Treasury SLFRF reporting data through September 30, 2023

Summary

Treasury State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) reporting data through September 30, 2023, whose Definitions sheet explains that it holds Project and Expenditure reporting for Quarter 3 of 2023, due to Treasury on October 31, 2023 from the largest recipients, including non-entitlement units allocated more than $10 million and Tribal governments allocated over $30 million, covering July 1, 2023-September 30, 2023. The file reflects data received as of 12/29/2023 and includes approximately 99% of Tiers 1 and 2 recipients, covering 99% of SLFRF awarded funds to those tiers. The sheet defines the recipient and project fields, the standard allowance election for revenue loss with formula estimates for 2020 through 2023, and the 124 expenditure categories across the 10 category groups.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text extracted from the spreadsheet file: one line per row, cells separated by tabs, each sheet headed by its name. Numbers appear as stored, without the workbook’s formatting.

Sheet: Definitions
Background: This State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) reporting data includes Project and Expenditure reporting data for Quarter 3 of 2023, which was due to Treasury on October 31, 2023. This includes reports from the largest SLFRF recipients (states, territories, and metro cities and counties with a population over 250,000 or an allocation over $10 million, non-entitlement units of local government allocated more than $10 million, and Tribal governments allocated over $30 million) covering the period of July 1, 2023-September 30, 2023. This file reflects data received as of 12/29/2023, and includes approximately 99% of Tiers 1 and 2 recipients (reporting quarterly). Data included in this file covers 99% of SLFRF awarded funds to Tiers 1 and 2 recipients. This file reflects data that has been certified and submitted by recipients in their Project and Expenditure reports to Treasury, with limited exceptions outlined in the definitions below.
Field Name	Category	Definition
Recipient ID	Recipients, Project	Treasury specific ID code for the recipient
Recipient Name	Recipients, Project	Name of the Entity
State/Territory	Recipients, Project	State that the recipient is located in
Reporting Tier	Recipients, Project	The reporting tier that the recipient falls under (based on designation, size, population, and funding amount) - see https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/state-and-local-fiscal-recovery-funds/recipient-compliance-and-reporting-responsibilities
Recipient Type	Recipients, Project	Entity designation (e.g. State, Local Government, etc.)
Number of Projects	Recipients	Count of the number of projects submitted by the recipient as of the targeted reporting cycle
Allocation	Recipients	The amount of SLFRF funds awarded to the recipient
Claiming Revenue Loss Standard Allowance? Yes/No	Recipients	Choice of whether the recipient has elected to take the standard allowance for revenue loss
Revenue Loss Claimed through Standard Allowance	Recipients	If electing "yes" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss reported
Estimated Revenue Loss 2020	Recipients	If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2020
Estimated Revenue Loss 2021	Recipients	If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2021
Estimated Revenue Loss 2022	Recipients	If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2022
Estimated Revenue Loss 2023	Recipients	If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2023
Project ID	Project	Treasury specific ID code for the project
Project Name	Project	Name given to project by the recipient
Expenditure Category Group (*1)	Project	Per guidance, this field represents the project expenditure category group selected by the recipient
Expenditure Category (*2)	Project	Detailed Expenditure Category selected by the Recipient, and based on Expenditure Category Group (total of 124 expenditure categories across the 10 category groups)
Completion Status	Project	Picklist for the status of the project. Choices include: not started, cancelled, completed, completed less than 50%, completed more than 50%
Project Description	Project	Narrative entered by recipient describing the project in sufficient detail to provide understanding of the major activities that will occur
Adopted Budget	Project	The adopted budget is the budget adopted by a recipient for each project associated with SLFRF funds. Recipients will enter the Adopted Budget based on information that exists currently in the recipient’s financial systems and the recipient’s established budget process. This field is only required for Tier 1 recipients
Total Cumulative Obligations	Project	Sum of all obligations to date. An obligation is an order placed for property and services, contracts and subawards made, and similar transactions that require payment
Total Cumulative Expenditures	Project	Sum of all expenditures to date. An expenditure is the amount that has been incurred as a liability of the entity (the service has been rendered or the good has been delivered to the entity)
Number of Households Served  (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	Number of households served (by program if recipient establishes multiple separate household assistance programs). Only applicable to Expenditure Categories 2.1-2.8
Number of Workers Served  (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	Number of workers served (by program if recipient establishes multiple separate Premium Pay assistance programs). Only applicable to Expenditure Categories 4.1 or 4.2
Number of Gov FTE Responding to COVID-19  (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	Number of government workers responding to COVID-19, as measured by Full Time Equivalents. Only applicable to Expenditure Category 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Note: (*) Denotes projects where the number is not published for governments that reported less than 6 FTE
Number of Gov FTE Rehired  (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	Number of FTEs rehired by the recipient. Only applicable to Expenditure Category 3.2-Public Sector Workforce: Rehiring Public Sector Staff Note: (*) Denotes projects where the number is not published for governments that reported less than 6 FTE
Community benefit agreement? (Infrastructure Only)	Project	For infrastructure projects, a yes/no picklist for if a Community Benefit Agreement has been established
Complying with David Bacon? (Infrastructure Only)	Project	For infrastructure projects, a yes/no picklist for if the project is complying with Davis-Bacon requirements (specifically, that all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors in the performance of the project are paid wages at rates not less than those prevailing, as determined by the U.S. Secretary of Labor in accordance with subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the “Davis-Bacon Act”), for the corresponding classes of laborers and mechanics employed on projects of a character similar to the contract work in the civil subdivision of the State (or the District of Columbia) in which the work is to be performed, or by the appropriate state entity pursuant to a corollary state prevailing-wage-in construction law
Project labor agreement? (Infrastructure Only)	Project	For infrastructure projects, a yes/no picklist for if a Project Labor Agreement whereby “the indicated project includes a project labor agreement, meaning a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement consistent with section 8(f) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C.  158(f))"
Does the Project have Capital Expenditures? (Yes/No) (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	For projects in Expenditure Category Groups 1, 2 , 3 and 8. A yes/no picklist for whether the project is expected to have capital expenditures
Type of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	For projects in Expenditure Category Groups 1, 2,3 and 8 that answered yes to expecting capital expenditures. A picklist of types that can be found in Appendix H of the Project and Expenditure Report User Guide
Total Expected Cost of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	For projects in Expenditure Category Groups 1, 2, 3 and 8 that answered yes to expecting capital expenditures. The reported dollar amount of the expected capital expenditures
Primary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	The selected primary population served by this project in response to “What Impacted and/or Disproportionally Impacted population does this project primarily serve?” See pg. 22 of the Compliance and Reporting Guidance
Secondary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	The selected secondary population served by this project in response to “If this project primarily serves more than one Impacted and/or Disproportionately Impacted populations, please select up to two additional populations served below.” See pg. 22 of the Compliance and Reporting Guidance
Tertiary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	The selected tertiary population served by this project in response to “If this project primarily serves more than one Impacted and/or Disproportionately Impacted populations, please select up to two additional populations served below.” See pg. 22 of the Compliance and Reporting Guidance
Project is conducting an evidence based program evaluation? (Yes/No)	Project	This field is only required for Tier 1 recipients. For relevant ECs identify whether there is a program evaluation of the project being conducted
Project Total Spending on Evidence Based Evaluation	Project	This field is only required for Tier 1 recipients. For relevant ECs identify the dollar amount of the total project spending that is allocated towards evidence-based interventions

Sheet: Recipients (Q3 2023) Submitted
Recipient-ID	Recipient Name	State/Territory	Reporting Tier	Recipient Type	Allocation	Number of Projects	Claiming Revenue Loss Standard Allowance? (Yes/No)	Revenue Loss Claimed through Standard Allowance	Estimated Revenue Loss 2020	Estimated Revenue Loss 2021	Estimated Revenue Loss 2022	Estimated Revenue Loss 2023
RCP-000937	Payne County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15885583	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-000938	City Of Fort Pierce, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13502665	10	Yes	1000000	1000000
RCP-000942	Town Of Cary, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16476072	13	No		17891826	40373851
RCP-000943	City Of Santa Fe, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15049631	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-000947	City Of Jurupa Valley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28077013	8	No		361797	3712583	10565830	9963206
RCP-000961	Johnson County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10500910	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-000964	Pender County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12248666	1	Yes	0
RCP-002001	City Of Goose Creek, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21738356.5	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-002006	City Of Greenwood, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11651042.2	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-002008	City Of Hanahan, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11621668.5	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-002030	Town Of Lexington, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11030728.62	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-002038	City Of Mauldin, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12649717.18	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-002078	City Of Simpsonville, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12058278.56	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-005171	Lawrence City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11209430.65	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-006371	Municipality Of Toa Alta, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33782434	5	No		2575873	2206854	6597930
RCP-006372	Wilson County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15888885	14	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-006414	City Of Mountain View, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15679080	1	No		36121906	141721281	121907756
RCP-006971	New Iberia, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10540923.36	27	Yes	9773779.34
RCP-010714	City of Beloit, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15218991	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-014283	Brentwood City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12694292.04	3	Yes	7694292.04
RCP-014308	Columbia City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11967937.49	2	Yes	2000000
RCP-014309	Cookeville City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10297737.41	6	Yes	8723000
RCP-014355	Gallatin City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12734348.36	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-014360	Germantown City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11638585.55	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-014401	La Vergne City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10597418.01	13	No		0	0	0
RCP-014406	Lebanon City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10823810.38	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-014448	Mount Juliet City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10987002.78	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-014525	Spring Hill City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12986851.52	1	Yes	956372.5
RCP-014696	City Of Easley, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10635938.36	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-014702	Town Of Fort Mill, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11093954.8	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-014706	City Of Greer, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16614546.48	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-014725	City Of North Augusta, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11871089.22	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-014801	City Of Dunkirk, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10885109	48	Yes	10000000
RCP-014812	City Of Huntington Park, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27952355	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-015436	Blount County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25850784	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-015611	Chatham County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14464924	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-015797	Sampson County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12340152	4	Yes	2000000
RCP-015798	Loudon County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10502075	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-015802	City Of Boca Raton, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12199643	2	No		17441707	33196583
RCP-016385	College Park City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21972843	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-016390	Easton Town, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16425261.01	35	No		3352295	2929798	6266652
RCP-016392	Elkton Town, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15391723.8	24	Yes	2336349
RCP-019361	BOONE, COUNTY OF	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13177707	8	No		10000000	0	0	0
RCP-023657	Municipio De Hatillo, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11743926.44	2	Yes	2063144.72
RCP-024361	Town of Hempstead, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51413999.27	5	No		0	0	11000000
RCP-024386	Town Of North Hempstead, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10114020.88	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-024402	Town Of Oyster Bay, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24464541.83	9	Yes	5000000
RCP-024884	Town Of Smithtown, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11388581.15	48	Yes	10000000
RCP-025660	Douglasville, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12693848	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-025664	Duluth, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11057077	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-025665	Dunwoody, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18431324	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-025668	East Point, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13023592	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-025759	Kennesaw, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12725590	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-025763	Lagrange, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11316988	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-025768	Lawrenceville, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11514536	16	Yes	9014536
RCP-025812	Milton, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14783224	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-025834	Newnan, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15527856	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-025859	Peachtree City, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13526985	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-025860	Peachtree Corners, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16395722	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-025927	Statesboro, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12306221	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-025930	Stockbridge, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11167240	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-025958	Tucker, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13591216	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-025999	Woodstock, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12337963	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-026329	Canton, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11400265	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-026333	Carrollton, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10179501	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-026340	Chamblee, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11317735	5	No		0	0	0
RCP-026398	Town Of Garner, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10009330.62	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-026438	Town of Holly Springs, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12050587.75	4	Yes	9590588
RCP-026444	Town Of Indian Trail, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12774525	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-026506	Town Of Matthews, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10560995.9	2	Yes	9707607.64
RCP-026528	City of Monroe, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11326507.16	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-026531	Town Of Mooresville, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12471268.37	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-026705	Town Of Wake Forest, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14541845.67	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-026731	City Of Wilson, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15762456.88	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-026746	City Of Temecula, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14079507	1	No		38805789	19888135	72966653
RCP-026747	Virgin Islands	Virgin Islands	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	558341774	128	No		103835859	111832692	107321725
RCP-030120	Bozeman City, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12767080.73	6	Yes	6052502.63
RCP-031257	Amherst, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11933556.32	37	Yes	10000000
RCP-031258	Andover, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10867056.79	47	Yes	10000000
RCP-031277	Beverly, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12606096.73	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-031278	Billerica, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12962692.57	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-031299	Chelmsford, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10578611.69	38	Yes	335000	0	0	0
RCP-031335	Everett, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13884521.24	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-031400	Marlborough, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11835813.82	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-031426	Natick, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10775591.28	15	Yes	7050841.28	0	0
RCP-031490	Shrewsbury, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11515684.58	2	Yes	9964084.58
RCP-031529	Watertown, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10742412.62	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-031560	Woburn, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12024424.02	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-031772	Bothell City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13248730	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-031814	Edmonds City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11904718	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-031850	Issaquah City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11039632	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-031870	Lynnwood City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10936804	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-031925	Puyallup City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11836538	11	Yes	2840000
RCP-032033	Town Middletown, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12363291.73	1	Yes	0
RCP-032039	City Of Newark, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18094136.34	24	Yes	10000000
RCP-032053	City Of Coral Springs, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20013374	44	No		8557164.84	11456209.16
RCP-035195	Hamilton County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	65654674	94	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035247	Town Of Culpeper, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19581052	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-035267	Town Of Front Royal, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15851180	3	No		2487034	0	0
RCP-035283	Town Of Herndon, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25523946	27	No		5922496.64	3681826.43	6014437
RCP-035338	Town Of Purcellville, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10559844	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-035373	Town Of Vienna, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17103462	3	Yes	7100000
RCP-035378	Town Of Warrenton, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10403180	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-035430	Boulder City City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21773790.18	52	Yes	10000000
RCP-035433	Elko City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27476865.36	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-035435	Fallon City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11614389.84	4	Yes	9601700.26
RCP-035436	Fernley City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20972821.5	2	Yes	8972821.5
RCP-035438	Mesquite City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26501498.44	37	Yes	10000000
RCP-035441	Winnemucca City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10417348.62	11	Yes	6211033.75
RCP-035819	Commonwealth Of The Northern Mariana Islands	Northern Mariana Islands	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	481876521	27	No		41293408	103969328	103969328
RCP-035820	City And County Of San Francisco, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	624817342	1	No		1126205371	1042846338
RCP-035821	Mchenry County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	59781491	66	No		11057112	9380924
RCP-035822	City Of Memphis, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	161061490	30	No		39863596	0
RCP-035823	Buncombe County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50733290	48	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035824	Shelby County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	182033509	1	No		75815270	106218239	0
RCP-035826	City Of Corpus Christi, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	67553894	5	Yes	4050000	4050000
RCP-035827	City Of San Diego, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	299714755	1	No		190816832	225902821
RCP-035828	State of Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2533160626.5	211	No		1458919287	0
RCP-035829	Baton Rouge City/Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	165443198	43	No		59884177	0	0
RCP-035830	City Of Fayetteville, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40427539	36	No		19181372	19181372
RCP-035831	Montgomery County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	204083827	35	No		173685173	0	346245439
RCP-035833	Clark County, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	440282817	28	No		221807389	455708801	0	0
RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	105319216	70	No		18574257	17948889	30859263
RCP-035836	Greensboro City, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	59430051	2	No		31469722.38	27960328.62	0	0
RCP-035837	Mahoning County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44418992	99	Yes	10000000	4535552
RCP-035838	Snohomish County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	159679985	106	No		25382234	0	3698053
RCP-035839	County Of Bergen, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	261035747	34	No		30878459.61	39727928	39600000	39600000
RCP-035840	County Of Johnston, NC	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40661647	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035841	Palm Beach County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	290730026	1	No		196558609	94171417	0
RCP-035842	Forsyth County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74256322	68	No		27125319	0
RCP-035843	Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	388295772	76	No		85638550	60824476	46874765
RCP-035844	Montgomery County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43992250	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035845	Salt Lake County, Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	225401283	19	No		88255066	66164867	50000000
RCP-035846	Pulaski County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	76124117	44	Yes	10000000	3685532
RCP-035848	Collier County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74762701	22	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035849	Metropolitan Government Of Nashville And Davidson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	259810600	2	No		216112204	35547010	0
RCP-035850	County Of Montgomery, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	161395498	131	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035851	Yonkers City, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87486480	1	No		106373510	57429103
RCP-035852	El Paso County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	163012143	48	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035853	City Of Sacramento, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	112313331	2	No		128019000	0
RCP-035854	City Of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1395292684	3	No		311044000	853941000	294349000
RCP-035855	St. Petersburg City, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	45413871	10	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035856	St. Joseph County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	52799014	21	No		11025478.79	12639505.35	6896322.55
RCP-035857	State Of North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	5439309692.2	295	No		3199000000	0
RCP-035859	State Of Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	5368386901	500	No		2006109910.11	0	0	0
RCP-035860	State Of New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1751542835	66	No		2585984244	2585984244
RCP-035862	Orlando City, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	58032405	3	No		92729824	170044019	143819646
RCP-035863	County Of Cumberland, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	65168690	20	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	396080366	63	No		246000681	48357570	0
RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1641611610.6	105	No		680749000	1641450000	0	660007
RCP-035866	City Of Raleigh, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	73292365	24	No		49106350	0	0
RCP-035867	County Of Yolo, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42829540	45	No		11561656	17649739	13618145
RCP-035868	Bernalillo County,  New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	131911293	25	No		17986816	0	0
RCP-035869	Fort Worth City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	173745090	37	No		86720682	0	0
RCP-035870	Glendale City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	59516611	39	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035871	Nueces County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	70371362	63	Yes	10000000	4180962
RCP-035872	Onondaga County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	89452165	14	No		73808465	4907433	17078931
RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	339789370	35	No		122568216.23	151328936.31	0
RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45543632	36	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035876	County Of Contra Costa, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	224058903	14	No		362452612	235909888	524547354
RCP-035877	Plano City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	36424316	10	No		92634304	0	0	0
RCP-035878	City Of Indianapolis and Marion County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	419769453	118	No		24954632	40795606	2767436
RCP-035880	Lubbock City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56575324	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035883	Clark County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	94835091	36	No		2783116	12095268	18322698
RCP-035884	Prince George's County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	176626110	60	No		369578954	369578954
RCP-035885	Howard County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63261464	73	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035886	City Of El Paso, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	154345135	46	No		38163507	0	0	0
RCP-035888	Omaha City, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	112591455	34	No		30762643	0	0
RCP-035889	Ada County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	93542629	46	Yes	10000000	2058799
RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	175781756	101	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035892	County Of Stanislaus, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106959250	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035893	Cuyahoga County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	239898257	1	No		263924401	0	0
RCP-035895	Tarrant County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	408388891	57	Yes	0	0
RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	270661716	64	No		526464099	391345915	160710606
RCP-035897	County Of Orange, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	616840943	5	No		326477883	273220928	17142132
RCP-035899	Winnebago County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54886298	84	Yes	10000000	6101508
RCP-035900	Washington County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50975893	26	No		25269594	57268873	60310468
RCP-035901	Mobile County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	80261198	37	No		19331018.82	0
RCP-035903	County Of Burlington, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	86503822	12	No		18090028	10625186
RCP-035905	Fort Bend County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	157660879	33	No		50009520	48496206
RCP-035906	Hinds County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45032202	29	No		5737122	0	13932913
RCP-035909	Harris County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	915508128	67	No		637577999	93119854	184810275.44	0
RCP-035910	Yavapai County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45665225	29	Yes	10000000	3000000
RCP-035911	Leon County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	57024862	20	No		15476739	7536058	14415603
RCP-035913	State Of Vermont	Vermont	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1049287303	376	No		242787538	0	0
RCP-035915	State Of New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	994555877.6	227	No		445500000	219100000	62200000
RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106189095	21	No		39170499	9500576	0
RCP-035917	Gwinnett County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	181855587	40	No		29764387.63	0	0
RCP-035918	County Of San Bernardino, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	423455955	82	No		161878027	113873234	0
RCP-035919	Cobb County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	147648478	130	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035920	City Of Las Vegas, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	130568739	70	No		53263017	44908998	69700105
RCP-035921	Caddo Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46656811	10	No		20000000	2356	6653
RCP-035922	Baltimore County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	160706923	50	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035923	Seminole County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	91646669	20	No		38231249	58521866
RCP-035925	City Of Chandler, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	34560795	13	No		0	0	0
RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60233613	12	Yes	0	0
RCP-035927	Dekalb County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	147484541	1	No		66942834	0	96596077
RCP-035928	Santa Clarita City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35148685	26	No		15058912	0
RCP-035929	Clay County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42587131	31	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035930	Franklin County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	255764417	43	No		60145000	58431000	96376000
RCP-035931	Lake County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	135293758	83	No		18255426	0	17666571
RCP-035932	Spokane County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	101547383	68	No		9636329	0
RCP-035933	Pasco County Fl, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	107597711	8	No		57099406	17992683
RCP-035934	Arlington City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	81498709	2	No		24404259	22778239	11690621	6576476
RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48549469	97	Yes	10000000	908174.03
RCP-035936	Clermont County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40096219	13	No		7113866	5266817	14591054
RCP-035937	Chatham County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56218385	81	No		17422180	0	0
RCP-035938	Fort Wayne City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50815327	99	No		27350327	10525557	0
RCP-035939	Jefferson County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	113217801	59	No		18116349.55	27316586.9
RCP-035940	County Of Washington, Ar	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46459271	21	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035941	Bell County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	70493732	7	No		8361792	9061435	11288414
RCP-035942	State of New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	12744981589	16	No		11861000000	0	0
RCP-035943	Lake County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71308368	35	No		12135823	16030223	16419190
RCP-035944	County Of Monroe, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	144080127	28	Yes	0	0
RCP-035945	Winston-Salem City, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51732065	10	No		11901280.05	35632093.65	4198691.3	0
RCP-035948	Clayton County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	66847995	22	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035949	Santa Ana City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	128360813	79	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035951	Marion County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71009435	11	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035952	Marion County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	67559569	36	No		14431286	5816785	9027438
RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	126556338	78	No		30481408	0	0
RCP-035955	Butte County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42574311	30	No		0	43517206
RCP-035956	Jersey City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	139971935	41	No		28693937.54	101368961.95
RCP-035957	Berkeley County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44268263	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	207895373	53	No		238355861.95	194368322.87	133357487.72
RCP-035960	Dauphin County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54056318	4	No		40164139	13892179	0	0
RCP-035963	City Of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	122507590	19	No		144165795.74	117814986.93	129225116.8
RCP-035964	Sarasota County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	84249299	20	No		30470849	2451710.15
RCP-035965	City Of San Antonio, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	326919408	21	No		477269000	501955000	356836000
RCP-035966	Galveston County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	66456490	54	No		8300462	5412267	8864089
RCP-035969	Government Of Guam	Guam	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	621443045	57	No		92068367	92068367	92068367
RCP-035970	State Of Idaho	Idaho	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1094018353.4	223	Yes	0	0
RCP-035971	Wake County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	215946541	52	No		15859936	0	15859936
RCP-035972	Richland County Government, Sc	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	80756312	33	No		14611040	7756012	9903727	9903727
RCP-035973	Montgomery County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	103273967	56	No		22817825	30975381	49480761
RCP-035974	Gloucester County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56646874	47	Yes	10000000	3471841.2
RCP-035976	Broward County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	379304234	1	No		305783000	73521377
RCP-035977	Cleveland County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	55166390	19	Yes	10000000	372867
RCP-035979	Commonwealth Of Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	2470061908	40	No		3488804000	1573789519	1485577446	2816233667
RCP-035981	Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40726716	26	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035982	Laredo City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	85558888	19	No		27293514	12002034
RCP-035983	Lucas County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	83201577	19	No		23192294.01	11239557.88	8981881.53
RCP-035986	St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50583338	56	Yes	10000000	3684319
RCP-035987	Harford County,Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	49616420	44	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035988	County Of Bucks, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	122034082	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-035989	Doña Ana County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42381821	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035990	Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39515058	23	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035991	Washoe County, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	91587038	108	Yes	10000000	11221136
RCP-035992	Fulton County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	206657290	24	No		44883276	19056823.75
RCP-035993	Kane County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	103413041	28	No		7445589	7396278.88
RCP-035994	State of Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	8127679948.7	117	No		3229400167.51	0	0
RCP-035995	City Of St Paul, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	166641623	55	No		35211905.02	65040331.12
RCP-035996	City Of Des Moines, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94824614	27	No		0	35038609	24485125.63	58018388
RCP-035997	Escambia County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	61829151	18	No		28358185.52	0	0
RCP-035998	Municipality Of Anchorage, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	103317366	80	No		25547969	0
RCP-035999	Cherokee County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50263622	65	Yes	10000000	3195386
RCP-036000	Arapahoe County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	127534910	68	No		24860025	37452961	53369065
RCP-036001	County Of Hudson, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	130604069	15	No		58556734.07	66110193.09	5937141.84	93747002.32
RCP-036002	Yakima County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	48729139	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036004	Manatee County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78327168	36	No		36149014.6	33346276	8831877.4
RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	355426891	94	No		191411155	119317901	20325255
RCP-036010	State Of Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	4853535459.7	25	No		0	0	0
RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	135696763	84	No		35128663	0	0
RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	324636065	35	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036013	City Of Baltimore, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	641170126	104	No		121498992	331909324	170122280
RCP-036014	City Of Boise, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36904682	10	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036016	Osceola County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	72985227	1	No		61828645	11156582	0	0
RCP-036017	Allegheny County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	380998452	47	No		154653288	39690062	67787479
RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	247450630	32	No		38209690	0	59312403
RCP-036019	County Of Lehigh, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71735692	23	Yes	10000000	8000000
RCP-036020	Mecklenburg County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	215673636	123	No		8868181	39657382	69385568
RCP-036021	Salt Lake City City, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85411572	20	No		9854972.96	32446793.13	17775835.82	38981781
RCP-036022	Pinal County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	89891338	11	Yes	0	0
RCP-036023	City Of Jacksonville Duval County Portion, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	343695791	11	No		132738000	83921000	0
RCP-036024	County Of Marin, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50273916	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036025	City Of Detroit, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	826675290	49	No		236743195	287782638	127046007
RCP-036026	County Of San Mateo, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	148897819	34	Yes	10000000	20000000
RCP-036027	Augusta-Richmond, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82348868	3	No		44949123	37399563
RCP-036028	City Of Bakersfield, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	94517089	13	Yes	10000000	19000000
RCP-036029	State Of Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2738837228.7	314	No		692296812	633233650	0
RCP-036030	Anaheim City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106630239	1	No		96000008	10630231	0
RCP-036031	City Of Houston, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	607769139	32	No		203411101	648386514	276074606
RCP-036032	State Of Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1806373345.9	717	No		286640464	0	0
RCP-036033	City Of New Orleans, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	387523049	5	No		114099494	114099494	114099494	114099494
RCP-036035	City Of Tampa, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	80373543	5	No		87761637	20760538	0
RCP-036037	Douglas County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	68207548	14	No		6655265	11405264	19314491
RCP-036038	Chesterfield County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	68527653	16	No		24051408	0	0	0
RCP-036039	Monmouth County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	120193675	9	No		25281466	38408317	54990163
RCP-036040	City Of Reno, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51519997	51	Yes	10000000	7555768
RCP-036041	City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	108810857	13	No		10042104	56867739	10042104	0
RCP-036042	City Of Spokane, Wa	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80991104	47	No		60017071	37205063
RCP-036044	City Of Columbus,  Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	187030138	10	No		159795945	0	0
RCP-036045	Union County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46589799	13	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036047	City Of Madison, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	47197155	28	No		44649062	40769182	26977553
RCP-036048	Rensselaer County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30828334	6	No		19931807	1959898
RCP-036049	Hillsborough County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	285912528	38	No		72534267	8928020
RCP-036050	Weld County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63028767	2	No		93351095	0	0
RCP-036051	County Of San Diego, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	648431468	66	No		176275023	0	0
RCP-036052	Jackson County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	136551645	30	No		23898130	9790042	0
RCP-036053	Sacramento County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	301469072	83	No		38699633	0
RCP-036054	Charleston County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	79910793	9	No		36262763	52305207	44317697
RCP-036055	Cook County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1000372385	77	No		322650350	15065714.51	0
RCP-036056	Kern County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	174853685	29	No		100640966.97	0	0	0
RCP-036058	Jefferson County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43719346	71	Yes	10000000
RCP-036059	Multnomah County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	157887555	19	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036060	County Of Summit, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	105085433	9	No		142162637	0
RCP-036061	State Of Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	8816581838.7	65	No		5113400000	0	0
RCP-036062	Dupage, County Of	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	179266585	100	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036063	Hall County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39710268	13	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036064	Pima County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	203421668	55	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036065	City Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	87826517	95	No		29285696	110362668	74472035
RCP-036066	Ramsey County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106893403	21	No		1201349	79486074
RCP-036067	Milwaukee County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	183696189	61	No		66253926	74844229	94682802
RCP-036068	Alachua County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	52258449	8	No		25388373	37111723	0
RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	57535251	32	No		31927355	30191977	57659412
RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	121178058	90	No		43283305.18	27256076.1	0
RCP-036071	Fairfax County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	222894638	23	No		173987634	444778486	92432024
RCP-036073	Wichita City, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	72422555	38	No		30878371	15443674	25362867
RCP-036074	State Of Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2120279417	390	No		536796346	0	0
RCP-036075	Lane County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74212036	44	No		56840199	74212036
RCP-036076	Durham City, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51881733	25	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036077	Brazoria County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	72696394	41	No		22797430	16555065	22978975
RCP-036078	City Of Minneapolis, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	271192484	69	No		129381000	280042000	280531000
RCP-036079	Washington County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	116852194	57	No		5493393	6234641	0
RCP-036080	County Of Greene, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56928520	28	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036081	State Of West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1355489988	26	No		1220903466	349793987.09	0
RCP-036082	City Of Cincinnati, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	279590123	55	No		71216236.82	95341231.75	96860051.97
RCP-036083	City Of Mesa, Arizona, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	105515724	21	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036084	County Of Los Angeles, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1949978847	78	No		638786249	371154517	0
RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50257113	22	Yes	10000000	10945638
RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	6244537955.5	135	No		4699000000	2244300000	0	0
RCP-036088	Polk County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	95208028	19	No		24804929.33	25529893.61	34305968.55
RCP-036090	Irving City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54277494	69	No		38669222	40741691	22454296
RCP-036091	State Of Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	6540417626.7	248	No		1848491965	0	0	0
RCP-036092	City Of Birmingham, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	141272354	23	No		42603048	471779	42603048
RCP-036093	Guilford County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	104339752	40	No		17640815	24685301	29168742
RCP-036094	Lancaster County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	61979492	54	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036095	City Of San Jose, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	212280152	45	No		131857093	432410880
RCP-036096	City Of North Las Vegas, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	46340548	16	No		30451647.01	0	0
RCP-036097	Berks County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	81806170	1	No		17813979	34236564	29685675.84	0
RCP-036098	Anne Arundel County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	112509414	135	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036099	Lafayette Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47469893	35	No		8445924	14003523	0
RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	69323447	46	No		9317174	11224898	16718212
RCP-036102	City of Colorado Springs, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	76039132	19	No		54084082	0	0	0
RCP-036104	Lee County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	149675549	103	No		48241146	0	0
RCP-036105	Somerset County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63891573	5	Yes	10000000	8700000
RCP-036106	State Of Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3011136886.6	30	No		1983712466	991620000	275030508
RCP-036107	Durham County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	62445275	17	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036108	Seattle City, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	232341627	66	No		344322260	59149352	0
RCP-036109	County Of Riverside, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	479874599	108	Yes	10000000	13300000
RCP-036110	Placer County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	77370739	19	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036112	Miami-Dade County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	527733745	1	No		1125064512	1102296281	437045351
RCP-036113	St Joseph, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38704807	69	Yes	10000000	1285700
RCP-036114	District Of Columbia	District of Columbia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2312383930.2	291	No		796661000	917459000
RCP-036116	St. Johns County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51409433	18	Yes	7000000	0
RCP-036117	Tuscaloosa County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40664754	42	Yes	10000000	3232005
RCP-036120	Rockingham County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	60168997	39	No		3104491	9353758	12845490
RCP-036121	Davis County, Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	69048017	23	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036122	Clackamas County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	81227922	50	No		11719103	0	0	0
RCP-036123	Utah County, Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	123581190	62	Yes	10000000	0	0	0
RCP-036124	Henry County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45560724	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-036126	Oakland City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	188081700	1	No		70781213	69046727	170583043	103766856
RCP-036127	Cabarrus County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42043458	64	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036128	City Of Miami, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	137639417	31	No		69659199	93989727	51408511
RCP-036130	Mclennan County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	49846009	56	Yes	10000000	1625876
RCP-036132	City Of Garland, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53513994	18	No		7502198	10624397	0
RCP-036133	Cameron County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	82194452	79	No		11675807	6784820	9811731
RCP-036134	County Of Lancaster, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106000489	21	No		5689115	8899082	3835905
RCP-036136	City Of Moreno Valley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48481233	3	Yes	0	0
RCP-036137	Will County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	134168730	177	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036139	Union County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	130591801	38	No		31931342.1	50657590.32	68969497.77
RCP-036140	Mercer County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71368970	42	No		15041207	26186653	30141110
RCP-036141	City Of Milwaukee, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	394226649	54	No		62761196	72343154	100457758
RCP-036143	Harrison County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40417101	32	No		9674473	4645064	0
RCP-036144	Oklahoma County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	154892206	59	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036145	Delaware County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	110083961	32	No		17555008.67	22395131
RCP-036146	The County Of Volusia, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	107468931	37	No		16258801	22734272
RCP-036147	City of Modesto, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45897056	33	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036148	Knox County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	91352787	37	No		49572137	38513334	3267316
RCP-036149	Dakota County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	83332300	10	No		26698748	0	0	0
RCP-036150	Toledo City, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	180948591	31	No		40812760	62776618	63094662
RCP-036151	Commonwealth Of Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2183237290.9	214	No		595788895.56	0	0
RCP-036152	Chester County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	101972959	115	No		33568263	23673029	13120613.75	31294383
RCP-036155	Greenville County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	101691896	14	No		32760841	23843564
RCP-036156	City Of Charlotte, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	141618325	19	No		120274952.53	317342455.7	170220580.96
RCP-036157	Riverside City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	73535189	32	No		74903216	0	0	0
RCP-036158	Adams County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	100502964	126	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036162	State Of Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1583680553.3	83	No		1337898804	234258521	1337898804
RCP-036163	City Of Henderson, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	37368428	36	No		24991300	29264305	0	54255605
RCP-036164	Polk County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	140779436	63	No		28893318	853491304	0	0
RCP-036165	Luzerne County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	112890152	22	Yes	10000000	8961430	0
RCP-036166	Rutherford, County Of	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	64542466	9	No		5904651	17885772
RCP-036167	County Of Ventura, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	164326748	5	No		43287691	68321123	75741779
RCP-036168	Fresno County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	194063657	79	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036169	Washington County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98857371	13	No		15602305	21732994
RCP-036170	Anderson County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39344517	12	No		13007053	0
RCP-036171	San Bernardino City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77656407	17	Yes	0	0
RCP-036172	City Of Port St. Lucie, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24739425	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036173	Oxnard City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59540662	47	No		16520363	4712379	17480193
RCP-036174	State Of Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3725832113	1213	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-036175	Pittsburgh City, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	335070222	23	No		143644795	115149402	80561525
RCP-036177	Atlantic County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51214806	17	No		2969213.4	5703599.63	3594152.62
RCP-036178	Webb County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	53736408	32	Yes	10000000	1885324
RCP-036179	Boulder County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63359749	41	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036180	Denton County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	172329559	66	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036181	Brown County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51384182	147	No		25652402	34035857
RCP-036182	City Of Boston, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	558709038	117	No		51830675	131249236	132785599	0
RCP-036183	Horry County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	68776083	47	No		147426927	110239667	91920693
RCP-036186	County of Middlesex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	160258621	18	Yes	10000000	6500000
RCP-036187	Northampton County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	61187165	9	No		0	8407280.67	30088060.5
RCP-036188	Bexar County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	389166877	52	No		71764795	98439601	98653666	98653666
RCP-036189	Commonwealth Of Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	5286067526.4	124	No		3898837971.25	0
RCP-036192	Suffolk County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	286812434	7	No		277627963.52	0
RCP-036193	Huntsville City, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34402593	9	No		29556851	29556852
RCP-036194	Erie County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	178447094	15	No		47554040	47554040
RCP-036196	Forsyth County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47443088	9	No		3000000	0	0
RCP-036203	Sonoma County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	96018973	55	No		36755179	0
RCP-036216	El Paso County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	139929837	40	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036227	San Luis Obispo County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54990993	39	No		40719630	20702880	23331388
RCP-036232	State Of Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3828761789.9	250	No		1139220251.27	2555432997.88	0
RCP-036234	Benton County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54219867	53	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036245	Gaston County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43612126	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036255	Morris County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	95535125	29	No		13175762	20536369	30831828
RCP-036256	Jefferson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	48863552	25	Yes	10000000	2510209
RCP-036261	Smith County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45209153	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036275	Brazos County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44521550	2	No		6419821	8445192	7299824
RCP-036276	Johnson County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	117009332	26	No		22568349	62968251	11997733.28
RCP-036278	Stark County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71985871	4	No		11036061	13449877	21853287
RCP-036288	Douglas County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	110973572	13	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036315	City Of Concord, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27040883	12	No		12634959	14405924	0
RCP-036320	Rochester City, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	202141319	61	No		68504626	27040247	46967265
RCP-036324	Dutchess County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	57148397	22	No		37636128	6648365	7634458
RCP-036326	Maricopa County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	871239088	125	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036328	Frisco City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16638254	7	No		0	0	0
RCP-036329	Westchester County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	187926698	16	No		121385378	4522661	41800053
RCP-036336	State Of Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1131061056.7	71	No		513646898	0	0
RCP-036339	Jefferson County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	127920085	33	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036341	Oneida County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44416661	22	No		40956048	11093982	0	0
RCP-036344	City Of Fresno, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	170808029	88	No		37807037	51129356
RCP-036352	County Of Tulare, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	90552914	78	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036355	Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	7291328098.4	31	No		4661847152	0	0
RCP-036374	Montgomery County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	117978581	42	Yes	10000000	21524641
RCP-036385	County Of Merced, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	53936085	11	No		36039354	36240386	54437231
RCP-036395	Madison County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	72433202	11	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036397	County Of Cumberland, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	49214152	6	No		26421938	48156466	68630418
RCP-036398	Niagara County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40650381	18	No		9642610.11	0	0
RCP-036401	City Of Austin, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	188482478	31	No		407399326	449348505	0
RCP-036411	Auburn, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16523077	3	Yes	2903779	2903779
RCP-036414	Town Of Babylon, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27770292	36	No		1	1	1
RCP-036417	Anoka County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	69327720	23	No		7376788	23386937	60816714
RCP-036426	Midland, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24988224	20	No		21763192	31474310	0	0
RCP-036427	Okaloosa County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40933386	7	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036428	State of Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2812288081.6	333	No		1993880866	147129658	0
RCP-036433	Whatcom County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44528542	54	No		8458440	19067980
RCP-036437	Delaware County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40630180	8	No		12805499	2300215
RCP-036442	City Of Fremont, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44211563	1	No		26277479	60703523	35946063
RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2685296130.8	830	No		1698819430.39	0	0	0
RCP-036462	Collin County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	200984172	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-036463	Orange County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74770082	23	No		74196578	573504	0	0
RCP-036470	Town Of Gilbert, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	24159871	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-036475	Town Of Brookhaven, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	55026837	83	No		20298313	0	0	0
RCP-036478	County Of Solano, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	86949405	59	No		35919857	5218884	5495485
RCP-036479	Albany County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	59340959	8	No		30059144.45	0	0
RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3071830673.2	160	No		2427977018.75	0	0	466364794
RCP-036491	Daviess County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19717322	3	Yes	9707622	10000000
RCP-036503	Buffalo City, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	331356932	31	No		95897484	51586372	39257535
RCP-036508	State of Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	4427709355.9	98	No		2213459284	999285708	1214964364
RCP-036509	State Of Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1040157440.4	88	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1011788220	12	No		1768244804	1764905912	1803376944
RCP-036513	Mohave County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41213672	42	No		1782250	0	1482500
RCP-036516	Hidalgo County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	212973405	135	No		15285406	6571334	24119647
RCP-036519	State Of Wyoming	Wyoming	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1068484768	206	No		584926766	0	0	0
RCP-036527	Elkhart County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40079320	12	No		7221383	13749999	6203798
RCP-036528	Lubbock County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	60324387	15	Yes	10000000	6744807
RCP-036536	San Joaquin County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	148038314	53	No		251275532	231865666	192586966	114530748
RCP-036538	Butler County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74419288	26	No		18193667.47	17965810.22
RCP-036566	American Samoa	American Samoa	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	500062807	60	Yes	0	0
RCP-036567	Hialeah City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66834253	8	No		25200564	12241764	8820264	33195811
RCP-036627	Municipio De Aguadilla, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31488326	26	Yes	10000000	2331013
RCP-036628	Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49289120	14	Yes	10000000	2419556
RCP-036630	Athens-Clarke County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57588843	22	No		10997114	31433048	15158681
RCP-036631	City And County Of Broomfield, CO	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20727034	5	Yes	10000000	5000000	2000000
RCP-036632	Cabo Rojo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30281701	35	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66817666	51	No		14528659	5661182	382126
RCP-036634	Canovanas Municipio City, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26486925	30	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036635	Carolina Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72224833	17	No		31044118	19748088	15444213
RCP-036636	Carson City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20774006	30	Yes	10000000	1889677.99
RCP-036637	Alexandria, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59633833	37	No		0	62439382	68493947
RCP-036638	Bristol, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10027374	2	Yes	10000000	4750565
RCP-036639	Charlottesville City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19609709	49	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036640	Chesapeake City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76025897	36	No		36001783	34455650	18691967
RCP-036642	Danville City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29142851	51	Yes	10000000	5000000
RCP-036643	Fredericksburg City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10782747	12	Yes	10000000	8440349
RCP-036644	Hampton City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48660418	29	No		25564155	17913559	5182704
RCP-036645	Harrisonburg City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23834094	12	No		7212596	9193598	5669090
RCP-036647	Lynchburg City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33328529	1	No		9662829	16644886	11367125
RCP-036648	Newport News City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66794246	1	No		32142578.72	34651667.28	0
RCP-036649	Norfolk City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	154141050	1	No		49332630	70526898	81169563
RCP-036650	Petersburg, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20961839	26	Yes	6613648.01	10000000
RCP-036651	Portsmouth City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56842564	29	No		5853730.46	18387245.65	18387245.65
RCP-036653	City Of Richmond, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	154879828	17	No		16013464	37350148	-29214413	-106960224
RCP-036654	Roanoke City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64576671	30	No		11674418.74	17758133.45	3380342.36
RCP-036655	City Of St. Louis, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	498076054	295	No		180921333	176519934	112126523
RCP-036656	Staunton City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12955826	22	No		3551334	7210124	2194368
RCP-036657	Suffolk City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30065296	11	Yes	10000000	4321097
RCP-036658	Virginia Beach City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	136429703	27	No		108623635	94672334	0
RCP-036660	Winchester City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12337682	18	Yes	10000000	2038226
RCP-036661	Columbus City, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	78482038	20	No		3559470.84	10115312.88
RCP-036662	Fajardo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17850216	11	Yes	10000000	1962344.51
RCP-036663	Guayama Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23725180	23	Yes	10000000	1808212
RCP-036664	Guaynabo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37101450	12	Yes	10000000	5826495
RCP-036665	Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44803757	28	No		16785217	584199	0
RCP-036666	Humacao Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29998616	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036667	Isabela Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26221362	20	Yes	10000000	2985263
RCP-036668	Juana Diaz Municipio City, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26632520	13	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036669	City Of Kansas City, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87516516	126	No		23396855	7759544	0
RCP-036670	Macon-Bibb County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75864910	53	Yes	10000000	24066974.25
RCP-036671	Manati Municipio City, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24470030	8	No		4396301	7695569.52	11220151.45
RCP-036672	Mayaguez Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48680443	67	No		5188240	4851573
RCP-036673	City Of New York, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	5878895712	93	No		4465000000	5909000000
RCP-036674	Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84809114	49	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036675	Rio Grande Municipio City, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26780515	31	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036676	San Juan Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	237708158	33	No		52735493	36828484	0
RCP-036677	San Sebastian Municipio County, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22524361	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036678	Toa Baja Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40283034	6	Yes	10000000	150845
RCP-036679	Trujillo Alto Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31586878	29	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036680	Vega Baja Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30218807	21	Yes	10000000	100000
RCP-036681	Yauco Municipality, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20431068	28	Yes	10000000	2004112
RCP-036683	Somerset County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14266219	11	Yes	7878878.94	3299435
RCP-036687	Appleton, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14891841	3	Yes	10000000	10422027
RCP-036691	Story County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18863839	33	Yes	10000000	8000000
RCP-036695	Longview, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17048510	6	Yes	8934890.29	1970377
RCP-036698	Alameda, City Of, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28679908	12	Yes	7480313	8487916
RCP-036703	Columbia County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10169151	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036707	Chester, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30357628	50	No		2640125.06	3031491.11	548413
RCP-036710	Upland, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15213716	34	No		2894037	3554565	6822317
RCP-036712	York County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40331830	25	Yes	0	10000000
RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16746253	25	Yes	10000000	1602807.39
RCP-036720	Hancock County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14719959	20	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036721	Anniston, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13291868	10	Yes	5080779.26	0
RCP-036722	Vancouver, Washington, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33135869	9	No		14027370	4376808
RCP-036723	Killeen, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29117907	34	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036725	Beaver County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	91978752	48	No		10458610	10545069	14957791	14957791
RCP-036731	Provo, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33880698	8	Yes	10000000	2037280
RCP-036732	Alexandria, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11290002	4	Yes	10000000	11044984
RCP-036738	Lewis And Clark County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13486352	51	Yes	10000000	873959
RCP-036739	Calhoun County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22066439	13	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036742	Morgantown, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11243509	18	Yes	0	0
RCP-036744	Sumner County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37154480	15	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036746	Columbia, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27178358	13	Yes	10000000	1230061
RCP-036750	State Of Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1870417575.7	93	No		0	0	0
RCP-036752	Battle Creek, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30545339	59	Yes	10000000	7261675
RCP-036753	Greece, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11863368	1	Yes	2940179	10000000
RCP-036754	Kennewick, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16062005	18	No		12376991.57	8987346.2	0
RCP-036755	Morgan County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23246243	13	Yes	10000000	979855.53
RCP-036760	Licking County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34353370	19	Yes	10000000	2887294.46
RCP-036761	Lake Elsinore City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14967198	13	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036763	Wayne County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22475311	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036766	Sioux Falls, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25415071	13	No		19485561.57	0	0
RCP-036770	Rockingham County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17677626	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036772	Randolph County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27905631	9	Yes	10000000	400000
RCP-036773	Ashland, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13474388	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036774	Gurabo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14152267.06	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-036775	Fayetteville, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17911418	17	No		6914393	0
RCP-036776	Lancaster City, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39518923	8	No		4084666	4500000	6000000	12000000
RCP-036777	Gordon County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11258633	7	Yes	9872391	0
RCP-036778	Rapid City, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13024994	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036779	Muskogee County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13207620	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036785	Rockingham County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15917438	2	Yes	10000000	8448256
RCP-036787	Delray Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10956323	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036794	Auburn, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21395055	14	Yes	7750977.66	3874085.66
RCP-036795	Greenville, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17908547	1	No		23919005	27876046	42072693
RCP-036797	Miami County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20780971	63	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036798	Flint, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94726664	29	No		32387528	37169068
RCP-036800	Waukesha County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78510723	34	No		2344675	14534168	33233665	28199047
RCP-036801	Daytona Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15010544	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036803	Rockford, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54822355	3	No		38429055	16239987.91	0
RCP-036804	Kent County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	127605807	15	No		48154364	76336054	58870703
RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56433212	42	Yes	10000000	2481235
RCP-036806	Union Township, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15492274	20	Yes	9897109.08	0
RCP-036807	Peoria County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34803420	8	No		15644260	17277374	1881786
RCP-036809	Elgin, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19501332	6	Yes	0	0
RCP-036810	Thousand Oaks, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14008949	1	No		20788970	16126729	20909854
RCP-036811	City Of Clearwater, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22483893	1	No		34124364	39908000
RCP-036812	Washington County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11637009	19	Yes	10000000	1294818
RCP-036813	Saline County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23781952	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036814	Vineland, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11559382	8	Yes	10000000	1717930.65
RCP-036815	Yakima, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26195479	7	No		11987053	0	11703865.74
RCP-036817	Monterey County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	84311261	66	No		250601050	383587394	450022304
RCP-036818	Black Hawk County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25489501	25	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036821	Lowndes County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22804739	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036840	Potter County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22806487	18	Yes	10000000	1687571
RCP-036842	Catoosa County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13126623	10	Yes	10000000	1
RCP-036844	Roanoke County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18294526	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036845	Kanawha County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34598499	55	No		0	3919453.15	8526899	8526899
RCP-036846	Fauquier County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13834039	7	Yes	3335000	12099058
RCP-036847	County Of Sedgwick, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	100235109	29	No		15625944	29080199	46480187
RCP-036848	Marion County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12643552	38	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036849	Cambria County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25288270	9	No		12285099	12005553
RCP-036850	Binghamton, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46184674	31	No		13634539	8039741	13459469
RCP-036851	Muskegon, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22881894	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036852	Leavenworth County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15880533	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036853	Hawthorne, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30521654	13	No		17282589	0	0
RCP-036854	Pearland, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11888971	5	Yes	1000000	1000000
RCP-036858	State of Maine	Maine	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	997495130.1	143	No		188904063	0	0	0
RCP-036859	Downey, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25438407	14	No		0	0	22004459	0
RCP-036860	Borough Of State College, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13276247	7	Yes	10000000	6265795	6265795
RCP-036861	Savannah, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55591247	2	No		42639776	16078292	0
RCP-036863	Redford, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21962768	14	Yes	10000000	5841811
RCP-036865	Bethlehem, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34467364	5	No		9495121	5497821	7241660
RCP-036866	Ogden, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25612830	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036868	Indiana County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16330195	1	No		7654585.22	6996744.48	1678865.3	0
RCP-036871	Cumberland County, Maine	Maine	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	57300874	53	Yes	10000000	1695999
RCP-036873	Bossier City, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13428592	2	Yes	10000000	0	0	0
RCP-036875	Columbia County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30439857	14	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036877	City Of Sugar Land, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11115958	4	Yes	9976180	30670714
RCP-036880	Chisago County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10989807	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036882	North Charleston City, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24317215	5	No		2127808	13124068	7184186	0
RCP-036885	Carrollton, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19571304	1	No		6721453	6241921	6607930
RCP-036886	Linn County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25202222	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036887	Madison County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25167259	25	Yes	10000000	3400000
RCP-036890	Ontario County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21322895	12	No		11922945.26	3297597.69	0	0
RCP-036893	Concord, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16255872	11	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036895	Seneca County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10717680	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036896	Stamford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49056682.71	16	Yes	10000000	10000000		21160000
RCP-036897	Reading, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61134970	13	No		14028713	5907434	11478997
RCP-036898	Williamsport, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25477801	23	Yes	10000000	960000
RCP-036900	Irondequoit, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22454916	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036902	Wheeling, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28197143	17	Yes	10000000	1951717.08
RCP-036906	Perris City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22171505	114	Yes	3964046	3964046
RCP-036908	Mckinley County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13862203	3	Yes	6931101.5	0
RCP-036914	Howard County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16033204	36	Yes	10000000	2102656
RCP-036918	Peoria City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20769706	23	Yes	10000000	6280000
RCP-036919	Salinas, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51567313	19	No		18491697	23373476	14982293	34118060
RCP-036922	Christian County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13686223	2	No		2231236	2818254	3367788
RCP-036924	Morgan County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13691662	2	Yes	10000000	2069327
RCP-036925	Bay City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31076578	23	No		4961492.63	7253670.71
RCP-036926	Montgomery County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19139269	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036928	Utica, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60881737	30	No		11419823	15979805
RCP-036929	Rosemead, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17878653	7	Yes	10000000	3121594
RCP-036936	Stafford County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29695536	46	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036941	New Braunfels, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10995314	3	Yes	10000000	0		0
RCP-036945	Randall County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26749136	13	Yes	10000000	3856633
RCP-036951	Boynton Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13647904	17	Yes	10000000	1968770.47
RCP-036953	City Of Chicago, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1886591388	92	No		1216614000	459885000	634302000
RCP-036954	Santa Barbara, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21837523	25	No		28929690	28929690
RCP-036956	County Of Burke, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17575650	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036960	Cidra Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21782715	8	Yes	10000000	4341575
RCP-036962	Casa Grande, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11403498	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036964	Wichita County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25684127	35	Yes	10000000	1200000
RCP-036965	State Of North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1007502515	1	No		1881933568	1795656461	810510629	1224007561
RCP-036966	White Plains, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23167555	1	No		31644552	0	0	0
RCP-036970	East Orange, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35984210	4	Yes	10000000	5286233.92
RCP-036973	Flathead County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20163099	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036974	St. Clair County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30908749	47	Yes	10000000	4817544	3290381	0
RCP-036976	Deerfield Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16284885	10	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036977	Rochester, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17435537	1	No		17782949.33	0	0	0
RCP-036979	Dekalb, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10422954	16	Yes	10000000	4254304
RCP-036985	Gilroy City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10964521	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-036986	Palo Alto, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13735071	2	No		64978869	79132986	90931414
RCP-036988	Highlands County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20632184	25	Yes	9999998	10000000
RCP-036992	Wayne County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12797195	4	Yes	10000000	1409987
RCP-036996	Madison County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20642090	4	Yes	10000000	14742434
RCP-037007	Franklin County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10885502	2	Yes	10000000	153000
RCP-037008	Tooele County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14035464	10	Yes	9252194.3	0
RCP-037010	Bend, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14076428	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037011	Santa Maria, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37190243	19	Yes	10000000	2400000
RCP-037012	Lakewood, Colorado, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21581066		No		16958421	9701546
RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30606902	50	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037020	St. Clair County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50440961	15	Yes	10000000	8596582
RCP-037024	Dougherty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17084422	11	Yes	10000000	365500
RCP-037027	Chapel Hill, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10668497	23	Yes	10000000	4175297.91
RCP-037033	Fairfield, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24830565.88	39	No		15240388	24417152
RCP-037035	Coos County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12525844	1	No		16206151.44	16206151.44	16206151.44	16206151.44
RCP-037036	Shreveport, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48240338	15	No		34373108	7365502	0
RCP-037037	Dekalb County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13890562	27	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037040	Yuba City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15615517	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037043	La Habra, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15828149	45	Yes	10000000	3283788	2785581
RCP-037045	West Lafayette, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11427539	5	Yes	2100000	1376833
RCP-037051	Pickaway County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11354587	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037052	Gardena, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15002061	2	No		11053614	0
RCP-037053	Grafton County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17459302	62	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037055	West Palm Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24530823	9	Yes	10000000	7000000
RCP-037058	Jones County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13227238	8	Yes	10000000	2100000
RCP-037059	Lake County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12506226	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037060	Anderson, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14507668	10	No		0	0	0
RCP-037061	Kaufman County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26446318	6	Yes	10000000	2059840
RCP-037064	Roseville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17644859	1	No		19278632	0	0
RCP-037065	Santa Rosa County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35800640	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037070	Taylor, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11593181	41	Yes	10000000	6834991
RCP-037072	Otsego County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11555818	43	Yes	10000000	10465961.17
RCP-037076	Norwich, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28838728.45	62	Yes	3233114	10000000
RCP-037077	Mishawaka, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11883602	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037078	Walton County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14387423	2	Yes	10000000	3689384
RCP-037079	Lawrence County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16609704	15	Yes	10000000	674619
RCP-037080	New Brunswick, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20726375	4	No		6000000	0	0
RCP-037081	Lincoln Park, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19146461	18	Yes	3129001	1480000
RCP-037083	Thornton, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21001371	11	No		11798733	7655786	0
RCP-037086	Butler County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12996677	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037087	Monroe County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33073146	13	No		7911832	7752896.48	7849482
RCP-037089	Tuolumne County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10581713	1	Yes	10000000	8097179
RCP-037090	Warren, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27318439	9	Yes	2000000	10000000
RCP-037092	State Of Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1377866887.6	45	No		916687401	0	0	0
RCP-037095	Citrus Heights, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15676972	15	Yes	10000000	3246927
RCP-037099	La Porte, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11476496	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037100	State of Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	4293727162.2	157	No		2179160000	3487860	3487860
RCP-037103	Hagerstown, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20421010	28	Yes	10000000	3570262
RCP-037104	Mobile, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58203265	19	Yes	0	401747.08
RCP-037108	Douglas County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21556564	11	No		3308532	6584500	11663531.68
RCP-037109	Carver County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20412306	7	No		17640424	0
RCP-037110	Coryell County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14752591	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-037112	Green Bay, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23695516	56	Yes	10000000	10320242
RCP-037113	Peoria, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47089976	33	No		20561566	0	0
RCP-037114	East Lansing, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12170077	12	No		8632045	9118910	9624494
RCP-037115	State Of Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2833294345.3	91	No		2548637792	0	0	0
RCP-037120	Euless City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10393946	2	Yes	10000000	3893946
RCP-037122	Jackson County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27895919	14	Yes	10000000	7804170
RCP-037124	Miami Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23555418	1	No		23555418	0	0	0
RCP-037126	Pike County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11241735	5	Yes	10000000	4347124
RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14891472	19	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037129	Little Rock, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37713401	43	No		95264438	61046365	82232889
RCP-037130	Wilmington, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25929952	34	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037135	Darlington County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12939766	2	Yes	9758300.92	0
RCP-037136	Margate, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10849938	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037137	Walla Walla County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11801918	9	Yes	10000000	1856612
RCP-037140	Malden, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45774149.62	50	No		11114182	22260547	12399000
RCP-037146	Everett, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20695570	4	No		50893824	49989766	71447588
RCP-037149	Blount County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11232023	35	Yes	8353640	0
RCP-037156	Waco, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34720687	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037157	Roane County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10368828	21	Yes	10000000	772919
RCP-037160	Muskegon County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33713161	15	No		10646762	16451469	4081202
RCP-037163	Sparks, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16230272	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037164	Crawford County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16438191	4	No		5029439	8484176.47	2924575.53
RCP-037166	Onslow County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38447136	16	Yes	10000000	10852061
RCP-037167	Blair County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23663855	3	No		2305444	3539935	7082768	10261394.98
RCP-037168	Allen County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	73674384	6	No		12663237	13730700.73
RCP-037169	Newton, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63589505.03	72	No		38889622	30289356
RCP-037170	York County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13262590	2	No		14680254	9592842
RCP-037172	Genesee County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78824418	45	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037173	James City County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14863696	25	No		14545840.93	26040384.35	26689630.53
RCP-037178	Riley County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14418696	4	No		4143686.07	6241258.77	3616805.78
RCP-037182	Apple Valley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14883978	3	Yes	10000000	536323
RCP-037185	Billings, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15940314	2	No		12742990	3197345	0
RCP-037186	Pensacola, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19153643	15	No		11391460.37	7203058.65
RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30788709	40	Yes	10000000	6507100
RCP-037190	Mendocino County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16849976	23	Yes	10000000	2500000
RCP-037195	Augusta County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14676256	12	Yes	10000000	1896723
RCP-037205	Hamilton County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71441615	73	No		25319000	37931000	8191615
RCP-037209	Wayne County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17465517	14	Yes	10000000	10312825
RCP-037217	Charlotte County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36693553	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037218	Hollywood, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29390502	88	No		14636872	10360790	4392840
RCP-037219	Lancaster County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19037682	21	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037223	Cape Girardeau County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15319767	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037226	Kettering, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13851520	2	No		11577527	8570559	0
RCP-037227	Poughkeepsie, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20863783	17	Yes	10000000	5135424	0
RCP-037228	Buena Park, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19622863	4	No		10769854	6839570
RCP-037229	Owensboro, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13324175		Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037231	Mcallen, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41922103	7	No		20210098	14446981	9040349
RCP-037235	Ithaca, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16092137	41	Yes	8700000	8239256
RCP-037239	Allentown, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57132604	12	No		10079420	12061904	9507549
RCP-037240	Craighead County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21430698	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037242	State of Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	15814388615	51	No		12154403291	3910963693	0
RCP-037248	St. Charles Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10314053	2	Yes	5157053	0	0	0
RCP-037249	Grand Forks County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13490043	25	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037250	Mesa County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29953485	5	No		16191196	9448824
RCP-037252	Nampa, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17511452	1	Yes	10000000	6500000
RCP-037253	Guadalupe County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32408074	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037256	Lynwood, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24446961	13	Yes	10000000	9310600
RCP-037260	Palm Coast, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12501879	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037261	Brevard County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	116920177	97	No		21735842	26760639	26626501.7
RCP-037262	Troup County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13581529	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037263	East Providence, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27785912.31	6	No		8077399	16060841	3647672
RCP-037264	Wauwatosa, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24663875	28	Yes	9485115.22	1640453
RCP-037267	Lincoln County, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11873397	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037272	Cape Coral, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25439699	3	No		12629642	0
RCP-037274	Greene County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32814032	30	No		7811501.02	8569795.05	11696752.39
RCP-037277	Pasco, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17464312	6	Yes	5389119.11	8598490
RCP-037278	Missoula, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14192996	31	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037279	Angelina County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16843372	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-037281	Spartanburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	62114487	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037285	Bowling Green, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16584849	5	Yes	10000000	8473050
RCP-037287	Wright County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26878110	34	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037291	Cape May County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17877497	26	No		2529093.28	0
RCP-037293	Marquette County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12955499	1	No		7958637	4996862
RCP-037294	Franklin County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13535494	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037302	Palm Springs, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10820822	1	No		48274322	0	0
RCP-037308	Iowa City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18325190	9	Yes	10000000	10308861
RCP-037309	Tuscarawas County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17867396	49	Yes	10000000	5726059
RCP-037311	Tehama County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12641804	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037315	Elizabeth, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40674250	13	Yes	10000000	20725831
RCP-037323	Tipton County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11964884	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037328	Fayette County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22224938	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037330	Lauderdale County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18011521	20	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037333	Cheyenne, Wyoming	Wyoming	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12191813	5	Yes	10000000	6392200
RCP-037334	Wood County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16222392	4	Yes	212000
RCP-037335	Clinton County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15633268	18	No		14181757	14181757
RCP-037336	Strafford County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25373929	12	No		3242955.33	6876467.87	0	0
RCP-037338	Montgomery, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41639442	9	No		9624283.03	15709014.53	0
RCP-037341	Woonsocket, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36388236.33	50	No		12954696	16032340	7401200.33
RCP-037342	Westminster, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14548323	1	No		19483112.42	0
RCP-037343	Fort Collins, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28118971	52	Yes	10000000	7364908
RCP-037344	Pitt County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35107015	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037345	Tonawanda Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40351859	24	Yes	10000000	2960591
RCP-037347	Vanderburgh County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35244730	20	No		15810729	3508917.77	5491001.87
RCP-037349	Kosciusko County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15433397	49	Yes	8235005.66	10000000
RCP-037352	Newport Beach, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10141272	4	No		18007069	0	0
RCP-037353	West Allis, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30941771	65	No		1769912	4843876	9848528
RCP-037355	Manassas, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50606650	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-037359	Rusk County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10567728	9	Yes	10000000	2500000
RCP-037361	Roswell, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11374757	2	No		20849481	32762002	0
RCP-037363	Spalding County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12956276	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037365	Outagamie County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36494459	33	Yes	10000000	2000000
RCP-037367	Homestead City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19192087	12	Yes	10000000	1558161
RCP-037371	Pasadena, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40199596	14	Yes	9999999.99	0
RCP-037374	Euclid, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25409948	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037377	Hancock County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15183218	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037382	Brooklyn Park City, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11052580	32	Yes	10000000	1500000
RCP-037384	White County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15296847	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037386	Union City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26618182	14	Yes	10000000	1726143
RCP-037388	Norwalk, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28046746	22	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037396	Lee County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16594941	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037397	County Of Kings, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29706802	46	Yes	10000000	4281131
RCP-037406	Akron, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	145337626	43	No		20630819	34261679.76	34776737
RCP-037408	Johnstown, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30716690	15	Yes	10000000	567003	1219051.34	1994246.5
RCP-037410	Salem, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35053419.78	39	Yes	10000000	3250428.47
RCP-037411	Jackson County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14174927	2	Yes	10000000	200000
RCP-037412	Stearns County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31286930	18	No		2991561	9165154
