Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents United States’s Proposed Jury Instructions — No. 5:22-cr-00100 (Dkt. 68, E.D. Ky.)

United States’s Proposed Jury Instructions — No. 5:22-cr-00100 (Dkt. 68, E.D. Ky.)

Summary

United States's Proposed Jury Instructions, Doc 68 in Criminal Action No. 5:22-CR-100-REW-MAS in the Eastern District of Kentucky, Central Division at Lexington, filed 02/21/24 in accordance with the Court's pretrial order at Docket Entry 17. The government submits, reserving the right to withdraw or supplement them, a list of Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions covering the introduction, jurors' duties, presumption of innocence, evidence, credibility of witnesses, on or about, inferring required mental state, other acts and statements of a defendant, and the deliberation and verdict instructions. The substantive instruction is Pattern Instruction 10.02 on wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. 1343, for Counts 1-12 against the two defendants, setting out the elements the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. A certificate of service is dated February 21, 2024.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“United States’s Proposed Jury Instructions — No. 5:22-cr-00100 (Dkt. 68, E.D. Ky.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/united-states-s-proposed-jury-instructions-no-5-22-cr-00100-dkt-68-e-d-cfccd9163e/, SHA-256 1b9bc7f8f98bd7a940d4628318c0d677427b00728cefe1818a2c43a8303599b7.

Full text

Case: 5:22-cr-00100-REW-MAS Doc #: 68 Filed: 02/21/24 Page: 1 of 6 - Page ID#: 261



                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
                               CENTRAL DIVISION
                                  LEXINGTON

 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:22-CR-100-REW-MAS

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                                                      PLAINTIFF


 V.            UNITED STATES’S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS


 KELLY HARRIS
 NEAL HARRIS                                                                 DEFENDANTS

                                        * * * * *

        In accordance with the Court’s pretrial order, Docket Entry 17, the United States,

 through counsel, submits the following proposed jury instructions. The United States

 respectfully reserves the right to withdraw or supplement instructions based on the

 evidence presented at the trial, as the Court permits.


                                                   Respectfully submitted,

                                                   CARLTON S. SHIER, IV
                                                   UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

                                            By:    /s/ Kate K. Smith
                                                   Kate K. Smith
                                                   Assistant United States Attorney
                                                   260 W. Vine Street, Suite 300
                                                   Lexington, Kentucky 40507-1612
                                                   (859) 685-4855
                                                   FAX (859) 233-2747
                                                   kate.smith@usdoj.gov




                                               1
Case: 5:22-cr-00100-REW-MAS Doc #: 68 Filed: 02/21/24 Page: 2 of 6 - Page ID#: 262



                             CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

       On February 21, 2024, I electronically filed this document through the ECF
 system, which will send the notice of electronic filing to counsel of record.

                                                /s/ Kate K. Smith
                                                Assistant United States Attorney




                                            2
Case: 5:22-cr-00100-REW-MAS Doc #: 68 Filed: 02/21/24 Page: 3 of 6 - Page ID#: 263




           Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 1.01
                                      Introduction
           Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 1.02
                                     Jurors’ Duties

           Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 1.03
            Presumption of Innocence, Burden of Proof, Reasonable Doubt

           Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 1.04
                                   Evidence Defined

           Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 1.05
                               Consideration of Evidence

           Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 1.06
                          Direct and Circumstantial Evidence

           Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 1.07
                                Credibility of Witnesses

           Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 1.08
                                 Number of Witnesses

           Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 1.09
                                  Lawyers’ Objections

           Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 2.01
                                      Introduction

           Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 2.04
                                      On or About

             Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 2.08
                           Inferring Required Mental State

             Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 7.13
                               Other Acts of Defendant

             Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction 7.20
                                Statement by Defendant



                                           3
Case: 5:22-cr-00100-REW-MAS Doc #: 68 Filed: 02/21/24 Page: 4 of 6 - Page ID#: 264



             Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 8.01
                                        Introduction

             Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 8.02
                         Experiments, Research, and Investigation

             Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 8.03
                                    Unanimous Verdict

             Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 8.04
                                     Duty to Deliberate

             Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 8.05
                                        Punishment

             Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 8.06
                                       Verdict Form

             Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 8.08
                     Verdict Limited to Charges Against this Defendant

             Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 8.09
                                   Court Has No Opinion

     Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 8.10 (if appropriate)
                                         Juror Notes

             Instruction No. __: Sixth Circuit Pattern Jury Instruction No. 10.02
                            10.02 Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343)

        Counts 1-12 of the indictment charge the defendants with wire fraud. For you to

 find the defendants guilty of wire fraud, you must find that the government has proved

 each and every one of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

        First, that the defendant knowingly participated in, devised, or intended to devise

 a scheme to defraud in order to deprive another of money or property.

        Second, that the scheme included a material misrepresentation or concealment of a

 material fact;

                                              4
Case: 5:22-cr-00100-REW-MAS Doc #: 68 Filed: 02/21/24 Page: 5 of 6 - Page ID#: 265



        Third, that the defendant had the intent to defraud; and

        Fourth, that the defendant used wire, radio or television communications and/or

 caused another to use wire, radio or television communications in interstate commerce in

 furtherance of the scheme.

        Now I will give you more detailed instructions on some of these terms.

 (A)    A “scheme to defraud” includes any plan or course of action by which someone

 intends to deprive another of money or property by means of false or fraudulent

 pretenses, representations, or promises.

 (B)    The term “false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises” means any

 false statements or assertions that concern a material aspect of the matter in question, that

 were either known to be untrue when made or made with reckless indifference to their

 truth. They include actual, direct false statements as well as half-truths and the knowing

 concealment of material facts.

 (C)    An act is “knowingly” done if done voluntarily and not because of mistake or

 some other innocent reason.

 (D)    A misrepresentation or concealment is “material” if it has a natural tendency to

 influence or is capable of influencing the decision of a person of ordinary prudence and

 comprehension.

 (E)    To act with “intent to defraud” means to act with an intent to deceive or cheat for

 the purpose of depriving another of money or property.




                                               5
Case: 5:22-cr-00100-REW-MAS Doc #: 68 Filed: 02/21/24 Page: 6 of 6 - Page ID#: 266



 (F)    To “cause” wire, radio or television communications to be used is to do an act

 with knowledge that the use of the communications will follow in the ordinary course of

 business or where such use can reasonably be foreseen.

 (G)    The term “interstate commerce” includes wire, radio or television communications

 which crossed a state line.

        It is not necessary that the government prove all of the details alleged concerning

 the precise nature and purpose of the scheme, that the material transmitted by wire, radio

 or television communications was itself false or fraudulent, that the alleged scheme

 actually succeeded in defrauding anyone, that the use of the wire, radio or television

 communications was intended as the specific or exclusive means of accomplishing the

 alleged fraud, that someone relied on the misrepresentation or false statement, or that the

 defendant obtained money or property for his own benefit.

        If you are convinced that the government has proved all of the elements, say so by

 returning a guilty verdict on this charge. If you have a reasonable doubt about any one of

 the elements, then you must find the defendants not guilty of this charge.




                                              6


File and source

File
68.pdf
Size
136,876 bytes
SHA-256
1b9bc7f8f98bd7a940d4628318c0d677427b00728cefe1818a2c43a8303599b7
Our copy
68.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top