Treasury SLFRF reporting data through September 30, 2024
Summary
Treasury State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) reporting data through September 30, 2024, whose Definitions sheet explains that it holds Project and Expenditure reporting for Quarter 3 of 2024, due to Treasury on October 31, 2024 from the largest recipients covering July 1, 2024-September 30, 2024, together with the annual reports due March 31, 2024 from smaller recipients covering April 1, 2023-March 31, 2024. The file reflects data received as of 9/30/24 for quarterly reporters, with additional annual information submitted since March 31, 2024, and includes approximately 99% of Tiers 1 and 2 recipients and 89% of Annual Tier 5 reporters. Project rows include a Greater Boston bereavement program dispatching coordinators and volunteers after a death by suicide.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Treasury SLFRF reporting data through September 30, 2024.”
Original at home.treasury.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/treasury-slfrf-reporting-data-through-september-30-2024-488d57f33a/
, SHA-256 551d1e0154b5dd670d8e34a268a310eb3dfb2e7fdb67cec0772f82ddf2c5d993.Full text
Text extracted from the spreadsheet file: one line per row, cells separated by tabs, each sheet headed by its name. Numbers appear as stored, without the workbook’s formatting.
Sheet: Definitions
Background: This State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) reporting data includes Project and Expenditure reporting data for Quarter 3 of 2024, which was due to Treasury on October 31, 2024. This includes reports from the largest SLFRF recipients (states, territories, and metro cities and counties with a population over 250,000 or an allocation over $10 million, non-entitlement units of local government allocated more than $10 million, and Tribal governments allocated over $30 million) covering the period of July 1, 2024-September 30, 2024. This reporting data also includes the Annual Project and Expenditure reports that were also due on March 31, 2024 from smaller SLFRF recipients (metro cities and counties with populations less than 250,000 and an allocation less than $10 million, Tribal governments with an allocation less than $30 million, and non-entitlement units of local government) covering the reporting period of April 1, 2023-March 31, 2024. This file reflects data received as of 9/30/24 for quarterly reporters with additional annual report information submitted since March 31, 2024 (which reflects data through March 31, 2024 for annual reporters), and includes approximately 99% of Tiers 1 and 2 recipients (reporting quarterly) and 89% of Annual Tier 5 reporters. This file reflects data that has been certified and submitted by recipients in their Project and Expenditure reports to Treasury, with limited exceptions outlined in the definitions below. In some cases, reported projects may display programmatic data that is not required for the listed expenditure category. Generally, this may happen when recipients re-categorize previously reported projects to a new expenditure category, and when they do so, the programmatic data associated with the previous expenditure category remains in Treasury’s reporting system unless the recipient updates it.
Field Name Category Definition
Recipient ID Recipients, Project Treasury specific ID code for the recipient
Recipient Name Recipients, Project Name of the Entity
State/Territory Recipients, Project State that the recipient is located in
Reporting Tier Recipients, Project The reporting tier that the recipient falls under (based on designation, size, population, and funding amount) - see https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/state-and-local-fiscal-recovery-funds/recipient-compliance-and-reporting-responsibilities
Recipient Type Recipients, Project Entity designation (e.g. State, Local Government, etc.)
Number of Projects Recipients Count of the number of projects submitted by the recipient as of the targeted reporting cycle
Allocation Recipients The amount of SLFRF funds awarded to the recipient
Claiming Revenue Loss Standard Allowance? Yes/No Recipients Choice of whether the recipient has elected to take the standard allowance for revenue loss
Revenue Loss Claimed through Standard Allowance Recipients If electing "yes" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss reported
Estimated Revenue Loss 2020 Recipients If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2020
Estimated Revenue Loss 2021 Recipients If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2021
Estimated Revenue Loss 2022 Recipients If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2022
Estimated Revenue Loss 2023 Recipients If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2023
Project ID Project Treasury specific ID code for the project
Project Name Project Name given to project by the recipient
Expenditure Category Group (*1) Project Per guidance, this field represents the project expenditure category group selected by the recipient
Expenditure Category (*2) Project Detailed Expenditure Category selected by the Recipient, and based on Expenditure Category Group (total of 125 expenditure categories across the 10 category groups)
Completion Status Project Picklist for the status of the project. Choices include: not started, cancelled, completed, completed less than 50%, completed more than 50%
Project Description Project Narrative entered by recipient describing the project in sufficient detail to provide understanding of the major activities that will occur
Adopted Budget Project The adopted budget is the budget adopted by a recipient for each project associated with SLFRF funds. Recipients will enter the Adopted Budget based on information that exists currently in the recipient’s financial systems and the recipient’s established budget process. This field is only required for Tier 1 recipients
Total Cumulative Obligations Project Sum of all obligations to date. An obligation is an order placed for property and services, contracts and subawards made, and similar transactions that require payment
Total Cumulative Expenditures Project Sum of all expenditures to date. An expenditure is the amount that has been incurred as a liability of the entity (the service has been rendered or the good has been delivered to the entity)
Number of Households Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Project Number of households served (by program if recipient establishes multiple separate household assistance programs). Only applicable to Expenditure Categories 2.1-2.8
Number of Workers Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Project Number of workers served (by program if recipient establishes multiple separate Premium Pay assistance programs). Only applicable to Expenditure Categories 4.1 or 4.2
Number of Gov FTE Responding to COVID-19 (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Project Number of government workers responding to COVID-19, as measured by Full Time Equivalents. Only applicable to Expenditure Category 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Note: (*) Denotes projects where the number is not published for governments that reported less than 6 FTE
Number of Gov FTE Rehired (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Project Number of FTEs rehired by the recipient. Only applicable to Expenditure Category 3.2-Public Sector Workforce: Rehiring Public Sector Staff Note: (*) Denotes projects where the number is not published for governments that reported less than 6 FTE
Community benefit agreement? (Infrastructure Only) Project For infrastructure projects, a yes/no picklist for if a Community Benefit Agreement has been established
Complying with David Bacon? (Infrastructure Only) Project For infrastructure projects, a yes/no picklist for if the project is complying with Davis-Bacon requirements (specifically, that all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors in the performance of the project are paid wages at rates not less than those prevailing, as determined by the U.S. Secretary of Labor in accordance with subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the “Davis-Bacon Act”), for the corresponding classes of laborers and mechanics employed on projects of a character similar to the contract work in the civil subdivision of the State (or the District of Columbia) in which the work is to be performed, or by the appropriate state entity pursuant to a corollary state prevailing-wage-in construction law
Project labor agreement? (Infrastructure Only) Project For infrastructure projects, a yes/no picklist for if a Project Labor Agreement whereby “the indicated project includes a project labor agreement, meaning a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement consistent with section 8(f) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158(f))"
Does the Project have Capital Expenditures? (Yes/No) (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Project For projects in Expenditure Category Groups 1, 2 , 3 and 8. A yes/no picklist for whether the project is expected to have capital expenditures
Type of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Project For projects in Expenditure Category Groups 1, 2,3 and 8 that answered yes to expecting capital expenditures. A picklist of types that can be found in Appendix H of the Project and Expenditure Report User Guide
Total Expected Cost of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Project For projects in Expenditure Category Groups 1, 2, 3 and 8 that answered yes to expecting capital expenditures. The reported dollar amount of the expected capital expenditures
Primary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Project The selected primary population served by this project in response to “What Impacted and/or Disproportionally Impacted population does this project primarily serve?” See pg. 22 of the Compliance and Reporting Guidance
Secondary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Project The selected secondary population served by this project in response to “If this project primarily serves more than one Impacted and/or Disproportionately Impacted populations, please select up to two additional populations served below.” See pg. 22 of the Compliance and Reporting Guidance
Tertiary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Project The selected tertiary population served by this project in response to “If this project primarily serves more than one Impacted and/or Disproportionately Impacted populations, please select up to two additional populations served below.” See pg. 22 of the Compliance and Reporting Guidance
Project is conducting an evidence based program evaluation? (Yes/No) Project This field is only required for Tier 1 recipients. For relevant ECs identify whether there is a program evaluation of the project being conducted
Project Total Spending on Evidence Based Evaluation Project This field is only required for Tier 1 recipients. For relevant ECs identify the dollar amount of the total project spending that is allocated towards evidence-based interventions
Sheet: Recipients (Q3 2024) Submit
Recipient-ID Recipient Name State/Territory Reporting Tier Recipient Type Allocation Number of Projects Claiming Revenue Loss Standard Allowance? (Yes/No) Revenue Loss Claimed through Standard Allowance Estimated Revenue Loss 2020 Estimated Revenue Loss 2021 Estimated Revenue Loss 2022 Estimated Revenue Loss 2023
RCP-054918 Alburnett City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104516.54 1 Yes 104516.54
RCP-055002 Stratford City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104516.54 2 Yes 104516.84
RCP-056316 Avinger, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104524.04 2 Yes 104524.04
RCP-034176 Town Of Norrie, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104563.89 1 Yes 104563.89
RCP-022793 Packer Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104580.16 1 Yes 104580.16
RCP-040822 Borough Of West Cape May, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104773.22 3 Yes 104773.22
RCP-026800 Bird Island City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104801.66 2 Yes 104801.66
RCP-013864 Village Of Millington, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104773.44 1 No 34191 0 0 0
RCP-055026 Seymour City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104815.59 2 Yes 104815.59
RCP-023773 Village Of Delevan, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104820.2 8 Yes 104820.19
RCP-040782 Borough Of Audubon Park, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104877.88 4 Yes 104877.88
RCP-034562 Town Of Porter, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104773.22 3 Yes 104773.22
RCP-013849 Village Of Athens, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104668.36 1 Yes 104668.36
RCP-006485 City Of Colman, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104709.8 4 Yes 104709.8
RCP-026041 Byron Town, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104756.75 1 Yes 104756.75
RCP-035134 Mekoryuk City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104635.39 1 Yes 104635.39
RCP-054476 Jamesport City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104920.95 1 Yes 104920.95
RCP-033642 Town Of Leroy, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104877.89 2 Yes 104877.89
RCP-001212 Castine Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104892.61 3 Yes 104892.61
RCP-051383 Washington Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105000.16 1 Yes 0
RCP-050228 Village Of Dodge, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104953.73 1 Yes 104953.73
RCP-055109 Murray City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104965.11 4 Yes 104965.11
RCP-052170 Borough Of Falls Creek, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104895.14 6 Yes 104729.54
RCP-023571 Southwest Madison Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104895.14 1 Yes 104895.14
RCP-022933 Hulmeville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 104895.14 Yes 104564.54
RCP-023175 Mcconnellsburg Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105210.16 1 Yes 105210.16
RCP-024724 Town Of Hopkinton, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105230.45 12 Yes 105230.45
RCP-034817 Town Of Hamburg, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105296.57 1 Yes 105296.57
RCP-003715 Village Of Lakeview, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105298.88 9 Yes 26000
RCP-050284 Village Of Greenwood, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105307.71 2 Yes 105307.71
RCP-025676 Ellenton, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105309 1 Yes 105309
RCP-017889 East Galesburg Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105329.52 1 Yes 12241
RCP-023821 Village Of Celoron, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105333.02 4 Yes 105333.02
RCP-023981 Village Of Stamford, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105333.02 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-023891 Town Of Smyrna, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105127.89 4 Yes 105127.89
RCP-031595 City Of Craigmont, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105181.99 1 Yes 105181.99
RCP-033550 Town Of Bridgeport, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105087.23 1 Yes 105087.23
RCP-034405 Town Of Gilman, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105087.23 2 Yes 105087.23
RCP-007761 Town of Cole Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105114.44 Yes 105114.44
RCP-003536 Lakefield Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105193.8 3 Yes 105193.8
RCP-052095 Supervisors Preston Township Dba Preston Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105000.16 2 Yes 105000.16
RCP-054007 Beech Creek Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105000.16 3 Yes 105000.16
RCP-035060 Town Of Sigel, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105401.23 1 Yes 105401.23
RCP-051406 Borough Of South Waverly, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105420.14 1 Yes 52710.07
RCP-024184 Village Of Alexandria Bay, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105435.58 1 Yes 105435.58
RCP-026999 Houston City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105457.36 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-008495 North Carrollton, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105467.58 1 Yes 105467.58
RCP-019016 Bloom Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105379.58 Yes 105379.58
RCP-027331 Nordland Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105348.08 1 Yes 105348.08
RCP-019314 Village Of Farmersville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105379.58 2 Yes 105379.58
RCP-007652 Town of Washington Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105465.42 Yes 105468.57
RCP-032756 Cass Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105484.75 7 Yes 105484.75
RCP-019316 Perry Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105484.75 3 Yes 105484.75
RCP-032073 Village Of Grand Rapids, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105589.92 1 Yes 105589.92
RCP-003695 Orange Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105509.06 1 Yes 105509.06
RCP-055976 Christine, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105517.15 1 Yes 105517.15
RCP-022763 Dunnstable Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105525.16 2 Yes 105525.16
RCP-023746 Town Of East Otto, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105538.15 5 Yes 105538.15
RCP-034715 Town Of Waukechon, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105610.57 3 Yes 105610.57
RCP-003463 Chapin Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105614.16 3 Yes 105614.16
RCP-018367 Ripley Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105589.92 1 Yes 105589.92
RCP-022722 Walker Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105630.14 2 Yes 105297.22
RCP-023248 Greenwood Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105630.14 2 Yes 105297.22
RCP-017615 Alexis Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105737.78 1 Yes 0
RCP-032091 Village Of Yorkville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105695.09 3 Yes 105695.09
RCP-003504 Village Of North Branch, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105719.24 1 Yes 105719.24
RCP-003861 Excelsior Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105719.24 4 Yes 105719.24
RCP-051572 Knox Township Road District, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105735.16 1 Yes 105735.16
RCP-018327 Milton Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105800.27 1 Yes 105379.57
RCP-019509 Town Of Bergman, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105662.23 1 Yes 105662.23
RCP-032926 Village Of Winchester, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105800.27 3 Yes 105800.27
RCP-026336 Cecil, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105682 3 Yes 105682
RCP-003406 Tilden Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105824.32 3 Yes 105824.32
RCP-022303 East Mahoning Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105945.16 1 Yes 105945.16
RCP-006504 City Of Burke, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105975.72 1 Yes 105975.72
RCP-007734 Town of Calumet Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105991.87 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-017801 Cissna Park Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106009.94 Yes 106000
RCP-039971 Howell County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7792257 45 Yes 7792257
RCP-026802 Biwabik City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105894.48 1 Yes 105894.48
RCP-014570 Woodland Mills City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105926.71 2 Yes 105926.71
RCP-054262 Sheldon City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 105939.6 Yes 105939.6
RCP-050780 Longwood City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7793784 7 Yes 7793784
RCP-040527 Warren County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7801386 3 Yes 7801386
RCP-040360 Galax City, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7817948 1 Yes 7817948
RCP-038654 Oconee County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7823918 1 Yes 7823918
RCP-053216 Town Of Summerville, Sc, South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7796973 5 Yes 5730953.69
RCP-037623 Avoyelles Parish, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7797501 1 Yes 7000000
RCP-025934 Suwanee, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7807434 1 Yes 7807434
RCP-039704 Clatsop County, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7813040 1 Yes 7813040
RCP-038398 Susquehanna County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7833241 1 Yes 7833241
RCP-037048 Marinette County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7837514 1 Yes 7837514
RCP-048913 Alamogordo City, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7905784 5 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-037535 Gratiot County, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7907634 1 Yes 7907634
RCP-038942 Texarkana, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7915767 8 Yes 7515766
RCP-037151 Ottawa County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7871506 1 Yes 7871506
RCP-035353 Town Of South Boston, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7872676 11 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-038568 Isanti County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7885297 7 Yes 7885297
RCP-039933 Orleans County, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7837903 1 Yes 7837903
RCP-026453 Town Of Kernersville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7859078.97 15 Yes 7859078.97
RCP-036768 Mcclain County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7861600 49 Yes 7861600
RCP-040449 Jim Wells County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7863154 1 Yes 7863154
RCP-039520 Tallapoosa County, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7840817 10 Yes 7840817
RCP-039144 Snyder County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7841788 1 Yes 7841788
RCP-037021 Saratoga Springs, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7848020 1 Yes 7848020
RCP-047016 Merrillville Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7884810.79 3 Yes 7884810.79
RCP-040621 North Kingstown, RI Rhode Island Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7868124.48 11 Yes 7868124
RCP-038055 Harrison County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7869564 2 Yes 7869564
RCP-037245 Mckean County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7890930 1 Yes 7890930
RCP-037576 Tift County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7894621 1 Yes 7894621
RCP-038095 Mississippi County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7895980 16 Yes 7895980
RCP-050068 City Of Wheat Ridge, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7873279.72 1 Yes 7873279.72
RCP-039107 Tioga County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7884326 1 Yes 7884326
RCP-038250 Nez Perce County, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7848780 3 Yes 7848780
RCP-006379 City Of Carbondale, Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7858667 9 Yes 7858667
RCP-037354 Tazewell County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7885103 1 Yes 7885103
RCP-040490 Cheatham County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7899088 1 Yes 7899088
RCP-037586 Kentwood City, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7899605 3 Yes 7899605
RCP-038483 Millcreek City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7929650 Yes 7929650
RCP-037426 Mayes County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7983193 44 Yes 7983193
RCP-040104 Fountain Valley, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7952893 1 Yes 7952893
RCP-039881 Yabucoa Municipio, PR Puerto Rico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9635537.44 9 Yes 8454007.94
RCP-038825 Smyrna Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7954313 2 Yes 7163313
RCP-026203 Town Of Clayton, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7931423.29 1 Yes 7931423.29
RCP-049219 New Milford, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7932955.41 5 Yes 7932955.41
RCP-040041 Preble County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7940849 3 Yes 7940849
RCP-050831 Opa-Locka City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7957062 6 Yes 7957062
RCP-035515 City Of Alabaster, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7960791.98 2 Yes 7960791.98
RCP-040265 Corozal Municipio, PR Puerto Rico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9650432.36 9 Yes 9650432.36
RCP-038440 Myrtle Beach City, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7920696 Yes 7920696
RCP-037299 Benton County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7942209 7 Yes 1411351
RCP-037800 Florence, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7943151 14 Yes 3040901
RCP-037269 Shawano County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7944151 39 Yes 7944151
RCP-037748 Buena Vista, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7979308 5 Yes 7979308
RCP-038223 Brick Township, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7917840 1 Yes 3958920
RCP-036963 Smyrna City, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7995546 43 Yes 7995546
RCP-037230 Sanilac County, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7996790 19 Yes 7996790
RCP-050816 Niceville City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7999634 30 Yes 7999634
RCP-047077 Plainfield Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7996991.22 1 Yes 7996991.12
RCP-037254 Mercer County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7997178 12 Yes 7997178
RCP-047090 Richmond City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8009455.71 12 Yes 8009455.71
RCP-039012 Cooke County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8013689 1 Yes 8013689
RCP-040340 Fayette County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7989603 1 Yes 7989603
RCP-037923 Georgetown City, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8029506 5 Yes 7873596.01
RCP-047254 Dana Point City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8032332 5 Yes 8032332
RCP-038795 Yucaipa City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8017860 1 Yes 8017860
RCP-050756 Lady Lake Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8023675 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-040489 Warren County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8017573 3 Yes 8017573
RCP-031521 Wakefield, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8083935.27 2 Yes 8083935.27
RCP-026334 Cartersville, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8125975 3 Yes 8125975
RCP-037497 Longview, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8112084 1 Yes 8112084
RCP-040080 San Ramon City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8115425 13 Yes 8115425
RCP-031942 Seatac City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8115494 1 Yes 8115494
RCP-056562 Harker Heights, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8049344.93 13 Yes 8049344.93
RCP-039935 Rantoul, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8052698 5 No 2200000 1300000 600000 0
RCP-039035 Sequoyah County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8074291 5 Yes 8074291
RCP-047211 Beverly Hills City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8083765 1 Yes 8083765
RCP-015799 Levy County Florida Board Of County Commisioners, Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8061471 1 Yes 8061471
RCP-010707 Wharton County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8071766 12 Yes 8071766
RCP-040151 Ohio County, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8043601 1 Yes 8043601
RCP-037373 Crawford County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8059723 4 Yes 8059723
RCP-015288 Nicholasville city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8088701.18 2 Yes 8088701.18
RCP-007015 Ruston, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8095921.1 2 Yes 8095921.1
RCP-047281 Foster City City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8109840 1 Yes 8109840
RCP-037583 Upshur County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8110031 1 Yes 8110031
RCP-040442 Burnsville City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8037982 1 Yes 8037982
RCP-056416 Southlake, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8038172.52 1 Yes 8038172.52
RCP-047410 San Dimas City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8042858 1 Yes 8042858
RCP-006079 City Of Fairmont, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8128188.01 4 Yes 4064094
RCP-050892 Stuart City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8132361 21 Yes 8132361
RCP-035262 Town Of Farmville, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8140356 1 Yes 8140356
RCP-016421 New Carrollton City, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8164521.75 1 Yes 8164521.75
RCP-037843 Encinitas, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8142344 1 Yes 8142344
RCP-053148 Clinton County, Oh, Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8151792 1 Yes 8151792
RCP-035196 Town Of Abingdon, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8162144 1 Yes 8162144
RCP-051308 Upper Makefield Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 903001.28 Yes 900155.22
RCP-022362 Bushkill Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 903526.28 1 Yes 902102.43
RCP-040777 Township Of Westampton, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 905278.32 17 Yes 905278.32
RCP-040655 City Of Brigantine, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 905383 1 Yes 905383
RCP-035798 City Of Elba, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 905980.78 2 Yes 905980.78
RCP-053249 Putnam County, Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 912143 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-053722 City Of Reedsport, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 913336.56 3 Yes 913336.56
RCP-031361 Hardwick, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 913758.18 7 Yes 913758.18
RCP-050679 Dunnellon City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 921571 1 Yes 921571
RCP-024739 Village Of Potsdam, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 922151.08 8 Yes 922150.62
RCP-022538 Quakertown Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 922321.3 No 200000 0 0 0
RCP-001431 Long Island Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25165.76 Yes 25165.76
RCP-016113 Royal Lakes Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25175.66 1 Yes 25175.66
RCP-026870 Cromwell City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25353.48 1 Yes 25353.48
RCP-004471 Moose Creek Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25353.48 2 Yes 25353.48
RCP-017364 Stoneham Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25572.04 1 No 0 25572 25572 25572
RCP-007265 Streeter, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25613.63 1 Yes 25613.63
RCP-023169 Gilmore Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25620.02 1 Yes 25620.02
RCP-017021 Jo Daviess Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25681.33 Yes 25681.33
RCP-014731 Town Of St. Matthews, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 946275.76 1 Yes 946275.76
RCP-053088 Dickey County, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 946329 8 Yes 946329
RCP-055913 Nash, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 950150.93 Yes 950150.93
RCP-001432 Wellington Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25905.93 1 Yes 25905.93
RCP-023447 Little Meadows Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25935.04 1 Yes 25853.3
RCP-057195 Hunter Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23714.24 2 Yes 23714.24
RCP-047766 Kirwin City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23807.04 1 Yes 23807.04
RCP-047949 Randolph City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23807.04 1 Yes 23807.04
RCP-015409 Wheatcroft city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24241.5 2 Yes 24241.5
RCP-017006 La Prairie Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24741.95 1 Yes 24741.95
RCP-052831 Newport Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 884132.63 1 Yes 884132.63
RCP-031442 Northfield, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 884166.39 30 Yes 884166.39
RCP-018335 Mad River Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 888049.13 6 Yes 884517.94
RCP-026504 Town Of Marshville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 888209.78 3 Yes 835667.13
RCP-054146 Ste. Genevieve City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 899671.69 9 Yes 899671.69
RCP-054176 California City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 899671.69 3 Yes 899671.69
RCP-050758 Lake Butler City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 903540 1 Yes 903540
RCP-025181 Town Of Hampstead, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 903681.04 23 Yes 903681.04
RCP-015823 Litchfield City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 913808.42 1 Yes 913808.43
RCP-034754 City Of Plymouth, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 913861.15 5 Yes 913861.15
RCP-048081 Woodbine City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25180.52 1 No 5000 1000 1000 0
RCP-018214 City Of Canal Winchester, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 927382.44 2 Yes 927382.44
RCP-033244 South Weber, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 927395 1 Yes 927395
RCP-017272 Big Bend Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25353.48 1 Yes 25353.48
RCP-023148 Washingtonville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25445.25 1 Yes 25445.25
RCP-048067 White Cloud City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25638.34 1 Yes 25638.34
RCP-014183 Village Of Daggett, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25641.64 1 Yes 25641.64
RCP-022591 Upper Leacock Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 939016.32 4 Yes 939016.32
RCP-025039 Town Of Walworth, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 939074.1 1 Yes 939074.1
RCP-054254 Rock Hill City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 941232.61 15 Yes 878232.62
RCP-019577 City Of Dardanelle, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 940808.22 3 Yes 940808.22
RCP-022411 Hamilton Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 941431.34 1 Yes 941431.34
RCP-047476 Abilene City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 946329.34 1 Yes 946329.34
RCP-047192 Angels City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 946359 4 Yes 946359
RCP-027059 Little Falls City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 950318.34 5 Yes 950318.34
RCP-038968 Ringgold County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 950602 1 Yes 950602
RCP-022852 Troutville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23625.04 1 Yes 23551
RCP-023374 Twilight Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23625.04 Yes 0
RCP-017483 Louisburg Village, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23632.68 1 Yes 23632.68
RCP-017104 Gray Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23823.53 1 Yes 23823.53
RCP-016070 Pulaski Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23814.82 1 Yes 23814.82
RCP-052432 Bullard Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23823.53 2 Yes 23823.53
RCP-017224 Preble Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23823.53 1 Yes 23823.53
RCP-022382 Spruce Creek Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23835.04 1 Yes 23759.92
RCP-050095 Village Of Alvo, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24247.32 2 Yes 24247.32
RCP-027312 Winger City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24260.66 3 Yes 13772.15
RCP-052341 Skagen Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24260.66 Yes 24260.66
RCP-029988 Township Of Plumsted, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 897114.18 1 Yes 897114.18
RCP-040429 Musselshell County, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 899906 1 Yes 899906
RCP-032371 Hanover Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 900353.95 5 Yes 896000
RCP-032399 City Of Wyoming, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 900459.12 1 Yes 900459.12
RCP-037540 Republic County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 900489 3 Yes 900489
RCP-014042 Quincy Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24906.02 1 Yes 24906
RCP-055556 Haverhill City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24970.33 1 No 2000 2000 2000 2000
RCP-023289 Reed Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24990.04 1 Yes 24990.04
RCP-040986 Borough Of Chatham, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 903812.96 5 Yes 882550.66
RCP-040781 Borough Of Audubon, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 904022.3 2 Yes 904022.3
RCP-025023 Village Of Newark, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 906253.69 2 Yes 906253.69
RCP-001986 Town Of Cowpens, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 906426.74 12 Yes 906000
RCP-027077 Mahtomedi City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 906386.88 1 Yes 906386.88
RCP-026782 Baxter City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 914036.64 2 Yes 914036.64
RCP-056828 Crane, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 914150.94 Yes 914150.94
RCP-040853 Borough Of Clayton, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 914593.82 1 Yes 914593.82
RCP-040867 Borough Of Pitman, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 914907.84 Yes 457453.92
RCP-027279 Virginia City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 915020.17 5 Yes 457000
RCP-048978 Mosquero Village, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25218 1 Yes 0
RCP-007810 Town of Foss Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25445.06 2 Yes 25445.06
RCP-032810 Village Of Higginsport, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25450.96 1 Yes 25349.76
RCP-017057 Lake Lillian City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25681.33 2 Yes 25681.33
RCP-017875 Du Bois Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25720 1 No 12000 12000 4000 0
RCP-015558 Golden Valley, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25771.74 1 Yes 25771.74
RCP-033687 City Of Sturgeon Bay, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 935108.87 1 Yes 935108.87
RCP-034728 City Of Shawano, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 935213.54 6 Yes 66578
RCP-055977 Cisco, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 939475.07 5 Yes 939475.07
RCP-035278 Town Of Halifax, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1255396 3 Yes 1255396
RCP-029984 Borough Of Mantoloking, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26062.46 1 Yes 13031.23
RCP-034718 Village Of Aniwa, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26062.47 1 Yes 26062.47
RCP-007049 Vienna, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23637 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-047715 Havensville City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23654.42 1 Yes 23654.42
RCP-034080 Village Of Gratiot, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23655.09 1 Yes 0
RCP-055537 Aurora City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24073.19 3 Yes 24073.19
RCP-048080 Winona City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24264.86 1 Yes 24264.86
RCP-047550 Burr Oak City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24570.08 1 Yes 24570.08
RCP-047576 Circleville City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24570.08 3 Yes 13258.58
RCP-003383 Village Of Wolverine, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24590.76 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-003763 Mackinaw Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24590.76 Yes 24590.76
RCP-056956 Leona, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24600 3 Yes 24600
RCP-019768 Town Of Jackson, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 897612.66 1 Yes 897612.66
RCP-051302 Solebury Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 897961.26 1 Yes 897961.26
RCP-016323 Winthrop Harbor Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 900608.22 9 No 200000 200000 200000 200000
RCP-006206 City Of Spencer, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 900872.7 1 Yes 900872.7
RCP-026437 Town Of Holly Ridge, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 900957.67 Yes 900957.67
RCP-024691 Village Of Airmont, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 901125.49 2 Yes 901125.49
RCP-056294 Wills Point, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 906454.4 1 Yes 906454.4
RCP-040681 Borough Of Cresskill, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 907267.02 1 Yes 907267.02
RCP-033181 Plain City Corporation, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 907631 3 Yes 907631
RCP-048976 Milan Village, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 907841 12 Yes 400000
RCP-051610 Swissvale Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 907936.28 2 Yes 907936.28
RCP-040719 Borough Of Park Ridge, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 909988.4 2 Yes 909988.4
RCP-008470 Hazlehurst, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 917002.49 Yes 917002.49
RCP-022316 Borough Of Perkasie, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 917491.3 1 Yes 917491.3
RCP-025152 Town Of Waterville Valley, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25230.21 2 Yes 25230
RCP-057182 Severance Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25244.19 1 Yes 25244.19
RCP-004478 Hornet Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25244.19 1 Yes 25244.19
RCP-027341 Carsonville Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25462.77 Yes 25462.77
RCP-027568 Coon Creek Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25462.77 2 Yes 25462.77
RCP-006534 City Of Conde, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25680.12 1 Yes 25680.12
RCP-057252 Danville Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25681.33 1 Yes 25681.32
RCP-027572 Stanley Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25790.61 1 Yes 25790.61
RCP-017371 Bashaw Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25790.61 Yes 25790.61
RCP-054286 Breckenridge Hills City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 930231.19 1 Yes 0
RCP-031301 Cheshire, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 935279.47 16 Yes 935279.47
RCP-034900 Town Of Stinnett, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26062.47 1 Yes 26062.48
RCP-017513 Chain-O-Lakes Village, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26077.44 Yes 26077.44
RCP-015979 North Henderson Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23678.74 1 Yes 23678.74
RCP-007242 Colfax, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24032.54 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-055573 Alexander City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24073.19 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-055639 Vincent City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24073.19 4 Yes 24073.19
RCP-055648 Little Sioux City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24073.19 1 Yes 24073.19
RCP-004184 City Of Greenville, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 884847.02 1 Yes 884847.02
RCP-038106 Menominee County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 884950 5 Yes 884950
RCP-027472 Foster Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24807.06 1 Yes 24807.06
RCP-004611 New Folden Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24807.06 1 Yes 24807.06
RCP-017238 Flensburg City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24807.06 3 Yes 0
RCP-018358 Village Of New Riegel, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24819.95 Yes 0
RCP-022794 Borough Of Hopewell, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25095.04 2 No 24458 0 0 0
RCP-052746 Chester Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 904165.43 2 Yes 903952.31
RCP-055931 Ballinger, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 904219.93 1 Yes 904219.93
RCP-035654 City Of Citronelle, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 917867.16 1 Yes 917867.16
RCP-015406 West Liberty city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 922476.21 5 Yes 922476.21
RCP-001995 Town Of Estill, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 924496.24 10 Yes 924496.24
RCP-040383 Carlisle County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 924574 4 Yes 715289.54
RCP-015319 Prestonsburg city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 925621.01 2 Yes 925621.01
RCP-025177 Town Of Seabrook, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 925665.87 3 Yes 925665.87
RCP-047675 Garfield City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25790.94 2 Yes 25790.94
RCP-047785 Lehigh City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25790.94 6 Yes 25790.94
RCP-018908 Etna Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 930853.03 2 Yes 930853.03
RCP-054233 North Kansas City City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 931249.84 2 Yes 909643.84
RCP-037962 Scott County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 936811 1 Yes 936811
RCP-051597 Board Of Commissioners Lower Swatara Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 936811.34 1 Yes 936811.34
RCP-023271 Jackson Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 945631.34 3 Yes 944141.13
RCP-056473 Clyde, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 949157.82 3 Yes 949157.82
RCP-035323 Town Of Occoquan, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 949560.76 12 Yes 949560.76
RCP-056173 Plum Grove, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26124.75 2 Yes 26124.75
RCP-054475 Jameson Town, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25873.71 1 Yes 25873.71
RCP-017685 Berlin Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23678.74 2 Yes 23654.29
RCP-004589 Schroeder Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23714.24 1 Yes 23714.24
RCP-004614 Hamden Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23714.24 1 Yes 23714.24
RCP-023491 Glen Campbell Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23835.04 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-054424 De Witt City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23836.41 1 Yes 23836.41
RCP-024178 Village Of Dolgeville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212204.49 6 Yes 212204.49
RCP-004347 Sheridan Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201034.72 1 Yes 201034.72
RCP-031626 City Of Grace, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201114.84 1 Yes 201114.84
RCP-050531 City Of Stromsburg, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201589.04 5 Yes 201589.04
RCP-004138 Hayes Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202295.78 13 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-051561 Marion Township Road District Dba Marion Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202335.3 1 Yes 202335.3
RCP-055999 Crowell, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202841.2 4 Yes 202441.12
RCP-025218 Town Of Alstead, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202888.54 6 Yes 133882.25
RCP-032933 Village Of Bellville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203081.82 1 Yes 203081.82
RCP-014638 Crosby, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203169.81 1 Yes 203169.81
RCP-024435 Village Of Boonville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203178.88 3 Yes 203178.87
RCP-017919 Erie Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203990.88 9 Yes 203990.89
RCP-025498 Parkin, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205109.04 3 Yes 205109.04
RCP-014690 Town Of Carlisle, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205111.72 1 Yes 205111.72
RCP-032802 Brownhelm Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205500.71 5 Yes 204683.57
RCP-003646 Indianfields Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206154.24 1 Yes 206154.24
RCP-015817 Limestone Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207120.84 1 Yes 207120.84
RCP-022658 Bell Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207165.3 1 Yes 207165.3
RCP-014091 New Buffalo Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207340.04 1 Yes 207340.04
RCP-035696 Town Of Brilliant, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207536.4 2 Yes 207536.4
RCP-032511 Village Of Batavia, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208550.62 2 Yes 0
RCP-054972 Wellman City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208584.51 2 Yes 208584.51
RCP-026315 Brooks, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208751 6 Yes 208751
RCP-025769 Leary, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208751 3 Yes 208751
RCP-025002 Town Of Easton, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208819.89 2 Yes 208819.89
RCP-001396 Palmyra Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208833.56 3 Yes 208833.56
RCP-026861 Coleraine City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215504.58 Yes 215504.58
RCP-034750 Village Of Kohler, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215512.55 2 Yes 107756.28
RCP-034730 Town Of Herman, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216245.23 1 Yes 0
RCP-024898 Village Of Bellport, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209948.08 2 Yes 209948.08
RCP-024951 Village Of Dryden, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209948.08 9 Yes 209948.08
RCP-025864 Pendergrass, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209871 1 Yes 209871
RCP-003762 South Branch Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209967.26 3 Yes 209967.26
RCP-015135 Evarts city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210439.89 1 Yes 207944.08
RCP-019667 City Of Horatio, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213396.27 2 Yes 213396.27
RCP-051689 Brockway Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213465.3 2 Yes 213128.9
RCP-055315 Corning City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214266.39 2 Yes 214266.39
RCP-006761 Epps, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214311.88 Yes 0
RCP-014444 Morrison Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214227.12 Yes 214227.12
RCP-015466 Machias Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214331.96 2 Yes 214331.96
RCP-002013 Town Of Hickory Grove, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201117.02 1 Yes 201117.02
RCP-025026 Village Of Clyde, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201127.6 1 Yes 201127.6
RCP-025232 Town Of Sutton, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201213.5 4 Yes 201213.5
RCP-018785 Somers Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202345.64 1 Yes 202345.64
RCP-051385 Baldwin Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203595.28 4 Yes 24509
RCP-022600 Berlin Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203805.28 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-048013 Sublette City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204343.66 3 Yes 204343.66
RCP-052929 Rupert Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204346.51 1 Yes 204346.51
RCP-017855 De Soto Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204399.14 6 Yes 204188.2
RCP-015266 Millersburg city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204412.34 3 Yes 201988
RCP-024530 Village Of Clifton Springs, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205537.84 6 Yes 205537.84
RCP-024759 Town Of Hadley, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205537.84 5 Yes 205537.84
RCP-034343 Town Of Woodruff, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206825.06 5 Yes 206825.06
RCP-014762 Fairview Park Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206864.25 4 Yes 206864.25
RCP-033010 Butler Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206867.91 1 Yes 206867.91
RCP-013782 Pokagon Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207550.22 1 Yes 207550.22
RCP-031622 City Of Genesee, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207567.73 Yes 207567
RCP-018176 Jackson Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207604.1 1 Yes 206778.59
RCP-022853 Leechburg Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208845.3 8 Yes 208516.18
RCP-018675 Adams Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208866.12 Yes 208866.12
RCP-019027 Vernon Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208866.12 1 Yes 208450.86
RCP-015063 Bromley city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208867.48 5 Yes 206390.33
RCP-047559 Carbondale City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208921.92 6 Yes 208921.92
RCP-027223 Slayton City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215723.14 1 Yes 215723.14
RCP-054473 Humansville City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215750.07 3 Yes 215750.07
RCP-050266 City Of Fullerton, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216279.03 Yes 4000
RCP-022432 Borough Of New Stanton, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216300.3 1 Yes 215959.44
RCP-056673 Savoy, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216496.37 1 Yes 216496.37
RCP-056899 Miles, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216496.37 2 Yes 216069.35
RCP-054951 Woodward City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216509.22 1 Yes 216509.22
RCP-003859 Watertown Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216587.84 11 Yes 216587.84
RCP-024767 Town Of Providence, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210871.16 2 Yes 210000
RCP-023068 Lake Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212625.3 1 Yes 212625.3
RCP-055141 Manning City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212621.63 2 Yes 212621.63
RCP-026089 Mountain View Town, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212635.38 Yes 212635.38
RCP-032769 Village Of Leipsic, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212652.22 1 Yes 212652.22
RCP-033980 Town Of Watertown, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214361.2 2 Yes 214361.2
RCP-003978 Village Of Lake Odessa, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214380.98 1 Yes 214380.98
RCP-022390 Menno Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201075.28 1 Yes 201075.28
RCP-048083 Yates Center City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201596.7 1 Yes 201596.7
RCP-026323 Cadwell, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201656 1 Yes 201656
RCP-049002 Tatum Town, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201743 1 Yes 201743
RCP-057054 Larimore, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203644.13 1 Yes 203644.13
RCP-022700 Upper Tyrone Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203805.28 2 Yes 203162.94
RCP-000999 Polk Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203818.01 14 Yes 203818.01
RCP-033510 City Of Colby, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203999.01 2 Yes 203999.01
RCP-030136 Darby Town, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204453.66 1 No 82352.94 26103.76 -28394.19 -96599.87
RCP-018486 Perry Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204764.53 2 Yes 0
RCP-003497 Maple Valley Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205133.18 23 Yes 205133.18
RCP-007923 Town of Mooreland Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205139.88 1 Yes 205137.46
RCP-051590 Shippen Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205590.3 1 Yes 205590.3
RCP-024256 Village Of Lima, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206768.61 1 Yes 206768.61
RCP-015079 Campbellsburg city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206770.95 3 Yes 206770.95
RCP-014299 Charleston City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206809.28 2 Yes 206809.28
RCP-052452 Buffalo Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207636.25 1 Yes 207636.25
RCP-032432 Perry Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208129.95 3 Yes 202462.81
RCP-052704 Greensboro Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208998.55 1 Yes 208998.55
RCP-014163 Pipestone Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215431.88 Yes 0
RCP-031967 Toledo City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215433 1 Yes 215433
RCP-051413 Mount Holly Springs Borough General Acct, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215460.3 2 Yes 215120.76
RCP-052719 Readsboro Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216331.64 5 Yes 216331.64
RCP-032260 Berlin Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216333.15 5 Yes 216333.15
RCP-052214 Porter Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216405.3 1 Yes 216405.3
RCP-024315 Village Of Churchville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216409.61 6 Yes 216409.61
RCP-047119 Silver Lake Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209176.83 4 Yes 209176.83
RCP-040518 Prairie County, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209195 1 Yes 209195
RCP-033596 Town Of Springdale, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210174.46 3 Yes 210174.46
RCP-034326 Town Of Crescent, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210907.14 1 Yes 210907.14
RCP-007657 City of Wetumka Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210930.82 Yes 210930.82
RCP-022554 Southwest Greensburg Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211890.3 1 Yes 211890.3
RCP-053708 City Of Oakland, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211897.64 2 Yes 211897.64
RCP-035055 Town Of Rock, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212895.84 1 Yes 212895.84
RCP-053894 The Borough Of North York Dba North York Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212835.3 Yes 425670.6
RCP-052562 Inverness, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212901.92 Yes 212901.92
RCP-056401 San Felipe, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204827.41 3 Yes 204827.41
RCP-034215 Town Of Porterfield, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205150.37 1 Yes 205150.37
RCP-006922 Junction City, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205232.01 1 Yes 205232.01
RCP-056448 New Deal, Town Of, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205323.96 1 Yes 204918.98
RCP-003700 Baltimore Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205658.62 11 Yes 205248.48
RCP-007055 Waterproof, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205602.47 1 Yes 205602.47
RCP-018205 Village Of Manchester, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205605.88 4 Yes 205605.88
RCP-004378 Algansee Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205763.7 1 Yes 2835
RCP-026294 Berlin, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206884 1 Yes 206884
RCP-050546 City Of Terrytown, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206898.68 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-003296 Almer Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206919.68 Yes 206919.68
RCP-001227 St Albans Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207353.22 2 Yes 207353.22
RCP-052440 Denmark Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207417.69 8 Yes 207417.69
RCP-004197 Clark Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207655.3 1 Yes 207655.3
RCP-013713 Ausable Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207655.3 1 Yes 207655.3
RCP-055166 Lenox City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207687.37 2 Yes 207687.37
RCP-032521 Village Of South Bloomfield, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208129.95 1 Yes 0
RCP-051889 Upper Frankford Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 217237.27 3 Yes 217237.27
RCP-023754 Town Of Hinsdale, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209435.27 1 Yes 209435.27
RCP-033620 Village Of Shorewood Hills, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209441.78 1 Yes 209441.78
RCP-013731 Palmyra Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209441.82 5 Yes 209441.82
RCP-019563 City Of Coal Hill, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209459.84 5 Yes 209459.84
RCP-007912 Town of Maysville Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211106.31 9 Yes 211106.31
RCP-033583 Town Of Dunkirk, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211116.47 2 Yes 58598.12
RCP-055116 Montezuma City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211126.39 1 Yes 211126.39
RCP-006041 Town Of Beverly, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212271 3 Yes 212271
RCP-040819 City Of Sea Isle City, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212372.5 2 No 50000 50000 0 0
RCP-033858 City Of Cuba City, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212372.5 1 Yes 212372.5
RCP-051661 Borough Of East Mckeesport, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214410.32 2 Yes 214410.32
RCP-019123 Newport Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201819.78 No 0 0 51836.13 0
RCP-004155 Tuscola Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203346.66 2 Yes 203346.66
RCP-033760 Town Of Florence, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203371 Yes 203371
RCP-027449 Oak Lawn Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204467.07 3 Yes 203235.27
RCP-052762 Halifax Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203626.02 3 Yes 203626.02
RCP-055213 Holstein City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204846.44 2 Yes 204846.44
RCP-006882 Gilbert, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204861.56 3 Yes 181578.36
RCP-017654 Bannockburn Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204943.48 1 Yes 204943.48
RCP-014090 Ely Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206184.06 6 Yes 206184.06
RCP-026412 Town Of Greenevers, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206197.25 1 Yes 206197.25
RCP-057232 Franconia Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207199.12 Yes 207199.12
RCP-023993 Town Of North East, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207281.43 1 Yes 207281.43
RCP-024257 Town Of Lima, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207281.43 1 Yes 207281.43
RCP-018541 Hanover Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207288.6 3 Yes 207288.6
RCP-018918 Village Of Newburgh Heights, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215491.79 2 Yes 215491.79
RCP-047020 Millersburg Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215522.39 18 Yes 215522.39
RCP-013950 Warren Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215536.96 1 Yes 215536.96
RCP-022437 Jermyn Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215565.32 7 No 0 0 25000 0
RCP-026457 Town Of Kingstown, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215758.17 Yes 215758.17
RCP-005255 Buckfield Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215812.3 2 Yes 212811.84
RCP-007515 City of Beggs Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 217072.74 Yes 0
RCP-056981 Rankin, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211282.58 1 Yes 211282.58
RCP-003368 Albee Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212384.3 2 Yes 212384.3
RCP-027001 Hoyt Lakes City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212663.23 4 Yes 212663.23
RCP-053908 Jonestown Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212940.3 1 Yes 212940.3
RCP-017998 Grayville City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212972.46 1 Yes 212972.48
RCP-015994 Oakwood Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202085.72 1 Yes 202085.72
RCP-054307 King City City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202100.16 4 Yes 202100.16
RCP-024213 Town Of Theresa, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202973.74 5 Yes 88651.01
RCP-006956 Mer Rouge, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203379.73 2 Yes 203379.73
RCP-047756 Johnson City City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204954.1 4 Yes 204954.1
RCP-025822 Morven, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205017 3 Yes 205017.86
RCP-014154 Sodus Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205028.08 2 Yes 205028.08
RCP-056944 Gholson, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205095 10 Yes 205095
RCP-007944 Town of Oologah Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206192.78 Yes 206190.34
RCP-031797 Concrete Town, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206212 2 Yes 0
RCP-024714 Town Of De Kalb, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206358.36 1 Yes 206358.36
RCP-006514 City Of Garretson, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207430.3 1 Yes 207430.3
RCP-001414 Parsonsfield Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207458.95 9 Yes 0
RCP-039172 Baxter County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8144799 1 Yes 8144799
RCP-047185 Adelanto City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8145245 2 Yes 8145245
RCP-038940 Hendry County, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8162281 5 Yes 8162281
RCP-056142 Nacogdoches, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8162558.62 5 Yes 8162558.62
RCP-035203 Town Of Ashland, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8170444 40 Yes 8170444
RCP-039207 Weston City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8173762 1 Yes 8173762
RCP-037243 Okeechobee County, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8190640 Yes 8190640
RCP-053164 Franklin County, Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8198409 1 Yes 8198409
RCP-040494 Okanogan County, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8205208 23 Yes 8205208
RCP-035780 City Of Vestavia Hills, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8180927.96 4 Yes 8180927.96
RCP-035388 Town Of Wytheville, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8218170 1 Yes 8218170
RCP-040047 Pettis County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8223854 20 Yes 8223854
RCP-038387 Troy City, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8181545 3 Yes 8181545
RCP-040134 Fulton County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8182482 1 Yes 8182482
RCP-039838 Summit County, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8186172 8 Yes 8186172
RCP-031313 Danvers, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8234584.32 18 Yes 8234584.32
RCP-036864 Fayette County, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8236868 1 Yes 8236868
RCP-037986 Sweetwater County, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8224631 1 Yes 8224631
RCP-050710 Groveland City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8225519 1 Yes 8225519
RCP-036652 Radford City, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8228392 1 Yes 8228392
RCP-038880 Morristown, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8234483 1 Yes 8234483
RCP-036704 Hickory, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8237002 1 Yes 8237002
RCP-024683 Town Of Clarkstown, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8237821.38 34 Yes 8237821.38
RCP-050924 Zephyrhills City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8242048 3 Yes 8242048
RCP-039731 Cerro Gordo County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8245415 1 Yes 8245415
RCP-047353 Menlo Park City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8300499 1 Yes 8300499
RCP-037193 Dubois County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8300967 1 Yes 8300967
RCP-053711 City Of Oregon City, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8293549.04 2 Yes 8293549.04
RCP-037931 Petaluma, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8303531 2 Yes 4559820
RCP-037131 Pierce County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8304463 1 Yes 8304463
RCP-039892 Erath County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8293586 1 Yes 8293586
RCP-039504 Butler County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8250854 1 Yes 8250854
RCP-055991 Copperas Cove, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8251441.31 11 Yes 0
RCP-040270 Bridgeton, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8255513 7 Yes 8255513
RCP-038884 Muscatine County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8286982 18 Yes 8286982
RCP-038661 Orange, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8289219 5 Yes 8289219
RCP-049152 Branford, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8257021.34 26 Yes 8257021.34
RCP-026126 City Of Ashboro, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8267011.69 1 Yes 8267011.69
RCP-039527 Polk County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8277076 2 Yes 8277076
RCP-038350 Cape Girardeau City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8280673 1 Yes 8280673
RCP-056426 Midlothian, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8325179.18 1 Yes 8308758.44
RCP-039414 Walnut Creek, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8327653 1 Yes 8327653
RCP-039018 Lees Summit, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8310882 3 Yes 8310882
RCP-038585 Montrose County, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8305240 1 Yes 8305240
RCP-053090 St. John The Baptist Parish, Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8320585 1 Yes 8320585
RCP-038414 Davie County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8322333 2 Yes 7578298
RCP-056007 Deer Park, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8310779.19 2 Yes 8310779.19
RCP-040376 Folsom City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8375645 2 Yes 8375645
RCP-049100 Frostburg City, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8382724.89 1 Yes 8382724.89
RCP-025966 Union City, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8364601 3 Yes 8364601
RCP-038441 Shelby Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8374084 11 Yes 8374084
RCP-031407 Melrose, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8374173.8 38 Yes 8374173.8
RCP-056333 Weatherford, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8328903.31 3 Yes 8328903.31
RCP-047386 Pleasant Hill City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8334229 17 Yes 8334229
RCP-050617 Auburndale City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8339213 1 Yes 8339213
RCP-037139 Shawnee, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8351474 2 Yes 8351474
RCP-037847 Delaware County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8353994 18 Yes 8353994
RCP-036927 Stephens County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8380022 13 Yes 8380022
RCP-036700 Kandiyohi County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8390899 5 Yes 8390899
RCP-040511 Highland County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8383518 1 Yes 8383518
RCP-037913 Sullivan County, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8380605 10 Yes 8380605
RCP-047081 Portage City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8382483.94 3 Yes 8382483.94
RCP-050814 New Port Richey City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8382787 3 Yes 8382786
RCP-038778 Douglas County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8381382 2 Yes 8381382
RCP-038767 Branch County, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8452667 4 Yes 8452667
RCP-037042 Holland, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8453519 4 Yes 8453519
RCP-049178 East Haven, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8455012.29 59 Yes 8455012.29
RCP-040026 Kay County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8456746 116 Yes 8456746
RCP-050766 Lake Wales City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8393806 1 Yes 8393806
RCP-037138 Coffee County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8405273 1 Yes 8405273
RCP-049274 Westport, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8431928.13 16 Yes 8431928.13
RCP-038391 Jefferson County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8434797 1 Yes 8434797
RCP-038010 Douglas County, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8435574 1 Yes 8435574
RCP-036899 Sherman, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8437356 7 Yes 8437356
RCP-040216 Brown County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8436157 13 Yes 8436157
RCP-037356 Mecosta County, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8440236 3 Yes 8440236
RCP-039138 Dekalb County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8444509 1 Yes 8444509
RCP-049032 Town Of Fountain Hills, AZ Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8416299.44 2 Yes 8416299.44
RCP-039651 Albany, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8459912 15 Yes 8459912
RCP-037806 Bellevue, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8395637 1 Yes 8395637
RCP-038065 Miller County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8402165 1 Yes 8402165
RCP-038197 Twin Falls, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8465111 1 Yes 8465111
RCP-037944 Moore City, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8469969 5 Yes 8469969
RCP-035374 Town Of Vinton, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8408034 1 Yes 8408034
RCP-040446 Siskiyou County, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8456940 1 Yes 8456940
RCP-047347 Manhattan Beach City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8416521 1 Yes 8416521
RCP-038229 North Port City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8427359 1 Yes 8427359
RCP-046888 Chrisney Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106968 1 Yes 106968
RCP-051765 Royalton Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107310.16 1 Yes 107310.16
RCP-052216 Borough Of Lincoln, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107310.16 2 Yes 106971.94
RCP-025745 Iron City, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107923 3 Yes 107923
RCP-008496 Noxapater, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107680.19 Yes 0
RCP-006120 Town Of Kermit, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107683.5 Yes 0
RCP-023749 Town Of Farmersville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107691.98 8 Yes 107691.98
RCP-023898 Village Of Champlain, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107691.98 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-033805 Town Of Nashville, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107703.94 2 Yes 107703.94
RCP-034747 Village Of Elkhart Lake, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106343.25 1 Yes 106343.26
RCP-057211 Buhl City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106331.62 1 Yes 106331.62
RCP-052683 Peru Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106368.05 1 Yes 106368.05
RCP-025886 Rentz, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106429 1 Yes 53214.5
RCP-016038 Pearl City Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106554.28 1 Yes 0
RCP-016327 Woodhull Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106554.28 5 No 0 40000 0 0
RCP-049985 Town Of Morrison, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106572.3 Yes 0
RCP-055411 Adair City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106609.85 1 Yes 106609.85
RCP-005915 St. Joe Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107194.63 1 No 0 26465.47 0 0
RCP-055844 Pleasant Plains Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107642.94 1 Yes 107642.95
RCP-046871 Bruceville Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107647.88 3 Yes 0
RCP-052169 Abbottstown Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107730.16 2 Yes 107730.16
RCP-052460 Middleville Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107752.28 1 Yes 107752.28
RCP-032379 Village Of Glandorf, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107798.48 1 Yes 107798.48
RCP-006977 Norwood, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107802.38 1 Yes 107802.38
RCP-055247 Fremont City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107806.04 1 Yes 107806.04
RCP-034329 Town Of Lake Tomahawk, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107808.61 1 Yes 107808.61
RCP-026975 Harmony City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107861.57 1 No 0 0 0 30000
RCP-048032 Udall City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107894.68 1 Yes 107894.68
RCP-033792 Village Of Rosendale, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107913.28 1 Yes 107913.28
RCP-005362 Phillips Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108064.76 1 Yes 108064.76
RCP-006898 Hall Summit, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106320.55 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-018153 Tully Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106431.27 1 Yes 106008.07
RCP-018356 Mifflin Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106431.27 1 Yes 106431.27
RCP-018925 Washington Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106431.27 Yes 0
RCP-023146 Howard Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106890.16 1 Yes 53613.53
RCP-016204 Stronghurst Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107370.78 1 No 34432.86 0 0 0
RCP-019122 Salem Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107377.81 4 Yes 107164.32
RCP-033527 Town Of Lowville, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107389.94 7 Yes 107389.94
RCP-032886 Marshall Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106010.61 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-033023 Village Of Thornville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106010.61 1 Yes 106010.61
RCP-034029 Town Of Carlton, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106133.91 1 Yes 106133.91
RCP-018703 Whiteoak Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106115.78 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-003509 Sherman Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106244.68 1 Yes 106244.68
RCP-052896 Newbury Village, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106143.75 16 Yes 106143.75
RCP-023809 Town Of Arkwright, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106256.09 1 Yes 106256
RCP-031599 City Of Dayton, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106257.47 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-033123 Bear River Town Corporation, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106279 1 Yes 106279
RCP-025909 Scotland, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106308.66 1 Yes 106308.66
RCP-013971 California Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108031.2 1 Yes 108031.97
RCP-051489 Central City Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108045.16 1 Yes 107704.62
RCP-047572 Cherokee City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108047.28 1 Yes 108047.28
RCP-056339 Angus, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106510.25 14 Yes 106300.17
RCP-051877 Yoe Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106470.14 1 Yes 106470.14
RCP-001402 Rome Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106478.68 4 Yes 0
RCP-007821 Town of Glencoe Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106518.31 No 32234.59 0 0 0
RCP-054425 Dearborn City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106550.79 3 Yes 106550.79
RCP-033012 Hopewell Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107272.64 1 Yes 107272.64
RCP-003819 Sherman Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106770.12 7 Yes 106770.12
RCP-057199 High Forest Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107205.88 1 Yes 107205.88
RCP-032471 Village Of Mantua, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107272.64 3 Yes 107272.64
RCP-004465 Elk Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107400.66 6 Yes 107400.66
RCP-047388 Point Arena City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107410 1 Yes 107410
RCP-030219 Twin Bridges Town, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106838.57 6 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-007806 Town of Fort Cobb Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106869.28 1 Yes 106869
RCP-032579 Dublin Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106851.96 2 Yes 106851.96
RCP-019664 City Of Holland, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106852.5 6 Yes 106852.5
RCP-052282 Rush Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106878.03 3 Yes 106878.03
RCP-057164 Bay Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106878.03 1 Yes 106878.03
RCP-032938 Rarden Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106957.13 6 Yes 106957.13
RCP-018740 Homer Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107588.13 1 Yes 107588.14
RCP-024362 Village Of Baxter Estates, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107589.42 4 Yes 107589.42
RCP-003752 Grant Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107625 Yes 107625
RCP-024723 Town Of Hermon, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106974.03 1 Yes 106974.03
RCP-032589 Village Of Bradner, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107062.3 Yes 0
RCP-018537 Paint Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107167.47 2 Yes 107167.47
RCP-014193 City Of Avon, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106699.12 1 Yes 106699.12
RCP-007289 Hebron, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106723.44 1 Yes 106723.44
RCP-006173 Town Of Pine Grove, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107079.75 1 Yes 107079.75
RCP-050059 City Of Victor, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107075 2 Yes 107075
RCP-057401 Forest Prairie Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107096.59 2 Yes 107096.59
RCP-025358 Avoca, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107112.5 5 Yes 107112.5
RCP-023816 Town Of Cherry Creek, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107281.73 7 Yes 107281.73
RCP-023850 Town Of Ashland, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107281.73 1 Yes 107281.73
RCP-024827 Town Of Tyre, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108102.24 1 Yes 108102.24
RCP-055030 Schaller City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108105.09 3 Yes 108105.09
RCP-013863 Brampton Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108136.3 4 Yes 2000
RCP-015887 Mclean Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108187.3 1 Yes 34240
RCP-056139 Mount Enterprise, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108248.19 1 Yes 108248.19
RCP-017045 Pike Creek Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106440.9 2 Yes 106440.9
RCP-022704 Lower Augusta Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106785.14 1 Yes 106785.14
RCP-050045 Town Of South Fork, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106823.64 1 Yes 0
RCP-003556 Sherman Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107926.12 1 Yes 107926.12
RCP-006311 City Of Newell, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107965.04 3 Yes 107965.04
RCP-024097 Village Of Northville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107999.67 1 Yes 107999.67
RCP-004431 Elkland Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108031.2 15 Yes 108031.2
RCP-023922 Town Of Ghent, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 420203.87 2 Yes 0
RCP-017973 Gillespie City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 420229.4 1 Yes 420229.4
RCP-051329 Jackson Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 420525.6 19 Yes 420525.6
RCP-025564 Star City, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 420577.12 3 Yes 420577.12
RCP-014295 Celina City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421333.12 10 Yes 0
RCP-056834 Bruceville Eddy, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421323.78 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-052958 Edgewood Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421073.19 1 Yes 421073.19
RCP-005412 Winterport Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421367.96 1 Yes 421367.96
RCP-025229 Town Of Boscawen, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421480.52 14 Yes 421480.52
RCP-052209 Akron Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421575.6 1 Yes 421575.6
RCP-055960 Caddo Mills, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421572.06 1 Yes 421576.06
RCP-026158 Town Of Blowing Rock, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421955.42 2 Yes 421955.42
RCP-035611 Town Of Sardis City, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421966.9 2 Yes 421966.9
RCP-052911 Cavendish Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421585.07 1 Yes 421485.7
RCP-024589 Town Of Constantia, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421639.76 1 Yes 843279.52
RCP-022664 Pine Grove Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421680.6 1 Yes 421680.6
RCP-019363 Culberson County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421691 1 Yes 421691
RCP-034915 Town Of Polk, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 421709.61 7 Yes 421709.61
RCP-024934 Village Of Waverly, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 422050.01 1 Yes 422050.01
RCP-018899 Village Of Bellaire, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 422044.2 Yes 212000
RCP-054523 New Haven City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 422128.57 1 Yes 422128.57
RCP-054956 Wilton City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 422252.8 1 Yes 422252.8
RCP-005278 Durham Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 422213.87 9 Yes 422213.87
RCP-054346 Weatherby Lake City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 422332.3 1 Yes 422332.3
RCP-052885 Newbury Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 422482.04 7 Yes 422482.04
RCP-049947 Town Of Kersey, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 422518.94 Yes 422518.94
RCP-056327 Archer City, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 422565.16 1 Yes 422565.16
RCP-007065 Woodworth, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423059.49 1 Yes 423059.49
RCP-026574 Town Of Pine Knoll Shores, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 422911.51 1 Yes 422911.51
RCP-056590 Meadowlakes, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 422813.43 1 Yes 421979.47
RCP-057088 Stanley, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423257.25 Yes 0
RCP-054432 Elsberry City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423147.22 1 Yes 423147.22
RCP-031469 Richmond, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423252.07 5 Yes 423252.07
RCP-022557 Board Of Supervisors Lower Milford Township Dba Lower Milford Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 422835.6 1 Yes 422835.6
RCP-023828 Town Of Hanover, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423383.35 8 Yes 423383.35
RCP-004313 Columbus Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423402.44 4 Yes 423402.44
RCP-052667 Wesson, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423345.39 Yes 423345
RCP-050368 City Of Madison, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423354.69 Yes 423354.69
RCP-032596 Norwich Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423411.39 6 Yes 423411.32
RCP-051822 North East Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423465.6 1 Yes 423465.6
RCP-054500 Marceline City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424777.06 9 Yes 424777.06
RCP-054624 Granby City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424777.06 2 Yes 424777.06
RCP-018151 Clinton Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423832.08 1 Yes 423832.08
RCP-033058 Gunnison City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424287 Yes 424287
RCP-055912 Hughes Springs, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424303.09 6 Yes 424303.09
RCP-056631 Westlake, Town Of, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424303.09 1 Yes 424303.09
RCP-053236 Municipio De Culebra, Puerto Rico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514276.18 3 Yes 365893.01
RCP-040659 City Of Egg Harbor City, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424116.98 1 Yes 424116.98
RCP-040974 Borough Of Shrewsbury, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424221.64 3 Yes 424221.64
RCP-052041 Forty Fort Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424305.6 11 Yes 394190.36
RCP-054003 Rush Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424410.6 2 Yes 424410.6
RCP-051692 Manor Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424515.6 1 Yes 424515.6
RCP-024274 Town Of Cazenovia, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424716.67 3 Yes 424716.67
RCP-054392 Cabool City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423758.41 8 Yes 423758.41
RCP-051832 Township Of Foster, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 423780.6 3 Yes 423780.6
RCP-003687 City Of Algonac, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424243.16 1 Yes 424243.16
RCP-004241 Rutland Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 424978.8 Yes 424978.8
RCP-024825 Town Of Romulus, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 425024.36 4 Yes 425024.35
RCP-014721 Town Of Mcbee, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 425158.74 1 Yes 425158.74
RCP-038456 Towner County, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 425188 2 Yes 425188
RCP-031564 City Of Aberdeen, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 425244.97 4 Yes 0
RCP-040509 Highland County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 425382 3 Yes 425382
RCP-040700 Borough Of Ho-Ho-Kus, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 425477.66 5 Yes 425477.66
RCP-040917 Township Of Cranbury, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 425687 1 Yes 425687
RCP-055904 Woodcreek, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 426041.03 1 Yes 426041.03
RCP-025829 Nahunta, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 426091 4 Yes 426091
RCP-032918 Colerain Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 426145.8 7 Yes 426145.8
RCP-052821 Franklin Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 426070.01 4 Yes 426070.01
RCP-054161 Village Of Four Seasons Village, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 426075 8 Yes 426075
RCP-056393 Italy, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 425480.51 1 Yes 425480.51
RCP-051953 Waterford Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 426090.6 3 Yes 426090.6
RCP-052768 Corinth Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 426070.01 3 Yes 426070.01
RCP-025806 Midville, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 94853 No 7800 8243 0 0
RCP-018397 Village Of Milford Center, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 94862.66 1 Yes 94862.66
RCP-015342 Sadieville city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 94868.29 3 Yes 93743.16
RCP-033514 City Of Owen, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97132.42 1 Yes 97132.42
RCP-014237 City Of Veblen, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97114.28 1 No 1200 1000 0 1000
RCP-048052 Waterville City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97059.42 1 Yes 97059.42
RCP-026331 Carlton, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97093 2 Yes 97093
RCP-018600 Mill Creek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97071.22 1 Yes 97071.22
RCP-056785 Higgins, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97075.79 3 Yes 97075.79
RCP-048056 Weir City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97059.42 1 Yes 97059.42
RCP-019231 Village Of Beloit, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97176.38 2 Yes 75890.45
RCP-051527 Borough Of Stockertown Dba Stockertown Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97230.14 1 Yes 96923.7
RCP-017651 Avon Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97164.44 1 Yes 0
RCP-018468 Freedom Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97176.38 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-023768 Village Of Portville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97230.48 1 Yes 97230.48
RCP-016238 Tonica Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97300.52 1 Yes 97300.52
RCP-003486 Grant Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97312.16 Yes 97312.16
RCP-034473 Town Of Pine Grove, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97237.09 1 Yes 97237.08
RCP-052280 Perham Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97261.19 1 Yes 97261.19
RCP-032692 Adams Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97281.55 Yes 97281.55
RCP-053633 City Of Fossil, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97286.34 1 Yes 97286.34
RCP-050681 Ebro Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97292 1 Yes 97292
RCP-025445 Mcneil, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97375 3 Yes 97375
RCP-015587 Lidgerwood, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97395.02 Yes 97395.02
RCP-007943 Town of Olustee Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97393.18 1 Yes 97393.18
RCP-051510 Canal Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97335.14 2 Yes 97335.14
RCP-052232 Cogan House Township Board Of Supervisors, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97335.14 3 Yes 97335.14
RCP-003500 Nadeau Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97417.24 2 Yes 97417.24
RCP-013753 Rogers Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97417.24 1 Yes 97417.24
RCP-033700 Town Of Solon Springs, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97341.76 1 Yes 97341.76
RCP-050330 City Of Indianola, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97343.26 1 Yes 0
RCP-027495 Vasa Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97370.48 1 Yes 97370.48
RCP-006748 Dixie Inn, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97429.63 5 Yes 97429.63
RCP-025094 Town Of Middlebury, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97435.61 2 Yes 0
RCP-051847 Todd Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97440.12 1 Yes 97440.12
RCP-033459 Town Of Sampson, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97446.42 1 Yes 97446.42
RCP-032424 Riley Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97491.89 1 Yes 78007.52
RCP-035596 Town Of Red Level, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97500 1 No 3000 1200 0 0
RCP-052447 New Hartford Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97479.75 2 Yes 97479.75
RCP-046811 Town Of Highland Lake, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97468.4 1 Yes 97468.4
RCP-034467 Town Of Eau Pleine, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97551.09 10 Yes 97551.1
RCP-017372 Barnum Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97500 1 Yes 97500
RCP-033787 Village Of Eden, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97551.09 1 Yes 97551.09
RCP-056596 Bloomburg, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97572.34 2 Yes 97572.34
RCP-056791 Howardwick, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97572.34 1 Yes 97379.88
RCP-034442 Town Of Luck, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97760.43 1 Yes 97760.43
RCP-025833 Newington, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97840 1 Yes 97840
RCP-026359 Climax, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97840 1 Yes 97840
RCP-027395 Blackhoof Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97635.58 1 Yes 97635.58
RCP-035213 Town Of Boyce, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 217665 7 Yes 217665
RCP-052947 Amo Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97676.29 9 Yes 97676.29
RCP-053775 City Of Wheeler, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97730.56 1 Yes 97730.56
RCP-007834 Town of Hammon Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97744.16 1 Yes 97744.16
RCP-033479 Town Of Grant, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97760.43 2 Yes 97760.43
RCP-057253 May Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97589.04 1 Yes 97589.04
RCP-018895 Gibson Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97597.06 1 Yes 97597.06
RCP-004079 Village Of Hesperia, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97627.42 1 Yes 97627.43
RCP-014410 Liberty Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97915.44 2 Yes 97915.44
RCP-033307 Town Of Oak Grove, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97865.1 1 Yes 97865.1
RCP-033686 Village Of Sister Bay, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97865.1 1 Yes 97865.1
RCP-053683 City Of Maupin, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97952.7 2 Yes 97952.7
RCP-055646 Shueyville City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97937.52 3 Yes 97937.52
RCP-004035 Rock River Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97942.68 4 Yes 97942.68
RCP-035007 Town Of Poy Sippi, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97969.77 3 Yes 97969.77
RCP-025224 Town Of Warren, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97989.51 1 Yes 97989.51
RCP-033003 Wayne Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98017.75 1 Yes 98017.75
RCP-054391 Burlington Junction City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 97994.13 1 Yes 97994.13
RCP-051952 Hopewell Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98070.14 2 Yes 98070.14
RCP-001372 Perry Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98019.61 2 Yes 97905.86
RCP-024851 Town Of Fremont, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98050.99 Yes 98050.99
RCP-056601 Reklaw, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98068.89 2 Yes 98068.89
RCP-022624 Crawford Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98070.14 5 Yes 98070.14
RCP-023246 Paint Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98175.14 4 Yes 97865
RCP-014766 Perrysville Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98129.55 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-033533 Town Of Scott, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98074.44 1 Yes 98074.44
RCP-016194 Stewardson Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98117.04 1 Yes 98117.04
RCP-054981 Van Horne City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98087.04 1 Yes 49044
RCP-022975 Trumbauersville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98175.14 1 Yes 97865.72
RCP-015389 Trenton city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98275.16 5 Yes 98275.16
RCP-050070 Town Of Wiley, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98780.46 1 Yes 10000
RCP-022648 Southampton Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98280.14 1 Yes 98280.14
RCP-034166 Town Of Hamburg, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98493.11 4 Yes 98493.12
RCP-055367 Blairstown City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98535.61 1 Yes 49267.81
RCP-005354 Ogunquit Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98231.08 3 Yes 98231.08
RCP-033979 Town Of Waterloo, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98283.77 1 Yes 98283.77
RCP-031686 City Of Nezperce, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98514.01 1 Yes 98514.01
RCP-004099 Ontonagon Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98783.4 10 Yes 98783.4
RCP-057151 Edna Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98681.86 1 Yes 98681.86
RCP-019013 Loudon Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98753.92 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-023763 Town Of New Albion, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98563.81 8 Yes 31799.83
RCP-054587 Urich City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98605.32 1 Yes 98605.32
RCP-026073 La Barge Town, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98686.4 Yes 49343.2
RCP-034160 Town Of Emmet, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98179.1 1 Yes 98179.1
RCP-017903 Elizabeth Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98253.12 2 Yes 98253.12
RCP-033296 Town Of Cedar Lake, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98702.45 1 Yes 98702.45
RCP-004007 Whitney Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98783.4 4 Yes 98783.4
RCP-034222 Village Of Crivitz, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98702.45 12 No 19266.79 136885.1 0 0
RCP-052954 Claypool Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98356.17 4 Yes 98356.17
RCP-003811 Elmer Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98658 1 Yes 98658
RCP-057233 Erin Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98572.57 1 Yes 98572.57
RCP-004196 Village Of Central Lake, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98678.3 3 Yes 98678.3
RCP-050699 Glen Ridge Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98438 3 Yes 98438
RCP-034169 Town Of Holton, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98283.77 Yes 98283.77
RCP-055007 Stanwood City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98386.09 1 Yes 98386.09
RCP-050575 Village Of Wauneta, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98405.19 2 Yes 98405.19
RCP-014743 Town Of Trenton, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98573.1 2 Yes 98573.1
RCP-054195 Fair Play City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98401.59 8 Yes 98401.59
RCP-034098 Town Of Vilas, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23864.43 Yes 23864.43
RCP-019498 City Of Banks, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24032.98 Yes 24032.98
RCP-019518 Town Of Bluff City, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24032.98 1 Yes 24032.98
RCP-055677 Woolstock City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24073.19 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-008512 Sallis, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24159 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-018820 Village Of Kipton, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24504.44 2 Yes 24407
RCP-032271 City Of Orrville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 885419.92 1 Yes 881899.17
RCP-027103 Minnetrista City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 888464.59 4 Yes 888464.59
RCP-004337 City Of Mason, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 888840.4 1 Yes 888840.4
RCP-007591 City of Lone Grove Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 898649.54 5 Yes 898638.9
RCP-056605 Farmersville, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 901240.61 3 Yes 901240.61
RCP-034932 Town Of Merton, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 901300.92 1 Yes 901300.92
RCP-046820 Town Of Billingsley, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25013.63 1 Yes 25013.63
RCP-005418 Yarmouth Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 908188.05 2 Yes 821688.05
RCP-054148 Scott City City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 910265.65 1 Yes 910265.65
RCP-054519 Mount Vernon City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 918414.85 1 Yes 918414.85
RCP-031879 Medina City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 918736 5 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-004534 Bigelow City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25244.19 1 Yes 25244.19
RCP-008480 Leland, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 925852.92 1 Yes 925825.92
RCP-040462 Tinian Municipality, Northern Mariana Islands Northern Mariana Islands Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1243255 Yes 840658
RCP-047128 Sullivan City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 927584.81 3 Yes 924086
RCP-032197 City Of Olmsted Falls, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 928434.14 2 Yes 928434.14
RCP-052358 Grafton Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25462.77 1 Yes 25462.77
RCP-057348 Galena Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25462.77 Yes 25462.77
RCP-022407 West Abington Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25725.04 1 Yes 25684.5
RCP-034956 Village Of Waukesha, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 931445.47 4 Yes 931445.47
RCP-037872 Crane County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 931761 1 Yes 931761
RCP-006237 City Of Winfield, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 946431 1 Yes 946431
RCP-036714 Mills County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 946523 1 Yes 946522
RCP-025502 Peach Orchard, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25897.61 1 Yes 25897.61
RCP-019653 City Of Haynes, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25897.61 1 Yes 25897.61
RCP-006266 Town Of Lesterville, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23690.84 2 Yes 23690.84
RCP-027416 Pine Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23714.24 2 Yes 23714.24
RCP-003716 Wells Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24275.5 1 Yes 24275.5
RCP-013736 Faithorn Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24275.5 1 Yes 24275.5
RCP-007727 Town of Burbank Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24392.17 1 Yes 24277.09
RCP-019318 Village Of Chesterville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24399.27 4 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-032740 Village Of Mount Eaton, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24609.61 1 Yes 24609.61
RCP-022452 Southampton Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 891976.26 1 Yes 891976.26
RCP-024534 Town Of Blooming Grove, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 892099.88 3 Yes 892099.88
RCP-040351 Morrill County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 901654 7 Yes 901654
RCP-035530 Priceville, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 901939.4 1 Yes 901939.4
RCP-017144 Birch Creek Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24916.35 1 Yes 24916.35
RCP-023504 Union Dale Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25095.04 1 Yes 0
RCP-054866 Pilot Mound City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25119.86 1 Yes 25119.86
RCP-039981 Furnas County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 908258 10 Yes 908258
RCP-025471 Nashville, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 908695.19 5 Yes 908695.19
RCP-053780 City Of Wood Village, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 909116.38 7 Yes 909116.38
RCP-050655 Century Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 924576 16 Yes 924576
RCP-054601 Westboro City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25873.71 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-032382 City Of Oakwood, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 939792.42 1 Yes 939792.42
RCP-017400 Mendota City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23714.24 Yes 23714.24
RCP-057123 Litchville, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23716.32 1 Yes 23716.32
RCP-033047 Aurelius Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23873.41 1 Yes 0
RCP-050218 Village Of Dawson, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23893.35 4 Yes 0
RCP-007989 Town of Sasakwa Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24041.2 4 Yes 24041.2
RCP-008021 Town of Summit Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24041.2 2 Yes 24041.92
RCP-017822 Cooksville Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24359.16 1 Yes 4975.18
RCP-000032 Tuscumbia Town, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24362.28 Yes 24362.28
RCP-027366 Roosevelt Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24369.94 2 Yes 24369.94
RCP-007642 City of Sulphur Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 884961.84 Yes 884961.84
RCP-025825 Mount Vernon, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 885418 1 Yes 885418
RCP-031781 Cashmere City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 886322 2 Yes 886322
RCP-032806 Sugarcreek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 886576.78 5 Yes 884814.11
RCP-051773 Conewago Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 892186.26 1 Yes 892186.26
RCP-040759 Township Of Mansfield, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 893136.78 1 Yes 446568.39
RCP-024965 Town Of Esopus, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 893433.22 1 Yes 893433.22
RCP-050286 City Of Gretna, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 895204.02 2 Yes 0
RCP-025666 East Dublin, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 895500 Yes 755525
RCP-006925 Kentwood, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 902428.11 Yes 902428.11
RCP-051755 North Londonderry Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 902791.28 1 Yes 902791.28
RCP-027159 Pease City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25025.63 2 Yes 25025.63
RCP-027486 Mansfield Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25025.63 3 Yes 25025.63
RCP-017349 Byron Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25025.63 1 Yes 25025.63
RCP-047480 Albert City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25027.9 1 Yes 25027.9
RCP-051638 Board Of Supervisors West Manheim Township Dba West Manheim Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 909196.28 3 Yes 909196.28
RCP-025263 City Of Franklin, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 909334.29 1 Yes 909334.29
RCP-027149 Orono City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 911304.58 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-052850 Derby Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 918816.22 13 Yes 918816.22
RCP-034612 Town Of Hudson, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 918885.24 2 Yes 918885.24
RCP-013922 Alpena Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 919211.02 1 Yes 919211.02
RCP-048926 Causey Village, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25218 1 Yes 0
RCP-048944 Encino Village, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25218 1 Yes 25218
RCP-048952 Grady Village, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25218 1 Yes 25218
RCP-054860 Oakville City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25269.38 Yes 25269.38
RCP-054877 Lambs Grove City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25269.38 Yes 12592.5
RCP-004483 Leenthrop Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25462.77 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-053883 Town Of Arapahoe, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25803.75 Yes 25803.75
RCP-050297 Village Of Hardy, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25840.21 2 Yes 25840.21
RCP-034911 Town Of Germantown, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25853.13 2 Yes 25853.13
RCP-026464 Village Of Lake Park, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 931811.25 7 Yes 931811.25
RCP-016251 University Park Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 937215 1 Yes 937215
RCP-032118 City Of Sheffield Lake, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 937689.03 1 Yes 937689.03
RCP-032321 City Of Shelby, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 949783.49 1 Yes 949783.49
RCP-033344 Town Of Namakagon, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25957.8 2 Yes 25957.8
RCP-018441 Village Of Port William, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26081.98 2 Yes 25978.26
RCP-024967 Town Of Hardenburgh, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23589.67 Yes 23589.66
RCP-026875 Currie City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23604.97 Yes 23604.97
RCP-024060 Town Of North Hudson, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23897.36 1 Yes 23897.36
RCP-026652 Town Of Speed, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23902.31 Yes 23902.31
RCP-026947 Gilman City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23932.81 1 Yes 23932.81
RCP-004563 Wahkon City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23932.81 1 Yes 23932.81
RCP-017086 Westside Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 23932.81 1 Yes 23932.81
RCP-018265 Village Of Unionville Center, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24083.75 1 Yes 24083.75
RCP-017794 Chesterfield Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24086.98 1 Yes 24086.98
RCP-047142 Universal Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24576 1 Yes 24576
RCP-017131 Slater Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24588.5 1 Yes 24588.5
RCP-015259 Meadowbrook Farm city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24611.25 1 Yes 24600
RCP-017634 Arlington Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24631.32 1 Yes 24631.32
RCP-056261 Taylor Lake Village, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 886592.36 18 Yes 884843.62
RCP-052787 Bellows Falls Village, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 886565.6 12 Yes 886356.64
RCP-006937 Lockport, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 890573.56 3 Yes 890573.56
RCP-025581 Tontitown, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 902894.13 2 Yes 902894.13
RCP-007779 Town of Devol Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24743.14 2 Yes 24743.14
RCP-047596 Corning City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25027.9 1 Yes 25027.9
RCP-047528 Bern City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25027.9 2 Yes 25027.9
RCP-046801 Town Of Hytop, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 25050 No 14000 10000 0 0
RCP-024470 Town Of Whitestown, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 919689.54 Yes 919689.54
RCP-024302 Town Of Hamlin, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 919279.29 1 Yes 919279.29
RCP-025937 Sylvania, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 919774 7 Yes 919774
RCP-051545 Canonsburg Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 919801.3 1 Yes 919801.3
RCP-056606 Lavon, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 924578.53 2 Yes 924578.53
RCP-034928 Town Of Delafield, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 924642.01 8 Yes 924642.01
RCP-053581 City Of Aumsville, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 928440.36 1 Yes 928440.36
RCP-007650 City of Vinita Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 931991.34 5 Yes 931980.3
RCP-017683 Benton City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 932315.94 1 Yes 932315.94
RCP-035286 Town Of Honaker, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 932632.5 2 Yes 932632.5
RCP-056520 Eagle Lake, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 937737.15 2 Yes 937737.15
RCP-038784 Gallatin County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 937782 14 Yes 937782
RCP-040701 Borough Of Leonia, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 945680.38 1 Yes 0
RCP-014673 Rhame, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26087.96 2 Yes 26087.96
RCP-048059 West Mineral City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26096.18 2 Yes 0
RCP-052288 Bremen Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26118.46 Yes 26118.46
RCP-004544 Island Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26118.46 3 Yes 26118.46
RCP-017127 Meadow Brook Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26118.46 2 Yes 26118.46
RCP-003410 Antwerp Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 886843.7 2 Yes 886843.7
RCP-016195 Stickney Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 893531.82 1 Yes 893531.82
RCP-055138 Maquoketa, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 895642.44 8 Yes 895642.44
RCP-015959 New Grand Chain Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 24767.4 1 Yes 24767.41
RCP-017668 Beckemeyer Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137173.32 5 Yes 137173.32
RCP-033613 Village Of Maple Bluff, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137220.48 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-055248 Fredericksburg City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138009.68 1 Yes 138009.68
RCP-019151 Village Of Boston Heights, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138192.39 1 Yes 138192.39
RCP-052116 Rockland Township Road District Dba Rockland Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139440.2 1 Yes 139440.2
RCP-026847 Clara City City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139444.14 1 Yes 139444.14
RCP-014383 Hornbeak Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139455.33 1 Yes 139455.33
RCP-032396 Harrison Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136614.86 3 Yes 136614.86
RCP-018536 Monroe Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136614.86 2 Yes 136614.86
RCP-024793 Town Of Fulton, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136717.54 1 Yes 136717.54
RCP-032454 Village Of Stryker, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136720.02 1 Yes 136720.02
RCP-030012 Borough Of Elmer, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136906.46 1 Yes 36300
RCP-026291 Barwick, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138918 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-005313 Jonesport Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139257.62 Yes 10000
RCP-004220 Village Of Saranac, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139557.82 Yes 139557.82
RCP-033640 Town Of Hustisford, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139523.18 3 Yes 139523.18
RCP-014178 Batavia Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139557.82 4 Yes 139557.82
RCP-050498 City Of Scribner, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141413.21 1 Yes 141413.21
RCP-027512 Stanchfield Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136712.08 1 Yes 136712.08
RCP-056110 Liverpool, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136799.88 6 Yes 136799.88
RCP-050307 Village Of Hemingford, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136811.53 1 Yes 136452.82
RCP-034299 Town Of Brazeau, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136906.47 1 Yes 136906.47
RCP-034366 Village Of Black Creek, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136906.47 1 Yes 136906.46
RCP-033257 Town Of Adams, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138267.16 2 Yes 138267.16
RCP-054124 Miller City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138740.13 2 Yes 138740.13
RCP-027248 Starbuck City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138788.44 2 Yes 138788.44
RCP-004179 Roxand Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138822.2 Yes 138822.2
RCP-013977 Bronson Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140608.7 2 Yes 140608.7
RCP-035031 Town Of Utica, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140674.54 1 Yes 140674.54
RCP-034806 City Of Independence, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136383.13 7 No 10000 12000 93000 21384
RCP-022536 Palmyra Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136395.18 1 Yes 136395.18
RCP-024313 Village Of Pittsford, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136614.97 4 Yes 136614.97
RCP-014101 Village Of Bellevue, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136930.6 2 Yes 0
RCP-031687 City Of Notus, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137231.31 5 Yes 137231.31
RCP-001350 East Machias Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137248.58 4 Yes 137248.58
RCP-035450 Town Of Pickensville, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137406.68 1 Yes 137406.68
RCP-022732 Burgettstown Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137445.2 3 Yes 137445.2
RCP-003409 Superior Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137456.04 2 Yes 137456.04
RCP-032410 Village Of Minerva Park, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138928.58 2 Yes 138928.58
RCP-030066 Borough Of Sussex, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207767.08 1 Yes 207767.08
RCP-052989 Palmyra Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216655.52 Yes 216655.52
RCP-022572 Burnham Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209265.3 2 No 0 0 104500 16100
RCP-018305 Cynthian Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210022.99 Yes 210022.99
RCP-032359 Village Of Valley View, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210022.99 3 Yes 210022.99
RCP-018734 Montville Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210022.99 16 Yes 210022.99
RCP-015377 Stamping Ground city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210177.82 2 Yes 210177.82
RCP-022566 Union Township Supervisors, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210945.3 1 Yes 210945.3
RCP-050458 City Of Plainview, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210969.39 1 Yes 210969.39
RCP-026561 Town Of Ocean Isle Beach, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211933.8 2 Yes 211933.8
RCP-034172 Town Of Knowlton, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212686.5 1 Yes 212686.5
RCP-057368 Mantorville Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212663.23 1 Yes 212663.23
RCP-051532 Hughesville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213045.32 10 Yes 212373.84
RCP-033354 City Of Washburn, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213105.18 3 Yes 213105.18
RCP-035733 Town Of Geraldine, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213479.6 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-052385 Solway Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213865.34 5 Yes 213865.34
RCP-026510 Town Of Mcadenville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214483.38 1 Yes 214483.38
RCP-001223 West Bath Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203440.89 8 Yes 203440.89
RCP-006170 Peterstown, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203505.75 1 Yes 203505.75
RCP-047568 Chapman City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204496.28 4 Yes 204496.28
RCP-025317 Town Of Webster, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204563.57 12 Yes 204563.57
RCP-056931 Crawford, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205323.96 2 Yes 0
RCP-051790 Limestone Township Supervisors, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207795.3 1 Yes 207795.3
RCP-056833 O'Donnell, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207806.72 2 Yes 207806.72
RCP-003415 Butman Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207865.48 3 Yes 207865.48
RCP-032013 Town Of Dewey Beach, DE Delaware Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215952.69 1 Yes 215952.69
RCP-017882 Earlville City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215966.34 1 Yes 215966.34
RCP-033542 Village Of Pardeeville, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215931.23 1 Yes 215931.23
RCP-056268 Trinidad, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215999.82 Yes 215573.78
RCP-054878 Walford City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216060.65 1 Yes 216060.65
RCP-013845 Bloomer Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216684 1 Yes 216684
RCP-047498 Arma City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216705 1 Yes 216705
RCP-013749 Calvin Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216692.94 10 Yes 216692.94
RCP-024842 Town Of Caton, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216717.3 4 Yes 216717.3
RCP-022888 Borough Of Robesonia, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 217035.3 1 Yes 217035.3
RCP-035683 Town Of Altoona, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 217045.5 1 Yes 217045.5
RCP-025663 Dudley, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209498 1 Yes 209498
RCP-014139 Hillsdale Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209546.92 1 Yes 209546.92
RCP-007061 Wilson, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210047.91 Yes 209706.29
RCP-023195 Fairview Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211155.3 1 Yes 211155.3
RCP-052651 Tunica, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212410.23 1 Yes 212410.23
RCP-025667 East Ellijay, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212485 1 Yes 212485
RCP-006965 Morganza, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213011.55 1 Yes 213011.55
RCP-047124 Spiceland Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213029.49 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-055006 State Center City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214714.94 1 Yes 214714.94
RCP-013933 Arlington Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215011.52 1 Yes 209000
RCP-022469 Jefferson Township Board Of Supervisors Dba Jefferson Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215040.3 2 Yes 215040.3
RCP-007663 City of Yale Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214966.94 2 Yes 214966.94
RCP-022506 Clinton Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215040.3 1 Yes 215040.3
RCP-003952 Charleston Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215116.6 1 Yes 215116.6
RCP-049955 Town Of La Veta, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203844.66 No 0 505354 431175 558665.4
RCP-056795 Rising Star, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203834.3 4 Yes 203834.3
RCP-016285 Waterman Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204126.98 1 Yes 204126.97
RCP-015257 McKee city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204150.27 2 Yes 204150.27
RCP-046866 Brook Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216428.9 6 Yes 106060.78
RCP-015067 Brownsville city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216467.43 6 Yes 213900.14
RCP-056037 Garrison, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216744.65 1 Yes 216744.65
RCP-018407 Hilliar Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216753.82 2 Yes 216753.82
RCP-052918 Albany Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216772.45 1 Yes 216772.45
RCP-018547 Darby Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216753.82 3 Yes 216753.82
RCP-052836 Orleans Village, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216772.45 1 Yes 216772.45
RCP-055354 Brooklyn Town Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209332.13 1 Yes 209332.13
RCP-007585 City of Konawa Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210053.41 10 Yes 210053.41
RCP-032380 Village Of Edgerton, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210233.33 1 Yes 210233.33
RCP-007645 City of Thomas Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210228.9 5 Yes 210228.9
RCP-007731 Town of Byng Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210228.9 2 Yes 209729.85
RCP-051469 Buffalo Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211575.3 3 Yes 211575.3
RCP-007819 Town of Geronimo Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213212.11 3 Yes 213212.11
RCP-026365 Collins, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213232 Yes 213232
RCP-016172 Southern View Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213652.9 1 Yes 213652.9
RCP-017887 East Dubuque City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213516.82 Yes 213516.82
RCP-035176 St. Paul City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213521.54 1 Yes 213521.54
RCP-022668 Moscow Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213675.3 4 Yes 213675.3
RCP-031338 Florida, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213718.39 1 Yes 213718.39
RCP-025835 Newton, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214726 2 Yes 214726
RCP-025234 Town Of Ashland, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215137.23 2 Yes 215137
RCP-032875 Spencer Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215176.29 1 Yes 215176.29
RCP-047117 Shirley Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201244.88 4 Yes 201244.88
RCP-055329 Clarksville City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201257.89 1 Yes 201257.89
RCP-032868 Mill Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203923.17 6 Yes 203923.17
RCP-033240 Oakley City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205930 1 Yes 205930
RCP-024249 Town Of Caledonia, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205948.1 1 Yes 205948.1
RCP-047131 Swayzee Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206457.31 2 Yes 206457.31
RCP-047764 Kinsley City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206480.18 1 Yes 206480.18
RCP-055373 Bedford City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206939.75 1 Yes 206939.75
RCP-004261 Wilson Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207024.76 5 Yes 207024.76
RCP-056417 Blooming Grove, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207310.17 1 Yes 207310.17
RCP-022730 South Shenango Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208635.3 1 Yes 208635.3
RCP-018357 Bronson Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208655.79 2 Yes 208655.79
RCP-026752 Aitkin City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 216925.24 1 Yes 216925.24
RCP-022886 Borough Of Conway, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 217035.3 1 Yes 217035.3
RCP-024424 Town Of Somerset, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209332.7 5 Yes 209332.7
RCP-014336 Eastview Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209776.42 2 Yes 209776.42
RCP-018301 Goshen Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209707.48 2 Yes 209707.48
RCP-034475 Town Of Sharon, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213942.53 3 Yes 213942.53
RCP-024649 Town Of Worcester, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214050.63 Yes 0
RCP-032535 Jefferson Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214545.27 2 Yes 214545.27
RCP-047996 Silver Lake City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214568.48 3 Yes 214568.48
RCP-047261 Dorris City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214581 2 Yes 209000
RCP-035003 Town Of Marion, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215198.55 1 Yes 215198.55
RCP-030197 Poplar City, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215214.38 2 Yes 215214.38
RCP-032385 Plain Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202450.81 1 Yes 202450.81
RCP-030134 Culbertson Town, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203685.04 3 Yes 203685.04
RCP-017891 East Hazel Crest Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203718.72 1 Yes 203718.72
RCP-057110 Parshall, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203644.13 1 Yes 203644.13
RCP-006723 Chatham, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203750.18 1 Yes 203750.18
RCP-033007 New Russia Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204238.68 1 Yes 204238.68
RCP-034134 Town Of Schleswig, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204627.02 1 Yes 204627.02
RCP-055031 Sanborn City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206491.18 2 Yes 55000
RCP-056911 Aspermont, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207310.17 5 Yes 207310.17
RCP-052258 Rochester Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207964.1 3 Yes 207964.1
RCP-032724 Chester Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208235.12 2 Yes 207407.1
RCP-004326 Village Of Mattawan, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208285.84 3 Yes 208285.84
RCP-052656 Utica, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 217081.29 1 Yes 217081
RCP-006689 Anacoco, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 217113.75 Yes 217113.75
RCP-023268 West Cornwall Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 217140.32 1 Yes 216455.94
RCP-004403 City Of Newaygo, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 217218.38 1 Yes 217218.38
RCP-051699 Port Allegany Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209790.3 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-001000 Yellow Creek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211179.85 5 Yes 211179.85
RCP-032237 Village Of Saint Paris, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211390.19 7 Yes 211390.19
RCP-032565 Jackson Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211390.19 2 Yes 210549.63
RCP-052766 Manchester Village, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213035.73 1 Yes 213035.73
RCP-056114 Lometa, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213765.34 5 Yes 213765.34
RCP-031389 Leyden, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213718.39 3 Yes 213000
RCP-056891 East Mountain, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213765.34 2 Yes 213765.34
RCP-033238 Mona City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213860 5 No 170900.7 246825.4 0 0
RCP-024248 Village Of Caledonia, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214768.58 1 Yes 214768.58
RCP-026572 Town Of Pikeville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214802.08 1 Yes 214802.08
RCP-053141 Camas County, Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214828 1 Yes 214828
RCP-025027 Town Of Galen, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215178.84 3 Yes 0
RCP-047726 Hill City City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215178.92 2 Yes 215178.92
RCP-054023 Porter Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201075.28 34 Yes 201075.28
RCP-049879 Town Of Deer Trail, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201079.8 1 Yes 201079.8
RCP-054127 New London City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201081.51 1 Yes 194082
RCP-051985 Upper Tulpehocken Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201390.28 3 Yes 201390.28
RCP-016280 Warsaw City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201405.3 3 Yes 201405.3
RCP-008504 Polkville, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201838.89 2 Yes 0
RCP-014138 Mills Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201875.42 4 Yes 201875.42
RCP-001992 Town Of Edisto Beach, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202124.64 1 Yes 0
RCP-031593 City Of Cottonwood, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202190.32 1 Yes 202190.32
RCP-055094 Nora Springs City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202454.06 2 No 12403 0 0 0
RCP-026608 Town Of Robbinsville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203010.27 8 Yes 203010.27
RCP-052520 Coffeeville, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203068.11 Yes 203068.11
RCP-047748 Inman City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203580.62 1 Yes 203580.62
RCP-033102 Toquerville City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205338 9 Yes 0
RCP-013946 Dayton Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205343.36 1 Yes 205343.36
RCP-049952 Town Of La Jara, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205352.74 3 Yes 102676.37
RCP-004412 Clarence Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 205973.88 1 Yes 205973.88
RCP-007716 Town of Boley Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206017.29 Yes 206000
RCP-022427 Roaring Brook Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208005.28 1 Yes 207349.7
RCP-046970 Jamestown Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209403.46 1 Yes 209403.46
RCP-022527 Borough Of South Greensburg, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209580.28 Yes 208919.74
RCP-049853 Town Of Calhan, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209625.7 2 Yes 0
RCP-019059 Village Of Arcanum, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211179.85 Yes 211179.85
RCP-052805 Stockbridge Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211390.53 6 Yes 211390.53
RCP-014735 Town Of Six Mile, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211403.26 1 Yes 211403.26
RCP-052842 Panton Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211390.53 2 Yes 211390.53
RCP-004008 Village Of Shelby, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211438.5 1 Yes 0
RCP-026436 Town Of Holden Beach, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211615.1 1 Yes 211615.1
RCP-019082 Union Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211647.75 3 Yes 211647.76
RCP-047143 Utica Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211669.73 2 Yes 211669.73
RCP-051584 Miles Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211995.3 1 Yes 211661.22
RCP-052891 Roxbury Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211988.53 1 Yes 211988.53
RCP-022403 Meyersdale Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211995.3 4 Yes 211327.14
RCP-019126 Village Of Woodville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212021.21 Yes 212021.21
RCP-032126 Sandy Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213809.08 1 Yes 65805
RCP-014030 Campbell Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213855.54 1 No 0 213855.55 0 0
RCP-014287 Bulls Gap Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213930.41 1 Yes 213930.41
RCP-047309 Isleton City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201903 1 Yes 201903
RCP-035164 Selawik City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203314.94 1 Yes 203314.94
RCP-052697 West Fairlee Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203317.61 1 Yes 0
RCP-057154 Webster Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203592.81 4 Yes 203592.81
RCP-003555 Wilson Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206078.98 Yes 205475.98
RCP-031358 Hancock, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208039.15 1 Yes 208039.15
RCP-049863 Town Of Cheyenne Wells, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208117.6 Yes 208117.6
RCP-055728 Ventura City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106609.85 1 Yes 0
RCP-052531 D'Lo, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107434.34 Yes 107434.34
RCP-033847 Village Of Dickeyville, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107180.6 2 Yes 107180.6
RCP-052578 Mclain, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107188.5 1 Yes 0
RCP-003534 Geneva Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107190.48 5 Yes 107190.48
RCP-018167 Salem Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107482.97 1 Yes 107482.97
RCP-019328 Fitchville Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107482.97 2 Yes 107482.97
RCP-022263 Liberty Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107520.16 2 Yes 107520.16
RCP-054284 Bland City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107569.44 1 Yes 107569.44
RCP-054670 Polo City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107569.44 9 Yes 0
RCP-007950 Town of Paoli Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107571.22 3 Yes 107571.22
RCP-032991 Buck Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 107588.13 8 Yes 107160.33
RCP-018346 Clinton Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106010.61 3 Yes 105589.07
RCP-023487 Pine Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106050.14 1 Yes 106050.14
RCP-047558 Canton City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106063.38 1 Yes 106063.38
RCP-047663 Frankfort City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106063.38 1 Yes 106063.38
RCP-054961 Wheatland City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108105.09 Yes 108105.09
RCP-027622 Lansing Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106659.46 1 Yes 106659.46
RCP-003328 Forest Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106665.04 1 Yes 106665.04
RCP-023832 Town Of Mina, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106666.34 10 Yes 106666.34
RCP-022488 Covington Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106680.16 4 Yes 106341.01
RCP-031712 City Of Richfield, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106687.66 1 Yes 106687.66
RCP-015477 Smithfield Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106690.15 3 Yes 106690.15
RCP-006766 Evergreen, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 106691 1 Yes 106691
RCP-025710 Graham, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108297 2 Yes 108297
RCP-023372 Upper Turkeyfoot Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109935.16 2 Yes 2434.16
RCP-056784 Follett, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109489.56 2 No 25760 21806.78 24371.25 20396.67
RCP-032761 Orange Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109586.36 1 Yes 109586
RCP-022343 Burnside Township Supervisors Dba Burnside Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109515.14 1 Yes 109169.98
RCP-031896 Nespelem Town, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109533 2 Yes 109533
RCP-025572 Sulphur Springs, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109598.67 5 Yes 109598.67
RCP-035680 Town Of Berlin, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109354.82 2 Yes 109354.82
RCP-025228 Town Of Jefferson, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109610.06 1 Yes 109610
RCP-052151 Neville Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109620.16 1 Yes 109274.66
RCP-034179 Town Of Rib Falls, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109692.65 3 Yes 109692.65
RCP-013875 City Of Reading, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109712.62 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-014145 Clayton Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109712.62 1 Yes 109712.62
RCP-056487 Buffalo Springs, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109737.83 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-018323 Marion Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109796.7 Yes 109796.7
RCP-017175 Walcott Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109719.37 1 Yes 109719.37
RCP-018947 Village Of Luckey, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109796.7 1 Yes 109796.7
RCP-033704 Village Of Lake Nebagamon, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109797.31 8 Yes 109797.31
RCP-054907 Garnavillo City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108254.61 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-022723 Borough Of New Philadelphia, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108255.16 2 Yes 80000
RCP-003707 Drummond Island Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109187.18 3 Yes 109187.18
RCP-050083 Village Of Adams, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109201.44 1 Yes 109201.44
RCP-053949 Belle Vernon Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108255.16 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-007587 Town of Lahoma Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108273.14 6 Yes 108271.86
RCP-023845 Town Of Villenova, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109435.57 4 Yes 109435.57
RCP-040885 Borough Of Califon, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109483.3 4 Yes 109483.3
RCP-032815 Harrison Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109481.19 Yes 109045.85
RCP-001418 Stonington Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109122.14 Yes 109122.14
RCP-052811 Belvidere Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109133.72 2 Yes 109133.72
RCP-019665 City Of Holly Grove, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109391.49 5 Yes 109391.49
RCP-019675 City Of Huttig, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109391.49 1 Yes 0
RCP-052464 Stockholm Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109391.52 1 Yes 109391.52
RCP-035512 Town Of Louisville, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109830.26 2 Yes 109830.26
RCP-034647 Town Of Merrimac, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109901.98 6 Yes 109901.98
RCP-035194 Whittier City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108442.27 2 Yes 108442.27
RCP-024441 Town Of Florence, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108512.49 11 Yes 108512.49
RCP-007665 Town of Earlsboro Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108975.08 1 Yes 108975.08
RCP-022733 Asylum Township Supervisors Dba Asylum Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108990.16 Yes 108646.64
RCP-054462 Hardin City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109403.01 6 Yes 109403.01
RCP-025870 Pitts, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109417 3 Yes 109417
RCP-015826 Livingston Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109412.06 Yes 109299.14
RCP-013827 Fairhaven Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109817.72 1 Yes 109597.74
RCP-055125 Merrill City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109301.28 3 Yes 109301.28
RCP-007744 Town of Carney Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109326.04 4 Yes 109326.04
RCP-018286 Ames Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109165.68 Yes 109165.68
RCP-033721 Town Of Rock Creek, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109169.3 7 Yes 109169.3
RCP-050242 City Of Elgin, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109201.44 2 Yes 109201.44
RCP-023949 Town Of Truxton, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109230.44 1 Yes 109230.44
RCP-003778 Village Of Concord, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109292.28 2 Yes 109292.28
RCP-034478 Village Of Amherst, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109378.64 1 Yes 109378.64
RCP-056331 Dish (Formerly Clark), TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108993.01 7 Yes 108993.01
RCP-002081 Town Of Stuckey, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109027.82 1 Yes 109027.82
RCP-022818 Greene Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109095.16 1 Yes 109095.16
RCP-019239 Perry Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108429.5 1 Yes 108325.31
RCP-052289 Chengwatana Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108517.26 1 Yes 108517.26
RCP-032372 Village Of Wakeman, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108534.67 1 Yes 108534.67
RCP-025097 Town Of Pike, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108615.06 2 Yes 0
RCP-033029 Blanchard Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108639.83 1 Yes 108639.83
RCP-014024 Sims Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108661.74 2 Yes 54078.27
RCP-026181 Town Of Cameron, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108675.83 4 Yes 106808.32
RCP-024053 Town Of Keene, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108717.62 5 Yes 108717.62
RCP-027112 Morristown City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108735.83 1 Yes 108735.83
RCP-056892 Leakey, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108744.75 1 Yes 108744.75
RCP-018231 Washington Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108745.01 1 Yes 108745.01
RCP-033544 Village Of Rio, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108750.63 1 Yes 108750.62
RCP-033669 Town Of Baileys Harbor, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108750.63 1 Yes 108750.63
RCP-033675 Town Of Gibraltar, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108750.63 1 Yes 108750.63
RCP-051297 Westfield Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108780.16 5 Yes 108780.16
RCP-022270 Mccalmont Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108780.16 3 Yes 108780.16
RCP-049870 Town Of Crawford, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108834.44 1 Yes 108834.44
RCP-018515 Harrison Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108850.17 6 Yes 92310.84
RCP-019098 Village Of Chauncey, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108850.17 1 Yes 108850.17
RCP-055722 Gilbertville, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108852.71 1 Yes 108852.71
RCP-015999 Ogden Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108867.72 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-019682 City Of Junction City, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108355.58 4 Yes 108355.58
RCP-003379 Cleveland Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108556.66 1 Yes 108556.66
RCP-022839 Mifflin Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108570.14 2 Yes 108570.14
RCP-053972 Thornhurst Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108570.14 1 Yes 108570.14
RCP-001275 Frenchville Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109650.84 Yes 109650.84
RCP-033581 Town Of Dane, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109692.65 1 Yes 109692.65
RCP-003429 Sherman Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108871.92 4 Yes 108871.92
RCP-033140 Minersville Town, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108883 Yes 108883
RCP-018555 Ward Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108955.34 5 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-027157 Parkers Prairie City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108954.39 1 Yes 108954.39
RCP-032739 Montgomery Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 108955.34 1 Yes 108955.34
RCP-019525 City Of Bradley, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109184.31 2 Yes 109184.31
