ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 39)

Summary

This ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel, Document 39 filed 06/23/21 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC in the Northern District of California, is a form in which each signer certifies reading the Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook, discussing the available dispute resolution options with each other, and considering whether the case might benefit from them. Counsel also certifies discussing the selection of an ADR process with counsel for the other parties, and the form offers two choices, intend to stipulate to an ADR process or prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management conference. The dates, party names and check boxes are blank in this copy. A second page is an attestation by Susan D. Fahringer, executed on the 23rd day of June at Seattle, Washington, that concurrence in the filing was obtained from the other signatory.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Form ADR-Cert  rev. 1-15-2019 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
Plaintiff(s) 
v.
Defendant(s)
CASE No C 
ADR CERTIFICATION BY 
PARTIES AND COUNSEL 
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or 
she has: 
 
1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook” 
(available at cand.uscourts.gov/adr). 
2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court 
and private entities; and 
3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution 
options. 
Date:
Date:
Party
Attorney 
Counsel further certifies that he or she has discussed the selection of an ADR process with 
counsel for the other parties to the case. Based on that discussion, the parties:
 intend to stipulate to an ADR process 
 prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management 
conference 
 
Date:
 
Attorney 
Important! E-file this form in ECF using event name: “ADR Certification (ADR LR 3-5 b) of Discussion of ADR 
Options.”
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC   Document 39   Filed 06/23/21   Page 1 of 2

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
ATTESTATION 
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Susan D. Fahringer, attest that 
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. I declare 
under penalty under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and 
correct. Executed this 23rd day of June, 202 , at Seattle, Washington. 
/s/Susan D. Fahringer 
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC   Document 39   Filed 06/23/21   Page 2 of 2

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.39.0.pdf

Size

210,141 bytes

SHA-256

124cb3f6a62159288281b7da3d10a588ffc6a4a597173bca61f63dec6732dc7a

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.39.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)