Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home United States v. Campbell, S.D. Ala. No. 1:21-cr-161, Doc. 1: Indictment (Sept. 29, 2021)Search ⌕

United States v. Campbell, S.D. Ala. No. 1:21-cr-161, Doc. 1: Indictment (Sept. 29, 2021)

Summary

Grand jury indictment marked "UNDER SEAL" in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, filed September 29, 2021, charging Corine Campbell with conspiracy to commit wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1349) and wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) over Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans. It alleges that from about May 1, 2020 to about September 20, 2021 Campbell and co-conspirators submitted false PPP loan applications to Prestamos CDFI, of Phoenix, Arizona, which worked with its information technology partner Blue Acorn. The applications claimed businesses with gross revenues of more than $105,000.00 in Tax Year 2019 and caused transfers of $20,830.00 into Navy Federal Credit Union accounts, from which funds were moved to Campbell's accounts. The indictment also seeks forfeiture.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“United States v. Campbell, S.D. Ala. No. 1:21-cr-161, Doc. 1: Indictment (Sept. 29, 2021).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/united-states-v-campbell-s-d-ala-no-1-21-cr-161-doc-1-indictment-sept-066a1dada9/, SHA-256 db020091a906955e0435fd25328602db6693d0a5a0b6ea75f53eaffaa95da27c.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

ON

Case 1:21-cr-00161-JB Document1 Filed 09/29/21 Page1lof9 PagelD#: 1

DAG/KSH
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION FILED IN OPEN COURT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * CRIM. NO.2(-OOll-Th SEP 29 2621
* USAO NO. 21R00503
V. * CHARLES R. DIARD, JR.
oo VIOLATIONS: 18 U.S.C. § 1349 CLERK
CORINE CAMPBELL * 18 U.S.C. § 1343
UNDER SEAL
INDICTMENT
The Grand Jury charges:
Introduction

At all times material to this Indictment:

1. The SBA was created in 1953 as an independent agency of the executive branch of the
federal government to aid, counsel, assist, and protect the interests of small businesses and to maintain
and strengthen the overall economy of the United States. The SBA maintained and strengthened the
nation’s economy by, among other activities, enabling the establishment and viability of small
businesses and by assisting in the economic recovery of communities after disasters. In executing
its mission, the SBA provided direct loans to small businesses and those affected by disasters.

2. On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security
(“CARES”) Act was enacted to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of
Americans suffering adverse economic consequences caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The
CARES Act established several new temporary programs and provided for expansion of others,
including programs created and administered by the SBA.

3. As part of this effort, the SBA enabled and provided for loans through banks, credit

1
SEALED
Case 1:21-cr-00161-JB Document1 Filed 09/29/21 Page2of9 PagelD#: 2

unions, and other lenders. These loans had government backed guarantees. One source of relief
provided by the CARES Act was the authorization of up to $349 billion in forgivable loans to
small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses, through a program referred to as the
Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). Congress has since increased the authorization amount for
PPP loans to over $813 billion. The PPP required that the small businesses must have been in
operation on or before February 15, 2020, maintained employees, and realized monthly payroll
costs.

4. To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business must submit a PPP loan application,
which is signed by an authorized representative of the business. The PPP loan application requires
the business (through its authorized representative) to acknowledge the program rules and make
certain affirmative certifications in order to be eligible to obtain the PPP loan. In the PPP loan
application, the small business (through its authorized representative) must state, among other
things, its: (a) average monthly payroll expenses; and (b) number of employees. These figures are
used to calculate the amount of money the small business is eligible to receive under the PPP. In
addition, businesses applying for a PPP loan must provide documentation showing their payroll
expenses.

5. A PPP loan application must be processed by an SBA authorized participating
lender. If a PPP loan application is approved, the participating lender funds the PPP loan using its
own monies, which are 100% guaranteed by the SBA. Data from the application, including
information about the borrower, the total amount of the loan, and the listed number of employees,
is transmitted by the lender to the SBA while processing the loan.

