Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Ilori et al USA v. Ilori et al — U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York Memo Endorsement as to Adedayo Ilori on re: 173 Letter — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 174, S.D.N.Y.)

Court filing

Memo Endorsement as to Adedayo Ilori on re: 173 Letter — USA v. Ilori et al. (Dkt. 174, S.D.N.Y.)

Filed June 11, 2026 in USA v. Ilori et al.; one of 59 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Filed2026-06-11

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · No. 1:21-cr-00746-MKV · Doc. 174 · 2026-06-11 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

6/11/2026
Case 1:21-cr-00746-MKV     Document 174     Filed 06/11/26     Page 1 of 2
USDC SDNY 
DOCUMENT 
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 
DOC #: 
 
 
 
DATE FILED: 
 
 

Hon. Mary Kay Vyskocil 
June 10, 2026 
Page 2 
June 15, 2026, through and including the date of the next conference, and submits that an exclusion 
of time under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) would serve the ends of justice and outweigh the best 
interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy retrial because it would allow for the 
defendant’s transportation to this District, new counsel’s retrial preparation, including the review 
of discovery, and the parties to engage in discussions regarding a potential resolution of the matter 
without the need for a retrial. 
Respectfully submitted, 
JAY CLAYTON 
United States Attorney for the 
Southern District of New York 
  By: /s/ 
Connie L. Dang 
David R. Felton 
Juliana N. Murray 
Daniel G. Nessim 
Assistant United States Attorneys 
(212) 637-2543/ -2299 / -2314 / -2486
cc:  
Elena Fast, Esq. (by ECF and email) 
The parties' request is GRANTED.  IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status 
conference scheduled for June 15, 2026 is ADJOURNED to July 21, 2026 at 2:00 PM.  
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on consent of the parties, all time is excluded from the 
date of this Order through and including July 21, 2026 under the Speedy Trial Act.  The 
Court finds that the ends of justice served by excluding such time outweigh the interests 
of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial because an exclusion will allow for 
Defendant's transportation to the District, his new counsel to prepare for retrial, and for 
the parties to engage in discussions regarding a potential resolution of this matter.  
SO ORDERED.
6/11/2026
Case 1:21-cr-00746-MKV     Document 174     Filed 06/11/26     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nysd.571512.174.0.pdf
Size
399,816 bytes
SHA-256
b15517b0bd5f2eddeaa01cb3074144229038c258f4428af9b2b0f773948c41d9
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nysd.571512.174.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top