Court filing
Statement of Non-Opposition re 88 MOTION for Protective Order by… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 89)
Summary
Defendant Thomson Reuters Corporation's Statement of Nonopposition to Non-Party File & ServeXpress, LLC's Motion for Limited Intervention and for Protective Order, Document 89, filed 05/09/22 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. Under Local Rule 7-3(b), Thomson Reuters states that it does not oppose the motion filed on April 25, 2022 (Docket No. 88). The motion seeks an order prohibiting Thomson Reuters from disclosing the Service Agreement between West Publishing Corporation and File & ServeXpress, LLC. Thomson Reuters reserves the right to use the existence of that agreement in its defense, including on the Dormant Commerce Clause and class treatment.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Statement of Non-Opposition re 88 MOTION for Protective Order by… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 89).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 89. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2022-04-25-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-89-0-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-89-0/
, SHA-256 40899a454b46f186702f894063ee70856b589d2d1e2b8c89b5b51bf6db9625bf.Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 89 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 2
Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567 Gabriella Gallego Bar No. 324226
1 SFahringer@perkinscoie.com GGallego@perkinscoie.com
2 Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice PERKINS COIE LLP
NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com 3150 Porter Drive
3 Erin K. Earl, pro hac vice Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
EEarl@perkinscoie.com Telephone: 650.838.4300
4 Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice Facsimile: 650.838.4350
AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com
5
PERKINS COIE LLP
6 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
7 Telephone: 206.359.8000
Facsimile: 206.359.9000
8
Attorneys for Defendant
9 Thomson Reuters Corporation
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
15 SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated, DEFENDANT THOMSON REUTERS
16
CORPORATION’S STATEMENT OF
Plaintiffs, NONOPPOSITION TO NON-PARTY
17
FILE & SERVEXPRESS, LLC'S
v.
18 MOTION FOR LIMITED
THOMSON REUTERS INTERVENTION AND FOR
19 CORPORATION, PROTECTIVE ORDER
20
Defendant.
21
22
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(b), Defendant Thomson Reuters submits this Statement of
23
Nonopposition (“Statement”) to the Motion for Limited Intervention and for Protective Order (the
24
“Motion for Limited Intervention”), filed on April 25, 2022 by Non-Party File & ServeXpress,
25
LLC (“FSX”). See Docket No. 88.
26
The Motion for Limited Intervention seeks an Order prohibiting Thomson Reuters from
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -1- THOMSON REUTERS’ STATEMENT OF
NONOPPOSITION
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 89 Filed 05/09/22 Page 2 of 2
1 disclosing and/or producing the Service Agreement between West Publishing Corporation and
2 Non-Party File & ServeXpress, LLC (the “FSX Service Agreement”). While Thomson Reuters
3 does not oppose the relief sought, Thomson Reuters reserves the right to use the existence of the
4 FSX Service Agreement in its defense. For example (and without limitation), Thomson Reuters
5 reserves the right to use the existence of the FSX Service Agreement to establish that the
6 injunctive and monetary relief Plaintiffs seek in this case would violate the Dormant Commerce
7 Clause 1 and would be an impermissible, extraterritorial application of California’s Unfair
8 Competition Law, 2 and/or to help demonstrate that this case is not suitable for class treatment or
9 that public injunctive relief is inappropriate.
10
Dated: May 9, 2022 PERKINS COIE LLP
11
12 By: /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
13 Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
14
Attorneys for Defendant
15 Thomson Reuters Corporation
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Applying California law to the collection, dissemination, or sale of data that is subject to
24 service agreements such as the FSX Service Agreement would burden interstate commerce and
impermissibly regulate conduct occurring wholly outside of California. See Sam Francis Found.
25 v. Christies, Inc., 784 F.3d 1320, 1323 (9th Cir. 2015) (citing Healy v. Beer Instit., 491 U.S. 324,
336 (1989)).
26
2 The UCL does not apply extraterritorially. See Sullivan v. Oracle Corp., 254 P.3d 237,
27 247 (Cal. 2011).
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -2- THOMSON REUTERS’ STATEMENT OF
NONOPPOSITION
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.89.0.pdf
- Size
- 135,463 bytes
- SHA-256
- 40899a454b46f186702f894063ee70856b589d2d1e2b8c89b5b51bf6db9625bf
- Original
- PACER (login required)