Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation — U.S. District Court, N.D. Cal. ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options of… — Brooks v. Thomson…

Court filing

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options of… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 46)

Summary

This one-page ADR Certification by Parties and Counsel, Document 46 filed 07/08/21 in Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC in the Northern District of California, is a form for the case of Cat Brooks and Rasheed Shabazz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, against Thomson Reuters Corporation. Each signer certifies reading the Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook, discussing the available dispute resolution options with each other, and considering whether the case might benefit from them. Counsel also certifies discussing the selection of an ADR process with counsel for the other parties, and the form offers two boxes, intend to stipulate to an ADR process or prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management conference. The dates, signature lines and check boxes are blank in this copy.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed2019-01-15

Cite this document

“ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options of… — Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation (Dkt. 46).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:21-cv-01418-EMC, Doc. 46, filed 2019-01-15. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-brooks-thomsonreuters-cand-374304/2019-01-15-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-46-0-gov-uscourts-cand-374304-46-0/, SHA-256 187ddf5094897893ded9c27d122744d5deb0c89946f113b62b95e6520162e183.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Form ADR-Cert  rev. 1-15-2019 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
Plaintiff(s) 
v.
Defendant(s)
CASE No C 
ADR CERTIFICATION BY 
PARTIES AND COUNSEL 
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or 
she has: 
1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook”
(available at cand.uscourts.gov/adr).
2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court
and private entities; and
3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution
options.
Date:
Date:
Party
Attorney 
Counsel further certifies that he or she has discussed the selection of an ADR process with 
counsel for the other parties to the case. Based on that discussion, the parties:
intend to stipulate to an ADR process 
prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management 
conference 
Date:
Attorney 
Important! E-file this form in ECF using event name: “ADR Certification (ADR LR 3-5 b) of Discussion of ADR 
Options.”
CAT BROOKS and RASHEED SHABAZZ,
individually and on behalf of all others 
similarly situated
THOMSON RETUERS CORPORATION
Case 3:21-cv-01418-EMC     Document 46     Filed 07/08/21     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.46.0.pdf
Size
103,036 bytes
SHA-256
187ddf5094897893ded9c27d122744d5deb0c89946f113b62b95e6520162e183
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cand.374304.46.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top