Court filing

Proposed Order — Benworth Oto (Dkt. 34.1)

Summary

A [Proposed] Order Regarding Petitioner's Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed, Document 34-1, filed 09/09/24 in Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO, Benworth Capital Partners, LLC, Petitioner v. Oto Analytics, LLC f/k/a Oto Analytics, Inc. d/b/a Womply, Respondent, Case No. 3:24-cv-4840-AMO on the caption, in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. The order has a table listing a Reply in Support of Petition to Vacate Final Arbitration Award, with redacted and unredacted versions at entries 33 and 34-3, Womply as the party with the burden to substantiate the need to seal, partial sealing sought and the stated reason that it contains information revealed during confidential arbitration. The Granted/Denied column and the date line above the name of the Honorable Araceli Martinez-Olguin are blank.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Filed September 9, 2024 in Benworth Oto; one of 100 filings from this case.

Record facts

Court	U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Filed	2024-09-09

Cite this document

“Proposed Order — Benworth Oto (Dkt. 34.1).” U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 4:24-cv-04840-AMO, Doc. 34-1, filed 2024-09-09. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-benworth-oto-cand-433897/2024-09-09-gov-uscourts-cand-433897-34-1-gov-uscourts-cand-433897-34-1/, SHA-256 0705043173d906b54b5995e49d2136199ede37f605a9312ca2db527924a19de3.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 
CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 
 
 
BENWORTH CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, 
 
 
 
 
Petitioner, 
 
 
v. 
 
OTO ANALYTICS, LLC f/k/a OTO 
ANALYTICS, INC. d/b/a WOMPLY, 
 
 
 
 
Respondent. 
 
Case No. 3:24-cv-4840-AMO 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING 
PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE 
MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER 
ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL 
SHOULD BE SEALED 
 
 
 
Having considered Petitioner’s September 9, 2024, Administrative Motion to Consider Whether 
Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 
 
 
 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 34-1     Filed 09/09/24     Page 1 of 2

 
1 
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO 
CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Document  
title or 
description 
Dkt. No.  
of 
redacted 
version 
Dkt. No. of 
unredacted 
version 
Dkt. No. of 
decl. in 
support of 
sealing 
Party with 
burden to 
substantiate 
need to seal 
Full or 
partial 
sealing 
sought 
Brief 
statement 
of reason 
for sealing  
Granted/ 
Denied 
Reply in 
Support of 
Petition to 
Vacate Final 
Arbitration 
Award 
33 
34-3 
 
Womply 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Partial 
Contains 
information 
revealed 
during 
confidential 
arbitration 
 
 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
Dated: _______________________ 
_____________________________ 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Araceli Martinez-Olguin 
 
 
 
 
United States District Judge 
Case 4:24-cv-04840-AMO     Document 34-1     Filed 09/09/24     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File: gov.uscourts.cand.433897.34.1.pdf
Size: 131,747 bytes
SHA-256: 0705043173d906b54b5995e49d2136199ede37f605a9312ca2db527924a19de3
Our copy: gov.uscourts.cand.433897.34.1.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)