Court filing
ORDER re 56 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 57)
Summary
In this stipulation in Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC in the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division, Defendant Thomson Reuters Corporation and Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz agree to extend the defendant's time to respond to the complaint. The current response date is August 30, 2021 and the new response date is September 10, 2021, an additional 10 days that Plaintiffs consented to. The parties say good cause exists because of the complexity of the facts alleged and that the extension will not affect any of the other dates set in the case. The stipulation is dated August 23, 2021 and signed by Susan D. Fahringer of Perkins Coie LLP and Andre M. Mura for Plaintiffs, and the court approval stamp at the end is too garbled to read.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“ORDER re 56 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 57).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2021-08-30-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-57-0-doc-57/
, SHA-256 f0c94d7da273aba5d28dafe0d6731f2edb9ea71d57982a20f493687925de6458.Full text
1 Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567 Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com GGallego@perkinscoie.com
2 Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice PERKINS COIE LLP
3 NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com 3150 Porter Drive
Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
4 AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com Telephone: 650.838.4300
PERKINS COIE LLP Facsimile: 650.838.4350
5 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
6 Telephone: 206.359.8000
7 Facsimile: 206.359.9000
8 Attorneys for Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation
9
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14 CAT BROOKS and RASHEED Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
15 all others similarly situated, STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
16 Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL
RULE 6-1((a)
17 v.
Current Response Date: August 30, 2021
18 THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
New Response Date: September 10, 2021
19 Defendant.
20
21
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant
22
Thomson Reuters Corporation (“Thomson Reuters”) and Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and Rasheed
23
24 Shabazz (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
25 WHEREAS, the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is August 30,
26 2021;
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Stipulation to Extend Time
to Respond to Complaint
1 WHEREAS, Thomson Reuters has requested, and Plaintiffs have consented to, an
2 additional 10 days for Thomson Reuters to answer the Complaint;
3
WHEREAS, good cause exists for the agreed extension due to the complexity of the facts
4
alleged in Plaintiffs’ Complaint;
5
WHEREAS, the requested extension will not affect any of the other dates set in the case;
6
7 NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through
8 their respective counsel, that Thomson Reuters shall answer or otherwise respond to the
9 Complaint by September 10, 2021.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -2- Stipulation to Extend Time
to Respond to Complaint
1
DATED: August 23, 2021 PERKINS COIE LLP
2
3 By: /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567
4 SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
5 Attorneys for Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation
6
7
8 DATED: August 23, 2021
By: /s/ Andre M. Mura________________
9
Andre M. Mura, Bar No. 298541
10 amm@classlawgroup.com
11
12 Eric H. Gibbs Jennifer D. Bennett
Andre M. Mura Neil K. Sawhney
13
Amanda M. Karl GUPTA WESSLER PLLC
14 Jeffrey B. Kosbie 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
GIBBS LAW GROUP San Francisco, CA 94111
15 505 14th Street, Suite 1110 (415) 573-0336
Oakland, CA 94612 jennifer@guptawessler.com
16 Telephone: (510) 350-9700 neil@guptawessler.com
Fax: (510) 350-9701
17
ehg@classlawgroup.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs
18 amm@classlawgroup.com
amk@classlawgroup.com
19 jbk@classlawgroup.com
20 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21 Benjamin Elga (pro hac vice) Albert Fox Cahn (pro hac vice)
Alice Buttrick (pro hac vice) ISTRISURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY
22 JUSTICE CATALYST LAW INC. TES D CT
OVERSIGHT PROJECT
A C
123 William Street, 16th floorT 40 Rector Street, 9th Floor
23 RT
S
New York, NY 10038 New York, NY 10006
UNIT
U
24 (518) 732-6703 O
albert@stopspying.org
VED
belga@justicecatalyst.org ED APPRO
25 abuttrick@justicecatalyst.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs
R NIA
26 Attorneys for Plaintiffs hen
NO dward M. C
Judge E FO
27
RT LI
28
H ER A
C
N O F
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC D I S T -3- Stipulation to Extend Time
RICT to Respond to Complaint
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.57.0.pdf
- Size
- 177,974 bytes
- SHA-256
- f0c94d7da273aba5d28dafe0d6731f2edb9ea71d57982a20f493687925de6458
- Original
- PACER (login required)