Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Bofa Ca Unemployment In re: Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation — S.D. Cal., No. 21-md-02992 Exhibit B — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 617-4, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Court filing

Exhibit B — In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation (Dkt. 617-4, S.D. Cal. No. 3:21-md-02992)

Filed January 8, 2026 in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation; one of 1415 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Filed2026-01-08

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB · Doc. 617-4 · 2026-01-08 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

EXHIBIT B 
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43878 
Page 1 of 14

1
         IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
       FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
                  SAN DIEGO DIVISION
4
                       --oOo--
5
 IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA
6
 CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT          Case Number:
7
 BENEFITS LITIGATION              21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB
8
 _______________________________/
9
 This document relates
10
 to All Actions
11
 _______________________________/
12
13
14
15
16
17
 VIDEO-RECORDED DEPOSITION OF DAVID I. LEVINE, Ph.D.
18
              SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
19
               WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 2025
20
21
22
23
 Reported by:
24
 Anrae Wimberley, CSR No. 7778
25
 Job No.  7309212
Page 1
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43879 
Page 2 of 14

1
         IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
       FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
                  SAN DIEGO DIVISION
4
                       --oOo--
5
 IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA
6
 CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT          Case Number:
7
 BENEFITS LITIGATION              21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB
8
 _______________________________/
9
 This document relates
10
 to All Actions
11
 _______________________________/
12
13
14
15
16
     HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER
17
18
            Transcript of video-recorded deposition
19
 of DAVID I. LEVINE, Ph.D., taken at Goodwin Procter
20
 LLP, 525 Market Street, 31st Floor, San Francisco,
21
 California 94105, and also on Veritext Virtual Zoom,
22
 beginning at 9:27 a.m. and ending at 3:45 p.m. on
23
 Wednesday, May 28, 2025, before Anrae Wimberley,
24
 Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 7778.
25
Page 2
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43880 
Page 3 of 14

1
 APPEARANCES ON ZOOM:
2
 ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS:
3
           COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
4
           BY:  BRIAN DANITZ, ESQ.
5
           DAVID HOLLENBERG, ESQ.
6
           (VIA ZOOM, WHERE NOTED)
7
           San Francisco Airport Office Center
8
           840 Malcolm Road, Suite 200
9
           Burlingame, California 94010
10
           (650) 697-6000
11
           bdanitz@cmplegal.com
12
           dhollenberg@cmplegal.com
13
14
 APPEARANCES IN PERSON:
15
 ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFFS:
16
           ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
17
           BY:  CAROLINE HUNSICKER, ESQ.
18
           CONNIE K. CHAN, ESQ.
19
           177 Post Street, Suite 300
20
           San Francisco, California 94108
21
           (415) 421-7151
22
           chunsicker@altshulerberzon.com
23
           cchan@altshulerberzon.com
24
25
Page 3
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43881 
Page 4 of 14

1
 O N  B E H A L F  O F  D E F E N D A N T  B A N K  O F  A M E R I C A :
2
           G O O D W I N  P R O C T E R  L L P
3
           B Y :   K E I T H  L E V E N B E R G ,  E S Q .
4
           L A U R A  B R Y S ,  E S Q .
5
           1 9 0 0  N  S t r e e t  N . W .
6
           W a s h i n g t o n ,  D . C .  2 0 0 3 6
7
           ( 2 0 2 )  3 4 6 - 4 2 4 8
8
           k l e v e n b e r g @ g o o d w i n l a w . c o m
9
           l b r y s @ g o o d w i n l a w . c o m
1 0
1 1
 A l s o  p r e s e n t :
1 2
           C A M E R O N  T U T T L E ,  V i d e o g r a p h e r
1 3
           V E R I T E X T  L E G A L  S O L U T I O N S
1 4
                       - - o O o - -
1 5
1 6
1 7
1 8
1 9
2 0
2 1
2 2
2 3
2 4
2 5
Page 4
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43882 
Page 5 of 14

1
                      I N D E X
2
 EXAMINATION BY:                            PAGE
3
 Mr. Levenberg                                 8
4
                       --oOo--
5
                   E X H I B I T S
6
 EXHIBIT           DESCRIPTION              PAGE
7
 Exhibit 1    Expert Report of Dr. David      15
              I. Levine, dated March 4,
8
              2025; 41 pages
9
 Exhibit 2    Expert Class Certification      35
              Report of Greg J. Regan,
10
              CPA/CFF, CFE, dated August
              29, 2024; 76 pages
11
 Exhibit 3    Third Amended Master            83
12
              Consolidated Complaint; 266
              pages
13
 Exhibit 4    Plaintiff Stephanie Moore's     90
14
              Supplemental Objections and
              Responses to Bank of
15
              America, N.A.'s First Set
              of Interrogatories; 42
16
              pages
17
 Exhibit 5    Expert Report of Professor      95
              Justin McCrary, Ph.D.,
18
              dated April 4, 2025; 100
              pages
19
 Exhibit 6    Plaintiff Kuang Ting            99
20
              Chong's Supplemental
              Objections and Responses to
21
              Bank of America, N.A.'s
              First Set of
22
              Interrogatories; 40 pages
23
 REPORTER'S NOTE: All quotations from exhibits are
 reflected in the manner in which they were read into
24
 the record and do not necessarily indicate an exact
 quote from the document.
25
                       --oOo--
Page 5
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43883 
Page 6 of 14

