Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents U.S. Department of the Treasury, Emergency Capital Investment Program: "Procedures to Evaluate Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) Quarterly Supplemental Reports in Connection with Aud"

U.S. Department of the Treasury, Emergency Capital Investment Program: "Procedures to Evaluate Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) Quarterly Supplemental Reports in Connection with Aud"

Summary

A comment draft dated 11.20.23 of Treasury's General Procedures to Evaluate Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) Quarterly Supplemental Reports in connection with Auditor Attestations. It is a guide for participants and their auditors in developing agreed-upon procedures to support the Auditor Attestation required pursuant to Section 4.1(d)(2)(ii) of the Securities Purchase Agreement. For participants reporting fewer than 30 originations in a QSR, procedures should be performed on all transactions; other samples should be random and include a minimum of the higher of five percent of reported originations or 30 originations. The procedures for Schedule A through Schedules D1-D8 direct the auditor to recalculate origination data, trace it to the participant's system of record, and check geocoding and race and ethnicity data.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“U.S. Department of the Treasury, Emergency Capital Investment Program: ‘Procedures to Evaluate Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP) Quarterly Supplemental Reports in Connection with Aud.’” Original at home.treasury.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/u-s-department-of-the-treasury-emergency-capital-investment-program-pr-9d6d9b29c4/, SHA-256 6fbe8c64df803e292237752c4671c346c0338fa2009d7c32b69c4ca3172d75df.

Full text

Comment Draft 11.20.23


     General Procedures to Evaluate Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP)
       Quarterly Supplemental Reports in connection with Auditor Attestations

Purpose

Treasury understands that certain recipients of ECIP investments (“Participants”) and their independent
auditors (“Auditors”) will enter into an agreed-upon procedures engagement to provide a report to
assist the Participant and the ECIP Program in assessing the effectiveness of the Participant’s processes
and controls, including the completeness and accuracy of the data reported by the Participant in its
Quarterly Supplemental Reports (QSRs), for the use of the Participant and the Department of the
Treasury.

The procedures below are intended as a guide for Participants and their Auditors to use in developing
agreed-upon procedures to be performed by the Auditor to support the Auditor Attestation required
pursuant to Section 4.1(d)(2)(ii) of the Securities Purchase Agreement.

Capitalized terms used and not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Securities
Purchase Agreement or the Instructions for the Quarterly Supplemental Report for Insured Depository
Institutions, Bank Holding Companies, and Savings and Loan Holding Companies, or the Instructions for
the Quarterly Supplemental Report for Credit Unions (as applicable, the “Instructions”).

Guidance Regarding Sample Size

For Participants reporting fewer than 30 originations in a QSR, agreed-upon procedures should be
performed on all transactions. For all other Participants, agreed-upon procedures may be performed on
a sample of transactions. Samples should be random and should include a minimum of the higher of
five percent of reported originations or 30 originations.

Reports Subject to the Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagement

The agreed-upon procedures must be performed with respect to all QSRs initially filed or amended by
the Participant during the Participant’s most recently completed fiscal year.

Inspection of the Participant’s procedures and data must involve observation of relevant calculated data
points. For example, the Instructions, Section VI, Glossary defines a “Low-income Borrower” as having
an income of not more than: (1) for borrowers in Metropolitan Areas, 80% of the area median income;
and (2) for borrowers in Non-Metropolitan Areas, the greater of 80% of the area median income; or 80%
of the statewide Non-Metropolitan area median income. Thus, in order to determine whether a
Participant correctly reported a loan to a Low-income Borrower, the auditor must: (1) identify the
borrower’s location; (ii) determine the relevant Area Median Income for the borrower’s location, using
the QSR Reference Dataset; and (iii) compare the borrower’s income to the relevant threshold of Area
Median Income. By performing these recalculations, the Auditor will be able to express in their findings
whether the origination was appropriately reported as a loan to a Low-income Borrower and whether
the origination was appropriately included as Deep Impact Lending on Schedule A and where the
origination was counted on Schedule C1, with respect to income.

Schedule A
Comment Draft 11.20.23

1. Recalculate the Origination Data (number of Originations and dollar amount of Originations)
   reported in Rows 1 through 11 for insured depository institutions (IDIs) and holding companies, and
   Rows 1 and 2 for credit unions for Columns A through F of Schedule A. In particular, the Auditor
   should confirm that:

   1.1. Participant correctly reported the total number and total amount of originations by category.
        Confirm number and total amount of originations reported in Column A and Column B of
        Schedule A (Rows 1-11 for IDIs and holding companies and Rows 1-2 for credit unions) agree
        with the Participant’s system of record. Confirm that originations during the period covered by
        the report that were excluded from Columns A and B of Schedule A, Total Originations met
        criteria for exclusion set forth in the Instructions, Section I.F – Exclusions.

