Court filing

Order Granting Motion to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Reconsider May 29, 2025 Order

Summary

An Order Granting Motion to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Reconsider May 29, 2025 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Protective Order, by Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel in In re Bank of America California Unemployment Benefits Litigation, Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB in the Southern District of California. Dated July 31, 2025 and filed 07/31/25 as Document 531, it rules on plaintiffs' motion (Dkt. No. 524). The Court granted the motion, finding plaintiffs had shown good cause to file their opposition under seal, citing Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order Granting Motion to File Under Seal Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Reconsider May 29, 2025 Order.” Original at ecf.casd.uscourts.gov, No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB, Doc. 531. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-bofa-ca-unemployment-casd-709615/2025-07-31-gov-uscourts-casd-709615-531-0-gov-uscourts-casd-709615-531-0/, SHA-256 046e86ac46587f1d1612974adb5be70c60342e3d7a9b426a42d9caaf4af5b1c8.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB     Document 531    Filed 07/31/25   PageID.30016    Page
                                      1 of 2


 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8                       UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 9                     SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
   IN RE BANK OF AMERICA                     Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
11
   CALIFORNIA UNEMPLOYMENT
12 BENEFITS LITIGATION                       ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
                                             FILE UNDER SEAL PLAINTIFFS’
13
                                             OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
14                                           MOTION TO RECONSIDER MAY 29,
                                             2025 ORDER GRANTING IN PART
15
                                             AND DENYING IN PART
16                                           DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
                                             PROTECTIVE ORDER
17
18                                           [Dkt. No. 524.]
19
                                             Judge:     Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel
20 This Document Relates to All Actions      Ctrm:      2D (2nd Floor)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

     Order Granting Motion to File Document Under Seal; Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB
 Case 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB            Document 531       Filed 07/31/25   PageID.30017   Page
                                             2 of 2


 1                                               ORDER
 2          Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Under Seal Plaintiffs’ Opposition
 3 to Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration May 29, 2025 Order Granting In Part and
 4 Denying In Part Defendant’s Motion For Protective Order, the Motion is GRANTED.
 5 Plaintiffs have shown good cause to file this under seal. See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of
 6 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006).
 7          IT IS SO ORDERED.
 8
 9 Dated: July 31, 2025
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28


     Order Granting Motion to File Document Under Seal;                                          1
     Case No. 3:21-md-02992-GPC-MSB

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.casd.709615.531.0.pdf
Size: 138,783 bytes
SHA-256: 046e86ac46587f1d1612974adb5be70c60342e3d7a9b426a42d9caaf4af5b1c8
Our copy: gov.uscourts.casd.709615.531.0.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)