Court filing
Motion for Preliminary Injunction — Changizi v. HHS
Filed March 29, 2022 in Changizi v. HHS; one of 18 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2022-03-29 |
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
COLUMBUS DIVISION
MARK CHANGIZI,
)
MICHAEL P. SENGER,
)
DANIEL KOTZIN,
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
Civil Action No.: 2:22-cv-01776
)
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
)
HUMAN SERVICES;
)
VIVEK MURTHY, United States
)
MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY
Surgeon General in his
)
INJUNCTION
official capacity, and
)
XAVIER BECERRA,
)
Secretary of the Department
)
of Health and Human Services
)
in his official capacity,
)
)
Defendants.
)
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
COME NOW Plaintiffs Mark Changizi, Michael P. Senger, and Daniel P. Kotzin. Pursuant
to Rule 65(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs move for a Preliminary Injunction
against Defendants: the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), United States Surgeon
General Vivek Murthy, and Secretary of HHS Xavier Becerra (collectively, “Defendants”).
Plaintiffs ask this Court to preliminarily enjoin Defendants from continuing to demand that
technology companies censor and ban users who articulate views that depart from the
Government’s messaging on COVID-19, to threaten them with adverse action if they do not
comply, and to retract the March 3, 2022 Request for Information (RFI).
As explained more thoroughly in Plaintiffs’ Complaint and the Memorandum in support
of this Motion, time is of the essence and Plaintiffs will suffer irreparable harm without urgent,
emergency injunctive relief from this Court. Respectfully, Plaintiffs ask this Court to grant
expedited relief on the papers and/or hold a hearing on Plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief as
soon as practicable. Plaintiffs respectfully request oral argument because of the complexities and
importance of the issues in this case.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant the foregoing Motion
and enter the proposed Preliminary Injunction.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Angela Lavin
Angela M. Lavin (0069604)
Jay R. Carson (0068526)
Local Counsel
WEGMANHESSLER
6055 Rockside Woods Boulevard North
Suite 200
Cleveland, Ohio 44131
Telephone: (216) 642-3342
Facsimile: (216) 642-8826
AMlavin@wegmanlaw.com
/s/Jenin Younes
Jenin Younes*
Litigation Counsel
NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE
1225 19th Street NW, Suite 450
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: (202) 869-5210
Facsimile: (202) 869-5238
jenin.younes@ncla.legal
Admitted pro hac vice
* Admitted only in New York. DC practice
limited to matters and proceedings before
United States courts and agencies. Practicing
under members of the District of Columbia
Bar.
Attorneys for PlaintiffsFile and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.ohsd.267163.9.0.pdf
- Size
- 124,556 bytes
- SHA-256
- e574b2f1ee44127810de46c3ed61b0e45bf592b754df75f92fa3b5e3bbede069
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.ohsd.267163.9.0.pdf
- Original
- archive.org