RCP-037413	Goodyear, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10350308	5	Yes	9955308	0
RCP-037417	Monroe County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28830982	29	Yes	10000000	2465587
RCP-037418	Cecil County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19978378		Yes	10000000	2147602
RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16872443	40	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037428	Carteret County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13494316	22	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037430	Wilkes County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13288229	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037431	Desoto County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35923398	6	No		4805185	7046782	4068182
RCP-037438	Grant County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12774857		Yes	0	0
RCP-037444	Galveston, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27371621	3	No		0	0	0
RCP-037445	St. Joseph County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11841542	5	Yes	10000000	2557724
RCP-037447	Eagle County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10707773	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-037451	Jackson County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10027745	12	Yes	9726912.65	0
RCP-037452	Providence, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	166314129.1	51	No		38394941	65269844
RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21339406	117	No		6475228	3694268	1928289
RCP-037456	Blacksburg, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13364987	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037458	Garfield County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11859412	10	Yes	0	0
RCP-037460	Santa Cruz, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14170321	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037464	Bangor, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20478297	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037465	Livingston County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37292778	31	Yes	10000000	2706092
RCP-037469	Columbiana County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19789578	104	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037473	Pico Rivera, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14772455	3	No		10227800	4110390
RCP-037480	Clinton County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15460396	5	Yes	0	3574239.7
RCP-037492	Warrick County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12236623	44	Yes	10000000	999653
RCP-037496	State Of Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	4182827491.6	158	No		800389715	0	800389715
RCP-037502	Visalia, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29364455	20	Yes	10000000	1302276
RCP-037503	State of Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1573121580.8	181	No		1013578249.48	0	0
RCP-037510	Ulster County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34491474	27	No		14031357	0
RCP-037511	Chautauqua County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24649420	66	No		16857857	7791563	0
RCP-037512	Flagstaff, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13252816	12	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037516	Monongalia County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20513893	11	No		3207660	3332343	0
RCP-037517	Brockton, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34590793	16	No		13318422	0	0	0
RCP-037520	Syracuse, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123076929	58	No		36413639	12494422	13123058
RCP-037524	Fairfield, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19805577	2	No		20538784	0	0
RCP-037528	York, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35304707	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16465385	26	Yes	10000000	1314192
RCP-037538	Camden, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61648323	14	No		26871808	26547045
RCP-037548	Pittsfield, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40602779.37	56	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037549	West Haven, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29008575.69	27	Yes	10000000	15527723
RCP-037550	Nash County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18316281	7	Yes	10000000	15095113
RCP-037554	Boone County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35052822	6	Yes	10000000	0	0
RCP-037559	Troy, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42879140	49	Yes	10000000	6468675
RCP-037561	Paramount City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18895185	23	Yes	8106928.03	3609820
RCP-037565	Richland County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23532744	43	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037569	City Of Ames, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14257623	8	Yes	10000000	1369178
RCP-037570	Steuben County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18526253	22	Yes	10000000	9102254
RCP-037571	Springfield, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40276290	23	No		28325177	44210694	25186597
RCP-037573	East Chicago, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31172909	6	Yes	10000000	0		0
RCP-037575	Hunterdon County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24157609	16	No		4276661	4220120	4439565
RCP-037579	Pembroke Pines, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25463361	3	No		24148595	1314766	0	0
RCP-037581	Dekalb County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20375013	3	No		4160670	6517207	5423546
RCP-037582	Union City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14099826	2	No		10889351	3210475
RCP-037589	Grant County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18983490	26	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037591	Vega Alta Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10785725.54	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-037592	San Lorenzo Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10751073.82	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-037598	Framingham, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26827697.63	9	No		22815565	0	0	0
RCP-037602	Herkimer County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11910497	57	No		10332724.82	617567.71
RCP-037604	Highland City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14895107	6	Yes	1040000	1040000
RCP-037606	Garland County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19304565	14	Yes	10000000	9999999.99
RCP-037611	Independence, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21485924	25	Yes	5000000	10052126
RCP-037612	Elk Grove, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21944605	52	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037617	Ottawa County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56684556	5	No		19030058	20712572	16941926
RCP-037622	Port Huron, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17959874	35	Yes	10000000	1684804
RCP-037626	Robeson County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25372375	15	Yes	10000000	2311000
RCP-037628	Saratoga County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44648193	14	No		30674734	0	0
RCP-037629	Wagoner County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15789435	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-037630	Monterey Park, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15043184	2	No		8316784	6463796	4708139
RCP-037636	Aiken County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33189883	6	No		4926214	6603443	1747476
RCP-037637	Wyoming, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13155842	8	Yes	10000000	6901653
RCP-037649	Lee County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11999847	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037661	Kirkland City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10155994	3	Yes	10000000	18553300
RCP-037669	Williamson County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12935687	36	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-037672	Port Arthur, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26731836	7	Yes	7101836	1000000
RCP-037673	Cleveland County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19025057	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037674	Pike County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10840244	3	Yes	10000000	4724551
RCP-037675	Columbia County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12618495	52	No		2070987	2070988.32	0	0
RCP-037678	Hood County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11973430	12	Yes	5986715	0
RCP-037682	Champaign County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40729630	24	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037686	Amherst Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15230415	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037692	County Of Butler, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36488243	53	No		12713881	3359370	3277912
RCP-037699	Sioux City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40618687	18	No		0	0	0
RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20995402	25	Yes	10000000	5013194.55
RCP-037705	Forrest County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14547864	18	Yes	10000000	3500000
RCP-037706	Washington County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29339498	12	Yes	10000000	10873203
RCP-037713	Elko County, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10251508	3	Yes	9788002	9748202
RCP-037717	Waukesha, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10883993	17	Yes	10000000	3200000
RCP-037723	Athens County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12689004	21	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29175676	35	Yes	10000000	5902786
RCP-037730	Waltham, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34952310.13	32	Yes	10000000	22415318
RCP-037732	Iberia Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13563659	12	No		2278991	3531358
RCP-037733	Spokane Valley City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16006492	7	No		10784249	0	6348423
RCP-037734	Mclean County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33315167	73	No		8069652	8094157	1300262
RCP-037735	Madison County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19032243	2	No		9923766	8412851	0
RCP-037737	Dickson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10478767	3	Yes	10000000	3337217
RCP-037742	Lafayette County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10492557	4	Yes	10000000	756056
RCP-037744	Scott County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33592150	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037746	Miami Gardens City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27114344	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037752	Barrow County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16168394	4	Yes	10000000	8492000
RCP-037753	Oshkosh, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20514484	9	No		10201733	5289094	4675927
RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14239414	26	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037757	Douglas County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23747378	51	Yes	9148468.48	0
RCP-037758	Shasta County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34978429	14	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037761	Alhambra, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21848669	107	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037772	Bloomington, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11396081	13	No		22072969	16866886
RCP-037773	Carroll County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32718855	23	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037774	Rockwall County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20378509	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037779	Humboldt County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26330552	24	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037788	High Point, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22699511	2	No		7531359	42785940	0
RCP-037789	Grand Traverse County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18081253	14	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037791	Gulfport, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19503534	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-037792	Lima, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26371401	1	No		3542645	9167555	8538335
RCP-037797	Jefferson County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12979779	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037802	Lakeland, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22726368	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037805	Auburn, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13545799	41	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-037808	Pittsburg, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16290477	5	Yes	10000000	2675865
RCP-037811	Madera, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23070374	9	Yes	0	1000000
RCP-037812	State of California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	27017016860.1	25	No		17823151622	0	0	0
RCP-037814	Carbon County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12466601	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037816	Tracy City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14798549	10	No		0	0	0
RCP-037824	Twin Falls County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16875033	3	Yes	10000000	1495664
RCP-037825	Federal Way, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19216886	5	No		14512696	4704190
RCP-037829	Costa Mesa, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26481513	1	No		35071318	25641840	27630393
RCP-037833	Warren County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25813490	16	No		4819524	7376331	5708463
RCP-037836	Worcester County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10154000	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037838	Medina County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34913553	22	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037840	Mankato City, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10097143	15	Yes	10000000	6309495
RCP-037846	Norristown, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20140217	17	Yes	10000000	2138198
RCP-037854	Sebastian County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24828896	16	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037855	New London, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26223863.59	50	Yes	419782	1500000
RCP-037856	Lakewood Township, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31890666	22	Yes	10000000	2000000
RCP-037863	Grady County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10845100	36	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037875	Rogers, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11710729	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037876	St. Lawrence County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20927232	27	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037884	Daly City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25255343	24	No		1114187	13606033	6243726	692927
RCP-037885	Grand Junction, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10484608	1	Yes	10000000	3967322.92
RCP-037896	Monroe, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18327658	3	Yes	10000000	9587029
RCP-037901	Sangamon County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37812754	15	Yes	10000000	2880983
RCP-037902	City Of Lowell, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76009996.05	77	Yes	7976729	7976729
RCP-037910	Jonesboro, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15579043	6	Yes	10000000	988103
RCP-037919	Waterloo, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30284282	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037920	Rancho Cucamonga, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26835530	1	No		27171372	5673134	0
RCP-037922	Lewisville, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19541144	6	Yes	10000000	11658866	0
RCP-037925	Weber County, Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50543325	15	No		13075648	10509109	8604042
RCP-037930	Cambridge, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88119386.58	23	Yes	10000000	10193322
RCP-037932	Fitchburg, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31238459.95	22	Yes	10000000	4986064.31	5317306.75
RCP-037935	Parkersburg, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21850407	16	Yes	8875723	3439602
RCP-037937	Kennebec County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23755730	49	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037942	Cayuga County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14873990	26	Yes	10000000	8286236
RCP-037945	Greeley, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20991595	11	No		24518952	0	0
RCP-037947	La Crosse, City, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21748073	22	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037948	Clearfield County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15394355	1	No		4514692	4514692	4514692
RCP-037959	Wood County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25409669	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037969	Burlington, Vermont	Vermont	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27176144.49	79	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037976	Knox County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12105318	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037980	Harrison County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12927140	2	Yes	10000000	415672
RCP-037981	Steubenville, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14598300	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037984	Grays Harbor County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14579719	22	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037985	La Mesa, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10826584	4	Yes	9750000	9750000
RCP-037990	Royal Oak, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28107502	13	No		7519845	18455937	2131720
RCP-037992	Hamburg Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11538866	14	Yes	10000000	1445981
RCP-037994	Putnam County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10964751	1	Yes	0	0
RCP-037996	Waukegan, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19705222	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038004	Santa Fe County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29205279	28	No		4202005	20940957	4062317
RCP-038014	Chelan County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14995195	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-038020	Wilmington, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55345780	73	No		8670207	17896831
RCP-038021	Hardin County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11188513	21	Yes	10000000	1000000
RCP-038032	Elmore County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15773896	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038035	Wausau, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15586461	17	Yes	10000000	2759548
RCP-038044	Arlington, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35247893	32	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038049	Easton City, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20665806	40	Yes	10000000	4393064.16		0
RCP-038051	Fulton County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10369022	3	Yes	10000000	3282244
RCP-038059	Springfield, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33804013	46	No		32150890	1653123	0	0
RCP-038060	Oconee County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15450878	7	Yes	4690166	1631033
RCP-038062	Chemung County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16210350	49	No		16210350	0
RCP-038072	Crawford County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12286931	14	Yes	657784	657784
RCP-038075	Christian County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17208540	27	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038083	Sunnyvale, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28154030	1	No		139043214.98	160164402.47	138862414.59	367679104.02
RCP-038089	Renton City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18113855	2	No		19731051	7219870	0
RCP-038097	Madison County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51078063	29	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038100	Rome, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11546686	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038102	Worcester, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	146634604.2	37	No		11289523.11	4499999.89
RCP-038109	Orem, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16087350	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038110	St. Clair County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17386657	14	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038111	Salem, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34127916	11	No		11837064	11753251	15378584
RCP-038118	Decatur, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33822135	10	Yes	10000000	5129754
RCP-038120	Middletown, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18925154	15	No		8895859	5536733	0
RCP-038135	Bremerton, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10851402	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-038138	Orange County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16198695	26	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038148	El Centro, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14095734	41	Yes	6329846	6329846
RCP-038149	Kerr County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10216933	8	Yes	10000000	0	0
RCP-038156	Berrien County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29796346	6	No		6316102	8568354	0
RCP-038159	Hendricks County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33080915	74	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038162	North Miami, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19354517	28	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038164	Haywood County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12104347	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038165	Pottawattamie County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18104173	10	Yes	10000000	2909833
RCP-038171	Canyon County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44645474	2	No		4891173	10297493	21989501
RCP-038179	West Jordan, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13388377	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038182	Rapides Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25182604	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038186	Newton County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11311660	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038195	Clinton Township, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14816245	1	No		5467998	8999669	348578
RCP-038196	Calvert County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17971897	24	Yes	0	0
RCP-038202	Racine County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38131110	27	Yes	9685940	6000000
RCP-038204	Lincoln City, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	45949074	18	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038215	Greenwich, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31399117.31	47	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038216	Duplin County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11409751	5	Yes	9335594.79	9270694.79
RCP-038225	Sauk County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12517103	3	Yes	10000000	2717641
RCP-038228	Caldwell City, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12481887	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038230	Long Branch, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11848909	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038235	Tempe, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45869312	3	No		29210898	24836127
RCP-038236	Melbourne, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14263027	12	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038237	El Dorado County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37457492	39	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038243	Carter County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10953291	18	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038246	Chicago Heights Illinois, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13654940	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038252	Ocala, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12202159	4	Yes	8173669	2072589
RCP-038254	West Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37234783.09	28	No		8654493	19785600
RCP-038260	Walworth County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20175141	41	No		5923066	4708861	11796324
RCP-038265	Hattiesburg, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12875821	10	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038268	St George, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15954196	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038273	Bannock County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17055675	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038280	Davie, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17934700	1	Yes	10000000	14745157.43
RCP-038282	Tom Green County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23153203	37	Yes	10000000	2912208
RCP-038283	Craven County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19839303	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038293	Springdale, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21351596	11	No		9194245	2660616	0
RCP-038301	Palmdale, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35445019	19	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038315	Androscoggin County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21031538	64	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038321	Jefferson County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11099941	25	Yes	5000000
RCP-038327	Henderson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16070692	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038331	Culpeper County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10217905	16	Yes	625000	0
RCP-038332	Rankin County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30159572	3	No		2965029	2965029
RCP-038339	Bradford County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11717036	5	Yes	10000000	5843152.79
RCP-038340	Columbus County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10781778	9	Yes	9828747	0	0
RCP-038342	Buckeye City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10575465	1	Yes	10000000	5152000
RCP-038349	Lancaster, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12556172	13	Yes	1170420.25	10000000
RCP-038355	Hunt County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19150729	16	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038356	Tuscaloosa, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20529224	21	No		11086966.61	10426276.43	0
RCP-038360	Spotsylvania County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26458167	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038362	Kent City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28172327	2	No		14523018	17754538	22028935
RCP-038363	St. Charles County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78088061	21	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038377	Bellingham, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20925817	13	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038381	Lafourche Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18960375	5	No		3970767.87	22931142.87	0	0
RCP-038384	Berkeley County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23147570	18	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038385	Columbia County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13924165	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038389	Yamhill County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20802919	6	Yes	9384909.65	0
RCP-038392	Kendall County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25054795	89	Yes	10000000	1194706
RCP-038397	Stanly County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12199329	7	Yes	10000000	40000
RCP-038400	Cullman County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16270952	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038406	Lincoln County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11462583	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038409	Franklin County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18495757	31	Yes	10000000	1798657
RCP-038410	Buchanan County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16969433	26	No		0	0	0
RCP-038412	Overland Park, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18581302	16	No		32469765	9371061	0
RCP-038416	Northampton, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21747984.2	55	Yes	10000000	7138342
RCP-038421	Warwick, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39431837.39	5	No		14501240	14113424
RCP-038422	Glen Falls, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12008323	17	Yes	10000000	1279306.05
RCP-038427	Sullivan County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30757243	21	No		9352676	30041000
RCP-038428	New Britain, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56132092.86	21	No		10074655.79	10074655.79	10074655.79
RCP-038435	York County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54576877	32	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038445	San Leandro, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18639484	36	Yes	10000000	13297183
RCP-038447	Scioto County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14628862	42	Yes	10000000	1818016
RCP-038454	Elyria, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18780812	17	No		5542256	5039374	6114406
RCP-038455	Anderson, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23105605	1	Yes	10000000	2806047.83
RCP-038462	Cass County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35336410	6	Yes	0	5574595
RCP-038463	College Station, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29478326	4	No		16140725.47	0	0
RCP-038464	Eaton County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21418266	11	Yes	10000000	3100000
RCP-038466	Ouachita Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29772649	33	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038472	Union County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11457727	1	Yes	10000000	1920528.91
RCP-038474	Orange County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28839722	26	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038476	West New York Town, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18144801	27	No		5684324	6919564	5540913
RCP-038480	San Marcos, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18101483	43	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038481	Wilson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28097926	13	Yes	3541319	15152956		15152956
RCP-038489	Davenport, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40896926	15	Yes	10000000	7292836
RCP-038492	Portage County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13746631	39	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038493	Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27457329	19	No		3063459	4640873	8286275	8286275
RCP-038494	Vigo County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20790877	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038495	Albany, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20398505	6	Yes	10000000	4533058
RCP-038496	Cumberland, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19595850	18	Yes	10000000	1224869.64
RCP-038497	Dearborn Heights, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24314463	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038498	Ingham County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56796438	36	No		13716975.42	13716975.42
RCP-038500	Marion County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10891329	22	Yes	1000000	0	0	0
RCP-038501	Josephine County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16993324	40	Yes	0	0
RCP-038512	Spartanburg, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16480273	3	Yes	1500000	3400000
RCP-038514	Rutherford County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13019597	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038521	Laporte County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21344456	26	No		11228067	7186922	9368661.79
RCP-038523	Jackson, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42098330	10	No		570000	570000	2149999.97
RCP-038526	Shawnee County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34355895	43	No		13029411	12594517
RCP-038529	Bellevue, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20110630	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038535	Huntington, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40628967	40	No		9330553	15491221	8895870
RCP-038536	Salem County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12117555	7	Yes	6058777.5	2232921.56
RCP-038540	Etowah County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19864360	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038545	Ft Myers, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15759486	2	Yes	10000000	6906475
RCP-038548	Watauga County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10911724	2	Yes	9979131	3086550.42
RCP-038550	Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21039307	12	No		2447743	0
RCP-038552	County Of Bristol, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	109786776	123	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038558	Kissimmee, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18069843	11	Yes	5314000	5314000
RCP-038563	Lafayette, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15881059	4	Yes	7940529.5	0
RCP-038569	Greenwood County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13754207	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038570	Hoboken City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26137293	34	No		8084636.35	7734716	10014802
RCP-038571	Otero County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13109141	5	Yes	3500000	0
RCP-038573	Caldwell County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15962113	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038581	New Bedford, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64729754	33	Yes	10000000	1203063
RCP-038583	New Rochelle, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36938483	5	No		13208604	11834169
RCP-038586	Northumberland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17645188	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038588	Franklin County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20194371	7	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038589	Franklin County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30112177	4	No		7144494	8247056	14275133
RCP-038590	Biloxi, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11098303	1	No		12084403	4728607
RCP-038592	Victoria County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17886237	15	Yes	8573402.02	10000000
RCP-038594	Newburgh, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21814339	7	Yes	10000000	3537595.19
RCP-038596	Lompoc, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12908901	5	No		0	0	0
RCP-038597	Redding, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18693433	19	Yes	10000000	4682799
RCP-038606	Glendale, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43521005	1	No		33418396	17371392	6168157
RCP-038607	Jefferson County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21333967	41	No		10743862	0	2853304
RCP-038610	Ann Arbor City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24182630	15	Yes	10000000	18376457
RCP-038612	Abington, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19107973	17	Yes	10000000	1153002.88	0	0
RCP-038615	Paterson, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64668166	20	No		28094096.3	0
RCP-038619	Washington County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25129577	2	No		11129257	15377879
RCP-038620	Youngstown, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82775370	39	Yes	3930400	3930300
RCP-038625	South San Francisco, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12278941	9	Yes	10000000	12300000
RCP-038626	Waller County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10730888	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038632	Corvallis, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13085521	3	No		20363281	32309463	24554687
RCP-038634	Harrisburg, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47073625	9	No		9127862	9524595
RCP-038635	Hall County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11917101	18	Yes	10000000	644981
RCP-038638	Russell County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11258245	36	Yes	0	0
RCP-038641	Lake County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	94301324	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038645	Compton, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34425003	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-038647	Deschutes County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38399353	65	No		0	0
RCP-038655	The Acadia Parish Police Jury, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12051514	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038657	Adams County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12709982	10	Yes	703000
RCP-038668	Scottsdale City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	29244706	1	No		31621082	0	0
RCP-038673	San Benito County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12199718	6	Yes	10000000	100000
RCP-038674	Columbia County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11174917	3	Yes	10000000	1152766
RCP-038676	Portland City, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46290652	33	No		4618907	13344274
RCP-038684	Sussex County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27288147	11	No		3766481	6719462	9491588
RCP-038691	Lapeer County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17016633	4	Yes	10000000	6216583
RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78052072	33	No		13849922	394324	9074732
RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22144651	116	Yes	10000000	6200000
RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16721002	19	Yes	10000000	1820441
RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	81002217	35	Yes	10000000	7697320
RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31063168	45	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038709	State Of Montana	Montana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	906418527	524	No		189745947	0
RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13893451	75	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038714	Sandoval County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28504079	14	Yes	10000000	1742993.46
RCP-038717	Rialto, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29373105	2	Yes	10000000	38851844
RCP-038721	Pennington County, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22099460	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18140021	33	Yes	10000000	3226260.81
RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18132223	20	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038733	Nacogdoches County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12665113	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27427882	23	Yes	1801113.75	5575128
RCP-038741	Oakland County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	244270949	46	No		25433998	52416232	94330655
RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39676317	26	No		14362120	11156799
RCP-038751	Bellflower, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21457498	14	No		4296913	7019231	4559101
RCP-038755	Edmond, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12741315	18	Yes	10000000	0	0	0
RCP-038756	Jefferson County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12688615	35	No		5338544	3706653	3643418
RCP-038758	Pittsylvania County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11723057	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038759	Lasalle County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21107679	47	Yes	10000000	377429
RCP-038763	Tyler, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20211586	11	Yes	10000000	1529529
RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18887342	192	No		18133379	753963	0
RCP-038774	San Rafael City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16088886	1	No		16187373	15773808	11868170
RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43281853	29	Yes	10000000	937000
RCP-038786	Scott County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11072359	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038789	Bartow County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20926843	5	Yes	10000000	5000000
RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	176667606	38	No		66320568.73	72974624	0
RCP-038796	Norwalk, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39249678.78	49	Yes	10000000	0	0	7000000
RCP-038808	Poquoson City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15114864	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-038811	Skagit County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25096557	45	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038818	Hayward, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38465994	32	No		14500000.04	9311518
RCP-038822	El Monte, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42556782	45	Yes	10000000	6479529
RCP-038826	Montebello, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16764058	8	No		6841365.33	6841356.33	3000000
RCP-038829	Olathe City, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14918491	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038837	Bryan, City Of Inc, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21183735	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038842	Ellis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35900284	24	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038845	Sullivan County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14651782	3	No		14470635	0	0
RCP-038847	Marietta, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11180581	14	Yes	10000000	2301375.43
RCP-038857	Denton, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23290438	29	Yes	10000000	5000000
RCP-038864	Bonneville County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23126398	2	Yes	10000000	8385216
RCP-038865	Island County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16537641	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038874	Cranston, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42592330.15	4	No		12295535	20511624	4104451
RCP-038876	Burleigh County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18574229	19	Yes	10000000	7445702
RCP-038877	Woodbridge, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17920419	2	No		13446777	13446777
RCP-038881	League City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10385742	25	Yes	10000000	205000
RCP-038885	Adams County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20008291	19	No		4479343.32	5585736	5377137	8936011
RCP-038887	Natrona County, Wyoming	Wyoming	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15511480	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038888	Pharr, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28232868	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038893	Torrance, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24074277	1	No		36256574	16920462	22087621
RCP-038894	Lee County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31960355	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038896	Chino, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14978541	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038899	Kalamazoo County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51485963	6	No		31641047	19844916
RCP-038900	Yuba County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15280337	13	Yes	10000000	5291003
RCP-038902	Kokomo, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19893216	23	Yes	10000000	3633125
RCP-038904	Taunton, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20992932	20	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038905	Bartholomew County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16273089	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038913	Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112218224.76	34	No		0	43782937	97449504
RCP-038915	Huntington Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22209010	1	No		16736168	8117512	13212390
RCP-038918	Mount Vernon, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41108657	33	Yes	10000000	500000
RCP-038922	Hamilton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17161883	56	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038930	Pueblo County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32714388	26	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038932	Greene County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13415844	8	Yes	10000000	2434817
RCP-038933	Tippecanoe County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38018646	7	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038944	Hammond, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51395851	15	No		17047990.2	7135500.94	20095232.51
RCP-038951	Portsmouth, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12880280	5	Yes	10000000	5190068
RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54536596	82	No		9891246.27	16714409.21	20154617.44
RCP-038959	Eugene, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35908037	1	No		50821398	33468518	39418972
RCP-038963	Weirton, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10028924	5	Yes	10000000	565420
RCP-038965	Martin County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31272363	22	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038969	Sumter County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20729303	16	Yes	10000000	1386195
RCP-038971	Otter Tail County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11410722	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038974	Kitsap County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	52730448	41	Yes	10000000	8000000
RCP-038976	Johnson County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29357173	35	Yes	10000000	2587425
RCP-038977	Vermilion County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14715103	38	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038980	City Of Clovis, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17291175	1	No		22390898	0	0
RCP-038981	Ascension Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24591343		Yes	10000000	13800000
RCP-038983	Gila County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10492363	8	No		0	0	0
RCP-038987	Cedar Rapids, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28190765	52	Yes	10000000	14947584
RCP-038990	Kershaw County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12926752	14	Yes	10000000	9076502
RCP-038992	Juneau City and Borough, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13949612.95	1	No		34551384	27925338	0
RCP-038998	Nassau County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17214367	3	No		16927566	9996589
RCP-038999	Dayton, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	137976174	16	No		32926074	29754569
RCP-039003	Saginaw County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37009967	19	Yes	10000000	5000000
RCP-039005	Carroll County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23307039	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039007	Comanche County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23454078	55	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039008	South Bend, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58910047	3	No		26101418	29329398
RCP-039009	Ft Lauderdale, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38133766	1	No		16642050	19560451	1931265
RCP-039014	Manassas Park, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21528613	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-039019	Panama City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10087173	9	No		0	0	0
RCP-039026	Sandusky County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11366435	10	Yes	10000000	3646831
RCP-039027	Hanover County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20932282	9	No		5751349	0
RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13109724	10	Yes	10000000	2543684
RCP-039031	Valencia County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14895745	84	Yes	10000000	562192
RCP-039033	Raleigh County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14249514	4	Yes	10000000	1555973
RCP-039034	Chattanooga, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38640506	4	No		23922557	14717949	0
RCP-039036	North Bergen Township, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16736740	16	Yes	10000000	4000000
RCP-039037	Jackson County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11023022	19	Yes	10000000	1956582
RCP-039040	Doral City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12878947	2	Yes	0	13209972
RCP-039041	Boulder, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20153269	35	Yes	10000000	41650967
RCP-039045	Gallatin County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22227463	21	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039053	Bristol, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27831925.97	52	Yes	10000000	3455867
RCP-039055	Sterling Heights, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19837262	26	No		11828172	11232505
RCP-039057	Dorchester County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31623740	29	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039060	Gadsden, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24042737	22	Yes	10000000	3613634	1671576	0
RCP-039062	Marathon County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26356580	17	No		8313632	15077870	2965078
RCP-039066	Plantation, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13042828	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039068	Victoria, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14508296	1	No		7176453	7331843	0
RCP-039069	Washington County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26423010	22	No		5718151	7869900	10370847
RCP-039072	Hardin County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21552291	5	Yes	10000000	97736034
RCP-039075	Rock Island, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26506259	18	Yes	10000000	5100000
RCP-039077	Yuma, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23071661	18	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039079	Erie County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14425300	2	Yes	2500000	0
RCP-039080	Watsonville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18265428	8	No		2161942	12562928	3510558
RCP-039083	Warren, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28680143	65	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039085	Putnam County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19097507	7	Yes	10000000	2853914
RCP-039086	Grand Forks, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11439298	9	Yes	1369592.21	1266733.38
RCP-039087	Porterville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19984717	11	No		6175073	11878682	1930962
RCP-039093	Saline County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10532376	43	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039095	Minnehaha County, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37514015	24	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039100	Joliet, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22207675	2	No		14330607	14000000	0
RCP-039101	New Albany, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16927916	29	Yes	10000000	1342993.79
RCP-039103	Santa Monica, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28570125	1	No		139295423	143292372	70957141
RCP-039109	Whitfield County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20322762	42	Yes	10000000	800000
RCP-039111	Erie County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	52391502	40	No		10836209	0	0
RCP-039113	Fall River, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	69599142	50	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039114	Meriden, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36359755.47	54	Yes	10000000	11046512
RCP-039116	Ector County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32286869	8	Yes	10000000	4585106
RCP-039119	Johnson City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13415440	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039120	Lowndes County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11381392	9	Yes	10000000	500000
RCP-039121	Rancho Cordova City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15588333	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039122	Berwyn, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31943759	17	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039125	Milford Town, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29196724.91	38	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039126	Cascade County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15804392	38	Yes	10000000	1883110
RCP-039128	Cheshire County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14778619	33	Yes	10000000	993280
RCP-039131	Haverhill, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37473649.09	69	No		13282626	0
RCP-039133	Monroe County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14417919	75	No		26194087	0	0
RCP-039136	Cleveland Heights, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38817062	15	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039139	Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11403341	2	No		9603711	0	0
RCP-039140	City Of Clarksville, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25531478	16	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039145	Gainesville, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32408804	21	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039147	Ionia County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12566634	47	Yes	10000000	3002182
RCP-039153	Cochise County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24458872	10	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039154	Jefferson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10585015	2	Yes	10000000	4200000
RCP-039155	County Of Bullitt, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15864606	24	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039162	Perth Amboy, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16899892	17	No		4082037.1	5278703.27	5278703.27
RCP-039164	Lakewood, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47219575	11	Yes	10000000	3926957	3902268	3926957
RCP-039165	Santa Cruz County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	53068422	15	No		42864801	18075068.86
RCP-039166	Arvada, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11075818	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039167	Crow Wing County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12636171	28	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039168	Citrus County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29069118	42	Yes	10000000	1186746
RCP-039169	St Clair Shores, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21247393	15	No		2562938	3687417	3503041	2849774
RCP-039170	Hemet, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21674344	27	Yes	10000000	9706743
RCP-039176	Huron County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11317487	13	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039178	Skokie, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15267242	7	No		12620790	0	0
RCP-039180	Los Angeles City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1278900928	109	No		1053845679	1130379592	0
RCP-039184	Pope County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12445235	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039187	Somerville, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77504170.23	112	No		48849489	22926292	51763319
RCP-039189	Midland County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16152078	5	Yes	9200000	4074933
RCP-039190	Auburn, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14751231	8	No		18953997	7559568	5634906
RCP-039191	Eddy County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11355170	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039192	Jackson County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42915782	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039196	Woodbury County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20027326	24	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039197	Tuscola County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10147979	5	Yes	10000000	149383.53
RCP-039198	Yellowstone County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31330634	10	Yes	10000000	5829560
RCP-039202	Rocky Mount, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11521180	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039206	Rice County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13008526	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039211	Mccracken County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12706680	3	Yes	10000000	740381.79
RCP-039215	Belknap County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11907389	38	Yes	10000000	440000
RCP-039216	West Sacramento, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11773300	13	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039222	Beaverton, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16859058	1	No		5967105.22	10981952.78
RCP-039226	Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20084821	29	No		3321152	5816378	5736456
RCP-039230	Joplin, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13779739	11	Yes	8779739	4100000
RCP-039234	Kootenai County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32184700	12	Yes	0	440071
RCP-039239	Baytown City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16345399	4	Yes	4000000
RCP-039240	Schenectady County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30165010	5	No		17947156	0
RCP-039244	Cleveland, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	511721590	17	No		108960480	0	323960480	464871480
RCP-039249	Isabella County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13571817	7	Yes	10000000	3557288
RCP-039250	Sutter County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18835480	10	No		13896577	4938903
RCP-039252	Bay County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20031017	23	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039258	Anderson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11214347	15	Yes	10000000	9500000
RCP-039260	Pomona, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45366413	26	Yes	10000000	12159195
RCP-039263	Cabell County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17859238	23	Yes	6000000	0
RCP-039265	Cumberland County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29043867	14	Yes	10000000	3669846.99
RCP-039267	Hamblen County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12612668	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039271	Kingsport, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10356906	25	Yes	10000000	8754285
RCP-039273	Deltona, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13972193	2	No		0	0	0
RCP-039275	Lewis County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15676389	24	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039276	Parma, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23734921	8	Yes	10000000	5876073	3558159	0
RCP-039278	Medina County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10019587	6	Yes	10000000	3255467
RCP-039281	Jasper County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23566542	23	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039283	Bulloch County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15462921	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039284	Muncie, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32321058	36	Yes	6550000	2701141
RCP-039285	Beaumont, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33084864	2	Yes	10000000	11017196	2817315
RCP-039287	Canton, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63613221	125	No		10145595.7	3938646.39
RCP-039288	Sandusky, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18091098	15	Yes	10000000	8987063
RCP-039290	Indio City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20425061	7	No		23851317	0	23851317
RCP-039297	Lorain, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32491585	25	No		5658572.24	5925518	5884940.09
RCP-039299	Roseville, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14393345	12	Yes	10000000	2268431
RCP-039301	Chicopee, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39536150.29	15	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039302	King County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	437576495	132	No		108715000	0
RCP-039306	Centre County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31541383	15	No		7035958.2	4513185.46	4902555.44
RCP-039307	Dubuque County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18901521	3	Yes	10000000	1793684
RCP-039314	Manitowoc County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15341133	44	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039315	Dearborn, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47212828	6	No		19060257	23214584	4937987
RCP-039316	Passaic, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31131607	21	No		5844418.34	9794143.26	12891188.2
RCP-039317	Kenton County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32437404	16	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039320	South Fulton, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11352517	1	Yes	500000
RCP-039322	Norman, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22245542	8	Yes	1114329	1114329
RCP-039324	Vallejo, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25727736	21	Yes	10000000	17792309	0
RCP-039326	Delaware County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22169386	34	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039329	Peabody City, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21079949.38	14	No		12353159	7762782	4636430
RCP-039331	Leominster, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19945242.96	30	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039333	Allegany County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13677483	62	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039335	La Crosse County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22923224	16	No		9952224	14355983	22569189
RCP-039338	Racine, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46246465	22	No		8472579.85	11949155	17860538
RCP-039339	Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13792153	25	Yes	10000000	1633000
RCP-039340	El Cajon, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30399751	20	Yes	8488000	6300000
RCP-039342	Altoona, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39258106	85	Yes	10000000	1000000
RCP-039346	Grand Prairie, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36709655	33	No		28583607.45	8126047.55
RCP-039352	Pearl River County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10787023	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039354	Elkhart, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18042360	19	Yes	10000000	8000000
RCP-039355	Maui County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50042085	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039356	Alamance County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32925136	15	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039357	Armstrong County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12574015	1	No		4345229	6634359	1594427
RCP-039360	Penobscot County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29552965	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039365	Topeka, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45676831	74	No		6115256.7	3558882.12	1761342.67	3161753.64
RCP-039370	Fullerton, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32665301	28	No		6768481.63	8775370.85	4818799.17
RCP-039371	Apache County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13963207	2	No		6329911	5405944	637658	0
RCP-039373	St. Croix County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17614887	20	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039374	Oak Park, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38984402	34	No		9739046	5698861	1628896
RCP-039381	Milpitas City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16736815	34	No		45006853	77771438	92458278	94894129
RCP-039384	Lexington County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	58028685	12	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039387	Mercer County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21254329	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-039388	Van Buren County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14699370	10	No		4035152	4035152	4035152
RCP-039389	Plainfield City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23801983	42	Yes	6000000	4784668.44
RCP-039390	Warren County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12420372	81	Yes	10000000	9337562
RCP-039394	Washtenaw County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71402185	43	No		27482769	22740776	21178640
RCP-039395	Lea County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13804514	2	Yes	5554647	6902257
RCP-039400	Lamar County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12303635	4	Yes	10000000	2431356
RCP-039402	Shelby County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42286061	2	No		0	1	0
RCP-039410	Janesville, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11686560	9	Yes	4000000	4740899
RCP-039415	Clallam County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15020640	32	Yes	7000000	0
RCP-039423	Lynn, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75134915.32	95	Yes	10000000	2933113
RCP-039424	Waterbury, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75388037.99	40	No		19144145	17698007	20092644	18490293
RCP-039425	Navajo County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21545687	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039426	Las Cruces, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24759826	18	No		6888670	0	0
RCP-039427	Sheboygan, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22006206	11	Yes	563489	563489
RCP-039429	Berkeley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66646289	5	No		49626591	14678925.26	0
RCP-039432	Dothan, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12438636	3	No		6196357	0	0
RCP-039434	Kenosha, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26488543	27	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039435	New Haven, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115807159.59	111	No		32334482	22608141	26563531
RCP-039436	Brookline, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32406450	85	No		10926986	2627528.01	0
RCP-039437	Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16493877	9	No		9396872.05	4641509.4	6858934.65
RCP-039438	Hot Springs, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11370797	9	Yes	10000000	1042636
RCP-039439	Springfield, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13956221	29	No		8495682	5460539
RCP-039440	Weymouth Town, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17804215	18	No		12653987	0
RCP-039442	Houston County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20566337	10	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039443	Kenosha County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32935236	22	No		16694659	23270217	35767406
RCP-039446	Campbell County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18177595	16	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039448	Valdosta, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16254692	20	Yes	10000000	971800
RCP-039449	Washington County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10438365	22	Yes	9368292.42	1913818
RCP-039450	Campbell County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10660768	2	No		0	0	0
RCP-039452	Porter County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33096066	38	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039454	Albemarle County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21236071	19	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039455	Fargo, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20205034	22	No		22683410.41	0
RCP-039456	Blue Earth County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13140802	13	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039458	Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26175162	17	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039459	Washington County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10008516	3	Yes	9677616	0
RCP-039462	Duluth, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58117859	11	No		13815533.36	19543038.55	0
RCP-039464	Burbank, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25547081	20	No		17365624	0	0	0
RCP-039466	Woodland, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11114656	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039467	Dubuque, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26522282	61	Yes	10000000	7097780
RCP-039468	Lyon County, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11170643	29	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039471	Rome, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24134423	11	Yes	10000000	8128018
RCP-039473	Covington, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35914130	32	No		3366602	1538459	12500000
RCP-039478	Columbia County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11549602	1	Yes	10000000	5100000
RCP-039479	Hamilton City, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33590200	1	No		30477228	27358187
RCP-039483	Garden Grove, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48374570	2	Yes	10000000	18000000
RCP-039486	Rockdale County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17655482	22	Yes	6186806	4450500
RCP-039487	Pine Bluff, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16044400	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039490	Bowie County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18111748	15	Yes	10000000	1474635
RCP-039492	Middletown, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21731554.29	23	Yes	10000000	5000000
RCP-039495	Bradenton, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10791837	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039496	Wayne County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23916753	20	Yes	10000000	177434
RCP-039499	Cowlitz County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21481394	20	Yes	10000000	7022423
RCP-039501	Taney County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10863358	10	Yes	10000000	1863645.22
RCP-039506	Newton County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21704962	23	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039507	State Of Delaware	Delaware	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	924597608	240	No		275159913	0
RCP-039509	Evanston, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43173654	25	No		13260956.14	7602681	-4577045
RCP-039510	Napa County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26755157	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039512	Lawton, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18202822	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039517	Macon County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20202529	26	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039518	Boone County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25946543	3	Yes	7346543	2000000
RCP-039521	St. Landry Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15951624	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-039522	Iredell County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35313684	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38872877	51	No		8342881	16310779
RCP-039529	Georgetown County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12174855	11	Yes	7866157	0
RCP-039530	Dodge County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17061696	31	No		2297293	4783840	7471603
RCP-039533	Albany, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80725433	12	No		17575810	16387293	22686808	23879719
RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29405927	51	No		3045257	13382069	19295338
RCP-039538	Salem, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31164631	2	No		6784575	16283509	8096547
RCP-039540	Floyd County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15251978	37	Yes	10000000	3749818
RCP-039541	Eau Claire County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20326259	60	No		4591273	3792656	4973599
RCP-039542	Scott County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28944028	25	No		0	17857899
RCP-039546	Delano City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14030801	5	Yes	10000000	1996474
RCP-039547	Davidson County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32556083	4	No		14184901	16993589	1377593
RCP-039548	Charleston, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21092855	32	No		93105327	67784429	105947560
RCP-039549	Sevier County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19083911	11	Yes	10000000	8100562
RCP-039551	Florence County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26861794	20	Yes	10000000	6775297	1477928
RCP-039554	East Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24561068.33	41	No		14602783	14758153
RCP-039555	Westland, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25932032	1	No		15514238	10417794
RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22118301	28	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039573	Madison County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13779458	21	No		10585837	3193621	0	0
RCP-039574	Asheville, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26293853	20	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039575	Murrieta, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16463101	13	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039578	Clark County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26044051	32	Yes	10000000	1380077
RCP-039579	Superior, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17082059	20	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039580	Chaves County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12550706	2	Yes	10000000	2173661
RCP-039581	Hennepin County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	245875163	18	No		131279363	103493674
RCP-039582	Olmsted County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30746560	10	No		7866321	17431560	5448679
RCP-039583	Marshall County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18797215	30	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039584	Rock Hill, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13179656	12	Yes	10000000	1507510
RCP-039585	Cicero, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42882464		Yes	10000000	7661098
RCP-039586	Naperville, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13308689	7	No		20500792	0	0
RCP-039588	Pulaski County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12621409	2	Yes	9818745.4	2553901
RCP-039590	Sanford, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13240884	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039591	Cathedral City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15572693	9	Yes	10000000	6119464
RCP-039592	West Valley, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26512139	1	No		2826944.65	3034094	0
RCP-039594	Hempstead Village, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16790322	41	No		6878491	10016625
RCP-039595	San Marcos City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18279146	6	Yes	10000000	7843062
RCP-039599	Montcalm County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12409495	13	Yes	6409495	1140497
RCP-039601	Rock County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31729599	32	Yes	10000000	5796000
RCP-039602	Madison County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18061635	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039606	Arlington County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46003782	19	No		64936560	144461793
RCP-039607	Richardson City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18285133	2	Yes	10000000	9210448
RCP-039608	Whittier, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16360631	15	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039609	Ashtabula County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18887924	28	Yes	10000000	230049.17
RCP-039611	Santa Rosa, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34637465	11	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039612	Charles County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31710758	79	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039613	Colton City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14881400	1	No		17167734	17167734
RCP-039614	Parker County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27752377	12	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039615	Houston County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30663037	19	Yes	10000000	580391.03
RCP-039616	Sharon, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14382307	11	Yes	10000000	600000
RCP-039617	Wise County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13593572	2	Yes	7834497	1000000
RCP-039618	Clifton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30531115	17	No		7672239.88	5377763.31
RCP-039620	Walton County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18373581	1	Yes	0	0
RCP-039621	Rock Island County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27558333	23	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039623	Bayonne, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35655886	10	No		4219301.34	11720409.42	5000000
RCP-039624	State Of Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3717212336.4	28	No		2854255596	0	0	0
RCP-039625	Midland County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34347543	8	No		33315233	1032310
RCP-039627	Simi Valley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15325294	1	No		6734897.96	7014078.47	1576317.57
RCP-039631	Springfield, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123684851.87	15	No		0	12080086	0
RCP-039634	Ozaukee County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17330133	36	No		5292326	10815782	1222025
RCP-039635	Fort Smith, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21220634	3	Yes	6220634	9052891
RCP-039636	Floyd County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19132082	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039637	Watertown City, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22265728	35	No		8322913	11746989
RCP-039638	Escondido, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38808509	24	Yes	10000000	6300000
RCP-039640	Calhoun County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26058813	34	No		8215281	13985000	23119111
RCP-039641	Kent County, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35115561	10	Yes	10000000	1396154
RCP-039642	Whiteside County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10717097	20	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039643	Sarasota, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10123762	10	Yes	10000000	22979753
RCP-039646	Missoula County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23230898	29	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039647	Allegan County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22935850	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039648	Sheboygan County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22403443	18	No		3908901	6791509	13816412
RCP-039650	Mesquite, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27021425	11	No		14570625.27	17890027.65
RCP-039653	Putnam County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15586651	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039658	Mission, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25044862	23	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039660	Clay County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12474371	1	Yes	10000000	1246126
RCP-039663	Cass County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10059018	7	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039666	Beaufort County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37317446	23	Yes	10000000	5682662
RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39700361	23	Yes	10000000	6915121
RCP-039669	Lower Merion, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25503294	1	No		12707713	6930292	13584024
RCP-039671	Trenton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72913998	20	Yes	10000000	27326425.46
RCP-039679	Huntington Beach, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29606925	2	No		18138284	34573656	37471143
RCP-039682	Walker County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13550256	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039683	Carlsbad, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12615746	1	No		33039977	61819966	92729991	52215496
RCP-039684	West Covina, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19566027	15	Yes	10000000	5954141
RCP-039686	Sarpy County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36360628	49	Yes	10000000	511434
RCP-039687	Nevada County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19376239	21	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039690	San Juan County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24077388	18	Yes	10000000	3475556
RCP-039691	Grand Rapids City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92279500	17	No		21565081	43164931	13261472
RCP-039692	Glynn County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16566971	10	Yes	10000000	1
RCP-039694	Wood County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14179200	33	Yes	10000000	2862573
RCP-039696	Surry County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13943006	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039697	Fayette County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25109959	2	No		9002450	14212052	1895457
RCP-039699	Medford, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48547342.05	55	No		13121184	16876459	18549699
RCP-039702	San Buenaventura, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16321147	1	No		19657008	6115407	0	0
RCP-039703	Hernando County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37666687	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039707	Genesee County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11125969	8	Yes	10000000	7032667
RCP-039708	Jamestown, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28079145	60	No		9261796	8861348	0
RCP-039711	Hancock County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10680580	30	Yes	10000000	500000
RCP-039714	Paulding County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32761587	11	Yes	10000000	1000000
RCP-039717	County Of Nassau, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	385003440	24	No		337368468	118392087	0
RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10886278	39	Yes	6427389	0
RCP-039720	Madera County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30558925	20	Yes	10000000	2231703
RCP-039723	Prince William County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	91357060	32	Yes	10000000	9178977
RCP-039726	Frederick County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17348003	4	Yes	10000000	4663871
RCP-039728	Bastrop County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17233403	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039735	Williamson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	114707609	42	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039738	Boone County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10400294	15	Yes	9320272	0
RCP-039739	Pompano Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25694057	21	No		11693784	2568838	2568838
RCP-039740	Niagara Falls, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57207528	79	No		17437801	11787513	12350782
RCP-039741	Effingham County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12488744	12	Yes	10000000	0	0	0
RCP-039742	Manchester, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24985218.92	49	No		7607024	12838614	4539580
RCP-039746	San Angelo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16650136	2	Yes	10000000	7873699
RCP-039747	Imperial County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35198889	20	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039751	Tustin, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19380784	10	No		13512339	0	0
RCP-039752	Monroe, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11405523	5	Yes	10000000	6175572.06
RCP-039754	Victorville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33500666	17	Yes	10000000	374770	0	0
RCP-039755	Oceanside, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32346514	38	Yes	10000000	12294362
RCP-039756	Barnstable County, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41370811	41	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039757	Normal, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10879113	11	Yes	10000000	6645736
RCP-039759	Manhattan City, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12757377	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039761	Antioch, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21550900	9	Yes	10000000	4000000
RCP-039765	Loudoun County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	80324909	13	No		40288042	45144306	227711550
RCP-039766	Logan, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13815781	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039767	La Plata County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10920270	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039770	Camden County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10618230	6	Yes	9961387.28	10000000
RCP-039771	Orange City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28018188	1	No		27749752	24088105	0
RCP-039773	Terre Haute, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35936890	6	No		10918291	14572078	10446521
RCP-039774	Great Falls, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19472737	29	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039776	Pulaski County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10218293	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039781	Pinellas County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	189381543	49	No		0	30843440
RCP-039782	Pueblo, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36407001	107	Yes	10000000	9409304
RCP-039785	Idaho Falls, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10570717	18	Yes	10000000	5575017
RCP-039788	Chippewa County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12559059	14	No		6284399	6412366	870924
RCP-039790	Gary, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80345314	14	No		11013357	-1481769	8930281
RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110710612.92	33	No		10000000	10000000	5000000	13837000
RCP-039795	Miramar, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22053169	6	No		11331537	5689475	0
RCP-039802	Harlingen, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21927374	22	Yes	10000000	3925182
RCP-039803	Abilene, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21455963	1	No		15119960	0	10264282
RCP-039807	Benton County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18074454	34	Yes	10000000	3146847
RCP-039809	Menifee, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13213674	14	No		18037867	0	0
RCP-039811	Gainesville, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11718342	5	Yes	10000000	12097604.62
RCP-039812	Napa City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15118910	18	No		22985432	11179893	0	0
RCP-039815	Bossier Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24675836	16	Yes	10000000	318642
RCP-039816	Columbia, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25284624	5	No		7875745.76	3240764.34	1285478.54
RCP-039818	North Little Rock, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16769719	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039820	Redwood City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18483063	1	No		16987610	65810636
RCP-039822	Washington County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34488172	7	Yes	661329.49	0
RCP-039826	Cache County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24918634	29	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039827	Klamath County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13254432	87	Yes	10000000	4436917
RCP-039828	Livingston County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12220307	1	No		0	0	12220307
RCP-039830	Wichita Falls, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29091650	15	No		0	0	12475286
RCP-039831	Bloomington, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13386924	15	Yes	10000000	8081000
RCP-039834	Creek County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13892310	31	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039835	Gaithersburg, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11500277	2	No		6758699	2725931	0
RCP-039837	Middletown, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11313784	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039841	Cherokee County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11129853	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039846	Gastonia, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15661923	26	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039847	Henderson County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22806876	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039848	Long Beach City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	135753078	8	No		205217000	181365000	789000
RCP-039850	Oswego County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22749964	21	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039851	Flagler County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22353135	12	Yes	10000000	2000000
RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15140874	41	Yes	10000000	4838405.72
RCP-039856	Coconino County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27868531	37	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039858	Laramie County, Wyoming	Wyoming	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19326709	107	No		4057523	11372206	7069797
RCP-039859	Kenner, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13833851	1	No		15838740	8344743	2598247	9388324
RCP-039860	Barberton, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16441150	12	Yes	10000000	1341936
RCP-039862	Reno County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12042385	15	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039863	Sussex County, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45495460	22	Yes	5000000	5000000
RCP-039865	Colbert County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10729917	16	Yes	9704139.49	0
RCP-039866	Evansville, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64483775	75	No		14500170	15225178	14498168
RCP-039867	Charleston, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36801358	28	No		16656181.62	10901203.33	3919671.61
RCP-039868	Falls Church, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18004561	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-039869	Jefferson Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	84006695	20	No		23270111.59	56201206.98	4535376.43
RCP-039872	Nashua, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16138777	4	No		10426087	18406213
RCP-039873	Maverick County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11406060	8	Yes	9853939.38	2170761
RCP-039877	Saginaw, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52089151	31	No		6126945	6578857	8788092
RCP-039878	Avondale City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17887327	22	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039883	Round Rock, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16397285	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039884	Ashland County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10388640	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039886	Washington County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11888160	5	Yes	10000000	11119825
RCP-039897	Toms River Township, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10345343	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039911	Santa Clara, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26231326	2	No		108297937	159906516	87924750
RCP-039915	Lakewood, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11309045	1	No		4654456	10176475	11690809
RCP-039918	Burien, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10806859	2	Yes	10000000	6200000
RCP-039924	Schenectady, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52971798	39	No		9940467	2542661
RCP-039926	Cole County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14906817	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039930	Mckinney City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23115761	3	No		29202980	0	0
RCP-039938	Oxford County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11260964	5	Yes	10000000	1803550
RCP-039940	Gobierno Municipal De Juncos, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11435176.24	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039942	Lenoir County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10867437	28	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039949	St. Francois County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13055726	14	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039953	Muskegon Hts, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10684772	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039957	Springfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44230364	13	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039958	Walker County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12338210	6	Yes	10000000	384988.43
RCP-039978	Van Zandt County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10991944	9	Yes	10000000	1329326
RCP-039984	Taylor County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26811486	9	No		6155471	5780444
RCP-039986	Silver Bow County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15727317.22	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039987	Johnson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34150391	81	No		12908307	1849401
RCP-039990	Enid, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11854984	2	Yes	10000000	1326511
RCP-039991	Manteca City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13928377	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-040001	Michigan City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16549045	19	Yes	10000000	3923638
RCP-040016	Union Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30477638	20	Yes	10000000	1098588.93
RCP-040019	Lycoming County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22007003	26	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040024	Conroe, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15844218	6	Yes	10000000	488067
RCP-040038	Palm Bay, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18009865	10	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040039	Aroostook County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13024648	39	No		198121	273859
RCP-040042	Hazleton, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17132482	13	Yes	2797440	2797440
RCP-040051	Catawba County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30990911	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040053	Urbana, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12974560	27	Yes	2500000	0
RCP-040054	Tompkins County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19847267	83	No		26725860	16365712
RCP-040059	Westminster, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23690019	9	Yes	10000000	8869280
RCP-040062	Faulkner County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24475383	20	Yes	0	0
RCP-040064	Lenawee County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19122953	23	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040069	South Gate, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34556473	45	No		8787074	3245811
RCP-040074	Broken Arrow City, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13768466	10	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16738484	13	Yes	10000000	2643419
RCP-040076	Maury County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18722045	4	No		19555351	0
RCP-040081	Pontiac, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37717953	4	Yes	10000000	2000000
RCP-040085	Pickens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24645730	9	Yes	10000000	2359069
RCP-040091	Muncipality Of Aguada, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10959287.46	3	Yes	9043333.33
RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24074863	19	Yes	10000000	3566078
RCP-040093	Tamarac, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10897007	1	Yes	10000000	7810428.64
RCP-040098	Iron County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10651833	4	Yes	9791833	10000000
RCP-040106	County Of Rockland, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63280694	12	No		0	0	0	44015365
RCP-040108	Lebanon, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16672455	7	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040109	Bristol Township, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15886687	15	No		2409047.68	54646.2	57390.48
RCP-040112	Champaign, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25277693	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040113	Lake Charles, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16918986	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040118	Alton City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21639201	6	Yes	10000000	1626330
RCP-040121	Clark County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22978777	10	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040124	Ward County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13138471	61	Yes	10000000	3687149
RCP-040129	Autauga County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10851898	10	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040132	Lawrence, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57351844.87	1	No		82629738	0	0
RCP-040136	Moore County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19594757	7	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040143	Upper Darby, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41761939	21	No		6383844	9999400
RCP-040144	Tallahassee, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46468128	22	No		6535223	5678481	6362053
RCP-040145	Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37156228	26	No		9720873	4311260	4535445.69
RCP-040156	Pawtucket, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58270160.87	14	No		5357893	17605243	12792118
RCP-040161	Atlantic City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32417555	12	Yes	9600000	9600000
RCP-040162	Harrison County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13063690	15	Yes	983690	983690
RCP-040163	St. Mary'S County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22047987	26	No		0	0	0
RCP-040166	Westfield, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17302570.99	50	Yes	10000000
RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11933029	46	No		0	0	0
RCP-040170	Garfield County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11666145	4	No		3527306	8404040	9753415	3987141
RCP-040172	Pekin, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11110631	3	Yes	10000000	7999788
RCP-040175	Lincoln County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16726052	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040176	Kingston, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17301385	26	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040180	Martinsville, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15463451	9	Yes	4212410.45
RCP-040186	Moline, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20783977	44	No		9528199	6042865	5212913
RCP-040193	Vista, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26178395	30	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040196	Cherry Hill, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11361785	8	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-040197	Mason County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12968901	44	Yes	10000000	1893335
RCP-040198	Shiawassee County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13231900	18	No		6481936	5448809	1301155
RCP-040201	Trumbull County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38454129	40	Yes	10000000	2565750.69
RCP-040208	Brownsville, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65194854	11	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040228	New Castle County, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	108531220	74	No		27354000	0	0
RCP-040236	Baldwin Park, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22917903	69	Yes	10000000	10132423
RCP-040242	Cayey Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23384207	14	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040249	Warren County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20446881	33	No		4292716	8600974	7553191
RCP-040253	Inglewood, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31755095	8	Yes	10000000	17587222
RCP-040254	Lodi, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15764793	7	Yes	6954793	6954793
RCP-040262	Lancaster, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36340561	11	No		16423977.05	18888934.46	1027649.5
RCP-040263	Carson, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17776763	6	Yes	1000000
RCP-040267	County Of Broome New York, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37000061	45	No		34979648	0	0
RCP-040268	Bloomfield, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25827441	3	No		4898377.68	5000000	4000000
RCP-040269	Cass County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20546525	7	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040272	Odessa, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20322959	9	No		37295485	56820904
RCP-040275	Starr County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12554203	14	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040276	Douglas County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28425412	14	Yes	10000000	3500000
RCP-040277	Tulare, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18024068	46	Yes	9774068	10000000
RCP-040278	Surprise City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15545984	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040280	Portage County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31557116	32	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040285	Edison, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15593864	4	No		4991210	5291836.58	5310817.42
RCP-040287	Methuen Town City, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19827491.1	11	Yes	10000000	19456647
RCP-040288	Knoxville, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42453411	42	No		18288197	0	0
RCP-040292	City Of Revere, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30054398.11	42	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040293	Williamsburg, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18419663	1	No		10866707	8305345	0
RCP-040294	Limestone County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19213079	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37686566.98	61	No		4212676.13	6400291.5	5916249.41
RCP-040302	San Luis Obispo City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13564467	5	Yes	10000000	8800000
RCP-040303	National City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18010907	10	Yes	10000000	4434484
RCP-040310	Johnson County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30722086	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040316	Medford, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18283804	22	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040318	Redlands City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11508106	18	Yes	10000000	9326519
RCP-040328	Eau Claire, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13529002	1	Yes	10000000	3559866	6706068	3263068
RCP-040330	Quincy, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45316692	12	No		14654136.6	0
RCP-040341	Montgomery County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40594440	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-040349	City Of Richmond, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27740723	15	No		5426213	14352627	9739630
RCP-040350	Vacaville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12675830	15	Yes	10000000	191445
RCP-040352	Penn Hills, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17129203	68	Yes	10000000	416777.86
RCP-040359	Erie, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76098836	47	No		6066693	9558236	13808835
RCP-040368	Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18811783	14	Yes	10000000	13490483
RCP-040369	Coffee County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10978347	2	Yes	8813347	10000000
RCP-040370	Liberty County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17135507	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040375	Corona, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29158725	18	No		22559845	1649720	1649720	1649720
RCP-040377	Turlock, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15753190	16	Yes	10000000	832000
RCP-040387	Coamo Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11497642.5	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-040391	Kankakee, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15052449	33	No		1591000	1591000	1591000
RCP-040396	Lansing, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49924664	27	No		14960176	0	23000000
RCP-040399	County Of Plymouth, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	101237378	40	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040404	Cherokee County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10225868	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040407	Belleville, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15792501	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040413	Commerce City, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10505025	5	No		11805998	0	0
RCP-040415	Jackson, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31444825	25	Yes	8719507	24136
RCP-040427	Henrico County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	64257518	33	No		71033672	0	0	0
RCP-040437	Walker County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14173761	17	Yes	10000000	1208234
RCP-040440	Massillon, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16373501	7	Yes	10000000	2780000
RCP-040441	Decatur, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10883767	3	Yes	10000000	4865910
