Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Ayvazyan et al United States v. Artur Ayvazyan et al. — C.D. Cal., No. 2:20-cr-00579-SVW Minute (in Chambers) Order Denying Motion to Modify Conditions of Pretrial Release — USA v. Ayvazyan et al. (Dkt. 127, C.D. Cal.)

Court filing

Minute (in Chambers) Order Denying Motion to Modify Conditions of Pretrial Release — USA v. Ayvazyan et al. (Dkt. 127, C.D. Cal.)

Filed February 18, 2021 in USA v. Ayvazyan et al.; one of 233 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Filed2021-02-18

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · No. 2:20-cr-00579-SVW · Doc. 127 · 2021-02-18 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
 
CRIMINAL MINUTES – GENERAL 
Case No. 
CR20-00579-SVW-3 
Date 
February 17, 2021 
Title 
U.S.A. v. Artur Ayvazyan 
 
  
                                                  CRIMINAL MINUTES - GENERAL 
  
               
Page 1 of 1 
 
Present: The Honorable 
 
Alka Sagar, United States Magistrate Judge 
Alma Felix 
 
None 
 
Deputy Clerk 
 
Court Reporter / Recorder 
 
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: 
 
Attorneys Present for Defendant: 
N/A 
 
N/A 
           Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) 
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY 
CONDITIONS OF PRETRIAL RELEASE 
 
On February 12, 2021, Defendant Artur Ayvazyan filed a motion seeking 
modification of certain conditions of pretrial release.   (Dkt. No. 117).  On February 
16, 2021, the government filed an opposition, (Dkt. No. 119).  The matter has been 
referred to the undersigned for determination. (Dkt. No. 122).  Having carefully 
considered the above-referenced filings, the Court DENIES the motion.  
  
The Court continues to believe that home detention and travel restrictions 
are necessary to assure Defendant’s appearance at trial and the safety of the 
community from economic danger, given the nature of the pending charges. See 
Opposition at 4-5.  As the government points out, these conditions permit 
Defendant a reasonable opportunity to seek and maintain employment with pre-
approval from Pretrial Services.  To the extent Defendant encounters unforeseen 
delays in completing deliveries on any given date, Defendant is able to provide 
notice to, and obtain approval from, Pretrial Services to return home at a later 
time.  Id. at 3.  If Defendant finds these requirements cumbersome, he may choose 
to use an electronic ankle bracelet as an alternative to the Voice ID form of 
electronic monitoring.1    
 
IT IS SO ORDERED.                                                                                          
                                                                   
                                                 
1  
The parties may submit a stipulation to replace the Voice ID form of electronic monitoring requirement with the 
electronic bracelet.    
Case 2:20-cr-00579-SVW     Document 127     Filed 02/18/21     Page 1 of 1   Page ID #:847

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.cacd.802533.127.0.pdf
Size
106,725 bytes
SHA-256
4ed190e06e07a4ba64808ea3f8493d516ff152d952c7bddd7612e81c035b5a8b
Our copy
gov.uscourts.cacd.802533.127.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top