Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Trial Brief — United States v. Mustafa Ayoub Diab (Northern District of Ohio)

Trial Brief — United States v. Mustafa Ayoub Diab (Northern District of Ohio)

Summary

Mustafa Ayoub Diab's Trial Brief in United States of America v. Mustafa Ayoub Diab, Case No. 5:23-cr-350, before Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, for a trial scheduled to commence March 18, 2025. The defendant states that he is accused of conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, theft of government funds, aggravated identity theft and conspiracy to launder monetary instruments from June 2020 through August 2021, and denies the allegations. The brief quotes the statutes charged, 18 U.S.C. § 1349, § 1343, § 1344, § 641, § 1028A(a)(1) and (c) and § 1956(h), and notes a pending motion in limine (Dkt. 75). It proposes a deliberate-ignorance jury instruction and gives an estimated trial length of eight days.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Trial Brief — United States v. Mustafa Ayoub Diab (Northern District of Ohio).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/united-states-v-diab-ohnd-5-23-cr-00350-doc76-gov-uscourts-ohnd-298607-a5f1b1381e/, SHA-256 29f61a806636e847f8749a3161d034aa937b297e00f56ff73734fbd4983e3a24.

Full text

                      IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                       FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
                                EASTERN DIVISION

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                     :   CASE NO. 5:23-cr-350
                                               :
               Plaintiff,                      :
                                               :   JUDGE SOLOMON OLIVER, JR.
        vs.                                    :
                                               :
 MUSTAFA AYOUB DIAB,                           :   MUSTAFA AYOUB DIAB’S
                                               :   TRIAL BRIEF
               Defendant.                      :


       Defendant Mustafa Ayoub Diab, through undersigned counsel, respectfully submits the

following Trial Brief for his trial schedule to commence March 18, 2025.

                                                          Respectfully submitted,

                                                          STEPHEN C. NEWMAN
                                                          Federal Public Defender
                                                          Ohio Bar: 0051928

                                                           /s/ Timothy C. Ivey
                                                          TIMOTHY C. IVEY
                                                          Assistant Federal Public Defender
                                                          Senior Litigator
                                                          Ohio Bar: 0039246
                                                          Akron Centre Plaza
                                                          50 S. Main Street, Ste. 700
                                                          Akron, OH 44308
                                                          P: 330-375-5739 F: 330-375-5738
                                                          E-mail: Timothy_Ivey@fd.org


                                                           /s/ Christian Grostic
                                                          CHRISTIAN GROSTIC
                                                          Assistant Federal Public Defender
                                                          Ohio Bar: 0084734
                                                          1660 West Second Street, Suite #750

    Cleveland, OH 44113
    (216) 522-4856 Fax: (216)522-4321
    E-mail: Christian_Grostic@fd.org




2

                                         TRIAL BRIEF

I.     Introduction

       Defendant, Mustafa Ayoub Diab, is accused of conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud,

wire fraud, bank fraud, theft of government funds, aggravated identity theft, and conspiracy to

launder monetary instruments, from June 2020 through August 2021. Mr. Diab denies the

allegations.

II.    Elements of the Offenses

       Mr. Diab is charged in Count 1 of the indictment as committing conspiracy to commit wire

fraud and bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1349, which provides:

       Any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense under this chapter
       shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense, the
       commission of which was the object of the attempt or conspiracy.

       Mr. Diab is also charged in Counts 2 through 13 with wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 1343, which provides:

        Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud,
       or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses,
       representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire,
       radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings,
       signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or
       artifice

       Mr. Diab is also charged in Counts 13 through 24 with bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 1344, which provides:

       Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice-
       (1) to defraud a financial institution; or
       (2) to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property
       owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of
       false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;

       Mr. Diab is also charged in Counts 25 through 36 with theft of government funds, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641, which provides:

                                                 3

       Whoever embezzles, steals, purloins, or knowingly converts to his use or the use of
       another, or without authority, sells, conveys or disposes of any record, voucher,
       money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency
       thereof, or any property made or being made under contract for the United States
       or any department or agency thereof; or