RCP-040450	Monroe County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29232861	35	Yes	10000000	1687024
RCP-040453	State of Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2648024988	396	No		2993693000	0	0
RCP-040461	Norfolk County, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	137282758	142	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040464	Bedford County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15344241	7	Yes	5406107.86	0
RCP-040465	Bay County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33934398	17	Yes	10000000	19506117
RCP-040467	Temple, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14170861	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040478	Coffee County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10166820	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040483	Oldham County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12974923	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040498	Comal County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30341767	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040500	Vermilion Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11559314	1	Yes	10000000	938344.21
RCP-040501	San Patricio County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12961520	19	Yes	10000000	1980517
RCP-040510	The City Of Frederick, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10615913	2	Yes	10000000	4095013
RCP-040519	Barry County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11955366	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040521	Brunswick County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27741111	10	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040522	State of Iowa	Iowa	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1480862558	99	No		603815000	0	0
RCP-040528	Alliance, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15387409	110	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040529	Hanford, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13077740	15	Yes	10000000	8200000
RCP-040530	Davis, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19730600	2	No		13114805	5865795	0
RCP-040532	Allen County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19880482	7	Yes	10000000	8163775.43
RCP-040535	Livingston Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27346613	20	Yes	10000000	400000
RCP-040538	Tazewell County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25601188	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-040539	Mckeesport, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24753914	5	Yes	10000000	750000
RCP-040540	Warner Robins, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15026496	3	Yes	10000000	428883
RCP-040547	Sandy Springs City, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13868305	1	Yes	10000000	20477207
RCP-040550	Longmont, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12973267	12	No		0	0	0
RCP-040555	Rowan County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27598928	18	Yes	0	1207631
RCP-040556	Municipality Of Bayamon, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	86005562	36	No		27832640	21400591	0
RCP-040557	Winnebago County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33390919	24	No		5982223	16754576	29647232
RCP-040558	Hillsboro, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18014829	3	No		4847608	12989145.45
RCP-040561	County Of Camden, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	98376054	17	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040564	Haverford, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19840290	30	Yes	10000000	3722256.86
RCP-040566	Lake County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44703745	16	Yes	0	0
RCP-040567	St. Lucie County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63767844	40	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040570	Yuma, County Of	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41525619	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040571	Elmira, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28270386	26	Yes	10000000	2296442.59
RCP-040572	Pasadena, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52625975	11	No		96354820	85465086
RCP-040575	Warren County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45568688	18	Yes	10000000	3300000
RCP-040576	City Of Kansas City, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	194776376	119	No		96960738	125266304	158901543	125266304
RCP-040577	Santa Clara County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	374462651	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040578	Coweta County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28846132	24	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040579	City and County of Denver, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	308048870	68	No		731010528	315166011	62297764
RCP-040581	Grayson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26457584	13	Yes	10000000	15293369
RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	155191527	14	No		20718556	36518609
RCP-040583	Frederick County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50413962	57	No		50005097	24678044
RCP-040586	St. Louis County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	193112666	16	No		94231660	84206032.41	0
RCP-040589	Dallas County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	511918088	109	No		46536240	76124888	151283031
RCP-040590	City Of Irvine, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56433217	2	No		34311637	23770672
RCP-040596	Baldwin County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43360588	36	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040597	Linn County Iowa, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44034983	72	Yes	10000000	6909852
RCP-040598	Aurora City, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	65424806	27	No		70747159	0	0
RCP-040599	County Of York, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	87224252	146	No		20899865	29962355	36362032
RCP-040600	Council Bluffs, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24810055	7	No		16262913	13282162	0
RCP-040601	Palatine Village, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12012529	10	Yes	10000000	5847866
RCP-040603	County Of Passaic, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	97473818	33	No		29774544	50665705.65	17033568.35
RCP-040609	Hamilton County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	158784547	37	No		41935127	0
RCP-040610	Ontario, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45609291	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040612	Lawrence, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19301467	1	No		11694722.24	5759638.48	11526448.99
RCP-040626	Coventry, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10407636.95	37	Yes	10000000
RCP-040645	Cumberland, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10540351.61	12	Yes	10000000	250000	250000
RCP-046972	Jeffersonville City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10906656.82	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-047203	Azusa City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11954843	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-047207	Bell Gardens City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10050163	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-047218	Brea City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10347515	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-047233	Ceres City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11651510	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-047239	Coachella City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10942698	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-047249	Covina City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11351049	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-047253	Cypress City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11723277	1	No		3619621	8098041	0
RCP-047255	Danville Town, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10647738	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-047321	La Mirada City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11526398	5	No		11940013	0	11940013
RCP-047331	Lincoln City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11548406	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-047362	Morgan Hill City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10992695	1	No		7364378	13855381	9847811	7025583
RCP-047367	Newark City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11757485	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-047371	Oakley City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10177190	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-047401	Rohnert Park City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10356127	1	Yes	10000000	20882819	26811555	20882819
RCP-047414	San Jacinto City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11773274	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-048988	Roswell City, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11751501	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-049013	City Of Apache Junction, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14217868.38	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-049016	City Of Bullhead City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13654443.89	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-049029	City Of El Mirage, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11940791.81	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-049044	Town Of Marana, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16375046.08	2	No		9519048	10660969	11507821
RCP-049047	Town Of Oro Valley, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15377781.4	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-049057	Town of Sahuarita, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10493989.86	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-049058	City Of San Luis, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11615161.18	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-049080	Aberdeen City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15782871.82	20	No		0	0
RCP-049085	Cambridge City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12079281.39	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-049104	Greenbelt City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22881666.47	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-049106	Havre De Grace City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13811367.58	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-049109	Hyattsville City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17961280.56	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-049113	Laurel City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25253186.07	48	Yes	10000000
RCP-049131	Takoma Park City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17463724.52	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-049137	Westminster City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18365236.96	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-049183	Enfield, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12920906.6	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-049187	Glastonbury, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10204968.08	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-049247	Shelton, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12172151.62	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-049252	Southington, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12972697.96	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-049262	Torrington, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10075341.7	14	Yes	9823497.31
RCP-049263	Trumbull, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10557445.23	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-049267	Wallingford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13118305.66	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-049357	Hamden, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24140337.11	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-049848	City Of Brighton, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10444587.62	1	No		5693085	0	0
RCP-049964	City Of Littleton, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12081125.98	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-050608	Altamonte Springs City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22109182	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-050618	Aventura City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18525074	34	Yes	10000000
RCP-050621	Bartow City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10090698	1	No		290683	0	290683	290683
RCP-050629	Belle Glade City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10084187	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-050652	Casselberry City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14403048	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-050660	Clermont City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19359997	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-050665	Cooper City City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17930560	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-050670	Cutler Bay Town, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21896320	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-050672	Dania Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16163048	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-050675	Debary City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10670687	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-050678	Dunedin City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18299690	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-050682	Edgewater City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11979418	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-050685	Estero Village, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16964413		Yes	10000000
RCP-050687	Eustis City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10669685	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-050705	Greenacres City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20593599	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-050714	Haines City City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13026702	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-050715	Hallandale Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19957515	49	No		9556703	10400812	29573794
RCP-050741	Jacksonville Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11834170	7	Yes	0
RCP-050753	Key West City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12079588	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-050767	Lake Worth Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19295888	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-050770	Lauderdale Lakes City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18127897	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-050776	Leesburg City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11855707	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-050781	Lynn Haven City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10280021	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-050800	Miami Lakes Town, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15710276	11	Yes	0
RCP-050815	New Smyrna Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13945267	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-050819	North Lauderdale City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22168784	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-050820	North Miami Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21557242	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-050825	Oakland Park City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22639586	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-050828	Ocoee City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24172699	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-050836	Oviedo City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20965734	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-050842	Palmetto Bay Village, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12282434	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-050844	Palm Springs Village, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12629526	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-050847	Parkland City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17114169	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-050853	Plant City City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19905927	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-050865	Riviera Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17761773	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-050866	Rockledge City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14137596	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-050867	Royal Palm Beach Village, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20232484	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-050893	Sunny Isles Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10920613	3	Yes	9999999.99
RCP-050895	Sweetwater City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10514921	49	No		3996832.07	-653706.59	0	0
RCP-050896	Tarpon Springs City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12810334	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-050898	Temple Terrace City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13342240	7	No		2100000	0	0
RCP-050910	West Melbourne City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12150209	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-050919	Winter Garden City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23064811	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-050920	Winter Park City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15438814	1	No		10119494	5319320	0
RCP-050921	Winter Springs City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18687851	5	No		0	0	0
RCP-052674	Lafayette City, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38256658	28	No		19198563	18276006	0
RCP-053030	Platte County, Mo	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20281972	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053031	St. Martin Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10378345	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053033	Hays County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44711903	47	Yes	10000000
RCP-053037	City Of Danville, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24704857	9	Yes	7890000	2614887
RCP-053066	City Of Largo, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12960041	13	Yes	10000000	9450685
RCP-053068	Municipio De San German, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19193080	13	Yes	10000000	2362128
RCP-053071	Town Of Islip, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	47551642	21	No		22408600.41	9702626.08	0
RCP-053079	Sunrise, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17326004	40	Yes	10000000	20000000
RCP-053081	City Of Bessemer, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13970941	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053085	Cattaraugus County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14784835	1	No		17268854	0	0	0
RCP-053098	Geauga County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18190220	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053103	Lebanon County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27541628	11	No		0	0	0
RCP-053104	Lawrence County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11549991	10	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053105	Sumter County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25721033	13	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053109	Robertson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13948833	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053110	County Of Macomb, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	169758815	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053116	City Of Lakewood, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13766236	38	Yes	10000000	3797405
RCP-053118	Anderson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14952074	32	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053126	Hawkins County, Tn	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11030015	5	Yes	10000000	3480493
RCP-053127	County Of Harnett, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26411744	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053128	Williamson County, Tn	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46308736	22	No		38352420	7956316	0
RCP-053132	Putnam County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14474831	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053134	City Of Scranton, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68746050	37	Yes	10000000	8969321
RCP-053137	Town Of Cheektowaga, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25316853	32	No		10804661	7730210	6781982
RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10498362	35	Yes	10000000	3363191
RCP-053154	Municipality Of Dorado,	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10825831.44	9	Yes	4967288.44
RCP-053163	Mcminn County, Tn	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10448854	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053165	Bradley County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20999100	26	No		2248892.99	2248892.99
RCP-053168	Cumberland County, Tn	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11755301	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053169	Pocatello, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10700496	14	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053175	City Of Lewiston, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20970428	9	No		0	0	0
RCP-053182	Pottawatomie County, Ok	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14100145	16	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053189	City Of St. Cloud, Mn	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16463610	2	No		8948575	7515035
RCP-053191	City Of Allen, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10159869	10	No		13724024	7206103
RCP-053196	Canadian County, Ok	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28806702	7	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053203	City Of Burlington, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11516517	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053206	City Of Texas City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10309444	9	Yes	500000	6373691.83	500000	0
RCP-053207	City Of Lake Forest, Ca	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12774385	3	Yes	10000000	8247531
RCP-053208	City Of Conway, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12233839	10	Yes	10000000	3840380
RCP-053209	State Of South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2499067328.5	319	No		514552955	0	0
RCP-053214	Granville County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11740344	4	Yes	10000000	2192972
RCP-053224	City Of Meridian, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12845509	5	Yes	10000000	6678957
RCP-053228	City Of Edinburg, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27132536	24	Yes	10000000	1394331	0	0
RCP-053232	Murfreesboro, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24106035	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053243	City Of Hesperia, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23403687		No		0	0	0	0
RCP-053244	City Of Greenville, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24689311	9	Yes	10000000	700000
RCP-053247	County Of Hoke, Nc	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10728557	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053250	Laurel County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11812212	3	Yes	9775611.25	1159686
RCP-053256	Dallas County, Ia	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18152150	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-053266	Talladega County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15534789	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053269	Jessamine County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10511204	14	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053276	City Of Atlanta, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	170928821	40	No		438247659.39	386226249.45
RCP-053279	Town Of Stratford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25928479.41	1	No		7912144	14835494	3180841.41
RCP-053281	City Of Gresham, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25399647	15	Yes	10000000	1663643
RCP-053282	State Of South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	974478793	283	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053283	City And County Of Honolulu, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	386252141	98	No		246789346	139462795	0
RCP-053564	County Of Santa Barbara, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	86727196	45	No		26574618	0	0
RCP-055901	Kyle, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12014803.68	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-055937	Bedford, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12177672.51	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-055969	Cedar Hill, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11899852.04	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-056029	Farmers Branch, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11956458.88	7	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-056032	Friendswood, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10003026.04	3	Yes	10000000			0
RCP-056050	Haltom City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10892845.99	2	Yes	9429729
RCP-056074	Huntsville, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10487411.84	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-056087	Keller, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11721838.39	6	Yes	8599053.39
RCP-056264	The Colony, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11032873.46		Yes	10000000
RCP-056282	Weslaco, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10335467.14	9	Yes	3371505.2
RCP-056330	Coppell, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10283825.81	15	No		12918924	0	0
RCP-056505	Schertz, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10438004.98	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-056647	Rockwall, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11392873.15	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-131241	County Of Ocean, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	117938762	32	No		13496712	26491681	0

Sheet: Projects (Q3 2023) Submitted
Project ID	Recipient-ID	Recipient Name	State/Territory	Reporting Tier	Recipient Type	Completion Status	Project Name	Expenditure Category Group	Expenditure Category	Project Description	Adopted Budget	Total Cumulative Obligations	Total Cumulative Expenditures	Number of Households Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Number of Workers Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Number of Gov FTE Responding to COVID-19 (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Number of Gov FTE Rehired (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Community benefit agreement? (Infrastructure Only)	Complying with David Bacon? (Infrastructure Only)	Project labor agreement? (Infrastructure Only)	Does the Project have Capital Expenditures? (Yes/No) (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Type of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Total Expected Cost of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Primary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Secondary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Tertiary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project is conducting an evidence based program evaluation? (Yes/No)	Project Total Spending on Evidence Based Evaluation
TPN-001214	RCP-035820	City And County Of San Francisco, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Public Safety Revenue Replacement	312408671	312408671	312408671
TPN-001406	RCP-038384	Berkeley County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Crawford Building Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.23-Strong Healthy Communities: Demolition and Rehabilitation of Properties	Vacant abandoned building, renovating it to expand the Judicial Center for mitigation purposes.	1641198	1641198	845244.4								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	0	1 Imp General Public	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-001408	RCP-053564	County Of Santa Barbara, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	El Colegio Homeless Shelter	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Emergency sheltering is a high priority in the Isla Vista unincorporated area of the county, with approximately 80 unhoused persons in need of shelter. Unsafe conditions for persons remaining unsheltered include risk of fire, impacts on public recreation areas and the environment, safety of the greater Isla Vista community and visitors, and concern for the health and safety of those experiencing homelessness. These concerns have been identified through an increase in calls for law enforcement service, the need for sanitation services and removal of biohazard, and the deterioration of parks due to work delays or cancellations caused by encampment activity. There is a need for an emergency shelter/temporary housing in the Isla Vista Community.  The navigation center is an evidence-based model, and the funding allocated toward this project was for acquisition of the physical property and therefore is being used for evidence-based interventions. The ongoing operations will provide evidence-based emergency sheltering and navigation services with linkage to interim and permanent housing via the Coordinated Entry System. County ARPA funds will also fund construction of an industrial kitchen which will provide meals to the shelter and surrounding homeless facilities. The goals include meeting individuals’ basic needs like food, clothing, and hygiene, and quickly connecting individuals to housing and other mainstream services including health and behavioral health services, juvenile justice, and social service agencies. Performance Measures are collected in the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS). The project has served 85 persons in year 1 with 25% of persons exiting transitioning out of homelessness to permanent housing.	2983743	1223851.63	1223851.63								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	7000000	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate		No	0
TPN-001409	RCP-038987	Cedar Rapids, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Providing Assistance to Community Homeowners (PATCH) Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Provide households with home rehabilitation assistance to address health, safety, and nuisance concerns of their owner-occupied home. This assistance allows homeowners to address issues that could lead to the placarding of the property, in turn making the household homeless. Funding is based on identified need and is unduplicated.		1000000	1000000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-001411	RCP-038987	Cedar Rapids, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Westside Flood Control - O Ave and Q Ave NW to Ellis Park	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Will provide more equity with the Eastside Flood Control projects that qualify for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers funding, speed up project completion to provide connectivity within the Northwest Neighborhood during future Westside flood control project construction, and increase the community’s resiliency to future high water events.		5100000	2172822.86
TPN-001413	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Public Works Department contracted with Kitchell to prepare a facilities condition assessment report that included an evaluation of the Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems at various City facilities. Included in the report was the recommendation to replace major components of the HVAC system at Police Headquarters. These components are original to the building that was constructed in 2004. Given the critical nature of this building, staff is recommending a single project to address all HVAC replacement and repairs as opposed to addressing HVAC needs at this facility through a phased approach. The ARPA funding will allow the City to address a major capital need and install a system that allows for a higher level of air filtration at a key 24/7 public safety facility, providing protection against viruses through the enhanced air filtration unit.	10000000	0	0								No
TPN-001415	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Small Business Grants Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	In summer 2020, as part of inclusive economic development research and pandemic recovery efforts, surveys were sent to residents and business owners to better understand the impacts of the pandemic. Over 576 business owner surveys were received, and 794 community surveys were received which detailed the immediate needs of businesses and the community during the pandemic. The make-up of respondents and their expressed needs was used to inform the program framework and requirements for the Chula Vista CARES Small Business Grant Program which funded 279 small businesses. In summer 2021, a survey was sent to 7,636 businesses with email addresses on file and 180 survey responses were received. Most respondents indicated they would like funds to replenish depleted reserves, cover payroll, rent, equipment, and other debt that has accrued during the pandemic. The survey was also sent to the Third Avenue Village Association for distribution. In July 2022, staff brought back for City Council approval a small business grant program that mirrors the program implemented under the CARES Act in 2020. The City Council approved the Chula Vista American Rescue Plan Act Small Business and Nonprofit Relief Grant Program to continue to target the businesses that were forced to close during the pandemic.  To implement the Small Business and Nonprofit Relief Grant Program, the City entered into an agreement with the San Diego Foundation to administer the program on the City’s behalf and the City transferred the $2.6 million in funding to the San Diego Foundation.	2600000	2600000	2600000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted	10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify	Yes	2600000
TPN-001416	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Choose Chula Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Small businesses were disproportionately impacted by the pandemic and providing support to aid in their equitable economic recovery is critical. Staff sought creative ways to bolster a circular economic recovery, increase consumer confidence and provide businesses with marketing support, a key area of help identified in a city-wide business survey. The Choose Chula app is a free platform, funded by the City of Chula Vista, designed to reward residents and visitors with points for shopping at local businesses right here in Chula Vista. Each local reward point equals $1, which can be easily redeemed at local businesses that choose to participate. This way we keep our local economy robust and the dollars in the community. The Choose Chula small business support mobile application (app) pilot program launched June 15, 2021 with the state-wide reopening. In the first month of the soft launch, over 100 applications were received resulting in 89 businesses being admitted into the app program, and there were over 1,500 app downloads. ARPA funds will be directed towards continued technology optimization during the pilot program, administration and marketing costs for the program as well as funding the rewards budget that rewards app users with digital Chula Points.	100000	36517.75	36517.75								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted		Yes	100000
TPN-001417	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Curb/Sidewalk Café Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	On July 13, 2021 City Council approved a process to create attractive and accessible curb cafes and sidewalk cafes along the Third Avenue business corridor, and to offset the cost to permit and construct these facilities. This action also appropriated $0.3 million of ARPA SLFRF funds for Fiscal Year 2022 to be dedicated to a reimbursement grant program for these facilities. These business enhancement efforts were guided by the City’s pursuit to facilitate a safe re-opening and recovery of Chula Vista’s local economy and boost consumer confidence. As businesses quickly responded to public health restrictions at the onset of COVID-19 and negative economic impacts, one outcome was the growth of both permitted and unpermitted outdoor dining spaces or “curb cafes” Now, as business are no longer operating under public health restrictions, cities are tasked with reviewing, enforcing and updating local business operating standards. CDC guidance for bars and restaurants has highlighted the use of outdoor dining in reducing the risk of COVID19 exposure compared to indoor dining.    On June 15, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsom announced a fully reopened California and a lift of pandemic executive orders. While restaurants, bars, and breweries may operate at full indoor capacity, they are still recovering financially from eighteen months of reduced occupancy and revenues. The continued opportunity to operate outdoors with increased occupancy will help these businesses better recover over the next year or so. In addition, during this time the community has enjoyed the opportunity to be outside when enjoying a meal or a beverage. As a result, staff obtained approval to terminate the temporary encroachments in the right-of-way, and replace it with a program that provides appropriately designed and constructed improvements within the right-of-way that are permitted and ADA accessible. These improvements are not allowed to encroach upon or impact surrounding businesses and must only be located in front of the existing business. This ensures and encourages more thoughtful placemaking with a goal of generating increased economic activity along Third Avenue. Given the number of businesses that took advantage of the curb and sidewalk café program, the City identified that it would not need all $0.3 million of ARPA SLFRF funds to implement the program. On February 8, 2022 the Chula Vista City Council reduced the budget of this program from $0.3 million to $0.2 million. The $0.1 million in savings was then reappropriated toward the Homeless Supportive Services Program to support the ongoing efforts of the City’s Homeless Outreach Team.	148049	140242.84	140242.84								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted	10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify	Yes	200000
TPN-001418	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay to Essential Workers	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	California Government Code, Title I, Section 3100 declares all government employees Disaster Service Workers who can be called upon in any emergency. Since March 2020, City employees were called on to respond to the pandemic in both their normal work duties and a variety of activities that are outside of their normal duties (e.g., food distribution, COVID testing and vaccination scheduling and site management). Essential Worker Premium is to recognize workers performing essential duties during this public health emergency.	2457000	2457000	2457000		383
TPN-001419	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Broadband Design	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	As part of stakeholder engagement for the development of the Digital Equity & Inclusion Plan (DEIP), the City of Chula Vista hosted multiple workshops with key community stakeholders to better understand the local digital divide and to uncover opportunities for collaboration on digital equity projects. The first workshop was conducted in July 2019 and included over 50 attendees throughout the San Diego region, including community-based organizations, academic institutions, regional agencies, private businesses, and city staff. In January 2020, the city conducted the second workshop. At this workshop, the city was able to gain feedback from practitioners that advocate on behalf of the needs of a wide group of the city’s population and tailor strategies for the DEIP. The list of workshop attendees included the regional public agencies, academic institutions, non-profits and private sector, including SANDAG, Port of San  Diego, San Diego Airport, City of Carlsbad, Chula Vista Elementary School District, T-Mobile, AT&T, Verizon, Cleantech San Diego, Computers 2 Kids, and the San Diego Futures foundation. This project will begin implementing the City’s Digital Equity and Inclusion Plan and Telecommunications Master Plan by getting engineering and construction documents prepared that will be able to provide high-speed wireless internet access (Wi-Fi) to the public at all City facilities in the future. Staff will look to future grant opportunities of the proposed Federal infrastructure bill to fund construction.	900000	0	0
TPN-001420	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Public Art Grants (Library)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Public Arts Grant is proposed for two purposes. The first $300,000 will be to support the local  artists who were directly impacted by the loss of the City of Chula Vista's Performing Visual Arts Grant. Each year, the City program would grant monies directly to artists to perform/create within city limits to support the following:  1. To increase public awareness of, and participation in, performing and cultural arts in our community  2. To support individuals/groups/agencies/organizations that can provide the most accessibility to the cultural arts 3. To encourage the growth of local arts resources 4. To support and encourage new organizations and individuals applying for funding  5. To promote cooperation and collaboration among the Chula Vista Public Library and local schools and performing and visual arts individuals/groups/agencies/organizations 6. To develop cultural venues which will attract both residents and tourists 7. To serve the cultural needs of the community 8. To broaden and leverage public and private support for the performing arts 9. To maintain and preserve the City's artistic cultural and historic heritage 10. To support exemplary community arts education The requested amount would be granted to the arts community in a similar fashion to the City's grant program, where artists would be paid to create/perform art within our community. Our goal is to continue to promote and stimulate the growth of performing and cultural arts within the City of Chula Vista through a grant application process for local performing and visual arts groups and individuals. The grant fund supports art projects such as: dance, design arts, media arts, music, photography, theater, traditional/folk arts and visual arts, or interdisciplinary expressions involving more than one of the above fields.   The remaining $100,000 will be allocated for the Small Business Art Incentive Program. Our goal is supporting our local businesses and artists by providing an incentive for local businesses to purchase art for their businesses that are created directly from our local artists within Chula Vista to further stimulate the art economy.	400000	400000	400000
TPN-001421	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Starlight Parade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City's Office of Communications coordinates City-sponsored events including the December Starlight Parade.  Because of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the City is not hosting a  parade that attracts upwards of 30,000 participants and parade entries. Instead, the City is creating Starlight Nights in collaboration with the Third Avenue Village Association to install and display holiday lights to create a festive holiday destination for residents and visitors to Third Avenue in December 2021. The City has allocated $200,000 in ARPA funds to support special events and small business promotion activities that will attract residents and visitors and support local businesses  as the City makes its way out of the pandemic. The Starlight Nights concept involves installing decorative lighting along Third Avenue from E Street to H Street. This installation requires modification to infrastructure on Third Avenue to support up-lights and decorative lighting to include: Modifying the decorative streetlights between E  Street and H Street, inserting a 120V  receptacle into each one to allow for decorations to be temporarily installed along the avenue. Modifying the medians between  E  Street and Park Way to install tree rings and up-lighting in the palm trees. The up-lighting may be adjusted for holidays and other events. TAVA (Third Avenue Village Association) and/or the City may collaborate to develop a  lighting schedule for the up-lighting. The City is working with McFarlane Promotions and New City America (management company for the TAVA Property Based Improvement District [PBID]) to implement this project.City staff and McFarlane Promotions contacted several vendors to request a  bid/quote and only one local vendor, Pro-Cal Lighting, had the capacity and availability to respond. Other vendors cited limited staffing, equipment and supply issues.	200000	200000	200000
TPN-001422	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Equity and Inclusion	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City has embarked upon advancing intentional equity and inclusion efforts to unify existing projects and programs and create a future action plan to ensure equitable practices in all facets of city operations. This funding would be allocated towards third party assistance in facilitating discussions and collaborating with internal and external stakeholders to create a broader citywide approach that may result in an Equity and Inclusion Action Plan. The Equity And inclusion effort are being pursued in conjunction with the City Manager's acceptance into the Leadership Institute on Race, Equity And Inclusion Led by The ICMA, Kettering Foundation and National Civic League.	200000	200000	108892
TPN-001423	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	University Innovation Center and Recruitment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This funding will serve as a catalyst tool for recruiting and seeding appropriate institutions to locate on the University and Innovation District site on 375-acres of city-owned land in Eastern Chula Vista. The City aims to recruit and co-locate a unique mix of academic partners in an environment different than a traditional university campus. Instead, academic institutions, including a four-year university, will integrate with commercial, retail and residential functions in an urban, mixed-use setting. This will provide a   collaborative learning and research environment for engaging students, faculty and corporations in the creation and application of knowledge for cross-border economic, social and cultural development. The University will offer a globally desirable range of academic, entrepreneurial, and urban amenities to attract the talent and investment that will sustain a world-class educational-innovation ecosystem. One proposed concept is the development of an innovation center at the Chula Vista Elite Athlete Training Center (CVEATC) in the interim to establish a physical presence on the university site. Establishing the Innovation Center at the CVEATC solidifies the valuable relationship between the existing asset of CVEATC and the planned University-Innovation District.	0	0	0
TPN-001424	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Main Street Fiber	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funding will allow the City to connect sprawling City facilities (Otay Recreation Center, Animal Shelter and Public Works Facility) to the existing fiber backbone located at City Hall. This will allow the future opportunity to provide free high-speed wireless internet access (Wi-Fi) to the public at the Otay Recreation Center. Connecting these facilities will assist the City in beginning to bridge the digital divide that was highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic.	300000	16674.2	16674.2
TPN-001426	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Telegraph Canyon Culvert Repair	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The need for Telegraph Canyon Channel improvements was identified as part of the City's Measure P asset management program. To help identify the needs of our community and to evaluate the state of our infrastructure, the City formed the Asset Management Program Advisory Committee (AMPAC) in March 2014. The committee continues to provide input into setting priorities for the Asset Management Program. Members of the AMPAC are residents, business owners, community leaders, and stakeholders. AMPAC members visited various asset management systems and observed and discussed the issues associated with each system. AMPAC reviewed the City's overall Asset Management Program methodology and helped to guide and reach consensus on how to address infrastructure deficits. A technical committee was formed within AMPAC to further engage the public in the understanding and review of the asset management methodologies and logic used to define preservation and restoration costs and schedules. A comprehensive inventory of assets took place for each asset management system. Where accessible, assets were visited, and their conditions were assessed. Based on the condition, actions required to restore the asset were identified, and the cost and timing were estimated. Through assessment of risk (probability and consequence of failures), activities were prioritized and communicated regarding urgency and the financial and resource requirements. In July and August 2015, the City of Chula Vista engaged a research firm to conduct a public opinion survey to identify resident priorities and secure input on potential local funding mechanisms (bond or sales tax) to upgrade, repair and maintain critical infrastructure. In addition, a survey mailer was distributed to 54,000 households and an online version posted on the City website from January through May 2016 to secure broad public input on infrastructure priorities. More than 3,000 responses were received. The Telegraph Canyon existing storm drain system is not adequate to convey water during a 100-year peak flow event requiring significant drainage improvements to be made to protect both private and public facilities.	6150000	1445.52	1445.52
TPN-001427	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Loma Verde Reconstruction	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project is to demolish and reconstruct the existing recreation center to provide the following: a new multi-purpose gymnasium, dance rooms, crafts room, fitness room, classroom space, game room, hard courts, restrooms, changing rooms, staff offices, lifeguard staff room, break room, new pool mechanical equipment, wet and dry storage, replacement pool and associated pool deck area.	235000	233782.5	233782.5
TPN-001428	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Casa Casillas	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project is to develop a space that supports the Chula Vista arts community to showcase work and gather where the community feels welcome and can experience art and culture. The focus of the building will be to create intergenerational collaborative opportunities while also supporting the development of opportunities for artists in residence. The building will be an opportunity for the Chula Vista arts community to grow their skills and showcase their talent.	2450000	1759.08	1759.08
TPN-001429	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Essential Worker Premium	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	California Government Code declares all government employees Disaster Service Workers who can be called upon in any emergency. Since March 2020 City employees were called on to respond to the pandemic in both their normal work duties and a variety of activities that are outside of their normal duties (food distribution, COVID testing and vaccination scheduling and site management). Essential Worker Premium is to recognize workers performing essential duties during this public health emergency.	2354000	2354000	2354000
TPN-001431	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	New Positions	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	A number of new positions, as detailed in following table are being recommended to be added to the City’s General Fund staffing to support operations and the delivery of projects.  Information and Technology Department The position being proposed in the Information and Technology Department is critical to manage and protect the city-wide network as we begin to implement the Telecommunications Master Plan. Included in the funding is 1.0 Chief Information Security Officer whose position will be utilized along with an existing Senior Network Engineer position to significantly strengthen the City’s information security posture and ensure alignment with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to help thwart cyber security threats such as Ransom Ware attacks on the City’s critical infrastructure. This position is not offset by revenues so is proposed to be funded initially by unrestricted reimbursement from ARPA to the General Fund. The annual estimated cost for this position is $176,282 and will be funded by unrestricted reimbursement from ARPA to the General Fund. Finance The position being proposed in the Finance Department is 1.0 Senior Management Analyst that may be partially offset through grants; since all grants have different requirement, this position is proposed to be initially funded by the General Fund. The position will be coordinating ARPA reporting and compliance requirements on behalf of the City, ensuring APRA spending complies to all applicable program rules, providing technical support to other City departments, coordinating reporting to the Department of Treasury and assisting with related program audits. This role will serve as a central grant coordinator/analyst, a position that currently does not exist. The annual estimated cost for this position is $126,000 and will be funded by unrestricted reimbursement from ARPA to the General Fund.	998814	314514.67	314514.67
TPN-001432	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Public Works Project Management - PWP0001	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The positions being proposed in Public Works are needed given the time constraints associated with ARPA monies and the need to deliver projects at a faster pace and to address high priority projects.  Staff recommends establishing a Project Management team in the Public Works Department in order to centralize project management.  This will create a more efficient project delivery method.  The Project Management team will be comprised of 1.0 Building Project Manager, 2.0 Building Project Supervisors, and 1.0 Management Analyst.    The estimated annual cost for these positions is $485,000 and will be funded by unrestricted reimbursement from ARPA to the General Fund.  These positions will be included in the City's long-term financial plan as a general fund cost starting after project delivery but no later than 2026 when current funding sources are set to expire.  Staff recommends creating a non-CIP project (PWP0001) in the Capital Improvement Projects fund for a total of $1.5 million which will be used to offset costs for these new positions while they are working on the above mentioned project; funds will be transferred from this project to the General Fund to offset the PW Project Management expenses on an annual basis.	1500000	712876.94	712876.94
TPN-001433	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Development Services Fund Revenue Recovery	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This funding will be used to offset personnel and contract costs incurred by the Development Services Fund in providing public services.  Such services include providing permitting and code information to the general public, as well as processing and issuing various permits and conducting related inspections.  Funds will also be used to digitize permit records, increasing ease of access to public records, and to support continued automation efforts, increasing permitting efficiency.	1000000	93272.06	93272.06
TPN-001434	RCP-037205	Hamilton County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		The Light House Collective Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Project to fund programs to provide mentoring and life-skills training to youth and young adults within the City of Chattanooga and its surrounding areas.	300000	300000	206616
TPN-001439	RCP-038987	Cedar Rapids, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Discovery Living, Inc. (group home) - Affordable Housing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	SFNC - 5 beneficiaries		50000	50000								No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate
TPN-001445	RCP-039166	Arvada, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Employee Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	The program funds are used to administer mandatory weekly employee COVID Testing	23000	1600	1600								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001446	RCP-039669	Lower Merion, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Township's Governing Body (Board of Commissioners) has made an initial allocation on roughly $11.8 million of ARP funding.  Most of the allocated funding will support ongoing capital projects over the next few years.  The remaining funding is to support various government services.  A second allocation of $14.8 million was made in mid-2023 (including interest earned on ARP funds).  Over $13 million was dedicated to ongoing capital projects with the remaining dollars to support local non-profit organizations.   Spending of ARP funds began in the fourth quarter of 2022 and we expect additional expenditures of ARP funds in 2023-2024.  The Township's lost revenue calculation exceeded $33.2 million as of 12/31/2022.	25503294	25503294	1359515
TPN-001447	RCP-039166	Arvada, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Risk Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Provided Risk Pay to Employees who qualified.	1000000	890260	890260		507
TPN-001453	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	COVID Vaccinations	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	The City COVID-19 vaccinations program to hire staff, purchase testing materials, including personal protective equipment, and cover any miscellaneous costs that may arise. Miscellaneous costs may include registration system software, paper materials, courier services, etc.  Without a cure for COVID-19, the impending flu season, and the need for data- driven decisions, testing remains an integral part in the fight against COVID-19. The CA Governor’s Office of Emergency Services ended the COVID-19 emergency proclamation on February 28th, 2023. As a result, the emergency authorization for EMTs/Paramedics to conduct COVID-19 testing and vaccinations also expired. February 28, 2023 was the final date for COVID-19 vaccination operations for the City. Operations were demobilized beginning March 1st. Staff is waiting  for final invoices for expenditures incurred prior to February 28, 2023 and is preparing for the close out of this project.	76509	76509	76509								No	COVID-19 testing sites and laboratories	70647.05	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001454	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	AFLOAT: Utility Debt Relief	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	The Portland Water Bureau (PWB) provides billing services for the City’s publicly owned sewer, stormwater, and water utilities. Due to the financial crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic, many Portlanders have been unable to pay their sewer, stormwater, water bills. PWB estimates that Portlanders have more $22 million of back-due bills. This project reduces the outstanding delinquent balances on PWB accounts with a focus on low-income Portlanders. In collaboration with the Bureau of Environmental Services, the Portland Utility Board, the Office of Equity and Human Rights, and community partners, PWB designed a debt relief program to help the most vulnerable Portlanders catch up on overdue bills. Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of individuals or households served •Amount of relief provided to individuals or households.	2688882.69	2688882.69	2688882.69	2011							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	No	2688882.69
TPN-001455	RCP-036442	City Of Fremont, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue replacement funds were allocated to support public safety (police and fire), capital maintenance, human services, and recreation services expenditures in the City's General Fund and Recreation Special Revenue Fund.	44211563	44211563	44211563
TPN-001456	RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Vaccination	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	The County has rented three spaces, has a mobile unit, and a number of pop-up sites to administer vaccines	15000000	7044492.39	7044492.39								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001457	RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	The County at the rented sites, mobile unit, and pop-up sites give out and administer Covid tests as well as purchase of test kits	400000	391552.63	391552.63								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001458	RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Covid Prevention Supplies	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	The County is purchasing PPE for offices and personnel to be able to have the government function on a daily basis.	150000	127636.78	127636.78								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001459	RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	OEM/Covid Building	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Building of facility to house vaccines, equipment, and OEM to combat Covid.	8450000	8450000	8450000								Yes	Other (please specify)	8450000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001461	RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Outreach	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	This is the outreach for vaccinations, testing, and social distancing	2000000	1917814.64	1917814.64								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001465	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Homeowner Foreclosure Prevention	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Anticipating long-lasting impacts of the pandemic, this is a multi-year program focused on home retention and stability. This project responds directly to the negative economic impacts of the pandemic on low-income community members by stabilizing vulnerable homeowners. Foreclosure prevention counseling will be offered through nonprofit HUD-certified counseling agencies. This project will also provide financial assistance to Portland residents who have been financially impacted by COVID-19 and who are at risk of losing their homes through direct payments to the mortgage company, utility company or tax collector (as eligible), extending the amount of assistance and eligible uses from previous programs. Program delivery will be primarily through culturally-specific organizations with an existing pipeline of Black, Indigenous, and other homeowners of color. Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of individuals or households receiving foreclosure prevention counseling  •Number of households receiving financial assistance •Distribution of financial assistance   •Percent of households receiving foreclosure prevention counseling who avoid foreclosure through permanent loan modification, refinance, forbearance, a repayment plan, reinstatement  •Number of homeowners no longer delinquent on mortgage and/or utility payments •Number of homeowners remain in the home 12 months after receiving services and/or financial assistance	2500000	2302694	1342767.92	806							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic		No	2500000
TPN-001466	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Eviction Legal Defense	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	The public health emergency, including necessary measures to protect public health, resulted in significant economic and financial hardship for community members, particularly those with lower incomes and at risk of housing instability. This project provides legal assistance and associated financial assistance for low-income tenants facing eviction, which is responsive to both the public health and economic impacts of the pandemic. Support includes legal defense services and associated financial settlement assistance for renters experiencing an eviction or potential eviction. Primary partners include the City/County Joint Office of Homeless Services, Multnomah County Youth and Family Services, legal service providers, and other culturally specific and community-based organizations. Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of individuals or households served   •Types of services provided  •Expenditure of financial assistance to landlords or other third parties •Clients with legal representation not receiving a court judgement/being evicted and retaining housing •Clients with legal representation not receiving a court judgment/being evicted and not retaining housing	4700000	4629085.36	4148630.69	1676							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity		No	4700000
TPN-001468	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Digital Divide Response Tech Kit Expansion	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.4-Household Assistance: Internet Access Programs	This project funds he Digital Divide Response Tech Kit Expansion project to address digital inequities to generate economic and social benefits for Black, Indigenous, and residents of color; people with disabilities; and older adults. The pandemic has caused profound societal disruptions and many illustrations of why broadband is essential. It has accelerated the digitalization of economic, educational, and social activities and services, exacerbating existing, and leading to new, inequalities and discriminations. With the Emergency Broadband Benefit, a federal subsidy program, to help pay for internet service, we plan to focus ARPA resources on device and digital literacy investments.  Output and Outcome Measures for Tech Kits: •Number of people receiving devices •Number of people receiving help to navigate services and internet connection •Number of training and technical sessions provided •Number of organizations with increased digital literacy capacity and providing training •Number of digital navigators •Languages that project training, device, and internet support materials are provided in, translated into and/or interpretation is provided for •Outcome survey for staff of partner organizations Performance Measures for WiFi6 Pilot •Number of network usage instances  •Number of network users that apply to additional services from splash page redirects •Network performance •Number of individuals using the network •Number of Center for Technology Education and Digital Equity Interns that are trained in network administration •Network security •Frequency of network use Performance Measures for Tech Hubs •Expenditures to setup and support hubs •Outcome survey	3500000	2856154.09	1675364.07	0							No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic			No	3500000
TPN-001469	RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Food Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	THIS IS A FOOD DISTRIBUTION PROGRAM	750000	736735.62	736735.62	50000							No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001470	RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Video Court Expansion	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	EXPANSION OF VIDEO COURT SYSTEM TO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY	2441843.49	2441843.49	2345491.74								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001472	RCP-037367	Homestead City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Employee Vaccine Incentives	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	The City of Homestead is providing a vaccine incentive payment of $250 per employee. In addition, FICA taxes were calculated at 7.65% of the total employee vaccine incentives. Employees will need to show their vaccine card and sign an attestation form with Human Resources once fully vaccinated against COVID-19 (received both doses of Pfizer or Moderna or one dose of Johnson & Johnson) no later than February 25, 2022. By offering this vaccine incentive, the City hopes that it will encourage the City’s employees to get vaccinated to help slow/stop the spread of COVID-19.		61629.89	61629.89								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001473	RCP-037367	Homestead City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	MAGIC Summer Camp	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services	MAGIC Summer Camp was conducted out of the Homestead Cybrarium (which is located in a Qualified Census Tract) in partnership with Miami-Dade College on July 12th – July 23rd, 2021 (Monday - Friday) from 9:30 AM to 3:00 PM. This educational service addresses educational disparities including assistance to address student academic, social, emotional, and mental health needs to 15 students. At the end of the summer camp, the students were given a survey to measure the success of the summer camp. Below are the details of what students learned in the summer camp: Week 1:  Game Design with Unity: Created their own video games that could be explored on a PC. They learned the proper workflow to create custom environments, objects and player challenges using Unity. Students were taught the basics of coding in Unity using the C# programming language. Students were able to create their own video games that could be explored on a PC. They also learned the proper workflow to create custom environments, objects and player challenges using Unity.  Week 2:     Game Programming: Gained deeper knowledge of scripting, learning basic programming techniques and editing tools. Students focused on developing for virtual reality and its unique design challenges. Students continued to learn the basics of coding in Unity using the C# programming language. Gained deeper knowledge of scripting, learning basic programming techniques and editing tools. They focused on developing for virtual reality and its unique design challenges.		9000	9000								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	0
TPN-001474	RCP-037367	Homestead City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	City of Homestead employees received a one-time lump sum payment of either $1,000 or $2,000 based on the employees’ position. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Field Staff received $2,000; IBEW Administrative Staff received $1,000; Non-Bargaining Staff (Except for the City Manager, Assistant City Managers, and Department Heads) received $1,000; Police Benevolent Association (PBA) Lieutenants received $2,000; and PBA Officers, Detectives, Sergeants, and Correction Officers received $2,000 (Except for the Police Chief). In addition, FICA taxes were calculated at 7.65% of the total premium pay. Premium pay is designed to compensate workers that, by virtue of their employment, were forced to take on additional burdens and make great personal sacrifices as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Premium pay is designed to address the disparity between the critical services provided by and the risks taken by essential workers and the relatively low compensation they tend to receive.		738479	738479		402
TPN-001476	RCP-039244	Cleveland, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Revenue Recovery	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue recovery funds were used to pay salary and benefits for public safety personnel in the Divisions of Police, Fire & EMS in the amount of calculated revenue loss.	108960480	108960480	108960480
TPN-001477	RCP-038496	Cumberland, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Revenue Loss	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Provide government services to the extent of revenue loss due to the pandemic.	10000000	10000000	7074956.55
TPN-001478	RCP-036328	Frisco City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Trailview Retaining Wall Reconstruction	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The project entails rehabilitation of the existing retaining wall located at Trail View Lane in Frisco, Texas at Lakeside in Lone Star Ranch.  The current wall is a 530-foot, 7-panel cast-in-place (CIP) concrete spread footing wall with a maximum height of approximately 18 feet (measured from bottom of footing to top of wall) per as-built drawings.  The planned rehabilitation will include replacing the backfill material.  This scope of work does not include structural remediation of the wall itself, but will include details for surficial repairs.  Contingency structural design and plans will be prepared as a bid alternative if it is discovered during construction that the retaining wall footing has been undersized.  Project construction start date is 4/10/23; project inittiation of operations date is 12/1/2023.	2643000	2629547	2174057.06
TPN-001480	RCP-039244	Cleveland, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Bricker	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Provide legal counsel regarding eligible ARPA items.	400000	190740	190740
TPN-001483	RCP-037135	Darlington County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium pay for government employees	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	A resolution to provide for premium pay for Darlington County government employees, in accordance with the Interim Final Rule from The United States Treasury for the American Rescue Plan.	1638120.08	1638120.08	1638120.08		1085
TPN-001484	RCP-037692	County Of Butler, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Butler Memorial Hospital Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.2-Private Sector: Grants to other employers	Project to help offset the costs for the front line employees who serve in critical infrastructure positions at Butler Memorial Hospital		209995	209995		729
TPN-001488	RCP-040001	Michigan City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium Pay to employees for hours worked between March 20, 2020 and July 22, 2021.	1646041.66	1646041.66	1646041.66		628
TPN-001489	RCP-040001	Michigan City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Baker Tilly	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Baker Tilly was contracted to serve in an advisory capacity to the City of Michigan City. They will offer Fiscal Recovery Fund program support.	100000	100000	61065.92
TPN-001490	RCP-039170	Hemet, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA Community Engagement	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	The ARPA community engagement project is ongoing. It involves requesting resident and business feedback on how the City is doing, where improvements are needed, how the ARPA SLFRF funding can assist in these areas, and what is area of focus is of importance to the community via this community engagement project. Surveys for residents and businesses are developed by Polco, Inc. and disseminated via an online link to a randomly selected group. The survey is also provided to the community that was not randomly selected to provide their  input for the City and use of SLFRF funding priority.		13500	13500
TPN-001492	RCP-036977	Rochester, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Safety (Police and Fire) - Operating Expenditures	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Used SLFRF Funds to support Public Safety Expenditures		17435537	17435537
TPN-001493	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Covid Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	The City would like to allocate $900,000 toward the COVID-19 testing program to hire staff, purchase testing materials, including personal protective equipment, and cover any miscellaneous costs that may arise. Miscellaneous costs may include registration system software, paper materials, courier services, etc.  Without a cure for COVID-19, the impending flu season, and the need for data- driven decisions, testing remains an integral part in the fight against COVID-19. The CA Governor’s Office of Emergency Services ended the COVID-19 emergency proclamation on February 28th, 2023. As a result, the emergency authorization for EMTs/Paramedics to conduct COVID-19 testing and vaccinations also expired. February 28, 2023 was the final date for COVID-19 vaccination operations for the City. Operations were demobilized beginning March 1st. Staff is waiting for final invoices for expenditures incurred prior to February 28, 2023 and is preparing for the close out of this project.	106873	106872.42	106872.42								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001498	RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Vaccine Clinic Signage	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Signage purchased through Blue Sky Sign Company, LLC indicating location of vaccine clinic held at the Westmoreland County Courthouse on Tuesday, April 27, 2021. Clinic was operated by Hayden's Pharmacy and had 600 doses of the Pfizer vaccine available.	231	231	231								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001499	RCP-035889	Ada County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Ada County Juvenile Services Bonus	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Ada County has recognized significant threats to the County’s ability to respond to the unprecedented impacts of COVID19 and the resulting ability to protect both staff and the community we serve.  The Board of Commissioners of Ada County has identified that detention facility officers, shift supervisors, and medical assistants at the Juvenile Services Detention Facility are essential staff needed to maintain continuity of operations of critical infrastructure sectors to protect the health, safety and well-being of the residents of Ada County.   Staff will receive 4 lump sum payments of $1,500 every six-months.	360415	360415	255448.8		49	6					No
TPN-001500	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Vibrant and Inclusive Community Spaces	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	Capacity restrictions to meet public health orders impacted small businesses and business districts. Business lost customers and revenue, and some closed. This project takes several approaches to support neighborhood business districts: • Reconfigure underused public right of way and adjacent storefronts to create and program plazas and public spaces. This initiative focuses on East Portland and the Central City. These spaces could be pop-up, seasonal or permanent installations that create a healthier community and business ecosystem. • Subsidize permitting-related fees and distribute financial awards to support community cohesion through events and activities. The program will fund grants Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of businesses or organizations served  •Type of service provided  •Distribution of funds to organizations •Number and type of events supported  •Number of community event grants provided •Amount distributed per grant  •Type of event   •Outcome survey	2090000	1822607.83	1701613.86								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify		No	2090000
TPN-001502	RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	COVID-19 Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	COVID-19 swab testing done through local healthcare provider, Excela Health,  as well as Wexford Health at various county-owned facilities including the county-owned nursing home, the Westmoreland Manor, juvenile detention center, and county prison.	500000	306760.09	282601.15								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001503	RCP-036000	Arapahoe County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Vaccination Incentive Program	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	It is suggested that some of the vulnerable populations that are choosing not to be vaccinated are low-income individuals that are concerned about the potential loss of income from becoming ill for a day or two from the vaccine.  This program incentivizes this population by ensuring they would have approximately two days of income, should they become ill from the vaccine.  This is directly related to the pandemic, and the state and federal governments have implemented similar programs to encourage people to become vaccinated.	1000000	1000000	1000000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-001504	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Streets to Stability: Safe Rest Villages	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The COVID-19 public health emergency exacerbated housing insecurity, especially for low-income and Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) communities. Social distancing requirements effectively cut our region’s congregate shelter capacity in half, overnight. Additional emergency outdoor shelters and capacity for non-congregate and isolation sheltering have not met the increased need. We’ve seen a significant increase in unhoused persons living outdoors, in public places, in vehicles, and in other areas not meant for human habitation. Pre-pandemic, the number of large, unsanctioned houseless encampments (with 8+ structures) in Portland was approximately 3-4 at any given time. During the pandemic that number increased tenfold, to more than 50. This project will develop six outdoor shelters – Safe Rest Villages – to serve unsheltered Portlanders across the city. Villages will provide safe places for rest with access to food, hygiene, sanitation, and wraparound services, with the goal of increasing access to supportive housing. Output and Outcome Measures: •Unduplicated number of individuals served •Number of bed nights provided  •Length of completed stays  •Exit destination  •Focused qualitative outcome survey	52259210	33671944.06	23104768.28								Yes	Transitional shelters	5300000	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations			No	52259210
TPN-001505	RCP-035889	Ada County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Ada County Coroner's Office Premium Pay	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Completed. Unspent amount returned to the grant. Ada County Coroner’s Office staff are directly impacted by the increase in workload resulting from COVID19 and are severely hampered in providing services during this unprecedented increase in caseload.   In order to recognize the risk that the Coroner's staff are faced with during this pandemic, incentive pay will be paid  in 4 lump sum amounts six months apart which is calculated at 10% of the employee’s base pay.	288670	248054.6	248054.6		31	15					No
TPN-001506	RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Prevention in Congregate Setting - Prison  Portable Radio System	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	A Motorola portable radio system, including 110 APX6000 portables, was purchased for the Westmoreland County Prison to allow corrections officers to communicate while socially distancing and/or being located in the isolation unit of the prison where the 24 negative pressure cells are located. These cells limit airflow around infected inmates to just the areas they are housed, but precautions must be taken to support the prevention and mitigation of the spread of COVID-19 in the Prison.	341921.44	341921.44	341921.44								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	341921.44	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001507	RCP-036017	Allegheny County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Human Services Crisis Prevention	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The pandemic exacerbated behavioral health needs and elevated the importance of crisis response services. The Allegheny County Department of Human Services (DHS) provides behavioral health crisis response through a multitude of services. With the support of this funding, DHS is expanding capacity of existing services and investing in new services including regional call centers, mobile crisis teams, and receiving and stabilization facilities. More specifically: UPMC resolve crisis services – includes a 24-hour hotline, walk-in center, short term residential program, and mobile crisis team; Pittsburgh Mercy Central Recovery Center – a 12-person program designed as an alternative to jail for people who are experiencing a mental health crisis. The length of stay is short term – up to five days – during which individuals receive a behavioral health evaluation, a psychiatric assessment, and care management services, which will assess for the need and appropriateness of delivering an evidence-based service. Community Treatment Teams - DHS contracts with providers to deliver Assertive Community Treatment (ACT), a model of comprehensive community-based psychiatric care for people with severe mental illness. ACT uses a multi-disciplinary team approach to deliver treatment, support, and rehabilitation services. Renewal Inc. provides screening & assessment for those with a substance use disorders and determines the most appropriate level of care. Funding is also being used to respond to growing needs through the establishment of Alternative Response, Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD), community-led and operated informal mental health supports, and peer-run respite. More specifically: Alternative Response  is a model that allows for unarmed, trained responders to respond to 911 calls that have been deemed to not require a law enforcement response.  Alternative response aims to provide the right response to individuals who are experiencing emotional distress, who are in need of mediation, who are struggling with substance use, and/or whose behaviors are coming to the attention of  the general public and seem to be related to mental health, substance use, intellectual disability, and/or human service needs; LEAD offers an alternative to arrest for criminal law violations that stem from poverty, problematic substance use and mental health needs. Individuals can be diverted at the critical moment of arrest, or proactively referred by other criminal legal system stakeholders and community members, to comprehensive, community-based and long-term case management that is trauma-informed and focused on Harm Reduction; Community-led and operated informal mental health supports are a complement to traditional MH services and will focus on target communities – both geographic and demographic – that may mistrust or feel alienated by traditional MH and crisis prevention and response services, especially Black, LGBTQIA+, immigrant and refugee communities, and community members with Limited English Proficiency (LEP); a Peer-Run Respite is a voluntary, short-term (maximum of 7 days) overnight program that provides community-based, non-clinical crisis support to help people find new understanding of their situation and identify ways that they can move forward. It operates 24 hours per day in a home-like environment; Recognizing the need for shared, interdisciplinary training across stakeholder groups, as well as differentiated and tailored training for specific stakeholders, DHS is seeking a partner to launch, grow and operate a Crisis Prevention and Response Training Center. This Training Center will be able to serve a wide array of crisis responders and other professionals.	14500000	8188958.73	4934108.06								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	No	14500000
TPN-001509	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	COVID-19 Homeless Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	This project continues the City/County joint COVID-19 homeless response strategy implemented in April 2020 through the second half of the 2021-2022 Fiscal Year (existing resources will fund the first half of the year). Funding will allow for continued assistance and support for individuals and families experiencing homelessness in the Portland metro area, who comprise several diverse communities disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and systemic inequities in health care, housing and homeless services systems. Primary among the impacted communities are those identifying as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC). County shall use the funds for continuation of physical distancing and voluntary medical isolation motel shelter; street outreach; and provider support. Funds were allocated to the Joint Office of Homeless Services (JOHS), which partnered with more than 30 community organizations that provide emergency shelter and street outreach programs. Output and Outcome Measures: •Unduplicated number of individuals served •Number of bed nights provided •Length of completed stays •Prior living situation •Number of people receiving personal protective equipment/hygiene supplies	12791000	12791000	12791000								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	No	12791000
TPN-001510	RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Personal Protective Equipment	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Personal Protective Equipment purchases including cloth face masks and nitrile gloves for the county prison and nursing home.	150000	111950.41	111950.41								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001511	RCP-036017	Allegheny County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Volunteer Fire and Emergency Medical Services Aid	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	Grant support to over 200 Volunteer Fire Departments and Emergency Medical Services providers throughout Allegheny County. These organizations continue to feel the financial effect of lost hall rental fees and reduced fundraising due to COVID-19 mitigation efforts over the last two years. Each organization received up to $25,000. This project is complete. All agencies received funding by January 2022.	5114805.43	5114805.43	5114805.43								No			13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify			No	0
TPN-001514	RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Flex Calling Agreement	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	This purchase is for a licensing agreement that takes our traditional Cisco Unified Connections and bundles everything into a single licensing tier, and increases the collaborative functionality by growing the number of users who have access to these types of tools. Licensing agreement includes enhanced collaboration capabilities for all county employees with a computer account, such as voicemail, instant messaging, and WebEx teams (collaborative tool that combines IM and creatable workspaces to better track projects, team efficiencies, etc.).  Licensing agreement allows employees to access their desktop and telephone remotely while also being able to effectively communicate with other county employees, regardless of location. This licensing also includes an Emergency Response feature which ties to 911 and allows a CAD @ 911 to see the exact location of a 911 call coming from any county building using our phone system.  Right now, they just see the call coming from  our main switchboard line.	344880	344880	344880								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001515	RCP-035889	Ada County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Ada County Emergency Medical Service Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Emergency Medical Services EMTs, AEMTs, Paramedics, FTOs, Field Captain, and Battalion Chiefs are critically impacted by the workload created by the COVID19 pandemic. Providing coverage 24/7 is increasingly difficult because of the high call volume as a result of COVID19.   Providing premium pay similar to those offered by local health care service providers and the state of Idaho is necessary to maintain staffing levels to meet demand.  Premium pay will be offered for field staff to pick up overtime shifts to fill staffing vacancies and be available to ensure necessary ambulance services to respond to the increased demand.	666675	666673.6	666673.6		130
TPN-001516	RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	WebEx Licenses	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	WebEx licenses purchased to allow for virtual meetings between magistrates, inmates, legal representation, employees, vendors, etc. to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.	12231.6	12231.6	12231.6								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001517	RCP-035889	Ada County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Ada County Sheriff's Office Health Unit Premium Pay	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Ada County has identified significant threats to the County’s ability to respond to the unprecedented impacts of COVID19 and the resulting ability to protect both staff and the community we serve.  The Board of Commissioners of Ada County has identified three categories of workers who are needed to maintain continuity of operations of essential critical infrastructure sectors to protect the health and well-being of the residents of Ada County, which include Sheriff's health services.	202274	202274	124105.65		33	15					No
TPN-001518	RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Microsoft Office	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Microsoft Office purchased for a previously purchased laptop to give county employee the ability to work remotely, if necessary.	4638.72	4638.72	4638.72								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001519	RCP-039153	Cochise County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Chiricahua Mental Health Expansion	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Chiricahua Community Health Center, Inc is a federally qualified health center. The organization plans to add psychiatric care to the scope of services and build a psychiatry department to diagnose and treat patients with mental health and/or substance abuse issues.  The funds will be used to hire a psychiatric nurse practitioner (NP) who will build and lead this new department.  The team is planned to include a substance abuse/mental health case manager, a medical assistant, a counselor, and a psychiatrist who would perform the oversight and supervision.  The NP will also develop internal policies and procedures and standards of practice that are in compliance with state and federal laws.  Total development is expected to take approximately 12- 24 months.  During this time, the provider would not be able to see patients or bill for services. The goal of this new department and line of service would be to provide care for any patient who needs this care regardless of ability to pay.  Referrals can be made from other healthcare institutions.  Additional providers would be hired as the demand increases.		1592000	1025200								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001520	RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Public Hearing 1 - Room Rental	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	In order for the Board of Commissioners to hold the first public hearing for community engagement and input regarding  SLFRF spending priorities. The room allowed for social distancing among the Board, county staff,  and community members in attendance. Public hearing was held at the Westmoreland County Community College.	300	300	300								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001521	RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Alpha Project Take Back the Streets	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Despite recent improvements in the economy and the lifting of California’s pandemic restrictions, many individuals in our community continue to struggle.  The City’s Homeless Outreach Team conducted a “point- in-time” count in August 2021 which revealed that the number of homeless has doubled from the last official count in 2019.  With this increase, so did the amount of trash and debris.  In March 2020 the City received a direct allocation of Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) funds through the Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) program.  Along with the allocation, the Department of Housing and Urban Development issued programmatic waivers that eliminated the standard fifteen percent (15%) cap on Public Services CDBG expenditures.  The City seized this opportunity to fund a City initiative, Operation Pride.  This multidisciplinary approach spans various City departments and agencies to assist in the City’s clean-up efforts.   As partners, the City selected McAlister Institute (Work for Hope Program) and Alpha Project (Take Back the Streets) - allocating $135,000 of CDBG to support two employment programs that not only provided for job opportunities to formerly homeless individuals but assisted City staff in maintaining clean and safe public spaces, including parks and streets from September 2020 to June 2021. Since its initial funding, the program demonstrated that it serves as a catalyst for homeless people who are able to work, providing them with immediate transitional employment and training while providing the community with vital cost saving services through the removal of over one million pounds in trash and debris throughout Chula Vista. Unfortunately, the expenditure waivers did not apply to subsequent CDBG funding for FY22.  In FY22, the City was therefore limited to $80,000 to support both programs, including $45,000 for Alpha Project’s “Take Back the Streets Program” in FY22.  The significant rise in trash resulted in staff’s determination that an increase of services from Alpha Project to continue and maintain clean-up efforts would be a substantial benefit to the program and the City.  For this reason, staff is proposing the addition and funding allocation for a new activity under the public health category of the ARPA Spending Plan in the amount of $100,000 to ensure the “Take Back the Street Program” continuation through June 2022.	200000	200000	100000								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	Yes	200000
TPN-001522	RCP-036149	Dakota County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Byllesby Dam	5-Infrastructure	5.7-Clean Water: Energy conservation	Byllesby Dam is a high hazard hydroelectric dam located on the southern border of Dakota County on Lake Byllesby and the Cannon River. The dam currently has three original turbines and generators (fabricated in 1910 and 1915) that are well beyond the end of their expected service life. Based upon a study conducted by a consultant in 2014, the most feasible option is to upgrade the turbine equipment and powerhouse facility. Dakota County received $6M in bonding funding from the State of Minnesota in 2017 and an additional $6M in 2020. This is a multi-year project.	22124830	21179278.71	7416623.37					No	Yes
TPN-001523	RCP-036017	Allegheny County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Grants for Industrial Site Development	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project will support infrastructure and site preparation that would open new industrial sites or reuse of former industrial sites that will ensure the economic resiliency of this region. Demand remains high for industrial development and there is currently not enough industrial real estate product to satisfy demand in Allegheny County. One major impediment is the upfront costs associated with grading and extending utilities and roadways to sites. This project will allow for site developers to apply for grant funds of up to $1 million to advance industrial sites to shovel ready. Examples of such development include interior roadway networks and trail development; grading and access roadways; and other private; non-profit and publicly owned industrial sites in Allegheny County. Applicants may include projects that promote local economic activity and create and/or retain jobs; improve or create infrastructure; improve or create civic, cultural, or recreational activities or facilities; and/or improve the quality of life in the affected communities. Priority will be given to those applications showing a significant public benefit. The Redevelopment Authority of Allegheny County (RAAC) will act as the subrecipient to oversee and administer the funds for this project. The expected outcome of this award is job creating business development and community improvement. The time frame for this project is to complete contract agreements within two years and an additional two years for project completion. Selected seven projects and all were under contract as of October 31, 2022. Five projects are in process.	11750000	11750000	11750000
TPN-001524	RCP-036017	Allegheny County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Operating Deficit	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The pandemic has caused large operating deficits in 2020, 2021, and 2022 and continues to have an effect in 2023. The ARP funding will allow the county to stabilize the operating budget and provide services that otherwise would have been cut due to lack of funding. Funds will be used to maintain pre-pandemic service levels and serve the community without interruption. Further funding of government services is anticipated at year end 2023 and 2024.	86881682.94	27500000	27500000
TPN-001525	RCP-036149	Dakota County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Mental Health Crisis Response	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Dakota County is adding staff capacity to the mobile crisis response services team. In the mobile crisis model, social workers (often in pairs) are dispatched to community locations to provide mental health crisis assessment, intervention, crisis planning, and connection to other resources, including crisis follow-up and stabilization.  Mobile crisis response services coordinate with other first responders, including dispatch, police, and medics. Additional response capacity is needed to meet service demands resulting mental health impacts of the pandemic; respond to changing community expectations; and provide the most effective and responsive service to residents.	707926	605863	416169								No			1 Imp General Public			Yes	605863
TPN-001526	RCP-036149	Dakota County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Mental Health Crisis Follow Up	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Countywide expansion of service model that pairs a mental health social worker with an assigned police partner to provide follow-up, service coordination and crisis stabilization services following a mental health crisis event. Crisis outreach, follow-up and stabilization services link residents to other short- and long-term support services and are an essential component of an effective crisis services continuum.	651696	429666.61	327538.44								No			1 Imp General Public			Yes	319459
TPN-001528	RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Essential Election Workers - Primary 2021	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	In May 2021, judge of elections and poll workers were required to attend training for the primary election as well as be located at their designated precinct. The SLFRF define essential work as those in critical infrastructure sectors who regularly perform in-person work, interact with others at work, or physically handle items handled by others. Since election workers were required to handle ballots handled by others as well as perform in-person work and interact with others, the pay they received is considered to be essential and therefore eligible under the SLFRF Final Rule.wesetmoreland	257780.32	257780.32	257780.32		1270
TPN-001529	RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Public Health COVID-19 Response Costs	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Address the state's most critical public health needs that are not covered by other available funding sources. This will include but not be limited to ensuring an adequate healthcare workforce to address facility needs resulting from COVID-19 as well as providing testing equipment and consultation services to ensure responsible safe events. The State of Alaska originally appropriated $20 million towards these efforts, but it was necessary to increase this appropriation to $40 million to address the ongoing Public Health needs of the pandemic. With multiple other response fund sources set to expire over the coming months (FEMA included) and the number of COVID infections rising again, the Alaska Division of Public Health anticipates an increased demand on this CSLFRF appropriation.	40000000	16929032.04	13290964.69								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001530	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sherburne County Small Business Recovery Fund	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The purpose of the Sherburne County Small Business Recovery Fund is to provide temporary support to help local businesses in their efforts to recover from the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.  The County’s goal is to help businesses survive the economic crisis caused by the pandemic and to provide a means for them to re-open under public health guidance and protocols. The program allocated a total of 27 grants between $9,841 and the program maximum grant was $20,000.	405361	405361	405361								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			Yes	0
TPN-001531	RCP-039184	Pope County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Pope County Governmental Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue Replacement to provide government services.		10000000	10000000
TPN-001532	RCP-037104	Mobile, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay for Essential Workers	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The City of Mobile provided premium pay to essential workers who were employed at the time of the start of the declaration of the pandemic in 2020 through 2021.  These workers were eligible for a one-time	10661778.56	10661778.56	10661778.56		2081
TPN-001535	RCP-036660	Winchester City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay for Public Sector Employees	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The City Manager implemented a premium pay program for eligible City employees who work in essential critical infrastructure sectors.  The program period ran from July 1, 2021 to October 31, 2021.  Eligible employees were paid an extra $1.00, $2.00 or $3.00 per hour worked based on job risk assessment as determined by the City Manager.	500000	499808.33	499808.33		354
TPN-001539	RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Administrative Expenses - Financial Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Administrative expenses (salary and benefits) of Financial Administration staff for time involved in administering the SLFRF program.	50000	37138.67	37138.67
