ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options of… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 47)

Summary

Document 47, stamped Filed 07/08/21 in Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC (N.D. Cal.), is a one-page ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel on court Form ADR-Cert rev. 1-15-2019. Under Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5(b), it certifies that the signers have read the Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook, discussed the available dispute resolution options, and considered whether the case might benefit from them. Plaintiffs are named as Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and the defendant as Thomson Reuters Corporation. The form's dates and signature lines are blank, and it does not show which option is selected on whether the parties intend to stipulate to an ADR process or prefer to discuss selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management conference.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

Full text

Form ADR-Cert  rev. 1-15-2019 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
Plaintiff(s) 
v.
Defendant(s)
CASE No C 
ADR CERTIFICATION BY 
PARTIES AND COUNSEL 
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or 
she has: 
1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook”
(available at cand.uscourts.gov/adr).
2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court
and private entities; and
3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution
options.
Date:
Date:
Party
Attorney 
Counsel further certifies that he or she has discussed the selection of an ADR process with 
counsel for the other parties to the case. Based on that discussion, the parties:
intend to stipulate to an ADR process 
prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management 
conference 
Date:
Attorney 
Important! E-file this form in ECF using event name: “ADR Certification (ADR LR 3-5 b) of Discussion of ADR 
Options.”
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,
individually and on behalf of all others 
similarly situated
THOMSON RETUERS CORPORATION
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 47     Filed 07/08/21     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.47.0.pdf

Size

104,651 bytes

SHA-256

1c7789979994ee2e61588ae291581f0fad22f2abbc311798089c35368f5ce05f

Our copy

gov.uscourts.cand.374304.47.0.pdf

Original

PACER (login required)