6. PPP loan proceeds must be used by the business on certain permissible expenses—

SEALED
Case 1:21-cr-00161-JB Document1 Filed 09/29/21 Page3o0f9 PagelD#: 3

payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities. The PPP allows the interest and principal
on the PPP loan to be entirely forgiven if the business spends the loan proceeds on these expense
items within a designated period of time after receiving the proceeds and uses a certain amount of
the PPP loan proceeds on payroll expenses.

7. Prestamos CDFI, of Phoenix, Arizona, is an approved PPP lender. In conjunction
with the SBA, Prestamos CDFI works jointly with Blue Acorn, its information technology partner,
to ingest, evaluate, process, and approve PPP applications. Blue Acorn maintains computer
servers in Virginia which ingested this PPP application.

8. Prestamos CDFI maintains its operational lending account at PNC Bank, which is
headquartered in Pennsylvania. Navy Federal Credit Union is headquartered in Vienna, Virginia.
Both PNC Bank and Navy Federal Credit Union are financial institutions as defined by 18 U.S.C.
§ 20.

Count One

Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349

9. The factual allegations of paragraphs 1 through 8 of this Indictment are re-alleged
for Count 1 as though fully set forth therein.

The Conspiracy

10. From in or about May 1, 2020, and continuing to in or about September 20, 2021,
the exact dates being unknown, within Mobile County in the Southern District of Alabama, and
elsewhere, the defendant

CORINE CAMPBELL,

did knowingly combine, conspire, and agree with others known and unknown to the Grand Jury,

SEALED
Case 1:21-cr-00161-JB Document1 Filed 09/29/21 Page4of9 PagelD#: 4

to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.

Manner and Means

11. ‘It was a part of the conspiracy that the defendant CORINE CAMPBELL, and her
co-conspirators, both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, would and did submit, and cause to
be submitted, false and fraudulent PPP loan applications to the Prestamos CDFI and the SBA to
obtain money for CAMPBELL’S personal use and for the personal use of her co-conspirators.

12. It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant CORINE CAMPBELL, and
her co-conspirators, both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, would and did falsely represent
on PPP loan applications that CAMPBELL’s co-conspirators owned businesses which had been
in operation since January 1, 2020 and had gross revenues of more than $105,000.00 and operating
costs of more than $24,000.00 during Tax Year 2019.

13. It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant CORINE CAMPBELL, and
her co-conspirators, both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, would and did cause Prestamos
CDFI to make electronic transfers of $20,830.00 into financial accounts at Navy Federal Credit
Union as a result of the false and fraudulent PPP loan application in co-conspirators’ names.

14. It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant CORINE CAMPBELL, and
her co-conspirators, both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, would and did cause electronic
transfers from certain co-conspirators’ financial accounts at Navy Federal Credit Union to transfer
sums of fraudently obtained PPP funds to CAMPBELL’S accounts.

All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.

SEALED
Case 1:21-cr-00161-JB Document1 Filed 09/29/21 Page5of9 PagelD#:5

Count Two
Wire Fraud
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343

15. The factual allegations in paragraphs 1 through 8 and 11 through 14 of this
Indictment are realleged as though fully set forth herein.

16. | From on or about April 1, 2021, and continuing to in or about August 2021, the
exact dates being unknown, within Mobile County in the Southern District of Alabama, and
elsewhere, defendant

CORINE CAMPBELL
aided and abetted by and by others both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, devised and
intended to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud the United States, Prestamos CDFI, the SBA,
and others, and to obtain money and property belonging to the United States, Prestamos CDFI, the
SBA, and others, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and

promises.

Purpose of the Scheme and Artifice

17. The purposes of the scheme and artifice are set out in Paragraphs 11 through 14 of
this Indictment. Paragraph 11 is hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein,
with the words “It was part of the scheme and artifice” replacing “It was part of the conspiracy.”
Paragraph 12 is hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein, with the words
“It was part of the scheme and artifice” replacing “It was part of the conspiracy.” Paragraph 13
is hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein, with the words “It was a further
part of the scheme and artifice” replacing “It was a further part of the conspiracy” at the start of

each paragraph.