TPN-001541	RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	SLFRF Monitoring - ZA	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Professional services provided by Zelenkofske Axelrod, LLC to provide technical assistance  and monitoring of the SLFRF.	100000	64710	64710
TPN-001545	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Wheel Chair Rental for Vaccination Clinics	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Rented wheel chairs for vax clinic	50	50	50								No		0	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001546	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Wellness Bus Expenses	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Wellness Bus expenses utilized for vax clinics	30172.41	30172.41	22060.11								Yes	COVID-19 testing sites and laboratories	30172	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-001547	RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Public Hearing Advertisement	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Expenditure associated with advertisement the Public Hearing information in the Tribune Review local newspaper.	677	677	677								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001548	RCP-037496	State Of Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Restore UI Trust Fund	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.28-Contributions to UI Trust Funds	Restore the state's UI Trust Fund to pre-pandemic levels	758826752	758826752	758826752								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001556	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Permanent Supportive Housing Construction	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	The County of Kauai is using ARPA/SLFRF funds ($2,500,000) along with HOME-ARP funds ($1,820,000) to assist in the development of a permanent supportive housing project at the Lima Ola subdivision in Eleele, Kauai, HI. An estimated 24 units will be constructed and target the following:  1) Individuals/families who are homeless  2) Individuals/families who are at risk of becoming homeless	3750000	3602147	2208349.02								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-001560	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	SARS-COVID Test Kits #1	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Testing supplies	2681.1	2681.1	2681.1								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	2681.1	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001563	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Oregon Worker Relief Small Enterprise Fund	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	This project funds Oregon Worker Relief Coalition, a broad-coalition with more than 200+ active navigators at dozens of community-based organizations, to create a rapid, community-based relief fund for micro and very small enterprises who are unable to access other forms of relief because of exclusionary immigration policy. OWR will disburse available funds to eligible small enterprises based on demonstration of need. As COVID-19 continues to affect Oregon’s immigrant communities, the immediate, disproportionate, and devastating economic impacts are well-documented and include housing and food insecurity among other long-term complications for these families. Often overlooked, many of Oregon’s small enterprises that are operated by immigrant Oregonians, often family-owned, have likewise suffered because exclusionary immigration policy prevents them from accessing pandemic relief. For instance, many ITIN-holders operate small enterprises and are ineligible for relief due to their immigration classification. Likewise, immigrant small enterprises may avoid pandemic relief operated through traditional systems because of systemic barriers. Many of these small enterprises are composed of essential workers who themselves are impacted by COVID-19. These small enterprises are also impacted by public health measures that close or limit their capacity. These compounding impacts magnify the disruption experienced by the immigrant small enterprise. These small enterprises are essential to Oregon, to our regional and local communities, and are necessary for our collective prosperity. Without relief, these small enterprises will be irreparably harmed. This harm reverberates through the communities in which the enterprises are rooted, impacting the people served, the jobs retained, and the cultural vibrancy they bring to Oregon. Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of businesses served  •Amount distributed by business  •Outcome follow-up survey  •Outcome focus group	1500000	1500000	1497481.72								No			24 Dis Imp Other SBs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify			No	0
TPN-001564	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Houseless Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The County of Kauai is using ARPA/SLFRF funds ($170,000) as flexible funding to assist homeless individuals and families as well as those who serve this demographic. Examples include efforts to assist in stabilizing those recently housed from homelessness in order to prevent a return to homelessness and efforts to help providers serve clients in ways that traditional funding struggles to do.	470000	420002	304380.25								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001565	RCP-039153	Cochise County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health and Public Safety Payroll, July 2021	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	On October 26, the County approved the use of ARPA funds for payroll expenses directed to the COVID-19 response for the July 2021. Employees considered in this use were Public Health Director, Epidemiologist, Public Health Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Jail Medical staff and Adult Detention staff.		357991.17	357991.17			74					No
TPN-001566	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Elderly Food Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	This project will provide food support to needy older adults 60 years or older. Items to be provided include fresh produce good for one person for a week delivered every two weeks or prepared meal delivered twice a week or meal kit delivered every week.  Consumers will be referred to the respective providers. Priority are consumers in the Wainiha, Kauai, HI area and those who are below the poverty threshold.	147000	146993	87981								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001567	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Elderly Mental Health	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	This project will provide mental health counseling. Child and Family Service thru Worklife will offer mental health counseling to older adults 60 years or older. YWCA will be awarded mental health counseling services for younger consumers. Sessions will be for sixty (60) minutes with a maximum of 3 sessions per week. Mental health counseling can be by phone, in person or via other online platforms.	100000	99940	71050								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001568	RCP-039153	Cochise County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health and Public Safety Payroll, FY 21	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Payroll expenses directed to the COVID-19 response for March 7, 2021 - June 30, 2021. Employees covered include the Public Heath Director, Epidemiologist, Public Health Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Jail Medical staff and Adult Detention staff.		1525466.72	1525466.72			74					No
TPN-001569	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Oregon Worker Relief Relief Fund	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Oregon Worker Relief is a community-governed initiative that uses an equity-focused design thinking approach to solve for the short-and long-term negative economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on underserved immigrant and refugee communities. Because of their immigration status, many Oregonians are categorically excluded from some of our most important federal safety net programs such as SNAP and TANF, in addition to the $1,200 Economic Impact Payment and the Earned Income Tax Credit. This has immediate harsh impacts such as homelessness, food insecurity, and long-term impacts undermining the health and stability of immigrant families and individuals that are restaurant workers, caregivers, immigrants, refugees, day laborers, and farmworkers. OWR will provide household assistance to eligible individuals based on demonstration of need, and will provide capacity to organizations in the field to create more community-centered solutions to household instability. Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of individuals or households served  •Amount distributed to individuals or households •Weeks of hardship experienced by recipient at point of application  •Outcome follow-up survey   •Outcome focus group	2000000	2000000	2000000								No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate			No	2000000
TPN-001573	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Non-Profit Economic Loss Support Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The County of Kauai’s Office of Economic Development (OED) offered grants through the Nonprofit Recovery Grant Program. The intent of the grant program was to provide funding to nonprofit organizations on Kauai that experienced an economic loss due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Eligible nonprofit organizations submitted applications along with supporting documentation to demonstrate their loss and need for grant funding.  A total of 34 nonprofit organizations were awarded funding through the grant. The individual amount of funding varied based on need and nonprofit size, with amounts up to $15,000.  Grant funds can be used for working capital to cover the day-to-day operating expenses of the nonprofit, such as rent/lease payments, mortgage payments, payroll and benefit costs and utility expenses not already covered by other grant funding.	476891	476891	326891								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-001575	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail Touchpoint Cleaning #2	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Outside vendor was hired to clean and sanitize the County Jail. These represent March - May costs.	19350	19350	19350								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001576	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Artists and Arts Organization Economic Loss Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The County of Kauai’s Office of Economic Development (OED) is working on a project to support rebuilding of the film industry and entertainment jobs on this island which is part of our arts/creative industries sector.  This project has not started yet and is still in planning stages.	349949	205869.74	169469.74								No			13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify
TPN-001578	RCP-037095	Citrus Heights, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	General Fund 101 ARPA - Police	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.2-Public Sector Workforce: Rehiring Public Sector Staff	Of the 147.5 authorized full-time equivalent positions in our Police Department, 26 positions were unfunded in the most recent adopted budget for Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23.  Of these 26 authorized, but unfunded positions, 22 were filled in January 2020 prior to the pandemic and were not re-filled as subsequent vacancies occurred due to lack of funding.  These 22 vacant Police Department positions are eligible for funding with ARPA funds.   City Council approved the use of $5,353,210 of the City's ARPA funding to re-fill 22 public safety positions for Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23.		5353209	4090892				22				No
TPN-001579	RCP-036031	City Of Houston, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Vaccination Incentive Cards	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	The incentive-based program focused on groups in zip codes with persistently low vaccination rates in accordance with Houston’s COVID Community Vulnerability Index (CCVI) report.   The Houston Health Department (HHD) selected the location where the incentives were provided in hopes that people who are reluctant to be vaccinated might opt to be vaccinated. Patients starting or completing the vaccine series were eligible for the incentive, targeting communities with low vaccination rates and within the vulnerable priority zip codes. Increasing vaccine uptake will decrease the transmission of the COVID-19 disease and decrease hospitalization admission burden on the public hospital systems. Houston Health Department will focus on the current coverage goal of 70% or more. The project launched on 08/26/2021 and is ongoing. https://www.houstontx.gov/health/NewsReleases/houston-health-department-to-provide-up-to-150-in-gift-cards-for-covid-19-vaccinations.html#:~:text=HOUSTON%20%2D%20To%20increase%20the%20city's,vote%20at%20its%20Wednesday%20meeting. Note: Relevant project outcome and evidence based data is uploaded to the Supporting Documents section of the City of Houston’s ARPA SLFRF website at www.houstontx.gov/arpa	3125000	3089757.26	3089757.26								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001581	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail Touchpoint Cleaning #1	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Hired vendor to clean and sanitize county jail to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. These represent June -August costs.	19350	19350	19350								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001583	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Meeting Room Video Conference Equipment	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Added video equipment to a public meeting room to allow for virtual meetings to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.	1616.87	1616.87	1616.87								Yes	Technology and tools	4200	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001584	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	SARS COVID Testing Kits #2	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Purchased COVID test kits for jail staff and inmates.	5362.2	5362.2	5362.2								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	5362.5	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001585	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Ho'ohana Kauai	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Hoomana Kaua‘i program enhances the workforce effort by creating relationships with employers.  Our team learns what the employers are looking for, intimately, then when someone contacts Hoohana Kaua‘i Hoohana Kaua‘i staff are doing a preliminary interview on the spot.  If the person looks like they qualify, they a call is made on the spot with the employer and typically the hire happens quickly.  The way the hiring works now is we just give them a list of possible jobs and the unemployed have to figure out what works for them and call employers one by one.  The staff is also assisting with several job fairs around the island.  Also, one staff member is screening everyone who comes into the American Job Center/Hale Kōkua where they are housed.	360000	354815.2	354815.2			*					No
TPN-001586	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Oregon Worker Relief Legal Defense	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Oregon Worker Relief (OWR) is a community-governed initiative using an equity-focused design thinking approach to solve for the short-and long-term negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on underserved immigrant and refugee communities. The historic exclusion of these communities from social and civic safety systems and recovery structures has urgent short-term implications, such as housing and food insecurity, and profound long-term implications, including marginalization, erasure, family separation, and civic exclusions. The immigration legal precarity experienced by immigrant and refugee communities prevents access to public health systems (such as health care), civic support systems (such as unemployment and rental support), and other aspects of civic life. This project funds immigration legal services to eligible individuals to mitigate immigration legal precarity that contributes to household destabilization. OWR Coalition is a broad coalition with 200+ active navigators at dozens of community-based organizations. Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of individuals served  •Legal outcomes  •Outcome follow-up survey	2000000	2000000	1759740.02								No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate			No	2000000
TPN-001587	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Rise to Work	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The Rise to Work program was created to help displaced workers on Kaua’i connect to temporary job opportunities with local employers. Participants in the program receive weekly pay, free health insurance benefits and the opportunity to learn new skills and gain professional connections. Positions are funded by the program for 12 weeks. In addition to supporting displaced workers, the Rise to Work program also benefits local businesses and nonprofit organizations on Kaua’i by allowing them to bring on new hires to increase their capacity or pivot their business model without taking on additional payroll costs.	708160	708159.52	708159.52								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-001588	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Rent Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	The public health emergency, including necessary measures to protect public health, resulted in significant economic and financial hardship for community members, particularly those with lower incomes. The severe recession has disproportionately affected low-income community members and amplified housing insecurity. This project provides rent assistance for renters impacted by the health and/or economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic who live in Portland Housing Bureau-regulated affordable housing. Researchers estimate that evictions led to 430,000 excess cases of COVID-19 and 10,000 excess deaths during the summer of 2020. Limiting the number of evictions by providing tenants with rent assistance will reduce community spread by keeping vulnerable residents stably housed. Rent assistance payments for renters in PHB-regulated affordable housing. Output and Outcome Measures: •Amount distributed per tenant to landlords	1500000	1500000	1488547.02	610							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	No	1500000
TPN-001589	RCP-039807	Benton County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	SERVICE RECOGNITION AWARDS	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace lost government revenues to recognize and compensate the additional time and effort of county employees throughout pandemic.		429793.59	429793.59
TPN-001591	RCP-039807	Benton County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	COUNTY ADMINISTRATION	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Allowable administration to cover cost associated with accountability and oversight for ARPA Funding		500000	134603.82
TPN-001593	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Youth Mental Recovery	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The $350,000 is being used by KPD to lease a space at the Kauai Philippine Cultural Center (KPCC) in Puhi for Youth Activities for the Kauai Police Activities League (see attached).  They are working towards providing a number of youth programs such as boxing, wrestling, jiu-jitsu, basketball, and pickleball (to name a few activities). Mentoring youth is an key component of the programs. KPAL strives to provide positive role models and activities that not only keep youth engaged and active, but helps to develop character, good sportsmanship, and good citizenship. KPAL’s motto is “filling playgrounds, not prisons.”  Funds have not moved yet because we negotiated a two month period for KPD to move in before payments begin	350000	249191	44330.89								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-001597	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Trash Can Program Expansion and Improvement	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	The COVID pandemic has led to a substantial increase in the amount of trash, graffiti, and vandalism in the city. From increased to-go containers from restaurants leading to overflowing trash cans, large increases in visitation to parks and natural areas and accompanying littering, to reduced services and build-up of litter and debris on the sides of our streets, the impacts of COVID are visible to all. Recovery requires that these issues be addressed head-on. This project adds 200 additional public trash cans to North Portland, an area currently underserved by the city’s public trash can program. Older, smaller, trash cans in other neighborhoods and business districts will also be replaced. Partners include Go Lloyd, Portland Business Alliance, Pearl District Neighborhood Association, COBID-certified haulers, North Portland Neighborhood Services, Venture Portland, Neighborhood Associations, and Business Districts. Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of new trash cans  •Number of updated/replaced trash cans  •Pounds of trash collected •Number of trash cans cleared of surrounding debris  •Number of trash-related 311 complaints collected about vicinity of new or replaced trash cans	765000	680964.5	669314.5								No			1 Imp General Public			No	765000
TPN-001598	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Addressing litter and vandalism in Portland	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	The COVID pandemic has led to a substantial increase in the amount of trash, graffiti, and vandalism in the city. The city’s recovery will require that these issues be addressed head-on. From increased to-go containers from restaurants leading to overflowing trash cans, large increases in visitation to parks and natural areas and accompanying littering, to reduced services and build-up of litter and debris on the sides of our streets, the impacts of COVID are visible to all. As the trash problem throughout the city has grown, community groups and individual volunteers have stepped up to help. However, these cleanup efforts require a growing amount of assistance with disposal. By providing disposal assistance to these community volunteers this proposal will ensure this aspect of the city’s recovery is addressed. Disposal assistance will be available to community groups conducting litter cleanups throughout the city. Partners include Neighborhood Associations, Business Districts, nonprofits, SOLVE, Planning and Sustainability, Parks and Recreation.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic		No	0
TPN-001599	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Addressing litter and vandalism in Portland	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Due to the impacts of COVID-19 our ability to maintain appropriate levels of street cleaning were drastically impacted. This project will focus on bringing the right of way back to a pre-pandemic state of cleanliness and safety through reduced response time to calls for large debris clean-up and increased street cleaning. Output and Outcome Measures: •Portland Bureau of Transportation Equity Matrix Values of census tracts in selected street cleaning districts •Bulky waste collected •Debris from street cleaning Volume Collected •Linear miles cleaned •Brush cutting in miles	1495000	1286913.41	1286913.41								No			1 Imp General Public	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic		No	1495000
TPN-001600	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Park Trash Can Replacement and Enhancement Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The COVID pandemic has led to a substantial increase in the amount of trash, graffiti, and vandalism in the city. The city’s recovery will require that these issues be addressed head-on. From increased to-go containers from restaurants leading to overflowing trash cans, large increases in visitation to parks and natural areas and accompanying littering, to reduced services and build-up of litter and debris on the sides of our streets, the impacts of COVID are visible to all. This project will replace or up-size 200 garbage cans in Portland parks system, which is a major draw for tourists and visitors to our community. This project will create a safer, more welcoming environment for out-of-town visitors to our parks. Output and Outcome Measures: •Park score and expenditure of funds •Number of new or updated trash cans •Number of trash cans updated to meet ADA Compliance •Outcome survey of park users	425000	145115	145115								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	425000	1 Imp General Public	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-001601	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	AdoptOneBlock: Community Cleanup Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	This project supports neighborhood business and social success through the lenses of environmental justice and land stewardship; nonprofit AdoptOneBlock (AOB) serves community by empowering volunteers with the technology and tools needed to ‘adopt’ and care for the block they live on or a block in their neighborhood. There is a direct focus on removing litter, trash, and hazards. During the COVID-19 pandemic this program has been a safe civic activity, as it supports individual, outside volunteerism. This pandemic-responsive model to create safe and welcoming neighborhoods benefits Portland’s neighborhood-based businesses and the communities who support them. Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of blocks adopted  •Information about business block adopters  •Outcomes survey	40000	40000	40000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	1 Imp General Public		No	40000
TPN-001602	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Healthy Business Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	This project provides right-of-way space for retail activity, offering safer access to goods and services. Outdoor space is critical to business operations during the pandemic. Due to safety concerns, many community members do not feel comfortable accessing businesses indoors. The availability of outdoor space allows businesses to retain customers while responding to shifting capacity limits and other public health regulations. Project activities include ongoing outreach, permit application processing, traffic engineering support, insurance processing, inspections coordination, and ongoing technical assistance. Partners include other regulatory agencies inside and outside of the City of Portland, including Oregon Liquor Control Commission, Fire Marshal, Noise Control, and Multnomah County Health. Additional partners include agencies focused on economic development and business support, including Prosper Portland internal to the City of Portland, and external business associations. Businesses, business groups, and organizations will also be partners in select implementation projects. Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of businesses or organizations served  •Type of service provided •Amount distributed to organizations (if direct monetary assistance will be provided) •Evaluation survey	7334000	3795593.38	3784349.63								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify		No	7334000
TPN-001603	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Business Restoration	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.31-Rehabilitation of Commercial Properties or Other Improvements	The pandemic has led to a substantial increase in the amount of trash, graffiti, and vandalism in the city. If the windows or doors of a business are broken during the commission of a crime, the Portland Police Bureau (PPB) is obligated to secure the business before leaving. Typically, a 24/7 contractor boards up businesses, then PPB bills the business for the costs. This doubly victimizes businesses – having to pay for the cost of any theft or vandalism as well as repairs. This project subsidizes those costs to relieve the burden on struggling businesses, providing board-up service free of charge. Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of businesses served •Reduction in the number of invoices sent to businesses •Amount of money saved by businesses receiving service	75000	74964.95	74964.95								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-001604	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	RV Pollution Prevention Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Economic impacts of the pandemic have disproportionately affected low-income workers and people experiencing houselessness. People living in RVs may have lost jobs due to COVID-19, or may have been excluded from finding work due to the virus. Providing services to unhoused Portlanders increases their stability and reduces their vulnerability to the ongoing threat of the virus. Sanitary waste and gray water from occupied Recreational Vehicles (RVs) parked in the right-of-way (ROW) are often discharged to a green street, a storm inlet, or the street gutter. The waste may flow from storm inlets to the Willamette River or another nearby stream. Exposure to wastewater poses serious health threats. Through this program, sanitary waste and gray water will be pumped from RVs parked in the ROW and disposed of safely, thus eliminating a potential pathway for human exposure to harmful pathogens. COVID-19 has been found in wastewater effluent from treatment plants, and is therefore present in sanitary waste from RVs. BES contracts with a private partner. Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of RVs served •Gallons of wastewater collected  •Pounds of trash collected   •Number and type of referrals for social, health and housing services  •Service survey	805000	662650.12	359434.36								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	No	805000
TPN-001605	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Relief and Recovery for Artists	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	With the majority of indoor arts and entertainment spaces closed for a long period since late March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted our local arts community more than most sectors. Artists have been disproportionately impacted by the pandemic, experiencing a significant loss of income as galleries, museums, theaters and music halls were forced to close for over a year – Black, Indigenous, Latinx, Asian, Pacific Islander and Artists of color even more so. Many arts organizations, including those led by People of Color, are struggling to remain in business and will have challenges re-opening safely at a time when local funding streams have been acutely impacted as a direct result of the pandemic. This project provides relief and new programming to help our arts community begin to recover. Residency grants and free space will be provided for Black artists to produce work and present public programs at the Interstate Firehouse Cultural Center. Native-produced artworks will be procured and installed in the Cully neighborhood, including a new cultural corridor along Northeast 42nd Avenue and the North Lombard Bridge Project. Block grants will be provided to nonprofit cultural organizations for culturally specific artist programming. Direct support will be provided to underrepresented artists who identify as Black, Indigenous, Latinx, Asian, Pacific Islander and People of Color; LGBTQIA+; and artists with disabilities. Output and Outcome Measures: •Amount of residency grants distributed by Interstate Firehouse Cultural Center  •Number of residency grants provided by Interstate Firehouse Cultural Center  •Number of public programs presented at the center •Amount distributed to artists receiving direct support  •Number of artists receiving direct support  •Amount of grants distributed to culturally specific organizations  •Number of grants distributed to culturally specific organizations  •Survey about uses of funds   •Number of artists who produce artwork   •Amount awarded to produce artwork	2000000	1688284.75	1225339.17								No			24 Dis Imp Other SBs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify	20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify	No	0
TPN-001606	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Upstream Services for Families Impacted by Gun Violence	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	This project addresses the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 and gun violence within both Black, Indigenous, and People of Color communities, focusing particularly on communities most isolated and disconnected from health care, community and government services. Although new City funds have been dedicated to address the holistic rise in gun violence, gaps remain, particularly within African immigrant communities. This project targets youth and families who have experienced dislocation and isolation to engage youth in Primary Prevention Programs – pro-social activities that are proven to reduce violence. Primary Prevention Programs deeply engage youth who are experiencing a lack of resources, trauma, and isolation. Funded activities may include pro-social activities to facilitate shame reduction, conflict resolution, social-emotional education, and comprehensive skill building. The project will also provide support to community partner organizations.  Outcome and Output Measures: •Number of contacts with young people •Type and number of services provided •Number of total clients served •Number of active clients •Number of high-risk clients •Number of clients with safety issues •Number of clients with mediations	11239612	5591803.62	623134.87								No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify		No	11239612
TPN-001607	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Continuation of Hygiene Stations	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	In 2020, the City placed hygiene stations – portable toilets and handwashing stations – throughout our neighborhoods to ensure community-wide access to this basic and essential public health resource. This risk-mitigation action to help people experiencing houselessness stay safe was a direct response to the public health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and continues to be a critical need. This project supports placement and regular servicing of approximately 130 hygiene stations across Portland. Output and Outcome Measures: •Number of hygiene stations •Qualitative outcome survey of those that have used the stations	2400000	1747250.58	885465.58								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity		No	2400000
TPN-001608	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Repayment of Unemployment Title XII advances for Benefit Payments	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.28-Contributions to UI Trust Funds	To repay Title XII advances provided by the U.S. Department of Labor to the State of Hawai‘i. These advances allowed the State to continue to pay unemployment insurance benefits even after the State's unemployment trust fund was depleted.	700000000	700000000	700000000								No			1 Imp General Public		1 Imp General Public
TPN-001609	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Hawai‘i Tourism Recovery Plan	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide resources to aid in the recovery of the Hawai‘i tourism industry.	48440036.5	48440036.5	48440036.5								No
TPN-001610	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Convention Center Funding	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For repair and maintenance projects at the Hawai‘i Convention Center.	10017053.86	10017053.86	10017053.86
TPN-001611	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Federal Recovery Plan Performance & Reporting	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide the resources to ensure the State of Hawai‘i can meet the U.S. Treasury’s compliance and reporting requirements for ARPA CSFRF and to facilitate the transition of federal award management into a new Enterprise Finance System that will support grant management, project management, reporting, and cybersecurity functions necessary to comply with requirements of federal awards in a timely, efficient, and uninterrupted manner.	13643026.1	2159346.93	2159346.93
TPN-001613	RCP-036320	Rochester City, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA Accounting and Compliance Services	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Consulting services and technical assistance to the City of Rochester for ARPA plan development, reporting, and grant compliance and management.	175000	163125	102131.25
TPN-001614	RCP-036812	Washington County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Devola Sanitary Sewer Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	The proposed project includes design and construction of a new pressurized sewer system in the general area of Masonic Park Road, Chamberlain Drive, Lawton Road, Strecker Lane and Sylvan Way in Devola, Washington County, Ohio. This project would include approximately 50,000 feet of sewer main network, air release valves and cleanouts, repairs and upgrades to an existing pump station, excavation and restoration of disturbed areas, installation of individual pump units at approximately 563 properties to include service lateral connections, electrical connections for the pump units, abandonment of existing septic tanks, tie-ins of the new sanitary sewer system to the existing gravity system, manholes, and all related appurtenances.	5775	5775	5775
TPN-001615	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail Touchpoint Cleaning #3	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	We contract with an outside vendor to clean and sanitize the jail helping mitigate the spread of COVID-19 (September, October, November).	19350	19350	19350								No			1 Imp General Public			Yes	0
TPN-001616	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail Touchpoint Cleaning #4	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Contract with a vendor to clean and sanitize the jail to help mitigate the spread of COVID-19 (December payment).	6450	6450	6450								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001617	RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	County Employees	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	County employees, Sheriff officers assigned to vaccination/testing sites, other employees assigned to vaccination/testing sites, Covid call centers, food distribution and other Covid related duties	350000	335382.34	335382.34			250					No
TPN-001618	RCP-038899	Kalamazoo County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Consultants	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Funding to support the use of consultants to communicate with public regarding ARPA spending efforts, administer ARPA grant program, assist with revenue replacement calculations and ensure allocations meet the federal government's specifications.	0	0	0
TPN-001619	RCP-036017	Allegheny County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Public Safety Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Police Department will use funds to acquire a new armored rescue vehicle for its Special Weapons and Tactics Team (SWAT) to complement its 15-year-old vehicle. The SWAT Team is a highly trained tactical unit that consists of patrol and investigative officers who assist various Federal, State, and Local agencies in the resolution of hostage rescue situations, barricaded armed individuals, high-risk arrest and search warrants, and other high-risk situations. This project is complete. Allegheny County received vehicle October 20, 2022.	301498	301498	301498
TPN-001620	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Home Monitors for HHS Hybrid Workers	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	HHS is moving forward with hybrid work as a permanent solution for most of our workforce. The pandemic has demonstrated that workers are connected and in many cases, more efficient at paperwork and processing at home than when in the office. We believe that even with client visits resuming and return to the office for Sherburne County staff, many of our workers will spend more time working from home than at the Government Center.  The pandemic has created a 'bulge' or bottleneck of work; HHS peacetime emergency waivers caused many programs, services, eligibility determinations to be put on hold. As the waivers are starting to be lifted (the first ones on June 1st with many of our public assistance programs, health care and social services waivers TBD), the floodgates of work are being opened.  Many requests for services or assistance applications skyrocketed during the economic and social/emotional crisis due to the pandemic and many waivers prohibited clients from being removed from programs. As we 'return to normal' and waivers are being lifted, public assistance application (tens of thousands in Sherburne County) will need to go through a manual review process and new eligibility determination. For our social services clients, some of the most vulnerable in our community (elderly, disabled, unstable family situations, children at-risk of abuse/in crisis), will need extra support and case management services as they return from isolation. All of these situations set-up the perfect storm for HHS workers to be completely overwhelmed.	33280	33280	33280								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	33280	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001621	RCP-036017	Allegheny County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Public Radio System Upgrades	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Reliable emergency communications impacts all county residents, and the COVID-19 pandemic has shown that all entities need to be better prepared for future pandemics and emergencies. The focus of this project is equipment upgrades and replacements to countywide radio trunk systems. This includes replacing the radio transmitters (repeaters), receivers, voter comparators (compares and selects best signal between receivers), antenna systems, and battery plants. This will have a direct impact on over 100 municipal police, fire and Emergency Medical Service (EMS) agencies as well as County Police, Sheriff, Emergency Services and Fire Marshall. These upgrades to the backbone of the communications system complements the project ID 3302 to replace radios across agencies. As of this reporting period, project specifications have been determined, pricing quotes obtained, and some equipment has been ordered and received to date. It is anticipated that all equipment will be ordered by year end and installation will begin in 2024.	7349459	2384294.24	1893373.29								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	7347833	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001622	RCP-036017	Allegheny County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	County-wide Radio Replacements	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	As an extension of project 3301, this project will provide radio equipment directly to over 300 fire, EMS and police departments throughout Allegheny County. These responders have had to adapt to new protocols implemented to better protect first responders and the public against COVID-19 and future contagious disease. Additionally, reliable communications are needed to directly respond to those with health complications from COVID-19 as well as other potential disasters, natural and manmade, that impact health such as fire, chemical spills, and gas leaks. This project also complements project 4601 to the extent that the pandemic has had direct economic impact on EMS and Volunteer Fire Departments that heavily rely on donations. Lost funding impacts their ability to obtain updated equipment and the county can lessen the burden by providing radio equipment. Project to be completed by 12/31/2023. As of this reporting period, all 2811 radios have been ordered but 10 have not been received. Of the 2801 received, 2136 radios have been distributed to 273 agencies; 80 radios are pending pickup from 10 agencies; and the remaining radios are in the process of being programmed for their respective agencies.	10958882	10958881.88	10900541.14					No	No	No	Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	10940508	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001623	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	HHS Zoom Licenses	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Virtual meetings, check-ins, and case consultations have become a way of life for everyone, HHS workers included. Now that we have a good idea moving forward of what our new normal will look like, hybrid/mobile working and virtual client meetings are here to stay! Because of this, HHS staff need a reliable and easy method to conduct both staff and client meetings. Due to the unique community-based nature of the work of HHS, Zoom is the most reliable and client-friendly solution as compared to other virtual platforms - primarily due to ease of use and unlimited participant capacity. While virtual client and staff meetings are used numerous times by dozens and dozens of staff daily, we know that virtual meetings with clients will only increase in the future. Specifically, the recent waiver that was passed by the Minnesota Legislature now eliminates the face-to-face requirement for family cash interviews. Currently, Sherburne County has 350 families on Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP). With the face-to-face requirement gone, we anticipate that most of these families will now utilize video conferencing as a way to fulfill the interview requirement. HHS did an inventory of staff who are actively using their Zoom licenses several months ago. Out of 200+ staff, 106 are actively using their Zoom license - either every week or most, every day. Therefore, HHS is requesting 106 Zoom licenses for three-years at a cost of $599.70 each.	63600	63600	63600								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001624	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail Zoom Licenses	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	To prevent the spread of COVID-19 within the jail during the pandemic outside visitors have been restricted from entering the jail. Professional visits are an operational necessity, therefore Zoom is used to provide those visits.	202.39	202.39	202.39								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001625	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Electrostatic Disinfectant Spraying System #1	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The Sherburne County Jail is requesting to purchase eight cordless electrostatic handheld sprayers help prevent the spread of the COVID-19 virus. Purchasing eight handheld sprayers will allow for each housing unit to safely and quickly sterilize common areas and touchpoints within the housing unit. The electrostatic handheld sprayers will disinfect/sterilize contaminates to include the COVID-19 virus.	5338.38	5338.38	5338.38								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	5338.38	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001626	RCP-036854	Pearland, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Pearland FY 21 ARPA Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue replacement for losses incurred during the initial period of performance - FY 2021.	1000000	1000000	1000000
TPN-001627	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Electrostatic Disinfectant Spraying System #2	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The Sherburne County Jail is requesting to purchase eight cordless electrostatic handheld sprayers help prevent the spread of the COVID-19 virus. Purchasing eight handheld sprayers will allow for each housing unit to safely and quickly sterilize common areas and touchpoints within the housing unit. The electrostatic handheld sprayers will disinfect/sterilize contaminates to include the COVID-19 virus.	1378.4	1378.4	1378.4								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	3000	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001628	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail Cleaning Equipment	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	The Sherburne County Jail is requesting to purchase two vacuum cleaners to prevent the spread of COVID-19 within the housing units.	1198	1198	1198								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	1198	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001630	RCP-040268	Bloomfield, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Revenenue Replacement - Provision of Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue Replacement as reported in CY 2021 Municipal Budget, based on 2020 data actuals.		4898377.68	4898377.68
TPN-001631	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail PPE #1	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Gloves, gowns, masks and safety glasses used within the Jail to prevent the spread of COVID-19.  Used to comply with the public health safety guidelines. Purchases from March and April 2021.	26588.29	26588.29	26588.29								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	26588.29	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001632	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail PPE #2	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Purchase nitrile gloves to be used within the jail to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Gloves are used to to comply with the public health safety guidelines.	14156.5	14156.5	14156.5								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	14156.5	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001633	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail PPE #3	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Gloves, gowns, masks and safety glasses used within the Jail to prevent the spread of COVID-19.  Used to comply with the public health safety guidelines.	11370	11370	11370								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	11370	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001634	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail PPE #4	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Disposable gowns to be used within the Jail to prevent the spread of COVID-19.  Used to comply with the public health safety guidelines.	557.53	557.53	557.53								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	557.53	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001635	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail PPE October	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Gloves, gowns, masks and safety glasses used within the Jail to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Used to comply with the public health safety guidelines.	12171	12171	12171								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	12171	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001636	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail PPE October #2	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Nitrile gloves to be used within the Jail to prevent the spread of COVID-19.  Used to comply with the public health safety guidelines.	6360	6360	6360								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	6360	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001640	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Wellness Van Electrical Work	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	The Wellness Van needs to be continually charged when not in use. Electrical Services were installed on the east end of the government center campus. The van is being used throughout the County to assist in the distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine.	2072	2072	2072								Yes	COVID-19 testing sites and laboratories	2072	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001642	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	COVID Signs Throughout Government Center	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Wear Your Mask signs were ordered for multiple locations throughout the Government Center. The signs were installed to help prevent the spread of the COVID-19 virus	36	36	36								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	36	1 Imp General Public			No	36
TPN-001645	RCP-039742	Manchester, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Rental Assistance First/Last Progrm	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Rental Assistance program	1100000	1100000	882719.63	500							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-001646	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	METS Eligibility Specialist Position	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	During the economic turmoil of COVID, public assistance requests and applications have skyrocketed.  Income Maintenance staff have been totally overwhelmed by the amount of folks applying for public assistance, as well as the changes of eligibility, waivers, program modifications, etc.  Renewals for cash and food support start June 1, 2021, so while we are seeing the floodgates open, we are managing through mandatory OT and extension of waivers in most of our programs, except for health care assistance.  The Federal Government has dictated that no one can be closed on health care programs during the pandemic - so health care applications keep coming in while no one is able to be dropped from health care.  Moreover, once the waiver is lifted, each individual case will need to be reviewed to ensure those who are on MA (Medical Assistance) remain eligible.  This will be a manual effort.   In January 2019, Sherburne County had 15,253 individuals enrolled on health care assistance.  As of April 2021, that had increased to 17,761 - an increase of nearly 20%.  Staff are seeing an average of 75-100 health care assistance applications per month.  Additionally, there have been an increase of phone calls and inquiries related to health care.  We are at the point now where federal performance benchmarks will soon not be met.  Additionally, calls can no longer be responded to in a timely manner.  Some of these phone calls are reported change in circumstance - which delays client’s ability to receive medications and/or schedule needed health care appointments.   HHS believes that after waivers have been lifted and manual reviews and redeterminations have been made, health care caseloads will go back to pre-pandemic levels, at which time we will no longer need this staff person.  The request is being made for a health care worker to start 7/1/21 until 12/31/24, or until the person is no longer needed due to shrinking caseload size. The total cost of this request, to include salary + fringe + equipment is estimated at $276.114.	276114	276114	125458.12			*					No
TPN-001647	RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Administration of Funds	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	The review uses of ARP and FEMA  funds related to Covid and prepares and file reports.	75000	64589.59	64589.59								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001649	RCP-039742	Manchester, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Social Service/ Police Partnership	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	Contract with a social worker to assist police department in responding to calls that involve mental health component/ to address equity issues in police response to domestic calls	375000	375000	163883.12								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-001650	RCP-039742	Manchester, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Social Service Enhancements	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Pay for additional social service consultants/ counselors to assist with COVID-related trauma	15000	15000	0								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001652	RCP-036632	Cabo Rojo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Planning and Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	The Municipality will allocate Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“CLFRF”) for planning and administration purposes. Under this activity, the Municipality will ensure that CLFRF resources are used effectively in compliance the applicable regulations and to expedite citywide recovery and economic revamping.  The funds will be used for the payment of salaries and fringe benefits of employees working directly in the administration of the CLFRF funds and the ARPA Program, cost of consultants to support effective management and guarantee compliance with the requirements of laws and regulations, acquisition costs of equipment, materials, supplies, vehicle adquisition  and other necessary cost for the administration of the program.   The  CLFRF funds administration will be led by the Municipal Office of Federal Programs (the “Federal Office”).  This office will be responsible for leading the response and recovery activities related to the COVID-19 pandemic, which will be financed mainly through the CLFRF funds. The Federal Office will be responsible for the overall management and administration of the CLFRF funds, including: 1. Monitoring and compliance activities 2. Fiscal, financial, and performance reporting The will also provide oversight over the following: 1. Procurement and contracting 2. Payroll and invoice cash disbursements 3. Coordination and oversight of municipal dependency working plans	2253995	2253995	713871.65
TPN-001653	RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Social Distancing	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Changes needed to operate the County while social distancing	25000	22692	22692								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001654	RCP-036691	Story County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	HVAC	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	HVAC system at Justice Center		1428990.19	1428990.19								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	1400000	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001655	RCP-039642	Whiteside County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	LUCAS Mechanical Chest Compression System	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	The LUCAS Mechanical Chest Compression System© is a battery-operated device for delivering consistent and continuous chest compressions during cardiac arrest events. In addition, this device can help with caregiver safety by minimizing exposure to COVID-19 or other infectious diseases and reducing the potential for responder injury by:    • Allowing providers to maintain a distance from the suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patient during the administration of CPR. Manual CPR is a possible transmission route for caregivers because the mouth and nose of the personnel come close to mouth and nose of the patient (that is valid for any other airborne transmission, such as meningitis)   • During manual CPR, the rescuer is performing an aerobic activity that increases his/her minute volume and makes it more likely to breathe in aerosol from the patient (patient exhalation of breath including airborne virus)  • The rotation of rescuers during manual CPR exposes more people to the disease transmission. When managing suspected and confirmed cases of COVID-19, the number of individual staff members involved in the resuscitation should be kept to a minimum with no or minimal exchange of staff for the duration of the case.	92756.85	92756.85	92756.85								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001656	RCP-039592	West Valley, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	First Responders	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	ARPA Funds to be used to pay for first responders salaries related to COVID.	26512139	26512139	26512139			376					No
TPN-001658	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	HHS COVID-19 Temporary Worker	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	HHS conducts case management for area Nursing Homes (for individuals not enrolled on Elderly Waiver) and for Minnesota Medicaid Senior Health Options (MSHO) Senior Care Plus (MSC+) Programs. Because this is a preventative program to help seniors live independently and/or without hospitalization, our Public Health Nurse provides case management. Since all Public Health Nurses needed to get pulled into vaccinations 100%, this left a gap in services. A former SCHHS staff was brought in on a temporary basis to cover the caseload left by the public health nurse. This person started early March and will be helping to cover cases and transition back to public health through the beginning of August. Funds requested are for the max she could work as a temp employee (67 days) at her job rate.	10092.85	10092.85	10092.85								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001660	RCP-039742	Manchester, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Community Agencies Enhancement	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	This would increase funding to the already established Community Agency Enhancement ARPA project account. The Town would provide competitive grants to non-profit organizations and businesses that  are working to ensure Manchester residents emerge strong from the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus  on equity and resilience. The competitive grant program, called COVID Resilient Response Grants, would provide funds to non-profits that are working to assist residents most affected by the public health emergency to foster long-term positive outcomes in affected communities. ARPA funding in the amount of $500,000 would be used to establish the COVID Resilient Response Grant program.	525000	525000	13060								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001661	RCP-036691	Story County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Workforce Initiative	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	design & management of the Story County COVID-19 workforce retraining initiative	610450	610450	418550.01								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001662	RCP-039742	Manchester, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Non-congregate Sheltering of Homeless	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Working with local non-profit to establish motel voucher system to house homeless population during winter on freezing nights or with inclement weather	618000	618000	234819.1								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001664	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Resident Emergency Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Funding would be used to help pay for the basic needs of Sherburne County residents who are experiencing a hardship or emergency situation caused by the pandemic. Funds would be used to help those that are without, or will lose, housing, utilities, transportation (that would affect gaining/ maintaining meaningful employment) and/or are in need of assistance with medical expenses as well as for burial expenses due to COVID related deaths.  We received CARES funding for the same purpose as stated above, the CARES Emergency Assistance Policy ended 2/1/20.	100000	100000	83072.56	3							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	Yes	0
TPN-001666	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - City Services Fee Waivers	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Program intended to absorb credit card fees for residents opting not to make in-person payment for city fees and services. From October to December the City absorbed $337,366.64 in credit card fees for residents making payments for City services and taxes with the intent to reduce congregate activity.		593484.38	593484.38								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001667	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	EDA Business Lab Consulting Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	The County EDA will be partnering with the Rural Ideas Network/Creative Adventure Lab to offer free consultation to small businesses impacted by the pandemic. Start-Up coaching, technical assistance and business management coaching will all be offered for free to Sherburne County Businesses. In addition, applicants of the County ARPA Small Business Recovery Fund were required to attend at least one consultation session as part of their application process.	12500	12500	12500								No			1 Imp General Public	13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify		Yes	0
TPN-001668	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Child Care Provider Training	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	Funding is being requested to cover the cost of 1st Aid/CPR and Child and Restraint System (CARS) classes for licensed day care providers within the County. These trainings are required for licensed daycare providers, but the State had waived the requirements during the pandemic state of emergency. Now that the State has lifted the state of emergency, all daycare providers must complete these trainings by September 1, 2021. The purpose of this request is to help the County’s daycare providers meet their licensing requirements. Throughout the pandemic, providers have suffered financial hardship resulting from frequent, intermittent closures of their at-home daycare in order to follow CDC quarantining guidelines. This occurred whenever children in their care or the provider/providers family experienced illness or displayed COVID related symptoms. Providers also saw a decrease in the number of families being served as parents had more opportunities to work from home. Many families also withdrew their children from day care due to loss of income or withdrew their children due to potential risk factors of COVID-19. Between January and August of 2021, sixteen licensed providers closed their home daycare business in Sherburne County. Promoting and preserving high quality childcare is a critical part of helping the community recover from the pandemic by providing children with healthy environments so that family members have opportunities to return to work. Providing this assistance will help ensure that the immediate financial cost of these licensing requirements do not act a barrier to the County’s daycare providers staying open. The funds would cover the cost for each training for approximately 100 Sherburne County daycare providers.	2195	2195	2195								No			1 Imp General Public	13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify		Yes	0
TPN-001670	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Broadband Market Survey	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Broadband infrastructure is an eligible expense under the Treasury guidelines. Staff from Finely engineering has created a Broadband Market Survey to help both plan and map out potential areas that currently fall under the 25/3 underserved & unserved threshold. The feedback we get from the study will allowed us to provide information to our Broadband provider partners.	6500	6500	6500
TPN-001671	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	U of MN Data Analysis	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	We have contracted with the U of MN Extension to conduct an economic analysis of Sherburne County. The report will help guide the county in the creation of potential economic relief programs thorough detailed data analysis of the local business climate and economy. The data was tailored to demonstrate the local effects of the COVID-19 pandemic	2000	2000	2000
TPN-001672	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	ARMER Radio & First-Net Enhanced Coverage	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project would remedy a loss of connectivity with both Armer system radios and well as First-Net cell system coverage in the Zimmerman Public Safety Building through an amplification boost.	9994.44	9994.44	9994.44
TPN-001673	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	ARMER Radio & First-Net Enhanced Coverage (with #46)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Project #46 did not include installation costs. Project 78 are the electrical and installation costs associated with the ARMER Radio project (46).	844.54	844.54	844.54
TPN-001675	RCP-039707	Genesee County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	IT Cybersecurity Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cybersecurity Equipment for Public Health, Mental Health and Emergency Services	157927	157927	157927
TPN-001676	RCP-038059	Springfield, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	CORP FIRE -  RESTORATION OF THE SPRINGFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT FY22 BUDGET	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	RESTORATION OF THE SPRINGFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT FY22 BUDGET	1400000	1400000	1400000
TPN-001677	RCP-036632	Cabo Rojo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay to Municipality's Eligible Workers	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Special incentive program for employees who provide critical and essential duties for the continuity of municipal services and to protect the health and well-being of the residents of the Municipality.  The premium pay will compensate to workers that faced heightened risks due to the character and nature of their work duties, as defined in the interim final rule as work duties involving regular in-person interactions or regular physical handling of items that were also handled by others.  Accordingly, the Municipality will compensate “premium pay” based on the followings: 1. Eligible workers providing eligible duties as declared by the Mayor; 2. Eligible workers duties will be calculated for the months of April to August 2021 up to 275 eligible hours; and 3. Payment will be based at $13 by eligible hours.	1531209.2	1531209.2	1531209.2		403
TPN-001678	RCP-039751	Tustin, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	21-22 Tustin Small Business Recovery Grant Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The Tustin Small Business Recovery Grant Program provides funding to eligible small businesses in need of financial assistance in overcoming the temporary loss of revenue due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The business must have at least one employee (not including the owner), and no more than twenty-five (25) full-time equivalent employees. Eligible businesses may receive a grant of up to ten-thousand dollars ($10,000).		2400000	2400000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-001679	RCP-039751	Tustin, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	2021 Main Street Digital Training and Grant Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The 2021 Main Street Digital Training and Grant Program provides training and funding to eligible woman-owned and/or minority-owned small brick and mortar retail businesses. Small woman-owned and/or minority-owned businesses with a minimum of one (1) employee (not including the owner), and a maximum of twenty-five (25) employees (full or full-time equivalent combination) may be eligible to receive a digital marketing grant of five hundred dollars ($500).		8500	8500								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-001680	RCP-036632	Cabo Rojo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Housekeeper Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	The Municipality of Cabo Rojo has created the  Housekeeper Services Program  (the “Program”) to offer services to low- and moderate-income households with members that are disabled and/or older citizens who face difficulties in their daily functioning, are limited in their daily activities, and/or are dependent on others.  The intended purpose of the program is to:  • Improve services to families with low- and moderate-income • Enhance services provided to people with disabilities and the elder population.  This project emphasizes in two areas: recruiting personnel to become helpers and to provide services to those in need, providing economical relief to both parties, and it is designed to provide the necessary help during a year.  The homecare assistants, among other services, will assist the participants in the following (not limited to):     • Personal hygiene; • Nutrition; • Medication; • Maintaining a clean and healthy living environment; and • Scheduling and accompanying the participants to their medical appoinments.	2457717.71	2457717.71	696237.59								Yes	Other (please specify)	45000	18 Dis Imp HHs residing in the U.S. territories or receiving services	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-001681	RCP-036632	Cabo Rojo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Municipal Public Works Opperations	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Municipal Public Works Operations activity will ensure the continuance of the Municipality’s public works through the allocation of revenue replacement funds. The Municipality will be able to cover the costs of personnel providing general services to the citizenry.  The revenue reduction resulting from the Pandemic threatened the reduction of the Municipality’s public works operations, which could have had a significant impact on the well-being of the residents and visitors of Cabo Rojo. The Municipality will now be able to continue to provide public services at pre-pandemic levels and could increase these services, as necessary. The Municipality’s Public Works Department is one of its most important agencies due to the large number of essential services it offers. The main objective of this department is to coordinate urban development planning actions, public works, and environmental management, which contribute to improvement of the quality of life of Cabo Rojo.’s residents. The Municipality mainly provides public work services to its citizenry through brigades, including pavement of municipal streets and roads, and maintenance of public green infrastructure, public parks, and other public recreational facilities.	2500000	2500000	2500000
TPN-001683	RCP-036632	Cabo Rojo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Rainwater Diversion Canal - Pole Ojea Community	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Municipality proposes the construction of a rainwater diversion canal for flood control and mitigation. The canal consists of three (3) sections for a total length of 1,600 meters long, an average depth of 2 meters and a width that varies from 12 meters in two of the sections and 44 meters in the final section. The channel will unload at the Wildlife Refuge. In addition, it includes the construction of a retention pond, a detention pond, and improvements to the existing pond within the refuge. The capacity to be developed will be 114,500 square meters. The purpose of this project is to provide a flood protection system to the Pole Ojea community. The main cause is the flood event and runoff that accumulates in a natural depression located in the center of the community. This natural depression is at a low point, which makes it impossible for it to empty completely in a natural way. The Pole Ojea community receives water from different hydrographic basins, called the West, East and Pole Ojea basins. Due to the lack of infrastructure for the management of rainwater in these basins, the waters are discharged on several roads affecting them, causing floods, economic losses and damage to property, it is generated north of the Polo Ojea community.	2475319.58	2475319.58	867225.1
TPN-001684	RCP-036632	Cabo Rojo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Patrol Division COVID 19	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The Municipality will carry out a  Patrol Project in charge of ensuring the safety of residents in matters related to mitigation and response to the Coronavirus pandemic. The Municipality, due to its tourist attractions, is one of the areas most visited by local tourism, creating a greater vulnerability to contagions due to the excessive crowding of people in tourist areas without due physical distancing, completely ignoring the restriction of the use of mask. This patrol division will make sure the citizenry and tourist are knowledgeable of the executive orders issued by the Municipality and the State. This activity’s main objective is to continue reducing the rate of infections and promote a healthy and orderly coexistence in our communities.   Currently, patrolling the streets has been affected by the lack of vehicles and equipment necessary to safeguard the well-being of citizens. Providing the necessary equipment to the Municipal Police will give them the tools to alert, prevent and enforce all health security orders imposed on citizens in the event of the COVID-19 Pandemic. The municipal response to guarantee the implementation of government measures for human rights to health produces better results when it comes to defeating the pandemic. This project proposes the payment of the salaries and fringe benefits of the Police Officers who will be working in the COVID-19 Patrol division, the purchase of 4 patrol cars, the purchase of electronic equipment, and materials and supplies.	2042746	2002746	801630.87								Yes	Other (please specify)	201064	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001685	RCP-039751	Tustin, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Revenue Replacement for the Provision of Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City has allocated $13.5 million of ARPA funds to be used to replace lost revenue related to the public health emergency for the provision of government services.		13512339	8214787.34
TPN-001686	RCP-039751	Tustin, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	2021 Non-Profit Recovery Grant Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The 2021 Non-Profit Recovery Grant Program provides up to fifteen-thousand dollars ($15,000) of funding to eligible 501(c)3 non-profits in need of financial assistance in overcoming the temporary loss of revenue due to the COVID-19 pandemic.		528250	528250								No			11 Imp Classes of NPs designated as negatively economically impacted
TPN-001687	RCP-036632	Cabo Rojo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Public Communication Program	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The Municipality of Cabo Rojo will carry out a Public Communication Program (the “Program”) as a measure to prevent and mitigate the spread of COVID-19. The Municipality’s  Press Office will be in charge of the Program. The main objective of this office is to inform the citizens about the Municipality’s arrangements, activities, projects, and plans through the timely, clear, and transparent disclosure through the different communication means available.  As part of the activities to be carried out under this Program, the Press Office will develop public orientation campaigns that will raise awareness among citizens about the importance of vaccination, infection prevention measures, and the services available in the Municipality to continue fighting the Coronavirus, such as the Municipal System for Investigation and Monitoring of Cases, Vaccination Program, City Sanitation Program, among others. These campaigns will be carried out through flyers, social networks, television advertisements, and other promotional material. The Program is expected to create awareness in citizens about the importance of continuing with prevention measures, the importance of vaccination as a preventive measure, as well as a greater participation of citizens and businesses in projects and/or activities developed for the response and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.	0	0	0								No	Other (please specify)	200000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001688	RCP-036632	Cabo Rojo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Sanitization	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The Fiscal Recovery Funds provide resources to meet and address emerging public health needs, including measures to counter the spread of COVID-19. For such purposes, the Municipality proposes the creation of a City Sanitization Project with the aim of preventing and mitigating COVID-19 infections. The works will be carried out in public facilities where there is an agglomeration of people, or the public is constantly received.  The Municipal Office of Emergency Management will be the lead office, in charge of the sanitization disinfection of public facilities. To carry out the tasks, the Municipality will require the following: • Pickup Vehicle • Indoor Disinfection equipment • Materials and Supply • Labor According to data from the Municipal System for Investigation and Monitoring of Cases of the Municipality, as of November 26, 2021, a cumulative total of 3,179 positive cases, 22 cases of deceased persons and a total of 8 active cases had been reported. It is important to note that the highest concentration of public facilities in the Municipality is in the Pueblo Ward, one of the areas with the highest number of infections in the city with 23.03% positivity of cases. The Municipality will be offering the city's disinfection service as a preventive measure due to the possibility of a rebound in cases due to the emergence of new variants, as well as continue to reduce the positivity rate in the city. The CDC recommends continuing with prevention strategies, where hygiene and cleanliness play a important role in curbing the COVID-19 infections.	53995	53995	53995								Yes	Other (please specify)	53995	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001689	RCP-037492	Warrick County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Warrick County Gigabit Community	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Design, construct, operate and maintain a broadband network in unserved and underserved areas of Warrick County.	3600000	3600000	3600000					Yes
TPN-001691	RCP-039707	Genesee County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA Consulting Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	ARPA Consulting Services Contract	10000	10000	4517.25
TPN-001695	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay - Office of the Sheriff	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium pay for civilian staff in the Larimer County Jail. Positions included: Deputy non-Certified (1 individual), Jail Program Specialist (4), Jail Maintenance Operations Specialist (4), Jail Maintenance Manager (1), Jail Booking Specialist (18), Volunteer Coordinator (a county employee, not an actual volunteer - 1 individual), Jail Program Manager (1), Jail Services Supervisor (2), and Jail Maintenance Worker I (1). Total premium wages to these employees for pay periods September 23, 2021 to December 29, 2021 was $153,806. The average amount of premium pay intended to go to each eligible employee was $5,000. Most sworn law enforcement personnel eligible for premium pay were provided a retention bonus that utilized other funding sources. Benefits. For reimbursement purposes, Larimer County has applied a rate of 15.58% of wages, which is the rate used by Larimer County for Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursement, for wage-based taxes and benefits such as Social Security, Medicare, Unemployment Compensation, retirement contributions, and others. The total value of these benefits applied to the premium pay program and reimbursed by State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds is $23,963. This premium pay program was ended in 2021 and converted to a retention incentive program in 2022.	177769	177769	177769		33
TPN-001697	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay - Community Justice Alternatives Department	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium pay for staff who worked directly with Criminal Justice Services clients whose COVID-19 status was often uncertain at best. Employees came into frequent, direct contact with clients in congregate living facility and with clients in their homes. Premium pay was provided to 218 employees during the pay period. Of the 196 employees, 29 are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act. Total premium pay wages provided to these 218 employees was $233,760 during pay periods from September 23, 2021 to December 29, 2021. Total premium pay wages to each employee were on average $5,000, with a minimum of $564 to one employee who left service to a maximum amount of $6,489. The total benefit costs of the premium pay wages, including social security, retirement, workers' compensation and other benefits was applied at a rate of 15.58% of wages, which is the rate used by Larimer County for Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursement. The total value of these benefits applied to the premium pay program and reimbursed by State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds is $139,597. The premium pay program was ended in 2021 and converted to a retention incentive in 2022.	1035601	1035601	1035601		196
TPN-001699	RCP-053281	City Of Gresham, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Covid Response PPE	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Project CWSARPACVD – PPE has been created to track all Personal Protection Equipment expenses incurred by the City of Gresham that will be using ARPA allocated funds. This includes Masks, Hand sanitizer, Gloves, etc.	362000	19679.98	19679.98								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001700	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Office of the Sheriff Payroll	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	COVID-19 has significantly impacted operation of the Larimer County Jail. This item represents best estimates of payroll costs  of Jail staff specifically designated to manage COVID-19, including a team responsible for developing, updating and implementing policies such as cohorting, assisting with researching, ordering and stocking of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment), assisting the health department with inmate testing when outbreaks have occurred, and allocating additional resources to COVID protocols and other COVID-related duties as assigned. Additionally, these costs include staffing of three different housing areas in the Jail reserved to isolate inmates who have tested positive or who have COVID-related symptoms. These costs do not include charges by the Jail's contracted medical care provider or for premium pay for staff. During the third quarter of 2022 the payroll costs total $29,436. The Office of the Sheriff indicates that during this quarter the jail has closed its COVID housing areas and will no longer be seeking reimbursement for staff costs as operations have returned to near-normal. Therefore, this project is completed.	732870	732870	732870			35					No
TPN-001701	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Community Justice Alternatives Department Payroll	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	The Larimer County Community Justice Alternatives (CJA - formerly the Criminal Justice Services (CJS)) Department is separated into four sub-departments:  Alternative Sentencing Department (ASD), Larimer County Community Corrections (LCCC), Pretrial Services (PTS), and Criminal Justice Services Administration (CJA).  These congregate correctional facilities continue to have much of its day-to-day operations dedicated to COVID.  Impacts include: overtime for three departments is a result of staffing shortages due staff exposures, staff positive cases, quarantines and lack of applicants expressing interest in working in a congregate setting during a pandemic, routine testing of new and in-custody offenders, symptom checks, ensuring mask compliance, room management and cohorting, quarantining and checking on clients who have been sent home, ordering personal protective equipment, reviewing policies and procedures, managing cases of individuals sent home instead of jail and who are waiting on delayed court proceedings, medical and vaccination transports, etc.  The costs reported are net of offsetting revenues from client fees and per-diem rates paid by the State of Colorado for services; gross costs for the fourth quarter of 2023 were more than $1.5 million. Approximately 200 total employees' time was impacted by COVID-19. Because COVID-19 is having less of an impact on this department's operations, this project is now completed.	7560747	7560747	7560747			200					No
TPN-001702	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Red Feather Lakes Water System Feasibility Study	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Red Feather Lakes is an established but unincorporated community in northern Larimer County. This community is reliant on well and septic services, but is considering the possibility of constructing a water system due to increasing growth. This project utilizes a consultant to conduct an analysis of implementing these systems in the Red Feather Lakes community. This project is completed.	95053	95053	95053
TPN-001703	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Larimer County Health Department Case Management System	1-Public Health	1.3-COVID-19 Contact Tracing	During the initial stages of the pandemic, the Larimer County Department Health & Environment (LCDHE) utilized the Larimer County Information Technology Department (IT) to build an automated Contact Information and Case Management (CICM) System.  This system was designed to replace an existing system made up of cumbersome spreadsheets to track COVID-19 case information. The project completed prior to the Fiscal Recovery Fund eligible date (March 3, 2021) cost approximately $125,000. During the spring of 2021, LCDHE utilized IT, which had custom developed the original CICM system, to add more functionality to the CICM tool, including communications components to ensure timely, accurate, and comprehensive communications to both patients and the public at large, tracking of vaccination information, and integrations with similar systems developed by the State of Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Larimer County IT spent approximately 630 hours on software development to improve the tool, at which it billed LCDHE for $90 per hour for the work performed.	56702	56702	56702								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001705	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Community Outreach	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	One limited term position in the Larimer County of Emergency Management (OEM) was designated to spend approximately one-half of their time organizing community engagement efforts to gather public input on residents' priorities for the utilization of Fiscal Recovery Fund resources. An allocation of $60,000 was approved to cover staff costs ($40,000) and operating costs such as printing, information technology, and contracting with community organizations to drive input. As of December 31, 2021, total expenses included $12,589 for personnel costs, $6,835 for operating costs, and $1,432 for the County's Indirect Cost Allocation, less $233 in outside funds for a net 2021 cost of $19,191	19191	19191	19191
TPN-001707	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Health Services for Larimer County Jail Inmates	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Additional costs paid to Larimer County Jail inmate medical services contractor for ongoing COVID-19 testing. Costs reflect amounts charged by the contractor that provides medical services in the Larimer County Jail for the months of July 2023 to September 2023..	515000	515000	493788								No			28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify			No	0
TPN-001708	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Larimer County Broadband Partnerships - Last Mile Projects	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	The four projects for which the County has reached agreements to begin implementation, utilizing direct SLFRF funding, include: • In partnership with the Loveland Pulse municipal broadband provider and Thompson School District, we provided funding to complete fiber to the premise expansion to communities where the school had children unable to get internet connectivity to participate in remove learning. • Connected over 300 unserved resident homes in the Lago Vista Mobile Home Park in Larimer County with a high at-risk student population. • Connected over 200 premises in the Drake community in the Big Thompson canyon with Fiber to the Home service to support the educational needs of that community. The drake community was only able to get internet services from expensive satellite internet providers. • The Sylvan Dale Guest Ranch area at the base of the Big Thompson canyon with limited connectivity options and surrounding neighborhood with unmet internet connection needs. This project includes an intergovernmental agreement with Loveland to enable future projects and partnerships for expansion using additional SLFRF support. The County has designated another $10.2 million of its Revenue Replacement funds to Broadband expansion.	0	0	0
TPN-001709	RCP-036632	Cabo Rojo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Purchase of Personal Protective Equipment	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	The Fiscal Recovery Funds provide resources to meet and address emerging public health needs, including measures to counter the spread of COVID-19. For such purposes, the Municipality proposes continuity to the Program for the Delivery of Personal Protective Equipment to the general public, such as  hand sanitizer, alcohol, desinfectants, hands soap among others, with the aim of preventing and mitigating COVID-19 infections.  Those items will be delivered in places with high traffic of people. Needs may increase or decrease due to increasing periods of infection or virus variants, the vaccination clinic that takes place, or other community needs that require large purchases of items. The Municipal Federal Program office will be the lead office, in charge of this project. To carry out the tasks, the Municipality will require the following: • Protective equipment cost This activity serves as a preventive measure due to the possibility of a rebound in cases due to the emergence of new variants, as well as continue to reduce the positivity rate in the city. The CDC recommends continuing with prevention strategies, where the proper use of personal protective equipment play an important role in curbing the covid-19 infections.	3475	2775	2775								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001711	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Small Business Development Center Contribution	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	Contribution to Larimer County Small Business Development Center towards its effort to support small businesses in Larimer County through consulting, classes, and other training.	10000	10000	10000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-001715	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Pre Trial Services LTE	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	During the pandemic, Pretrial Supervision caseloads increased by nearly 43% to release as many individuals as possible from the jail & ensure community safety by assigning them to pretrial supervision. This increase in jail releases resulted in a 400% increase in the number of high-risk defendants ordered to GPS monitoring. This increase has strained our Intake & Supervision staff as GPS monitoring requires added staff time to install & maintain the equipment & 24/7 monitoring of violation alerts. This position is budgeted at a cost of $71,509 for 2022. This position was filled in February of 2022 but was vacated in April 2022. The department has been unable to fill this position and will no longer seek to fill it. This project is complete.	18599	18599	18599			*					No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001717	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Natural Resources Water Improvement Projects	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Improvements to drinking water and wastewater at Natural Resources facilities and properties due to increased use & health concerns. Funds have been allocated to the following county-specific projects: LC21A038 - Inlet Bay Marina Toilet Upgrade $150,000 LC21A039 - Carter Lake Dump Station - $660,000 LC21A040 - Hermit Park Wastewater Treatment - $400,000 LC21A041 - Hermit Park Pavilion Well System - $$160,000	0	0	0
TPN-001718	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Keep NoCo Open	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	In September 2021, the Larimer County Board of County Commissioners allocated $100,000 to the Economic and Workforce Development department to implement a "Keep NoCo (Northern Colorado) Open" campaign to encourage residents to get vaccinated and engage in other mitigation strategies such as social distancing and mask wearing. The budget included production of audio and video messages in English and Spanish, social media promotion, other advertising, and community outreach to support culturally-appropriate messaging. As of December 31, 2021, this project had not yet been implemented and had no obligations or expenditures. Note that the Project Expenditure Category has been updated to 2.37 in the 2022 1st Quarter Report.	0	0	0								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-001720	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Office of the District Attorney - Complex Case Prosecutor	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	To create a complex case attorney (title code Deputy District Attorney III) through ARPA funding for the next 3 years to handle certain high-level, time-intensive case types that have increased as a result of, or during, COVID. In analysis of our case data, discussions with our attorneys, conversations with law enforcement, and other study of state and national trends, it has become apparent to the District Attorney’s Office that four case types have grown or been substantially impacted during the COVID pandemic (March 2020-present): Drug Task Force (fentanyl distribution) cases, Domestic Violence cases, Economic Crimes, and Violent Crimes. This position was filled in April 2022. For the 3rd quarter of 2023, total costs were $41,801. This included $36,498 in payroll costs, and $5,303 applied to the Countywide Indirect Cost Rate.	450000	220674	220674								No			1 Imp General Public			Yes	450000
TPN-001722	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Immediate Needs Grants - Small Business Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The Larimer County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) allocated $3 million to an immediate needs grant program designed to provide short-term resources to small businesses, non-profits, other governmental agencies and other eligible organizations that faced significant negative economic impacts due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The County has awarded 16 grants to small businesses who showed evidence of a negative impact and, as of March 31 2022, has reached grant agreements with 16 of these organizations with awards totaling $634,276. These grants have now expired and one grant was underspent by $2,056, resulting in a final budget and obligation amount of $632,220. In the 2nd quarter of 2023 one grantee, Shine LLC, received a total of $2,684 in reimbursement funding.	632221	632221	632221								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-001723	RCP-037367	Homestead City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Water Meter Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	The water meter replacement project entails the purchase and installation of 20,000 new water meters to include encoder receiver transmitters (ERT) throughout the City of Homestead. New installation will result in ability to remotely read all water consumption throughout the City, increase efficiency, water accountability, and improve real-time monitoring of water loss.		0	0
TPN-001724	RCP-037367	Homestead City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Septic to Sewer Conversion Project	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	The septic to sewer conversion project will target approximately 125 homes in the NW section of the City of Homestead. The scope consists of design, engineering and construction of new gravity mains, new lateral connections to the edge of the right-of-way, pump station improvements/development and road restorations. This project will result in enhanced environmental protection of potable water wellfields. The City still needs the selection of planning, engineering and design consultants will be brought to Mayor and Council for approval. The City is also seeking grant funding to assist customers with potential costs associated with decommissioning of existing septic tanks and subsequent connection to City sewer infrastructure.		0	0
TPN-001738	RCP-037103	Hagerstown, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay - Public Sector Employees	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium pay for essential workers as designated by the City Administrator.		2153000	2153000		400
TPN-001746	RCP-037412	Stearns County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Co-Responder Program	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Support a behavioral health co-responder program to embed a licensed mental health professional with a law enforcement officer to respond collaboratively on scene to 911 calls involving persons with mental illness or substance use disorder.	805000	805000	437474.83								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001748	RCP-037103	Hagerstown, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Grant Coordinator Position	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Temporary 36-month contract employee hired to manage SLFRF grant funding. Total expenditures include payroll, employer provided benefits, and other administrative costs related to the position during the current reporting period. Adjustments made to reconcile total actual cumulative obligations with June 30 end of fiscal year.		183499.4	183499.4
TPN-001749	RCP-037412	Stearns County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Rental Navigator Programs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators	Support a program of rental assistance navigation for low-income individuals.	287500	287500	267500								No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001753	RCP-036189	Commonwealth Of Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	VaxMillions Giveaway	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	The Commonwealth has allocated $8,197,582 from the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund to the VaxMillions Giveaway to increase awareness of the availability and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines and to encourage residents to get vaccinated. Funds will be used to award five $1 million cash prizes to fully vaccinated adults and five $300,000 scholarship grants to fully vaccinated residents between 12-17 years of age. The remainder of the funds will be used for program administration and outreach.	8197582.02	8197582.02	8197582.02								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001754	RCP-036189	Commonwealth Of Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Aid to Disproportionately Impacted Communities	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Commonwealth has allocated $109.1 million from the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund to provide Aid to Disproportionately Impacted Communities. These four communities – Chelsea, Everett, Methuen, and Randolph – have been designated as “Hardest Hit” communities by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. However, due to shortcomings in the CLFRF  funding formula for local governments, they were set to receive disproportionately smaller amounts of federal funding compared to other hard-hit communities. Additional funds from the state's CSFRF allocation were distributed to these communities, as follows: • Chelsea – $28.5 million • Everett – $33.3 million • Methuen – $26.3 million • Randolph – $21.0 million.	109080277	109080277	109080277								No
TPN-001755	RCP-036189	Commonwealth Of Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Health & Human Services Workforce Stabilization Payments	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	EOHHS (the Executive Office of Health and Human Services)  is providing one-time grants to human service providers to address the current workforce crisis in health and human services as a result of the COVID-19 public health emergency. This investment is intended to assist eligible provider agencies with direct care workforce development, which could include hiring and retention bonuses and other categories of worker compensation. Additionally, provider agencies that receive enhanced funds are required to submit a spending report to EOHHS that accounts for how the enhanced funds were used.	54381579.17	54381579.17	54381579.17								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001756	RCP-037412	Stearns County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Summer Program 1	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	Support a summer education program for children 4 days per week.  This program includes tutoring, math/reading education, and sporting activities to reduce educational disparities in the community.  Funds cover program staff, activity supplies and food for students.	315000	315000	315000								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools	20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-001757	RCP-037103	Hagerstown, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Hagerstown Fire Department Ladder Truck Purchase	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funding provided for the replacement purchase of an aerial ladder truck for the City's fire department. Total expected cost is $1.5M which will include a maximum of $1.2M SLFRF fund contribution. Total obligation for the current period includes the required deposit for the purchase with the remaining balance paid upon delivery in approximately March 2023.		1200000	732336
TPN-001758	RCP-036189	Commonwealth Of Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	COVID-19 Temporary Emergency Paid Sick Leave Program	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Massachusetts has allocated almost $159 million from the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery Fund to the Paid Sick Leave Program to respond to COVID-19 and the broader impacts of COVID-19 and the COVID-19 public health emergency. The aim of this allocation is to eliminate job-related obstacles to recovering from, quarantining for, and/or being vaccinated against COVID-19 for all Massachusetts residents. In particular, the program is intended to support lower-wage workers who may not otherwise have access to paid sick leave.	158838299.48	158838299.48	158838299.48								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001760	RCP-037103	Hagerstown, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Backhoe Purchase - Public Works/Parks & Recreation Departments	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funding provided for the purchase of a new backhoe to perform services and maintenance in the City's Public Works and Parks & Recreation departments.		128413.6	128413.6