RCP-040343 Lawrence County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8812591 1 Yes 8812591
RCP-038748 Goldsboro, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8813514 8 Yes 8813514
RCP-040379 Henderson, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6345733 1 Yes 6345733
RCP-039561 Barron County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8788117 1 Yes 8788117
RCP-047206 Bell City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8497378 1 Yes 8497378
RCP-049280 Windsor, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8503548.17 19 Yes 8503548.16
RCP-056118 Lufkin, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8694861.63 7 Yes 8694861.63
RCP-031413 Milford, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8698487.71 10 Yes 8698487.71
RCP-001982 City Of Clemson, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8712767.14 1 Yes 8712767.14
RCP-038948 Polk County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8504334 1 Yes 8504334
RCP-047447 Temple City City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8566752 6 Yes 8566752
RCP-037743 Delaware County, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8572706 1 Yes 8555226.51
RCP-037621 Columbus, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8570495 1 Yes 8570495
RCP-038124 Lawrence County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8574066 1 Yes 8574066
RCP-056097 La Porte, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8683689.23 9 Yes 380385
RCP-039213 Shelby County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8688084 2 Yes 8688084
RCP-037718 Ravalli County, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8508802 1 Yes 8508802
RCP-054599 Wentzville City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8512654.44 1 Yes 8512654.44
RCP-038432 Jackson County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8534441 1 Yes 8534441
RCP-038750 Holmes County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8538715 1 Yes 8538715
RCP-039030 Florence, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8546584 14 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-035545 City Of Prattville, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8547979.72 19 Yes 8547979.72
RCP-049265 Vernon, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8688813.18 2 Yes 8606391.18
RCP-038270 Callaway County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8690803 1 Yes 8690803
RCP-047356 Monrovia City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8691147 1 Yes 8691147
RCP-039503 Leavenworth, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8549063 1 Yes 8549063
RCP-026686 City Of Thomasville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8492968.18 24 Yes 8492968.18
RCP-026259 Acworth, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8521070 1 Yes 8521070
RCP-031254 Agawam, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8552621.19 1 Yes 8552621.19
RCP-031292 Burlington, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8556805.87 4 Yes 8556805.87
RCP-038848 Suwannee County, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8627482 1 Yes 8627482
RCP-037215 Brookhaven, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8471155 1 Yes 8471155
RCP-037280 Shenandoah County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8471897 6 Yes 8471897
RCP-031481 Saugus, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8477296.67 1 Yes 8477296.67
RCP-038937 Pittsburg County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8479278 8 Yes 8479278
RCP-053221 Lake Havasu City, Az, Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8528306 15 Yes 8528306
RCP-037202 Washington County, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8528809 17 Yes 8528809
RCP-056546 Socorro, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8533234.18 46 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-047360 Moorpark City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8701673 3 Yes 8701673
RCP-038574 Richmond County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8707508 12 Yes 8707508
RCP-037486 Warren County, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8814727 3 Yes 8814727
RCP-053664 City Of Keizer, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8820849.86 34 Yes 8820849.86
RCP-039796 Laguna Niguel, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8821454 19 Yes 8821454
RCP-037714 Chambers County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8514823 11 Yes 8514823
RCP-037835 Coral Gables City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8518456 6 Yes 8518456
RCP-025716 Griffin, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8519203 1 Yes 8519203
RCP-049161 Cheshire, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8563922.1 10 Yes 8563922.1
RCP-040651 West Warwick, RI Rhode Island Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8656939.64 43 Yes 8656939.64
RCP-038564 Phelps County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8657783 8 Yes 8657783
RCP-039675 City Of Coeur D'Alene, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8659329 28 Yes 8659329
RCP-049894 City Of Englewood, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8776379.4 11 Yes 8776379.4
RCP-035352 Town Of Smithfield, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8792954 1 Yes 8792954
RCP-037134 Centennial, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8489546 1 Yes 8489546
RCP-030164 Helena City, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8486620.42 1 Yes 8486620.42
RCP-040354 Chilton County, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8629618 1 Yes 8629618
RCP-039421 Stephenson County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8643215 1 Yes 8643215
RCP-015145 Florence city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8649262.72 7 Yes 8546682.96
RCP-040636 Johnston, RI Rhode Island Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8809083.23 10 Yes 8809083.23
RCP-038806 Dunn County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8812202 16 Yes 8812202
RCP-038760 Hopkins County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8679732 69 Yes 8679732
RCP-036889 Baldwin County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8719356 1 Yes 8719356
RCP-047460 West Hollywood City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8725595 1 Yes 8725595
RCP-040067 Union County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8725766 1 Yes 8725766
RCP-040015 Macoupin County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8726349 44 Yes 8726349
RCP-039698 Itasca County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8765973 57 Yes 8765973
RCP-038359 Huntingdon County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8768693 1 Yes 8768693
RCP-026667 City Of Statesville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8773103.24 3 Yes 8773103
RCP-026524 Town Of Mint Hill, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8801467.31 5 Yes 8801467.31
RCP-039719 Greene County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8803850 2 Yes 8803850
RCP-038399 Habersham County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8804433 1 Yes 8804433
RCP-049191 Groton, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8587894.04 61 Yes 8587894.04
RCP-047417 San Juan Capistrano City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8590675 3 Yes 8590675
RCP-053158 Jackson County, Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8591353 1 Yes 8591353
RCP-038775 Caldwell County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8481220 1 Yes 8481220
RCP-031540 West Springfield, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8523926.13 12 Yes 8523926.13
RCP-001394 Industry Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98442.55 4 Yes 98442.55
RCP-013854 Village Of Dryden, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98573.22 1 Yes 98573.22
RCP-004513 Dunn Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98463.3 1 Yes 98463.3
RCP-022299 Pringle Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98805.14 3 Yes 98805.14
RCP-022476 Ivyland Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98805.14 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-007247 Lakota, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98818 1 Yes 98130.25
RCP-004214 Hatton Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98888.48 1 Yes 98888.48
RCP-033129 Copperton Metro Township, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98823 Yes 98823
RCP-030170 Jordan Town, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98896.13 1 Yes 98896.13
RCP-022970 Office Of Goldsboro Borough Council, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98805.14 1 Yes 0
RCP-034150 Town Of Berlin, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98807.12 2 Yes 98807.12
RCP-024232 Town Of Lyonsdale, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98871.5 3 Yes 98871.5
RCP-047707 Hanover City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98890.74 1 Yes 98890.74
RCP-017721 Brownstown Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98933.54 1 Yes 98933.54
RCP-050208 Village Of Culbertson, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98936.15 4 Yes 98936.15
RCP-050576 Village Of Wausa, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 98936.15 1 Yes 98936.15
RCP-057391 Hale Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99009.71 1 Yes 99009.71
RCP-054068 Crystal Lake Park City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99012.78 1 Yes 99012.78
RCP-049957 Town Of Lake City, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99031.8 1 Yes 99031.8
RCP-025361 Bellefonte, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99032.44 3 Yes 99032.44
RCP-047941 Pretty Prairie City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99043.34 2 Yes 99043.34
RCP-032683 Flatrock Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99279.78 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-015629 Aleknagik City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99287.39 1 Yes 99287.39
RCP-024396 Village Of Mill Neck, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99179.19 1 Yes 99179.18
RCP-051605 Bernville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99225.14 1 Yes 98912.4
RCP-016219 Tampico Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99205.7 1 Yes 99205.7
RCP-034439 Town Of Laketown, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99330.46 1 Yes 99330.46
RCP-003511 Village Of Lake Linden, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99413.92 1 Yes 99413.92
RCP-050142 Village Of Boys Town, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99467.11 1 Yes 0
RCP-032431 Sandusky Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99490.1 1 Yes 99490.1
RCP-051900 Rose Valley Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99540.14 6 Yes 99383.28
RCP-003516 Summit Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99308.84 1 Yes 99308.84
RCP-051367 Saegertown Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99330.14 1 Yes 99330.14
RCP-051675 Banks Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99330.14 1 Yes 99330.14
RCP-015330 River Bluff city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99546.75 1 Yes 99457
RCP-055406 Albert City City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99432.76 Yes 99432.76
RCP-016057 Pocahontas Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99477.88 Yes 0
RCP-022415 Juniata Township Supervisors, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99435.14 1 Yes 99435.14
RCP-034489 Town Of Elk, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99330.46 5 Yes 99330
RCP-018832 Washington Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99069.44 Yes 99069.44
RCP-014539 Toone Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99102.3 1 Yes 99102.3
RCP-025291 Town Of Harrisville, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99559.86 4 Yes 99559.86
RCP-052887 Hancock Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99565.84 3 Yes 99542.37
RCP-016287 Watson Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99613.96 1 Yes 99613.96
RCP-006694 Athens, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99652.37 1 Yes 99652.37
RCP-033415 Town Of Siren, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99644.46 1 Yes 99644.46
RCP-051842 Borough Of Bechtelsville Dba Bechtelsville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99645.14 1 Yes 99331.08
RCP-055324 Coggon City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99731.8 1 Yes 99731.8
RCP-018535 Gorham Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99700.44 1 Yes 99700.44
RCP-001362 Monroe Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99711.41 1 Yes 99711.41
RCP-015632 Coffman Cove City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99680.16 3 Yes 99680.16
RCP-038909 Morgan County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6537672 10 Yes 6537672
RCP-034032 Town Of Lincoln, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99749.13 4 Yes 99749.14
RCP-047784 Lecompton City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99806.38 1 Yes 99806.38
RCP-040619 Bristol, RI Rhode Island Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6550543.01 1 Yes 6550543.01
RCP-008517 Shubuta, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99813.14 Yes 99813.14
RCP-031365 Hawley, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99834.88 2 Yes 99834.88
RCP-033398 City Of Buffalo City, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99853.8 7 Yes 99853.8
RCP-033122 Town Of Apple Valley, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99888 1 Yes 99888
RCP-034603 Town Of Baldwin, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99958.47 2 Yes 99958.47
RCP-023360 Avonmore Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99960.14 1 Yes 99802.61
RCP-047304 Imperial Beach City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6564231 1 Yes 6564231
RCP-039023 Mansfield, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6550549 9 Yes 6550549
RCP-050885 South Daytona City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6551166 1 Yes 6551166
RCP-053004 Wheatland Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99750 1 Yes 99750
RCP-040484 Gibson County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6537866 40 Yes 6537866
RCP-023535 Lewis Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99750.14 Yes 99750.14
RCP-036923 Wakulla County, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6553405 1 Yes 6553405
RCP-054119 Liberty City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6539733.09 6 Yes 6539733.09
RCP-017344 Hudson Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99774.68 3 Yes 23750
RCP-049030 City Of Eloy, AZ Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6554360.17 1 Yes 6554360.17
RCP-039142 Clarendon County, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6554571 18 Yes 6554571
RCP-014511 Shelbyville City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6557664.22 1 Yes 6557664.22
RCP-039124 Hot Spring County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6559621 9 Yes 6559621
RCP-034766 Town Of Holway, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99853.8 2 Yes 99853.8
RCP-040649 Smithfield, RI Rhode Island Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6545162.89 1 Yes 6545162.89
RCP-032854 Colebrook Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99805.62 1 Yes 99805.62
RCP-018280 Lebanon Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99805.62 1 Yes 99805.62
RCP-049192 Guilford, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6550274.32 7 Yes 6550274.3
RCP-004360 Village Of Onsted, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99834.28 2 Yes 99634.08
RCP-054268 Summersville City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99827.7 2 Yes 49913.86
RCP-035714 Town Of Kennedy, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100083.42 1 Yes 100083.42
RCP-023936 Village Of Mcgraw, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 99999.7 3 Yes 99999.7
RCP-038346 Hinesville, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6569056 18 No 198967.23 0 0 0
RCP-056947 Grandfalls, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100055.1 1 Yes 99857.74
RCP-040637 Lincoln, RI Rhode Island Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6572064.5 13 Yes 6572064.51
RCP-050821 North Palm Beach Village, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6574706 1 Yes 6574706
RCP-046807 Town Of West Jefferson, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100083.42 1 Yes 100083.42
RCP-039134 Coon Rapids City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6568368 1 Yes 6568368
RCP-030210 Stanford Town, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100177.17 1 Yes 100177.17
RCP-023685 Village Of Andover, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100204.83 Yes 100204.83
RCP-038169 Effingham County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6605655 47 Yes 6605655
RCP-037150 Seneca County, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6607209 14 Yes 6607209
RCP-040072 Pulaski County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6609346 6 Yes 2515056.4
RCP-037106 Whitley County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6597109 8 No 1632972 1632972 1632972 1632972
RCP-037698 West Chester Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6625344 1 Yes 6625344
RCP-018720 Perry Township, East Liberty, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100226.3 9 Yes 99827.76
RCP-039806 Greenwood, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6616647 9 Yes 5944767.52
RCP-039137 Lincoln County, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6633820 5 Yes 6633820
RCP-055922 Alvin, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6634670.27 1 Yes 6621583.91
RCP-055295 Urbandale City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6635678.74 1 Yes 6635678.74
RCP-040445 West Memphis, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6639347 6 Yes 6639347
RCP-037002 Wasatch County, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6621777 1 Yes 6621777
RCP-037102 Lee County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6622748 33 Yes 6622748
RCP-037322 Putnam County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6577102 1 Yes 6577102
RCP-031905 Oak Harbor City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6584548 32 Yes 6584548
RCP-040438 Emporia City, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6584962 79 Yes 6584962
RCP-038056 Middletown, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6586018 5 Yes 6586018
RCP-036940 Halifax County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6586814 18 Yes 0
RCP-050690 Fernandina Beach City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6595742 6 Yes 6595742
RCP-023691 Village Of Bolivar, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100102.26 1 Yes 100102.26
RCP-033304 Town Of Lakeland, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100167.81 1 Yes 100167.81
RCP-034171 Town Of Johnson, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100167.81 1 Yes 100167.9
RCP-034971 Town Of Iola, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100167.81 Yes 100167.81
RCP-022854 Moreland Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100170.14 1 Yes 100170.14
RCP-039204 Jackson County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6640230 9 Yes 2383002
RCP-040281 Panola County, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6641395 3 Yes 6641395
RCP-049046 City Of Nogales, AZ Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6714002.68 1 Yes 6714002.68
RCP-016443 Taneytown City, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6718993.01 8 Yes 6716513.97
RCP-036716 Scotland County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6763960 15 Yes 3029655.75
RCP-039493 Sioux County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6770175 27 Yes 6770175
RCP-025685 Fayetteville, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6718493 1 Yes 6718493
RCP-039261 Steuben County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6719479 11 Yes 6719479
RCP-039336 Arlington Heights, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6772596 1 Yes 6772596
RCP-038815 Covington City, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6821460 3 Yes 6821460
RCP-031778 Camas City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6822893 1 Yes 6822893
RCP-040229 Diamond Bar City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6830947 3 Yes 6830947
RCP-023654 Municipality Of Barranquitas, PR Puerto Rico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8291635.68 5 Yes 6189596.55
RCP-049121 Ocean City Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6844167.15 Yes 6841641.92
RCP-055983 Colleyville, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6726035.7 1 Yes 6712769.14
RCP-037463 Lincoln County, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6727248 17 Yes 6727248
RCP-037868 Monroe County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6727831 27 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-038408 Miami County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6650136 1 Yes 6650136
RCP-026204 Clemmons Village, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6650259.56 9 Yes 6650259.56
RCP-039821 Harris County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6844180 11 Yes 6844180
RCP-035204 Town Of Bedford, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6844498 4 Yes 2344498
RCP-038844 Rowlett, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6851861 1 Yes 6851861
RCP-039158 Miami County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6898567 1 Yes 6898567
RCP-006062 City Of Clarksburg, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6730022.98 3 Yes 6447265
RCP-038112 Lincoln County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6774448 8 Yes 6774448
RCP-037471 Cowley County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6780470 1 Yes 6780470
RCP-038187 Lincoln County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6781635 1 Yes 6781635
RCP-040333 Maricopa City, AZ Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6730215 2 Yes 6730215
RCP-031889 Moses Lake City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6730126 Yes 6730126
RCP-049132 Thurmont Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6795871.62 1 Yes 6795871.62
RCP-037939 Blaine City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6793793 5 Yes 6793793
RCP-040103 Gloucester Twp, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6799055 2 Yes 6669055
RCP-038518 Redondo Beach, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6801080 1 Yes 6801080
RCP-037300 Town Of Clay, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6644891 5 Yes 6644891
RCP-007067 Zachary, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6649294.77 2 Yes 6649294.77
RCP-038528 Fairborn, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6811368 22 Yes 6811368
RCP-040307 Greenup County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6817375 1 Yes 6817375
RCP-053178 Madison County, Ne, Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6817569 12 Yes 6817569
RCP-039391 Nicollet County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6657323 48 Yes 6657323
RCP-040544 Fulton County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6670142 40 Yes 6670142
RCP-038853 Greenbrier County, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6732687 2 Yes 6732687
RCP-036833 Naranjito Municipio, PR Puerto Rico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8175795.12 7 Yes 5312223
RCP-023662 Municipio De Utuado, PR Puerto Rico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8169441.72 5 Yes 8169441.72
RCP-036920 Lacey City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6856924 1 Yes 6856924
RCP-039610 Grapevine, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6860286 1 Yes 6860286
RCP-037794 Morrow County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6862050 5 Yes 6862050
RCP-047457 Wasco City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6868042 1 Yes 6868042
RCP-038633 Alpharetta City, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6644511 1 Yes 6644511
RCP-038566 Lincoln County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6675193 1 Yes 6675193
RCP-038683 Marshall County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6676941 1 Yes 6676941
RCP-038134 Transylvania County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6678883 3 Yes 6368042
RCP-025865 Perry, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6682270 31 Yes 6682270
RCP-039670 Becker County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6686264 2 Yes 6686264
RCP-040408 Marshall County, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6855446 Yes 6855446
RCP-035746 City Of Enterprise, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6745765.02 2 Yes 6745765.02
RCP-026187 Town Of Carrboro, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6753198.84 4 Yes 6753198.84
RCP-040595 Clark County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6754442 9 Yes 6754442
RCP-047210 Benicia City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6755608 1 Yes 6755608
RCP-056101 Lake Jackson, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6758063.27 19 Yes 4050985
RCP-039223 Harvey County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6687430 1 Yes 6687430
RCP-001961 City Of Beaufort, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6689031.44 1 Yes 6689031.44
RCP-037953 Salinas Municipio, PR Puerto Rico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8110304.54 12 Yes 8110304.54
RCP-040624 Westerly, RI Rhode Island Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6689833.76 29 Yes 6689833.76
RCP-049895 Town Of Erie, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6787197.44 1 Yes 6787197.44
RCP-040131 Wapello County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6792318 11 Yes 6792318
RCP-056558 Paradise, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139282.64 1 Yes 139282.64
RCP-050129 City Of Benkelman, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139820.32 1 Yes 139820.32
RCP-018484 Village Of Beverly, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140085.44 1 Yes 140085.44
RCP-034430 Town Of Black Brook, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140151.19 1 Yes 140151.19
RCP-031716 City Of Roberts, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137016.21 1 Yes 137014.21
RCP-018602 Washington Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137035.53 3 Yes 137035.53
RCP-003313 Hill Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137035.7 3 Yes 137035.7
RCP-006250 City Of Philip, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138347.16 1 Yes 138347.16
RCP-027227 Spring Grove City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138351.31 Yes 138351.31
RCP-056051 Hawk Cove, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138289.53 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-024433 Town Of Augusta, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138358.56 15 Yes 93626.8
RCP-003852 Chester Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138401.84 1 Yes 138401.84
RCP-047924 Perry City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138874.34 3 Yes 138874.34
RCP-015146 Fordsville city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138895.57 1 Yes 137248.37
RCP-006976 North Hodge, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139291.03 1 No 7862 0 0 0
RCP-053920 Huston Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139335.2 6 Yes 139335.2
RCP-057071 Lamoure, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139610.07 2 Yes 139610.07
RCP-015840 Lovington Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139622.86 2 Yes 139622.86
RCP-034357 Town Of Kaukauna, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139627.85 1 Yes 139627.85
RCP-048044 Wakefield City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140400.42 2 Yes 140000
RCP-024859 Town Of Jasper, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140409.83 1 Yes 140409.83
RCP-025754 Jenkinsburg, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140412 1 Yes 140412
RCP-051711 Newlin Township Board Of Supervisors Newlin Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141435.2 1 Yes 141435.2
RCP-023881 Village Of Oxford, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141435.47 3 Yes 141435.47
RCP-055675 Princeton City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141448.7 1 Yes 141448.7
RCP-056153 Old River-Winfree, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137250 4 Yes 137250
RCP-027088 Medford City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137258.49 1 Yes 137258.49
RCP-032159 Village Of Frazeysburg, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138402.73 4 Yes 137865.78
RCP-018884 Coitsville Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138402.73 2 Yes 137852.39
RCP-052900 Waltham Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138435.38 1 Yes 138435.38
RCP-034508 City Of Phillips, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139837.19 6 Yes 139837.19
RCP-003711 City Of Litchfield, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139873.08 2 Yes 139873.08
RCP-025490 Oxford, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140675.79 5 Yes 140675.79
RCP-022849 Pittsfield Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141120.2 3 Yes 141193.26
RCP-003636 Fawn River Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141134.14 2 Yes 141134.14
RCP-022909 Mount Pleasant Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141225.2 1 Yes 140780.1
RCP-050571 Village Of Walthill, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141236.22 10 Yes 0
RCP-034972 Town Of Larrabee, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141407.22 4 Yes 141407.22
RCP-050367 City Of Lyons, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141413.21 2 Yes 141413.21
RCP-015997 Odin Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137309.4 1 Yes 137309.4
RCP-055695 Elkhart City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137262.06 1 Yes 137262.06
RCP-024062 Town Of St. Armand, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137332.92 13 Yes 137332.91
RCP-052148 Monroe Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137655.2 1 Yes 137655.2
RCP-007852 Town of Howe Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138456.26 5 Yes 138456.26
RCP-003938 Marcellus Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138506.94 3 Yes 137578.4
RCP-013951 Rose Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139347.64 Yes 10000
RCP-032135 Village Of West Alexandria, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139349.25 8 Yes 120000
RCP-032951 Village Of Morrow, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139349.25 2 Yes 139349.25
RCP-024813 Town Of Reading, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139384.2 3 Yes 0
RCP-027463 Ida Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140209.11 1 Yes 140209.11
RCP-054375 Bevier City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140777.43 1 No 10000 10000 10000 10000
RCP-025654 Dillard, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140785 3 Yes 140785
RCP-054871 Wayland City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141000.13 3 Yes 141000.13
RCP-055088 Odebolt City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141000.13 1 Yes 141000.13
RCP-019095 Brush Creek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141031.97 2 Yes 141031.97
RCP-055225 Griswold City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141149.66 1 Yes 141149.66
RCP-047044 New Market Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141188.7 Yes 141188.7
RCP-024922 Town Of Fremont, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136614.97 2 No 1 1 1 1
RCP-015885 Mccullom Lake Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137173.32 1 Yes 137173.32
RCP-047547 Burlingame City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137500.86 8 Yes 137500.86
RCP-000023 Leawood Village, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137517.75 Yes 0
RCP-056008 Deport, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138537.82 2 Yes 138537.82
RCP-015462 Medway Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138517.45 6 Yes 138517.45
RCP-024936 Town Of Berkshire, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138563.68 Yes 138563.68
RCP-025606 Weiner, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139639.89 1 Yes 139639.89
RCP-050393 City Of Minatare, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139643.33 1 Yes 139643.34
RCP-026567 Town Of Parkton, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139908.18 4 Yes 117558.8
RCP-026339 Centralhatchee, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140785 1 Yes 140785
RCP-033672 Town Of Egg Harbor, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141197.88 1 Yes 141197.88
RCP-034265 Town Of Byron, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141197.88 1 Yes 141197.88
RCP-034312 Town Of Oconto, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141197.88 2 Yes 0
RCP-005416 Woodstock Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137037.11 1 Yes 136878.08
RCP-022719 Borough Of Elverson, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137340.18 3 Yes 137340.18
RCP-050438 City Of Oshkosh, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137519.48 7 Yes 137519.48
RCP-016074 Ramsey Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137581.58 1 Yes 137581.58
RCP-014330 Ducktown City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138565.19 1 No 0 0 138565.19 0
RCP-037246 Thomas County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140240 4 Yes 140240
RCP-022615 Litchfield Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136395.18 3 Yes 136395.18
RCP-026313 Bronwood, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137051 1 Yes 137051
RCP-014540 Townsend City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137081.62 1 Yes 137081.62
RCP-027409 Watertown Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138569.87 4 Yes 138569.87
RCP-040768 Borough Of Pemberton, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138581.16 3 Yes 138581.16
RCP-034124 Town Of Gibson, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138581.17 5 Yes 138581.17
RCP-025446 Mcrae, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138603.99 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-057097 Hankinson, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139926.29 2 Yes 139926.29
RCP-034465 Town Of Carson, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139941.86 1 Yes 139941.86
RCP-019169 Webster Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139980.27 3 Yes 139980.27
RCP-035590 Town Of Hurtsboro, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140021.68 1 Yes 140021.68
RCP-018318 Middlebury Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140506.12 1 Yes 139947.42
RCP-026169 Town Of Bridgeton, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140545.57 Yes 140545.57
RCP-053928 Nicholson Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136395.18 4 Yes 136395.18
RCP-055349 Calmar City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137112.54 1 Yes 137112.54
RCP-034906 City Of Shell Lake, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137115.81 1 Yes 137115.81
RCP-051497 Washington Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137130.2 5 Yes 137130.2
RCP-033046 Ridge Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137140.7 1 Yes 137140.7
RCP-032939 Rice Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137351.04 3 Yes 137351.04
RCP-052027 Jefferson Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139650.2 1 Yes 139650.2
RCP-053954 Little Beaver Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139650.2 1 Yes 139650.2
RCP-035305 Town Of Madison, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 250042 1 Yes 250042
RCP-022448 North Mahoning Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139755.2 1 Yes 139755.2
RCP-056571 Grey Forest, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140027.48 4 Yes 140027.48
RCP-056910 Loraine, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140027.48 1 Yes 140027.48
RCP-054166 Wheaton City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140166.24 2 Yes 140166.24
RCP-050164 Village Of Cairo, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140174.3 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-022484 Harford Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140280.2 1 Yes 140280.2
RCP-046878 Camden Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140282.19 2 Yes 140282.19
RCP-053910 North Shenango Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140595.2 1 Yes 140595.2
RCP-013819 Village Of Webberville, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137666.22 1 Yes 137666.22
RCP-032826 Wayne Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137666.55 3 Yes 137119.14
RCP-018410 Rome Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138613.08 6 Yes 138613.08
RCP-040972 Borough Of Sea Bright, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140046.52 Yes 0
RCP-034037 Town Of West Kewaunee, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140046.53 3 Yes 140046.53
RCP-025889 Rhine, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140039 1 Yes 140039
RCP-019683 City Of Keiser, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140054.25 4 Yes 140054.25
RCP-003798 Greenbush Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140293.44 2 Yes 140293.44
RCP-018910 Village Of Milan, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140295.77 2 Yes 140295.77
RCP-052325 Cannon City Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140318.4 1 Yes 140318.4
RCP-023806 Town Of Venice, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140820.09 2 Yes 140820.09
RCP-052718 Andover Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140827.35 13 Yes 140794.16
RCP-026713 Town Of Washington Park, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136402.51 1 Yes 136402.51
RCP-052457 French Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136493.51 3 Yes 136493.51
RCP-022996 Mead Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136500.2 2 Yes 136500.2
RCP-026278 Arnoldsville, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136678 1 Yes 136678
RCP-054857 Legrand City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136663.97 3 Yes 136663.97
RCP-008522 State Line, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136689.92 1 Yes 273379.84
RCP-055274 Eldon City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136813.49 3 Yes 136813.49
RCP-027332 Shamrock Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137804.9 1 Yes 137804
RCP-027606 Kingston Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137914.18 1 Yes 137914.18
RCP-019173 York Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139769.94 1 Yes 139769.94
RCP-035674 Town Of Forkland, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139783.96 1 Yes 139639.51
RCP-035812 Town Of Courtland, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139783.96 1 Yes 139783.96
RCP-055175 Lansing City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139803.94 1 Yes 0
RCP-050249 Village Of Emerson, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140174.3 1 Yes 0
RCP-019127 Clay Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140190.6 2 Yes 140190.6
RCP-026414 Town Of Grimesland, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140864.27 13 Yes 136864.27
RCP-034734 Town Of Mitchell, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137848.49 1 Yes 137848.49
RCP-007756 Town of Clayton Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137929.8 Yes 137929.8
RCP-040894 Borough Of Hampton, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137953.14 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-019183 Eagle Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138613.08 8 Yes 138613.08
RCP-026388 Town Of Fountain, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138633.39 1 Yes 138633.39
RCP-024119 Town Of Oakfield, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138666.25 7 Yes 138666.25
RCP-006263 City Of Viborg, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138708.84 1 Yes 138708.84
RCP-033004 Eden Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138928.58 9 Yes 138928.58
RCP-013737 Vermontville Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139032.38 2 Yes 139032.38
RCP-057060 Wishek, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140874.94 1 Yes 140874.94
RCP-019625 City Of Gillett, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140882.98 Yes 140882.98
RCP-057246 Preston City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140864.8 1 Yes 140864.8
RCP-034804 City Of Blair, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140883.87 10 Yes 140883.88
RCP-007693 Town of Arapaho Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140913.02 Yes 140913.02
RCP-006274 City Of Marion, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141059.84 2 Yes 141059.84
RCP-034423 Village Of Spring Valley, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141093.21 8 Yes 141093.21
RCP-035052 Town Of Port Edwards, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141197.88 5 Yes 141197.88
RCP-034561 Town Of Plymouth, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136697.13 1 Yes 136697.13
RCP-034649 Town Of Reedsburg, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136697.13 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-026191 Town Of Caswell Beach, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137358.6 1 Yes 137358.6
RCP-051516 Mahoning Township Supervisors Dba Mahoning Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137970.2 3 Yes 137970.2
RCP-018251 Liberty Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137982.05 2 Yes 0
RCP-054965 West Point City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139056.35 2 Yes 138500
RCP-025320 Town Of Grafton, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139132.54 8 Yes 139132.54
RCP-018922 Village Of Leesburg, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139138.91 1 Yes 0
RCP-019096 Center Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139138.91 6 Yes 136649.09
RCP-015494 Rudyard Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140923.96 1 Yes 140923.96
RCP-017643 Astoria Town, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 140983.7 1 Yes 140983.7
RCP-035312 Town Of Monterey, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141102 Yes 70551
RCP-004401 City Of The Village Of Douglas, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141344.32 1 Yes 141344.32
RCP-015614 Goodnews Bay City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141385.38 1 Yes 141385.38
RCP-001098 San Juan County, Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141405 1 Yes 141405
RCP-040892 Borough Of Frenchtown, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141407.22 2 Yes 141407.22
RCP-014188 City Of Alcester, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136538.68 1 Yes 136538.68
RCP-056592 Groom, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136551.61 5 Yes 136282.27
RCP-032942 Leesburg Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136825.19 3 Yes 136825.19
RCP-024990 Town Of Horicon, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137640.61 1 Yes 137640.61
RCP-047616 Dighton City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137653.46 1 Yes 137653.46
RCP-055772 Colfax Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137853.74 2 Yes 137853.74
RCP-022494 Loganville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137865.2 1 Yes 137865.2
RCP-023262 Pine Creek Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137865.2 1 Yes 137865.2
RCP-003488 Orange Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137876.4 1 Yes 137876.4
RCP-016106 Rosiclare City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137989.82 Yes 235
RCP-049901 Town Of Flagler, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137991.02 3 No 19000 100000 0 0
RCP-033075 Fountain Green City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 137997 2 Yes 137997
RCP-014368 Greenback City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138000 1 Yes 138000
RCP-047673 Garden Plain City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 138721.72 1 Yes 138721.72
RCP-015815 Lily Lake Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139214.6 1 Yes 139214.6
RCP-023150 Borough Of Flemington, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139230.2 1 Yes 69615.1
RCP-006153 Town Of Newburg, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 139241.86 3 Yes 33484.25
RCP-026238 Town Of East Arcadia, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 141300.75 2 Yes 141300.75
RCP-050425 City Of Oakland, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208668.55 2 Yes 208668.55
RCP-031516 Truro, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210174.46 2 Yes 210174.46
RCP-031658 City Of Kootenai, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210363.98 Yes 210363.98
RCP-052803 Morgan Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210493.53 1 Yes 210493.53
RCP-026273 Arabi, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210618 3 Yes 203118
RCP-026993 Hinckley City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210696.16 1 Yes 210696.16
RCP-054294 Crocker City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211675.47 4 Yes 211675.47
RCP-056077 Indian Lake, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212027.4 1 Yes 211609.2
RCP-033678 Town Of Nasewaupee, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212058.49 1 Yes 212058.49
RCP-055159 Logan City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212023.53 1 Yes 212023.53
RCP-025828 Mountain Park, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212112 1 Yes 212112
RCP-046862 Borden Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212122.98 1 Yes 212122.98
RCP-003523 Aetna Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212489.4 1 Yes 212489.4
RCP-004339 Fulton Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212489.4 6 Yes 212489.4
RCP-003445 Castleton Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214065.72 1 Yes 214065.72
RCP-052781 Peacham Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214081.5 3 Yes 214081.5
RCP-054104 Highlandville City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214120.23 1 Yes 214120.23
RCP-048972 Magdalena Village, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214351 Yes 214351
RCP-048979 Mountainair Town, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214351 1 Yes 0
RCP-049287 Bantam Borough, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215156.08 12 Yes 215156.08
RCP-022414 Borough Of Mcdonald, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215250.3 1 Yes 215250.3
RCP-026696 Town Of Unionville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215268.75 1 Yes 215268.75
RCP-050632 Beverly Beach Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215367 18 Yes 215367
RCP-018754 Monroe Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215386.63 5 Yes 215386.63
RCP-008485 Maben, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206509.94 Yes 0
RCP-006034 Village Of Beech Bottom, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207315.65 Yes 207315.65
RCP-018757 Village Of Camden, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207498.93 Yes 0
RCP-034861 Town Of La Fayette, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 209860.45 1 Yes 209860.45
RCP-014050 Ford River Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210387.62 7 No 5000 3500 0 0
RCP-022542 Ayr Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210420.3 1 Yes 210420.3
RCP-015233 Lewisburg city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210701.95 1 Yes 210701.95
RCP-049037 Town Of Hayden, AZ Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210741.47 2 Yes 210741.47
RCP-023965 Town Of Hancock, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210768.6 12 Yes 210768.6
RCP-055279 Earlham City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210827.34 1 Yes 210827.34
RCP-052747 Waterville Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211091.53 Yes 211091.53
RCP-033017 Springcreek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212126.38 2 Yes 211282.89
RCP-018147 Jackson Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212126.38 2 Yes 211282.89
RCP-019293 Staunton Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212126.38 Yes 212126.38
RCP-025420 Luxora, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212774.73 5 Yes 212774.73
RCP-006549 City Of Baltic, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213036.54 Yes 0
RCP-013796 Leland Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214486.08 2 Yes 214486
RCP-034272 Town Of La Grange, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214675.21 1 Yes 214675.21
RCP-052892 Sheffield Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214679.5 3 Yes 214679.5
RCP-033600 Town Of Verona, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201382.3 2 Yes 201382.3
RCP-015858 Manito Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202221.8 No 39130 24930 0 0
RCP-016062 Port Barrington Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202493.96 Yes 202493.96
RCP-026164 Town Of Bolton, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204285.06 3 Yes 204285.06
RCP-004128 Ronald Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204292.46 1 Yes 204292.46
RCP-023261 Hopewell Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204645.3 1 Yes 204645.3
RCP-034468 Town Of Grant, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206092.38 7 Yes 206092.38
RCP-024603 Town Of Parish, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206153.22 6 Yes 206153.22
RCP-055157 Lone Tree City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206491.18 3 Yes 206146.43
RCP-025194 Town Of Deering, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206552.68 4 Yes 206552.68
RCP-002071 Town Of Salley, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 206605.24 3 Yes 206605.24
RCP-031768 Bingen City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207330 13 Yes 207330
RCP-004372 Brockway Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 207340.04 2 Yes 207340.04
RCP-023740 Town Of Ashford, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208307.07 1 Yes 208307.07
RCP-033535 Town Of West Point, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208290.42 Yes 208290.42
RCP-024393 Village Of Laurel Hollow, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 208512.19 4 Yes 208512.19
RCP-006052 Town Of Burnsville, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210851.95 8 Yes 210851.95
RCP-050688 Everglades City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 210859 1 Yes 210859
RCP-014484 Powells Crossroads Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211500 6 Yes 211500
RCP-054518 Mound City City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211675.47 13 Yes 211675.47
RCP-057035 New Rockford, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211707.68 2 Yes 211707.68
RCP-007243 Tioga, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 211707.68 1 No 375018.36 221082.83 0 0
RCP-030205 St. Ignatius Town, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212139.89 1 Yes 212139.89
RCP-018592 Westland Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 212547.05 2 Yes 212547.05
RCP-018826 Adams Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 213283.24 2 Yes 213283.24
RCP-018513 Meigs Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214124.6 1 Yes 214124.6
RCP-034459 City Of Saint Croix Falls, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214151.86 1 Yes 214151.86
RCP-018772 Jefferson Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214440.1 1 Yes 214440.1
RCP-019193 St. Albans Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 214440.1 2 Yes 214013.76
RCP-024783 Town Of Princetown, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215281.4 6 Yes 214406
RCP-054312 Lilbourn City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215342.61 1 Yes 213000
RCP-054325 New Franklin City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215342.61 8 Yes 215342.61
RCP-015042 Bellefonte city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 215419.16 1 Yes 215419.16
RCP-056808 Mountain City, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201103.28 1 Yes 201103
RCP-031482 Savoy, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201762.11 5 Yes 201762.11
RCP-007514 City of Barnsdall Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201805.69 5 Yes 201805.69
RCP-050094 City Of Alma, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 201943.02 3 Yes 201943.02
RCP-026596 Town Of Red Cross, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202500 1 Yes 202500
RCP-035553 Town Of Pine Hill, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202544.12 2 Yes 202544.12
RCP-014081 Bunker Hill Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 202561.16 2 Yes 202561.16
RCP-004233 Ingham Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203767.02 2 Yes 203767.02
RCP-051480 Oliver Township Supervisors, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 203805.28 1 Yes 203805.28
RCP-018815 Sugar Creek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204659.36 10 Yes 203845.56
RCP-055802 Herscher Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 204671.32 1 No 0 0 20000 0
RCP-055898 Bellmead, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2667473.61 4 Yes 2667473.61
RCP-003330 Readmond Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62422.7 1 Yes 62422.7
RCP-003970 Klacking Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62422.7 1 Yes 62422.7
RCP-015986 Norwood Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62462.86 1 Yes 62462.86
RCP-049861 Town Of Cheraw, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62586.08 1 Yes 62586.08
RCP-048962 Jemez Springs Village, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63045 2 Yes 0
RCP-048986 Reserve Village, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63045 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-057273 Farmington City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2523436.14 21 Yes 2523436.14
RCP-053574 Kodiak Island Borough, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2524709 3 Yes 2524709
RCP-026168 City Of Brevard, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2525995.94 1 Yes 2525995.94
RCP-035800 Town Of Sanford, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60382.86 Yes 0
RCP-025250 Town Of Sugar Hill, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60405.93 Yes 60405.93
RCP-022990 Franklin Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61005.1 1 Yes 60812.82
RCP-023055 Warrior Run Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61005.1 1 Yes 61005.1
RCP-025611 Wheatley, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61739.89 1 Yes 61739.89
RCP-057155 Good Thunder City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61744.47 1 Yes 61744.47
RCP-054835 Bussey City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61752.97 Yes 61546.77
RCP-026146 Town Of Belwood, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61755 1 Yes 61755
RCP-014512 Signal Mountain Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2553516.05 29 Yes 2553516.05
RCP-025783 Lovejoy, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2554305 1 Yes 1277152.5
RCP-050631 Belleview City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2554855 1 Yes 2554855
RCP-051523 Bethlehem Township Board Of Commissioners, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2555808.62 1 Yes 2555808.62
RCP-037685 Douglas County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2561032 97 Yes 2561032
RCP-031397 Mansfield, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2561239.53 2 Yes 2561239.53
RCP-006337 Millard County, Ut, Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2561614 24 Yes 2561614
RCP-053213 City Of Vero Beach, Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2562386 1 Yes 2562386
RCP-031621 City Of Garden City, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2574485.05 1 Yes 2574485.05
RCP-014834 Ripley County Missouri, Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2581038 1 Yes 2581038
RCP-035191 Wasilla City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2623246.79 2 Yes 2623246.79
RCP-050066 Town Of Wellington, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2623337.4 Yes 0
RCP-003901 Harrison Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2624800.96 5 Yes 2624800.94
RCP-052287 Barry Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62181.6 1 Yes 62181.6
RCP-026256 Town Of Eureka, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62464.7 1 Yes 62464.7
RCP-049943 Town Of Jamestown, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62586.08 5 No 12500 12500 12500 24323
RCP-019765 Town Of Cross Hill, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62587.5 2 Yes 62587.5
RCP-014791 Mecca Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62735.25 1 Yes 62735
RCP-003584 Village Of Eau Claire, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62737.96 4 Yes 62737.96
RCP-054122 Maitland City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62748.84 5 Yes 62748.84
RCP-019099 Deerfield Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62891.21 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-003722 Greenwood Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63053.22 9 Yes 63053.22
RCP-017369 Aurora Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63055.85 1 Yes 63055.85
RCP-056859 Benjamin, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63062.01 1 Yes 62937.63
RCP-018859 Union Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63101.56 Yes 63101.56
RCP-018957 Hamilton Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63101.56 1 Yes 62976.1
RCP-052428 Gillford Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63165.13 Yes 63165.13
RCP-049093 Crisfield City, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2527137.75 8 Yes 2526205.34
RCP-049099 Forest Heights Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2527137.75 7 Yes 2526205.34
RCP-050677 Dundee Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2526306 Yes 2526306
RCP-024760 Town Of Halfmoon, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2526659.07 1 Yes 2526659.07
RCP-023332 Borough Of Sutersville, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59850.1 1 No 12672.7 0 0 0
RCP-046791 Town Of Vredenburgh, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60762.34 1 Yes 60762.34
RCP-055656 Andrew City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61005.35 1 Yes 60903.5
RCP-055681 Hawkeye City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61005.35 1 Yes 61005.35
RCP-034983 Town Of Weyauwega, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61231.1 4 Yes 61231.1
RCP-030152 Fort Peck Town, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61233.62 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-006104 Town Of Harman, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61443.23 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-025882 Rebecca, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61617 1 Yes 61617
RCP-015346 Sanders city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61585.77 1 Yes 60855.37
RCP-022863 Port Matilda Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61635.08 1 Yes 61635.08
RCP-050092 Village Of Allen, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61768.72 3 Yes 0
RCP-018080 Jacksonville City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2531582.74 1 Yes 2531582.74
RCP-015303 Paris city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2534450.97 3 Yes 2504392.53
RCP-023659 Municipio De Maunabo, PR Puerto Rico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 3083145.88 2 Yes 2619145.88
RCP-038267 Fremont County, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2544327 Yes 2544327
RCP-056273 Vernon, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2562949.57 2 Yes 2562949.57
RCP-050497 City Of Scottsbluff, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2576233.64 1 Yes 0
RCP-039927 Madison County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2575794 1 Yes 2575794
RCP-019012 City Of Avon Lake, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2577067.29 8 Yes 2577067
RCP-031777 Burlington City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2577376 1 Yes 2577376
RCP-054881 Clive City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2578074.61 1 Yes 2578074.61
RCP-049283 Woodbridge, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2589567.62 3 Yes 2589567.62
RCP-050754 Labelle City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2614957 10 Yes 2614957
RCP-022487 Upper Macungie Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2646108.76 47 Yes 2646108.76
RCP-038239 Massac County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2675050 35 Yes 2675050
RCP-038475 Crenshaw County, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2675050 12 Yes 2675050
RCP-037747 Hardy County, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2675827 1 Yes 2675827
RCP-047500 Assaria City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62264.54 1 Yes 62264.54
RCP-035729 Town Of Langston, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62284.68 9 Yes 62284.68
RCP-055246 Galva City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62650.11 2 Yes 62650.11
RCP-024284 Village Of Wampsville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62666.48 4 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-023020 Borough Of Patterson Heights, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62685.08 1 Yes 62685.08
RCP-007743 Town of Carmen Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62822.99 2 Yes 62822.99
RCP-055872 Towanda Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62871.1 9 Yes 62871.1
RCP-008483 Louin, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63673.9 2 Yes 62000
RCP-004058 Norwich Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63683.76 1 Yes 63683.76
RCP-048071 Williamsburg City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59670.18 2 Yes 59670.18
RCP-054177 Callao City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59692.89 3 Yes 59692.89
RCP-030138 Denton Town, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59696.37 1 Yes 59696.37
RCP-018148 Bern Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59736.14 1 Yes 59736.14
RCP-034162 Town Of Franzen, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59870.41 1 Yes 59870.42
RCP-017726 Buckner Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59877.26 18 Yes 59877.26
RCP-013908 Boon Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59900.58 4 Yes 59900.58
RCP-013927 Brevort Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59900.58 1 Yes 59900.58
RCP-032772 Paint Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60156.81 1 Yes 59917.61
RCP-023843 Village Of Cassadaga, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60820.33 1 Yes 60820
RCP-001256 Danforth Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61011.12 1 Yes 61000
RCP-003451 Village Of Port Sanilac, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61056.54 2 Yes 0
RCP-054504 Mercer Town, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61322.73 2 Yes 61322.73
RCP-024830 Village Of Ovid, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61333.15 3 Yes 61333.15
RCP-037810 Barren County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8594850 6 Yes 8594850
RCP-038132 Pleasanton City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8595930 1 Yes 8595930
RCP-037605 Vance County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8650402 Yes 8650402
RCP-039073 West Seneca, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8508246 24 Yes 8508246
RCP-040056 Titusville, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8607193 1 Yes 8607193
RCP-035649 City Of Phenix City, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8673975.48 2 Yes 8673975.48
RCP-047235 Claremont City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8675598 1 Yes 8675598
RCP-037062 St. Cloud City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8780823 1 Yes 8780823
RCP-036836 Henderson County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8781513 5 Yes 8781513
RCP-037534 City Of Coconut Creek, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8597464 14 Yes 7000000
RCP-050763 Lake Mary City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8754421 6 Yes 8754421
RCP-039205 Logan County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8871251 2 Yes 10000000
RCP-040311 Hancock County, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9251958 13 Yes 0
RCP-039777 Franklin City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9253841 9 Yes 8253841
RCP-037599 Noble County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9273712 6 Yes 9273712
RCP-039321 Waterford Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9280012 5 Yes 9280012
RCP-037141 Fremont County, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9292165 5 Yes 9292165
RCP-047464 Wildomar City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8905968 6 Yes 8905968
RCP-037873 Boyd County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9074424 1 Yes 9074424
RCP-040400 Marshall, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9078903 4 Yes 9078903
RCP-040005 Taylorsville, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8884092 1 Yes 8884092
RCP-037522 Bonner County, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8884265 2 Yes 8884265
RCP-039975 Mcdowell County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8887567 12 Yes 8887567
RCP-050897 Tavares City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8889651 24 Yes 8889651
RCP-039105 Dalton, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8873412 1 Yes 8873412
RCP-037119 Allegany County, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8952636 14 Yes 8952636
RCP-002094 City Of West Columbia, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8960195.6 3 Yes 8960195.6
RCP-040083 Clinton County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9018289 40 Yes 9018289
RCP-026533 Town Of Morrisville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9193146.47 41 Yes 9193146.47
RCP-039677 Perry County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8987794 1 Yes 8987794
RCP-053229 Camden County, Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8994203 26 Yes 2560392.89
RCP-039550 Osage County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9122012 Yes 9122012
RCP-047440 Stanton City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9123659 15 Yes 9123659
RCP-039242 Beaufort County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9128034 2 Yes 9128034
RCP-037881 Bolingbrook, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9140140 1 Yes 9140140
RCP-047350 Martinez City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9161456 1 Yes 9161456
RCP-037957 Greene County, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9165716 13 Yes 9165716
RCP-014424 Maryville City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8824851.79 7 Yes 8824851.79
RCP-037656 Chesterfield County, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8866977 9 Yes 8866977
RCP-040334 Livonia, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8910652 1 Yes 8910652
RCP-037979 Mifflin County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8961766 1 Yes 8961766
RCP-038018 Camarillo, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8962170 1 Yes 8962170
RCP-037183 Washington Parish, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8972643 1 Yes 8972643
RCP-040524 Hoover City, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8975754 5 Yes 8975754
RCP-035337 Town Of Pulaski, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9040920 1 Yes 9040920
RCP-040028 Seaside, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8994311 1 Yes 8994311
RCP-036984 Mount Vernon, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9053048 1 Yes 9053048
RCP-037862 Lincoln Parish, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9079086 2 Yes 9079086
RCP-037725 Auglaize County, Oh, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8868143 1 Yes 8868143
RCP-037158 Placentia City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9083054 1 Yes 9083054
RCP-039106 Bingham County, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9092488 9 Yes 9092488
RCP-040152 Stokes County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8855517 4 Yes 8855517
RCP-036659 Waynesboro City, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9046603 4 Yes 9046603
RCP-038064 Canton Twp, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9186398 4 Yes 9186398
RCP-039025 Bedford County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9301683 1 Yes 9301683
RCP-037476 Nye County, NV Nevada Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9036547 17 Yes 9036547
RCP-038617 Santa Cruz County, AZ Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9031691 1 Yes 9031691
RCP-031809 Des Moines City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9038700 37 Yes 9038700
RCP-039195 Beltrami County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9165716 1 Yes 9165716
RCP-039695 Chenango County, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9169406 7 Yes 9169406
RCP-015159 Georgetown city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9170252.13 13 Yes 9170252.13
RCP-039934 Salisbury, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9188340 6 Yes 9188340
RCP-025931 Sugar Hill, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9192882 1 Yes 9192882
RCP-050786 Maitland City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8841069 1 Yes 8841069
RCP-053669 City Of Lake Oswego, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8845060.38 1 Yes 8845060.38
RCP-049214 Naugatuck, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9206430.82 1 Yes 9206430.82
RCP-039889 Brunswick, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9212262 2 Yes 9061956.23
RCP-047377 Pacifica City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9221023 1 Yes 9221022
RCP-038889 Laurens County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9235253 1 Yes 9235253
RCP-040602 Cortland County, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9242051 1 Yes 9242051
RCP-037830 Nelson County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8980218 1 Yes 8980218
RCP-037416 Jacksonville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9000774 2 Yes 9000774
RCP-040185 Jackson County, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9015375 1 Yes 9015375
RCP-037525 Colquitt County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8857265 1 Yes 8857265
RCP-038919 Hillsdale County, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8858237 3 Yes 8858237
RCP-056903 Del Rio, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8878337.33 7 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-038898 Sandy City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9151064 1 Yes 9151064
RCP-049031 Town Of Florence, AZ Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9158403.3 10 Yes 9158403.3
RCP-040150 Borough Of Carlisle, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9186671 1 Yes 9186671
RCP-056218 San Juan, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9188185.35 2 Yes 9125062.39
RCP-036857 Gadsden County, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8868920 16 Yes 8868920
RCP-039596 Vernon Parish, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9212527 1 Yes 9212527
RCP-036808 Kendall County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9212916 1 Yes 9212916
RCP-040416 San Benito, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9066287 12 Yes 3000000
RCP-040642 South Kingstown, RI Rhode Island Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9071224.47 7 Yes 9071224.47
RCP-037191 Lexington, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9171646 2 Yes 9171646
RCP-038609 St. Bernard Parish, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9176593 4 Yes 9176592.5
RCP-007639 City of Stillwater Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8826630.06 3 Yes 8826630.06
RCP-039778 Kittitas County, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9310812 27 Yes 9310812
RCP-000954 City Of Cleveland, Tn, Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9313001 1 Yes 9313001
RCP-039910 Stevens County, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8881157 26 Yes 7332217.76
RCP-039921 Farmington Hills, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8911759 1 Yes 8911759
RCP-040148 Green Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8913892 3 Yes 8913892
RCP-000949 County Of Calaveras, California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8916508 4 Yes 8916508
RCP-052588 Meridian, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8935734.47 5 Yes 8935734.47
RCP-040306 Marshall County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8985074 1 Yes 8985074
RCP-038091 Monroe County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8984103 10 Yes 8984103
RCP-036745 Monroe County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9040821 12 Yes 9040821
RCP-037767 Goodhue County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9001002 1 Yes 9001002
RCP-038816 Campbell County, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9001196 1 Yes 9001196
RCP-036955 Olympia, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9205624 3 Yes 9205624
RCP-040189 Wood County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8845417 5 Yes 8845417
RCP-049218 Newington, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8882660.86 1 Yes 8882660.86
RCP-036747 Grand Island, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9093880 1 Yes 9093880
RCP-037483 Martinsburg, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9111132 1 Yes 9111132
RCP-037813 Novato City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9112951 1 Yes 9112951
RCP-037234 Casper City, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9115340 2 Yes 9115340
RCP-040171 Arcadia City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 8864856 2 Yes 8864856
RCP-048076 Wilson City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110489.02 1 Yes 110489.02
RCP-016014 Oreana Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110364.66 1 Yes 110364.65
RCP-032000 Village Of Ardentown, DE Delaware Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110651.1 3 Yes 110651.1
RCP-035673 Town Of Fairview, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110067.98 Yes 110067.98
RCP-040671 City Of Port Republic, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110111.32 Yes 0
RCP-018010 Hamel Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110228.56 1 Yes 110228.57
RCP-035058 Town Of Seneca, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110320.66 4 Yes 110320.66
RCP-003820 Frost Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110868.6 6 Yes 110868.6
RCP-034233 Town Of Montello, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110006.65 Yes 110006.65
RCP-034455 Village Of Luck, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110006.65 2 Yes 59163
RCP-003759 Newark Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110027.9 1 Yes 110027.9
RCP-048068 Whitewater City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110031.2 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-024188 Village Of Brownville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110871.46 1 Yes 110871.46
RCP-023397 Borough Of Shinglehouse, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110670.14 1 Yes 110321.34
RCP-007275 Reile'S Acres, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110676.16 1 Yes 110676.16
RCP-056059 Highland Haven, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 109986.12 1 Yes 109986.12
RCP-033649 Town Of Theresa, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110006.65 4 Yes 110006.65
RCP-022655 Amity Township Supervisors, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110040.16 2 Yes 109693.34
RCP-024075 Town Of Chateaugay, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110050.96 2 Yes 100000
RCP-014157 Manistique Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110553.34 1 Yes 110553.34
RCP-024643 Town Of Richfield, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110563.77 7 Yes 110563.77
RCP-024804 Town Of Summit, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110563.77 4 Yes 110563.77
RCP-022462 Fairview Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110565.16 1 Yes 110565.16
RCP-022625 Oliver Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110040.16 1 Yes 110040.16
RCP-023757 Village Of Little Valley, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110666.34 4 Yes 110666.34
RCP-033909 Town Of Mineral Point, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110006.65 Yes 0
RCP-050722 Highland Park Village, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110188 1 Yes 110188
RCP-018308 Village Of Frankfort, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110217.37 5 Yes 82310
RCP-018553 Miller Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110322.54 1 Yes 50000
RCP-003680 Village Of Roscommon, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110343.16 Yes 110343.16
RCP-055404 Alden City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110347.93 3 Yes 110347.53
RCP-033646 Town Of Portland, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110425.33 2 Yes 110425.33
RCP-006046 Town Of Bramwell, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110739 1 Yes 110739
RCP-007306 Town Of Bloomfield, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110739.33 Yes 110739.33
RCP-019216 Village Of Tuscarawas, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110743.23 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-006909 Hosston, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110766.02 1 Yes 110766.02
RCP-018878 Richland Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110217.37 3 Yes 110217.37
RCP-054152 Sunrise Beach Village, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110421.66 Yes 0
RCP-054675 Alba City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110421.66 2 Yes 110421.66
RCP-024618 Town Of Burlington, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110768.89 Yes 100000
RCP-023229 Springfield Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110880.14 1 Yes 110880.14
RCP-023299 Ashland Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110880.14 3 Yes 110880.14
RCP-007710 Town of Binger Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110905.39 3 Yes 110905.39
RCP-055262 Essex City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110497.45 1 Yes 110497.45
RCP-016085 Ridge Farm Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110500.74 1 Yes 110500.74
RCP-033163 City Of Green River, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110658 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-018937 Auburn Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110217.37 3 Yes 110217.37
RCP-054313 Madison City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110217.93 2 Yes 110217.93
RCP-023791 Town Of Mentz, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110871.46 2 Yes 110871.46
RCP-024000 Village Of Tivoli, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110871.46 1 Yes 110871.46
RCP-026120 Town Of Alliance, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110692.5 3 Yes 110692.5
RCP-027020 Keewatin City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110702.9 2 Yes 110702.9
RCP-005393 Troy Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110708.21 3 Yes 110706.21
RCP-033632 Town Of Calamus, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110529.99 1 Yes 110529.99
RCP-034980 Town Of Scandinavia, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110529.99 16 Yes 110529.99
RCP-035454 Town Of Hammondville, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110153.25 3 Yes 110153.25
RCP-057208 Lake Emma Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110156.5 1 Yes 110156.5
RCP-023131 Oneida Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110250.16 1 Yes 110250.16
RCP-034843 Town Of Cloverland, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110948.67 4 Yes 110948.67
RCP-018182 Norwich Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110953.56 1 Yes 110953.56
RCP-000956 Kidder County, North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481711 12 Yes 481711
RCP-026128 Town Of Atlantic Beach, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481870.54 1 Yes 481870.54
RCP-026647 Town Of Snow Hill, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481870.54 2 Yes 481870.54
RCP-039081 Goshen, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6692508 24 Yes 6692508
RCP-025994 Winder, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6698328 1 Yes 6698328
RCP-026349 City Of Kingsland, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6702809 1 Yes 6702809
RCP-038488 New Bern, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6704351 1 Yes 6704351
RCP-008472 Horn Lake, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6704689.54 6 Yes 0
RCP-031557 Winchester, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6814776.86 27 Yes 6814776.86
RCP-037641 Brookings County, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6813296 Yes 0
RCP-037385 Hopkinsville, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6758997 10 Yes 6758997
RCP-056733 Forney, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6762035.66 1 Yes 6762035.66
RCP-050841 Palmetto City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6885736 10 Yes 6885736
RCP-036816 Fannin County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6898178 3 Yes 6898178
RCP-037544 Fishers City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6900880 3 Yes 6900880
RCP-036994 Jasper County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6901092 Yes 6901092
RCP-047258 Desert Hot Springs City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6908231 1 Yes 6908231
RCP-036708 Floyd County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6912746 1 Yes 6912746
RCP-046905 Crown Point City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6909407.66 1 Yes 6896380.37
RCP-053070 City Of Missouri City, Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6910253 9 Yes 0
RCP-052607 Oxford, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6913657.93 9 Yes 6913357.93
RCP-038367 Oneida County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6913911 30 Yes 5190000
RCP-025946 Thomasville, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6915294 1 Yes 6915294
RCP-039428 Scotts Bluff County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6918379 11 Yes 6918379
RCP-038787 Brentwood City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6923339 2 Yes 6923339
RCP-039763 Eagan City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6917343 15 Yes 6917343
RCP-038875 Livingston County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6924206 1 Yes 6924206
RCP-039447 Warren County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6924400 2 Yes 0
RCP-035360 Town Of Strasburg, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6926462 1 Yes 6926462
RCP-047396 Ridgecrest City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6930957 16 Yes 6930957
RCP-040554 Houghton County, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6931199 1 Yes 6931199
RCP-050615 Atlantic Beach City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6947842 1 Yes 6947842
RCP-037676 Old Bridge Township, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6949009 4 Yes 6949009
RCP-025925 St. Marys, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6933593 1 Yes 6933593
RCP-040204 Uintah County, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6940911 1 Yes 6940911
RCP-039995 Laclede County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6938774 20 Yes 6938774
RCP-037214 Ware County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6940911 3 Yes 6940911
RCP-037867 Bentonville City, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6943556 4 Yes 6943556
RCP-056332 Hutto, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6938559.65 3 Yes 4867668.06
RCP-039292 Adams County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6949263 1 Yes 6949263
RCP-037433 Barry County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6951594 5 Yes 6951594
RCP-054157 University City City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6960435.55 1 Yes 6960435.54
RCP-039885 Sagadahoc County, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6964608 5 Yes 6964608
RCP-040356 Macon County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6964996 3 Yes 6964996
RCP-040342 Carlton County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6967521 1 Yes 6967521
RCP-040470 Washington County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6969658 26 Yes 6969658
RCP-050802 Miami Springs City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6970380 1 Yes 6970380
RCP-039412 Delta County, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6950623 21 Yes 6950623
RCP-040110 Mcleod County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6971794 12 Yes 6971794
RCP-001977 City Of Cayce, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6974296.04 39 Yes 6974296.04
RCP-038813 Webster County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6973931 1 Yes 6973931
RCP-025809 Milledgeville, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6984753 9 Yes 6984753
RCP-038269 Cocke County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6993355 2 Yes 6993355
RCP-056509 Converse, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6994173.4 1 Yes 6994173.4
RCP-056800 Big Spring, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 6998145.82 1 Yes 6998145.82
RCP-031555 Wilmington, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7007870.67 12 Yes 7007870.67
RCP-049224 North Haven, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7008997.73 28 Yes 7008997.73
RCP-047265 East Palo Alto City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7012532 4 Yes 7012532
RCP-039604 Mount Prospect, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7027870 3 Yes 7027870
RCP-053566 Perry County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7018606 1 Yes 7018606
RCP-039997 Ocean City, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7035892 Yes 7035892
RCP-053234 Plymouth, Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7021371 1 Yes 7021371
RCP-038997 Niles, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7031749 1 Yes 7031749
RCP-040357 Apopka City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7037307 14 Yes 7037307
RCP-037339 Greene County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7037835 1 Yes 7037835
RCP-037878 Rocklin City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7039025 1 Yes 7039025
RCP-050647 Callaway City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7042002 1 Yes 7042002
RCP-038931 Clark County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7043663 4 Yes 7043663
RCP-039491 Whitley County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7043857 4 Yes 5712818.92
RCP-047199 Atwater City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7071141 1 Yes 7071141
RCP-034707 Town Of Maple Grove, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100481.81 5 Yes 100481.81
RCP-035272 Town Of Glen Lyn, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100640 5 Yes 100640
RCP-050099 Village Of Arnold, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100529.04 1 Yes 100529.04
RCP-032402 Lee Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100646.96 3 Yes 100646.96
RCP-032330 Canaan Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100646.96 5 Yes 100246.76
RCP-018498 Greene Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100646.96 Yes 100646.96
RCP-019132 Madison Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100226.3 1 Yes 100226.3
RCP-057072 Milnor, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100240.98 1 Yes 100240.98
RCP-050441 Village Of Overton, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100352.05 Yes 100352.05
RCP-014124 Meyer Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100359.72 1 Yes 100359.72
RCP-031251 Acton, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7072733.45 21 Yes 7072733.45
RCP-047441 Suisun City City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7096020 1 Yes 7096020
RCP-036995 Johns Creek City, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7076181 1 Yes 7076181
RCP-053092 City Of Millville, Nj, New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7078893 9 No 1768904.82 1735618.93 1507705.95 707146.92
RCP-039980 Finney County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7083287 11 Yes 7083287
RCP-037966 Dublin City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7088512 23 Yes 1758808
RCP-039565 Huntington County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7093582 27 Yes 7093582
RCP-040238 Moorhead, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7099345 7 Yes 7099345
RCP-047456 Walnut City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7101283 1 Yes 7101283
RCP-037694 Dodge County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7102323 1 Yes 7102323
RCP-047977 Salina City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7103956.02 1 Yes 7103956.02
RCP-023243 Penn Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100380.14 1 Yes 100380.14
RCP-026234 Town Of Dublin, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100389.69 1 Yes 100389.69
RCP-025086 Village Of Castile, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100409.95 1 Yes 50204.98
RCP-022698 Highland Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100485.14 2 Yes 100485.14
RCP-013841 Forester Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100569.9 4 Yes 100569.9
RCP-023045 West Brownsville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100590.14 6 Yes 100273.1
RCP-023121 Liverpool Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100590.14 3 Yes 100273.1
RCP-003425 City Of Saugatuck, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100885.16 1 Yes 100885.16
RCP-034078 Village Of Benton, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100272.48 1 No 41442.49 0 0 0
RCP-022695 Terry Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100275.14 1 Yes 100275.14
RCP-052554 Gunnison, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100304.83 2 Yes 50000
RCP-050384 Village Of Mead, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100352.05 6 Yes 100352.05
RCP-014347 Farragut Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7055252.7 6 Yes 7055252.7
RCP-031764 Bainbridge Island City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7068783 7 Yes 7068783
RCP-006302 City Of Lake Preston, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100369.5 1 Yes 100369.5
RCP-033432 Town Of Woodville, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100377.14 1 Yes 100377.14
RCP-033489 Town Of Mayville, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100377.14 6 Yes 100377.14
RCP-051855 Susquehanna Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100380.14 1 Yes 100380.14
RCP-047583 Clyde City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100416.84 1 Yes 100416.84
RCP-031645 City Of Idaho City, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100449.88 3 Yes 100449.88
RCP-001211 Embden Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100451.58 1 Yes 100451.58
RCP-034093 Town Of Polar, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100481.81 3 Yes 100481.82
RCP-052054 Arendtsville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100695.14 3 Yes 100695.14
RCP-019234 Camp Creek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100752.13 3 Yes 100351.51
RCP-033463 Town Of Woodmohr, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100795.82 Yes 100795.82
RCP-023396 Fairfield Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100800.14 1 Yes 100482.44
RCP-024693 Village Of Hillburn, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100820.21 1 Yes 100820.21
RCP-054202 Green Ridge City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100846.35 2 Yes 100846.35
RCP-032934 Village Of Pleasantville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100857.31 1 Yes 59596.04
RCP-004541 Hampton Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100867.5 1 Yes 100867.5
RCP-048964 Lake Arthur Town, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100871 1 Yes 100871
RCP-049012 Williamsburg Village, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100871 Yes 100871
RCP-031627 City Of Grand View, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100880.07 2 Yes 100880
RCP-003723 Leroy Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100885.16 5 Yes 100885.16
RCP-003838 Portage Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100885.16 Yes 100885.16
RCP-013876 Iron River Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100885.16 1 Yes 100885.16
RCP-034842 Town Of Boulder Junction, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100900.49 1 Yes 100900.49
RCP-051576 Catawissa Township Board Of Supervisors Dba Catawissa Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100905.16 2 Yes 100905.16
RCP-022788 Supervisors Tioga Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100905.16 1 Yes 100905.16
RCP-023886 Town Of Preston, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100922.77 5 Yes 100922.77
RCP-018718 Richland Township, Sabina, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100962.48 Yes 0
RCP-019319 Village Of Highland Hills, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100962.48 1 Yes 100962.48
RCP-003382 Custer Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 100990.26 1 Yes 100990.26
RCP-033898 City Of Green Lake, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101005.16 9 Yes 0
RCP-024204 Town Of Lorraine, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101025.34 2 Yes 101025.34
RCP-026434 Town Of Hobgood, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101027.09 1 Yes 101027.09
RCP-008497 Osyka, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101042.37 4 Yes 101042.37
RCP-056493 Orchard, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101048.18 2 Yes 101048.18
RCP-022919 Sugar Notch Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101010.14 2 Yes 101010.09
RCP-053730 City Of St. Paul, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101062.3 1 Yes 0
RCP-018158 Salem Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101067.65 1 Yes 101067.65
RCP-057260 Oxford Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101086.06 9 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-027456 Nininger Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101086.06 2 Yes 101086.92
RCP-034818 Town Of Harmony, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101319.16 1 Yes 101319.16
RCP-024381 Village Of Saddle Rock, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101333.03 Yes 101333.02
RCP-025536 Rose Bud, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101104.25 1 Yes 101104.25
RCP-019677 City Of Jasper, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101104.25 1 Yes 101104.25
RCP-025169 Town Of Wentworth, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101130.2 Yes 0
RCP-032846 Village Of Magnolia, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101172.82 1 Yes 100971.67
RCP-006261 City Of Waubay, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101273.74 1 Yes 101273.74
RCP-033031 Monroe Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101277.99 5 Yes 765.89
RCP-030013 Township Of Elsinboro, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101319.16 1 Yes 101319.16
RCP-057209 Pine River City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101304.64 1 Yes 101304.64
RCP-054304 Innsbrook Village, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101208.15 1 Yes 101208.15
RCP-022392 Ellsworth Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101115.16 1 Yes 101115.16
RCP-022988 Beavertown Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101115.16 Yes 100796.46
RCP-032114 Village Of Ottoville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101383.16 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-018152 Pease Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 443078.04 1 Yes 11721.14
RCP-055932 Bartonville, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 443172.04 1 Yes 442297.92
RCP-027051 Le Sueur City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 443358.04 2 Yes 443358.04
RCP-022575 Mount Pleasant Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 443205.62 1 Yes 443205.62
RCP-052792 Newfane Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 441040.22 8 Yes 441040.22
RCP-025226 Town Of Winchester, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 442418.45 19 Yes 442418.46
RCP-032334 Danbury Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 442447.04 18 Yes 442447.04
RCP-026830 Cannon Falls City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 442593.07 1 Yes 442593.07
RCP-053627 City Of Enterprise, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 443341.38 10 Yes 443341.38
RCP-013726 Ann Arbor Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 442738.78 6 Yes 442738.78
RCP-024493 Town Of Marcellus, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 442767.9 3 Yes 442767
RCP-015234 Lewisport city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 442893.41 17 Yes 442893.41
RCP-030194 Plentywood City, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 443751.56 1 Yes 443751.56
RCP-006154 City Of New Cumberland, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 444689.86 3 Yes 444689.86
RCP-024059 Town Of North Elba, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 444511.49 1 Yes 444511.49
RCP-052564 Itta Bena, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 444733.92 Yes 138000
RCP-052788 Rockingham Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 441638.24 4 Yes 441534.15
RCP-040984 Township Of Boonton, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 443480.66 1 Yes 443480.66
RCP-016448 Washington Grove Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 443667 1 Yes 443667
RCP-046981 Kouts Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 443735.91 1 Yes 443735.91
RCP-003686 City Of Wayland, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 443999.84 1 Yes 443999.84
RCP-000958 Eddy County, North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 444223 1 Yes 444223
RCP-054226 Marionville City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 444335.14 1 Yes 444335.14
RCP-032764 Village Of Waverly, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 445496.94 12 Yes 445496.94
RCP-051504 Mahoning Township Board Of Supervisors Dba Mahoning Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 445095.64 1 Yes 445095.64
RCP-025696 Franklin Springs, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 445136 1 Yes 445136
RCP-032163 Pultney Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 445286.6 Yes 221758
RCP-056767 Miami, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136551.61 2 Yes 136551.61
RCP-005331 Milbridge Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136825.63 1 Yes 136825.63
RCP-046873 Burlington Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 136882.78 1 Yes 136882.78
RCP-034634 City Of New Richmond, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 985349.77 15 Yes 985349.77
RCP-024044 Village Of Hamburg, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 996099.57 6 Yes 996099.57
RCP-022864 Supervisors Hazle Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1003381.42 1 Yes 1000219
RCP-018071 Inverness Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1003760.36 4 Yes 1003760.36
RCP-015734 Town Of County Line, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26900.81 2 Yes 26900
RCP-005177 Mitchell City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 962938.64 15 Yes 962938.64
RCP-030160 Hardin City, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 970514.37 7 Yes 970514.38
RCP-031364 Hatfield, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 971746.11 4 Yes 971746
RCP-051405 Benner Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 977026.38 1 Yes 977026.38
RCP-057137 Normandy City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 985645.75 10 Yes 985645.75
RCP-004166 Hampton Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 986047.46 Yes 493029
RCP-052708 Windsor Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 986090.48 1 Yes 986090.48
RCP-033185 Santa Clara City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 996157 1 Yes 996157
RCP-032726 Nimishillen Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 996478.64 1 Yes 994497.47
RCP-017665 Baylis Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26672.58 1 Yes 26672.58
RCP-007980 Town of Rocky Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26673.46 13 Yes 26673.46
RCP-051809 Bristol Borough Dba Borough Of Bristol, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1005481.42 1 Yes 502740.71
RCP-032457 City Of Willoughby Hills, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1004681.84 4 Yes 1004681.84
RCP-013746 City Of Ecorse, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1005699.04 1 Yes 1005699.04
RCP-007254 Selfridge, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26246.06 1 Yes 26246.06
RCP-017413 Spruce Valley Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26337.02 1 Yes 26337.02
RCP-033719 Town Of Peru, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26376.48 7 Yes 26376.48
RCP-019520 Town Of Bodcaw, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26519.15 2 Yes 26519.15
RCP-055827 Montrose Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26536.5 Yes 0
RCP-016154 Shumway Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26536.5 1 Yes 26536.5
RCP-017869 Donnellson Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26536.5 1 Yes 26536.5
RCP-033814 Town Of Castle Rock, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26585.81 1 Yes 26585.81
RCP-055061 Portsmouth, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26615.09 1 Yes 0
RCP-051652 West Donegal Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 951616.34 2 Yes 948617.06
RCP-032662 Medina Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 951676.55 1 Yes 951676.55
RCP-025149 Town Of Weare, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 951733.59 2 Yes 951733.59
RCP-002041 Town Of Mccormick, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 957808.5 6 Yes 957808.5
RCP-025595 Vilonia, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 957797.05 2 Yes 957797.05
RCP-002082 Town Of Sullivan'S Island, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 957851.78 1 Yes 957851.78
RCP-026605 Town Of River Bend, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 964378.47 4 Yes 964378.47
RCP-033096 Price City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 986097 2 Yes 986097
RCP-056394 Nassau Bay, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 986150.89 2 Yes 0
RCP-034671 City Of Reedsburg, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 996549.31 1 Yes 996549.31
RCP-040214 Craig County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 996637 1 Yes 996637
RCP-006949 Many, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 996523.66 3 Yes 996523.66
RCP-056732 Crandall, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 997323.3 4 Yes 995356.16
RCP-055103 Nevada City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 998364.69 1 Yes 998364.69
RCP-056982 Ravenna, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26684.6 4 No 5644 5655 0 0
RCP-054553 Rhineland Town, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26688.63 1 Yes 26688.63
RCP-026118 Yoder Town, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26709.5 1 Yes 26709.5
RCP-014641 Binford, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26720.39 1 Yes 26720.39
RCP-014642 Grandin, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26720.39 1 Yes 26720.39
RCP-034584 Town Of Murry, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27213.82 1 Yes 27213.82
RCP-034759 Town Of Cleveland, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27213.82 1 Yes 27213.82
RCP-050061 Town Of Vona, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26140.38 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-022641 Bear Creek Village Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26145.04 2 No 13480.65 15859.88 0 0
RCP-018827 Village Of Lockbourne, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26187.13 Yes 26187.13
RCP-050320 Village Of Hordville, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26194.19 1 Yes 0
RCP-047483 Allen City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26248.78 1 Yes 26248.78
RCP-007933 Town of Norge Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26250 1 Yes 26250
RCP-047454 Vernon City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26314 1 Yes 26314
RCP-055686 Rickardsville City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26316.04 1 Yes 26316.04
RCP-019781 Town Of Smyrna, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26385.73 1 Yes 26385.73
RCP-017286 Eagles Nest Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26664.86 3 Yes 26664.86
RCP-053953 Wellsville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26670.04 1 Yes 26670.04
RCP-054132 Osage Beach City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 950604.19 3 Yes 950604.19
RCP-050176 City Of Chadron, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 957857.68 6 Yes 957857.68
RCP-025141 Town Of Newmarket, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 958538.42 7 Yes 958538
RCP-038153 Marshall County, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 958566 1 Yes 958566
RCP-031341 Freetown, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 983256.4 1 Yes 983256.4
RCP-019329 Richland Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 987223.74 1 Yes 987223.74
RCP-023858 Town Of Horseheads, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 987791.9 1 Yes 987791.9
RCP-056577 Shavano Park, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 987888.83 3 Yes 987888.83
RCP-046996 Ligonier City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 992400.16 10 Yes 992400.16
RCP-019572 City Of Crossett, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 993224.98 2 Yes 993224.98
RCP-050513 Village Of Sprague, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26725.15 1 No 9400 9400 0 0
RCP-055442 Shambaugh City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26764.62 1 Yes 26764.62
RCP-024409 Village Of New Hyde Park, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1005843.13 1 Yes 1001753
RCP-018927 Village Of Melrose, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27344 1 Yes 27344
RCP-040706 Borough Of Maywood, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1006283.48 Yes 1006283.48
RCP-015546 Petersburg, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27352.82 2 Yes 9922.82
RCP-018100 Keensburg Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27353 1 Yes 3042.82
RCP-017730 Bulpitt Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27353 3 Yes 27353.01
RCP-055521 Beaman City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27362.69 1 Yes 27362.69
RCP-007832 Town of Grayson Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27375.38 2 Yes 27375.38
RCP-023111 Venango Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26145.04 Yes 26062.64
RCP-055523 Hillsboro City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26465.57 1 Yes 26465.57
RCP-001178 Mount Ayr Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26515.38 1 Yes 20000
RCP-019482 City Of Alicia, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26519.15 6 Yes 26519.15
RCP-055497 Sherrill City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26615.09 1 Yes 26615.09
RCP-022678 North Codorus Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 952771.36 3 Yes 952771.36
RCP-054520 Mountain Grove City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 955493.71 1 Yes 955493.71
RCP-053896 Perkiomen Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 959701.36 1 Yes 959701.36
RCP-026409 Town Of Granite Quarry, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 959916.7 1 Yes 959916.7
RCP-032729 Ravenna Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 967767.44 1 Yes 967767.44
RCP-006685 Abita Springs, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 968369.08 Yes 0
RCP-038738 Thayer County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 971774 11 Yes 485887
RCP-034296 City Of Tomah, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 983570.41 11 Yes 983570.41
RCP-032012 Town Of Delmar, DE Delaware Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 983664.52 3 Yes 983664.52
RCP-040066 Johnson County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 984982 11 Yes 984982
RCP-004231 Long Lake Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 989620.48 8 Yes 989620.48
RCP-056198 Richwood, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 990123.3 3 Yes 990123.3
RCP-051884 South Strabane Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 990151.42 10 Yes 395000
RCP-023997 Town Of Pleasant Valley, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 993330.34 1 Yes 993330.34
RCP-030240 Township Of Mount Holly, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 999270.68 1 Yes 999270.69
RCP-057038 Valley City, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 999721.93 Yes 999721.93
RCP-015507 Village Of Prescott, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26692.52 2 Yes 26692.52
RCP-056597 Douglassville, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26694 Yes 2200
RCP-034889 Town Of Brooklyn, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26795.15 3 Yes 26795.15
RCP-047681 Geuda Springs City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26859.22 1 Yes 26859.22
RCP-015990 Oakdale Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27216.92 5 Yes 27216.92
RCP-016033 Parkersburg Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27216.92 1 Yes 27216.92
RCP-018118 La Fayette Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27216.92 1 Yes 5000
RCP-033231 Henrieville Town, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26629 7 Yes 0
RCP-004473 Prior Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26664.86 8 Yes 26664.86
RCP-019651 City Of Haskell, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 954067.8 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-013914 City Of Charlotte, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 955256.46 1 Yes 955256.46
RCP-031275 Berlin, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 968458.14 19 Yes 968458.14
RCP-014456 Newbern Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 976780.72 Yes 0
RCP-047865 Mulvane City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 990280.78 3 Yes 990280.78
RCP-006513 City Of Goodwin Inc., SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26765.2 1 Yes 26765.2
RCP-052323 Troy Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26774.15 1 Yes 26774.15
RCP-003585 Holland Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26797.62 3 Yes 26797.62
RCP-055825 Mill Shoals Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26808.66 2 Yes 26808.66
RCP-018448 Village Of Fulton, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26818.16 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-027567 Clifton Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26883.43 1 Yes 26883.43
RCP-057303 Springwater Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26883.43 2 Yes 26883.43
RCP-003541 Weldon Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26902.7 2 Yes 26902.7
RCP-017662 Batchtown Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26944.76 1 Yes 21000
RCP-027593 Fox Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26992.71 1 Yes 6452.95
RCP-015320 Prestonville city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26250 Yes 20000
RCP-055823 Mendota City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 951776.04 1 Yes 951776.04
RCP-053139 County Of Scotland, Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 952156 1 Yes 952156
RCP-039375 Rooks County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 955652 1 Yes 955652
RCP-055835 Orland Hills Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 955722.5 1 Yes 955722.5
RCP-027260 Thief River Falls City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 964743.59 1 Yes 964743.59
RCP-014518 Somerville Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 968472.74 2 Yes 968472.74
RCP-027291 Waseca City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 968787.03 1 Yes 0
RCP-031581 City Of Buhl, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 969438.06 3 Yes 969438.06
RCP-039823 Big Stone County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 969443 2 Yes 969443
RCP-006713 Brusly, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 969480.43 1 Yes 969480.43
RCP-016413 Martins Additions Village, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 978723.79 6 Yes 978362.68
RCP-047651 Eudora City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 978377.28 1 Yes 978377.28
RCP-024537 Town Of Cornwall, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 979176.54 3 Yes 979176
RCP-030095 Town Of Hackettstown, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 979279 9 Yes 979279
RCP-031835 Goldendale City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 979370 1 Yes 979370
RCP-035566 City Of Haleyville, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 984668.7 1 Yes 984668.7
RCP-027231 St. Anthony City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 984960.8 3 Yes 984960.8
RCP-051878 Moore Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 990571.4 1 Yes 990571.4
RCP-014150 Bedford Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 998447.94 2 Yes 998447.94
RCP-037558 Atchison County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 998967 5 Yes 998967
RCP-016095 Robinson City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 998997.42 2 Yes 998997.42
RCP-017180 Round Grove Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26774.15 1 Yes 26774.15
RCP-047816 Mccracken City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26859.22 1 Yes 26859.22
RCP-047611 Denison City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27011.82 Yes 27011.82
RCP-047947 Ramona City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27011.82 1 Yes 27011.82
RCP-050084 Village Of Cody, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27079.13 1 Yes 15273.03
RCP-055578 Gravity, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27063.66 5 Yes 27063.66
RCP-051838 Cummings Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27090.04 1 Yes 27090.04
RCP-027596 Tenhassen Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27101.99 1 Yes 27101.99
RCP-052304 Brandsvold Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27101.99 1 Yes 27101.99
RCP-034061 Town Of Blanchard, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27109.16 2 Yes 27109.16
RCP-055729 Magnolia City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26316.04 2 Yes 26316.04
RCP-015468 St John Plantation, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26328.88 6 Yes 26296.75
RCP-034487 Town Of Catawba, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26376.48 Yes 26376.48
RCP-034681 Town Of Ojibwa, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26376.48 1 Yes 26376.48
RCP-003476 Ausable Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26482.36 2 Yes 26482.36
RCP-003834 Village Of Leroy, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26482.36 2 Yes 26482.36
RCP-056283 West Columbia, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 950895.74 1 Yes 950895.74
RCP-031856 La Center City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 951148 1 Yes 951148
RCP-056018 Eastland, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 955861.26 12 Yes 955861.26
RCP-023015 West Caln Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 956551.36 4 Yes 953536.52
RCP-007575 City of Holdenville Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 965333.15 Yes 965333.15
RCP-019555 City Of Cherokee Village, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 965669.92 3 Yes 965669.92
RCP-025192 Town Of Barrington, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 969844.9 3 Yes 969844.9
RCP-003378 Kimball Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 973541.9 10 Yes 973541.9
RCP-031416 Millville, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 973539.55 1 Yes 973539
RCP-025986 Webster County Unified Government, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 973549 1 Yes 739964
RCP-022402 Darby Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 974296.38 Yes 974296.38
RCP-025948 Thunderbolt, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 979524 1 Yes 979524
RCP-050827 Ocean Ridge Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 979670 1 Yes 979670
RCP-046953 Greendale City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 983788.33 7 Yes 983788.34
RCP-005262 Cape Elizabeth Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 983791.09 1 Yes 983791.09
RCP-014041 Sumpter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 984155.86 1 Yes 984155.86
RCP-015084 Carrollton city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 990613.66 11 Yes 978865.03
RCP-047071 Pendleton Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 990587.14 12 Yes 990587.14
RCP-049903 City Of Florence, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 991323.44 2 Yes 991323.44
RCP-055607 New Vienna City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61453.93 2 Yes 61453.93
RCP-004466 Marquette Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61476.9 3 Yes 61476.9
RCP-031947 Skykomish Town, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61473 Yes 61473
RCP-035119 Kaktovik City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61478.57 1 Yes 61478.57
RCP-017670 Beecher City Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61646.34 2 Yes 61646.35
RCP-025069 Village Of Ossining, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2544812.87 Yes 2544812.87
RCP-018053 Homewood Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2545191.2 11 Yes 2545191.2
RCP-025121 Town Of Aberdeen, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2545755.18 2 Yes 2545755.18
RCP-015025 Alexandria city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2545981.92 4 Yes 2559750.51
RCP-052070 Upper Providence Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2557278.62 2 Yes 2557278.62
RCP-031931 Ridgefield City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2557537 2 Yes 2557537
RCP-052668 West Point, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2557773.17 3 Yes 2557773.16
RCP-040088 Lewis County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2578513 2 Yes 2420127.8
RCP-037568 Monroe County, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2578513 5 Yes 250000
RCP-056375 Bonham, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2578590.92 1 Yes 2578590.92
RCP-051540 Warrington Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2578803.66 1 Yes 2578803.66
RCP-047430 Sierra Madre City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2581915 1 Yes 2581915
RCP-056274 Vidor, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2582811.61 13 Yes 2582811.61
RCP-018128 Lake Forest City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2646302.1 1 Yes 2646302.1
RCP-055820 Matteson Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2646574.26 1 Yes 2646574.26
RCP-039700 Izard County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2647273 2 Yes 2647273
RCP-026619 City Of Roxboro, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2648057.06 2 Yes 0
RCP-040250 Comanche County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2648439 1 Yes 2648439
RCP-031810 Dupont City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2658967 1 Yes 2658967
RCP-033248 Clinton City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2662771 1 Yes 2662771
RCP-002087 City Of Travelers Rest, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2661473.8 Yes 2661473
RCP-014691 City Of Chester, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2676906.98 1 Yes 2676906.98
RCP-026282 Austell, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2677539 1 Yes 2677539
RCP-025274 Town Of Groton, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62290.34 2 Yes 62290.34
RCP-033529 Town Of Newport, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62591.8 1 Yes 62591.8
RCP-033908 Town Of Mifflin, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62591.8 Yes 62591.8
RCP-051580 Borough Of Big Run, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62895.1 4 Yes 62696.86
RCP-022541 Knoxville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62895.1 1 Yes 62696.86
RCP-033817 Town Of Fennimore, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62905.8 Yes 62905.8
RCP-054600 West Plains City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2506693.95 3 Yes 2506693.96
RCP-047272 Exeter City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2508235 8 Yes 2508235
RCP-030163 Havre City, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2508528.57 1 Yes 2508528.57
RCP-006179 City Of Princeton, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2508563.57 9 Yes 2508563.57
RCP-018605 Jasper Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60156.81 No 26000 0 0 26000
RCP-022607 Sugar Grove Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60165.08 2 Yes 60070.27
RCP-019560 City Of Clarkedale, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60412.5 1 Yes 60412.5
RCP-052278 Otto Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60433.07 1 Yes 60433.07
RCP-051769 Ulysses Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60795.1 2 Yes 60603.48
RCP-050434 Village Of Orchard, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61060.77 1 Yes 61060.77
RCP-033652 Village Of Brownsville, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61126.44 1 Yes 0
RCP-007935 Town of North Miami Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61500 2 Yes 61500
RCP-047509 Axtell City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61501.48 1 Yes 61501.48
RCP-019163 Adams Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61524.01 1 Yes 0
RCP-036686 City Of Naples, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2563890 Yes 948000
RCP-037421 Howard County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2564334 10 Yes 2564334
RCP-052684 Middlebury Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2625189.3 2 Yes 2624570.52
RCP-031419 Monson, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2626494.34 29 Yes 2626494.34
RCP-017702 Bourbonnais Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2648479.46 22 Yes 2648479.46
RCP-039945 Gulf County, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2649216 1 Yes 2649216
RCP-052743 Springfield Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2663460.87 2 Yes 2663460.87
RCP-047382 Piedmont City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2663729 6 Yes 2663729
RCP-040337 Paradise, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2678454 1 Yes 2678454
RCP-008501 Picayune, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2680695.76 11 Yes 2680695.76
RCP-019587 City Of Donaldson, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62154.25 1 Yes 10000
RCP-001304 Sebec Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62597.19 6 Yes 62597.19
RCP-017914 Emden Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62598.94 2 Yes 62534
RCP-003642 Doyle Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62632.88 Yes 0
RCP-008488 Marietta, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62690.52 Yes 62690.52
RCP-026420 Town Of Harrells, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62783.4 1 Yes 62783.4
RCP-026673 Village Of Sugar Mountain, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62783.4 1 Yes 62783
RCP-013755 Village Of Hopkins, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63788.84 3 Yes 63788.84
RCP-024459 Village Of Oneida Castle, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63794.68 2 Yes 63794.68
RCP-018070 Industry Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59605.08 Yes 59605.08
RCP-040537 Wayne County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2500429 10 Yes 2500429
RCP-026977 Hastings City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2501033.29 12 Yes 2501033.29
RCP-039351 Butler County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2501595 1 Yes 2501595
RCP-032481 City Of Wadsworth, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2528899.78 1 Yes 2528899.78
RCP-053731 City Of Sandy, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2529222.62 1 Yes 2529222.62
RCP-035526 Town Of Bakerhill, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59907.42 1 Yes 29953.71
RCP-055096 New Market City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59958.71 Yes 59958.71
RCP-055342 Casey City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59958.71 2 Yes 59958.71
RCP-055727 Calamus City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59958.71 1 Yes 59758.49
RCP-033073 Big Water Municipal Corp, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60477 1 Yes 30239
RCP-034163 Town Of Green Valley, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60498.42 1 Yes 60498.42
RCP-026966 Halstad City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60542.36 1 Yes 60542.36
RCP-017750 Camargo Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60829.84 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-050586 Village Of Wilcox, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61060.77 1 Yes 61060.77
RCP-033912 Town Of Ridgeway, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61126.44 Yes 61126.44
RCP-050412 Village Of Newcastle, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61237.76 1 Yes 10000
RCP-015927 Mount Auburn Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61238.1 Yes 61238.09
RCP-014019 Village Of Addison, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61266.72 1 Yes 61266.72
RCP-027478 Chatfield Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61307.34 2 Yes 60000
RCP-032972 Clark Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61313.67 1 Yes 10000
RCP-018589 Miami Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61313.67 1 Yes 61313.67
RCP-027532 Colfax Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61525.9 1 Yes 61525.9
RCP-017043 Willmar Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61525.9 1 Yes 61525.9
RCP-017301 Fawn Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61525.9 1 Yes 61525.9
RCP-038151 Grundy County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2608037 1 Yes 2608037
RCP-026925 Faribault City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2611517.63 1 Yes 2611517.63
RCP-054342 Troy City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2611818.64 3 Yes 2611818.62
RCP-013919 City Of Wyandotte, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2612400.5 1 Yes 2612400.5
RCP-040045 White County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2629404 22 Yes 2629404
RCP-031330 Easton, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2627704.06 2 Yes 2627704.06
RCP-034959 City Of Muskego, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2630006.78 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-040398 Anacortes, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2631759 1 Yes 2631759
RCP-056205 Rockport, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2632715.02 2 Yes 2632715.02
RCP-038861 Stewart County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2663978 2 Yes 2663978
RCP-022397 Moon Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2670888.78 1 Yes 2670888.78
RCP-001978 Town Of Central, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2680889.72 1 Yes 2680889.72
RCP-023655 Municipio De Ceiba, PR Puerto Rico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 3243833.68 3 Yes 2865114.89
RCP-035253 Town Of Dublin, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2680942 Yes 2680942
RCP-017703 Bowen Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62190.68 3 Yes 62190.68
RCP-023290 Hooversville Borough Dba Borough Of Hooversville, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62370.1 5 No 10000 10000 0 0
RCP-019226 Harrison Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62786.04 2 Yes 62786.04
RCP-055386 Ashton City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62799.64 1 Yes 62799.64
RCP-047589 Colony City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63180.2 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-050506 Village Of Silver Creek, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63184.63 3 Yes 63184.63
RCP-018867 Wayne Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63206.73 1 Yes 63206.73
RCP-033689 Town Of Bennett, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63219.81 1 Yes 63219.81
RCP-032759 Village Of Bay View, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63311.89 3 Yes 63311.89
RCP-018594 Bokescreek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59630.97 1 Yes 59630.97
RCP-025670 Eatonton, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2511359 9 Yes 2511359
RCP-035583 City Of Fairfield, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2512307.74 1 Yes 2408999.56
RCP-037643 Webster County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2513832 2 Yes 2513832
RCP-039310 Lincoln County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2529759 2 Yes 1485447.5
RCP-056078 Ingleside, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2530425.45 2 Yes 2530425.45
RCP-016201 Strasburg Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59741.16 1 Yes 59741.17
RCP-046946 Gentryville Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60056.18 1 Yes 60056.18
RCP-031988 Wilson Creek Town, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60076 2 Yes 60076
RCP-034693 Town Of Almon, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60184.42 2 Yes 60184.42
RCP-027069 Lyle City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60542.36 2 Yes 60542.36
RCP-003309 Reno Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60846.36 4 Yes 60846.37
RCP-057180 Lake Marshall Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60870.21 4 Yes 60870.21
RCP-052265 Candor Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61088.77 2 Yes 61088.77
RCP-052273 Leaf Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61088.77 2 Yes 61088.77
RCP-017938 Fithian Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61102.02 1 Yes 61102.01
RCP-054940 Royal City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61154.88 1 Yes 61154.88
RCP-055106 Mystic City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61154.88 6 Yes 61154.88
RCP-055726 Earling City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61154.88 2 Yes 61154.88
RCP-032797 York Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61208.5 1 Yes 61208.5
RCP-047629 Edna City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61348.88 2 Yes 61348.88
RCP-037399 Mississippi County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2560060 1 Yes 2560060
RCP-040471 Jackson County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2558312 20 Yes 2558312
RCP-047274 Farmersville City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2560385 1 Yes 2560385
RCP-056313 Elgin, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2560715.08 4 Yes 2560715.08
RCP-050749 Kenneth City Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2564872 14 Yes 2564872
RCP-040422 Tumwater City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2565043 1 Yes 2565043
RCP-016446 University Park Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2593174.51 1 Yes 2592217.73
RCP-039513 Price County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2593275 18 Yes 2593275
RCP-051368 East Hempfield Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2593608.66 1 Yes 2593608.66
RCP-004342 City Of Walker, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2613451.38 3 Yes 2613451.38
RCP-039977 Perquimans County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2615030 2 Yes 2615030
RCP-054315 Marshall City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2616096.97 9 Yes 2616096.97
RCP-051555 Swatara Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2633508.72 1 Yes 2633508.72
RCP-049286 Groton City, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2637215.65 18 Yes 2637215.65
RCP-039149 O'Brien County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2671359 36 Yes 2671359
RCP-038711 Glacier County, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2671359 2 Yes 2671359
RCP-031477 Rutland, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2671629.26 1 Yes 2671629.26
RCP-052673 Yazoo City, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2672091.18 3 Yes 2672091.18
RCP-037238 Atoka County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2672330 10 Yes 2672330
RCP-057188 Verndale City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62290.87 2 Yes 62290.87
RCP-052120 Borough Of Cranesville, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62475.08 3 Yes 62278.18
RCP-033910 Town Of Moscow, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62905.8 1 Yes 62905.8
RCP-019780 Town Of Ruby, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62967.2 5 Yes 62967.2
RCP-055668 Birmingham City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62949.16 1 Yes 31474.58
RCP-015049 Berry city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62968.5 1 Yes 62968.5
RCP-034699 Town Of Fairbanks, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63324.48 Yes 63324.48
RCP-047732 Holyrood City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63332.8 2 Yes 63332.8
RCP-047916 Parkerfield City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63332.8 1 Yes 63332.8
RCP-050457 Village Of Pilger, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63361.61 2 Yes 63361.61
RCP-049048 City Of Page, AZ Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2514536.45 12 Yes 2514536.45
RCP-040149 Macon County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2514803 1 Yes 2514803
RCP-027517 Balsam Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60214.51 1 Yes 60214.51
RCP-055362 Bonaparte, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60257.76 1 No 15000 10000 0 0
RCP-033826 Town Of Marion, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60812.43 1 Yes 60812.43
RCP-034828 Town Of Wheatland, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60812.43 1 Yes 60812.43
RCP-004613 Iosco Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60870.21 1 Yes 60870.21
RCP-031717 City Of Rockland, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60872.2 1 Yes 8000
RCP-054989 Tipton City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481912.44 1 Yes 481912.44
RCP-024542 Town Of Greenville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481947.27 26 Yes 481947.27
RCP-032894 Muskingum Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 477678.73 8 Yes 477678.73
RCP-019181 Paint Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 477889.07 1 Yes 475988.81
RCP-031349 Granville, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481538.91 4 Yes 481538.91
RCP-030181 Malta City, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 476802.34 2 Yes 476802.35
RCP-033970 Town Of Ixonia, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 476869.94 1 Yes 476869.94
RCP-035074 Town Of Menominee, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 476869.94 3 Yes 476869.94
RCP-052882 Proctor Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 476899.44 Yes 476899.44
RCP-024421 Town Of Porter, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 476921.64 Yes 476921.64
RCP-054230 Moline Acres City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 477950.59 3 Yes 477950.59
RCP-005368 Raymond Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 478255.28 5 Yes 0
RCP-024948 Town Of Tioga, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 482460.09 10 Yes 482460.09
RCP-001295 Glenburn Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 482484.81 11 Yes 0
RCP-040801 Borough Of Mount Ephraim, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 480114.66 3 Yes 80000
RCP-055918 Albany, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 480165.11 1 Yes 480000
RCP-037541 Graham County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 482099 3 Yes 482099
RCP-053035 Rich County, Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 482294 1 Yes 482294
RCP-056618 Haslet, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 477434.08 4 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-025238 Town Of Danville, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 476966.04 24 Yes 476966
RCP-054206 Hermann City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 477135.67 1 Yes 477135.67
RCP-032840 Columbia Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 477258.06 1 Yes 477258.06
RCP-035705 Town Of Collinsville, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 477595.22 2 Yes 382000
RCP-033783 Town Of Taycheedah, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 477602.62 1 Yes 477602.62
RCP-047063 Orleans Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481582.63 Yes 481582.63
RCP-035282 Town Of Haysi, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 482446 1 Yes 482446
RCP-005325 Lyman Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 477620.85 4 Yes 320176.53
RCP-047184 Jasonville Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 480902.75 10 Yes 480902.75
RCP-007046 Urania, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481961.81 1 Yes 481961.81
RCP-054065 Concordia City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 482025.19 4 Yes 482025.19
RCP-050559 City Of Valentine, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 478928.84 1 Yes 478928.84
RCP-052877 Alburgh Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 478992.41 5 Yes 478992.41
RCP-051840 Borough Of Donora, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 479010.68 1 Yes 479010.68
RCP-040890 Borough Of Flemington, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 479067.96 1 Yes 479067.96
RCP-003631 Wells Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 480558.76 3 Yes 479591.46
RCP-032619 Hamilton Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 480728.64 8 Yes 480728.64
RCP-024500 Town Of Skaneateles, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 482972.91 1 Yes 482972.91
RCP-025210 Town Of Lee, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 478327 2 Yes 240399.47
RCP-052922 Calais Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 479590.41 1 Yes 479590.41
RCP-032350 Village Of Coldwater, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 479782.12 1 Yes 479782.12
RCP-007607 City of New Cordell Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 479771.1 1 Yes 479771.1
RCP-022388 Bradford Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481215.68 2 Yes 479699
RCP-025154 Town Of Haverhill, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 477908.24 2 Yes 477908.24
RCP-015412 Whitesburg city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 482989.67 1 Yes 246258.82
RCP-013939 Berrien Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 483092.84 1 Yes 482124.17
RCP-014185 Nelson Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 483092.84 Yes 0
RCP-051427 Bridgeport Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 479850.68 Yes 478338.3
RCP-039659 Kiowa County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 480740 4 Yes 480740
RCP-027237 St. James City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 480841.84 4 Yes 480841.84
RCP-001958 Town Of Aynor, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481415.1 4 Yes 481415.1
RCP-022712 White Deer Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481425.68 Yes 479908.34
RCP-019771 Town Of Lincolnville, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481462.5 2 Yes 481462.5
RCP-022517 Smithfield Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481635.68 16 Yes 481635.68
RCP-032104 Village Of Plain City, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 482306.18 1 Yes 480388.36
RCP-019107 Washington Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 482306.18 9 Yes 482306.18
RCP-026110 Thermopolis Town, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 479383.52 1 Yes 479383.52
RCP-019647 City Of Harrisburg, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 478380.57 3 Yes 478380.57
RCP-014741 Town Of Swansea, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 478428.04 1 Yes 478428.04
RCP-023449 Jenkins Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 478800.68 11 Yes 478800.68
RCP-047241 Colfax City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 478921 1 Yes 478920
RCP-025024 Town Of Arcadia, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 482049.83 1 Yes 482049.83
RCP-032096 Village Of Greenfield, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 479151.1 14 Yes 477245.83
RCP-052635 Shelby, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 479152.24 1 Yes 479152.24
RCP-027311 Windom City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 479311.9 1 Yes 479311.9
RCP-051834 West York Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 479955.68 Yes 478442.96
RCP-006262 City Of Summerset, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481050.22 1 Yes 481050.22
RCP-040964 Borough Of Neptune City, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 481056.68 1 Yes 481056.68
RCP-022605 Liverpool Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111300.16 1 Yes 111300.16
RCP-050259 Village Of Firth, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110971.32 2 Yes 110971.32
RCP-025475 Norfork, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111048.93 Yes 111048.93
RCP-003814 Wexford Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111052.5 1 Yes 111052.5
RCP-003951 Mentor Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111000 2 Yes 94785.52
RCP-027538 Lake Andrew Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111030.75 2 Yes 111030.75
RCP-006313 City Of Menno, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111039.42 1 Yes 111039.42
RCP-034303 Town Of Gillett, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111053.34 1 Yes 111053.34
RCP-024109 Village Of Bergen, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111076.59 1 No 0 193038.88 0 0
RCP-006749 Dodson, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111136.47 1 Yes 111136.48
RCP-055015 Sioux Rapids City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111245.06 3 Yes 111245.06
RCP-024846 Village Of South Corning, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111179.15 1 Yes 111179.15
RCP-001334 Garland Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111236.91 3 Yes 111236.91
RCP-014556 Watauga City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110970.83 3 Yes 110970.83
RCP-023697 Town Of Clarksville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111076.59 1 Yes 111076.59
RCP-022568 Schuylkill Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110985.16 1 Yes 110985.16
RCP-031600 City Of Deary, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 110989.58 2 Yes 110989.58
RCP-007590 City of Lindsay Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 487316.87 3 Yes 487316.87
RCP-030109 Township Of White, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 487336.78 2 Yes 487336.78
RCP-018222 Brown Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 487669.81 5 Yes 487669.81
RCP-026893 Dilworth City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 483246.06 1 Yes 483246.06
RCP-022338 Borough Of Danville, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488040.7 11 Yes 488040.7
RCP-051697 Warrington Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488250.7 2 Yes 488250.7
RCP-030182 Manhattan Town, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488331.68 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-040940 Borough Of Brielle, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488383.48 2 Yes 488383.48
RCP-026448 Town Of Jefferson, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488563.18 3 Yes 488563.18
RCP-026707 Town Of Walnut Cove, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488563.18 18 Yes 0
RCP-018008 Hainesville Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 484053.1 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-025314 Town Of Milton, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 484084.93 8 Yes 484084.93
RCP-046979 Knightstown Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 484302.16 7 Yes 484302.16
RCP-046895 Cloverdale Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 486115.17 1 Yes 486115.16
RCP-054566 Seneca City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 486303.52 Yes 486303.52
RCP-030088 Township Of Allamuchy, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488383.48 Yes 488383.48
RCP-031446 Oak Bluffs, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488488.14 Yes 488488.14
RCP-005326 Madison Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488511.91 1 Yes 488511.91
RCP-030113 Baker City, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 485000.98 1 Yes 485000.98
RCP-016000 Oglesby City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 484325.26 1 Yes 484325.26
RCP-004247 Crockery Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 484564.08 3 Yes 0
RCP-056705 Fritch, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 484634.07 5 Yes 484634.07
RCP-053597 City Of Carlton, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 484654.74 1 Yes 484654.74
RCP-016092 Riverwoods Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 484733.52 1 Yes 484733.51
RCP-046836 Albany Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 486795.06 2 Yes 486795.06
RCP-031806 Davenport City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 487310 3 Yes 487310
RCP-031545 Westhampton, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 489310.48 14 Yes 489310.48
RCP-053706 City Of North Plains, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 489319.18 6 Yes 489319.18
RCP-023432 Jackson Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 489405.7 1 Yes 487863.2
RCP-003800 Hayes Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 490238.88 1 Yes 490238.88
RCP-032591 Lawrence Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 486723.29 1 Yes 486723.29
RCP-047731 Holton City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 489570.16 1 Yes 489570.16
RCP-006883 Glenmora, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 486036.81 1 Yes 486036.81
RCP-055984 Collinsville, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 486371.99 12 Yes 486371.99
RCP-022372 Borough Of Lemoyne, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 486570.68 1 Yes 486570.68
RCP-038821 Sheridan County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 489675 5 Yes 489675
RCP-003335 Kawkawlin Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 489713.44 2 Yes 489713.44
RCP-022912 Blooming Grove Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 489930.68 1 Yes 489930.68
RCP-032019 Town Of Frankford, DE Delaware Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 489999.75 28 Yes 489999.75
RCP-047091 Rising Sun City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 484755.41 3 Yes 484755.41
RCP-014300 Charlotte Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 484829.8 3 Yes 441073.82
RCP-056720 Somerset, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 487861.65 1 Yes 487861.65
RCP-023717 Town Of Binghamton, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 483383.17 1 Yes 483383.17
RCP-024063 Town Of Ticonderoga, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 487793.41 10 Yes 327244.43
