Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings USA v. Chancy et al — Adedayo Ilori filings, U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Sanford Talkin dated 10/6/23 re:……

Court filing

LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Sanford Talkin dated 10/6/23 re:… — USA v. Chancy et al (Dkt. 144)

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Filed2023-10-06

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York · No. 1:20-cr-00378-LJL · Doc. 144 · 2023-10-06 · Docket on CourtListener

Summary

A letter motion dated October 6, 2023 from defense counsel Sanford Talkin to United States District Judge Lewis J. Liman in United States v. Adedayo Ilori, No. 1:20-cr-00378-LJL, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It responds to the Court's August 11, 2023 Order and states that Ilori agrees a further written order is sufficient to remedy a mistaken pronouncement at sentencing. The letter says Ilori wishes to speak with his appellate attorney, Elizabeth M. Johnson, before fully consenting, and that she agrees the error can be corrected through a written order. Counsel asks leave to supplement the letter within one week to confirm Ilori's consent. The one-page letter is Doc. 144 and is copied to AUSA Cecilia Vogel.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

October 6, 2023 
 
Honorable Lewis J. Liman 
United States District Judge 
Southern District of New York 
500 Pearl Street 
New York, New York 10007 
 
VIA ECF 
Re: 
United States v. Adedayo Ilori  
20 Cr. 378 (LJL) 
 
Dear Judge Liman: 
 
 
 
This letter is respectfully submitted on behalf of defendant Adedayo Ilori (“Ilori”) 
in response to the Court’s August 11, 2023 Order (Order”).  Ilori agrees that a “further written 
order” as described in the Order is sufficient to remedy the the mistaken pronouncement at 
sentencing.  However, he wishes to speak to his appellate attorney before fully consenting to the 
issuance of the further order.  I have spoken to Ilori’s appellate attorney, Elizabeth M. Johnson, 
and she informed me that she also agrees that the error can be corrected through the issuance of 
the written order.  However, I have not yet heard directly from Ilori regarding his conversation 
with Ms. Johnson about this issue.   
 
 
 
For this reason, I respectfully request that the Court allow me to supplement this 
letter within one week of today to allow for conformation of Ilori’s consent to the proposed 
procedure.  I apologize for any inconvenience created by this delay. Thank you for Your Honor’s 
consideration.   
 
 
 
Very truly yours, 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sanford Talkin 
Sanford Talkin 
 
 
cc: 
AUSA Cecilia Vogel (by ECF) 
 
Elizabeth M. Johnson, Esq. (by email) 
Case 1:20-cr-00378-LJL     Document 144     Filed 10/06/23     Page 1 of 1

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nysd.540905.144.0.pdf
Size
153,007 bytes
SHA-256
2278cd3086bdd72dae96aeef16c3254a2f9b4b6f8bb750b3306688394e749aff
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nysd.540905.144.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top