SEALED
Case 1:21-cr-00161-JB Document1 Filed 09/29/21 Page6of9 PagelD#: 6

The Wire Communication

18. On or about April 15, 2021, in Mobile County in the Southern District of Alabama,

and elsewhere, defendant
CORINE CAMPBELL,

and abetted by Demetrius Richardson and Tyanna Latoya Earl, who are not named as defendants
herein, and by others both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, for the purpose of executing
the above-described scheme and artifice and attempting to do so, did cause to be transmitted in
interstate commerce, by means of a wire communication, certain signs and signals, that is, the
defendant CAMPBELL, aided and abetted by Richardson and Ear] and by others both known
and unknown to the Grand Jury, caused an interstate wire communication when a false and
fraudulent PPP loan application for Richardson was submitted to the Prestamos CDFI and the
SBA.

All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2.

Count Three

Wire Fraud
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343

19. The factual allegations in paragraphs 1 through 8 and 11 through 13 of this
Indictment are realleged as though fully set forth herein.
20. From on or about March 18, 2021, and continuing to in or about September 29,
2021, the exact dates being unknown, within Mobile County in the Southern District of Alabama,
and elsewhere, defendant
CORINE CAMPBELL,

aided and abetted by others both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, devised and intended to

SEALED
Case 1:21-cr-00161-JB Document1 Filed 09/29/21 Page 7of9 PagelD#: 7

devise a scheme and artifice to defraud the United States, Prestamos CDFI, the SBA, and others,
and to obtain money and property belonging to the United States, Prestamos CDFI, the SBA, and
others, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises.

Purpose of the Scheme and Artifice

21. The purposes of the scheme and artifice are set out in Paragraphs 11 through 13 of
this Indictment. Paragraph 11 is hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein,
with the words “It was part of the scheme and artifice” replacing “Jt was part of the conspiracy.”
Paragraph 12 is hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein, with the words
“It was part of the scheme and artifice” replacing “It was part of the conspiracy.” Paragraph 13
is hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein, with the words “It was a further
part of the scheme and artifice” replacing “It was a further part of the conspiracy” at the start of
each paragraph.

The Wire Communication

22. On or about March 25, 2021, in Mobile County in the Southern District of Alabama,

and elsewhere, defendant

CORINE CAMPBELL,
aided and abetted by Leroy Vidal Jackson, who is not maned as a defendant herein, and by others
both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, for the purpose of executing the above-described
scheme and artifice and attempting to do so, did cause to be transmitted in interstate commerce,
by means of a wire communication, certain signs and signals, that is, the defendant CAMPBELL,
aided and abetted by Jackson, and by others both known and unknown to the Grand Jury, caused

an interstate wire communication when a false and fraudulent PPP loan application for Jackson

SEALED
Case 1:21-cr-00161-JB Document1 Filed 09/29/21 Page8of9 PagelD#: 8

was submitted to the Prestamos CDFI and the SBA.

All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2.

Forfeiture Notice

Upon conviction of any of the violations of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343
Charged in Counts One, Two, and Three, the defendant CORINE CAMPBELL shall forfeit to
the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28,
United States Code, Section 2461(c), all property constituting or derived from proceeds traceable

to said violations, including but not limited to the following:

MONEY JUDGMENT: A sum of money in United States Currency of at least

$200,000.00 that the defendant obtained as a result of the offenses charged in Counts

One, Two and Three.

If, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant, any property subject to forfeiture:

a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person;

c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court;

d. has been substantially diminished in value; or

e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided without

difficulty;

the United States intends, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), as incorporated
by Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), to seek forfeiture of any other property of said

defendant up to the value of the forfeitable property.

SEALED
Case 1:21-cr-00161-JB Document1 Filed 09/29/21 Page9of9 PagelD#:9

A TRUE BILL

FOREMAN USITED STATES GRAND JURY
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SEAN P. COSTELLO
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

KASEE S. SIV |
Assistant United States Attorney
Deputy Chief, Criminal Division

DEBORAH A. GRIFFIN
Assistant Upited States Attorney

SBAN P. COSTELLO
Chief, Criminal Division SEPTEMBER 2021

SEALED


File and source

File
1-indictment.pdf
Size
2,447,513 bytes
SHA-256
db020091a906955e0435fd25328602db6693d0a5a0b6ea75f53eaffaa95da27c
Our copy
1-indictment.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top