RCP-000967 Mcintosh County, North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 485013 3 Yes 485013
RCP-032855 Chardon Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 485461.26 12 Yes 483530.89
RCP-040184 Hettinger County, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 485401 2 Yes 485401
RCP-047096 Rockport City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 485888.55 1 Yes 485888.55
RCP-035799 City Of Creola, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 484013.86 Yes 484013.86
RCP-026034 Bar Nunn Town, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 487708.56 2 Yes 487708.56
RCP-052491 Belmont, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488740.2 Yes 488740.2
RCP-052760 Barnet Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 487962.32 4 Yes 487962.32
RCP-046796 Town Of Wilsonville, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488768.44 1 Yes 488768.44
RCP-032445 Jackson Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488826.67 1 Yes 488826.67
RCP-004072 Village Of Dundee, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 483513.2 1 Yes 483513.2
RCP-006058 Town Of Chapmanville, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 483589.17 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-049153 Bridgewater, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 483879.2 4 Yes 483879.2
RCP-056809 Three Rivers, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 483889.25 Yes 482934.81
RCP-005312 Jay Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488829.13 1 Yes 488829.13
RCP-051633 Jim Thorpe Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488985.7 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-051727 Summit Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 488985.7 2 Yes 488985.7
RCP-035474 Town Of Thorsby, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 489006.16 2 Yes 489006.16
RCP-005349 North Berwick Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499931.67 1 Yes 499931.67
RCP-056567 Troy, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 500523.71 Yes 499536.47
RCP-014537 Three Way City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 500852.32 1 Yes 500852.32
RCP-019199 Wooster Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 501236.64 1 Yes 501236.64
RCP-051596 Royersford Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499275.7 10 Yes 499275.7
RCP-006897 Gueydan, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499373.19 2 Yes 499373.19
RCP-014372 Gruetlilaager City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 500519.25 2 Yes 500519.25
RCP-056414 Hamlin, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 501765.1 1 Yes 501765.1
RCP-014523 Spencer Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 501742.46 3 Yes 355042.46
RCP-051291 German Township Supervisors, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 501795.7 2 Yes 500214.16
RCP-025307 Town Of Fremont, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493088.24 5 Yes 493088.24
RCP-037917 Hamilton County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493171 3 Yes 493171
RCP-007524 City of Cache Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493283.31 5 Yes 493277.46
RCP-056924 Beverly Hills, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493323.72 6 Yes 493323.72
RCP-050713 Gulf Stream Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493341 3 Yes 493341
RCP-056286 West Tawakoni, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 498040.95 2 Yes 498040.95
RCP-015511 Owosso Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 498330.7 2 Yes 497331.52
RCP-051909 Scott Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 498435.7 1 Yes 498435.7
RCP-003994 Vergennes Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 498435.78 2 Yes 498435.78
RCP-026304 Boston, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 491816 3 Yes 491816
RCP-051349 New Freedom Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 491925.7 4 Yes 0
RCP-023342 Westmont Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 491925.7 18 No 156609.9 281577.59 296262.8 0
RCP-014313 Cowan City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 491950.92 2 Yes 491950.92
RCP-027210 Sauk Centre City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 492316.48 1 Yes 492316.48
RCP-032190 Village Of Lexington, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 492402.43 5 Yes 492402.43
RCP-051785 Borough Of Fountain Hill, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493395.7 4 Yes 491840
RCP-026663 Town Of Stanfield, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493343.64 5 Yes 493343.64
RCP-040949 Borough Of Highlands, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493407.56 1 Yes 0
RCP-027191 Rockford City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493409.3 1 Yes 493409.3
RCP-047676 Garnett City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493690.62 1 No 100000 0 0 0
RCP-052827 Londonderry Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495161.09 Yes 495044.38
RCP-006023 Town Of Alderson Inc, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497292.34 11 Yes 497292.34
RCP-035711 City Of Graysville, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497326.64 5 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-049931 Town Of Hayden, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497421.16 1 Yes 497421.16
RCP-006948 Mansura, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 500855 Yes 500855
RCP-019305 Vermilion Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 500921.14 7 Yes 500921.14
RCP-050640 Bristol City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 490837 1 Yes 490837
RCP-018180 Village Of South Lebanon, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 490930.05 1 Yes 490930.05
RCP-032210 Village Of New Lexington, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 491245.57 9 Yes 491245.57
RCP-033924 City Of Dodgeville, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 491418.86 9 Yes 491418.86
RCP-037066 Haines Borough, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 491423 1 Yes 491423
RCP-039804 Rawlins County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 491423 15 Yes 328069.4
RCP-026588 Town Of Princeton, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 445539.03 5 Yes 445539.03
RCP-007581 City of Jay Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446078.32 1 Yes 446078.32
RCP-007659 City of Wilburton Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446078.32 2 Yes 446078.32
RCP-004278 Birch Run Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446101.6 9 Yes 446101.6
RCP-035125 Klawock City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 445728.95 1 Yes 440431.28
RCP-023811 Town Of Busti, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446049.94 15 Yes 446049.94
RCP-015400 Warsaw city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446300.28 10 Yes 448713.85
RCP-034921 Village Of Kewaskum, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446306.72 12 Yes 446306.72
RCP-032882 Harrison Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446127.95 1 Yes 444353.99
RCP-026466 Town Of Lake Waccamaw, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446176.42 4 Yes 446176.42
RCP-024788 Village Of Cobleskill, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446767.89 1 Yes 446767.89
RCP-056857 Grandview, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446399.62 1 Yes 446399.62
RCP-053721 City Of Rainier, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446450.98 Yes 446450.98
RCP-000935 Faulk County, South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446554 2 Yes 446554
RCP-026061 Glenrock Town, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446603.67 Yes 446603.67
RCP-035592 City Of Linden, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446928.34 6 Yes 15198.58
RCP-052504 Bruce, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446946.52 2 Yes 446946.52
RCP-051556 Little Britain Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 447090.62 4 Yes 445681.5
RCP-052052 Jackson Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 447090.62 Yes 445681.5
RCP-022486 Centre Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 447090.62 7 Yes 440000
RCP-019622 City Of Gassville, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 447096.27 2 Yes 447096.27
RCP-040800 Borough Of Magnolia, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 447248.72 7 Yes 447248.72
RCP-013941 Lee Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446627.06 9 Yes 446627.06
RCP-026316 Broxton, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446630 9 Yes 446630
RCP-019544 City Of Carlisle, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 446681.9 2 Yes 446681.9
RCP-005156 Battle Ground Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 447588.57 1 Yes 447588.56
RCP-023489 Beaver Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 447930.64 2 Yes 447930.64
RCP-031959 Stevenson City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 447353 1 No 166569.18 154616.44 18811 22940.83
RCP-026269 Alto, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 447377 1 Yes 447377
RCP-034510 Town Of Dover, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 447981.41 1 Yes 447981.41
RCP-003474 City Of Buchanan, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 447993.2 1 Yes 447993.2
RCP-002073 Town Of Santee, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448059.56 2 Yes 448059.56
RCP-034782 City Of Medford, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448190.75 6 Yes 448190.76
RCP-055124 Milford City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448120.26 1 Yes 448120.26
RCP-050666 Cottondale Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448264 2 Yes 448264
RCP-052688 Enosburgh Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448195.75 Yes 448090.1
RCP-006279 City Of Lennox, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448317.12 1 Yes 448317.12
RCP-056832 Ralls, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448385.82 2 Yes 448385.82
RCP-019213 Village Of Blanchester, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448231.34 1 Yes 446449.01
RCP-052031 Chalfont Borough Dba Borough Of Chalfont, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448245.62 1 Yes 446832.86
RCP-023917 Town Of Claverack, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448408.9 3 Yes 448408.9
RCP-040656 Borough Of Buena, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448400.08 3 Yes 448000
RCP-024271 Village Of Dansville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448511.47 1 Yes 448511.47
RCP-046889 Churubusco Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448495.07 11 Yes 448495.07
RCP-057319 Wadena City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448603.58 1 Yes 448603.58
RCP-023710 Village Of Wellsville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448716.6 1 Yes 448716.6
RCP-033609 Village Of Cross Plains, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448609.43 1 Yes 448609.43
RCP-025798 Mccaysville, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449617 3 Yes 449617
RCP-026953 Goodview City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449040.71 1 Yes 449040.71
RCP-053604 City Of Columbia City, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449116.36 1 Yes 449116.36
RCP-047213 Biggs City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449497 1 Yes 224748
RCP-034424 City Of Prescott, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449551.44 2 Yes 449551.44
RCP-013809 Deerfield Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449569.54 1 Yes 449569.54
RCP-005332 Millinocket Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449600.14 1 Yes 449600.14
RCP-026201 City Of Claremont, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448726 4 Yes 448726
RCP-049940 City Of Idaho Springs, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448910.66 Yes 448910.66
RCP-051801 Upper Paxton Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 448980.64 1 Yes 448980.64
RCP-054593 Warsaw City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449020.93 2 Yes 449020.92
RCP-023305 Borough Of Honesdale, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449505.64 1 Yes 449505.64
RCP-035597 City Of Carbon Hill, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449781.06 9 Yes 449781.06
RCP-026959 Grant City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449805.69 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-056254 Sunray, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449875.48 1 Yes 449875.48
RCP-034045 Town Of Campbell, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 449970.12 Yes 449970.12
RCP-027365 Northern Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450898.51 7 Yes 450875
RCP-018856 Perry Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450965.74 3 Yes 449172.54
RCP-046995 Liberty Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450081.47 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-056430 Morton, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450123.77 6 Yes 449235.93
RCP-035453 Town Of Sylvania, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450256.52 4 Yes 450256.52
RCP-004460 Taymouth Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450200.08 3 Yes 450200.08
RCP-026573 Town Of Pilot Mountain, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450319.49 1 Yes 450319.49
RCP-033000 Paint Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450229.55 4 Yes 450229.55
RCP-019802 Bogart, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450364 2 Yes 450364
RCP-035500 City Of Ashland, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450494.24 1 Yes 450494.24
RCP-052726 Johnson Village, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450587.72 1 Yes 450587.72
RCP-025765 Lake Park, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450738 4 Yes 450738
RCP-032418 Washington Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450860.57 8 Yes 450860.57
RCP-026864 Columbus City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451335.64 11 Yes 47652
RCP-032964 Perry Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451281.25 1 Yes 451281.25
RCP-034874 Village Of East Troy, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451435.48 7 Yes 451435.48
RCP-014760 Trail Creek Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451441.22 2 Yes 451441.22
RCP-056747 Briarcliff, Village Of, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451613.42 1 Yes 451613.42
RCP-019591 City Of Earle, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451447.06 2 Yes 451447.06
RCP-003554 Caledonia Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451566.24 1 Yes 451566.24
RCP-047639 Ellsworth City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451875.7 1 Yes 451875.7
RCP-014557 Watertown City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451894.6 Yes 451894.6
RCP-035264 Town Of Floyd, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 452358 1 Yes 452358
RCP-035525 City Of Dora, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 452871.52 2 Yes 452403.5
RCP-030150 Forsyth City, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453487.45 2 Yes 453487.45
RCP-034247 Village Of Bayside, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453633.52 1 Yes 453633.52
RCP-051974 Delaware Township Dba Supervisors Delaware Twp, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453705.64 10 Yes 452275.66
RCP-052963 Flora Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453707.5 3 Yes 453707.5
RCP-048975 Mesilla Town, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453921 2 Yes 453921
RCP-035571 City Of Florala, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453109.24 Yes 453109.24
RCP-053093 Renville County, North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451992 1 Yes 451992
RCP-047297 Hidden Hills City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 452128 1 Yes 452128
RCP-035786 City Of Brundidge, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 452158.34 2 Yes 445658.34
RCP-053585 City Of Banks, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 452225.98 1 Yes 452225.98
RCP-051698 Slatington Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 452235.64 3 Yes 452235.64
RCP-027187 Rice Lake City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 452319.18 2 Yes 452319.18
RCP-055244 Garner City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453503.09 1 Yes 453503.09
RCP-019605 City Of Fairfield Bay, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453518.87 2 Yes 453518.87
RCP-024521 Town Of Phelps, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453537.1 6 Yes 453537.1
RCP-016268 Virden City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453161.88 2 Yes 453161.88
RCP-051614 Washington Township Board Of Supervisors Dba Washington Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453285.64 2 Yes 453285.64
RCP-014039 Spencer Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453352.74 Yes 453352.74
RCP-015311 Pineville city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453376.09 3 Yes 450999.2
RCP-051721 Mckean Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453390.64 1 Yes 453390.64
RCP-055988 Combine, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453456 Yes 0
RCP-025220 Town Of New London, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451003.01 6 Yes 451003.01
RCP-022251 West Penn Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 450975.64 1 Yes 450975.64
RCP-022276 Borough Of West Reading Dba West Reading Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451080.64 Yes 449658.94
RCP-025257 Town Of Northwood, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451107.69 1 Yes 451107.69
RCP-017956 Fulton City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451120.62 Yes 40000
RCP-023982 Town Of Amenia, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451178.13 3 Yes 451178.13
RCP-035724 City Of Slocomb, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451207.44 1 Yes 451207.44
RCP-026153 Town Of Biltmore Forest, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 451275.58 4 Yes 451275.58
RCP-040194 Liberty County, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 453935 1 Yes 453935
RCP-032659 Village Of Archbold, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 454225.98 1 Yes 453000
RCP-014270 Baxter Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 454268.31 6 Yes 454268
RCP-032921 Village Of Cedarville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 454331.16 8 Yes 454331.16
RCP-007558 City of Fairview Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455203.45 Yes 455203.45
RCP-022738 Narberth Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455280.64 1 Yes 453845.7
RCP-019121 Muskingum Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 454541.5 19 Yes 454541.5
RCP-052010 Strasburg Township Board Of Supervisors, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 454545.64 13 Yes 454545.64
RCP-025401 Lake Village, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 454554.78 1 Yes 454554.78
RCP-024489 Village Of Manlius, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 454767.86 1 Yes 454767.86
RCP-004467 Erie Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 454823.98 12 Yes 454823.98
RCP-056703 Goldthwaite, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455089.26 2 Yes 455089.26
RCP-031331 Edgartown, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455098.88 Yes 455098.88
RCP-001324 China Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 454887.07 13 Yes 454887.07
RCP-013740 Roscommon Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455034.16 4 Yes 455034.16
RCP-014339 Englewood Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455158.45 1 Yes 455158.45
RCP-027358 Bemidji Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455160.52 3 Yes 455160.52
RCP-038272 Sanborn County, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455295 1 Yes 455295
RCP-040831 Township Of Hopewell, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455308.2 1 Yes 455308.2
RCP-030074 Borough Of Garwood, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455517.54 Yes 455517.54
RCP-025739 Homer, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455592 1 Yes 455592
RCP-031899 Nooksack City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455735 3 Yes 455735
RCP-023182 Heidelberg Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455805.64 1 Yes 455805.64
RCP-034015 City Of Mauston, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455831.56 3 Yes 197730.12
RCP-056377 Krugerville, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455834.1 1 Yes 455834.1
RCP-054248 Plattsburg City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455947.75 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-032732 Village Of St. Bernard, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 456013.86 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-054469 Holden City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455540.29 1 Yes 455540.29
RCP-027213 Scandia City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 456362.62 Yes 0
RCP-025107 Town Of Jerusalem, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 456511.45 1 Yes 456511.45
RCP-031854 Kettle Falls City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 456853 1 Yes 456853
RCP-050664 Coleman City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 456278 3 Yes 456278
RCP-014298 Chapel Hill Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 456345.3 2 Yes 456345.3
RCP-040936 Borough Of Atlantic Highlands, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 455412.88 1 Yes 227706.44
RCP-051490 Smith Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 457380.64 3 Yes 456659.86
RCP-052825 Sharon Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 457464.65 7 Yes 457464.85
RCP-003908 City Of South Haven, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 456925.76 4 Yes 456925.76
RCP-032255 Springfield Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 457065.55 1 Yes 457065.55
RCP-032530 Marlboro Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 457065.55 1 Yes 457065.55
RCP-038323 Greeley County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 457625 Yes 457625
RCP-001097 County Of Niobrara, Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 457625 10 Yes 457625
RCP-052542 Flora, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 457763.71 Yes 457763.71
RCP-003537 Crystal Lake Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101410.62 1 Yes 101410.62
RCP-034618 Town Of Somerset, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 457087.58 1 Yes 457087.58
RCP-023876 Village Of New Berlin, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101435.59 2 Yes 101435.59
RCP-054218 Laddonia City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101457.54 Yes 101457.54
RCP-026780 Battle Lake City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101523.2 1 Yes 101523.2
RCP-025917 Sky Valley, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101948 3 Yes 101948
RCP-023680 Town Of Alfred, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101948.41 3 Yes 61770.46
RCP-003181 Town Of Butte Falls, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101506.52 14 Yes 101506.52
RCP-055036 Ruthven City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101974.66 Yes 101974.66
RCP-024519 Village Of Naples, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101948.41 1 Yes 50974.21
RCP-018830 Village Of Bolivar, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102014.17 Yes 102014.17
RCP-049842 Town Of Blanca, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102048 5 Yes 20660
RCP-055359 Boyden City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101526.09 2 Yes 14926
RCP-033635 Town Of Elba, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101528.5 1 Yes 101528.5
RCP-034810 Town Of Christiana, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101528.5 1 Yes 101528.5
RCP-033449 Town Of Delmar, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101423.83 1 Yes 101423.83
RCP-022379 Union Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101535.14 1 Yes 101535.14
RCP-023172 Venango Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101535.14 5 Yes 101535.14
RCP-025379 Fountain Lake, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101625 5 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-026886 Deer River City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101632.48 2 Yes 101632.48
RCP-033305 Town Of Maple Grove, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102051.84 1 Yes 102051.84
RCP-034794 Town Of Preston, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102051.84 1 Yes 102051.84
RCP-055842 Piper City Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102063.5 3 Yes 102063.5
RCP-050230 Village Of Dorchester, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101590.97 1 Yes 0
RCP-018211 Wesley Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101593.5 2 Yes 101593.5
RCP-004493 Wasioja Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101632.48 5 Yes 101632.48
RCP-023944 Town Of Marathon, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101640.72 1 Yes 101640.72
RCP-047514 Basehor City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 991349.06 1 Yes 985486.11
RCP-047614 De Soto City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 993790.8 1 Yes 993790.8
RCP-007276 Taylor, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26878.5 Yes 26691.43
RCP-057117 Sanborn, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26878.5 Yes 26878.5
RCP-004542 Pillsbury Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26883.43 1 Yes 26883.43
RCP-035121 Kasaan City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27185.49 1 Yes 26862.39
RCP-022417 Allegheny Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27195.04 2 Yes 22000
RCP-056684 Iola, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27191.97 4 Yes 13595.99
RCP-007947 Town of Osage Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27199.9 1 Yes 27199.9
RCP-026905 Eitzen City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27211.28 1 Yes 27211.28
RCP-050333 Village Of Ithaca, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26194.19 1 Yes 26194.19
RCP-023772 Town Of South Valley, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26256.33 1 Yes 26256.33
RCP-054480 Kingdom City Village, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26484.9 1 Yes 26484.9
RCP-054571 St. Clair City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 959975.77 5 Yes 959975.77
RCP-035245 Town Of Craigsville, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 965928 8 Yes 965928
RCP-023129 Borough Of Brentwood, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 973141.38 6 Yes 970074.26
RCP-052020 Dallas Township Board Of Supervisors, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 973246.38 Yes 973246.38
RCP-057378 Oak Grove City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 974469.71 3 Yes 974469.71
RCP-052670 Winona, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 974530.26 2 Yes 545126
RCP-034942 Village Of Hartland, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 975510.93 Yes 975510.93
RCP-047938 Pratt City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 991349.06 6 Yes 991349.06
RCP-032011 City Of Delaware City, DE Delaware Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 991762.75 3 Yes 991762.75
RCP-056121 Mabank, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 991861.23 1 Yes 991861.23
RCP-051649 Borough Of Lititz Dba Lititz Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 993826.42 2 Yes 993826.42
RCP-047609 Delia City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26859.22 Yes 26859.22
RCP-015776 Chandler Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27217.98 1 Yes 27217.98
RCP-007910 Town of Martha Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26147 Yes 26147
RCP-034787 Town Of Chimney Rock, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26376.48 1 Yes 26376.5
RCP-005366 Presque Isle City, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 952386.76 1 Yes 952386.76
RCP-055384 Atlantic City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 975786.74 3 Yes 975786.74
RCP-053170 Pickett County, Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 980515 1 Yes 980515
RCP-025863 Pembroke, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 980644 1 Yes 980644
RCP-032234 Bath Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 994270.08 6 Yes 990316.51
RCP-049291 Jewett City Borough, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 994393.96 1 Yes 994393.96
RCP-054295 Desloge City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 994609.87 1 Yes 994609.87
RCP-051670 Maidencreek Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 995191.42 1 Yes 995191.42
RCP-056067 Horseshoe Bay, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 999061.22 5 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-026467 Town Of Landis, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1000072.58 11 Yes 1000072.58
RCP-027484 Hartland Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26883.43 Yes 26883.43
RCP-026043 Clearmont Town, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27229.82 5 Yes 31872.25
RCP-050216 Village Of Davey, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27256.11 2 Yes 27256.11
RCP-050477 Village Of Republican City, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27256.11 1 Yes 27256.11
RCP-019689 City Of Frankfort, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27307.74 Yes 0
RCP-047618 Dorrance City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27317.04 1 Yes 27236.26
RCP-033282 Town Of La Pointe, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27318.49 2 Yes 13688.49
RCP-034833 Village Of Genoa, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27318.49 1 Yes 27318.49
RCP-054516 Morrison City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26484.9 1 Yes 26484.9
RCP-032574 Champion Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 952728.24 6 Yes 952728.24
RCP-024447 Town Of Marcy, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 970253.49 Yes 850000
RCP-013745 York Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 970179.08 4 Yes 970179.08
RCP-032239 City Of Girard, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 970396.66 4 Yes 970396.66
RCP-002040 Town Of Mccoll, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 980752.6 Yes 980752.6
RCP-002048 Town Of Ninety Six, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1000358.26 18 Yes 1000358.26
RCP-023859 Town Of Southport, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1001125.2 20 Yes 1001125.2
RCP-014663 Christine, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26878.5 2 Yes 26878.5
RCP-022944 Watson Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26880.04 2 Yes 26880.04
RCP-027429 Alliance Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26883.43 2 Yes 26883.43
RCP-027471 Clark Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26883.43 1 Yes 26883.43
RCP-035066 Village Of Milladore, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27318.49 Yes 0
RCP-027462 Evansville Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27320.56 1 Yes 27320.56
RCP-027631 Granby Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27320.56 1 Yes 27320.56
RCP-017746 Caledonia Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26264.34 Yes 26264.33
RCP-033126 Bryce Canyon City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26274 Yes 26274
RCP-018363 Village Of New Alexandria, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26502.65 1 Yes 26502.65
RCP-019763 Town Of Cope, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26560.96 Yes 0
RCP-025903 Royston, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 960105 1 Yes 960105
RCP-040737 Township Of Washington, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 960438.66 2 Yes 267899
RCP-051849 Neshannock Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 966736.38 1 Yes 963689.44
RCP-032067 City Of Louisville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 984384.17 17 Yes 984384.17
RCP-038840 Custer County, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 984400 1 Yes 984400
RCP-050578 City Of Wayne, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1001750.65 4 Yes 1001750.65
RCP-054563 Salem City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1002147.88 1 Yes 1002147.88
RCP-017297 Watopa Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26883.43 1 Yes 26883.43
RCP-017437 Angora Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26883.43 Yes 0
RCP-003427 Village Of Emmett, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27323.06 Yes 27323.06
RCP-004459 Hebron Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27323.06 8 Yes 24164.9
RCP-013873 Village Of Walkerville, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27323.06 1 Yes 27268.37
RCP-030158 Grass Range Town, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26901.8 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-050192 Village Of Concord, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26902.14 1 Yes 0
RCP-017910 Ellsworth Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26944.76 1 Yes 26944.76
RCP-027161 Pemberton City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26337.02 Yes 26337.02
RCP-026980 Hayward City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26446.3 Yes 15435.48
RCP-027470 Solem Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26446.3 1 Yes 26446.3
RCP-004527 Kanaranzi Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26446.3 1 Yes 26446
RCP-052322 Preston Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26555.59 1 Yes 26555.59
RCP-001307 Old Orchard Beach Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 953232.66 1 Yes 953232.66
RCP-000934 Washington County Of, Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 953321 1 Yes 953321
RCP-023493 Borough Of Economy, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 955291.36 3 Yes 955291.36
RCP-005250 Brewer City, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 955347.43 7 Yes 955347.43
RCP-003503 Blair Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 955466.64 1 Yes 477738.76
RCP-050316 City Of Holdrege, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 957149.73 1 Yes 957149.73
RCP-040929 City Of South Amboy, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 960438.66 1 Yes 960438.66
RCP-037803 Scott County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 961674 7 Yes 961674
RCP-031724 City Of Shelley, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 960619.12 1 Yes 960619.12
RCP-032577 City Of Madeira, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 972289.71 2 Yes 972289.71
RCP-031461 Plainville, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 972684.88 7 Yes 972684.88
RCP-055957 Bunker Hill Village, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 976964.69 1 Yes 975037.71
RCP-049133 Trappe Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 985623.15 2 Yes 985259.49
RCP-055950 Brookshire, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1002272.84 6 Yes 1002272.84
RCP-026828 Cambridge City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1002773.81 1 Yes 1002773.81
RCP-026300 Bloomingdale, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1003050 1 Yes 1003050
RCP-017199 Lewisville City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26992.71 1 Yes 26992.71
RCP-007970 Town of Redbird Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27024.41 Yes 27025.22
RCP-001258 Stoneham Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26223.15 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-031612 City Of Elk River, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26241.73 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-027539 Lake Elizabeth Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26337.02 Yes 0
RCP-057267 Sugar Bush Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26555.59 1 Yes 26555.59
RCP-023185 Jefferson Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26565.04 1 Yes 26565.04
RCP-056612 Dodson, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26565.5 1 Yes 26565.5
RCP-029985 Township Of Ocean, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 951227.82 9 Yes 951227.82
RCP-015928 Mount Carmel City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 952728.64 3 Yes 952728.99
RCP-022278 City Of Jeannette, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 952771.36 2 Yes 952771.36
RCP-051803 City Of Lock Haven, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 953716.36 1 Yes 950710.46
RCP-022383 East Nottingham Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 953926.36 1 Yes 953926.36
RCP-054188 Crystal City City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 957531.01 5 Yes 957531.01
RCP-056873 Colorado City, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 957599.18 1 Yes 957599.18
RCP-055965 Canton, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 958592.29 1 Yes 958592.29
RCP-026711 Town Of Warsaw, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 984456.4 4 Yes 984456.4
RCP-054699 Novelty Village, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26892.36 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-050060 Town Of Vilas, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26894.42 1 Yes 26894.42
RCP-016363 Amherst Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27174.8 Yes 27174.8
RCP-025940 Talking Rock, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26514 Yes 26514
RCP-003922 City Of Grosse Pointe Farms, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 957778.6 1 Yes 957778.6
RCP-025074 Village Of Rye Brook, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 976509.89 5 Yes 976509.89
RCP-053665 City Of King City, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 979082.58 1 Yes 979082.58
RCP-004521 Prairieville Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27211.28 1 Yes 27211.28
RCP-017374 Christiania Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26446.3 1 Yes 26446.3
RCP-050025 City Of Rocky Ford, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 958899.32 2 Yes 885423.81
RCP-038038 Hyde County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 958954 1 Yes 871192.6
RCP-037577 Kingsbury County, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 959343 1 Yes 959343
RCP-015378 Stanford city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 959689.74 8 Yes 959689.74
RCP-047415 San Joaquin City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 961909 1 Yes 961909
RCP-004067 City Of Plymouth, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 961982.14 3 Yes 961982.14
RCP-038713 Ouray County, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 961868 1 Yes 961868
RCP-049223 North Canaan, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 962135.35 12 Yes 962135.37
RCP-031261 Ashby, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 962181.09 5 Yes 962181.09
RCP-056869 Presidio, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 966785.38 6 Yes 966785.38
RCP-024549 Town Of Monroe, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 966868.89 9 Yes 966868.89
RCP-004406 City Of Saline, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 981843.9 1 Yes 981843.9
RCP-037370 Garfield County, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 981098 1 Yes 981098
RCP-037029 Wheeler County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 982069 4 Yes 982069
RCP-051357 City Of Sunbury, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 983011.38 3 Yes 896453.78
RCP-055513 Kirkville City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26166.52 6 Yes 26166.52
RCP-006028 Town Of Auburn, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26245.5 Yes 26245.5
RCP-052335 Falun Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26337.02 1 Yes 26337.02
RCP-006295 City Of Spencer, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 26584.36 1 Yes 26584.36
RCP-046856 Berne City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 962485.38 1 Yes 962485.38
RCP-006987 Pearl River, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 966887.25 2 Yes 0
RCP-032622 Porter Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 970396.66 1 Yes 970396.66
RCP-051730 Bethel Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 970411.38 2 Yes 970411.38
RCP-040740 Borough Of Wood-Ridge, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 972789.54 Yes 972789.54
RCP-031767 Benton City City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 976575 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-007573 City of Henryetta Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 976739.56 2 Yes 976739.56
RCP-055365 Blockton City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27661.74 1 Yes 27661.74
RCP-052050 Corydon Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27720.04 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-027329 Idun Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27866.97 Yes 27866.97
RCP-050443 Village Of Page, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27964.06 2 Yes 27964.06
RCP-040941 Township Of Colts Neck, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1028054.54 1 Yes 852926.62
RCP-025613 White Hall, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1028238.54 3 Yes 1028238.54
RCP-038437 Brule County, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1028880 2 Yes 1028880
RCP-034295 City Of Sparta, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1029101.23 8 Yes 1029101.23
RCP-057290 Eden Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29506.21 4 Yes 29506.21
RCP-015834 Long Point Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29122.12 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-031290 Brookfield, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1031826.38 5 Yes 1031826.38
RCP-026485 City Of Locust, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1031942.32 1 Yes 1031942.32
RCP-053715 City Of Phoenix, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1033500.72 2 Yes 1033500.72
RCP-049103 Garrett Park Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1033918.69 7 Yes 1033537.21
RCP-035790 City Of Argo, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1033640.62 6 Yes 1033640.62
RCP-025570 Success, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27555.05 6 Yes 27555.05
RCP-016022 Palmer Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27897.36 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-047755 Jewell City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61348.88 3 Yes 46884.53
RCP-037404 Clay County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2560837 80 Yes 2560837
RCP-032062 City Of Marysville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2594209.88 5 Yes 0
RCP-037017 Mason County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2594829 20 Yes 2594829
RCP-056780 Pearsall, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2633956.39 11 Yes 2628761.13
RCP-016369 Berwyn Heights Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2635211.25 1 Yes 2635211.25
RCP-026384 Town Of Fletcher, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2667178.91 1 Yes 2667178.91
RCP-015918 Montgomery Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2672430.36 5 Yes 2672430.37
RCP-034950 Village Of Oconomowoc Lake, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62801.13 3 Yes 62801.14
RCP-057405 Akeley Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62837.29 1 Yes 62837.29
RCP-052388 Wuori Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62837.29 Yes 62837.29
RCP-027338 Audubon Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62946.56 1 Yes 62946.56
RCP-034244 Village Of Oxford, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63010.47 5 Yes 63010.47
RCP-034938 Village Of Chenequa, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63010.47 2 Yes 28431.34
RCP-035317 Town Of Nassawadox, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63037.5 4 Yes 63037.5
RCP-018090 Junction City Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63415.44 1 Yes 63415.44
RCP-026131 Town Of Autryville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63420.79 Yes 63420.79
RCP-005385 Southport Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63443.1 1 Yes 63443.1
RCP-035467 Town Of Anderson, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63473.34 1 Yes 0
RCP-018989 Village Of Harveysburg, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59630.97 Yes 59422
RCP-026501 City Of Marion, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2514841.53 5 Yes 2514841.53
RCP-052079 Marple Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2515278.56 10 Yes 2515278.56
RCP-040931 Borough Of South Plainfield, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2517488.06 3 Yes 2517488.06
RCP-039115 County Of Buffalo, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2531119 15 Yes 2531119
RCP-014503 Samburg Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59639.41 1 Yes 59639.41
RCP-003325 Dover Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59795.48 Yes 0
RCP-003694 Village Of Dansville, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59795.48 1 Yes 59795.49
RCP-023694 Town Of Burns, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60820.33 Yes 60820
RCP-050570 Village Of Wallace, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60883.78 Yes 60883.78
RCP-000011 Everton City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60915.27 3 Yes 60915.27
RCP-052575 Lula, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61215.45 Yes 61215.45
RCP-033993 Town Of Fountain, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61231.1 7 Yes 61231.1
RCP-034038 Village Of Casco, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61231.1 1 Yes 61231.1
RCP-034588 Town Of Stubbs, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61231.1 1 Yes 61231.1
RCP-003521 Center Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61371.82 2 Yes 30686.26
RCP-056887 Pecos City, Town Of, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2597211.6 Yes 2592088.81
RCP-031793 College Place City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2603363 1 Yes 2603363
RCP-025465 Mountain Home, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2604056.05 3 Yes 2604056.05
RCP-050884 South Bay City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2604439 1 Yes 2604439
RCP-033377 City Of De Pere, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2613573.81 1 Yes 2613573.81
RCP-017950 Frankfort Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2636367.92 1 Yes 2636367.92
RCP-051628 Susquehanna Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2636973.74 1 Yes 2636793.74
RCP-026558 Town Of Oak Island, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2672596.76 1 Yes 2672596.76
RCP-018317 Latty Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62260.19 1 Yes 62260.19
RCP-018075 Irving Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62871.1 4 Yes 62871.1
RCP-016174 Spring Bay Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62871.1 4 Yes 0
RCP-047817 Mccune City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62874.98 2 Yes 62874.98
RCP-018457 Jennings Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62891.21 Yes 62641.13
RCP-032988 Village Of Thurston, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63522.22 3 Yes 63522.22
RCP-023298 Mill Creek Township Supervisors, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63525.1 1 Yes 63525.1
RCP-053913 Borough Of Cokeburg, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63525.1 1 Yes 63324.88
RCP-034109 Town Of Rock Falls, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63533.81 4 Yes 0
RCP-036730 Ford County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2517522 9 Yes 2517522
RCP-050416 Village Of Niobrara, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59821.86 1 Yes 59821.86
RCP-022847 Jamestown Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60165.08 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-023022 Scott Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60165.08 1 Yes 59975.46
RCP-016960 Tordenskjold Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60542.36 1 Yes 60542.36
RCP-001390 Vienna Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60588.16 1 Yes 60532.4
RCP-014566 Williston City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60603 1 Yes 60603
RCP-034053 Town Of Washington, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60917.1 3 Yes 60917.1
RCP-017140 Jadis Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60919.27 1 Yes 60919.27
RCP-024243 Village Of Croghan, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60922.89 1 Yes 60922.89
RCP-018658 Pike Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61103.33 8 Yes 61103.33
RCP-022711 Morris Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61110.08 2 Yes 61110.08
RCP-023425 Borough Of Wheatland, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61110.08 1 Yes 61110.08
RCP-047191 Anderson City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2542922 Yes 0
RCP-023358 Springfield Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2547408.62 8 Yes 2539379.76
RCP-056219 Jacinto City, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2598452.98 1 Yes 2598452.98
RCP-056885 Sweetwater, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2599197.8 8 Yes 2599197.8
RCP-007050 Ville Platte, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2605409.22 2 Yes 1300618.84
RCP-047435 Sonoma City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2637175 1 Yes 2637175
RCP-039143 Vienna City, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2637342 3 Yes 2637342
RCP-031523 Walpole, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2637647.58 2 Yes 2637647.58
RCP-053974 Worthington Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61845.08 5 Yes 0
RCP-053986 Curtin Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61845.08 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-052942 Jacksonville Village, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61596.13 1 Yes 61596.13
RCP-027481 Albert Lea Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61853.74 1 Yes 61853.74
RCP-053575 Town Of Birch, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61963.78 3 Yes 61963.78
RCP-035180 Tenakee Springs City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62026.96 2 Yes 62026.96
RCP-034004 Town Of Plymouth, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62487.13 2 Yes 62487.13
RCP-014267 Auburntown Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62986.5 1 Yes 62986.5
RCP-055995 Cove, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63000 1 Yes 63000
RCP-017842 Dakota Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63687.62 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-050172 Village Of Cedar Rapids, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63715.59 1 Yes 63715.59
RCP-057106 Westhope, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63717.84 2 Yes 63717.84
RCP-015369 Sparta city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63750 Yes 31875
RCP-034488 Town Of Eisenstein, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63743.15 1 Yes 63743.15
RCP-017024 Green Prairie Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63750 3 Yes 63750
RCP-024356 Village Of Rockville Centre, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2517941.15 4 Yes 2517941.15
RCP-030072 Township Of Cranford, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2517697.4 1 Yes 2517697.4
RCP-047182 Yorktown Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2518053.94 5 Yes 2518053.94
RCP-055164 Lewis, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59659.66 2 Yes 59659.66
RCP-055390 Arlington City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59659.66 1 Yes 59659.66
RCP-033308 Town Of Prairie Farm, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60079.75 Yes 60079.75
RCP-056151 Oak Ridge, Town Of (Cooke Co), TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60082.7 1 Yes 60082.7
RCP-056682 Anderson, Town Of, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60082.7 3 Yes 60082.7
RCP-038843 Dooly County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2600851 1 Yes 2600851
RCP-004181 City Of Auburn Hills, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2600735.64 2 Yes 2600735.64
RCP-026156 Town Of Black Mountain, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2601208.54 2 Yes 2601208.54
RCP-039379 Charlton County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2601239 6 Yes 2601239
RCP-013905 Byron Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2618075.28 1 Yes 2618075.28
RCP-031343 Georgetown, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2620815.11 29 Yes 2620815.11
RCP-015727 Greene County Board Of Supervisors, Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2638921 2 Yes 2638921
RCP-031758 Airway Heights City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2650305 1 Yes 2647718
RCP-051313 Township Of Derry Dba Derry Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2651148.76 1 Yes 2651148.76
RCP-001373 Jackson Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61857.02 1 Yes 61857.02
RCP-006276 Town Of Keystone, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62030.16 Yes 62030.16
RCP-018637 Van Buren Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62049.86 1 Yes 62049.86
RCP-050314 Village Of Hildreth, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62299.69 1 Yes 62299.69
RCP-050480 Village Of Rising City, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62299.69 4 Yes 62299.69
RCP-023301 Southampton Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63000.08 3 Yes 63000.8
RCP-008051 Town of Wanette Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62998.48 1 Yes 62998.48
RCP-024867 Village Of Hammondsport, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63794.68 1 Yes 63794.68
RCP-034235 Town Of Neshkoro, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59661.08 1 Yes 59661.08
RCP-047702 Gypsum City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59670.18 1 Yes 59670.18
RCP-055589 Cumming City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60556.78 1 Yes 60556.78
RCP-008505 Pope, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60969.6 Yes 60969.6
RCP-026865 Cook City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61416.62 2 Yes 61416.62
RCP-057412 Fall Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61416.62 2 Yes 61416.62
RCP-017860 Deerfield Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2537434.38 2 Yes 2537434.39
RCP-030083 Township Of Scotch Plains, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2540724.48 Yes 2540724.48
RCP-052845 Barre City, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2549842.27 10 Yes 2549241
RCP-025432 Marion, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2550396.22 1 Yes 2550396.22
RCP-050691 Flagler Beach City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2565873 7 Yes 2565872
RCP-037620 Goshen County, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2566082 2 Yes 2566082
RCP-054198 Fulton City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2566183.12 6 Yes 2566183.12
RCP-032254 City Of Trotwood, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2566445.19 1 Yes 2566445.19
RCP-048920 Bernalillo Town, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2584826 1 Yes 2584826
RCP-031367 Hingham, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2583115.26 2 Yes 2583115.26
RCP-040371 Morgan County Fiscal Court, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2585117 3 Yes 2209731.3
RCP-031315 Dedham, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2639636.28 4 Yes 2639636.28
RCP-038695 Newton County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2640669 11 Yes 2640669
RCP-031996 Yelm City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2642201 2 Yes 2641289.67
RCP-056358 Granbury, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2663997.75 1 Yes 2663997.75
RCP-006059 City Of Charles Town, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2665044.89 1 Yes 2665044.89
RCP-014567 Winchester City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2665080.32 1 Yes 2665080.32
RCP-001320 Jonesboro Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62068.51 1 Yes 62068.51
RCP-016984 Pine Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62072.31 1 Yes 62072.31
RCP-007861 Town of Jennings Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62121.05 1 Yes 62121.05
RCP-054694 East Lynne City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62137.65 1 Yes 62137.65
RCP-022651 The Borough Of Clark Dba Borough Of Clark, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62160.1 2 Yes 61964.18
RCP-015427 Woodlawn city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62371.97 4 Yes 62371.97
RCP-034414 Town Of Spring Lake, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62382.46 2 Yes 62382.46
RCP-006547 City Of Hudson, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62391.86 1 Yes 62391.86
RCP-027355 Toad Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62400.16 5 Yes 7321.32
RCP-034193 Village Of Hatley, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62487.13 1 Yes 62487.13
RCP-034506 Village Of Prentice, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62487.13 1 No 2545 15000 0 0
RCP-034151 Town Of Bern, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62487.13 6 Yes 62487.13
RCP-048940 Eagle Nest Village, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63045 1 Yes 63045
RCP-051439 Ulysses Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63315.1 1 Yes 31558.8
RCP-034532 Town Of Ithaca, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63324.48 2 Yes 63324.48
RCP-034848 Town Of Manitowish Waters, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60603.09 Yes 60603.09
RCP-035682 Town Of Goshen, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60620.58 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-019208 Virginia Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61418.84 2 Yes 61418.84
RCP-023324 Harmony Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61530.08 Yes 0
RCP-024164 Village Of Newport, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61538.27 3 Yes 61538.27
RCP-017678 Bellwood Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2540972.58 1 Yes 2540972.58
RCP-037683 Vinton County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2541608 1 Yes 2541608
RCP-053075 Camp County, Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2543356 3 Yes 2543356
RCP-050888 South Pasadena City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2551849 3 Yes 2551849
RCP-034388 City Of Mequon, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2552028.7 1 Yes 2552028.7
RCP-053049 Big Horn County, Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2587060 4 Yes 2578060
RCP-031576 City Of Blackfoot, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2588466.29 3 Yes 2588466.29
RCP-004009 City Of Mt Pleasant, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2605885 1 Yes 2605885
RCP-032057 Springfield Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2606935.36 3 Yes 2606935.36
RCP-026643 Town Of Siler City, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2621286.48 11 Yes 2621286.48
RCP-014312 Covington City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2621166.72 1 Yes 2621166.72
RCP-049098 Federalsburg Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2622743.2 11 Yes 2621775.51
RCP-018994 City Of Riverside, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2643218.74 17 Yes 2643218.74
RCP-038438 Faribault County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2651935 2 Yes 2651935
RCP-034705 Town Of Hutchins, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62487.13 Yes 0
RCP-034654 Town Of Westfield, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63219.81 2 Yes 0
RCP-052330 Wheeling Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63274.42 2 Yes 63274.42
RCP-016412 Mardela Springs Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63300 Yes 63300
RCP-004645 Onamia Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63383.7 2 Yes 63383.7
RCP-025521 Prattsville, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63397.34 1 Yes 63397.34
RCP-054128 Niangua City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63410.93 1 Yes 63410.93
RCP-016056 Plymouth Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63415.44 1 Yes 63415.44
RCP-048063 Westwood Hills City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59670.18 2 Yes 59670.18
RCP-023077 Emlenton Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60165.08 Yes 49483
RCP-051895 Decatur Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 492450.7 1 Yes 492450.7
RCP-030022 City Of Salem, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 492570.22 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-024486 Town Of Lafayette, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 492716.47 9 Yes 492716.47
RCP-003893 City Of Cheboygan, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 492445.74 3 Yes 492445.74
RCP-031872 Mccleary City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 492898 2 Yes 492898
RCP-055783 Fairbury City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 492898.6 2 Yes 492898.6
RCP-052540 Eupora, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 492919.57 1 Yes 492919.57
RCP-040697 Borough Of Harrington Park, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495082.26 1 Yes 495082.26
RCP-027068 Luverne City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495157.81 1 Yes 495157.81
RCP-046939 Fremont Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 496313.39 Yes 496313.39
RCP-055003 Story City City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 496416.18 1 Yes 496416.18
RCP-031308 Colrain, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 496484.24 1 Yes 496484.24
RCP-025340 Town Of Barnstead, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 496647.69 1 Yes 496647.69
RCP-024293 Village Of Chittenango, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497434.4 3 Yes 497434.4
RCP-007549 City of Drumright Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497494.91 1 Yes 497494.91
RCP-013866 Cambridge Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497490 5 Yes 497490
RCP-056528 Goliad, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497544.4 2 Yes 497544.4
RCP-040882 Township Of Alexandria, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497594.3 3 Yes 497594.3
RCP-018249 Pleasant Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497660.88 1 Yes 495682.01
RCP-051907 Walker Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499380.72 2 Yes 499380.72
RCP-031994 Yacolt Town, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 501840 8 Yes 501840
RCP-040859 Township Of Greenwich, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 501885.72 2 Yes 501885.72
RCP-005307 Hollis Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 501940.7 2 Yes 501000
RCP-003405 Schoolcraft Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 500117.2 1 Yes 500117.2
RCP-047161 West Terre Haute Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 500392.68 2 Yes 500392.68
RCP-054513 Monroe City City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 496693.75 Yes 496693.75
RCP-034872 Village Of Bloomfield, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 496756.96 3 Yes 496756.96
RCP-016271 Wadsworth Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 496845.04 1 Yes 496845.05
RCP-026277 Arlington, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495177 11 Yes 495177
RCP-003676 Attica Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495283.14 14 Yes 495283.14
RCP-004086 Acme Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497700.18 1 Yes 497700.18
RCP-052242 Shenandoah Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499800.7 1 Yes 498225.44
RCP-022529 West Pittston Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499905.7 1 Yes 499905.7
RCP-014322 Decatur Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 494621.34 1 Yes 494621.34
RCP-034918 Town Of West Bend, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 494663.59 16 Yes 494663.59
RCP-013962 Rives Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 494757.7 4 Yes 494757.7
RCP-004174 Port Sheldon Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495283.14 1 Yes 495283.14
RCP-006036 Town Of Belle, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497734.38 2 No 18106 48720 10000 0
RCP-056382 Pelican Bay, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497792.69 2 Yes 496810.83
RCP-052710 Moretown Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497829.19 3 Yes 497829.19
RCP-007653 City of Watonga Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 498547.8 1 Yes 498547.8
RCP-047833 Marysville City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 498879.32 1 Yes 498879.32
RCP-056801 Cooper, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 494813.38 1 Yes 494813.38
RCP-049244 Scotland, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 494829.37 1 Yes 494829.37
RCP-034361 Town Of Oneida, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495291.6 Yes 495291.6
RCP-053767 City Of Waldport, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495316.28 2 Yes 0
RCP-025438 Mayflower, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495369.4 1 Yes 495369.4
RCP-004153 City Of Dexter, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495493.32 1 Yes 495493.31
RCP-014280 Bluff City City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495511.48 1 Yes 495511.48
RCP-030017 Borough Of Penns Grove, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497908.3 1 Yes 497908.3
RCP-053776 City Of Willamina, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499758.58 2 Yes 0
RCP-024352 Village Of Island Park, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 501126.7 1 Yes 501126.7
RCP-054648 Strafford City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 501175.81 Yes 501175.81
RCP-052728 South Hero Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 494839.23 1 Yes 494839.23
RCP-056023 El Lago, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 494890.49 8 Yes 494890.49
RCP-032536 Wayne Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 501341.81 3 Yes 498347.12
RCP-025433 Marked Tree, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 501377.65 1 Yes 501377.65
RCP-026241 Town Of East Spencer, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 494299.74 5 Yes 494299.74
RCP-007620 City of Perkins Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 494336.21 15 Yes 494336.21
RCP-026274 Aragon, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 498911 1 Yes 498911
RCP-025261 Town Of Epsom, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499055.55 4 Yes 499055.55
RCP-003806 Allegan Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493706.8 1 Yes 493706.8
RCP-014121 City Of Gladstone, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493706.8 4 Yes 491733
RCP-051608 Mount Pleasant Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493710.7 5 Yes 493710.7
RCP-004308 Kochville Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493811.9 3 Yes 493811.9
RCP-018907 Granger Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493874.79 3 Yes 493874.79
RCP-030051 Borough Of Franklin, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 494140.24 1 Yes 494140.24
RCP-027292 Watertown City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 494939.25 1 Yes 494939.25
RCP-034916 Town Of Trenton, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495605.61 1 Yes 495605.61
RCP-019576 City Of Danville, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495783.76 2 Yes 495783.76
RCP-052133 Edwardsville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495915.7 6 Yes 494352.68
RCP-032701 Hambden Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 495978.19 4 Yes 495978.19
RCP-007557 City of Eufaula Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499425.22 1 Yes 499419.3
RCP-056475 Memphis, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499530.61 1 Yes 499530.61
RCP-052798 Warren Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499623.16 1 Yes 499505.41
RCP-024831 Village Of Waterloo, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499690.8 6 Yes 499690.8
RCP-032010 Town Of Dagsboro, DE Delaware Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 500470.37 1 Yes 500470.37
RCP-040466 Elk County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 491423 2 Yes 491423
RCP-054489 Lawson City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 491804.23 1 Yes 491804.23
RCP-052128 Brecknock Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 492975.7 1 Yes 492975.7
RCP-013739 Lasalle Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 493076.28 1 Yes 493076.28
RCP-056329 Pinehurst, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 490592.69 2 Yes 490592.69
RCP-026230 Town Of Dobson, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 490475.37 2 Yes 490475.37
RCP-015265 Midway city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 496093.03 3 Yes 496093.03
RCP-057020 Beulah, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 496303.51 1 Yes 496303.51
RCP-022595 Lower Alsace Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 497070.72 Yes 327301
RCP-056208 Roman Forest, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 498040.95 1 Yes 497058.61
RCP-024364 Village Of Flower Hill, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 501434.39 3 Yes 501434.39
RCP-017742 Byron City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 499158.5 2 Yes 499158.5
RCP-054490 Leeton City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113273.88 2 Yes 113273.88
RCP-052051 Cleveland Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113295.16 1 Yes 113116.62
RCP-057230 Nevis Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113325.68 6 Yes 113325.68
RCP-014504 Sardis Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113344.54 Yes 113344.54
RCP-003842 Montmorency Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112234.76 1 Yes 112234.76
RCP-022524 Knox Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112245.16 5 Yes 112245.16
RCP-019409 Hopedale Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112269.83 1 Yes 112269.83
RCP-006053 Town Of Cairo, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112277.55 2 Yes 104331.55
RCP-018311 New Lyme Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112951.78 2 Yes 112741.9
RCP-018858 Village Of Williamsport, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112951.78 2 No 0 56251.22 56700.56 0
RCP-003426 Osceola Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112970.38 1 Yes 112970.38
RCP-003481 Fife Lake Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112970.38 11 Yes 112970.38
RCP-047587 Coldwater City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112320.34 3 Yes 0
RCP-003879 Greenwood Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112339.84 2 Yes 112339.84
RCP-019034 Tymochtee Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112951.78 4 Yes 112951.78
RCP-005295 Georgetown Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113034.46 2 Yes 113034.46
RCP-033645 Town Of Oak Grove, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113042.04 1 Yes 113042.04
RCP-053997 Milesburg Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112980.16 Yes 112980.16
RCP-017078 Taylors Falls City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112997.83 1 Yes 112997.83
RCP-033773 Town Of Forest, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113042.04 1 Yes 113042.04
RCP-054678 Bloomsdale City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113070.15 1 Yes 113070.16
RCP-057082 Glen Ullin, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113364.01 Yes 113364.01
RCP-015965 Newman City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113358.5 1 Yes 113358.5
RCP-006962 Mooringsport, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111338.7 1 Yes 0
RCP-034577 Town Of Flambeau, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111367.34 2 Yes 111367.34
RCP-018181 Peru Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111374.23 2 Yes 111374.23
RCP-019187 Crawford Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111374.23 Yes 111374.23
RCP-003400 Sagola Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113075.46 1 Yes 113075.46
RCP-052005 Borough Of Galeton, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113085.16 2 Yes 112728.74
RCP-033434 Village Of Hilbert, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113146.71 2 Yes 0
RCP-034791 Town Of Hale, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113146.71 3 Yes 113146.71
RCP-007990 Town of Savanna Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113186.68 2 Yes 113186.68
RCP-023294 Cass Township Supervisors, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113190.16 3 Yes 113190.16
RCP-057075 Wilton, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113205.9 Yes 0
RCP-003777 Village Of Baldwin, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113390.72 No 55118.21 0 0 0
RCP-052389 Albany Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113434.96 Yes 113434.96
RCP-015046 Benham city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111378.52 15 Yes 110057.58
RCP-023966 Town Of Harpersfield, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111384.28 1 Yes 111384
RCP-022565 Mercer Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111405.16 3 Yes 111405.16
RCP-025359 Bauxite, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113535.1 8 Yes 113535.1
RCP-026781 Baudette City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111467.88 Yes 111467.88
RCP-056594 Skellytown, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111475.77 2 Yes 90019.3
RCP-022796 Lower Tyrone Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111510.16 1 Yes 111510.16
RCP-051474 Cherry Township Supervisors, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112350.16 1 Yes 112350.16
RCP-017717 Brookport City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112405.92 1 Yes 112405.92
RCP-048060 Westmoreland City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113236 3 Yes 113236
RCP-003758 Eckford Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113250 1 Yes 113250
RCP-014726 Town Of Olar, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113508.42 1 Yes 113508.42
RCP-018434 Center Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111584.57 1 Yes 111584.57
RCP-004511 Clinton Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111686.45 2 Yes 111686.45
RCP-013885 Republic Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111604.22 No 5000 7000 0 0
RCP-033888 Town Of Kingston, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113356.04 1 Yes 113356.04
RCP-026103 Shoshoni Town, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111694.28 1 Yes 111694.28
RCP-047625 Eastborough City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111709.9 2 Yes 111709.9
RCP-024716 Town Of Edwards, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112409.92 5 Yes 112409.92
RCP-034127 Town Of Manitowoc, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112414.03 2 Yes 112414.03
RCP-057112 Steele, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112415.36 3 Yes 112415.36
RCP-018238 Adams Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112425.92 2 Yes 112425.92
RCP-046883 Chalmers Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111727.17 1 Yes 111727.17
RCP-034286 Town Of Wilton, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111786.02 1 Yes 111786.02
RCP-032935 Florence Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111794.92 1 Yes 111794.92
RCP-018400 Richmond Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111794.92 1 Yes 111794.92
RCP-053884 Town Of Atkinson, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113456.29 1 Yes 113456.29
RCP-035446 Town Of Sand Rock, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113461.5 5 Yes 113461.5
RCP-048985 Red River Town, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113480 Yes 113480
RCP-032998 Village Of Holgate, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111374.23 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-054969 West Bend City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111843.16 4 Yes 111843.16
RCP-031663 City Of Lewisville, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111849.97 5 Yes 111849.97
RCP-047787 Leon City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111862.5 2 Yes 111862.5
RCP-051914 Borough Of Speers, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111930.16 Yes 0
RCP-018287 Hartland Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112425.92 1 Yes 112425.92
RCP-014302 Clarksburg Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112454.4 3 Yes 112454.4
RCP-039515 Yakutat City And Borough, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112464 2 Yes 112464
RCP-033654 Village Of Hustisford, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112518.7 Yes 112518.7
RCP-023707 Town Of Rushford, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113538.12 Yes 113538.12
RCP-016374 Burkittsville Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 113542.3 1 Yes 113542.3
RCP-033902 Town Of Brigham, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111995.35 2 Yes 111995.35
RCP-024050 Town Of Elizabethtown, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111999.66 6 Yes 19285.08
RCP-024863 Town Of Rathbone, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111999.66 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-003573 Village Of Bellaire, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112024.58 2 Yes 112024.58
RCP-024680 Village Of Nassau, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112615.04 1 Yes 112615.04
RCP-023194 Penn Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112665.16 2 Yes 112665.16
RCP-017711 Brimfield Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112678.08 2 Yes 112678.09
RCP-015088 Centertown city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112688.85 11 Yes 112688.85
RCP-023275 Borough Of Cochranton, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112980.16 5 Yes 112980.16
RCP-034702 Town Of Green Valley, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111367.34 Yes 111367.34
RCP-032655 Village Of Convoy, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 111374.23 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-050182 City Of Clarkson, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112033.24 2 Yes 112033.2
RCP-031694 City Of Paris, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112065.07 5 Yes 112065.07
RCP-034189 Village Of Athens, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112728.03 1 Yes 112728.03
RCP-055215 Hedrick City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112740.3 1 Yes 112740.3
RCP-033457 Town Of Lake Holcombe, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112832.7 7 Yes 112832.7
RCP-026983 Henderson City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101632.48 1 Yes 101632.48
RCP-024871 Town Of Wayne, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101538.16 4 Yes 101538.16
RCP-049902 Town Of Fleming, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101545.3 1 Yes 101545.3
RCP-008466 Glen, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101779.9 Yes 0
RCP-053905 Taylor Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101745.14 1 Yes 101745.14
RCP-050120 City Of Beaver City, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101767.95 1 Yes 101767.95
RCP-007705 Town of Bernice Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101780.26 1 Yes 101780.26
RCP-055851 Ridgway Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101655.22 18 Yes 101655.22
RCP-034181 Town Of Rietbrock, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101737.84 6 Yes 90077.69
RCP-056827 Evant, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101793.02 2 Yes 101692.63
RCP-032354 Fox Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101803.83 1 Yes 101399.03
RCP-034466 Town Of Dewey, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101842.5 Yes 101842.5
RCP-057343 Hillsdale Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101741.77 1 Yes 50870.89
RCP-035056 Town Of Rudolph, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101842.5 Yes 101842.5
RCP-027050 Le Roy City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101851.04 1 Yes 101851.04
RCP-017640 Ashmore Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101927.4 1 Yes 101927.39
RCP-001277 Harrington Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101931.93 5 Yes 101931.93
RCP-025620 Wilmot, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 101932.98 4 Yes 101932.98
RCP-027284 Walker City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102069.61 1 Yes 102069.61
RCP-050922 Worthington Springs Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102146 3 Yes 102146
RCP-015328 Richlawn city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102153.75 2 Yes 102153.75
RCP-034077 Village Of Belmont, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102156.51 1 Yes 102156.51
RCP-035106 Buckland City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102141.55 1 Yes 101867.53
RCP-022786 Plum Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102165.14 2 Yes 102004.14
RCP-057178 Amador Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102069.61 Yes 101000
RCP-019189 Willshire Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102119.34 2 Yes 101906.31
RCP-007853 Town of Hulbert Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102131.23 1 Yes 102130.02
RCP-056431 Whiteface, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102289.57 1 Yes 102289.57
RCP-051975 Linesville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102480.16 3 Yes 102318.66
RCP-008059 Town of Welch Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102482.2 1 Yes 102482.2
RCP-025139 Town Of New Castle, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102491.17 Yes 102491.18
RCP-035677 Town Of Silas, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102222.96 4 Yes 102222.96
RCP-019094 Jefferson Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102224.51 3 Yes 33382.67
RCP-018992 Jackson Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102329.68 1 Yes 102329.68
RCP-024479 Village Of Elbridge, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102358.67 3 Yes 100858.67
RCP-007016 Saline, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102616.01 Yes 102616.01
RCP-024189 Village Of Dexter, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102256.1 1 Yes 102256.1
RCP-006299 Town Of Humboldt, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102539.66 2 Yes 102539.66
RCP-032599 Deer Creek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102540.02 1 Yes 102540.02
RCP-034325 Town Of Cassian, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102575.18 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-003529 Camden Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102585 1 Yes 102585
RCP-022671 Borough Of Dunbar, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102585.14 2 Yes 102261.82
RCP-033502 Town Of Withee, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102365.85 2 Yes 102365.85
RCP-051970 Harrison Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102375.14 1 Yes 102375.14
RCP-003190 City Of North Powder, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102172.86 2 Yes 102172.86
RCP-052666 Weir, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102334.5 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-016013 Orangeville Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102335.66 3 Yes 102335.66
RCP-019205 Cass Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102434.85 2 Yes 102434.85
RCP-052981 Michigantown Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102435.46 4 Yes 102435.46
RCP-001323 Liberty Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102354.88 2 Yes 102354.88
RCP-004414 Moran Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102356.4 3 Yes 102356.4
RCP-034683 Town Of Round Lake, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102470.52 1 Yes 102470.52
RCP-034701 Town Of Grant, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102470.52 6 Yes 102470.52
RCP-047716 Haviland City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102553.34 1 Yes 102553.34
RCP-029971 Borough Of Bay Head, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102261.18 1 Yes 102261.18
RCP-024786 Town Of Broome, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102358.67 3 Yes 102358.67
RCP-001233 Patten Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102566.36 Yes 102566.36
RCP-004015 New Haven Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102566.58 Yes 102566.58
RCP-057386 Irving Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102178.89 1 Yes 102178.89
RCP-047093 Roann Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102208.83 4 Yes 102208.84
RCP-003491 Village Of Elsie, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102776.76 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-034133 Town Of Rockland, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102784.52 2 Yes 102784.52
RCP-014062 Elk Rapids Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102671.68 2 Yes 102671.68
RCP-034433 Town Of Clayton, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102679.85 1 Yes 102679.85
RCP-054971 Wellsburg City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102722.26 2 Yes 102722.26
RCP-026570 Town Of Peletier, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102637.5 4 Yes 102637.5
RCP-022979 Meshoppen Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102690.14 17 Yes 102366.48
RCP-023046 Palo Alto Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102690.14 3 Yes 102690.14
RCP-055084 Olin City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102722.26 1 Yes 102722.26
RCP-018113 Kinmundy City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102743.92 4 Yes 102637.88
RCP-034449 Village Of Balsam Lake, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102784.52 Yes 0
RCP-031544 Westford, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7417970.84 70 Yes 7417970.84
RCP-036883 Isle Of Wight County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7207988 1 Yes 7207988
RCP-038534 Macomb Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7210898 5 Yes 7210898
RCP-031501 Stoneham, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7211426.22 2 Yes 7211426.22
RCP-047422 Saratoga City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7213239 10 Yes 7213239
RCP-049279 Windham, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7268842.23 24 Yes 7268842.23
RCP-050810 Mount Dora City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7270392 2 Yes 7270392
RCP-037912 Boone County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7270727 4 Yes 7003627
RCP-040638 Newport, RI Rhode Island Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7273598.75 17 Yes 7273598.75
RCP-037046 Williams County, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7301223 4 Yes 7301223
RCP-039498 Louisa County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7301611 3 Yes 7301611
RCP-037936 Richland, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7361385 3 Yes 7361385
RCP-048924 Carlsbad City, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7363602 1 Yes 7363602
RCP-037530 Brown County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7354638 12 Yes 7354638
RCP-036827 Eastvale City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7360219 1 Yes 7360219
RCP-039157 Oconto County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7367458 1 Yes 7367458
RCP-056016 Eagle Pass, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7369814.47 1 Yes 7369814.47
RCP-039006 Dover, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7535686 4 Yes 7535686
RCP-039291 Town Of Mount Pleasant, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7428213 4 Yes 7428213
RCP-022724 Borough Of Stoneboro, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102900.14 Yes 102575.82
RCP-003609 Long Rapids Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102986.94 1 Yes 102986.94
RCP-015153 Frankfort city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7273672.49 1 Yes 7187407.15
RCP-039855 Beaumont City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7306318 1 Yes 7306318
RCP-039362 Wellington, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7376577 2 Yes 7376577
RCP-039562 Dyer County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7217700 2 Yes 7217700
RCP-038989 Desoto, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7306702 6 Yes 7306702
RCP-038163 Yadkin County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7316373 5 Yes 7316373
RCP-037319 Matagorda County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7117473 9 Yes 7117473
RCP-037286 Steele County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7118639 3 Yes 7118639
RCP-040234 Hill County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7118639 1 Yes 7118639
RCP-036981 Bowling Green, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7316778 13 Yes 7316778
RCP-039874 Colleton County, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7318316 7 No 0 1325494 1519517 1313573
RCP-038210 Howard County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7121552 9 Yes 7121552
RCP-040036 Williams County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7126991 1 Yes 7126991
RCP-047421 Santa Paula City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7130229 1 Yes 7130229
RCP-037161 Piscataway Township, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7282692 1 No 4000000 3000000 0 0
RCP-037184 Alexander County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7283353 3 Yes 7283353
RCP-007038 Sulphur, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7433177.31 Yes 7433177
RCP-039304 Scott County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7435441 1 Yes 7435441
RCP-038047 Pontotoc County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7436218 27 Yes 7436218
RCP-056537 Seguin, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7446283.38 3 Yes 7431596.18
RCP-056045 Greenville, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7157042.23 1 Yes 7157042.23
RCP-038728 St. Charles City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7157499 14 Yes 7157499
RCP-037454 Essex County, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7164479 15 Yes 7164479
RCP-037003 Montgomery County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7446707 3 Yes 7446707
RCP-040027 Webster Parish, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7447096 1 Yes 7447096
RCP-037127 Eden Prairie, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7447401 2 Yes 7447401
RCP-039182 Alcorn County, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7177687 3 Yes 7177687
RCP-039416 Green County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7179047 20 Yes 6501336.65
RCP-037434 Jefferson County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7319675 60 Yes 7319675
RCP-040327 Desoto County, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7381249 Yes 7381249
RCP-040274 Prince George County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7449621 10 Yes 7449621
RCP-038043 Lawrence County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7450009 1 Yes 7450009
RCP-047317 Laguna Hills City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7465378 2 Yes 7465378
RCP-040562 Clarion County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7466131 3 Yes 7253054.62
RCP-037603 Newberry County, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7466519 3 Yes 1499685.77
RCP-047204 Banning City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7468727 1 Yes 7468727
RCP-038912 Dare County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7188564 1 Yes 7188564
RCP-054349 Wildwood City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7218561.46 1 Yes 7218561.46
RCP-038723 Talbot County, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7221973 13 Yes 7221973
RCP-037771 Jasper County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7222750 11 Yes 7222750
RCP-047408 San Carlos City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7220894 1 Yes 7220894
RCP-039378 Dallas County, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7224887 1 Yes 7224887
RCP-036819 Marion County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7226635 3 Yes 7226635
RCP-037882 Woodford County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7470210 21 Yes 7470210
RCP-039871 Okmulgee County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7471375 12 Yes 7471375
RCP-039736 Franklin County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7472152 22 Yes 7472152
RCP-015205 Independence city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7474415.89 3 Yes 7385769.75
RCP-025690 Forest Park, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7476196 2 Yes 7476196
RCP-039793 Escambia County, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7115531 8 Yes 7115531
RCP-047197 Atascadero City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7194579 2 Yes 7194579
RCP-038298 Covington County, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7196334 11 Yes 7196334
RCP-036917 Orange County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7196722 1 Yes 7196722
RCP-037731 Cass County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7320646 1 Yes 7320646
RCP-040099 San Clemente, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7491798 1 Yes 7491798
RCP-053233 Colerain Township, Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7496967 1 Yes 7496967
RCP-017983 Godley Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102880 1 Yes 102880
RCP-047169 Wilkinson Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102888.71 8 Yes 0
RCP-040549 Beauregard Parish, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7283353 1 Yes 7283353
RCP-049239 Ridgefield, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7386630.66 3 Yes 7319534
RCP-057024 Minot, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7491511.04 1 Yes 7491511.01
RCP-039982 Morovis Municipio, PR Puerto Rico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9091186.22 2 Yes 5000000
RCP-025919 Snellville, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7497481 6 Yes 7497481
RCP-037861 Tigard, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7499726 1 Yes 7499726
RCP-022413 Elder Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102900.14 1 Yes 102900.14
RCP-039654 Santee, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7325525 15 Yes 7325525
RCP-047221 Burlingame City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7389305 1 Yes 7389305
RCP-037720 Defiance County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7397953 3 Yes 7397953
RCP-026475 Town Of Leland, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7503412.62 1 Yes 7503412.62
RCP-038936 Clinton County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7503813 1 Yes 7503813
RCP-037593 Kent, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7510281 3 Yes 7510281
RCP-038651 Union County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7513525 6 Yes 7513525
RCP-049249 Simsbury, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7515665.11 1 Yes 7515665.11
RCP-038168 Camuy Municipio, PR Puerto Rico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9115682.68 1 Yes 9115682.68
RCP-040169 Carmel, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7522920 5 Yes 7522920
RCP-039484 Berwick Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7287582 1 Yes 7287582
RCP-038155 Clinton County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7295978 6 Yes 7295978
RCP-038382 Douglas County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7408442 4 Yes 6408442
RCP-038993 Glendora City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7525063 6 Yes 5589823
RCP-053077 City Of Shoreline, Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7533842 1 Yes 7533842
RCP-037844 Salisbury, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7227329 3 Yes 5691542.94
RCP-047342 Los Gatos Town, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7229745 1 Yes 7229745
RCP-031880 Mercer Island City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7235319 28 Yes 7235319
RCP-038947 Knox County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7107956 4 Yes 7107956
RCP-039312 Coshocton County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7109121 3 Yes 1742621
RCP-040002 Graves County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7238484 1 Yes 7238484
RCP-037194 Bonita Springs City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7241423 Yes 7241423
RCP-007728 Town of Burlington Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27901.83 2 Yes 27901.83
RCP-047646 Ensign City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27927.48 1 Yes 27927.48
RCP-047890 Offerle City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27927.48 1 Yes 0
RCP-048069 Whiting City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27927.48 1 Yes 27927.48
RCP-050565 Village Of Verdon, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27964.06 1 Yes 27964.06
RCP-025458 Moorefield, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27969.41 Yes 27969.41
RCP-056920 Aquilla, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28055.15 Yes 28055.15
RCP-019508 City Of Ben Lomond, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29419.68 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-007288 Wing, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29408.23 Yes 29203.56
RCP-004004 Moltke Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29424.84 1 Yes 29424.84
RCP-018821 Village Of Sherrodsville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29447.4 1 Yes 29447.4
RCP-035494 Town Of Toxey, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29478.24 1 Yes 29478.24
RCP-004011 Loud Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29529.92 1 Yes 29529.92
RCP-014079 Interior Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29529.92 Yes 29529.92
RCP-014179 Village Of Grand Beach, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29529.92 1 Yes 29412
RCP-055361 Bondurant City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1040380.64 2 Yes 1040380.64
RCP-038867 Norton County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1041311 9 Yes 1041311
RCP-024528 City Of Canandaigua, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1041637.89 1 Yes 1041637.89
RCP-057409 Wolf Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27976.26 3 Yes 27976.26
RCP-050019 Town Of Raymer (New Raymer), CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28151.18 1 Yes 28151.18
RCP-014660 Mooreton, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28162.5 Yes 28162.5
RCP-033082 Leamington Town, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28286 1 Yes 28286
RCP-056685 Todd Mission, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28303.42 1 Yes 28303.42
RCP-016181 St. Johns Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28305.62 1 Yes 28305.62
RCP-047951 Rantoul City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28385.32 1 Yes 28385.32
RCP-055527 Kamrar City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28409.36 1 Yes 28409.36
RCP-017001 Cambria Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28413.39 4 Yes 28413.39
RCP-023861 Village Of Millport, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29435.81 No 0 50000 25000 0
RCP-035154 Port Alexander City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29450.96 1 Yes 29450.96
RCP-047797 Lincolnville City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29453.58 4 Yes 29453.58
RCP-047850 Mission Woods City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29453.58 1 Yes 29453.58
RCP-007898 Town of Lookeba Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28428.28 1 Yes 28427.94
RCP-052293 Norman Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28631.95 7 Yes 28631.94
RCP-004474 Effington Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28631.95 1 Yes 28631.95
RCP-049875 Town Of Crook, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27397.12 Yes 27397.12
RCP-055432 Maysville City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27661.74 1 Yes 27661.74
RCP-055617 Henderson City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27661.74 1 Yes 0
RCP-019285 Salt Rock Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27869.85 2 Yes 27869.85
RCP-047813 Luray City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28080.08 2 Yes 27717.01
RCP-006040 Village Of Bethlehem, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1025969.35 6 Yes 1025969.35
RCP-026693 Town Of Troy, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1026843.16 1 Yes 1026843.16
RCP-047166 Whiteland Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1027074.11 3 Yes 1025886.49
RCP-056729 Cotulla, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1027116.37 3 Yes 1027116.37
RCP-003431 Spurr Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28479.04 3 Yes 28479.04
RCP-003369 Village Of Lake Ann, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28479.04 Yes 28479.04
RCP-027438 Minerva Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28522.66 4 Yes 28522.66
RCP-034441 Town Of Lorain, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28888.52 1 Yes 28888.52
RCP-052754 Lemington Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28893.17 1 Yes 28886.4
RCP-015956 New Burnside Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29122.12 1 Yes 29122.12
RCP-007725 Town of Bromide Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29130.21 2 Yes 29130.21
RCP-008019 Town of Stuart Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29130.21 1 Yes 29130.21
RCP-026745 Town Of Kittrell, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29148.75 1 Yes 29148.75
RCP-016165 South Beloit City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1037509.38 1 Yes 1037509.38
RCP-053260 Stark County, Il, Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1037621 1 Yes 1037621
RCP-006112 City Of Hinton, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1041882.7 10 Yes 569500
RCP-055986 Comanche, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1042012.91 6 Yes 1042012.91
RCP-050788 Malone Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1047785 5 Yes 1047785
RCP-024347 Village Of East Rockaway, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1006561.07 9 No 1942468.43 2500000 1401233.53 418555.53
RCP-057382 Minneota Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27429.84 1 Yes 24000
RCP-050278 Village Of Goehner, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27964.06 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-035111 Clark'S Point City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27980.99 1 Yes 27980.99
RCP-019692 City Of Monroe, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28031.14 1 Yes 28031.14
RCP-015963 New Minden Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28033.44 2 Yes 28033.45
RCP-016262 Verona Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28033.44 1 Yes 28033.45
RCP-018103 Kempton Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28033.44 1 Yes 28033.44
RCP-024143 Town Of Arietta, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28102.48 2 Yes 28102.42
RCP-054935 Elberon City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28110.31 1 Yes 28110.31
RCP-016088 Rio Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28169.54 1 No 25000 2000 0 0
RCP-017838 Curran Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28169.54 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-018102 Kell Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28169.54 1 Yes 28169.53
RCP-032355 Village Of Stratton, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28921.54 Yes 28806.54
RCP-005315 Kittery Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1038246.42 Yes 1038246.42
RCP-026653 Town Of Spencer, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1037997.57 3 Yes 1037997.57
RCP-015302 Paintsville city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1045647.75 2 Yes 1033246.43
RCP-056811 San Diego, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1047971.53 1 Yes 1047971.53
RCP-052791 Hartland Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1048580.75 1 Yes 1048580.75
RCP-014297 Centerville Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1050365.66 5 Yes 1050365.66
RCP-026125 Town Of Archer Lodge, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1050426.75 1 Yes 1050426.75
RCP-004319 City Of Flat Rock, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1051307.56 1 Yes 1051307.56
RCP-015941 Murphysboro City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1007842.92 4 Yes 1007842.92
RCP-039163 County Of Calhoun, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1007902 3 Yes 1007902
RCP-024721 Village Of Hammond, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27692.22 1 Yes 27000
RCP-016347 Hanover Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27703.49 1 Yes 27703.49
RCP-026491 Town Of Lumber Bridge, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28045.38 2 Yes 28045.38
RCP-034502 Town Of Spirit, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28051.17 5 Yes 28051.17
RCP-034892 Town Of Crystal, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28051.17 Yes 28015.17
RCP-030184 Melstone Town, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28182.84 1 Yes 10000
RCP-050562 Village Of Venango, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28318.04 2 Yes 28318.04
RCP-048025 Tipton City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29453.58 1 Yes 29453.58
RCP-055245 Garden Grove City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29456.02 6 Yes 29455.31
RCP-023130 Markleysburg Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29505.04 1 Yes 0
RCP-033074 Boulder Town, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28523 1 Yes 28523
RCP-054539 Pickering Town, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28929.66 1 Yes 28929.66
RCP-006164 City Of Paden City, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1032599.91 15 Yes 1032599.91
RCP-051626 North Versailles Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1042021.48 9 Yes 1042021.48
RCP-033146 Riverdale City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1045983 2 Yes 1045983
RCP-024747 Village Of Massena, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1046150.7 1 Yes 1046150.7
RCP-026598 Town Of Red Springs, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1052338.96 1 Yes 1052338.96
RCP-015368 Southgate city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1051675.29 1 Yes 1039202.48
RCP-052799 Manchester Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1052594.28 5 Yes 1052594.28
RCP-026987 Hermantown City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1053152.92 1 Yes 1053152.92
RCP-038653 Day County, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1053548 1 Yes 1053548
RCP-022286 Milford Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1055881.5 Yes 1052553.6
RCP-056710 Groesbeck, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1055916.34 15 Yes 1053833.64
RCP-040952 Borough Of Keansburg, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1008167.52 1 Yes 1008167.52
RCP-040221 Boone County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1008485 11 Yes 1008485
RCP-033093 Park City Municipal Corporation, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1009057 1 Yes 1009057
RCP-054718 Mangonia Park, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1010723 1 Yes 1010723
RCP-004536 Elk Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27429.84 1 Yes 27429.84
RCP-055698 Blencoe City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29456.02 3 Yes 0
RCP-055687 Stockton City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28558.88 1 Yes 28558.88
RCP-023439 Hunker Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28560.04 1 Yes 28470.02
RCP-017817 Colp Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28577.78 2 Yes 28577.78
RCP-025810 Millen, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1032925 1 Yes 1032925
RCP-047256 Del Mar City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1033197 2 Yes 1033197
RCP-025601 Walnut Ridge, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1048749.44 1 Yes 1048749.44
RCP-034881 City Of Elkhorn, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1048674.25 4 Yes 1048674.25
RCP-039902 Hansford County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1048692 23 Yes 1048692
RCP-004186 Tittabawassee Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1049205.78 1 Yes 1049205.78
RCP-051442 South Lebanon Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1053571.5 9 Yes 1053571.5
RCP-047173 Winchester City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1057215.52 3 Yes 1057215.52
RCP-035224 Town Of Cape Charles, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1057230 4 Yes 1057230
RCP-040735 Borough Of Waldwick, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1057989.74 Yes 1057989.74
RCP-035543 City Of Hokes Bluff, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1012007.4 1 Yes 1012007.4
RCP-015865 Marengo City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1012061.54 6 Yes 1012061.55
RCP-016031 Park City City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1012197.62 2 Yes 1012197.62
RCP-014466 Oliver Springs Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1012979.76 4 Yes 1012979.76
RCP-015227 Lancaster city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1013413.49 11 Yes 1001394.47
RCP-032537 Bath Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1013516.06 1 Yes 3535.88
RCP-000929 Ransom County, Nd, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1013535 10 Yes 1013535
RCP-040685 Borough Of East Rutherford, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1013924.28 1 Yes 1009819.13
RCP-004617 Mound Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27429.84 1 Yes 27424.84
RCP-017449 Norman Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27429.84 2 Yes 27429.84
RCP-018499 Village Of Donnelsville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27449.17 Yes 27449.17
RCP-035600 Town Of Myrtlewood, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27576.44 1 Yes 27576.44
RCP-026059 Frannie Town, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27576.69 4 Yes 985.81
RCP-027626 Bondin Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28194.82 1 Yes 28194.82
RCP-017163 Tofte Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29506.21 1 Yes 29506.21
RCP-017409 Clinton Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29506.21 1 Yes 29506.21
RCP-033320 Village Of Haugen, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28679.18 Yes 0
RCP-047699 Grenola City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28690.52 1 Yes 28690.52
RCP-033186 Torrey Town, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28878 1 Yes 28878
RCP-033334 Town Of Delta, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28888.52 1 Yes 28888.52
RCP-033736 Village Of Ridgeland, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28888.52 1 Yes 28888.52
RCP-027336 Wealthwood Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28959.79 Yes 0
RCP-016969 Ben Wade Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28959.79 1 Yes 28959.79
RCP-017018 Rock Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28959.79 Yes 0
RCP-052105 East Bradford Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1039081.46 4 Yes 1039081.46
RCP-027114 Mound City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1039164.8 1 Yes 1039164.8
RCP-037888 Lincoln County, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1042283 5 Yes 1042283
RCP-055697 Prairieburg City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28110.31 1 Yes 0
RCP-050219 Village Of Daykin, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28141.05 Yes 0
RCP-017350 Hay Brook Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28194.82 1 Yes 24764.51
RCP-023214 Thompson Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28245.04 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-049129 St. Michaels Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1025048.07 1 Yes 1025048.07
RCP-040873 City Of Woodbury, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1025123.82 4 Yes 1025123.82
RCP-052727 Morristown Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1024960 1 Yes 1024960
RCP-015574 Edinburg, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28617.69 2 Yes 28617.69
RCP-026854 Climax City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28741.23 1 Yes 28741.23
RCP-027526 Spang Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28741.23 1 Yes 28741.23
RCP-057340 Murdock City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28741.23 Yes 28741.23
RCP-017074 Hope Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28959.79 1 Yes 28959.8
RCP-053992 Leraysville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28980.04 1 Yes 28980.04
RCP-026189 Town Of Casar, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29166 1 Yes 29166
RCP-052342 Stafford Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29178.35 1 Yes 29178.35
RCP-056665 Ovilla, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1034564.65 11 Yes 1034564.65
RCP-049195 Hartland, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 627415.24 6 Yes 627415.22
RCP-006232 City Of White Sulphur Springs, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1039230.47 19 Yes 1039230.47
RCP-031463 Princeton, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1042587.03 39 Yes 1042587.03
RCP-025032 Town Of Ontario, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1042663.53 6 Yes 1042663.53
RCP-024976 Town Of Plattekill, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1046150.7 1 Yes 1046150.7
RCP-004024 City Of Alpena, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1046263.3 12 Yes 1046263.3
RCP-019545 City Of Carthage, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61118.35 Yes 61118.35
RCP-014849 Eagleville Town, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61119 1 Yes 54000
RCP-014463 Oakdale Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61419.69 3 Yes 61419.69
RCP-024818 Village Of Interlaken, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61435.72 2 Yes 50697.67
RCP-037505 Amelia County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2553262 7 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-047011 Martinsville City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2644511.87 1 Yes 2644511.87
RCP-038945 Osage County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2644554 5 Yes 2644554
RCP-038322 Monroe County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2652129 19 Yes 2652129
RCP-026195 Town Of Cerro Gordo, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62146 2 Yes 62146
RCP-033706 Village Of Poplar, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63115.14 1 Yes 63115.14
RCP-040366 Shoshone County, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2502177 2 Yes 2502177
RCP-007244 Maddock, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59765.12 1 Yes 59765.12
RCP-026996 Hokah City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59777.38 1 Yes 59777.38
RCP-052400 St. Martin Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60651.64 1 Yes 60651.64
RCP-022850 Marion Heights Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60690.08 1 Yes 60690.08
RCP-006910 Ida, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60975 1 Yes 60975
RCP-027205 Sabin City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60979.49 3 Yes 0
RCP-057299 Green Isle City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60979.49 3 Yes 60979.49
RCP-018504 Cranberry Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60998.16 4 Yes 60755.61
RCP-017792 Cherry Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61646.34 1 Yes 61646.34
RCP-033714 Town Of Hay River, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61649.78 8 Yes 61649.78
RCP-040224 Hughes County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2579290 12 Yes 2579290
RCP-031650 City Of Jerome, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2579862.45 1 Yes 2579862.45
RCP-038943 Moffat County, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2580067 1 Yes 2580067
RCP-032472 City Of Athens, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2580432.7 10 Yes 2580432.7
RCP-034513 Village Of Caledonia, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2645707.06 Yes 0
RCP-006487 City Of Yankton, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2656084.4 1 Yes 2656084.4
RCP-041013 Township Of Randolph, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2656278.58 5 Yes 2656278.58
RCP-031410 Middleborough, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2665175.41 3 Yes 2665175.41
RCP-037030 Pend Oreille County, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2665726 1 Yes 2665726
RCP-047385 Placerville City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2673298 22 Yes 2673298
RCP-040981 Township Of Wall, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2674700.24 1 Yes 2674700.24
RCP-054862 Plainfield City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61902.5 2 Yes 61902.5
RCP-050483 Village Of Roca, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61945.72 Yes 500
RCP-031739 City Of Tetonia, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61947.68 4 Yes 61947.68
RCP-016263 Versailles Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62326.76 7 Yes 62326.76
RCP-054982 Vail City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62351.07 1 Yes 62351.07
RCP-004003 Village Of Peck, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62527.78 14 Yes 62527.78
RCP-052404 Havana Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62509.44 1 Yes 62509.44
RCP-004484 French Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62509.44 2 Yes 62509.44
RCP-004089 Eden Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62527.78 2 Yes 62527.78
RCP-027102 Minnetonka Beach City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63492.98 1 Yes 63492.98
RCP-057389 Zumbrota Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63492.98 2 Yes 63492.98
RCP-050462 Village Of Pleasanton, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63538.6 4 Yes 63538.6
RCP-026874 Crystal City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2502453.95 1 Yes 2502453.95
RCP-039898 Lamb County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2504314 2 Yes 2504314
RCP-039038 Greene County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2519076 15 Yes 2519076
RCP-023322 West Fallowfield Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60270.08 1 Yes 60270.08
RCP-047176 Wingate Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60282.81 1 Yes 60282.81
RCP-033467 Village Of New Auburn, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60289.09 2 Yes 60289.09
RCP-033523 Town Of Hampden, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60707.76 Yes 60707.76
RCP-033722 Town Of Sand Creek, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60707.76 2 Yes 59537.92
RCP-004002 Posen Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60741.28 1 Yes 60741.28
RCP-027179 Ranier City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60760.92 2 Yes 60695
RCP-017044 Ironton City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60760.92 1 Yes 60760.92
RCP-014734 Town Of Sellers, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60999.76 1 Yes 60999.76
RCP-040457 Clay County, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2570744 9 Yes 2570744
RCP-053062 Bienville Parish, Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2571909 2 Yes 2571909
RCP-026368 Commerce, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2645796 2 Yes 2645796
RCP-032242 City Of Zanesville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2645847.98 10 Yes 0
RCP-040842 Township Of Maplewood, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2656487.92 Yes 2656487.92
RCP-033707 Village Of Solon Springs, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61963.78 1 Yes 61963.78
RCP-019516 City Of Blevins, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62361.43 2 Yes 62361.43
RCP-026001 Woolsey, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62364 2 Yes 62364
RCP-056469 Carmine, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 62565.46 1 Yes 62442.06
RCP-034422 Village Of Plum City, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63115.14 2 Yes 63115.14
RCP-004555 Bruce Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63602.27 3 Yes 63602.27
RCP-017401 Burbank Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63602.27 1 Yes 63602.27
RCP-054435 Farber City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63767.49 1 Yes 63767.49
RCP-026177 Town Of Butner, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2504643.21 1 Yes 2504643.21
RCP-047363 Morro Bay City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2522110 1 Yes 2522110
RCP-022980 Upper Moreland Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2523258.58 13 Yes 2523258.58
RCP-047812 Lucas City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 59670.18 1 Yes 29658.64
RCP-035321 Town Of Nickelsville, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60000 5 Yes 5000
RCP-054502 Martinsburg Town, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60100.35 2 Yes 60100.35
RCP-054990 Thornton City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60108.23 Yes 60108.23
RCP-053292 Randolph, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60122 1 Yes 60122
RCP-017067 Daggett Brook Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60323.8 1 Yes 60323.8
RCP-007683 Town of Agra Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60366.23 Yes 60366.23
RCP-007800 Town of Fargo Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 60366.23 1 Yes 60366.23
RCP-024559 Village Of Tuxedo Park, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 61538.27 Yes 30769.13
RCP-015254 Mayfield city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2572712.77 2 Yes 2572712.77
RCP-054145 St. Ann City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2572906.21 1 Yes 2572906.21
RCP-052611 Petal, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2613825.87 5 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-040723 Village Of Ridgewood, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2622575.3 1 Yes 2622575.3
RCP-040378 York County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2656985 20 Yes 2656985
RCP-039308 Wadena County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2657568 1 Yes 2657568
RCP-001625 Allamakee, County Of, Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2658539 1 Yes 2658539
RCP-037200 Roane County, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2658734 1 Yes 2658734
RCP-047530 Bird City City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65927.16 2 Yes 65927.16
RCP-033316 Town Of Vance Creek, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65941.19 2 Yes 65941.19
RCP-034813 Town Of Forest, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65941.19 1 Yes 65941.19
RCP-022479 Tell Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66255.1 1 Yes 66046.28
RCP-052769 Hartford Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2857210.59 19 Yes 2857210.59
RCP-038217 Nolan County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2858022 10 Yes 2858022
RCP-046799 City Of Sylacauga, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2860816.74 10 Yes 2860816.74
RCP-035565 City Of Leeds, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2862243.12 Yes 2862243.12
RCP-024298 Town Of Chili, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2925837.35 16 Yes 2925837.35
RCP-026991 Hill City City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63930.11 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-054197 Frankford City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63971.22 3 Yes 63971.22
RCP-026206 City Of Clinton, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2694268.19 7 Yes 2694268.19
RCP-053259 Calhoun County, Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2789456 1 Yes 2789456
RCP-037907 Florida Municipio, PR Puerto Rico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 3382150.64 1 Yes 2790172.82
RCP-025935 Swainsboro, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2816457 5 Yes 2816457
RCP-037034 Moultrie County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2816649 26 Yes 2816649
RCP-037266 Bourbon County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2823059 4 Yes 2823059
RCP-032476 City Of Shaker Heights, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2842409.31 Yes 2831106.88
RCP-031827 Fife City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2845620 6 Yes 2845620
RCP-018727 Bowling Green Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65310.11 2 Yes 65310.11
RCP-006239 City Of Worthington, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65421.57 1 Yes 65421.57
RCP-004126 Gustin Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65470.26 2 Yes 65470.26
RCP-007812 Town of Foyil Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66332.66 1 Yes 0
RCP-033849 Village Of Livingston, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66359.86 2 Yes 66359.86
RCP-019612 City Of Forrest City, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2863239.29 3 Yes 2863239.29
RCP-031507 Sutton, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2864125.26 7 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-056021 El Campo, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2864852.76 1 Yes 2864852.76
RCP-040963 Township Of Neptune, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2866243.7 8 Yes 2866243.7
RCP-037596 Jackson County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2866957 8 Yes 2866957
RCP-037610 Knott County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2875892 2 Yes 2875892
RCP-040676 Borough Of Bergenfield, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2860277.58 2 Yes 2860277.58
RCP-031417 Milton, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2888119.43 1 Yes 2888119.43
RCP-031288 Bridgewater, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2890840.81 11 Yes 2890840.81
RCP-038953 Arenac County, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2890848 Yes 1628804
RCP-031962 Sumner City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2913519 6 Yes 2910676
RCP-029995 Township Of Stafford, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2914495.9 Yes 0
RCP-026823 Butterfield City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64367.24 Yes 64367.24
RCP-033002 Village Of Bergholz, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64679.08 5 Yes 0
RCP-035008 Town Of Richford, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64685.17 Yes 64685.17
RCP-017786 Chapin Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65048.48 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-047229 Canyon Lake City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2698416 19 Yes 2698416
RCP-037722 Ketchikan Gateway Borough, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2700106 1 Yes 2700106
RCP-041016 Township Of Rockaway, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2708403.52 5 Yes 2708403.52
RCP-030009 Township Of West Milford, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2756027.7 2 Yes 2756027.7
RCP-025065 Town Of Mount Pleasant, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2757222.48 7 Yes 0
RCP-026772 Austin City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2757518.7 3 Yes 2757518.7
RCP-040286 Jefferson County, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2767118 1 Yes 2767118
RCP-038394 Mcintosh County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2792758 11 Yes 2792758
RCP-024995 Town Of Queensbury, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2806042.85 4 Yes 2806042.85
RCP-014265 Atoka Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2823822.02 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-040769 Township Of Pemberton, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2823852.92 4 Yes 523000
RCP-038856 Renville County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2825778 1 Yes 2825778
RCP-037317 Clay County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2826361 5 Yes 2826361
RCP-003439 City Of Allen Park, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2831090.12 1 Yes 2831090.09
RCP-056280 Webster, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2843004.5 1 Yes 2843004.5
RCP-052145 Borough Of Plum, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2844139.02 1 Yes 2844139.02
RCP-034463 Town Of Belmont, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65627.18 1 Yes 65627.18
RCP-008533 Thaxton, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65610.75 7 Yes 55304.61
RCP-025281 Town Of Hebron, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65640.41 1 Yes 65640.41
RCP-023742 Town Of Coldspring, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66051.08 8 Yes 66051.08
RCP-047562 Cawker City City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66079.76 4 Yes 66079.76
RCP-035520 Town Of Beatrice, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66088.34 1 Yes 66088.34
RCP-054568 Sibley Village, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66408.76 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-006181 Town Of Quinwood, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66429.75 Yes 32000
RCP-004682 Saratoga Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66443.6 3 Yes 66443.6
RCP-031504 Sturbridge, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2868608.86 27 Yes 2868608.86
RCP-054164 Washington City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2868722.17 1 Yes 2868722.17
RCP-039259 Hamilton County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2869482 1 Yes 2869482
RCP-049236 Prospect, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2871312.58 12 Yes 57154.7
RCP-049156 Burlington, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2871904.48 2 Yes 2871904.48
RCP-024314 Town Of Pittsford, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2876401.61 13 Yes 2876401.61
RCP-049905 City Of Fort Morgan, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2881222.24 1 Yes 2881222.24
RCP-039710 Alleghany County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2886381 1 Yes 2886381
RCP-055837 Park Forest Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2886355.42 1 Yes 2886355.42
RCP-018391 City Of Garfield Heights, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2886685.55 1 Yes 2886685.55
RCP-030155 Geraldine Town, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63795.69 3 Yes 63795.69
RCP-056481 Mingus, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63806.85 1 Yes 63680.99
RCP-007583 City of Kaw City Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64402.34 2 Yes 64402.34
RCP-027060 Littlefork City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64695.09 1 Yes 64695.09
RCP-017618 Allendale Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64912.38 1 Yes 64912.38
RCP-027458 Concord Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64913.65 2 Yes 64913.65
RCP-007788 Town of Dustin Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64928.79 2 Yes 64930.73
RCP-018028 Hecker Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65048.48 1 Yes 30000
RCP-025639 Dahlonega, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2723845 1 Yes 2723845
RCP-047298 Hillsborough Town, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2724012 1 Yes 2724012
RCP-037241 Pennington County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2742450 6 Yes 2742450
RCP-033764 Town Of Alto, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112100.02 2 Yes 112100.02
RCP-032333 Ridgeville Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112110.42 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-018300 Mason Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112110.42 2 Yes 112110.42
RCP-025306 Town Of Bridgewater, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112122.61 1 Yes 112122.61
RCP-014007 Stambaugh Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112129.66 2 Yes 0
RCP-053960 Juniata Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112875.16 Yes 112875.16
RCP-026833 Carlton City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112888.55 1 Yes 112888.55
RCP-022661 West Perry Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112140.16 1 Yes 112140.16
RCP-056818 Byers, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112220.59 Yes 0
RCP-017336 Elmdale Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112232.86 2 Yes 112232.86
RCP-033040 Perry Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112951.78 3 Yes 112951.78
RCP-018197 Village Of Millersport, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 112951.78 1 Yes 112951.78
RCP-016419 Mount Airy Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9322023.75 9 Yes 9322023.75
RCP-037837 Crittenden County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9314697 1 Yes 9314697
RCP-038636 Henry County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9317999 35 Yes 9317999
RCP-031511 Tewksbury, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9319317.2 6 Yes 9319317.2
RCP-031436 North Andover, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9322306.28 43 Yes 9322306.28
RCP-039279 Morton County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 502494 3 Yes 502494
RCP-031884 Millwood City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 502957 3 Yes 341763.98
RCP-032215 Wayne Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 503024.53 1 Yes 501024.32
RCP-026143 Town Of Belhaven, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 503223.26 1 Yes 503223.26
RCP-024740 Town Of Potsdam, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 503280.54 1 Yes 503280.54
RCP-004304 Village Of Wolverine Lake, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 502639.36 4 Yes 501631.82
RCP-003963 Henrietta Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 502744.44 11 Yes 502744.44
RCP-025403 Lavaca, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 502827.91 3 Yes 502827.91
RCP-047209 Belvedere City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 503322 3 Yes 503322
RCP-047798 Lindsborg City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 502084.12 3 Yes 502084.12
RCP-014022 Royalton Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 502429.18 3 Yes 286784.12
RCP-056658 Vinton, Village Of, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 502013.37 1 No 187071 0 0 0
RCP-047416 San Juan Bautista City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 503322 1 Yes 503322
RCP-015897 Metamora Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 503377.12 2 Yes 503377.11
RCP-032789 Harlem Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 505969.26 1 Yes 503957.35
RCP-018068 Indian Head Park Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 506098.82 Yes 506098.82
RCP-025115 Village Of Penn Yan, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 505126.69 2 Yes 505126.69
RCP-004239 City Of Dewitt, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 505266.56 1 Yes 505266.56
RCP-015215 Jenkins city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 505527.44 3 Yes 505527.44
RCP-025992 Willacoochee, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 505633 3 Yes 505633
RCP-050217 City Of David City, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 504769.05 1 Yes 504769.53
RCP-026452 Town Of Kenly, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 504816.75 1 Yes 504816.75
RCP-050905 Waldo City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 504861 1 Yes 504861
RCP-025996 Woodbine, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 504886 2 Yes 504886
RCP-014606 County Of Butte, Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 504437 5 No 250000 250000 0 0
RCP-054589 Versailles City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 504639.22 3 Yes 504639.22
RCP-052809 Wolcott Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 504706.09 6 Yes 504706.09
RCP-016096 Rochester Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 504737.98 1 Yes 504737.97
RCP-052973 Hope Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 504925.23 2 Yes 504925.24
RCP-033178 Morgan City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 505712 2 Yes 505712
RCP-005260 Camden Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 505747.29 Yes 505747.29
RCP-035472 Town Of Owens Cross Roads, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 506122.56 7 Yes 500000
RCP-052834 Waitsfield Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 506201.11 2 Yes 506201.11
RCP-031647 City Of Iona, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 506336.19 1 Yes 506336.19
RCP-051804 Borough Of Hummelstown, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 506415.72 1 Yes 506415.72
RCP-055771 Coal Valley Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 506643.16 Yes 0
RCP-014707 Town Of Heath Springs, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507303 1 Yes 507303
RCP-041000 Borough Of Mendham, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507328.48 1 Yes 507328.48
RCP-053766 City Of Vernonia, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 506644.14 1 Yes 253179.64
RCP-051977 Borough Of Green Tree, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507360.72 1 Yes 505761.64
RCP-023719 Town Of Colesville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507383.09 3 Yes 507383
RCP-025977 Walnut Grove, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 506753 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-030055 Township Of Hampton, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 506805.14 10 Yes 506805.14
RCP-035141 North Pole City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 506835.1 3 Yes 506835.1
RCP-018938 Sugar Creek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507546.8 4 Yes 505528.61
RCP-032313 Village Of West Milton, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507757.13 1 Yes 507757.13
RCP-006146 Town Of Monongah, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507901.24 17 Yes 507901.24
RCP-007009 Ringgold, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507523.19 1 Yes 507523.19
RCP-040573 Pawnee County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507545 7 Yes 507545
RCP-051843 Swatara Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 506835.72 2 Yes 506835.72
RCP-003588 Ida Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 506947.98 2 Yes 506947.98
RCP-056742 Troup, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507475.44 7 Yes 507475.44
RCP-023167 Pocopson Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507045.72 3 Yes 505447.62
RCP-052591 Moorhead, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507178.59 Yes 507178.59
RCP-047018 Middletown Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507191.5 12 Yes 507191.5
RCP-022670 Arnold City, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507255.72 2 Yes 505656.96
RCP-032801 Hocking Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 507546.8 2 Yes 253773.4
RCP-051462 Manheim Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509145.72 1 Yes 509145.72
RCP-055280 Eagle Grove City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509275.15 1 Yes 509275.15
RCP-046931 Ferdinand Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509231.14 25 Yes 509231.14
RCP-055100 New Hampton City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509275.15 6 Yes 509275.15
RCP-003896 Big Rapids Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509365.02 3 Yes 509365.02
RCP-054417 Country Club Village, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 508713.82 2 Yes 508713.82
RCP-051520 Caernarvon Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 508725.72 2 Yes 508725.72
RCP-006982 Olla, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509375.47 1 Yes 509375.47
RCP-052856 North Bennington Village, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 508469.26 2 Yes 508469.26
RCP-035606 City Of Lipscomb, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 508499.84 1 Yes 508499.44
RCP-027296 Wayzata City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 508927.38 1 Yes 508927.38
RCP-051968 East Caln Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 508935.72 1 Yes 508935.72
RCP-056533 Yorktown, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 508965.1 1 Yes 508965.1
RCP-052071 Union Township Supervisors Dba Union Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509460.72 1 Yes 509460.72
RCP-015211 Jackson city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 508148.12 2 Yes 508148.12
RCP-007544 City of Davis Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 508199.38 1 Yes 508199.38
RCP-050174 City Of Central City, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 508662.78 3 Yes 508662.78
RCP-032314 Village Of Whitehouse, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509545.01 3 Yes 509545.01
RCP-022503 Girard Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509670.72 1 Yes 509670.72
RCP-052771 New Haven Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509789.04 2 Yes 509668.88
RCP-052925 Poultney Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509490.06 6 Yes 509490.06
RCP-054464 Hayti City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509528.74 6 Yes 217494.9
RCP-056671 Leonard, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509958.2 4 Yes 509958.2
RCP-056845 Hale Center, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509958.2 Yes 509958.2
RCP-022757 Duryea Borough Dba Borough Of Duryea, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509460.72 3 Yes 507855.02
RCP-047151 Walkerton Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511270.78 1 Yes 511270.78
RCP-022436 Butler Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 509985.72 3 Yes 508378.36
RCP-032595 Berne Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511227.72 3 Yes 511227.72
RCP-047123 Spencer Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511270.78 1 Yes 511270.78
RCP-056632 Stratford, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 510703.02 1 Yes 510703.02
RCP-052201 Clarks Summit Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 510825.72 Yes 510825.72
RCP-006529 City Of Winner, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 510708.96 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-015850 Madison City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511406.12 8 Yes 511406.12
RCP-056154 Olton, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511447.83 1 Yes 511447.83
RCP-056531 Ganado, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 510206.46 Yes 255750
RCP-039445 Frontier County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 510264 5 Yes 510264
RCP-019554 City Of Charleston, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511115.15 8 Yes 511115.15
RCP-035681 Town Of Morris, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 510877.12 11 Yes 510877.12
RCP-039368 Dunkirk City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511044.16 3 Yes 511044.16
RCP-032702 Cross Creek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 510070.86 8 Yes 510070.86
RCP-056960 Mccamey, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511447.83 2 Yes 511447.83
RCP-050560 City Of Valley, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511494.59 13 Yes 511494.59
RCP-053640 City Of Gold Beach, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511752.76 3 Yes 250000
RCP-004445 City Of Ironwood, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511782.06 1 Yes 511782.06
RCP-052097 Straban Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 522690.74 5 Yes 522690.74
RCP-001263 Warren Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 512197.33 2 Yes 512197.33
RCP-040682 Borough Of Demarest, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 512247.9 1 Yes 253546.31
RCP-052129 Penn Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 512295.72 1 Yes 510681.08
RCP-013913 City Of Davison, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 512938.04 2 Yes 512938.04
RCP-033194 Elk Ridge City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 513050 Yes 513050
RCP-031262 Ashfield, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 513223.02 4 Yes 513223.02
RCP-026151 Town Of Bethel, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 513421.58 1 Yes 513421.58
RCP-032132 City Of Toronto, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 517748.21 33 Yes 515689.46
RCP-053726 City Of Rogue River, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 517749.88 6 Yes 517749.88
RCP-023823 Town Of Ellicott, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 512818.98 3 Yes 0
RCP-022465 Franklin Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 512820.74 1 Yes 512820.7
RCP-015422 Windy Hills city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 512925 8 Yes 512925
RCP-056613 Wellington, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 513434.04 1 Yes 512421.34
RCP-031328 Eastham, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 513503.93 1 Yes 513503.93
RCP-026057 Evansville Town, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514071.18 Yes 514071.18
RCP-001297 Lincoln Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514100.63 2 Yes 394343.79
RCP-040824 City Of Wildwood, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 517900 2 Yes 517900
RCP-035057 Town Of Saratoga, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 518004.68 8 Yes 518004.68
RCP-037651 Harmon County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 515314 13 Yes 515314
RCP-022691 Pine Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 515340.74 3 Yes 513716.5
RCP-023417 Telford Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 513870.72 1 Yes 513870.72
RCP-025412 Lincoln, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514015.68 3 Yes 409354.51
RCP-026157 Town Of Bladenboro, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514058.98 6 Yes 514058.98
RCP-015231 Lebanon Junction city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514175.66 3 Yes 514175.66
RCP-025831 Nelson, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514222 11 Yes 514222
RCP-040827 Township Of Commercial, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514550.6 14 Yes 514550.6
RCP-019522 City Of Bono, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514637.22 1 Yes 514637.22
RCP-026694 Town Of Tryon, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514696.37 1 Yes 514696.37
RCP-034052 Town Of Shelby, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514759.95 1 Yes 514759.95
RCP-022455 Bridgeville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514815.72 1 Yes 514815.72
RCP-024400 Village Of Sea Cliff, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514870.25 1 Yes 514870.25
RCP-052722 Middlesex Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 515469.99 1 Yes 515469.99
RCP-023734 Town Of Windsor, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 515485.63 11 Yes 515485.63
RCP-037392 Chase County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514343 2 Yes 514343
RCP-019582 City Of Dermott, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514430.04 13 Yes 514430.04
RCP-022707 Borough Of Sugarcreek, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 514920.74 1 Yes 513297.82
RCP-026615 Town Of Rose Hill, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 515652.46 3 Yes 515652.46
RCP-056193 Jones Creek, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 515668.54 2 Yes 515668.54
RCP-023727 Town Of Maine, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 518767.67 3 Yes 518767.67