1
               WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 2025;
2
              SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA;
3
                      9:27 A.M.
4
                        - - -
5
      THE VIDEOGRAPHER:  Good morning.  We are going         09:27:52
6
 on the record.  The time is 9:27 a.m. on May 28th,
7
 2025.
8
           Please note that the microphones are
9
 sensitive, may pick up whispering and private
10
 conversations.  Please mute your phones at this             09:28:08
11
 time.  Audio and video recording will continue to
12
 take place unless all parties agree to go off the
13
 record.
14
           This is Media Unit 1 of the video-recorded
15
 deposition of Dr. David Levine taken by counsel for         09:28:22
16
 defendant in the matter of In Re:  Bank of America
17
 California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, filed
18
 in the United States District Court, Southern
19
 District of California, San Diego Division, Case
20
 No. 21-MD-02992-GPC-MSB.                                    09:28:44
21
           The location of the deposition is
22
 525 Market Street, 31st Floor, San Francisco,
23
 California 94105.
24
           My name is Cameron Tuttle representing
25
 Veritext, and I'm the videographer.  I am not               09:29:11
Page 6
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43884 
Page 7 of 14

1
 authorized to administer an oath.  I am not related         09:29:16
2
 to any party in this action nor am I financially
3
 interested in the outcome.
4
           If there are any objections to proceeding,
5
 please state them at the time of your appearance.           09:29:25
6
 Counsel will now state their appearances and
7
 affiliations for the record beginning with the
8
 noticing attorney.
9
      MR. LEVENBERG:  Good morning.  This is Keith
10
 Levenberg with Goodwin Procter representing Bank of         09:29:35
11
 America.
12
      MS. BRYS:  Good morning.  Laura Brys, also
13
 representing Bank of America.
14
      MS. HUNSICKER:  I'm Caroline Hunsicker with
15
 Altshuler Berzon for the plaintiffs.                        09:29:46
16
      MS. CHAN:  Connie Chan from Altshuler Berzon on
17
 behalf of the plaintiffs.
18
      THE VIDEOGRAPHER:  Will the court reporter
19
 please introduce yourself and administer the oath to
20
 the witness.                                                09:29:57
21
      THE REPORTER:  We are on the record.  My name
22
 is Anrae Wimberley, CSR No. 7778, and I will now
23
 swear in the witness.
24
 //
25
 //                                                          09:30:01
Page 7
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43885 
Page 8 of 14

1
               DAVID I. LEVINE, PH.D.,                       09:30:01
2
  sworn in personally as a witness by the Certified
3
      Shorthand Reporter, testified as follows:
4
                     EXAMINATION
5
 BY MR. LEVENBERG:                                           09:30:01
6
      Q.   State your name.
7
      A.   David Levine.
8
      Q.   And you've been retained by plaintiffs to
9
 offer an expert opinion in this case?
10
      A.   Yes.                                              09:30:32
11
      Q.   Have you had a deposition taken before?
12
      A.   Yes.
13
      Q.   About how many times have you previously
14
 sat for a deposition?
15
      A.   Three or four.                                    09:30:40
16
      Q.   When was the last time?
17
      A.   A dozen or 15 years ago, I think.
18
      Q.   Okay.  So I'll go through some of the
19
 things, which you've probably already heard, even
20
 though it's been a while.                                   09:30:57
21
           I'll ask the questions.  Your attorney may
22
 or may not object to those questions, but unless
23
 your attorney tells you not to answer them, you
24
 should answer them.
25
           Does that make sense to you?                      09:31:06
Page 8
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43886 
Page 9 of 14

1
 appropriate way to represent classwide harm."               11:38:48
2
           Describe what you mean by "aggregate
3
 measure of harm."
4
      A.   The total harm suffered by a group.
5
      Q.   And do you need to have information about         11:39:17
6
 the harm suffered by individual members of the group
7
 to form an opinion about the total harm suffered by
8
 the group?
9
      MS. HUNSICKER:  Objection; vague.
10
      THE WITNESS:  Can you ask that again?                  11:39:41
11
           You mean individuals as opposed to
12
 having . . .
13
 BY MR. LEVENBERG:
14
      Q.   If you have information about the
15
 aggregate measure of harm for a group, can you use          11:39:50
16
 that to draw conclusions about the harms suffered by
17
 individual members of the group?
18
      MS. HUNSICKER:  Objection; vague.
19
      THE WITNESS:  So the method I'm proposing is to
20
 say that this credit card interest rate is a                11:40:10
21
 conservative lower bound on the opportunity cost of
22
 funds.
23
           My expectation is one would then take the
24
 individual claims amounts and durations to create a
25
 damage per person.                                          11:40:30
Page 72
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43887 
Page 10 of 14

