Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents USA v. Reis et al, Texas Northern District Court, 4:24-cr-00287Search ⌕

USA v. Reis et al, Texas Northern District Court, 4:24-cr-00287

Summary

A docket for USA v. Reis et al, case 4:24-cr-00287, in the Texas Northern District Court, filed Nov 14, 2024, with Nathan Reis (1) and Stephanie Hockridge (2) as defendants and USA as plaintiff. The first entry, Thursday, November 14, 2024, is a sealed indictment with forfeiture notice as to both, listing count(s) 1, 2-5. Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor's Nov 14, 2025 order denied the defendants' Joint Motion to Compel Discovery, and a Nov 20, 2025 order denied Hockridge's Motion for New Trial Based on Newly Disclosed Brady Evidence. A Feb 10, 2026 order denied requests to transfer the writ proceedings to the District of Puerto Rico, and an Apr 29, 2026 order granted the Government's Cross-Motion for Final Order of Garnishment.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived web capture. Preserved source — captured from www.pacermonitor.com; archived 2026-06-25.

Cite this document

“USA v. Reis et al, Texas Northern District Court, 4:24-cr-00287.” Original at www.pacermonitor.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/usa-v-reis-et-al-735f9f273c5f0450-8e780ffbc1/, SHA-256 3bc49a30632383f7cc6121a2f99c9736e839144b4ef144c7bd41b4276ee553e6.

Full text

USA v. Reis et al

Texas Northern District Court
Case #: | 4:24-cr-00287
Case Filed: | Nov 14, 2024
Terminated: | Dec 18, 2025
Last checked: Sunday Jul 20, 2025 10:23 PM CDT
Defendant Stephanie Hockridge (2) | Represented By Mark A Srere Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info Daniel Nester Bryan Cave LLP contact info Kevin H Jenco Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner contact info Richard Finneran Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP contact info Christopher W Lewis Chris Lewis & Associates, PC contact info Gregg Gallian Gallian Firm contact info
Defendant Nathan Reis (1) | Represented By Blake C. Goebel Boies Schiller Flexner LLP contact info Kevin Andrew Chambers Latham & Watkins LLP contact info Matthew S Salerno Latham & Watkins contact info Michael Clemente Latham & Watkins contact info Michael P Heiskell Johnson Vaughn & Heiskell contact info
Plaintiff USA | Represented By Justin C Beck-DOJ Us Attorney'S Office contact info Elizabeth Carr Doj-Crm contact info Lindita V Ciko Torza Doj-Crm contact info Philip Berkeley Trout Doj-Crm contact info Matthew Robert Weybrecht-DOJ Us Department Of Justice contact info Jeffrey Ryan McLaren-DOJ Doj-Usao contact info Steven Scott Michaels-DOJ Us Department Of Justice contact info
GPO Nov 14 2025 Memorandum Opinion and Order as to Nathan Reis, Stephanie Hockridge: For the foregoing reasons Defendants' Joint Motion to Compel Discovery is DENIED. Additionally, Defendants' Request for Hearing on Defendant's Joint Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 330) is DENIED as moot. The parties' motions to file Docs. 329, 332, and 335 and the accompanying attachments under seal are GRANTED. (Ordered by Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor on 11/14/2025) (wxc) Memorandum Opinion and Order as to Nathan Reis, Stephanie Hockridge: For the foregoing reasons Defendants' Joint Motion to Compel Discovery is DENIED. Additionally, Defendants' Request for Hearing on Defendant's Joint Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 330) is DENIED as moot. The parties' motions to file Docs. 329, 332, and 335 and the accompanying attachments under seal are GRANTED. (Ordered by Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor on 11/14/2025) (wxc)
GPO Nov 20 2025 Memorandum Opinion and Order as to Stephanie Hockridge: Before the Court are Defendant Stephanie Hockridge's Motion for New Trial Based on Newly Disclosed Brady Evidence (Doc. 341) and Memorandum in Support (Doc. 342); and the Government's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for a New Trial (Doc 346). Having reviewed the evidence presented at trial, the briefing and applicable law, the Court finds that the newly disclosed evidence was not suppressed nor material for Brady purposes. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion is DENIED. Defendant's Motion for New Trial under Brady is DENIED. Additionally, Defendants' Request for Hearing on the Motion (Doc. 350) is DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor on 11/20/2025) (wxc)
GPO Feb 10 2026 Memorandum Opinion and Order as to Nathan Reis, Stephanie Hockridge: Defendants' Requests for Transfer of the writ proceedings to the District of Puerto Rico (ECF Nos. 403, 404) are hereby DENIED. A ruling on Defendants' requests for a hearing on the writs in this Court is reserved pending amendment of the Requests. Defendants may amend their requests for a hearing no later than February 17, 2026. (Ordered by Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor on 2/10/2026) (wxc) Memorandum Opinion and Order as to Nathan Reis, Stephanie Hockridge: Defendants' Requests for Transfer of the writ proceedings to the District of Puerto Rico (ECF Nos. 403, 404) are hereby DENIED. A ruling on Defendants' requests for a hearing on the writs in this Court is reserved pending amendment of the Requests. Defendants may amend their requests for a hearing no later than February 17, 2026. (Ordered by Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor on 2/10/2026) (wxc)
GPO Apr 29 2026 OPINION & ORDER as to Nathan Reis, Stephanie Hockridge: For the forgoing reasons, the Family Trustee's Petition to Modify the Writs of Garnishment (ECF No. 428) and Defendants' Claims for Exemption and Requests for Hearing (ECF Nos. 430, 431, 435) are DENIED. The Government's Cross-Motion for Final Order of Garnishment (ECF No. 433) is GRANTED. Any objection or argument not explicitly addressed herein would not have affected the Court's ruling and is overruled. The final order of garnishment will be docketed separately. (Ordered by Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor on 4/29/2026) (wxc)OPINION & ORDER as to Nathan Reis, Stephanie Hockridge: For the forgoing reasons, the Family Trustee's Petition to Modify the Writs of Garnishment (ECF No. 428) and Defendants' Claims for Exemption and Requests for Hearing (ECF Nos. 430, 431, 435) are DENIED. The Government's Cross-Motion for Final Order of Garnishment (ECF No. 433) is GRANTED. Any objection or argument not explicitly addressed herein would not have affected the Court's ruling and is overruled. The final order of garnishment will be docketed separately. (Ordered by Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor on 4/29/2026) (wxc)
Docket last updated: 5 hours ago
Thursday, November 14, 2024
3 | 3 15
 pgs SEALED INDICTMENT with Forfeiture Notice as to Nathan Reis (1) count(s) 1, 2-5, Stephanie Hockridge (2) count(s) 1, 2-5. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the[LINK:Judges Copy Requirements] and[LINK:Judge Specific Requirements] is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (sre)

Continue to Create Account

File and source

File
usa-v-reis-et-al_735f9f273c5f0450.html
Size
29,762 bytes
SHA-256
3bc49a30632383f7cc6121a2f99c9736e839144b4ef144c7bd41b4276ee553e6
Our copy
usa-v-reis-et-al_735f9f273c5f0450.html
Original
www.pacermonitor.com
Back to top