RCP-016162 Smithton Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 519299.02 3 Yes 519299.02
RCP-040789 Borough Of Clementon, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 518842.02 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-052619 Quitman, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 518979.16 2 Yes 518979.16
RCP-047172 Winamac Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 519429.36 5 Yes 519429.36
RCP-056123 Magnolia, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 519640.93 4 Yes 519640.93
RCP-015083 Carlisle city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 520465.27 3 Yes 514292.58
RCP-032660 Licking Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 520482.62 2 Yes 518412.99
RCP-024766 Town Of Northumberland, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 520613.82 4 Yes 520613.82
RCP-031965 Tenino City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 521120 2 Yes 521120
RCP-046859 Bloomfield Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 521242.38 8 Yes 521242.38
RCP-003913 Village Of New Haven, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 515670.36 2 Yes 515670.36
RCP-027056 Lindstrom City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 515812.16 7 Yes 515812.16
RCP-054713 Fanning Springs City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 515879 Yes 0
RCP-025277 Town Of Newton, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 515910.59 19 Yes 515910.59
RCP-026576 Town Of Pinebluff, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 515971.16 1 Yes 515971.16
RCP-053058 Cheyenne County, Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 516091 Yes 516091
RCP-014477 Pikeville City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 516578.14 1 Yes 516578.14
RCP-032226 Village Of Wellington, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 516591.35 2 Yes 516591.35
RCP-024776 City Of Mechanicville, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 516613.83 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-004245 Thornapple Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 516616.14 1 Yes 516616.14
RCP-047666 Frontenac City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 517039.8 Yes 517039.8
RCP-027171 Princeton City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 516795.7 Yes 516795.7
RCP-052160 Lower Frederick Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 517440.74 6 Yes 517440.74
RCP-036759 Gloucester County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7254411 12 No 3786345 1884440 2107526 3928272
RCP-037326 Chippewa County, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7254605 2 Yes 7254605
RCP-037197 Putnam County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7298697 1 Yes 7298697
RCP-037379 Denison, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7326612 65 Yes 2173744
RCP-037929 Independence County, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7347063 11 Yes 7347063
RCP-037532 Hopkins County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7203132 1 Yes 7203132
RCP-038560 Wise County, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7261210 4 Yes 7261210
RCP-015213 Jeffersontown city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7263189.8 1 Yes 7177048.79
RCP-039598 Natchitoches Parish, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7411744 1 Yes 7411744
RCP-047419 San Pablo City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7413467 1 Yes 7413467
RCP-037785 Brown County, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7544020 2 Yes 7544020
RCP-049185 Farmington, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7545852.07 3 Yes 7545852.07
RCP-040613 Crawford County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7539941 1 Yes 7539941
RCP-049207 Mansfield, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7542892.52 39 Yes 7542892.52
RCP-053142 Graham County, Az, Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7543632 1 Yes 7543632
RCP-050830 Oldsmar City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7543357 7 Yes 7543357
RCP-031875 Maple Valley City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7600802 10 Yes 7600802
RCP-040159 Southaven City, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7604974 7 Yes 7604974
RCP-040087 Shawnee, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7564030 1 Yes 7564030
RCP-006721 Central, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7608266.53 1 Yes 7608266.53
RCP-038050 Annapolis, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7609469 11 Yes 7609469
RCP-053215 Champaign County, Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7552955 1 Yes 7552955
RCP-038817 Hanover Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7573079 3 Yes 7573079
RCP-039232 Warren County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7612392 3 Yes 7612392
RCP-040389 Fremont County, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7625989 2 Yes 7625989
RCP-040160 Sumter, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7565586 13 Yes 7565586
RCP-050912 West Park City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7557381 1 Yes 7557381
RCP-037982 Rio Arriba County, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7559948 22 Yes 7559948
RCP-039992 Albany County, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7551984 5 Yes 5878101.4
RCP-039386 Des Moines County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7568883 1 Yes 7568883
RCP-025362 Benton, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7628398.75 4 Yes 7628398.75
RCP-036892 Pike County, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7631233 1 Yes 7631233
RCP-053143 Guernsey County, Oh, Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7551013 25 Yes 7551013
RCP-038623 Calloway County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7575487 2 Yes 7575487
RCP-039001 Jefferson City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7586581 7 Yes 7586581
RCP-039810 Jupiter, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7590958 3 Yes 3795479
RCP-031467 Reading, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7592233.53 20 Yes 7592233.52
RCP-038208 Marshall County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7646967 1 Yes 7646967
RCP-038295 Prescott Valley Town, AZ Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7647867 12 Yes 7647867
RCP-047327 La Verne City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7648860 7 Yes 7648860
RCP-039408 Wayne County, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7653377 33 Yes 7653377
RCP-037894 Cedar Park City, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7653456 7 Yes 1300000
RCP-050072 Town Of Windsor, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7660386.48 1 Yes 7660386.48
RCP-038143 Person County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7670470 5 Yes 7670470
RCP-039280 Bryan County Boc, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7697080 1 Yes 7697080
RCP-039000 West Des Moines, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7670872 1 Yes 7670872
RCP-038150 Barnstable, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7692669 11 Yes 7692669
RCP-038262 Beckley City, WV West Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7689933 21 Yes 4635556
RCP-036784 Webster County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7690282 1 Yes 7690282
RCP-049956 City Of Lafayette, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7713169.92 3 Yes 7713169.92
RCP-037179 Waldo County, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7714173 14 Yes 7714173
RCP-039451 Lagrange County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7694555 19 Yes 7694555
RCP-049220 Newtown, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7674294.63 29 Yes 7674294.63
RCP-047144 Valparaiso City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7681979.51 8 Yes 7681979.51
RCP-049275 Wethersfield, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7697082.82 65 Yes 5802964
RCP-053679 City Of Mcminnville, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7716938.7 3 Yes 7716938.7
RCP-039289 Amador County, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7721360 1 Yes 7721360
RCP-050869 St. Augustine City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7720659 7 Yes 7720659
RCP-049906 City Of Fountain, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7725234.72 2 Yes 7725234.72
RCP-037927 Lehi City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7741569 1 Yes 7741569
RCP-037446 Wyoming County, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7742143 1 Yes 7742143
RCP-047328 Lawndale City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7748137 1 Yes 7748137
RCP-049253 South Windsor, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7742659.21 21 Yes 7742659.21
RCP-038814 Knox County, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7725245 10 Yes 7725245
RCP-039461 Franklin Township, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7735197 4 Yes 7735197
RCP-036728 Pasquotank County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7735345 1 Yes 7735345
RCP-040551 Campbell County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7738841 1 Yes 7738841
RCP-038652 Oak Lawn, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7750640 1 Yes 7750640
RCP-037237 Madison County, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7751467 4 Yes 7751467
RCP-037562 Borough Of Chambersburg, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7763037 10 Yes 7763037
RCP-056843 Cibolo, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7766310.69 16 Yes 7766310.68
RCP-039254 Winter Haven City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7776962 1 Yes 7776962
RCP-039888 Mower County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7781574 Yes 7781574
RCP-056351 Cleburne, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7769786.55 1 Yes 7769786.55
RCP-037176 Latah County, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7790509 15 Yes 7790509
RCP-039094 Des Plaines, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7787945 1 Yes 7787945
RCP-053188 Murray County, Ga, Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7788178 3 Yes 7788178
RCP-039457 O'Fallon, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 7774553 1 Yes 7774553
RCP-003625 Elbridge Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102986.94 Yes 102986.94
RCP-001265 Kingfield Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102989.31 4 Yes 102989.31
RCP-034031 Town Of Franklin, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102993.86 2 Yes 102993.86
RCP-052493 Bentonia, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103009.13 Yes 1
RCP-019279 Chesterfield Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103276.2 1 Yes 103276.2
RCP-026142 Town Of Beech Mountain, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103257.97 1 Yes 103257.97
RCP-032696 Jefferson Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103276.2 3 Yes 103276.2
RCP-054400 Center City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103087.38 2 Yes 103087.38
RCP-022261 Borough Of Milford, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103110.14 1 Yes 102785.16
RCP-032299 Village Of Beach City, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103171.03 12 Yes 79036.05
RCP-033606 Village Of Blue Mounds, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103203.19 1 Yes 103203.19
RCP-005174 Rocky Ripple Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 102993.75 1 Yes 102993.75
RCP-023935 Town Of Cincinnatus, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103179.17 1 Yes 103179.17
RCP-050170 Village Of Cedar Bluffs, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103183.86 8 Yes 0
RCP-017704 Braceville Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103288.26 1 Yes 103288.26
RCP-033170 Town Of Leeds, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103320 Yes 103320
RCP-050532 Village Of Stuart, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103360.84 2 Yes 103360.84
RCP-003737 Day Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103302.2 4 Yes 102889
RCP-004463 Fremont Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103302.2 4 Yes 103302.2
RCP-050026 Town Of Romeo, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103304.74 1 Yes 103304.74
RCP-007740 Town of Canton Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103359.61 2 Yes 103359.61
RCP-019596 City Of Elaine, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103383.24 1 Yes 103383.24
RCP-033262 Town Of Jackson, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103412.53 2 Yes 103412.53
RCP-034727 Village Of Wittenberg, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103412.53 3 Yes 103412.53
RCP-052069 Bloomfield Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103425.16 2 Yes 103099.18
RCP-025916 Siloam, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103442 5 Yes 103442
RCP-023137 Knox Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103425.16 1 Yes 103425.16
RCP-047859 Mound City City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 103469 Yes 103469
RCP-015086 Catlettsburg city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 457831.23 1 Yes 452401.38
RCP-056305 Rhome, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458068.58 8 Yes 457165.08
RCP-025794 Marshallville, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458206 Yes 458206
RCP-032351 Village Of Ottawa, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458222.42 1 Yes 458222.42
RCP-032020 Town Of Frederica, DE Delaware Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458359.59 1 Yes 458359.59
RCP-035743 Town Of Lake View, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458372.66 6 Yes 458372.66
RCP-051299 Tarentum Borough Dba Borough Of Tarentum, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458430.64 3 Yes 458430.64
RCP-024056 Town Of Moriah, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458562.72 6 Yes 458562.72
RCP-026005 Zebulon City, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458580 5 Yes 458580
RCP-014326 Dover City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458719.01 9 Yes 458719.01
RCP-035251 Town Of Dillwyn, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458582 1 Yes 458582
RCP-019191 Granville Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458853.43 1 Yes 458853.43
RCP-005296 Greene Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458799.39 12 Yes 458799.39
RCP-025251 Town Of Ossipee, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458959.42 9 Yes 458959.42
RCP-052646 Sumrall, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 458992.94 Yes 458992.94
RCP-056980 Quitman, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 459061.68 3 Yes 458156.22
RCP-025852 Omega, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 459327 3 Yes 459327
RCP-049295 Woodmont Borough, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 459315.31 4 Yes 459315.3
RCP-025923 Sparta, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 459327 2 Yes 429327
RCP-003607 Aurelius Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 459342.78 7 Yes 459342.78
RCP-031653 City Of Kellogg, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 459445.24 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-015214 Jeffersonville city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 459403.63 1 Yes 459403.63
RCP-031667 City Of Malad, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 459660.34 2 Yes 459660.34
RCP-034991 City Of Clintonville, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 459599.62 6 Yes 459599.62
RCP-027065 Lonsdale City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 459750.37 1 Yes 459750.37
RCP-022547 Borough Of Cornwall, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 459480.66 2 Yes 458032.48
RCP-031450 Otis, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 460017.61 1 Yes 460017.61
RCP-022321 Larksville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 460425.66 11 Yes 460425.66
RCP-014552 Vonore Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 460499.29 1 Yes 460499.29
RCP-052444 West Lakeland Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 460624.63 3 Yes 460624.63
RCP-034839 City Of Viroqua, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 460750.98 Yes 460750.98
RCP-050855 Pomona Park Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 460785 1 Yes 460785
RCP-004330 City Of Coopersville, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 461024.2 1 Yes 461024.2
RCP-032554 Village Of Ashville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 461167.16 20 Yes 461167.16
RCP-018086 Johnston City City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 461190.88 1 Yes 461190.89
RCP-024672 Town Of Poestenkill, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 461434.51 1 Yes 461434.51
RCP-051400 Penn Township Supervisors Dba Penn Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 461475.64 2 Yes 461475.64
RCP-002083 Town Of Summerton, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 461501.36 1 Yes 461501.36
RCP-031696 City Of Parma, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 461811.3 2 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-016236 Tolono Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 461599.14 1 Yes 461599.14
RCP-025051 Village Of Ardsley, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 461742.2 Yes 461742.2
RCP-047390 Portola City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 461697 1 Yes 461697
RCP-051662 Montoursville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 461895.64 1 Yes 461895.64
RCP-038729 Mcpherson County, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 462093 2 Yes 462093
RCP-025995 Winterville, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 461941 10 Yes 461941
RCP-051828 Borough Of Jessup Dba Jessup Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 462000.66 1 Yes 462000.66
RCP-018333 Berlin Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 462008.51 Yes 460171.4
RCP-035266 Town Of Fries, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 462732 1 Yes 462732
RCP-026173 Town Of Bryson City, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 462748.69 2 Yes 462748.69
RCP-031932 Ritzville City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 462162 16 Yes 462162
RCP-004159 Village Of Sparta, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 462285.26 1 Yes 462285.26
RCP-027156 Park Rapids City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 462810.28 2 Yes 462810.28
RCP-032373 Village Of Sheffield, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 462955.03 1 Yes 462955.03
RCP-018842 Salt Creek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 462849.86 2 Yes 461929.63
RCP-040888 Township Of Delaware, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 463158.34 Yes 463158.34
RCP-034332 Town Of Minocqua, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 463158.35 1 Yes 463158.35
RCP-052852 Poultney Village, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 463145.6 5 Yes 463145.6
RCP-022574 Conneaut Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 463260.66 1 Yes 463260.66
RCP-051498 Peters Township Supervisors Dba Peters Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 463470.66 1 Yes 463470.66
RCP-032394 Dover Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 463480.89 1 Yes 461637.92
RCP-040750 Township Of Delanco, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 463681.7 6 Yes 463681.7
RCP-034665 Village Of Prairie Du Sac, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 463786.37 1 Yes 463786.36
RCP-035720 City Of Stevenson, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 463807 3 Yes 463807
RCP-047146 Veedersburg Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 463905.72 1 Yes 463905.72
RCP-034385 Village Of Saukville, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 463995.7 10 Yes 463995.7
RCP-026499 Town Of Manteo, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 464023.48 1 Yes 464023.48
RCP-051787 Office Of The Borough Of Jenkintown Borough Hall Dba Jenkintown Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 464100.66 Yes 463369.29
RCP-056620 Van Horn, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 464275.46 2 Yes 463359.72
RCP-031799 Cosmopolis City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 464397 1 Yes 464397
RCP-024550 Village Of Montgomery, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 464408.86 5 Yes 464408.86
RCP-003769 Whiteford Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 464597.24 1 Yes 464597.24
RCP-001407 Arundel Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 464615.01 6 Yes 464615.01
RCP-006247 Town Of Isabel, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27488.6 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-016258 Vermilion Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27489.1 1 No 13716 2880.8 1 19434.3
RCP-014380 Hickory Valley Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27594.35 1 Yes 27000
RCP-053923 Blain Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27615.04 1 Yes 27615.04
RCP-007811 Town of Foster Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28252.81 1 Yes 28252.81
RCP-054558 Rockville City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28365.6 Yes 28365.6
RCP-025485 Okolona, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28383.78 4 Yes 28383.78
RCP-033922 Village Of Rewey, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29516.53 1 Yes 29516.53
RCP-018467 Village Of Scott, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28711.2 1 Yes 0
RCP-018479 Village Of Burkettsville, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28711.2 1 Yes 28711.2
RCP-031668 City Of Malta, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28759.5 Yes 0
RCP-023217 Pavia Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28770.04 2 Yes 28770.04
RCP-007904 Town of Manitou Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28779.25 1 Yes 28779.25
RCP-047854 Morganville City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28995.74 4 Yes 28995.74
RCP-033124 Town Of Bluff, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28996 1 Yes 0
RCP-025064 Village Of Sleepy Hollow, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1030355.88 1 Yes 0
RCP-003894 Bridgeport Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1030815.24 3 Yes 1030815.24
RCP-006493 City Of Belle Fourche, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1031183.58 Yes 1031183.58
RCP-056623 Cockrell Hill, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1031337.05 4 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-019499 City Of Barling, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1043362.74 2 Yes 1043362.74
RCP-052024 Butler Township Supervisors Dba Butler Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1044016.48 1 Yes 1040725.98
RCP-022508 Penn Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1047061.48 1 Yes 1047061.48
RCP-024367 Village Of Great Neck, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1047073.77 2 Yes 516947
RCP-055939 Bellville, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1047474.98 3 Yes 1047474.98
RCP-025618 Willisville, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29212.5 4 Yes 29212.5
RCP-015784 Village Of Burlington, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29214.66 1 Yes 0
RCP-052678 Norwich Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1019279.09 1 Yes 1019279.09
RCP-047643 Emmett City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28385.32 1 Yes 28301.38
RCP-018518 Village Of Catawba, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28711.2 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-030243 Borough Of Cape May Point, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28783.84 Yes 28783.85
RCP-033920 Village Of Hollandale, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28783.85 1 Yes 28783.85
RCP-056252 Sullivan City, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1035309.47 7 Yes 1035309.47
RCP-006743 Delhi, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1035421.41 4 Yes 1035421.41
RCP-040480 Delta County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1035484 Yes 1035484
RCP-032316 City Of Galion, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1049799.44 5 Yes 1049799.44
RCP-037310 Washington County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1050052 6 Yes 1050052
RCP-022901 Fairview Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1053886.5 5 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-016110 Round Lake Park Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1054247.8 2 Yes 1054247.8
RCP-033372 Village Of Hobart, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1055268.37 27 No 0 51773 85993.5 0
RCP-024294 Town Of Sullivan, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1055278.88 1 Yes 1055278.88
RCP-024928 Town Of Mamakating, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1012202.09 2 Yes 1012202.1
RCP-038358 Polk County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1012564 16 Yes 1012564
RCP-035670 City Of Fayette Alabama, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1016286.5 4 Yes 1016286.5
RCP-055847 Princeton City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1016280.16 1 Yes 1016280.16
RCP-003942 City Of Marysville, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1016418.1 1 Yes 1016418.1
RCP-039813 Schley County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1021111 1 Yes 1021111
RCP-025547 Sheridan, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1021194.39 3 Yes 1021194.39
RCP-014391 Jasper Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1022771.3 1 Yes 1022771.3
RCP-032166 Franklin Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1022876.12 1 Yes 1022876.12
RCP-003558 Village Of Oakley, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28794.3 1 Yes 28794.3
RCP-004284 Fairbanks Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28794.3 1 Yes 28794.3
RCP-047518 Beattie City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28843.14 1 Yes 28843.14
RCP-004570 St. Hilaire City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 28850.51 Yes 28850.51
RCP-055387 Arthur City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29007.45 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-055551 Woodburn, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29007.45 1 Yes 29007.45
RCP-024216 Village Of Deferiet, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29025.55 1 Yes 29025.54
RCP-025113 Village Of Dresden, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29025.55 2 Yes 29025.55
RCP-049981 City Of Monte Vista, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1040085.28 1 Yes 1040085.28
RCP-040998 Borough Of Lincoln Park, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1058303.76 1 Yes 1058303.76
RCP-040987 Township Of Chatham, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1058931.76 1 Yes 1058931.76
RCP-056174 Port Aransas, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1059143.94 1 Yes 1059143.94
RCP-030035 Borough Of Manville, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1059350.44 1 Yes 1059350.44
RCP-055585 Volga City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29306.5 1 Yes 29306.5
RCP-007854 Town of Hunter Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29305.7 Yes 29305.7
RCP-003892 City Of Howell, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1009272.08 1 Yes 1009272.06
RCP-046865 Bremen Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1013929.74 8 Yes 1013929.74
RCP-049269 Washington, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1014518.6 1 Yes 1014518.6
RCP-049073 Town Of Wellton, AZ Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1016635.54 1 Yes 1016635.54
RCP-039482 Phillips County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1016643 3 Yes 1016643
RCP-031323 Dunstable, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1017179.95 10 Yes 1017179.95
RCP-006930 Lake Arthur, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1018010.03 Yes 1000000
RCP-054071 Dellwood City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1018038.82 2 Yes 1018038.82
RCP-035642 City Of Geneva, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1019614.68 1 Yes 1019614.68
RCP-056678 Whitesboro, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1022895.69 1 Yes 0
RCP-031287 Brewster, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1023135.12 1 Yes 1023135.12
RCP-023463 New Ringgold Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27510.04 1 Yes 27510.04
RCP-019772 Town Of Livingston, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29043.84 1 Yes 29043.84
RCP-015190 Hickory Hill city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29185.5 2 Yes 29185.5
RCP-022827 Hartleton Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29190.04 1 No 29144.04 0 0 0
RCP-014729 Town Of Pomaria, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29193.76 1 Yes 29193
RCP-024485 Town Of Geddes, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1031381.52 16 Yes 280000
RCP-038949 Beaver County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1031599 3 Yes 1030036
RCP-040746 City Of Burlington, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1031822.6 4 Yes 1031822.61
RCP-040673 City Of Ventnor City, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1035695.34 1 Yes 1035695.34
RCP-040997 Borough Of Kinnelon, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1035800.02 1 Yes 1035800.02
RCP-025290 City Of Berlin, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1059668.62 7 Yes 1059668.62
RCP-007040 Sunset, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1059871.43 18 Yes 1054925
RCP-025928 Statham, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1060186 Yes 1060186
RCP-034590 Town Of True, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29202.53 4 Yes 29202.53
RCP-033391 Town Of Montana, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29202.53 1 Yes 29202.53
RCP-034832 Village Of De Soto, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29202.53 4 Yes 0
RCP-050256 Village Of Farnam, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29202.98 1 Yes 29202.98
RCP-034597 Village Of Hawkins, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29307.2 1 Yes 29307.2
RCP-024822 Village Of Lodi, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29333.24 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-039619 Lincoln County, NV Nevada Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1006737 3 Yes 1006737
RCP-049148 Bethlehem, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1006823.88 12 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-052580 Magee, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1007227.67 Yes 1007227.67
RCP-055861 Silvis City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1017232.76 3 Yes 1017232.77
RCP-056777 Dimmitt, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1017681.9 16 Yes 1017681.9
RCP-035760 City Of Adamsville, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1017712.84 8 Yes 1017712.84
RCP-018900 City Of Wapakoneta, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1019931.38 8 Yes 1019931.38
RCP-033109 Hyrum City, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1020064 2 Yes 1020064
RCP-035582 City Of Springville, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1023180.6 8 Yes 1023180.6
RCP-055272 Eldridge City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1023634.07 1 Yes 1021925
RCP-023161 Woodbury Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27720.04 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-033733 Village Of Downing, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27527.83 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-055303 Davis City City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27512.21 6 Yes 27420.35
RCP-025252 Town Of Easton, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27533.38 Yes 0
RCP-047503 Atlanta City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27622.26 2 Yes 27622.26
RCP-056736 Garden Ridge, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1025378.45 7 Yes 1025378.45
RCP-052806 Shaftsbury Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1025627.73 3 Yes 1025386.49
RCP-017396 North Fork Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29069.08 Yes 29069.08
RCP-007245 Buffalo, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29092.01 Yes 28889.54
RCP-033280 Town Of Gordon, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29097.86 1 Yes 29097.86
RCP-031424 Nahant, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1050059.7 1 Yes 1050059.71
RCP-034055 Village Of Holmen, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1050244.28 2 Yes 1050244.28
RCP-038286 Fillmore County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1060929 1 Yes 1060929
RCP-038737 Cook County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1061124 4 Yes 1061124
RCP-018519 Village Of Casstown, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29237.05 Yes 29120.79
RCP-035663 Town Of Eldridge, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29240.52 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-007946 Town of Orlando Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29305.7 2 Yes 29305.7
RCP-033684 Village Of Ephraim, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29307.2 1 Yes 29307.2
RCP-034587 Town Of Strickland, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29307.2 1 Yes 29307.2
RCP-033116 Salem City Corp, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1020301 1 Yes 1020301
RCP-024309 Town Of Parma, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1020407.19 2 Yes 1020407.19
RCP-016187 Standard Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27625.18 1 Yes 27625.18
RCP-017731 Buncombe Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27625.18 2 Yes 7000
RCP-034302 Town Of Doty, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27632.5 3 Yes 13115.58
RCP-037270 Pulaski County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1036261 1 Yes 1036261
RCP-017713 Broadview Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1036692.86 1 Yes 1036692.87
RCP-023529 Borough Of Northampton, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1036351.46 1 Yes 1036351.46
RCP-025764 Lake City, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1056451 Yes 1056451
RCP-040773 Township Of Southampton, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1056629.06 4 Yes 0
RCP-023835 Village Of Fredonia, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1056714.78 3 Yes 1023682.66
RCP-037450 Tripp County, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1056850 1 Yes 1056850
RCP-056476 Coleman, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1061130.15 1 Yes 1061130.15
RCP-049067 Town Of Superior, AZ Arizona Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1061388.87 1 Yes 1061388.87
RCP-016308 Williamson Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29258.2 1 Yes 29258.2
RCP-027379 Big Stone Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29287.64 1 Yes 29287.64
RCP-004596 Ellington Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29287.64 1 Yes 29287.64
RCP-027390 Burnstown Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29396.92 7 Yes 29396.92
RCP-023569 Freeport Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29400.04 6 Yes 29400.04
RCP-051554 Borough Of Middletown Dba Middletown Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1007371.42 3 Yes 1005783.92
RCP-050725 Hillsboro Beach Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1007718 1 Yes 1007718
RCP-051759 Marshall Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1007791.42 1 Yes 1007791.4
RCP-052725 Pownal Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1018736.28 4 Yes 1018496.66
RCP-039407 Sheridan County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1018974 11 Yes 1018974
RCP-023224 Uniontown City, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1020496.46 2 Yes 1020496.46
RCP-033331 Town Of Bell, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27737.17 1 Yes 27737.17
RCP-014340 Enville Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27795 5 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-026776 Backus City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27539.12 3 Yes 27539.12
RCP-017099 Sacred Heart Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27539.12 1 Yes 27539.12
RCP-017411 Urness Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27539.12 1 Yes 27539.12
RCP-004616 Beaver Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27648.41 Yes 27648.41
RCP-004658 Villard City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 27648.41 Yes 27648.41
RCP-014345 Etowah City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1036716.84 1 Yes 1036716.84
RCP-024029 Village Of Lancaster, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1036817.4 3 Yes 1036817.4
RCP-052959 Edinburgh Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1040218.48 1 Yes 1040218.48
RCP-026621 Town Of Rural Hall, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1040228.46 1 Yes 1040228.46
RCP-050614 Astatula Town, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1044280 1 Yes 1044280
RCP-049836 Town Of Basalt, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1044860.94 2 Yes 1007200.93
RCP-040725 Township Of River Vale, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1045010.84 1 Yes 1045010.85
RCP-024685 Village Of West Haverstraw, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1045022.5 10 Yes 1045022.5
RCP-052765 Williamstown Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1055457.63 1 Yes 1055457.63
RCP-038430 Walworth County, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1055685 Yes 1055685
RCP-052115 College Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1055776.48 1 Yes 1055776.48
RCP-037232 Harper County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1055879 6 Yes 1055879
RCP-032319 City Of Struthers, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1063366.28 1 Yes 1063366.28
RCP-015106 Crescent Springs city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1063468.31 1 Yes 1063468.31
RCP-017097 Boy Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29287.64 1 No 14643.82 14643.82 0 0
RCP-055539 Hancock City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29306.5 1 Yes 29306.5
RCP-057309 Grove Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29396.92 1 Yes 29396.92
RCP-017069 West Union Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29396.92 3 Yes 29396.92
RCP-022734 Railroad Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 29400.04 1 Yes 29400.04
RCP-027038 Lake Elmo City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1006489.41 3 Yes 1006489.41
RCP-016125 Sandwich City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1009475.92 1 Yes 1009475.92
RCP-054330 Platte City City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1009482.16 1 Yes 1009482.16
RCP-051679 City Of Oil City, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1009891.42 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-038672 Jim Hogg County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1010039 1 Yes 1010039
RCP-051656 Plains Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1014616.44 4 No 134367.44 0 0 0
RCP-026891 Detroit Lakes City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1015013.42 1 Yes 1015013.42
RCP-034261 City Of Saint Francis, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 1015180.31 1 Yes 1015180.31
RCP-049234 Portland, CT Connecticut Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2742574.09 7 Yes 2742574.09
RCP-039734 Union County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2793341 2 Yes 2793341
RCP-056203 Robstown, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2795832.13 1 Yes 2795832.13
RCP-017997 Grayslake Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2820354.38 2 Yes 2820354.38
RCP-039852 Calhoun County, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2826750 2 Yes 2826750
RCP-026566 City Of Oxford, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2831945.49 1 Yes 2831945.49
RCP-037073 Fleming County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2832188 1 Yes 2832188
RCP-047294 Healdsburg City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2833576 9 Yes 2833576
RCP-039218 Pendleton County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2833936 1 Yes 2833936
RCP-019280 Lykens Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65310.11 2 Yes 65310.11
RCP-033315 Town Of Turtle Lake, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65313.18 1 Yes 65313.18
RCP-034120 Town Of Centerville, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65313.18 1 Yes 65313.18
RCP-047120 Somerville Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65495.24 5 Yes 65248.26
RCP-035587 Town Of Gordonville, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66088.34 1 Yes 66088.34
RCP-034187 Town Of Weston, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66359.86 1 Yes 66359.86
RCP-013918 City Of Rose City, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66416.06 1 Yes 66416.06
RCP-031640 City Of Hollister, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66464.7 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-018932 Benton Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66466.97 1 Yes 66466.97
RCP-018935 Rochester Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66466.97 2 Yes 65912.97
RCP-014004 Gaines Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2873651.06 1 Yes 2873651.06
RCP-055397 Altoona City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2873980.51 3 Yes 2873980.51
RCP-038326 Carbon County, WY Wyoming Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2874726 5 Yes 2874726
RCP-048982 Portales City, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2874831 1 Yes 2874831
RCP-022868 Municipality Of Monroeville, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2874904.06 1 Yes 2865843.02
RCP-026579 Town Of Pineville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2877200.52 5 Yes 2877200.52
RCP-047268 Emeryville City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2891228 1 Yes 2891228
RCP-037155 Lasalle Parish, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2892596 2 Yes 2892596
RCP-038337 Cleburne County, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2896093 9 Yes 2896093
RCP-055893 Robinson, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2960935.43 2 Yes 2955095.23
RCP-014256 Alcoa City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2961200.35 1 Yes 2961200.35
RCP-056504 Fayetteville, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63806.85 1 Yes 63680.99
RCP-016164 Sorento Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63823.7 1 Yes 63757.83
RCP-032722 Village Of Cuyahoga Heights, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63837.73 1 Yes 63837.73
RCP-018578 Black Creek Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63837.73 1 Yes 63583.89
RCP-022466 Eldred Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63840.08 1 Yes 63840.08
RCP-054665 Hume Town, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63971.22 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-051944 Sankertown Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64470.1 4 Yes 23030.56
RCP-034360 Town Of Maple Creek, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64475.83 Yes 64475.83
RCP-004428 Village Of Suttons Bay, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65049.92 Yes 65049.92
RCP-033916 Village Of Avoca, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65208.51 4 Yes 65208.51
RCP-034008 Village Of Camp Douglas, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65208.51 10 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-004119 Lovells Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65260.08 1 Yes 65260.08
RCP-049856 City Of Castle Pines, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2705277.42 1 Yes 2705277.41
RCP-038752 Crawford County, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2724969 10 Yes 2724969
RCP-038886 Archuleta County, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2724969 9 Yes 2651569
RCP-047338 Los Alamitos City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2726883 1 Yes 2726883
RCP-001980 Town Of Cheraw, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2769008.1 1 Yes 2769008.1
RCP-038052 Swain County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2771974 2 Yes 2771974
RCP-032500 City Of Wooster, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2775837.17 1 Yes 2775837.17
RCP-038664 Larue County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2796643 6 Yes 2796643
RCP-056555 Burkburnett, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2798066.6 1 Yes 2798066.6
RCP-040202 Port Orchard City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2821078 Yes 2821078
RCP-051366 Lower Providence Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2821669 1 Yes 2821669
RCP-037958 Fulton County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2822282 1 Yes 2822282
RCP-015837 Lostant Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65320.64 1 Yes 65320.64
RCP-016001 Ohio Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65320.64 1 Yes 65320.64
RCP-034763 Town Of Greenwood, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66359.86 1 Yes 66359.86
RCP-034824 Town Of Sterling, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66359.86 1 Yes 66359.86
RCP-039840 Kossuth County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2877252 1 Yes 2877252
RCP-047879 Newton City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2878361.22 1 Yes 2878361.22
RCP-026281 Auburn, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2860522 2 Yes 2860522
RCP-007506 City of Chickasha Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2883364.65 7 Yes 2883364.65
RCP-026840 Chanhassen City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2883848.97 1 Yes 2883848.97
RCP-031524 Ware, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2902684.23 13 Yes 2902000
RCP-055981 Clute, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2902342.38 2 Yes 2902342.38
RCP-023086 Township Of Spring, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2904199.12 1 Yes 2904199.12
RCP-055689 North Liberty City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2915846.94 9 Yes 2915846.94
RCP-037038 Sebring City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2915991 1 Yes 2915991
RCP-040688 City Of Englewood, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2972796.28 12 Yes 2972796
RCP-024561 Town Of Wallkill, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2973016.7 5 Yes 2973016.7
RCP-027411 Crooked Lake Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64039.39 2 Yes 64039.39
RCP-034408 Town Of Maiden Rock, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64475.83 1 Yes 0
RCP-033092 Paragonah Town, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64501 1 Yes 64501
RCP-016216 Tallula Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64504.12 2 Yes 64504.12
RCP-047487 Alta Vista City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64706.28 2 Yes 64706.28
RCP-050276 Village Of Giltner, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64954.5 3 Yes 64954.5
RCP-019490 City Of Arkansas City, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65261.97 6 Yes 65261.97
RCP-040664 Township Of Hamilton, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2694796.6 Yes 2694796.61
RCP-046955 Greensburg City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2694823.1 4 Yes 2694823.1
RCP-056815 Pleasanton, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2695032.21 1 Yes 2689716.47
RCP-037880 Franklin County, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2695250 2 Yes 2695250
RCP-026215 City Of Conover, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2721676.17 2 Yes 2721676.17
RCP-052517 Cleveland, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2722243.59 6 Yes 2722243.59
RCP-037429 Harrison County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2728854 16 Yes 0
RCP-006979 Oakdale, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2801009.41 1 Yes 2692002.74
RCP-014285 Brownsville City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2799491.51 2 Yes 2799491.51
RCP-038226 Noble County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2801693 1 Yes 2801693
RCP-024030 Town Of Lancaster, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2802247.99 3 Yes 2802247.99
RCP-017728 Buffalo Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65320.64 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-018095 Kaneville Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65320.64 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-052999 Switz City Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65495.24 Yes 0
RCP-003845 Austin Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66100.8 Yes 66100.8
RCP-018969 Village Of Risingsun, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66151.46 1 Yes 66151.46
RCP-024149 Town Of Long Lake, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66461.34 1 Yes 66461.34
RCP-024245 Village Of Port Leyden, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66461.34 1 Yes 66461.34
RCP-038423 Mckenzie County, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2918236 1 Yes 2918236
RCP-040035 Sequatchie County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2918624 7 Yes 2918624
RCP-040915 Township Of West Windsor, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2919729.32 1 Yes 2919729.33
RCP-038562 Lawrence County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2975148 2 Yes 2975148
RCP-040846 Township Of Nutley, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2976145.68 2 Yes 2976145.68
RCP-027173 Prior Lake City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2976957.43 4 Yes 2976957.43
RCP-057217 Owatonna Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64148.67 Yes 64148.67
RCP-004515 Viola Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64148.67 1 Yes 64148.67
RCP-054894 Marquette City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64743.43 1 Yes 64743.43
RCP-055161 Little Rock City Of, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64743.43 1 Yes 64743.43
RCP-003294 Ocqueoc Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65155 9 Yes 65155
RCP-052932 Stannard Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65181.24 Yes 65181.24
RCP-040199 Lamar County, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2681459 9 Yes 2681459
RCP-025203 Town Of Hudson, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2682044.1 15 Yes 320226.4
RCP-038036 Winn Parish, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2700689 8 Yes 2700689
RCP-032292 City Of Medina, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2729773.04 23 Yes 2729773.04
RCP-047431 Signal Hill City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2732146 1 Yes 2732146
RCP-056239 Snyder, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2736742.51 4 Yes 2736742.51
RCP-015914 Mokena Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2743330.46 1 Yes 2743330.46
RCP-036935 Craig County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2746918 14 Yes 2746918
RCP-026610 City Of Rockingham, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2759601.17 9 Yes 2759601.17
RCP-035285 Town Of Hillsville, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2760832 1 Yes 2760832
RCP-032592 City Of Xenia, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2833995.76 1 Yes 2833995.76
RCP-034515 Village Of Mount Pleasant, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2834633.8 1 Yes 2834633.8
RCP-006301 City Of Mitchell, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2835483.58 1 Yes 2835483.58
RCP-054229 Mineral Point Town, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65325 1 Yes 65325
RCP-013724 Richland Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66100.8 6 Yes 0
RCP-036767 Harrison County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2921344 3 Yes 2868184
RCP-037001 Bayfield County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2920567 1 Yes 2920567
RCP-032015 Town Of Elsmere, DE Delaware Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2927377.5 15 Yes 2927377.5
RCP-023732 Town Of Vestal, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2931068.11 6 Yes 2741107.11
RCP-023507 Parker Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 63840.08 1 Yes 63840.08
RCP-033872 Town Of Mount Pleasant, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64057.16 1 Yes 64057.16
RCP-017048 Isle Harbor Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64148.67 4 Yes 64148.67
RCP-023083 Irvona Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64155.08 6 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-056638 Dickens, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64303.4 11 Yes 0
RCP-015615 Chuathbaluk City, AK Alaska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64312.48 1 Yes 64230.66
RCP-052952 Carbon Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64541.25 1 Yes 64541.25
RCP-027176 Racine City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64804.36 1 Yes 64804.36
RCP-057156 Harrison Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64804.36 1 Yes 64804.36
RCP-023030 Borough Of Conneaut Lake, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64995.08 3 Yes 64995.08
RCP-038810 Tallahatchie County, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2682236 2 Yes 2682236
RCP-040505 Glades County, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2682625 9 Yes 2682625
RCP-046987 Lake Station City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2684398.25 7 Yes 2684398.25
RCP-052049 Exeter Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2706063.84 1 Yes 2697534.94
RCP-036791 Callahan County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2708264 1 Yes 2708264
RCP-034486 City Of Stevens Point, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2708822.2 2 Yes 2708822.2
RCP-038982 Bamberg County, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2732156 3 Yes 2732156
RCP-039845 Clay County, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2732933 1 Yes 2732933
RCP-053638 City Of Gladstone, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2737344.28 5 Yes 2737344.28
RCP-017787 Charleston City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2737614.9 1 Yes 2737614.9
RCP-031920 Port Townsend City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2746985 5 Yes 2746985
RCP-038868 Rolette County, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2753522 11 Yes 2753522
RCP-047352 Mendota City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2753676 1 Yes 2753676
RCP-038094 Oglala Lakota County, SD South Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2753716 2 Yes 2753716
RCP-026839 Champlin City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2761343.58 4 Yes 2761343.58
RCP-040395 Jasper County, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2761874 1 Yes 2761874
RCP-017832 Crest Hill City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2772860.84 1 Yes 2772860.84
RCP-040966 Township Of Ocean, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2778112.78 2 Yes 2460405.28
RCP-014607 Hamilton County Emergency Management, Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2802470 3 Yes 2802470
RCP-033252 Mayfield Town, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65330 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-053302 Town Of Trenton, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65330 1 Yes 15834
RCP-052645 Sumner, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65640.66 1 Yes 65640.66
RCP-034896 Town Of Long Lake, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65941.19 1 Yes 65941.19
RCP-053702 City Of Nehalem, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65968.12 1 Yes 65968.12
RCP-016330 Woodson Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66001.06 2 Yes 66001.06
RCP-027087 Mcintosh City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66115.76 1 Yes 66115.76
RCP-027607 Manannah Township, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 66115.76 Yes 66115.76
RCP-027314 Winona City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2906251.83 17 Yes 2906251.83
RCP-050791 Marianna City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2906454 1 Yes 2906454
RCP-026841 Chaska City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2949418.31 2 Yes 2949418.31
RCP-004292 Delhi Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2951101.44 Yes 2945218.5
RCP-007643 City of Tahlequah Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2951452.15 1 Yes 2951452.15
RCP-001987 City Of Darlington, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2957193.12 1 Yes 2957193.12
RCP-038996 Livingston County, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2957666 13 Yes 2957666
RCP-024476 Town Of Cicero, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 2958452.64 9 Yes 2958452.64
RCP-014776 Larwill Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64362.1 Yes 5000
RCP-056135 Moran, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64551.67 1 No 0 25000 10000 10000
RCP-047685 Glen Elder City, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64553.68 1 Yes 64553.68
RCP-023543 Knox Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64575.08 4 Yes 64575.08
RCP-023120 Upper Mahantongo Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 64995.08 Yes 0
RCP-018012 Hammond Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65184.56 5 Yes 65184.56
RCP-019262 Wabash Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65204.94 Yes 64945.66
RCP-007770 Town of Coyle Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 65279.75 1 Yes 65279.75
RCP-003408 Coloma Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 517667.04 2 Yes 0
RCP-027141 Nowthen City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 518107.09 1 Yes 518107.09
RCP-019766 Town Of Gaston, SC South Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 518043 2 Yes 518043
RCP-025673 Edison, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 521317 2 Yes 521317
RCP-051873 Franklin Township Board Of Supervisors Dba Franklin Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 521640.74 7 Yes 521640.74
RCP-052927 Starksboro Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 521449.9 2 Yes 521449.9
RCP-054440 Forsyth City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 521548.81 6 Yes 521548.8
RCP-003477 Grass Lake Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 521660.4 Yes 521660.4
RCP-046934 Fowler Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 521695.63 1 Yes 521695.64
RCP-031459 Phillipston, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 521891.33 2 Yes 521891.33
RCP-016403 Hebron Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 522032.25 7 Yes 522032.25
RCP-019562 City Of Clinton, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 522095.73 1 Yes 522095.73
RCP-050394 City Of Minden, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 522113.85 5 Yes 522113.85
RCP-014531 Surgoinsville Town, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 522215.69 1 Yes 522215.69
RCP-035298 Town Of La Crosse, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 522288.76 3 Yes 522288.76
RCP-023720 Town Of Conklin, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 523280.47 1 Yes 523280.47
RCP-056093 Kountze, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 523365.08 1 Yes 523365.08
RCP-051593 Granville Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 523530.74 1 Yes 523530.74
RCP-052774 Dummerston Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 521474 1 Yes 521474
RCP-031598 City Of Dalton Gardens, ID Idaho Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 518381.57 3 Yes 518381.57
RCP-035748 City Of Ashford, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 518484.4 12 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-034546 City Of Richland Center, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 518214.01 14 Yes 518214.01
RCP-055818 Marshall City, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 518618.6 1 Yes 518618.6
RCP-006936 Livonia, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 518636.84 1 Yes 518636.84
RCP-035325 Town Of Onley, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 518758 1 Yes 518758
RCP-024961 Town Of Newfield, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 519690.75 2 Yes 519690.75
RCP-056498 Josephine, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 519889.22 4 Yes 519889.22
RCP-052621 Raymond, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 519962.54 3 Yes 519962.54
RCP-035252 Town Of Drakes Branch, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 519796 2 Yes 519796
RCP-005300 Harpswell Town, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 520021.98 1 Yes 520021.98
RCP-003912 City Of Kingsford, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 520294.24 1 Yes 520294.24
RCP-026910 Elko New Market City, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 521713.4 9 Yes 521713.4
RCP-023909 Town Of Schuyler Falls, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 521844.59 1 Yes 521844.59
RCP-056748 Jonestown, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 522620.24 3 Yes 522620.24
RCP-016283 Washington Park Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 525967.16 Yes 525967.16
RCP-025072 Town Of Pound Ridge, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 526049.7 4 Yes 526049.7
RCP-035688 City Of Vincent, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 526091.7 3 Yes 526091.7
RCP-033081 City Of La Verkin, UT Utah Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 526187 1 Yes 0
RCP-025166 Town Of Henniker, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 525332.66 10 Yes 525332
RCP-014415 Loretto City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 525479.54 1 Yes 525479.54
RCP-025068 Town Of North Salem, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 525536.88 Yes 525000
RCP-025215 Town Of Charlestown, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 525646.72 3 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-051621 Swoyersville Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 525945.74 36 Yes 0
RCP-014497 Rocky Top City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 526369.68 2 Yes 526369.68
RCP-014428 Mcewen City, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 513611 3 Yes 513611
RCP-056092 Kirbyville, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 513682.33 4 Yes 513682.33
RCP-052794 Berkshire Town, VT Vermont Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 524140.86 3 Yes 524140.86
RCP-031491 Shutesbury, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 524282.57 1 Yes 524282.57
RCP-032905 Harlan Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 524584.21 1 Yes 524584.21
RCP-015907 Millstadt Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 524878.5 4 Yes 524878.5
RCP-026176 Town Of Burnsville, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 524894.69 1 Yes 524894.69
RCP-034057 Village Of West Salem, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 524912.8 6 Yes 524912.8
RCP-054546 Potosi City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 525012.22 1 Yes 525012.22
RCP-047074 Petersburg City, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 525095.04 4 Yes 525095.04
RCP-018170 Jerome Township, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 525215.23 Yes 523126.8
RCP-016182 St. Joseph Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 525286.74 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-007647 City of Tonkawa Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 522939.98 1 Yes 522939.98
RCP-030216 Three Forks City, MT Montana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 526506.61 1 No 0 0 0 0
RCP-050005 Town Of Pagosa Springs, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 524064.24 2 Yes 524064.24
RCP-056073 Huntington, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 524109.9 2 Yes 523076.14
RCP-033667 City Of Mayville, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511829.23 1 Yes 511829.23
RCP-022804 Vandergrift Borough, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511875.72 14 Yes 511068.96
RCP-053002 Waterloo Town, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 511950.67 1 Yes 511950.67
RCP-038482 Gove County, KS Kansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 512012 1 Yes 512012
RCP-034308 Town Of Little Suamico, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 512038.57 8 Yes 512038.57
RCP-019598 City Of Elm Springs, AR Arkansas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 512151.05 2 Yes 512151.05
RCP-019360 Logan County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9325574 1 Yes 9325574
RCP-040329 Carter County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9344998 38 Yes 9344998
RCP-037056 Tioga County, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9362868 28 Yes 9362868
RCP-037207 Bryan County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9322466 28 Yes 9322466
RCP-038986 Grants Pass, OR Oregon Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9373862 10 Yes 9373862
RCP-040000 Kannapolis, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9352893 2 Yes 9352893
RCP-039255 Burnet County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9353544 1 Yes 9353544
RCP-053091 Cherokee County, Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9451052 4 Yes 9451052
RCP-031321 Dracut, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9455618.72 19 Yes 9455618.72
RCP-048931 Clovis City, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9469289 1 Yes 9469289
RCP-038231 Plymouth Town, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9472098 1 Yes 9472098
RCP-031860 Lake Stevens City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9475434 1 Yes 9475434
RCP-015329 Richmond city Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9475560.3 1 Yes 9526803.84
RCP-047323 La Puente City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9476511 1 Yes 9476511
RCP-039209 Colonie Town, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9482071 6 Yes 9482071
RCP-037671 Le Flore County, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9683361 8 Yes 5313104.11
RCP-039652 Lamar County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9684526 1 Yes 9684526
RCP-054063 Chesterfield City, MO Missouri Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9684916.87 50 Yes 9684916.87
RCP-036932 Pinellas Park, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9685810 3 Yes 9685810
RCP-047299 Hollister City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9745874 1 Yes 9745874
RCP-049992 City Of Northglenn, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9757146.14 10 Yes 9757146.14
RCP-038019 Biddeford, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9759098 1 Yes 9759098
RCP-040648 North Providence, RI Rhode Island Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9770068.68 6 Yes 9770068.68
RCP-040411 Queen Anne'S County, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9785919 1 Yes 9785919
RCP-037063 Somerset County, ME Maine Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9805925 1 Yes 9805925
RCP-038978 Winona County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9805925 1 Yes 9805925
RCP-031388 Lexington, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9903381.15 1 Yes 9903381.15
RCP-039724 Waupaca County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9904210 10 Yes 9904210
RCP-037292 Franklin County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9904404 5 Yes 9904404
RCP-014813 Edgecombe County, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9997833 1 Yes 9997833
RCP-036646 Hopewell City, VA Virginia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9998813 17 Yes 9998813
RCP-049112 La Plata Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9492536.55 1 Yes 9489034.18
RCP-038925 Bensalem Township, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9497764 10 Yes 9497764
RCP-036822 Douglas County, NV Nevada Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9499223 4 Yes 9499223
RCP-036855 Carroll County, NH New Hampshire Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9500194 9 Yes 9500194
RCP-031974 University Place City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9500582 12 Yes 9500582
RCP-038123 Henry County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9500777 1 Yes 9500777
RCP-039528 Loveland, CO Colorado Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9504879 1 Yes 9504879
RCP-039403 Curry County, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9508741 14 Yes 9508741
RCP-056211 Rosenberg, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9510695.42 5 Yes 9510695.42
RCP-037313 Newaygo County, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9513791 1 Yes 9513791
RCP-039364 North Richland Hills, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9515205 1 Yes 9515205
RCP-039505 Shelby County, KY Kentucky Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9522337 56 Yes 9522337
RCP-040055 Val Verde County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9522532 1 Yes 9522532
RCP-047223 Calexico City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9526987 3 Yes 9526987
RCP-019845 Gibson County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9543509 1 Yes 9543509
RCP-047412 San Gabriel City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9544689 1 Yes 9544689
RCP-036838 Dale County, AL Alabama Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9551085 19 Yes 9551085
RCP-038175 Attleboro, MA Massachusetts Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9557617 17 Yes 9207617
RCP-038221 Montgomery County, NY New York Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9560602 9 Yes 9560602
RCP-052606 Olive Branch, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9569277.48 6 Yes 9569277.48
RCP-039559 St. Mary Parish, LA Louisiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9585270 1 Yes 9585270
RCP-026629 City Of Sanford, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9588012.6 4 Yes 9093330.9
RCP-047358 Montclair City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9588706 2 Yes 9588706
RCP-050852 Pinecrest Village, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9593852 4 Yes 9593852
RCP-025873 Pooler, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9595073 1 No 2257633 0 0 0
RCP-025650 Decatur, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9595820 3 Yes 9595820
RCP-056075 Hurst, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9597095.35 2 Yes 8729779.05
RCP-038637 Dearborn County, IN Indiana Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9606637 6 Yes 9606637
RCP-036997 Rockville City, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9619188 6 Yes 10000000
RCP-056551 Duncanville, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9620929.8 7 Yes 9620929.8
RCP-038791 Oktibbeha County, MS Mississippi Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9631693 9 Yes 9631693
RCP-031924 Pullman City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9641690 1 Yes 9641690
RCP-026218 Town Of Cornelius, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9642828.56 1 Yes 9642828.56
RCP-038878 Buffalo County, NE Nebraska Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9645679 41 Yes 9645679
RCP-039032 Knox County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9653448 45 Yes 9653448
RCP-056387 Waxahachie, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9431495.48 4 Yes 9431495.48
RCP-050879 Seminole City, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9435081 12 Yes 9435081
RCP-040141 Shelby County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9438038 1 Yes 9438038
RCP-039928 Ypsilanti Charter Township, MI Michigan Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9439025 2 Yes 9439025
RCP-039787 Bismarck, ND North Dakota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9656565 1 Yes 9656565
RCP-038866 Bedford County, TN Tennessee Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9656167 1 Yes 9656167
RCP-026395 Town Fuquay-Varina, NC North Carolina Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9664181.29 1 Yes 9664181.29
RCP-048957 Hobbs City, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9671031 1 Yes 9671031
RCP-038351 Venango County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9841665 1 Yes 9841665
RCP-038403 Midwest City, OK Oklahoma Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9858239 1 Yes 9858239
RCP-037204 Farmington, NM New Mexico Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9862919 1 Yes 9862919
RCP-039936 Schaumburg Village, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9873008 1 Yes 9873008
RCP-038955 Grundy County, IL Illinois Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9916641 1 Yes 9916641
RCP-039179 Wilson County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9919749 3 Yes 9000000
RCP-037306 Darke County, OH Ohio Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9928101 7 Yes 9928101
RCP-036949 Redmond, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9928999 13 Yes 9928999
RCP-047393 Rancho Palos Verdes City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9934859 13 Yes 9934859
RCP-038181 Atascosa County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9935871 9 Yes 9000000
RCP-036706 Chino Hills, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9956344 1 Yes 9956344
RCP-037437 Asbury Park, NJ New Jersey Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9962705 36 Yes 2000000
RCP-049081 Bel Air Town, MD Maryland Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9973520.65 3 Yes 9969840.81
RCP-038471 Polk County, TX Texas Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9974718 8 Yes 9974718
RCP-039676 Walla Walla City, WA Washington Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9974964 1 Yes 9974964
RCP-037075 Wayne County, PA Pennsylvania Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9976272 1 Yes 9976272
RCP-039743 Port Orange, FL Florida Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9981987 1 Yes 9981987
RCP-037268 Palm Desert, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9983052 1 Yes 9983052
RCP-047324 La Quinta City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9987009 1 Yes 9987008
RCP-038369 Grant County, WI Wisconsin Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9991423 7 Yes 9991423
RCP-025799 Mcdonough, GA Georgia Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9996144 9 Yes 9996144
RCP-040382 Warren County, IA Iowa Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9996667 17 Yes 9996667
RCP-047228 Campbell City, CA California Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government 9997774 9 Yes 9997774
[truncated: rows 5001-27728 of 27728 not shown; row cap 5000 per sheet]
Sheet: Projects (Q3 2024) Submit
Project ID Recipient-ID Recipient Name State/Territory Reporting Tier Recipient Type Completion Status Project Name Expenditure Category Group Expenditure Category Project Description Adopted Budget Total Cumulative Obligations Total Cumulative Expenditures Number of Households Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Number of Workers Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Number of Gov FTE Responding to COVID-19 (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Number of Gov FTE Rehired (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Community benefit agreement? (Infrastructure Only) Complying with Davis Bacon? (Infrastructure Only) Project labor agreement? (Infrastructure Only) Does the Project have Capital Expenditures? (Yes/No) (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Type of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Total Expected Cost of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Primary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Secondary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Tertiary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only) Project is conducting an evidence based program evaluation? (Yes/No) Project Total Spending on Evidence Based Evaluation
TPN-060385 RCP-039418 Pope County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed less than 50% Governmental Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Other Governmental Services 84986 5045.41
TPN-060267 RCP-039418 Pope County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Not Started Replace Lost Public Sector Revenue 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Replace lost public sector revenue, using this funding to provide government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue experienced due to the pandemic. 300000 0
TPN-060250 RCP-039418 Pope County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Negative Economic Impacts 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Address negative economic impacts caused by the public health emergency. 500000 288581.89
TPN-060231 RCP-039418 Pope County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Not Started Public Health Expenditures 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Support of Public Health Expenditures 100000 0
TPN-060171 RCP-039418 Pope County, MN Minnesota Tier 5. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Broadband Infrastructure 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Expand access to broadband internet within Pope County, MN. 1200000 1200000
TPN-112604 RCP-036035 City Of Tampa, Florida Florida Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed City of Tampa Housing - Affordable Housing Units 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The City's project is for the development and construction of five single family, rental housing units located in Sulphur Springs, all of which shall be occupied by households with incomes that do not exceed 50% Area Median Income. 200000 200000 200000
TPN-112602 RCP-036035 City Of Tampa, Florida Florida Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed City of Tampa Housing - DARE 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The City's project is for the Dare to Own the Dream (DARE) Homeownership Program which assists income-qualified buyers with down payment and closing costs for property within the City limits of Tampa. 267809.5 267809.5 267809.5
TPN-128191 RCP-036035 City Of Tampa, Florida Florida Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed City of Tampa Housing - Affordable Housing Units II 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The City's project is for the development, construction and leasing of affordable multi-family, rental housing units located at Busch Blvd. and Nebraska Avenue, consisting of 128 rental units, all of which shall be occupied by households with incomes that do not exceed 80% Area Median Income (AMI). 1250000 1250000 1250000
TPN-008880 RCP-036035 City Of Tampa, Florida Florida Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more City of Tampa Provision of Government Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The City's project for the Provision of Government Services includes: Fire Station renovations, vehicles, and other items for Fire Rescue; sidewalks and resurfacing; Police vehicles, aviation maintenance, and body-worn cameras; Parks & Recreation development of the East Tampa Recreational Complex and the New Tampa Inclusive Playground; various repairs and renovations to City facilities; Parking capital projects; Solid Waste facility relocation; Technology and Innovations cybersecurity; pandemic response costs and personnel expenses for the Police and Fire Departments. 76985233.5 76985233.5 75023376.3
TPN-108780 RCP-036035 City Of Tampa, Florida Florida Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more City of Tampa Housing - Affordable Housing 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The City's project is for the purchase of five (5) properties for a future Affordable Housing development. The land will be put out for proposal in January 2023. This proposal process will result in a project that will produce affordable housing units meeting the CDBG LMI national objective with approximately 80 units; which will then be rented to those who are at or below 80% AMI. 1670500 1670500 1670500
TPN-114123 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Four Lakes Water District 5-Infrastructure 5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution The project will fund work for the installation of 2,500 lineal feet of 4” PVC C-900 water main from the School Well located at 12916 West 6th Avenue (99004), East on 6th Avenue, then North on South Cheney Street to 10300 South Cheney Street, then East along an existing easement to the District’s 300,000-gallon reservoir. Also included is a connection to the existing system, a connection through the wall of the existing reservoir, approximately 310 tons of crushed surfacing for gravel road repair, miscellaneous surface repairs, and an upgrade to the District’s telemetry system to ensure that the Craig Road Well comes on each time the School Well is used to be sure the combined water would be well below the MCL for nitrates and thus usable by the District. 335000 335000 39098.5
TPN-114121 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more City of Medical Lake 5-Infrastructure 5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares The funds will be used to replace several blocks of 6” cast iron lead-joint water main that has lead gooseneck services with new 8” PVC C-900 water main and move the resident’s services on to these new mains in order to abandon the lead-joint pipe and goosenecks. 495000 495000 491658.57
TPN-114119 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started NEPDA 5-Infrastructure 5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution The funds will be used to replace a near century-old water transmission main beneath Freya Boulevard between Garland Avenue and East Wellesley Avenue. The condition of infrastructure in the NEPDA area is a major barrier to business development and increased economic activity, and this investment, coupled with others in the immediate vicinity, will prove catalytic in unlocking the economic potential of the area. This project covers the replacement of the water transmission main and reconstruction of the disturbed roadway surface only, per ARP requirements. 1500000 1500000 0
TPN-114117 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Town of Rockford 5-Infrastructure 5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance The funds will be used to replace portions of the wastewater collection piping, manholes and service laterals within the Town right-of-way in areas most impacted by inflow and infiltration. Current lines have structurally failed and show significant cracking, even partial collapse. This project will allow the Town to continue to provide affordable sewer service to its residents through compliance with the state wastewater discharge permit requirements and maintain capacity at the wastewater treatment facility. The improvements will help reduce flows to and thereby protect the water quality in Rock Creek (a tributary to Hangman Creek), a 303(d) listed water body, and reduce the potential for contamination of the drinking water aquifer. 600000 600000 58620.03
TPN-114116 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed City of Deer Park 5-Infrastructure 5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment The funds will be used to construct a 7.6-million-gallon primary wastewater aeration treatment lagoon with double HDPE liner system, underdrain and leak collection piping, and a new effluent lift station with emergency backup power supply. The biosolids in the existing lagoon will be removed and disposed. Equipment in the existing lagoon will be removed or salvaged after the new lagoon is in operation. This project also includes site clearing and grubbing, gravity sewer improvements, site grading, storm water improvements, electrical and control improvements for the new primary aeration lagoon systems. 546519 546519 546519
TPN-114114 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Spokane County Public Works - Mead 5-Infrastructure 5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance The funds will be used for a trenchless undercrossing of Highway 2 and BNSF Railroad is the key to unlock future septic tank elimination projects (STEP) and allow for sewered development of vacant parcels in the Mead area. Highway 2 and the Railroad present a physical barrier that must be crossed before the area can be sewered. This area is in the High and Medium Critical Aquifer Recharge Area. The funds will be used in removing septic tanks over the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer to improve groundwater quality and help to alleviate some of the high groundwater problems in this area. The scope of work includes easement acquisition, survey, permits, traffic control, design, construction, and inspection of the undercrossing and sewer main extension under Highway 2 and Railroad right-of-way. The project includes approx. 1,300 feet of 12-inch sewer main, a lengthy 350-foot trenchless undercrossing, a 24-inch steel casing pipe, bore pits, manholes, property and road restoration. Construction surveying will provide tight control and monitoring for any settlement during the trenchless undercrossing. Construction management will ensure the project is constructed per the design standards and complies with the requirements of both the WSDOT and BNSF Railroad permits. The General Facilities Fund may be used to cover potential cost overruns or unexpected changes in conditions. 1300000 1300000 0
TPN-114113 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Spokane County Public Works - Nevada & North Cedar 5-Infrastructure 5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater Nevada Street Stormwater Retrofit and Remediation will address high risk flooding that occurs at the corner and along the south side of Nevada Street east of US-2. Nevada Street is a busy Urban Principal Arterial with 13,000 average daily vehicular trips and is classified as a freight route that carries up to 4,000,000 tons per year in north Spokane County terminating at US-2. The flooding is so severe that it covers the sidewalk and road prohibiting road visibility and creating a safety concern for both drivers and pedestrians. The North Cedar Wilbert Vault effort will address a brownfield site with a complex environmental history of legacy pollutant deposition that has spanned more than 50 years. Vermiculite Northwest, a facility that processed vermiculite to produce insulation, was located just west of the Operations Building site and operated from the 1940s to the mid-1970s. In 2000 and 2001, the EPA sampled soil on the site, finding that asbestos was present in the soil where the Vermiculite Northwest facility was located. In 2007, Spokane County installed an asphalt cap covering a portion of the asbestos contaminated soil, however there are some areas of the property that are contaminated with asbestos that have not been capped. Predevelopment geotechnical exploration discovered oils and heavy metals consistent with railroad activity on the STA site, and similar conditions are expected on the Operations Building project site. 1528082 1528082 178510.15
TPN-114112 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Golf - West Plains 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety This project will fund the acquisition of real estate, initial phase of a multi-phased park master development plan, A&E design, and construction of one or more phases of a new, 10-20-acre community park serving the West Plains portion of Spokane County’s Urban Growth Area (“West Plains UGA”). 6000000 6000000 538428.32 Yes Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks 6000000 1 Imp General Public
TPN-114110 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Golf - Plantes Ferry 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety This project will fund the initial phase of a multi-phased park master development plan, Architecture and Engineering (A&E) design, and subsequent construction of one or more phases of renovations to Plante's Ferry Sports Complex. 5000000 5000000 0 Yes Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks 5000000 1 Imp General Public
TPN-114107 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Family Promise Greenspace 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety The project will fund a permanent playscape and greenspace for children and families living at the Family Promise Center FPC), a public service emergency shelter, and FPS's transitional housing units. 143500 143500 0 Yes Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks 143500
TPN-114105 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started HUB Sports Center 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety The project funds will be used to develop 20 acres adjacent to the current HUB Sports Center property to expand our capacity to serve our community and increase the opportunities for youth and families to be physically active year-round. Facility assets: Build multiple (4+) rectangle fields with synthetic turf and lights. Rectangle fields afford the most variety for sports and activities including soccer, football, lacrosse, rugby, ultimate frisbee and t-ball to name a few. Develop pickleball courts for recreational play and tournaments. This compliments our indoor courts and is a wonderful outlet for all ages, but especially seniors, to be active and play the fastest growing sport in our nation. Include a walking path throughout the property as a safe space for people to exercise. Construct an inclusive playground for youth of all abilities to play and interact together. Construct a building to include space for restrooms, concessions, offices and a teen center/ community room. Assets will be available for public use with the fields, pickleball courts and community room being available to rent in the afternoons, evenings and weekends. Coordinate with local user groups and nonprofits to program activity and event options that benefit at risk youth and community at large. 990000 990000 0 Yes Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks 990000
TPN-114103 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started S3R3 5-Infrastructure 5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater The project will complete geotechnical investigations, design, and construction documents for a regional stormwater system (RSS) in the West Plains. S3R3 invested $850,000 to create and implement a Capital Improvement Program. Stormwater management is the practice of controlling runoff from precipitation to prevent flooding and protect water bodies from pollutants. Creating a RSS is a proven mechanism to promote economic development. Currently, 20-30% of developable land is required for onsite stormwater treatment facilities. Concentrated infiltration at regional facilities will support and expedite groundwater recharge, recharge to the Spokane River, and improve runoff treatment and water quality. The area covered by the by the regional stormwater system has an estimated job growth of 19,000 jobs; 7,265 new residential units; 668,177 sq ft office space; 1,417,097 sq ft retail space; 11,415,780sq ft industrial; 564,931 sq ft hospitality; and 708,232 sq ft mini storage by 2045. This project has a benefit to cost benefit ratio of 3.39:1. 2000000 2000000 0
TPN-114102 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% SHBA - Frame Your Futures Pilot 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other The project will fund a pilot program in an industry-driven, industry-funded solution which simultaneously addresses Spokane's housing crisis and construction worker shortage by providing exposure to the trades and introducing construction-based curriculum beginning as early as middle school. The pilot will facilitate hands-on building projects in high school, by offering summer internship placement and direct-hire opportunities, and by providing pre-employment and on-the-job training for adults. Frame Your Future is currently collaborating with NEWTech Skill Center, the Northeast Community Center, and WorkSource Spokane to fortify a worker training pipeline for residential construction and a clear and accessible pathway to employment in construction primarily for underserved populations of students and unemployed adult job seekers displaced by C0VID. Outcome metrics for workforce placement, post-secondary educational and/or vocational attainment and outcome metrics for disproportionally impacted populations as outlined by US Treasury guidelines for this Eligible Use category. 800000 800000 155584.4 Yes Job and workforce training centers 200000 1 Imp General Public No 800000
TPN-114100 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Project id 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Project funding will provide expansion to day programming for individuals, from teens to adult, who identify as intellectually disabled in a safe and inclusive place. One out of every seven people identifies as intellectually disabled, that equates to 77,000 people in Spokane County who need this opportunity. This group of people are often overlooked when promoting the needs of marginalized groups. Awarded funds will provide for their physical and mental welfare in a safe place to be among others experiencing similar life issues. 100000 100000 100000 No 16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs No 0
TPN-114099 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Spokane Valley Partners 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other The project funds will be used to acquire, relocate and begin operations in a new location to warehouse of goods and location for wraparound services including, but not limited to, food bank and personal needs warehouse, wellness, mental health, housing assistance, case management and homeless resources. A portion of the project will be used for administrative and programming expenses for the above capacity expansion. 1700000 1700000 1700000 Yes Food banks and other facilities 1700000 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations No 0
TPN-114096 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Spokane Workforce Council 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other The project will utilize funding for childcare crisis stabilization for families and providers resulting from the ongoing impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thousands of Spokane County parents left the workforce to care for children, and they are struggling to return. Over 13% of childcare providers in Washington closed due to the pandemic, and since then centers have struggled to provide consistent and reliable staffing. The Spokane Workforce Council (SWC) proposes to serve up to 200 families over three years in Spokane County with this funding who are ineligible for Washington Working Connections Childcare, and for whom the cost of childcare access is a barrier to entering the workforce and/or continuing their education. SWC will provide services to childcare providers, including assistance with filling their talent pipeline and navigating the licensing system for both center-based and Family, Friends, and Neighbor (FFN) care. This includes workforce navigators for work placement as childcare needs are met. 2200000 2200000 657346.61 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic Yes 2000000
TPN-114093 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Women and Childrens Free Resturaunt 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Project funds will support nutrition security for disproportionately impacted women, children, and teens from the COVID-19 pandemic supported by the services at the Women’s and Children's Free Restaurant (WCFR) & Community Kitchen. The WCFR fills nutritional gaps for women and children in need while fostering dignity and respect. Our target population faces acute financial pressures and limited resources that have accelerated since the onset of COVID-19. The demand for our services has increased over 10-fold (95,000 meals in 2019 to over 1 million/yr). Funds will allow for capital improvement to increase kitchen capacity for meal prep and storage, aid in the distribution of nutritious grocery boxes and prepared meals at WCFR with our partner network. All requested funds will be spent on SLFRF evidence-based interventions to reach economically disadvantaged people. 200000 200000 75000 Yes Food banks and other facilities 200000 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations No 734956
TPN-114074 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Cancelled Historic Flight Foundation 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality The project applied for eligible uses to establish a tourism event related to Legacy Air Experience. The event will be modeled after a similar, top-tier tourist event in the Puget Sound region that has occurred annually over the last ten years each September hosted by the Historic Flight Foundation. The event, Vintage Aircraft Weekend ("VAW"), attracted seventy-five concourse-level antique aircraft from five states and two provinces. Patrons travel to see the static aircraft and flying demonstrations (e.g., spot landing, flour bombing, formation flights) from an even larger area, many of them booking hotel rooms through the event website. HFF desires to establish this tradition in 2023 and 2024 at Felts Field in Spokane. The event would be announced at the International Council of Air Shows convention in Las Vegas on December 12-15 and added to 2023 airshow calendars throughout the world. Reduced fees and or scholarships will be available to youth and disproportionately impacted populations to attend in the enhanced programming experience. 0 0 0 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-113898 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Spokane Valley Performing Arts Center 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality Funds will be used towards a new state-of-the-art performing arts center. The 59,000 square foot facility will house a 480+ seat Main Stage Theatre, a 200-seat flexible Studio Theatre, an Acting Conservatory for area youth, as well as event/business meeting space. For the 2022 season, 34% of patrons attended from outside the cities of Spokane and Spokane Valley. Up from 30% in 2021. 15% attended from out of state, up from 11% in 2021. Access will be given to disproportionally impacted populations, particularity below 80% AMI and youth through reduced fees and/or scholarship options. 590000 590000 590000 Yes Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks 590000 12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-113885 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed MAC 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality Project funding will be used enhance youth engagement and exhibit access. The MAC is the region's oldest and largest cultural organization, serving 100,000+ visitors and 10,000 school children each year. Funding would support the following education, tourism, and cultural priorities of the MAC. This funding will specifically offset exhibition rental fees & expenses for major travelling exhibitions (Example: DreamWorks, Minecraft) to bring art & culture to members of the community who cannot access it in other ways. Major exhibitions attract tourists and contribute to the economic health of Spokane. For every $1 spent on a visit to the MAC, it returns $32 to the local economy (www.americansforthearts.org). Visitors in 2022 came from 28 states, Canada and two foreign countries. Funding will also be used for youth and education programming and Title 1 student admission fees. The MAC works with 16 regional school districts and 73 schools - 34% are Title 1. The MAC may be the only museum a student visits. Funds would support educational programming and admission fees and/or bus transportation for Title 1 and rural schools to visit the museum and its exhibition. 300000 300000 300000 No 12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-113879 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Visit Spokane 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality Project funding will be used in eligible activities to support (1) the 50th year anniversary of the 1974 World's Fair for Spokane to market itself as a premiere destination in the last 50 years. A committee for Expo 50 has been formed and efforts are already underway to activate the community from May 4, 2024 - July 4, 2024, through outdoor and community activities for all populations to experience this important community milestone event and (2) establishment of the Sports County USA proclamation by the Spokane County Commissioners into a viable tourism draw to the region. Initial branding for the project was completed during the summer of 2022 and a website is in development. ARP funding will be used to fully integrate and promote the brand as a viable proclamation when selling our destination to the rest of the world. 500000 500000 92075.76 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-113877 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Feast Collective 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality Funds will be used to expanded capacity for improvements and planned upgrades and second location for increased internal capacity including capital equipment for upgrades of service delivery. The funds will equip the FIRM for resiliency and long-term sustainability. A significant portion of the funding request is for one-time capital expenses that do not need ongoing funding. The remainder of the funding is for core programmatic costs that are not at risk of not being funded in the future. The investment will help increase auxiliary funding for Feast Collective beyond the ARP award period. 390000 390000 110433.1 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 390000 12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-113873 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% AHANA 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) Funds will be applied to eligible programming uses for AHANA Capacity Building Program for Multi-Ethnic Business expansion serving Spokane County and surrounding regions. AHANA will assist multi-ethnic entities in the ongoing aftermath, recovery and support and services from COVID-19 including business resources for multi-ethnic community non-profit organizations sustainability and growth in their organizations, provide funding to continue to help new multi-ethnic non-profit startups and continue to represent all multi-ethnic communities for government agencies and corporations. AHANA leadership is aware that in order to efficiently accomplish these goals the organization needs to build internal capacity as a community non-profit organization to provide business programs that educate and expand multi-ethnic businesses owners and non-profit executives, as well as participate in community building with corporations, other non-profits, and government agencies. 1000000 1000000 383037.48 No 11 Imp Classes of NPs designated as negatively economically impacted
TPN-113868 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Camp Fire Inland Northwest 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) The project funds will be used to expand the capacity of youth hosted at the Camp Fire summer camp called “Camp Dart-Lo.” Camp programs promote optimal social-emotional development, outdoor education, and environmental stewardship in rustic, heavily wooded natural environments. Improvements will broaden the accessibility of all camp facilities and provide new programming to youth who are most disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. All requested funds will intentionally target services for youth in Qualified Census Tracts and those from households with incomes below 60% of the area median income. Campfire INW intentionally reach low-income households through our outreach to Title I schools and our partnership model with nonprofits located in Qualified Census Tracts. The project encompasses two core strategies for providing services to disproportionately impacted youth in Spokane County. 210700 210700 67123.95 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 210700 1 Imp General Public
TPN-113867 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Cancelled PHS - Carlyle Care Center Facility Improvments 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) The funds will be used in used capital improvements required for continued Occupancy Permit at 206 South Post Street called The Carlyle Care Center. The Carlyle is Pioneer’s a permanent supportive housing facility where residents with behavioral conditions can access counseling, group therapy, SUD treatment, and peer supports to maintain stable housing. Our facility needs a new generator and roofing to meet building code requirements. Without these upgrades, the 74 units and 100 people who reside at the Carlyle will be displaced. Before COVID-19, Pioneer could generate reserves for facility improvements from rental subsidies paid by our residents. The costs of operating our housing facilities have significantly increased since the onset of the pandemic. Supply chain shortages, increased costs of labor, and inflation are key factors. Given the existing shortage of long-term housing for individuals experiencing behavioral health conditions and histories of homelessness in Spokane, losing the Carlyle’s units would be disastrous for our community. The Carlyle promotes an environment conducive to recovery and is a low-barrier housing program for individuals with criminal histories. The Carlyle also houses an interim housing program for veteran experiencing homelessness. 0 0 0 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 300000 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-113865 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Unite Family Services - Foster Youth 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) Funds will be used to reduce the impact of Covid-19 on Unite staff, DCYF staff and clients, medically complex foster children and the foster families who care for them effectively reducing length of stay in foster care and increasing timely reunification of families in our community. Eligible uses include capital expenditures towards the purchase the property and necessary existing building improvements at 1310 N Maple Street to give full control of the property access to Unite Family Services allowing for implementation of Covid-19 safety measures including Adding hookups for laundry to be done on-site, addition of a fence enclosing an outdoor play space for families, purchase of play equipment and outdoor seating to encourage time outside, implementation of additional Health screening, cleaning and disinfecting protocols, additional space for rooms to have a "rest" between clients to allow for reduced spread of germs and added social distancing and secured entry to prevent unauthorized access. 351385 351385 346385 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 351385 25 Dis Imp NPs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-113852 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Meals on Wheels - Greater Spokane County 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) The funds will be used to assist Greater Spokane County Meals recovery from the impact of COVID-19 with awarded funds including capital funds for the procurement of an iCombi Pro 20-Full Size Combi Oven. The size and features of this oven will allow the organization to save on labor costs within the kitchen while simultaneously cooking more food to help us meet the increased demand that we are seeing throughout Spokane County. Funds will also be used to maintain and expand capacity to continue serving Spokane County seniors without delay or waitlist in 2023. The FIRM’s data shows that 56% of all meals served goes to seniors outside of the City of Spokane in the unincorporated area of Spokane County. The FIRM expects food costs to increase in 2023 than what was originally budgeted for 2022. Award funds will go towards this gap. 134076 134076 134076 Yes Food banks and other facilities 134076 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-113842 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Operation Family Health OFH Dental Clinic 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services The project will fund capital expenses to purchase new dental equipment and supplies to expand our services to Medicaid patients. The Good News Dental Clinic, operated by OHF will serve be able to serve over 80 patients, currently on the cancellation-short call waiting list for an opening in the schedule may be served with the additional capital. Services include bilingual staff consists of a Licensed Dentist/Director, a hygienist, a mid-level provider, and a patient coordinator who speaks Spanish, Russian, and Ukrainian. They represent Spokane’s economic, cultural, and racial diversity: many who have experienced immigration and poverty. 428000 428000 145322.9 Yes Medical equipment and facilities 428000 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-113837 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more SRHD Building Improvements 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services SRHD has been instrumental in addressing and providing guidance to the community during the C0VID-19 pandemic. SRHD project will fund proposed window replacements and roof repairs at the SRHD Building as set forth in its response. Before work may commence on the window and roof replacement SRHD must complete the required WA State Clean Energy Transformation Act Management Plan. 1390000 1390000 1023975.02 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 1390000 1 Imp General Public
TPN-113836 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% CHAS Mobile Clinic 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services The project will fund the CHAS Spokane County Mobile Medical Medicine primary care. preventative dental, and behavioral health services through the existing and additional new Mobile Medical Unity serving the periphery regions of Spokane County to include Deer Park, Airway Heights, Cheney. Spokane Valley, Otis Orchards, Medical Lake, Rockford, North Spokane, Spangle and Fairfield. To improve health outcomes of patients with mobility limitations, transportation challenges, homebound patients, and older patients by providing home visits and near-borne services as set forth in the Firm's response. 505854 505854 93602.25 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-113831 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% YWCA DV Support 1-Public Health 1.11-Community Violence Interventions The project with fund eligible uses to support Community Violence Interventions for victims of intimate partner domestic violence (DV) whose needs have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Funds requested will address three priority areas for victims of DV: behavioral health services; minor capital improvement at the DV Shelter and housing stability, including rent assistance through documented domestic violence situation; and essential storage; and civil legal aid & criminal justice response and associated programmatic support and administrative services by YMCA for the capacity expansion. Over the duration of the award the YWCA anticipates aiding over 10,100 victims per year and up to more than 30,000 victims over a 3-year period. 1417241 1417241 268405.07 Yes Adaptations to congregate living facilities 123759 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations No 1525000
TPN-113823 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% SCSO RTCC 1-Public Health 1.11-Community Violence Interventions The project will establish a multi-phased pilot that will build and implement a regional Real-Time Crime Center (RTCC) for official law enforcement & community safety purposes, including active and ongoing criminal investigations, critical incidents, pre-planned events, civil unrest, natural disasters, community complaints or any other instance where its use would improve the safety of law enforcement officers and/or the community. The RTCC will provide immediate and actionable intelligence to responding deputies & officers in order to increase the likelihood of suspect apprehension and case resolution. The RTCC will strategically utilize technology resources to prevent, identify, solve, and reduce violent crime. The RTCC pilot technology will assist local law enforcement agencies’ units both in patrol and investigations, as well as, support staff during the initial stages of response and through the preliminary investigation of priority calls or events that are significant in nature. It is anticipated 50% will be for minor equipment and software for the RTCC and 50% for programmatic support. 3997000 3997000 445461.6 Yes Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment 2000000 1 Imp General Public Yes 2500000
TPN-113806 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% VOA Crosswalk 2.0 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing The project will fund a portion of the Crosswalk 2.0 new building construction for the 2nd and 3rd Floor Supportive Independent Living Program (SILP), serving both homeless and foster youth aged 16-20 years in a single room occupancy setting as set forth in the FIRM’s response. The project will house 20 youth in a dorm style environment, with communal living space and kitchen and allowing them to stay for up to four years if needed. These programs are designed to mitigate the impact of ACES and the barriers faced by the marginalized community, by providing an environment for youth and young adults to gain competencies, get an education and a sense of self-worth as they move into sustainable income jobs and permanent housing. 1500000 1500000 1368044.44 Yes Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing 2000000 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-113805 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Cancelled Spokane Housing Authority HiFumi-en Apts 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing The project funds a portion of the construction of eighty-six (86) one-bedroom apartments for elderly and disabled low-income households at the new Hifumi-en development as set forth in the FIRM’s response. The project is part of a portfolio recapitalization effort over the past seven years. It will be constructed on the current site occupied by the existing building. The new building provides the opportunity to design a space that reflects best practices in design for these populations including meeting full accessible requirements. The building will incorporate an expanded common area and outdoor spaces that promote community. Office space for property management and services will be designed with the needs of residents in mind. The reception areas will allow for visibility and enable communication with residents. The building will be designed to meet or exceed the ESDS standards. Once constructed, households will be relocated from the old Hifumi-en location to the new Hifumien location. The old building will be demolished, and the landscape converted to outdoor and garden space. 0 0 0 Yes Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing 1500000 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 0
TPN-113792 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Habitat for Humanity Spokane New Homes 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing The project is for an Affordable Homeownership and Construction Resiliency Project which aims to provide training and equity support/subsidy in the completion of 36 new construction units through 2024. In addition to supporting shared equity subsidy, the project also aims to fund construction overhead and training for construction supervisors, apprenticeship programs and residential training to support homebuilding. Habitat for Humanity's Affordable Homeownership and Construction Program will provide valuable training to those entering the construction trades while also serving those earning 45-80% of the area median income (AMI) through the homebuyer process. The FIRM’s model is successful through volunteer labor, apprenticeship support, and donor engagement to keep costs down while providing evidence-based interventions through housing stability and affordability as outlined in the FIRM’s response. 1700000 1700000 315960.11 Yes Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing 1700000 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 9180000
TPN-113787 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed SCFD 10 FF Housing 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing The funding will be available for costs and expenses in the proposed expansion of volunteer fire fighter living quarters. The project is a way to house college-age people who are going to college to learn a trade. In return for living at the station, they volunteer as fire fighters. The current program in place does not have enough housing to meet the demand. The purpose of affordable off-site housing improves the FIRM’s emergency response times by offering housing on or near fire station property. 86746.03 86746.03 86746.03 No Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing 1000000 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations No 1500000
TPN-115760 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Spokane County Indirect Costs 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Spokane County Indirects (2024 Q3 SLFRF Report) are based on the total of awards as of Sept 30, 2024. Spokane County ARP Policy is to claim 10% Indirects for each award, with the exception of Sole Source to an internal County Department and/or Direct Costs (solely contained by the CLA ARP Application Portal Subscription contract). The Indirects amount as of Q3 2024 totals $5,202,762.23 5202762.22 5202762.22 5202762.22
TPN-149150 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% City of Airway Heights 5-Infrastructure 5.18-Water and Sewer: Other South Industrial Sewer Extension Project to expand the existing sewer system in the southern portion of the City of Airway Heights The project will eliminate septic tanks in the area. The project will include a new lift station including a lift station building, wet well, controls, pumps, electrical improvements, appurtenances and site restoration, approximately 2,700 LF of sewer force main pipe, 730 LF of gravity sewer pipe, and all associated improvements necessary for a complete and operating system. The new lift station will serve approximately 240 acres of land in the southern portion of Airway Heights. 1500000 1500000 690.95
TPN-171854 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Spokane County - Human Resources / Staffing Capacity 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.2-Public Sector Workforce: Rehiring Public Sector Staff The proposed project includes those activities required to be completed by Spokane County employees ensuring services are delivered and compliance activities are achieved. 3952135.65 3952135.65 0 No
TPN-171849 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Spokane County - Human Resources -Effective Service Delivery (ERP) 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery The proposed project, ERP Replacement Project will replace Spokane County’s first-generation Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system called PeopleSoft, which was implemented over 20 years ago, is nearing its end of useful life and not supporting current business processes in a modern and efficient manner 8000000 8000000 2884441.53 Yes Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations 8000000
TPN-171845 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Spokane County - Finance/ Facilities and Information Technology 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs The proposed project will include projects such as replacement of the roof at the Spokane County Fairgrounds; replacement of windows in the Public Works Building; remodel of the Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Golf Administration building; the remodel costs related to the creation of a courtroom in the Spokane County Courthouse; and any other general campus facility upgrades to bring county buildings in compliance with the Clean Buildings requirements. 9349438 9349438 5028488.97 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 8466000
TPN-173904 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Transfer to City of Medical Lake 7-Administrative 7.2-Transfers to Other Units of Government Funds left on the table from the PTERA project 100000 100000 100000
TPN-183527 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Cancelled Emergency Relief Natural Disasters 8-Natural Disasters 8.5-Other Immediate Needs: Debris Removal in order to protect the County’s groundwater from being contaminated with asbestos or other toxic elements the Board desires to award $258,249.94 of ARP funds toward the required match to receive State of Washington funding dedicated to asbestos testing and proper disposal of fire debris 0 0 0 No
TPN-248304 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government 2024 County Salaries 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provision of government services 2024 general fund salaries. 10000000 10000000 10000000
TPN-093741 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Whitworth Water 5-Infrastructure 5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution The Project encompasses two new high production wells (one of which has been constructed) and four and a half miles of watermain, valves, fittings, paving and other associated items. The total Project cost is estimated to be $14 million dollars. The District is seeking $4 million dollars from Spokane County’s apportionment of ARPA funds to help offset Project costs related specifically to water transmission and distribution expenses. The District plans to seek reimbursement from the County for expenses incurred by the District and its subcontractors related to Project transmission and distribution. Reimbursable expenses include project materials acquired by the District, design and engineering expenses, and subcontractor charges. 4000000 4000000 4000000
TPN-093732 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Irvin Distribution and Transmission 5-Infrastructure 5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution The Irvin Water District No. 6 will complete the design work and construction required to install165 lineal feet of 10” ductile iron pipe to close a system loop where a dead-end hydrant now exists. This project has bid, and the District has awarded the contract to Red Diamond Construction on today’s date. The road description is as follows: E. Portland Ave: From N. Williams Rd. to 165’ East of Williams Rd. upon an easement that the District has obtained. 30200 30200 30200
TPN-093726 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% West Terrace 5-Infrastructure 5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater Spokane County Public Works, with subcontractor services as needed, shall provide engineering services for the design, bidding and potential construction management and/or inspection of the West Terrace Capital Improvement Project No. SWW311. Spokane County Public Works, with subcontractor services as needed, will prepare drawings and technical specifications for the stormwater system improvements and road replacement portions of the Project and provide a complete set of bid documents. The proposed project schedule will most likely result in the need for multiple construction contracts being awarded and managed simultaneously. 4626174.54 4626174.54 1984654.61
TPN-094703 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Trentwood 5-Infrastructure 5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution The Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3 will complete the design work and construction required to relocate 1,200 lineal feet of 12” water main due to Spokane County Road Project No. 2991 (Bigelow Gulch Road Project 6). Since the opportunity has presented itself with replacement, the District is upsizing the replacement main to 16” as this line is the primary transmission main that leads to the District’s recently constructed 2.0MG Reservoir. The road description is as follows: N. Sullivan Rd.: From E. East Valley School Rd. North to 5215 N. Sullivan Rd. 74900 74900 74900
TPN-094698 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Innovia LaunchNW 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services Innovia LaunchNW's project will include the creation of an asset inventory and asset map, detailing the (1) availability of community-based wrap-around services, (2) capacity for existing services to expand/scale, and (3) gaps in service or capacity to address educational disparities in Spokane County. Building on research and exploration already done by Innovia, current assets will be mapped to determine their impact on student and family resiliency, stability and readiness, using an established educational benchmark pathway. Upon identification of gaps in wrap-around service expertise or capacity, LaunchNW will solicit RFP’s as needed and/or develop MOU's for partnership with existing providers, including potential public-private partnerships, to address specific, measurable target outcomes for student achievement. 5000000 5000000 571754.5 No 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools No 0
TPN-094794 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed CLA 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses All projects for Spokane County are managed through an online repository portal called the Spokane County ARP Application Portal under vendor contract by Clifton Larson Allen (CLA), LLP. Performance management for subrecipients is incorporated and managed through this repository. This includes ongoing updates for compliance and reporting elements as revisions are published by the US Treasury on SLFRF Final Rule determinations. Overarching goals for Spokane County use of funds are shared as measured with the results on the Spokane County ARP Website. 219249.59 219249.59 219249.59
TPN-106640 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Orchard Irrigation District No.6 5-Infrastructure 5.18-Water and Sewer: Other This project replace several blocks of 4" cast iron lead-joint water main with lead goosenecks with new 8" PVC C-900 water main and move the resident's services on to these new mains in order to abandon the lead-joint pipe. The work includes the replacement of 5,600 lineal feet of 4" cast iron lead-joint pipe with 8" PVC C-900 pipe, the replacement of 34 valves, 12 fire hydrants, 110 service connections & meter assemblies, and 10,000 lineal feet of service pipe, along with gravel and pavement repair. In addition to a potential long-term drinking water contaminant problem, the lead joints leak. The District estimates that approximately 90% of the joints are leaking and their system currently has about 25% leakage. This effort will eliminate all goosenecks and nearly all lead-joint pipe in the District. 950800 950800 32159.16
TPN-106638 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Clear Lake Water Association 5-Infrastructure 5.18-Water and Sewer: Other This project will upgrade their water system. The water system problems are widespread and include two streets of un-bedded existing pipe that continuously leaks, an undersized transmission main from their well station, and an undersized and corroded water reservoir that in 2009 was inspected and while hammering off some of the interior corrosion, the hammer went completely through the wall of the tank. The Association's new Administration is pursuing funding to remedy the various problems, water system has aged to a critical condition and the "No Action" Alternative will result in an ultimate failure in the very near future. Since the Association's new administration has taken over, immense and urgent work has been completed in applying for USDNRD funds in order to remedy the many problems. 480900 480900 287998.51
TPN-106636 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Irvin Water District No. 6 5-Infrastructure 5.18-Water and Sewer: Other This project will assist in relocating 1 O" and 16" water mains due to WSDOT & the City of Spokane Valley's Pines Rd. BNSF Grade Separation Project. No consideration was given in seeking funds for utility relocation when WSDOT/COSV was seeking funds to initiate the grade separation project and now the District is forced to relocate these mains with District funds that have been accumulated over many years to pay for other 'planned' projects. The work includes the replacement of 1,300 lineal feet of 16" C-905 or D.I. pipe, 1,800 l.f. of 10" C-900 or D.I. pipe, 13 valves, 6 fire hydrants, 14 relocated meter services, 280 l.f. of service pipe, 590 ton of CSTC, 440 ton of HMA repair, along with other repairs and construction items. Design is 50% complete and is slated for 2023 construction prior to the grade separation project. 50% drawings are uploaded with this application. Environmental & Cultural is tied to the WSDOT/COSV APE and is approved under their APE. 516400 516400 322490.85
TPN-106634 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% City of Fairfield 5-Infrastructure 5.18-Water and Sewer: Other This sewer project will replace approximately 461 feet of sewer collection pipe and rehabilitate 372 feet of sewer main that in in poor condition and prone to blockages. 385091.24 385091.24 218726.88
TPN-106633 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Consolidate Irrigation District No.19 (CID) 5-Infrastructure 5.14-Drinking water: Storage Legacy Ridge 2MG Reservoir project is to construct a 2MG concrete drinking water storage tank. The storage project addresses hydraulic issues in the Corbin pressure zone and also bolsters reliability and redundancy for all of the customers in the south system. Reliability has become more critical than ever for the growing number of people that began working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, CID serves a large number of commercial businesses, schools, and senior living facilities that need reliable water service in order to perform their core vital functions for the community. The site for the new storage tank is located in the City of Liberty Lake, WA; however, ClD's water system mostly serves City of Spokane Valley and unincorporated Spokane County. This project is poised for rapid implementation because CID has performed much preliminary groundwork relating to the site and connecting utilities. CID has constructed the transmission main and overflow main that will connect to the new storage tank. The site has been rough graded to approximate elevations and excess rock on the site has been removed. The funding requested herein is the last piece of the puzzle that needs to fall into place for this project to move forward. CID has all other needed project funds in hand. Spokane County's assistance in funding this project will reduce the impact of rate increases for a population struggling financially from the COVID-19 pandemic. 500000 500000 500000
TPN-106627 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Clear Lake Water Association 5-Infrastructure 5.14-Drinking water: Storage lear Lake Water Users Association is seeking funds to upgrade their extremely undersized and dilapidated water storage reservoir along with other water system problems. The main component of the project is a 30' diameter x 30' high concrete, ground level reservoir. The water system problems are widespread and include two streets of un-bedded existing pipe that continuously leaks, an undersized transmission main from their well station, and an undersized and corroded water reservoir that in 2009 was inspected and while hammering off some of the interior corrosion, the hammer went completely through the wall of the tank. The Association's new Administration is pursuing funding to remedy the various problems, water system has aged to a critical condition and the "No Action" Alternative will result in an ultimate failure in the very near future. Since the Association's new administration has taken over, immense, and urgent work has been completed in applying for USDNRD funds in order to remedy the many problems. Only partial PER & NEPA could be uploaded below, full can be sent upon request. The current 60,000-gal. reservoir is undersized by 100,000-gal., the new reservoir would be 160,000-gal. along with a new booster station and main replacements. 480900 480900 394630.21
TPN-106626 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Town of Latah 5-Infrastructure 5.14-Drinking water: Storage Latah Water Reservoir Lining and Repair project includes the relining of the 250,000-gallon water reservoir. It is proposed to use the AmTech DuraChem 580 or equivalent tank liner system, which will apply a polyurea product to the interior of the steel tank walls and base, creating a monolithic wall and floor on the inside of the tank. While the reservoir liner is installed and cures, a series of pressure tanks will be constructed for temporary provisions to provide water at proper service pressure to the system, being fed by the primary well source. 474289 474289 69000.54
TPN-106622 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Cancelled Spokane County Indirect Costs 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Entered in error. 0 0 0
TPN-106620 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Comcast 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects This project is for make ready work to extent the cable facilities to 612 residents and business under their current Cable Service Franchise with Spokane County and applicable law. All project passing will be offered Comcast's full sure of project and services, including a network capable of delivering broad band speed of 1.2Gbps/35Mbps, video, voice, and home security service. 2500000 2500000 0
TPN-106460 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Golf (Irrigation Updates) 5-Infrastructure 5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation This project will replace and modernize the irrigation system at Holmberg, Camelot, Northwoods, and Pine River community parks in North Spokane. All sites are served by Whitworth Water District water, with irrigation systems that date back to the early 1990s. This project will include new pipes, sprinkler heads, clocks, and modern features that will provide an adaptive / responsive watering approach - adjusting to weather conditions to reduce the amount of water used at all four sites. Anticipated significant reduction in water use at these sites upon implementation. 70322.89 70322.89 53258.59
TPN-106458 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Spokane County Environmental Services (Newman Lake) 5-Infrastructure 5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation The Newman Lake Flood Control Zone District manages the water quality at Newman Lake using oxygenation and alum injection systems. Newman Lake has a history of excess phosphorus and is listed on the Washington State Department of Ecology's 303(d) list. The systems have shown decreased effectiveness in recent years, with the alum system currently inoperable. Jacobs Engineering evaluated the system’s current condition and operational efficiency and recommended extensive improvements. 2000000 2000000 216795.52
TPN-106457 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Spokane County Risk Mangement 1-Public Health 1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities) Spokane County is Self-Insured for Workers Compensation injury & illness claims. Washington State Labor & Industries (LNI) mandated presumptive illness coverage for COVID-19 illness claims for selected workers in Law Enforcement, Corrections and Health Care. Compensation includes medical treatment payments and Time Loss Compensation for required missed work due to quarantine and isolation timeframes mandated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). COVID-19 related payments were unbudgeted and placed a financial burden on program funding. Spokane County absorbed all costs for COVID-19 response in prior years and will apply this funding for current year expenses from COVID-19 Claim expenses. 117060.84 117060.84 117060.84 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-106462 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed East Spokane Water District 5-Infrastructure 5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation The work includes the installation of 685' of 8" PVC C-900 pipe, 630' of 6" PVC C-900 pipe, 9 valves, 2 fire hydrants, 7 service connections, meter assemblies, existing connections and misc. repairs. The existing steel pipe was installed in the 1950's with no bedding and the pipe has required repairs on numerous occasions. The District currently loses 33,000 gallons to leakage each year and their water conservation efforts include replacement of leaking mains. The extension of main on 12th Ave. completes a current dead-end fire hydrant loop outlined as a deficiency in the District's design criteria and general specifications. Outcome measures include measured reduction compared to current year as baseline of loss water each year due to leakage for an anticipated water loss reduction of at least 33,000 per year from current state. 113000 113000 113000
TPN-106456 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Spokane County Medical Examiner 1-Public Health 1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities) The project will be a combination of efforts for the Spokane County Medical Examiner’s Office to solve Cold Cases through contracted state-of-the-art methodologies to help local, state and federal law enforcement identify both victims and perpetrators from the most intractable forensic evidence and crime scenes. The process will help the Spokane Medical Examiner's Office to clear their current backlog of unidentified persons. Violent crime is up nation-wide and COVID-19 has resulted in delays to clearing these cases adding to an already growing backlog of cold cases. Spokane County has over 100 cold cases where the traditional Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) DNA method has failed to provide an investigative lead resulting in a DNA dead end. The Spokane's Medical Examiner's Office inventoried 36 unidentified human remains where there is no funding to pursue Forensic Grade Genome Sequencing testing. Many of these unidentified persons are homicide victims and some victims of unsolved sexually motivated homicides. The quick and accurate identification of these victims would allow justice to be pursued and provide closure for each victim's family. The other aspect of the project award will be on-site access to Point of Care Toxicology Testing at the Medical Examiner's Office. The COVID-10 pandemic associated with an unprecedented increase in overdose deaths in Spokane County. These deaths are preventable; however, development of effective prevention strategies relies on accurate, timely information about fatal overdose events. A major challenge to identifying trends in overdose deaths in Washington state is the prolonged turnaround time for toxicology testing at the state forensic laboratory; test results may take up to 10 months to be released by this laboratory. Outcome measures include the reduction of over 100 unsolved cold cases where traditional CODIS DNA method has failed to provide an investigative lead resulting in a DNA dead end. An additional output measure will be to reduce the amount (from 36) of unidentified human remains using Forensic Grade Genome Sequencing testing. Output Measures for the Point of Care Toxicology Testing will be the ability to test for overdose deaths at autopsy in-house rather than waiting several months for results from the state laboratory. Additional measures will be the number of solved cold cases per year and amount of unidentified human remains that can be identified using Forensic Grade Genome Sequencing testing. Outcome Measures for the Point of Care Toxicology Testing will be a reduction in response and backlog of test results. Comparisons will be made between the current state as a baseline to real-time testing capacity for rapid reporting of these deaths to public health officials to better equip them to respond to the opioid crisis, while providing more timely information to families, law enforcement, and other stakeholders. 200357 200357 192085.97 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-106455 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed SVFD Additional BLS Units 1-Public Health 1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities) SVFD added personnel to staff two additional Basic Life Support (BLS) units in response to the increase in 911 calls for emergency response as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and an additional four FTE’s to meet EMS demand increases in Calls for Services (CFS) in 2021. SVFD was able to mitigate this need temporarily with staff vehicles for the increased personnel, but they were too small to carry all the life-saving equipment required by the state. This was not funded, nor was the call volume increase projected to be as high as was predicted requiring additional personnel. This project will fund dedicated emergency response vehicles (not staff cars) to accomplish the mission. Larger carrying capacity vehicles to transport all of the necessary medical equipment to provide care to COVID patients and to separate the medical equipment from the cab where the crew sits. Outcome measures include ability for vehicles to accommodate state and nationally required equipment for a BLS unit as well as provide the adequate safety measures for the EMS crew assigned for emergency response to 911 CFS. Measures improvements in BLS unit response arising out of the ability of SVFD staff to increase level of treatment given to individuals on-scene (without waiting for another response unit) due to greater capacity of onboard BLS medical equipment carried on larger vehicles. 145000 145000 145000 Yes Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment 145000 1 Imp General Public
TPN-107134 RCP-035932 Spokane County, Washington Washington Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Cancelled Ptera 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Broadband Expansion to City of Medical Lake for unserved and underserved populations. 0 0 0
TPN-146023 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Business Support Organizations - Capacity Building Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) The goal of the Growing Capacity for Local Nonprofit Business Support Organizations Grant program is to increase Organization’s internal infrastructure and service delivery efficiency to combat the negative economic impact due to COVID-19. This project provided capacity building grants for local nonprofit business support organizations funding internal planning needs, feasibility studies, program development and/or professional development opportunities for staff, and technology infrastructure to increase the number of small businesses and entrepreneurs served in Washington County, based on community desired outcomes. 37327.42 37327.42 37327.42 No 11 Imp Classes of NPs designated as negatively economically impacted
TPN-180040 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Countywide Broadband Investment Strategy Implementation 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery In 2022, the County pursued a Broadband Investment Strategy to gather information needed for potential decision making on future broadband investments. The Strategy focuses on addressing barriers of access and affordability. The Strategy was completed in early 2023. It presents a framework of goals and a menu of potential actions for the County and partners to pursue. Within the 2023-2026 Workplan, the County’s Broadband Strategy project will focus on near-term implementation. Tasks include programming to address the digital divide and pursuit of external funding to develop broadband infrastructure. The overall goal of this work is to accelerate the deployment of broadband infrastructure and improve access and affordability. 650000 595096.19 160505.37 No
TPN-180009 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Countywide Workforce Development 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) This program aims to provide Washington County residents with robust support to acquire better work opportunities through education, trainings, and connecting individuals to employers. In partnership with community organizations and institutions, this work is focused on assisting workers with reaching stable, better paying work, with a particular focus on ensuring equitable access to career opportunities across the County. 2323882.71 1990678.13 1241599.45 No 1 Imp General Public No 2458536.56
TPN-180015 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% SB-Technical Assistance and Business Planning 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning This project is providing small businesses and entrepreneurs access to resources and development to improve long-term economic resilience for populations disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic including Black, Indigenous, Latino/a/x, immigrant, and refugee business owners. A key focus of this program is building capacity within community-based organizations to expand services provided to small businesses. This includes technical assistance, access to capital, and professional development opportunities for service providers throughout the County's geography, notably in unincorporated areas not served by city programs 1147685.18 995602.16 524226.18 No 1 Imp General Public No 1147685.18
TPN-180004 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Justice Service Building (JSB) HVAC and Controls Replacement 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) Redesign and replace obsolete HVAC system and digital controls to provide uninterrupted heating and cooling to critical county functions within the building which include: State Courts, District Attorney, Community Corrections and State Offices (staff and Customers). Project will result in modern, efficient and reliable mechanical systems as measured by lowered utility costs, improved control over both indoor (airborne pathogens) and outdoor (smoke and heat) air quality threats to building users and reduced risk of business interruptions due to mechanical failures. Project will improve year-round health and safety of justice involved individuals, county staff and visitors by reducing transmission of airborne diseases. 4977035 293367.11 125090.81 Yes Installation and improvement of ventilation systems 5000000 1 Imp General Public No 5000000
TPN-180003 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Community Correction Center (CCC) HVAC and Controls Replacement 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) Redesign and replace antiquated HVAC equipment and obsolete controls system that prohibit efficient and effective cooling and heating serving residential corrections program. The system uses refrigerants that are no longer available and have been banned by EPA and is no longer reliable. Frequent system failures place staff at risk during high heat events. Project will result in modern, efficient, and reliable mechanical systems as measured by reduced utility costs, improved control over both indoor (airborne pathogens) and outdoor (smoke and heat) air quality threats to residents and staff and ability to mitigate impacts of increasingly frequent high temperature events 1692507.08 158465 48282.9 Yes Installation and improvement of ventilation systems 2850000 1 Imp General Public No 2850000