1
           Is that what you're asking?                       11:40:34
2
           I'm not sure what you're asking.
3
 BY MR. LEVENBERG:
4
      Q.   Well, that is helpful.
5
           So I guess let's back up a little.  Tell          11:40:42
6
 me how you would propose to arrive at the aggregate
7
 measure of harm.
8
      A.   If I can find opportunity cost to funds --
9
 a lower bound on the opportunity cost to funds for
10
 the vast majority of the class, and we apply that to        11:41:11
11
 the total amount of UI payments that were delayed
12
 times their delay, we would get an aggregate measure
13
 of harm.
14
      Q.   Okay.  And that aggregate measure of harm
15
 is basically just the sum total of all individual           11:41:31
16
 harms?
17
      MS. HUNSICKER:  Objection; confusing.
18
      THE WITNESS:  It is a conservative lower bound
19
 on the sum of the individual harms is what it's
20
 intended to create.                                         11:41:51
21
 BY MR. LEVENBERG:
22
      Q.   Can your method be used to measure the
23
 individual harms suffered by any individual class
24
 member?
25
      MS. HUNSICKER:  Objection; outside the scope of        11:42:01
Page 73
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43888 
Page 11 of 14

1
 designed to create a conservative lower bound on an         11:50:12
2
 interest rate that one could then multiply by an
3
 amount of missing -- of delayed funds times the
4
 duration of the delay and create an estimate of
5
 harms for individuals.                                      11:50:31
6
           But it's designed to create an aggregate
7
 measure being a conservative lower bound that
8
 applies to the vast majority of the class.
9
           Is that responsive to your question?
10
           There's many -- I don't know what you mean        11:50:48
11
 by individual -- I mean --
12
 BY MR. LEVENBERG:
13
      Q.   Well, it is what it is.
14
      A.   -- it's what it is designed for.
15
      Q.   It is a helpful response, but I can't stop        11:50:55
16
 asking questions, so I'm going to keep going.
17
           So should I interpret that to mean the
18
 method was designed to create an aggregate measure
19
 of harm for a class of 109,000 people; is that fair?
20
      A.   Even though I use that number, I forget           11:51:14
21
 exactly which, but that was part --
22
      Q.   Whatever that number is, I know it's --
23
      A.   For more than 100,000 people, yes.
24
      Q.   Could that method also be used to create
25
 an aggregate measure of harm for a class of 50,000          11:51:29
Page 80
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43889 
Page 12 of 14

1
 people?                                                     11:51:33
2
      MS. HUNSICKER:  Objection; incomplete
3
 hypothetical, confusing.
4
      THE WITNESS:  Yes.
5
 BY MR. LEVENBERG:                                           11:51:42
6
      Q.   Could it be used to create an aggregate
7
 measure of harm for a class of 100 people?
8
      MS. HUNSICKER:  Same objection; incomplete,
9
 confusing.
10
      THE WITNESS:  As members get smaller, reliance         11:51:55
11
 on averages gets more challenging and sampling
12
 variation, random errors, and things like that,
13
 become more important.
14
           So as -- for 50,000, it's easy, and for
15
 numbers at 100 and below, one has to be more                11:52:35
16
 careful, so I would need to know a lot more.
17
 BY MR. LEVENBERG:
18
      Q.   Okay.  And could it be used to create an
19
 aggregate measure of harm for a class of one person?
20
      MS. HUNSICKER:  Objection; incomplete.                 11:52:48
21
      THE WITNESS:  This wouldn't be how I would
22
 approach that problem.
23
 BY MR. LEVENBERG:
24
      Q.   Okay.
25
           All right.  I think we are almost at our          11:52:54
Page 81
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43890 
Page 13 of 14

1
           I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand
2
 Reporter of the State of California, do hereby
3
 certify:
4
           That the foregoing proceedings were taken
5
 before me at the time and place herein set forth;
6
 that any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings,
7
 prior to testifying, were administered an oath; that
8
 a record of the proceedings was made by me using
9
 machine shorthand which was thereafter transcribed
10
 under my direction; that the foregoing transcript is
11
 a true record of the testimony given.
12
           Further, that if the foregoing pertains to
13
 the original transcript of a deposition in a Federal
14
 Case, before completion of the proceedings, review
15
 of the transcript (X) was ( ) was not requested.
16
           I further certify that I am neither
17
 financially interested in the action nor a relative
18
 or employee of any attorney of any party to this
19
 action.
20
           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date
21
 subscribed my name.
22
 Dated:  June 11, 2025
23
24
                       <%16617,Signature%>
25
                       ANRAE WIMBERLEY, CSR No. 7778
Page 157
Veritext Legal Solutions
Calendar-CA@veritext.com 866-299-5127
Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 617-4     Filed 01/08/26     PageID.43891 
Page 14 of 14

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.617.4.pdf
Size
242,630 bytes
SHA-256
1cf56616a6617fa7022484e6bf9fd2a475f266d815447383ba7b7aa41e10b39e
Our copy
gov.uscourts.casd.709615.617.4.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top