[Proposed] Order on Leave to Respond and to Vacate Order
Summary
A [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss 11/8/24 (DCKT #8) and to Vacate Void Order from 12/30/24 (DCKT #23), in Brandon Joe Williams v. United States Small Business Administration, No. 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK, Document 25-2, filed 01/06/25, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The proposed order would grant leave to respond in opposition to the defendant's motion to dismiss and would state that the 12/30/24 order to dismiss the case is void and vacated. The order carries date and signature lines for Honorable R. Gary Klausner, United States District Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Issuer
- SBA materials
- Document type
- Order
- Case
- Williams Sba Eidl Docket 69344443 Doc 25 Att 2 Id 426306328 Proposed Order
Cite this document
“[Proposed] Order on Leave to Respond and to Vacate Order.”
Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/williams-sba-eidl-docket-69344443-doc-25-att-2-id-426306328-proposed-order/
, SHA-256 f174502b00b8fe1d38403d1be87b98af5eb36f448f57ed57be352a5578faa63c.Full text
Case 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK Document 25-2 Filed 01/06/25 Page 1 of 1 Page ID
#:197
Brandon Joe Williams
747-273-0799
brandon@williamsandwilliamslawfirm.com
PO Box 1962
Glendale, CA 91209
Attorney-in-fact for Plaintiff
BRANDON JOE WILLIAMS®
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRANDON JOE WILLIAMS®, No. 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
v.
TO FILE A RESPONSE IN
UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
ADMINISTRATION, DISMISS 11/8/24 (DCKT #8) AND TO
VACATE VOID ORDER FROM
Defendant. 12/30/24 (DCKT #23)
Honorable R. Gary Klausner
United States District Judge
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD
Having reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File ea Response in Opposition to
Motion to Dismiss 11/8/24 (DCKT #8) and to Vacate Void Order from 12/30/24 (DCKT #23), the
accompanying affidavit, and the arguments presented, the Court finds that it erred in the previous order
and hereby permits leave to respond in opposition to the defendant’s motion to dismiss. It is
acknowledged that any response from the defendant to the affidavit presented must be in affidavit form.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is GRANTED. The Order to Dismiss
this Case from 12/30/24 (DCKT #23) has been void and vacated and the response in opposition (with
attached affidavit) to the Motion to Dismiss 11/8/24 (DCKT #8) has been processed and is now ready
for the defense to address.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: ________________ BY: _____________________________
Honorable R. Gary Klausner
United States District Judge
File and source
- File
- williams_sba_eidl__docket-69344443__doc-25_att-2__id-426306328__Proposed_Order.pdf
- Size
- 78,728 bytes
- SHA-256
- f174502b00b8fe1d38403d1be87b98af5eb36f448f57ed57be352a5578faa63c
- Original
- storage.courtlistener.com