TPN-180000 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Harkins House HVAC Upgrade 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) Redesign and replace 22-year-old HVAC system that has exceeded expected useful life of 15-20 years, experiencing escalating rates of failure and currently operating at 50% capacity. Original design was undersized for current demands and uses banned refrigerants. Project will result in modern, efficient, and reliable mechanical systems as measured by improved control over both indoor (airborne pathogens) and outdoor (smoke and heat) air quality threats to building users, capacity to serve as shelter in place, reduced utility costs and reduced risk of business interruptions due to mechanical failures. Project will improve year-round health and safety of juvenile residents, visitors and county staff by reducing transmission of airborne diseases. 1005085.47 1005085.47 881495.22 Yes Installation and improvement of ventilation systems 1100000 1 Imp General Public No 1100000
TPN-180018 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% SB-Capacity Building Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning In the current transition from community-wide recovery to a focus on resiliency, Washington County seeks partnerships with nonprofit business support organizations to achieve long-term resiliency in the organization’s programming. Capacity building grants include providing business support organizations with flexible funding to support their organizations in achieving their goals including investment in technology infrastructure, program design and development, professional development for staff, data analysis and feasibility or action planning. 362172.58 332048.6 97317.93 No 1 Imp General Public No 362172.58
TPN-179999 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Law Enforcement Center (LEC) HVAC Infrastructure Replacement 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) Replace obsolete and unreliable HVAC equipment, distribution systems, and HVAC system controls serving the Law Enforcement Center. Existing equipment has exceeded expected useful life, is considered obsolete and uses EPA banned refrigerants and distribution system serving the Jail and LEC. Project will result in modern, efficient, and reliable mechanical systems as measured by improved control over air quality threats, ability to support shelter in lace options for building users, and full redundancy to HVAC system. Project will improve year-round health and safety of adults in custody, visitors and county staff by reducing transmission of airborne diseases. 26075372.45 17802591.86 2250421.21 No Yes No Yes Installation and improvement of ventilation systems 24500000 1 Imp General Public No 24500000
TPN-179996 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Grants Capacity and Management 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Grants Capacity and Management Description pending 411769 0 0
TPN-179994 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Enterprise Resource Planning - Modernization 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Washington County’s ERP hub (WISARD) is 20+ years old. Over the last two decades the County has implemented add-on tools to be able to perform their daily duties. This has caused the ERP landscape to evolve into a conglomeration of disparate systems. The ERP Modernization project is a multi-year project to modernize the technology and methods we use to conduct core business functions, all with a One Washington County approach to integrate system improvements across the full organization. This is a management/business systems transformation that is enterprise wide. 11109941.26 11109941.26 4506860.57
TPN-179992 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% ARPA Communications 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Graphic design, narrative development, and data visualization development for quarterly and annual reporting English and Spanish communications such as fact sheets, social media posts, newsletters, videos, and reports detailing ARPA program progress and outcomes 1692045.24 1692045.24 436415.15
TPN-179990 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% ARPA Program Administration 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses This investment area includes the administration of ARPA programs and portfolio-wide coordination activities essential to planning, developing, implementing and reporting on ARPA programs. 6100000 4268743.41 1718840.68
TPN-179987 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% County Strategic Plan 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery The purpose of the Washington County strategic plan is to define long-term goals and desired community outcomes in service to the population of Washington County. It will be used to guide the work of Washington County government service delivery for the next five years and implement long-term community goals and outcomes. 350000 189129.72 97717.22 No
TPN-179986 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Service Level Assessment 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery This project is a precursor to developing the strategic plan for the future of County’s operations. An external consultant will be selected through open RFP process, they will carry out a comprehensive review of current baseline landscape of county service delivery. 300000 298800 183375 No
TPN-179963 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Behavioral Health Workforce Development 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) The Behavioral Health Division used Tranche I APRA funds to provide trainings to support the behavioral health workforce and allocate funds to contracted behavioral health providers to support their current workforce and mitigate impacts of lost revenue due to COVID-19. Our Tranche II program will collaborate with the Economic Development Department and Public Health Division to support ongoing workforce development. The Behavioral Health workforce project will focus on supporting our community-based organizations who support peers and culturally specific services to engage and support a larger number of community members in critical behavioral health supports. The project will also focus on identifying specific trainings to support providing increased behavioral health supports in the places where the community has identified them being needed the most, including our schools. 879979.64 264158.57 188287.42 No 1 Imp General Public No 886212.28
TPN-179962 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Early Learning and Care Provider Workforce Development and Supports 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) Increase community-wide child care availability, enrollment and revenue through professional-level training and management software for early childhood education providers. This will support economic growth, business resilience, and access to culturally responsive and linguistically appropriate services. 625000 0 0 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 625000
TPN-179961 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% PH Administration 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Ensure Washington County the Local Public Health Authority (LPHA) has operational supports for compliance with tasks, timelines, contracts, grants and County policies related to statutory responsibilities (OAR 333-014-0550) and accepting reports of reportable disease, disease outbreak or epidemics and investigating reportable diseases, disease outbreaks, or epidemics under ORS 433.004 and 433.006. 3745787.11 3231486.97 932260.75
TPN-179959 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% COVID Vaccine Access 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination Washington County the Local Public Health Authority (LP HA) has statutory responsibility (OAR 333-014-0550) for making immunizations available (ORS 433.269) and to provide for the assessment of public access to immunizations, testing, and cost-effective preventative care (ORS 431.145) to ensure culturally responsive and linguistically appropriate services including addressing health inequities (ORS 431.137), and to prevent severe disease, hospitalization and death (e.g., COVID-19 vaccination and boosters). 250000 250000 124286.87 No 1 Imp General Public 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate
TPN-179958 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Case and Outbreak Response 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other Washington County the Local Public Health Authority (LPHA) has statutory responsibility (OAR 333-014-0550) for accepting reports of reportable disease, disease outbreak or epidemics and investigating reportable diseases, disease outbreaks, or epidemics under ORS 433.004 and 433.006. Reportable diseases, including Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), have requirements detailed by the Oregon Health Authority in documents called “Oregon Disease Investigative Guidelines.” During a disease outbreak the LPHA should provide accurate, timely, understandable and culturally and linguistically appropriate information, recommendations and instructions to the public in communications (ORS 431.131). The intended outcomes are to prevent disease spread, mitigate outbreaks, protect those most at risk, and reduce the number of hospitalizations and deaths in Washington County. 6041879 4500085.81 1600071.07 No
TPN-184501 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Vaccination Outreach 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other Washington County the Local Public Health Authority (LPHA) has statutory responsibility (OAR 333-014-0550) for making immunizations available (ORS 433.269) and to provide for the assessment of public access to immunizations, testing, and cost-effective preventative care (ORS 431.145) to ensure culturally responsive and linguistically appropriate services including addressing health inequities (ORS 431.137), and to prevent severe disease, hospitalization and death (e.g., COVID-19 vaccination and boosters). The intended outcomes are to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates and reduce preventable hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19 in Washington County. 312876.43 312876.43 312876.43 No
TPN-218528 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Bolstering State-County Shared Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Government Relations Manager. Funding for this position will primarily come from the ARPA Revenue Replacement program, which has been approved by the ARPA director Rachael Fuller in the CAO's office. There are also CAO funding savings from the recent reclassification of one position that led to a budget savings of $50,000. 600082.42 600082.42 97666.16
TPN-090939 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Health and Human Services Cross Projects Admin Support 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses This encompasses the general administrative support required for administering and operating the Washington County Health and Human Services (HHS) ARPA projects. 1760854.21 1760854.21 1760854.21
TPN-110692 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Overdose Prevention 1-Public Health 1.13-Substance Use Services To provide naloxone kits to prevent death due to overdose for impacted and disproportionately impacted individuals. 45933.39 45933.39 45933.39 No 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs 1 Imp General Public 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic No 92000
TPN-029529 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Child Care Provider and Family Support 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care Families who rely on childcare services as well as childcare providers have been deeply impacted by the pandemic. Pandemic recovery must include intertwined considerations for household access to childcare as well as childcare provider capacity. This proposed investment area includes an assessment of current childcare service capacity that will inform how Washington County will develop childcare support efforts in future strategic recovery planning. To address disparities in pandemic impacts and advance equitable access to service, this investment area will also develop ten focused childcare networks spanning Spanish, Somali, Arabic, Vietnamese, and other language networks. 2436269.43 2436269.43 1943684.5 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs No 167244.29
TPN-029528 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Migrant and Seasonal farmworker community support 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other This project supports migratory and seasonal agricultural workers and farmworkers. Part I of grant funds are disbursed through a community partner, Centro Cultural de Washington County, implemented through contracts with community-based organizations. Centro Cultural has both expertise and built distribution infrastructure to administer food, basic needs, and climate health related supports to the prioritized communities who are disproportionately affected by the pandemic, economic stressors, racism, and systemic underinvestment. In Part II of this project, slated for spring of 2023, Washington County will host a formal community grants application process that will welcome numerous partner applications and expand the scope of impact. 131134.74 131134.74 131134.74 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate No 53806.02
TPN-029527 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Community Resilience and Recovery 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators The Community Resilience and Recovery project addresses social determinants of health and equity for Black, Indigenous, or other People of Color (BIPOC) communities by utilizing culturally and linguistically responsive interventions implemented by CBOs. The program includes contracts with 19 culturally specific CBOs. The main activities include: 1) utilizing community health workers to provide culturally and linguistically responsive support and resource navigation; and 2) addressing the health and social needs of community members, such as food insecurity and social isolation. 1698928.54 1698928.54 1698928.54 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts No 1287349.5
TPN-029526 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Public Health COVID-19 Communications 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) This program leads efforts to reach and inform those most impacted by the pandemic. At the start of the pandemic, our Latinx population was the most disproportionately impacted with about 50% of cases occurring among this population even though people who identify as Latinx make up only 15-17% of the total county population. Latinx community members also had significantly lower rates of vaccination than other ethnic/racial groups, so our efforts are focused on creating materials to reach the Latinx/Spanish-speaking population as well as the English-speaking population. We also focused efforts on reaching populations that were more likely to get COVID because they were essential workers who didn't have the privilege of working from home. 172774.48 172774.48 172465.18 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-029525 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more COVID-19 Outbreak Response 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) Identifying and responding to COVID-19 outbreaks, with a focus on high-risk, congregate settings. The team supports infection prevention, COVID-19 education/disease mitigation guidance, staffing crisis consultations and resource/supply distribution. The program completes tracking and monitoring of COVID-19 cases to mitigate outbreaks while meeting state requirements for outbreak reporting. This quarter, special projects focused on outbreak support and education to Spanish speaking family daycare facilities. Resources such as test kits, vaccine and PPE were offered to the employer and their family members. Information was collected as to what support they need from public health to respond to an outbreak in their facility. 6461759.01 6461759.01 6461759.01 No 1 Imp General Public 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools No 3992334.8
TPN-029524 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Other Public Health Services 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services As a result of COVID-19, many adjacent and essential public health services have been impacted. Work in this area is intended to fill programmatic gaps in services. Areas include data analysis, assessment and evaluation, communications, fostering community partnerships, coordinating with partners, creating and implementing policies and ensuring access through coordination with health care system partners and limited direct services to address gaps in access. Even amid the pandemic, Washington County has worked diligently to guarantee continued government operations without gaps in services. 352435.16 352435.16 352435.16 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-029523 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more COVID-19 Case Investigation 1-Public Health 1.3-COVID-19 Contact Tracing For this quarterly period, Case Investigation Staff processed positive SARS-CoV-2 electronic lab reports, provider reports, and rapid home tests reported by facilities and created COVID cases within one business day of lab receipt in state OPERA database. They also performed the following: identified cases that link to high-risk facilities and expedited them to the outbreak team for investigation; quality assurance work; medical record entry for deaths and hospitalizations; data entry for contacts to known cases linked to outbreaks; and staffed a clinical nurse phone line to provide consultation to employers and individuals on outbreak/prevention guidance and isolation/quarantine education and support. 4334304.33 4334304.33 4334304.33 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-029522 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed COVID-19 Testing 1-Public Health 1.2-COVID-19 Testing This program works to provide testing supplies to our community through targeted outreach. Our objective was a model that prioritizes limited testing resources for populations disproportionately affected by COVID-19 that have not historically had access to testing. This effort was supported utilizing metrics pioneered in the vaccine roll-out. This quarter, Washington County distributed 4,896 COVID-19 testing kits to community based organizations, homeless service sites, and facilities, These tests are then distributed directly to community members . 116320.66 116320.66 116320.66 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-029521 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more COVID-19 Vaccination 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination This project provides and promotes access to COVID-19 vaccinations with a focus on individuals who are medically underserved in the community. The team coordinates efforts with community-based organizations, FQHCs and non-governmental agencies to promote and operationalize vaccine equity goals to achieve a vaccine rate of 80% or greater of the primary series in our target populations. The program supports multiple CBOs in their vaccine outreach by linking vaccinators with CBO events. Funding of both clinical and non-clinical staffing support to local FQHC has allowed capacity building of the COVID Center to improve access to COVID vaccine, testing and treatment to all residents regardless of their immigration or insurance status. 2653946.43 2653946.43 2653946.43 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-029520 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Isolation and Quarantine Support 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) The Isolation and Quarantine Support (Wraparound Services) program connects people who are in isolation due to COVID-19 with a Community Health Worker (CHW) from a culturally specific Community-Based Organization (CBO). The CHW supports the person or family who is isolating due to a positive COVID-19 test by arranging food delivery, accessing funds to pay rent or mortgage and utilities. The CHW also supports the person or family by helping navigate other resources that support health and mental well-being. The funding for wraparound services has been vital to support people being able to stay home during their infectious period which prevents the spread of COVID-19 in our community. 7980638.48 7980638.48 7980638.48 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-029557 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Household Water Utility Relief 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid Provide Water utility relief for disproportionately impacted communities through partnership with local utility providers. 1484386.39 1484386.39 1484386.39 0 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts No 2000000
TPN-029556 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Culturally Specific Nutrition 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs This project has been created and implemented in collaboration with a community partner organization, Community Action Organization, to develop equity-centered practices for distributing funding resources to community organizations addressing food insecurity across Washington County. This project is focused on providing culturally specific nutrition support and food to people of color, immigrant and refugee populations, older adults, and other communities disproportionately affected by the pandemic, and to combating systems and structures that perpetuate racial oppression to create health disparities. 1867852.67 1867852.67 1867852.67 0 Yes Food banks and other facilities 300000 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity No 707077.26
TPN-029555 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed General Nutrition and Hygiene Support 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs This project includes Nutrition Services, Congregate Meals, and Site Management for eligible individuals and Home-Delivered Meals to homebound older adults in Washington County as well as access to food/essential needs through gift cards or food boxes for adults under 60 and living with a disability. In 2nd quarter of 2023 Number of total meals served was 29,008. This number includes multi-person and multi-meal households, home delivered and congregate. 882996.96 882996.96 882996.96 0 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity No 257867.19
TPN-029549 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Programmatic Administrative Support 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses This encompasses the general administrative support required for administering and operating ARPA as a program 2337724.1 2337724.1 2337724.1 No
TPN-029548 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Covid-19 Public Communications 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery The Public Health COVID-19 Communications program leads communications efforts to reach, educate, and inform those most impacted by the pandemic. In our county, the Latinx population was the most disproportionately impacted with about half of COVID cases occurring among this population even though people who identify as Latinx make up only 15 to 17% of the total population. Our communications efforts focused on creating materials to reach the Latinx and Spanish-speaking population along with our English speaking population. We also focused on populations that were more likely to get COVID because they lived in multi-generational housing, congregate living centers or because they were essential workers who didn't have the privilege of working from home during the pandemic. Because of ARPA funding we were able to hire a temporary bi-lingual/bi-cultural communicator to reach our Latinx/Spanish speaking population. We provided media interviews, created and updated COVID-19 pages in English and Spanish, created and updated COVID-19 web pages in English and Spanish, worked with community organizations to created shared vaccination education campaigns, created written materials in many languages, created comprehensive vaccination equity reports, and responded to community requests. These efforts have helped to reduce the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on our Latinx population, improved relationships with community-based organizations, and improved vaccine and testing access for community members who face language, economic, social, and other barriers. 388371.92 388371.92 388371.92 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-029547 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Telework and ITS costs due to COVID-19 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses This project captures the internal County costs of increased telework demands and ITS upgrades to allow for telework to mitigate the spread of Covid-19 217782.31 217782.31 217782.31 No
TPN-029546 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Facilities COVID-19 Response Costs 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs "This project is specific to the ongoing internal County costs for enforcing and implementing covid-19 mitigation measures including social distancing, PPE, barriers, and cleaning" 247894.07 247894.07 247894.07 Yes Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations 78189
TPN-029545 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Advancing Data Equity 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery This investment area includes performing a systems analysis of tools and strategies used across departments and preparing for a potential comprehensive approach to data equity for ARPA program implementation and evaluation. 300000 300000 0 No
TPN-029544 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Building Community Capacity 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) "This investment area includes structuring cross-jurisdictional community engagement coordination that centers equity, builds community capacity, advances equitable community engagement policies, and helps create a pathway for long-standing equity-centered community engagement structures and processes across Washington County. Proposed investments include building community partner capacity, leading community engagement strategies, including coaching, outreach materials, participant stipends, and related support." 355269.09 355269.09 353987.56 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-029543 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Cancelled Accessible Communications 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery "This investment area includes using tools, platforms, and strategies that are more accessible to historically and presently marginalized populations disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. This includes advanced social media and video streaming content with culturally specific strategies for pandemic recovery communications." 0 0 0 No
TPN-029542 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Broadband Infrastructure study 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery "Strategic planning is needed to prepare for anticipated and more substantial ARPA investments in the future. This initiative seeks to develop a countywide Broadband Investment Strategy. The purpose of the strategy is to develop a shared vision and collaborative plan for future investments in broadband infrastructure to ensure fast, reliable, and affordable internet access to all residents and businesses within the county." 190000 190000 190000 No
TPN-029541 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Workforce Development 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) This program aims to provide Washington County residents with robust support to acquire better work opportunities through education, trainings, and connecting individuals to employers. In partnership with community organizations and institutions, County is focusing on assisting workers with reaching stable, better paying work, with a particular focus on ensuring equitable access to career opportunities across the County. 715348.47 715348.47 715348.47 No 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations No 80263.56
TPN-029540 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Small Business Support 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning Our work is focused on the formation of the Small Business Support Network, as we are intentionally centering community in the design of programs and investments, with the goal of strengthening the ecosystem to close gaps in service for the most adversely impacted businesses through the pandemic. Through our Equitable Development Contracts, participating partner organizations serve specific demographics, such as the Latino/a community (Centro Cultural, Small Business Legal Clinic, Adelante Mujeres’) and communities of color (MESO, PBDG), and programs provide culturally specific service to historically marginalized communities. We also are engaging with partner organizations with a diversity of service specialties and/or target sectors. 980595.91 980595.91 980595.91 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact 24 Dis Imp Other SBs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify No 620828.4
TPN-029539 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Homeless Encampment 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons Participants residing in encampments need targeted support to limit the exposure and spread of COVID-19 and other public health hazards among the unsheltered population. Further, case law and legislation has constrained how communities respond to homeless encampments on public land. Targeted support of participants residing in encampments includes regular trash collection, personal property management, sanitation services, outreach coordination, and when necessary, full encampment cleanups. The Encampment Management Program (EMP) utilizes staff from the Washington County Department of Health and Human Services, Washington County Housing Services, and Washington County Sheriff’s Office to ensure a coordinated response to encampments. The EMP collects encampment reporting through a public portal on the Washington County website. The EMP launched in August 2021, serving encampments located in unincorporated Washington County. Washington County has encouraged city and special district partners to partner with the EMP to management encampments. 1746786.17 1746786.17 1746786.17 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic No 840865.26
TPN-029538 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Perinatal Health Equity 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators This project includes increased connection for community health nurse programs and perinatal care, resources and supports to address social determinants of health and health inequities among BIPOC families, families with limited income, and families with disabilities. This includes funding community health worker(s) with knowledge, experience, and training in BIPOC prenatal and early childhood support. The community health worker(s) will be embedded in birthing hospital and prenatal clinics. 173519.92 173519.92 108339.04 No 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 0
TPN-029537 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Healthy Births & Family Stability 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.12-Healthy Childhood Environments: Home Visiting The pandemic has underscored the need for in-home services for health, social/emotional wellness, and parenting supports. Pre-pandemic racial inequities have become more disparate as historically marginalized populations continue to experience the deepest pandemic impacts. This project increases capacity to address social determinants of health and disparities in health outcomes through increased service capacity for perinatal support and nurse home visiting programs. 574038.36 574038.36 484681.41 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate No 165869.34
TPN-029536 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Homeless Prevention due to Mental Health Issues 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services This project provides a range of housing support services necessary to assist older adults and persons with disabilities to improve their living conditions in the community. Individuals served by this project may be living in conditions that prevent the introduction of in-home services, and/or may be at-risk of being displaced from their current residence for a variety of reasons, and/or living in unsafe housing conditions. Intensive cleaning, also referred to as “muck-out,” is cleaning required to pass a landlord inspection or to remove an imminent health threat. Clients needing assistance may be evidencing hoarding behavior or squalor syndrome, which typically results in extreme clutter and/or unsanitary conditions. 23037.16 23037.16 23037.16 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate No 5541
TPN-029535 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Caregiver Support 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services This project is focused on increasing access to support and assistance for unpaid family caregivers who have been impacted due to the pandemic's ongoing isolation and increased needs to those who are high-risk individuals. Support to caregivers is provided through the following activities: respite, counseling, support groups, and caregiver access assistance. Respite care offers temporary substitute supports to a care recipient to provide a brief period of relief or rest for the family caregiver. Counseling sessions provide support related to the complex physical, behavioral and emotional problems related to their caregiver roles. Support groups offer a facilitated discussion of common experiences, building a mutual support system. 50920 50920 50920 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-029534 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Behavior Health Provider Investment 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries Investments in currently contracted outpatient behavioral health providers serving the most vulnerable and highest risk residents of Washington County to: Continue to maintain their physical infrastructure within Washington County through the COVID-19 pandemic so that they can continue to provide face to face services to the County’s most vulnerable residents who are facing significant substance use or mental health symptoms. Provide safety items and equipment to staff and clients to decrease the spread of COVID-19 during face-to-face treatment services. Provide equipment and supplies to support staff teleworking to decrease the spread of COVID-19 in congregate work settings. Hold a Behavioral Health Workforce Summit Conduct trainings 144518.03 144518.03 144518.03 No 10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-029533 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Behavioral Health Treatment 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services Wellness Grants: Grants offered to community-based organizations to provide opportunities for recreation, peer groups, etc. for residents of Washington County to increase resilience and natural supports to prevent an increase in mental health symptoms that would require treatment. COVID Behavioral Health Supports: This project provides direct Behavioral Health Supports to Highly Impacted Communities. Information and Assistance and Reassurance: This project provides funding to other community organizations, for telephone reassurance calls with older adults in the Latino/a/x and Asian communities to provide them with socialization, information and assistance, emotional support and assistance with technology. 711359.7 711359.7 711359.7 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs No 230666.29
TPN-029532 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Investments in Youth Resilience within Schools 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services This project consists of culturally responsive social emotional learning curriculum, emotional calming/wellness supplies, and professional development to explicitly support students’ diverse backgrounds, identities, strengths, and challenges as a strategy to address the emotional and behavioral health challenges caused or exacerbated by COVID-19. 268183.72 268183.72 268183.72 No 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools 19 Dis Imp For services to address educational disparities Title I eligible No 25167.55
TPN-029531 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Suicide Prevention 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services The Suicide Prevention project has a number of activities under its umbrella, which collectively seek to broaden Suicide Prevention Program impacts to all communities in Washington County. By pursuing these projects, the Suicide Prevention Program will be able to respond better to community needs, develop a more strategic approach to training and engagement, and tailor information and services to languages other than English and cultures other than the dominant culture. This broader impact includes delivery of materials like lethal means safety devices, train-the-trainer trainings for various suicide prevention curricula, and professional media resources that may be prohibitively expensive at scale by nongovernmental organizations. 143253.21 143253.21 143253.21 No 1 Imp General Public 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic No 58973.02
TPN-029530 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Child Care Workforce Development 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) This work will encompass multiple steps: Developing pathways from within existing training institutions, developing and scaling professional development opportunities for communities with the least access, developing and implementing paid stipend and/or scholarship programs. Project will be inclusive of providers throughout the community and likely will include support from municipality economic development offices. 2880.03 2880.03 2880.03 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic 16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs No 1740.34
TPN-106721 RCP-036079 Washington County, Oregon Oregon Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Addressing Court-Case Backlog due to COVID-19 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers County will take steps to reduce the court-case backlog by hiring 3 additional District Attorney Office staff to increase speed of case resolution. 1264022.25 1264022.25 474244.68 * No
TPN-184330 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed State Fair of Louisiana 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality Unfortunately, due to the COVID pandemic beginning in early 2020, the State Fair of Louisiana suffered a huge negative impact to our finances due to the mandates that prevented events from occurring including our year‐round facility rentals, event space rentals and most notably, the 2020 State Fair which is the largest fundraiser for our non‐profit organization. As reflected in our 2020 and 2019 audited financial statements, the State Fair of Louisiana had a loss of revenue of $2,951,379 in 2020 as compared to 2019 which was a normal revenue year. Our total revenue and other income in 2020 was $705,021 and in 2019 it was $3,526,693 for a difference of $2,821,672. Our net income was a negative ($792,667) in 2020 and was positive $11,699 in 2019. The State Fair of Louisiana had to cut expenses during the year even with the help of Payroll Protection Program loans which helped pay a portion of the payroll. There were possible projects that also had to be suspended due to the lack of funds. 300000 300000 No 12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors 12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-184320 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Rutherford House 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) Rutherford House is a non‐profit organization with a residential program that provides adjudicated youth, who have been placed by the Louisiana Office of Juvenile Justice, with educational, vocational, independent living skills and counseling services. Rutherford House is located at 1707 Line Avenue, Shreveport, Louisiana and has been serving troubled and disadvantaged youth since 1974. The purpose of the requested American Rescue funds is to assist in increasing employees' salaries who are direct care staff and maintenance personnel. By increasing staff salaries the goal is to maintain experienced personnel who are currently employed, and secondly, to have a competitive salary that sustains the successful operation of Rutherford House. Another long‐term goal of increasing salaries will assist the agency in achieving a higher per diem rate when Rutherford House renegotiates its contract with the Office of Juvenile Justice. The projected outcome of these funds will place the agency in a better position to rehire staff that were lost as a result of the COVID‐19 pandemic, and again, to emphasize the critical need to maintain quality experienced staff. Finally, with American Rescue funds, Rutherford House will continue to provide the rehabilitative services to adjudicated youth with the ultimate goal to correct the youths' behavior and provide them with the academic and vocational skills need to become successful adults. 100000 100000 No 1 Imp General Public 1 Imp General Public
TPN-215270 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed less than 50% Caddo Water and Sewer Projects 5-Infrastructure 5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment Various water projects in Caddo Parish. 3213448 597071.62
TPN-224804 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed less than 50% Caddo Assistance to NonProfits 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) General assistance to local non profit organizations 780198 113931.28 No 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-224721 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Not Started Caddo Business/ Education Training 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) support business entrepreneurial training for start up and new business ventures. Primary targets would be for moderated income individuals, minorities and women owned businesses. There will also be a component for youth to encourage business interests and entrepreneurship. 830000 120000 No
TPN-236703 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Not Started Walter B Jacobs Nature Park 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety The Walter B Jacobs Memorial Nature Park is dedicated to helping citizens of Northwest Louisiana connect with nature by conserving a pine‐oak‐hickory forest for interpretation and recreation. The Park serves the surrounding area neighborhoods as well as neighborhoods all of Caddo Parish. With over five miles of outdoor nature trails, the Park encourages outside activities which are a necessary for overall health of our community. Caddo Parish has a high obesity rate, with the City of Shreveport being the 4th obese city in the State of Louisiana. The City of Shreveport is the largest municipality in Caddo Parish and also falls below the AMI limit. According to the National Library of Medicine access to quality parks are directly associated to obesity. Most of the studies reveal that the COVID‐19 pandemic and lockdown contributed to the growth of BMI in many countries and in different populations of people and it increased the prevalence of overweight and obesity. 17000000 2666987.4 No Yes Yes Yes Improvements to existing facilities 17000000
TPN-238454 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed less than 50% Caddo Parish Public Health Initiative 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Caddo Parish efforts to assist Fire Districts and entitles housing disproportionally affecting populations. 1013699 582225.16 No 1 Imp General Public 1 Imp General Public 1 Imp General Public
TPN-238774 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed North La Crime Lab Assistance 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery Assistance to replace lost/decreased revenue. Courts are the main source of revenue and due to court closures during COVID a decrease in revenue occurred. Revenue replacement will allow for technology upgrades. 90000 90000 No
TPN-082402 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Youth Summer Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Summer intern program for local high school students organized by Goodwill Industries. 202430 202430 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-083213 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Ring Doorbell Initiative 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety To provide low income citizens in high crime areas with front door video monitoring and providing monitoring rights to local law enforcement. 87003.7 87003.7 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-097516 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Caddo Juvenile Court 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Revenue replace for Caddo Parish Juvenile Court which assists children and their families in negotiating their way through the Juvenile Justice System 91760 91760
TPN-023496 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Revenue Replacement 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Revenue replacement for government services. 12492381.81 12492381.81
TPN-023234 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Caddo Parish Vaccination Campaign 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination Caddo Parish efforts to increase overall vaccination rates within the parish. 101151.36 101151.36 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-023206 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Caddo Parish Essential Employee Premium Pay 4-Premium Pay 4.1-Public Sector Employees Premium pay for essential employees for approved agencies throughout the parish. 1052205.31 1052205.31 1000
TPN-109331 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Red River Stem Revenue Replacement 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality This funding request is a revenue replacement for the funds that were lost due to the Covid pandemic. During the year 2020, Red River STEM Inc. continued to support its staff members. As evidenced by Sci‐Port’s independent financial statements (audited by Carr, Riggs, and Ingram, CPA’s), payroll was $697,778; $663,646; and $916,754 for the years 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. Conversely, total revenue was $2,010,915; $1,377,997; and $2,904,691 for the years 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The replacement of revenue will allow for the completion of deferred maintenance such as hvac chillers. 400000 400000 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-109867 RCP-035921 Caddo Parish, Louisiana Louisiana Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed less than 50% SLFRF Administrative Support 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Administrative support to Caddo Parish in project management. 1538256 497489.3
TPN-115263 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Home Rehabilitation 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.23-Strong Healthy Communities: Demolition and Rehabilitation of Properties Home repair and rehabilitation program for income-eligible homeowners within the Albuquerque city limits. The City will document home owner eligibility per Part 5 verification as well as census tract information. Home owners will be considered presumed beneficiaries as being negatively impacted by COVID-19 based on income verification. 3300000 3300000 843837.24 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-115950 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Wellness Motel Extension 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance CABQ-FCS has been involved in developing effective programs through collaboration with community partners. Contracts for services have been procured in compliance with federal procurement rules to provide direct services: 1. Site Operations Management. Scope of services include: intake screening, maintaining roster, enforcing behavioral rules, distributing meals, 24/7 on-site availability. 2. Case Management: Scope of services includes evidence-based case management for caseloads of 15 families to conduct needs assessment, develop individualized service plan, articulate and follow up on clients’ and case managers’ action steps, support clients to assemble documents needed to sign a lease, connect clients to medical, educational, employment and social services as needed. 3. De-Escalation and Crisis Response Team: To provide added-value security services, staff with de-escalation and behavioral health training maintain continual contact with residents to increase positive community and accountability. The team responds to crisis situations as they may arise, collaborates with case managers on family support/behavior plan and call in emergency services when needed. 4. Delivered meals: A caterer provides breakfast, lunch and dinner on a daily basis, based on the meal count provided weekly by the site operations team. 5. Housing Coordination: A housing case manager coordinates and oversees the process for clients who are identified as eligible for supportive housing vouchers to ensure that the documents are assembled, monitors progress with the rental assistance agency and provides connection to ID clinics, VI-SPDAT screenings and serves as the link between on-site case managers and external agencies providing supportive housing vouchers. 6. Motel Lease: The City leases the entire motel consisting of 102 rooms for use by the program. The motel provides maintenance and repair, weekly housekeeping for each room, front desk staff and on-site general manager who coordinates with the site operations team. The lease payment covers use of all rooms and lobby, room furnishings, utilities, insurance and property taxes. CABQ-FCS oversees operations and monitors development and adherence to standard operating procedures to ensure that parents and children connect to housing, behavioral health and school services. Successful housing exits have been possible by leveraging City General Funds or dedicated supportive housing vouchers. 4000000 3872703.87 3770171.05 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs Yes 0
TPN-115596 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Revenue Replacement First Reponder Payroll 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The salary and benefits for the staff in Albuquerque Police Department APD and Albuquerque Fire Rescue AFR included in the payroll project met the criteria of specifically work on public safety government services In addition the specific pay and benefit codes included are allowable under ARPA Act guidance The Accounting Division reviewed all entries each pay period to ensure that the amounts posted correctly and are allowable under the ARPA Act 27130906 27130906 27130906
TPN-173754 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed WECH Kitchen 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Renovate year-round shelter for unhoused population; the shelter provides a safe and welcoming environment and provides medical, food, shelter and wrap-around services. 1486576 1486576 1484411.03 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 1484660.14 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-211441 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Gibson Medical Respite 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Renovate a former hospital space into a medical respite facility for people who are unhoused and need to recover from illness or injury. The medical respite facility will be a 50 bed shelter offering up to a 45 day stay. Medical services, food and wrap around services will be available. 7000000 6811292.08 6236193.02 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 6480000 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-070835 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Administrative Support 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Two additional Administrative Staff assisting with reporting and accounting functions for COVID-related funding. 463561.9 463561.9 463561.9
TPN-083364 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Rapid Rehousing 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid Provides housing vouchers to families and individuals experiencing homelessness. Participants in the rapid rehousing program will receive rental assistance (e.g. housing vouchers) and case management services for up two (2) years, which will help participants become self-sufficient and maintain housing on their own. 1000000 1000000 809888.8 45 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs No 1000000
TPN-009470 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Project Consulting Expense 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses The City selected a contractor to provide consulting services to support the effective management and oversight of the ARPA funds, including consultation for ensuring compliance with legal, regulatory and other requirements. Additional projects may be added to this category. The consultant will be responsible for the following tasks: - Assist the City in developing appropriate policies and procedures for use of ARPA funds available from federal, state and other sources; - Assist the City in developing and implementing strategies and plans for the use and coordination of ARPA funds available from federal, state and other sources; - Assist the City in developing appropriate documentation to demonstrate compliance with ARPA guidance; - Perform comprehensive compliance and eligibility reviews of uses of the ARPA funds regular basis and in a timely mannner. 481135.6 441201.6 441201.6
TPN-009453 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Revenue Replacement First Reponder Payroll 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The salary and benefits for the staff in Albuquerque Police Department (APD) and Albuquerque Fire & Rescue (AFR) included in the payroll project met the criteria of specifically work on public safety government services. In addition, the specific pay and benefit codes included are allowable under ARPA Act guidance. The Accounting Division reviewed all entries each pay period to ensure that the amounts posted correctly and are allowable under the ARPA Act. 36810000 36810000 36810000
TPN-009349 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Premium Pay 4-Premium Pay 4.1-Public Sector Employees The City intends to use these funds to compensate city employees, deemed essential by the Chief Administrative Officer, for providing additional services during the transition period when the City is reopening city facilities and services. The one-time premium pay recognizes that city employees will, in the course of employment, perform additional services for the City as we contend with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. 2876649.17 2876649.17 2876649.17 5505
TPN-020136 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Eviction Prevention 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid Provide legal assistance to families and individuals at risk of eviction. 240000 240000 230405.35 2940 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs No 230405.35
TPN-021669 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Community Impact Fund 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.3-Household Assistance: Cash Transfers The program’s mission is to help mitigate the pandemic’s negative economic impact on low-to-moderate households by providing cash transfers for eligible uses. Cash transfers in the amount of $1,000 per household will be granted to approximately 4,100 households. The target population is facing food and housing insecurity, at risk of having their utilities shut off, or requires emergency finical assistance to cover burials, home repairs, weatherization or internet access. Cash transfers will allow these households to mitigate the negative economic impacts due to COVID-19. 4200000 4200000 4200000 4101 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic No 0
TPN-021425 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Business Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship The program will offer one-time grants of $10,000 to qualifying small businesses that were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic to cover operating expenses, payroll, permitting, business equipment purchases, business mortgage obligations, business rent, lease payments, surveillance and security improvements, and utility expenditures. By helping keep small businesses open, the grants will help provide employment opportunities to current workers and those seeking work. The Hotel & Public Safety Grants may be used for safety improvements. 7500000 7063502.06 7063502.06 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact 10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify No 0
TPN-025674 RCP-036041 City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico New Mexico Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Police Vehicles 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Due to an increase in the amount of FTE cadets hired as a direct result of COVID-19, additional Police Vehicles needed to be procured. The purchase of vehicles for city police officers. The people of Albuquerque have told us unequivocally that public safety continues to be a top priority. Although we have made progress in the fight against property crime, Albuquerque has not been immune to the national trend of increased violent crime. This means we need to continue to invest in police, including working to bring the number of officers back to their historical levels. 3000000 2968937 2968937
TPN-157808 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICE 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services DUE TO THE VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE SERVICES SHUTTING DOWN DUE TO COVID THE COUNTY STARTED A REGIONAL AMBULANCE SERVICE TO ENSURE THE BERGEN COUNTY RESIDENTS GET THE SERVICES THEY NEED TIMELY. THE COUNTY HAS SPLIT THIS COST BETWEEN ARP FUNDING AND CAPITAL FUNDING TO SECURE 4 AMBULANCES AND ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT. THE SERVICES WILL EARN INCOME ONCE THE AMBULANCES GET ON THE ROAD. 3000000 2360445 2000000 Yes Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment 2000000 1 Imp General Public
TPN-173919 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started BVMI HEALTH CENTER 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.26-Addressing Educational Disparities: Mental Health Services BUILD OUT OF HEALTH CENTER FOR UNDERINSURED OR NON-INSURED INDIVIDUALS 500000 0 0 Yes Medical equipment and facilities 3000000
TPN-173776 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 2023 REVENUE LOSS 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services LOSS OF REVENUE FOR 2023 39600000 39600000 39600000
TPN-222039 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 2024 REVENUE LOSS REPLACEMENT 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services REVENUE REPLACEMENT FOR 2024 39600000 39600000 39600000
TPN-083986 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed COVID-19 Cleaning & Disinfection 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other Covid-19 positive case office disinfecting 107152.8 107152.8 107152.8 No
TPN-083548 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Center for Online Learning 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other The COVID-19 pandemic has made access to online instruction a core aspect of higher education; however, not all institutions of higher education were equally prepared for the transition to remote learning. Colleges and universities that enrolled a greater percentage of students in distance education courses prior to the pandemic were expected to be well prepared to support the transition to remote learning given their experience and infrastructure already in place. Yet, approximately one year prior to the pandemic, in the fall 2018 semester, only 11.9% of students at Bergen Community College (BCC) were enrolled in online classes. BCC was at a significant disadvantage compared with other institutions of higher education in New Jersey. It fell into the category of “less prepared.” Addressing this critical need with the development of a robust Center for Online Learning will be key in continuing to position the College as an economic engine for the County and the region. Whereas BCC has a long history of offering courses in an asynchronous, online modality, it has not provided the technological or personnel infrastructure needed to provide true online services to meet an ever-increasing student and community demand. The Center for Online Learning will be dedicated to expanding virtual and fully online instructional services for all non-credit and credit-based programs at the College. In recent years, the College has opted for a free learning management system (Moodle) that effectively limits the scope, range, and quality of educational services that could be provided by a best-practices system, creating a limited educational experience for BCC's students in comparison to competitor institutions. The College proposes to create a Center that utilizes a new learning management system (LMS) (cost A) and hires new positions (cost B) to provide a full range of technologist and designer support to faculty. Through the Center, the College would not only improve its course offerings, but would also further define fully online programs and boost enrollment by expanding access (serving additional community members) in the process. 1420000 920000 787208.47 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic Yes 270000
TPN-083489 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Hazardous Materials Collection Program 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery This project is intended to continue the County Hazardous Materials Collection Program for one year until the Bergen County Utilities Authority can get a fee change to continue the sustainability of the program. Due to the increase in freight charges and other expenses associated with Hazardous Waster disposal the program could not sustain funding to keep the program running. The program is vital to Bergen County residents as well as the environment making sure that proper disposal is occurring. 750085 750085 750085 No
TPN-085420 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Alternatives to Domestic Violence 1-Public Health 1.11-Community Violence Interventions Annually, Alternatives to Domestic Violence renders services to more than 1,100 unduplicated victims and more than 415 unduplicated mandated clients from either Superior and/or municipal courts, probation, and/or Division of Child Protection and Permanency. These services include counseling for both victims and offenders, court preparation sessions, and legal intakes for pro bono representation. Prior to the COVID-19 public health crisis, all services and pertinent client records were kept and maintained via paper folders with limited client information stored on our in-house data base. COVID-19 quickly determined the need for a coordinated system which would allow for precise and accurate information to be available to staff in order to quickly and appropriately respond to survivors needs. Along with the change in the delivery of services shifting from in-person to virtual, the victim’s needs changed significantly due to the extenuating circumstances of the public healthcare crisis. The demand to offer digital and virtual modes of communication for survivors is pertinent. Initially due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of HOTLINE calls declined largely due to survivors in need not having access to a safe place to make a phone call during periods of lock down. The effects of the pandemic-isolation and lock downs are still impacting survivors ability to safely connect with resources. In order to provide a structured coordinated approach to meeting the client’s communicative needs, as well as have access to important client information in order to properly support, the agency would like to obtain client management software. Grantor's require that ADV services be rendered in compliance with HIPPA, as well as meeting the strong confidentiality provision that limits the sharing of victims’ personal identifying information. Global Vision Technologies FamCare’s software platform has end-to end encryption, is HIPPA compliant, and satisfies all compliance issues in accordance with our grantor's. The software requested was vetted and approved by our IT department. Cesar Guerra confirmed that the software requested could be securely integrated into our system. The software requested would overcome the barriers set for by the COVID-19 pandemic by allowing clients and ADV to communicate through a multitude of channels such as messaging, texting abilities, and client portal access offered in various languages to meet clients communicative needs comfortably. Additionally, the platform has the ability to be integrated with other existing HIPPA compliant systems, which could allow for safely sharing information between other referring and mandating entities. With the courts still being virtual and information sent electronically, this program would allow for that pertinent information to be fed directly into our system allowing for a more responsive and cohesive approach to coordinating client services, which ultimately will lead to faster access. The project is broken into two implementation phases in order to manage the overall cost. The overall budget for the project is $44,241.28 which includes the one time integration fee (transferring of our current data into the new system). Phase I costs ($13,250), including the platform and user licensing costs. Before entering Phase II, the goal is to fully learn the system, configure the system and perform a gap analysis to determine necessary customizations. Phase II is anticipated to begin three to six months after the initial software implementation. Phase II will allow for specific tailoring and configurations as well as importing client data. In working with Cesar throughout this process, our goal is to utilize ADV staff and IT staff to help with data integration to reduce the cost. The cost for Phase II is estimated at $18,000--with $7,000 (35 hours) dedicated to importing data. Following year one, the annual fee for ongoing maintenance and hosting is $18,937.50. It is anticipated that this platform will be made sustainable past ARP funding by other grant opportunities, as our grantors encourage the use of safe, diverse, and accessible technology applications to provide services to clients in need. 44241.28 44241.28 40843.58 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic No 44241.28
TPN-098266 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more IT INFRASTRUCTURE & SOFTWARE 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses IT CONSULTING SERVICES, COMPUTER INTEGRATION SOFTWARE FOR ONLINE BUSINESS, RADIO EQUIPMENT FOR PROSECUTOR 3252704.85 3252704.85 3154634.85
TPN-013824 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Wastewater Sampling Project 5-Infrastructure 5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure This project above is a continuation of a Wasterwater Sampling Project that was original started with the use of CARES funding. This project is a COVID-19 wastewater sampling project involving the Bergen County Utilities Authority, Passaic Valley Sewer Commission (PVSC), Columbia University, and Bergen County. The purpose of the project is to continue to evaluate, study, and measure the presence of COVID-19 in wastewater in order to determine possible approaches and early warnings of COVID-19. As COVID-19 remains a serious health concern, the early warning detection system of this project is vital to community safety. The BCUA contracted outside consultation to assist with COVID-19 wastewater sampling. 1312896.97 1312896.97 1312896.97 No
TPN-013805 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Edgewater Water Pollution Control Facility Plant Conversion 5-Infrastructure 5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment In October of 2007, the Bergen County Utilities Authority (BCUA) assumed responsibility for the Edgewater Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) as the facility had been facing major challenges meeting the permit requirements for new effluent discharge into the Hudson River and addressing odor related issues have been situated in prime residential areas . The BCUA studied alternatives to address the non-compliance and odor challenges, and concluded that the most effective solution was to decommission the Edgewater WPCF and construct a pump station and a force main to transfer the wastewater to the Little Ferry WPCF. The decommissioning and conversion of the Edgewater WPCF will require the demolition of the existing building and the construction of the new pump station designed to accommodate the newly established flood elevations. The station will also have state of-the art engineering equipment and controls, including being equipped with five pumps that would provide great flexibility, duality and redundancy to meet the challenges of the greatly variant flow characteristics. The pump station will force flow via twin 18 inch pipes through easements and public right of ways across the towns of Edgewater, Cliffside Park, Fairview, North Bergen and Ridgefield until it reaches the gravity sanitary sewer. Most, notably, approximately nearly one mile of the twin pipes will be constructed with an abandoned railroad tunnel owned by the NY Western and Susquehanna RR Company. 18033974.29 14000000 10000000 No Yes Yes
TPN-019675 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 2021 Revenue Loss 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Revenue loss based on federal calculation for 2021. 30878000 30787000 30787000
TPN-019667 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Revenue Loss Emergency 2020 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Emergency appropriation deferred charged create from 2020 revenue loss. Paydown required in budget for deferred charge. 26500000 26500000 26500000
TPN-019647 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Northern Valley Force Main Improvements 5-Infrastructure 5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure Improvements to the Northern Valley Force Main. An assessment inspection identified concerns and recommended the replacement of segments of the 42-inch diameter prestressed concrete cylinder pipe (PCCP). Bergen County Utilities Authority (BCUA) plans to replace approximately 260 linear feet of this 42-inch PCCP section. In addition, the project includes the installation of four air release valves along the Northern Valley Force Main and the installation of one air release valve along the Northvale Force Main. 0 0 0
TPN-019655 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Cogeneration Engines Rehabilitation Improvements 5-Infrastructure 5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure Rehabilitation of the cogeneration engines at the Bergen County Utilities Authority's Little Ferry Water Pollution Control Facility. The cogeneration units have been operating for approximately thirteen (13) years and are at or approaching their maintenance milestone of 60,000 operating hours. The rehabilitation of these engines is required at this time in order to ensure that the Little Ferry WPCF will be able to maintain resiliency due to a power failure. 0 0 0
TPN-022936 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Juvenile Fire Prevention Program 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services The Juvenile Fire Prevention Program was historically funded by a grant from the State of NJ, however when the pandemic hit the State cancelled the funding. At the time the funding was cancelled the County of Bergen had already finalized the budget and did not have the ability to add to fund the program. The Bergen County Juvenile Fire Prevention program is for youth up to the age of 18 displaying recurring interest and/or engagement in fire setting behaviors and this program is the only one of its type in Bergen County. Mental Health has been a major driving factor in the behaviors being sought out by these juveniles. Lock-downs and virtual learning coupled with parents working from home and have less time to closely monitor the child's actions have lead to an increase in the negative behaviors. The County did not want to eliminate the program due to a funding snafu for youth that needed the help. The County funded the program for 1 year through the ARP funding to keep the program intact. The program contains a mental health and counseling component which we believe is very important during this time. 41805 41805 41805 No 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-022890 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed GovPilot Portal Enhancements 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs The current contract with GovPilot has been for 5 modules, which requires a $65k annual expenditure to pay for the contract/licensing agreement. These modules have been successfully utilized to digitize and streamline paper processes, such as Public Works work orders/Citizen reporting of public works issues, and road opening permits. There is need for additional modules to solve software and process challenges in other departments. GovPilot offers a $165k Unlimited Package which would cover any and all additional modules developed for the County. These modules would help eliminate paper processes, allowing more efficient processing by employees and allow for remote processing. Most modules also have a public-facing component, and the expansion of modules is meant to provide greater government services online, increasing access for members of the public who are unable to come to Hackensack during normal business hours. Integrating these modules with online payment solutions would allow for easier payment and new revenue from the increase in service delivery. We are requesting an additional $100k for expansion of GovPilot to include unlimited modules. 330000 330000 330000 No
TPN-022876 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Winter Wonderland County Event 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Prior to the the pandemic the County of Bergen would host a Winter Wonderland event in Van Suan park that was funding solely by donation from businesses in the Bergen County area. Winter Wonderland serves the Bergen County communities in a number of ways. It helps small business with selling their products, it increases tourism to Bergen County, it gives residents a number of outside activities while being able to social distance. The County found that not having the program for a second year in a row would be more determinantal then beneficial to the Bergen County residents, small business, art vendors and other that enjoy it. We believe the utilizing the ARP funding for one year to build back up the Event income would be a beneficial use of the funding since many that utilize it were negatively impacted by the pandemic. The funding that was generated this year by the sale of the tickets will be escrowed to support next years event. 1309731.44 1309731.44 1309731.44 No 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-023541 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Homeless Shelter Expenses 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons The County of Bergen operates a Adult Homeless Shelter as well as a Transitional Housing Center for the residents of Bergen County. The pandemic has proved challenges in these areas due to the congregate sheltering setting in both of these locations. In order to protect all the individuals residing in these units the County has had to implement testing and sheltering protocols for COVID-19 positive residents. 591847.84 591847.84 477812.65 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-023559 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Application Review Services and In-Person Support for Emergency Rental Assistanc 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance The County hired two firms to assist the County in the review of applications for our Emergency Rental Assistance Program. The County expended the administrative funding allocation and require additional support. Greater Bergen serves as out in-person application assistance. Applicants can meet with a representative in person and they will assist them in all aspects of entering their applications. 2267491.24 2267491.24 2267491.24 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-023498 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Packetalk Trailers 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs These Packetalk trailers will be used for multiple purposes around the County of Bergen. Such purposes include but are not limited to: COVID-19 Testing Sites, COVID-19 Vaccination Sites, monitoring population density, and securing outdoor events, adding thermal capabilities to an existing facility, and contact tracing. These trailers incorporate several functions: thermal imaging cameras (which will allow you to read a person's body temperature in an outdoor environment), ALPR cameras which will record the license plates of every vehicle for contact tracing purposes, and providing situational awareness information real time while not having to put personnel in a crowded environment to monitor it. These trailers will be used at numerous sites around the County. Due to COVID-19 the County has changed the way they conduct operations. Therefore events that would normally be inside buildings which contain the proper technology are now being held outside at venues that do not contain the necessary technology. These trailers will allow us to stand up that technology at any facility the County deems necessary in an expedient manner to ensure public safety. 472500 472500 472500 No
TPN-023493 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Testing Initiatives for Employees and Residents 1-Public Health 1.2-COVID-19 Testing Vaccination Clinics have been setup for Unvaccinated County Employees and testing for inmates upon booking at the Bergen County Correctional Facility. 415125.33 415125.33 415125.33 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-023473 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Vaccination Sites and Mobile Sites 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination Throughout the pandemic the County has ran and participated in multiple Vaccination events. The County has mobile trailers that they use in conjunction with New Bridge Medical Center that go out to communities and provide mobile vaccination clinics and also go to homebound residents. The County ran an event to incentive young 12-17 to get vaccinated where we provided a $25 gift card to all children whom received a vaccination. The County also runs vaccination clinics within our Bergen County Correctional Center to provide incarcerated individuals the opportunity to receive a vaccination in hopes of limiting outbreaks within the jail. 68062.3 68062.3 68062.3 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-027172 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 2022 Revenue Loss (Partial Allocation) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Partial allocation for 2022 Revenue loss to be used in conjunction with our second tranche of funding. 7000698 7000698 7000698
TPN-027171 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed COVID EMPLOYEE MEDICAL CLAIMS 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other The County of Bergen is self-insured when it comes to Health Insurance. The pandemic has increased health claims greater than what the County can budget. 3959466.59 3959466.59 3959466.59 No
TPN-027170 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Premium and Hazard Pay 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Premium and Hazard pay was granted to individuals working at the County testing and vaccination sites. 244155 244155 244155 200 No
TPN-027169 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Small Business Assistance 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.32-Business Incubators and Start-Up or Expansion Assistance The County of Bergen will continue to assist small businesses as we did under the CARES funding. One of the planned projects as this time to assist small business through our Bergen for Business Program Consulting and Website in conjunction with Bergen County Community College. Bergen County also issued a new grant program for small businesses. 2289809 2289809 2289809 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact 9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted Yes 0
TPN-027167 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Mental Health Assistance 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services It is understood that the funding pool for ARP consists of $1M allocation that is divided into four annual allocations over four years, but the funding is not operational and can be carried forward into the next year where spending plans may fluctuate over time. In addition, about $200k in funds were allocated under Aid to Mental Health contracts in 2021 and is being proposed to merge into a single pool of funding rather than two separate pools. Lastly, executive guidance was to ask for what was needed. The total funds needed to fully execute this plan are about $280k over the allocations to date, and it is respectfully requested that additional funds be allocated to fulfill the whole plan. The funds will be expended to address “behavioral health” (mental health and substance use) needs. Health equity will be promoted by targeting underserved communities. Efforts will be made to connect with new and different community leaders to become trainers/trainees (e.g.: food pantry directors, faith-based leaders, community centers, senior or golden age clubs, funeral directors, Rotarians, etc.). Requests for Proposals will be developed that will include awards and options to renew 2 additional years. The RFP for Community Behavioral Health includes a vision to ensure creative outreach and interventions outside traditional settings for special populations (e.g.: chronic unemployed, victims of violence, marginalized populations), co-location of services across different system stakeholders, and inclusion of residents that are impacted by COVID and not aware of services due to barriers (cultural, isolation, specialized LGBTQ needs, low income/underinsured, others). Children’s wellness and resiliency services will expand engagement opportunities as well as access to creative or unique interventions that may not be covered by insurance. These services will need to demonstrate that they are evidence based or demonstrate positive impact through research. Trauma response services are proposed to ensure there is a capacity to respond to traumatic events for adult victims. Currently the Traumatic Loss Coalition in Bergen County serves those impacted by the loss of a child (such as a child suicide response). There is no capacity for a response for an adult loss. As suicide rates climb because of COVID-19, this capacity complements our prevention work with a response capacity. Suicide prevention funding will support professional development and community education. As previously noted, suicide rates are increasing, and this funding will Mental health awareness funding includes mini grants to communities to promote mental health awareness locally. It is envisioned that the Stigma Free initiatives will lead these efforts, however, the funding is not exclusively for those groups and other community entities will be eligible as well. Awareness and outreach education funding will build the capacity to deliver evidence-based trainings to the community at large. Trainers for Mental Health First Aid and Youth Mental Health First Aid will be trained and outreach targeted communities. This new capacity of trainers will continue to provide training to the community throughout the ARP funding duration and beyond. Outreach supplies include training curriculum/book expenses, and usual training consumable supplies such as markers, easel pads, etc. As a point of reiteration, the impact of the funding will serve the entire County, however, specific communities and cohorts of individuals will be prioritized in all efforts. Many operational resources will be leveraged to implement this spending plan, and this new capacity will augment, not duplicate, or supplant existing operational capacity. 1798998.99 1777378.56 1514878.56 No 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate Yes 0
TPN-027166 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed JOB TRAINING 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) The County is currently in the process of planning additional job training efforts originally started under CARES funding. The job training will be in conjunction with other Bergen County agencies, but will also include job training for County Employees. 41250 41250 41250 No 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment No 0
TPN-027165 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Payroll Costs for Public Health, Safery and Other Public Sector Staff 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Employees that are dedicated to COVID-19 work: include Health staff that work at the testing and vaccination site as well as the COVID-19 task force which include nurses and administrators. Human Services staff who assist with the Juvenile Detention Center, homeless shelter and transitional housing center. Public Safety Staff which include OEM staff that work at the testing and vaccination sites, manage the PPE inventory and run operational needs for COVID-19, Public Safety Telecommunication employees who assist with 9-1-1 operation throughout the County, Sheriff officers that assist vaccination centers and testing centers, as well as manage and oversee the County Jail inmates, County Prosecutors office who assist with our Emergency Rental Assistance Program providing background checks, they also assist in contract tracing efforts & Administration staff that act in an array of way from running the Emergency Rental Assistance program and the team of reviewers whom review each application, making and adjusting COVID-19 policies based on CDC guidelines, bulk ordering PPE supplies to keep staff and visitors in County building safe. 5899574.23 5899574.23 5899574.23 1000 No
TPN-027160 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Private Fiber Run WAN 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Executive Summary: The Coronavirus has transformed the lives of Americans in many ways and technology has played a vital role in that transformation. 2020 brought on a new normal with the shutdown of schools, businesses, workplaces and force millions of Americans to relocate from the office and classroom to the home office and bedroom. Bergen County experienced this technology transition for both the good and the bad. The CARES funding played a large role in assisting to get the technology that was needed to transition the County workforce of nearly 2,900 to a remote environment with the purchase of laptops and other needs, however one struggle still existed the unreliability of the internet used to keep our virtual environment up and running. With the uncertainties of the pandemic it was vital for the County to come up with a plan to ensure that our workforce had the least interruptions as possible so we can continue to provide services to the constituents of Bergen County. The County then decided that a Private Fiber Wan was a beneficial solution, not only to the County of Bergen, but also to the 70 municipalities that share our borders. Project Summary: Internet connectivity became a necessity during the pandemic, not only for the County of Bergen but for the entire world. The stress on the public networks led to downtime during peak hours that the County of Bergen could not afford when trying to service the public, educate children, and ensure public safety, health and welfare to the nearly 1 million residents of Bergen County. The Private Fiber Run was the solution that the County of Bergen needed in order to operate at the highest level of service for not only County Departments but also for municipalities and indirectly the residents of Bergen County by creating a closed loop infrastructure that will be managed directly by the County. The Private Fiber WAN provides for greater security of governmental data, increased broadband speed and unlimited bandwidth, cost effective, no longer paying for an ISP, more reliability as fiber can withstand fluctuations in temperature and can be submerged in water, supports voice-over IP phone networks, good for the environment as it require lower energy with copper cables and allows for the County to assists municipalities with lower utility bills. The County will indirectly assist households and residents by connecting to the libraries and County parks in the 70+ municipalities of Bergen County. The project will be rolled out in three phases, starting from the most critical and easiest to implement, to the more wide-spread and logistically harder areas to implement. Phase 1: Implementation of Private Fiber Network for 34.93 miles throughout Bergen County to allow for faster internet speed and unlimited bandwidth. This phase will focus on 18 vital locations throughout the County to stabilize the existing infrastructure and provide for a seamless transition from office to home when working offsite is needed. The County will also provide the fiber run to assist our Technical School so that students have the ability to transition from the classroom to home schooling without the loss of services. The 18 locations will include: 1) Bergen County Administration Building (OBCP) – The core of the County operation and is comprised of the Legislative, Executive, Financial & Information Technology, Health and Human Services department. All the departments in OBCP were transitioned to a work from home setting when COVID-19 hit. 2) Bergen County Technical School – Offers Full and Part-time technical instruction to over 18,000 secondary and adult students. The technical schools also provide services broad spectrum special education programs and services for children and adults with disabilities through the Special Services Schools. The Schools were greatly impacted and had to transition to a virtual learning environment when the pandemic hit. 3) Prosecutors Office Justice Center – The Prosecutors office investigate and prosecute criminal offenders, assist municipal departments in law enforcement needs, and also have specialized units such as arson, homicide, sex crimes, drug trafficking, organized crime, domestic violence, insurance fraud and cybercrimes. During the pandemic the prosecutor’s office also stepped in and helped with Contract tracing needs, delivery of food and meals to the elderly and also assisting municipalities who were effected by staff shortages due to the pandemic. Prosecutor’s staff were able to be transitioned to a work from home environment and it was crucial that they had the technology in place to keep them connected at all time. 4) Public Safety Center – The Public Safety Center of PSOC, is a vital area as it home to the Bergen County’s 9-1-1 and dispatch operations. The PSOC serves 21 towns and acts as a secondary alternate call routing center for all of Bergen County as well as other County agencies. Due to the Pandemic and the absence of 9-1-1 due to illness PSCO stepped up and assisted municipalities with all 9-1-1 needs. They also served in the capacity of recording COVID-19 cases for contact tracing and reporting. 5) Environmental Center – The Bergen County Environmental Center is the only County facility in western central Bergen and is an integral location to complete the fiber loop, especially considering the lack of available broadband infrastructure currently in the vicinity. The facility is a wildlife refuge and education center for numerous student groups, Boy/Girl scout troops, as well as being an active public park. Expanding internet connectivity in this park will expand educational opportunities and access for park visitors. 6) Youth Center – The Bergen County Youth Shelter is a state licensed residential crisis and homeless shelter for youth ages 11 through 17. Runaway, homeless and at-risk youth may access the program on a walk-in or referral basis 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The program addresses youths’ immediate needs, including food, clothing, health and mental wellbeing. Residents need internet access for things such as Education needs, counseling, court and other areas of need. During the pandemic it was extremely important to keep the facilities internet up and running for all areas from intake to virtual learning. 7) Van Saun County Park – Fiber run was important to assist household and communities with little not no internet needs. The park allowed for residents to work from the park or attend virtual learning if internet was weak or non-existent in the household. Wi-fi capabilities also allowed parents to be connected to work while giving children much needed fresh air throughout the pandemic lockdown. 8) Campgaw Maintenance Building – Fiber run was important to assist household and communities with little not no internet needs. The park allowed for residents to work from the park or attend virtual learning if internet was weak or non-existent in the household. Wi-fi capabilities also allowed parents to be connected to work while giving children much needed fresh air throughout the pandemic lockdown. 9) Bergen County Juvenile Center- As with any correction setting access to internet is important for a number of reasons. Juveniles under the care of the Bergen County Juvenile system must be provided educational, recreational, religious and social opportunities. During the pandemic the facility was placed on a lockdown to control the spread of the virus, many of the activities that have to be provided to the juveniles needed to switch to a virtual platform, such as school and attorney meetings. 10) Community Transportation: The Division is in charge of providing a safe, trouble-free, scheduled transportation system for persons with disabilities, seniors and frail residents of Bergen County. Each bus is equipped with technology equipment to ensure that riders get where they need to go as quickly and safely as they can. During the pandemic Community Transportation also assisted in the transport of residents to testing and vaccination sites. Community transportation also help with the delivering of nutritional meals to homebound clients daily. During the pandemic the scheduling and delivery of these meals increased and stabile wi-fi and internet allowed the delivery to be seamless and timely. 11) Animal Shelter – Due to the pandemic the animal shelter was closed for in-person meetings and adoptions. The animal shelter needed to switch to a zoom based adoption process. The animal shelter internet connectivity had to be upgrade in order to accommodate the ability to be able to hold virtual adoption. 12) Voting Warehouse- The pandemic brought on many changes to the voting structure in the State of NJ. The Voting Warehouse became vital in making sure that all the new technology that was introduced had the capability of being programs. Secure internet is extremely important for the programming of voting machines and now the e-poll books, 13) BC Annex – During the pandemic the BC Annex because a vital location is the coordination and distribution of PPE and food security items. The internet in the area of the Annex always had issues with connectivity and it was vital that internet connection was reliable for planning, distribution and logging of the activities taking place at the location. 14) New Bridge Medical Center – New Bridge Medical Center as well as the FEMA constructed vaccination tent were critical from the start of the Pandemic. Internet connectivity and bandwidth was essential with multiple COVID-19 operation being coordinated on the same grounds as the same time. NBMC was running an external pop-up field hospital, drive thru testing site and very large vaccination site. All of the activities relied upon fast and reliable internet to be order to treat, log, and test and vaccinate the residents of Bergen County. 15) Darlington County Park – Darlington Park is a large park in the Borough of Mahwah, a mountainous and wooded municipality that has areas with spotty cell phone service. Expanding broadband service to this location will ensure park amenities and communications can function properly, and provide options to expand park services to residents. 16) Community Services – 327 Ridgewood Avenue – This building, located near the County’s hospital, houses numerous County agencies such as the Improvement Authority, and will soon house an auxiliary communication and dispatch center for Bergen County law enforcement and first responders. Robust connection is necessary here for this center to function properly as part of the County’s 911 and dispatch network. 17) Overpeck Park – Overpeck Park, also called Bergen County’s “Central Park” is one of its most heavily trafficked park due to the size and number of amenities. The County uses Overpeck Park to host numerous events and programs, including nonprofit and educational group activities and retreats. Expanding free internet service in a large park like Overpeck is a priority to expanding internet service opportunities for County residents. 18) Two Bergen County Plaza. – Two Bergen County Plaza is the home to the Bergen County Courts as well as the Surrogate and Sheriff Office. With courts being closed and moving to a virtual courtroom setting it was imperative that the internet speed was not only reliable, but also fast. The Fiber run allowed for the County to provide these needs to the Courts. Phase 1a: This phase will begin the funding needs under the American Rescue Plan funding and will expand upon the groundwork laid in Phase 1. The phase will add an additional 8 locations to the already established Fiber Run structure described above in Phase 1. The additions will include: 1) Bergen County Probation 2) Bergen Community College 3) Bergen County Technical Schools (Phase 2) – Paramus Campus 4) Bergen County Technical and Special Services Schools Business Education Office 5) Regional Day School 6) Gateway School 7) Additional support for the Bergen County Technical School in Teterboro and lastly the Workforce Investment Board and Unemployment Office. This phase is currently underway and contracts have been established. Phase 2: Phase 2 will expand the fiber run to areas that have more logistical capabilities, but greater public access. This phase which is currently estimated to cost $3,241,511.00 will include each of the County’s six (6) golf course and the maintenance buildings within those golf courses. With the plan of going to a more contactless service the Wi-fi capabilities will allow for more individuals to be able to connect to the internet via their phones and schedule T-times, reserve golf carts and partake in other transactions. Fiber runs at the golf courses also expand wi-fi capabilities to other areas of the parks which in the past did not allow for it. This phase will also add fiber capabilities to both the Ramapo Reservation and Campgaw Reservation, which at the moment has limited internet connectivity, the Medical Examiner’s Office and the Family Transitional Shelter. The Family Transitional Shelter serves as a temporary living arraignments for families who are struggling to find housing. Adding an internet with strong Wi-Fi capabilities will allow for children in the shelter to utilize the computer lab space to complete homework assignments, attend on-line virtual learning or simply play or watch educational games or shows. Phase 3 – This phase will be the largest phase to accomplish out of the entire project. Phase 3 is going to cost approximately $12,171,746.96 and will expand the fiber run to any or all of the 70 municipalities that have fiber run connection. The County will utilize funding from the American Rescue plan to also run fiber connection to each municipal library or community center to allow from public access to free, fast and reliable internet services. This phase of the project is to ensure that all residents of Bergen County have equal access to education, work and leisure even if internet cannot be afforded in their home. The fiber run will also help lower municipal utility bills as well as build stronger relationship via shared services between the County and Municipal counterparts. With the phases listed above additional costs for this project will come in the form of: 1) The purchase of 11 Network switches at various locations – approx. $246,728.18. This switches are necessary for the Fiber Project to connect other devices together and enable communication between the different network devices, connecting back to the hub at One Bergen County Plaza. 2) Wireless Capabilities at Bergen County Golf Courses- $5,479,289.80 – All of the courses experience poor signal service and provide weak Wi-Fi capabilities. Expanding and replacing the current equipment with new capable equipment will be beneficial to the golfers and employees utilizing the golf courses. Improving the Wi-Fi capabilities can also assist in future revenue generation by allowing for tournaments and events to be held at the courses. 3) SD WAN Network Deployment: $1,516,894.40- As the County’s network grows and transitions from a largely broadband based WAN to a private fiber based WAN, the need arises to increase throughput at remote sites as well as enhance the capabilities of the network around monitoring, manageability and scalability. 4) Cisco ACI Network Upgrade - $784,112.64 – The current datacenter core infrastructure used by the County Information Technology Department, Prosecutors Office, Pubic Safety Command Center and Bergen County Sheriff’s Department is in need of upgrade to be able to support the incoming county-wide fiber network and shard services incentives. Upgrades are necessary to refresh the system, add capacity and throughput to support the growing needs of the county of Bergen. This proposal will significantly increase capacity across the system, add features, allow seamless delivery of new services to fiber remote sites, and refresh the aging portions of the system with new modern hardware. 5) HP Nimble Storage Project: $221,178.37 - Cyber-attacks have surged over the past year with increasing ransomware strikes. The Hewlett-Packard Nimble solution will prevent the county from becoming a victim of ransomware strikes. This solution creates an immutable storage solution, once something is written it cannot be changed or deleted. The county will recover from ransomware never having to pay the ransom. The county can be back up and running in very short period of time approximately 60 minutes and will be one day data behind. This solution is another of layer of protection that will be extremely beneficial in protecting the county from cyber-attacks assuring we can remain operational. 33704347.62 30727933.47 25966979.02 No Yes Yes
TPN-027156 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Food Security Task Force 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs The Food Security Task force was originated using the CARES funding. The County will continue assisting families of Bergen County utilizing ARP funds as we continue our donation campaign for long term stabilization. COVID-19 exacerbated food insecurity levels across Bergen County. On July 15th 2020, Bergen County launched the Food Security Task Force led by Commissioner Tracy Zur and the County Executive Office along with key leadership from local nonprofits and key representatives from across the County who manage food pantries and local meal distribution efforts daily. Together, this Task Force is charged with devising new solutions to ensure every County resident has access to healthy food options during this pandemic and afterwards. While there are over 80+ emergency food providers spread across the County, a recent survey indicated the majority of these sites are experiencing a 50% increase in clients since March 2020 with some sites now serving an increase of more than 200%. Many of these providers are reliant on private individual donations and supplies are quickly dwindling as they struggle to meet the new demand. 2000000 1791519.14 1686939.14 25000 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity Yes 0
TPN-108766 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 2022 REVENUE LOSS 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services 2022 REVENUE LOSS 32599302 32599302 32599302
TPN-109613 RCP-035839 County Of Bergen, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Ramapough Lenape Community Project 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other ENHANCEMENTS TO THE RAMAPOUGH LENAPE COMMUNITY CENTER 56521 56521 0 No
TPN-142864 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Indirect Costs-7.1 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses This project funds indirect costs including, but not limited to Personnel staff salaries and benefits, Fiscal staff salaries and benefits, and Contract Administrative staff salaries and benefits. 14746762 14746762 14746762
TPN-168614 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Worker Retention Payment Costs 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Costs associated with the one-time payments made to County employees who met specific criteria (Skilled Nursing Facility COVID-19 Worker Retention Payment Program). 408509 408509 408509
TPN-232470 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed FY23/24 EF1 Contribution 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services $37,544,394.50 contribution towards Hospital Enterprise Fund 1 for the provision of healthcare services to residents of Contra Costa County in fiscal year 2023/24. Authorized by the Board of Supervisors on 4/23/2024 (File # 24-1211). 37544394.5 37544394.5 37544394.5
TPN-111402 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Pandemic Service Relief Payment 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provision of pandemic service relief payments to employees 24300111.5 24300111.5 24300111.5
TPN-008011 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Prevent and Mitigate COVID-19-3.1 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers This project will fund a broad range of services and programming for the prevention and ongoing response to COVID-19. All project activities will be ongoing throughout the FY23-24 project period and focus on maintaining, improving and expanding testing, vaccination, contact tracing/case investigation, public health epidemiology, communication with the public and purchase and distribution of PPE. These activities will be conducted by CCHS and in coordination with community partners. The intended outcomes of this work are to improve vaccination rates in areas of the county with low vaccine uptake, effectively and efficiently meet the demand for testing with timely reporting of results, efficient and effective communicable disease management, improve CCHS capacity for public health epidemiology and data analytics, and effectively communicate with the public via trusted and culturally relevant partners and sources that bridge the digital divide. The costs associated with this project are specific to salaries and benefits for our Public Health employees who are responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. 54980065 54980065 54980065 895 No
TPN-007996 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Addressing Disparities in Public Health Outcomes-1.14 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionally impacted communities of color, low-wage essential workers, and other historically disadvantaged populations. This project addresses CCHS’s ability to effectively monitor and respond to these disparities and work closely with our community partners and the public to improve the design and execution of public health programs and outcomes. Key activities within this project include maintenance and expansion of current community engagement efforts, targeted consumer outreach and communications, and data analysis and evaluation to identify disparities, guide equity initiatives with input from Public Health and CBOs and assess results. The intended outcomes of this project are to reduce disparities in COVID-19 related public health outcomes. CCHS is committed to providing timely and transparent data on testing, case, and vaccination rates to identify disparities, guide equity initiatives with input from Public Health, community-based organizations and community members, and assess results. Funding will be used to maintain and expand data identification, visualization and analysis efforts as the pandemic continues to evolve and change. 36550422 36550422 36550422 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-007995 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Delivery System COVID-19 Treatment and Medical Services-1.13 1-Public Health 1.13-Substance Use Services The intended outcome of this project is to maintain and improve CCHS’s delivery system to better respond to the medical and behavioral health needs of patients and residents impacted by COVID-19. All project activities will be ongoing throughout the FY22-23 project period and will be conducted by CCHS and, where relevant, in coordination with community partners. Project activities include enhancing health care capacity to treat COVID-19 patients, capital investments or adaptations to public facilities to improve infrastructure for the safe provision of services, technical assistance and education related to COVID-19 prevention and mitigation for congregate living facilities and addressing gaps in care resulting from COVID-19. The intended outcomes of this project are to improve health care capacity to provide care and services to COVID-19 patients, improve infrastructure for the safe delivery of services and build capacity to address gaps in care due to COVID-19. The costs associated with this project are more specific to substance use services. 3622122 3622122 3622122 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-007994 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Delivery System COVID-19 Treatment and Medical Services-1.12 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services The intended outcome of this project is to maintain and improve CCHS’s delivery system to better respond to the medical and behavioral health needs of patients and residents impacted by COVID-19. All project activities will be ongoing throughout the FY22-23 project period and will be conducted by CCHS and, where relevant, in coordination with community partners. Project activities include enhancing health care capacity to treat COVID-19 patients, capital investments or adaptations to public facilities to improve infrastructure for the safe provision of services, technical assistance and education related to COVID-19 prevention and mitigation for congregate living facilities and addressing gaps in care resulting from COVID-19. The intended outcomes of this project are to improve health care capacity to provide care and services to COVID-19 patients, improve infrastructure for the safe delivery of services and build capacity to address gaps in care due to COVID-19. The costs associated with this project are more specific to mental health services. 210043 210043 210043 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-007993 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Addressing Disparities in Public Health Outcomes-1.7 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionally impacted communities of color, low-wage essential workers, and other historically disadvantaged populations. This project addresses CCHS’s ability to effectively monitor and respond to these disparities and work closely with our community partners and the public to improve the design and execution of public health programs and outcomes. Key activities within this project include maintenance and expansion of current community engagement efforts, targeted consumer outreach and communications, and data analysis and evaluation to identify disparities, guide equity initiatives with input from Public Health and CBOs and assess results. The intended outcomes of this project are to reduce disparities in COVID-19 related public health outcomes. CCHS uses data and community input to create and deliver targeted consumer outreach to share health education, vaccination and testing information and resources, and other targeted messaging through a variety of communication channels. CCHS will use CSLFRF funds to maintain and improve these efforts, including investing in redesigning our website and data dashboards, improving targeted communication and alerting technology, and maintaining staff to support media updates, social media campaigns, and address questions from leaders and community members. Funding will also be used to support contracts with outside consultants specializing in communications with traditionally marginalized and/or underserved communities, vaccine incentive projects and other targeted consumer outreach efforts. 4799690 4799690 4799690 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-007992 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Delivery System COVID-19 Treatment and Medical Services-1.6 1-Public Health 1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities) The intended outcome of this project is to maintain and improve CCHS’s delivery system to better respond to the medical and behavioral health needs of patients and residents impacted by COVID-19. All project activities will be ongoing throughout the FY 23-24 project period and will be conducted by CCHS and, where relevant, in coordination with community partners. Project activities include enhancing health care capacity to treat COVID-19 patients, capital investments or adaptations to public facilities to improve infrastructure for the safe provision of services, technical assistance and education related to COVID-19 prevention and mitigation for congregate living facilities and addressing gaps in care resulting from COVID-19. The intended outcomes of this project are to improve health care capacity to provide care and services to COVID-19 patients, improve infrastructure for the safe delivery of services and build capacity to address gaps in care due to COVID-19. Costs associated with this project will be for enhancing health care capacity to treat COVID-19 patients and provide care and services for their near and long-term needs. This also includes treatment costs for long-term symptoms or effects of COVID-19, including post-intensive care syndrome. 15824226 15824226 15824226 Yes Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment 158137 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-007974 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Prevent and Mitigate COVID-19-1.5 1-Public Health 1.5-Personal Protective Equipment This project will fund a broad range of services and programming for the prevention and ongoing response to COVID-19. All project activities will be ongoing throughout the FY23-24 project period and focus on maintaining, improving and expanding testing, vaccination, contact tracing/case investigation, public health epidemiology, communication with the public and purchase and distribution of PPE. These activities will be conducted by CCHS and in coordination with community partners. The intended outcomes of this work are to improve vaccination rates in areas of the county with low vaccine uptake, effectively and efficiently meet the demand for testing with timely reporting of results, efficient and effective communicable disease management, improve CCHS capacity for public health epidemiology and data analytics, and effectively communicate with the public via trusted and culturally relevant partners and sources that bridge the digital divide. Funding will help CCHS coordinate and distribute PPE and other infection control supplies to be used internally and distributed to community partners. 790917 790917 790917 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools
TPN-007973 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Prevent and Mitigate COVID-19-1.4 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) This project will fund a broad range of services and programming for the prevention and ongoing response to COVID-19. All project activities will be ongoing throughout the FY21-22 project period and focus on maintaining, improving and expanding testing, vaccination, contact tracing/case investigation, public health epidemiology, communication with the public and purchase and distribution of PPE. These activities will be conducted by CCHS and in coordination with community partners. The intended outcomes of this work are to improve vaccination rates in areas of the county with low vaccine uptake, effectively and efficiently meet the demand for testing with timely reporting of results, efficient and effective communicable disease management, improve CCHS capacity for public health epidemiology and data analytics, and effectively communicate with the public via trusted and culturally relevant partners and sources that bridge the digital divide. 133093 133093 133093 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic No 133093
TPN-007971 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Prevent and Mitigate COVID-19-1.3 1-Public Health 1.3-COVID-19 Contact Tracing This project will fund a broad range of services and programming for the prevention and ongoing response to COVID-19. All project activities will be ongoing throughout the FY23-24 project period and focus on maintaining, improving and expanding testing, vaccination, contact tracing/case investigation, public health epidemiology, communication with the public and purchase and distribution of PPE. These activities will be conducted by CCHS and in coordination with community partners. The intended outcomes of this work are to improve vaccination rates in areas of the county with low vaccine uptake, effectively and efficiently meet the demand for testing with timely reporting of results, efficient and effective communicable disease management, improve CCHS capacity for public health epidemiology and data analytics, and effectively communicate with the public via trusted and culturally relevant partners and sources that bridge the digital divide. CSLFRF funds will help CCHS invest in redesigning and digitizing workflows using advanced tools and technologies to increase efficient and accurate monitoring and contact tracing. In addition, funding will be used to support technology and contact tracing/case investigation staff and to support isolation and quarantine of cases and contacts. 16353832 16353832 16353832 No 1 Imp General Public 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-007970 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Prevent and Mitigate COVID-19-1.2 1-Public Health 1.2-COVID-19 Testing This project will fund a broad range of services and programming for the prevention and ongoing response to COVID-19. All project activities will be ongoing throughout the FY23-24 project period and focus on maintaining, improving and expanding testing, vaccination, contact tracing/case investigation, public health epidemiology, communication with the public and purchase and distribution of PPE. These activities will be conducted by CCHS and in coordination with community partners. The intended outcomes of this work are to improve vaccination rates in areas of the county with low vaccine uptake, effectively and efficiently meet the demand for testing with timely reporting of results, efficient and effective communicable disease management, improve CCHS capacity for public health epidemiology and data analytics, and effectively communicate with the public via trusted and culturally relevant partners and sources that bridge the digital divide. CCHS operates community testing sites and mobile testing teams. Costs associated with testing includes staffing, supplies, equipment, facility expenses and texting platforms to ensure timely and secure receipt of testing results. 3705061 3705061 3705061 Yes COVID-19 testing sites and laboratories 138155 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts 1 Imp General Public
TPN-007969 RCP-035876 County Of Contra Costa, California California Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Prevent and Mitigate COVID-19-1.1 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination This project will fund a broad range of services and programming for the prevention and ongoing response to COVID-19. All project activities will be ongoing throughout the project period and focus on maintaining, improving and expanding testing, vaccination, contact tracing/case investigation, public health epidemiology, communication with the public and purchase and distribution of PPE. These activities will be conducted by CCHS and in coordination with community partners. The intended outcomes of this work are to improve vaccination rates in areas of the county with low vaccine uptake, effectively and efficiently meet the demand for testing with timely reporting of results, efficient and effective communicable disease management, improve CCHS capacity for public health epidemiology and data analytics, and effectively communicate with the public via trusted and culturally relevant partners and sources that bridge the digital divide. The CCHS Department (including Public Health, the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and county operated Health Centers) operate at least 10 vaccination sites every day, as well as home-based, business, school and congregate setting vaccination services and a Health Equity Mobile Vaccination Team. CSLFRF funds will be used to maintain vaccination clinics and expand vaccination efforts as needed. 10089655 10089655 10089655 Yes COVID-19 vaccination sites 36973 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts 1 Imp General Public
TPN-063095 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Essential Government Service Programs (Revenue Loss) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The U.S. Department of the Treasury allows local governments to utilize $10 million of their SLFRFA allocation for regular government services such as road construction and improvement. The Commissioners Court has not made any decisions regarding the allocation of the $10 million for essential government services. 10000000 742443.96 742443.96
TPN-063728 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Enhance Radio Networks for First Responders 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services This project enhances the radio networks for first responders in Tarrant County. First responders have been at the forefront of the pandemic response, and programs under this project ensure emergency communications networks have the necessary resources to facilitate the delivery of effective, efficient, and equitable emergency response service. 2645608 2645608 645608 Yes Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment 2645608 1 Imp General Public
TPN-063599 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Public Health Informatics Systems 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services This project improves Tarrant County Public Health informatic systems through a comprehensive modernization program focused on increasing access to available data and integrating disparate local, state, and federal systems. 558630.93 558630.93 558630.93 Yes Public health data systems 558630.93 1 Imp General Public
TPN-063577 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Public Health Facilities Improvement 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the additional federal resources made available, additional space is necessary for the Public Health Department. With numerous public-facing services, additional space is necessary to ensure accessibility to the public for all the Public Health programs. 18201523 18178057.96 18108745.43 No Yes Yes Yes Other (please specify) 17209252.96 1 Imp General Public
TPN-064724 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Reduce Public Health Disparities in Disproportionately Impacted Communities 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Through a community call for proposals, five proposals were awarded funding to improve public health programs in Tarrant County. This project funds program expansions to address disparities in health outcomes in areas of cancer care screening and detection support, HIV/AIDS care, and other preventative care programs for Tarrant County residents. Funded subrecipients: AIDS Outreach Center, Cancer Care Services, HELP Center, United Way of Tarrant County/Community-Based Doulas, and Black Heart Association. 4981933.7 4981933.7 3063192.62 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-065780 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Expand Family and Individual Support Programs 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services This project supplies funding for the purpose of providing critical support to Tarrant County residents with a family member who has an intellectual and/or development disability. My Health My Resources (MHMR) of Tarrant County is the funded subrecipient. 1500000 1500000 1078310.74 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-065712 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Strengthen Tarrant County Businesses 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning United Way of Tarrant County’s BRAVE/R Together project will meet the County's goal of helping small, disproportionately impacted businesses to remain open and grow in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. BRAVE/R helps small businesses in the 76104 zip code gain their minority business certification, giving them increased access to capital and technical assistance. The program will also provide business coaching to help overcome COVID-19. 1000000 1000000 719506.52 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 1000000
TPN-065702 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Direct Grant Program for Businesses & Non-Profits 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries Grant funds were awarded to eligible businesses and non-profits that were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Eligible businesses and non-profits could receive up to $27,500 in funding ($2,500 base grant with an additional $1,000 per employee). The grants provided financial assistance to eligible small businesses and non-profits whose workforces were adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Awarded funds were used for workforce recovery, retention, recruitment, and development. 17073500 17073500 17073500 No 24 Dis Imp Other SBs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-065693 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Provide a Safe Environment 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services This project allows the County to provide a safe environment for residents and the public through additional cleaning and non-PPE mitigation measures. This project funds COVID-19 mitigation measures for common areas, elections, and high-contact spaces. 153790.57 153790.57 144045.54 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-065681 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Keep the Work Force Safe 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Due to the spread of COVID-19 and to meet CDC and OSHA guidelines, many Tarrant County employees have taken pandemic leave for cases of COVID-19 for themselves or a dependent. Costs of COVID-19 quarantines for employees are included in this project. Employees were able to take the time off they needed through this program and maintain their current level of pay. 755493.64 755493.64 755493.64 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-065413 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Mental Health Programs - Youth & Adult 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services Through a community call for proposals, three proposals were awarded funding for mental health programs in Tarrant County. This project will fund program expansions for substance abuse services and behavioral health programs for County youth. Funded subrecipients: Alliance Child & Family Services, Communities in Schools of Greater Tarrant County, and Lena Pope. 1092902 1092902 803907.48 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 1092902
TPN-065399 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Mental Health Programs 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services Tarrant County allocated significant funding to programs which will address the increased need for mental health care within the community. Funded subrecipients: My Health My Resources (MHMR) of Tarrant County for Help Me Thrive Program, and ACH Child & Family Services for Secure Assessment Facility project. 13692194 13692194 12603105.32 Yes Behavioral health facilities and equipment 9402000 1 Imp General Public No 13692194
TPN-065967 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Resource Connection Infrastructure Broadband 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project includes investments into the infrastructure at the Resource Connection campus. The campus serves as a centralized location for the provision of critical socioeconomic services by Tarrant County staff and local non-profit organizations. 93253.93 93253.93 93253.93
TPN-065950 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Alleviate Food Insecurity 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs This project will develop additional community infrastructure to alleviate food insecurity in Tarrant County. This project will assist in the expansion of a school-based food program and the expansion of meal deliveries in Tarrant County. Funded subrecipients: Meals On Wheels, Inc. of Tarrant County, and Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service. 10229968 10137666.48 7172100.02 0 Yes Food banks and other facilities 9869188 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity No 0
TPN-065954 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Alleviate Food Insecurity - Call for Projects 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs Increase resources available in the community to alleviate food insecurity. This project will implement programs to address the serious and growing food insecurity needs of the Tarrant County community through partnerships with area agencies. Funded subrecipients: 6 Stones Mission Network, Tarrant Area Food Bank, Texas Health Research and Education Institute, GRACE Food Pantry, Community Enrichment Center, Community Food Bank, and Arlington Charities. 8786843 8786843 8358490.79 12746 Yes Food banks and other facilities 6800000 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity No 1986843
TPN-066074 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Support Programs that Reduce the Effects of Community Violence - Call for Proj 1-Public Health 1.11-Community Violence Interventions Through a community call for proposals, four organizations were awarded funding to reduce the impacts of community violence. Funding will directly impact programs that serve children who have been witnesses to violence, programs that aim to reduce gun violence, youth resilience programs, and parks and recreation programs to enhance community connectedness. Funded subrecipients: One Safe Place, Lena Pope, City of Grand Prairie, and United Way of Tarrant County. 4573575.86 4573575.86 2428808.35 Yes Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks 2000000 1 Imp General Public No 2573575
TPN-065939 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Support Programs that Reduce the Effects of Community Violence - External 1-Public Health 1.11-Community Violence Interventions This project provides assistance and programmatic support for organizations that serve victims of domestic violence and abuse in Tarrant County, along with capital support to meet the increased needs of the population as a result of due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Funded subrecipients: Alliance for Children, The Women’s Center, Safe Haven, and Center for Transforming Lives. 7132939 7132939 7066502.05 Yes Other (please specify) 4983214 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 3882939
TPN-065961 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Enhance Access to Youth Services 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services Through a community call for proposals, five programs were chosen to enhance access to youth services. Funded programs include facility enhancements, mentoring programs, mobile engagement activities, educational success, and youth resilience efforts. Funded subrecipients: YMCA of Metro Fort Worth; Lena Pope; Girls, Inc.; Boys and Girls Club of Greater Tarrant County; and RevTarrant County. 8158084.89 8158084.89 5488851.96 Yes Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks 6000000 1 Imp General Public No 2158085
TPN-065887 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Provide Support for the Aging Population 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) In conjunction with local community organizations, Tarrant County will provide support for the aging population. Programs within this project include transportation and caregiver programs. Funded subrecipients: Helping Restore Ability and Catholic Charities of Fort Worth. 1561999 1561056.32 807789.13 Yes Other (please specify) 697000 28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-065877 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Support Innovative Business Support Programs 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.32-Business Incubators and Start-Up or Expansion Assistance The University of North Texas Health Science Center (UNTHSC) Next SBIR Phase 0 Program assists Tarrant County-based small businesses with the preparation and submission of proposals for federal Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) funding. The program provides mentoring, market research information, technology assessments, and grant writing assistance to small businesses as they emerge from the pandemic. The program facilitates the submission of 150 SBIR proposals during the project term. The combined impact will be the growth of small businesses, the creation of jobs, and an increase in physical therapy providers. 1377587.46 1377587.46 863620.03 No 1 Imp General Public No 1377587
TPN-065853 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Create Workforce Development Opportunities 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) To ensure a strong economic recovery, Tarrant County is funding job training and workforce development in the community with the goal of reducing unemployment and benefitting disproportionately impacted individuals. Funded subrecipients: Taste Project, Camp Fire First Texas, and Presbyterian Night Shelter. Capital expenditures included renovations to a warehouse for Presbyterian Night Shelter’s UpSpire program. 3137870 3137870 2234086.91 Yes Job and workforce training centers 538844 1 Imp General Public No 3137870
TPN-065832 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Increase Post Secondary Completion Programs 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services This project ensures a strong economic recovery from the pandemic by investing in post-secondary programs. Partnerships under this project include a persistence coach program with the TCC Foundation and a Bachelor of Nursing program (BSN) with Texas Tech Health Science Center in Mansfield. 1156168 1155524.73 1106983.57 No 1 Imp General Public Yes 630643
TPN-065893 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Provide Support for the Aging Population-Call for Projects 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) Through a community call for proposals, five SLFRF grants were awarded to support the aging population in Tarrant County. Initiatives under this focus area include: bilingual dementia programs, homebound library services, programs to reduce social isolation, healthy aging, and community re-engagement. Funded subrecipients: Guardianship Services, Inc.; James L. West Center for Dementia Care; Sixty and Better; United Way of Tarrant County; and City of Arlington. 2138207 2138207 1510917.84 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-097051 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more FRF Workforce 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.2-Public Sector Workforce: Rehiring Public Sector Staff The final rule allows for the County to increase the number of budgeted full-time equivalent (FTE) employees to support essential government functions. Tarrant County, according to the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s calculation, can hire up to 298 FTE’s under this program. 4772071 4772071 4772071 21 No Yes Yes No
TPN-096934 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Youth Educational Programs 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services The Tarrant County Texas Agrilife STEM Program will provide robust educational activities for Tarrant County youth. Increased access to high quality educational experiences for disproportionately impacted students will increase learning outcomes in Tarrant County. 651754 505280.7 500679.63 Yes Schools and other educational facilities 250000 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools No 651754
TPN-007668 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Expand Job Training Opportunities 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) This project enhances job training opportunities through partnerships with Workforce Solutions of Tarrant County and HOPE Farm, Inc. Workforce Solutions’ Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) provides education and training services through five sub-contractors as part of the Tarrant County Adult Education and Literacy Consortium. HOPE Farm., Inc. will use funding toward the construction of the Slone Vocational Center with space dedicated to training in the areas of IT, culinary arts, auto mechanics, and construction. Capital expenditures include vocational training facility construction for HOPE Farm, Inc. 1551652 1551562 1551562 Yes Devices and equipment that assist households in accessing the internet 1316800 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 951652
TPN-007639 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Technical Assistance to Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19 and Assist the Community 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses This project includes technical assistance related to mitigating the spread of COVID-19 in the community, as well as County facilities. Items such as the County's COVID Needs and Resources Assessment will be included in this project. 7730294 6411762.41 6411762.41 No
TPN-007638 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed SLFRF Program Evaluation 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery This project seeks to evaluate the SLFRF projects and programs to ensure the County's efficient and effective use of SLFRF funds as authorized by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. The Program Evaluation Specialist positions will develop and guide external and internal project requests to ensure compliance with the U.S. Department of the Treasury reporting requirements. 117112.03 117112.03 117112.03 No
TPN-007637 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Admin Capacity for Development, Implementation, and Oversight Activities 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses This project ensures that Tarrant County has adequate administrative capacity to conduct program development, evaluation, implementation, and oversight activities for the effective and efficient administration of ARPA SLFRF grant funding. 1435430.01 1435430.01 1435430.01 No
TPN-009313 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Support Programs that Reduce the Effects of Community Violence - Internal 1-Public Health 1.11-Community Violence Interventions This project provides support reduce the backlog of community violence caseloads in the Criminal District Attorney's Office that resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic. Additional FTEs were provided for the intimate partner violence unit, investigators, gang violence unit, DFPS attorney, and protective order unit. 2868645 2868645 2767210.56 No 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-009289 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Resource Connection Infrastructure Water 5-Infrastructure 5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure This project includes investments into the infrastructure at the Resource Connection campus. The campus serves as a centralized location for the provision of critical socioeconomic services by Tarrant County staff and local non-profit organizations. 2800500 2762950.68 1988890.25
TPN-009268 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Enhanced Cancer Screening and Early Detection 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center’s Moncrief Cancer Institute (MCI) provides cancer screening, patient care, and outreach to patients who did not complete or delayed cancer screenings due to COVID-19, as well as traditionally underrepresented communities. This project aims to engage 7,200 Tarrant County patients for cancer screenings and diagnostic services. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, diagnostic services were postponed or delayed. Individuals in underserved Tarrant County communities will be targeted. The Moncrief Cancer Institute will also employ community engagement strategies related to comprehensive breast, cervical, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer screenings. 9000000 9000000 7915613.62 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-009276 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Support Solutions for Housing Insecurity 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance This project provides assistance and programmatic support to organizations that serve individuals experiencing or at risk of homelessness in the County and capital support to meet the increased need for affordable housing. This project provides capital support and other additional services to meet the increased needs due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Funded subrecipients Fort Worth Housing Solutions (Hughes House and Casa de Suenos), Presbyterian Night Shelter, Tobias Place, LP, and Tarrant County Housing Finance Corporation. The deadline for the second call for proposals was June 16, 2023. 18565716 18497877.38 14265701.66 No Yes Yes Yes Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing 32500000 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity No 701000
TPN-009262 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Support Accelerator and Incubator Programs 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.32-Business Incubators and Start-Up or Expansion Assistance University of North Texas Health Science Center (UNTHSC), with its partner Techstars, offers business development assistance for a new generation of physical therapy companies. The technologies are intended to deliver innovative medicine and rehabilitation to physical therapy patients. The technologies and treatments developed by this project will help to address concerns around providing physical therapy services post-pandemic. 2400000 2400000 2200000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 2400000
TPN-009246 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Expand Access to High Quality Early Learning for all Families 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care Through a three-strategy approach funded by SLFRF, Child Care Associates (CCA) is expanding access to high quality child care in Tarrant County. Strategy One strengthens child care businesses by providing local business coaching and free access to over 1,800 sustainability tools and supports. Strategy Two, the Prime Early Learning Pilot, stabilizes child care programs by ensuring the costs of quality child care are covered, and enhances quality child care to low-income children by offering whole family supports including family meetings, professional development, and referrals to early childhood intervention services. Strategy Three will aid in the development of new child care centers in targeted areas of Tarrant County. 33505418 33505418 10783099.45 No Yes Yes Yes Childcare, daycare and early learning facilities 25340678 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 33505418
TPN-009102 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Mitigate COVID-19 in Tarrant County Facilities 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) This project seeks to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in Tarrant County facilities. By renovating existing facilities and reconfiguring workstations and customer service areas to comply with CDC recommendations, the County aims to provide a safer environment for its employees and community. 38675699.49 30346928.22 9643819.79 No Yes Yes Yes Adaptations to congregate living facilities 31013610 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-009097 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Public Health COVID-19 Staffing 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers This program includes costs related to the increased staffing needs at the Public Health and Medical Examiner departments due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 78229 77144.96 77144.96 No
TPN-009091 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed COVID-19 Vaccination Efforts 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination This project includes expenses related to the effort to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates in Tarrant County. The partnership with Trinity Metro and Arlington Via Rideshare to provide free rides to vaccination sites is funded under this project. 3620 3169.63 3169.63 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-009082 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Mitigate COVID-19 in the Community 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services This project is inclusive of public health expenses related to mitigating COVID-19 in Tarrant County including epidemiology, marketing for Public Health staffing, and facilities 919643.28 919643.28 917166.87 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-009078 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Translational Services for COVID-19 Communication Efforts 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) This project provides translation services to minimize communication barriers between the County and its residents, to ensure all residents have access to materials related to COVID-19. 10782 10782 4490.63 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-009073 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Ensure Adequate Law Enforcement Staffing 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers This project provides resources to the Tarrant County Sheriff’s Office to meet the increased staffing needs, including operational and administrative needs, resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. These expenses include, administrative and human resources staffing, detention staffing, patrol deputy staffing, and more. 2428406 2428406 2428406 * No
TPN-009017 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Mitigate COVID-19 in Congregate Settings 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) This project provides COVID-19 mitigation measures in the County jail, including additional building engineers, due to the increased space needs to distance inmates, provide a clean environment through disposable products, and provide an opportunity for home confinement to alleviate jail crowding and keep inmates safe. 810840 652420.36 617579.86 No 1 Imp General Public No 810840