TPN-001761	RCP-037412	Stearns County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Summer Program 2	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	Support meals to children and adults who have transportation barriers to obtaining food; providing social/emotional support and development opportunities to low-income families; providing workshops and conferences that support young entrepreneurship; providing a summer reading program to assist with education; and providing tutoring to address academic disparities	150000	150000	150000								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools	20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001762	RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	AT&T/Motorola Solutions VESTA 911 Geo diverse Backup Solution	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Installation of the VESTA 911 Solution will ensure Jackson County continues to provide equitable reliable emergency services to all Citizens of Jackson County.  The addition of the VESTA 911 system provides Geodiversity opportunities that provide immediate access for dispatching to resume and or move operations in the event of disaster, emergency, or overflow to any location that has access to the internet.  In addition, the system handles all incoming calls and outgoing calls to 911 and texting, without failure.		302583	302583								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	302583
TPN-001763	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Reapportionment Commission Overtime	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide overtime incurred as a result of the Chief Election Officer’s constitutional and statutory duties to provide support to the Reapportionment Commission.	6701.07	6701.07	6701.07
TPN-001764	RCP-035910	Yavapai County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Air Quality Testing for Public Facilities	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The evaluation of the facilities listed below in regard to their ventilation and HVAC systems. Evaluate all equipment associated with the indoor air quality of each facility and provide a detailed report and recommendations on how to best go bout resolving issues and improving the facilities indoor environmental and air quality.  Review the recommended upgrades and procure the equipment and installation of the equipment to improve the indoor air quality of the buildings as per CDC standards.  Superior Court Administration Building Cottonwood Annex Attorney/Law Enforcement Building Prescott Health Building	3169365.6	130492.27	130492.27								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	3129365.6	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001765	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Hawai‘i Public Housing Authority State Rental Supplement Program	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To assist approximately 240 low-income households with rent payments for about five months.	500000	500000	500000
TPN-001766	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Tax Management System Post Warranty Maintenance and Professional Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To fund GenTax post warranty maintenance and support, professional services for GenTax, and professional services for document imaging for continued operations of the Tax System Management and the security of taxpayer data.	2876764	2876764	2876764
TPN-001768	RCP-037412	Stearns County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Social Worker Program	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Support two social workers, one with child therapy specialization, to provide therapy and support with the objective of reducing health disparities around mental health in the community.	525000	525000	253000								No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-001769	RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Keely Park WiFi Expansion and service agreement	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Installation of expansion of WiFi service on the grounds of Keely Park Campus.   The expansion of WiFi services on the grounds provides enhanced support venues for other emergency management response situations that may arise in the future.  In addition, the Keely Park Campus has been used for and can continue to serve as a mass vaccination drive-thru clinic.		130404	130404								No
TPN-001770	RCP-037412	Stearns County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Community Navigators Promise Neighborhood	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators	Program of assistance to low-income families that includes assessing the needs of the family, customizing a plan of interventions/education, and relationship building between families and resources/organizations. The goal is to decrease disparities, improve communications, and move families toward self-sufficiency.	456000	456000	342000								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001771	RCP-037103	Hagerstown, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Hagerstown Ice Rink Fresh Air Project	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Funding will contribute 75% to 100% of project funding for the replacement of existing dehumidifiers at the Hagerstown ice rink. The dehumidifier equipment will keep the air dry in the ice rink, bleachers, and locker rooms. These spaces have no fresh air intake which is no longer compliant with current building and mechanical codes. In addition, the equipment will help to eliminate moisture in the air and reduce the spread of COVID-19 in this congregate setting. Actual final contract price reduced to $190,425		190425	190425								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001772	RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Fiber Exension from the Adm Building to the Tower at the Jackson County Airport	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Fiber extension will provide enhanced and improved technology to improve productivity and support economic growth and assist small businesses.		17518	17518								No
TPN-001773	RCP-037412	Stearns County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Broadband Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Establish contracts with incentives to Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to serve unserved and underserved premises. The County will provide a portion of the capital needed to build out 500 Mbps of services to homes and businesses. In addition, ISPs will be asked to commit to further build-outs using other grant dollars that come available in the future.	16000000	8582027	1739766.04
TPN-001775	RCP-037412	Stearns County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Highway Items	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Highway construction and maintenance projects which include culvert replacements, seal coating, epoxy striping, concrete overlay, and resurfacing projects that were eliminated or postponed due to reduction in state aid during pandemic.	5911000	3499573	3499573
TPN-001776	RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Payroll reimburement for Public Safety and 12th District Court	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Reimbursement of payroll for staff of Jail, Morgue and Emergency Dispatch .  The reimbursement supports Jackson County's efforts in containing the spread of the COVID-19 in our community.		3149816.82	3149816.82			71					No
TPN-001777	RCP-036031	City Of Houston, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Domestic Abuse Response Team (DART)	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	DART (Domestic Abuse Response Team) is a multidisciplinary crisis response team purposed to assist victims of domestic violence by engaging the victim immediately, following a reported incident of domestic violence, in an effort to ensure their safety and provide trauma-informed care, with the ability to coordinate and provide emergency services, such as medical care, food, temporary shelter and connections to long-term solutions, counseling, legal help, and compensation; all, of which, precede follow-up and outreach services provided by the Department’s Victim Services Division.  The DART program provides for specially trained, two-person mobile teams consisting of one HPD officer and one victim advocate who respond to “high risk” domestic violence crime scenes at the request of the primary responding police unit for the purpose of making on-scene danger assessments and reaching out to the victims to engage and connect them with needed emergency services.	3615822	1796711.06	1796711.06								Yes	Other (please specify)	110058	1 Imp General Public			Yes	3615822
TPN-001778	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Tax Review Commission	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide funds to support the Tax Review Commission, which by mandate, must conduct a review of the State’s Tax structure every five (5) years.	79976.86	79976.86	79976.86
TPN-001779	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Heeia District Mangrove Remediation (HCDA)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To remove mangrove in order to restore lo’i kalo (taro) and other food-producing agricultural fields.	299992	299992	299992
TPN-001780	RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Replace Access Control Server	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Replace the Access Control Server.  The server is used for governance to enforce compliance, enhance infrastructure security and streamline network/security data collection in administration of switches, Wireless LAN Controllers, Virtual Private Networks, gateways and data center switches.  The funding will provide an enhanced access control policy platform which aligns with the strategic mission to maintain security in  day and age where Cyber Security threats are matters of if not when.		180259.31	180259.31								Yes	Public health data systems	180259.31
TPN-001781	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	State Procurement Office Past Performance Database	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To establish and administer a past performance database, which would routinely capture contractor performance information in a structured and uniform way and is accessed and utilized when future procurements need to determine a contractor’s responsibility, which will help to address issues of repeated inefficiencies and substandard work.	80000	80000	77863.87
TPN-001782	RCP-037103	Hagerstown, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	32 N Potomac Acquisition - Relocate City Customer Service and Billing Operations	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Funding for the acquisition of former M&T Bank building. Obligated amount includes funding for the building purchase to relocate the City's Utility Billing/Customer Service operations to a new location to better serve the community. The new building will provide sufficient space for social distancing in the lobby and throughout the building where customers are served. It will also include a kiosk and drive through window where customers can make utility payments and complete other necessary tasks without entering the building. Upper floor will also be occupied by other City offices. Current period expenditures include the earnest money deposit required at time of contract signing.		2200000	1409234.61								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	175000	1 Imp General Public	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts		No	827000
TPN-001783	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Tourism Industry Recovery Status Monitoring and Research	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To monitor the recovery of the Hawaiʻi tourism industry by reviewing data, conducting surveys and economic impact studies.	4000000	3611212.55	2847078.87
TPN-001784	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Emergency Medical Ambulance, Dispatch, and Aeromedical services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The State contracts for emergency medical ambulance and dispatch services on the island of O‘ahu, Hawai'i, Kauaʻi, Maui, Molokaʻi, and Lāna‘i. The State contracts include aeromedical services for the islands for Hawai‘i, Maui, Moloka‘i, and Lāna‘i. Funds will be used to maintain the current level of emergency ambulance, dispatch, and aeromedical services statewide for the state fiscal period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022.	84257043	83569705.22	83569705.22
TPN-001785	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Hawai‘i Youth Correctional Facility Utility Expenditures	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To pay for utility costs at the Hawai‘i Youth Correctional Facility for the period July 1st, 2021 to June 30th, 2022.	520000	520000	520000
TPN-001786	RCP-037103	Hagerstown, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Camera Rig Replacement - Wastewater Department	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funding for the replacement of camera truck in the Wastewater department which is necessary to complete maintenance and repairs of the City's pipe systems. *Adjusted total cumulative obligations to reflect actual expenditures.		415136.75	415136.75
TPN-001787	RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Replace all non-supported and end of life support Network Appliances/Devices	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Replace the network appliances which include Independent Distribution Frame switches, core network switches and Main Distribution Frame switches.  Replacing the network appliances/devices aligns with the strategic mission to maintain security in a day and age where Cyber Security threats are matters of if not when.		184506.37	184506.37								Yes	Public health data systems	184506.37
TPN-001788	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Office of Youth Services Service Contracts	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To pay for the purchase of services at the Office of Youth Services for the period July 1, 2021 to June 30th, 2022.	832500	832500	832500
TPN-001789	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Stadium Operating Budget - Revenue Shortfall	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide funding to address a projected operating budget shortfall for FY 2022 due to a significant drop in revenues.	2300000	2300000	2300000
TPN-001790	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Reproductive Healthcare, Perinatal Support and Family Planning Services 2021	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funding will support in-place purchase of service contracts to provide reimbursement for reproductive healthcare, perinatal support, and/or family planning services will be available for underinsured and uninsured adolescents, women, and men through public state/federal government agencies and private family planning services agencies.	1190853.05	1190853.05	1190853.05
TPN-001791	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	State Tree Nurseries	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To build, expand, and repair facilities of the state tree nurseries as well as produce seedlings for tree planning efforts statewide. State tree nurseries provide high-quality trees and various other plans for agriculture, the public, and for DLNR planting and reforestation projects; and specialized nurseries used to produce rare and endangered plants for ecosystem restoration and endangered species recovery.	750000	679884.71	679884.71
TPN-001792	RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Network/Security Infrastructure	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Funding for Network/Security Infrastructure - Tower Data Center, Disaster Recovery Site and replacement of end of the life support Main Distribution Frame network appliances for County Buildings.		1294936.82	1294936.82								Yes	Public health data systems	1322144.25	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001793	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Rapid Ohia Death Response	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To fund the Rapid Ohia Death Response to prevent the additional spread of Rapid Ohia Death into heathy forests. Rapid Ohia Death can kill ohia lehua, Hawai‘i’s most abundant native tree species, and is caused by two related fungi.	995000	976463.04	976463.04
TPN-001794	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	DOCARE Entry Level Training Academy Course of Instruction and New Hire Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide entry level Conservation and Resources law enforcement training course of instruction for newly hired personnel.  This project will also provide funds to equip personnel with their initial issue of law enforcement equipment needed to perform duties in the field.	2548290	1804175.05	1359622.41
TPN-001795	RCP-035889	Ada County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Ada County Indigent Services	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Update: Unused funds will be returned to the grant. Specific funding for indigent services to address medical and mental heath needs not generally covered under indigent services specific to the COVID19 pandemic.	1500000	1311275.87	1311275.87								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-001797	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Comprehensive Primary Care Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide comprehensive medical and health care services to the Wahiawa community on O‘ahu.	2899999.98	2899999.98	2899999.98
TPN-001798	RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	FOIA and Information Request Processing Solution Cost	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Funding for Jackson County Sheriff's Department, Central Dispatch 911 and County Administration for FOIA software that is a centralized solution for processing information requests.		109270	42420								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001801	RCP-039687	Nevada County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Quarantine and Isolation Support (Active Cases)	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Expenses related to providing quarantine and isolation support for Nevada County residents that are experiencing COVID-19.	1686040	1406677.29	1406677.29								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-001804	RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Countywide Centralized Security Camera	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Installation of a Countywide Centralized Security Camera.  The funding will assist County Agencies in providing safe and secure access to Jackson County Facilities and grounds to the community when onsite for services and support.  Provides the opportunity for social responsibility in working with Law Enforcement to assist in solving crimes.		842212.79	769720.4								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	842212.79	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001805	RCP-039687	Nevada County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	HHSA Administrative Support to Respond to Pandemic	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Administrative support related to the HHSA response to the COVID-19 pandemic.	255000	126561.26	126561.26			*					No
TPN-001806	RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Tower Buidling Sub-Basement Waterproofing	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install crawlspace water encapsulation system for the Tower Building sub-basement.		46133	46133
TPN-001807	RCP-036031	City Of Houston, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Victim Advocates (5)	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Victim Services Division contains a Victim Advocacy Unit that initiate follow up on cases involving crime victims via phone, in person and through virtual platforms. This follow up consists of meeting the needs of the victim by offering the appropriate referrals and assistance specific to each victim. The Advocacy Unit also has an On-Call Team, which consists of on-call supervisors, advocates, and officers who respond to media worthy incidents in order to assist the victims and their families directly affected by the incident.	1335843.18	766281.05	766281.05								No			1 Imp General Public			Yes	1335843.18
TPN-001808	RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Tower Building Masonry Repairs	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Perform repairs for the Tower building limestone and brick facing		852501	835169.02
TPN-001809	RCP-039687	Nevada County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Other Dept/GF Time Tracking	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other	Other department (non-HHSA) salary and benefits primarily related to communications and enforcement of COVID-19 pandemic response.	399957	282571.85	282571.85								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001810	RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		In Car video upgrade, body camera upgrade and Taser upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase Axon Taser 7, Axon body 3 worn camera, Axon Fleet in car cameras.  This will replace old antiquated equipment for the Sheriff's department.		764041.59	458424.87
TPN-001811	RCP-039687	Nevada County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Nevada County Relief Fund - Small Business Micro Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Small business grants to help businesses respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.	250000	250000	202125								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-001814	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Implementation of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) No. 87 – Leases	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To ensure the State of Hawai‘i is in full compliance with the requirements of GASB No. 87 – Leases by fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.	500000	418420.3	318392.48
TPN-001815	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Emergency Security System Improvements to Various State Facilities	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide funds to install a security system to allow ‘virtual’ patrolling at strategically placed cameras at various State facilities.	15000000	14716377.38	13047449.36
TPN-001816	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	DAR Sea Urchin Hatchery Repair	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To repair and upgrade the hatchery building at the Anuenue Fisheries Research Center (AFRC) on Sand Island, O‘ahu, to ensure continuity and address future safety concerns.	1000000	34553	26530.58
TPN-001817	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	PSD COVID-19 Response	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To support the services provided by the Department of Public Safety (PSD) to prevent, contain, and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 through ventilation improvements that reduce concentration levels of SARS-CoV-2 in congregate and health care settings within jails and prisons statewide.	49951794.96	33939905.99	18210458.79
TPN-001818	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Data Infrastructure & Analysis for Health and Housing Program and Policy Design	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To enable the development of a data infrastructure at the UHM and UHERO that will allow us to inform policy makers and address future pandemics and public health emergencies more effectively	1177507.6	1177507.6	1177507.6
TPN-001819	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Enterprise Financial System (EFS) Project (1)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To replace the state’s financial accounting systems and budget preparation and reporting systems and processes in a phased approach over the course of three years.	3373000	1462238.94	1462238.94
TPN-001820	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Administrative Pandemic Related Payroll Costs	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	Since March 3, 2021, significant staff time has been dedicated to the County pandemic response. Staff have been tracking their time and is requesting a reimbursement of $60,164.34 that covers the following (FAQ Guidance 2.14): Administration and Property Maintenance staff time substantially dedicated to the COVID-19 Response (March - July 2021): 1126 hours = $60,164.34	60164.34	60164.34	60164.34			7					No			1 Imp General Public	28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-001821	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Tax Services Reopening to the Public	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide funds to allow DOTAX to take a series of actions to maintain and/or improve employees’  health, safety, and security.	507300	456958.37	456958.37
TPN-001822	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Black Cinder Quarry Site Survey, Island of Hawai‘i	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To identify the most suitable location for black cinder cone quarries on the island of Hawai‘i.	150000	150000	142246.77
TPN-001823	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	State Parks - Lifeguard Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide lifeguard services at state park beaches – specifically at Makena State Park, Maui.	728080	728080	728080
TPN-001824	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Health Screening System Maintenance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To maintain health screening system equipment installed at all arriving gates, at the passenger security checkpoints, and throughout the terminals at the five main airports, Daniel K. Inouye International Airport (HNL), Kahului Airport (OGG), Ellison Onizuka Kona International Airport at Keahole (KOA), Hilo International Airport (ITO), and Lihue Airport (LIH), to detect passengers who have an elevated body temperature of 100.4 degrees or higher. The System will track passengers with an elevated body temperature of 100.4 degrees or higher until they can be pulled aside for additional medical screening.	1389860	1389860	1389860
TPN-001825	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	2-Lined Spittlebug	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide funds to mitigate and control the two-lined spittlebug, including reducing the two-lined spittlebug population by using pesticides, integrating weed management measures in affected rangelands, and reseeding pastures damaged by infestations with range grasses know to be resistant to two-lined spittlebug.	309364.52	309364.52	309364.52
TPN-001826	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Workers’ Compensation and Unemployment Insurance Benefit Costs	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To pay worker compensation and unemployment benefit costs.	582775	307775	307775
TPN-001827	RCP-038059	Springfield, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	CORP SPD - AUTOMATIC LICENSE PLATE READER (ALPR) CAMERAS	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	AUTOMATIC LICENSE PLATE READER (ALPR) CAMERAS for the Springfield Police Department - The purchase of 83 Flock Safety Automatic License Plate Reader (ALPR) cameras to be used for comprehensive monitoring, processing, and machine vision services solution; and in addition to license plates, this system uses machine vision to analyze vehicle color, vehicle make, vehicle type and objects based on image analytics instead of vehicle registration data and can identify characteristics of vehicles with a paper license plate or vehicles absent of a license plate; and the cameras have the capability to capture and process up to 30,000 vehicle per day with a single camera powered by solar power; and the Springfield Police Department will be able to share data across law enforcement departments on a national level.	210000	210000	210000
TPN-001828	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Enterprise Financial System (EFS) Project (2)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To replace the state’s financial accounting systems and budget preparation and reporting systems and processes in a phased approach over the course of three years.	500000	500000	440733
TPN-001829	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	University of Hawai‘i ARPA support	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide funds that will enable UH to continue to provide quality educational opportunities to students and the community, pursue research opportunities that Hawai‘i needs, and serve the public across the entire state.	28000000	28000000	28000000
TPN-001830	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff/Jail COVID Related Costs #1	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Sheriff and Jail  staff time dedicated to the County's COVID-19 Response (March - August) 740 hours = $35,728.	35728	35728	35728			*					No
TPN-001831	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Professional and Vocational Licensing Call Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To contract with a qualified company that can provide contact center services to PVL. PVL is facing a temporary backlog that resulted in large part from COVID-19 restrictions, and an increased demand for licensed health care professionals.	701064	701064	701064
TPN-001832	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Special Project for Reorganization of Department of Public Safety	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To analyze and plan for a proposed legislative reorganization of the Department of Public Safety into two departments: a Department of Law Enforcement and a Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.	587314.47	511279.95	511279.95
TPN-001833	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Hawai‘i Promise	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Hawai‘i Promise Program is a scholarship program that provides free in-state tuition for qualified UHCC students with financial need. The Hawai‘i Promise Program covers financial needs not met by other forms of financial aid such as federal grants, scholarship benefits from the University of Hawai‘i (UH), employers and other private sources.	1300000	1300000	1300000
TPN-001834	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff Jail COVID Related Payroll Costs (with project 49)	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Sheriff and jail staff time dedicated to the County's COVID-19 Response (March - August). With project #49 additional costs.	17115.8	17115.8	17115.8			*					No
TPN-001835	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Hawai‘i Made Program Administration and Promotion	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For the promotion and program development of Made in Hawai‘i products.	149250	149250	149250
TPN-001836	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Work from Home Initiative with a Technology Refresh	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To increase and improve BESSD’s telework capacity to better serve clients of federal and state programs, including SNAP, TANF, TAONF, GA, Aid to Aged, Blind, and Disabled (AABD), employment support and child care services through First to Work, SNAP Employment & Training, Child Care Services Programs, and Homeless Programs Services, by improving virtual private network (VPN) usage speed to maximize the available broadband and upgrading computer equipment that connect to broadband.	3170948	2828478.35	2828478.35
TPN-001837	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Aquaria	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To reestablish critical positions that were vacated during the COVID-19 closure and to help with utilities costs, thereby allowing the Aquarium to return to full operations.	1000000	1000000	1000000
TPN-001839	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Security Access to the State Capitol	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide trained security personnel at selected building access points into the Capitol.  Because of the openness of the Capitol’s entry points and compliance with State’s COVID-19 protocols, visitor screening is needed to verify ID and vaccination status or a negative COVID-19 test.  Enhancing security projection levels will also ensure employee and public safety.	359886	359886	359886
TPN-001840	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Contact Center Services for DCCA Professional and Vocational Licensing Division	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	PVL is facing a temporary backlog that resulted in large part from COVID-19 restrictions, and an increased demand for licensed health care professionals. At present, PVL has a backlog of approximately 4,100 applications. Due to the complexity of the license process, the PVL needs trained individuals that can provide meaningful assistance to the existing licensing staff.	909000	908998.38	393992.15
TPN-001841	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Homeless Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide core homeless services through the following programs: Family Assessment Centers, Homeless Outreach and Civil Legal Services, Housing First Program, and the Rapid Re-housing Program.	10800000	10800000	10800000
TPN-001842	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Administration COVID Related Payroll Costs  (August - October 2021)	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	Administration and Property Maintenance staff time dedicated to the COVID-19 Response (August - October) - 575.25 hours = $32601.10	32601.1	32601.1	32601.1			*					No			1 Imp General Public	24 Dis Imp Other SBs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-001843	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Technical Assistance to Hawai‘i Floriculture & Nursery Association	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide the technical assistance to build the in-state capacity off the dendrobium growers to micro-propagate the desired dendrobium varieties and decrease their reliance on offshore tissue culture operations.	100000	100000	70000
TPN-001845	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Electronic Case Management System (eCMS) Project Capabilities	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To rebuild electronic Case Management System (eCMS) project capabilities lost during the pandemic.  The project will develop LIRAB and workflow processes, digitize case files, and provide for the web portal licenses.	3541937	0	0
TPN-001846	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff/Jail COVID Related Payroll Costs (August  - October 2021) #3	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Sheriff/Jail staff time dedicated to the County's COVID-19 Response (August - November)516 hours = 33,977	33977	33977	33977			10					No
TPN-001847	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Housing Resource Specialist	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Just last week, HHS was notified of a grant award from the Department of Human Services for a Housing Resource Specialist. This grant is a two-year award for a 1FTE requested to work on four goals related to housing: Referrals and Outreach - connecting individuals to housing and stabilization services; Landlord Engagement - creating and establishing relationships to landlords, encouraging them to work with individuals who may have poor credit/rental history or criminal records; Prevention - once housing is secured, keeping folks in housing through case management and supportive services, thereby reducing the risk of re-entering homelessness; Transitioning out of Institutions - working with individuals on finding and securing housing that are transitioning out of jails, hospitals, treatment centers, and foster care. While SCHHS asked for a 1 FTE, what was awarded was a .5 FTE. At the June 1st Board Meeting staff brought this grant to Commissioners and asked for their direction on whether or not to accept or forfeit this grant award. HHS was encouraged to bring a request to the ARPA committee to fund the other .5 of the position since housing is so frequently referenced in ARPA guidance.  As we know, COVID-19 has exacerbated our nation’s already severe housing affordability crisis. Today, 1 in 5 renters is behind on rent and just over 10 million homeowners are behind on mortgage payments. The economic toll of COVID has exacerbated those in our communities who are experiencing homelessness or housing instability. As stated to the Board of Commissioners, this would be a grant-funded and ARPA-funded position which would likely not sunset in three years. That said, there are several new state and federal housing programs that have recently been established and HHS staff is confident that grant funding would be available to sustain the position. County Board members felt that it was worth the risk and that an investment in housing stabilization transcends far beyond HHS programs and clients and really is an investment in the community and growing our business and resident base.	171390.52	171390.52	89658.1			*					No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		Yes	0
TPN-001850	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	DCBA	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Assistance to Downtown Business Association	25000	25000	25000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-001851	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Chamber of Commerce	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Assistance to small business	75000	75000	75000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-001858	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Sister-State Program Activities to Assist Hawai‘i Businesses	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For program support of Hawai‘i's Sister-State relationships.	0	0	0
TPN-001859	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Hawai‘i Health Systems Corporation - Regions	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide funds to HHSC’s hospitals to have sufficient staff to support the State of Hawai‘i’s healthcare infrastructure to treat and care for current and future patients on the island of Hawai‘i and Kaua‘i.	32315400	32315400	32315400
TPN-001860	RCP-040172	Pekin, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Standard Allowance for Revenue Loss	10000000	35018.9	35018.9
TPN-001861	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Green Jobs Youth Corps Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The Green Jobs Youth Corps program provides entry level positions and on the job training to recent graduates and displaced workers with short term (1 year) employment while providing support for the green sector and providing economic benefits for Hawai‘i.	5000000	5000000	4500000								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	1 Imp General Public	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	Yes	0
TPN-001862	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Repayment of Unemployment Title XII advances for Benefit Payments	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.28-Contributions to UI Trust Funds	To provide funds to repay Title XII advances taken through September 30, 2021.	100000000	100000000	100000000								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001863	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Safe Travels Hawai‘i and Other COVID-19 Related Expenditures	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To promote health and public safety to our community and mitigate the spread of COVID-19 by operating the Safe Travels Hawai‘i program and other programs and activities related to responding to the impacts of COVID-19.	23519525.77	23519525.77	23519525.77								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001864	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Operating Subsidy for the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum and ‘Iolani Palace	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	To provide an operating subsidy to offset payroll, fringe, and electricity costs for the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum and ‘Iolani Palace.	1346000	1346000	1346000								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001865	RCP-053281	City Of Gresham, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Aldercrest Apartments Loan	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	This project has been created to purchase Aldercrest Apartments with the intent of providing affordable housing to Gresham citizens. The City of Gresham loaned this money to Human Solutions Inc with the expectation that it will be repaid in 2022 when they receive funding. The property was being sold in November 2021 and Human Solutions Inc did not have the funds available at that time.	1200000	1200000	1200000								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	1200000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-001866	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Community Development Software	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Digital video plan checking hardware and software, Zoom Room creation for digital meetings, Zoom license	120000	112557.46	112557.46								No	Devices and equipment that assist households in accessing the internet	120000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001867	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Relocate BMX track	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Relocate BMX track to make location for homeless service center	600000	536044.51	536044.51								No		600000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001869	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Unemployment Insurance Program Support	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide funds to be used for a call and adjudication center.  The call center will provide the public with information about unemployment benefits.  The adjudication center will adjudicate unemployment claims.	30502134	13994783.29	13994783.29								No			1 Imp General Public	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	No	0
TPN-001870	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Landlord Tenant Mediation Program for County of Hawai‘i	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	To provide funds to the County of Hawaii to establish a program to provide mediation services as may be needed due to the lifting of the eviction moratorium in Hawai‘i on August 6, 2021.  See https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/slh/Years/SLH2021/SLH2021_Act57.pdf.	69000	69000	69000	285							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	No	0
TPN-001871	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Agenda Management Software	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Agenda management software for online accessibility	47000	37525.48	37525.48
TPN-001872	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Mediation for Eviction Prevention	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	To provide funds to the County of Maui to establish a program to provide mediation services as may be needed due to the lifting of the eviction moratorium in Hawai‘i on August 6, 2021.	4350	4350	4350	41							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	No	0
TPN-001873	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Parklet Development	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Create outside dining for restaurants	300000	21399.14	21399.14								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001874	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Tenant Eviction Mediation Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	To provide funds to the County of Kauai to establish a program to provide mediation services as may be needed due to the lifting of the eviction moratorium in Hawai‘i on August 6th, 2021.	0	0	0	0							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	No	0
TPN-001875	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Honolulu Eviction Prevention Mediation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	To provide funds to the City and County of Honolulu to establish a program to provide mediation services as may be needed due to the lifting of the eviction moratorium in Hawai‘i on August 6th, 2021.	0	0	0	0							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	No	0
TPN-001876	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	PG&E SST Phase 2	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Sustainable Solutions Turnkey program to implement energy saving projects to reduce costs and energy consumption	2600000	2600000	2600000
TPN-001877	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Homeless Resting Site	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Construct a homeless resting site to house the unhoused	800000	791561.58	791561.58								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001878	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Computer Aided System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Police department CAD System-RIMS	328163	328163	328163
TPN-001879	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Broadband General Plan	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Develop plan for broadband development in City	4800000	569044.57	569044.57					No
TPN-001880	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Updated ransomware, software	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Work from home has created need for security software	300000	268455.96	268455.96								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001881	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Treasury Management Software	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Treasury management software for management and reporting on cash and investments	15000	12686.3	12686.3
TPN-001882	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Fire Station Improvement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Update Fire Station design for new station combined with Fire Station improvements.	495929	0	0
TPN-001883	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Park and Greenway Restoration	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Encampments allowed during the early COVID lockdown damaged park and greenway within the City	250000	3812.75	3812.75								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001884	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Digital Video Plan Checking	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Digital method of plan checking	100000	0	0
TPN-001885	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Neogov Software	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Neogov software for digital hiring and employee review	40372	0	0
TPN-001886	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Agreement Monitoring Panel (AMP) for DPS COVID-19 Mitigation	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The project would fund the establishment and operation of a five-person, independent Agreement Monitoring Panel (AMP) pursuant to the settlement agreement in Anthony Chatman, eta! v. Max Otani, Civil No. 21-00268 JAO-KJM (Settlement). The AMP’s task is to monitor the Department of Public Safety (DPS)’s COVID-19 mitigation efforts. The project also would fund COVID-19 mitigation measures recommended by the AMP.	729357.76	729357.76	729357.76								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-001887	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Transfer to Hawai‘i Health Systems Corporation	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	To allow for the continued provision of services in the O‘ahu Regional Health Care System.	16320700	16320700	16320700								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-001888	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Hawai‘i State Hospital COVID-19 Public Health Expenditure	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To support the Hawai‘i State Hospital’s COVID-19 response and mitigation efforts.	6180433	5802016.14	5802016.14								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-001889	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Administrative Assistant on Homelessness	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	To fund the Administrative Assistant on Homelessness position 121540 for FY 2022 to assist in leading statewide efforts to end homelessness, including the alignment of effort within State government, with local and federal government, and the private sector.  In addition, the project will increase public awareness and understanding of homelessness, maximize efficiencies in existing programs, and scale promising programs.	75883.56	75883.56	75883.56			*					No
TPN-001890	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Workers’ Compensation Costs	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To pay for worker compensation claims.	3700000	3700000	3700000
TPN-001892	RCP-036320	Rochester City, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Broad and Allen Firehouse Renovation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Broad & Allen Firehouse Kitchen Renovation & Exhaust Hood Upgrades Project will renovate the existing kitchen with stainless steel cabinets and countertops, lighting upgrades, new flooring, and painting. Replacement is required of the existing hood with a code complaint exhaust hood and fire suppression system with make-up air unit.	162000	0	0
TPN-001894	RCP-036683	Somerset County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	PPE Items	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Purchased lysol spray to disinfect county offices to prevent the spread of covid to staff and the public	77.64	77.64	77.64								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001895	RCP-036683	Somerset County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	911 Building Ventilation	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Update the exhaust fan at the 911 building to help prevent the spread of covid to the staff and public	3144	3144	3144								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001896	RCP-036683	Somerset County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	CSA "Y" replacement Que System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Assist with the replacement of the "Y" connection to continue to provide clean drinking water to customers on the Que System	111504.07	111504.07	111504.07
TPN-001897	RCP-039113	Fall River, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Water Main Replacement (Contract 1)	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Replacement of water transmission and distribution lines including rehabilitation of affected roadways	12946028	12946028	8949441.15					No	Yes
TPN-001898	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Vaccination Clinic Floor Damage	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Due to the pandemic, several dozen vaccination clinics have been held at the Government Center. Over the course of time, the thousands of people coming through the door along with the chairs that were used to house staff, have damaged and severely scratched the entryway flooring. This project would restore the flooring to its original state.	4560	4560	4560
TPN-001899	RCP-037157	Roane County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Additional Ambulance Equipment	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	To help fight COVID-19 and its evolving numerous strands, new equipment was needed for Roane County's Office of Emergency Services' ambulances. The equipment was necessary to allow a quicker return of our current ambulances after servicing COVID patients.  Additionally, this equipment will allow for decontamination of our frontline ambulances to be properly completed before returning to service.   The equipment purchased consisted of: one (1) Auto-Pulse System, four (4) auto pulse, twelve (12) batteries, four (4) chargers, twenty-four (24) life bands, four (4) quick cases and two (2) Vent Portable Ventilators, two (2) vents, two (2) carry cases, two (2) case circuits.	100000	100000	92957.29								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001900	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Out-of-Home Placement Costs	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Out of Home Placement (OOP) costs for children are a significant expense in the HHS budget. We work hard to lessen the cost of this line item through any means necessary - relative search efforts, preplacement screening, Family Group Decision Making, and other preventative measures. Our 2021 budget line item for OOP is $200,000. We are currently tracking to double that amount by year-end. While there are numerous factors that attribute to our sharp increase in OOP costs, one factor has been extended foster care placements due to significant court delays. HHS currently has seven children in extended foster care due to these delays, at a cost of $33,142.80. We are seeking ARPA dollars to reimburse the county for these added costs due to COVID delays.	26906.41	26906.41	26906.41
TPN-001901	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	On-Site Child Care Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	In 2019, Health and Human Services, YMCA of Greater Twin Cities, and Sherburne County Board embarked on a collaborative effort to provide an on-site child care within the Sherburne County Government Center. The on-site child care was meant to serve children 6 months to 12 years of age, up to 2 hours, and for purposes of providing safe and nurturing care for when parents on site at the Government Center who are conducting business. The child care will be open 16 hours each week (currently all day Tuesday, half-days Wednesday and Thursday). Also, due to the nature of the funding, ONLY available to persons who are applying for assistance on the Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP) or MFIP families accessing services. Unfortunately, this program limitation excludes many who can benefit from this service. With the increased demand of many services within the Government Center (public assistance programs, courts, drivers licenses, passports), we are proposing expansion of the hours of the child care center to be an additional 16 hours, open Monday - Friday with the proposed hours being Monday - Thursday: 8:30am to 4:00pm and Friday: 8:30am to noon. The current contract with the YMCA is $2817 per month for the current 16 hours. Adding an additional 16 hours at the same rate would come out to $33,804/annual. It was suggested by the ARPA Risk Management Committee to trial these expanded hours to ensure utilization. Therefore, this request is for expanded hours (16 hours month x $2817) for the last 4 months of 2021 (9/1 - 12/31/21) and CY 2022.	37274.4	37274.4	37274.4
TPN-001902	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	IS Virtualization Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	A capital investment is being requested to initiate a three year resiliency update plan in support of the Sheriff Office virtualized IS infrastructure. This capital request is for the replacement of existing virtualized infrastructure and associated operating system licensing. The existing system will reach end of support in December 2021, and this existing system does not have the capacity or capability to consolidate other physical servers into a virtualized state. In total this request consists of three (3) physical server systems. Once in place this will set the foundation for displacing nineteen (19) expired or expiring physical servers with these three (3) new virtualization hosts.	99502.29	99502.29	99502.29
TPN-001903	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Park Trail Grooming & Maintenance Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Since the initial restrictions were put into place due to the pandemic we have experienced significantly increased traffic in the County Park and Trail System. Along with that use has come many requests for better trail maintenance in all seasons. This includes blowing an sweeping of bituminous trails, plowing and blowing snow off bituminous and cross country ski trail grooming. The Parks Department does not currently own any of the necessary equipment to perform this level of maintenance. We are requesting that ARPA funding assist in this capital expense to provide a level of maintenance that is consistent with the increased level of use.	143100	143100	143100
TPN-001904	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	CheckPoint Firewall Consulting	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	We have the large circuits from the State of MN to be moved, along with the back-end of the County Departments. We want these events to be as painless as possible with minimal impact to all Departments.  IT would like to request the minimum purchase of a 1 year ad-hoc consulting agreement with Checkpoint, our firewall maker. Their Firewall experts can aid in the heavy lifting of the back-end networks and help to ensure our projects are well planned and executed. Once complete IT will maintain the Firewall services.	19600	19600	19600
TPN-001905	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	System of Care Children's Mental Health	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Sherburne County Health &amp; Human Services received a 3 year System of Care Grant from SAMHSA to implement Wraparound Services to children being served by Children Mental Health Case Management. The grant also had other deliverables including creating a mental health system that includes youth and family voice, has appropriate cultural and linguistic services and addresses health equity issues. Due to the COVID pandemic, Wraparound Services and our agencies work on the grant deliverables were significantly impacted and could not be fully executed as planned. As a result, the Department of Human Services has requested and received a one year extension for the grant. Pending the results of the extension and the needs for DHS to implement new contracts with grant entities, we were instructed to cease any grant spending on 9/30/21. Our collaborative partner for the grant, Mainstreet Family Services, is currently providing Wraparound Services to 7 families and we are requesting ARPA funds so that Mainstreet can continue to provide Wraparound Services to these families. DHS has also instructed us that we cannot back pay for any services rendered after 9/30/21. This funding will allow us to continue to serve and transition the 7 families current receiving Wraparound Services. The youth being served have significant mental health needs and an immediate disruption in this service could have serious implications.<	24000	24000	24000
TPN-001906	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	EDA Support for Entities - Food & Beverage	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Small Business Emergency Assistance Grant Program - Food and Beverage provides working capital grants to eligible food and beverage establishments.	14875000	11823000	11378000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-001907	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Headsets for Hybrid Workers	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HHS is moving forward with hybrid work as a permanent solution for most of our workforce. The pandemic has demonstrated that workers are connected and in many cases, more efficient at paperwork and processing at home than when in the office. Even with client visits resuming and return to the office for Sherburne County staff, many of our workers are spending more time working from home than at the Government Center. The pandemic has demonstrated that workers can process more paperwork and carry higher caseloads (33% on average) by working from home. As we work through the bottleneck of cases caused by the pandemic, something anticipated to take a year or two, HHS staff need to work as efficiently as possible. Headsets are necessary for home work stations to stay connected to clients, co-workers, and provide privacy for sensitive and private discussions. HHS is requesting $6,750 for headsets. This would allow us to purchase 45 headsets at approximately $150 each.	6656	6656	6656
TPN-001908	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	10 Hrs of Public Planner Time for HR Support	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Recently, through a grant, HHS was able to hire a Public Health Planner FTE. County Human Resources would like to utilize 10 hours of the PH Planner's time to assist HR with COVID contract tracing and providing staff with the necessary quarantine guidance. COVID contact tracing and quarantine support has already put an enormous strain on the county human resources department.  The cost of this 10/hours per week, for the period of 12/1/21 to 12/31/24 will be approximately $100,000.	8876.78	8876.78	8876.78			*					No
TPN-001909	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Administration of FRF Funds	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Larimer County hired one limited term Fiscal Recovery Program Manager to coordinate utilization of Fiscal Recovery Funds. Duties include collaborating with County departments, public stakeholders and municipalities; determining project eligibility; ensuring proper procurement procedures; tracking expenses; and other related duties. This project has been completed and these duties will be absorbed by other County budget staff.	81993	81993	81993
TPN-001910	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Attorney Staffing Needs - Court Backlog	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	In March of 2020, with the onset of the pandemic, the Courts shut down and only allowed the hearing of emergent issues (persons in custody, emergency petition in child protection cases, civil commitment). Everything else was placed on hold. This began to back up pending cases. In the second phase, the Courts allowed hearings to be conducted by zoom with limited in person jury trials/grand juries. This meant that the majority of trials and hearings on other cases continued to be delayed while at the same time our office continued to charge criminal and civil cases.  At the same time, there has been an overall increase in the serious cases our office sees. For example, from 2019 to 2020, there was a 14% increase in felony case openings. So far in 2021, there is an additional 7% increase in the referrals. This adds to the backlog of cases we will have to address since the Courts are still not fully open yet. One additional reflection of the impact of COVID was the strain on mental health of individuals. This is reflected in our case numbers: there was a 24% increase in civil commitment cases from 2019 to 2020 and it has not abated. When the Courts do open this summer, our office will have an extraordinarily large caseload to address. As of May 18, 2021, there are 145 trial settings from May 18 to November of 2021. This will be the first wave. The following waves will come in the form of appeals, probation violations and post-conviction relief requests. During the pandemic, the Courts also allowed law enforcement to quash warrants on misdemeanors and gross misdemeanors. The objective was to limit the numbers of person held in the jail facility to control the spread of COVID. By quashing the warrants, many of the issues with pending cases have gone unresolved and will now need to be addressed by our office. The District Court bench is addressing the backlog by adding judicial time using retired judges and this will require more court appearances for the County Attorney’s Office. With the added judicial time, the Courts are trying to place as many appearances on individual court calendars as possible. The County Attorney’s Office has had to staff those calendars with two attorneys rather than one attorney due to the sheer volume. In addition to the backlog and other increases of criminal, civil commitment, child support enforcement and other cases that our office must address, we are also seeing an increase in demand on our civil division to assist other County departments as they respond to the pandemic and its implications for their workload. Combined with Project #76.	848581	848581	445795.15			*					Yes	Technology and tools	5575.94
TPN-001914	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	0.5 Adult Mental Health Social Worker	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Mental Health aliments and crises have been exacerbated by the pandemic. Isolation, financial/employment hardship, fear, disruption to normalcy and routine have all played a significant role in the significant increase in deterring mental health. For some, poverty, broken family systems, socio-economic status, etc. make gaining access to mental health services almost prohibitive. These individuals then default to costly and inappropriate systems like detox, jail, and emergency rooms. With no one to provide intensive case management and supportive services to these individuals, programs are delivered in fragmented ways and too often, individuals find themselves cycling in repeat patterns of maladaptive or destructive behavior. Since 2019, Regional Treatment Center placements has increased $53,798 (18%) and our detox costs have increased $32,251 (35%). The amount of civil commitments filed has increased 40%+ and the amount of staff hours assigned to these cases has increased dramatically. The request from HHS is to take the currently budgeted .5FTE and combine it with another .5FTE (this ARPA request) to work on intensive case management with a small case load of very complex and high needs individuals. This would be in efforts to prevent unnecessary trips and costs associated with deep end systems like the emergency room, detox, and jails. Equity, Prevention, Mental Health, and Chemical Dependency are all priorities very prominent in ARPA guidance as being significant after effects brought on/amplified by the pandemic. Specifically, the Interim Final Rule issued May 17, 2021 (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-05-17/pdf/2021-10283.pdf) specifically states that new or enhanced State, local, and Tribal government services may be needed to meet behavioral health needs exacerbated by the pandemic and respond to other public health impacts. These services include mental health treatment, substance misuse treatment, other behavioral health services, hotlines or warmlines, crisis intervention, overdose prevention, infectious disease prevention, and services or outreach to promote access to physical or behavioral health primary care and preventative medicine. Because we have seen a significant increased in our detox and mental health costs from 2019 to 2020, and know that qualitatively through clients testimonial these more complex mental and chemical health aliments are attributed to the social isolation and disruption cause by the pandemic, HHS believes this Adult Mental Health Social Worker is a necessary and innovative prevention to help mitigate some of these effects.	165955	165955	84101.23			*					No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		Yes	0
TPN-001915	RCP-040465	Bay County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay FY22	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	American Rescue Act Plan (ARPA) Premium Pay for Essential Workers  Executive Summary: The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) was signed into law on March 12th, delivering $65 billion of direct and flexible aid to America’s cities, towns, and villages. Bay County, Florida will receive an estimated $33.8 million in two payment tranches with approximately 50% of the funds available in August of 2021. Funds must be used by December 31, 2024. Recovery Funds provide substantial flexibility for each jurisdiction to meet local needs—including support for households, small businesses, impacted industries, essential workers, and the communities hardest-hit by the crisis. Within the categories of eligible uses listed, recipients have broad flexibility to decide how best to use this funding to meet the needs of their communities. In addition to allowing for flexible spending up to the level of their revenue loss, recipients can use funds to: Support public health expenditures, by – among other uses – funding COVID-19 mitigation efforts, medical expenses, behavioral healthcare, mental health and substance misuse treatment and certain public health and safety personnel responding to the crisis. Address negative economic impacts caused by the public health emergency, including by rehiring public sector workers, providing aid to households facing food, housing, or other financial insecurity, offering small business assistance, and extending support for industries hardest hit by the crisis Aid the communities and populations hardest hit by the crisis, supporting an equitable recovery by addressing not only the immediate harms of the pandemic, but its exacerbation of longstanding public health, economic and educational disparities Provide premium pay for essential workers, offering additional support to those essential and forward-facing employees who have borne and will continue to bear the greatest health risks because of their service during the pandemic. Specifically, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds provide resources for eligible state, local, territorial, and Tribal governments to recognize the heroic contributions of essential workers. Since the start of the public health emergency, essential workers have put their physical well-being at risk to meet the daily needs of their communities and to provide care for others. Many of these essential workers have not received compensation for the heightened risks they have faced and continue to face. Recipients may use this funding to provide premium pay directly, or through grants to private employers, to a broad range of essential workers who must be physically present at their jobs. Eligibility of Bay County Employees for American Rescue Act Plan (ARPA) Premium Pay: Recipient governments have wide latitude to use the funds to provide premium (hazard) pay to workers earning modest wages.  As noted above, ARPA and the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 86- FR 26786-01 names premium pay compensation for essential workers as an authorized use of State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. As effective models already exist for state and local governments to deploy these funds toward workers who risked the most during the pandemic while earning the least. The Treasury Department guidance provides significant, welcome flexibility to state and local governments to provide premium pay to essential workers. The rule names several qualifying sectors, including health care, public health and safety, education, transportation, and food production and services, but also provides governments with the ability to add other sectors deemed critical during the pandemic. This is important for Bay County as the Government response for the Covid-19 Pandemic differs from a traditional weather/disaster event response. The key language in the law is that the worker is exposed to heightened risk of Covid-19 due to their duties in providing critical services to the public or in support of other essential staff. Justification for Bay County Tier 1-3 Employees receiving Premium Pay By its nature the Covid-19 Pandemic response is much longer in duration and presents significant risk to front-line and forward- facing workers daily as they respond and/or maintain essential services for health, safety, and quality of life. For example, a library worker or building services worker would not typically be placed at risk during an active disaster, but during the Covid-19 Pandemic response, they are considered a front-line worker with significant risk of exposure.  Therefore, any employee who is working in the environments approved by Bay County leadership would be considered essential and eligible for Premium Pay under the Department of Treasury interim guidance. Below is a list of essential employees considered eligible. This list is not all inclusive and County leadership may add or subtract by position or qualifier so long as consistency is maintained.  Employees eligible for Premium Pay must be physically present at the Job Site. These employees would not be permitted to work from home or remotely.  • Emergency or Medical Rescue Response Staff including office and support staff • Police/Fire/EMS/Lifeguard  • Health Department Staff • Utilities, Wastewater, or other essential services  • Forward-Facing staff providing services to/or in support of residents or other essential staff • Staff at Long-Term Care (LTC) or nursing homes, hospitals, and home care settings • Truck drivers, transit staff, and warehouse workers • Procurement, Budget, or Clerks office staff  • Parks and Recreation, After-School or childcare staff • Janitors and sanitation workers • Social service and human services staff. • Public health and safety staff • Police, Fire, or other Dispatch Staff • Food Safety and Code Enforcement  • Animal Control • I.T., Library, Risk Management and Human Resources • Forward Facing Staff of Constitutional Offices  • Roads and Bridges Staff  • Building and Construction Permitting and Planning  • County Leadership and support staff • Housing and Community Services Staff   Premium Pay Guidelines and Considerations ARPA allows for premium pay to be awarded at up to $13 per hour, to a maximum of $25,000 per worker. The rule clarifies that governments should prioritize compensation for lower-income eligible workers and imposes additional reporting requirements if they award premium pay to workers such that they would earn at least 50% more than their state’s average wage. The State of Florida 2021 median family income per capita is $59,227. Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, 86- FR 26786-01 Fiscal Recovery Funds payments may be used by recipients to provide premium pay to eligible workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency or to provide grants to third-party employers with eligible workers performing essential work.[FN95] These are workers who have been and continue to be relied on to maintain continuity of operations of essential critical infrastructure sectors, including those who are critical to protecting the health and wellbeing of their communities. Importantly, state, and local officials can apply premium pay retrospectively for work performed at any time since the start of the pandemic—recognizing that many essential workers have yet to be adequately compensated for work they previously performed. At the same time, the rule also provides flexibility to recipient governments to apply premium pay prospectively. Some state and local leaders may consider using the funds to provide incentives (essentially, hiring bonuses) to workers to fill in-person occupations with an abundance of vacancies, such as in health care, care work, public safety, retail, and restaurants.  In these ways, the interim final rule provides wide latitude and strong encouragement to state and local governments to devote a portion of their fiscal recovery funds to compensate essential workers who kept their neighbors fed, protected, and healthy over the past year. • Premium Pay may be awarded on an hourly basis of up to $13.00 per hour up to maximum of $25,000 per eligible employee • Premium Pay must be above and beyond the employee’s normal salary and benefits and in no way offset the employees’ normal wages. • Premium Pay may be awarded as a lump sum amount per eligible employee so long as the award does not exceed the maximum amounts noted in the interim Treasury Guidance  • If Premium Pay exceeds 150% of the State of Florida average annual wage as defined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the County will need to provide enhanced written justification and provide to the Department of Treasury and make public.  o The recipient must provide, whether for themselves or on behalf of a grantee, a written justification to the Secretary of how the premium pay or grant provided under this paragraph (c) responds to eligible workers performing essential work if the premium pay or grant would increase an eligible worker’s total wages and remuneration above 150 percent of such eligible worker’s residing State’s average annual wage for all occupations or their residing county’s average annual wage, whichever is higher. • Premium Pay recipients must be physically present at the jobsite and have regular interaction with the public or handle items that were handled by others.  o To ensure that premium pay is targeted to workers that faced or face heightened risks due to the character of their work, the interim final rule defines essential work as work involving regular in-person interactions or regular physical handling of items that were also handled by others. A worker would not be engaged in essential work and accordingly may not receive premium pay, for telework performed from a residence. • Premium Pay and Pension Payments - Deposit into Pension Funds The statute provides that recipients may not use Fiscal Recovery Funds for “deposit into any pension fund.” For the reasons discussed below, Treasury interprets “deposit” in this context to refer to an extraordinary payment into a pension fund for the purpose of reducing an accrued, unfunded liability. More specifically, the interim final rule does not permit this assistance to be used to make a payment into a pension fund if both:  o The payment reduces a liability incurred prior to the start of the COVID-19 public health emergency, and o The payment occurs outside the recipient’s regular timing for making such payments. Under this interpretation, a “deposit” is distinct from a “payroll contribution,” which occurs when employers make payments into pension funds on regular intervals, with contribution amounts based on a pre-determined percentage of employees’ wages and salaries. • Premium Payments for Essential Workers may be based upon time worked after January 2020, although the County may want to consider time after the first State Declaration of Emergency as the start date of the period of service. However, there is no language in the law that requires a state emergency declaration to be in place.  • Premium Pay must prioritize low- and moderate-income workers but does not exclude higher income workers. **BOCC extended the premium pay program to employees of the county Tax Collector, Property Appraiser, and Supervisor of Elections. Constitutional officers were required to submit a justification and the same eligibility guidelines used for BOCC employees were applied.	1702753.88	1702753.88	1702753.88		708
TPN-001917	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Children's Mental Health Worker	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators	Out of Home placement costs are on the rise in 2021, specifically due to our group home and residential placements. The intensity of client needs and the increased time that is needed on the cases being served by Children’s Mental Health has increased significantly in 2021. Placement options for high needs children are less available which creates crisis and intensive searches to find adequate and appropriate levels of children being served. When placement can not be readily found, intensive safely planning and monitoring is needed by the case manager. With the recent closing of Woodland Hills in Duluth and The Hills Youth and Family Services in East Bethel the agency will face additional obstacles only adding to the time and intensity of our cases moving forward. In 2021, HHS budgeted $220,000 for group home placements. Through May, 2021 we’ve expended $194,913. Our budget estimate is that we will expend $467,791 - over budget by $247,791. Residential placements have also increased and we have budgeted $200,000 in this area. Through May, we’ve expended $101,433 and are estimated to end the year at $243,439 - over budget by $43,439. We know that both of these overages can be attributed in large part to the after effects of COVID. The need for more acute levels of care has increased due to the complex needs due to the isolating and disruptive effects of the pandemic, hence requiring a more intensive and costly level of care. HHS has a been successful in decreasing out of placements historically by operationalizing preventative measures to shorten the duration or intensity of placements, or avoid out of home placements all-together through safety and support network planning, respite, or relative search which have been proven to work. In 2020 and 2021, the child welfare system has been faced with extraordinary circumstances that have resulted in children needing to be placed in higher levels of care. HHS requests 1 FTE Children Mental Health social worker to help us in these efforts. This person will be dedicated as a .5 FTE to help with the growing number of cases and referrals, as well as a .5 FTE Rapid Response/Relative Search worker to help us prevent and shorten duration of placements. The Rapid Response process and relative search practice in Children’s Mental Health will allow us to pull a child’s informal support system together early and often to prevent the need for out of home placements whenever possible. It will also help us identify alternatives to placement and/or develop discharge plans with the informal support system. Both of these practices have been highly successful in Child Protection and Child Welfare cases in preventing Out of Home Placements (OHP’s) and/or decreasing the amount of time in OHP. In the Interim Final Guidance 2.1.1 eligible services include enhanced services for child welfare-involved families and foster youth and supports for students’ social, emotional, and mental health needs. This request aligns with that guidance.	331181	331181	160784.92								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		Yes	0
TPN-001918	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	SARS-COVID Test Kits #3	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	The Jail is requesting funding to purchase additional SARS-COVID testing kits. To mitigate the spread of COVID we are testing each inmate/detainee for COVID-19 when they enter the jail and before entering general population. Test kits are also used if inmates/detainees develop symptoms. Tests are also used on staff to mitigate the spread of COVID.	21448.8	21448.8	21448.8								Yes	COVID-19 testing sites and laboratories	21448.8	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001919	RCP-036261	Smith County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Medical Personnel Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.2-Private Sector: Grants to other employers	Pay for hospital workers	4078017.5	4078017.5	4078017.5		4068
TPN-001920	RCP-039244	Cleveland, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Food Bank	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The Food Bank has been operating at maximum capacity and efficiency to distribute food directly and through our network of partner agencies since before the pandemic. The agency has had to turn food away due to lack of storage and have been using off-site storage space.  Despite the Food Bank's reach throughout the community, there was significant and growing need for food assistance.  Investment in a critical capital project, such as the Food Bank’s expansion, is a particularly well-suited use of ARPA funds because it is a non-recurring expenditure that will provide benefits over many years. Furthermore, since the Food Bank partners with over 1,000 partner agencies to serve more than 343,000 people across our service area, the expansion will be felt far and wide.	5000000	5000000	5000000								Yes	Food banks and other facilities	5000000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001921	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	PRPAY	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Hazard pay for municipal employees	841319	841319	841319		106
TPN-001922	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	DRM Salem American Legion Ambulance Assoc	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Payroll costs for ambulance services.	500000	500000	500000			53					No
TPN-001923	RCP-036812	Washington County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Buckeye Fields - Low Income Senior Housing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Construction of new low-income senior housing. Project is being carried out by Buckeye Fields Housing, LLC. County is giving $200,000 of ARPA funds to help the project.	200000	200000	200000								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001924	RCP-037108	Douglas County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Douglas County COVID-19 Public Safety and Heath Repsonse	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Douglas County elected to make investments in various equipment to implement COVID-19 mitigation strategies for the county’s public safety personnel to assist in protecting our staff when engaging the public and to mitigate potential COVID-19 spread while offering services within the community.		339814.04	339814.04								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001927	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Second Harvest	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	The County is providing funds to the Second Harvest Food Bank so that the food bank can purchase additional quantities of bulk food to be distributed among local food pantries	19750000	18250000	18249996								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-001928	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Non-Profit Direct Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The county distributed funds to non-profit organizations.	5000000	5000000	5000000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-001930	RCP-036812	Washington County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Ohio River Museum Expansion	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Ohio Historical Society is overseeing expansion project with a new facility for the Ohio River Museum in Marietta, OH. Will relocate archives of the Washington County Local History and Genealogy Library into the new facility. The museum's STEM+Art content and library's resources will promote workforce development and tourism in the region. The county is giving $150,000 toward the project from its ARPA funds.	150000	150000	150000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001932	RCP-035933	Pasco County Fl, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	One time premium pay for local government employees who worked during height of pandemic and one time incentive pay for fully vaccinated local government employees.	2724098.25	2724098.25	2724098.25		3600
TPN-001934	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	UV Filtration Project	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	This project involves installation of updated air filtration equipment in a number of county facilities to prevent virus transmission	571300	194917.37	194917.37								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	571300	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-001935	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Public Health Violence Prevention	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	The county will contribute funds to the local health department to be used for community violence prevention programs	300000	0	0								No
TPN-001936	RCP-035933	Pasco County Fl, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	COVID Reimbursements to Sheriff's Office Operations	7-Administrative	7.2-Transfers to Other Units of Government	Reimburse the Sheriff's Office for COVID related expenses affecting daily operations, including- cleaning supplies, increased internet access and cell phones for remote workers.	50071.66	50071.66	50071.66
TPN-001937	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	AEC Air Filtration	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	This project involves installation of UV air filtration equipment at the county's convention facility buildings	1032347.43	1032347.43	1032347.43								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	1032347	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-001938	RCP-035933	Pasco County Fl, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue Replacement- based on calculations using the US Treasury formula and the first allotment of funds received.	75092089	75092089	74595289.46
TPN-001940	RCP-040465	Bay County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	County Park Revitalization	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	The final rule "includes enumerated eligible uses in disproportionately impacted communities for developing neighborhood features that promote improved health and safety outcomes, such as parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks, pedestrian safety features like crosswalks, projects that increase access to healthy foods, streetlights, neighborhood cleanup, and other projects to revitalize public spaces." The county has chosen to use SLFR funding to revitalize parks that are located on, or near, qualified census tracts. Considering these improvements are closely related and directed toward a common purpose, we have created 1 project for the following activities:  *Youngstown/Fountain Multipurpose Facility - Relocate Playground (Playmore West PO 20220173) *HG Harder’s Park - Usability improvements including added irrigation for landscaping, aeration for recreational pond, pathways, concrete pads, and storm drains (Allon Services - PO 20220088; WW Grainger – PO 20230240; Hombre Concrete – PO’s 20230164 & 20230165; Panama City Concrete Inv. #147) *Bayou George Park - Pour Basketball Courts (Hombre Concrete PO 20230160) *Majette Park - Walking Trail Bridges (to be completed)	151575	74883.18	68583.18								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	151575	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-001941	RCP-039726	Frederick County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	P25 Public Safety Radio Network	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Provision of an Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) International Project 25 (P25) radio communications system to support mission-critical public safety communications within the county. The communications system will provide enhanced, two-way wireless communications capabilities to all public safety users and include the following: 1. A new P25 trunked simulcast Phase II system to replace the County’s multiple radio systems, including ultra-high frequency (UHF) conventional and trunked system elements, a very-high frequency (VHF) conventional analog system, and various interoperability channels. 2. A new Internet Protocol (IP)-based microwave. 3. New radio dispatch consoles at the County’s Department of Public Safety Communications (911 center) or an upgrade to current consoles. 4. Mobile and portable subscriber radios for the County’s first responders. 5. Simulcast tone-and-voice paging. 6. Civil work to support upgrades to new and existing radio sites, and tower upgrades to support the aforementioned communications subsystems.	6868003	6868003	4013019								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	6868003	1 Imp General Public
TPN-001942	RCP-040465	Bay County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Single Engine Combination Jet/Vacuum Sewer Cleaner	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The EPA’s Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) and Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) eligible projects continue to be presumed to be necessary investments under the final rule. The CWSRF program overview lists several options under the Stormwater category, one of which is the use of vacuum trucks for sediment control. The county has chosen to use SLFR funds to purchase a single engine combination jet/vacuum sewer cleaner through Adams Equipment CO., Inc. (County PO #20220146) https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-07/documents/overview_of_cwsrf_eligibilities_may_2016.pdf	445524	445524	445524
TPN-001945	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Better Health Outcomes and Community Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Funds provide resources needed to ensure resident COVID-19 testing and vaccination efforts remain available through the duration of the public health emergency. This includes education, outreach, and incentives, with a focus in communities of color. This includes $4 million to support Combating COVID kits that include at-home rapid antigen tests, supportive resources for positive tests, information about COVID-19 vaccines, and KN95 masks.	28900000	16614643.79	16614643.79								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001947	RCP-038331	Culpeper County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	New Pathways Equipment funding	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Purchase of a CNC machining tools equipment, which was initially loaned to the School.  The owner wished to sell the equipment and the School would like to purchase it.  They already have some debt, on which they are currently paying.  Further, they have secured a grant to cover a portion of the purchase price of the machine.	75000	75000	75000								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	75000	1 Imp General Public			Yes	75000
TPN-001948	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Meals that Work	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	This program will prepare and deliver 1,000 meals for 26 weeks to social service organizations, such as St. Vincent de Paul, schools, and more. Fourteen food service employees at the Convention Center will be utilized to prepare the meals.	655000	640000	632697.24	26000							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	640000
TPN-001950	RCP-039374	Oak Park, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Beyond Hunger Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	On August 30, 2021, the Village Board approved RES 21-166, A Resolution Approving a Funding Grant Agreement Between the Village of Oak Park and Beyond Hunger in an Amount Not to Exceed $85,000 and Authorizing its Execution. This grant funding will be used by Beyond Hunger to offset the costs (approximately 9%) of providing low-income Oak Park residents with critical COVID-19 response services to enhance food security. Funding will cover staffing, volunteer costs, supplies, food, printing, and indirect costs such as rent and electricity. $42,500 is anticipated to be paid out in 2021, with the remaining $42,500 budgeted in 2022. Beyond Hunger is the Oak Park and River Forest food pantry.  Beyond Hunger's food pantry provides access to healthy nutritious food to anyone in need, in a grocery store-like environment. The Village of Oak Park has determined that it is in the public interest to provide the Grantee, Beyond Hunger, with a grant of funds from the ARPA funds received by the Village for the Grantee to implement a program to provide for the food security of households impacted by the Covid-19 crisis.		85000	84999.75	21057							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-001951	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Personnel/Technical Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	Funds allow for continued technical assistance and professional development in financial sustainability, business practices, and reopening strategies. The Office of Arts and Culture has conducted several workshops for the field, offered scholarships to the statewide nonprofit alliance conference, and contracted with consultants to conduct a comprehensive asset mapping of neighborhoods in Phoenix that have received limited arts support from the City. An overarching goal of the Office of Arts and Culture is "to identify and eliminate barriers that have prevented marginalized groups' full participation from the agency's programs and to strengthen equity, diversity, and inclusion in the arts and culture sector for all Phoenix residents," the results from asset mapping the community will clarify what strengths to build from and what challenges exist in developing and growing arts programming for community members.	250000	159709.38	159709.38								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment			No	250000
TPN-001953	RCP-036797	Miami County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Health Department Vehicle	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Purchase of 2021 Ford F-150 Supercab truck for the Miami County Health Department.  The truck will be used to tow a trailer the Health Department owns.  The Health Department utilizes the trailer to move supplies and equipment to various locations around the Miami County for COVID clinics. The Miami County Health Department does not own a vehicle that can tow the trailer. This vehicle will provide a reliable and safe way to move the trailer from COVID clinic to COVID clinic for county residents to access clinics.		43285	43285								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001954	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Micro and Small Business Assistance Programs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Based on lessons learned from the CRF program, Community and Economic Development recommends combining the micro and small business programs into one program. This would allow for a more efficient and less bureaucratic process. Awards would be either $3K, $5k or $10k and would be based on the number of employees. Funding will also be used to provide assistance to business that have been impacted by COVID-19 and light rail development. For these businesses award amounts would be 50% higher due to the double impact of COVID and light rail construction.	8000000.66	8000000.66	8000000.66								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	8000000
TPN-001955	RCP-038331	Culpeper County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Well Purchase	5-Infrastructure	5.13-Drinking water: Source	Funding was used for the purchase of 4 existing potable wells, well lots, and easements in the Clevenger's Corner area for the purpose of drinking water.  The next step is to install well pumping equipment and connect the wells to our existing distribution system.  This will not happen for a couple of years.  Our engineer is working on the design plans, but we do not have any CIP funding.  We hope to get a contribution from local developers that need water.	252097.4	252097.4	252097.4					Yes
TPN-001956	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Summer Heat Respite	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	"A sprung structure was constructed to provide a place of respite during the summer for individuals experiencing homelessness. The sprung structure has been completed and provides guests with a place to socially distance due to COVID-19 and include meals, outreach, and other supports. It has evolved from a summer respite to a space where individuals homelessness can properly social distance and receive case management services. Funds were also used to provide temporary shade structures in the summer of 2021.  The pandemic exacerbated the national crises of individuals suffering from homelessness. Social services and safe, open spaces were limited in 2020 and the economic consequences of the pandemic have put more Americans at the risk of entering homelessness. This structure is increasing access to services for disproportionately impacted groups such as those experiencing homelessness as they will be able to find respite in times of extreme heat and make contact with social service agencies. "	3000000	2799131.91	2209532.91								Yes	Transitional shelters	1500000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	3000000
TPN-001957	RCP-039374	Oak Park, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Housing Forward Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	A resolution approving a funding grant agreement between the Village of Oak Park and Housing Forward in an amount not to exceed $500,000 and authorizing its execution. This grant will help Housing Forward provide housing support to address the needs of individuals impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Housing Forward provides emergency shelter, temporary shelter and interim housing to those experiencing homelessness. Housing Forward addresses the needs of homeless persons by providing emergency shelter, temporary shelter and interim housing. On August 30, 2021, the Village Board approved RES 21-168, A Resolution Approving a Funding Grant Agreement Between the Village of Oak Park and Housing Forward in an Amount Not to Exceed $500,000 and Authorizing its Execution. Housing Forward will use this grant funding to provide a combination of direct assistance for food, rent, and security assistance for individuals and families experiencing homelessness and will also use the funds to prevent eviction. Additional direct assistance will be used for transitional wages for those enrolled in Housing Forward’s Career Passport job training program. Housing Forward also proposes to use ARPA funds to provide needed case management and life skill services to improve housing stability for 33 individuals who are currently homeless with a documented disability and who received a mainstream housing choice voucher through the Oak Park Housing Authority.  $250,000 is budgeted in 2021, with the remaining $250,000 budgeted in 2022. Housing Forward will submit invoices for reimbursement of grant-related expenses along with supporting documentation quarterly to the Village of Oak Park. The funding schedule indicates estimated reimbursements expected quarterly beginning in September 2021 through December 31, 2024.		500000	319352.85								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-001958	RCP-038331	Culpeper County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Municipal Utility Relief	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Municipal Utility Relief - funds provided by the CW of VA - funds are designated for the Town of Culpeper and are flowing from the CW of VA to the County and then to the Town.	109735.72	109735.72	109735.72
TPN-001959	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Administrative Oversight, Compliance and Outreach Efforts	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Funds are intended to be used to provide staffing necessary to support federal compliance efforts. Staffing additions will also assist with enhancing community outreach to improve service delivery and to increase transparency on city progress for all approved programs via an enhanced website.	6900000	1446010.58	1415010.58
TPN-001960	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Vaccination Raffle	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County continues to strive to create a safe work environment for all employees while protecting the lives most vulnerable within our care and custody. Effective in the month of July and continuing through December 31, 2021, Merrimack County will conduct a COVID Vaccine Raffle whereby all employees will be entered to win a thousand dollars ($1,000) each month to encourage all employees to become vaccinated against COVID-19. Employees will be required to provide proof of vaccination to be eligible for the raffle monies. This program would be allowable under Expenditure Category 1: Public Health; specifically 1.12: Other Public Health Services.		19566.81	19566.81								No
TPN-001961	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Transit Heat Respite	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The goal of this summer program was to provide a 40-foot bus at the Human Services Campus where individuals experiencing homelessness are located to prevent heat-related illnesses and deaths among vulnerable populations. The program ran from July 2021 to September 2021. Total number of individuals on the bus was tracked by the hour each day. These numbers may have been duplicated throughout the day.	71498	71488.71	71488.71								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	78677
TPN-001962	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	COVID PPE	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Merrimack County purchases of gowns, masks, gloves and other equipment needed to mitigate COVID-19 are required for employees, especially in congregate facilities on the Merrimack County Campus; the County Nursing Home and the County Jail.		335212.01	335212.01								No			17 Dis Imp HHs receiving services provided by Tribal governments
TPN-001963	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Bus Card Subsidy Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Funds provide subsidies and fare assistance to residents that rely on public transportation. Various nonprofits have been provided a number of passes to provide to low-income families in need at a number of locations throughout the City. Passes are providing access to employment, child care, medical services, grocery stores, and more.	1000000	1000000	1000000								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations			No	1000000
TPN-001964	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	PPE Cleaning Sanitizing Testing and Vaccine Distribution	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Funds have been used to procure necessary PPE, cleaning, and sanitizing materials for vulnerable populations in the City. Additionally, staff is using funds to purchase other necessary items to assist with heat relief in 2022. Items will be distributed to the public throughout the summer and includes pop-up shelters, water bottles, and evaporative coolers.	600000	597451.22	590618.22								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-001965	RCP-040564	Haverford, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Back to Business Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Haverford Township recognizes the struggle many businesses endured throughout the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic and continue to feel as our community fights through it.  We also recognize the value of local businesses and that local businesses build community.  With that acknowledgment, the Township has awarded $2,500 grants from its American Recovery Plan Act funds to assist Haverford Township businesses that experienced negative economic impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic.  The goal of this program is to help local businesses mitigate financial hardship resulting from the COVID-19 public health emergency. A negative economic impact was defined as a revenue reduction between 2019 & 2020.		247076.91	247076.91								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-001966	RCP-039374	Oak Park, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Non-Profit Organizations PPE Assistance Grants	1-Public Health	1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits	A resolution authorizing the creation of an Oak Park Business and Non-Profit Coronavirus Recovery grant program using American Rescue Act Funding in an amount not to exceed $550,000 and approving guidelines for the program. The proposed Oak Park Business and Non-Profit Coronavirus Recovery (BNPCR) Grant Program will seek to assist small businesses and non-profit 501(c)(3) organizations as they recover from the financial hardship resulting from the Covid-19 public health emergency.  On August 30, 2021, the Village Board approved RES 21-180, A Resolution Authorizing the Creation of an Oak Park Business and Non-Profit Coronavirus Recovery (BNPCR) Grant Program Using American Rescue Plan Act Funding in an Amount Not to Exceed $550,000 and Approving Guidelines for the Program. $100,000 of this funding is earmarked be used for reimbursement of costs incurred by non-profits for the purchase of PPE and safety equipment installation related to the COVID-19 public health emergency. $75,000 of the $100,000 is anticipated to be paid out in 2021, with the remaining $25,000 budgeted in 2022.		100000	39552.16								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-001967	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Workforce Training Facility and Training Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	This program leverages funding from IDA, PCDIC, Maricopa County and the Arizona Community Foundation to purchase and rehabilitate the old Kmart Building. Arizona State University, Maricopa Community Colleges and WestMec would take over all ongoing operations and maintenance. The facility will be used to create workforce training programs to assist the huge service sector job loss that occurred in this area of the City. The corridor where this building is located is consistently a source of violent crime, prostitution, drug use, trespassing, blight and other quality of life concerns. The ease of access to this area, along with challenging hotels, motels and apartment complexes, several of which are immediately north, have created an area where crime can flourish with few impediments. These challenges were exacerbated by the pandemic as this segment of the community was hit much harder than others due to density, distrust of government, and loss of service sector jobs that are the primary source of employment in the area. This area is also in a Qualified Census Track. Utilizing the building for workforce programs will improve the safety and quality of this neighborhood and bring pandemic- and downturn-resistant employment training to the community. "	18500000	12137669.61	12137669.61					No	No	No	Yes	Job and workforce training centers	18500000	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment			No	18500000
