Court filing
Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 88.2)
Summary
A proposed order granting Non-Party File & ServeXpress, LLC's Motion for Limited Intervention and for Protective Order, Document 88-2, filed 04/25/22 in Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case No. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC (N.D. Cal.), for Hon. Edward M. Chen. It is a proposed order. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(A), it would prohibit Defendant Thomson Reuters Corporation from disclosing or producing the Service Agreement between West Publishing Corporation and File & ServeXpress, LLC. The order recites that the Court considered the motion, the responses and oral argument, and the signature date is blank.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Proposed Order — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 88.2).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 88-2. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2022-04-25-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-88-2-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-88-2/
, SHA-256 7612e18b1580c992a036d2caf4190f1574edbe04121e07c12a5456e17706baeb.Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 88-2 Filed 04/25/22 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ, Case No. Case No. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC
10 individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING NON-
11 PARTY FILE & SERVEXPRESS, LLC’S
Plaintiff, MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION
12 AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
vs.
13
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
14
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LIMITED
INTERVENTION AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 88-2 Filed 04/25/22 Page 2 of 2
1 The Court has considered Non-Party File & ServeXpress, LLC’s Motion for Limited
2 Intervention and for Protective Order, the response(s) thereto, and has considered oral argument of the
3 parties. The Court GRANTS the Motion.
4 In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(A), Defendant Thomson Reuters
5 Corporation is prohibited from disclosing and/or producing the Service Agreement between West
6 Publishing Corporation and Non-Party File & ServeXpress, LLC as described in File & ServeXpress,
7 LLC’s Motion for Limited Intervention and for Protective Order.
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 Dated:
_________________________
10 HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
11 United States District Court Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LIMITED
INTERVENTION AND FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Case No. 3:21-CV-01418-EMC
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.88.2.pdf
- Size
- 126,333 bytes
- SHA-256
- 7612e18b1580c992a036d2caf4190f1574edbe04121e07c12a5456e17706baeb
- Original
- PACER (login required)