No change proposed.
deadlines for trial expert
disclosures and discovery,
18
pre-trial deadlines, and a
19 trial date.
20 Defer setting this deadline
until after a ruling on class Disclosure of Rebuttal Trial Experts No change proposed.
21 certification.
22 Defer setting this deadline Close of Expert Discovery No change proposed.
until after a ruling on class
23 certification.
24
Defer setting this deadline Dispositive Motion Deadline No change proposed.
25 until after a ruling on class
certification.
26
27
2
28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO MODIFY
THE CASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 113-3 Filed 10/07/22 Page 4 of 4
1 Defer setting this deadline Pretrial conference No change proposed.
until after a ruling on class
2 certification.
3 Defer setting this deadline Trial No change proposed.
until after a ruling on class
4 certification.
5
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
DATED: _____________________ __________________________
9 EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
3
28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO MODIFY
THE CASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:21-cv-1418-EMC
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.113.3.pdf
- Size
- 399,815 bytes
- SHA-256
- aa1597c0bd88d01883628c867817a036bf7b4fc28a6c58cfddb0aa032d4f1040
- Original
- PACER (login required)