TPN-001969	RCP-040564	Haverford, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Haverford Township Local Business Job Fair	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The Township partnership with the Haverford Partnership for Economic Development to host a local jobs fairs on October 12, 2021 and May 16, 2022 since we were aware that businesses were struggling to find employees. Additionally, these staffing shortages led to reduced hours of operations which continued to impede the economic recovery efforts from the COVID-19 pandemic.  We knew there were good candidates out there and we wanted to help make that connection with our local businesses so they could get back to 100% operational.  As a result of the positive response we received from the October 2021 job fair, the Township hosted a second job fair on May 16, 2022 to introduce local unemployed or underemployed persons with local businesses that are still trying to fully staff their operations.		2769.6	2769.6								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact		No	0
TPN-001970	RCP-039686	Sarpy County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	COVID-19 Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Covid-19 Testing primarily for our inmates		27174	15628								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001971	RCP-039686	Sarpy County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Zoom licenses	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Zoom licenses for various departments- will allow for trials, meetings, and other business to be able to be conducted safely and socially distanced.		8941	8940.29								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-001972	RCP-039686	Sarpy County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Medical Expenses	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	Medical grade refrigerator to safely store vaccines in		1475	1475								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001974	RCP-040564	Haverford, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Darby Rd Streetscape - Phase 3	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.31-Rehabilitation of Commercial Properties or Other Improvements	A section of one of the main business corridors (Darby Road) within Haverford Township will undergo a streetscape improvement to include new sidewalks, plantings, and lighting.  This will enhance a somewhat blighted area as businesses in that corridor continue their rebuild from the negative economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.		290948.72	69898.72								Yes	Mitigation measures in small businesses, nonprofits and impacted industries	455000	8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	1 Imp General Public		No	455000
TPN-001975	RCP-039686	Sarpy County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Stadium Aid	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Baseball/Soccer Stadium Turf replacement		200435	200435								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	196650	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-001977	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Artist to Work	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The Artists to Work program will enable the City to contract artists to develop temporary projects, installations, and performances. These commissions would reactivate a wide range of public spaces, including parks, trails, community centers, and neighborhood areas not usually defined or programmed as cultural spaces. The events could range from outdoor community performances of music, opera, theater, poetry, etc., to temporary outdoor installations/exhibitions of sculptures, paintings, and other forms throughout the city.	1000000	432541.72	432541.72								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			Yes	0
TPN-001978	RCP-039374	Oak Park, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Small Business PPE Assistance Grant	1-Public Health	1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses	A resolution authorizing the creation of an Oak Park Business and Non-Profit Coronavirus Recovery grant program using American Rescue Act Funding in an amount not to exceed $550,000 and approving guidelines for the program. The proposed Oak Park Business and Non-Profit Coronavirus Recovery (BNPCR) Grant Program will seek to assist small businesses and non-profit 501(c)(3) organizations as they recover from the financial hardship resulting from the Covid-19 public health emergency. $150,000 of this funding is earmarked be used to assist small, licensed Oak Park businesses by reimbursing said businesses for costs related to PPE and safety equipment installation expenses that they have incurred since March 2020. $112,500 of the $150,000 is anticipated to be paid out in 2021, with the remaining $37,500 budgeted in 2022.		150000	131523.11								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-001981	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	AHOME	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Contracted service to provide mobile mental health intervention services to homeless population.	90000	90000	90000								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001983	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Recruitment & Referral Programs	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County intends to offer a referral incentive which would provide two stipends to both the new hire and the employee that referred them. To enhance our recruiting tools, the employee referral program will be an addition to the many tools already in use. Employees are encouraged to refer friends and contacts to help the County grow. For Full-Time employees there would be a $1,000 stipend at 6 months and a $1,500 stipend at 12 months; totaling $2,500 for each party. Part-Time new hires would receive ½ the incentive rate previously addressed. As of 1/1/2022, this incentive has changed to a sign-on bonus for specific needed positions.		486259.63	486259.63
TPN-001988	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Farm Updates	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County is looking to improve and expand the existing farm by adding one large greenhouse, 4 high tunnel greenhouses and repairing the existing high tunnel greenhouse. Additionally, electrical infrastructure upgrades on all levels are needed for multiple farm buildings from the service entrance to the wall plug are needed due to antiquated wiring and devices which are an electrical hazard to persons and property, irrigation, harvesting and maintenance supplies and equipment are all included in the scope of this project. Examples of supplies would be loam, fertilizer or seed. Examples of equipment would be different types of harvesters, a tractor with various PTO attachments ($46,974) and a side by side utility task vehicle (UTV) ($18,233).		537389.21	537389.21
TPN-001992	RCP-039573	Madison County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Facilities	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	County building and parking lot improvements, equipment and furniture.	2806574	2806571.39	1909800.57
TPN-001993	RCP-039573	Madison County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Highway Equipment & Projects	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase equipment and finance projects for County Highway Department.	4134751	4134749.06	2697492.64
TPN-001994	RCP-039573	Madison County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Solid Waste & Sanitation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase equipment and conduct a study for the County's Department of Solid Waste and Sanitation.	1155566	1155565.56	1123434.66
TPN-001996	RCP-039573	Madison County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Records management	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase records management software and equipment for the County Clerk's Office to support the needs of County departments.	258156	258155.83	258155.83
TPN-001999	RCP-039374	Oak Park, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Small Business Rent/Mortgage Assistance Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	A resolution authorizing the creation of an Oak Park Business and Non-Profit Coronavirus Recovery grant program using American Rescue Act Funding in an amount not to exceed $550,000 and approving guidelines for the program. The proposed Oak Park Business and Non-Profit Coronavirus Recovery (BNPCR) Grant Program will seek to assist small businesses and non-profit 501(c)(3) organizations as they recover from the financial hardship resulting from the Covid-19 public health emergency. On August 30, 2021, the Village Board approved RES 21-180, A Resolution Authorizing the Creation of an Oak Park Business and Non-Profit Coronavirus Recovery (BNPCR) Grant Program Using American Rescue Plan Act Funding in an Amount Not to Exceed $550,000 and Approving Guidelines for the Program. $300,000 of this funding is earmarked be used to assist small, licensed Oak Park businesses in paying off past-due rent or mortgage payments. $225,000 of the $300,000 is anticipated to be paid out in 2021, with the remaining $75,000 budgeted in 2022.		300000	198178.21								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002000	RCP-039573	Madison County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Cowaselon Creek Watershed District	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Ditch cleaning and soil conservation to prevent flooding and erosion.	200000	200000	126771.8
TPN-002001	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	SPCTV	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of equipment for municipal Community Television Network	14815	14815	14815								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	15000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002002	RCP-039374	Oak Park, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	2021 Holiday Gift Guide	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	A resolution approving a professional services agreement with the Oak-Park River Forest Chamber of Commerce to create a 2021 Holiday Gift Guide for the benefit of the Oak Park business community in an amount not to exceed $10,000 and authorizing its execution. In 2021, as part of the American Recovery Plan Act (ARPA) listening sessions, businesses indicated that the Holiday Gift guide would be an important marketing tool this coming holiday season to assist with the economic impact of COVID-19  on small businesses. The OPRF Chamber requests t hat any financial support f or t his project would go directly t o partially subsidizing the advertising costs f or Oak Park Businesses. As a starting point f or discussion we suggest a subsidy of $100 per business who would like to advertise in the Gift Guide.		10000	6100								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002003	RCP-040564	Haverford, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Storm sewer replacement - Frederick & Ellis Roads	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Replacement of storm sewer at the intersection of Frederick & Ellis Roads.  This area has experienced repeated backups due to severe storms jeopardizing lives, property and water quality.		417926.42	302948.82					No
TPN-002004	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	COVID-19 Vaccination	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Funding will support continued COVID-19 vaccination efforts for Orange County residents in order to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Orange County will offer COVID-19 vaccines at no cost throughout the community to decrease the spread of COVID-19. To promote equitable outcomes, the County has established several vaccination sites in and near qualified census tracts. This is made possible with the collaboration of the Florida Department of Health in Orange County.	3283120	3258550.93	3210624.68								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002005	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	AEDEQ	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of AED devices for the Police Department	8000	8000	0
TPN-002006	RCP-036328	Frisco City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Frisco #2 Ground Storage	5-Infrastructure	5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation	The project consists of the rehabilitation of an existing 5-million gallon ground storage tank, approximately 330 linear feet of 24" reclaimed water pipeline and an associated butterfly valve, chemical building and chemical feed system, electrical improvement, site paving and drainage improvements.  The existing Frisco #2 water ground storage tank is being converted to a reclaimed water ground storage tank.  The project will include rehabilitation of the existing 5-million gallon tank and demolition of a 1-million gallon ground storage tank.  Also included are demolition of all existing pump station facilities, removal of existing pipes near the ground storage tanks, installation of a reclaimed water main on the west side of the pump station site, and installation of tank overflow piping from the 5-million gallon ground storage tank.  The project is located along Huntington Road, just south of the Preston Ridge Park.  Expansion of the reclaimed system will provide needed reuse storage.  This storage will allow the City to provide more reclaimed water to existing customers; thus, reducing the use of treated potable water.  The conversion of the Frisco #2 ground storage tank and the pipeline to convey the reclaimed water flows to and from the tank accomplish this system expansion.  Although this project has a total estimated cost of $5,329,000.00, the City of Frisco intends to fund approximately $1,621,000.00 via local bond funding.  SLFRF funding for this project will be $4,458,000.00. Project initiation of operations date: 12/1/2023	4458000	4458000	4458000					No
TPN-002007	RCP-040564	Haverford, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Storm sewer replacement - Euclid Ave	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Replacement of storm sewer on Euclid Avenue as a result of aged and collapsing existing infrastructure jeopardizing lives, property and water quality.		250590.5	250590.5
TPN-002008	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	COVID-19 Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Funding will support Orange County’s continued efforts to combat the widespread presence of the COVID-19 virus within our community. Currently, Orange County is offering PCR/molecular and rapid/antigen COVID-19 testing for all county residents. Through our public awareness campaign to ensure residents are information of the multiple testing options offered throughout the county, we are able to identify positive cases and mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Testing is currently being offered at no cost seven days a week from 9am to 5pm in or near qualified census tracts.	9982700	8994569.39	8989094.4								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002009	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Library Building Assessment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Contracted serveces to provide an assessment of the Library building; firm has been selected and are starting work.	30000	30000	10733
TPN-002010	RCP-036193	Huntsville City, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City of Huntsville Fire Truck Update	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Huntsville has identified a critical need for the community in updating fire trucks. The age and condition of the Huntsville Fire Department trucks is severely impacting required readiness levels for emergency response. The average age of these vehicles is 20 years, with the oldest truck being over 30 years old. Most of these trucks have reached obsolescence, so parts are no longer available for repair and maintenance.  This project has purchased 21 trucks: 3 ladder trucks, 17 pumper trucks, and 1 Hazmat truck.		17686237	17686237
TPN-002011	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Personal Protective Equipment	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	The Orange County Health Services Department will utilize funding to purchase personal protective equipment (PPE) such as hand sanitizer, masks, and gloves. Staff will distribute PPE at all testing locations, which are located in or near qualified census tracts. In addition to testing site locations, the Health Services Department will supply PPE for distribution at different community events throughout the county.	81155	81154.86	81154.86								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002012	RCP-039374	Oak Park, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Nursing Services Agreement With Cassidy Olson, R.N.	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	On December 6, 2021, The Village Board Approved Resolution 21-320 A Resolution approving a nursing services agreement with Cassidy Olson, R.N., in an amount not to exceed $40,000 and authorizing its execution and approval of $40,000 in American Rescue Plan Act funds for the position. This position is a temporary nurse position for a one-year period to assist the Oak Park Public Health Department primarily with COVID-19 vaccinations as requested, in particular on weekends. The Village’s other nurses hired during COVID primarily work weekdays and evenings.		40000	3975			*					No
TPN-002013	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	School Based Mental Health Grants	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The county provided grants to local school districts in support of student services that would enhance student mental health	1500000	1495666.28	1303158.47								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools			No	0
TPN-002014	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Personal Protective Equipment Warehouse Improvement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funding will be utilized for the renovation of Orange County’s PPE Warehouse. The warehouse will store the county’s stockpile of PPE and other related emergency equipment for the COVID-19 pandemic and other public health emergencies. The renovation of this warehouse will ensure county residents have access to PPE irrespective of their income. Local hospital representatives were elicited for feedback on what types of PPE should be stored in the warehouse, in addition to nursing homes, Federally Qualified Health Centers, Corrections, Medical Clinic, and other healthcare organizations.	2768847	339816.75	337566.4								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	0
TPN-002015	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Mobile Video System for PD	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacement mobile camera system for Police Dept	75000	75000	10330
TPN-002016	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Small Business Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The county provided assistance to local small business that had experienced lost revenue or increased expenses due to COVID 19	14129705.56	14129705.56	14129705.56								No			9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted			No	0
TPN-002017	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Building Bridges Expansion	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	This project will supplement mental health staffing in several local school districts	126697.49	126697.49	126697.49								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-002018	RCP-039374	Oak Park, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Two CDC Public Health Fellows	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	A Resolution Authorizing the Submission of a New Grant Application for the Illinois Department of Public Health Cooperative Public Health Grant for Emergency Response in an Amount Not to Exceed $115,678 and Authorizing Submission of a New Grant Application for Two Fellow Positions from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Council for State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) and the Use of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds in an Amount not to Exceed $12,000 for the Positions and Approval of Subsequent Agreements and Authorizing their Execution The Health Department seeks approval to apply for grants for the following three new temporary positions: one (1) temporary 1-year epidemiologist that is primarily focused on COVID-19 and two (2) public health Fellows. The epidemiologist is funded by the Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Response position through the IDPH and the fellows are funded through the CDC and CSTE. The Fellows application requires an additional $12,000. Staff is requesting $12,000 in ARPA funds if the Village is selected as a fellow recipient.		12000	0								No
TPN-002020	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Adult Mental Health Community Expansion	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Funding will include an expansion of current community mental health services and implementation of identified service gaps within Orange County. All services are rooted in evidence-based practices which include the following target areas that address mental health concerns exacerbated by COVID-19: peer respite for mental health, peer respite for the homeless with mental health, certified peer respite training, expansion of residential mental health services, increase of outpatient mental health services, and mental health care for the LGTBQ+ community. This list of services are a result of an extensive community gaps analysis during the first year of COVID-19 and are currently being reviewed as part of Orange County's Mayor Demings Mental and Behavioral Health System of Care Community Analysis. All of these services are to serve individuals with mental health concerns and that are often marginalized and uninsured or under insured.	5477250	4033936.4	612621.65								No			28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify			Yes	5377250
TPN-002021	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Eviction Prevention Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	This program will help persons in eviction court to navigate the process and, using other funds available under ERA, seek to settle the eviction action short of the tenant losing their housing	750000	366836.4	366836.4	0							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-002022	RCP-036328	Frisco City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Upper Reuse 24” Pipeline Phase 2	5-Infrastructure	5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation	Upper Reuse Phase 2 project includes installation of a 24" diameter reclaimed water pipeline from Warren Sports Complex,west to Preston Road along Eldorado Parkway, to the west end of an existing pipeline called Panther Creek Reuse Water line located along Panther Creek.  The pipeline will skip a section called "Hillcrest Rd. and Reuse Line" and pick back up just south of Main St, continuing to and connecting to the proposed Frisco #2 Ground Storage Tank located on Huntington Road, west of Hillcrest Road.  Expansion of the reuse system pipeline will allow conveyence to reuse storage.  This storage will allow the City to provide more reclaimed water to existing customers; thus, reducing the use of treated potable water.  The conversion of the Frisco #2 ground storage tank and the pipelines to convey the reuse flows to and from the tank accomplish this system expansion.  Funding source comment:  this project will be funded by both SLFRF funding ($5,604,700.00) and local bond funding ($1,200,000.00) for a total project cost of $6,485,900.00. Construction began in July.	4854700	4854700	3120570.6
TPN-002023	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Expansion of Community Substance Abuse Services	1-Public Health	1.13-Substance Use Services	Funding will support an expansion of community substance abuse services and target identified gaps in the current available substance abuse services in Orange County. All of these services are rooted in evidence-based practices. This project will include the following areas, in collaboration with a public provider, to address substance abuse concerns that have been exacerbated by COVID-19: expansion of residential substance abuse services for youth and adults who are uninsured and under insured, increase of inpatient detoxification services for adults who are uninsured and under insured, and expansion of medicated assistance treatment (MAT) for adults. All services listed were a result of an extensive community gaps analysis during the first year of COVID-19 and are currently being reviewed by Orange County's Mayor Demings Mental and Behavioral Health System of Care Community Analysis. All of these services are to serve individuals with substance abuse concerns and that are often marginalized and uninsured or under insured. Outcomes are intended to close the identified gaps.	1000000	0	0								No
TPN-002024	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Non-Congregate Sheltering for Persons Experiencing Homelessness	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	This project involves providing non-congregate shelter (hotel rooms) for vulnerable persons experiencing homelessness in Dane County. The program includes hotel rooms, food, on-site management and security at a local hotel.	14675855.94	14675855.94	14309873.76								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic			No	0
TPN-002025	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Hotels to Housing Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Through rental subsidies and case management, this program attempts to move vulnerable persons experiencing homelessness into permanent housing.	13200000	9072166.85	8493757.37			25					No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic			No	0
TPN-002026	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	SARS-COVID Tests #4	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	The Jail is requesting funding to purchase additional SARS-COVID testing kits. To mitigate the spread of COVID we are testing each inmate/detainee for COVID-19 when they enter the jail and before entering general population. Test kits are also used if inmates/detainees develop symptoms. Staff and visitors to the jail are also tested on a regular basis.	10078.54	10078.54	10078.54								Yes	COVID-19 testing sites and laboratories	10078.54	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002027	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Broadband Investment	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	The county has allocated $5 million to invest in expanding the availability of broadband service in rural areas of the county.  A county task force is guiding this effort.	0	0	0
TPN-002028	RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail PPE - additional costs (with project #62)	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Nitrile gloves used within the Jail to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Used to comply with the public health safety guidelines. The original invoice amount for Corporate Connections request was $11,370 and invoice (58998) is in the amount of $11,596. Project 80 covers overage of project #62.	226	226	226								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	226	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002029	RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Artist Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	The county offered grants to local artists to offset lost opportunities for income due to the pandemic	1000000	1000000	1000000								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic			No	0
TPN-002030	RCP-040564	Haverford, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay to Firefighters	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The Township offered payments of UPTO $950 to firefighters who risk health and safety to fight fires thus saving lives and property during the COVID-19 pandemic.		130786.03	130786.03		157
TPN-002033	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Registry of Deeds Office Rehire	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.2-Public Sector Workforce: Rehiring Public Sector Staff	Merrimack County Registry of Deeds Office is looking to increase the hours of a current part time employee from 32, to 40 hours a week. The position was previously a full time position and is currently a part time position. This change was initially made to match the estimated workload of the deeds office. Since the pace of home purchases was very slow during the pandemic, full time positions were shifted to part time and thus; hours were reduced. However, now that housing purchases are going up with no signs of a downward trend, the workload for the deeds office had increased beyond its current capacity. Even if housing sales decline, the associated paperwork as well as other paperwork the deeds office processes, takes up a considerable amount of time thus increasing the workload.  The funds would be used to pay for the increase of hours, from part time to full time, and benefits of the employee.		8236.87	8236.87				*				No
TPN-002034	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Temp Secretaries for County Attorney's Office	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.2-Public Sector Workforce: Rehiring Public Sector Staff	Merrimack County Attorney’s Office is looking to hire two Fulltime, temporary (two-year) Administrative Assistants for the County Attorney’s office to assist with court backlogs due to the negative impacts of COVID-19.		81563.71	81563.71				*				No
TPN-002036	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Comprehensive Plan Update	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Contracted services for Planning Dept  to help with updating the Comprehensive Plan.	10000	10000	1096
TPN-002037	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff's Office: Mobile-Portable Radio Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County Sheriff’s Department is looking into updating their portable and mobile radios for their deputies as their current equipment is around 8 years old. The scope of this purchase includes ordering and installing 32 mobile radios and ordering 27 portable radios. This equipment is essential for deputies in staying safe and being able to communicate clearly and effectively while performing their duties. Two mobile radios and two portable radios will be utilized by the Merrimack County Attorney’s office investigators, deputized by the Sheriff.		163008.71	163008.71
TPN-002039	RCP-036882	North Charleston City, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Employee premium pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	PREMIUM PAY PROVIDED TO EMPLOYEES FOR WORK PERFORMED SINCE THE START OF THE COVID-19 PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY THROUGH FEBRUARY 1 2020 THROUGH JANUARY 31, 2021.	4000000	3767620	3767620		1015
TPN-002040	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Contribution to Regional Crime Lab rehab	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Amortization of cost share (through 2026) for Regional Crime Lab rehabilitation	12000	12000	12000
TPN-002042	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay Programs	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Merrimack County is looking to adopt a premium pay policy for essential employees, a $15 minimum wage and an overtime shift premium. These policies were created to ensure that essential county facilities are fully staffed, to provide the workforce with incentives to move forward during the difficult economic conditions created by the COVID-19 Pandemic, and to maintain competition with the private sector and other counties. The premium pay policy will be in the form of stipends; two full-time employee one-time stipend premiums will be in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000) each and two part-time employee one-time stipend premiums will be in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000) each. The overtime shift premium policy essentially provides employees at the Merrimack County Nursing Home, Department of Corrections and Sheriff’s Office an additional $3 per hour during the weekday and $5 on the weekend, working a minimum of 4 hours per extra shift, to compensate them for hours worked outside their regular shift. Lastly, the lowest grade positions will have a rate applied to bring the minimum wage to $15 an hour for the following departments: Dietary, Laundry, Housekeeping and Assisted Living.		3498338.75	3498338.75		642
TPN-002043	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Crosstown Connector Overpass engineering	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Additional engineering & legal work on Crosstown Connector Overpass	10000	10000	0
TPN-002045	RCP-035943	Lake County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	County Administration Computer Upgrade	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	This project includes the purchase of laptops and accessories to help support a remote work environment. Laptops will be used as replacements to desktop computers for those employees who are able to work remote. This will improve social distancing within our various buildings, thus reducing the spread of COVID-19. Some laptops will also be used as loaner devices for employees who may need to work temporarily from home to help stop the spread of COVID-19.	50000	43594.95	43594.95								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public		No	0
TPN-002046	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		County Phone Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County is looking into updating their telephones. The scope of this acquisition is 36 telephones, 7 operator consoles, 4 main control units, 4 adapter gateway modules, 2 redundancy modules and 2 gateway modules.  Units at the old courthouse in Concord and at the sheriff’s department in Boscawen will be updated simultaneously and service will be from the same provider so that communication between the two is both efficient and cost effective. Installation, programming and training are also included. This equipment is essential the sheriff’s department to maintain internal communication as well as external communication with the courthouse.		81172.63	81172.63
TPN-002048	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Miscellaneous Small Projects	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project is to cover smaller expenses that do not fit into any of the other specific projects and are too small to qualify for their own		13491.69	13491.69
TPN-002049	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Code Enf Filing System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Vertical storage system for Code Enforcement	48000	48000	33841
TPN-002050	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	HubScrub Machine	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Merrimack County Nursing Home is looking into replacing their current wheelchair cleaner (HubScrub) as it is 20 years old, far past its useful life, especially since it is a prototype. It is a very important apparatus for maintaining equipment hygiene for residents under the care of the facility. Additionally, with the Pandemic in mind, the HubScrub helps keep the facility sanitary.		17775	17775								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	17775	17 Dis Imp HHs receiving services provided by Tribal governments			No	0
TPN-002051	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Quint Fire Truck	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Portion of cost for replacement quint fire truck	337500	337500	337500
TPN-002052	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Dietary Infrastructure Upgrades	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County Department of Corrections is looking for a Hobart or similar style dishwasher to replace the existing one in the main kitchen, inside the correctional facility. The scope of this project includes, installing the new machine in the kitchen and doing the electrical and plumbing hook-ups.		312207.51	312207.51
TPN-002053	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Venting for Landfill	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Match funds for replacement of landfill vents	13000	13000	3082
TPN-002054	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Solar	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County is exploring a “behind the meter” solar panel array(s) for county facilities to meet the 7.5 M kWh annual needs. The system would be owned and operated by the county or by a third party company/organization. The scope includes installing a 6 acre array producing optimal 2.3 megawatt rooftop arrays producing 903 kW and any necessary conversion equipment for the solar arrays to store and distribute power.		1318425.25	1318425.25
TPN-002057	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	NETWORK UPGRADE	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Upgrade of computer network system	70000	70000	0
TPN-002058	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	PD Radar Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace car radar equipment	11065	11065	0
TPN-002059	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Replacement Radios	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacement of handheld radios for public safety communications system	227500	181986	181986
TPN-002060	RCP-036328	Frisco City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Preston Vineyard Creek Stabilization	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The project includes the following critical and preventative maintenance improvements along Stewart Creek adjacent to Preston Vineyard Drive in Frisco, Texas: 1- The south bank of the channel upstream of Stewart Creek is meandering toward Preston Vineyard Drive.  The top of the bank is 7' from the back of curb.  this section is 1-2 years away from a critical failure that would threaten the road.  A gabion wall or other streambank stabilization devices will be constructed to stabilize the slope and to protect existing driveways.  In addition, there is a channel headcut nearby.  A grade control structure will be placed to slow further upstream erosion.  2- The channel under the Preston Vineyard Drive bridge is experiencing channel degradation and the footing of the concrete apron is exposed.  Gabion toe walls and gabion mattress will be used as preventative maintenance to slow further degradation and prevent a critical failure of the bridge.  The concrete riprap below the bridge will be repaired or removed and replaced.  3- The south bank of the channel downstream of the bridge is experiencing erosion and threatening a nearby parking lot and utilities.  A gabion wall or other streambank stabilization devices will be constructed as preventative maintenance to prevent a critical failure of the existing infrastructure. In design phase, construction estimated to begin in 1st quarter 2024.	1000000	0	0
TPN-002061	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Arts Career Advancement Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Grants support working artists or arts workers who have experienced job loss, indefinitely postponed or canceled events and residencies, or terminated contracts due to the pandemic. Program funds provides financial assistance, support services to grow artistic skills, equipment or business operations recovery costs, and participation in an exhibit, festival, vendor showcase, or artist residency.	500000	499834	499834								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			Yes	0
TPN-002062	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Nonprofit Arts and Culture Stabilization Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The program provided two-years of funds to help nonprofit arts and culture organizations manage their operations, personnel, and programming as they welcome back audiences, guests, and patrons to their services. The program awarded recovery grants to eligible organizations of all sizes who demonstrate intent, commitment, and strategies to sustain well beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Organizations must have been in operation prior to March 1, 2020 and had to complete an online application process to demonstrate need.	2750000	2750000	2750000								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002064	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Recreation Van	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacement recreation van for Senior Programs	62500	62500	62500
TPN-002065	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Arts and Culture Internships	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The Arts and Culture Internship Program is a two-year program that will allow nonprofit arts and culture organizations and for-profit creative industries the opportunity to hire full-time interns for twenty weeks. The internships provide undergraduate students with meaningful on-the-job training and experience working in the cultural sector. The program ultimately strengthens Phoenix’s workforce by providing access to high-quality opportunities for college students of all backgrounds to gain experience, understanding, and transferable skills relevant to careers in and out of the arts, the creative economy, and engagement in public life.	500000	153000	153000								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment			No	500000
TPN-002066	RCP-036328	Frisco City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Mountain Creek Slope Stabilization	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	N/A	0	0	0
TPN-002067	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	PW Roller	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacement pavement roller	43435	43435	43435
TPN-002068	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Covid Prevention Supplies	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Merrimack County Nursing Home needs to purchase equipment to prevent COVID cases. Pulse Oximeters and accessories are among the items that the MCNH does not currently have.		4757.52	4757.52								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	3032.28	17 Dis Imp HHs receiving services provided by Tribal governments			No	0
TPN-002069	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	US Vets and Veteran Relief	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.23-Strong Healthy Communities: Demolition and Rehabilitation of Properties	Funds will provide relief for Veterans experiencing or at risk of homelessness during the pandemic. Many of our vets are more vulnerable to COVID-19 due to living conditions, age, and chronic health complications. Funding could also provide additional operational support needed by the US Vets Organization to transition into the property purchased earlier this year with COVID Relief Funds. The project consists of acquiring, renovating, and converting a hotel into a 132-bed facility to provide transitional and permanent supportive housing for US homeless veterans and atrisk of being homeless veterans. Supportive services include case management, job skills development, addiction treatment, financial assistance, legal advocacy, and necessities.	4500000	1521663.41	1017537.6								No		1100000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002070	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Covid Testing	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County Nursing Home and Corrections needs to conduct tests to prevent COVID cases. For the nursing home, the state if covering much of the testing but the means to store/ transport test kits are among the items that the MCNH does not currently have.		78343.39	78343.39								No		75.38
TPN-002071	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Google Workspace Enterprise	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County’s IT Department is looking to purchase a subscription to Google Workspace Enterprise to replace Microsoft Outlook Webmail as its current email configuration for employees.  Due to the software limitations caused by the current configuration being used past its useful life, it is time for an upgrade.		269762	269762
TPN-002073	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Edison Impact Hub	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.23-Strong Healthy Communities: Demolition and Rehabilitation of Properties	Funds will be used to retrofit the historic children’s hospital from a vacant, dilapidated building to a community services center that will provide medical offices and other services to the community.The Edison Impact Hub will include a behavioral health and medical clinic, commercial community kitchen, community gardens, classrooms, meeting rooms, offices for city partners and caseworkers, and will offer workforce development programs and a variety of classes.	5000000	50643.66	50643.66								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	5000000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002074	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Outreach and Support Staff	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Funds are used to provide advertising and outreach efforts to ensure funds allocated under this program is fully maximized. Additionally, funds are used to hire two full-time positions to manage and monitor all activities for the Phoenix Resilient Food System programs in the Office of Environmental Programs.	550000	402226.66	402226.66
TPN-002076	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Sidewalk Repair	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Repairs to brick and concrete sidewalks	210297	210297	0
TPN-002077	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Replacement Plow Truck	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacement plow truck for PW	128467	128467	128467
TPN-002078	RCP-035943	Lake County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Department of Health Expenses	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	Health departments are located within each of the sixty-seven (67) counties in Florida. The county health departments improve public health by preventing epidemics, protecting against environmental hazards, encouraging healthy behaviors, preparing for, and responding to disasters, and assuring the quality and accessibility of health services. The health departments are supported by a variety of revenues, including county funds. This project will be providing the county-share of funds on a quarterly basis to help cover expenses of the Lake County Health Department, which has been significantly impacted by the pandemic.	963936	963936	642624								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002080	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	PD Digital Storage Equip	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Digital storage for PD body and in-car video	0	0	0
TPN-002081	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Economic Development and Innovation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	The Feed Phoenix Program, implemented by Local First Arizona Foundation (LFAF), provided healthy meals through the purchase of produce from local farms that was used in meal preparation by local restaurants and caterers, and then delivered to social service organizations serving COVID-19-impacted individuals and families. The program concluded Dec. 31, 2022. The Agri-Food Tech Innovation Grants were provided funds to existing food system entrepreneurs and new/innovative food businesses impacted by COVID-19 to continue to operate or expand with consideration given to agricultural technology that also addressed challenges posed by climate change. The Worker Cooperative program, implemented by Thrive Consultancy, Inc. (Thrive), is providing training to residents and entrepreneurs to develop food businesses using the cooperative business model. One cohort is being provided for Spanish-speaking residents. The Agri-Food Tech Incubator, implemented by Arizona State University (ASU), will establish an incubator that incubates and accelerates sustainable food systems and agricultural ventures with funding to assist businesses with start-up operations.	5515000	3997700	3809050.9	200064							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	5150000
TPN-002082	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Outreach Svcs	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Material and supplies for outreach efforts related to environmentally conscious efforts and services	9000	6289	6289
TPN-002083	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Taser Replacement for PD	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacement tasers for Police	20695	20695	20695
TPN-002084	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Equity and Inclusion	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	This portion of the Phoenix Food Initiative includes the following programs: Feed Phoenix Program – This program is a continuation of the CRF funded Feed Phoenix Program. Under this program, the Local First Arizona Foundation delivered over 80,000 meals. Urban Agriculture Fellowship – Provide funding for a one-year fellowship for high school and college age students with local food producers with 60% for Black, Indigenous, and persons of color participants. Council District Food Action Plans or Initiatives – The program would focus on districts with food deserts, high food insecurity and hunger rates to identify whether a council specific food plan would be feasible and desired or whether more specific projects or initiatives would be preferred.	3372200	2846358.5	2662771.44	26614							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	3372200
TPN-002085	RCP-036355	Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Commonwealth of Pennsylvania - Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has applied the revenue replacement funds available to counteract revenue loss within the General Fund and to aid with the provision of government services. This has also allowed Pennsylvania to create a series of programs to accelerate the recovery of selected businesses, nonprofits, and affected workers, also under the Revenue Replacement Expenditure Category. Please note: In Quarter 2 of 2022, project obligations and expenditures dating back to September 2021 were removed from PA1 to create a new project - Long-Term Living Programs (87375A).  This resulted in negative Quarter 2 period obligations and expenditures for PA1.	4661847152	4582132654.57	4559329495.01
TPN-002086	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Food Banks and Pantries Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	Funds provide resources for local food banks and food pantries to provide food and other resources for struggling families. There has been broad engagement with small, medium and large foodbanks and pantries ensuring outreach and emphasis with smaller community-based food banks and food pantries.	1432500	1432500	1432500	523666							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	1432000
TPN-002087	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Truck for Parke & Rec	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacement half ton pickup for Parks Dept	38003	38003	38003
TPN-002088	RCP-038059	Springfield, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	CORP - MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING REVENUE	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING LOST REVENUE 200K for lost Parking Department revenue; Downtown parking meters were originally turned off at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 to encourage more people to come downtown and patronize downtown businesses who had lost customer base due to the pandemic as downtown employees began working remote; tourism came to a halt and conventions were canceled;  During fiscal year 2022 and 2023 YTD the parking meters remain free as many employees have remained working remotely; tourism is low and convention traffic has not returned to pre-pandemic levels as a result the Motor Vehicle Parking fund has lost its main revenue stream; Employees of the Motor Vehicle Parking Fund have not been laid off during this pandemic; Transfers from the Corporate fund and this revenue transfer have enabled the fund to remain afloat.	200000	200000	200000
TPN-002089	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Airport Childcare Facility	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	"The department will utilize $4 million to allocate funds to provide vouchers to airport employees for use at childcare facilities. There is a current assessment of the Aviation Annex at 3430 E. Sky Harbor Blvd in Terminal 3 to review if it is a potential site for a childcare facility. Based on the assessment, up to $1 million will be used in facility upgrades.  Airport employees struggling to pay for childcare services will receive a scholarship to use at a local childcare facility. Applicants will need to meet the household income criteria to be considered eligible. Many families struggled to balance both employment and childcare needs during the pandemic and this program aims to increase access to child care, increase stability of care, and increase employment retainment for applicants. "	5000000	4320739.65	589466.08								Yes	Childcare, daycare and early learning facilities	1000000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	5000000
TPN-002093	RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Broadband Network	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Creation of a community broadband network or expansion - this project is on hold and likely to be abandoned; cannot change the subaward as there is nowhere to enter a reason	0	0	0
TPN-002095	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	StartupPHX @ Burton Barr	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.32-Business Incubators and Start-Up or Expansion Assistance	Funds will be used to provide a broader range of services to the community by expanding the Hive @ Central. The expansion would include the addition of two meeting rooms, a graphics station, and technical assistance for small business owners. For programming, funds would be used to contract with a vendor to provide the Business Roadmap and MAPA Para Us Negocio series for teens and adults. The contracted vendor would be responsible for curriculum development and facilitating all sessions in English and Spanish.	1400000	901015.23	239540.1								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			Yes	0
TPN-002100	RCP-039113	Fall River, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Fall River Holiday Parade	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	While COVID-19 affects children physically, the largest toll has been on children and families mental health. This especially a concern for school –age children and adolescents and their families. Underserved communities such as those of lower socioeconomic status are disproportionately affected. According to Massachusetts General Hospital research, between 21-47% of parents reported that their children experienced changes to health and learning because of the pandemic. The pandemic has disrupted children’s daily services, such as school, daycare and leisure time. Children have been isolated and living in quarantine. They have suffered from family loss, sleep disturbances and child abuse. Children are being exposed to chronic stress. The parade brings community engagement and allows the city’s youth to take part in a celebration with their peers. It is a day where children forget their worries, reduces their stress and brings families together. The parade has a tremendous positive effect on children’s mental health.    The number of small businesses in Massachusetts has dropped by 37% this year amid the coronavirus pandemic, while small business revenue is down 44% since the start of the year. The economic crisis is hitting all businesses particulary hard especially small business. People are not going out to eat, they are staying home. Restaurants and the hospitality sector have been particularly hard hit. People are not visiting retail establishments but are spending money with online retailers. Fall River has not been exempt from the negative effects of the pandemic. Since quarantine city businesses have struggled. City retail and dining establishments have seen a drastic decrease in sales and revenue. The parade brings approximately 20,000 to 30,000 people from all over Massachusetts to our downtown business district to shop at our local retail and dining establishments. This parade is an economic driver that pumps thousands of dollars into the local economy, demonstrates how beautiful a city Fall River is and what Fall River has to offer.  Holding the parade benefits children of all ages and their families in Fall River and the Greater Fall River area. For some, the parade is the only holiday celebration a young child enjoys.  This event also assists with bringing tourism to the City since parade goers patronize Downtown businesses and local restaurants. This parade services a disproportionately impacted community. The City as a whole has 60.55% of its population designated as low-to-moderate income and the parade route takes place in one of the city’s lowest income census tracts.	75000	61540.05	61540.05								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002101	RCP-040465	Bay County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Contract with Walton County Sheriff for Inmate Services	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Due to overcrowding caused by court closures and limited transfers to the state prison system, the Bay County Sheriff and the Walton County Sheriff entered into an agreement whereby the Walton County Jail would house Bay County inmates. This agreement is in effect for 1 year beginning June 2021, when the agreement was signed by all parties. Bay County is required to reimburse the Walton County Sheriff’s Office for the provision of inmate services at a per diem rate per inmate.  Per the final rule, capital investments in expanding the jail facility would not be an eligible expenditure since more cost effective alternatives exist.	3546582.39	3431292.39	3431292.39								No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate			No	1140342.4
TPN-002103	RCP-036401	City Of Austin, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	EOC Emergency Response	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project supports Emergency Operations Center (EOC) response activities. Expenses include support and coordination for public health response and recovery activities under COVID-19, including provision of emergency medical overflow services, public information campaigns, managing logistics and distribution of emergency supplies, and cost recovery work. Planning and Cost Recovery continues work begun during COVID-19 on mass care planning, and on cost recovery administration. The EOC assumed responsibility for maintaining emergency supplies and pods, and moving and distributing emergency supplies during COVID-19. This has continued creating vehicle costs on an ongoing basis.	6000000	3540390.43	3540390.43
TPN-002105	RCP-040465	Bay County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Quint Fire Truck and Ambulances	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	To respond to the overall increase in emergency call volume and use of vehicles in conjunction with the pandemic, the County has purchased one fire truck and three ambulances to ensure continuity of service. During 2020, the County received approximately 2,544 Covid-19 related calls. The Covid-19 pandemic increased the overall emergency call volume in Bay County by 19.2% as of August 2021. As of August 12th, 2021, the figure increased to 3,375 calls. Covid-19 related calls were considered to be calls dispatched as "Respiratory, CPR in Progress, Unresponsive – Unknown, Illness-Fever, and Illness – Covid-19". In addition, EMS has followed strict pandemic protocols by decontaminating ambulances after every call. Therefore, ambulances that would normally be out-of-service are forced to remain in-service and used on a daily basis. During 2021, our ambulance service experienced periods of “Status 0” or times when no ambulances were available three times more than an in the prior year. Further, in 2020 the EMS service experienced eleven instances where not only were no ambulances available but multiple calls for service were on hold. In 2021, this happened 96 times sometimes with responses lagging by eight calls. The addition of a reliable apparatus in the fire fleet will allow us to supplement and bolster the EMS division. Further, the increase in call volume and the resulting 25% increase in mileage has significantly affected our fleet. The burden on our existing fleet has led to costly emergency repairs. In many cases, the scarcity of parts or the unavailability of skilled labor to repair apparatuses has led to extended out-of-service periods further stressing an already stressed fleet. This has and will continue to affect our annual maintenance and fuel budgets.	1842770.48	1818076.28	1630808.28								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	1811616.28	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002107	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Small Business Programs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Develop and implement programs that will use the grant award to provide meaningful assistance, relief, and support for small Tucson based businesses working to recover and become more resilient.	1825000	0	0								No
TPN-002108	RCP-039113	Fall River, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Small Business Grant Assistance Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Grant assistance to small businesses that have been negatively affected by the pandemic. Assistance amounts are $2,500 for businesses with 5 or less employees and $5,000 for businesses with 6 to 10 employees.	1166560	589026.7	532433.5								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002109	RCP-036401	City Of Austin, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Regional Food Systems Planning	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the weak points in our local food system, resulting in food supply chain disruptions that caused economic harm to households, food service workers, small businesses like grocery stores and restaurants, public institutions like schools no longer accessible for school lunches, and the broader food industry across our region. The crisis demonstrated why we need to build a food system that is more resilient. Strong, dependable local and regional economies are able to pivot quickly to meet changing demands for food. When confronted with supply chain disruptions, our local and regional farms, processing plants, distribution channels, and businesses make our communities resilient. The City of Austin will develop a comprehensive food system plan to holistically assess baseline conditions, identify opportunities and provide a blueprint to guide food system goals, activities, and investments. The plan will also provide recommendations to the City and partners on how to best coordinate and synergize local food system work cross functionally and regionally. Policies within the plan will prioritize improving conditions for those most negatively impacted by the food system.	500000	355071.78	278966.78
TPN-002110	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	FTA Building Rent Subsidy for Non-Profits	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	FTA Building Rent Subsidy for Non-Profits	159800	0	0								No
TPN-002111	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	SBA Grant Program Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	This grant-funded program will assist in the delivery of support and business development services to small businesses in the City of Tucson by addressing three fundamental needs: Access to Capital, Financial Health, and Leadership Acumen. Additionally, the program’s approach is to aid with business relief and recovery services from the Covid-19 pandemic in industries such as travel, tourism, hospitality, and restaurants.    The Small Business Navigator Program was formed to provide services that address the stated needs in the form of technical assistance, one-on-one counseling, and workshops/trainings for business planning and expansion. The targeted audience under these three goals are small business owners and entrepreneurs, underserved, legacy, minority groups and the Spanish speaking neighborhoods. All support services will be offered on-location or virtually to accommodate the needs of the community.    A key component for the Small Business Navigator Program includes a food entrepreneur training program, Sazon Empresarial, which will take participants through a program designed to help them start or scale, beginning to end, producing tangible materials, and teaching best practices. Participants will be guided by expert mentorship and instruction and will have access to build networks among their peers and teachers. In addition, clients will have access to working space and culinary kitchen for the different areas of learning.	1200000	1200000	124544.6								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002112	RCP-039113	Fall River, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Med Cat Ambulance Purchase	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	The Fall River Emergency Medical Services Division (EMS) purchased a Lenco Med Cat Ambulance. This vehicle will enable our Police and EMS departments to work together during situations of high risk and extreme weather situations. This vehicle will treat a victim or team member during a high risk situation in a hot zone ensuring immediate pre hospital care for positive outcomes. This vehicle will be used in crime prevention awareness programs and is servicing a disproportionately impacted community.	298900	298900	298900								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	298900	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002114	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy: to include stakeholder and public engagement, demographic and economic assessment; develop a comprehensive strategy to address the issues facing Tucson area and how these have been compounded by the pandemic.	550000	155110.67	155110.67								No
TPN-002115	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Community Health and Safety Programming	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Community Health and Safety Programming will provide programs and services to those experiencing the primary and secondary impacts of COVID through support services, community engagement activities and resources to facilitate programs that target high risk populations and/or reduce violence. Can include infrastructure investment for programs support, low-no barrier ADA and accessible programs, and/or wellness programs.	9052413	0	0								No
TPN-002116	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Covid Related Cleaning, Hygiene and Sanitation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Investment in resources enjoyed by the general public to ensure their health and safety when it comes to access to clean, drinkable water both in outdoor park use and inside of Recreation Centers. The ability to use and enjoy pools for fitness and recreation purposes and have confidence in the filtered quality of the water they will be swimming in. To allow response to conditions where homeless individuals have impacted park areas and as the public returns to frequent outdoor park use, utilize a bio-hazard contractor to assist with disinfection and sharps removals so that the public can use outdoor park areas safely.	3000000	496343.91	496343.91								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002117	RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Senior Centers (HTH-904)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide a broad spectrum of services statewide, which shall include the delivery of health (including mental and behavioral health), social, nutritional, and educational services, as well as adequate facilities for recreational activities for older individuals, ages 60 and older.	1500000	1500000	1476445.4
TPN-002118	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Organizational Mental Health Program	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The City will utilize these funds for the construction and continued expansion of our behavorial health initiative that was launched in 2021.  Upon completion of an on-site behavioral health facility, the City will hire 2 behavioral health navigators who will connect those employees in need of behavioral health to community resources trained in the provision of these services.  Further, the City will retain, through partnership with our medical network provider, 2 on-site behavioral health counselors who will be available to City employees free of charge.	2400000	121412.44	121412.44								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002121	RCP-035910	Yavapai County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Broadband Admin Expenses	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Contract with consultant to assist in the analysis of the RFP responses for Broadband infrastructure and records management.	15379.65	15379.65	7157.15
TPN-002123	RCP-036401	City Of Austin, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Austin Arts & Culture Non-Profit Relief Grant	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Austin Arts & Culture Non-Profit Relief Grant provided one-time unrestricted $20,000 grants to local arts and culture non-profit organizations facing hardships due to the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. In total $3,942,000 funded 196 Arts & Culture Non-Profit organizations.	2000000	2000000	2000000
TPN-002124	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Implementation of Climate Resilience Strategies	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	The City of Tucson is taking a wide range of climate actions, both within its ongoing operations and when external funding becomes available. This use of ARPA funding is to implement and/or accelerate actions that protect our most vulnerable populations from the risks of climate change. Examples of programs that will be implemented include completion of the city’s Climate Action Plan, irrigation investments to support tree planting to increase urban tree canopy (targeted at areas with lower Tree Equity Scores), support for electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and similar efforts.	9089563	279999.4	279999.4								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002125	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Parks Irrigation Improvements and Conversion to Reclaimed	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Keep parks green, trees thriving and open space available for public outdoor enjoyment thru the expansion and replacement of existing or new irrigation systems. Irrigation solutions that will permit planting of hundreds of new trees across the park system and assist in responding to the rising heat index and climate action plan to create shade canopy in parks. Irrigation investments will also facilitate the underground infrastructure needed to build sports fields as part of recently completed master plan at parks where a high participation of public engagement supported more sport fields for youth and adult use. Preserve the existing water system integrity thru the investment in new backflow preventors that prevent the water in an irrigation or plumbing system from back flowing into the main lines, this will assist in support of our installation of water fountains in parks. Contribute to the restoration of a botanical garden that is enjoyed by residents from all over the city that has a failing irrigation system, investment in the replacement of the system mean preserving a 50+ year old destination for all ages to enjoy annually for free.	7200000	722764.72	722764.72	5000							No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		Yes	0
TPN-002126	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Library Technology, Capital and Staff support	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Funds will be used to cover the costs of various technological and capital enhancements identified by library staff including but not limited to online catalog enhancements, tablets and hotspots for lending and onsite use, outdoor signage upgrades and automated materials handler replacement at Mesquite Library.	3000000	573015.99	402885.93
TPN-002127	RCP-039374	Oak Park, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Nurse Salaries - Portion of Salaries to Support Public Health Department	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	On December 6, 2021, The Village Board Approved Resolution 21-324 A Resolution Authorizing the Submission of Annual Public Health Grants Applications with the Community Development Block Grant, the Cook County Department of Public Health, the Illinois Department of Human Services, the Illinois Department of Public Health, the Public Health Institute of Metropolitan Chicago, and the Shawnash Institute with an Anticipated Total Funding Amount of $1,048,545 and Approval of Subsequent Agreements, Including $34,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds for Fiscal Year 2022 for a Portion of Nurses’ Salaries, and Authorizing their Execution Annually, the Health Department seeks approval for the various grant funding applications it intends to seek in order to offset a portion of the total cost of providing public health services in Oak Park. In addition, the Village continues to receive grants funds to support the Public Health Department for COVID-19. These COVID-19 grants include the 2 FTE equivalent positions to continue in FY22 of which $34,000 in ARPA funds are needed in addition to the grants.		34000	34000			*					No
TPN-002129	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Expand Economic Workforce Development Grant Program with ARPA Criteria	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Expand Economic Workforce Development Grant Program with ARPA Criteria	600000	37744.95	37744.95								No
TPN-002130	RCP-035910	Yavapai County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Vaccination Clinics/PODs	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Vaccine Clinic Operations throughout Yavapai County	124538.97	124538.97	124538.97								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002131	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Local Food Consumption/Production	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	This portion of the Phoenix Food Initiative includes the following programs: Farmland Preservation – In partnership with nonprofits and land trusts, assist in the purchase and preservation of up 100 acres of land for agriculture in Phoenix. Backyard Food Production Pilot – Provide grant funding to 100 residents located in food deserts for backyard gardens and community gardens using aquaponics, raised beds, and other water conservative growing methods.	4930300	4425627.86	1319300.19	526							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	4930300
TPN-002132	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Workforce Development and Skill Building	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Workforce Development and Skill Building	744855	0	0								No
TPN-002134	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Memory Cafe Program	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Funds expand the City’s Memory Café program for senior center members and their caregivers. Memory Cafes stimulate participants through music therapy, art and memory exercises, and are a key contributor to the Dementia Friendly City initiative.	2000000	454736.79	454736.79								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			Yes	0
TPN-002135	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Expansion of KIDCO Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	Targeting the youth in the city of Tucson thru expanding an existing after school program targeting ages 6-13 with additional locations to provide parents who need a safe and reliable care option so they can maintain work schedules. Over the course of 4 years want to expand to 15-25 locations within Tucson Unified School District school locations, funding for staffing to grow the program and increase the number of children currently served. Introduce new teen engagement programs for ages 13-17 an underserved population currently. Program will be built by teen input and will have the goal to expand the audience of teens to be served such as those from groups such as LGBTQ+; foster programs; low income families; teens residing within neighborhoods with a higher instance of violence or abuse reported cases, for the intent to become a resource for support, respite, life skills and social and emotional support in a fun, positive environment.	400000	400000	61682.93								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		Yes	0
TPN-002136	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Area Agency on Aging's Goods2HOME	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Funding will continue to support the Area of Agency on Aging’s Goods2HOME program which the City support with CARES Act funding in 2020. This program provides delivery services to low-income, disabled, and homebound seniors who need medication and sanitation supplies.	2000000	2000000	1060239.92								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			Yes	0
TPN-002140	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Digital Accessibility (Website Improvements)	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Digital Accessibility (Website Improvements)	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002143	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Housing Cooperative Development Fund	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Housing Cooperative Development Fund to create housing trust funds, those established by city, county or state governments that receive ongoing dedicated sources of public funding, to support the preservation and production of affordable housing and increase opportunities for families and individuals to access decent affordable homes.	3000000	0	0								No
TPN-002144	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Small Scale Senior/Youth Housing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Small Scale Senior/Youth Housing  to create transitional housing program(s) for seniors and youth.	1135036	0	0								No
TPN-002145	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Justa Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The City has contracted with Justa Center to provide COVID-19 supportive services for seniors experiencing homelessness. Funds will expand outreach and engagement services, non-urgent facility-based care and housing supportive services such as move-in kits, classes on independent living, weekly check-in visits from a social worker, assistance with scheduling health care appointments, and transportation to health care appointments if needed.	1000000	1000000	175804.15								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	1000000
TPN-002146	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Housing Resource Connection Program/Wraparound Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Housing Resource Connection Program/Wraparound Services to provide a one-step shop with immediate support to persons in need of affordable housing.	750000	0	0								No
TPN-002147	RCP-040465	Bay County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health and Safety Payroll Expense	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	This project includes the percentage of PH&S payroll in proportion to employee time spent on Covid-19 related activities. The percentage, along with specific activities performed, is reported on bi-monthly questionnaires by department and position title. Per the Final Rule, PH&S personnel include “police officers (including state police officers), sheriffs and deputy sheriffs, firefighters, emergency medical responders, correctional and detention officers, and those who directly support such employees such as dispatchers and supervisory personnel." Treasury also clarified that "recipients may use reasonable estimates to establish administrable presumptions; for example, a recipient could estimate, based on discussions with staff, the general share of time that employees in a specific role or type of position spend on Covid-19 related tasks and apply that share of time to all employees in that position. " The County uses the percentage reported and applies that to the actual wage costs incurred during the period to determine the claim amount.	718757.61	718757.61	718757.61			171					No
TPN-002148	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Manufactured Housing Rehabilitation/Replacement	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Manufactured Housing Rehabilitation/Replacement to acquire and rehabilitate, with end goal to sell, manufactured housing to low to moderate-income families.	1000000	0	0								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	1000000
TPN-002149	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Affordable Housing Programming/Acquisition	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	City of Tucson has a large low income population which has been exasperated by the pandemic Housing program directors monitor and ensure that the impacted populations needs are being addresses in a reasonable manner. the objective of this program is to obtain housing facilities and/or renovate to provide affordable housing options for negatively impacted populations,	15000000	3905742.73	3905742.73								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	9900000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	Yes	19197.9
TPN-002150	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Hotel/Bridge Housing Operations	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Hotel/Bridge Housing Operations: to provide temporary housing to homeless and others with temporary needs to bridge the gap between the streets and more permanent solutions. This includes locations on Anklam and Oracle as well as the purchase of the Wild Cat Inn. The City is in the process of procuring a management company to manage the properties and provide oversight of daily operations, maintenance and cleaning. This is an expansion of the Citys housing program to address the additional impact on the homeless community due to the pandemic Program managers monitor the hotels on a continuous basis to ensure that appropriate populations are being served.	8000000	4290897.51	4290897.51								Yes	Transitional shelters	3445981.56	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts		Yes	3445981.56
TPN-002151	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		General Fund Revenue Recovery	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	General Fund Revenue Recovery	19505749	19505749	17263412.91
TPN-002153	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Partnership for City-wide Volunteer Management Network	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other	create a single resource/network for information, coordination, and/or access to all volunteer services available inside the city.	200000	0	0								No
TPN-002155	RCP-038526	Shawnee County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Consultant for ARPA SLFRF	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Professional Service Agreement for consultation services related to ARPA funds.		150000	75035
TPN-002157	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Small and Legacy Businesses Revolving Micro-Loan Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Small and Legacy Businesses Revolving Micro-Loan Program to find an entity to administer the City’s Revolving Loan Fund Program. The Revolving Loan Fund Program will provide business planning, underwriting, loan preparation, and loan assistance to support existing small businesses, businesses owned by socially and economically disadvantaged entrepreneurs, and businesses with fewer than ten employees.	2000000	0	0								No
TPN-002158	RCP-037604	Highland City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Prevention in Congregate Settings	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	This category will include expenditures relating to the renting of temporary park fencing to keep residents off of the play equipment and ventilation improvements at all city facilities. Also used for biohazard clean-up and sanitizer and sanitizing wipes for all City facilities to prevent Covid-19 in congregate settings.		235073.36	235073.36								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002159	RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Youth Employment Program City Government	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Youth Employment Program City Government  to provide tools and/or resources for workforce development and skill building such as educational programs, trainings, creation of job pipelines, and closing the skill gap.	400000	0	0								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic			No	0
TPN-002161	RCP-037604	Highland City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Personal Protective Equipment	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	This category includes  PPE gloves, gowns, masks, etc. for all city facilities provided to the employees as well as the public if needed.		13534.1	13534.1								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002163	RCP-037604	Highland City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications, Enforcement)	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	This category includes City Attorney services advising the city with emergency declarations, re-opening orders, and enforcement of health orders.		2727.66	2727.66								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002167	RCP-037604	Highland City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Payroll Costs for Public Health, Safety, and Other Public Sector Staff Resp	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	This category includes Fire, Police and Paramedics staff responding to the Public Health Emergency.		6031075.1	6031075.1			54					No
TPN-002168	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	COVID-19 Vaccination Software	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	In an effort to stop the spread of COVID-19 among County employees, Thurston County is engaged with the vendor Qualtrics for software to track the COVID-19 vaccination status and/or weekly COVID-19 testing tracking of Thurston County employees. This was pursuant to Thurston County Resolution #16067, adopted August 24, 2021 by the Board of County Commissioners, which required that all Thurston County employees be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or be tested weekly. This resolution has since been rescinded. The Board of County Commissioners approved $44,778 for this project.	44778	44778	44778								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002170	RCP-037604	Highland City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Small Business Economic Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	This category includes providing $7500 grants per small business that experienced negative economic impacts as a result of the pandemic.		1312500	1312500								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-002171	RCP-037604	Highland City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Revenue Replacement-Provision of Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This category includes the modernization of cybersecurity, including hardware, software, and protection of critical infrastructure, in addition to these purchases, staff will have a consultant perform a penetration test to gauge how vulnerable our current network is and repair/replace hardware and/or software. We are also now using this category for Public Works projects.		59806.66	59806.66
TPN-002172	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Explore Butte County	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Explore Butte County promotional project	250000	200000	200000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002173	RCP-036996	Madison County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Broadband - Fiber to the Home	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Provide fiber to home broadband service to a largely underserved rural area in the northeast portion of Madison county.  We engaged a firm to start the preliminary phase to define scope and requirements of program, procure a third party vendor to provide facilities and services and to implement the program.		609202.46	407564.19					No
TPN-002174	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Temporary shelters for homeless	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Partnership project with Butte County to create a location where individuals experiencing homelessness can have a low barrier, safe and secure place to sleep.  (County project number ARPA-21)	1085107	1085107	1085107								No		900000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-002175	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Small Business Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Assistance to Small Businesses	1000000	1000000	1000000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002176	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Bike Fence	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Bike trail fencing	350000	306965.12	306965.12								Yes	Other (please specify)	350000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002177	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Youth Grant Wellbeing Program	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other	Children activities	150000	150000	150000								No
TPN-002178	RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Citywide Building Enhancement	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Beautify downtown business locations	200000	190000	190000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002183	RCP-039454	Albemarle County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	General Government Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	On August 11, 2021, the County Executive issued County Emergency Order No. 21-3 (EO 21-3), pursuant to VA. Code Section 44-146.21(C), in order to reduce the transmission of COVID-19 among Albemarle County employees and the public; protect those who are at higher risk for adverse health complications; and maintain essential services for the public. EO 21-3 requires that all full-time, part-time and contract County employees provide verification of their full vaccination status or submit a weekly COVID-19 test through the County's screening clinic.		190810	190810								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002186	RCP-039607	Richardson City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Custer Road Improvement Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Custer Road Improvement Project consists of removal and replacement of existing reinforced concrete pavement, installation of storm sewer drainage pipes, water lines, sanitary sewer lines, pedestrian signal and barrier free ramp improvements, traffic signal pole improvements, signage and pavement markings, and other supporting appurtenances from Campbell Road to Arapaho Road.	8462578	8462577.88	5829201.61
TPN-002187	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		MCNH Geothermal Wells	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County is seeking a responsible vendor to provide all labor, parts and equipment to make repairs to the Nursing Home Geothermal well system.  The project consists of finding solutions for several different issues and making repairs which are suspected of having a related cause. The expectation is that the bid awardee is a subject matter expert and able to provide a long term solution. The geothermal well system consists of 16 standing column wells and the electronic components to control the well system providing 615 ton of cooling capacity for 326 water-to-air heat pumps.		223043.6	223043.6
TPN-002190	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	MCNH Laundry Ventilation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County is looking into a new Make-up Air (MUA) unit for the Nursing Home, specifically for the laundry room. The existing air intake for the Laundry gas burning dryers is plagued with issues from freezing temperature, rain, snow & Ice intrusions. The scope of this project includes: Engineering evaluation for Structural & Mechanical, removal of the existing MUA fans, installation of a MUA unit and ductwork, installation of gas piping for the heater, electrical runs for power and controls wiring, any modifications of the building structure necessary to installation, roof work, patching, pitch pockets, equipment mounts, installation labor, equipment commissioning, and a record draw of the system from the engineering firm.		14130.5	14130.5								No
TPN-002191	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Washing Machines for DOC & MCNH	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Merrimack County Department of Corrections & Nursing Home are looking to replace 4 55-60lb Milnor washer/extractors. They are 17 years old and maintenance costs are becoming increasingly more expensive.		112635.76	112635.76
TPN-002192	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		McLeod Bldg. Improvements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County intends to upgrade the McLeod Building so that it can be used for Nursing Home, assisted living, and agency support site for cities and towns within the county. Additional activities in this project include replacing the vintage 1978 emergency generator, adding Life Safety, Mechanical upgrades, IT Transfer Switches, upgrading Main Electrical BUS to code and Roof and Storm Drain replacement for North and South Wings.		239930.99	239930.99
TPN-002193	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Hotel Damage Reimbursements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County Human Services Division is looking for vendors to house clients, within this mission; they are looking into ways to manage related risk and compensate vendors for damages caused by human services / juvenile services clients.		2665	2665								No
TPN-002194	RCP-039726	Frederick County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Regional Broadband - VATI	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	The project is a regional Fiber-To-The-Home (FTTH) project that includes 8 localities.  Broadband Service will be made available to 41,690 currently unserved locations in the Region leveraging a partnership between the localities, the electric cooperatives, and All Points Broadband.  In Frederick County, this will provide broadband access to all locations in Frederick County that remain unserved by cable or FTTH broadband.  The requested funds represent Frederick County’s portion of the overall project cost.  Contracts for the start of the project are completed. Total project completion is expected by July 22, 2025.  The overall project is being managed by the Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission.  The NSVRC is the grantee of the VATI award.  Frederick County's contribution is the matching funds for the project and will be paid to NSVRC as they are overseeing and coordinating the regional project.  The NSVRC is registered in SAM as a US GOVT ENTITY.	8650000	8650000	4325000
TPN-002196	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Rental Vouchers	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County Human Services Division is looking into providing vouchers to people experiencing temporary homelessness. The scope is still under development; however the goal is to partner with a hotel or multiple hotels in order to provide vetted individuals or families with a voucher to be able to acquire a hotel room. Therefore it would be allowable under Expenditure Category 3: Services to Disproportionately Impacted Communities, 3.11 Housing Support: Services for Unhoused Persons* ^.		0	0								No
TPN-002197	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Microwave Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County Sheriff’s Department is looking into updating their microwave communication infrastructure.  The scope of this project includes installation and set-up of both outdoor and indoor units, dish antenna and grounding apparatus. Testing of microwave paths from the Courthouse to Oak Hill and Oak Hill to Boscawen Dispatch are also included.		162190.75	162190.75
TPN-002198	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Enterprise Resource Planning Software Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County is looking into purchasing new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software that has updated features to better manage purchase orders and projects. Financial management for grants as well as budgeted funds would be greatly streamlined and more simplistic, while being better organized for audits from the Federal government. The scope of this project is the purchase of upgraded software with specific modules added on.		477628.4	477628.4
TPN-002200	RCP-036194	Erie County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Shop 716	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Erie County is devoting $2,080,000 in ARP funding towards small business promotion programs. These programs are piggybacking on successful CARES Act funding programs from 2020. $80,000 will go towards the creation of a “one-stop” business assistance portal which is sorely lacking in Erie County. This project will be administered by the Amherst Chamber of Commerce. $1,000,000 will go towards a shop local advertising campaign, administered by Visit Buffalo Niagara. A second $1,000,000 will go towards a shop local gift card program, where individuals will receive a bonus $20 when then buy a $20 gift card to be used at local small businesses	1969684.73	1969684.73	1969684.73								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted		Yes	2080000
TPN-002201	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	County Navigator Position Through 2026	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County’s Human Services Division is looking to hire a County Navigator. This would be a human services position generated to support the County’s mission to help its citizens and provide them with a physical point of contact for housing information and community support.		0	0								No
TPN-002204	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Concord Coalition to End Homelessness: COVID-19 Shelter	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Merrimack County is looking into sheltering for people experiencing homelessness that have contracted COVID-19. This temporary isolation while sheltered is very important as many shelters don't have room for a quarantine area.		0	0								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002205	RCP-037349	Kosciusko County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Communications Tower Project	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Public safety communications tower project, including land, storage buildings, towers, and equipment which will be used for public safety radio access in areas which did not have strong radio signals, thus hampering communications among first responders.  These towers will also be used to improve county-wide broadband internet access, which is needed for virtual education and those working from home		1280000	1280000
TPN-002210	RCP-036194	Erie County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Office of Health Equity & Cancer Services	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Erie County will establish staffing and budget lines for a new Office of Health Equity within the Erie County Department of Health. This office is directly in line with the stated goals of the ARP State and Local Recovery Fund’s mission to address disparities in public health outcomes with a staff of 9 individuals including Epidemiologists. The Office of Health Equity will produce an annual report that improves and expands on the current 3-year Community Health Assessment process required by NYS. The Office will direct future county and grant spending, as well as provide detailed analysis and support to not-for-profit entities to better invest philanthropic dollars into health equity issues. A core focus will be addressing the social determinants of health.   In addition, Erie County’s existing Cancer Services program, partially funded by New York State, will hire two additional outreach workers and launch a marketing campaign to make county residents aware of the importance of cancer screening, schedule free screenings for cervical, colorectal and breast cancer, and enroll eligible residents in NYS’s special cancer Medicaid program, as well as connect cancer patients and survivors with additional resources. The marketing campaign will last for through mid-2022, and the additional outreach coordinators will become permanent county employees, paid for by general fund resources with partial NYS reimbursement.	974267	974267	974267								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-002212	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	General Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	This project code captures expenditures related to the administration of the ARPA grant, such as administrative personnel costs, bank fees, consulting related to compliance, and audit.	25	25	25
TPN-002213	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	PURCHASE OF TRIPLEXES	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Jefferson County will purchase two triplex housing units to assist with transitional housing for persons that were economically disadvantaged by the pandemic.  The units will require some renovations to meet code and safety requirements which is also included in this project cost.	410000	356490	356490								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	353526.67	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-002214	RCP-036194	Erie County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay for In-Person Workers	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Many county employees continued to report to work in person throughout the worst of the pandemic including the critical early days when little was known about the COVID-19 virus. In order to compensate those employees, this project provides a premium pay bonus of $5.00 per hour for every hour worked onsite from March 16th 2020 to June 26th 2020. Those dates align with the county’s shift to a work-from-home policy for non-essential personnel.  Per federal guidance, only employees who earned less than 150% of the county’s median income in 2020 ($116,400), will be eligible for this premium pay. Payments will be capped when an employee’s gross compensation exceeds 150% of median income so for instance a bonus payment of $5,000 that would raise an employee’s gross compensation to $120,000 would be capped at $1,400. Additional county share dollars were also committee to this project which totaled approximately $6,000,000.	3054265	3054265	3054265		3958
TPN-002215	RCP-036194	Erie County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Provision of Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds were allocated to restore cut positions (107), create new positions informed by the pandemic and operations needs (26), undertake various capital projects that were delayed due to the COVID-19 recession, make new capital improvements to the parks system which has had a tremendous increase in usage, and restore funding to community organizations supported by the county.	47554040	27896784.05	17408866.45
TPN-002216	RCP-036020	Mecklenburg County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Communication Plan	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Marketing plan to encourage community participation to ensure all people but specifically communities of color are represented in the development of plans and priorities for allocation of the Federal Recovery Funds / ARP in the community.	7000	7000	7000
TPN-002217	RCP-037349	Kosciusko County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Office Disinfection	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	When an employee tests positive for COVID-19, offices must be disinfected to protect other employees and the public.  Professional disinfection services are used to give us a higher level of sanitation than is provided by normal spraying and wiping.  The service uses EPA registered disinfections to clean and sanitize to a hospital-grade clean room condition.  The process was approved by the County Commissioners.		30000	20948								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002218	RCP-036020	Mecklenburg County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Mecklenburg County Sheriffs Office Bonuses	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	$2K bonus for Detention Officers & Field Training Officers	792000	746000	746000		373
