Court filing
STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 56)
Summary
A Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), Document 56, filed 08/23/21 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. The parties stipulate that the current response date of August 30, 2021 is extended to a new response date of September 10, 2021, an additional 10 days that Plaintiffs consented to. The stipulation states that good cause exists due to the complexity of the facts alleged in Plaintiffs' Complaint. It is dated August 23, 2021 and signed /s/ Susan D. Fahringer.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 56).”
Original at ecf.cand.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 56. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2021-08-30-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-56-0-doc-56/
, SHA-256 95814fb16a73dda10b7cd01bb0bfc0772d7a2112301448f32e8ce932645cb436.Full text
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 56 Filed 08/23/21 Page 1 of 4
1 Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567 Gabriella Gallego, Bar No. 324226
SFahringer@perkinscoie.com GGallego@perkinscoie.com
2 Nicola C. Menaldo, pro hac vice PERKINS COIE LLP
3 NMenaldo@perkinscoie.com 3150 Porter Drive
Anna M. Thompson, pro hac vice Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
4 AnnaThompson@perkinscoie.com Telephone: 650.838.4300
PERKINS COIE LLP Facsimile: 650.838.4350
5 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
6 Telephone: 206.359.8000
7 Facsimile: 206.359.9000
8 Attorneys for Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation
9
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14 CAT BROOKS and RASHEED Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC
SHABAZZ, individually and on behalf of
15 all others similarly situated, STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
16 Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL
RULE 6-1((a)
17 v.
Current Response Date: August 30, 2021
18 THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION,
New Response Date: September 10, 2021
19 Defendant.
20
21
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendant
22
Thomson Reuters Corporation (“Thomson Reuters”) and Plaintiffs Cat Brooks and Rasheed
23
24 Shabazz (“Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
25 WHEREAS, the deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is August 30,
26 2021;
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Stipulation to Extend Time
to Respond to Complaint
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 56 Filed 08/23/21 Page 2 of 4
1 WHEREAS, Thomson Reuters has requested, and Plaintiffs have consented to, an
2 additional 10 days for Thomson Reuters to answer the Complaint;
3
WHEREAS, good cause exists for the agreed extension due to the complexity of the facts
4
alleged in Plaintiffs’ Complaint;
5
WHEREAS, the requested extension will not affect any of the other dates set in the case;
6
7 NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through
8 their respective counsel, that Thomson Reuters shall answer or otherwise respond to the
9 Complaint by September 10, 2021.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -2- Stipulation to Extend Time
to Respond to Complaint
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 56 Filed 08/23/21 Page 3 of 4
1
DATED: August 23, 2021 PERKINS COIE LLP
2
3 By: /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
Susan D. Fahringer, Bar No. 21567
4 SFahringer@perkinscoie.com
5 Attorneys for Defendant
Thomson Reuters Corporation
6
7
8 DATED: August 23, 2021
By: /s/ Andre M. Mura________________
9
Andre M. Mura, Bar No. 298541
10 amm@classlawgroup.com
11
12 Eric H. Gibbs Jennifer D. Bennett
Andre M. Mura Neil K. Sawhney
13
Amanda M. Karl GUPTA WESSLER PLLC
14 Jeffrey B. Kosbie 100 Pine Street, Suite 1250
GIBBS LAW GROUP San Francisco, CA 94111
15 505 14th Street, Suite 1110 (415) 573-0336
Oakland, CA 94612 jennifer@guptawessler.com
16 Telephone: (510) 350-9700 neil@guptawessler.com
Fax: (510) 350-9701
17
ehg@classlawgroup.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs
18 amm@classlawgroup.com
amk@classlawgroup.com
19 jbk@classlawgroup.com
20 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21 Benjamin Elga (pro hac vice) Albert Fox Cahn (pro hac vice)
Alice Buttrick (pro hac vice) SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY
22 JUSTICE CATALYST LAW INC. OVERSIGHT PROJECT
123 William Street, 16th floor 40 Rector Street, 9th Floor
23
New York, NY 10038 New York, NY 10006
24 (518) 732-6703 albert@stopspying.org
belga@justicecatalyst.org
25 abuttrick@justicecatalyst.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs
26 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -3- Stipulation to Extend Time
to Respond to Complaint
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 56 Filed 08/23/21 Page 4 of 4
1 ATTESTATION
2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document
3 has been obtained from the other signatory.
4
5 /s/ Susan D. Fahringer
6 Susan D. Fahringer
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC -4- Stipulation to Extend Time
to Respond to Complaint
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.56.0.pdf
- Size
- 164,361 bytes
- SHA-256
- 95814fb16a73dda10b7cd01bb0bfc0772d7a2112301448f32e8ce932645cb436
- Original
- PACER (login required)