TPN-009016 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Personal Protective Equipment 1-Public Health 1.5-Personal Protective Equipment This project includes expenses related to the purchase of various Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and other cleaning items for all County departments to mitigate potential exposure and transmission of COVID-19 among staff and the public. 70521 69724.04 69724.04 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-009008 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed COVID-19 Testing Efforts 1-Public Health 1.2-COVID-19 Testing This program includes expenses related to enhancing COVID-19 testing capacity throughout the County. 3538141.84 3538141.84 3538141.84 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-008982 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Tarrant County Emergency Services District No. 1 Program 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Tarrant County Emergency Services District (TCESD) No.1 provides fire, first responder, and ambulance services in the unincorporated portion of Tarrant County. TCESD provides services for approximately 80,000 residents through contracts with 26 municipal and volunteer departments for fire services and ambulance services. 15000000 15000000 4176061.79 No Yes Yes Yes Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment 15000000 1 Imp General Public
TPN-008972 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Technical Support Related to Public Health Department Development 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services This project includes expenses related to technical support for the evaluation of the Tarrant County Public Health Department and development of a plan to improve operational and spatial capacity. Items such as informatics contracts and organizational consultant contracts will be included. 487467 487467 487412.19 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-008986 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Increase Access to Mental Health Needs in the Judicial System 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services This project provides residents in the criminal justice system with access to assisted behavioral health treatment. The project helps those individuals that have acute behavioral health concerns to be provided with intensive case management under the supervision of a court. This project is a court-ordered deferral program that seeks to retain or maintain competency. Funded subrecipient: My Health My Resources (MHMR) of Tarrant County for Assisted Outpatient Treatment program. 2400000 2400000 1989757.37 No 1 Imp General Public No 2400000
TPN-008985 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Create and Operate a Mental Health Jail Diversion Center 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services This project funds the creation and operation of a mental health jail diversion center for Tarrant County. The facility provides jail diversion for individuals who interact with law enforcement and are having an acute behavioral health situation. The County purchased a facility and contracted with My Health My Resources of Tarrant County (MHMR), the local mental health authority, to operate and provide services to patients. 42 total beds are available. 26664094 26476695.66 24419854.8 Yes Behavioral health facilities and equipment 6153024 1 Imp General Public No 26664094
TPN-008936 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Reduce Judicial Backlog from COVID-19 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs This project meets Tarrant County’s need to reduce the judicial backlog that has occurred because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Closures in the court system had a negative impact on the justice system that required additional positions, updating a case-flow management program, and additional associated court activities (visitation supervision). 10250584 9862629.59 9859043.59 No
TPN-008935 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Support Public Safety Needs 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other This project will ensure that Tarrant County has adequate law enforcement personnel to meet the COVID-19-induced public safety needs in the community and in the County jail through marketing and recruitment efforts. 1597694 1518138.22 1329720.05 Yes Adaptations to congregate living facilities 625700
TPN-008934 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Ensure Continuity of Essential Government Services 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services This project seeks to ensure that the Tarrant County community has the essential government services necessary for operational needs. Continuity of essential government services includes expenditures related to operational and technological costs of various County departments such as the Medical Examiner. 1620280 1522460.53 1290067.21 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-008933 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Improve Air Quality in Tarrant County Facilities 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) This project seeks to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in Tarrant County facilities. By renovating existing facilities and reconfiguring workstations and customer service areas to comply with CDC recommendations, the County aims to provide a safer environment for its employees and community. 28181611 27911776.09 25579962.14 No Yes Yes Yes Installation and improvement of ventilation systems 18560000 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-008943 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Technologies (IT Solns) to Mitigate the spread of CV19 among Staff and Community 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) This project seeks to use technological applications to reduce the spread of COVID-19 among Tarrant County employees and the community they serve. The need for social distancing in work settings and congregate meeting rooms resulted in a demand for IT solutions such as GoToMeeting to facilitate meetings with internal and external stakeholders. 4942761 2308671.96 1997143.6 Yes Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations 1513893 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-107589 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed F: COVID-19 Administrative Expenses 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Administrative expenses to support the FRF program operations. 5932.37 5932.37 5932.37
TPN-107588 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more E: Retention Payment Program 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other Tarrant County, like other public sector organizations, has struggled to retain employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. To reduce turnover, this retention program provided Tarrant County employees with up to $4,900 in retention payments. These retention payments were necessary for all full-time County employees across all categories because each category has seen an increase in turnover due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 26784303 26707178.79 26707178.79 No
TPN-107572 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more G: Alternative Inmate Housing Program 1-Public Health 1.11-Community Violence Interventions The increased backlog of court cases and increase in crime due to the COVID-19 pandemic has created challenges for the County Jail. The jail has remained above 90% capacity in 2022 with little change anticipated. To maintain state ratios and provide superior services within the jail, additional space is needed to house inmates. Contract jail space, including in Garza County, Texas, is needed to house inmates to keep the Tarrant County jail in compliance with state standards and adequately serve the needs of the community. 37517618 35951823.05 32433651.15 No 1 Imp General Public No 37517618
TPN-107861 RCP-035895 Tarrant County, Texas Texas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed B:Direct Grant Program for Non-Profits 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) Grant funds were awarded to eligible businesses and non-profits that were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Eligible businesses and non-profits could receive up to $27,500 in funding ($2,500 base grant with an additional $1,000 per employee). The grants provided financial assistance to eligible small businesses and non-profits whose workforces were adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Awarded funds were used for workforce recovery, retention, recruitment, and development. 1000000 1000000 1000000 No 28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-115961 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Broadband Study 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services $150,000 is provided as revenue replacement for the purpose of developing a broadband infrastructure study supporting increased access within the City of Spokane. 150000 150000 150000
TPN-115959 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Utility Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services $4,000,000 is provided for the purpose of providing matching grant funding of one dollar for every dollar in outstanding utility bills written off the bills of economically challenged customers within the City of Spokane impacted by the COVID pandemic, on the condition that the City not waive or reduce any wastewater tax obligations owed under the Spokane Municipal Code to customers outside the City of Spokane without first obtaining approval by a majority of the Spokane City Council. 4000000 4000000 4000000
TPN-115957 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more ADU Permit Fees 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services $150,000 is provided as revenue replacement for the purpose of offsetting the amount of accessory dwelling unit permit fee waivers directed under the Spokane Municipal Code. 90000 72563.02 72563.02
TPN-115956 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 2022 Police Overtime 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services $2,500.00 to provide for Police uniformed overtime while understaffed 2500000 2500000 2500000
TPN-115955 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 2022 Fire Overtime 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services $3,700,000 to provide for Fire uniformed overtime while understaffed 3700000 3700000 3700000
TPN-115954 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Firehouse Safety Center 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services $125,000 is provided as revenue replacement for the purpose of capital expenditures for improvement of firehouse safety 125000 112369.59 112369.59
TPN-174512 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed General Fund Expenditures 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Misc. General Fund Expenditures 2000000 2000000 2000000
TPN-184340 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Truck for Firehouse 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Purchase of a truck to tow the firehouse purchased in project 97322. This is capital in nature. 50000 50000 50000
TPN-184339 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more AV Upgrades 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Upgrades to existing AVI capabilities to improve technology in council chambers and conference rooms in City Hall. These are capital in nature. 246080.98 246080.98 237096.89
TPN-216276 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Police Capital 2024 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Purchase of Police Vehicles in 2024. 3128000 2767767.01 2767767.01
TPN-216269 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Not Started Expo 74 +50 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Contractual Services to support the EXPO '74 5oth Anniversary public celebration in Riverfront Park. 250000 0 0
TPN-216248 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed less than 50% Language Access 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Program to develop language access and translation services so that websites and documents can be translated to other languages. 259553 69371.52 69371.52
TPN-216263 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Chief Recruitment 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Contractual Services to recruit a Police Chief and Fire Chief. 125000 112843.38 112843.38
TPN-236711 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Cannon Hill Pond 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Contractual services for Cannon Hill Pond lining project 150000 0 0
TPN-236710 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Fire Station 1 Improvements 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Purchase of equipment and facility improvements at Spokane Fire Department Station 1 300000 0 0
TPN-236709 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government School Health Center 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Contractual services for a school-based health center in partnership with Spokane Public Schools 200000 0 0
TPN-236708 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Marketing Campaign 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocation to provide local marketing and campaign to work with community centers, libraries, and community based organizations to bring awareness and assistance for community members to apply for the working families tax credit 250000 0 0
TPN-236707 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Behavioral Health Vehicle 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Purchase of Behavioral Health Vehicle 100000 60473.81 60473.81
TPN-236706 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Police Omsbudsman 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Contractual services to increase privacy of the Police Omsbudsman's Office 100000 0 0
TPN-236702 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Alleyway Activation 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services To provide lighting and activation to maintain safer alleyways downtown 166000 0 0
TPN-236704 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Downtown Housing Study 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Contractual services for Housing Study 50000 0 0
TPN-236701 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Residential Street Lighting 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services To provide expanded residential street lighting to maintain safer neighborhoods 150000 0 0
TPN-236699 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government E. Sprague BID Refuse Receptacle 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Contractual services for the purpose of refuse recepticles in the East sprague Business Improvement District 14000 0 0
TPN-236697 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Clean & Safe 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Contractual services for the purpose of refuse removal for clean and safe neighborhoods 503576.36 0 0
TPN-236696 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Youth Sports 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provide scholarships/equipment for youth sports in underserved communities 250000 0 0
TPN-236695 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Criminal Justice Funding 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Expenditures to fund municipal justice services 550000 0 0
TPN-236694 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Shelter Model Property Acquisition 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Property acquisition for reductions f impact of homelessness in the downtown core and/or for contractual service for implementation of a new shelter model outside the downtown plan area expanded south to 11 Ave between Maple and Arthur 1876233 0 0
TPN-053167 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Citywide Significance 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This request would provide funding to implement an existing policy (ADMIN 0650-16-02; LGL 2016-0023), which was made effective April 18th, 2016, that provides uniform operating rules and procedures for the consideration and award of financial assistance to development and investment project(s), which are valued at $5 million (five million dollars) and greater. Upon re-funding of this incentive, "multifamily housing" should be formally added to the Projects of Citywide Significance Incentive Policy as a significant citywide public benefit, as adopted by City Council in Resolution 2018-0112. Notably, the ARPA funded projects of significance would include a modified scoring sheet that would emphasize affordable housing and other ARPA eligibility goals 818809.51 818809.51 818809.51 No
TPN-053156 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Down Payment Assistance / Credit Union 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing Organization to administer a down payment assistance program for 1st time homebuyers. 1500000 1500000 1489577.95 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-053154 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more At-Risk Youth Services 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Seeking organizations administer funds to support culturally appropriate behavior health services and other interventions for at risk youth in the City between 2022 and 2024. 1700000 1300000 1300000 Yes Behavioral health facilities and equipment 1000000 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-053146 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Pre-Apprenticeship Education 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) 19. Pre-Apprenticeship Program -$400,000-The ARPA work group wants to create an RFP to create and operate a construction preapprenticeship educational program targeted towards individuals involved in or at risk of being involved in the criminal justice system. COVID has compounded the issues that individuals who are involved or at risk of being involved with the justice system. These individuals struggle to find stable housing, food, healthcare and these issues are even more compounded when they cannot find a job due to their involvement in the criminal justice system. This program will help students receive valuable education training that will provide students with an entrée to construction trades apprenticeships for family wage employment. 400000 400000 336894.41 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-053134 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Administration 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Administrative Needs $655,000- . With the increased demand on reporting needs within the accounting and finance team of the city, more capacity will be needed to ensure that the funds are spent in accordance and reported in compliance with the US Department of Treasury guidance. This request supports 1 FTE within the accounting and finance department (to be divided as the finance department sees fit) and necessary trainings to aid in the team staying abreast of any additional regulatory information. 655000 467059.28 467059.28
TPN-053162 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Child Care Support 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care 6. Childcare Support-$3,500,000 – Childcare Providers – CM Wilkerson/CM Zappone/Eric Finch This RFP would seek a non-profit entity to distribute grants to childcare providers within the City of Spokane for the following purposes: retention/signing bonuses for staff members who are unrelated by blood, marriage, or domestic partnership with individuals with an ownership interest in or manager of the entity; hiring of new staff members to reduce workload on current staff; and/or time-limited and descending vouchers for city residents who are newly employed. Retention bonuses would be limited to $2,000/employee and $20,000/entity. Vouchers would be 100% of first month’s cost, 50% of second month’s cost and 25% of third month’s cost as long as parent/caretaker remained employed. No more than twenty vouchers would be awarded to any one provider. If there is sufficient uptake of this grant program, the City may increase the amount of money for this project from ARPA fund balance. 3725000 3500000 2276742.29 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-053141 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Affordable Housing 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing 2. Affordable Housing-$6,000,000 - Affordable Housing Projects – CP Beggs/Brian McClatchey/Steve MacDonald-The City of Spokane already distributes pass through affordable housing construction dollars to developers of permanent low-income housing in the City of Spokane. These dollars will be distributed using an RFP committee overseen by the CHHS Board. The intent of this RFP would be to use the members of the CHHS RFP committee plus two members of communities of color to recommend grant awards of up to $1.5 million each to developers that can demonstrate an existing project in the City of Spokane that is already partially funded such that the ARPA grant would guarantee occupancy within 18 months for individuals with incomes at 60% of AMI or below. Projects would be rated, at a minimum, on the following aspects in order of importance: - Number of units produced, - Cost per unit, - Earliest date of occupancy, - Energy conservation/generation, - Proximity to transit, - Targeted at underserved groups, and - Innovative partnerships, design and techniques. 2000000 1999999.73 1811829.53 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-059378 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Cancelled Comm. Engagement/Project Coordinator 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses 8. Community Engagement/Coordination-$120,000 . With the Spokane City Council determining spending priorities, two part-time project Council Staff Positions are dedicated to the workgroup for the sole benefit of assisting Council and Administration in ARPA fund spending. The Community Engagement Specialist will develop and lead public engagement programming at all steps of the ARPA process and act as a liaison between the Council, Administration, and the public on the critical needs and navigation of ARPA funding of the community. The ARPA Project Coordinator will provide consolidation and organization of incoming proposals/applications to be communicated to the workgroup and prepared for review by both Council and Administration 0 0 0
TPN-059370 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Admin - Legal Support 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Legal Support-120,000- . With the complex guidelines set forth by the US Department of Treasury’s Final Rulings, the City has determined it invaluable to decrease the overall City risk by hiring a source matter expert to review projects and/or programs to ensure eligibility before running a competitive bid process. 7413.02 7413.02 7413.02
TPN-059361 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Don Kardon Bridge 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services 10. Don Kardong Pedestrian Bridge-$2,950,000 Create safe trail, park, and access assistance by rehabilitating Don Kardong Bridge, for local (QCT) neighborhoods and communities. Providing community, the ability to participate in healthier outdoor environments, activities, relaxing, socializing, playing, walking, running and bike riding to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Building stronger neighborhoods and addressing health disparities by providing safe access to parks, service providers and businesses in the local and Downtown area. The neighborhoods include Logan, Hillyard, Chief Garry Park, Downtown, and West Central. The Don Kardong bridge is part of the Centennial Trail that safely connects many neighborhoods with downtown parks and businesses it is one of Spokane’s primary activity paths for recreation. 2950000 2950000 2950000 Yes Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks 2950000
TPN-059350 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Parks Amenities Expansion 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other 17. Park Amenities Expansion-$1,120,000- The ARPA work group wants to create an RFP to upgrade play equipment and bathrooms in parks, prioritizing those parks located in the lowest income census tracts. COVID-19 has forced the closure of parks bathrooms and a delay in replacing play equipment that would otherwise be in high demand due to COVID-19 protocols. The lack of maintenance for the bathrooms and play equipment has led to many parks becoming unsafe or unavailable for the community to use. The RFP would upgrade the play equipment and bathrooms to allow for more community use and provide for more safe spaces for families, especially in lower income neighborhoods. 1120000 1065265.01 1065033.05 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-059334 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Homelessness Svs Capital/Operational 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services 15. Homelessness Svs Capital/Operational-$500,000 Homeless services between the years of 2022-2024 to support the purchase of capital and operational costs of current Low Incoming Housing buildings within the City. Specific proposals would be evaluated during the RFP process. Homelessness has become an increased issue during the COVID-19 pandemic and by funding this proposal the City will be able to help decrease the homeless issues within the City.3, 10124071 9798668.19 7420259.48 No
TPN-059340 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Housing Assistance Down Payment-Shared Equity 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing 16. Housing Assistance Down Payment-$2,000,000 – Down Payment Assistance – CP Beggs/Brian McClatchey/Steve MacDonald-This RFP is for an entity to administer a fund for first time homebuyers with incomes under 100% of AMI to secure supplemental down-payment assistance of up to $75,000 in exchange for deed restrictions that would provide for repayment with interest and a share of increased equity depending on the length of time between purchase and sale. The repayment funds would be returned to the fund for reuse by new buyers. At the time of purchase, a fixed amount not subject to repayment would be placed into an administrative reserve to monitor the deed and seek repayment. It is anticipated that this fund would work closely with developers of lower income attainable housing to match available units with qualified buyers who would otherwise not be able to purchase a first home. Townhouses and condominiums would be included in this program. Projects would be rated, at a minimum, on the following aspects in order of importance: - Annual cost of administration, - Record of fiscal responsibility, - Established partnerships with lenders, - Demonstrated ability to market to historically underserved communities, - Innovative program design and community partnerships, - Plan for long term tracking of properties and educational programming for clients. 2000000 2000000 2000000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-059330 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Cultural Events 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety Cultural Events Downtown-$900,000 – Downtown Cultural Events – CM Wilkerson/Mark Carlos/Garrett Jones-Grants to support Downtown cultural events 2022-2024, including parades and festivals, especially those that were not able to get LTAC funds due to the additional requirements of documented hotel stays. The funds would be used for marketing and promotional activities as well as any costs owed for City of Spokane public safety reimbursement. This process could be managed by City Administration/Council staff similar to the LTAC process or awarded as an RFP to a third party administrator. Priority would go to events that have not been funded by LTAC since 2018 with a maximum grant of $25,000/year through 2025. 793927.84 793927.84 793927.84 No 10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-059321 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Employment Support for the Arts 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality 11. Employment Support for Arts-$1,000,000 – Employment Support in the Arts – CM Stratton/Brian McClatchey/Steve MacDonald-This RFP would seek a non-profit entity to distribute grants to creatives earning their living in the arts and entities engaged in creative businesses within the City of Spokane for the following purposes: - Direct grants to individuals who primarily work in the arts and can demonstrate a drop in income caused by the pandemic, - Performing arts venues grossing less than $2 million/year in 2019 that can demonstrate a drop in income caused by the pandemic, - Non-profit arts organizations that grossed less than $1 million in income in 2019 and demonstrated a drop in income caused by the pandemic, and - Other creative business entities that grossed less than $1 million in income in 2019 and demonstrated a drop in income caused by the pandemic. Projects would be rated at a minimum on the following aspects in order of importance: - Cost of administration, - History of fiscal responsibility, - History of engagement with historically marginalized communities and creatives, - Marketing plan, - Innovative program design, - Demonstrated partnerships. 1000000 1000000 1000000 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-059345 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed less than 50% Sub-Area Planning 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services 20. Sub-Area Planning-$1,000,000 - Sub-Area Planning – CM Kinnear/Shauna Harshman/Steve MacDonald The ARP Project Committee for this project, which includes a Council Member and staff and Planning and Economic Development staff from the CED Division, will select target locations for Sub-Area Planning. The Planning Department will hire consultants through an RFP process to accomplish this Sub-Area Planning work in the selected locations with project committee members serving on the RFP review panel. The Planning Department will also hire a project employee to manage the consultant’s work. This Sub-Area Planning will be accomplished in 2022-2025. The primary criteria that the ARP Project Committee for this project will use for selecting a location for Sub-Area Planning will be established by the ARP Project Committee. These criteria will be aligned with New Market Tax Credit (US Treasury) eligible Census Tracts and other community indicators that identify underserved and distressed areas within the City (with one or more of the following characteristics: high poverty, low Area Median Income, or high unemployment). The ARP Project Committee will also consider the following characteristics when selecting target locations for Sub-Area Planning: - Social capital strength – stakeholder interest and capacity - Time sensitive opportunities & market pressures - Vacant and underdeveloped land opportunities - Other public or private investment or projects to leverage The ARP Project Committee will notify The ARP Committee once Sub-Area Planning locations have been determined and the Planning Department is ready for the consultant and project employee to be hired to complete this Sub-Area Planning work. 1000000 330791.91 219226.03 No
TPN-059324 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Equity Navigator Service 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Seeking an organization to develop and administer a new equity navigator program for accessing ARPA funds and other City funded programs that removes barriers from and empowers historically excluded underrepresented communities within the City of Spokane. 40447 40447 40447 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-059316 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Cancelled Eviction Def & Education 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid 13. Eviction Defense & Education-$300,000 – Eviction Legal Defense – CP Beggs/Howard Delaney The State of Washington has funded attorneys for low-income tenants facing eviction from their residences. The intent of this RFP would be to offer $150,000/year over two calendar years to organizations that are currently providing this work with state funding so that they can increase the number of City of Spokane residents served. Qualifications for organizations and clients served would be parallel with those using state funds from the Office of Civil Legal Aid (“OCLA”) for these purposes. Must be a non-profit organization or affiliated with a non-profit organization under contract with the Office of Civil Legal Aid to provide representation for indigent tenants appointed counsel under RCW 59.18.640. 0 0 0 0 No 1 Imp General Public 1 Imp General Public
TPN-059243 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Cancelled Mobile Medical 1-Public Health 1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities) Matching funds for mobile medical clinic(s) for 24 months ($1,200,000) provide medical staffing for existing vehicles five days/week. CHAS Health and InMotion Imaging came forward asking for ARPA funds for program like this. Once organization had staffing but not the vehicle and the other had the vehicles but not the staffing. Evaluation of projects based on: cost/day of coverage, Number of days of coverage/month, Demonstrated history of serving people living on the street, Fiscal responsibility, Demonstrated partnerships. 0 0 0 No 1 Imp General Public 1 Imp General Public
TPN-098341 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed EV Stations 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services EV Stations- $90,000 With the Spokane City Council determining the need for increased electric vehicle infrastructure, this allocation is to be used solely for the purchase and installation of electric charging infrastructure stations in the City of Spokane. 15188.58 15188.58 15188.58
TPN-098340 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Fleet Police Study 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Fleet Police Study- $100,000 With the Spokane City Council determining a need for a police vehicle study this allocation is to be used solely for a study to reduce police vehicle maintenance and purchase costs by proposing reforms to take home vehicle, when cages are included and fleet rotational policies and recommend electric vehicle model choices based on experiences of other police departments and independent analysis. 57411 57411 57411
TPN-098338 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Fire Capital (Fire Pumper Trucks) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Fire Pumper Trucks- $3,707,869 With the Spokane City Council determining spending priorities in regards to Fire Capital needs. The allocated amount is to be solely for the purchase and commissioning of 4 Fire Pumper Trucks to replace existing retiring equipment. 3707869 3489236.16 3489236.16
TPN-098332 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Police Capital (Vehicles) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Police Vehicles -$2,374,000 With the Spokane City Council determining spending priorities in regards to Police vehicle capital needs. The allocated amount is to be used solely for the purchase and commissioning of the following thirty-five police vehicles: 25 Ford K8 Electric Hybrid models, 5 Ford Mach-E models, 3 Ford Lightening models, and 2 Chevrolet Diesel Tahoe models. 2374000 2374000 2374000
TPN-009473 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Fire Overtime 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Fire 2021 Operation Revenue Replacement 1750000 1750000 1750000
TPN-009459 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Swim Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services 21. Swim Program-$220,000 The Parks and Recreation Department was significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic during the 2020 program season. Revenue from Park operations and programs decreased nearly 70 percent from 2019 levels with a number of programs and activities canceled, including the 2020 aquatics season. At the Urban Experience committee meeting on March 8th, 2021, Parks and Recreation staff presented the 2021 aquatics plan, a limited “foundational services’ model, running from June through late August and prioritizing water safety programs for the community. On April 12, 2021, the City council adopted Resolution 2021-0030 expressing support for supplemental aquatics facility and operational funding support for 2021 in an amount not to exceed $220,000. 220000 220000 220000
TPN-009455 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Playground Equipment 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services 18. Playground Equipment $160,000 -For the purpose of replacing playground equipment at the Cannon and Logan Peace Parks. 160000 160000 152660.56
TPN-009406 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Vaccination Clinic 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination 22. Vaccination Clinic-$29,000-Provide five mobile, rapid vaccination facilities at city fire stations and other locations throughout the city, to more rapidly provide COVID-19 vaccinations to the general public. 29579.63 29579.63 29579.63 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-108369 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Not Started Neighborhood Business Districts 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship Supplies grants to neighborhood business district associations and other independent business associations for capital improvements, business improvement, procurement enhancement, marketing, and branding services, for both associations and individual businesses, etc. 2500000 12750 12750 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-108357 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Municipal Justice Center 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Purchase a new Municipal Court Justice Building. 78078.18 78078.18 78078.18
TPN-108309 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed CBA Add-to-Pay 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Ordinance No. C36246 Section 1B) Of the increased appropriation, $2,400,000 is provided for the purpose of funding the add to pay for the collective bargaining agreement. 2058168.71 2058168.71 2058168.71
TPN-108335 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Extreme Weather Sheltering 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services To help provide reimbursement for expenses during the pandemic within the City of Spokane during extreme weather conditions. 120000 120000 120000
TPN-108305 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Not-for-Profit Entities 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) Financial Assistance to not-for-profit agencies affected by the pandemic. 4984880.28 4984880.28 4984880.28 No 10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-108301 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Small Business Recovery 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship Assistance to small businesses that have disproportionately impacted by the pandemic and their communities need help in the post-pandemic recovery. 4422716.22 4422716.22 4422716.22 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-108298 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed less than 50% Higher Education 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services Supply "Last Dollar Scholarship" to all High School Students who attended secondary learning. (Partnering regionally with the County, and Spokane Valley) 4895100.69 4895100.69 1512567.2 No 19 Dis Imp For services to address educational disparities Title I eligible
TPN-108294 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed less than 50% West Central Capital 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.23-Strong Healthy Communities: Demolition and Rehabilitation of Properties Capital Expenditures on City owned property for exchange of space lease. Total of three awards to three Community Centers. 500000 180178.09 0 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 500000 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-108292 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed less than 50% MLK Center Capital 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.23-Strong Healthy Communities: Demolition and Rehabilitation of Properties Capital Expenditures on City owned property for exchange of space lease. Total of three awards to three Community Centers. 500000 51722.69 51722.69 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 500000 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-108288 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed NE Community Center Capital 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.23-Strong Healthy Communities: Demolition and Rehabilitation of Properties Capital Expenditures on City owned property for exchange of space lease. Total of three awards to three Community Centers. 500000 500000 500000 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 500000 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-108280 RCP-036042 City Of Spokane, Wa Washington Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Not Started Multicultural Center 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.23-Strong Healthy Communities: Demolition and Rehabilitation of Properties Supplies grants to organizations seeking to remodel, purchase or build multicultural centers within the City of Spokane; including but not limited to: costs for design, building, purchasing, and consulting. 1000000 0 0 No
TPN-116790 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Rural Wisconsin Entrepreneurship Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides education, training, research, and technical assistance to small businesses and entrepreneurs, economic development practitioners, and communities that are interested in supporting and developing entrepreneurial activity throughout rural parts of Wisconsin. 1095638 1095638 178315.91
TPN-116789 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Municipal Services Payment Program Supplementation 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides supplemental payments to municipalities whose 2022 Municipal Services Payment (MSP) calculated in accordance with s. 70.119, Wis. Stats, was less than its 2021 MSP, or the estimated payment reported to the municipality in 2022. 759565.27 759565.27 759565.27
TPN-116788 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Veterans Rental Assistance Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program will help veterans offset reoccurring housing emergencies and provide for long-term stability through help with past due and current rent payments and other living expenses. 3000000 3000000 3000000
TPN-116787 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Veterans Outreach and Recovery Program Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides additional funding for the Veterans Outreach and Recovery Program (VORP) to provide personalized and strategic mental health supports for veterans, including suicide prevention efforts. 1562819.15 1562819.15 886527.27
TPN-116786 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Veterans Mental Health Grant Programs Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to support veteran mental health initiatives, including supporting community-based programs, increasing access to emergency services, and investing in peer support programs. 3900018.85 3900018.85 3420597.78
TPN-116785 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Lao Veterans of America Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to the Wisconsin Lao Veterans of America, Inc., to assist Wisconsin Hmong-Lao veteran members with funeral services and health care costs. 75000 75000 75000
TPN-116782 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC County and Tribal Veterans Service Offices Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides additional resources to county veteran services offices (CVSOs) and tribal veterans service offices (TVSOs) to help veterans to connect to benefits, preventative programming, and family engagement activities. 1500000 1500000 1473118
TPN-116781 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Hire Heroes Workforce Development Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) "Hire Heroes is the expansion of the Agency's Hire Heroes program, which may include, but is not limited to, providing alternative service options and increasing outreach to eligible veterans, providing incentives to employers providing on-the-job learning opportunities to veterans, and increasing program staffing." 500000 500000 331524.85 No 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment No 0
TPN-116780 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more COVID Oral Antivirals 1-Public Health 1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities) This program provides Wisconsin residents free access to a telehealth service that can issue prescriptions for COVID-19 antiviral treatments to eligible patients. 1212028 1110524.97 1110524.97 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-116779 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Wisconsin State Patrol Overtime 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other This program provides funding for the Wisconsin State Patrol to help meet staffing needs. 3000000 3000000 3000000 No
TPN-116777 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC WTCS IT Modernization Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program will modernize the Wisconsin Technical College System's Course, Curriculum and Programs System to increase responsiveness to employers' workforce and talent needs. 2000000 2000000 406514
TPN-116773 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Equivalency Diploma System Automation 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides for the implementation of a computerized general educational development certificate (GED) and high school equivalency diploma (HSED) credentials system and conversion of existing records from paper to electronic. 1500000 1500000 1448868.88
TPN-116709 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC WHEDA Foundation Housing Grant Program Supplemental Funding 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program expands the funding pool for grants to organizations that increase the supply of safe, affordable housing for people facing housing instability. 1000000 1000000 1000000
TPN-117733 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started Health Care Surge Staffing Reserve 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services This program reserves funding for future emergency staffing resources for hospitals and long-term care facilities in Wisconsin. 0 0 0 No
TPN-144002 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Transforming Human Resources Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to help the State of Wisconsin redesign human resources structure and processes to improve the delivery of services to employees, customers, and residents. 2500000 913328.49 680792.49
TPN-148488 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC DHARMA Workers Compensation System Improvements 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding for upgrades to the Workers Compensation case management system at the Division of Hearings and Appeals. 500000 0 0
TPN-153882 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Wisconsin Forest Products Cluster Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program creates partnerships with the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point and Mid-State Technical College to grow the state’s paper and forest products industry through research, business development, and worker training. 8160563 8160563 3079902.14
TPN-155110 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started Public Sector Workforce Initiative 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other This program provides funding for public sector workforce capacity initiatives. 15000000 0 0 No
TPN-164346 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Long-Term Care Facility Infection Prevention Control 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Program providing funding to skilled nursing facilities and other types of long-term care facilities for purposes of making infrastructure improvements and taking other measures that will increase the ability of the facilities to prevent infection 4800000 4800000 3157730.5 No Adaptations to congregate living facilities 4800000 1 Imp General Public
TPN-164069 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Broadband Intelligence 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program funds mapping and data analysis of broadband availability, need, and opportunity to ensure that future broadband infrastructure investment funding can be more efficiently and effectively deployed. 2976000 2976000 2345503.87
TPN-169500 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Great Lakes Inter-Tribal Council Adolescent Recovery and Wellness Center 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program helps fund the construction of a 36-bed adolescent recovery and wellness treatment center to provide substance abuse and mental health treatment and services to youth ages 13 to 17. 15000000 15000000 1121053
TPN-172797 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Secretary of State Improvements 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides resources to facilitate the identification, analysis, and coordination of process improvement initiatives and activities for the Office of the Secretary of State. 1459200 1459200 496624.7
TPN-173694 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Targeted Community Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program supports community projects with a transformative local, regional or statewide impact. 36630000 36630000 5062027.36
TPN-173692 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Main Street Bounceback Technical Assistance 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning This program provides technical assistance counseling and business planning services to Main Street Bounceback Business Grant recipients. 5364625 5364625 48199.64 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 5364625
TPN-183794 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Substance Abuse Prevention Compliance Database 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project funds creation of a database for tracking compliance with substance abuse prevention requirements on public works and public utility projects to improve the public delivery of programs and perform outreach to stakeholders engaged in such work. 277900 277900 122479.68
TPN-183787 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Safety and Professional Services Website Redesign 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery This program provides funding for DSPS to redesign its public-facing website to improve the experience of website users. 200000 200000 0 No
TPN-191059 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC City of Racine Municipal Operations 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to assist the City of Racine with municipal operations. 7500000 7500000 1547076
TPN-191058 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC City of Racine Public Safety Video Surveillance Solutions 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides for the purchase and implementation of public safety video surveillance solutions with related equipment and software accessories for the City of Racine Police Department. 1500000 1500000 493268
TPN-191057 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Capitol Police K9 Replacement 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides for the replacement of the Division of Capitol Police's vapor wake K9, which is preparing to retire. 75000 52353.64 45088.64
TPN-191056 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Veteran Housing Recovery Program Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides temporary housing, training, and supportive services to veterans who are homeless or at risk of being homeless to help them obtain permanent housing. 537162 537162 537162
TPN-191055 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Child Care Counts 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides assistance to households and individuals by preserving existing child care providers and services, creating incentives for new or expanded services, and increasing access to services for Wisconsin's working families. 172639628 172639628 63159570.05 No 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-191710 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Northridge Mall Demolition and Redevelopment Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program is to acquire, secure, and demolish the Northridge Property, including remediation of certain contaminants and hazards, site grading, seeding and construction of a pond, in order to prepare the Northridge Property for further redevelopment. The program is an essential component of the City of Milwaukee’s strategy to return the Northridge Property to productive use and accelerate economic recovery in the Granville Business Improvement District. 15000000 15000000 15000000
TPN-205020 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Ryan White Part B Supplemental Funding 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides supplemental funding to existing grantees under Part B of the Ryan White CARE Act due to a reduction in federal program funding, and which is used for continuing health insurance coverage, home and community based care, treatment and medicines that prolong life and/or prevent hospitalization; and AIDS Drug Assistance Program services for HIV-related medications. 3500000 3500000 0
TPN-220487 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cooperative Network 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program invests in Cooperative Network, which provides provides a crucial public service to Wisconsin by providing a set of unique services to the Wisconsin business community by supporting and representing cooperatives of all sizes across multiple sectors though government affairs, education, director training, communication, and public advocacy. 900000 900000 900000
TPN-234570 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Wisconsin Out of School Time Alliance Grant 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to the Wisconsin Out of School Time Alliance to coordinate and deliver training and to develop a formalized center for technical assistance and professional development courses focused on the reduction of anxiety/mental health disorders in response to the Covid-19 pandemic and social isolation conditions among Wisconsin’s youth and families. 210000 210000 0
TPN-234543 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Jobs for America’s Graduates 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to increase the number of students served by the Jobs for America's Graduates program, which helps students reach economic success by providing various forms of support and training, including classroom instruction, mentoring, leadership development, guidance and counseling, job and postsecondary placement services, links to community services, and 12-month follow-up services. 1000000 1000000 53746.83
TPN-238266 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Milwaukee Public Schools Independent Audits 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program funds operational and instructional audits of Milwaukee Public Schools to analyze the district’s programs and operations and effectiveness of teaching and instruction, respectively. 3500000 0 0
TPN-238204 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Noise Mitigation Study 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to support a study of noise mitigation for buildings in the vicinity of Dane County Regional Airport. Results are a prerequisite to applying for mitigation funds from the Department of Defense. 2000000 2000000 105931.1
TPN-238202 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC PartnerUp! Program Expansion 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program will enhance and expand the Department of Children and Families (DCF)'s existing Partner Up! Program by helping employers secure dedicated childcare slots in existing childcare facilities. The program will provide slots for a minimum of 400 children of participating businesses' employees and pay up to 75 percent of the cost of the dedicated childcare slot. 3596815 3596815 3362884.63
TPN-238200 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Meat Inspection Supplemental Funding 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides supplemental funding for the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection's state-inspected meat inspection program to mitigate the negative impact of reductions in U.S. Department of Agriculture – Food Safety Inspection Services (FSIS) funding for the program. 690131.87 690131.87 690131.87
TPN-238832 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize Fiber to the Premise service to reach 92 residential and 2 business locations in the municipality of Waumandee in Buffalo County. 500000 500000 391286.3
TPN-238831 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize Fiber to the Premise service to reach 143 residential and 11 business locations in the municipalities of Edgewater and Sand Lake in Sawyer County. 782809 782809 0
TPN-239605 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Program Compliance and Oversight 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project ensures that the State has sufficient resources to administer SLFRF programs and meet state and federal requirements after 2024 10000000 0 0
TPN-239606 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Title V Air Permit Supplemental Funding Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides supplemental funding to the DNR for its Title V Air Permit Program. 500000 500000 0
TPN-247978 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC COVID-19 Vaccination Non-Federal Match 6-Revenue Replacement 6.2-Non-federal match for other Federal Programs This program supports public health efforts to make COVID-19 vaccinations available in communities across the state through the provision of non-federal match for the COVID-19—Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters) (ALN 97.036). Vaccination efforts help limit the spread of COVID-19 and make strides in ending the pandemic. 862677.59 862677.59 862677.59
TPN-247976 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC MATC Office of Workforce Solutions Early Childhood Pathway 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funds for Milwaukee Area Technical College to offer six (6) Early Childhood Pathway closed cohort courses to support participants who are working towards earning an early childhood educational credential. 68700 68700 0
TPN-247953 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Graduation Alliance 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding for the Department of Public Instruction to extend its existing contract with Graduation Alliance pursuant to which Graduation Alliance works with local education agencies throughout Wisconsin to identify and re-engage students who have been chronically absent and/or are not on track for high school graduation. 2690000 2690000 0
TPN-247806 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Department of Health Services Office of Grants Management 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program reserves funding to be used for the purpose of creating and maintaining the Department of Health Services Office of Grants Management that will be responsible for management of the process of awarding grant funds to third parties and ongoing monitoring of and interaction with grant recipients. 8766900 0 0
TPN-110523 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Back to School Supplemental Aid 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program distributes flexible funding to school districts and independent charter schools on a per pupil basis. 74999270 74999270 74999270
TPN-110521 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Domestic Violence Shelter and Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program invests in domestic violence-survivor housing to provide additional basic services funding for shelter providers and to extend an evidence-based and holistic pilot project. 2000000 2000000 1552465.41
TPN-110522 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Services for Children With High Acuity Needs 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program funds enhanced in-community support and programming for children and youth with complex needs. 7500000 7500000 4729997.02
TPN-110520 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Milwaukee County Domestic Violence High Risk Team 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program invests in domestic violence programming through the Milwaukee County Domestic Violence High Risk Team and the Sojourner Family Peace Center. 1000000 1000000 302877
TPN-110519 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Enhanced Youth Mental Health Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program invests in enhancements to youth mental health services and a new pediatric psychology residency program. 5000000 5000000 2723257.37
TPN-110518 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started Public Sector Capacity Reserve 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other This program reserves funding for future public sector capacity initiatives. 0 0 0 No
TPN-110517 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started Medical Expenses Reserve 1-Public Health 1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities) This program reserves funding for future medical expense needs related to COVID-19. 0 0 0 No
TPN-045566 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Meat Talent Development Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program invests in meat processing training programs to help build a worker pipeline and mitigate limitations in meat processing capacity. 5110000 5110000 2531791.02 No 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-045550 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Behavioral Telehealth Services 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services "This program invests in telehealth services, including access to mental and behavioral health services, child psychiatry telehealth services, and neighborhood telehealth access points. It is split between two grant programs—one for hospitals and health systems to administer child psychiatry telehealth services, and the other for provider-organization partnerships to establish telehealth access points at convenient community locations." 5000000 5000000 4444558.04 No 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-045559 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC UW System Tuition Freeze 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to the University of Wisconsin System so that in-state tuition costs can remain constant through the state’s biennial budget. 25000000 25000000 25000000
TPN-046279 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC UW System Student Mental Health Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program expands mental health offerings for students within the University of Wisconsin System through telehealth counseling and mental health support staff. 5000000 5000000 4855396.44
TPN-046277 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Get Kids Ahead K-12 Mental Health Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program allocates grants to school districts on a per pupil basis with an award floor to provide school-based mental health services for K-12 students. 31889424 31889424 31617882.62
TPN-046244 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Emergency Medical Services Investment 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program invests in EMS providers statewide through grants for both public and private ambulance service providers. 45000000 45000000 44405763.45
TPN-046228 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Security Personnel Add-on Pay 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers This program funds a per-hour salary increase for Department of Health Services (DHS) facility staff in security classifications to improve recruitment and retention of employees in these positions and reduce overall vacancy rates. 13901451.47 13901451.47 13901451.47 No
TPN-061730 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 4 businesses and 101 residential locations in the town of Dayton in Waupaca county. 147640 147640 147640
TPN-061729 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 10 businesses and 260 residential locations in Ashland county. 6041269 6041269 0
TPN-061728 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 9 businesses and 375 residential locations in the towns of Mountain and Riverview in Oconto County. 1595464 1595464 0
TPN-061727 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 2000 residential locations in the town of Yorkville and the villages of Rochester and Union Grove in Racine county. 629616 629616 0
TPN-061726 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 47 businesses and 1531 residential locations in the cities of Whitewater and Elkhorn, the villages of Walworth and Bloomfield, and the towns of Walworth, Linn, Bloomfield, Whitewater, La G" 2244450 2244450 0
TPN-061725 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 918 residential locations in the towns of Paris and Brighton, and the village of Bristol in Kenosha county." 872171 872171 0
TPN-061724 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 39 residential locations in the town of Janesville in Rock county. 133654 133654 0
TPN-061723 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 18 businesses and 341 residential locations in the town of Wheaton in Chippewa county. 1421630 1421630 1421630
TPN-061722 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 7 businesses and 126 residential locations in the town of Weston in Dunn county. 616285 616285 616285
TPN-061721 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 6 businesses and 112 residential locations in the town of Howard in Chippewa county. 529635 529635 529635
TPN-061720 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 13 businesses and 254 residential locations in the town of Brunswick in Eau Claire county. 869545 869545 869545
TPN-061719 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 17 businesses and 326 residential locations in the town of Tainter in Dunn county. 1438035 1438035 1438035
TPN-061718 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 16 businesses and 313 residential locations in the town of Stanton in Dunn county. 1506790 1506790 1506790
TPN-061717 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 8 businesses and 146 residential locations in the town of Spring Brook in Dunn county. 794835 794835 794835
TPN-061716 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 24 businesses and 457 residential locations in the town of Red Cedar in Dunn county. 1479140 1479140 1479140
TPN-061715 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 15 businesses and 286 residential locations in the town of Menomonie in Dunn county. 1069815 1069815 1069815
TPN-061714 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 13 businesses and 240 residential locations in the town of Lucas in Dunn county. 857915 857915 857915
TPN-061713 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 17 businesses and 328 residential locations in the town of Elk Mound in Dunn county. 1383320 1383320 1383320
TPN-061712 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 1 business and 393 residential locations in the towns of Clayton, Scott, and Haney in Crawford county." 2364000 2364000 2364000
TPN-061711 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 46 businesses and 1377 residential locations in the city of Phillips and towns of Worcester, Elk, Emery, Hackett, and Harmony in Price county." 1994994 1994994 1994994
TPN-061710 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 24 businesses and 185 residential locations in the town of Barksdale in Bayfield county. 624580 624580 624580
TPN-061709 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 37 residential locations in the town of Barnes in Bayfield county. 114365.49 114365.49 114365.49
TPN-061708 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 20 businesses and 153 residential locations in the town of Lenroot in Sawyer county. 613130 613130 613130
TPN-061707 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 13 businesses and 248 residential locations in the city of Washburn and towns of Washburn and Barksdale in Bayfield county. 483365 483365 483365
TPN-061706 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 5 businesses and 493 residential locations in the town of Adams in Adams county. 869813.16 869813.16 869813.16
TPN-061705 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 3 businesses and 313 residential locations in the town of Springfield in Marquette county. 790568 790568 790568
TPN-061704 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 15 businesses and 600 residential locations in the town of Quincy in Adams county. 986180 986180 788944
TPN-061703 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 10 businesses and 641 residential locations in the towns of Mecan, Shields, and Montello in Marquette county." 2303132.9 2303132.9 2303132.9
TPN-061702 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 8 businesses and 121 residential locations in the towns of Packwaukee and Harris in Marquette county. 324091 324091 62953.9
TPN-061701 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 2 businesses and 205 residential locations in Columbia county. 901679 901679 124598.17
TPN-061700 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 2 businesses and 235 residential locations in the town of Adams in Adams county. 538645 538645 430916
TPN-061699 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 1 business and 210 residential locations in the town of Woodland in Sauk county. 949500 949500 949500
TPN-061698 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 2 businesses and 145 residential locations in the towns of Lindina and Summit in Juneau county. 624750 624750 624750
TPN-061697 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 26 businesses and 202 residential locations in the town of Cross in Buffalo county. 1703229.86 1703229.86 1703229.86
TPN-061696 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 7 businesses and 300 residential locations in the town of Alden in Polk county. 333200 333200 333200
TPN-061695 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 3 businesses and 97 residential locations in the town of Tilden in Chippewa county. 663340 663340 530672
TPN-061694 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 5 businesses and 200 residential locations in the town of Eagle Point in Chippewa county. 1216759 1216759 923727.54
TPN-061693 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 18 businesses and 668 residential locations in the communities of Little Falls, Joel, Lykens, Wanderoos, and Deronda in Polk county." 980000 980000 0
TPN-061692 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 15 businesses and 269 residential locations in the towns of Delmar, Edson, Sigel, and Goetz in Chippewa county." 1065000 1065000 349216.51
TPN-061691 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 13 businesses and 98 residential locations in the towns of Arthur and Colburn in Chippewa county. 436403 436403 349122.4
TPN-061690 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 15 businesses and 150 residential locations in the towns of Cleveland, Estella, Lake Holcombe, and Ruby in Chippewa county." 673650 673650 538920.01
TPN-061689 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 52 businesses and 993 residential locations in the towns of Freeman, Utica, and Seneca, and the villages of Mount Sterling and Lynxville in Crawford county." 5697500 5697500 5697500
TPN-061688 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 40 businesses and 652 residential locations in the towns of Troy, Honey Creek, Prairie du Sac, and Sumpter in Sauk county." 3600000 3600000 462108.84
TPN-061687 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 57 businesses and 625 residential locations in the village of Plain and towns of Bear Creek, Franklin, Buena Vista, and Ithaca in Sauk and Richland counties." 3757500 3757500 2485147.86
TPN-061686 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 23 businesses and 479 residential locations in the village of Arena, the towns of Arena and Wyoming, and the communities of Coon Rock, Helena, and Wyoming in Iowa county." 2025000 2025000 263193.86
TPN-061685 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 28 businesses and 404 residential locations in the towns of Honey Creek, Westfield, Baraboo, and Freedom in Sauk county." 2362500 2362500 0
TPN-061684 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 1 businesses and 44 residential locations in the town of Liberty Grove in Door county. 318500 318500 54968.68
TPN-061683 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 102 residential locations in the town of Sterling in Polk county. 403324 403324 122613.89
TPN-061682 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 35 residential locations in the town of Union in Burnett county. 251545 251545 139691.79
TPN-061681 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 45 residential locations in the town of Anderson in Burnett county. 223530 223530 96625.28
TPN-061680 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 65 businesses and 1268 residential locations in the Reservation of Mole Lake Indians, and the towns of Lincoln, Laona, Blackwell, Argonne, Hiles, Crandon, Nashville, Three Lakes, and Washin" 2283772 2283772 0
TPN-061679 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 102 businesses and 1036 residential locations in the city of Glenwood, and the villages of Downing and Boyceville in St. Croix and Dunn counties." 2130629 2130629 2130629
TPN-061678 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 3 businesses and 96 residential locations in the town of Norrie in Marathon county. 150000 150000 150000
TPN-061677 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 4 businesses and 148 residential locations in the towns of Almon, Stockbridge, and Red Springs in Shawano county." 543400 543400 543400
TPN-061676 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise to reach 13 businesses and 156 residential locations in the towns of Antigo, Neva, Upham and Polar in Langlade county." 544850 544850 544850
TPN-061675 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 6 businesses and 200 residential locations in the towns of River Falls, Trimbelle, and Oak Grove in Pierce county." 575465 575465 460372
TPN-061674 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 14 businesses and 360 residential locations in the city of River Falls and the towns of Kinnickinnic and River Falls in Pierce and St. Croix counties. 804340 804340 804340
TPN-061673 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 5 businesses and 255 residential locations in the towns of Ellsworth, El Paso, and Martell in Pierce county." 627174 627174 627174
TPN-061672 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 2 businesses and 214 residential locations in the town of Oak Grove in Pierce county. 507549 507549 507549
TPN-061671 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 8 businesses and 142 residential locations in the towns of Oak Grove and Clifton in Pierce county. 712130 712130 569704
TPN-061670 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 10 businesses and 250 residential locations in the towns of Ellsworth, El Paso, and Hartland in Pierce county." 591698 591698 591698
TPN-061669 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 10 businesses and 390 residential locations in the towns of River Falls, El Paso, and Martell in Pierce county." 1293497 1293497 1293497
TPN-061668 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 6 businesses and 120 residential locations in the city of River Falls and the town of Clifton in Pierce county. 537725 537725 537725
TPN-061667 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 10 businesses and 100 residential locations in the towns of River Falls and Clifton in Pierce county. 1080103 1080103 1080103
TPN-061666 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 142 businesses and 142 residential locations in the town of Mondovi in Buffalo county. 1585200 1585200 1585200
TPN-061665 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 10 businesses and 160 residential locations in the town of Naples in Buffalo county. 1137500 1137500 1137500
TPN-061664 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 10 businesses and 338 residential locations in the town of Alma in Jackson county. 2177500 2177500 1742000
TPN-061663 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 7 businesses and 177 residential locations in the towns of Harrison and Potosi in Grant county. 943333 943333 754666.4
TPN-061662 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 25 businesses and 780 residential locations in the towns of Armenia, Clearfield, Finley, and Necedah in Juneau county." 1088791 1088791 871032.8
TPN-086881 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Personal Protective Equipment 1-Public Health 1.5-Personal Protective Equipment This program funds procurement of various personal protective equipment needs. 4151892.46 4151892.46 4151892.46 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-088136 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Comprehensive Health and Wellness Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program invests in mental health support programs through the Wisconsin National Guard's Comprehensive Wellness Office. 5000000 5000000 3889433.88
TPN-088043 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Milwaukee Criminal Justice and Community Safety 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program funds criminal justice and community safety initiatives in the City and County of Milwaukee, including 911 crisis call diversion, road safety redesigns, and expanded pretrial supervision. 10752006 10752006 10752006 No
TPN-088025 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Civil Legal Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program funds civil legal aid interventions to persons facing foreclosure, eviction, and other housing-related problems due to COVID-19; needing legal assistance to access unemployment benefits, workforce opportunities, or health coverage; or still struggling with other economic hardships related to the pandemic. 8064000 8064000 6972593.19
TPN-088005 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Part-Time Criminal Justice-Law Enforcement Academy 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program supports part-time police academy programs through the Wisconsin Technical College System. 1000000 1000000 512781.88 No
TPN-088004 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Just Recovery for Racial Equity 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to mobilize community based organizations and local residents to develop and coordinate with local public organizations to mitigate the adverse impact of COVID-19 on racial and ethnic minority populations. 68470.01 68470.01 68470.01
TPN-087990 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Safety and Professional Services Staff Augmentation 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery This program funds staff augmentation at the Department of Safety and Professional Services to assist application processing. 3900085 3900085 3301813.56 No
TPN-087975 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Assistant District Attorney Initiative 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs This program provides staffing and resources to hire assistant district attorneys to address existing caseloads and court backlogs. 11639824 7892654.22 7892654.22 No
TPN-087938 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Equal Rights Division ALJs and IT 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs This program funds the Department of Workforce Development Equal Rights Division and its administrative and IT needs related to hearing and mediation services. 4087850 4087850 2888693.81 Yes Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations 2659950
TPN-096797 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Meat and Poultry Supply Chain Resiliency Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program supports the growth of Wisconsin's meat processing industry and improves the long-term viability of the state's livestock industry by offering competitive reimbursement grants that grow or develop meat and poultry processing facilities and rendering businesses' harvest or throughput capacity, improve production or profitability, or help address capacity or production bottlenecks and challenges. 9454868.13 9454868.13 6472783.31 No
TPN-097313 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Tribal and Local Law Enforcement Agency Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides grants to Tribal and local law enforcement agencies to address the unique needs facing their communities. 20943224.12 20943224.12 20943224.12
TPN-097276 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Increased Utility Cost Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program covers unexpected increases to the State’s utility costs. 1739204.18 1739204.18 1739204.18
TPN-097250 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Concordia 27 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program invests funding to convert a vacant building into a multi-faceted community center in Milwaukee's Near West Side. 5000000 5000000 5000000
TPN-097976 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Victim Services Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides grant funding to support victim services. Programs across the state and the Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault have additional resouces to meet increased demand during the pandemic. 20711000 20711000 16957742.89 No
TPN-098281 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Multifamily Housing 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing This program helps fill financing gaps due to rising construction costs, interest rate increases, and supply chain delays in multifamily housing projects across Wisconsin. 25000000 25000000 25000000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 25000000
TPN-100476 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Wisconsin Eye 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program invests in Wisconsin Eye, the state's nonprofit public affairs network. 250000 250000 250000
TPN-100395 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started Economic Impact Assistance Reserve 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other This program reserves funding for future economic impact assistance needs related to COVID-19. 35000000 0 0 No
TPN-023618 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Main Street Bounceback Business Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other This program provides grants to new or existing businesses and non-profit organizations moving into vacant properties to revitalize Wisconsin’s downtowns and commercial corridors. Funds can be used to pay leases or mortgages, operational expenses and other business costs related to the newly opened location. 96982385.11 96982385.11 96982385.11 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 96992385.11
TPN-023615 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Safety and Professional Services Licensing 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program funds system upgrades to the State's occupational licensure review and adjudication process by automating tasks and improving customer service. 7037417 7037417 6875600.28
TPN-023604 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Food Security Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The program aims to reduce food insecurity by supporting the state’s two largest hunger relief organizations. The funding is used to purchase food as well as make investments in storage, distribution, and transportation capacities. 44927061.59 44927061.59 44927061.59
TPN-024077 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Healthcare Infrastructure Capital Investment Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program aims to reduce healthcare disparities for individuals living in qualified census tracts or other populations disproportionately affected by the pandemic, by providing grants to local and Tribal governments and non-profit healthcare organizations. Grantees would be able to invest in capital projects that specifically support increasing access to healthcare for low income, uninsured, and underserved communities, and the ability to address future pandemic response needs. 100445854.44 100329521.91 81336765.48
TPN-024066 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Destination Marketing Organization Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides grants to Destination Marketing Organizations that promote tourism in a specified area. Recipients include tourism, convention, and event organizations that saw decreases in visitors or cancelled events due to the pandemic, resulting in financial losses. 15020031.77 15020031.77 15020031.77
TPN-024034 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC School Safety Resource Center 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program funds the continuation of the School Safety Resource Center that helps address threats of violence and provides referrals to mental health services in collaboration with school districts and first responders. These resources respond to the fact that the pandemic has negatively affected the mental health of school-age children. 3214100 3214100 2822463.61
TPN-024028 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Legal Services Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program increases funding for consumer and environmental legal protection, and the prosecution of domestic violence and crimes against vulnerable adults. 603919 603919 466312.98
TPN-024024 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Wisconsin State Crime Laboratories 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program supplements existing funding for the State’s crime laboratories that provide forensic science testing, responding to the need for workflow changes and safe operation amidst the pandemic. 10848252 10848252 9859172.17
TPN-023735 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Transit Services Investment 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program helps restore funding to transit systems in the city of Madison and Milwaukee County. Transit providers have lost farebox revenue during the pandemic due decreased ridership. 25000000 25000000 25000000
TPN-026554 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Health Care Surge Staffing 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services This program supports the Agency Staffing Resource Assistance Service Healthcare facilities can request assistance to mitigate stresses on staffing and subsidize 60 percent of the associated costs of temporary staffing. 45467508.51 7727142.89 7727142.89 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-026553 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more DHS COVID Operations-Environmental And Occupational Health 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) "This program funds staffing costs for industrial hygiene research scientist, epidemiologist, and environmental epidemiologist roles. These positions are dedicated to COVID-19 surveillance programs and providing consultation to employers, local health departments, and the public." 500000 500000 272529.36 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-026552 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Covering Wisconsin 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) "This program funds a navigator agency to support outreach, awareness, and enrollment related to health insurance options for Wisconsin residents" 3961009 3961009 2882742.79 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-026551 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% DHS COVID Operations-Storage And Transportation 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) This program funds warehouse and freight costs related to state’s stock of PPE and ventilators. 3401107 3181436.2 2049707.2 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-026550 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more DHS COVID Operations-Office Of Health Informatics 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) This program funds staffing costs for employees of the state health department that manage and administer data and information technology associated with providing timely, accurate, and accessible information related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including but not limited to data systems managers, help desk support, IT systems trainers, and data analysts. 375000 375000 235281.15 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-026549 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Ventilators Assistance (DHS) 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) This program provides funding for the periodic maintenance and servicing of the State's supply of ventilators to ensure ongoing availability for use by medical facilities and retain their financial value. 7523530 7523530 7523530 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-026548 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more DHS COVID Operations-Communications 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) This program funds staffing and programmatic costs associated with creating updating and maintaining DHS public-facing COVID-19 related web pages and associated data and content providing COVID-related information and public communication services. 11796500 11796500 9456903.23 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-026547 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more DHS COVID Operations-Medicaid Services COVID Funding Implementation 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) This program funds staffing costs for the administration of COVID Birth-to-3 grant funding; Medicaid and FoodShare SNAP eligibility benefit and service delivery changes mandated or authorized under federal COVID legislation; and other Medicaid and FoodShare SNAP initiatives implemented in response to the pandemic 6261100 6261100 6261100 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-026546 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more DHS COVID Operations-COVID Response Team Transition Operations 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) "This program funds staffing costs for the state health department employees that manage and administer testing, vaccination, contact tracing, and transition to recovery efforts as part of the response to COVID-19." 13485887 13485887 13111754.97 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-026545 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Local And Tribal Health Department Response And Recovery Support 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) This program funds public health departments and their efforts to address the COVID-19 public health emergency through various eligible activities. 58460000 58460000 40247737 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-026542 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Violence Prevention Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program supports the Medical College of Wisconsin's Violence Prevention Project, the City of Milwaukee's Office of Violence Prevention, and summer youth programming and job training opportunities in Milwaukee in collaboration with Employ Milwaukee, the city of Milwaukee, Milwaukee Public Library (MPL), and Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS). The initiative responds to the uptick in violence and trauma during the pandemic by using public health-based solutions. 26555224 26442585.64 13111368.49 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-026541 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Reallocated Victim Support Initiative 1-Public Health 1.11-Community Violence Interventions This program provides grant funding to support victim services. Programs across the state and the Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault have additional resources to meet increased demand during the pandemic. 0 0 0 No 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-026538 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more COVID-19 Vaccination 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination This program supports public health efforts to make COVID-19 vaccinations available in communities across the state Vaccination efforts help limit the spread of COVID-19 and make strides in ending the pandemic. 16922329.4 16922329.4 16922329.4 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-026537 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Project Resiliency 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program supports Project Resiliency, an initiative of Wisconsin United Coalition of Mutual Assistance Association to provide mental health services. Demand for such services has increased during the pandemic. 2000000 1552808.79 1552808.79 No 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate No 2000000
TPN-026536 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Milwaukee County Mental Health Emergency Center 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program supports a joint venture between Milwaukee County and the county’s four health systems for a new mental health emergency center. The center offers comprehensive mental health services, trains healthcare professionals, and provides job opportunities. 4500000 4500000 4500000 No
TPN-027283 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started COVID-19 Testing Reserve 1-Public Health 1.2-COVID-19 Testing This program reserves funding for future testing needs related to COVID-19. 0 0 0 No
TPN-027280 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more COVID-19 Testing 1-Public Health 1.2-COVID-19 Testing "This program provides funding for lab testing and specimen collection, state employee COVID-19 testing, and a testing payment program." 48906129.83 21831944.07 21831944.07 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-027065 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more State Public Defender Initiative 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs This program provides funding for additional resources to support the Wisconsin State Public Defender Office The initiative responds to the backlog of court cases due to the pandemic 14048200 11514500 10329562.34 No
TPN-027041 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Wisconsin Small Business Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship This program supports small business relief. This set of businesses have been hard hit by the pandemic and are key to Wisconsin making a strong economic recovery. 88435191.63 88435191.63 88435191.63 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-027038 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Hotel and Lodging Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality This program distributes funding to members of Wisconsin’s hotel and lodging industry. The support helps offset pandemic-incurred financial losses and maintain jobs across the state. 72275742.55 72275742.55 72275742.55 No 9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted
TPN-027032 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Tourism Capital Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides competitive grants to local governments and tourism entity non-profits to make tourism-related investments with substantial capital components. The goal is to help promote, maintain, or bolster Wisconsin tourism while emphasizing pandemic recovery and sustainability. 22114730.38 22079839.75 16280712.13
TPN-027028 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Neighborhood Investment Fund Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program funds competitive grants to local and Tribal governments for capital-focused projects that help their communities to deliver innovative public services, including new or improved facilities. These investments help neighborhoods recover from the pandemic and address equity gaps. 235165338.41 234994749.64 170765727.89
TPN-027029 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Summer Camp Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality This program provides grant funding to overnight summer camps that faced reduced enrollments and closures during the pandemic. 1997717.79 1997717.79 1997717.79 No 9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted 11 Imp Classes of NPs designated as negatively economically impacted
TPN-027026 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Movie Theater Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality This program provides grants to movie theater companies. Movie theaters have experienced significant financial losses during the pandemic with lower sales and closures. 10084032.08 10084032.08 10084032.08 No 12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-027025 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Minor League Sports Team Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality This program supports minor league sports teams that experienced lost revenue and closures during the pandemic. 2792655.5 2792655.5 2792655.5 No 12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-027020 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Event Venue and Live Event Small Business Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality This program assists small businesses that run event venues and provide services for live events. Due to the reduction of live events during the pandemic, businesses and workers in this industry suffered considerable financial losses. 30853409.28 30853409.28 30853409.28 No 12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-027012 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Equitable Recovery Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program assists community-based organizations providing services or programming aimed at increasing equity and eliminating disparities in health, early childhood development, education, economic support, housing, and environmental justice in qualified census tracts or communities disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 88138745.8 88025199.83 72735442.18
TPN-029488 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Improving Workforce Training Programs 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) "This program improves and expands workforce training efforts, including mobile classrooms, institutional job centers, and a labor market information system. " 2057600 2057600 1678047.52 Yes Job and workforce training centers 500000 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment No 0
TPN-029483 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Administrative and Operations Expenses 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses This program funds operations, including contract administration, project management, fiscal oversight, procurement, and reporting. 20951414.28 15600718.76 10945791.58
TPN-029331 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Access 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This includes remaining project awards and administration costs of the Broadband Access Grants. 1892105.56 1892105.56 1286028.1
TPN-029311 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 11 businesses and 69 residential locations in the town of Lafayette in Walworth county. 144804 144804 0
TPN-029310 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 78 businesses and 232 residential locations in the town of Washington in Door county. 1060178 1060178 839827.25
TPN-029309 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 5 businesses and 184 residential locations in the town of Pleasant Springs in Dane county. 76005.03 76005.03 76005.03
TPN-029308 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 17 businesses and 149 residential locations in the town of Lorain in Polk county 540057 540057 432045.6
TPN-029307 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 12 businesses and 187 residential locations in the town of Washington in Vilas county. 349658 349658 349658
TPN-029306 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 10 businesses and 152 residential locations in the town of Oakland in Burnett county. 252264 252264 201811.2
TPN-029305 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 1 businesses and 247 residential locations in the town of Jackson in Burnett county. 421948 421948 102463.38
TPN-029304 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 75 businesses and 690 residential locations in the towns of Sarona, Madge, Beaver Brook, and Long Lake in Washburn county." 4233425 4233425 4233425
TPN-029303 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 19 businesses and 57 residential locations in the town of Otter Creek in Dunn county. 878700 878700 878700
TPN-029302 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 9 businesses and 13 residential locations in the towns of Wilson, Cedar Lake, and Birchwood in Washburn, Barron, and Rusk counties." 185530 185530 185530
TPN-029301 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 24 businesses and 511 residential locations in the towns of Birchwood and Edgewater in Washburn and Sawyer counties. 4093321 4093321 4093321
TPN-029300 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 93 businesses and 468 residential locations in the towns of Bear Lake, Oak Grove, Sarona, and Cedar Lake in Washburn and Barron counties." 3625483 3625483 3625483
TPN-029299 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 4 businesses and 140 residential locations in the town of Foster in Clark county. 179048 179048 179048
TPN-029298 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Assistance 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects This project will utilize a Fiber to the Premise service to reach 1 business and 53 residential locations in the town of Big Bend in Rusk county 66225 66225 66225
TPN-029128 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Department of Tourism Marketing 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides amounts to the Wisconsin Department of Tourism to support its marketing and outreach, which is intended to result in broad benefits to the state’s tourism, travel, and entertainment industries. 7500000 7500000 7377448.71
TPN-030005 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Unemployment Insurance Modernization 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery This program funds system upgrades to outdated technology used to administer unemployment insurance benefits as the pandemic continues to impact operations and workload. 80828962 80828962 41921181.08 No No No Yes Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations 76547491
TPN-029999 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled (Cancelled) Unemployment Insurance Administration 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery This program provides additional funding for staff and operational resources to administer unemployment insurance benefits. 0 0 0 55 No
TPN-029970 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Wisconsin Historical Society Reopening 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program supports the Wisconsin Historical Society in its efforts to reopen museums and historical sites that closed due to the pandemic. 1000000 1000000 1000000
TPN-029564 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Diverse Business Assistance Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides financial support to chambers of commerce and other collaboratives that provide technical assistance and services to businesses owned by members of communities disproportionately affected by the coronavirus pandemic. These grants will encourage more business development in affected communities and ensure adequate support as they navigate the pandemic recovery economy. 70839207.65 70699181.39 45251901.09
TPN-029562 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Employment and Training System Application and Upgrades 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery This program improves technology systems for employment and training across the state. This allows for better targeted outreach to match employers and jobseekers. 8386150 8386150 3515411.71 Yes Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations 3527000
TPN-029560 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Job Center Staffing Resources 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) This program funds staff resources at the States job centers that provide education training employment and business services to workers to address the pandemic impact on the labor market. 3599600 3599600 3195822.72 No 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment Yes 0
TPN-029559 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Worker Connection 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) "This program funds career coaches to connect individuals looking to expand their employment opportunities in the post-pandemic economy. The goal is to help them overcome barriers, navigate the workforce system, and match them with employers that ultimately leads to careers with growth potential." 10000000 10000000 8655607.1 No 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment No 0
TPN-029558 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Worker Advancement Initiative 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) This program subsidizes employment and skills training opportunities with local employers for unemployed individuals. These grants are directed to workforce development boards around the state to provide subsidized work to individuals. 20397137 20397137 19069291.42 No 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment No 0
TPN-029551 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Workforce Data Quality Initiative 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery This program funds staff and contractual support to maintain and expand a longitudinal data warehouse. Improved data collection and analysis provides information to improve the State’s workforce development programs. 1809200 1809200 836022.16 No
TPN-029550 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Diverse Business Investment Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) to support grants and forgivable loans to small businesses, particularly those in qualified census tracts or areas disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. These businesses have been both severely distressed by the economic effects of COVID-19 and have historically had difficulty accessing the credit and capital necessary to recover. 42224312 42205828 36174179.61
TPN-031481 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Unannounced American Rescue Plan Act Programs 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program includes funding for American Rescue Plan Act programs pending announcement. 903338.13 0 0
TPN-031473 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Pandemic Response and Recovery Reserve 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program reserves funding for future pandemic response and recovery needs related to COVID-19. 15000000 0 0
TPN-031910 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Beyond the Classroom Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to non-profit organizations that offer educational and support services to children between 5 and 17 years old. Funding is used to increase enrollment capacity, additional learning opportunities, and increased mental health supports. 48222162.5 48222162.5 48222162.5
TPN-031874 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more DHS COVID Operations-Division of Quality Assurance 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers "This program funds staffing to support complaint investigations of nursing homes and assisted living facilities and complete related federal and state surveys efforts. centers, and a labor market information system. These resources assist unemployed workers. and training across the state. This allows for better targeted outreach to match employers and jobseekers" 10376880 7085200 4701128.6 23 No 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate
TPN-031841 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more DHS COVID Operations-Aging and Disability Resources 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers This program funds employees managing COVID-related funding under the Older Americans Act and project management resources for the Wisconsin Coalition to End Social Isolation and Loneliness to address mental health and other health issues exacerbated by the COVID public health emergency 575000 575000 358256.24 * No
TPN-035119 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Workforce Innovation Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program's goal is to help solve the most pressing workforce challenges at the regional level, through financially supporting collaborative, sustainable and innovative pandemic-recovery plans developed by regional organizations. This two-round program encourages the development of leading-edge, long-term solutions that enable businesses to find workers and empower those workers to prepare for and connect to family-supporting careers in their regions. 126719572 126715370.45 86709051.64 No 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment No 0
TPN-037379 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Safe Shelter and Homelessness Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides additional financial resources to homeless shelters, domestic abuse shelters, and youth homelessness and runaway centers as a supplement to an existing grant program. The funding helps mitigate unsafe housing situations exacerbated by the pandemic. 7221313.96 7221313.96 6802084.58 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations Yes 6000000
TPN-105529 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Behavioral Health Workforce Expansion and Capacity Building Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program consists of several efforts increase the quantity of behavioral health providers entering the profession to help address the shortage of mental health services. 10120000 10120000 10096068.2
TPN-106291 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC PATHS Youth Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to Permanent Connections, Academics, Training and Employment, Housing Social and Emotional Well-being (PATHS) that prepares youth from out-of-home care for successful adulthood. 800000 800000 616656.75
TPN-106288 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Park Falls Water Main Improvements 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program makes water infrastructure investments in the City of Park Falls. 3750000 3750000 2200000
TPN-106287 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Dream Up! Child Care Supply-Building Grant Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program expands existing efforts to provide strategic planning support, funding, and stipends to address child care shortages. 2500000 2500000 2433679.3
TPN-106279 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Low Income Home Energy Assistance 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid This program supplements existing funding to ensure that low-income households have available assistance to pay for heating costs through Wisconsin Home Energy Assistance Program. 13426172.73 13426172.73 13426172.73 38625 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 13457007.95
TPN-106270 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Safety and Professional Services Customer Support Service Center 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery This program provides additional resources to the customer service center at the Department of Safety and Professional Services. 5943000 5943000 4843292.07 No
TPN-106268 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Natural Resources Conservation Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program funds five projects that invest in efforts in conservation, education, and stewardship of the state’s natural resources. 4462515.41 4462515.41 1320915.41
TPN-106264 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Milwaukee County Medical Examiner and Emergency Medical Center 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program supports the construction costs of the Center for Forensic Science and Protective Medicine, which will house the Milwaukee County Medical Examiner's Office and the Milwaukee County Office of Emergency Management. 20000000 20000000 20000000
TPN-106826 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC HEAB Information Technology Modernization Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program funds technology upgrades to the Higher Education Aids Board’s financial aid system. 3180000 3180000 1244840.65
TPN-109702 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Well Compensation Grant Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to support the replacement, reconstruction, treatment, or abandonment of private wells facing contaminants such as nitrate, E. coli, and arsenic. 10074484.59 10074484.59 6740899.72
TPN-109637 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Maternal and Child Health Initiative Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program funds efforts to improve maternal and child health outcomes through grant programs and partnerships. 16000000 16000000 5045271.05
TPN-110300 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Keep Wisconsin Warm Fund 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to the Keep Wisconsin Warm/Cool Fund for crisis energy assistance. 3000000 3000000 3000000
TPN-110297 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Homeless Case Management Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program provides funding to homeless case management services and the State Shelter Subsidy Grant Program and to help Wisconsinites experiencing homelessness and the shelters that serve them. 499326.82 499326.82 499326.82
TPN-110291 RCP-035828 State of Wisconsin Wisconsin Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC City of Racine Blueprint for Peace Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This program funds efforts to reduce violence in Racine through a public-health approach. 715000 715000 302436.11
TPN-088091 RCP-035824 Shelby County, Tennessee Tennessee Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Government Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The County took the entire award as revenue loss has used it to support various government services such as Community Service projects, providing infrastructure support to the County's clinics, equipping the EMS team with much needed equipment, providing much needed food and temporary housing support to disiefranchised families. 182033509 182033509 126167006
TPN-115211 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Reaching Hope - Family Trauma Recovery Program Expansion 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services By ensuring the clients and staff at Reaching HOPE are well-supported, this project will enable Reaching HOPE to hire and maintain both English and Bi-Lingual English/Spanish-speaking mental health providers, as well as a Bilingual Community Engagement Coordinator who can assist our clients with finding and obtaining resources that allow for safety and stability. In addition to providing the resources needed to hire and maintain staff, this project will also provide direct therapy services to children, families, and frontline workers in Adams County who do not have adequate access to other funding sources. 397820 397820 397820 No 1 Imp General Public Yes 0
TPN-117029 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Centro Comunitario 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses Adelante Community Development (ACD) business programming provides support and education to Spanish-speaking entrepreneurs. Under the entrepreneurship pillar, ACD offers three main programs: 1) Business and Digital Skills Development, 2) Business Transformation, and 3) Business Solutions. Ten subprograms fall under the three main programs. An entrepreneur may participate in any of the 25 projects available under the 10 subprograms, depending on their knowledge of business compliance, industry, and level of establishment of their business. ACD additionally offers government business compliance services, as well as digital transformation support for business owners. The programs and services are offered 100% in Spanish, in a culturally relevant fashion. ACD has championed the ecosystem for the Spanish-speaking entrepreneur community in Colorado creating the access to education, business mindset, tools and technical assistance in Spanish to establish a strong foundation in business fundamentals since its inception in 2014. Our business programming works to meet the business community where they are – working individually with entrepreneurs to build up the unique capacity and skills required for success. Through our comprehensive programs, we are committed to bridging the funding gap and providing the technical assistance required for business compliance, finance preparation, digital transformation, and ongoing business operation. 1886362.67 1886362.67 1257575.12 Yes Job and workforce training centers 365000 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 600000
TPN-117644 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more BHA Adams County Covid-19 Recovery Center 1-Public Health 1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits With our ARPA funding, we plan to update one of the community centers we own and transition it into a food pantry. We are looking for a food access partner who can assist us by running that program. These upgrades would include updated security to the building, updating any electrical to handle industrial equipment, and flooring. With Covid-19 we found that not only is our community have food access issues they are also experiencing issues with finding safe and clean housing. We are also using funds for housing navigation. This will assist our services department help our community find safe, clean and affordable housing in the Adams County Area. 350000 350000 350000 50 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-117633 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Aurora Interchurch Task Force - Food Pantry 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs Adams County ARPA funding supports Aurora Interfaith Community Services' expanded food assistance services for Adams County residents in Aurora, which are delivered through a brick-and-mortar food pantry and a mobile food pantry. Aurora Interfaith’s brick-and-mortar food pantry offers a variety of food options and many hours of availability, being open at least four days each week. Aurora Interfaith’s mobile food pantry, launched in May 2020 in response to increased need during the COVID-19 pandemic, provides farmer's market-style food distributions in locations around Aurora (including schools and low-income housing facilities) to ensure ease of access and decrease the stigma associated with food insecurity. Both pantries provide a variety of nutritious and culturally appropriate food choices, including fresh produce. Through these food pantries, Aurora Interfaith helps community members to survive food insecurity brought on by the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic. 73152 73152 73152 877 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate Yes 0
TPN-117627 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Aurora Interchurch Task Force - Community Navigation Services 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators Aurora Interfaith Community Services (Aurora Interfaith)’s community navigation program helps clients to access the diverse resources they need during the challenging COVID-19 environment and economy, with an ultimate goal of supporting clients in overcoming poverty and food insecurity long-term. There is a great need for this program, which will help current clients to not only survive COVID-driven poverty and hunger but to have equitable access to resources for improving their lives long-term. We have found that our clients have had difficulty finding and utilizing these resources for myriad reasons that include a lack of time, language barriers, experiences of discrimination, often an unawareness of the services available, and having been disproportionately impacted by the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic. In Aurora Interfaith’s community navigation program, staff members work with clients to identify their current needs and ultimate goals and help them to access appropriate community and governmental resources through referrals and warm handoffs. Primary referral categories include housing and homelessness, veterans' assistance, health and mental health, employment, legal assistance, immigrant and refugee support, and education. 30163 30163 30163 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate Yes 0
TPN-117622 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 9Health:365 Serving Marginalized Communities 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination 365 Health’s project is to serve marginalized communities within Adams County through hyper-localized bi-lingual outreach, engagement, marketing, and communications around preventive health topics, including COVID-19, and flu, and through vaccine clinics (including COVID-19 and flu vaccines), health fairs inclusive of preventive health education, accompanied by screenings such as vision, dental and more and connection to next step resources, such as Telehealth. 201069.48 201069.48 201069.48 No 1 Imp General Public 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-117620 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Kids in Need of Dentistry Adam County Oral Health 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services KIND’s mission is to increase the oral health and happiness of Colorado children in need by eliminating dental disease through treatment and education. We envision healthy mouths, minds, bodies, and habits for every child. KIND values providing thorough, high-quality services to not only treat existing dental issues, but also prevent future dental disease, and reduce fear and anxiety associated with dental visits. Above all, KIND values providing quality care, with kindness. This endeavor, grounded in the concept of a health home with coordinated, continuous, and comprehensive care, has major potential to improve access to oral health treatment – and whole-person physical and behavioral health and social and public service. 271628 271628 271628 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-117524 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed The Senior Hub: Addressing the Exacerbated Needs of Adams County Older Adults du 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs Working directly with older adult community members, The Senior Hub has identified that priority community needs during the pandemic include food insecurity and nutrition, social isolation, access to healthcare, and support for those with memory loss and cognitive issues as well as support for their caregivers. The Senior Hub's Meals on Wheels program provides prepared home delivered meals to food insecure older adults in Adams County. Meals are delivered by staff members and trained volunteers who also provide wellness check-ins, friendly conversation, and additional resource supports. Daily meal drop-offs are an opportunity for volunteers and staff to monitor for any declines in the clients physical or mental conditions so that The Senior Hub can follow up with appropriate safety measures as needed. 1286550.63 1286550.63 1286550.63 5314 No 1 Imp General Public 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity Yes 1527063.63
TPN-117512 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Growing Home Infrastructure Development Project 1-Public Health 1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits Growing Home's continued effort to serve participants struggling with immediate needs in the areas of food and housing, while walking alongside them to address their long-term challenges obstructing them from leading a stable and successful life. This program also builds Growing Home's DEIB infrastructure and ongoing trainings to support an inclusive staff experience that can be expressed externally to participants. 788740 788740 788740 425 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations No 0
TPN-117503 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% ECPAC - Supporting Young Children and Their Caregivers 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care The Early Childhood Partnership of Adams County (ECPAC) plans to strengthen the overall health and wellbeing of young children (ages 0-8 years) and their families impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic by implementing the following strategies: a. Support the social and emotional development and mental health of children in Early Childhood Education (ECE ) and other community settings by providing early childhood mental health consultation and training for ECE providers in supporting social emotional development. b. Support sustainable and high-quality childcare programming by assisting early care and education programs with needed resources, including those who wish to start a childcare business, thereby increasing the number of childcare slots available, and allowing more families to find necessary care to return to work. c. Support professionals in advancing or entering the ECE field, to further support sustainability of business and increase the number of slots available for families, by providing culturally specific relationship-based support in navigating the various career pathways. 197719 197719 131153.33 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 1 Imp General Public Yes 0
TPN-117486 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more ECPAC - Family Care Navigation Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators Offer community-based, culturally responsive care navigation to Adams County families of young children (ages 0-8) and support families in following through with indicated services, with a priority focus on families experiencing housing instability/homelessness in the northern part of the County through a dedicated co-located partnership with Almost Home. 207295.33 207295.33 137851.16 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity Yes 0
TPN-117474 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more CASA of Adams - Volunteer Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.13-Healthy Childhood Environments: Services to Foster Youth or Families Involved in Child Welfare System The CASA Volunteer Program supports children who have experienced abuse and neglect and are involved in the court system by recruiting, training and professionally supervising community volunteers to advocate for their best interests and ultimate well-being. CASA Volunteers are sworn in as Officers of the Court and appointed by a judge to serve on a case. They provide an extra set of eyes and ears intended to keep children safe. They spend time with the children to provide a social connection and a caring, consistent adult who wants to know and understand what is important to them, what they have, what they need, and what they want. CASA Volunteers visit with children at least two times per month to ensure a safe placement and foster a relationship with them. They gather objective information so that the judge can make informed decisions about therapy, treatment, visitation, placement, and ultimately, permanency. An inherent benefit of the CASA Volunteer Program is its one-to-one model. One CASA Volunteer is typically appointed to work with one child or sibling group and stays involved for the duration of the case. A CASA Volunteer provides compassion, stability, and a voice when a youth’s world is turned upside down. As part of their role in the court process and as an adult connection for youth, CASA Volunteers also advocate that families have adequate resources to succeed in properly caring for children and providing a stable home. 965270 965270 965270 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-117463 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Archway Housing & Services 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs Archway Housing & Services owns and operates two affordable housing communities in Adams County: Greenleaf and Villa Verde. Combined, these communities serve 82 households which represent 249 individual residents in Adams County that benefit from having access to affordable housing. More than half of the households house a minor under 18 with 89 youth living within the community. Like all Archway communities, there is a full-time onsite Program Coordinator who works closely with all residents to assess their needs, gather feedback, and provide appropriate supportive services such as food banks, COVID-19 vaccines and information, benefits access, linkages to healthcare and mental healthcare, and much more. 4500 4500 4500 78 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity Yes 0
TPN-117444 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed VEC - Low Wage Workers Fund (LWWF) 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.9-Unemployment Benefits or Cash Assistance to Unemployed Workers The Low Wage Workers Fund (LWWF) provides financial assistance to low-wage workers who test positive for COVID-19. Since many of them do not have employer paid sick leave, this supplemental assistance makes it possible for them to stay home and quarantine, offsetting the financial hardship from lost wages. The LWWF provides up to $1,500 in cash payments to households ($1,000 for single adults) to allow for people earning under $30,000 per year to quarantine upon a positive COVID-19 test result. We are referred to applicants through either a self-referral or they are provided by Tri-County Health Department and the Veterans Affairs Hospital upon a matching intake by their respective program officers. 500000 500000 500000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs Yes 0
TPN-117388 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more VEC - Microenterprise Business Development 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning The Village Exchange Center (VEC), Aurora Chapter of the NAACP (NAACP) and the Colorado Hispanic Chamber of Commerce (COHCC) are partnering to provide targeted support to minority-owned small businesses in Adams County. This program is focused on providing support to minority businesses as they pivot to meet the challenges in the current landscape, realize economic recovery and provide pandemic relief. 1164076 1164076 776050.9 No 24 Dis Imp Other SBs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify Yes 0
TPN-117367 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Adams County Emergency Food Bank 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs Adams County residents have been impacted by COVID-19, including those who have lost employment or are no longer able to work due to the impacts of COVID-19. Adams County Food Bank continues to serve individuals and families by providing direct food assistance and improving the air quality and safety in the building where food assistance and Head Start services. With the continued increase in demand of our services, we replaced volunteers sheltering in place with staff members to help meet the growing demand for services and food. This led to a 125% increase in staffing costs over January 2020, and double the spending amount for food purchases (we continue to incur those costs). We also are incurring additional costs related to equipment and supplies related to food distribution. 350000 350000 350000 4044 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-117310 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Junior Achievement Programs for Adams County Youth 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.27-Addressing Impacts of Lost Instructional Time JA-Rocky Mountain equips volunteers with proven curriculum to facilitate meaningful programs and experiences for students in Adams County. Young people need access to role models who can fuel their confidence and motivation, instill an enterprising spirit, teach them about financial responsibility, and help them gain practical skills and knowledge to pursue a rewarding career. JA programs in Adams County align with the county goals of Education and Economic Vitality and Community Enrichment as we facilitate partnerships between business and community organizations and local schools to provide impactful experiences that equip young people for success in the workforce with a focus on high growth industries and careers. 40000 40000 40000 No 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools
TPN-117272 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Ready to Work Aurora 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance RTW Aurora provides Emergency and Transitional Shelter and employment for adults experiencing homelessness who wish to participate in our RTW Program. Our program provides immediate access to safe and COVID- free shelter in our RTWA House. We provide basic needs such as laundry facilities, meals, showers and access to COVID testing and vaccinations. RTW participants have the desire and capacity to work full-time and with the right support, can become self-sufficient. RTW provides that platform for success and a tremendous return on investment (ROI) for the community. We accept participants from a variety of community referral partners such as faith communities, Department of Corrections, Shelters, Substance Abuse and Mental health treatment centers, and walk-ins. Approximately 40% of our participants have reported that they come from the City of Aurora or Adams County. Our Ready to Work (RTW) Program provides a pathway to independence for adults experiencing homelessness. RTW offers balanced and effective solution by offering 3 elements within 1 program immediately upon enrollment: 1) Paid employment and workforce development training in a RTW Aurora owned social enterprise 2) Dormitory-style housing in our RTW Aurora House (located on Peoria Ct. and Parker Road, across from Nine-Mile Station) 3) Case management support services, which include addiction recovery, financial management and employment/housing counseling 202348.33 202348.33 202348.33 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations Yes 0
TPN-117249 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Ralston House Child Advocacy Center - Mental Health Case Management Navigator 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services Ralston House is an accredited child advocacy center through the National Children's Alliance (NCA), operating under strict, best-practice standards. Children and teens who have been abused sexually, physically, emotionally, or are witness to a crime, can tell their story, undergo a comprehensive, pediatric medical exam and receive victim support services in a friendly, respectful environment, as they begin to heal from the trauma they have experienced, without being re-traumatized in the process. All services are free of charge to victim families and investigators and are available in both English and Spanish. Ralston House also provides education and outreach to prevent child abuse. 96075 96075 64050 No 1 Imp General Public Yes 96075
TPN-117236 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Ralston House Child Advocacy Center - Bilingual Program 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services Ralston House is an accredited child advocacy center that provides a child-friendly, safe, neutral environment where law enforcement, case workers, mental health, and medical professionals can talk with children and their families in surroundings that would lessen the anxiety of a child who has been assaulted. This program allows monolingual or bilingual Spanish-speaking child victims to receive forensic interviews and victim advocacy support from Ralston House staff who are like them and can understand the nuances of their specific culture and language. 248281.33 248281.33 165520.88 No 1 Imp General Public Yes 248281.33
TPN-117210 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Colorado Youth for a Change - Educational Recovery 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services To address the learning impacts of COVID-19 through evidence-based tutoring, academic and attendance support. The Educational Recovery program directly addresses pandemic-related learning loss for Adams County students, while also helping to close persistent educational inequities. Specifically, the program will: 1) increase reading proficiency among K-3rd graders, ensuring that students read at grade level by 3rd grade, 2) increase math proficiency among 4th-8th graders, ensuring algebra readiness by 8th grade, and 3) increase school engagement and attendance among 9th-12th graders who have been disengaged during COVID-19, ensuring that they get back on track to graduate. 552348.33 552348.33 552348.33 No 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools 19 Dis Imp For services to address educational disparities Title I eligible Yes 552348.33
TPN-117189 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Colorado Poverty Law - Adams County Housing Solutions 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance This project would leverage CPLP's existing work in Adams County to expand legal resources to create housing solutions through five subprograms. 1. Eviction legal Defense Representation Services. Funding would expand resources to counsel and represent County residents on eviction and housing security matters. 2. Fair Housing Representation Services. Funding would counsel and represent residents on disability discrimination, source of income, immigrant protection, and other fair housing practices that impact housing equity. 3. Housing Navigation Services. Funding would assist at-risk County tenants to transition to alternative housing and avoid homelessness. 4. Young Adult Legal Services. Funding would outreach with partners to the young adult population to help them obtain and maintain housing. S. Self-Help Legal Services. Funding would develop materials and provide community training for County residents to engage in self-advocacy. 1040000 1040000 1040000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity Yes 1040000
TPN-117168 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Five Star Ed Foundation - COVID-19 Response Team and Supports 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other This grant will provide meaningful support to students and their families in crisis due to COVID and its impacts. The funds will hire two new staff members of SFOP (Student and Family Outreach Program) solely dedicated to providing triage for students and families and analyzing and adjusting processes and needs as COVID-19 changes including recovery and planning for the endemic phase. It will also focus on the ongoing health needs of students due to COVID for the 2022/2023 school year. The funds will also allow us to hire 8 Health Aids and 2 Health Aid floats. The roles will continue to provide support to schools when students, their family members, and staff test positive for COVID. 487033 487033 487033 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations No 487033
TPN-117076 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed VEC - Health Equity Fairs 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination The Village Exchange Center will partner with the Colorado Hispanic Chamber of Commerce to reach the most vulnerable and at-risk Spanish-speaking Hispanic populations of Adams County.While Covid-19 campaign awareness and vaccination efforts are ongoing across Colorado, we know many of these efforts are not reaching our immigrant and Spanish-dominant Hispanics. We are working to develop more effective, accessible, and culturally sensitive support for the most vulnerable in our community, Spanish-speaking Hispanics. VEC has hosted one of the Governor’s equity clinics since February 2021 and has seen many successes through different methods of outreach. Specifically, VEC has empowered its Natural Helpers, trusted leaders from multiple countries of origin, to provide targeted outreach to the hardest to reach communities. In addition, VEC piloted the Vaccine Equity Fund in partnership with Adams County and saw a large spike in vaccination rates as a result of financial incentives of $250 for BIPOC individuals.VEC will partner with the Colorado Hispanic Chamber of Commerce to launch targeted outreach strategies for the Hispanic population. 0 0 0 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-117050 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Rocky Mountain Partnership - RMP 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other RMP brings community partners / community members most impacted by the challenges that are sustaining through COVID-19 together to work on strategic projects that address these challenges. They use a proven framework centered around data and voice / perspective to inform collective projects and hold accountability to making impact through short / long term metrics. RMP exists to ensure community members have the opportunity to earn incomes that allow them to take care of themselves / their families and reduce inequalities amplified by COVID-19. RMP facilitated seven response teams in 2020 and continues facilitating efforts around talent development and housing. Others are sustained through different organizations. This includes the development of a collective data infrastructure, convening regional stakeholders, engaging community, supporting regional partners / community members to grow talent to ensure individual prosperity and increase income-aligned housing. RMP provides coaching / technical assistance to AdCo ARPA subrecipients to ensure their efforts align with improving community outcomes. 249999.66 249999.66 249999.66 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate Yes 249999.66
TPN-117046 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Cultivando - COVID-19 Community Response 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.3-Household Assistance: Cash Transfers Our proposed work will help to continue supporting the work we are currently performing. Many of these individuals are undocumented who received no government aid from the pandemic. Others experienced loss of employment and reduced work hours which caused them to fall behind on rent and medical bills. Many in our community also lost family members and are currently facing the aftermath of the pandemic. We want to support the folks who in our community received little to no financial support and who continue to struggle to recover from the hardships that the pandemic imposed on them. Another component to this project is supporting our home-based childcare providers, known as Family, Friends, and Neighbors (FFNs). Our FFNs are an essential component to our community. They are the ones who provide care, education, structure, and support to the many families in our community who cannot afford a licensed child center, and although they have a big responsibility in caring for our children, they are often not paid what they deserve. FFNs are facing financial struggles to provide nutritious meals, and educational opportunities to the children in their care. The goal with these funds is to alleviate their stress with the opportunity to purchase fresh foods and healthy alternatives for the children in their care. Ultimately, the pandemic has brought on emotional, physical, financial, and spiritual heartaches to our Latinx community, and we recognize the importance of self-care and mental health. With this support of the Adams County COVID-19 Response and Recovery grant we would like to continue providing our emotional health programming and invite speakers that support the growth and well-being of those who continue to face repercussions. 34608.93 34608.93 34608.93 19 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity Yes 0
TPN-117041 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Second Wind - Connecting Youth At Risk 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services Second Wind Fund connects youth at risk for suicide with life-saving mental health treatment. Suicide is currently the leading cause of death for youth ages 10-24 in Colorado. Second Wind Fund (SWF) aims to decrease the incidence of suicide in children and youth by removing the financial and social barriers to treatment. Second Wind Fund’s underlying goal is to ensure that all youth at risk for suicide have access to life-saving therapy. SWF partners with therapists across the state who are licensed and experienced working with this population. With our delivery process, we are able to invest in the mental health community by paying therapists directly for 12 - 20 sessions of therapy per youth, while also working collaboratively with school districts, youth-serving professionals, and other mental health agencies to expand the network of professionals who are prepared to respond quickly and effectively when a young person is at risk. Specific to this project, Second Wind Fund will support Adams County youth ages 19 and under who are at risk for suicide and who are facing one or more financial or social barriers to accessing treatment, connecting them with providers in our network and paying for 12 – 20 sessions of therapy. 66600 66600 66600 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic Yes 46805
TPN-118282 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Cancelled Ralston House Child Advocacy Center - Prosecutor Project 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Ralston House proposes a 3-year Prosecutor Project in the 17th Judicial District that would provide 1 FTE prosecutor position that would elevate and enhance support for cases specifically brought to Ralston House by Adams County. Ralston House proposal would ensure that a prosecutor from the 17th Judicial District would observe forensic interviews involving Adams County, for the duration of the grant funded time-period. The goal of this project is to have the prosecutor participate in the multi-disciplinary team during child abuse and neglect investigations which will lead to more successful prosecutions of child/abuse neglect, or more expeditious dismissal of cases.In addition, the 1FTE prosecutor assigned to Ralston House would work closely with law enforcement from the onset of an investigation allowing for strong and healthy partnership to form and the prosecutor to train and steward newer investigators as to what important evidence to collect, and whether a case can be prosecuted or would be dismissed. 0 0 0 No 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-118276 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Jesus on Colfax 1-Public Health 1.11-Community Violence Interventions This short-term program will provide a long-term impact for friends, the majority of whom are of color (JOC refers to community members as "friends"). This new program is directly related to the pandemic because statistics show COVID-19 has led to an increase in violence/addiction. Goals: 1) Create a strong community presence to support friends/discourage violence; 2) Partner with community stakeholders to expand anti-violence/anti-drug programming; 3) Protect friends by increasing area security; 4) Provide emergency supplies/awareness training/support. Violence has been rampant recently, as evidenced by several traumatic incidents. 29200 29200 29200 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity Yes 29200
