Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Sources Local copies Archived copy

The Archive · Sources · Archived copy

Archived copy: Womply, FTC v. | Federal Trade Commission

This is an archived copy of a page from www.ftc.gov, kept for the record so that a citation on this site still has its source if the page changes or disappears. Pandemic Darlings did not write it.

Original address: https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/womply-ftc-v. Copy made 19 September 2026.

Forms, sign-in fields, buttons, scripts, images and embedded frames from the original are not reproduced here. Links that went through a redirect or a sign-in page are shown as plain text. All local copies of cited sources.

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Main Menu Mega

Enter Search Term(s):

Looking for legal documents or records? Search the Legal Library instead.

Womply, FTC v.

Last Updated
Case Status
Pending
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. OTO ANALYTICS, INC., also d/b/a WOMPLY, a corporation, and TOBY SCAMMELL, individually and as an officer of OTO ANALYTICS, INC., Defendants.
Docket Number
3:24-cv-01661
Federal Court
Northern District of California

Case Summary

Womply and its CEO, Toby Scammell, have agreed to pay $26 million to settle FTC charges they preyed on small businesses in desperate need of PPP funding. The FTC’s complaint alleges they widely advertised that small businesses – particularly one-person businesses like gig workers – could successfully get PPP funding when they applied through Womply. The complaint charges, however, that more than 60 percent of Womply applications never resulted in funding.

In addition, according to the complaint, Womply and Scammell advertised that their automated processes and good customer service would help small businesses secure PPP loans fast. In fact, applicants regularly faced significant issues that slowed down or fully hindered their applications and were often unable to receive customer service assistance they were promised, according to the complaint.

Return to top

Main navigation

Back to top