Court filing
Stipulation of Dismissal (Settlement) — Apter v. HHS
Summary
A stipulation of dismissal filed March 21, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, No. 3:22-cv-00184, Document 74. Plaintiffs Robert L. Apter, Mary Talley Bowden and Paul E. Marik and the defendants, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the FDA, stipulate to dismissal with prejudice of all claims because the parties have reached a settlement. Within 21 calendar days, the defendants agree to retire the FDA Consumer Update entitled Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19 and to delete social media posts from August 21, 2021 and April 26, 2022. The stipulation states that it is not an admission of any issue of fact or law, wrongdoing or liability by any party.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Filed March 21, 2024 in Apter v. Department of Health and Human Services; one of 69 filings from this case.
Record facts
| Court | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Galveston Division) |
|---|---|
| Filed | 2024-03-21 |
Cite this document
“Stipulation of Dismissal (Settlement) — Apter v. HHS.”
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Galveston Division), No. 3:22-cv-00184, Doc. 74, filed 2024-03-21. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/court-filings/apter-v-hhs/2024-03-21-stipulation-of-dismissal/
, SHA-256 d3b1490c0e0d63e64054f9f308d0e02a0c558baf5ab895ff7eea26a4ba08ac11.Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION MARY TALLEY BOWDEN, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:22-cv-184 JUDGE JEFFREY V. BROWN STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiffs Robert L. Apter; Mary Talley Bowden; and Paul E. Marik,1 and Defendants U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services; U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA); and Robert M. Califf, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of all claims in the above- captioned case because the parties have reached a settlement. In exchange for Plaintiffs’ agreement to dismiss all claims in this case, Defendants agree to, within 21 calendar days: 1 Dr. Apter and Dr. Marik were dismissed from this case on February 5, 2024, ECF No. 66, but join in this Stipulation of Dismissal. Case 3:22-cv-00184 Document 74 Filed on 03/21/24 in TXSD Page 1 of 3 2 Retire FDA’s Consumer Update entitled, Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19, originally posted on March 5, 2021, and revised on September 7, 2021 (ECF No. 12, Ex. 1), while retaining the right to post a revised Consumer Update. Delete and not republish (1) FDA’s Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook posts from August 21, 2021 (ECF No. 12, Exs. 4, 5), that read, “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”; (2) FDA’s Instagram post from August 21, 2021 (ECF No. 12, Ex. 6), that reads, “You are not a horse. Stop it with the #ivermectin. It’s not authorized for treating #COVID.”; (3) FDA’s Twitter post from April 26, 2022 (ECF No. 12, Ex. 7), that reads, “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.”; and (4) all other social media posts on FDA accounts that link to Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19 (ECF No. 12, Ex. 1). FDA has already retired the Frequently Asked Questions (ECF No. 12, Exs. 2, 3) at issue in this case. All materials will be archived, as required by federal law. Neither this Stipulation of Dismissal nor the actions described herein shall constitute an admission or evidence of any issue of fact or law, wrongdoing, misconduct, or liability on the part of any party to this litigation. March 21, 2024 Case 3:22-cv-00184 Document 74 Filed on 03/21/24 in TXSD Page 2 of 3 3 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jared M. Kelson R. Trent McCotter So. Dist. No. 3712529 Texas Bar No. 24134174 Michael Buschbacher (pro hac vice) D.C. Bar No. 1048432 Jared M. Kelson (pro hac vice) Attorney-In-Charge D.C. Bar No. 241393 Laura B. Ruppalt So. Dist. No. 3869876 V.A. Bar No. 97202 Boyden Gray PLLC 801 17th St NW, Suite 350 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 706-5488 tmccotter@boydengray.com jkelson@boydengray.com Counsel for Plaintiffs /s/ Isaac C. Belfer Isaac C. Belfer Attorney-In-Charge D.C. Bar No. 1014909 Oliver McDonald Of Counsel N.Y. Bar No. 5416789 Trial Attorneys Consumer Protection Branch Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice PO Box 386 Washington, DC 20044-0386 (202) 305-7134 (Belfer) (202) 305-0168 (McDonald) (202) 514-8742 (fax) Isaac.C.Belfer@usdoj.gov Oliver.J.McDonald@usdoj.gov Counsel for Defendants Case 3:22-cv-00184 Document 74 Filed on 03/21/24 in TXSD Page 3 of 3
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.txsd.1875135.74.0.pdf
- Size
- 129,836 bytes
- SHA-256
- d3b1490c0e0d63e64054f9f308d0e02a0c558baf5ab895ff7eea26a4ba08ac11
- Original
- archive.org