Court filing
Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 25-1, N.D. Cal. No. 3:21-cv-01418)
Summary
A Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, signed by Clerk of Court Susan Y. Soong. It says the case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project under General Order 65, and that the parties' consent is required before any proceeding may be recorded. If a party, the judge or the media requests recording, consent is presumed unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form. Parties who object are asked to explain why, and the notice says the decision has no effect on the case. The notice states no case number or dates.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed January 13, 2020 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation; one of 443 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2020-01-13 |
Cite this document
“Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 25-1, N.D. Cal. No. 3:21-cv-01418).”
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:19-cv-08315-JD, Doc. 11-1, filed 2020-01-13. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2020-01-13-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-25-1-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-25-1/
, SHA-256 52bbebfc9814786b6af537a82e735909f6974c1ca79ec6d1ce45ae2573c929ca.Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF ELIGIBILITY FOR VIDEO RECORDING This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. The parties’ consent is required before any proceedings in this case may be recorded. If a party, the presiding judge, or a member of the media requests that a proceeding be recorded, consent of the parties will be presumed unless a party submits an Objection to Request for Video Recording form as directed by the Cameras in the Courtroom Procedures. Parties objecting to video recording are asked, for research purposes, to communicate to the Court the reasons for declining to participate. If you decline to participate, you should candidly convey the reasons for your decision. Whether you agree to participate or decline to participate will have no effect on your case whatsoever. Susan Y. Soong, Clerk of Court Susan Y Soong Clerk of C Case 3:19-cv-08315-JD Document 11-1 Filed 01/13/20 Page 1 of 1 Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC Document 25-1 Filed 03/17/21 Page 1 of 1
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cand.374304.25.1.pdf
- Size
- 49,144 bytes
- SHA-256
- 52bbebfc9814786b6af537a82e735909f6974c1ca79ec6d1ce45ae2573c929ca
- Original
- PACER (login required)