Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filings Children's Health Defense, Inc. v. Rutgers Declaration of Counsel Julio C. Gomez — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgers (D.N.J., 2022-01-11)

Court filing

Declaration of Counsel Julio C. Gomez — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgers (D.N.J., 2022-01-11)

Filed January 11, 2022 in Childrens Health Defense v. Rutgers; one of 33 filings from this case.

Record facts

CourtU.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
Filed2022-01-11

U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · No. 3:21-cv-15333-ZNQ-TJB · Doc. 42-1 · 2022-01-11 · Docket on CourtListener

Full text

Julio C. Gomez, Esq. 
GOMEZ LLC ATTORNEY AT LAW 
1451 Cooper Road 
Scotch Plains, NJ 07076 
Tel 908.789.1080 
Fax 908.789.1081 
Attorney for Plaintiffs 
 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY 
CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE, INC., 
PETER CORDI, RAELYNNE MILLER, 
KAYLA MATEO, ADRIANA PINTO, 
JAKE BOTHE, AND DOES 1-13, 
 
 
Plaintiffs, 
Case No. 3:21-cv-15333 
(ZNQ-TJB) 
 
-against- 
 
 
 
RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY 
OF NEW JERSEY, BOARD OF 
GOVERNORS, RUTGERS SCHOOL OF 
BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH 
SCIENCES, CHANCELLOR BRIAN L. 
STROM, PRESIDENT JONATHAN 
HOLLOWAY, in their official capacities. 
 
DECLARATION 
OF COUNSEL 
Defendants 
 
 
DECLARATION OF COUNSEL JULIO C. GOMEZ 
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I, JULIO C. GOMEZ, of full age certify as 
follows: 
1. 
I am a solo practitioner for the firm GOMEZ LLC Attorney At Law, 
Case 3:21-cv-15333-ZNQ-TJB   Document 42-1   Filed 01/11/22   Page 1 of 2 PageID: 671

counsel for Plaintiffs in the above-captioned matter.  I make this certification in order 
to place certain information and documents before the Court in support of Plaintiffs’ 
Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 
2. 
Attached hereto are true and correct copies of the following documents: 
TAB DESCRIPTION 
A 
Rutgers University Policy section 10.3.14, entitled, “Interim 
COVID-19 Immunization Record Requirement for Students” 
(the “Policy”), revised 11/02/2021. 
B 
FDA Briefing Document, Pfizer BioNTech COVID 19 
Vaccine, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory 
Committee Meeting, December 10, 2020. 
C 
21 N.J.R. 3585-3688, New Jersey Register, Volume 21, 
Number 22 (November 20, 1989). 
D 
22 N.J.R. 1011-1182, New Jersey Register, Volume 22, 
Number 7 (April 2, 1990). 
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 
 
Executed on January 11, 2022  
 
 
s/ Julio C. Gomez  
 
Julio C. Gomez 
Case 3:21-cv-15333-ZNQ-TJB   Document 42-1   Filed 01/11/22   Page 2 of 2 PageID: 672

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.njd.480171.42.1.pdf
Size
168,944 bytes
SHA-256
655f8b4727ef6461d841b19363f6ccfcd32a24798811efe4711008ce4ff6c1ef
Our copy
gov.uscourts.njd.480171.42.1.pdf
Original
archive.org
  1. Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgerssame docket · 2022-01-11
  2. Exhibit, Doc. 42-4 — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgerssame docket · 2022-01-11
  3. Rutgers Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgers (D.N.J.)same docket · 2022-01-31
  4. Rutgers Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgers (D.N.J.)same docket · 2021-11-19
  5. Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Compelsame docket · 2021-11-01
  6. Supplemental Authority Letter — NJ PBA v. Murphy — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgerssame docket · 2022-02-14
  7. NJ PBA v. Murphy — Slip Opinion (Exhibit to Supplemental Authority) — Children's Health Defense, Inc. v. Rutgers (D.N.J.)same case · 2022-02-14
  8. Letter Order — Doe Plaintiffs Must Disclose Identities — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgers (D.N.J.)same case · 2022-04-12
  9. Plaintiffs' Opposition to Compel Doe Disclosure — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgerssame case · 2021-10-18
  10. Supplemental Authority Letter — Goe v. Children's Health Defense — CHD v. Rutgers (D.N.J.)same case · 2022-08-02
  11. Stipulation and Order — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgerssame case · 2021-10-12
  12. Plaintiffs' Response to Goe Supplemental Authority — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgers (D.N.J.)same case · 2022-08-04
  13. Motion to Compel Doe Plaintiffs to Identify Themselves — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgers (D.N.J.)same case · 2021-10-08
  14. Plaintiffs' Supplemental Authority — CDC Guidance and EO 302 — Children's Health Defense v. Rutgerssame case · 2022-08-16
  15. in support of Rutgers’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 39), Isame docket · 2022-08-02

Part of: Children's Health Defense, Inc. v. Rutgers · U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey · Other pandemic litigation · Suits against governments and agencies · Exhibits and declarations · 2022 · Court filings

Back to top