TPN-117787 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Revenue Replacement 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Public safety salaries from our detention facility staff. 10000000 10000000 10000000
TPN-117730 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Intrepid Body Works 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses The grant m would be used to address some of the needs of current and new employees. Due to expansion significant amounts of additional PPE would be needed to keep staff and clients safe ($2000). This includes but is not limited to masks, air purifiers, increased chemicals for sanitation. Medical Expenses for an alternative medical facility would include additional equipment for the increase in rooms like hydroloic tables ($25,000) Payroll costs to cover the new staff, get them off unemployment and in the work force as quickly as possible ($10,000 one months payroll for current operations). 5000 5000 5000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-118408 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed HEIDIS TEST KITCHEN LLC 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses We are improving technology system for our point-of-sale system to offer contactless payments, and a mobile app, continue PPE, continue to offer health insurance for full time workers, continue employment for existing staff and hope to add more staff. To continue operations we have had to invest in some new equipment and need additional equipment and create a mobile app to become more available to customers. 5000 5000 5000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-118405 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed HEIDI'S BROOKLYN DELI 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses We are seeking to develop our workforce as we work to hire and train new staff in a tight labor market while also working to stay open at full capacity hours for the community while being short staffed. We are looking to invest in technology support for touchless service to our guests as we make up the lost revenue from Covid 19. 5000 5000 5000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-118391 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Colorado Coalition for the Homeless- Renewal Village 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons The Colorado Coalition for the Homeless (CCH) received $3.8M in funding from Adams County to assist in the acquisition and renovation of the Clarion Inn to create a continuum of housing opportunities for individuals experiencing homelessness and creates a combination of long-term supportive housing (PSH), bridge and transitional housing, and non-congregate shelter under one roof. Located at 200 W 48th Avenue near the border of Adams County and Denver County, the Clarion Inn is an active, operational hotel that CCH intends to acquire and repurpose to meet the immediate critical needs of homelessness in Denver County, Adams County, and the surrounding metro area. The project will increase the supply of much-needed safe housing solutions and provide critical on-site supportive services to assist people in finding and maintaining long-term housing. 3800000 3800000 3800000 Yes Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing 3800000 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations Yes 0
TPN-118389 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Maiker - Building Community Spaces 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety Maiker aims to build indoor and outdoor community space to mitigate the negative impacts its community members (majority families and children) faced due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including the deterioration of a sense of community, the worsening of food insecurity, and the low utilization of educational and social support systems. This project aligns with the County priority areas by 1) serving Adams County residents who are low-income, BIPOC, and families with young children, and 2) improving social determinants of health and improving access to safety net services. Low-income, BIPOC populations experienced the highest levels of financial strain and stress during the pandemic. 552348.33 552348.33 184116.11 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 624233 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-118381 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Mapleton Public Schools 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services We are just starting to realize the significant impacts of COVID in our community. Mapleton's increased classroom sizes because of teacher resignations have resulted in a rise in student behavioral issues. In addition to increased incidents of challenging behaviors, we also experienced increased staff turnover in our middle grades. Therefore, we are hiring Culture Coaches for each school with middle grade levels and a Culture Coordinator to support Culture Coaches in their implementation of social-emotional education and positive school culture and climate. Culture Coaches will be charged with: collaborating with teachers to design and implement classroom management systems that are feasible, age-appropriate, and consistent among school teams; integrating behavioral and social-emotional learning practices into their instruction; and reducing students’ reliance on the adult(s) in the classroom and increase their independence through strategic structures and support. Culture Coaches will also lead and coordinate peer mentoring programs. 759472 759472 759472 No 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations Yes 759472
TPN-118377 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Rebuilding Together Metro - Safe at Home & Emergency Repairs 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance We offer programs to all low-income homeowners in the Metro Area but target Adams County low-income homeowners who have been affected by COVID. Our organization has seen an increase in service calls since March 2020.We help vulnerable populations remain safe at home. Many older adults need critical home repairs and modifications. Rebuilding Together’s (RT) Safe at Home Program provides home health and safety repairs for low-income homeowners. These repairs are simple and inexpensive, but unreachable for low-income homeowners. Safe at Home removes safety hazards and helps homeowner age-in-place, retaining their home. The program is year-round and volunteers conduct the repairs. Common repairs: locks and doors, smoke/CO alarms, Class ABC fire extinguishers, tub treads, grab bars, interior handrails, lighting, minor plumbing repairs and the ER Program tackles urgent home repairs, including furnaces and hot water heaters usually in 72-hour or less. ER repairs keep families in their homes and avoid county intervention. RT pays skilled professionals to complete the work. We have strong relationships with licensed contractors. They offer in-kind materials and labor, reducing our cost. RT Safe at Home/ER aligns with Adams County's Priorities preserving Affordable Housing by providing free repairs to low-income homeowners that can’t financially make needed repairs and remain safe in their homes prioritizing older Adults, Veterans and Multi-generational families including children. 55000 55000 55000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs No 0
TPN-118373 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed OTM Skin's Community Tattoo Removal Program 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses We created this public health program in 2020 to help people in re-entry, ex-gang intervention, rehabilitation, and human trafficking organizations and have continued to go above and beyond to serve our community and make a positive impact during the pandemic with our professional laser tattoo removal. Sometimes, all the personal rehabilitation in the world can't change how the world views you, but with this program, we can help change how people view themselves. 20000 20000 20000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-118364 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Aurora Mental Health 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.21-Medical Facilities for Disproportionately Impacted Communities The Acute Care Center construction project will co-locate and expand three essential behavioral health services offered by Aurora Mental Health and Recovery (AMHR): 1) 24/7/365 Withdrawal Management; 2) 24/7/365 Walk-In Crisis Center and a Crisis Stabilization Unit; and 3) Connect to Care same-day access clinic. Construction of a new facility to co-locate these services will eliminate first responder and community confusion regarding where to access acute behavioral health services and thereby increase access to the correct level of care. The new facility will also provide sufficient space for program expansion, including expansion Withdrawal Management from 30 to 45 beds and expanding medication assisted treatment onsite, and will support staff collaboration. The project will support construction of a 48,000 square foot facility on a 7-acre property that is easily located off 1-225 and Mississippi to create a one-stop location for mental health and substance abuse care. 1341862.67 1341862.67 447287.56 Yes Behavioral health facilities and equipment 1341862.67 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-118348 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Every Child Pediatrics- Virtual Scribe 1-Public Health 1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits Every Child Pediatrics is piloting a virtual scribe service in our Thornton Clinic to help reduce the immediate and long-term impact of COVID-19 on clinician well-being. Utilizing virtual medical scribes and other virtual tools can reduce clinician burnout by taking on administrative tasks for the clinician, improving job satisfaction by removing distractions, allowing for more meaningful patient interaction, lowering turnover rates, enhancing productivity, and increasing patient satisfaction. 75000 75000 75000 No 10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-118344 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Vuela for Health - Mejorando la Salud Juntos 1-Public Health 1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits Through our project, Mejorando la Salud Juntos (Improving Health Together) Vuela for Health will address workforce development and provide COVID-related messaging and vaccination clinic referrals while educating and training Latinas, allowing them to move toward financial independence. Our project aligns with Federal, State and Adams County priorities by creating a workforce development project specifically for Latinas living in Adams County that also incorporates COVID-10 education and referral to either a Vuela hosted or other organizations vaccine clinic. Our Embajadoras (Ambassador) program is a workforce development pathway as we train graduates of Vuela physical and mental health programs on motivational interviewing, self-care, vicarious trauma and COVID-19 information. They become certified in Youth Mental Health First Aid and have an in-depth understanding of what depression is, symptoms, and assist with the individual receiving mental health services if needed. 90076.33 90076.33 60050.88 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-118341 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Platte Valley - Nurse Extern Transition to Practice Program 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Platte Valley Medical Center Foundation (Platte Valley), will pilot an initiative in partnership with Colorado Christian University (CCU) that will bridge the gap between academia and practice in order to create practice-ready graduate nurses. The Nurse Extern Program is a competitive-entry, specialty-specific transition to practice for top-seeded senior-level BSN nursing students. New nurses will have greater satisfaction, productivity, competence, and confidence from the outset of their nursing career. This will support COVID-19 recovery by increasing nurse retention and reducing turnover costs. Additionally, Platte Valley believes expanding nurse's competencies will better equip them to improve patient care and satisfaction and eliminate health inequities in Adams County. Therefore, this project will address both the County priority area of Health Care & Vaccinations, as well asWorkforce Development & Job Training. 1500000 1500000 1500000 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-118358 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Maiker - Crossing Pointe South Affordable Housing Development 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing Maiker Housing Partners (Maiker) requests funds to develop an affordable housing community Crossing Pointe South. Funding for the completion of construction and/or interest costs of a low-income multifamily housing. 750000 750000 750000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-118337 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Savio House - Child First 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services In partnership with Invests in Kids, Savio has launched Child First in Adams County as a response to a need for evidence-based interventions for families that address youth mental health and trauma. This two-generation model utilizes a mental health clinician and a care coordinator to prevent or mitigate the effects of stress and trauma on young children. The Child First model is based on scientific research that asserts early trauma and adversity lead to biological changes in young children that damage their developing brain and metabolic systems, leading to long-term problems in mental health, learning, and physical health. The program addresses this by directly decreasing the stress experienced by the family by connecting them to needed services. Intensive care coordination and parent-child psychotherapy strengthen the caregiving relationship, mitigate the effects of trauma, and promote long-term positive outcomes for children and families. 100000 100000 100000 No 1 Imp General Public 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs Yes 100000
TPN-118324 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Mile High United - United for Schools 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services Mile High United Way’s United for Schools (UFS) program partners with schools in under-resourced neighborhoods with the goal of improving school attendance and reducing chronic absenteeism, thereby increasing the chances of academic success. When students are chronically absent, they miss 10% or more days of the school year (18 or more days). Regular attendance is an essential first step toward academic achievement, but one in five Colorado students is chronically absent. Among UFS partner schools, that ratio was nearly one in three students before the pandemic, and the disruptions created by the pandemic during the last year resulted in an even higher number of chronically absent students. 226500 226500 226500 No 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs Yes 0
TPN-118319 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Almost Home - Adams County Housing Stability Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons Almost Home, Inc. provides a variety of services to increase opportunities to permanent housing. These programs include the Rapid Re-Housing Program, Homelessness Prevention Program, and the Housing Navigation Center. Almost Home provides Rapid Re-Housing to households experiencing literal homelessness in Adams and Southern Weld Counties. Once enrolled in the program, households receive ongoing supportive, home-based case management services to help ensure ongoing housing stability and short-term rental assistance. Referrals for this program come directly from local CoC Coordinated Entry systems. The Homelesss Prevention Program offers rental, mortgage, and/ or utility assistance to households to ensure they stay stably housed. The Housing Navigation Center provides an array of services for drop-in clients. 1886362.67 1886362.67 1257449.36 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 1886363
TPN-118312 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Colorado Safe Parking - Adams County SafeLots 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons CSPI will create and sustain a network of legal SafeLots serving Adams County residents. CSPI will recruit and plan SafeLots to meet the County's current and emerging needs, conduct outreach to unsheltered individuals targeting those residing in vehicles (PLV) and connect them to a full range of services. CSPI will provide centralized intake services, interview homeless individuals and families to access their needs, provide crisis intervention as needed and determine eligibility, provide referrals, and assign to a SafeLot as appropriate. Once assigned to an Adams County SafeLot participants (guests) will be greeted by a host and provided services. A case manager will contact each guest and provide professional case management and supportive services including housing search and placement, employment, substance abuse services, and health/mental health care and benefits enrollment. In addition to service navigation and connection to housing, CSPI provides hotel/motels and/or alternate shelters for winter weather or car repair emergencies. Working with SafeLot hosts and partners, CSPI also works to meet additional guest needs such as providing gas cards, towing fees, car maintenance, and companion animal supplies and services. CSPI tracks applicant and guest data in HMIS and evaluates the effectiveness of each SafeLot. 387889.23 387889.23 258592.82 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations Yes 387889.23
TPN-118307 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Weecycle 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Baby Gear Essentials is WeeCycle’s primary program developed to match and provide essential baby gear to Colorado families in need. WeeCycle partners with individuals and businesses to obtain baby gear donations, which are then distributed through partnerships with local community nonprofits serving at-risk populations. The partnership model ensures that each family receives the wraparound support services they need to thrive. Our goal is to meet each family’s specific needs rather than provide a “one size fits all” donation. Under this program, we operate two subprograms: our Diaper Bank and Mobile Baby Essentials. The Diaper Bank program was established in early 2018 as a response to the overwhelming need and substantial amount of diaper requests by families. The term “diaper need” is a simple concept with devastating ramifications. 1in3 American families suffer from diaper need, defined as lacking an adequate supply of diapers to remain clean, dry and healthy. Mobile Baby Essentials is our latest program to address the inequities that exist among vulnerable populations struggling to meet their children’s basic needs. Through this program - both in partnership with other organizations and independently - we deliver much needed diapers, wipes, baby food and baby formula to underserved populations in targeted underserved and under resourced areas across the Denver metro area and beyond, in their own neighborhoods, thus eliminating financial and transportation barriers. 618491 618491 618491 Yes Other (please specify) 25000 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-118298 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Cancelled Shiloh Home - Family-Based Housing for Youth Finishing High School 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.13-Healthy Childhood Environments: Services to Foster Youth or Families Involved in Child Welfare System This $70,000 grant across two years will support Shiloh House expand their existing Host Homes program into Adams County to house ~10 unaccompanied youth (approximately 50% child welfare-involved) over the age of 18 while they complete high school. Host Homes is a nationally recognized model for providing family-based transitional housing for homeless and/or runaway youth in the k-12 school system. Host families would be trained and approved for the proposed program to shelter and support an unaccompanied youth. 0 0 0 No
TPN-118295 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Kids First Health - New Pediatric Primary Care Clinic 1-Public Health 1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities) With just two medical exam rooms and one part-time mental health counseling room at our current site, the Westminster pediatric primary care clinic is too small to effectively meet the need for care among local children and families. The support of Adams County ARPA grant funds will allow Kids First to relocate our Westminster clinic into a larger, higher-capacity space within Maiker Housing Partners’ Alto community. Funds will be used to convert existing space into a pediatric health clinic that will double Kids First capacity to deliver medical and mental health services to children and youth ages birth to 21. Our current clinic cares for over 1,100 children and youth, and 78% identify as Latino. Approximately 80% of our patients are enrolled in Medicaid, and close to 20% are uninsured. The local Westminster school district has a free/reduced lunch rate of 79%, and five Maiker Communities are located within three miles where approximately 450 children under the age of 18 reside. Kids First’s partnerships with Westminster Public Schools, Maiker and other local nonprofits will help us reach new children, youth and families and deliver the care they deserve. 618264 618264 412176 Yes Improvements to existing facilities 618264 1 Imp General Public
TPN-118286 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Kids First Health - Expansion of Children and Youth Mental Health Services 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services The mental health of children and youth has never been more important and integrating counseling into primary care is an evidence-based model for achieving wellbeing. The pandemic contributed to an unprecedented level of mental illness, and states of emergency for youth mental health were declared locally and nationally by Children’s Hospital of Colorado and the American Academy of Pediatrics, respectively. Low-income and communities of color were particularly hard hit. Approximately 80% of Kids First patients are enrolled in Medicaid, and close to 20% are uninsured and likely uninsurable due to immigration status. The great majority of our patients identify as Latino, and many caregivers are recent immigrants and mono-lingual Spanish speakers. Delivering mental health services improves access to care for our patients and helps to eliminate stigma because patients feel it’s just a "normal" visit to the doctor's office. Kids First hired our first behavioral health professionals (BHP) in 2021, and the Adams County ARPA grant has allowed us to further build mental health programming so that it meets the need. Kids First will continue to hire BHPs to deliver counseling and brief interventions across Kids First’s sites, including school-based clinics where we care for students and in community clinics that serve ages birth to 21. A Program Manager will deliver limited direct patient counseling and oversee other staff and operations to support a fully functioning Mental Health Program. Medicaid reimbursement is expected to largely sustain the program in the future once BHPs successfully achieve full patient panels. 603408.67 603408.67 603408.67 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs Yes 603406.67
TPN-120256 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Vaccine Stipend 2022 Q4 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination Vaccine stipend for new employees 6800 6800 6800 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-120250 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Covid Payroll 2022 Q4 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Payroll for staff helping with outreach to homeless, elderly, and low income. Payroll for staff doing backlog for out human services department due to covid. Payroll for staff in emergency management who are creating awareness and gathering data from the ones most in need. 381370.11 381370.11 381370.11 24 No
TPN-146195 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Covid Payroll 2023 Q1 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Payroll for staff helping with outreach to homeless, elderly, and low income. Payroll for staff doing backlog for out human services department due to covid. Payroll for staff in emergency management who are creating awareness and gathering data from the ones most in need. Payroll for staff doing subrecipient monitoring. 305909.96 305909.96 305909.96 22 No
TPN-146736 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Neighborly Software 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Software to support subrecipients and the reporting needs 35100 35100 35100
TPN-146750 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Administrative Expenses 2023 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Admin supplies to support staff working under ARPA. 44874.48 44874.48 44874.48
TPN-151470 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Cancelled Front Range Community College Foundation - Adams County Nursing Student Clinical 1-Public Health 1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries This proposed program will help offset the significant strain upon Colorado regional healthcare networks through providing additional trained nurses ready to directly enter into the local healthcare system. COVID-19 has, and continues to provide, significant strain on regional and state-wide healthcare system resources. Funding will support the hiring of one (1) full-time clinical coordinator from February 2023 through December 2024 who will support Front Range Community College’s Westminster Campus nursing program students. The provider will assist Front Range Community College nursing students through clinical placement/coordination/data tracking, support of the nursing simulation training, and programmatic support (administrative/student enrollment.) 0 0 0 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-151439 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Adams County School District 14 - Homeless Supports Office Expansion 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance To expand the staffing and services offered by it's Homeless Supports Office. The increased staffing will fund an additional Homeless Liaison to assist the District in servicing the additional demands caused by Covid 19 for these families and more specifically children experiencing homelessness in Adams 14. To expand the hours and services of the Hope Center which is a community program run on donations that provides families in need within Adams 14 but not necessarily homeless with referrals and information on support available along with offering services and support to ensure their basic needs are met. 275000 275000 183333.32 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment Yes 0
TPN-151398 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Adams 14 - Motorola Nitro 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.4-Household Assistance: Internet Access Programs The Adams 14 - Motorola Nitro project is intended to provide consistent and reliable high-speed internet for our students at their homes. 1000000 1000000 333333.33 0 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-151363 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed CSPC - Conectando and Providers Advancing School Outcomes (PASO) 1-Public Health 1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits Providers Advancing School Outcomes (PASO): A unique, long-term, comprehensive training for Spanish-speaking Friends Family Neighbors (FFN) in-home childcare providers, favored by immigrant communities living with low-incomes, to attain Child Development Associate (CDA) certification and increase children’s school readiness skills. Tutoring- As a response to the academic and emotional stress that has been caused by the COVID-19 health crisis, this program will provide academic mentorship, relationship building and socio-emotional learning to K-12 students in Adams County. 60000 60000 60000 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-151332 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed AEOC North Aurora AEOC COVID Recovery Program 1-Public Health 1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits Funding will support the Aurora Economic Opportunity Coalition's (AEOC) COVID-19 response and recovery programs directed at immigrant and refugee communities of North Aurora. Specifically, it will support vaccination clinics, outreach to Spanish-speaking households, workforce development programs and basic needs assistance that address health equity. This organization’s objective is to establish economic equity that supports the revitalization of North Aurora by empowering long-time residents and small business owners, particularly immigrants, refugees and people of color. 75000 75000 75000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-151306 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Mango House 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Mango House is the largest facility serving exclusively refugees in the state (actually country). It has been in Adams County on Colfax since 2014. In 2019 Mango House added a facility just across Colfax which is in Arapahoe County, and since then Mango House exists as two buildings - one in Adams and one in Arapahoe. These house initiatives including covid vaccine testing/tracing/vaccines. Our facility in Adams county at 1532 Galena is a community center, housing a dozen churches (Nepali, Burmese, Swahili/DRC, Kirat, and Somali Bantu) and youth programs (Scout Troops, underserved Bike clinic). We also use the space for our covid initiatives in the last couple years. 75000 75000 75000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-151060 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Front Range Community College - High Needs Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.3-Household Assistance: Cash Transfers The High Needs Fund is the Foundation's emergency fund providing financial assistance to FRCC students experiencing unforeseen financial hardship. The goal is to provide students with resources to meet their basic needs without having to drop out of school or go into significant debt to complete their education. Due to COVID-19, many of our students lost work, became sick, or had family members become sick. The HNF allowed them to apply for immediate financial assistance (up to $500) to help pay for rent, groceries, medical bills, child care, and more. The fund helps keep students housed and safe while allowing them to pursue their education and achieve their career goals. 50000 50000 50000 99 No 1 Imp General Public Yes 0
TPN-152292 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Mile High United - Bridging the Gap 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) Bridging the Gap (BTG) program has served young adults who enter the program at age 18-24 who have been involved in the child welfare system, (foster care and/or the Department of Youth Services) and who lack safe and stable housing when they enter the program. BTG uses a multi-faceted approach that links housing with wraparound services in the areas of housing, coaching, education, employment, and mental health support. 294153 294153 98051 No 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity No 0
TPN-174645 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Foster Family Meals 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services HSC food needs 6802 6802 6802 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-174643 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Smart Benches 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Install smart benches in areas where people experiencing homelessness congregate to provide solar-powered Wifi and electricity to those that need it. 12000 12000 12000 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-174640 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Covid Payroll 2023 Q2 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Payroll for staff helping with outreach to homeless, elderly, and low income. Payroll for staff doing backlog for out human services department due to covid. Payroll for staff in emergency management who are creating awareness and gathering data from the ones most in need. Payroll for staff doing subrecipient monitoring. 362838.92 362838.92 362838.92 21 No
TPN-174581 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Urban Land Conservancy - Holly Park 5-Infrastructure 5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater The $350,000 ARPA grant award will enable ULC to complete a drive aisle and pedestrian infrastructure project in partnership with Westminster’s Green Court right of way repair work in the Holly Park community. In late-December 2018, the City of Westminster transferred a previously condemned 6-acre parcel of land to Urban Land Conservancy (ULC) for the development of workforce housing at Holly Park. ULC worked on development plans and secured a development partner in 2019. April 2020, ULC had just finalized development agreements and construction budgets when COVID-19 halted business operations. Supply chain and commodity cost increases disrupted predevelopment and project funding, leading to ULC’s November 2021 request for $2.3M for housing development budget gap. The $350K ARPA grant funds enables ULC to re-activate pre-development infrastructure activities stalled by COVID-19 conditions. " 350000 350000 116666.66
TPN-174546 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Boyer's Coffee Site Acquisition - Land Banking 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing Site acquisition for the former Boyer's Coffee located at 7925 Washington Street. Funds will cover acquisition costs for the future development of affordable housing. The subrecipient will construct a minimum of 90 affordable units. 2250000 2250000 2250000 Yes Other (please specify) 2250000 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-181458 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Adams 14 Scholars and Funding the Unfunded 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services The Adams 14 Education Foundation board uses fundraising to support the scholarship program, Funding the Unfunded mini-grant program and Leadership Commerce City. In 2020 and 2021, the Foundation did not raise enough funds to run these programs to full capacity. The Foundation board had to use funds from the Foundation's reserves to float these programs. Both of these programs support the students and staff of the Adams 14 School District. The funds allow us to provide additional funds for more teacher created programs and additional support for our scholarship students. 35000 35000 35000 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-181409 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Strengthening Families Partnership (ECPAC) 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators ECPAC is working to increase access to services for marginalized families - who were mostly likely impacted by COVID. ECPAC will focus efforts on the following: 1. Systems Alignment efforts of the Strengthening Families (SF) Partnership Leadership Team: Includes ECPAC serving as the backbone with the goal of strengthening partnerships, elevating policy and funding solutions, ensuring strong data/evaluation efforts, and ensuring community voice in decision making. 2. Strengthening Families Protective Factors Alignment: increasing concrete supports in time of needs and social connections led by ECPAC as the backbone organization with local community partners to support the Family Resource Center Hub in Commerce City as the coordinated “one-stop shop” and shifting community norms top support help seeking behaviors and promote social connections. 3. Direct Services: Helping families connect to services that promote all 5 protective factors. 1150000 1114375 409583 No 1 Imp General Public Yes 0
TPN-181371 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Severe Weather Activation Program (SWAP) 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.17-Housing Support: Housing Vouchers and Relocation Assistance for Disproportionately Impacted Communities The Severe Weather Activation Program (SWAP) is a program that activates during inclement weather and provides life-saving measures for people experiencing unsheltered homelessness. SWAP will assess households and administer hotel vouchers directly to enrolled households when the weather poses a threat to the well-being and lives of people sleeping or living outdoors. 2000000 2000000 666666.66 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-182917 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Covid Payroll 2023 Q3 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Payroll for staff helping with outreach to homeless, elderly, and low income. Payroll for staff doing backlog for out human services department due to covid. Payroll for staff in emergency management who are creating awareness and gathering data from the ones most in need. Payroll for staff doing subrecipient monitoring. 192062 192062 192062 10 No
TPN-182904 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Farmers Market 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other The Adams County Healthy Farmers Market is a coalition-led initiative designed to increase access to fresh, healthy, and local foods in areas identified as USDA low-income, low-access. The secondary mission is to provide a safe, community hub that offers access to benefits enrollment, a plethora of community resources, and small, local businesses. 69624.95 69624.95 69624.95 No 1 Imp General Public Yes 0
TPN-194187 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Domestic Violence Programs 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Adams County has set aside $4 million dollars in ARPA funds to fund community partners that provide Housing, Mental Health, and wrap-around services for victims of Domestic Violence. 4711000 4645390 827202.06 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic Yes 0
TPN-193135 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed ACCESS Housing Tiny Home Village 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons Site acquisition for 8-10 Tiny Home units for families and unaccompanied youth located at 6960 Colorado Blvd. Commerce City, CO 80022 485000 401426.67 401426.67 Yes Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing 1704641 1 Imp General Public 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations Yes 0
TPN-192525 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Adams County Domestic Violence Program Support 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other As part of our ongoing collaboration with Adams County Government, the Rocky Mountain Partnership (RMP) team is actively supporting the implementation of the ARPA tranche 2 recommendations around domestic violence presented to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) on February 7, 2023. We will empower the Domestic Violence Workgroup with tools, data, and guidance to make informed decisions about the distribution of funds and effectively address the critical issues arising from the intersection of domestic violence and impacts of COVID-19. 80000 80000 80000 No 1 Imp General Public 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate Yes 80000
TPN-192052 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Agriculture Supportive Housing 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing Site analysis for the Historic Splendid Valley located at 13600 Crystal Street. Funds will cover all pre-development studies for the future of potential development of agriculture supportive housing. The subrecipient agrees to complete all pre-development studies necessary to move forward to the next phase of development (the “Project”). 100000 100000 100000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 0
TPN-191827 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Affordable Housing Land Banking Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing Adams County set aside $8,900,000 in ARPA to fund an Affordable Housing Land Banking Program. Eligible entities can apply for funds to acquire land for the future development of affordable housing. Properties must be located in Adams County and be consistent with HOME Investment Partnerships Program guidelines. Projects funded under this program will remain affordable for a minimum of 40 years for rental properties and permanently affordable for-sale units under a land trust model. Eligible entities include local housing authorities or non-profit affordable housing developer (for sale), and experience developing affordable housing. 3300000 3050000 3050000 No Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing 0 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 6750000
TPN-191802 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Covid Payroll 2023 Q4 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Payroll for staff helping with outreach to homeless, elderly, and low income. Payroll for staff doing backlog for out human services department due to covid. Payroll for staff in emergency management who are creating awareness and gathering data from the ones most in need. Payroll for staff doing subrecipient monitoring. 288565.72 288565.72 288565.72 9 No
TPN-227208 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Almost Home, Next Step 2 Gen Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.17-Housing Support: Housing Vouchers and Relocation Assistance for Disproportionately Impacted Communities "The Next Step Program provides ongoing supportive, home based case management services to help ensure ongoing housing stability and short-term rental assistance to referred McKinney-Vento families. " 134400 134400 89600 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-226495 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Adams County Broadband Study 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Analysis and data gathering for the preparation of a broadband strategy that creates the greatest opportunity and value to implement solutions that are capable of meeting current and long-term community needs. The strategic plan will include recommended approaches to broadband implementation. 162540 162540 91155.22
TPN-226635 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% HSC Food Security Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs Adams County Human Services Department (ACHSD) has made available American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) grant funding for projects and programs that provide services and support to increase food security and access for Adams County residents. This funding is intended to increase food security in Adams County by targeting efforts in three priority areas: 1. direct access to food, 2. education on food access, and 3. improving the ability to access and store food. 1469500 1275386.88 714014.87 24855 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 240096.5
TPN-227377 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Mental Health Stigma Reduction 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services The Metro Denver Partnership for Health (MDPH) is partnering with community organizations to reduce stigma associated with mental health among communities who experience disproportionate mental health outcomes, The goal of this project is, by 2027, to reduce the percentage of self-reported mental health stigma by 5% among adults within these priority populations. This program is a continuation of funding and will utilize lessons learned from two previous cohorts. Adams County Health Department is a member of the Metro Denver Partnership for Health (MDPH). MDPH is a collaboration of public health agencies, healthcare partners, and Medicaid-serving organizations working to improve health in Colorado. 919900 739946.1 247546.1 No 1 Imp General Public Yes 0
TPN-227119 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Community Reach Center - Youth Shelter 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance To provide a safe trauma-informed 24/7 homeless youth shelter in Adams County, as well as ancillary services, to surrounding areas as contracted, with support and partnership with various Country, State, and other entity involvement. Homeless youth shelter services to include: 24/7 trained staffing, meals daily, milieu management, case management, and basic medical assessment services. Through case management services internal and external referrals will be made for services and identified needs using evidence-based models to assess risk and needs: clinical interventions to best fit the needs of the individual youth and their families as needed, use modalities to address Family Systems; Substance Misuse/Abuse; Serious Persistent Mental Illness, referred interventions to included but not limited to: Motivational Interviewing; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Group Dynamics and Therapy; Family Systems work; and in-home services. Through these internal and external referrals, CRC will be able to support the complex needs of Adams County Homeless Youth with the ultimate goal of family reunification, or long-term sustainable placement provided by human services, or other qualified organizations within a 21-day program stay 1200000 1200000 800000 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity No 0
TPN-227801 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Mental Health Gap Assessment 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Behavioral Health Assessment for Adams County 100000 98098.6 45098.6
TPN-227762 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Building Resilient Community-Based Organizations 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) As ARPA and SLFRF funds begin to dissipate, it is imperative to support our local nonprofit and community-based organizations that serve Adams County in building their internal capacity and overall resiliency. The “Building Resilient Community-Based Organizations” program provides in-depth capacity-building to equip organizations with the tools they need to understand their internal and external systems to maximize community impact, maintain sustainable services, and be better prepared for any major change or disruption that may occur in the future. Program Details: 10 coaching sessions 3-5 training sessions 1-year action plan development Recommendations for continued capacity-building activities, training, or coaching Roundtables and networking opportunities Collaboration with Colorado Non-profit Association Funds for related activities, trainings, coaching 325000 212500 145833.33 No 10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-237364 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Aurora Regional Navigation Campus 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance The City of Aurora will acquire a regional navigation center housing campus that will include 150 shelter beds, 80 transitional units, and a full-service day center with laundry, mental health services, housing navigation and case management. 5000000 5000000 5000000 Yes Transitional shelters 5000000 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-237071 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Rapid Rehousing Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance Housing Now is excited to expand services in Adams County through a rapid rehousing project targeting Safe Outdoor Parking participants. Kathy Mulloy is the director of Housing Now and will head up the team with the Safe Outdoor Parking Initiative (CSPI) project in Adams County. Housing Now is located at 2821 W 65th Place in Westminster Colorado. Up to ten outdoor parking spaces may be located at this address and the case management team will work with those participants as well as other safe parking locations throughout Adams County. The staffing proposal includes one Lead Case Manager and one Housing Navigator/Case Manager working a flexible schedule to meet clients when it is best for the participant. Staff will coordinate referrals through the Colorado Safe Outdoor Parking initiative. Housing Now will utilize the Housing First model and Rapid Rehousing to provide permanent housing outcomes for identified households from the safe parking location at the Housing Now site and throughout Adams County’s Safe Parking sites. 1000000 1000000 333333.33 0 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity Yes 1000000
TPN-236674 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Adams County Long-Term Resiliency Plan 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses The Adams County Long-Term Recovery and Resiliency Plan will establish a framework that represents the vision for a resilient future. It represents a call to action and partnership, supporting proactive, ongoing coordination among the organizations and stakeholders to ensure it is prepared for, and has the capacity to recover from, any natural or manmade disaster. This process will capture our organization’s projects, services, programs, and partnerships in one document in order to better understand our capacity and resources as well as identify where gaps may exist. 165000 165000 39987.98
TPN-238961 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Detention Facility Salaries 2024 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Salaries for Detention Facility Staff - Increased after COVID-19 for 2024 8162071.94 0 0 No
TPN-054583 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Covid Payroll 2022 Q1 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Public safety staff 36547.75 36547.75 36547.75 8 No
TPN-094197 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed ANM software 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses This expense is related to the Business Registration programme launch. During COVID, the County has launched many different business relief programmes (Mini‐grants, Winterization‐grants, Restaurant Assistance), the business registration system has been designed to follow up and monitor the health of those businesses. We opened up the registration system to the larger County business community as well as we realized that with COVID, we need to have a more direct channel of communication with all businesses. The system will let us have more frequent feedback with the businesses registered, provide better announcement of resources available (County Grants, Federal programmes, etc.), and also be able to determine where business are being impacted by COVID still or another social/economic impact similar to it. 66600 66600 66600
TPN-094193 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Administrative Expenses 2022 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Supplies and conference for equity. 1478.27 1478.27 1478.27
TPN-094169 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Vaccine Stipend 2022 Q2 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination Vaccine stipend for new employees 8000 8000 8000 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-094160 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Covid Payroll 2022 Q2 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Public safety staff 137957.59 137957.59 137957.59 9 No
TPN-097258 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Colfax Community Network 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Mile High Behavioral Healthcare (MHBHC) proposes to fill the void in family preservation services in Central East Adams County. For 60 years, MHBHC has served families experiencing or at risk of homelessness. Colfax Community Network, MHBHC’s flagship family program, operates from a church shared by seven ministries. To fulfill MHBHC’s vision of providing comprehensive family preservation services, it must move. This would allow MHBHC to serve 3,000 individuals, over its current baseline of 1,000. MHBHC proposes to purchase the Kamsy Event Center, 10190 E. Montview Boulevard, Aurora, CO 80010, in Adams County’s Ward 1. The single-story, ADA-compliant building has a reception area, event space, medical offices, a kitchen, offices, parking and wheelchair ramps. It is located along public transportation, near MHBHC’s emergency homeless shelter, Comitis Crisis Center, and MHBHC’s drop-in center for adults experiencing homelessness, Aurora Day Resource Center—allowing MHBHC to provide additional services to parents experiencing homelessness. 1700000 1700000 1700000 Yes Behavioral health facilities and equipment 1700000 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-035095 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Covid Testing 2021 1-Public Health 1.2-COVID-19 Testing Equipment for testing cites and employee testing expense. 35000 34409.28 34409.28 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-032669 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Vaccination clinic assistance 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination support of vaccine clinic with supplies needed to run the site. vaccine stipend. 665447.06 665447.06 665447.06 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-036996 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Administrative Expenses 2021 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Software subscriptions for remote work and to run the emergency rental assistance program. 200910.5 200910.5 200910.5
TPN-036768 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Other Public Health Services 2021 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Reopening consultant and water testing for Covid and other variants. 100945 100945 100945 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-035965 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed PPE 2021 1-Public Health 1.5-Personal Protective Equipment Purchase of PPE 10331.31 10331.31 10331.31 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-036089 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Public Health Expenses 2021 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) Cost of hiring staff to take temperatures at buildings. Additional cleaning needed. Cost of adds to promote application process for Covid-19 grants. 79565.06 79565.06 79565.06 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-035386 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Social Distancing 2021 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) Expense to assist with social distancing 122620.63 122620.63 122620.63 No 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-037316 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Covid Payroll 2021 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Sheriff staff at clinic and community recovery. 218287.03 218287.03 218287.03 30 No
TPN-037193 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Senior Hub Food Assitance 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs The Senior Hubs Meals on Wheels (MoW) program provides prepared home delivered meals to food insecure older adults, 60 plus, regardless of income, race, or ethnic background in Adams County. In alignment with Adams County's priority area of older adults, the program targets vulnerable, home bound older adults residing in Adams County, who demonstrate three or more deficiencies of their Activities of Daily Living. The Senior Hub transitioned from the frozen meals it previously distributed and now offers hot, nutritionally complete, restaurant-quality meals delivered five days a week, as well as nutrition education services provided by a contracted Registered Dietician. 1118972.37 1118972.37 1118972.37 3691 No 1 Imp General Public 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity Yes 1024152.65
TPN-104629 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Covid Payroll 2022 Q3 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Payroll for staff support due to covid 252928.83 252928.83 252928.83 23 No
TPN-104625 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more 27J 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other This project is focused on work-force retention and recruitment incentives to current staff to stay in their current roles to maintain continuity for students and for the support structures of the district; and, to enhance current recruitment efforts. 1000000 1000000 1000000 No
TPN-104624 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Vaccine Stipend 2022 Q3 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination Vaccine Stipends 4000 4000 4000 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-108944 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 3 Non-Profit Coffee Houses Employment Aid 1-Public Health 1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits We strengthen young adults ages 15-24 through challenges. (Covid and generational) Mental health, gender minorities, aging out of foster care, diversion, high school dropouts. We help them with young adult courses, workshops and confidence to get their first or next job. We hire them at our non profit coffee shops - working through basic needs, life skills and model a healthy work environment. The need for young adult support and mentoring is on the rise. We have two new coffee shops opening up to make room for expanding into a greater area of Adams County and adding more shifts. 75000 75000 75000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact 1 Imp General Public Yes 75000
TPN-108920 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Panaderia Antojitos La Piramide 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses The project will add and replace inside tables and chair to increase number of people served and to improve the looks to attract more clients. 5000 5000 5000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-108875 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Rent and Equipment for Program Growth 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses Even though we provide dance education to Adams County residence and surrounding areas, we want to continue to offer additional dance education to enhance the art of dance. We consider us an inclusive studio and want to continue this with expanding our inclusive classes and culturally diverse education. We find there are minimal resources for Special Education students and cultural dance instruction. COVID did not do justice for us or any business. We continue push forward so that we can become a stronger business providing more for our community. 10000 10000 10000 No 1 Imp General Public 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic No 0
TPN-109446 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Self-Sufficiency Programs for At-Risk Teen Moms 1-Public Health 1.14-Other Public Health Services Hope House Self-Sufficiency Programs for at-risk teen moms help improve the lives of teen moms by empowering them to make change and build a stable future for themselves and their children. Historically, approximately 40% of the moms we serve are from Adam's County. In 2020, of the 231 moms served, 96 moms and 140 children were from Adams County for a total of 236 individuals. Our teen moms as a whole are a very vulnerable population, with 67% of teen moms living below the federal poverty line. Compounded on that already difficult economic barrier, Hope House moms also face daunting emotional challenges like pregnancy-related depression, history of emotional abuse/neglect, history of physical or sexual abuse, history of mental health issues in the home and growing up around drugs. These challenges existed before COVID and only became magnified during the pandemic. Mental health setbacks in our teen moms and regression in our early learning kids were just two of the many areas in our programming where we were able to identify the negative impact of COVID. Additionally, extra support for virtual learning or delaying schooling for teen moms in our High School & GED and College & Career Programs, as well as added supports in our Parenting Program were also signs of the weighty impact of COVID on our teen moms and their children. The need to fulfill essential needs through our food pantry and to assist teen moms experiencing crises with housing shed light on the extreme need our moms had to simply cover the most essential needs like food, housing, hygiene products, diapers and wipes in the midst of economic setbacks like job loss and cut hours onset by COVID. 25000 25000 25000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-109443 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Operation Freebird 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Operation Freebird is an annual program where a complete Thanksgiving holiday meal is provided to people and families in need, suffering joblessness, or homelessness. This has been an effort to reduce hunger in Adams County. Along with the food items provided to each family there will be Centura Health, SCL Health, and Kaiser Permanente on sight to provide medical screenings, flu vaccinations, and COVID vaccinations. We will also have dental professionals providing dental screenings and care, and multiple Adams County Departments and programs will be onsite as well to connect with the families in need. Adams County Human Services will have community Support Services, Workforce & Business Center, Head Start, Child Support, Low Income Energy Assistance Program (LEAP), and Child Care Assistance Program onsite (CCAP). 1200 1200 1200 0 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 0
TPN-109440 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Resilience Family Program 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services Life Recovery Center created a resilience family program due to ongoing need for trauma- informed services in both Spanish and English. This program addresses the mental health and substance use issues in Adams County and works to eliminate barriers to treatment. The resilience family program will work with youth and family members that are struggling with substance use or mental health issues that hinders their ability to be productive as a family. By providing services to youth and family that are trauma informed, culturally and linguistically appropriate services (individual, group, and family psychoeducation), we can prevent further involvement with Human services or criminal justice system. 50000 50000 50000 No 1 Imp General Public Yes 0
TPN-109436 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed GE Heating & Air LLC 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses GE Heating & Air, LLC will be applying grant funds to the following: Additional advertising to generate revenue lost from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Additional miscellaneous funds will be applied to protective gear; masks, gloves, shoe covers, etc. 5000 5000 5000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-109444 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Therapeutic Services to Foster/Kinship Parents 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services Foster Source began providing mental health services to foster parents as a direct result of stressors due to the Covid-19 pandemic including loss of employment, financial burdens, at-home schooling, and increased behaviors in children due to isolation. This program provides virtual therapy for foster parents through our partnership with Better Help and private therapists specializing in foster care and trauma parenting. We also sponsor five-hour equine-assisted parenting labs for Adams County families with our partner, Groundwork Ranch. Foster parents that have taken advantage of therapeutic services tell us these services dramatically impact their ability to self-regulate and parent children from trauma. This program is helping foster parents continue to foster in a time when we need them more than ever. Funds from this grant will allow Foster Source to expand and offer mental health services to Kinship families in Adams County. 31998 31998 31998 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 31998
TPN-109432 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Vida Consejeria Individual & Familiar 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services Our program provides evidence base mental health treatment for Hispanic- immigrant families- Spanish speaking individuals who have suffered trauma and other mental health disorders past/present COVID-19. We target the Adams county residents that have been significantly affected by COVID-19 and are at greater disadvantage. Our program offers sliding fee scales and provides emotional and mental support so our working class families can function adequately day to day and attend to their jobs and responsibilities. The social distancing and change to online schools have increase the anxiety and depression among most children and youth. Parents are having major challenges with parenting and following COVID-19 state guidelines; therefore, it is crucial to offer emotional support and psychoeducation because it becomes a snow ball effect to the entire community. 30000 30000 30000 No 1 Imp General Public 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate No 30000
TPN-109428 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Ultimate Beauty 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses To help pay for rent and payroll to keep employees employed and the business open. With inventory cost rising, it helps keep prices low for Adams county residents. 5000 5000 5000 No 21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts No 0
TPN-109427 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Free English as a Second Language and High School Equivalency Preparation classe 1-Public Health 1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits Coal Creek Adult Education Center received funding for its free English as a Second Language and High School Equivalency Preparation classes in Northglenn and Brighton for the 2023 calendar year. Funding helped support both direct and indirect costs for four classes, five sessions per year, for a total of 420 instructional hours in a 12-month period. 15000 15000 15000 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 1 Imp General Public Yes 0
TPN-109418 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Rain Dance Car Wash LLC 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses The Covid Recovery Plan aims to revitalize our business by implementing new ideas and projects through innovation and adaptation. In order for our company to survive during these difficult times, we need to make the necessary changes to cope with the current climate. We are confident the Covid Recover Plan will help save our business. We are seeking financial assistance through the Covid-19 Grant to fund our projects.Rain Dance Car Wash has served Westminster and the surrounding community for over 30 years. Since the Covid-19 Pandemic, like many other small businesses we struggled to survive. Our revenue drastically declined due to fewer customers coming to our business 5000 5000 5000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-109407 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Cakes by Karen 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses We are continuing to serve our community with specialty cakes for all occasions. With Covid restrictions, these celebrations have been canceled, postponed, or drastically down sized. This directly impacts the entire company's success for revenue, employment & everything else that coincides. 5000 5000 5000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-109405 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Alley Cat- New Product Line 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses Covid has significantly changed my customer base. My prior "regular" customers were older (60+) and very much into classes. These customers are no longer coming in for the most part because of Covid. My class revenue is now non-existent and the merchandise that was popular for classes and for that age group is just not moving anymore. My new clientele is much younger, learning with Youtube, etc., and into different products. While I've been able to pivot and provide some of these products (which have been going well), the customers are still needing more. We also are getting in many Native Americans (because other bead stores have closed) that need a particular selection of beads for their art projects. Crafts are very important for mental health and stress relief, so I feel it's important to continue to support this and expand with the ever changing market.I would like to get more involved with providing online classes and an online store. This requires some upfront money for the e-commerce platform, and it will take a while to get off the ground. 3000 3000 3000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-109399 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Healthy Spine- Economic recovery relief 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses Small business economic relief assistants for rent, payroll and personal protective equipment due to lower revenue in 2020 due to operational restrictions caused by COVID-19. 5000 5000 5000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-109394 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Galaxy Towing Maintenance 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses Most of the community is still on a stay at home order and are still working from home. Resulting in the loss of business fo several months; during the COVID-19 hardship Galaxy Towing continued to use household funds to stay afloat. During this time period Galaxy Towing has not able to fund the upkeep of auto repairs, parts replacement, or simple maintenance to our Truck. Helping with these very expensive items will keep Galaxy Towing truck running. Galaxy Towing can continue to provide safe, reasonable rates to our transportation community. "If you have an unfortunate stall give us a call" 7000 7000 7000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-109390 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Awakening Balance Acupuncture - Full Spectrum Traditional Chinese Medicine 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses At Awakening Balance Acupuncture we want to be part of the solution and if we can help more patients, we can expand, and this can bring more people to Adams County and more people to Northglenn. Thus, helping the community grow and helping people to have a better quality of life. Once patients begin to heal, then they will grow. If we get this grant, we will be able to reach more people and show them how acupuncture and TCM can help. 5000 5000 5000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 5000
TPN-109364 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Recover Revenue lost from COVID restrictions 1-Public Health 1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits We are a community recreation center that serves the eastern plains of Colorado. We were shut down, we were then restricted with the number of patrons that could be in the establishment at any given time. Due to the length of time that we had restrictions, we have had cancellations of memberships. We are looking for this grant to help us continue the employment of staff and to create those relationships of those who have chosen to stay home and not use our facility. 80000 80000 80000 No 1 Imp General Public 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic Yes 0
TPN-109904 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Juntos Adelante 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination As Adelante Community Development (ACD) witnessed the catastrophic effect that the commencement of the COVID-19 pandemic had on the Latino community, the organization pivoted its efforts to fill the equity gaps in health care. ACD implemented a weekend vaccine clinic at the Mile High Flea Market, offering equitable access to free COVID-19 and flu vaccines, as well as free COVID-19 testing kits. Collaborating closely with partners such as the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Adams County Health Department, Inner City Health Center, and Walgreens, ACD ensures a robust and accessible vaccination infrastructure. ACD hired and trained Community Navigators, to engage with the community visiting the flea market to ensure they have access to testing and vaccines as well as many other resources. By collaborating and curating healthcare providers and community organizations, ACD works towards eliminating barriers to healthcare and advancing initiatives that improve health outcomes for marginalized populations. ACD’s health equity pillar underscores the organization's commitment to addressing disparities in healthcare access, outcomes, and social determinants of health for our Latino community especially Spanish-speaking entrepreneurs. Recognizing the persistent threat of COVID-19, ACD's Salud con Dignidad pivots towards developing prevention programs beyond the immediate focus on vaccinations. ACD is set to roll out physical activity and nutrition workshops as part of its prevention program. 1862662.67 1862662.67 1241765 Yes COVID-19 vaccination sites 38290.85 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs 1 Imp General Public
TPN-109890 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Food For Hope 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs Food for Hope provides healthy food for families in need through food banks located in schools and school district locations. We partner with Adams County school districts to identify families in need, and then provide them with vital nutrition for their families. Funding from ARPA is used to purchase food and support infrastructure to accommodate the increased traffic we are seeing at all food bank locations. 180474.99 180474.99 180474.99 3110 No 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity Yes 180475
TPN-109880 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Five Star Resource Closets 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs The Five Star Resource Closets provide fresh and non-perishable food, hygiene products, school supplies, clothing, and essential household items to students and families in need in Adams 12 schools. We have Resource Closets in 34 schools in Adams County. From the start of COVID to now we have grown to 37 Resource Closets in 67% of Adams 12 schools and are serving nearly 5,000 people a month. Each Resource Closet is unique to the school. Our Resource Closet Managers oversee the ordering and distribution of food and supplies. The objectives of the Resource Closets are to maintain a supply of food and resources to give to families when they have an immediate need. The Resource Closet managers connect these families (when applicable) to long-term resources of support and to Adams 12 resources through the Student and Family Outreach Program (SFOP). The Resource Closets serve as a triage for families until they can get back on their feet or connected with more permanent support. 1359900 1359900 1359900 64066 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 1359900
TPN-109870 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Adams 12 Summer Explores 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services The Summer Explores program works to address the following inequities for Adams 12 Five Star students: A. Providing highly qualified staff to accelerate learning and work to close the existing learning gaps that resulted during in-person closures due to COVID-19. B. Provide stable meal options with regular school breakfast and lunch when these options may not typically be available during summer months. C. Provide experiential learning opportunities i.e. bowling, golf, swimming more common to student’s counterparts in middle and upper-class homes. D. Provide social interactions with peers in a joyful setting not typically available over the summer when schools are closed to recover from the social isolation incurred during in-person closures. E. Provide physical fitness and movement daily F. Provide rich language experiences and English practice for all students whom English is their second language. G. Provide transportation to and from Summer Explores programming or equitable access to the resources by placing them within walking distance. 1052348 1052348 1052348 No 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 1052348
TPN-109852 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed ADAMS COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 4-Premium Pay 4.1-Public Sector Employees Our project provides premium pay for our firefighters as allowed by the American Rescue Plan Act (Premium Pay 4.1 Public sector Employees). Adams County Firefighters perform essential public safety work and have continued that work despite the challenges of COVID-19. Due to close living quarters and contact with the public, including rendering patient care and transporting patients, our firefighters are at an increased risk of contracting COVID-19. 230000 230000 230000 86
TPN-109843 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Community Based Programs and Truancy Prevention 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services This project is Community Programs to Adams County providing therapeutic, mental health interventions for families in crisis and at risk for child maltreatment and trauma. Supported activities included direct therapeutic interventions and counseling for these families. Funding of $25 per counseling session was provided for 1,000 sessions with clinicians. Families who are receiving Griffith’s Adams County services are at greater risk for experiencing health inequities such as reduced access to care and poor educational outcomes. Most families are extremely low-income, living at poverty level, and they lack access to remote technology and Internet connectivity. Most families at Griffith are involved with the child welfare system and may have multiple system involvements with criminal court, truancy court, juvenile justice system, and family/divorce court. Almost all families have experienced post-traumatic stress, resulting in a broad spectrum of physical, emotional and psychological responses, such as isolation, chronic fear, confusion, guilt or shame, helplessness and hopelessness leading to health problems, depression, and anxiety. 25000 25000 25000 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment Yes 25000
TPN-109807 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Fleet Management Services 1-Public Health 1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses Fleet Management Services will provide employment and COVID PTO wages to its employees regardless of the reduction of customer demand created by the COVID 19 pandemic. We provide masks to all employees and customers to prevent the spread of COVID 19 while proved. Additionally, we implement COVID 19 cleaning and antiseptic procedures for both employees and customers to ensure we limit the spread of COVID. Lastly, we reconfigured the shop to ensure we have proper social distancing for all employees and customers. 75000 75000 75000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted No 0
TPN-109824 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Adams 12 Employee Wellness Support Program 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services The Employee Wellness Program’s goal is to provide teachers and staff in the Adams 12 Five Star School District with social-emotional support never available before while lessening the mental burden of their careers due to COVID-19. The impacts of this program will include positive effects not only to their families and children but to their students and their student’s families and support staff loss due to burnout during these unprecedented times. We will provide a full-time Mental Health Professional dedicated to staff for two years and material support for school-level staff wellness programming. 270856 270856 270856 No 1 Imp General Public Yes 270856
TPN-109963 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Shelter Support & Community Safety 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid As the COVID pandemic has exacerbated housing challenges. Brothers Redevelopment, Inc (BRI) will address impacts by : (1) ensuring that all households, especially those most vulnerable in our society, are given an opportunity to live in safe and healthy homes; (2) stabilizing and sustaining neighborhoods and communities (3) preserving and increasing availability of affordable housing (4) empowering renters and home buyers and (5) formalizing, adding and enhancing services that empower seniors. Operating out of Paris Family Apartments in Adams County, case management and support will be provided to help residents and people from the surrounding neighborhood find stability. The goals of the program are connections to employment or education opportunities, early child education, maintaining housing stability, and supporting overall family stability. 302348.33 302348.33 100782.77 0 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic Yes 0
TPN-109959 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Equitable Vaccine/Booster Information and Administration 1-Public Health 1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination Provide COVID-19 vaccines to Adams County Residents at least to 5000 vaccines. According to CDPHE, in the Denver Metro area, Adams County has the second highest COVID-19 death rate when compared to number of infections (1.13%). Statewide, Adams County ranks #3 in most deaths following Mesa County (1.52%) and Jefferson County (1.73%) The Colorado Health Institute identified that the life expectancy within BIPOC communities has been deeply and disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. Based upon the death rates of Latino and Black residents, both groups' life expectancy statistics fell by about four years. Through dedicated mobile outreach, this project will provide direct vaccination and/or boosters to at least 1000 Adams County Residents in year once and 800 in year 2 and 3, as well as reach at least 18,000 Adams County residents with free and paid media/advertising. 182790 182790 121860 No 1 Imp General Public 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-109949 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Mental Health and Substance Misuse Tre 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services Through this project, Servicios will provide free, evidence-based, bilingual, and OBH-licensed mental health treatment, substance misuse treatment, and/or behavioral healthcare case management to at least 84 Adams County youth and/or adults each year over the period of three years. Outreach will be prioritized in hardest to reach, lowest-income areas. Latinos are over-represented in substance use disorder treatment admissions as compared to their representation in the population. Latinos are the second most addicted people group in Colorado across all substances: Marijuana, Methamphetamine, Rx Opioids, Alcohol, Crack/Cocaine, and Heroin. In 2020, Latino Coloradoans were the second highest utilizers of mental health services in the State representing 25.8% of all utilizers (2020 Uniform reporting system, SAMHSA). The vast majority of the construction workforce is made up of Latinos. Data show that almost every year, construction is associated with the highest number of suicides of any industry in Colorado. 177848.33 177848.33 118564.78 No 1 Imp General Public Yes 0
TPN-109945 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Culturally Responsive, Mobile Benefits Enrollmen 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators About 1 in 5 (19 percent) households headed by Latinos and food insecure, compared with 1 in 8 (12 percent) for all U. S. households and that more than 1 in 5 (22 percent) households headed by Latinos with children are food insecure compared with 1 in 6 (17 percent) for all U. S. households with children. WIC and SNAP are highly underutilized programs by Latino communities in Colorado due to language barriers; residency status; stigma and embarrassment; previous negative experiences with other service provider; cultural expectations and norms; transportation barriers; and other factors. A Bilingual Enrollment Specialist will conduct a combination of outreach efforts as a strategy to effectively educate and inform the target population and increase their knowledge of benefits, as well as provide hands-on assistance for completing applications. At least 800 low-income Adams County community members will be enrolled in Medicaid, SNAP or WIC each year, for three years. 221848.33 221848.33 221848.33 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-109942 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Employment Navigation, Education, Workforce Training, and Upskilling/Reskilling 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) Employment Navigation, Education, Workforce Training, and upskilling/reskilling for low income Adams county community members. 422928 422928 422928 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations Yes 0
TPN-109935 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Strengthening Pandemic Emergency Health Care Services in Adams County 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery The South Adams Fire Protection District (SACFD) is seeking to improve medical training and purchase new medical and COVID-testing equipment, thereby improving emergency medical services provided to the community. These healthcare, workforce development, and job training services are beneficial to the whole community, but they are likely to be especially beneficial for veterans, older adults, undocumented residents, and families; these are demographics that may either be more susceptible to critical health issues and COVID-related health issues, or they may need support in handling health crises. 912393 912393 912393 No
TPN-109931 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Young Adult & Firefighter Workforce Development Cooperative 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services The Young Adult & Firefighter workforce development Cooperative provides a pathway for high school students to graduate with the technical skills in key residential construction areas and real-world experiences in building and welding careers while providing valuable community service to the first responders. By partnering with local high schools, SACFD will be able to give this program the workspace and resources needed to be successful, and the students and their instructor will provide SACFD firefighters with the ability to train on high-quality firefighting props, which ultimately heightens the level of service we provide to Adams County. Demonstrated by CDC/ATSDR Social Vulnerability Index 2020 our community is disproportionately impacted. 490000 490000 490000 Yes Job and workforce training centers 181793.1 1 Imp General Public 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools Yes 490000
TPN-109920 RCP-036158 Adams County, Colorado Colorado Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Simply Pizza 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs Primo Bachh dba Simply Pizza Truck will be providing 9,200 meals ($6 per person) to communities in need in Adams County. They will do so by partnering with local entities, providing events, or popping up in neighborhoods that are high need. They will also provide one-time payments of $750 to employees who worked throughout the pandemic and $350 onboarding bonuses for people who recently joined or are joining our team to help provide these services. Events will be community based and TBD partners will join us to make these meaningful resources for Adams County residents (in kind donations). Simply Pizza will provide the vessel for distribution of services as well as fuel cost and labor for preparation. 60000 60000 60000 960 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 1 Imp General Public Yes 0
TPN-114262 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Refurbishment of Building for Housing 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for the purpose of the refurbishment of a building to accommodate housing needs for a city in Northeast Kansas with a population greater than 12,200 and less than 12,700 as of the 2020 census. 3100000 3100000 3100000
TPN-114249 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Moderate-Income Housing Expansion Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds are to be used for the purpose of funding grants or loans that may be awarded to cities and counties to develop multi-family rental units and single-family for-purchase homes in communities with populations fewer than 60,000 people. 20000000 20000000 4780504.99
TPN-114248 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% COVID-19 Retail Storefront Property Tax Relief Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Funds are to be used for the purpose of providing economic assistance to eligible businesses as provided in the 2022 Session Laws, Chapter 98, sections 1-13 and the Uniform Grant Guidance - 2 CFR Part 200. 500000 38548.85 38548.85 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-114245 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Language Assessment Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services Funds are to be utilized to provide funding for the Language Assessment Program for children age birth to age two, up to the child’s third birthday. 386000 386000 386000 No 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-114241 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Nursing Home Staffing Support Program 4-Premium Pay 4.2-Private Sector: Grants to other employers Funding for the Nursing Home Staffing Support Program to provide funding to nursing facilities to cover rising costs associated with staffing shortages for facilities. 14787837.93 14787837.93 14787837.93 5000
TPN-114238 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Kansas Firefighter Recruitment and Safety Grant (KFRSG) Program 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery Funding to support Office of the State Fire Marshal to carry out the Kansas Firefighter Recruitment and Safety Grant Program, which aids volunteer and part-time fire departments across Kansas with no-match grant funding for personal protection equipment, including structural fire bunker gear and wildland fire fighting gear, extractor washing machines to aid in decreasing the rising occurrence of cancer in the fire service. 1200000 1200000 1200000 No
TPN-114231 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Economic Development Infrastructure Building a Stronger Economy 1.0 (BASE 1.0) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services BASE 1.0 (Building a Stronger Economy) program that provides matching investments to support speculative building development, modernization of business park facilities and other infrastructure development, and the attraction and retention of businesses in Kansas. 100000000 100000000 78479709.11
TPN-114226 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Docking Building Renovation 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Renovation of the Docking State Office Building that houses critical Capitol Complex infrastructure and will provide needed office and public use spaces. 60000000 60000000 24917185.33
TPN-114221 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% KDHE Laboratory Building 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for the planning and design work associated with Kansas Department of Health and Environment’s State Laboratory. Construction and equipment of a new Health and Environmental laboratory began in November 2022 with completion projected to be December 2024. 32500000 32128405.04 26098208.01
TPN-135669 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Kansas Connect and Learn Initiative 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services Matching funds for school districts to use alongside the FCC's E-rate program to invest in high-speed broadband buildout. 650000 594463 446353.8 No Schools and other educational facilities 0 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-135660 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Individual Education Learning Loss Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.27-Addressing Impacts of Lost Instructional Time The Kansas Education Enrichment Program (KEEP) provides students from qualifying households with a $1,000 award per eligible student, to purchase educational good and services that enable learning recovery and facilitate academic enrichment opportunities. 50000000 38205581.01 37683051.17 No Schools and other educational facilities 0 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools
TPN-135683 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% KU Economic Development 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Fund strategic initiative projects at KU that develop and strengthen local and national partnerships. 35000000 35000000 35000000
TPN-135744 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Suicide Prevention Sleep Systems 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to be utilized for implementation of safety sleep systems in all restrictive housing environments to reduce potential suicidal behavior and/or suicidal incidents. 33363 33363 33363
TPN-135737 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Call Center Phone System Upgrade 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding to modernize the call center phone system to allow expanded recruiting capabilities across the state, upgrade the phone system that will allow off-site work to be conducted and recorded as if the customer service repsentatives were located in the call center and to ensure adequate system capacity for future economic downturns. 200000 200000 197882.01
TPN-135735 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Capitol Complex Security Enhancements 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to implement modern security systems and protective measures within existing and new buildings, parking and grounds within the Capital Complex, Cedar Crest, and Printing plant to include artificial intelligence for facial and tag recognition. 6000000 6000000 2573567.24
TPN-135732 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Childcare Capacity Accelerator 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care Increase childcare capacity through construction and capital enhancements to physical child care facilities and launch operations supporting child care workforce across Kansas through competitive grants 20000000 19780682.94 11283421.29 No Childcare, daycare and early learning facilities 0 1 Imp General Public 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-135728 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Private and Private and Independent Colleges 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for expansion of services projects at private or independent colleges that have a physical presence in Kansas and funding for the Benedictine college engineering program. 10000000 8543658.39 6389748.85
TPN-135726 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Manhattan Tech: Expansion of Biomanufacturing Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for the expansion of a biomanufacturing program. 1843594 1843594 1843594
TPN-135725 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Salina Tech: Automation and Maintenance Programs 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for automation and maintenance programs. 1843594 1843594 921797
TPN-135723 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more NW Kansas Tech: Funding for Cybersecurity and Cryptosecurity Programs 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for cybersecurity and cryptosecurity programs. 600104 600104 600104
TPN-135720 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Butler CCC:Culinary Arts, Hospitality, and Management Programs 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for culinary arts, hospitality, and management programs. 572268 572268 572268
TPN-135717 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Seward CCC: Professional Truck Driver Program and Diesel Technology Lab 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for professional truck driver program and diesel technology lab. 1843594 1843594 1843594
TPN-135715 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Colby CCC: Career and Technical Education Agricultural Center 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for career and technical education agricultural center. 1843594 1843594 1843594
TPN-135712 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Kansas City Comm College Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for the construction and equipment of the Kansas City, Kansas community, education, health and wellness center that will be an education, workforce, behavioral and physical health center to house programs that do not currently exist in downtown Kansas City, Kansas and provide high-wage, high-demand training in various industries. 12000000 12000000 6000000
TPN-135707 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Johnson County Comm College Commercial Driver's License Program Project 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to expand the Class A commercial driver's licence program to meet supply chain and logistics workforce shortages and offer additional courses for students during the day, night, and weekends. 2538502 2538502 1269251
TPN-135702 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Garden City Comm College Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding to expand a facility to increase agricultural technology, farm equipment mechanic, industrial machinery mechanic, and welding programs to service more students and meet local industry workforce demands. 1499913 1499913 1499913
TPN-135699 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Fort Scott Comm College Heavy Equipment Operators Training Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding to establish a training program for heavy equipment operators in partnership with industry to serve multiple Southeast Kansas counties and school districts to meet the workforce shortage in such industry. 800103 800103 400051.5
TPN-135693 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Cowley County Comm College Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding to build a career and technical education facility in Arkansas City to expand carpentry and construction trades, welding, electromechanical maintenance and other high-wage, high-demand programs. 4000000 4000000 4000000
TPN-135688 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Cloud County Community College Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding to build a technical education and innovation center to house academic programs of renewable energy, nursing and allied health, agriculture, and industrial technology to meet workforce needs. 4000000 4000000 4000000
TPN-135676 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Agriculture Production Facility 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for infrastructure for an agricultural production facaility in a Kansas county with a population greater than 34,000 and less than 35,000 as of the 2020 census that will create over 200 jobs, include over $35,000,000 in capital investment, and attract additional estimated local development and jobs. 35000000 35000000 35000000
TPN-135674 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Kansas Senior Nutrition Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs Funds are to be used to contract with and directly support participating Older American Act nutrition providers across the state. These providers serve Kansans aged 60 and older by providing nutritious meals and socialization opportunities in congregate settings, offering home-delivered and grab-and go meals to eligible individuals in their homes, and conducting safety checks for vulnerable older adults. 1500000 1500000 1500000 0 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity No 0
TPN-168409 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% ESU Nursing Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for the relocation and staffing of the ESU nursing program. 5000000 5000000 2500000
TPN-169440 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Capitol Complex Air Handler Replacement 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) Funds will be used to replace the air handling equipment within the Capitol Complex to improve the filtration and indoor air quality as mitigation measures in response to the pandemic. 4500000 2741392.29 2741392.29 No 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-169439 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Safe and Secure Schools Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services Funds are to be utilized for disbursements of grant moneys approved by the State Board of Education for the acquisition and installation of security cameras and any other systems, equipment and services necessary for security monitoring of facilities operated by a school district and for securing doors, windows and any entrances to such facilities; and salaries and wages, and associated fringe benefits, for newly created positions of school resource officers and the costs associated with any newly created school resource officers provided by the city or county of such school district. 1000000 1000000 1000000 No 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools No 0
TPN-169437 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Data Center Upgrade Project 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to provide updated modernized Dell Hosts to the Kansas Bureau of Investigation (KBI) Data Center to provide faster, more reliable IT infrastructure foundation to deliver improved performance for KBI employees and faster service to Kansans. 35067.14 35067.14 35067.14
TPN-169436 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Cheney State Park Potable Water Line 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This funding will be used to install a water supply line to the east side of Cheney State Park to the nearest rural water supplier (Garden Plain), to provide safe water to the public. 500000 500000 500000
TPN-169435 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Technology Upgrades 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be utilized to modernize the equipment and technology to support cybersecurity upgrades, allow the public to attend or appear at court proceedings remotely, ensure district court personnel work efficiently to comply with operating standards for a centralized case management system and provide enhancements to cybersecurity and to meet the evolving needs of the public. 1152000 1152000 721328.27
TPN-169434 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Audio/Visual Upgrades 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be utilized to modernize the courtroom audio-visual equipment throughout many of the district courts and at the Kansas Lawyers Assistance Program (KALAP). Additionally, the appellate courts require upgrades to audio-visual equipment to provide more robust coverage of oral arguments, and hybrid meeting capabilities. The impact will maximize access to and promote justice for all Kansans – regardless of ability to meet in person or remotely. 744000 744000 719671.55
TPN-169433 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% BOTA Modernization Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be utilized to modernize and implement an Information Technology Solutions critical to Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA’s) hearing rooms by adding the technology and equipment necessary to conduct remote hearings. Additionally, updating the website and replacing an end-of-life document management system with an integrated e-filing, case management, and document management suite that will improve operational efficiency. 225000 225000 138426
TPN-169432 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Front Office Door and Security Additions 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be utilized to modernize the Topeka office security and safety measures. Funds will be used to purchase and install a fire rated entrance/exit door, a security intercom system, and a security badge/fob entry system for both entrances/exits to increase efficiency of agency security. 13500 13500 13500
TPN-169431 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Security Cameras 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding will be used for the modernization of video security systems from analog to digital within the nine correctional facilities as identified in the Five-Year Capital Improvements Plan. 500000 500000 500000
TPN-169430 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% IT Server & Switch Refresh 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding will be used to purchase and modernize the many of the outdated or near end-of-life servers and switches required to securely continue operations within Correctional Facilities and allow for safe and secure service for staff and residents. 466637 387369.7 334838.43
TPN-169429 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Patrol (Law Enforcement) Radio Modernization -- Kansas Statewide Interoperabilit 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to be utilized to meet mandated standards and standardized radio communication for the Kansas Statewide Interoperable Communication System (KSICS). The system will be an imperative modernization that will impact various public safety agencies across Kansas that use it. 15000000 15000000 14943758.4
TPN-169428 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Boardroom Camera & Projector for Effective Hybrid Meetings During and After Pand 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds for the purchase of Boardroom equipment to modernize efficiency and hold virtual/hybrid meetings and allow public attendees to be able to see members on the screen and broadcast materials more effectively, following the resolution of the pandemic more effectively. 2277.7 2277.7 2277.7
TPN-169427 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Local Safety and Security Equipment Grant Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Assist local jurisdictions across Kansas achieve modernization of communication infrastructure and equipment, enable safe and secure crises response for Kansas through investments in local public safety infrastructure through competitive grants. 6500000 6351791 3283858.98
TPN-169425 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Workforce: Delivering Residents and Workforce (DRAW) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for Delivering Residents and Workforce (DRAW) program, authorized through the SPARK process, will provide training and equipment funding for critical need industries facing severe labor shortage and additional incentives to draw new residents into the state through competitive grant program. 10000000 8055474 6347466.92
TPN-169424 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Aviation Learning Opportunities & Funded Training (ALOFT) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provide funding to aviation and aerospace manufacturers, supply chain providers, and local airports for training and workforce development initiatives through competitive grants, authorized through the SPARK process. 20000000 15633103 11482447.21
TPN-169423 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% ARPA Building Opportunities for the Disables & Elderly (ADOBE) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for construction and renovation of multi-housing units for elderly or disabled individuals. Housing investments will include new construction providing health and safety accommodations for high needs population through competitive grants, authorized through the SPARK process. 10000000 9730995.38 873146.99
TPN-169422 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% State Park Revitalization and Investment in Notable Tourism (SPRINT) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This funding authorized through the SPARK process, seeks to address the pandemic’s impact and support the tourism industry by funding the development and/or improvement of tourism-focused businesses and tourism agencies. Tourism is a key sector for the Kansas economy and local communities. 30000000 30000000 18479526.64
TPN-169421 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Building a Stronger Economy (BASE) 2.0 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Additional round of the BASE grant program authorized through the SPARK process. Will address economic development and infrastructure for Building a Stronger Economy (BASE) 2.0 through funding previous grant applications from the original BASE program. The BASE program is designed to support infrastructure development to address economic development opportunities statewide with the goal of expanding the state’s base of businesses and residents. 50000000 41487041.5 23108323.55
TPN-169420 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Wichita State Tech: Smart Manufacturing, Industry Training 4.0 and Associate De 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for the smart manufacturing industry training 4.0 and associate degree nursing programs. 1843594 1843594 921797
TPN-169419 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Pratt Comm College Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to expand the welding program to serve more students and purchase additional robotic welding and technology equipment. 778445 778445 394222.5
TPN-169418 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Hutchison Comm College Lab Space Project 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding to expand facilities to allow for additional lab space for use by 20 additional registered nurse education students to meet a healthcare workforce shortage. 999786 999786 999786
TPN-169417 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% KSU Agriculture Development 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Fund projects at KSU that address current and emerging problems in the biosciences field, advance countermeasures for disease, drive economic revitalization, and provide training. 25000000 25000000 12500000
TPN-173794 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Administrative costs associated with Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 1535570.84 1535570.84 767417.79 No No No
TPN-182899 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Early Childhood Data Integration and System Enhancements 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs Accelerate early childhood data and integration and system enhancements to modernize data and IT systems, ensure data security and improve accountability,effectiveness and quality of early childhood services to children and families across Kansas. 5000000 4316351.53 772690.97 No
TPN-182887 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Virtual Math Education Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services Funds are to be utilized for the purpose of implementing a virtual math program to be used by school districts that shall be customized to Kansas curriculum standards, be evidence based, not impose any fee or cost upon students, provide tutoring in multiple languages, and provide professional development for the implementation of the program 2207828.5 2207828.5 2207828.5 No 6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools No 0
TPN-182881 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Printing Plant Improvements 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This funding will be used for fund improvements to the Department of Administration printing plant in accordance with 2023 Session, HB 2184, Section 146a. 6500000 6500000 2308838.74
TPN-182878 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% HVAC Great Bend Lab 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This funding will be used for HVAC replacement and laboratory renovations at the Kansas Bureau of Investigation Great Bend Forensic Science Laboratory. 910000 59250 59250
TPN-182874 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% State Fair Security Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds shall support security projects as directed by 2023 HB 2184 Section 168(a). 600000 600000 579668.05
TPN-182873 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Kansas Real Time Flood Mapping Tool Development 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This funding will be used to purchase computer equipment, to be operated and maintained by the Kansas Biological Survey, that will support emergency response and management activities in the State of Kansas. Specifically, a server will be purchased that will be dedicated to live flood mapping in Kansas. 50000 50000 50000
TPN-182872 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% IT Infrastructure Modernization 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding will be used to expand Information Technology systems to ensure the security and maintenance of the judicial branch network, servers, and other software and hardware are modernized due to remote use. 504000 504000 377825
TPN-182860 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% KSSB HVAC Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be utilized to modernize the central steam boiler and distribution system with efficient heating and cooling systems for each building. Construction will be done to upgrade building accessibility and function with a new elevator to ensure greater ADA accessibility and relocate and upgrade the HVAC equipment and building environmental climate control. 1000000 1000000 445186.76
TPN-182853 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% eLicense Enhancements 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding will be used for the modernization that would accelerate and enhance delivery of public services for pharmacists and pharmacies through secure, modernized IT infrastructure. These enhancements would seek to build better resilience in the event of future disruption. 50000 50000 22625
TPN-182851 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed IT Infrastructure Improvement 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding will be used for the modernization of paper records to be converted to digital records, a contract with a vendor to enable Kansas law enforcement agencies to efficiently submit fillable forms behind a secure login to the central registry, and will make submission quicker and easier for Kansas stakeholders. 36000 36000 36000
TPN-182848 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Enterprise Professional Licensing Platform 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding will be used to create and implement an Enterprise Professional Licensing Platform to serve the needs of all Kansas agencies that have similar professional licensing needs. The modernization of the Enterprise Professional Licensing Platform will enhance the protection of Kansans' data as the information will all be collected in a single system. 3500000 889985 379127.05
TPN-182847 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Fire Detection Modernization 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The funds will be utilized for a total replacement of the fire detection system at the Kansas Historical Society in Topeka. This will include both the Kansas History Museum and State Archives. The current network for the fire system and the fire panels are at the end of life and require current modernization. 162000 162000 162000
TPN-182846 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Kansas Infrastructure Hub Capacity Extension 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to be utilized for the Kansas Infrastructure Hub (Hub), a collaborative and coordinated multiagency body of Kansas state agencies that represent infrastructure sectors included in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL). Extension of Hub includes contracting with a firm to assist in the development and deployment of strategies and activities designed to maximize Kansas benefit from BIL. 3000000 3000000 3000000
TPN-182845 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Community Resource Capacity Accelerator 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Accelerate community capacity in health and education programs through one time funding for programs and facilities serving children or providing enrichment programs. Funding may be utilized for enhancing facilities and expansion projects for organizations that provide health, education, and/or early childhood services across Kansas through competitive grants. 18000000 17996999.98 8323842.13
TPN-182843 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Health Facilities and Program Expansion 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Expand statewide health and behavioral health services to close service gaps in the continuum of care through expansion of health care facilities, expand reach of current service providers, and efforts that will lead to workforce training expansion though competitive grants. It is anticipated all projects will have been initiated by 12/31/2023. 66000000 66000000 20738116.75
TPN-182841 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Barton CCC: Agriculture, Farm machine, and Transportation Technology Complex 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for the agriculture, farm machine, and transportation technology complex. 1843594 1843594 1843594
TPN-182840 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Highland Comm College Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to expand the welding program in Atchison and purchase equipment for computer support specialist and other high-wage, high-demand information technology programs in the Highland Community College service area. 425375 425375 212687.5
TPN-182836 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Animal Nourishment Facility 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for the purpose of construction infrastructure to expanded services for an animal nourishment facility in Kansas with a population greater than 24,000 and less than 24,500 as of the 2020 census. 5000000 5000000 5000000
TPN-182839 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% University Challenge Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds for projects administered by State Universities that attract and recruit students and aid in the retention of such students and build the state workforce through increased enrollment. 90000000 77387129.97 77387129.97
TPN-190750 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% PSU Tyler Research & Development Park & Block 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for the expansion of the Tyler research development park and projects in block 22. 5000000 5000000 1250000
TPN-190749 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Economic Expansion Rural Housing Grant 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds are to be used for the purpose of providing grants to housing projects intended to accommodate expansion due to recent economic development that creates over 500 new jobs. 25000000 25000000 13000000
TPN-190774 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Geologial Survey Laboratory 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The University of Kansas will be using these funds to construct, upgrade, and equip the Kansas Geological Survey’s Laboratory Facilities including water quality programs. 3800000 369020.44 291339.3
TPN-190773 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% KBI Lab Equipment 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The Kansas Bureau of Investigation will use these funds for the purchase of advanced laboratory equipment and consumable laboratory supplies 510000 488983.08 488983.08
TPN-190772 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed IT Cybersecurity Upgrades - Washburn 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be used for IT and Cybersecurity Upgrades and Improvements at Washburn University. 450000 450000 450000
TPN-190771 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more IT Cybersecurity Upgrades State Universities 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be used for IT and Cybersecurity Upgrades and Improvements at the State University System 5000000 5000000 5000000
TPN-190770 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% KSSB IT Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be used to replace aging critical network infrastructure used for all education delivery (On site and Distance learning) and backbone of building safety, security operation systems. 100000 100000 85519.96
TPN-190769 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Radios, Kansas State Parks Law Enforcement Officers 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This funding will be used to purchase 60 total sets of modernized vehicle mounted radio units and portable units. New radio units will allow enhanced communications with local and county law enforcement agencies. 658000 658000 658000
TPN-190768 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Agency-wide network modernization and security/cybersecurity upgrades 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding will be used to invest in network/infrastructure modernization and security enhancements at the Kansas Veterans Home (KVH), the Kansas Soldiers Home (KSH), the Kansas Veterans' Cemeteries, and Veteran Services Field Office locations throughout the State of Kansas. 500000 392984.22 389984.2
TPN-190763 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% OITS Network Modernization 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The funds will be utilized to assess the environment, provide a gap analysis of the current state and build the roadmap for depreciation and modernization. Additionally, funds will be used to enhance and standardize the hosting solution for the State of Kansas websites, as well as require network hardware modernization and architecture updates and enhancements to improve resource usage across the state network (KANWin) and allow for the use of bandwidth effectively and efficiently. 6000000 1934977.47 1299331.29
TPN-190762 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Animal Health Preparedness 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to be utilized to purchase an Avi-FoamGuard system to streamline the states response to High Path Avian Influenza and other similar diseases. 110000 91100 91100
TPN-190761 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started Flint Hills Tech: Welding Equipment 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Purchase of additional welding equipment for the Welding Technology program, including additional welders and fabrication of additional welding booths to increase student enrollment. Â 500000 500000 250000
TPN-190759 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Washburn Tech: Manufacturing Training Center 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Engineering, construction labor and materials, and equipment purchases for the manufacturing training center. 1843594 1843594 921797
TPN-190758 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% NC Kansas Tech: Carpentry and Commercial Drivers’ License Programs 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services An addition to the Administrative Building to house the CDL and Carpentry programs, including classrooms, meeting, and office space and expanded work area for students. 1843594 1843594 921797
TPN-190756 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Coffeyville CCC: Construction, Electrical, Fire Science and Welding Technology 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Renovation and expansion of the construction, electrical, fire science and welding technology programs. 425987 425987 425987
TPN-190754 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Neocho Comm College Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to expand the technical education center to provide various technical education programs including healthcare, aerostructures, electrical technology, and industrial maintenance technology programs. 1498987 1498987 749493.5
TPN-190753 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% FHSU - Gross Coliseum 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for Gross Coliseum improvements. 5000000 5000000 2500000
TPN-217898 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Economic Development Infrastructure in SE KS 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for the purpose of infrastructure for a city in Southeast Kansas with a population greater than 20,000 and less than 21,000 as of the 2020 census. 5000000 5000000 0
TPN-218107 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Mental Health Bed Expansion 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds for this emergency department expansion project will be allocated towards the growing behavioral health population throughout the state. 20 additional beds will be added to the existing 29-bed unit. This space will also include an 11-bed psychiatric observation area for rapid stabilization and avoidance of inpatient hospitalization. 22000000 22000000 1015622.36
TPN-218075 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% License Plate Replacement 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be used to replace embossed license plates which lose about 50% of their reflectivity after five years, making them more difficult to read, which poses a challenge for law enforcement. The current Ad Astra license plate design dates to 2008. 9800000 9800000 7910750.22
TPN-218067 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more KSSD IT Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This funding will be used to replace aging critical network infrastructure used for all education delivery (on-site and distance learning), and backbone of building safety, security and operation systems. 100000 100000 100000
TPN-218064 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Public Broadcasting 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The primary outcome of this project will be a modern infrastructure to ensure the continuity of public broadcasting service for all Kansas’ 2.7 million residents. Existing broadcast and digital infrastructure has aged beyond its usable life. Funding will be essential in ensuring equitable services to the underserved communities in both rural and urban areas of Kansas. 6000000 6000000 3713500
TPN-218044 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% KSSD HVAC Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be utilized to modernize the central steam boiler and distribution system with efficient heating and cooling systems for each building. 1000000 1000000 181324
TPN-218052 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed DCF Consultation & Training – EES Business Process 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be utilized to procure business consulting and training services that will require on-site review of 10 of the largest DCF local offices. The review and execution of training and content will focus on DCF Economic & Employment Services (EES) business process methods and ability to resolve the backlog. 500000 500000 500000
TPN-218021 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% KSBN Infrastructure Modernization 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be utilized to modernize the existing Kansas State Board of Nursing (KSBN) Licensing System Software and expand licensing online services for citizens and internal services portfolio. This will assist the Board of Nursing to accommodate efficient licensure for any fully qualified nurses to help care for Kansas citizens. 225000 225000 104845
TPN-218008 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started KLISS Modernization Project - Phase II 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds used for the completion of Phase II of the KLISS Modernization Project will include an overall redesign and upgrade of fiscal and budgetary publications, collaboration tools for seamless legislation drafting, and wider public access to track legislative data. 5000000 5000000 0
TPN-217995 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Larned State Hospital Key Control 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be utilized to purchase new key machines and modernize existing machines. The key management systems provide a secure way to manage keys, provide the opportunity for staff to be assigned keys only necessary for them to carry out their assigned duties, and collect and report out information vital to ensuring proper key accountability. 90000 89988.6 89988.6
TPN-217987 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% State of Kansas Cybersecurity Enhancements 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding will be used to further develop both cybersecurity and cyber resilience capabilities of the State of Kansas. Implementation will ensure that Kansas can deliver secure digital services to citizens, protect the network, protect user accounts, and provide for agency resilience and continuity of operations. This will prevent and actively block cybersecurity threats. 7500000 4422275.3 2953374.95
TPN-217974 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Kansas State Board of Healing Arts Office Re-Model 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to be utilized to modernize and re-model of the Kansas State Board of Healing Arts office, to accommodate the growing staff to meet the needs and demand due to rising numbers of licenses, investigation and litigation cases. 76000 73276 73276
TPN-217966 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Handheld and Vehicle Radio Replacement 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds for the purchase of 61 KBI portable radios, including programming costs, to maintain State of Kansas compliance with the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) guidance and best practice standards. 771151 570486.98 553281.26
TPN-217949 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Digital Equity Grant Program 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive Digital Equity Grants to facilitate the development of digital literacy skills and adoption of broadband services. 5000000 299138.31 153177.31
TPN-217936 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Washburn University 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding utilized for costs associated with Mabee Library reconstruction 3000000 3000000 750000
TPN-217924 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Healthy Sciences Education Center (WSU/KU) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Project is being used to support the development of health sciences education center. 35000000 25000000 6250000
TPN-217904 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started Port Authority Transload Facility 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding for the purpose of establishing an expansion of a transload facility in Central Kansas with a population greater than 4,000 and less than 4,300 as of the 2020 census. 2500000 2500000 0
TPN-217886 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Rural Hospital Innovation Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.21-Medical Facilities for Disproportionately Impacted Communities The Rural Hospital Innovation Grant (RHIG) Program strengthens and improves the healthcare system and increases access to healthcare services in eligible counties by providing transitional assistance to hospitals implementing new models of healthcare service delivery. 10000000 10000000 10000000 No 24 Dis Imp Other SBs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-217962 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started Small Town Water and Sewer Infrastructure Assistance Program 5-Infrastructure 5.18-Water and Sewer: Other Small Town Water and Sewer Infrastructure Assistance Program 10000000 9938230 53902
TPN-238537 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Public Television Broadcasting Station 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will be used to upgrade a public television broadcasting studio in western Kansas for FY 2024. 2500000 2500000 1250000
TPN-238536 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Ag Enterprise Database 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to be utilized for the purchase of AgEnterprise software to servce as an enterprise respository for all regulatory and enforcement activities of state agricultural programs for both the Kansas Department of Agriculture, the Division of Animal Health and the Dairy and Feed Program. 342000 341760 125586
TPN-238535 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% LiveScan Fingerprinting Devices for Staff Recruitment 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to be utilized for the purchase of two LiveScan Fingerprinting machines to be utilized for employment criminal background checks at Larned State Hospital and Parsons State Hospital. 38000 38000 34354
TPN-238534 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC State Defense Building Remodel 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to be utilized for the design and remodel of the State Defense Building and State Emergency Management Operations. To provide Kansas Division of Emergency Management (KDEM) a more modern and efficient space to conduct the emergency response activities for the State of Kansas. 22628000 18389220 111780
TPN-238532 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC WSU Digital Transformation Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Construction of the National Institute for Aviation Research (NIAR) Hub for Advanced Manufacturing Research (HAMR). 10000000 10000000 0
TPN-243396 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity K 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 5000000 5000000 0
TPN-243395 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity J 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 847774.28 847774.28 54583.34
TPN-243394 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity I 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 1669353 1669353 0
TPN-243390 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity H 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 1258177.62 1258177.62 60216.97
TPN-243389 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity G 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 866160 866160 72666.62
TPN-243378 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity D 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 4177723.55 4177723.55 0
TPN-243374 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity C 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 1764080.77 1764080.77 531046.81
TPN-243371 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity B 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 3881706 3881706 0
TPN-243365 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity A 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 2487808.79 2487808.79 811914.55
TPN-243386 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity F 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 548800 548800 74771.61
TPN-243380 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity E 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 2962845.15 2962845.15 309555.28
TPN-243348 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Patient Building (ATC) Generator and Motor Replacement 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding will be used to purchase and install a new generator and motor for the ATC building. And be in compliance with, NFPA 110, which requires hospitals and health care facilities to have protective systems in place to address any power outages. 110000 110000 0
TPN-243347 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC National Core Indicator Survey 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds to be utilized to contract with a survey firm to complete the required National Core Indicator (NCI) survey for the Intellectual and Developmental Disability (IDD) waiver population. The NCI survey uses in person interviews of wavier participants or their responsible parties to measure their satisfaction with the services provided through the IDD waiver. 1000000 1000000 0
TPN-243399 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity L 5-Infrastructure 5.21-Broadband: Other projects Office of Broadband Development to provide competitive grants for Lasting Infrastructure and Network Connectivity, to enable the deployment of last mile and middle mile broadband infrastructure in areas if the state that lack access to high-speed internet service. 3000000 3000000 0
TPN-046744 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Recovery Office Operations 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Staffing and other administrative expenses related to the ongoing management of the federal pandemic relief funds. 21061810.78 13359517.47 12634064.77
TPN-065218 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more 24/7 Facility Staff Pay Plan 3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers New pay initiatives designed to address critical staffing shortages in correctional and other congregate care settings operated by the State of Kansas. 23855767.75 23855767.75 23855767.75 5275 No
TPN-065663 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Offender Management Information System 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Funding for Kansas Department of Corrections to finance the modernization of the Offender Management Information System with the goal of increasing the agency’s ability to monitor offenders, maintain public safety and manage congregate offender populations in an effort to realize better outcomes post-release. 2000000 2000000 2000000 No 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-065523 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Unemployment System Modernization 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Funding for the Kansas Department of Labor to modernize the unemployment insurance IT system and related processes to be more user friendly for staff and have outward facing capabilities that are easy to navigate for Kansan citizens. Kansans will be able to reach unemployment benefits more efficiently and effectively through upgraded technology, phone applications, plain language upgrades, claimant self-service functionality, and chatbot help technology. 9600000 9600000 9600000 No 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment No 0
TPN-065507 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled State of Kansas Revenue Replacement 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Revenue replacement funding for the provision of key government services by the state. To date the funding has been used for the planning and design work associated with the KDHE State Laboratory and Docking State Office Building. 0 0 0
TPN-100333 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Pathways for Success Initiative 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services Funds are to be utilized to provide technical education equipment at correctional facilities, including internet access, tablets, charging equipment, and educational program access. 6665392 5765644.62 5763405.72 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic No 0
TPN-100331 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 988 Crisis Hotline 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services Initial Funding for Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services to finance the Kansas 988 Crisis Hotline Grant Program, which includes the hiring of workforce, training, technical support and software to provide in-state coverage of 988 crisis calls. 2542679.85 2542679.85 2542679.85 No 1 Imp General Public 1 Imp General Public 1 Imp General Public No 0
TPN-002402 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Frontline Hospital Worker Retention Plan 4-Premium Pay 4.2-Private Sector: Grants to other employers The Frontline Hospital Worker Retention Plan provided eligible hospitals with financial tools to reward and retain essential frontline healthcare workers to address ongoing COVID-19 public health needs and ensure retention of critical staffing resources. Amount of funding available to allocate is $50 Million. Approved funding allocation will be an advanced payment following receipt of a fully executed subrecipient agreement based on the formula of imputed percentage of total nursing resources multiplied by $49.5 million (remaining $500k set aside for administrative purposes). Period of Performance established by the SPARK Committee: 9/1/2021-2/28/2022 48770005.53 48770005.53 48770005.53 10000
TPN-002401 RCP-036162 State Of Kansas Kansas Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Deposit to the State Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.28-Contributions to UI Trust Funds Deposit to unemployment insurance trust fund to replenish state reserves to pre-pandemic level. 257947710.44 257947710.44 257947710.44 No 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-071063 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Digital Equity Plan 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project will develop a Digital Equity Plan to help close the digital divide and increase technological access. 121873.21 121873.21 121873.21
TPN-070930 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Benefits Navigator 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project is one of several aspects of a community access and emergency support initiative that will provide both emergency support funding and benefit navigation support. The emergency support will be provided through non-profits who will distribute direct resources to residents. The benefits navigators will work in the Department of Community and Human Services to ensure that connection to services is expedited. 824919.43 824919.43 824919.43
TPN-070920 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Aid to Non Profits 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project is one of several aspects of a community access and emergency support initiative that will provide both emergency support funding and benefit navigation support. The emergency support will be provided through non-profits who will distribute direct resources to residents. The benefits navigators will work in the Department of Community and Human Services to ensure that connection to services is expedited. 276860 276860 276860
TPN-070891 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Other Economic Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project is one of several aspects of a community access and emergency support initiative that will provide both emergency support funding and benefit navigation support. The emergency support will be provided through non-profits who will distribute direct resources to residents. The benefits navigators will work in the Department of Community and Human Services to ensure that connection to services is expedited. 500000 500000 500000
TPN-070880 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Cash Assistance 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project is one of several aspects of a community access and emergency support initiative that will provide both emergency support funding and benefit navigation support. The emergency support will be provided through non-profits who will distribute direct resources to residents. The benefits navigators will work in the Department of Community and Human Services to ensure that connection to services is expedited. 325000 325000 325000
TPN-070876 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Medical Expenses 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project is one of several aspects of a community access and emergency support initiative that will provide both emergency support funding and benefit navigation support. The emergency support will be provided through non-profits who will distribute direct resources to residents. The benefits navigators will work in the Department of Community and Human Services to ensure that connection to services is expedited. 205676 205676 205676
TPN-097006 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Public Safety Center Cleaning and Staffing 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services During the pandemic, the public safety center, where prisoners are housed, required additional cleaning that exceeded the amount budgeted in FY 2022. ARPA funds were used to cover the additional costs. Remaining funds were used to recruit additional staff in the public safety center. 62044.86 62044.86 62044.86
TPN-098391 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Public Safety Compensation 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The ARPA funds will be used to pay for the first responders in the Alexandria Police Department who supported the community during the pandemic in FY 2022 and FY 2023. A portion of this project ($4,125,164) was executed in FY 2023. An additional $1,578,717.99 was executed in FY 2024. 41514881.27 41514881.27 41514881.27
TPN-002712 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Office of Internal Audit Control Assessment 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project provides for an external audit firm to assist the City with review of existing controls and to ensure compliance with federal regulations. The firm will work closely with the ARPA project managers and the City's Office of Internal Audit to ensure that the funds are used in accordance with the guidelines set forth by Treasury, the UGG and the City's own policies. 36167.5 36167.5 36167.5
TPN-005891 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed COVID Contact Tracers 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds have been used to contract for additional support to conduct contact tracing of infected and exposed individuals. 204410.02 204410.02 204410.02
TPN-005890 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Recreation Facility COVID response 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will provide for increased cleaning and disinfection in City recreation centers and public parks. 105109.99 105109.99 105109.99
TPN-005888 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Public Health response and support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds will support continuing efforts at the Alexandria Health Department to respond to community needs and will provide for a nurse practitioner for long term and congregate care support and a volunteer developer to manage the medical reserve corps and other volunteers engage in the public health emergency. Throughout the pandemic the City's response has been handled by a combination of staff and volunteers. 190730.35 190730.35 190730.35
TPN-005886 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed City and Courthouse Facility COVID maintenance 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding will provide for enhanced cleaning supplies, freestanding air filtration and additional cleaning and disinfecting efforts in City facilities. City government operations have continued throughout the pandemic, but have required considerable investment to ensure both the safety and protection of the workforce and the residents. 386644.36 386644.36 386644.36