   1.2. Participant correctly reported the total number and total amount of Qualified Lending
        originations by category. Confirm number and amount of Qualified Lending originations
        reported in Column C and Column D of Schedule A (Rows 1-11 for IDIs and holding companies
        and Rows 1-2 for credit unions) agree with the Participant’s system of record. For a sample of
        originations, confirm (1) whether originations that were included on Schedule A, Qualified
        Lending (i.e., Columns C and D of Schedule A, Rows 1-11 for IDIs and holding companies and
        Rows 1-2 for credit unions), met the criteria for classification as Qualified Lending and (2) that
        originations that are reported as Qualified Lending are not also reported as Deep Impact
        Lending.

   1.3. Participant correctly reported the total number and total amount of Deep Impact Lending by
        category. Confirm number and amount of Deep Impact Lending originations reported in
        Column E and Column F of Schedule A (Rows 1-11 for IDIs and holding companies and Rows 1-2
        for credit unions) agree with the Participant’s system of record. For a sample of originations,
        confirm (1) whether originations included on Schedule A, Deep Impact Lending (i.e., Columns E
        and F of Schedule A, Rows 1-11 for IDIs and holding companies and Rows 1-2 for credit unions),
        met the criteria for classification as Deep Impact Lending and (2) that originations that are
        reported as Deep Impact Lending are not also reported as Qualified Lending.


Schedule B

2. Recalculate the Origination Data (number of Originations and dollar amount of Originations)
   reported in Rows 1-11 for IDIs and holding companies and Rows 1-15 for credit unions in Schedule B,
   for Columns A through AJ of Schedule B. In particular, the Auditor should confirm that:

   2.1. Participant correctly reported the total number and total amount of originations by category.
        Trace Qualified Lending and Deep Impact Lending originations reported in Columns A through
        AJ of Schedule B (Rows 1-11 for IDIs and holding companies and Rows 1-15 for credit unions)
        back to the Participant’s system of record.

       2.1.1. Observe whether transactions are reported in each applicable Qualified and Deep Impact
              Lending row and column by type of lending, in accordance with the Instructions. Confirm
              that originations are not included in categories or types of lending where inclusion would
              be precluded by the Instructions. For example, an origination to a borrower that is an
              LMI Borrower but not a Low-income Borrower would be included in Columns A and B of
Comment Draft 11.20.23
             Schedule B but not in Columns E and F of Schedule B. By contrast, an origination to a
             Low-income Borrower would be included in Columns A, B, E, and F of Schedule B.

    2.2. The agreed-upon procedures should include procedures to confirm that that originations during
         the period covered by the report that were properly excluded from Schedule A, Total
         Originations (i.e., Columns A and B of Schedule A) are not included on Schedule B.

    2.3. For data related to Other Targeted Populations (Columns C, D, G and H of Schedule B), confirm
         that procedures to collect race and ethnicity data are consistent with the Instructions, Section
         I.G – Demographic Data Collection. Further, based on race and ethnicity data collected with
         originations, trace reported race and ethnicity originations to the corresponding categories.
         For example, if a residential mortgage loan borrower self-reported her race as Black, the
         origination would be reported on Row 3 in Columns C, D, G, and H of Schedule B.

    2.4. Confirm that originations by location are geocoded properly by determining if originations have
         been assigned the correct FIPS Code and that each origination is included in the correct
         category of “place-based” lending (Columns I – V of Schedule B) using the QSR Reference
         Dataset.

    2.5. For transactions that are reported as those that “create direct benefits for LMI communities or
         to Other Targeted Populations”, observe if each investment reported in Columns AA – AJ of
         Schedule B matches the definitions in the Instructions, Section VI, Glossary.1 Component
         activities include Affordable Housing, Qualified PWI, Community Service Facilities, Deeply
         Affordable Housing, and Deep Impact PWI.


Schedule C1

3. Recalculate the Origination Data (number of Originations and dollar amount of Originations)
   reported in Rows 1-11 for IDIs and holding companies and Rows 1-15 for credit unions in Schedule
   C1, for each column. Unlike Schedule A and B, data in this Schedule covers the entire year. In
   particular, the Auditor should confirm that:

    3.1. Participant correctly reported the total number and amount of originations, Qualified Lending
         originations, and Deep Impact Lending originations by category. Trace Qualified Lending and
         Deep Impact Lending originations reported in Columns A - AN of Schedule C1 (Rows 1-11 for
         IDIs and holding companies and Rows 1-15 for credit unions) back to the Participant’s system of
         record.