       Whoever receives, conceals, or retains the same with intent to convert it to his use
       or gain, knowing it to have been embezzled, stolen, purloined or converted

       Mr. Diab is also charged in Counts 37 through 46 with aggravated identity theft, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1) and (c), which provides:

       Whoever, during and in relation to any felony violation enumerated in subsection
       (c), knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of
       identification of another person

       (1) section 641
       ...
       (5) any provision contained in chapter 63 (relating to mail, bank, and wire fraud)

       Mr. Diab is also charged in Counts 47 with conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), which provides:

       Any person who conspires to commit [Whoever, knowing that the property
       involved in a financial transaction represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful
       activity, conducts or attempts to conduct such a financial transaction which in fact
       involves the proceeds of specified unlawful activity knowing that the transaction is
       designed in whole or in part to conceal or disguise the nature, the location, the
       source, the ownership, or the control of the proceeds of specified unlawful activity]

III.   Reasonably Anticipated Evidentiary Issues

       Pending before the Court is Mr. Diab’s Motion in Limine to exclude references to specific

acts and to statements made by potential witnesses not called by the government to testify. (Dkt.

75: Motion in Limine). Any details of his prior convictions should not be disclosed to the jury.

The details of the nature of his prior convictions should be excluded because the risk of unfair

prejudice substantially outweighs the probative value of the record of conviction. See Old Chief v.

United States, 519 U.S. 172 (1997). Statements from witnesses not called by the government



                                                4

should be excluded based on the requirements of the Confrontation Clause and the Rules of

Evidence. See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004); Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813

(2006).

          The defense anticipates the government may try to prove Mr. Diab is guilty beyond a

reasonable doubt by trying to prove that he was deliberately ignorant or willfully blind. In

anticipation of this, the defense has requested a specific jury instruction as part of the joint

submission of proposed jury instructions. The proposed instruction is:

          1. Next, I want to explain something about proving a defendant’s knowledge.
          2. In deciding whether [the defendant] acted knowingly, you may infer that
          [defendant] had knowledge of a fact if you find that he deliberately closed his eyes
          to a fact that otherwise would have been obvious to him. In order to prove
          knowledge, you must prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt.
          3. First, [the defendant] must have subjectively believed there is a high probability
          a fact exists.
          4. Second, [the defendant] must take deliberate actions to avoid learning that fact.

          See Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A., 563 U.S. 754 (2011); cf. Sixth Circuit

Pattern Jury Instructions 2.09. Following Global-Tech, the proposed jury instruction is a correct

statement of law and should be given to the jury in the instant case.

IV.       Estimated Length of Trial

          The estimated length of this trial is eight days.

                                                                Respectfully submitted,

                                                                STEPHEN C. NEWMAN
                                                                Federal Public Defender
                                                                Ohio Bar: 0051928

                                                                /s/ Timothy C. Ivey
                                                                TIMOTHY C. IVEY


                                                    5

    Assistant Federal Public Defender
    Senior Litigator
    Ohio Bar: 0039246
    Akron Centre Plaza
    50 S. Main Street, Ste. 700
    Akron, OH 44308
    P: 330-375-5739 F: 330-375-5738
    E-mail: Timothy_Ivey@fd.org


     /s/ Christian Grostic
    CHRISTIAN GROSTIC
    Assistant Federal Public Defender
    Ohio Bar: 0084734
    1660 West Second Street, Suite #750
    Cleveland, OH 44113
    (216) 522-4856 Fax: (216)522-4321
    E-mail: Christian_Grostic@fd.org




6

File and source

File
United_States_v._Diab__ohnd_5-23-cr-00350__doc76__gov.uscourts.ohnd.298607.76.0.pdf
Size
159,047 bytes
SHA-256
29f61a806636e847f8749a3161d034aa937b297e00f56ff73734fbd4983e3a24
Our copy
United_States_v._Diab__ohnd_5-23-cr-00350__doc76__gov.uscourts.ohnd.298607.76.0.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top