Brandon Joe Williams — Case 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK, Document 27-2
Summary
A [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss 11/8/24 (DCKT #8) and to Vacate Void Order from 12/30/24 (DCKT #23), in Brandon Joe Williams v. United States Small Business Administration, No. 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Document 27-2 filed 01/10/25. The proposed order would state that the Court, having reviewed the motion and the accompanying affidavit, finds that it erred in the previous order and permits leave to respond in opposition to the defendant's motion to dismiss. It would also order that the order of 12/30/24 (DCKT #23) is void and vacated. The order is unsigned and undated, with the signature block naming the Honorable R. Gary Klausner, United States District Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Issuer
- SBA materials
- Document type
- Order
- Case
- Williams Sba Eidl Docket 69344443 Doc 27 Att 2 Id 426802056 Proposed Order
Cite this document
“Brandon Joe Williams — Case 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK, Document 27-2.”
Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/williams-sba-eidl-docket-69344443-doc-27-att-2-id-426802056-proposed-order/
, SHA-256 2fad389f6bb308cc89044f342e03f3ca37037321035c8b85b1a07c4f302328f3.Full text
Case 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK Document 27-2 Filed 01/10/25 Page 1 of 1 Page ID
#:212
Brandon Joe Williams
747-273-0799
brandon@williamsandwilliamslawfirm.com
PO Box 1962
Glendale, CA 91209
Attorney-in-fact for Plaintiff
BRANDON JOE WILLIAMS®
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRANDON JOE WILLIAMS®, No. 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
v.
TO FILE A RESPONSE IN
UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
ADMINISTRATION, DISMISS 11/8/24 (DCKT #8) AND TO
VACATE VOID ORDER FROM
Defendant. 12/30/24 (DCKT #23)
Honorable R. Gary Klausner
United States District Judge
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD
Having reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File ea Response in Opposition to
Motion to Dismiss 11/8/24 (DCKT #8) and to Vacate Void Order from 12/30/24 (DCKT #23), the
accompanying affidavit, and the arguments presented, the Court finds that it erred in the previous order
and hereby permits leave to respond in opposition to the defendant’s motion to dismiss. It is
acknowledged that any response from the defendant to the affidavit presented must be in affidavit form.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is GRANTED. The Order to Dismiss
this Case from 12/30/24 (DCKT #23) has been void and vacated and the response in opposition (with
attached affidavit) to the Motion to Dismiss 11/8/24 (DCKT #8) has been processed and is now ready
for the defense to address.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: ________________ BY: _____________________________
Honorable R. Gary Klausner
United States District Judge
File and source
- File
- williams_sba_eidl__docket-69344443__doc-27_att-2__id-426802056__Proposed_Order.pdf
- Size
- 78,469 bytes
- SHA-256
- 2fad389f6bb308cc89044f342e03f3ca37037321035c8b85b1a07c4f302328f3
- Original
- storage.courtlistener.com