Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options… — Brooks v. Thomson Re…

Court filing

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 39)

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2021-06-23

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC · Doc. 39 · 2021-06-23 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Form ADR-Cert  rev. 1-15-2019 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
Plaintiff(s) 
v.
Defendant(s)
CASE No C 
ADR CERTIFICATION BY 
PARTIES AND COUNSEL 
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or 
she has: 
 
1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook” 
(available at cand.uscourts.gov/adr). 
2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court 
and private entities; and 
3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution 
options. 
Date:
Date:
Party
Attorney 
Counsel further certifies that he or she has discussed the selection of an ADR process with 
counsel for the other parties to the case. Based on that discussion, the parties:
 intend to stipulate to an ADR process 
 prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management 
conference 
 
Date:
 
Attorney 
Important! E-file this form in ECF using event name: “ADR Certification (ADR LR 3-5 b) of Discussion of ADR 
Options.”
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC   Document 39   Filed 06/23/21   Page 1 of 2

1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 
ATTESTATION 
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Susan D. Fahringer, attest that 
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. I declare 
under penalty under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and 
correct. Executed this 23rd day of June, 202 , at Seattle, Washington. 
/s/Susan D. Fahringer 
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC   Document 39   Filed 06/23/21   Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.39.0.pdf
Size
210,141 bytes
SHA-256
124cb3f6a62159288281b7da3d10a588ffc6a4a597173bca61f63dec6732dc7a
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.39.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top