TPN-005885 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Mobile Hotspot Lending Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The Alexandria Library will lend free mobile hotspots to cardholders to broaden internet access to residents impacted by the pandemic. The mobile hotspots will support remote working, learning and applying for employment, benefits and services offered by local non-profits for those customers without internet access at home. This is in addition to the hotspots circulated by the Alexandria City Public Schools to students, to ensure that working parents and residents without children have reliable access to the internet as well. 20000 20000 20000
TPN-005884 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Arts Relief and Recovery Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project will fund grants to sustain the local arts economy by providing support to Alexandria-based arts organization and arts whose programming and/or operations have been significantly impacted by the pandemic. The arts organizations are small non-profit businesses and artists who economically support tourism, travel and the hospitality industries in Alexandria. 108168 108168 108168
TPN-005883 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Community Remembrance Project 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This is a multi-year city-wide initiative to understand Alexandria's history of racial terror with the goals of becoming a more inclusive community and "claiming" our Alexandria Lynching Pillar from EJI. 150000 150000 150000
TPN-005882 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Freedom House Staffing 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project provides seasonal frontline staff at the Freedom House and additional staff support at Alexandria museums. The Freedom House Museum is a recently acquired facility in the City's historic resources. This property was once part of the headquarters of the largest domestic slave trading firm in the United States. 150000 150000 150000
TPN-005879 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Reemployment and Upskilling Project 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project will help residents return to work with increased skills, utilizing work-based learning, vocation-based English for Speakers of Other Languages (V-ESOL) training, digital literacy and equity for employment, and access to supportive services. Participants will earn as they learn, and hosting companies will receive support and a chance to assess a good fit before making a hiring decision on a prospective employee. 1345000 1345000 1345000
TPN-005878 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Food Security Coordination 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project includes the creation of a Food Security Coordinator position to support the integration of food security efforts, the establishment of two community food hubs, and the continued support of pantry network and food delivery operations. The position will also help to improve communication and access and increase the use of data to improve planning and maximize resources. 2721174.99 2721174.99 2721174.99
TPN-005881 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Cancelled Alexandria African American History Tourism Enhancements 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The project will create two new visitor tourism experiences focused on the City's Duke Street Corridor history and the City's Civil Rights history. These new initiatives will have both physical as well as digital products and will be promoted through Visit Alexandria. The research and development of these projects will be done in collaboration with a HBCU paid internship. 0 0 0
TPN-005876 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Eviction Prevention Legal Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds have been used to contract a housing justice attorney to provide additional direct legal support in eviction prevention protection. 388357 388357 388357
TPN-005880 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more Guaranteed Basic Income Pilot Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This initiative will provide $500 to approximately 150 families for 24 months. Participants will be supported through case management to help families establish goals, navigate systems, and fully participate in the pilot. A research partner will assist with monitoring of outcomes and assess the program's impact to provide a comprehensive understanding of if/how participants achieve greater economic stability and the implications of future investments in programs designed to reduce poverty. 3000000 2929130.28 2929130.28
TPN-005875 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Rental Assistance 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding was provided to residents who needed financial support in the form of rent assistance. Funds are being used to ensure that all eligible individuals and landlords are enrolled and accessing the rental assistance resources that are currently available through navigation and outreach efforts. 1274176.14 1274176.14 1274176.14
TPN-005874 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Food insecurity - tangible aid 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds were used to provide food to residents in the community who were experiencing food insecurity. Funds helped to address the basic needs of residents, particularly those who did not qualify for existing federal programs or other food security assistance programs. 675000 675000 675000
TPN-005873 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Cancelled Lower King Street Closure - King Street Place 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project is an investment in infrastructure and amenities to make the closure of the 100 block of King Street permanent and to explore expansion to other City blocks. The closure was a temporary pilot that has been very successful. The permanent solution will involve design and construction of long-term improvements to lower King Street and will involve consideration of expansion to other City blocks. 0 0 0
TPN-005872 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Visit Alexandria Tourism Enhancements 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funding provided to Visit Alexandria will be used to enhance the organization's website and expand marketing efforts to promote tourism. The direct investment in advertising is specifically designed to accelerate small business recovery, to support visitors and entrepreneurs of color and grow regional visitation to Alexandria. Enhancements to the VisitAlexandriaVA.com website are expected to provide a faster, more secure, state of the art web experience that increases visitation and the length of time on the website. 620000 620000 620000
TPN-005871 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Alexandria Library Outdoor Programs and Job Skills Workshops 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project will enable the Alexandria Libraries to reconnect with customers and job seekers through free outdoor programming, in addition to virtual offerings. Presenters will host programs and workshops for all age groups on library properties and local parks. 24000 24000 24000
TPN-005870 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed less than 50% Out of School Time Program Enhanced Enrichment Programming 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project is intended to support enhanced enrichment opportunities for children in the City subsidized Out of School Time Program (OSTP) after school and summer programs, including project-based and social/emotional learning programs. These enrichments will assist with learning loss and will increase academic and social supports to vulnerable children in addition to traditional recreation activities that maintain physical and mental health and wellness. 419719.23 411251.23 386051.23
TPN-005869 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed 50% or more LGBTQ and BIPOC Equity Project 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project will continue essential work to build inclusive and equitable services and increase awareness of City services for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) and Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) communities. Research from the pandemic reflects that these communities have been hit hard by the pandemic and are suffering disproportionately. 221893.3 207471.1 207471.1
TPN-005868 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Unified Early Childhood Workforce Stabilization Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This initiative will support childcare providers and early childhood educators, provide a safe and healthy learning environment for children, and help parents, especially women, get back to work. 2099073.43 2099073.43 2099073.43
TPN-005867 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Rental Resiliency 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Bilingual and temporary staff are expected to supplement the capacity of the Office of Housing's Landlord Tenant Division. Staff will work onsite and in the field with at-risk renters to prevent evictions; to mediate landlord-tenant issues and/or repayment plans; and, to identify/navigate other emergency response and recovery resources to ensure renter households can access and maintain long term housing stability and security. 312000 240519.03 240519.03
TPN-005866 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Court Mental Health and Asset Builder Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The focus of this initiative is to provide mental health and substance abuse services for residents, especially Court-involved community members. The emphasis will be on trauma-informed, equity-based, individual and family engagement professionals to support the building of youth/family assets in order to mitigate the risk factors of continued court involvement. 402075.78 401114.13 401114.13
TPN-005865 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed City of Alexandria Broadband Strategist and Policy Analyst 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This position will provide community outreach and assist in addressing equitable digital access as part of the City's municipal fiber network implementation. The City is constructing a municipal fiber network and plans to create a digital ecosystem that will create vast opportunities to benefit both the City government and the community. 296251.05 296251.05 296251.05
TPN-005864 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Cancelled Storm Water State of Good Repair and Resiliency 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project will fund one-time state of good repair and structural resiliency improvements of the Hoofs Run Culvert, including additional heavy cleaning. City inspection reports reflect the need for capital maintenance investment. Heavy cleaning is proposed for the section between Timber Branch Parkway and East Maple Street, to be preceded by robotic inspection. 0 0 0
TPN-005863 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Performance Analytics Eviction Prevention and other Analytical Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This position will support the data collection and analysis needs of the Eviction Prevention Task Force, and other data collection needs to support the evaluation and reporting of the City's ARPA investments. This data management position will produce data analytics that will inform the priorities of the Task Force and support the development of longer-term prevention strategies linked to the systems of care and other stabilization efforts. 97031.09 97031.09 97031.09
TPN-005862 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed Project Reporting Manager 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This position will serve as the project manager for the City's ARPA funds, ensuring that all reporting requirements are met and subrecipients track and manage funds and beneficiaries in compliance with the Treasury and with the City's Single Audit. This position will compile all of the information needed to report to stakeholders in an accurate and timely manner. 147216 147216 147216
TPN-005861 RCP-036637 Alexandria, Virginia Virginia Tier 2. Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding Local Government Completed ITS Smartsheet Software 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Smartsheets software is enabling the City to collaborate and work efficiently across multiple locations, particularly in support of the Incident Command structure and tracking COVID in the workplace. This software has been critical operates in a hybrid environment with changing guidelines. Staff is able to maintain the status of city service delivery, the impact of COVID in the workplace, and staff vaccination/testing compliance. 408380 408380 408380
TPN-177135 RCP-036039 Monmouth County, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Aid to Tourism, Travel or Hospitality 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality the 95000 95000 95000 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-052893 RCP-036039 Monmouth County, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Consultants 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Consultants are engaged by the County to support effective management and oversight and to ensure compliance with Federal and State requirements. 66376.25 66376.25 66376.25
TPN-052687 RCP-036039 Monmouth County, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Nonprofit Organizations 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted) This Program was established by the Monmouth County Board of County Commissioners on March 8, 2022 pursuant to Resolution #2022-0201. The primary objectives of grant funds under this Program are to support organizations who: (i) serve veterans and their families through supportive housing, education, healthcare and community reintegration; (ii) combat food insecurity; (iii) provide temporary care, housing and adoption services for animals; (iv) support special needs persons in their transition into the community from institutional care; (v) provide for the presence and preservation of the arts, historic and cultural resources; and (vi) provide mental health services. Funds under this Program may be used to accomplish any of the five (5) aforementioned objectives and may be applied retroactively as reimbursement of eligible expenditures incurred during the COVID-19 public health emergency from March 1, 2020 through March 28, 2022, to retroactively reimburse reductions in total revenue experienced during the COVID-19 public health emergency from March 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021, or prospectively to reimburse eligible COVID-19 expenditures or enhance existing programs and services from March 29, 2022 through December 31, 2022. 23935016.49 23935016.49 23935016.49 No 10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify 25 Dis Imp NPs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-063358 RCP-036039 Monmouth County, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Nursing Services 1-Public Health 1.2-COVID-19 Testing The County contracted with this entity to provide registered and licensed nursing services at its COVID-19 testing sites since the County does not have in-house employees who could perform this function. The eligible use is to expand access to COVID-19 testing under EC 1.2 COVID-19 testing. 1605 1605 1605 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-063262 RCP-036039 Monmouth County, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Ambulance Standby 1-Public Health 1.2-COVID-19 Testing To provide standby ambulance services at various vaccination sites throughout Monmouth County. 43500.6 43500.6 43500.6 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-070564 RCP-036039 Monmouth County, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Administrative Expenditures 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Administrative expenses are inclusive of applicable direct and indirect costs incurred by the County to administer its SLFRF allocation and programs. This includes consultants to support effective management and oversight and to ensure compliance with Federal and State requirements. All administrative costs are reasonable and allocable to the Federal award pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200. 5562 5562 5562
TPN-020947 RCP-036039 Monmouth County, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Revenue Replacement for General Government Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services The revenue replacement calculation was utilized to recoup lost or diminished revenues. Proceeds from the revenue loss calculation are being used to support existing County programs. In addition, the County has entered into a contract for an expansion of our existing mental health services agreement. We will also be providing additional funding to our vocational school. 91387854.14 91387854.14 81978440.41
TPN-020650 RCP-036039 Monmouth County, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Testing Clinics 1-Public Health 1.2-COVID-19 Testing COVID-19 TESTING CLINICS IN VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT MONMOUTH COUNTY. 375000 375000 375000 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-020623 RCP-036039 Monmouth County, New Jersey New Jersey Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Employee Testing 1-Public Health 1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.) MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION -MANDATED COVID-19 TESTING SUPPLIES AND SERVICES FOR UNVACCINATED EMPLOYEES. 336030 336030 336030 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations No 0
TPN-166675 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066867 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171761 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066917 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171760 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000068206 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171759 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066807 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171758 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000068060 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171757 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066921 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171756 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066863 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171755 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066920 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171754 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066942 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171753 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066919 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171752 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066948 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171751 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066874 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171750 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066868 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171749 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066915 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171748 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066861 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171747 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066940 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171746 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066872 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171745 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066846 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171744 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066912 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171743 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066911 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171742 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066808 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171741 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066865 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171740 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066950 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171739 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066871 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171738 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066897 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171737 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066870 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171736 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066944 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171735 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066922 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171734 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066866 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171733 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066895 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171732 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066842 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171731 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066857 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171730 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066869 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171729 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066890 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171728 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066806 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171727 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066879 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171726 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066949 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171725 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066862 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171724 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066860 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171723 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066864 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171722 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066364 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171721 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066954 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171720 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066873 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171719 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066941 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171718 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066953 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171717 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066847 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171716 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066947 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171715 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066914 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171714 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066845 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171713 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066913 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171712 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066952 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171711 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066397 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171710 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066363 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171709 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066910 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171708 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066849 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171707 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066946 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171706 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066848 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171705 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066859 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171704 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066951 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171703 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066945 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171702 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066858 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171701 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066899 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171700 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066844 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171699 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066362 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171698 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066898 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171697 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066402 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171696 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066361 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171695 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066840 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171694 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066896 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171693 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066401 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171692 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066894 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171691 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066297 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171690 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066843 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171689 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066360 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171688 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066893 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171687 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066892 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171686 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066399 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171685 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066349 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171684 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066841 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171683 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066345 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171682 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066943 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-171681 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066340 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-182898 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066824 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-182897 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000068019 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-182896 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000066298 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-182895 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000067758 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-182894 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000067782 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects ""The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. "" 0 0 0
TPN-184908 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Davie County 5-Infrastructure 5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-184907 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Dunn 5-Infrastructure 5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0 No Yes Yes
TPN-184906 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Greensboro 5-Infrastructure 5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution Camp Burton Water Main 0 0 0
TPN-184905 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Greensboro-Wastewater 5-Infrastructure 5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-184904 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Jamesville 5-Infrastructure 5.10-Drinking water: Treatment DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-184903 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Clayton 5-Infrastructure 5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-184902 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Midland 5-Infrastructure 5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-184901 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Pembroke-Wastewater Treatment Plant 5-Infrastructure 5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-184900 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Davidson County 5-Infrastructure 5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-184899 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Boonville 5-Infrastructure 5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-184898 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Kings Mountain 5-Infrastructure 5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0 No Yes Yes
TPN-184897 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Southern Wayne Sanitary District 5-Infrastructure 5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-184896 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Lake Lure 5-Infrastructure 5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-184895 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Cleveland County 5-Infrastructure 5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-184747 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Transylvania County 5-Infrastructure 5.18-Water and Sewer: Other DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-187305 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC DEQ Administrative Costs 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Administrative costs for DEQ projects 13279039.88 13279039.88 13265742.95
TPN-187304 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Speedway Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This project is designed to mitigate the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on After 5 Events LLC 50000 50000 50000
TPN-187841 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000072586 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187840 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000072585 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187839 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000072584 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187838 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000072581 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187825 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069973 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187824 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069968 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187823 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000072535 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187822 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070332 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187821 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069466 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187820 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069970 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187819 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070331 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187818 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070523 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187817 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070522 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187816 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069943 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187815 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070758 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187814 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070757 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187813 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000072312 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187812 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069971 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187811 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069967 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187810 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070337 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187809 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070340 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187808 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069949 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187807 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070338 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187806 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069945 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187805 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070525 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187804 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070521 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187803 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070334 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187802 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070333 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187801 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069969 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187800 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069965 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-187799 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069963 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-188608 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Faison 5-Infrastructure 5.10-Drinking water: Treatment WIP 0 0 0
TPN-188607 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Hendersonville 5-Infrastructure 5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment WIP 0 0 0
TPN-190904 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Pembroke 5-Infrastructure 5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment DEQ State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 0 0 0
TPN-209774 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069972 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-209773 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070335 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-209772 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000073395 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-209771 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000073247 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-209770 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000074091 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-209769 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070751 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-209768 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000070339 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-209767 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000069941 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-209766 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000072238 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-209765 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000072237 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-215612 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 7000072630 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-215611 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000074352 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-215610 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000072582 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-215609 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000074353 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-215608 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000074368 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-215607 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000072708 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-215606 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000072583 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-215605 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000072587 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-215604 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000072589 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-215603 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000072588 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-218990 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled DEQ-148-Clinton 5-Infrastructure 5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater Clinton WWTP Resiliency Improve 0 0 0
TPN-234937 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000075716 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Increase broadband availability 0 0 0
TPN-234936 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000075715 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Increase broadband availability 0 0 0
TPN-234935 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000075717 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Increase broadband availability 0 0 0
TPN-234934 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled NCDIT GREAT Grant Program - 2000075714 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Increase broadband availability 0 0 0
TPN-234929 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Completing Access to Broadband Program - 2000075995 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects Deploy infrastructure to provide broadband service to currently unserved locations 0 0 0
TPN-243243 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Not Started Department of Adult Correction Government Services Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides fund for the Department of Adult Correction for personnel costs and other government services. 800000000 800000000 0
TPN-243240 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Childcare Stabilization Grant 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other This project will continue the compensation grants portion of the Child Care Stabilization grants program to provide compensation support to eligible, qualified early care and learning programs across the state to sustain and stabilize their businesses, support working families with access to high-quality, affordable care and education, and promote equity for children, parents, and teachers. Funds may be used to provide bonuses or increase salaries and benefits for child care workers. Per NC Session Law 2024-40, funding will support the cost of compensation supports for the first two quarters of the 2024-2025 fiscal year at a reduced level from previous program iterations to stay within the provided funding limits. Funds will be distributed to any eligible, qualified child care providers who apply for continued stabilization grant funding. Funding for child care stabilization compensation grants will be based on available funds and established formulas based on the type of compensation support to be provided. 32853032 32853032 32853032 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic No 0
TPN-076837 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Long Leaf Scholarship 2022 Graduates 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to the State Education Assistance Authority (SEAA) to administer the Longleaf Commitment Program. This program provides need-based grants to eligible students graduating from high school in the FY 2021-22 academic year to cover tuition and fees at a community college for up to 2 years. 12351725 12351725 11650288
TPN-076825 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Ultraviolet-C Sterilization Units 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to the UNC Board of Governors to purchase ultraviolet-C sterilization units to disinfect surfaces to prevent the spread of COVID-19. This equipment shall be divided equally between Elizabeth City State University (ECSU), Fayetteville State University (FSU), and the University of North Carolina at Pembroke (UNCP). 0 0 0
TPN-076957 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Brevard College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 417061 417061 417061
TPN-076815 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Project Kitty Hawk 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to establish a public-private partnership for digital learning courses with the goal of generating postsecondary learning and career advancement opportunities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. 97000000 97000000 89666666.67
TPN-076567 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed PBS North Carolina COVID-19 Expenses 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to the UNC System Office for PBS North Carolina to offset expenses incurred to directly respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. 22500 22500 22500
TPN-076558 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed North Carolina Arboretum COVID-19 Expenses 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to the UNC System Office for the North Carolina Arboretum to offset expenses incurred to directly respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. 138000 138000 138000
TPN-076546 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Crosby Scholars 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates a directed grant to the Crosby Scholars Community Partnership in Forsyth, Rowan, and Iredell counties to provide scholarships for students seeking higher education and who are eligible for Pell grants. Crosby Scholars Forsyth will receive $300,000, and Crosby Scholars Rowan and Crosby Scholars Iredell will each receive $100,000. 500000 500000 400000
TPN-076284 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Smart School Bus Pilot 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds for the 2021 Smart School Bus Pilot. The 2021 Smart School Bus Pilot Program will allow for enhanced safety protocols and Wi-Fi connectivity on school buses in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. 14820415 14820415 10467438.62
TPN-076053 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Longleaf Commitment Student Support Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to temporarily expand outreach and student advising capacity in support of the Longleaf Commitment grant program, which is for community college students who are from low- or moderate-income families. 6000000 6000000 5137645.3
TPN-076112 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Cape Fear Botanical Gardens 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds for economic assistance to the Cape Fear Botanical Gardens to mitigate the impacts of the COVID19 pandemic. 321000 321000 230587.75
TPN-076029 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Apprenticeship Program Expansion 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to temporarily expand apprenticeship opportunities for youth ages 16 to 25 in high-demand fields, including surveying, engineering, and construction, at small businesses located in Tier 1 and Tier 2 counties. 12000000 12000000 5244020.95
TPN-076006 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Community College Rural Broadband 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to improve broadband access for 25 rural community colleges. 15000000 15000000 11042983.81
TPN-075514 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Community College Stabilization 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates budget stabilization funds for community colleges that experienced a decline in enrollment due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 79983422 79983422 66592378.06
TPN-077054 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Johnson C Smith Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 7543584 7543584 7543584
TPN-077048 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Johnson & Wale Univ - Charlotte 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 572500 572500 572500
TPN-077044 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Guilford College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 964118 964118 964118
TPN-077038 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Greensboro College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 613040 613040 613040
TPN-077024 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Gardner-Webb Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 1269331 1269331 1269331
TPN-076976 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Catawba College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 762500 762500 762500
TPN-076974 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Carolinas College of Health Sciences 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 53750 53750 53750
TPN-076966 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Campbell Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 1788750 1788750 1788750
TPN-076962 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Cabarrus College of Health Sciences 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 248750 248750 248750
TPN-076950 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Bennett College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 1589942 1589942 1589942
TPN-076942 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Belmont Abbey College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 571250 571250 571250
TPN-076982 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Chowan Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 1128408 1128408 1128408
TPN-076919 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Barton College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 774908 774908 774908
TPN-078290 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Lead & Asbestos- Remediation of Lead Paint and Asbestos in Schools & Childcare 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund to support lead and asbestos remediation in public schools and childcare facilities. 150000000 150000000 35642371.52
TPN-078275 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Incident Response Improvement System (IRIS) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund to replace the Incident Response Improvement System, a web-based application through which service providers are required to report incidents that may affect the health and safety of individuals receiving publicly funded behavioral health services. 2500000 2500000 510043.4
TPN-078265 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Forsyth & Mecklenburg Counties Crisis Behavioral Health Program Joint Partnershi 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund for Forsyth and Mecklenburg Counties for crisis behavioral health joint partnerships with local hospital systems, local behavioral health crisis centers, local emergency services providers, and LME/MCOs. 25000000 25000000 2984377.88
TPN-078258 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Temporary Funding for ICF/IID Providers 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund to local management entities/managed care organizations (LME/MCOs) for temporary funding assistance for intermediate care facilities for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ICF/IID) services on a per diem basis. Funds are to assist with additional costs to these facilities incurred due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. 12595314 12595314 12595314
TPN-078231 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Grants to Pre-K & Child Care Centers 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund for startup and capital grants to NC Pre-K classrooms and childcare centers across the State 20000000 20000000 19834451.34
TPN-078218 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Atrium Health School-Based Virtual Health 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund for a directed grant to Atrium Health, Inc., to respond to the public health emergency by providing school-based virtual health services to classrooms in Anson County and Winston-Salem/Forsyth County school districts. 1000000 1000000 454147.64
TPN-078340 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% State Fair Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for the State Fair to replace receipt losses resulting from closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. 12770000 12770000 4586283.48
TPN-078159 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Camino Community Development Corporation, Inc. 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund for Camino Community Development Corporation, Inc., a nonprofit in Mecklenburg County that serves low-income families through primary care, behavioral health, and wellness services, as well as a thrift store and food pantry. Funding is for mobile units to support service delivery. 7500000 7500000 7500000
TPN-078225 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% NC Statewide Telepsychiatry Program (NC-STeP) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund to NC Statewide Telepsychiatry Program to respond to the public health emergency by providing virtual psychiatric assessments and consultations to patients using telemedicine technologies. The revised total requirements for this program are $3.3 million in FY 2021-22 and $1.8 million in FY 2022-23. 1500000 1500000 698684.33
TPN-078155 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Hospice of Davidson County 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides economic assistance from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund for Hospice of Davidson County, North Carolina, Inc., a nonprofit that provides hospice care and related services in Davidson County and surrounding counties. 125000 125000 125000
TPN-078176 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Duke University Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund for the Duke University Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Duke University Hospital operates this program in coordination with the City of Durham to identify and link patients at risk of repeat violent injury with hospital-based and community-based resources to address underlying risk factors. 375232 375232 263774.9
TPN-078136 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed NCSSM COVID-19 Expenses 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to NCSSM to offset expenses incurred to directly respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. 1360230 1360230 1360230
TPN-078215 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Virtual Behavioral Health Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund to the Office of Rural Health to establish a competitive grant program to support virtual behavioral health services. 10000000 10000000 1116008.71
TPN-078133 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more UNC School of the Arts COVID-19 Expenses 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to offset expenses incurred by the UNCSA High School Academic Program to directly respond to the COVID-19 pandemic 364253 364253 321402.55
TPN-078127 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Mobile Medical Units 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to the University of North Carolina at Pembroke for the operation of mobile medical units in rural and at-risk communities to respond to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. 500000 500000 485605.39
TPN-078279 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Brynn Marr Hospital 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund for Brynn Marr Hospital, Inc., a psychiatric hospital in Onslow County. 500000 500000 500000
TPN-078141 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Rapid Rehousing for Individuals and Families at Risk of Homelessness 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund for rapid rehousing services, activities to increase local capacity for services to prevent homelessness, and home improvements and home repairs for vulnerable seniors ages 60 and older. 15000000 15000000 1669800.17
TPN-078116 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 4-H Centers and Camps COVID-19 Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to 4-H centers and camps in the State to offset revenue loss caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the funds provided, $750,000 is allocated to the Betsy-Jeff Penn Center in Rockingham County, $600,000 to the Eastern 4-H Center in Tyrrell County, and $350,000 to the Millstone 4-H Camp in Richmond County. 1700000 1700000 1700000
TPN-078294 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Cleveland Vocational Industries 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funding from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund to provide economic assistance to Cleveland Vocational Industries Inc., a nonprofit providing training and employment opportunities for adults with barriers to employment. 350000 350000 350000
TPN-078195 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed The North Carolina Association of Free & Charitable Clinics (NCAFCC) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding from the State Fiscal Recovery fund for a directed grant the North Carolina Association of Free & Charitable Clinics, to respond to the public health emergency by supporting member clinics. 15000000 15000000 15000000
TPN-078148 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Nutrition Services for Older Adults 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund for nutrition services for older adults in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. 3585000 3585000 74345
TPN-078095 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Rapidly Emerging Antiviral Drug Development Initiative 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to the Vice Chancellor for Research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for the Rapidly Emerging Antiviral Drug Development Initiative to advance development of therapeutics for the COVID-19 pandemic. 18000000 18000000 17334637.85
TPN-078081 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more NC Policy Collaboratory 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to the North Carolina Policy Collaboratory (Collaboratory) to award research grants to monitor, assess, and address the public health and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. 30000000 30000000 15078796.61
TPN-078069 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Marine Scholarship Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds for a need-based scholarship recovery program for children of currently serving members of the Armed Forces and for certain disabled veterans along with their children and spouses to attend postsecondary institutions in order to recover from learning loss caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. 0 0 0
TPN-078061 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Patriot Star Family Recovery Scholarship Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds for a need-based scholarship recovery program for children of currently serving members of the Armed Forces and for certain disabled veterans along with their children and spouses to attend postsecondary institutions in order to recover from learning loss caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. 13000000 13000000 10000000
TPN-078182 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Trellis Supportive Care 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund for Trellis Supportive Care, a nonprofit with offices in Davie, Forsyth, Stokes, and Rowan counties, to provide hospice and palliative care. 250000 250000 0
TPN-078165 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Winston-Salem Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund for the City of Winston-Salem to create a Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program in response to the COVID19 pandemic. This program identifies and links patients at risk of repeat violent injury with hospital-based and community-based resources to address underlying risk factors. 500000 500000 359081.5
TPN-078026 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed High Point Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 1000000 1000000 1000000
TPN-078020 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Wingate Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 1892352 1892352 1892352
TPN-078011 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Warren Wilson College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 252500 252500 252500
TPN-078009 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Univ of Mount Olive 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 1699352 1699352 1699352
TPN-078000 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed St. Augustine's Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 4273138 4273138 4273138
TPN-077989 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 165000 165000 165000
TPN-077996 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed St. Andrews Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 251250 251250 251250
TPN-077987 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Shaw Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 6251815 6251815 6251815
TPN-077982 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Salem College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 484246 484246 484246
TPN-078018 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed William Peace Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 661799 661799 661799
TPN-077980 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Queens University of Charlotte 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 590000 590000 590000
TPN-078086 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Innovative Highly Treated Wastewater Pilot 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to the Collaboratory for a water and sewer project that establishes the Innovative Highly Treated Wastewater Pilot Program. 20000000 20000000 1294626.59
TPN-077621 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Pfeiffer Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 860215 860215 860215
TPN-077616 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed NC Wesleyan College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 1745398 1745398 1745398
TPN-077588 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Meredith College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 871250 871250 871250
TPN-077602 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Montreat College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 434448 434448 434448
TPN-077585 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Mars Hill Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 899059 899059 899059
TPN-077579 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Louisburg College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 689768 689768 689768
TPN-077568 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Lenoir-Rhyne Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 1314510 1314510 1314510
TPN-077598 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Mid-Atlantic Christian Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 128984 128984 128984
TPN-077593 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Methodist Univ 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 974428 974428 974428
TPN-077572 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Livingstone College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 6634494 6634494 6634494
TPN-077561 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Lees-McRae College 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Financial assistance for private university 628102 628102 628102
TPN-078599 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Motorsports 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for infrastructure needs at various speedways across the State, as well as grants for local governments to increase opportunities for events at motorsport venues. 45874662 45874662 32187436.22
TPN-078589 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Rural Tourism Recovery 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the Department of Commerce for its contract with EDPNC for rural tourism recovery. 0 0 0
TPN-078577 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Business Marketing 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the Department of Commerce for its contract with EDPNC for business marketing. 0 0 0
TPN-078571 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Travel and Tourism Marketing 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the Department of Commerce for its contract with the Economic Development Partnership of NC (EDPNC) for travel and tourism marketing. 0 0 0
TPN-078550 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed River City Community Development Center 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides economic assistance to River City CDC, a nonprofit organization impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 250000 250000 250000
TPN-078559 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Tourism Education Foundation of NC 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the Tourism Education Foundation of North Carolina for a regional program to recruit and train new employees for the hotel industry. 200000 200000 200000
TPN-078543 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Prospera 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for Prospera, an economic development nonprofit organization. 250000 250000 250000
TPN-078486 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed High Point Furniture Market 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides economic assistance to the High Point Furniture Market Authority, a nonprofit organization impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 1510000 1510000 1510000
TPN-078478 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Carolina Small Business Development Fund 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the Carolina Small Business Development Fund for small business loans and financial training to startups and existing businesses, and lending services to community-based organizations. 7000000 7000000 7000000
TPN-078449 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Capacity-Building for CDFIs 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the North Carolina Rural Center, Inc. for capacity-building grants for community development financial institutions (CDFIs) which provide financial services to low-income individuals. 5000000 5000000 5000000
TPN-078440 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% DWS Leveraging Technology & Online Services 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to DWS to procure technology and enhance online services available to help unemployed and underemployed people learn about and connect to in demand jobs. 2000000 2000000 364849.61
TPN-078413 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% DWS Substance Abuse Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to DWS for a program that helps individuals battling substance abuse enter and stay in the workforce. 2000000 2000000 377716.42
TPN-078406 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% DWS Re-entry Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to DWS to enhance the Department of Public Safety's re-entry program which supports individuals involved in the justice system by connecting them to employment opportunities prior to transitioning back into the community. 2000000 2000000 466037.74
TPN-078391 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Rural Downtown Transformation Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the Rural Economic Development Division (REDD) for grants to local governments. Of the funds provided in this item, $25 million will be used for neighborhood revitalization grants and $25 million will be used for grants for community development 50000000 50000000 12563927.77
TPN-078383 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Carolina Farm Stewardship Association 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the Carolina Farm Stewardship Association to purchase locally grown food for the Farms Serving Hospitality and Restaurant Employees (FarmsSHARE) program, an initiative which provides food at no cost to families in need. 2000000 2000000 2000000
TPN-078379 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Swine & Dairy Assistance Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for grants to swine and dairy producers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 30000000 30000000 20318645.65
TPN-078397 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Division of Workforce Solutions (DWS) Creating Work-Based Learning Opportunities 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the Division of Workforce Solutions (DWS) to establish a three-year, work-based learning program targeting businesses with fewer than 25 employees. 10000000 10000000 2854260.75
TPN-078377 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Meat & Seafood Processing Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the Increasing Meat and Seafood Production and Capacity (IMSPAC) grant program for financial assistance to meat and seafood producers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 17000000 17000000 9015015.93
TPN-078368 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Food Security—Golden LEAF 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to Golden L.E.A.F. (Long Term Economic Advancement Foundation) for grant funds to assist nonprofit organizations in becoming partner agencies with food banks and serving food security needs in their communities 10000000 10000000 1700000
TPN-078374 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Reinvestment Partners 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to Reinvestment Partners for its Produce Prescription Program. 5000000 5000000 5000000
TPN-078364 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Food Banks 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to be distributed equally to the six food banks in the State to meet the increased demand caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. 40000000 40000000 33881250.96
TPN-078359 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Western North Carolina Agricultural Center Receipt Replacement 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for the Western NC Agricultural Center to replace receipt losses resulting from closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2030000 2030000 696938.72
TPN-078337 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Food Distribution Division 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the Food Distribution Division. These funds may be used for a warehouse lease or purchase for cold storage, and equipment, such as trucks and refrigerated trailers to haul and distribute commodities to eligible recipient agencies across the State. 10000000 10000000 182092.4
TPN-081314 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Video Conferencing for Courtroom Proceedings 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding for video conferencing equipment to enhance courtroom proceedings by encouraging social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 4755600 4755600 4622993.01
TPN-081311 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Personal Protective Equipment-Courts 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding for personal protective equipment for court personnel due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 200000 200000 200000
TPN-081312 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Mobile Wi-Fi Hotspot Equipment 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding for mobile Wi-Fi hotspot devices to promote social distancing through remote work capabilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 300000 300000 300000
TPN-081309 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed The Lost Colony Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides economic assistance to the Roanoke Island Historical Association, a nonprofit organization impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, for the Lost Colony production. 500000 500000 500000
TPN-081307 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Paul J. Ciener Botanical Gardens (Kernersville) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides economic assistance to the Paul J. Ciener Botanical Gardens, a nonprofit organization impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 100000 100000 100000
TPN-081292 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Natural Science Center of Greensboro 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides economic assistance to the Natural Science Center of Greensboro, a nonprofit organization impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 500000 500000 479005.7
TPN-081290 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Laurel Ridge Camp, Conference, and Retreat Center 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides economic assistance to the Southern Province of the Moravian Church, a nonprofit impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, for the Laurel Ridge Camp, Conference, and Retreat Center. 100000 100000 100000
TPN-081287 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Flat Rock Playhouse 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides economic assistance to Flat Rock Playhouse, a nonprofit organization impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 100000 100000 100000
TPN-081283 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Carolina Ballet 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides economic assistance to the Carolina Ballet, Inc., a nonprofit organization impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 4000000 4000000 4000000
TPN-081279 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more NC Museum of History Foundation 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides economic assistance to the NC Museum of History Foundation, a nonprofit organization impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 3000000 3000000 1580780
TPN-081255 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed NC Symphony Society 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides economic assistance to the NC Symphony Society, Inc., a nonprofit organization impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 5000000 5000000 5000000
TPN-081247 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Science Museum Grants (Grassroots Science) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for grants to local museums or science centers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 7000000 7000000 6541891.37
TPN-081244 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more State Aid to Public Libraries 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the State Library to provide economic assistance grants to local libraries impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 10000000 10000000 9012242.25
TPN-081242 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Grassroots Arts Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for the Arts Council to provide grants for economic assistance to local arts nonprofit organizations impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 10000000 10000000 9999144
TPN-081225 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more NC Arts Council General Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the NC Arts Council to provide grants to nonprofit arts organizations to address financial hardships, support programming, and ensure events and facilities are safe for the public 5000000 5000000 4530750
TPN-081220 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Moonshine and Motorsports Trails 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to create cultural trails related to moonshine and motorsports. 1000000 1000000 861624.21
TPN-081209 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Zoo Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for the Zoo to replace receipt losses resulting from closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. 1850000 1850000 364800
TPN-081206 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed NC Battleship Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for the USS North Carolina Battleship Commission to replace receipt losses resulting from closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. 1400000 1400000 1400000
TPN-081203 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Tryon Palace Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for Tryon Palace to replace receipt losses resulting from closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. 370000 370000 370000
TPN-081202 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Transportation Museum Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for the Transportation Museum to replace receipt losses resulting from closures during the COVID19 pandemic 280000 280000 280000
TPN-081178 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Roanoke Island Festival Park (RIFP) Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for RIFP to replace receipt losses resulting from closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. 300000 300000 300000
TPN-081169 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% State Parks Water and Sewer Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for water and sewer projects at the State Parks. The Division may use up to 3.0% of the funds for the administration of the projects. 40000000 40000000 2412894.37
TPN-081166 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Viable Utility Reserve 5-Infrastructure 5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure Provides funds for the Viable Utility Reserve. These funds will be used to provide grants to water and sewer utilities that have been designated as distressed by the State Water Infrastructure Authority and the Local Government Commission. 325718109.35 325718109.35 35031643.31 No Yes Yes
TPN-081175 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Aquarium Support 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for the aquariums to replace receipt losses resulting from closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. 5700000 5700000 2681845.92
TPN-082433 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Local Government Capacity Assistance - Huntersville 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for guidance and technical assistance to localities in the administration of Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. 12000000 12000000 12000000
TPN-082428 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Local Government Capacity Assistance - Apex 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for guidance and technical assistance to localities in the administration of Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. 11500000 11500000 11500000
TPN-082426 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Local Government Capacity Assistance - COG 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for guidance and technical assistance to localities in the administration of Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. 10000000 10000000 5014996.41
TPN-082425 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Local Government Capacity Assistance - NCACC 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for guidance and technical assistance to localities in the administration of Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. 10000000 10000000 5548789
TPN-081449 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Local Government Capacity Assistance - NCLM 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for guidance and technical assistance to localities in the administration of Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. 10000000 10000000 3350033.97
TPN-081447 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more League of Municipalities Grants for Audit Software 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the League of Municipalities for the creation of an audit software grant program for tracking local use of funds related to the COVID-19 pandemic. 15000000 15000000 7805336.4
TPN-081446 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Dare County Housing 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to Dare County for the construction of affordable housing units. 0 0 0
TPN-081438 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Construction Training & Apprenticeship Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the CAGC Foundation, Inc. for construction education programs, including financial support for students and support for employers offering work-based learning programs. 1000000 1000000 409589.99
TPN-081435 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Pandemic Recovery Office - Extension of Operations 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for the North Carolina Pandemic Recovery Office to continue operations through the end of FY 2022-23. 24375000 24375000 12971696.66
TPN-081444 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Winston Salem Housing 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the City of Winston-Salem for the construction of affordable housing units. 10000000 10000000 1747000
TPN-081432 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled ARPA Auditing Funds 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to conduct audits of recipients of American Rescue Plan funds. 0 0 0
TPN-081427 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Division of Nonpublic Education - Data Improvement 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for time-limited positions and database improvements for tracking the increased number of operational home schools in the State due to the COVID19 pandemic. 750000 750000 657132.99
TPN-081425 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Small Business & HUB Resiliency (RETOOLNC) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for additional grants to small, historically underutilized businesses through the RETOOLNC program administered by the Office of Historically Underutilized Businesses. 22250000 22250000 21807583.76
TPN-081433 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Continuity of Operations 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for the continuity of operations across State government impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. 13903476 13903476 9638917
TPN-081423 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Treatment for Effective Community Supervision 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding for community supervision programs, including short term housing, recidivism reduction services, and social programming, for offenders reentering the community due to the settlement in NC NAACP v. Cooper, which is reducing the prison population as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. 1000000 1000000 293630
TPN-081422 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Transitional Living Support for Youth Re-entering 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding for the Juvenile Justice section to expand wraparound services for at-risk youth who are transitioning from Youth Development Centers into their communities. Funds will expand capacity and necessary services to address the increase in youth detention following the passage of S.L. 2017-57 (Raise the Age) legislation during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2500000 2500000 858338.48
TPN-081441 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Contractor Business Academy for HUBs 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the CAGC Foundation, Inc. to conduct a construction contractor business academy for historically underutilized businesses (HUBs). 3000000 3000000 2011659
TPN-081416 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Highway Patrol Computer Aided Dispatch System 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding to modernize the CAD system to facilitate timely service from law enforcement during the COVID-19 pandemic. This system provides automated record-keeping, dispatch information, and other support for troopers in the line of duty. 11100000 11100000 9264051.12
TPN-081415 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more VIPER Equipment Upgrades 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding to update obsolete Voice Interoperability Plan for Emergency Responders (VIPER) equipment to facilitate timely service from emergency first responders during the COVID-19 pandemic 19325000 19325000 10433455.6
TPN-081408 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Human Trafficking Grants- Human Trafficking Commission 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding to the Human Trafficking Commission for a grant program to provide economic assistance and enhanced services for victims of human trafficking to mitigate the increased risk of human trafficking due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 8800000 8800000 4240091.97
TPN-081437 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Construction Training & Apprenticeship Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the CAGC Foundation, Inc. for construction education programs, including financial support for students and support for employers offering work-based learning programs. 2500000 2500000 1606500
TPN-081424 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Inmate Medical Shortfall funding 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding for the Prisons section to help address a budget shortfall related to increased medical costs for inmates due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 45000000 45000000 45000000
TPN-081409 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Victims of Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding to the Human Trafficking Commission for a grant program to reduce the negative economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on organizations that provide services to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault across the State. 14035320 14035320 9530705.05
TPN-081400 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Temporary Courthouse Resources 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding for temporary court support personnel to address the court docket backlog due to the COVID19 pandemic. 2397510 2397510 2397510
TPN-081337 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Court Overtime Expenses 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding for overtime expenses to assist with court docket backlogs related to the COVID-19 pandemic. 3936330 3936330 3936330
TPN-082768 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Driver License Extended Operations 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund of the American Rescue Plan Act to add extended hours to driver license offices. 3000000 3000000 1261728.26
TPN-082753 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% HVAC-DHHS Facilities 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Appropriates funds for HVAC upgrades at Cherry Hospital, Central Regional Hospital, Broughton Hospital, Caswell Developmental Center, Murdoch Developmental Center, J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center, Black Mountain NeuroMedical Center, Longleaf Neuro-Medical Center, O'Berry Neuro-Medical Center, R.J. Blackley Treatment Center, Julian F. Keith Treatment Center, and/or Walter B. Jones Treatment Center. 20000000 20000000 3755104.45
TPN-082749 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% DPS HVAC for State Facilities 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Appropriates funds for HVAC upgrades for DPS State facilities. 30000000 30000000 14932278.45
TPN-082758 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed State Health Plan COVID-19 Related Costs 1-Public Health 1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities) Provides funds to reimburse the State Health Plan for COVID-19 testing, treatment, and vaccine administration. 101000000 101000000 101000000 No 1 Imp General Public
TPN-082728 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Carolina Cyber Network 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for a comprehensive workforce development network consisting of 2 and 4-year colleges and universities working together to create a coordinated effort to meet the talent needs of North Carolina's public agencies and private businesses in North Carolina. 11000000 11000000 8762555.25
TPN-082733 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Broadband Mapping 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for the preparation of statewide broadband maps. 1000000 1000000 538271.92
TPN-082722 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Broadband Administration 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the Department of Information Technology to supplement existing administrative capacity in support of high-speed internet efforts. $15M is authorized over 4 years. 15000000 15000000 6620566.32
TPN-082717 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Digital Literacy 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for an awareness campaign with targeted community-based efforts and digital literacy offerings. $50M is authorized over 4 years. 44147747 44147747 5061509.49
TPN-082545 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Mainframe Migration 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for the migration of the Department's data from the Department of Information Technology's mainframe to IBM. 2165763 2165763 2165763
TPN-082551 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Small Business Pandemic Recovery Grant Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to provide financial assistance to NCRLA to mitigate the economic impacts of COVID-19 5000000 5000000 5000000
TPN-082531 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Workforce Housing Loan Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for the Workforce Housing Loan Program (WHLP) to assist with the development of multi-family affordable housing units across the State. The total budget for the WHLP is $170 million in FY 2021-22. 0 0 0
TPN-082524 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed NCGA Pandemic Recovery and Mitigation 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the operations of the legislature. 21800000 21800000 21800000
TPN-082518 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more YMCA Grants 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for a statewide grant program to YMCAs for recovery from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. 11400000 11400000 11300000
TPN-082498 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Metrolina Native American Association 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to urban organizations serving American Indians to mitigate and respond to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. 250000 250000 250000
TPN-082492 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Guilford Native American Association 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to urban organizations serving American Indians to mitigate and respond to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. 250000 250000 250000
TPN-082513 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more NC Trucking Association Foundation 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the NC Trucking Association Foundation to address the State's truck driver shortage. 5000000 5000000 2695840.81
TPN-082491 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Cumberland County Association for Indian People 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to urban organizations serving American Indians to mitigate and respond to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. 250000 250000 250000
TPN-082506 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Triangle Native American Society 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to urban organizations serving American Indians to mitigate and respond to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. 250000 250000 250000
TPN-082475 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Assistance for State-Recognized Tribes 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to the Coharie, Haliwa-Saponi, Lumbee, Meherrin, Occaneechi Band of the Saponi Nation, Sappony, and Waccamaw Siouan State-recognized American Indian Tribes to mitigate and respond to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. 9006995 9006995 9006995
TPN-083500 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Broadband Pole Replacement Program 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services "The Broadband Pole Replacement Program serves to accelerate deployment or broadband infrastructure in unserved parts of the state by reimbursing a portion of eligible pole replacement costs incurred by communication service providers." 100000000 100000000 136459.49
TPN-083499 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Broadband Stop Gap Solutions 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "NCDIT Broadband Stop Gap Solutions will address unserved and underserved areas in the state by providing grants to internet service providers, local government entities, and nonprofits for infrastructure deployment in areas where traditional broadband projects and programs (e.g., GREAT grants, CAB RFPs) do not address need. These solutions could include projects in particularly high-cost areas, locations with low population density, or areas where fiber solutions are not feasible or reasonable expenses." 0 0 0
TPN-083498 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% NCDIT Completing Access to Broadband Program 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "As authorized in S.L. 2021-180 Section 38.6, the NCDIT Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO) will partner with a county that wishes to match its ARPA funds with the state’s ARPA funding from the CAB program to address the need of households or businesses that do not have access to broadband infrastructure in an unserved area or for a project that was not awarded a grant in the most recent round of grant awards under N.C.G.S. 143B-1373." A location file is not present because this single project with one MOU between NCPRO (the administering agency and prime recipient) and DIT (the co-prime recipient and counterparty in the MOU/IAA) encompasses several individual infrastructure projects across several different sites. NCPRO and DIT maintain records for each individual project, including the location files. However, the UST portal will only allow users to upload one location file per sfrf project. All project related location files, along with other site specific information, is available upon request. 212939144 212939144 500000 No Yes Yes
TPN-083497 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% NC DIT GREAT Grant Program 5-Infrastructure 5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects "The North Carolina Department of Information Technology’s Broadband Infrastructure Office (BIO), as authorized under S.L. 2018-5, and amended by S.L. 2019-230, S.L. 2020-97, and S.L. 2021-180, provides grants to private providers of broadband services to incentivize the deployment of broadband service to unserved areas of the state. " A location file is not present because this single project with one MOU between NCPRO (the administering agency and prime recipient) and DIT (the co-prime recipient and counterparty in the MOU/IAA) encompasses several individual infrastructure projects across several different sites. NCPRO and DIT maintain records for each individual project, including the location files. However, the UST portal will only allow users to upload one location file per sfrf project. All project related location files, along with other site specific information, is available upon request. 350000000 350000000 45870000 Yes Yes Yes
TPN-083452 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Local Assistance for Stormwater Infrastructure Investment 5-Infrastructure 5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater The funds will be administered as grants to eligible entities to implement stormwater infrastructure projects. Projects will include construction and planning projects to improve or create infrastructure for controlling stormwater quantity and quality. Projects may include nature-based solutions where feasible. Eligible entities include municipalities and counties that demonstrate significant hardship raising revenue necessary to finance stormwater management activities, as well as regional councils of governments and nonprofit entities that partner with the municipalities and counties. Up to 3% of the funds will be used to cover administrative costs of the Department." 38990926.26 38990926.26 5597975.89 No Yes Yes
TPN-083451 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Asset Inventory and T.A. Grants 5-Infrastructure 5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure "The funds will be administered as grants to water and wastewater utilities to implement studies and pre-construction planning activities (“planning grants”). Planning grants will include asset inventory and assessments, rate studies, merger/regionalization feasibility assessment/planning, training, and pre-construction planning grants to conduct project engineering " 58250330.41 58250330.41 19116529.38 No Yes Yes
TPN-083450 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% State Drinking Water/Wastewater Reserve Infrastructure Grants 5-Infrastructure 5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure "The funds will be primarily administered as grants to water and wastewater utilities to implement infrastructure capital (construction) projects. Infrastructure capital projects may include rehabilitation of existing assets, regionalization of systems, decentralization, extensions of service to disadvantaged underserved communities, or other infrastructure projects to support water and wastewater service needs. Grant funding will be administered to water/wastewater utilities that the Department of Environmental Quality categorizes as at-risk, as well as other utilities neither designated as distressed nor defined as at-risk. Additionally, some funds will be transferred to the Department of Commerce and the Department of Public Safety for other water/wastewater infrastructure projects. Up to 3% of the funds will be used to cover administrative costs of the Department of Environmental Quality." Unable to answer labor questions as project has not started 659125150.1 659125150.1 152933271.38 No Yes Yes
TPN-083355 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Small Business Pandemic Recovery Grant Program-Hospitality 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship The Department of Revenue (NCDOR) has been authorized by Senate Bill 105 to create and administer the Business Recovery Grant Program (Program). The Department will provide a one-time grant to businesses that suffered economic damage from the COVID-19 pandemic. A business is eligible for a grant under this Program if it meets one of the following conditions: 1 – a hospitality grant if the business (i) is subject to North Carolina income tax, (ii) is classified for the period for which economic loss is measured in NAICS Code 71 or 72 and (iii) demonstrates that it suffered an economic loss of at least 20% 2 – a reimbursement grant if the business (i) is subject to North Carolina income tax, (ii) is not classified for the period for which economic loss is measured in NCICS Code 71 or 72, (iii) demonstrates that it suffered an economic loss of at least 20%, and (iv) has not previously received an award amount. The grant amount is equal to the lesser of $500,000 or a percentage of the economic loss of the business demonstrated above. For applicants who have not previously received an award amount, the percentage is equal to 20%; for all other applicants, the percentage is equal to 10%. If grant applications exceed the funds allocated for the program, the Department will reduce grant amounts pursuant to the statute. The Department is authorized to spend $2.5 million of the $500 million appropriated for this Program for the administration of the Program. $200 million of the amount appropriated shall be reserved for reimbursement grants. The remaining amount ($297.5 million) is reserved for hospitality grants. Senate Bill 105 also requires NCDOR to use $5 million of the funds reserved for hospitality grants as a grant to the NC Restaurant and Lodging Association to be used for hospitality industry workforce recruitment designed to support the rebuilding of the State’s hospitality industry. 292971275 292971275 292971274.7 No 12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors No 0
TPN-085257 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Temporary Assistance for Facilities that Serve Special Assistance Recipients 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funding from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund to reduce the negative economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on facilities that serve Special Assistance (SA) recipients. Funds will provide a monthly payment of $125 per SA recipient beginning July 2021. 48000000 48000000 47992148
TPN-085233 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Premium Pay Bonuses - State and Local Education Employees 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides a $1,000 bonus for full-time State employees and local education employees, regardless of funding source. Also provides an additional $500 bonus to employees in at least one of the following employee groups: 1) Employees with an annual salary of less than $75,000, 2) Law enforcement officers, 3) Employees in the Department of Public Safety, Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice, with job duties requiring frequent in-person contact, or 4) Employees of the Department of Health and Human Services in a position at a 24-hour residential or treatment facility 523002253 523002253 523002253
TPN-085230 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Premium Pay Bonuses - Direct Care Workers 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides a $2,000 bonus for eligible direct care workers employed by eligible providers enrolled in the Medicaid or NC Health Choice program. 121006912 121006912 121006912
TPN-085241 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Grants to Volunteer Fire Departments 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds to mitigate the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on local volunteer fire departments. These funds will provide a $10,000 base allocation to each eligible volunteer fire department as defined in G.S. 58-87-1. 8000000 8000000 8000000
TPN-085253 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Communicable Diseases (Funding for Local Health Department 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds for local health departments to expand communicable disease surveillance, detection, control, and prevention activities to address COVID-19 and other communicable disease-related challenges impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. *Negative expenditures this quarter reflect changes to correct reporting made in previous months 36000000 36000000 28288741.61
TPN-085997 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Small Business Pandemic Recovery Grant Program - Other 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship The Department of Revenue (NCDOR) has been authorized by Senate Bill 105 to create and administer the Business Recovery Grant Program (Program). The Department will provide a one-time grant to businesses that suffered economic damage from the COVID-19 pandemic. 199111582 199111582 199111582 No 13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify No 0
TPN-088214 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Cancelled Revenue Replacement not otherwise classified 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services This category denotes that all revenue replacement has been appropriated by the NCGA. 0 0 0
TPN-098221 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed National Guard Project Planning 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides a planning grant to the North Carolina National Guard for a water and sewer infrastructure project at the site formerly known as Fountain Correctional Center for Women 500000 500000 500000
TPN-098218 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Economic Development Projects 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides grants for water and sewer infrastructure projects intended to advance economic development or affordable housing objectives for the recipients 42411444 42411444 30440294.93
TPN-109706 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Rockingham County 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Water and Sewer Infrastructure Improvements 17875000 17875000 8003003.49
TPN-109709 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Town of Madison 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Water and Sewer Infrastructure Improvements 1000000 1000000 653000
TPN-109703 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Town of Madison 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds for water and wastewater infrastructure projects 8350000 8350000 0
TPN-109700 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed less than 50% Rockingham County 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Funds for water and wastewater infrastructure projects 10000000 10000000 3750000
TPN-109696 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed EmitBio, Inc 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Provides funds from the State Fiscal Recovery Fund for a grant to EmitBio, Inc., a life sciences company, for continued development of a light-based treatment option for COVID-19 patients with severe respiratory involvement 6000000 6000000 6000000
TPN-109588 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed 50% or more Ultraviolet-C Sterilization Units (FSU) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to Fayetteville State University (FSU) to purchase Ultraviolet-C sterilization units to disinfect surfaces to prevent the spread of COVID-19. 666667 666667 596675.62
TPN-109586 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Ultraviolet-C Sterilization Units (ECSU) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to Elizabeth City State University (ECSU) to purchase ultraviolet-C sterilization units to disinfect surfaces to prevent the spread of COVID-19. 666666 666666 666666
TPN-109582 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Ultraviolet-C Sterilization Units (UNCP) 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Allocates funds to the University of North Carolina at Pembroke (UNCP) to purchase Ultraviolet-C sterilization units to disinfect surfaces to prevent the spread of COVID-19. 666667 666667 666667
TPN-110006 RCP-035857 State Of North Carolina North Carolina Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents State/DC Completed Premium Pay Bonuses - Line of Duty Death Benefit 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services Line of duty death benefits 800000 800000 800000
TPN-195210 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Technical and Trade Education 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Funds from this project will support the technical and trade education ecosystem in Boston. 4000000 4000000 4000000 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic No 0
TPN-195209 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Research on Boston's History of Slavery 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other Funds from this project will be used to support research and a report on the history and legacy of slavery in Boston. Through an RFP, the City will select partners to produce a report on the City’s role in and historical ties to the trans-Atlantic slave trade and the history and legacy of slavery, including original historical research and a comprehensive review of the secondary literature. 250000 250000 0 No 1 Imp General Public Yes 0
TPN-207243 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Not Started Food Rescue and Distribution 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs The purpose of this project is to support an increase in fresh food distribution for Boston residents facing food insecurity by supporting collaborative food storage and distribution of low or no-cost perishable foods, including rescued food. The project will provide support to collaborative non-profit organizations who partner to identify more efficient ways to increase the volume of non-perishable food available to food insecure residents with an increased levels of dignity and choice of food. We will support the ability of organizations and food distribution sites that serve food insecure residents to provide increased access to fresh food through collaborative cold storage, coordination, transportation and/or distribution logistics, including through partnerships with regional producers or food waste generators wishing to donate surplus food to Boston residents. Grantees will develop opportunities to collaborate and to build in efforts to connect participating individuals and families with nutrition assistance, workforce development, health and other social services that address root causes of food insecurity, on site or otherwise through the distribution of food. 2500000 0 0 No
TPN-207241 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Neighborhood Investments to Reduce Violence 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety This is a project that was substantially completed in 2021. In brief, this funding was directed toward 4 non-profit organizations that provided community violence prevention and intervention services to residents and supported them during pandemic recovery. 500000 500000 250000 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-207236 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Support for Cultural Ecosystem 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries This project will cover $2,000,000 for a new BCYF Arts Access program (RFP responses due 4/26/24) and $350,000 of the Cultural Access Pilot with Boston Museums. 2594000 631250 390000 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-243000 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Income Restricted Housing Development 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing This project will support the development of income restricted housing across the City including rental, homeownership, and cooperative housing, with a focus in areas with a high risk of displacement. Priorities will include the creation of housing for our older adults, supportive housing, and homeownership. In partnership with non-profit and for profit developers, this program will create units that are accessible to low-to-moderate income Bostonians. <br /> 7166500 7166500 0 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 0
TPN-242999 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% OEOI Admin Costs 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses Funding will support the creation of an ARPA Grants and Contracts Manager position. The staff member will provide project management and financial/accounting support for OEOI's ARPA-funded projects. 225630.61 0 0
TPN-242998 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Covid Economic Impact Study 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other OEOI will issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a vendor or vendors to undertake a comprehensive economic development study to evaluate and inform its strategies over the next five years. The vendor(s) should conduct the analysis in the context of the economic conditions impacted by COVID-19, review the efficiency and efficacy of the aforementioned economic development strategies and programs, as well as recommend actionable short- and long-term steps that can be taken to ensure the continued equitable economic development of all of Boston’s neighborhoods. 500000 0 0 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic No 0
TPN-064626 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Small Business Technical Assistance 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning The Small Business Technical Assistance grant will be awarded to one subrecipient to provide Technical Assistance to our small businesses who receive SBRF 2.0 funding. The OEOI Small Business Unit runs a successful Technical Assistance Program and will provide oversign of these services and programs. This program will provide Technical Assistance to businesses who receive the Small Business Relief 2.0 funds. <br /><br /><br />Small Business Strong is a non-profit organization empowered to help women and minority owned small businesses navigate the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Through this partnership with Small Business Strong the Small Business Unit of OEOI will be able to provide expedited resources to small businesses ranging from access to capital to consulting, business restructuring, business growth, digital marketing and customer engagement plans.<br /><br />The contract awarded to Small Business Strong through LISC Boston will be broken down into 3 key components that will spearhead capacity building for the economic ecosystem in Boston:<br />Small Business Unit training<br />Technical Assistance & community workshops<br />Bos Network convenings<br /> 350000 328223.75 196128.75 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-064611 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Commercial Space Supports 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship The Commercial Space supports Funds will provide grant funding for revitalization of underserved neighborhoods and businesses that do not qualify for CDBG funds, filling a critical gap in rebuilding neighborhood revitalization equitably across our City. 280000 22001 22000 Yes Other (please specify) 250000 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-011209 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Digital Equity in Public Housing 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.4-Household Assistance: Internet Access Programs Support internet access and digital literacy for City of Boston residents negatively impacted by the pandemic, by expanding free public Wi-Fi in public housing and/or supporting digital literacy, internet connectivity and access to modern technology. According to an August 2020 survey by the BHA, one in three seniors and one in three Limited English Proficiency residents whose first language is Spanish do not have internet access at home. BHA’s public internet initiatives, coupled with digital literacy efforts and purchase of equipment brings digital equity to residents’ doorstep, overcoming financial, technological and educational barriers. BHA will support residents in accessing internet services in common spaces in their developments, as well as through distribution of devices and by enhancing access to digital literacy efforts. 1000000 1000000 1000000 2000 Yes Devices and equipment that assist households in accessing the internet 300000 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations No 0
TPN-011208 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Cash assistance to individuals facing housing insecurity 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.3-Household Assistance: Cash Transfers The Boston Housing Authority (BHA), a subgrantee of the City of Boston, will conduct a cash assistance pilot. The BHA will identify a subset of its tenants, voucher holders, or, in partnership with the Supportive Housing team at the Department of Neighborhood Development, Rapid Rehousing clients to deliver cash assistance. The BHA will target several hundred households for either one-time or short-term recurring cash payments based on economic factors, existing benefits programs and housing-related needs. One likely target population is formerly homeless residents who are housed at BHA public housing, a project-based voucher site, or through BHA-run mobile voucher programs, with cash assistance beginning at time of placement or move-in to ensure basic needs are met. Based on data known to the BHA, the BHA will structure payments to avoid interference with other benefit programs or excessive assistance/subsidy to a particular household. 800000 800000 800000 500 No 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-011207 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Public Housing Food Assistance 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs The BHA, a subgrantee of the City of Boston, will address food security at targeted public housing communities through outreach from its management staff, through its resident-facing programs, and through resident task force leaders. Means of distribution may include a combination of: delivery of groceries; delivery of prepared meals; coordination with or subsidy or expansion of mobile service providers who bring fresh produce to underserved neighborhoods; distribution of gift cards; and distribution of coupons to facilitate discounted purchasing of healthy food. The BHA is currently in the process of auditing food resources across and adjacent to its housing portfolio and will make programmatic decisions based on how funds can effectively be leveraged to fill gaps in access. 500000 500000 500000 500 Yes Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks 150000 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 0
TPN-012078 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed BPS Student Behavioral Health Supports 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.26-Addressing Educational Disparities: Mental Health Services Expand student and family support in the Boston Public Schools for behavioral health, including additional dollars to ensure a full time social worker in every school. 1600000 1446544 1446544 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations No 0
TPN-012049 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more BPS Family Mentoring and Leadership 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services Whereas Boston Public Schools values strong family-school partnerships in support of student achievement, and recognizes that parents deserve and have the right to the appropriate resources to aid in informed discussions with school and district leaders, our intention is to develop a Parent Mentoring program that both builds the confidence and skills of parents to be active in their children’s school life and further creates conditions in which schools demonstrate the value parents contribute to their school community and their students’ learning. 400000 0 0 No 19 Dis Imp For services to address educational disparities Title I eligible Yes 0
TPN-011846 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Basic Needs Assistance for Families 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.3-Household Assistance: Cash Transfers The City of Boston Equity and Inclusion Cabinet and the Mayor’s Office for Immigrant Advancement are awarding $1 million dollars of ARPA funds to the Massachusetts Immigrant Collaborative (MIC) to support Boston residents who were not eligible for federal COVID-19 relief benefits. MIC will distribute the funds as cash assistance to families in need, regardless of immigration status. Eligible Boston households can apply for up to $1,000 in cash aid until funding is exhausted (the program will run from September 2021 to December 2021). Approximately 1,200 households in need will benefit from this pandemic relief grant to help pay for rent, utilities, food, school supplies or other basic needs. 1000000 1000000 1000000 1219 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 1000000
TPN-013775 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Boston School Food Distribution without Cost 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs This project will support BPS families and neighboring community members by offering Culturally Relevant Food Distribution at No Cost. This project seeks to complement school meals and increase food access for BPS families and communities near schools—keeping dignity, freedom of choice, and cultural relevance front and center of solutions.<br /> 90000 90000 90000 5550 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations Yes 0
TPN-013774 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Boston Food Sovereignty Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs This program will increase growing spaces for low-income households of color. In Boston, there are no more spaces available for community gardens and the waiting list is years for most. During the Food Access Assessment, we heard low-income residents asking for available space to grow their own food, especially ethnic vegetables that are difficult to locate in the Caucasian markets. This initiative also seeks to create space that helps them cope with the stress, create links between neighbors, and pass farming and cooking knowledge between generations. We will partner with local Boston farmers to build, install and provide supplies to low-income households in Boston including the BHA locations and the Boston Public Schools<br /> 202208 202208 202208 2091 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations Yes 0
TPN-013773 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Food Access Community Grants 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs The Mayor’s Office of Food Justice (OFJ) endorses a just, resilient, and robust food community in Boston that supports the wellbeing of all Boston residents. We recognize that root causes of food insecurity are complex and that addressing food access issues requires multi-dimensional solutions. $1.9 Million of the American Rescue Act Funding will be available through two different grant opportunities for the Boston community - one focused on equity in the food system and the second on destigmatization and outreach. <br /> 2130014.61 2130014.61 2130014.61 74157 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations Yes 0
TPN-013764 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Housing Search and Stabilization Services for BHA Vouchers 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.17-Housing Support: Housing Vouchers and Relocation Assistance for Disproportionately Impacted Communities The Boston Housing Authority (BHA), a sub-grantee of the City of Boston, will stabilize renter households by expanding programming to support the hardest hit households with housing search and stabilization services for BHA rental vouchers. 200000 200000 200000 No Devices and equipment that assist households in accessing the internet 700000 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations No 0
TPN-013983 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Revenue Replacement 6-Revenue Replacement 6.1-Provision of Government Services City of Boston Revenue Replacement 95000000 95000000 95000000
TPN-013975 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Creating Language Access for Federal Funding 7-Administrative 7.1-Administrative Expenses LCA is working with City of Boston departments who received ARPA funds to further increase access to their projects and ensure collaboration, engagement and participation with persons who speak a Language other than English and persons with a disability. We are meeting with departments to discuss their projects including their outreach, meetings, documents, etc. and go over the LCA standards in the City while providing guidance on the accommodations that should be present within their projects. The goal is to ensure that we are able to have the accommodations already available to projects based on the department's audience and recorded need and also, provide additional accommodations as appropriate and needed based on the standards within the Language and Communications Access Policy and Language and Communications Access Ordinance. Accommodations may include but are not limited to, translation of documents, presentations, flyers and interpretation at meetings, assistive technology as needed, CART, and ASL. Based on our meetings with departments and LCA standards, we are generating an estimate on the amount of funding departments will need from LCA to support the increase in access. 635218.75 422798.82 385934.32
TPN-013962 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Green Residential Building Retrofits 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.23-Strong Healthy Communities: Demolition and Rehabilitation of Properties The City of Boston will develop programs to support efficiency, electrification and renewable energy (e.g., solar PV, battery storage, heat pump installation) in residential properties, nonprofits, and small businesses , including addressing barriers to such installations, like roof replacement and electrical upgrades. This will be done in concert with energy service providers to leverage existing programs, such as weatherization incentives. Disbursement of funds will primarily occur in Q3 and Q4 of 2024, through an RFP to an entity administering such services. By making programs more accessible to EJ communities, this project is intended to improve air quality and decrease energy cost burden for residents and small business owners. 500000 0 0 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-013959 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Green Jobs 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) The City of Boston will develop programs to support expansion of green job training opportunities for Boston residents, with a particular focus on women, people of color, immigrants and returning citizens. Our intent is to support the Boston community’s recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and to connect unemployed and underemployed residents to quality employment opportunities in the green jobs sector. This includes both grantmaking for external organizations that are training and connecting residents to green jobs, and building further pathways for green jobs with the City of Boston’s workforce (e.g., horticulture and tree maintenance, green stormwater infrastructure, building management). We also intend to conduct targeted outreach to improve the efficacy of programs to conduct green jobs training and hire residents into green job opportunities. We expect job placement rates in the range of 70-80% for mature programs, but want to also support emerging programs where there is high potential, but which may have lower placement rates early on. 9000000 8750000 5154037.6 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic 3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations Yes 0
TPN-013933 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Young Adult Job Opportunities (19-24) 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives) The Young Adult Workforce Development grant is now the Young Adult Career Pathways Project (YACP). This project will increase access to career development for young adults in Boston, aged 18-24 years old, with barriers to career employment <br /><br />This YACP project seeks to:<br />● Support programs that offer career pathways with high-value credentials;<br />● Support programs with robust wrap-around services designed to meet the needs of young adult clients with barriers to employment, including stipends/wages;<br />● Build partnerships amongst grantees by encouraging participation in referral, co-<br />enrollment and the Boston Youth Services Network.<br /><br />While this RFP offers one-time, non-renewable funding, OWD is looking to engage youth development organizations who are interested in learning more about other funding offered by our office, like WIOA Youth funding (Workforce Innovation and Opportunity) 500000 500000 0 No 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic Yes 5000
TPN-013912 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Workforce Hiring and Retention for Childcare Sector 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care The Childcare Sector, already a low-paying sector before the pandemic, has a severe workforce shortage. This workforce shortage limits childcare programs’ ability to serve the number of children they are licensed to care for. To incentivize hiring, the Mayor’s Office of Women’s Advancement will provide direct grants to childcare businesses in the City that have hired new childcare staff (or rehired previously laid-off staff) since July 1, 2021. The grant will be for the providers to reimburse themselves or it will be intended as a bonus for the employees they hire or re-hire. The intended outcomes of this program are to draw qualified caregivers back into the childcare workforce with better pay, help childcare workers remain in the field with augmented pay, and help childcare businesses retain their workers with annual bonuses. To avoid more FCCs from permanently closing. 1469124 1469124 1469124 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 0
TPN-013911 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Child Care Business Development 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care This project includes training and grants for Family Child Care (FCC) businesses. FCCs are small businesses that offer childcare in the provider’s home. This project intends to focus on training these small business owners in technology and marketing and conducting developmental screenings. The training will take place in cohorts of 30 or fewer participants and is intended to enhance the provider’s skill in the training area while also providing the provider with a community of similarly situated entrepreneurs to support them. Entrepreneurs in the technology and marketing workshop cohort will receive a Chromebook or laptop and a grant in order to support their efforts to expand their childcare businesses. MOWA plans to issue RFPs for these workshops in early 2022, with workshop cohorts taking place over the following two years. The intended outcomes of this program are to 1) improve FCC marketing and technology skills to help 50 Boston childcare providers serve more children and 2) teach 200 FCC providers how to conduct developmental screenings and follow up with families if additional intervention is warranted. 435844.5 435844.5 417172 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 0
TPN-019905 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more All-Inclusive Boston Campaign 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality This investment included a contract to launch a two-phase marketing project: 1) Extension of the All-Inclusive Boston tourism campaign for Spring 2022 and 2) B-Local "shop local" app 2021 holiday campaign. The B-Local campaign supports the 2,700+ small businesses on the app. Concluding on 12/31/21, the app drove over $1.6 million in user spending at small businesses and issued over $40,000 in direct payments to businesses through user reward redemptions. The All Inclusive campaign supports the entire tourism and hospitality industry. This contract ended on 12/31/22.<br /><br />As part of Mayor Wu's commitment to revitalizing Downtown Boston and all neighborhoods of Boston, this project allocated funding to event activations and block party series to attract residents, workers, and visitors. A contract was awarded to a vendor in 2022 for the "Downtown Together Again" series. Another RFP for neighborhood block parties will be issued in Q4 2023.<br /><br />Remaining funds are dedicated to special event activations, including the national NAACP convention, neighborhood block parties, and community-based winter nightlife events.<br /><br />The purpose of this memo is to provide a referential overview of the Wake Up the Night (WUN) Grant Pilot Program. In an effort to support the recovery of the nightlife industry and identify creative ways to bring people back to commercial districts and main streets, this pilot grant program is designed for both neighborhood and downtown nighttime activities. 2920000 2429791.98 2416623 No 12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact 1 Imp General Public
TPN-019896 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more High Roads Kitchen Restaurant Relief Fund 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship Phase 2 will focus on providing recovery support to a wider variety of food businesses. It will be expanded to bars/taverns, juice bars, and other similar establishments. It will provide monetary aid without a tuition reimbursement component. Phase 2 of this program launched in November 2023, where our office opened applications for the for businesses to apply for grants. Our office received over 170 applications from Businesses across Boston looking for grants. We are now in the process of application review in order to award funding. 1570000 1002500 913833.33 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-019890 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Commercial Rental Relief Fund 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship Leveraging these funds, City of Boston will reopen the Commercial Rent Relief Fund for businesses and new landlord applications until end of day on December 31, 2020 for applicants needing support for rent for January, February, and March of 2021, as well as for those with rent owed from April 1- December 31, 2020. Applicants will be reviewed on a first-come, first-served basis. The COVID-19 Commercial Rent Relief Fund will work with business owners and their landlords as a partnership to ensure their survival through, and growth beyond, the pandemic. This Fund will support small businesses through a direct payment to landlords. The Commercial Rent Relief Fund will seek to serve at least 250 small business owners. Landlords can receive up to $15,000 in the form of a grant to cover rent between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Landlords will agree to work with business owners so they may remain in their commercial space for a minimum of 12 months from the date of the grant. 3445908.67 3040102.11 3040102.11 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-019885 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Small Business Fund 2.0 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship The SMALL BUSINESS RELIEF FUND 2.0 is designed to help small businesses with business expenses to help in their recovery and will assist businesses that seek to grow beyond the pandemic. Businesses will be able to apply for two types of grants: 1. Relief Grant: Up to $10,000 to support outstanding debts for rent/mortgage, inventory, payroll, or fixed expenses, and/or 2. Growth Grant: Up to $10,000 to support business growth through tools, technology, materials, personnel, or other costs associated with investing in the growth of their business. All applicants will be considered for either one or both grants. Grants will be allocated primarily according to the budget included in this application. Businesses will be able to apply for a Relief grant and/or a Growth grant. Relief grants must be used to help businesses address fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable, lost sales, lost opportunities, and other working capital expenses that could have been recognized had the COVID-19 pandemic not occurred. Growth grants must be used on tools, materials, or personnel to invest in the growth of the business. 13041624.33 13028512.68 13028512.68 No 8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact No 0
TPN-019763 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed less than 50% Traffic Calming and Street Improvements 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety The Boston Transportation Department will expand the existing Slow Streets program with a $2 million investment that focuses on improving street safety at the neighborhood level. We will install speed humps on "zones" of connected, small streets to reduce the prevalence of speeding. Near some public places, we will add crosswalk features that improve visibility, reinforce yielding to pedestrians, and slow drivers moving through. 2000000 2000000 2000000 Yes Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks 2000000 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 1 Imp General Public
TPN-019761 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Fare Free Bus Pilot 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other The City of Boston will eliminate fares on the 23, 28 and 29 bus routes for a two-year period starting in early March 2022. The two-year investment will allow the City of Boston and transit partners to measure the benefits of fare-free bus service. 10000000 10000000 9279387.72 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 1 Imp General Public Yes 250000
TPN-019718 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Digital Infrastructure for City Services 1-Public Health 1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine) This project will invest in (1) the expansion of Wicked Free Wifi by funding the “Wicked Free WiFi on the Go” pilot and expanding Wifi in city buildings including BPHC’s Mattapan campus, (2) the Secure Boston app, a free, privacy-first mobile security app that alerts and protects you when suspicious activity is detected, (3) a digital equity survey and a Community Broadband Plan and Design, and (4) a strategic roadmap on bringing the City's ecosystem of digital infrastructure up to security, scalability, and digital experience standards. 1000000 694500.82 574750.82 Yes Devices and equipment that assist households in accessing the internet 800000 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-019693 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Humphreys Studios 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries Humphreys Street Studios is an important hub of artistic endeavor and creative sector businesses. It is a cultural anchor located in Upham’s Corner, the City’s Arts and Innovation District. The City has recognized the value of the studios based on the belief that sustainable opportunities for local residents and businesses can be created by supporting and empowering the significant artistic and entrepreneurial talent that exists in the neighborhood. The property (11-13 Humphreys Street) was recently listed for sale. In an effort to preserve the artist studios; the tenants, New Atlantic Development, and Place Tailor have been working towards purchasing the property with tremendous support from the Mayor’s Office of Arts and Culture, the Mayor’s Office of Economic Development, and the Mayor’s Office of Housing, as well as the surrounding community and local elected officials. This funding will be used to preserve approximately 29 artists' studios. The current partnership between the artists and New Atlantic Development, and their plan for acquisition and development for the site, speaks directly to the principle of development without displacement, which is guiding the wider Upham’s Corner Arts and Innovation District efforts. 434933 434933 434933 Yes Other (please specify) 434933 13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify No 0
TPN-019664 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Housing Pilot for Families Impacted by Violence 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance This project aims to address the housing related needs of households who have been impacted by community violence. The City of Boston, alongside other key stakeholders, have already established a bi-weekly Housing Assistance Network for households who have experienced violence to allow social service providers, medical providers, and other relevant stakeholders to coordinate care for households who have been impacted by violence in their communities. Many of the households assisted through this coordination are households of color, oftentimes single female heads of household, who are caring for children and other loved ones in the aftermath of community violence. The City will leverage this existing network to connect with households who are connected to existing organizations as part of their trauma response and medical care. This project will enable impacted households to re-establish a sense of safety by facilitating connections to new housing either within the City of Boston or outside the City of Boston. 199999.58 199999.58 199999.58 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 0
TPN-019651 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more First Generation Matched Savings Homebuyer Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.17-Housing Support: Housing Vouchers and Relocation Assistance for Disproportionately Impacted Communities Funding will be used to supplement our existing partnership with the Massachusetts Affordable Housing Alliance (MAHA) so that income qualified first generation Boston buyers can be enrolled in MAHA’s current first generation homebuying program called STASH. Enrollees receive financial literacy and individualized coaching, and a 2:1 grant match of up to $5,000, provided they can save $2,500. The grant money can be used by the buyers toward the purchase of a home. The funds will be distributed to MAHA through an amendment to an existing grant agreement. With these funds, we expect to have 125 new participants enrolled in the program with approximately 80 (64%) of those participants purchasing homes. 500000 500000 500000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 500000
TPN-019646 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Credit Booster Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance This program will provide an incentive, in the form of a $5,000 grant, to low and moderate income homebuyers who can raise their credit score by at least 20 points to a minimum score of 680 by taking a credit bootcamp or counseling program at an approved non-profit partner agency. Funds will be distributed through an RFP process to qualified non-profit partner agencies, who currently conduct credit boot camp type counseling programs. The intended outcome is to have 70 percent of enrollees increase their credit score to 680 within two years. 60000 60000 60000 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 60000
TPN-019641 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Cancelled Additional Land Acquisition Opportunties 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing Based on the Final Rule, the City of Boston cancelled this project and decided to pursue other avenues to meet the goal of the project, to secure vacant or underutilized property for affordable housing / commercial development. 0 0 0 No Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing 2000000 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 0
TPN-019635 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Acquisition Opportunity Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing The City has a rolling RFP for qualified nonprofit and for-profit developers to purchase units off of the private market and create long term income-restrictions for low- and moderate-income tenants. With the new ARPA funds in place, the City will issue an updated RFP based on the successful experience with the existing AOP, with the goal of accelerating acquisitions with ARPA funds. Developers have a choice to pre-qualify as AOP buyers or to apply on a property-by-property basis. To qualify developers must keep the tenancies of residents in good standing, keep affordable rent levels for the units in the property long-term, agree to set aside at least 40 percent of the units for low- and moderate-income families, have investor-owned rental properties that are fully or partially occupied, and agree that no tenant in good standing will be displaced from their unit. 48516491.76 36086907 32856007 No No No Yes Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing 47031400 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 46031400
TPN-019540 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Mortgage Relief Program 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid This program will help Boston homeowners at risk for foreclosure remain in their homes, providing stability for those homeowners and neighborhoods which have historically experienced high foreclosure rates, all of them majority minority neighborhoods. We expect to begin the program in early September. Funding will likely be added to existing contracts with foreclosure counseling providers and may be supplemented with State funding. Approximately 50 homeowners will be assisted with ARPA funds. An additional 150 homeowners will be assisted with other City (Neighborhood Development) sources. 1293216.15 1293216.15 1293216.15 158 No 4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations No 0
TPN-019465 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Emergency Assistance for Haitian Asylum Seekers 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other IFSI-USA will use the Grant funds to provide emergency food assistance and hire four (4) full-time staff members to support the organization’s work with recently-arrived Haitian asylum seekers. These positions will include: two (2) case managers, one (1) social worker, and one (1) legal case coordinator/manager. These four (4) new staff members will be responsible for providing the following services:<br /><br />Case managers: Wraparound support, including connecting families to housing, food/basic needs, healthcare, legal services, and assisting with school enrollment. One case manager will focus on supporting the adults with services, and the other will focus on supporting youth and children.<br /><br />Social worker: Deliver culturally-competent, trauma-informed therapeutic interventions to families and connect individuals with additional mental health services.<br /><br />Legal case manager: Assist lawyers with case coordination in preparation for asylum hearings and applications for other forms of immigration benefits and relief. 244333 244333 244333 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations Yes 243333
TPN-020132 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed Workforce Digital Literacy 2-Negative Economic Impacts 2.4-Household Assistance: Internet Access Programs The Digital Literacy Initiative helps Boston residents in underserved communities and the community organizations that assist them. The funds are used to provide computers and internet access to those who need it, as well as to give organizations the tools, training, and support to create strong digital literacy programs.<br /><br />Due to increased demand from COVID-19, these programs need more funding to better serve their communities. The initiative focuses on working closely with organizations to improve their operations.<br /><br />Additionally, grant money helps keep students enrolled at two local two-year colleges by providing laptops, tuition assistance, and coaching. Funds are also given to the Office of Financial Empowerment and the Boston Housing Authority in Charlestown to boost their literacy and digital skills training programs.<br /><br />This approach not only meets immediate digital access needs but also supports long-term education and economic growth in Boston's underserved areas. 2000000 2000000 1836083.36 5451 No 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations 7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic No 400000
TPN-022897 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed COVID-19 Testing 1-Public Health 1.2-COVID-19 Testing This funding of this project is meant to support testing services to high transmission communities within the City of Boston. These services are provided by a combination of private testing companies, community health centers, and our Public Health Preparedness staff. This project funding allows us to provide equitable, low-barrier, access to testing services for all Boston residents across the city, with the intended outcome of reduced covid rates across the city. 3113303.93 3113303.93 3113303.58 No 1 Imp General Public 2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-022789 RCP-036182 City Of Boston, Massachusetts Massachusetts Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents Local Government Completed 50% or more Mental Health Services/Suicide Response 1-Public Health 1.12-Mental Health Services DeeDee’s Cry will create a new LOSS (Local Outreach to Suicide Survivor) team to promote a healthy grief process and trauma protection for Boston residents who are impacted by suicide and to increase education on resources regarding suicide prevention and behavioral concerns. The overall intended outcome of the project is to increase awareness of mental health issues in the City and increased access to mental health services in targeted communities. The mission of the DeeDee’s Cry LOSS Team is to be dedicated to helping those people who have tragically lost someone to suicide while working to reduce the incidence of suicide within our community, through available education, awareness, and prevention services. <br /><br />The L.O.S.S. Team coordinator and volunteers provide bereavement service that is specific to suicide. Note: If the LOSS team is contacted in the event of a sudden or traumatic death, we will provide referrals to other organizations that can best support the family. The L.O.S.S. Teams are activated either from a referral by the local police department, district attorney and/or family referral. The L.O.S.S. Team coordinator and volunteers will be dispatched to support families and friends who have lost a loved one, friend, or colleague to suicide throughout Greater Boston.<br />The L.O.S.S. Team coordinator and volunteers provide bereavement service that is specific to suicide. Note: If the LOSS team is contacted in the event of a sudden or traumatic death, we will provide referrals to other organizations that can best support the family. The L.O.S.S. Teams are activated either from a referral by the local police department, district attorney and/or family referral. The L.O.S.S. Team coordinator and volunteers will be dispatched to support families and friends who have lost a loved one, friend, or colleague to suicide throughout Greater Boston. 250000 250000 146642.1 No 14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations 15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts 16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs No 225000
[truncated: output stopped at 2057508 bytes; size cap per file]
File and source
- File
- October-2024-Reporting-Data-through-September-30-2024.xlsx
- Size
- 33,237,318 bytes
- SHA-256
- 551d1e0154b5dd670d8e34a268a310eb3dfb2e7fdb67cec0772f82ddf2c5d993
- Original
- home.treasury.gov