Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Alexandra Acosta United States v. Alexandra Acosta — S.D. Fla., No. 0:23-cr-60170-RNS Court Minutes/Order — Report Re: Counsel/Arraignment — USA v. Alexandra Acosta (S.D. Fla., 2023-10-19)

Court filing

Court Minutes/Order — Report Re: Counsel/Arraignment — USA v. Alexandra Acosta (S.D. Fla., 2023-10-19)

Filed October 19, 2023 in USA v. Alexandra Acosta; one of 136 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
Filed2023-10-19

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida · No. 0:23-cr-60170-RNS · Doc. 13 · 2023-10-19 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

COURT MINUTES/ORDER 
United States Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt 
 Courtroom 310 
Date: 10/19/2023    
Time: 11:00 a.m. 
Defendant: Alexandra Acosta (B) 
 J#:   81798‐510 
 Case #: 23‐CR‐60170‐RNS 
AUSA:  Trevor Christopher Jones   
  Attorney:  Brian Yaacov Silber, Esq. (Permanent) 
Violation:  WIRE FRAUD 
Proceeding:  Report Re: Counsel/Arraignment 
  CJA Appt:   
Bond/PTD Held: 
Yes
No
      Recommended Bond:   $50,000 PSB 
Bond Set at: $50,000 PSB 
  Co‐signed by:   
Language:   English 
  Surrender and/or do not obtain passports/travel docs 
  Report to PTS as directed/or   
x’s a week/month by 
Disposition: 
 
phone:   
x’s a week/month in person 
Defendant present 
 
Defendant arraigned 
Reading of Indictment Waived 
Not guilty plea entered 
Jury trial demanded 
Standing Discovery Order requested 
Brady order entered 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Random urine testing by Pretrial Services  
 
Treatment as deemed necessary 
  Refrain from excessive use of alcohol 
  Participate in mental health assessment & treatment 
  Maintain or seek full‐time employment/education 
  No contact with victims/witnesses 
  No firearms 
  Not to encumber property 
  May not visit transportation establishments 
 
Home Confinement/Electronic Monitoring and/or  
Curfew   
 pm to   
 am, paid by  
 
  Allowances: Medical needs, court appearances, attorney visits, 
religious, employment 
  Travel extended to:    
  Other:  
NEXT COURT APPEARANCE 
Date:   
  Time:   
 Judge:   
  Place:   
Report RE Counsel:   
PTD/Bond Hearing:   
Prelim/Arraign or Removal:    
Status Conference RE:    
D.A.R.   11:09:44 
  Time in Court:   5 minutes 
 
CHECK IF APPLICABLE: _____For the reasons stated by counsel for the Defendant and finding that the ends of justice served by 
granting the ore tenus motion for continuance to hire counsel outweigh the best interests of the public & the Defendant in a 
Speedy Trial, the Court finds that the period of time from today, through and including ________, shall be deemed excludable in 
accordance with the provisions of the Speedy Trial Act, l8 USC 3161 et seq..
  
Case 0:23-cr-60170-RNS   Document 13   Entered on FLSD Docket 10/19/2023   Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.flsd.654235.13.0.pdf
Size
125,658 bytes
SHA-256
b74aee903b6fb931ead7b908ac949327b14f612704b1d9ab4cbfead1b2b912f8
Our copy
gov.uscourts.flsd.654235.13.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top