Waiver of Rights Pursuant to Speedy Trial Act of 1974 and Order — United States of America v. James Richard Stote, Case No. 1:20MJ4215 (Dkt. 21, N.D. Ohio)
Summary
In this waiver and order in United States of America v. James Richard Stote, Case No. 1:20MJ4215 (N.D. Ohio), the parties' attorneys and Stote waived, with the consent of the court, the right to have the case presented to a grand jury within thirty (30) days under Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(b) and 3161(h), and agreed to extend the time for presenting the matter to the grand jury until no later than September 10, 2021. The court found that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy presentation, because counsel for both sides need reasonable time for effective investigation, negotiation and preparation. Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg signed the order on 5/27/2021.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
Case: 1:20-mj-04215-JDG Doc #: 21 Filed: 05/27/21 1of1. PagelD #: 81 FILED 8:28 am May 27 2021 THERN DISTRICT OF OHIO * as i : FOR THE ws TERN DIVISION Northern District of Ohio — Cleveland UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO.: 1:20MJ4215 MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff, JONATHAN D. GREENBERG Vv. WAIVER OF RIGH SUANT Ti SPEEDY TRIAL ACT OF 1974 AND ORDER JAMES RICHARD STOTE, Defendant. We, the attorneys for the respective parties, and I, James Richard Stote, the defendant, with the consent of the Court, hereby waive any of the rights to have this case presented to a Grand Jury within thirty (30) days pursuant to the provisions of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(b) and 3161(h), including all excludable periods. It is further agreed that the time for presenting this matter to the Grand Jury is extended until no later than September 10, 2021, As grounds for continuance, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a speedy presentation of the case to the Grand Jury because failure to grant such a continuance would deny counsel for both sides the reasonable time necessary for effective investigation, negotiation, and preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. am D. O’Shea Assistant U.S. Attorney David } Magitligan, Esq. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Jonathan D. Greenberg 5/27/2021 JONATHAN D. GREENBERG United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.ohnd.266941.21.0.pdf
- Size
- 238,762 bytes
- SHA-256
- e19704f998a1dc1a851b7e72cb542b58617eadd3df04cd18f25258544ab5d713
- Original
- archive.org