TPN-002220	RCP-036179	Boulder County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	1.2.1 BCPH COVID TESTING	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Access to COVID-19 testing, especially for vulnerable and hard to reach populations, is a critical immediate need given the spikes in cases due to variants. BCPH has been working with Boulder Community Hospital over the past year to ensure access to testing in congregate settings, shelters, outbreak sites, and more remote mountain communities such as Nederland. These populations represent priority populations (e.g., older adults in LTCF’s, homeless, homebound, etc.) and vulnerable groups, including those in congregate settings (e.g. assisted living, etc.) who have been exposed to a positive case, as well as geographically remote residents. Funding is for Boulder Community Hospital, reimbursement of services since March 3, 2021, and pass-through funds to continue the work.	201985.87	201985.87	76985.87								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002221	RCP-039198	Yellowstone County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Digital Screens / Public Address System	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	In First Interstate Arena, upgrade LED Video Display/signage, security system, and public address system to allow evacuation notices and other public safety announcements.	3278000	2840578.03	2840578.03								Yes	Other (please specify)	1467042	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002222	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	New Owner-Occupied Housing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	This activity will provide a new owner-occupied housing opportunity for a low income household.  A single family house will be constructed in a Qualified Census Tract and sold to a first time home buyer low income household by the Greater Springfield Habitat for Humanity.  The new home owners will receive first time homeowner counseling, participate in the construction of their home and undergo vigorous screening by GSHFH.   The activity will support the availability of affordable owner occupied housing in a community where only 45% of housing units are owner occupied.   The impact will be measured by the completion and sale of the home to the eligible household.   The activity will strengthen the neighborhood, add to the City’s real estate tax base, and increase high quality housing stock.	355000	355000	316093.97								No			15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-002223	RCP-039198	Yellowstone County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sanitation Devices	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Kart Kleen entrance units and disinfectant lockers for the detention facility. Incident response bags and PPE units for Sheriff's office patrol officers.	53850	53850	53850								Yes	Other (please specify)	53850	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002226	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Staffing Capacity for Habitat for Humanity Holyoke Projects	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	This activity will fund professional housing development staff at the Greater Springfield Habitat for Humanity to support the construction of owner-occupied housing for low-income households in Holyoke.  The City of Holyoke has limited non-profit capacity in the development of owner-occupied housing opportunities and this ARPA funding for capacity building will ensure that GSHH is able to complete its ARPA funded activities on time and within budget.	40000	39733	39733								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002227	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Broadband Expansion	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	This project provides potential matching funds for Broadband Expansion Grants coming through the Wisconsin Public Service Commission, or could be used for direct broadband expansion projects should Jefferson County not be awarded other grant funding.	1280000	15000	15000					No
TPN-002230	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	New Owner Occupied Housing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	This activity will fund the construction of duplexes on vacant lots in the City of Holyoke owned by OneHolyoke CDC. This grant will address systemic public health and economic challenges that have contributed to the unequal impact of the pandemic on certain populations. Specifically, due to job loss other economic disruption caused by COVID-19, many Holyoke residents who aspire to purchase their first home in our community have been set back. The price of housing increased even as the ability to save for a down payment and prepare for homeownership through classes and financial education were curtailed. The delivery of a deed and keys to each new homeowner is the measurable and objective goal of this project. One Holyoke CDC has successfully built over 160 units of affordable housing for purchase over several decades, exclusively in the City of Holyoke, and primarily in the Qualified Census Tracts identified in this application.	0	0	0								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	355000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-002232	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Rental Neighborhood Improvement Program - Rehab	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	This activity will provide funding to the existing Rental Neighborhood Improvement Program (RNIP) that is currently administered by OneHolyoke CDC.  The RNIP is a revolving loan program which provides funding to property owners for rental housing improvements such as new roofs, HVAC improvements, lead-based paint abatement, doors, windows, and other housing improvements.  RNIP funding may also be used to address code enforcement and building code violations.  The RNIP ensures safe, healthy, and sanitary housing options for low income households.  The program has been previously funded with Community Development Block Grant funds and has been in operation for over 25 years.   Over 60% of the City of Holyoke’s occupied housing stock is rental housing built prior to 1978.  This funding may be provided in the form of loans or grants depending on the needs of the property owner.  The impact will be measured by the number of apartments with improved housing conditions.	0	0	0								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-002233	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Neighborhood Improvement Program - Rehab	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	This activity will provide funding to the existing Neighborhood Improvement Program (NIP) that is currently administered by OneHolyoke CDC.  The NIP is a grant program which provides funding to low-income owner occupants to make housing improvements such as new roofs, HVAC improvements, lead-based paint abatement, doors, windows, and other housing improvements.  NIP funding may also be used to address code enforcement and building code violations and to make improvements required by property insurance companies.  The NIP ensures safe, healthy, and sanitary housing options for low income households and allows aging homeowners to make modifications needed to age in place.  The program has been previously funded with Community Development Block Grant funds and has been in operation for over 25 years.   Over 40% of the City of Holyoke’s occupied housing stock is owner occupied housing built primarily prior to 1978.  This funding will be provided in the form of grants. Depending on the needs of the property owner, they may be required to make a small contribution towards the repairs or agree to have a lien placed on their homes.  The impact will be measured by the number of housing units with improved housing conditions.	0	0	0								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002235	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Home modifications for Covid-19 impacted residents	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	This activity will fund Revitalize CDC in its work to provide free home assessments to identify asthma triggers, unsafe housing conditions, and needed age-in-place modifications for100 Holyoke households identified by a COVID-19 emergency response project. Assessments will be follow up with a plan to make repairs/modifications and work completed by licensed contractors. Asthma treatment education and proper medication protocols will be provided for those suffering from asthma. These activities are important; these families have been financially impacted by COVID-19 and can’t afford to complete repairs. Asthma triggers can exacerbate COVID-19 long-term effects (e.g., shortness of breath, cough). The CDC recommends avoiding asthma triggers and following an asthma action plan, but families can’t afford, or don’t know how, to remove triggers or properly take medication. For elderly clients, modifications to reduce fall risks can help keep them out of nursing homes, thus reducing their potential for contracting the virus. Outcomes of this project include: number of homes assessed/repaired; asthma reduction rate percentage; reduced risk of homelessness; reduced asthma exacerbation & elderly falls; safer homes increase well-being and reduce risk of homelessness.	215000	215000	100000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002237	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	South Holyoke Homes Phase 2	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	This activity will provide funding to the Holyoke Housing Authority for Phase 2 of the South Holyoke Homes housing development.  The Holyoke Housing Authority (HHA) is the developer of the South Holyoke Homes, a multi-phased affordable housing project centered around Carlos Vega Park. The first phase of the project is getting underway, and the second phase of the project consists of homeownership units to be sold to low-income First Time Homebuyers. The HHA has done extensive community outreach, plus a market study and is proposing to build 19 units of rowhouse style homes around Carlos Vega Park. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the need for quality affordable housing. The pandemic has had a very strong effect on the housing market and reduced the number of homes available for First Time Homebuyers. In addition, the pandemic has disrupted supply chains and severely impacted the cost of building materials.  The ARPA funds will help overcome the increased costs of development as a result of the pandemic.	1300000	1300000	0								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	1300000
TPN-002238	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Public Health Improvements to Essential Municipal Facilities	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	This activity will fund much needed improvements to municipal buildings including the City Hall, City Hall Annex, Department of Public Works headquarters and Fire Stations No. 3 and 6.  These improvements will address long needed repairs associated with air quality and healthy workplaces including new roofs, windows, HVAC, and flooring.  The buildings are generally historic in nature and may have been repurposed from prior uses (i.e. the Annex was once the police headquarters).   These buildings are critical to the operations of the municipality and are where the majority of the municipal public sector workforce are located.	4000000	4000000	1391139.82								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	4000000
TPN-002239	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	RESOLVE COURT BACKLOGS	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will fund 2 positions in the District Attorney's office to assist with resolution of backlogged court cases due to the COVID crisis.	295000	201741	114938.67			*					No
TPN-002240	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Springdale Pond Sewer Separation	5-Infrastructure	5.4-Clean Water: Combined sewer overflows	This activity is a sewer infrastructure project.   This project is an EC 5.4 project that will redirect the Springdale pond drain from the combined sewer system where it typically contributes more than 100,000 gallons per day to the City’s wastewater treatment plant and over 1 million gallons per day during wet weather. The pond drain will be redirected to the City’s separate storm drains reducing combined sewer overflows to the CT River and treatment facility operational costs and reducing the potential for flooding and sewer backups in the Springdale neighborhood. Testing has confirmed the presence of COVID-19 in municipal wastewater so reducing the potential exposure of City residents to untreated wastewater has the potential to eliminate a potential transmission pathway. Secondary benefits of this project will be replacement of a portion of the City’s wastewater and storm water collection infrastructure and resurfacing of the roadways in the impacted neighborhood, this reducing reliance on other City funds to complete this work.	675000	675000	479052.58
TPN-002241	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Stab Vests	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This appropriation shall be used to purchase stab vests for Indiana Department of Correction personnel.	7000000	3166457	2643428
TPN-002242	RCP-039686	Sarpy County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Lift Up Sarpy	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Community Assistance		750000	750000	483							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	No	0
TPN-002243	RCP-036797	Miami County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Courthouse 3rd Floor HVAC Upgrade Project	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The Miami County Courthouse 3rd Floor Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Upgrade Project.  This will include the project design, bidding documents, overall project management, meetings, system commissioning and closeout services. The scope of this project will include replacing the air handler, ductwork, variable air volume boxes (VAV's) to condition each space, heating hot water piping, chilled water piping and building automation filtered/sanitized air. Total estimated project cost is $930,000.00.		927800	896260								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	1003800	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002244	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Sewer System Rehab	5-Infrastructure	5.4-Clean Water: Combined sewer overflows	This activity is a sewer infrastructure project. This project is an Expenditure Category 5.4 project that will separate sanitary sewer from storm drains throughout the S Holyoke area and eliminate the combined sewer discharge point to the river at the Jackson St Pump Station. Approximately 19.3 million gallons of combined sewage discharges to the Connecticut River annually from this outfall. Treatment facility operational costs will be reduced as well as the potential for flooding and sewer backups in the South Holyoke neighborhood. Testing has confirmed the presence of COVID-19 in municipal wastewater so reducing the potential exposure of City residents to untreated wastewater has the potential to eliminate a potential transmission pathway. Secondary benefits of this project will be replacement of a portion of the City’s wastewater and stormwater collection infrastructure and resurfacing of the roadways in the impacted neighborhood, this reducing reliance on other City funds to complete this work.	2000000	2000000	35708.94
TPN-002245	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Indiana State Police Body Cameras	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The above appropriation are to be used for the acquisition of body and in-car cameras and peripheral equipment for Indiana State Police.	19910121	19772686	11971689
TPN-002246	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Revenue Replacement Phx Convention Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds will be used to replace lost revenue at the Convention Center and to offset COVID-19 worker’s compensation claims. COVID-19 has had a severe impact on the Convention Center bookings. It is likely that large conventions and the associated hospitality industry will be among the slowest to recover and revenue will continue to be weak. Using the prescribed Treasury formula, staff has determined that up to $31 million of the revenue lost by the Convention Center is eligible for revenue replacement. Staff recommends replacing this revenue over two years rather than all at once. It is important to note that the General Fund serves as the financial backstop for the Convention Center so replacing lost revenue with ARPA funds significantly reduces risk to the General Fund.	20000000	19561713.45	19561713.45
TPN-002247	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Local Unit Body Camera Grants	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The above appropriations are for the purpose of providing matching grants to city, town, and county law enforcement agencies for the acquisition of body cameras.  Grant proceeds may only be used for the purchase of body cameras and may not be used to purchase video storage equipment or services. Eligible law enforcement agencies may apply for grants in accordance with procedures established by the Indiana State Police.  The grant opportunity has been published and the application period is open.	10000000	1335932	1168222
TPN-002248	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Fire Station 6 Generator	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	This activity will fund the installation of an emergency generator at the Holyoke Fire Department’s Station 6, 600 High Street, Holyoke.  Station 6 is the HFD’s headquarters building.  The generator will ensure that the HFD headquarters continues its emergency response operations in the event of a power outage.  Station 6 serves the entire community, and is the station that responds to emergencies in the Qualified Census Tracts of Holyoke where many older multi-family buildings are located.	0	0	0								No	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	60243
TPN-002249	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Workforce Wraparound Tuition/Apprentice Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	"For this program, $8.5 million will be used to offer free training and education to residents who have been impacted by the pandemic in the hardest hit industries of hospitality, food service, retail, and families with young children. The program will offer short-term and long-term training in fields, such as bioscience, healthcare, construction, IT, and more (industries negatively impacted by the pandemic). Participants enrolled in training will receive monthly financial assistance to help with emergency expenses such as transportation and childcare. Additionally, $1.5 million will be used to partner with a community-based organization to expand workforce services with a focus on families with young children. The organization will target families not enrolled at a Maricopa Community College.  There is strong evidence that vocational training can help dislocated workers regain employment. As such, participants will self-attest as part of their application their negative economic COVID-19 impact, such as job and income loss. Supportive services are also recommend in programs like this and participants will receive support to limit barriers to accessing training and employment. "	10000000	10000000	4201030								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment			No	10000000
TPN-002252	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Turnout Gear for Firefighters	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	To provide the 120 Holyoke Firefighters with a second set of structural firefighting turnout gear. The second set of gear will be used when first set is being laundered and dried after a fire. Researchers have found that more than two -thirds of firefighters- 68% develop cancer, compared to about 22% for the general population. These cancer rates have been attributed to firefighters being exposed to products of combustion. These products of combustion tend to adhere to the structural firefighting gear causing exposure to the skin. Having the second set of turnout gear will enable the firefighter to take his first set out of service after a fire and put his second clean set in service giving the firefighter less of a chance of exposure to the byproducts of combustion. The outcome of this activity is to keep out firefighters safe during the pandemic and beyond.	338518.8	338518.8	338518.8								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	338519	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002253	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Bus Stop Shelter	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	As part of the T2050 plan, the Public Transit Department has a goal of installing 80 new bus shelters per year. This additional funding will increase this goal to 100 shelters per year over the next two years. Bus shelters will be placed in locations currently without shade and provide heat relief to transit users.	500000	0	0								Yes	Transitional shelters	500000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002254	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	RESOLVE VETERAN'S SERVICES BACKLOGS	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project funds 1 full time position in the Veteran's Services office to assist with resolving case backlogs due to COVID-19.	195000	152708	85170.74			*					No
TPN-002255	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Small Business Workforce Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	This program provides assistance to small businesses (less than 100 employees) in Phoenix through. PHXb!zConnect, an exclusive-for-Phoenix businesses social media platform, gives small business owners connections to each other, business webinars, and city resources. This program also provides grant funding for small business training programs and/or demonstration projects that benefit the Phoenix entrepreneurial/small business community.	2000000	887968.13	887968.13								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	2000000
TPN-002257	RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Fin Assistance for Phx Refugee & Asylee Community	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Funds will be used to support nonprofit agencies serving the refugee and asylee community, as well as to create full-time staff support to provide services to this community. These positions would act as navigators that would help this community navigate government services and programs.	8300000	6000000	444880.27								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002262	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	SOUTH CAMPUS WATER MAIN	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	This project will replace a failing water main at our South Campus, which includes Health and Human Services departments.	344146	344145.83	344145.83					No
TPN-002264	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Rent and Mortgage Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	This activity will provide funding to Valley Opportunity Council to administer a rental/mortgage assistance program. Up to 3 months of rent or mortgage payments will be covered in whole or in part for qualified households. The overall goal is to assist Holyoke residents to remain housed and create better conditions for long term stability and self-sufficiency. COVID-19 has created a number of urgent, and significant needs for households. The program is located in South Holyoke. This activity will contribute to the overall stability of the Holyoke community by enabling 240 households over a period of 4 years to maintain housing and long term stability. Indicators will include less incidents of homelessness and need for emergency services. Those with more stability have increased access to services that address their health, including services that address COVID-19.	195607	195607	110929.84	240							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002267	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	TCF Greater Tulsa LLC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Tulsa Community Foundation received $3 million to administer an airline minimum revenue guarantee to market Tulsa as a nonstop destination for airlines. Local tourism strategies have focused on adding nonstop flights to boost tourism and economic development since before the COVID-19 pandemic, which negatively impacted air travel and tourism.	3000000	3000000	3000000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002269	RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Small Business & Hospitality, Travel, and Tourism Grant Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Emergency Relief and Recovery Grant program available to small, local businesses and nonprofits in the tourism sector that have been negatively impacted by the Covid 19 pandemic and related restrictions. Program will be administered out of the Office for Community Development and will respond directly to the financial needs of Holyoke-based small businesses that were founded prior to February 15, 2020. Priority will be given to businesses in the highly impacted Hospitality, Travel, and Tourism sector. Nonprofits that fall within the Tourism sector (e.g. museums, attractions, public events) will be eligible. Grants will be capped at $25,000 each and the program will aim to fund a minimum of 32 businesses with a goal of helping highly-impacted businesses make it through the slow winter months.	800000	800000	714813.22								No			15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-002274	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	WORKFORCE HVAC REPLACEMENT	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	This project will improve circulation in our Health and Human Services building.	280877	280877	280877								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	278458	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002277	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Deposit to Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.28-Contributions to UI Trust Funds	Deposit to Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund	500000000	500000000	500000000								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-002278	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Affordable Housing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Several recent studies commissioned by the County have identified a need for a position to assist with housing in the County, to include a liaison to communities, developers, and granting agencies as well as individuals seeking affordable housing.	240000	186465	41306.75								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002279	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Mental Health Grants	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The appropriation shall be used to address  a range of mental health needs across the state. Planned program areas include 988 Crisis Hotline establishment, a competency restoration pilot, assessments and technical assistance, development of regional and local capacity building grant program, and workforce development initiatives.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002281	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	SOUTH CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTS	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will make improvements to our South Campus including replacement of current lighting with LED lighting and bathroom upgrades.	659159.76	659159.76	659159.76
TPN-002283	RCP-053085	Cattaraugus County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Cattaraugus County Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cattaraugus County revenue loss projects include a 3% stipend for all County employee’s, the hiring of a Program Administrator, Engineering & Financial Consulting, along with providing funding for Emergency Services, Economic Development, Youth, and other government services.	14784835	12313486.79	6375708.47
TPN-002285	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTS TO SUPPORT REMOTE WORK	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will support remote work for employees that either are quarantined or choose to work remotely due to COVID related circumstances such as remote schooling for their children, supporting family members with COVID, social distancing, etc.	55673.11	55673.11	55673.11								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002286	RCP-035840	County Of Johnston, NC	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Timothy G Broome Water Treatment Plant Efficiency Project	5-Infrastructure	5.10-Drinking water: Treatment	The Timothy G. Broome Water Treatment Plant Efficiency project is a water and sewer project, which is eligible under EPA’s Drinking Water State Revolving Fund.  It consists of multiple operational and efficiency projects at the County's water treatment plant including new SCADA system, generator replacement, chemical feed improvements, new and replacement process monitoring equipment, mechanical sludge removal system for byproduct basin, clearwell headspace ventilation and clearwell mixing.  The Project is to be financed by a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan, an appropriation from the County Water Fund, and an appropriation from the County’s 2021 American Rescue Plan Act – Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Funds funds.	1649800	1365170.39	160326.67					No
TPN-002287	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	INMATE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	This project will increase the Jail Mental Health Nurse position from .5 FTE to 1 FTE.	145000	100000	58464.17								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002288	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Inter-modal Transportation Study	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The appropriation shall be used to fund the final analysis for a light manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, and logistics district along Buffington Harbor. The study must be conducted to determine the expected market demand, provide transportation and logistics operational modeling, and analyze the need for environmental remediation. The project shall be accomplished through a public private partnership to further advance the development opportunities.	1200000	1100000	890232
TPN-002289	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	NJDA Food and Hunger Programs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	The Food and Hunger Program provides emergency food assistance through a network of organizations who coordinate the distribution of food to disproportionately impacted families in need.	10000000	10000000	10000000	2833144							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity		Yes	10000000
TPN-002291	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	PPE for Residential Care Facilities	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	This project was cancelled.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002292	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Install a Body Scanner in the County Jail	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	To mitigate the introduction of contraband into the Thurston County Corrections Facility, jail staff perform searches such as pat searches and strip searches. Both involve close contact between jail staff and inmates which increases the potential of spreading COVID-19 between individuals. The purchase of a body scanner allows for social distancing and enhances searching for contraband. The body scanner has the same technology as airport scanners. A body scanner eliminates dignity and privacy concerns that strip searches can cause and has the added benefit of saving staff time. The Board of County Commissioners allocated $177,266 for the purchase and installation of the body scanner.	177266	177266	177266								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	177266	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002293	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Substance Abuse Monitoring	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The Substance Abuse Monitoring program (through an ankle bracelet that can detect alcohol in the blood) is a program requested by the Thurston County District Court for the purposes of COVID-19 mitigation and prevention. Prior to this project, the District Court had an option of obtaining monitoring in lieu of pre-sentencing incarceration. However, obtaining this monitoring is entirely up to the defendant, including identifying a provider and paying the cost. As a result, many individuals ended up not participating and were then incarcerated, increasing their risk of contracting COVID-19 in the congregate setting. The new program allows those who are unable to pay to have the ability to obtain monitoring from Friendship Diversion Services, the provider the County contracted with. This program is focused on those who are currently being jailed because they cannot afford or lack the ability to navigate the monitoring program. This project helps the District Court accomplish its goal of increasing physical distancing within the jail by reducing the number of inmates, which would decrease the likelihood of COVID-19 spreading to other inmates and staff. The Board of County Commissioners has allocated $590,000 for the Substance Abuse Monitoring program.	590000	500000	446794								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002294	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	PROMOTE TOURISM IN JEFFERSON COUNTY	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Jefferson County has engaged Discover Wisconsin for a 3-year marketing campaign to promote tourism that was impacted by COVID-19.	250000	247100	247100								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002295	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Medical Expenses (Coroner Lab Fees)	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	This project pays for invoices from Providence St. Peter Hospital, or other lab testing services as needed, and rapid tests used for COVID-19 testing for decedents in the care of the Thurston County Coroner’s Office. The Board of County Commissioners allocated $20,000 for this project.	20000	16520	16520								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002296	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Medical Expenses (Employee testing)	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	This project was for the employer portion of weekly COVID-19 testing for Thurston County Employees who opted for weekly testing rather than COVID-19 vaccination. This was pursuant to Thurston County Resolution #16067, adopted August 24, 2021 by the Board of County Commissioners, which required that all Thurston County employees be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or be tested weekly. This resolution has since been rescinded. The Board of County Commissioners allocated $141,546 for this project.	141546	141546	141546								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002297	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Install Video Court Equipment in Jail Housing Units	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The Thurston County Corrections Facility has experienced several COVID-19 outbreaks. During response to an outbreak, movement of inmates is curtailed, and pre-trial inmates are not transported to courts or allowed to congregate in areas equipped for video court. Each time this happens it exacerbates an already substantial court backlog caused by the response to COVID-19. This infrastructure project installs video court equipment in housing pods at the County jail, enabling video court appearances during COVID-19 outbreaks and assisting in the clearance of the court backlog. The Board of County Commissioners has allocated $900,000 for this project.	900000	25836	25836								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	900000	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002298	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	IMPROVE COUNTY FAIR PARK	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will improve the County Fair Park.  The Fair Park is the largest tourist draw in Jefferson County.	525953	525953	525805
TPN-002300	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Thurston County Website Contract	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	COVID-19 has been devastating to people and to the economy. It also put a strain on the government's digital infrastructure. Thurston County website traffic doubled between 2019 and 2020 as residents turned to online systems more than ever. Before the website update, Thurston County employees directed residents online, but the residents’ ability to find information remained severely limited by the website’s search capability and outdated content. The two separate platforms (HTML and SharePoint) prohibited the ability for users to search for content because the search didn't work across both platforms. Additionally, much of the website was neither mobile capable nor ADA compliant, both crucial for effectiveness. It is essential that the County website be functional for residents to avoid unnecessary trips to government facilities to conduct business and risk either becoming infected or transmitting COVID-19.  This new website, which went online March 2023, standardized page layouts between departments, removed outdated information, and streamlined pathways for people to find documents and file reports. The county reviewed and updated the content and pages. The finished product is highly searchable, legible to screen readers, and mobile-friendly, which is extremely important when more than 62 percent of people visit the county website using a mobile device.  The Board of County Commissioners allocated $480,849 for this project.	480849	480849	480849								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	500000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002301	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Thurston County Website Staff Support	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	COVID-19 has been devastating to people and to the economy. It also put a strain on the government's digital infrastructure. Thurston County website traffic doubled between 2019 and 2020 as residents turned to online systems more than ever. Before the website update, Thurston County employees directed residents online, but the residents’ ability to find information remained severely limited by the website’s search capability and outdated content. The two separate platforms (HTML and SharePoint) prohibited the ability for users to search for content because the search didn't work across both platforms. Additionally, much of the website was neither mobile capable nor ADA compliant, both crucial for effectiveness. It is essential that the County website be functional for residents to avoid unnecessary trips to government facilities to conduct business and risk either becoming infected or transmitting COVID-19.  This new website, which went online March 2023, standardized page layouts between departments, removed outdated information, and streamlined pathways for people to find documents and file reports. The county reviewed and updated the content and pages. The finished product is highly searchable, legible to screen readers, and mobile-friendly, which is extremely important when more than 62 percent of people visit the county website using a mobile device.  The Board of County Commissioners allocated $98,714 to staff support for this project.	98714	98714	98714								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002302	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	MONITOR COVID MEDIA	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	This project will purchase a subscription to ZenCity which is a software product that monitors social media posts and feedback to help Jefferson County monitor feedback on policy decisions related to vaccines, shutdowns, masking, etc.	96000	48000	48000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002303	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	COVID Paid Leave for County Employees	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	To encourage vaccination, this project included up to 32 hours of COVID-19 leave for eligible Thurston County employees, COVID-19 testing time for employees who opted for weekly testing over vaccination, a floating holiday for employees who chose to become fully vaccinated, and other COVID-19 related leave time defined by Human Resources. The Board of County Commissioners allocated $523,024 for this project.	523024	523024	523024								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002304	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Emergency Medical Services Staff	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a shortage of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transport capability in Thurston County to transport patients to the hospital Emergency Departments. This was due to the COVID-19 pandemic and healthcare staffing shortfalls felt in all sectors of medicine. There were situations where patients waited over an hour for a transport unit to arrive at their location. This extended wait for transport units impacted EMS response since a Basic Life Support crew is always dispatched to treat the patient and, under state law, must remain on scene until the transport unit arrives and the patient is transferred to their care. EMS call volume is part of the driving force. In 2020, there were 33,201 EMS 911 calls for service. This rose to 37,837 calls for service in 2021, an increase of 14 percent. In 2022, EMS 911 calls grew to 40,810. EMS calls for service are projected to drop to 43,000 in 2023, still significantly above pre-pandemic levels. Medic One employed Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) as Extra County Help at Medic One to staff the transport units, at times of extreme staffing and transportation shortfalls. The Board of County Commissioners allocated $63,456 for this project.	63456	63456	63456								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002305	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Vaccinations	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	This project will cover costs of vaccinations that are not covered by other federal or state grants.	20868.93	20868.93	20868.93								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002306	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Reserve for Public Health	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	This project was cancelled.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002308	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Consistent with guidance in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, and US Treasury’s Final Rule and Compliance and Reporting Guidance, the City of Portland has calculated the revenue it has lost as a result of the COVID-19 public health emergency, and has allocated a portion of its Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to Revenue Replacement to support the provision of general government services. This allocation ensures continuity of critical services provided by the City. The Revenue Replacement allocation includes general backfill of General Fund-supported personnel and activities as well targeted investments in certain key services. These funds were not used to make a deposit in a pension fund or in any way otherwise prohibited by the American Rescue Plan Act or US Treasury guidance.	38863195	38861146.28	38861146.28
TPN-002310	RCP-035840	County Of Johnston, NC	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Archer Lodge Water District 500,000 Gallon Elevated Storage Tank Project	5-Infrastructure	5.14-Drinking water: Storage	The Archer Lodge Water District project is a water and sewer infrastructure project, which is eligible under EPA’s Drinking Water State Revolving Fund.  It includes the construction/installation of a 500,000 gallon elevated water storage tank.  The new tank will facilitate greater water system reliability, better pressure and storage for fire protection, and additional storage for growth in the region. The Project is to be financed by a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan, an appropriation from water district reserves, and an appropriation from the County’s 2021 American Rescue Plan Act – Coronavirus Local Fiscal Recovery Funds funds. The Archer's Lodge Water District was created by the County as a separate legal entity pursuant to Chapter 162A of the General Statutes of NC, as amended, to provide water and sanitary sewer services to the residents of the district.  The County's Board of Commissioners also serves as the governing body of the district.	428821.4	428821.4	428821.4
TPN-002311	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Coroner's Office New Transport Vehicle	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	The COVID-19 public health emergency has increased the need for staff to drive to scenes/funeral homes to collect time-sensitive and necessary COVID-19 swabs and then drive the swabs to Providence St. Peter Hospital for testing. Currently, staff must often use their personal vehicle to get these tests done in a timely manner, at a liability to the County. This project will provide a coroner vehicle equipped with a secure, designated space to transport decedents to the Thurston County Morgue for additional examination and testing. The Board of County Commissioners has approved $45,000 for this project.	45000	0	0								Yes	Other (please specify)	45000
TPN-002312	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Thurston Works Jobs Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The pandemic’s impact on the workforce created an opportunity to assist nonprofit organizations to find essential workers and for workers to learn new skills that lead to higher-wage career pathways. The Thurston Works Job Program provides grants to nonprofit organizations to hire new workers for one year and connect unemployed or underemployed workers to employment in COVID-19 impacted nonprofits. The Board of County Commissioners has approved $1.3 million for this project.	1300000	1300000	1015056								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify		Yes	0
TPN-002314	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	COVID-19 Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	This project will cover costs of COVID-19 testing that are not covered by other federal and state grants.	2037.5	2037.5	2037.5								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002315	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Animal Control	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	The unprecedented court backlog caused by the pandemic created an influx in animal control related events. Funding assisted with housing and veterinary costs caused by court delays. Many of the animals were victims of animal abuse and were housed until trials were completed and animals were either returned to their owners or adopted by new owners.	45487.34	45487.34	45487.34								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-002316	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Thurston Business Relaunch	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	At the time of this project's inception, studies showed that as of January 2021, approximately 30 percent of small businesses remained closed. To assist in the relaunch, Business Relaunch Grants were awarded to microbusinesses that were operating pre-pandemic and are now working to stay open or restart, with an emphasis including, but not limited to, small independent businesses in personal services, cultural attractions/shuttered venues, restaurants, and retailers. Grants were awarded to businesses who documented losses due to COVID-19 from impacts such as, but not limited to, revenue loss, onboarding new or returning employees, or offsetting the cost of adapting to new conditions of the market. The Board of County Commissioners approved $2.2 million for this project including administrative costs.	2200000	2200000	2021698								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			Yes	0
TPN-002318	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Minority Enterprise Investment	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	At the time of this project’s inception, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce reported that businesses owned by community members identifying as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) had been hit disproportionately hard by the pandemic. BIPOC-owned businesses were more likely to report difficulty obtaining loans, express fears about permanently closing, and predict declining revenues. To engage and assist BIPOC business owners, the Thurston Economic Development Council (EDC) hired a BIPOC Business Liaison to lead engagement and staff a newly formed BIPOC Business Task Force. The Board of County Commissioners set a target to fund small business grants to COVID-19 impacted BIPOC-owned businesses. The liaison will conduct the outreach needed to connect BIPOC business owners with the grant opportunity. This target to provide grants to BIPOC-owned small businesses is administered as part of the Thurston Business Relaunch grant program by the EDC. The goal is to build a more inclusive economy. The Board of County Commissioners approved $2.2 million for this project including administrative costs.	2200000	2200000	1689695								No			24 Dis Imp Other SBs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify			Yes	0
TPN-002319	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Expanded Hygiene Access	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	This project is administered by the City’s Homelessness and Urban Camping Impact Reduction Program. The project funds additional ADA-accessible hygiene stations community-wide, and will establish a new central laundry service, staffed through a low-barrier jobs program, to provide wash/dry/fold service for community partners serving unhoused Portlanders. This facility will also be able to save textiles that would otherwise be sent to landfills, instead laundering them for continued use. Clean laundry is a critical public health resource – laundry ranks as a very high need for unhoused people, and clean laundry helps reduce the transmission of bacteria and ectoparasites. Output and Outcome Measures: •o Number of new accessible hygiene stations placed •Qualitative outcome survey of those that have used the stations	570000	238673.26	182504.93								No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity		No	570000
TPN-002320	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Nonprofit Organization Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	At the time of this project's inception, while national trends in charitable giving showed overall growth, not all nonprofit organizations saw increased donations following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Small nonprofits struggled to continue to meet an overwhelmingly high demand for services while seeing a decrease in donations from businesses and foundations. They were faced with the prospect of reducing work hours, laying off staff, and closing facilities. To assist these small organizations, grants were provided to offset documented impacts to ensure a continuation in services. The Board of County Commissioners approved $900,000 for grants to nonprofit organizations including administrative costs.	900000	900000	849204								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002321	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	United Way of Thurston County Grant Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	United Way of Thurston County needed administrative support to distribute Recovery Funds. The Board of County Commissioners approved $32,274 for United Way Administrative Expenses.	32274	32274	21294								No			25 Dis Imp NPs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-002322	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Economic Impact Grants to Support Youth Service Nonprofits	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, organizations that provide services to youth and their families saw a dramatic decrease in the number of children they were able to serve. One example:  at the Boys & Girls Club, pre-pandemic services were provided to an average of 626 children a day. Average daily attendance dropped to 153. Due to capacity restrictions, they were then able to serve 200 children. To support nonprofits that provide youth services such as, but not limited to, before and after school programming, summer programming, youth sports, homework assistance, academic support, and volunteer youth mentors the Board of County Commissioners authorized United Way to provide pass-through grants of $270,868 to the Boys & Girls Clubs of Thurston County and $200,000 to the YMCA.	470868	470868	470868								No			25 Dis Imp NPs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-002323	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Economic Impact Grants to Shelter and Other Basic Needs Nonprofits	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	United Way of Thurston County administered an Economic Impact Grant to support the Family Support Center, which provides services such as, but not limited to, shelter operations and hotel room nights for families and children experiencing homelessness. The Board of County Commissioners authorized United Way of Thurston County to provide a pass-through grant of $194,624 to the Family Support Center.	194624	194624	194624								No			25 Dis Imp NPs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-002324	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Economic Impact Grants to Food Security and Senior Service Nonprofits	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Food insecurity is defined as the lack of access to sufficient food because of limited financial resources. According to the 2023 report Map the Meal Gap by Feeding America, the food insecurity rate in Thurston County was 8.5 percent in 2021 (most recent data available), with an estimated 25,000 people in the county experiencing food insecurity. This number is expected to rise, due to inflation driven by the COVID-19 pandemic supply chain issues and worker shortages.  The Board of County Commissioners authorized United Way of Thurston County to provide pass-through grants to select nonprofits which provide food bank services and senior nutrition:   • $75,750 to Catholic Community Services  • $69,400 to Rochester Organization of Families (ROOF) • $149,358 to Senior Services for South Sound  • $507,726 to the Thurston County Food Bank	802234	802234	802234								No			25 Dis Imp NPs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-002325	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Tourism, Recreation, and Entertainment Recovery	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Repeated restrictions in 2020 and 2021 had the most severe impact on this area of the economy, and small businesses make up over half of this sector. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, a McKinsey & Company study reported that in the arts, recreation, and entertainment sector, it could take until 2025 or longer for businesses to recover to pre-COVID-19 levels of revenue.  In May 2023, State of Washington Tourism (SWT) noted Washington’s recovery in visitor spending and tax generation rank among the five worst performing states in the nation, year-to-date through March 2023, according to Tourism Economics preliminary figures. This sector continues to recover, with Washington State visitor spending in 2022 amounting to 86.3 percent of 2019 pre-pandemic levels, and state visitors still just 93 percent of 2019 levels.  Initially, a targeted investment of $100,000 was made by the Board of County Commissioners to raise awareness and stimulate the return to entertainment venues and tourism activity through promotion, marketing, and events.  The Board of County Commissioners approved a total of $302,500 for the tourism, recreation, and entertainment industry, including grants to select impacted nonprofits:  • $100,000 to The Washington Center for the Performing Arts • $100,000 to Harlequin Productions • $2,500 to Tenino Young-at-Heart Theatre	302500	302500	300000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors	25 Dis Imp NPs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-002326	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Thurston Agricultural Market Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	At the inception of this project, the 2017 Census of Agriculture (most recent quinquennial report available) showed agriculture was a $176 million industry in Thurston County. A state-wide COVID-19 farm impacts study conducted by the University of Washington showed that 65 percent of farms dealt with increased costs, 41 percent experienced revenue declines of more than 10 percent, and 33 percent were looking for ways to facilitate new distribution channels, as they experienced a disruption of their distribution systems and a closure of direct marketing outlets. Of the small farms with revenue of less than $250,000, 16 percent were denied aid. To support the farms and farmers of our county, Commissioners approved $963,295 for grants, and an additional $106,429 to purchase food (including administrative costs) which was provided to those in need and to expand the market for coop growers.	1069724	1069724	696092								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	1 Imp General Public		Yes	0
TPN-002327	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Thurston County Agriculture Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	The Thurston County Agriculture Support project, also known as the Agricultural Labor project, is a workforce recovery effort focused on recruiting and developing talent, subsidizing worker wages for employers, expanding knowledge of agriculture-related career pathways in Thurston County, and supporting Thurston County’s long-term recovery by investing in and developing talent for the sector.  In addition to the impacts stated in 2.36.A, 49 percent of farms report being unable to pay competitive wages, 41 percent are having difficulty finding workers, and 17 percent are reducing employees or work hours. Recent employment reports show agriculture-related industries employ 1.7 percent of the labor in Thurston County.  Agricultural employers directly engaged in crop production, livestock production, shellfish, and animal slaughter and processing are eligible to apply to participate in the project, provided they are located in Thurston County and were established prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Board of County Commissioners has approved $500,000 for this project.	1000000	500000	13509								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002328	RCP-036179	Boulder County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	7.1.1 OFM ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT ARPA	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Funding for temporary staff to assist in administration and management of ARPA and various grant funding received between 2021 and 2024. Duties include facilitating requests for funding, eligibility evaluation, financial compliance, accounting, reporting, account reconciling, audit preparation, and other related duties. Staff resources are also needed for communications, briefings, presentations, training, and other reporting and procedure development. This request includes FT Program Manager, FT Grant Accountant, PT Clerical Support, PT Eligibility Analyst, and Communications Specialist coordinating across BoCo units.	2580745.2	2580745.2	1242479.16
TPN-002329	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Decrease the Court Backlog	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	In response to a series of mandates to curtail exposure and stop the spread of COVID-19, Superior, District, and Juvenile Courts in Thurston County stopped hearing all but the most urgent of court cases. They reopened slowly over time. To the extent possible cases were converted to video court procedures. When in-person court appearances were again permitted, the courts were required to allow for appropriate physical distancing for staff, jurors, attorneys, defendants, and observers. Given the size and configuration of the County’s courtrooms, this restricted the number of cases and trials that could be heard. Today the courts are still not at the same operational level as prior to the pandemic. The result is a significant backlog of court cases. The County has leased space for two additional courtrooms. In addition to the additional space, time and effort of existing and new employees and associated costs will be charged to the Recovery Fund to clear backlogged criminal and civil cases. The Board of County Commissioners has approved $5.51 million for this project.	5510000	2282757	2070626								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002330	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Add Funding for Diversion Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	This project will allow the Thurston County Prosecutor’s Office to pay for diversion services for cases where the Treatment Sales Tax (TST) cannot fund the diversion. Having this option available is part of our strategy to address court backlog cases. The initial plan is to use this money to contract with a community diversion provider to provide these services. The Board of County Commissioners has initially approved $200,000 for this project.	200000	0	0								No
TPN-002331	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Funding for Purchase of Jail Transport Vehicle	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	This project is to purchase a Jail Transport Vehicle (a van) fully dedicated for transport of inmates to and from Chandler Court. Chandler Court is an alternative courtroom needed for COVID-19 distancing measures and prevention, mitigating the spread of COVID-19. The Board of County Commissioners has approved $90,000 for this project.	90000	0	0								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	90000
TPN-002333	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Affordable Housing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	The 2023 Thurston County point in time homeless count found 792 people individuals experiencing homelessness. The point in time count was conducted on January 26, 2023. On the night of Thursday January 26, 50 people were staying in transitional housing, and 274 people in emergency shelter. More than half of people counted were experiencing unsheltered homelessness. 425 people were staying in sanctioned or unsanctioned encampments, RVs or other vehicles, small structures, doorways, and/or were in other places not meant for human habitation. Thurston County’s numbers for 2023 are down from 2021, when 1,145 people were counted as experiencing homelessness. Affordable housing units are scarce in Thurston County, as are housing assistance vouchers; the wait time for HUD vouchers, even with the Emergency Housing Voucher Program, can be up to two years. Lack of available permanent housing has caused an increase in the number of days participants stay in programs. There is increased demand for traditional response to the lack of affordable housing and for non-traditional approaches such as safe parking, scattered site support, and tiny homes.  Homelessness disproportionately affects the Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) community. Black residents make up four percent of the Thurston County population, however, ten percent of the homeless population in Thurston County identify as Black or African American. American Indian or Alaska Natives comprise a little under two percent of the County population, but four percent of people experiencing homelessness. Thurston County and the cities have formed the Regional Housing Council; participating jurisdictions are considering the use of Recovery Fund money to assist in addressing the housing challenge. Some strategies under consideration include the development and operations of tiny home sites, and the construction of new housing units. The Board of County Commissioners has approved $4,325,547 for this project.	4925547	825547	825547								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	6500000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-002334	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Replace Tamoshan Sewer Main	5-Infrastructure	5.3-Clean Water: Decentralized wastewater	The Tamoshan/Beverly Beach sewer system provides services to nearly 120 properties, was constructed in 1972 and is now 50 years in age. The system is comprised of County owned and operated pipes which are rapidly approaching their end of useful service lives. During large storm events, high rates of inflow and infiltration (I&I) into the sewer system increase  the amount of flow into the treatment plant. This large amount of I&I results in changes to how the plant is operated during these events, requires additional treatment to compensate for the increased flows, and can result in permit violations and higher operational costs. This project would make improvements to the Tamoshan sewer system to reduce I&I and replace aged infrastructure. The County is considering funding a portion of the project with Recovery Fund money, and any remaining costs would be paid with utility revenue and County tax funds. The Board of County Commissioners has approved $1.53 million for this project. Required programmatic data questions apply to this program, and will be updated in future versions of this report, once the project is underway: Projected/actual construction start date:  September 1, 2024  Projected/actual initiation of operations date:  December 31, 2026   Location Type:  Address Location Details:  Tamoshan Sewer Service Area. Residential Subdivision off Cooper Point Rd. with 94 utility connections.  Majority of the utility replacement work would be performed within County right of way, with potential for some work on private property to meet the project goals.   Public Water System (PWS) ID Number:  N/A  National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number:  WA0037290  Median Household Income of service area:  $73,940  Lowest Quintile Income of the service area:  $33,066	1530000	181027	82388
TPN-002335	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	CLEANING/DISINFECTING SUPPLIES	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	This project reserves funds for cleaning and disinfecting supplies.	1474.78	1474.78	1474.78								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002336	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Replace Boston Harbor Sewer Main	5-Infrastructure	5.3-Clean Water: Decentralized wastewater	The Boston Harbor sewer system provides services to nearly 280 properties, which includes Burfoot Park (over 100,000 visitors annually), Boston Harbor Marina/Public Restroom, and Boston Harbor Elementary School (2022 enrollment is 179). The system was constructed in the 1980s and is now approaching 40 years in age. The system is comprised of County owned and operated septic tank effluent pumping (STEP) system. During large storm events, high rates of inflow and infiltration (I&I) into the sewer system increase the amount of flow into the treatment plant. This large amount of I&I results in changes to how the plant is operated during these events, requires additional treatment to compensate for the increased flows, and can result in permit violations and higher operational costs. The project would make improvements to reduce I&I into the County's sewer system. The County is considering funding a portion of the project with Recovery Fund money, and any remaining costs would be paid with utility revenue and County tax funds. The Board of County Commissioners has approved $1,750,000 for this project.  Required programmatic data questions apply to this program, and will be updated in future versions of this report, once the project is underway. Projected/actual construction start date:  September 1, 2024 Projected/actual initiation of operations date:  December 31, 2026 Location Type:  Address Location Details:  Boston Harbor Sewer Service Area. Residential community in north Thurston County with 278 utility connections. Majority of the utility replacement work would be performed on public sewer infrastructure located on private property to meet the project goals.   Public Water System (PWS) ID Number:  N/A  National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number:  WA0040291  Median Household Income of service area:  $73,940  Lowest Quintile Income of the service area:  $33,066	1750000	243375	33541
TPN-002337	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Replace Tamoshan Water Main	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The Tamoshan/Beverly Beach water system provides services to nearly 120 properties, was constructed in 1972 and is now 50 years in age. The system is comprised of County owned and operated pipes which are rapidly approaching their end of useful service lives. The water system is made up of a combination of PVC and suspected asbestos cement (AC) pipe. As the water distribution system continues to age, the number of leaks has been steadily increasing, pipe failures are expected to increase, replacement costs are expected to increase, and there becomes an increased risk of potential health issues for consumers. The project would replace water mains to reduce leakage and improve long-term serviceability of the water system. The County is considering funding a portion of the project with Recovery Fund money, and any remaining costs would be paid with utility revenue and County tax funds. The Board of County Commissioners has approved $1.25 million for this project.  Required programmatic data questions apply to this program, and will be updated in future versions of this report, once the project is underway: Projected/actual construction start date:  September 1, 2024  Projected/actual initiation of operations date:  December 31, 2026  Location Type:  Address Location Details:  Tamoshan Water Service Area. Residential Subdivision off Cooper Point Rd with 94 utility connections. Majority of the utility replacement work would be performed within County right of way, with potential for some work on private property to meet the project goals. Public Water System (PWS) ID Number:  87140V  National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number:  N/A  Median Household Income of service area:  $73,940  Lowest Quintile Income of the service area:  $33,066	1250000	194780	34187
TPN-002338	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Replace Boston Harbor Water Main	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The Boston Harbor water system provides services to 280 properties, which includes Burfoot Park (over 100,000 visitors annually), Boston Harbor Marina/Public Restroom, and Boston Harbor Elementary School (2022 enrollment is 179). The system was constructed in the 1980s is are now approaching 40 years in age. The system is comprised of County owned and operated pipes which are rapidly approaching their end of useful service lives. The water system is made up of a combination of PVC and suspected asbestos cement pipe (AC). As the water distribution system continues to age, the number of leaks has been steadily increasing, pipe failures are expected to increase, replacement costs are expected to increase, and there becomes an increased risk of potential health issues for consumers. The County is considering funding a portion of the project with Recovery Fund money, and the remaining costs would be paid with utility revenue and County tax funds. The Board of County Commissioners has initially approved $1,750,000 for this project.  Required programmatic data questions apply to this program, and will be updated in future versions of this report, once the project is underway: Projected/actual construction start date:  September 1, 2024   Projected/actual initiation of operations date:  December 31, 2026  Location Type:  Address Location Details:  Boston Harbor Water Service Area. Residential community in north Thurston County with 278 utility connections. Majority of the utility replacement work would be performed within County right of way, with potential for some work on private property to meet the project goals.  Public Water System (PWS) ID Number:  07840H  National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number:  N/A  Median Household Income of service area:  $73,940  Lowest Quintile Income of the service area:  $33,066	1750000	167691	34719
TPN-002339	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Expanding Broadband to Rural Thurston County	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	The Nisqually Indian Tribe is proposing to carry out a multi-faceted Broadband Initiative to end the digital inequality that exists in areas of Thurston County. The project would deliver high speed internet services to residents, businesses, and facilities in Thurston County that currently are unserved or underserved by internet services. The Tribe is working  to construct a Fiber Optic Infrastructure - Open Access Network, or OAN. This type of network is gaining popularity throughout the country as a model that can increase competition and internet access while reducing the cost to the end user. At this point, this Recovery Fund project is to fund the Tribe’s broadband coverage survey to identify unserved and underserved areas in Thurston County, pre-engineering, and engineering routes. The Board of County Commissioners has approved $2,065,000 for this project. All numerical, text, and date values for Additional Questions for this project should be TBA, as this project has not yet started.	4000000	2065000	502079
TPN-002340	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Lost Revenue Replacement for Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To date, the County has used the Revenue Replacement Funds for Public Safety, including the Sheriff's Office and Corrections Facilities; Employee Retention Bonuses; the Tenino Agricultural Park; and Sheriff’s Office Retention Bonuses. The Board of County Commissioners has approved $10 million for Revenue Replacement: • $7,000,000 for Lost Revenue Replacement for Government Services • $1,536,500 for Employee Retention Bonuses • $821,500 for the Voter Registration Center • $500,000 for the Tenino Agricultural Park • $142,000 for Sheriff’s Office Retention Bonuses	10000000	10000000	4984286
TPN-002341	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Administrative Expenses - Thurston County	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Providing administrative support, including fiscal support, grant management, survey development, contract development, contract management, invoice payment, quarterly and annual reporting, program management, subrecipient monitoring, and audit support associated with the American Rescue Plan Act State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF) grant programs. The Board of County Commissioners has approved $1,122,198 for Administrative Expenses.	1819573	490149	490149
TPN-002342	RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Evaluation and Data Analysis	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Key projects will be subject to a Program Evaluation. The Thurston Economic Development Council is performing a multi-year program evaluation study to determine the program outcomes of 11 State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF) funded programs. The analysis is occurring in three phases including:  the initial programmatic stimulus impact evaluation, the evaluation of individual outcomes for those served in programs, and the estimation of impact through public sector intervention over the long-term. Details of this project and project methodology is provided in the Use of Evidence section of the Recovery Plan Performance Report. The Board of County Commissioners approved $619,674 for the Evaluation and Data Analysis project.	619674	619674	242114								No
TPN-002344	RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	BUDGETING AND FORECASTING	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will assist the Finance Department with assessing the impact of financial decisions on the long-term fiscal health of Jefferson County, and also assist with determining if new or existing programs align with the County's strategic goals.	148873	114161.48	114161.48
TPN-002348	RCP-039765	Loudoun County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Hotel Relief Grant Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	This project provides funding to the Economic Development Authority of Loudoun County to provide grants to eligible applicants of $1,000 per room up to $250,000 for general operating expenses such as rent, payroll, job training, and COVID-19 related costs such as PPE sanitation services, or equipment.  Eligible applicants must show a reduction of at least 25% of revenue due to the pandemic from March 1, 2020, must be open to the public as of August 1, 2021, must have been in operations prior to March 1, 2020, must be licensed and operating in Loudoun County, and must be a provider of accommodations as defined by Virginia code 58.1-3819 and subject to Loudoun Transient Occupancy Tax to be eligible.  Applications were reviewed by an internal review team to determine eligibility.  Any unawarded funds will be used towards the Business Recovery and Reinvention Program.	4060000	4060000	4060000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002349	RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Housing Stabilization Contingency	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	The COVID-19 pandemic and its public health and economic impacts have led to housing instability across the spectrum: homeowners have been foreclosed on; renters have been evicted; and many thousands of people have fallen into houselessness. This set-aside has allowed the City of Portland to use these funds where they are most needed in support of community stability. During Fiscal Year 2021-22, Portland City Council allocated a portion of the set-aside to two new projects supporting (1) homeless shelter operations and (2) ground-floor retail in an affordable housing development.	0	0	0								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			No	0
TPN-002353	RCP-039765	Loudoun County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Business Recovery & Reinvention Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	This project provides funding to the EDA to provide grants of up to $50,000 to eligible applicants to help companies make changes to their business models, adopt new technologies or practices, or otherwise reinvent their business to cope with the economic and/or public health impacts of the pandemic.  Eligible applicants must be appropriately licensed, for-profit businesses in Loudoun County, must have been in operation prior to March 1, 2020, must commit to maintain the funded project within Loudoun County for a minimum of 2 years post award, must have between 0 and 250 employees, and must have had annual pre-COVID revenue of between $50,000 and $8,000,000.  All applicants must demonstrate the impacts of COVID-19 on their business and how the requested funding is in response to that impact as part of the application process.  All applications will undergo an administrative review for eligibility requirements by an internal team made up of County staff and staff from incorporated towns in Loudoun.  Eligible applications will then go through certification review to be scored based on highest impact to the business and county with funds dispersed until depleted.	4980000	4978729.65	4978729.65								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	24 Dis Imp Other SBs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify		No	0
TPN-002367	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Extended Driver's Licenses Hours	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Under the current Covid 19 pandemic proclamation, the Governor of the State of Hawaii emergency orders temporarily waived the deadlines on driver’s licenses expirations. In the preparation for the expiration to be reinstated, early indication showed a large backlog of people who had expired licenses due to the emergency proclamation. Kauai County allowed those with expired licenses to come in during extended hours to get that done.  The assigned funds went to payroll for the extended hours of the office staff to accommodate the needs of the public.	6681	6680.58	6680.58			*					No
TPN-002369	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Retrain Tulsa	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Retrain Tulsa empowers job seekers and businesses affected by COVID-19 by upskilling individuals for new careers through personalized coaching, training, workshops, and certifications offered in-person and through web-based services.	1637500	1637500	1213750								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment			No	0
TPN-002370	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Tulsa Regional Tourism - Travel Detective	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Tulsa Regional Chamber's Visit Tulsa department received $75,000 to fund a project with Peter Greenberg, host of Peter Greenberg Travel Detective and Hidden Gems, a syndicated travel program. Greenberg's publications drive marketing and tourism interest, shown through web traffic.	75000	75000	75000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002371	RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	FY22 Yukon River Salmon Food Security Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	Address the state's most critical food security needs that are not covered by other available funding sources. This will include but not be limited to ensuring adequate food supply in areas disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 food supply chain disruptions due to other food supply concerns such as poor subsistence fish runs.	175628.73	175628.73	175628.73	3284							No			15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity		No	0
TPN-002372	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	TCPFA Currency Recyclers	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Currency and coin recyclers and sorters for use at Tulsa County Public Facilities in order to mitigate congregation where social distancing is not feasible.	200000	200000	200000								No		200000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002374	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Adolescent Drug Treatment Support	1-Public Health	1.13-Substance Use Services	The project will be to provide cleaning and disinfecting services  and repairs to restore the Adolescent Treatment and Healing  Center to prepare it for the original intent of the center.  After the ATHC is no longer being used for a Covid-19 Isolation  Facility and prior to it being released back to it’s original purpose  as a Treatment and Healing Center for youth, the buildings and  furniture needs to be cleaned and disinfected according to the  protocols set forth by the CDC. Cleanup procedures will include  cleaning and disinfecting of Kitchen and dining room,  Bathrooms, Offices/Conference Rooms, Reception Areas,  Schools/Classrooms/Study Areas, Water Fountains,  Shelving/Racks, Desks/Counters, Tables and Chairs, Carpets and  Rugs, Stair Handrails, Youth Bedrooms and Play areas,  Equipment, Tools, Doorknobs, Light Switches, Bathroom Fixtures,  Phones, Televisions, Keyboards and Computer Monitors, Laptops,  Tablets, etc.  The building also needs some minor repairs from damages  sustained by wear and tear of occupants, and outside elements.	200000	0	0								No
TPN-002375	RCP-036116	St. Johns County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	St. Johns County Vaccination Response	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	The vaccination center operated 7 days per week between March 3, 2021 and May 24, 2021 from 7am to 7pm.  Vaccination Center staff duties included but not limited to administering the COVID 19 vaccine, scheduling appointments, data entry and cleaning.  These operations were outside the scope of County and Sheriff Employees’ duties.  The vaccine site was placed in a centrally located area that was accessible to the underserved community and ADA compliant.  Over 1,000 vaccinations were given daily at no charge.	1650000	1625001	1625001								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002377	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Emergency Operations Center Ongoing Response	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Project was created to fund Covid 19 response efforts out of the Kauai Emergency Management Agency.  This County of Kauai department had taken the lead in the response efforts since activation back in 2019 at the onset of the pandemic.  Use of funds can be applied to direct Covid response efforts (PPE, testing supplies, logistical efforts, etc.).  As well as administrative and logistical needs at the Kauai Emergency Operations Center (EOC), Covid testing centers, and various location on the Island of Kauai.	1493319	1392542.67	1392542.67								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002378	RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Victim Services Grants	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	This funding supports grants to community partners providing domestic violence and sexual assault Victim/Enhanced Services. Victim/Enhanced Services are critical emergency and safety programs that intervene in life-or-death situations. These grants are administered by the Alaska Council for Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault.	8000000	7984041.31	7899656.77								No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate
TPN-002379	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Domestic Violence Prevention Grants	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	The Covid 19 pandemic caused a major shift in family situations at home are cared for.  An unfortunate result of the numerous Covid restriction, specifically the stay at home orders that were put in place at the onset of the pandemic, resulted in a unfortunate spike in domestic violence in homes of the lower income bracket of the population.  Government officials were asked and in many case begged to increase the efforts to combat this problem.  Kauai was not immune to this issue, so we designated funds to distribute as Non Profit grants for domestic violence prevention programs.  Providing help in understanding, recognition, treatment, and prevention.	121033	121033	96826.4								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002380	RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Tourism and Other Businesses COVID Relief	1-Public Health	1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses	Funds toward a tourism and other impacted businesses relief grant program. This program was established to ensure small businesses impacted by revenue loss during the pandemic could remain viable.	90000000	90000000	79393000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002381	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	TCPFA Ventilation	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Improve air handling/circulation ventilation units for large congregate areas in the Ford Truck Barn	1200000	1200000	1200000								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	1200000	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors			No	0
TPN-002382	RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Non-Profits COVID Relief	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Funds for nonprofits in response to the public health emergency and its negative economic impacts.	20000000	20000000	20000000								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002383	RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Grants to Electric Utilities for Delinquent Accounts	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Payments to electric utilities to address delinquent household accounts resulting from the negative economic impacts of COVID-19. The negative economic impacts of COVID-19 resulted in unpaid utility bills that remain in arrears. To address this negative economic impact and ensure services continue to Alaska households, funding was provided to Electric Utility companies to cover the accounts still in arrears.	7000000	3360314.19	3360314.19	3874							No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002385	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	TCPFA Restroom Trailers	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Purchase of five restroom trailer units to provide improved sanitation due to high demand and usage	324597	324597	324597								No		324597	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors			No	0
TPN-002386	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Tulsa Health Department - COVID Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	COVID 19 testing materials and supplies for the uninsured population	500000	500000	350095								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002387	RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Local Governments COVID Relief	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Funds for local governments with significant revenue loss. The local governments will expend the funds for the provision of government services.	50000000	50000000	50000000								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002388	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	OSU Medical Center	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Multistory parking facility to support the new Tulsa VA and Mental Health hospitals	4000000	4000000	2000000								Yes	Behavioral health facilities and equipment	4000000	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs		No	0
TPN-002389	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	BA Senior Citizens Center	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Broken Arrow Senior Center received $4,500 for air ventilation machines to support clean air within the facility.	4500	4500	4500								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002390	RCP-036116	St. Johns County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Public Safety Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium Pay for Public Safety Employees	5480502	5383718	5383718		915
TPN-002392	RCP-035910	Yavapai County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Seligman Sanitary Sewer Project	5-Infrastructure	5.3-Clean Water: Decentralized wastewater	This project has been reduced to the designing the scope of the upgrades to Seligman Sanitary Sewer.  The project has been delayed due to permitting from the railroads.		5873.5	5873.5
TPN-002394	RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Replace Lost FY21 Community Commercial Vessel Shared Taxes	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	This funding is to make up for the loss of the Commercial Vessel Passenger (CPV) tax revenue shared with port of call communities for fiscal year 2021 (FY21). The appropriation language is written so that the amount shared with local governments for each of these years is the same as what was shared for calendar year 2019. The FY21 tax collections are based on collections in calendar year 2020.  Since there were no major cruise ship sailings in Alaska in 2020, there were no tax monies collected.	21230720	21230720	21230720								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002395	RCP-035910	Yavapai County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Purchase Morgue Trailer	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	16 foot refrigerated morgue/cadaver trailer include installation of  racks and lifts.		50998.8	50998.8								Yes	Medical equipment and facilities	65000	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002396	RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Replace Lost Community Fisheries Business Shared Taxes	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	This funding is to make up for the loss in FY21 of the Fisheries Business tax revenue shared with communities where fishery resources were processed. The appropriation language is written so that the amount shared with local governments is the same as what was shared for fiscal year 2019, less any tax revenues collected.	4944504.62	4944504.62	4944504.62								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002399	RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Replace Operating Budget General Funds to Offset Revenue Loss	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The government services supported by these appropriations include but are not limited to public advocacy, public defenders, Corrections, Troopers, the Alaska Court System, Alaska Pioneer Homes Payment Assistance, Juvenile Justice, the Senior Benefits Payment Program, and various food security enhancement efforts.	750839688.18	748990935.57	747288391.95
TPN-002401	RCP-036162	State Of Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Deposit to the State Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.28-Contributions to UI Trust Funds	Deposit to unemployment insurance trust fund to replenish state reserves to pre-pandemic level.	257947710.44	257947710.44	257947710.44								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-002402	RCP-036162	State Of Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Frontline Hospital Worker Retention Plan	4-Premium Pay	4.2-Private Sector: Grants to other employers	The Frontline Hospital Worker Retention Plan provided eligible hospitals with financial tools to reward and retain essential frontline healthcare workers to address ongoing COVID-19 public health needs and ensure retention of critical staffing resources.  Amount of funding available to allocate is $50 Million.   Approved funding allocation will be an advanced payment following receipt of a fully executed subrecipient agreement based on the formula of imputed percentage of total nursing resources multiplied by $49.5 million (remaining $500k set aside for administrative purposes).   Period of Performance established by the SPARK Committee: 9/1/2021-2/28/2022	48770005.53	48770005.53	48770005.53		10000
TPN-002403	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Family Safety Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	To provide capital funding for public health mitigation measures, ventilation, and physical barrier construction in a congregate setting of a public facility.	2000000	2000000	1000000								Yes	Behavioral health facilities and equipment	2000000	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-002405	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	River Parks - Turkey Mountain	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Improvements and maintenance of the Turkey Mountain trails due to use during the pandemic.	1000000	1000000	0								No
TPN-002407	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	OKPOP	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	OKPOP's 60,000 square foot facility will serve as a marquee addition to the growing collection of Tulsa's downtown tourist attractions. OKPOP has raised nearly 60% of the total goal from public and private funds. As this "shovel-ready" project enters the home-stretch, continued timely investment from public and private sources will allow OKPOP to open to the public by early 2023. COVID-19 has greatly impacted our construction timeline and ability to raise the necessary funds to complete the project. ARPA funding would allow OKPOP to open the doors sooner and begin bringing in new tax revenue and supporting surrounding businesses and attractions.	2000000	2000000	2000000								No		2000000	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002409	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Tulsa Area United Way	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	To address food insecurity by funding the administrative costs to develop a collaborative Master Food Plan and to fund a Food Insecurity Innovation Grant Program	261250	261250	261250								No
TPN-002412	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	KBH Vaccinations / Potter's House Vaccinations	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Expenses related to drive-through vaccination site operations at The Potter's House parking lot operated by contracted vendor American Medical Response. Contractor shall provide the administration of COVID-19 vaccination services for residents, employees, and others as directed by the City, in accordance with all Health Care laws, in the City and County of Dallas. Contractor shall provide call center and email response services on behalf of the City to support COVID-related vaccination questions. Contractor shall be responsible for all staffing and equipment costs associated with operating the Call Center. Dallas Police Department staff to provide site security and traffic control services.	993371	993370.64	993370.64								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-002417	RCP-039595	San Marcos City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Business Sustainability Program (BSP) Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The Business Sustainability Program was developed to provide loans to local businesses to help offset financial hardships caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The ARPA funded Business Sustainability Program Grants allows the outstanding loan balances for these struggling small businesses to be converted to grants. The Business Sustainability Program Grants provide direct financial assistance to small businesses that has allowed them to minimize debt incurred as a result of the pandemic, continue operating and sustain employment opportunities within the community.	1099547	1099547	1099547								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002418	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Mental Health (CMH, BIPOC, AAPI)	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	• This project will fund subrecipients to administer community mental health programming for residents of the city of Dallas in four categories: (1) access to mental health services, (2) education, outreach, and lay person training, (3) grief and stress support, (4) seniors isolation support. Services will target low- and moderate-income communities, historically underserved communities, Qualifying Census Tracts (QCTs), communities of color, and/or populations outlined in the Mayors Task Force on Poverty, as well as clients eligible outlined as targets	2400000	0	0								No
TPN-002419	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Mental Health (Grief, Stress, & PTSD)	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	• This project will fund subrecipients to administer community mental health programming for residents of the city of Dallas in four categories: (1) access to mental health services, (2) education, outreach, and lay person training, (3) grief and stress support, (4) seniors isolation support. Services will target low- and moderate-income communities, historically underserved communities, Qualifying Census Tracts (QCTs), communities of color, and/or populations outlined in the Mayors Task Force on Poverty, as well as clients eligible outlined as targeted areas	1200000	0	0								No
TPN-002420	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Mobile Vaccinations	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Continency for COVID-19 testing and vaccination site expenses operated by Parkland Hospital in accordance with Dallas County contract. The City agrees to reimburse Dallas County 50% of any contract expenses not reimbursed through the FEMA Public Assistance grant program. Depending on the determination by the FEMA Public Assistance grant program to reimburse Dallas County’s submission for eligible expenses, the city will utilize the allocated funds contained in this unit to pay for 50% of the expenses with Dallas County.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002421	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Fair Park Vaccinations	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Fair Park vaccination site operated by Dallas County to serve the greater Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex with Dallas Fire Rescue, Dallas Police Department, and Office of Emergency Management support. DPD staff to provide site security and traffic control services. DFR EMS teams stationed on site to offer immediate aid in the event of patient adverse reactions to the vaccine. OEM staff to provide administrative support to Dallas County operations as needed.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002423	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Home Visiting Programs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.12-Healthy Childhood Environments: Home Visiting	• This project is a collaboration between the City of Dallas - OCC, Dallas County, and Parkland Hospital. Through an Interlocal Agreement (ILA), Parkland will provide a universal home visiting program modeled after Family Connects, which is a population-level approach that coordinates care and aligns resources with a simple, evidenced-based strategy: a postpartum, nurse home-visit available to every family with newborns ages 2 to 12 weeks (and provides up to 3 home visits). Nurse home visits are offered to all families in a community to assess family health and well-being at about three weeks postpartum. This program will primarily serve low- and moderate-income families, as well as families eligible outlined as targeted areas	2000000	2000000	0								No
TPN-002424	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Contingency	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	Assist the area Public Libraires with shelves and fixing up structured areas need to assist with homelessness that comes to library.	414002	414001.79	414001.79								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002425	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Mobile Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	The mobile COVID-19 testing program was made available to the public to fill a necessary void in the established drive-through testing model. Many Dallas residents lack a personal vehicle, financial or physical means to self-transport to a dedicated drive-through location. The elderly, homebound, and those with underlying medical conditions or comorbidities were also identified as particularly vulnerable to the virus. Mobile testing ensures these high-risk populations are afforded the same consideration and opportunity given to otherwise healthy individuals outside those demographics. Contracted vendor MCI Diagnostic Center manages patient registration, test administration, laboratory services, and notification of test results directly to patients.	525076.46	4250	4250								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002426	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Personal Protective Equipment and Disinfections	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other	Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and Disinfection will be divided into two service delivery mechanisms to support ARPA efforts on behalf of the City of Dallas through the Office of Procurement Services. As we move through the second year of the pandemic with several variants being identified, it will be our responsibility to create a safe environment for our employees and the residents of the City of Dallas through securing PPE and disinfection services. PPE and disinfection will also support efforts to decrease the spread of Covid 19. Personal Protective Equipment in the form of masks, gloves, shoe covers, gowns, goggles, other garments, and non-professional cleaning supplies will be sourced, purchased, and secured by the ARPA Senior Buyer (SB). The PPE will be utilized for job-related occupational safety and health purposes to decrease opportunities for contamination and to support and protect internal and external customers.  Disinfection services will be contracted out to an external supplier.  The Senior Contract Compliance Administrator (SCCA) will work with City departments to receive decontamination requests, send requests to the supplier dispatch unit, track requests, track expenditures, pay invoices and report expenditures as requested by the funding agency.  The SB and the SCCA will work closely together to ensure that procurements are appropriately tracked and reported.  They will also ensure that each request is fulfilled to support safety and preventative health measures, while following local, state and federal guidance.	5000000	1866099.46	1703078.38								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	40359.76	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-002427	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Facility Retrofits	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	In an effort to improve the resiliency of City Facilities, the Building Services Department(BSD) identified facility improvement projects to mitigate and prevent COVID-19 transmission. The retrofit program, established in FY2020-21, identified over $45 million dollars in building improvements to mitigate and prevent COVID-19 transmission. The identified projects include upgrades to ventilation systems and hands-free alternatives for doors, water fountains, restrooms, and sanitizer dispensers. The program goal is to complete all projects in high-traffic public-facing buildings and high-risk public safety facilities within three years and then to complete projects in the other facilities, dependent on available funding and time. With the allocation of $20.5 M in American Rescue Plan Act funds for the retrofit projects, BSD estimates completion of the high traffic public facing buildings and high-risk public safety facilities within the next 1-2 years. BSD will continue to provide retrofit projects to other city facilities with a priority placed on improved ventilation systems. Ventilation systems are a priority due to their impact on air quality and ability to properly sanitize large areas. Aging, inefficient coils and compressors, lack of small particle filtration, and controls system issues impact air quality. Upgrading the coils and compressors allows for proper conditioning of the air and humidity control. Installation of HEPA air filtration improves air quality and reduces harmful particles, like COVID-19, throughout a facility. Modernizing the controls allows for remote access, early warning, and detection of air quality and ventilation issues.	21000000	15077338.84	10942299.1					Yes	Yes		Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	11342163.07	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		Yes	3068687.13