        3.1.1. Using full-year data, observe whether the Participant’s procedures match the
               Instructions with respect to income and calculation of the percentage of Area Median
               Income for the location of each borrower. Then trace the calculated percentage to


1
  In the case of some projects in these categories – specifically Affordable Housing and Deeply Affordable Housing
– the investment may contain elements that partially meet Deep Impact Lending categories. Treasury has advised
Participants that have affordable housing projects that have both types of units to pro-rate the investments by the
number of units. For example, a $100,000 loan for a ten-unit apartment building, in which two units are Deeply
Affordable Housing and eight are Affordable Housing, would report the single origination twice – $20,000 would be
included as Deeply Affordable Housing in Column AH and the full $100,000 would be included as Affordable
Housing in Column AB (since Deeply Affordable Housing is a subset of Affordable Housing).
Comment Draft 11.20.23
             observe if the origination was included in the correct Columns A – H of Schedule C1 and
             Lending Activity Category (rows).

        3.1.2. Mathematically check if the total number of originations and total amount of
               originations reported in the sum of Columns A, C, E, and G of Schedule C1 and B, D, F,
               and H of Schedule C1 match the total amount of the sum of Schedule B for all quarters in
               the year, Columns A and B, respectively.

        3.1.3. Mathematically check if the total number of originations and total amount of
               originations reported in the sum of the Columns A and C of Schedule C1 and B and D of
               Schedule C1 match the total amount of the sum of Columns E and F, respectively, of
               Schedule B for all quarters in the year.

        3.1.4. To inspect Other Targeted Population data points in Columns I – AN of Schedule C1,
               confirm that procedures to collect race and ethnicity data agree with the Instructions.
               Within the Instructions, particular attention is called to Section IV. A – Loans to
               Borrowers in Multiple Demographic Categories and Section I.G – Demographic Data
               Collection.


 Schedule C2

4. Participant correctly reported the total number and total amount of originations by business gross
   revenue, and borrower income, race, and ethnicity for Underserved Small Businesses. In particular,
   the Auditor should:

    4.1. Observe whether computation of “gross annual revenue” is consistent with the Instructions.
         See the definition of “Underserved Small Business” in the Instructions, Section VI, Glossary.
         Only Underserved Small Businesses should be reported on Schedule C2.

    4.2. For Majority owned by Low-income Borrowers, Columns C and D of Schedule C2, using full-year
         data, observe whether the Participant’s procedures match the Instructions with respect to
         income and calculation of the percentage of Area Median Income for the location of each
         borrower. Then observe whether the Participant correctly reported loans to Underserved Small
         Businesses owned by Low-income Borrowers, i.e., columns C and D only include loans to
         Underserved Small Businesses owned by Low-income Borrowers and only exclude loans that
         are not to such businesses.

    4.3. Confirm that in Columns E – V of Schedule C2, Participants reported Underserved Small
         Businesses by owner race and ethnicity. Observe if the Participant collected race and ethnicity
         data in accordance with the Instructions. Within the Instructions, particular attention is called
         to Section IV.A – Loans to Underserved Small Businesses.

Schedule D1 – D8

5. Participant correctly listed originations on each place-based lending schedule. Trace the data in
   Schedules D1-D8 to the Participant’s system of record and observe whether reported data in the
   Schedules matches the Instructions, Section V.
Comment Draft 11.20.23
   5.1. Mathematically check that the total number of originations and total amount of originations
        reported in Schedule D1 is not greater than the total amount of the sum of Columns I and J,
        respectively, of Schedule B for all quarters in the year.
   5.2. Mathematically check if the total number of originations and total amount of originations
        reported in Schedule D2 matches the total amount of the sum of Columns K and L, respectively,
        of Schedule B for all quarters in the year.
   5.3. Mathematically check if the total number of originations and total amount of originations
        reported in Schedule D3 matches the total amount of the sum of Columns M and N,
        respectively, of Schedule B for all quarters in the year.
   5.4. Mathematically check if the total number of originations and total amount of originations
        reported in Schedule D4 matches the total amount of the sum of Columns O and P,
        respectively, of Schedule B for all quarters in the year.
   5.5. Mathematically check that the total number of originations and total amount of originations
        reported in Schedule D5 is not greater than the total amount of the sum of Columns Q and R,
        respectively, of Schedule B for all quarters in the year.
   5.6. Mathematically check if the total number of originations and total amount of originations
        reported in Schedule D6 matches the total amount of the sum of Columns S and T, respectively,
        of Schedule B for all quarters in the year.
   5.7. Mathematically check if the total number of originations and total amount of originations
        reported in Schedule D7 matches the total amount of the sum of Columns U and V,
        respectively, of Schedule B for all quarters in the year.
   5.8. Mathematically check if the total number of originations and total amount of originations
        reported in Schedule D8 matches the total amount of the sum of Columns AA, AC, AE, AG & AI
        and Columns AB, AD, AF, AH & AJ, respectively, of Schedule B for all quarters in the year.


File and source

File
TREAS-Agreed-UponProceduresGuidance-Comment112023.pdf
Size
156,265 bytes
SHA-256
6fbe8c64df803e292237752c4671c346c0338fa2009d7c32b69c4ca3172d75df
Our copy
TREAS-Agreed-UponProceduresGuidance-Comment112023.pdf
Original
home.treasury.gov
Back to top