Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Ayvazyan et al United States v. Artur Ayvazyan et al. — C.D. Cal., No. 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Proposed Order — USA v. Ayvazyan et al (Dkt. 451.1)

Court filing

Proposed Order — USA v. Ayvazyan et al (Dkt. 451.1)

Filed June 8, 2021 in USA v. Ayvazyan et al; one of 233 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Filed2021-06-08

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 2:20-cr-00579-SVW · Doc. 451-1 · 2021-06-08 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE 
SUMMARY WITNESS 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ashwin J. Ram (SBN 227513) 
aram@steptoe.com 
Michael A. Keough (SBN 327037) 
mkeough@steptoe.com 
Meghan L. Newcomer (pro hac vice) 
mnewcomer@steptoe.com 
Nicholas P. Silverman (pro hac vice) 
nsilverman@steptoe.com 
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1900 
Los Angeles, CA 90071 
Telephone: (213) 439-9400 
Facsimile: (213) 439-9599 
 
Counsel for Defendant Richard Ayvazyan 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA  
 
 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 
 
                              Plaintiff, 
 
v. 
 
RICHARD AYVAZYAN,  
et al., 
 
Defendants. 
 
 Case No.  20-cr-579 (SVW) 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION IN 
LIMINE TO PRECLUDE 
SUMMARY WITNESS 
 
Judge:   Hon. Stephen V. Wilson 
Date:     June 14, 2021 
Time:    11:00 a.m. 
 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 451-1     Filed 06/08/21     Page 1 of 2   Page ID
#:5103

 
 
1 
 
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE 
SUMMARY WITNESS 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER 
 
This Court, having considered Defendants’ Motion in limine to Preclude 
Summary Witness, hereby GRANTS the motion and ORDERS the following relief: 
1. 
The government is precluded from calling Marylee Robinson or any 
summary witness to testify at trial and the government is precluded from using its 
proposed summary charts at trial;  
Or, in the alternative;   
2. 
The summary witness’s testimony is limited to the seventeen loans 
charged in the redacted superseding indictment, the testimony will be accompanied by 
limiting instructions, the government must produce updated summary charts pertaining 
only to the seventeen loans charged in the indictment, and the summary charts will not 
be submitted to the jury. 
 
 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
 
  Dated:  ________, 2021  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The Honorable Stephen V. Wilson 
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States District Judge 
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 451-1     Filed 06/08/21     Page 2 of 2   Page ID
#:5104

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cacd.802533.451.1.pdf
Size
131,574 bytes
SHA-256
b6bad418c8cca8943712157ab750b5a43a7dcf279befbf740cd02ab75c866a31
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cacd.802533.451.1.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top