Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings United States v. Chris Recamier — U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. LETTER by USA as to Adedayo Ilori addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from USA dated……

Court filing

LETTER by USA as to Adedayo Ilori addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from USA dated… — USA v. Ilori et al (Dkt. 173)

Summary

The United States, by Assistant United States Attorneys Connie L. Dang, David R. Felton, Juliana N. Murray and Daniel G. Nessim for United States Attorney Jay Clayton, asked Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil in a letter of June 10, 2026 to exclude time from June 15, 2026 through the next conference under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) in Case 1:21-cr-00746-MKV. The letter, Document 173, argues the exclusion would allow the defendant's transportation to the District, new counsel's retrial preparation including review of discovery, and discussions of a potential resolution without a retrial, and is copied to Elena Fast, Esq.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Filed2026-06-10

Cite this document

“LETTER by USA as to Adedayo Ilori addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from USA dated… — USA v. Ilori et al (Dkt. 173).” U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:21-cr-00746-MKV, Doc. 173, filed 2026-06-10. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/full-docket-adedayo-ilori-nysd-571512/2026-06-10-gov-uscourts-nysd-571512-173-0-doc-173/, SHA-256 15f1a91f0467aa4b4991dfeecb5c756cd58c041630a7cc163b326ea53d8a4211.

Search CourtListener for this docket number

Full text

Case 1:21-cr-00746-MKV     Document 173     Filed 06/10/26     Page 1 of 2

Hon. Mary Kay Vyskocil 
June 10, 2026 
Page 2 
 
 
 
 
 
 
June 15, 2026, through and including the date of the next conference, and submits that an exclusion 
of time under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) would serve the ends of justice and outweigh the best 
interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy retrial because it would allow for the 
defendant’s transportation to this District, new counsel’s retrial preparation, including the review 
of discovery, and the parties to engage in discussions regarding a potential resolution of the matter 
without the need for a retrial. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Respectfully submitted, 
 
JAY CLAYTON 
United States Attorney for the 
 
Southern District of New York 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      By: /s/  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Connie L. Dang 
David R. Felton 
Juliana N. Murray 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Daniel G. Nessim 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Assistant United States Attorneys 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(212) 637-2543/ -2299 / -2314 / -2486 
 
cc:  
Elena Fast, Esq. (by ECF and email) 
Case 1:21-cr-00746-MKV     Document 173     Filed 06/10/26     Page 2 of 2

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nysd.571512.173.0.pdf
Size
246,761 bytes
SHA-256
15f1a91f0467aa4b4991dfeecb5c756cd58c041630a7cc163b326ea53d8a4211
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nysd.571512.173.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top