TPN-002428	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health PPE	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	This project is to account for personal protective equipment. It includes the purchase of masks, gloves, and supplies for safeguarding measures. The need for PPE has arisen based on the impact of the public health emergency. Some supplies are on-hand, but additional supplies are anticipated. The county investment specifically addresses the need by providing PPE; the investment helps the county respond to the disease by improving safeguarding measures.	199.9	199.9	199.9								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002429	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health, Medical Expenses	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	This project is to account for uses of ARP fiscal recovery funds for reimbursement of COVID-19 medical expenses within the county self-funded insurance fund, representing public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic; these uses are part of the public health response because maintaining the health of county workers is imperative to being able to provide an effective local response to the pandemic; this is the specific need that has arisen from the pandemic; the county investment specifically addresses this need arising from the pandemic by supporting the county health benefit plan to address COVID-19 health related needs of county workers and will allow the county health benefit plan to address future needs associated with long-term effects of the disease, including continuing care for employees who have had COVID-19 or for employees who become infected in the future.	206838.33	206838.33	206838.33								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002430	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health, Vaccination Clinic and Related Expenses	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	This project is to support leasing additional space (and related adaptations) for the Board of Health. It is a type of COVID-19 response, mitigation, and prevention activity: The Health Commissioner certified the new space (and adapting and implementing the new space) with a lease amendment was a type of COVID-19 response, mitigation, and prevention activity. A broad range of services are needed to contain COVID-19, including the conduct of vaccination programs; medical care; testing; contact tracing; support for isolation or quarantine; supports for vulnerable populations to access medical or public health services; public health surveillance (e.g., monitoring case trends, genomic sequencing for variants); enforcement of public health orders; public communication efforts; enhancement of public health data systems; and other public health responses which directly or indirectly support the fight against COVID-19. For example, vaccinations for other diseases will help keep the public healthy and promote stronger immunity systems to fight the disease. The Health Department needed to move the vaccination clinic from the fairgrounds and mall to the Health Department offices. The additional space is being used in part for the clinic and in part for activities that are connected to public health which were displaced due to the need of the space for the clinic. The space changes were needed because of the move of the clinic. Also, adaptations (such as wiring, flooring, and furniture, fixtures, and equipment) for the leased public space are included for COVID-19 mitigation tactics.	66362.57	66362.57	66362.57								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002431	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Health, Capital Investments and Public Facilities of the County	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	This project includes expenditures as a response to the public health emergency for capital investments to improve public safeguarding, distancing, and remote work, such as improvements in technology to allow for social distancing and remote services for the public. Investments include conference room equipment and key technology and software purchases for multiple public departments to allow for improved response, public safety, safeguarding, electronic filing, searching, communications and essential services. The category also includes building improvements and the purchase of general assets for facilities (such as a tent) and minor improvements for facilities to allow for safeguarding measures, such as distancing or the provision of services in outdoor spaces.	3478288.29	3478288.29	2791173.57								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	3478288.79	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002432	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health, Capital Investment for Air Quality Improvements	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	This project addresses the need to improve air disinfection in public buildings, specifically in the buildings of Utilities and Developmental Disabilities, which have not yet received air disinfection equipment (as other buildings received from the CARES Act purchases) and have a need to improve air quality. Improvements in air quality management have been shown to be helpful in the measures to combat the spread of COVD19 and other diseases that are cause by airborne viruses; the county issued a request for proposals to survey the current market for appropriate methods, and records of the request for proposal are filed with the Facilities Management Department; the investment for the winning proposal was $56,674, with such investment addresses the specific need as the county will be more prepared to improve air quality with the equipment; the investment helps the county respond to the disease by allowing for improved safeguarding measures.	56674	56674	56674								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	56674	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002433	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health, Capital Investment for Health Equipment, Mobile Morgue	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	The American Rescue Plan fiscal recovery funds are permitted to be used to respond to the public health emergency with respect to COVID19; one lesson from the pandemic was how there is an impact to the health system when there is an increased number of decedents; in 2020, EMA documented two reported instances where morgue capacity in the county was critically low; funeral home services were often backlogged and not able to take any decedents to alleviate room in the morgues, and funeral homes have indicated they would not be able to decedents in the future; the need for a mobile morgue exists as a direct result of the public health emergency; county EMA will research available mobile morgue units and evaluate costs from quotes obtained; such investment addresses the specific need as the county will have a mobile morgue and will be more prepared to address a potential increase in the number of decedents; the investment helps the county respond to the disease by allowing for improved response measures.	49498.87	49498.87	49498.87								Yes	Medical equipment and facilities	49498.87	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002434	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Capital Investment for Sheriff Cruiser to Respond to Increased Violence PH	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The Fairfield County Sheriff’s Office has identified a need arising from the pandemic, with the need being an additional supervisor and cruiser relating to reassignment of staff to the northwestern portion of the county that has experienced an increase in violence associated with the pandemic. The new supervisor position and vehicle will be directly focused on advancing community policing and law enforcement strategies in the northwestern portion of the county, where an increase in gun violence has been experienced.	60565	60565	54250.98								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	60565	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002435	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Professional Communications on Behalf of the Board of Health	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	This project supported the Board of Health, a separate political subdivision, with professional communication services for outreach to the public about COVID vaccination clinics and protocols. The services began on March 3, 2021. While the project is completed as of the September 30, 2021, report date, the county is willing to re-open the project if the Board of Health requests additional support in this category.	34577.94	34577.94	34577.94								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002436	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health, Creation of a Community Health Assessment (CHA)	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	This project is for a subgrant to the Fairfield County Board of Health, a separate political subdivision, and is designed to support the Board of Health and its creation of a 2022 Community Health Assessment report and the development, with community partners, of a Community Health Improvement Plan to address health issues. The project will provide essential data collection and planning that will be used as a response to the COVID-19 public health emergency.	48943.1	48943.1	48943.1								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002437	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Safety Payroll Support	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	This project includes approved public safety payroll support expenditures, documented with attestation of the County Sheriff, opinion of the County Prosecutor and certification of the County Auditor. Position descriptions and assignments of 100 FTEs primarily addressing the public health emergency from March 13, 2021, through April 23, 2021, are available. The expenditures for March 12, 2021, through April 23, 2021, were accounted for with memo transactions, based on the timing of the US Treasury guidance. The project also includes additional public safety payroll support connected with the effort to address gun violence. These expenditures will be documented in an authorizing resolution and will be paid directly from the American Rescue Plan fiscal recovery fund.	1655582.09	1655582.09	1319738.55			100					No
TPN-002438	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health Payroll Support	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	This project is for a subgrant to the Fairfield County Board of Health, a separate political subdivision for 2021 and 2022. Payroll and related expenditures for public health employees hired as a response to the public health emergency are included. The deliverables and goals are evaluated periodically. Position descriptions and payroll reports are available for documentation. Examples of hires for the project are an epidemiologist and a public health educator/public information officer. Two FTEs are included in the subgrant.	185406.39	185406.39	185406.39			*					No
TPN-002439	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Other Public Sector Payroll Support	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	This project is to account for public sector payroll support for county employees, other than public safety for the County Sheriff. This is for the Fairfield County political subdivision. Payroll and related expenditures for public sector employees working on responses to the public health emergency are included. An example is public sector payroll support addressing court backlogs. As of September 15, 2021, nine FTEs are included with effort to address Domestic Relations Court backlogs. One employee is a new employee hired specifically to address the backlog, while eight others have increased hours from 35 to 40 in order to address the backlog. An additional public sector employee will address needs arising from pandemic based on an increase of substance abuse cases within protective services.	302778.33	302778.33	189485.02			9					No
TPN-002440	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Mental Health and Behavioral Health Services	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	This project is for the county to contract for professional mental health and related behavioral health services to address needs arising from the pandemic. An example is how the Fairfield County Juvenile Court has identified a need based on the increase in truancy directly related to the public health emergency; the county investment with ARP funds specifically addresses the truancy related need that has arisen from the public health emergency with the investment in professional services with mental health service provider, Ohio Guidestone. In this case, the county investment will specifically address the need by providing expanded early identification and prevention services for children and youth who are struggling with attendance, behavior, and grades. Evidence-based approaches will be used whenever possible. The investment helps the county respond to the disease or harmful economic consequences or the economic disruption by providing a direct response and support to children and youth who are suffering from the impact of the COVID-19 public health emergency. Additional contracted mental and behavioral health services for families could be included in this project. As of September 30, 2021, less than $50,000 is expected to be used.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002442	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Emergency Assistance for Non-Profit Organizations, a Subgrant to The Lighthouse	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The Lighthouse has a need arising from the public health emergency, and that need is for case management and supervisory services based on increased referrals of domestic violence, which are now dramatically increasing based on the effects of the pandemic. Referrals to the non-profit organization had waned while there were periods of shutdowns or stay-at-home orders. Beginning February 2020, and running through August 2021, in-shelter client numbers dropped dramatically. The number of clients per month dropped to just under four from 17. Now, the stay-at-home orders have been lifted, and referrals are increasing as contact with stakeholders and those who can make referrals increase. Since September 2021, the Fairfield County Lighthouse has experienced an increase of 75.6% in its caseload, consistent with trends reported throughout Ohio. There has also been a negative impact of the public health emergency in that there are fewer donations from the private sector and there are fewer resources with non-profit funders, such as the Fairfield County United Way, which has seen a significant drop in its available resources for local support. This year, the Lighthouse lost $44,500 based on reduced contributions to the United Way. The Lighthouse is attempting to maintain a 24/7 crisis service and is limited with its resources, and the Lighthouse can provide critical case management and supervisory services during a time when referrals and caseloads are increasing and when funding has been decreased.	120000	120000	120000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002443	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Subgrant for Tourism, Support for the Fairfield County Fair	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The American Rescue Plan fiscal recovery funds are permitted to be used to respond to the public health emergency with respect to the COVID19 or its negative economic impacts, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits, or aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality; the Fairfield County Agricultural Society leads the Fairfield County Fair and is an institution that is part of the tourism and travel industry that has suffered based on the COVID19 pandemic, with negative economic effects from not being able to hold a traditional County Fair in 2020 (and losses of revenue and goodwill from not being able to hold a full fair in 2020); there were significant negative economic impacts in lost sales in connection with the public health emergency. The project is catalytic in that it will also support future County Fairs. This investment helps the county respond to the harmful effects of the economic disruption by directly supporting tourism and the county fair, with catalytic improvements for future fairs and the tourism industry. The subgrant will be used for safety and security services,	499996	499996	499996								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002444	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Aid to Tourism, Travel, or Hospitality	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The American Rescue Plan fiscal recovery funds are permitted to be used to respond to the public health emergency, including aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality; Fairfield County partners with a non-profit organization to support tourism and travel by managing a baseball field owned by Fairfield County; Fairfield County owns the land and buildings which are leased for $1; the field is known as Beavers Field; the operations at Beavers Field suffered during the pandemic, with 30% fewer games able to be held in 2020, as compared to the projected number in 2021; rental income decreased in 2020 during the pandemic, and the non-profit organization had fewer dollars to invest in pandemic safeguards or improvements; there arose a need to improve restrooms to address the impact of the public health emergency, (including the ability to efficiently clean the flooring); the county investment specifically addresses this need by allowing for additional physical safeguards for the public with the purchase of sanitary fixtures, touchless faucets, and flooring; the investment helps the county respond to the disease or the harmful economic consequences of the economic disruption by supporting improvements for an organization within the tourism industry; Fairfield County anticipates contracting for professional services and the purchase of fixtures and flooring for the project to improve the health safeguarding for the public. Beyond the need identified in September 2021, this category could include additional aid for tourism, travel, and hospitality.	18278.01	18278.01	18278.01								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors	8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002445	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Emergency Assistance for Business Planning	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	The county received multiple reports about the need for small businesses and non-profit organizations to have consulting services to help solve problems that have arisen from the pandemic and its negative effects; the county will implement contracted services for business consulting services to solve problems arising from the negative effects of the health emergency for Fairfield County businesses and non-profit organizations. The county investment specifically addresses the need by identifying solutions with respect to problems arising from the pandemic, such as recruitment and retention of employees. The effort will respond to the significant negative economic impact in lost sales, opportunities, or revenues in the business and non-profit community. A contract for professional services supports future business activity and will address harm by allowing for improvements within the workforce, organizations, and the overall economy.	160178	160178	146829.87								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify	10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002446	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Support for Agriculture and the Growing Community	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	As an industry, agriculture has experienced market disruptions and slowdowns due to the pandemic. In response, the United States government provided economic relief in 2020 to assist farmers affected by the disruptions. This assistance has continued into 2021. In a study from the US Department of Agriculture in May of 2021, there was evidence that there were economic disruptions for agri-food products, with meat products and seafood being most severely impacted by the pandemic (Arita, Grant, Sydow, & Beckman, May 2021). Arita, et al. (May 2021) concluded there was a high degree of uncertainty in the agricultural industry based on the impact of the pandemic; reporting in the media shows uncertainty and disruptions in the agricultural industry; the Fairfield County agricultural industry faces challenges in identifying long-term needs and in examining how their businesses will emerge from the coronavirus pandemic. Fairfield Growing, is a local food council spearheaded by the Regional Planning Commission; the community would benefit from a long-term Fairfield Growing plan establishing strategies to support growers coming out of the pandemic and supporting the overall agricultural economy; professional consulting services will provide researched recommendations for improvements and stabilization as the industry comes out of the pandemic; the project addresses harm by identifying research, needs	45000	35000	35000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002447	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Technical Assistance for Townships	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Fairfield County supports townships, villages, and cities in the county and desires to implement contracted services for grant writing support, technical assistance, and planning support through a contract for services to solve problems arising from the negative effects of the health emergency; and this county investment specifically addresses a need by identifying solutions with respect to problems arising from the pandemic; there have been reports from smaller public entities about negative economic impacts in lost opportunities, delayed development, or lost revenues, and contracting for professional services for grant writing support, technical assistance, and planning supports future economic activity and development and will address harm by allowing for improvements within the overall economy; the reports for the need for assistance are justified by federal actions which share ARP Act funds and also by state and federal actions that have increased the number of grant opportunities and reporting requirements placed upon smaller entities who often do not have an ability to respond; contracting on behalf of the smaller entities is similar to providing an allocation but there is a defined use consistent with the ARP Act (provision of technical assistance to	400000	400000	199354.84								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002448	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Contracts for Services to Support Residents Suffering Effects of the Pandemic	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	This project is for services to support residents suffering from the pandemic. An example of contracted services is for pro bono legal services. The U.S. Supreme Court ended the eviction moratorium on August 26, 2021, and this has left some renters subject to eviction as the delta variant continues to surge; there is a negative impact of the pandemic that has resulted in citizens at risk for eviction. A county investment in providing legal and related services would help the county respond to the harmful economic consequences of the economic disruption by supporting residents who are evicted, on the brink of eviction, in need of unemployment, or in need of help with filing taxes or addressing a legal matter that has arisen during the pandemic. These uses are part of the public health response because the legal services are imperative to fiscal recovery for residents; A main part of this project is for the purchase of services to include pro bono legal services for those facing eviction or dealing with potential eviction of tenants; services to help navigate unemployment claims or appeals; services relating to filing federal, state, or local taxes; and any legal matter to be of support as response to the pandemic. Another example is for supplies and storage services (and a vehicle with safeguarding measures) to support wards of the Probate Court who are facing eviction or are unsheltered based on effects of the pandemic and mental health concerns. Related services might be included as identified.	102000	102000	71240								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002449	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Housing Support - Affordable Housing Strategic Planning	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	As a community, Fairfield County has experienced economic disruptions and slowdowns due to the pandemic. Members of a housing coalition, many of whom are county agencies, non-profit groups, and other governmental organizations, have reported a growing concern about the lack of affordable housing, heightened by the problems arising from the pandemic. The housing coalition is in need of a facilitated process to help the group with a collaboration to address the lack of affordable housing in the county. Professional consulting services will provide researched recommendations for improvements and stabilization as the comes works hard to come out of the pandemic; the project addresses harm by identifying research, needs for improvements, and support for new grant opportunities, which in turn supports the overall economy and addresses the problem of the lack of affordable housing. There will be a contract for services to support the Housing Coalition in the strategic planning process.	39554	39554	39554								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002450	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Emergency Assistance for Non-Profit Organizations, a Subgrant to Lancaster	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The county received multiple reports about the need for support for non-profit organizations, and the City of Lancaster (the county seat) is organizing some of its share of ARP funds to specifically help non-profit organizations who have been impacted by the public health emergency. The City of Lancaster desires to serve as the point of contact for the effort to assist non-profit organizations, and Fairfield County is a partner in the effort, sharing resources to support the approach so that all non-profits will be able to participate as long as they are eligible for the funding and purposes meet the ARP guidelines. The City of Lancaster will maintain records on the eligibility of the funds and will monitor the activity and help the non-profit organizations with reporting. A subgrant with the City of Lancaster is anticipated. The funding will help solve problems that have arisen from the pandemic and its negative effects; the county investment specifically addresses the need by sharing funds to identify solutions with respect to problems arising from the pandemic, such as recruitment and retention of employees. The effort will respond to the significant negative economic impact in lost opportunities or increased demands in the non-profit community, allowing for all non-profits to participate not only those within the City of Lancaster.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public	10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002451	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay for Emergency Management Agency Workers	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Based on US Treasury guidance, it is permissible pay Emergency Management Agency workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to permanent EMA workers of the county performing essential work. The county selected the timeframe of March 14, 2020, through February 26, 2021, for all regular hours worked during that time for payment. Permanent EMA workers are unique county workers included in the decision for premium pay because they had fundamental responsibility for the success of the response to the health emergency for the county (as an entity). Their work was essential for all of Fairfield County. The total of the project cost is $27,907.73.	27907.72	27907.72	27907.72		5
TPN-002452	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Clean Water: Centralized Collection and Conveyance, Airport	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Clean Water: Centralized Wastewater Collection and Conveyance projects are included as projects in the Compliance and Reporting Guidance; this project includes costs associated with the planning, design, and construction of centralized collection and conveyance of wastewater in accordance with EPA Handbook definitions for a project located at the Fairfield County Airport; Fairfield County Utilities will perform all construction inspection services and administer the contract and related competitive bidding processes.	598480	598480	33190.54					No
TPN-002453	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Clean Water, Stormwater	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The American Rescue Plan fiscal recovery funds are permitted to be used for water, sewer, and broadband infrastructure, of which stormwater projects (Clean Water definitions) are included, based on the June 17, 2021, Compliance and Reporting Guidance issued by the US Department of Treasury; the stormwater project includes costs associated with the planning, design, and construction of conveying stormwater via pipes, inlets, roadside ditches, and other similar mechanisms. This category also includes the costs of activities associated with the planning, design, and construction of treating stormwater with wet ponds, dry ponds, manufactured devices, and other similar means. A subgrant is anticipated for the Hunters Run Conservancy District, and a subgrant is in place for Walnut Township, separate political subdivisions of the state. Other stormwater costs could be included as identified.	539895	539895	539895
TPN-002455	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Drinking Water: Transmission and Distribution, the Grant Hampton Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Drinking Water: Transmission & Distribution projects are included in ARP projects; this project includes costs associated with the planning, design, and construction of water lines, hydrant, valves and other similar mechanisms in accordance with Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in the Fairfield County Public Water System ID# 2301912 (consistent with the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Compliance and Reporting Guidance - Page 22, issued June 17, 2021); the waterline improvements will be along Grant Lane, Hampton Drive, Hampton Circle and MacIntosh Circle, areas tested with high levels of arsenic in private wells; Fairfield County is seeking to construct transmission waterlines to offer alternatives to the private wells with high levels of arsenic and in doing so, improve the available water supply and health conditions of 60 residences; Fairfield County Utilities will perform all construction inspection services and administer the contract and related competitive bidding processes.	1038515.5	1038515.5	800318.61
TPN-002456	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Workforce and Education Pathway - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services	The Pathway Tutoring Program addresses the inaccessibility of high-quality tutoring and out-of-school literacy supports for kindergarten through 3rd grade members. This program will be implemented by 2/1/22 and will run through 8/31/22. The timeframe selected will not only support the participants during Kalamazoo Public School’s second and third trimester but will continue to support through the summer months to prevent “summer slide” and make literacy gains. The tangible supports begin with having the consistency of qualified adults to provide meaning literacy development. In additional to the adult supports, we are using Boys & Girls Club units inside of Kalamazoo Public School’s elementary schools, ensuring that transportation to the program is not a barrier. Another environmental component is the resources available for youth including books, reliable internet connection, tablets/computers, and other necessary program materials.	50000	50000	50000								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools
TPN-002457	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Drinking Water: Transmission and Distribution, Airport	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Transmission & Distribution projects are included in ARP projects; this project includes costs associated with the planning, design, and construction of water lines, hydrant, valves and other similar mechanisms in accordance with Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in the Fairfield County Public Water System ID# 2301912 (consistent with the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Compliance and Reporting Guidance - Page 22, issued June 17, 2021); the waterline improvements will be located at property near the Airport to improve drinking water transmission and distribution; Fairfield County Utilities will perform all construction inspection services and administer the contract and related competitive bidding processes.	102000	102000	0
TPN-002458	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BETA - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	In April 2021, community partners Sisters In Business and Black Wall Street Kalamazoo came together and successfully launched the Black Entrepreneur Training Academy (BETA) pilot program with a cohort 10 Black businesses. This program was developed in response to the impacts on black businesses prior to and during COVID. The Black Entrepreneur Academy BETA is a cohort-based hybrid (virtual and in person) training program to equip, support, and resource Black entrepreneurs. The practical curriculum is designed to empower entrepreneurs with the tools and skills to successfully navigate the path to business ownership combining business training, personal development, access to professional services, financial counseling, and mentorship through community partnerships. The curriculum includes six modules, facilitated by experts, and delivered through pre-recorded video and live virtual sessions. This consists of two required sessions each week.	50000	50000	50000								No			9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted
TPN-002459	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Can-Do Camp and Roadmap - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	Can-Do Camp and Roadmap Navigation provide access to crucial knowledge and resources needed to start a new business or expand from a home to commercial business. The roadmap empowers entrepreneurs to see their progress in the larger context of the business development journey. It also allows Can-Do Kitchen staff to provide resources and connections to entrepreneurs according to where they are on the roadmap (rather than overwhelming them with a lot of information at once). Can-Do Camp modules are designed to assist entrepreneurs in moving along the roadmap. They provide dedicated time for introductions and deeper understanding of crucial components of launching and managing a business.	50000	50000	50000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002460	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Drinking Water: Transmission and Distribution, Greenfield Sub-district	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Drinking Water: Transmission & Distribution projects are included as allowable infrastructure projects. This project includes costs associated with the planning, design, and construction of water lines, hydrant, valves and other similar mechanisms in accordance with the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund in the Fairfield County Public Water System ID# 2301912 (consistent with the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, Compliance and Reporting Guidance - Page 22, issued June 17, 2021); the waterline improvements will be located in the Greenfield Sub district to improve drinking water transmission and distribution; Fairfield County Utilities will perform all construction inspection services and administer the contract and related competitive bidding processes. This project is for the overall Greenfield Sub district, as opposed to the area located at the Fairfield County Airport.	1900000	1900000	0
TPN-002461	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Scale Kalamazoo - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	Scale Kalamazoo fills an important training and coaching void that assists organizations that are ready to grow to the next level by working on the business instead of in the business. The program focuses on growth by workshops on financial benchmarks and literacy, marketing, pricing, operations, leadership, hiring and training just to name a few.  By providing workshops, networking opportunities and community mentors that provide one-on-one coaching these businesses can catapult to greater heights. These organizations were some of the hardest hit by COVID, survived and now are ready to grow.	50000	50000	50000								No			9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted
TPN-002462	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Broadband, “Last Mile” Projects	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	This project is for a broadband infrastructure purpose, pledging support to broadband providers participating in the State of Ohio Residential Broadband Expansion Program and benefitting Fairfield County residents when certain criteria are met. 1. The winning project, awarded a contract with Fairfield County, is intended to allow internet access to at least 1,600 residences located in Fairfield County; 2. The winning project will allow internet access with a minimum speed of 100 megabits per second (Mbps) downstream; 3. The project’s total cost is at least $8 million; 4. The winning broadband provider sought financial support in advance from Fairfield County; 5. The funds awarded to Fairfield County under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 can lawfully be used for the support contemplated by this resolution; and 6. If multiple projects are awarded in Fairfield County, then Fairfield County’s commitment could be spread across multiple projects on a per household basis as long as all other requirements are met.	500000	500000	0
TPN-002463	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	CAASCM - ARPA - Kzoo - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Community Action will provide assistance, to qualified City of Kalamazoo residents, for rental and utilities. Our main priority would be utilities, but we will also provide rental assistance through eviction prevention. We will also refer out to other programs when necessary.	50000	50000	50000	64							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-002464	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Broadband, Other Projects	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project is to improve broadband connectivity for locations owned by the county, Beavers Field and the County Utilities Building. There will be two new connections to have increased access to broadband meeting service of 25 Mbps download and 3 Mbps upload for the local government.	49900	49900	20896.18					No
TPN-002465	RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	According to US Treasury guidance dated June 24, 2001, recipients of funds may use fiscal recovery funds to cover the portion of payroll and benefits of employees corresponding to the time spent on administrative work necessary due to COVID-19 public health emergency and its negative economic impacts; this includes, but is not limited to, costs related to disbursing payments of fiscal recovery funds and managing new grant programs established using fiscal recovery funds. A Deputy County Administrator has been assigned fundamental responsibility for success of the fiscal recovery program; work assignments are documented in a position description; there are examples of work products relating to the management of fiscal recovery programs. Also included in this category are professional, contracted services for strategic visioning to help identify catalytic projects with community stakeholder support.	412415.82	412415.82	285317.63
TPN-002466	RCP-039113	Fall River, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Quequechan Rail Trail Project - Phase 4	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	ARPA funds are requested for construction of Phase Four of the Quequechan River Rail Trail, from Britland Park to Father Travassos Park. The most recent work on this was concluded in 2015 with the drafting of “100% construction documents” and development of a cost estimate ($4,000,000). Funding will enable completion of work started over ten years ago on a project which has become one of Fall River’s signature features, and for which significant public funds have already been invested. It will serve to link Britland Park to Travassos Park and the rest of the trail system. It will link existing residents and new residents in recently developed renovated mills to the trail system and to the edge of the downtown core, and provide a significant amenity and inducement to additional development. Finally, it will advance the goals of the recently initiated Flint Neighborhood Urban Renewal process.	4000000	4000000	0								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	4000000
TPN-002467	RCP-039113	Fall River, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Jerry Lawton Plaza Rehabilitation Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	This proposal is for the renovation of “Jerry Lawton Plaza”, a badly deteriorated public open space at the southwest corner of South Main Street and Anawan Street, abutting the Cherry and Webb building, across the street from the courthouse in the heart of our central business district.  This parcel was developed in the late 1970’s as a small urban “pocket park” as an attractive amenity for downtown. Its current condition makes it a detriment to downtown renewal. Due to general lack of maintenance and to the ripping out of several large concrete benches, without proper patching of the brickwork, the entire plaza has become an unsightly trip-hazard, totally in violation of ADA standards. The landscaping along the southerly and westerly bounds has largely died off, and the trees have never had any pruning or other attention. The lighting is totally inadequate, and there is faded art work on the walls of the building. We propose two goals for restoration of this plaza: Goal #1: Restore the plaza as an ADA-compliant safe route for pedestrians between South Main Street and Pearl Street Garage, and as an attractive feature, instead of a detriment, to our downtown, including: -repairing the deteriorated brick stairs leading from Anawan Street at the northwest corner of the plaza; -restoring the plaza surface to pedestrian-safe and ADA accessible condition; -enhancing the lighting to discourage use of the space for illicit activities and to enhance pedestrians’ sense of safety, as well as for decorative purposes; -reconstructing the planting areas, planting new low-maintenance landscaping features, and installing an irrigation system; Goal #2: Develop the plaza as a “flex space” to accommodate temporary outdoor displays of public art/sculpture, pop-up music events, pop-up craft and retail sales, and seasonal outdoor dining space. -remove a select number of trees to provide space for pop-up events; -establish water and electrical outlets to support pop-up events; -construct a locked storage facility for storage of chairs, tables and other equipment in support of pop-up events. We have obtained preliminary estimates of the construction cost of this restoration project in the range of $210,000 to $220,000, but that does not include design consultant services. We have obtained a quote for design services in the amount of $35,000, not including survey, electrical, or irrigation and not including construction management services. A reasonable estimate of total cost for all these items would be $300,000. This project will restore a long-neglected public space so that it will be an amenity to attract and support downtown development, rather than a detriment to development. It will restore a space where public funds have previously been invested, rather than allowing further waste and deterioration.	300000	300000	32552.36								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	300000	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002468	RCP-039113	Fall River, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Crime Prevention Equipment - Purchase of Police Cruisers	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of new police cruisers	275000	275000	266354.65
TPN-002470	RCP-036395	Madison County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Provide premium pay for essential workers, offering additional support to those who have and will bear the greatest health risks because of their service in critical sectors.	5500000	5236618.35	5236618.35		1200
TPN-002471	RCP-039113	Fall River, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Crime Prevention Training and Equipment	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	Purchase of equipment and training classes for the intervention and prevention of community violence and gun violence.	287000	287000	147779.1								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	287000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002473	RCP-039113	Fall River, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Rehiring of Public Sector Staffing	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.2-Public Sector Workforce: Rehiring Public Sector Staff	Restoring pre-pandemic employment to city employees in Fall River.	2909785	2307561	2307561				30				No
TPN-002474	RCP-038075	Christian County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Vaccination	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Vaccinations for citizens, employees and inmates of Christian County		8423.82	8423.82								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002476	RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	COVID Communications	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	To keep the citizens of St. Louis County informed on COVID-related resources available to citizens to obtain testing and/or vaccine as well as other COVID-related announcements.		12031.63	12031.63								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002478	RCP-037976	Knox County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Ensure KPH to serve those that are underserved		500000	500000								Yes	Medical facilities generally dedicated to COVID-19 treatment and mitigation	500000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002479	RCP-039068	Victoria, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Loss of Revenue	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Loss of revenue funds have been used for the provision of government services including road building and maintenance projects; general government administration and staff; and provision of public safety services.		12545835.28	12022988.88
TPN-002480	RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Mobile Vaccine Clinics	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide mobile covid testing and vaccine clinics to rural areas of St. Louis County		67289.34	67289.34								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002482	RCP-038075	Christian County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Finley River TDD Stormwater	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Construction of Bio-swales for stormwater quality.		462000	431302.08
TPN-002484	RCP-037976	Knox County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Economic Recovery	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Speed the recovery of travel, tourism and hospitality sectors		500000	500000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002485	RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	EOC Related Costs	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Emergency Operations Center costs		40639.02	40639.02								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002486	RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	De Minimis	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Recipients may use funds for administering the SLFRF program, including costs of consultants to support effective management and oversight, including consultation for ensuring compliance with legal, regulatory, and other requirements. Merrimack County has elected to use the de minimis rate of 10 percent of the modified total direct costs pursuant to 2 CFR 200.414(f).		1198585.39	1198585.39
TPN-002487	RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Essential Services and Food to SLC Residents	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	St. Louis County staff are bringing food and medications to residents with COVID which is required by State Statute		24004.4	24004.4								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002488	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Parking Acquisition	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Municipality will lease by November 2021, as a tenant, a commercial space located at Ramón E. Betances Street for an estimated of five-years lease term contract.  The space will be occupied by the Secretary of Economic Development, including the Tourism Office, and the Office of Recovery and Reconstruction of the Municipality.   The Tourism Office is aimed at promoting and marketing the Caguas tourist attractions to appeal to the tourism industry and consider the city of Caguas as a tourist destination.  On the other hand, the Recovery and Reconstruction Office (OMRR) mission is to plan, manage and develop in an orderly manner the reconstruction and recovery projects of the Municipality resulting from the natural disasters.  The commercial space referred above does not have a parking facility which may limit access to employees and visitors to the Municipality’s offices.  Thus, the Municipality identified and intends to acquire and improve a parking lot located at Vizcarrondo street for the intended use and support the accessibility to employees and visitors to provide and receive Municipality government services.  In addition, the improvement of this facility will allow the availability of additional parking space to citizens after business hours to support the economic activities of the surrounding area.  Also, this activity would have been postponed or could not have been carried out if not for CLFRF assistance because the revenue collections have been lower due to the pandemic.	269265	269265	269256.43
TPN-002489	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	CARES Housing Assistance Program - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	CARES Housing Assistance for People Living with AIDS (HOPWA) will use this funding to specifically supplement funds provided to clients through rental assistance, mortgage assistance, utility assistance and permanent housing placement (first month's rent and deposit.)  These funds will assist our clients in Kalamazoo County that have been negatively affected by the Covid pandemic.   Funds for administration and staffing will be provided through other sources.	50000	50000	50000	28							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-002492	RCP-037976	Knox County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Small Business Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Local Small Business Grants		250000	250000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002494	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Ninas del Corazon (Girls of the Heart) - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services	Niñas Del Corazón (Girls of the Heart) is an after school and summer program benefiting Latina (female) Youth ages 8 to 15, living in Kalamazoo’s Edison neighborhood. The program is a partnership with local resource El Concilio, and provides support in addressing environmental factors and concerns of Kalamazoo's Hispanic community, including low academic performance, substance use, and acculturation. The Edison Community has struggled with high-risk environmental factors for years, including poverty, violence, and systemic injustice. It is our hope that the young women it serves can become role models and mentors, in turn boosting their academic performance and engagement within the community, ultimately experiencing a progressive transition of equity.	50000	50000	50000								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools
TPN-002495	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	DWU- Water Unserved Area	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	In an effort to improve equity across Dallas Water Utilities’ (DWU) water and wastewater systems and provide service to all Dallas residents, DWU established the Unserved Areas program in FY2020-21. The program identified 47 occupied areas throughout the City that did not have access to water and/or wastewater service, with an estimated cost of $37.4 million dollars to design and construct these improvements. The goal of the program was to complete all infrastructure improvements and provide service within 10 years. With the allocation of American Rescue Plan Act funds for this infrastructure, DWU estimates completion within the next 3-4 years. With the implementation of the program, priority will be given to those unserved areas that are also identified as reinvestment areas in the City’s Comprehensive Housing Policy.	7200000	3676674.53	832616.54
TPN-002496	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	DWU- Wastewater Unserved Area	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	In an effort to improve equity across Dallas Water Utilities’ (DWU) water and wastewater systems and provide service to all Dallas residents, DWU established the Unserved Areas program in FY2020-21. The program identified 47 occupied areas throughout the City that did not have access to water and/or wastewater service, with an estimated cost of $37.4 million dollars to design and construct these improvements. The goal of the program was to complete all infrastructure improvements and provide service within 10 years. With the allocation of American Rescue Plan Act funds for this infrastructure, DWU estimates completion within the next 3-4 years. With the implementation of the program, priority will be given to those unserved areas that are also identified as reinvestment areas in the City’s Comprehensive Housing Policy.	30226891	15354708.82	5064306.35					No	Yes
TPN-002498	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Communications and Outreach	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Creation by COM staff, contract vendors, and media outlets of multilingual multimedia text messages, graphics, videos, advertising, and other communications assets needed for outreach and marketing regarding all of the City of Dallas ARPA-funded programs and services to educate and inform eligible Dallas residents of what opportunities are available to them and how and when they need to apply to receive assistance or support.	1000000	253846.15	253846.15								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	1 Imp General Public	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-002499	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	STREET - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services	The S.T.R.E.E.T. After School & Summer Program connects Black adolescent youth ages 10-17, living in at-risk environments in Kalamazoo, with a variety of supportive resources and provides education opportunities and positive role models at a critical, formative time in their lives. S.T.R.E.E.T. helps to decrease crime, violence, underage drinking and drug use, while increasing academic performance, confidence, and positive decision making among this particular demographic. It creates survivors and leaders instead of victims of systemic injustices. The program aims to work with the whole family, whenever the opportunity arises. The program is intentionally staffed by Black adults of familiar backgrounds, who serve as safe, positive role models for the young men.	50000	50000	50000								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools
TPN-002500	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Water/Waterwaste to Support Affordable Housing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	The Department of Housing and Neighborhood Revitalization (Housing) allocated $6M to infrastructure improvements in three designated QCT areas including Joppa Neighborhood, Historical Tenth Street and Five-Mile Neighborhood. This program will improve the neighborhood by providing new/repaired streets, sidewalks, and water/wastewater improvements to allow residents to walk and ride bikes and other means of transportation to easily enter into the neighborhoods with deliveries of goods and services. Due to COVID, families are working, schooling and entertaining in-place. These improvements will allow families to safely distance themselves while enjoying the outdoors and obtaining goods/services as needed through delivery. Same staff needs as posted above in the home repair program.	10000000	0	0								No
TPN-002502	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Targeted for Home Repair & Infrastructure	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	The Department of Housing and Neighborhood Revitalization (Housing) allocated $6M to home repairs to provide up to $100,000 in ARPA funds to property owners in three designated QCT areas including Joppa Neighborhood, Historical Tenth Street and Five-Mile Neighborhood. This program will improve the neighborhood by allowing seniors to age in place and residents to remain in the neighborhood in a safe, healthy renovated home. Residents should not be effected by higher tax rates since most of the repairs made will not effect the value of the home, such as foundation repair, plumbing, electrical, HVAC and other types of repairs. COVID has made it necessary for families to spend more time at home. These repairs will improve the household’s ability to work, school and leisure at home. Two dedicated staff will outreach and process applicants for this program, while receiving support from Housing Inspectors, Housing Budget staff, and Housing Compliance staff.	11250000	2008499.98	1258863.8								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify	No	0
TPN-002503	RCP-038758	Pittsylvania County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Vaccination Incentive	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	To encourage employees to get vaccinated, Pittsylvania County will pay 1,000 Covid incentive bonus to all fully vaccinated employees and Volunteer Fire and Rescue personnel	406284.78	406284.78	406284.78								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002504	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Fire Youth Empowerment and Growth - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services	Fire is creating intentional and holistic SEL programming for 2022 that reinforces our staff pathway for youth (13-21) participants to grow their talents and be empowered to impactful leadership positions internally and throughout Kalamazoo County. We work especially with BIPOC, neuro-divergent youth identifying as LGBTQIA+. Many are well below the AMI and FPL, so our programs and space are always free. Through one-on-one support, referral services, basic need support and expansive programming we are creating space for youth not often served in after-school programming and ensuring that their aging out of such space, means we have new leaders, volunteers, and staff to support Fire and other organizations across the county. This is why it is a general program of the entire organization; it is an intricate system meant to ensure sustainable gains in social emotional growth of youth, their guardians, and the broader community. This is all building on existing frameworks and past programs	75000	75000	75000								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools
TPN-002507	RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium pay for eligible workers performing essential duties during the pandemic. Excludes teleworkers, elected officials and board members.		5214049.02	5214049.02		1784
TPN-002508	RCP-035943	Lake County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Portable Variable Message Boards	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The project includes the purchase of six (6) roadside portable message boards - two (2) black & white and four (4) color. The portable message boards will be used throughout the County to announce locations and dates/times of COVID testing and vaccine sites in advance of scheduled dates. They will be placed in strategic locations to let residents know about upcoming testing and vaccine sites and then reprogrammed to let residents know the sites are in use for testing and vaccines. When testing and vaccine sites are not active we will use them to let residents know how to keep themselves safe from the virus.	154984.2	154984.2	154984.2								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002510	RCP-039765	Loudoun County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Nonprofit Assistance Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Provides funding to eligible non-profit and faith-based organizations working to mitigate the negative impacts of the pandemic allowing them to continue or enhance their services in the community.  The program covers categories:  emergency food assistance, COVID-19 service expansion, service interruption, and nonprofit service continuity.  Eligible applicants must be in good standing with the Virginia State Corporation Commission, provide proof of 501(c)3 status, provide financial documentation, and demonstrate that their services continue to be affected by COVID-19 in order to qualify.  Applicants were also required to describe their long-term recovery plan, including steps taken to promote long-term stability as well as innovations and adaptations made in response to the pandemic along with plans to enhance future service delivery.	5000000	4430616.58	4430616.58								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002512	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	GO! Afterschool Program - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services	Our vision is to offer an after-school program for K-8 students that provides a fun, safe and supervised space for recreational activities, access to high quality (HQ) programs (e.g.,sport leagues and training, artistic opportunities, etc.), and evidence-based tutoring. The goal of our program is to accelerate the progress of students who have been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and help navigate their journey on the path to academic and social-emotional success. Our programs will be offered in the Northside QCT to help eliminate cost and access barriers that might otherwise prevent youth in the neighborhood from accessing HQ extracurricular opportunities. However, we hope that our HQ programs will draw diverse student participation outside the neighborhood as well.	75000	75000	75000								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools
TPN-002513	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	OCC - Isolation Support	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	• This project will fund subrecipients to administer community mental health programming for residents of the city of Dallas in four categories: (1) access to mental health services, (2) education, outreach, and lay person training, (3) grief and stress support, (4) seniors isolation support. Services will target low- and moderate-income communities, historically underserved communities, Qualifying Census Tracts (QCTs), communities of color, and/or populations outlined in the Mayors Task Force on Poverty, as well as clients eligible outlined as targeted areas	750000	289.8	289.8								No
TPN-002514	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	OCC - Family Violence Prevention and Intervention	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	Family Violence Prevention and Intervention Programs: The pandemic has caused stressful family situations and created and exacerbated existing family stressors, contributing to increased isolation and risk of family violence. • The project will fund family violence prevention and intervention programs in the city of Dallas. OCC seeks multiple subrecipients to provide family violence prevention and intervention services such as individual and group counseling, housing and shelter operation costs, prevention services, education, and near-fatality prevention. The programs will target low- and moderate-income communities, historically underserved communities, Qualifying Census Tracts (QCTs), communities of color, and/or populations outlined in the Mayors Task Force on Poverty, as well as clients eligible outlined as targeted areas	2250000	137.55	137.55								No
TPN-002515	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Positive Youth Development / Academic Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services	• This project will fund subrecipients to administer community youth programming for residents of the city of Dallas in two categories: (1) to serve as a subrecipient for the purpose of serving as a backbone entity to align outreach and service delivery among youth navigation services providers and (2) to serve as a subrecipient to deliver Positive Youth Development programming that provides positive youth development programming, including built in academic support to school-aged youth. The project will target nonprofit organizations located in Qualified Census Tracts (QCTs) and/or nonprofit organizations that serve a large proportion of clients residing in QCTs or clients that are low- and moderate-income as well as clients eligible outlined targeted areas	2924764.1	104.76	104.76								No
TPN-002517	RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Fair Shots Vaccination Program	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	In response to the Public Health Emergency, Benton County is implementing a mitigation and prevention program to encourage vaccination. Benton County is providing an incentive program to encourage vaccination with a free ticket to the Benton Franklin Fair with each new vaccination. The free vaccination is available to all Benton County residents. The Benton Franklin Health Department is providing the vaccination at no charge. Our goal is that the incentive increases the number of people who get vaccinated sooner than otherwise would have.  100 Vaccination/tickets were provided.		1500	1500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002518	RCP-038758	Pittsylvania County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium pay for essential employees	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The Commonwealth of VA elected to provide a $3,000, one-time bonuses to all law enforcement, sheriff's deputies, and correctional officers. Also, the county elected to give public safety-related an front line employees the bonuses also. One time bonuses of $1,500 go to the remaining essential employees.	704469.25	704469.25	704469.25		287
TPN-002519	RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Corrections Payroll Costs	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	In responding to Public Health emergency, Benton County is using funds to restore and bolster public sector capacity, which supports government’s ability to deliver critical Covid-19 Services. Correctional staff and related supervisory personnel that support public safety staff are providing services devoted to mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 emergency. Benton County is assessing the extent the Corrections Department (division)/time spent is engaged in activities responding to COVID -19 with a memo from the Chief of Corrections using a reasonable estimate.  The Chief of Corrections will update the assessment amount periodically throughout time based on activities implemented in response to the pandemic. An average of 96 staff are employed by the Corrections Department. The Benton County Jail serves the citizens of Benton County.		4117888.37	4117888.37			96					No
TPN-002520	RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff Payroll Costs	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	In responding to Public Health emergency, Benton County is using funds to restore and bolster public sector capacity, which supports government’s ability to deliver critical Covid-19 Services. The Sheriff, Deputy Sheriffs, staff and related supervisory personnel that support public safety staff are providing services devoted to mitigating or responding to the COVID-19 emergency. Benton County is assessing the extent the Sheriff’s Department (division)/time spent is engaged in activities responding to COVID -19 with a memo from the Sheriff using a reasonable estimate.  The Sheriff will update the assessment amount periodically throughout time based on activities implemented in response to the pandemic. An average of 91 staff are employed by the Sheriff’s Department. The Benton County Sheriff serves the citizens of Benton County.		736034.37	736034.37			91					No
TPN-002522	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Child Care Providers Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	• The purpose of this project is to provide microgrants to Early Childhood and Out of School Time/Afterschool Providers (Providers) and City of Dallas Early Childhood and Out School Time Program Providers (COD Providers) who have been negatively impacted due to or during the COVID-19 pandemic that are in the city of Dallas and are serving residents in the city of Dallas. The microgrants will assist childcare providers that have experienced loss of income, decrease and/or increase in costs due to the pandemic. The grant can be used for, including but not limited to rent, utilities, staff salaries and benefits, and program supplies. The project will target childcare providers that provide service delivery in communities in which poverty is concentrated, in communities heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and in Qualified Census Tracts (QCTs), as well as childcare centers who serve clients eligible outlined as targets areas	1000000	0	0								No
TPN-002523	RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Coroner Payroll Costs	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	In Response to the Public Health emergency additional morgue staff is needed. Benton County is experiencing an increase in deaths.  We are adding a Lead Deputy Coroner (morgue staff) who is primarily dedicated to respond to Covid -19 and whose services are devoted to responding to the COVID-19 emergency. The Benton County Coroners office serves the citizens of Benton County. The project is for one employee.		264000	157882.45			*					No
TPN-002529	RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay - Vaccine Response	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Provide additional premium pay for employees working directly in the vaccine response to compensate them for their dedication, long hours and constant work in vaccinating our community and saving lives.		296910.98	296910.98		467
TPN-002530	RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Prosecuting Attorney Payroll Costs	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	In Response to the Public Health emergency, public sector capacity, effective service delivery, addressing administrative needs, 3 additional staff have been added to the Prosecuting Attorneys Office due to Court backlogs caused by the shutdown. The Courts and the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office have been negatively affected in their ability to administer services and the courts were unable to operate safely during the pandemic and as a result, causing significant backlogs.  Therefore, steps to reduce backlogs, hiring additional court staff and attorneys will increase the speed of case resolution. The Prosecuting Attorney added 2 Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, a Legal Process Assistant and additional overtime available for current staff to assist with reducing court backlogs. The Prosecuting Attorney’s Office serves all citizens of Benton County.		1576600	771311.1			*					No
TPN-002532	RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Benton County can use funds for Administrative purposes and can use the NICRA/current negotiated indirect costs rate agreement, or De Minimus rate of 10% applies. Benton County uses the De Minimus indirect cost rate of 10% per Benton County Resolution 2016-440. The indirect cost rate may be applied to a federal grant applying the Modified Total Direct costs, as defined by Federal OMB 2 CFR Section 200.68 is a direct costs excluding equipment, capital expenditures, rental costs, tuition and sub awards in excess of $25,000.		187853.85	187853.85
TPN-002533	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Covid Prevention And Security Center	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The Autonomous Municipality of Caguas intends to develop and operate a Safety and Prevention Center (the “Center”) in the downtown area to provide and ensure public health and safety services in compliance with applicable regulations and health measures.    The Center’s operation will support the Municipality’s efforts monitoring compliance with different Executive Orders implemented by the Government of Puerto Rico to respond to the COVID-19 public health emergency.   The Center will serve a specialized unit to respond to all COVID related incidents in the area, including the surveillance, prevention, and the implementation of public health protocols. The Center will work in collaboration with a private contractor to expand the security services provided by the Municipality.  The Center will operate the first year with fifteen (15) safety officers: ten (10) from a private contractor and five (5) local police officers.  After the first year, the Municipality intends to operate the Center with fifteen (15) local police officers.  Safety and police officers will be responsible of making walking surveillance throughout the downtown area during high activity business hours. Also, they will also assist the COVID-19 Monitoring Unit, established at the Center, with personnel from the Secretariat of Human Development.  The specialized safety and police officers will be undertaking the following activities: enforce social distancing, enforce mask use and hand washing and enforce business compliance with public health protocols established by the Executive Orders implemented by the government.	1632500	1632500	606236.56								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	171410	1 Imp General Public	18 Dis Imp HHs residing in the U.S. territories or receiving services
TPN-002534	RCP-039449	Washington County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Cyber Security Modernization	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The County has cybersecurity applications and processes in place; however, in lieu of recent events and attacks, a stronger effort to secure County digital assets becomes even more critical. CrowdStrike is a leading organization in the cybersecurity industry. CrowdStrike provides System and Endpoint security against potential threats and breaches. CrowdStrike will provide protection across the entire threat lifecycle by combining machine learning, artificial intelligence, behavior analytics and proactive threat hunting in a single solution. With the purchase, CrowdStrike also provides incident handling and remediation services from their team of experts.		85281	85281
TPN-002536	RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Revenue Loss Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Benton County has experienced Revenue loss during the pandemic.  Sales Tax, the 2nd largest source of revenue and numerous other areas such as the courts and county offices were closed due to the pandemic.  Shortfalls were experienced in taxes, licenses & permits, charges for goods & services, as well as fines and forfeitures. Benton County will use the Revenue Recovery Funds for Governmental Services in our Main fund, the General Fund. This enables local government to provide valuable services and to ensure that fiscal austerity measures do not hamper the broader economic recovery.   Benton County has 639 employees. As County employees, they are providing services to our citizens.  We consider our employee services essential, and the Interim Rule defines essential employees as any work performed by an employee of the local government.  The Counties largest expenses are wages and benefits accounting for around 65% of all expenses (excluding intergovernmental services and transfer to other funds).  Supplies and Services account for around 35% off all expenses. These services are provided to County citizens. The General Fund includes services for the citizens in the areas of (non-exclusive):  • Superior Court:  • District Court:  • Prosecuting Attorney’s Office  • Office of Public Defense  • Clerk’s Office • Auditor’s Office  • Assessor’s Office • Treasurer’s Office • Commissioners’ Office  • Planning department  • Facilities department  • Adult & Juvenile Drug Court • Animal Control • Parks • WSU Extension Office  • Personnel/Human Resources • GIS/ Geographic Information Systems • Corrections department.  • Sheriff’s department.  • Coroner’s office.  The General Fund indirectly supports additional funds and services such as: • Juvenile Detention • Fairgrounds • Elections • Economic Development		10000000	10000000
TPN-002538	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Special incentive program for employees who provide critical and essential duties for the continuity of municipal services and to protect the health and well-being of the residents of the Municipality.  The premium pay will compensate to workers that faced heightened risks due to the character and nature of their work duties, as defined in the interim final rule as work duties involving regular in-person interactions or regular physical handling of items that were also handled by others.  Accordingly, the Municipality will compensate “premium pay” based on the following: a. Employees must have completed 77 hours or more of work in face-to-face assignments from March 16, 2020 to June 30, 2021. b. Be an active employee at the time the payment is issued. c. Have not been subject to any disciplinary action within the last 18 months. d. The benefit will be up to $1,000 per individual employee. e. The benefit is applicable to all employees of the Autonomous Municipality of Caguas, regardless of their appointment status. f. The Secretary and/or the Office or Department Director is responsible for certifying the employees who meet the criteria using the certification form.	1192202	1192202	1192202		1034
TPN-002539	RCP-035943	Lake County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Grants Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	A new Grants Coordinator position was created to properly administer the Fiscal Recovery Funds for the Lake County Board of County Commissioners. The position is responsible for staying current with reporting requirements, communicating with the U.S. Department of Treasury, ensuring funds are used for eligible purposes, coordinating funding requests, facilitating communications with subrecipients, approving expenditures, tracking expenses, compiling reports, and submitting reports.	300000	122492.63	122492.63
TPN-002541	RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Planning Dept - Energov	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	In Response to the Public Health emergency, Benton County is using funds to restore and bolster public sector capacity, which supports government’s ability to deliver critical Covid-19 Services.  We are improving our effective service delivery to address administrative needs caused or exacerbated by the pandemic. Addressing Administrative needs and Supporting program evaluation, Benton County is using funds to improve efficacy of public health and economic programs/administrative needs with Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations to the pandemic and technology infrastructure to improve access to and user experience of government IT systems. The Planning Dept is implementing ENERGOV Permitting Software. The Planning, Building and Public Works Departments regularly engage with the public regarding permitting, planning/zoning, inspections, code enforcement, and business licensing. ENERGOV is a web-based permitting, planning/zoning, inspections, code enforcement, and business licensing software which maximizes public engagement through an internet portal that promotes efficiencies through public self-service. The new service will facilitate remote access with public self service and reduce the trips to the Departments and in-person interactions with staff.		584272	398305.72								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	534272
TPN-002542	RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Broadband Access	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.4-Household Assistance: Internet Access Programs	Connect homes to broadband, focusing on households with children who qualify for low-income programs such as Medicaid, TANF or Food and Nutrition benefits, to increase access and affordability of reliable high-speed internet for students and families.		152132	62661.57	97							No			5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	0
TPN-002543	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Nonprofits Assistance Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	o Nonprofit Assistance will support community-based non-profit organizations by providing funding through a grant process for operational expenses, including, but not limited to expenses such as rent, utilities, staff salaries and benefits, cleaning supplies, and programs supplies incurred between March 3, 2021 and December 31, 2024, and resulting from COVID-19 and/or in response to needs caused by pandemic, to Dallas-based nonprofit organizations that deliver social services programming. The project will prioritize, but not exclusively support nonprofit organizations located in Qualified Census Tracts (QCTs) and/or nonprofit organizations that serve a large proportion of clients residing in QCTs or clients that are low- and moderate-income. OCC seeks a subrecipient to administer the project.	2600000	90.83	90.83								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002544	RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Clerk Dept - OnBase	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	In Response to the Public Health emergency, Benton County is using funds to restore and bolster public sector capacity, which supports government’s ability to deliver critical Covid-19 Services.  We are improving our effective service delivery to address administrative needs caused or exacerbated by the pandemic. Addressing Administrative needs and Supporting program evaluation, Benton County is using funds to improve efficacy of public health and economic programs/administrative needs with Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations to the pandemic and technology infrastructure to improve access to and user experience of government IT systems. The Clerk is implementing the OnBase System. The Onbase portal facilitates remote access for Attorneys who can review and print documents online. This reduces trip to the Justice Center and in-person interactions with staff. The Onbase Judge edition allows records to be transmitted into the courtroom digitally.  This eliminates the need for staff to enter the courtroom to hand deliver records, plus reduces staff time printing and preparing records with will help with the Court backlog. The Onbase licenses facilitate access to the digital filing system for staff and outside agencies (Attorney General, Police). This reduces in-person interaction with staff and allows for remote work opportunities. Truefiling allows for the office to go paperless, and reduces in-person interaction with staff, plus streamlines staff time to help with the Court backlog. Microfilm Digitizer are needed to digitize older records that are on microfilm.  This allows for remote access to files and reduces in-person interaction for persons needing to view them.		498430	251154.38								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	210850	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002545	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Food - Distribution	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	• This includes two projects: Making Food Accessible – (1) Food Distribution/Delivery and (2) Garden Kits. Food Distribution/Delivery includes programs that enables low- and moderate-income households access food items, including groceries. This may include distribution events, pantries, delivery or other programs. The Garden Kids project will provide garden kits to families in targeted communities, including low- and moderate-income households and households in QCTs, as well as clients eligible targeted areas	2400000	2277150.1	171126.1	0							No
TPN-002546	RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Small Business Grants - 1	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	In Response to the Public Health emergency, Benton County is providing public health mitigations and prevention services to disproportionately impacted small businesses through Grants. Grants for mitigation will assist with storefront improvements, façade improvements, and outdoor seating. Benton County is contracting with Tri-Cities Chamber of Commerce (subrecipient) to provide Grants to disproportionately impacted small businesses (beneficiaries) as well as provide Operations Support/staff. Grants will be to Disproportionately Impacted Small Businesses. Operations Support such as technical assistance, counseling, and assistance with business planning needs, outreach advertising will be provided directly by the Tri-Cities Chamber of Commerce. Businesses will have no more than 500 employees and be independently owned and operated.		420000	301025.68								No		0	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002547	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Food - Home Delivery	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	• This includes two projects: Making Food Accessible – (1) Food Distribution/Delivery and (2) Garden Kits. Food Distribution/Delivery includes programs that enables low- and moderate-income households access food items, including groceries. This may include distribution events, pantries, delivery or other programs. The Garden Kids project will provide garden kits to families in targeted communities, including low- and moderate-income households and households in QCTs, as well as clients eligible	1400000	1399998	0								No
TPN-002548	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Food - Food Banks Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	o Food Banks Support will support Dallas-based food banks and hunger-relief nonprofits serving Dallas residents through grants to hunger relief organizations for operational expenses. The project will prioritize, but not exclusively support organizations located in Qualified Census Tracts (QCTs) and/or organizations that serve a large proportion of clients residing in QCTs or clients that are low- and moderate-income. OCC seeks a subrecipient to administer the project.	800000	195.59	195.59	0							No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	No	0
TPN-002549	RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Small Business Grants - 2	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	In Response to the Public Health emergency, Benton County is providing negative economic impact assistance to impacted small businesses through Grants. This is an effort to mitigate financial hardship, provide technical assistance, counseling, and other services to assist with business planning needs. Benton County is contracting with Tri-Cities Chamber of Commerce (subrecipient) to provide Grants to Impacted Small businesses (beneficiaries) as well as provide Operations Support/staff. Grants will be to Small Businesses to mitigate financial hardship and assist with hiring/retention of staff such as Workforce Development, Work Incentive, Rent/Utilities Assistance, Digital Transformation (Online presence and/or using digital technologies). Operations Support such as technical assistance, counseling, and assistance with business planning needs, outreach advertising will be provided directly by the Tri-Cities Chamber of Commerce. Businesses will have no more than 500 employees and be independently owned and operated.		3000000	1870520.06								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002550	RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Business Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Business assistance was focused on the retail, service, leisure, and hospitality sectors as well as childcare facilities, which were areas that were particularly hard hit during the pandemic.  Assistance was scaled in size based on a business’ number of employees and need.  Funds were required to be used for mitigating Covid impacts, hiring and rehiring staff.		2287337	2287337								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors		No	0
TPN-002551	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Food - Garden Kits	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	• This includes two projects: Making Food Accessible – (1) Food Distribution/Delivery and (2) Garden Kits. Food Distribution/Delivery includes programs that enables low- and moderate-income households access food items, including groceries. This may include distribution events, pantries, delivery or other programs. The Garden Kids project will provide garden kits to families in targeted communities, including low- and moderate-income households and households in QCTs, as well as clients eligible outlined targeted areas.	200000	85.17	85.17								No
TPN-002553	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Essential Necessities	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	• This project will fund the purchase of essential necessities, including two specific projects: (1) Period Access Dallas (PAD) and (2) diapers. PAD provides tampons and pads for low- and moderate-income individuals residing in Dallas. They will be distributed at City of Dallas libraries and recreation centers – there are 23 sites in total. The program is marketing in both Spanish and English. Diapers will be distributed at partnering WIC and community centers to low- and moderate-income families.	1500000	130772.71	80114.81								No
TPN-002554	RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Nonprofit Assistance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Economic incentive funding was provided to nonprofits that experienced financial hardship and negative economic impact as a result of the pandemic. Focus was placed on organizations serving vulnerable or marginalized communities.		683804.66	683804.66
TPN-002555	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Benefits Navigation (Bene-Dallas)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators	o Benefits Navigation will fund a subrecipient to administer a benefits navigation program for residents of the city of Dallas. The subrecipient will build a single stop data-match enabled proactive benefits outreach, enrollment and renewal program that helps ensure low- and moderate-income clients are able to maximize support and access all benefits for which they are eligible for, focused on federal funding that is assigned and available. This is a critical need that has become more urgent during the COVID-19 pandemic as many families have seen reductions in income, increased costs, and even limited access to programs that traditionally require in person application and renewals.	2750235.9	2750235.9	235.9								No
TPN-002556	RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Job Training	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Initial project: Two jobs programs which include a six-week paid job training placement program for up to 200 people in addition to a six-month paid internship and job placement program for an additional 25 people.  Both programs will be administered in partnership with Step Up Wilmington and focus on developing long-term skills and employment. Revised project (3/31/23): The new scope of the project includes an expanded job training program. Paid internships will now last a maximum of 16 weeks. In addition, training in Sector Specific Hard Skills will be added. The new goal will be to place 500 individuals in jobs that pay a living wage and create long-term sustainable jobs.		945000	618831.5								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	0
TPN-002557	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Expanded Tax Preparation and Consultation Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	• This project will fund a subrecipient to provide city-wide tax assistance to low- and moderate-income families or individuals, with a focus on connecting those seeking tax assistance to wrap-around services, specifically those services related to financial literacy and/or coaching and workforce training or skills development. The tax preparation program will offer multiple sites throughout the city, especially Southern Dallas, and offer tax preparation services in both English and Spanish.	800000	800000	231043.58								No
TPN-002559	RCP-039636	Floyd County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Consultant Fees	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Fees paid to consultant for State funded ARPA grant application assistance.		1901.25	1901.25								No
TPN-002560	RCP-035943	Lake County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Community Mental Health Services	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The county will be providing funds to our community health services organization, LifeStream Behavioral Center Inc., to continue providing community alcohol and mental health care services and programs to the residents. The funds will assist the organization with the continuation of operations and these much-needed services exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The services are open to the general public who are in need of assistance.	5659106	2635000	2635000								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public		No	0
TPN-002562	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	OCC - Financial Navigation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators	Benefits and Financial Navigation: Funds will enable Dallas to put into place a single stop opportunity integrating benefits access and application to simplify process for clients, modeled after best practices such as the Benefits Trust, and the continuation of a financial navigators program launched during the early days of the pandemic. Additionally, funds will support expansion and enhancement of our city-wide tax assistance program in anticipation of additional needs of VITA filers related to tax law changes, such as the Child Tax Credit, and additional time needed to process returns in virtual or distanced environment.	300000	48050.9	45557.34								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic		Yes	2950000
TPN-002563	RCP-039765	Loudoun County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Polco ARPA Engagement Platform	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Funds were used to purchase a subscription to the Polco ARPA Engagement Package that enables the County to measure stakeholder needs and prioritize ARPA-funded initiatives, monitor changes to assess the effectiveness of initiatives, and provide data driven evidence of program efficacy for audits and reporting.  The package contains three primary components:  Engagement, including high quality standardized surveys of residents and business stakeholders, the engagement platform enabling collaboration among local government leaders, and on-line reporting dashboards that include key findings, benchmark comparisons, national indices, and demographic reports.	8000	8000	8000								No
TPN-002564	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	OCC - Service Design Support	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	This item will support the costs of high level temporary staff and/or contractors to support program oversight and management, with an emphasis on helping the department to integrate contracts management software and processes into overall operations. Service design support will serve as a liaison between internal ITS, procurement and identified contractors, and in conjunction with department contract management staff, to ensure establish processes and protocols for program and contract oversight.	100000	0	0	0							No
TPN-002566	RCP-039686	Sarpy County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Replacement of Sheriff vehicles	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacement of Sheriff vehicles		781254	781254
TPN-002567	RCP-039686	Sarpy County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Mental health needs assessment study	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Mental health needs assessment study		0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002568	RCP-039686	Sarpy County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Consultant & Other Administrative Costs	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Consultant & Other Administrative Costs		20000	12011.6
TPN-002569	RCP-039686	Sarpy County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	JJC Design/Expansion	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Design and expansion of JJC facility to be responsive to social distancing measures, mental health/medical needs		85641	85640.55								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002573	RCP-039410	Janesville, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	JACVB Revenue Replacement	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Provide a grant of $257,215 to the local visitors and convention bureau to replace lost hotel tax revenue related to the COVID-19 pandemic.	257215	257215	257215								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002574	RCP-039410	Janesville, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Downtown Janesville Revenue Replacement	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Provide a grant to the local Chamber of Commerce to replace lost revenue related to the COVID-19 pandemic.	26403	26403	26403								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002575	RCP-038435	York County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	HANDHELD RADIOS FOR PRISON STAFF	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Provide a two way radio to each prison staff member to assist with COVID response. The prison needed approximately 15-20 radios. Currently, the York County Prison staff shares handheld radios. Each officer should be issued their own personal radio to help with cross-contamination, but most importantly, so each officer has a call number going into the 9-1-1 system and master console.  This would make it easier to identify who is calling through the master control console. Currently, if an officer/prisoner has a COVID-19 medical emergency or another type of emergency, the radio is identified with an ID not a person. (Outcome) Prison staff now has 21 radios issued to each staff member.  Each staff member is now identified by their radio call number; thus creating a safer environment for all by providing expedited care and service and less COVID-19 contamination amongst staff.	74996.35	74996.35	74996.35								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	74996.35	1 Imp General Public			No	74996.35
TPN-002578	RCP-038435	York County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	DETENTION CENTER EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM EQUIPMENT	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Provide full riot suits/helmets to each member on the Detention Center Emergency Response Team. Currently, this equipment must be shared (including full face covering helmets) and passed between staff during riot events and especially during training events. This is harmful to Detention staff members because sharing equipment, especially around the nose and mouth, creates the potential of passing communicable diseases, including COVID-19, to one another and prisoners.   (Outcome) 30 riot helmets with visors and 30 suits were issued to each ERT member so that they do not have to share equipment which helps stop the spread of COVID-19 in the prison/detention center (vulnerable population), and provide better ERT response. Impacts: Inmates and General Public.	14669.1	14669.1	14669.1								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002580	RCP-036068	Alachua County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Ambulance Transport Support and Premium Pay Program	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	"6 additional Rescue Lieutenant and 6 Fire Fighter positions will be created and staffed for 6 months.  At the end of 6 months the program will be evaluated and either extended another 6 months or 4 Fire Fighters will phased out through attrition. The phase out of the program will retain all 6 Rescue Lieutenants and 2 Fire Fighters, creating the planned new permanent transport unit from the General Fund.  Rescue Lieutenants will be required to provide a 2 year commitment to stay in position to reeive a $10,000 in Premium Pay, unless promoted to District Chief, and will receive half of the premium pay at 6 months service and the other half at 12 months service.  Current Rescue Lieutenants with more than 1 year service will receive the premium pay in October."	219812.24	219812.24	219812.24		73
TPN-002581	RCP-039410	Janesville, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Lead Service Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Replace publicly owned lead service mains.	2308971	1999191.19	1999191.19					No
TPN-002582	RCP-039410	Janesville, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Center Ave Water Main Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Replace water main on Center Avenue	2000000	25637	25637					No
TPN-002583	RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Local Road Construction	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Local Road Construction 069-030-053 CP 0000-541653		350475.94	350475.94
TPN-002584	RCP-036068	Alachua County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	AC Employee Vaccination Program	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Under the Alachua County Government Employee Vaccination Program, all employees of the Board of County Commissioners and Constitutional Officers will be provided an incentive award of $500 upon being fully vaccinated. If they are not currently fully vaccinated, they may receive $250 after the first shot and $250 after the second shot, as long as they receive the first shot (or the Johnson & Johnson shot) prior to September 15, 2021.  If an employee is not eligible for the vaccination because they recently had COVID-19, there timeline for the first shot may be extended to the date of eligibility as determined by their physician.	835599.14	835599.14	835599.14								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002585	RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Local Road Construction	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Local Road Construction Project CP 0734-0432192 (Low Prime)		6472.9	6472.9
TPN-002586	RCP-039410	Janesville, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Court Street Water Main Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Replace Water mains on Court Street west of Center Avenue	2308971	52493.45	52493.45
TPN-002587	RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Local Road Construction	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Local Road Construction - SAP 069-030-052		515677.12	515677.12
TPN-002588	RCP-039449	Washington County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Broadband Study	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Washington County Broadband Mapping Project:  Ernst & Young Infrastructure Advisors, LLC will provide support to the Office of County Administration for (a) developing a map of broadband coverage and pricing/affordability in Washington County (b) lay the groundwork for future grant applications at either the State or Federal level (c) developing a map of existing fiber networks and conduits in Washington County, assessing the economics of a build-out scenario and providing estimates of subsidies required to enable expansion. Major Activities include:  (1) Build geospatial map of the County, (2) Create existing supply layer (fixed and wireless) (2a) using existing EY data and identify any additional useful data to map coverage on a census block by block basis or on a road segment bases for rural areas and (2b) identify and categorize where broadband coverage is confirmed compared with areas where coverage may exist but requires additional outreach to confirm, (3) Create plan speeds layer, (4) Create plan pricing layer, (5) Suggest next steps required for grant applications, (6) Mapping of existing fiber networks and conduit, (7) Create shortlist of build options by technology (fiber, fixed wireless, cellular, etc.) (8) Develop estimates of subsidies required to improve coverage in certain areas after emulating private sector’s economics for providing service (9) Supplemental outreach on a customer survey basis or through outreach to broadband providers to fine-tune broadband mapping where existing data sources can not confirm whether broadband is present or not.		175000	175000					No
TPN-002589	RCP-039410	Janesville, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Lost City Revenue	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	City Revenue lost attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic.  The City Council has authorized spending up to $2,000,000 for the design of a community center.  The City Council authorized up to $2,000,000 in grants be provided to local non-profits for capital expenditures which will allow the non-profits to respond to the needs of the community.	4000000	4000000	3249196.98
TPN-002590	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Family Caregiver Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Training Nursing Assistants to bolster local healthcare needs, provide career training for High School students, and aid individuals with training that receive state/federal aid, or live and work in QCT zones.	200000	200000	200000								No			5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts		No	0
TPN-002591	RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Health Salaries for COVID related work	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Public Health Staff time related to COVID		1324869.77	1324869.77			10					No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002593	RCP-039410	Janesville, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Emergency Operations Plan	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Money will fund the development of a Citywide emergency operations plan to respond to future natural or manmade disasters.	75000	55892.5	55892.5								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002594	RCP-036068	Alachua County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	AC Health Plan Credit Program	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Under the Alachua County Government Employee Health Plan Program, all members of the Alachua County Health Insurance Plan will be provided an incentive award of $10 per member per month premium credit upon being fully vaccinated. If they are not fully vaccinated prior to October 1, 2021, they may receive a prorated credit for the remainder of the fiscal year upon being fully vaccinated. The credit will be a maximum of $50 per month per contract (5 per family for credit) and the credit is limited to the amount they pay as a premium.	197005	197005	197005								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002595	RCP-039410	Janesville, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Remote Work Implementation	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Purchase and implement software and hardware that will allow the City workforce to work remotely.	600000	3590.02	3590.02								No
TPN-002596	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Tulsa FMAC - Music & Film Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The mission of the Tulsa Office of Film, Music, Arts & Culture (Tulsa FMAC) is to develop/connect resources to grow and enhance northeast Oklahoma’s creative industries, including film, music and the arts, while promoting Tulsa as a creative and cultural hub. Primarily, we aim to highlight Tulsa’s creative industries, communities and ideas so they flourish. Tulsa FMAC administers Play Tulsa Music, the Tulsa County Film Recovery Program, the Tulsa Music Strategy, and the Tulsa Creativity Database. Tulsa FMAC is housed under Tulsa Regional Tourism at the Tulsa Regional Chamber.	1733000	1733000	1733000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002597	RCP-039410	Janesville, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Digitize Files	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The City will use funds to transfer paper files to digital files to allow for remote work.	110000	68062.16	68062.16								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002598	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Tulsa Regional Tourism	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	This funding will arm Tulsa Regional Tourism with first-class marketing collateral, support for strategic geo-campaigns to our drive-in markets and a potent presence in travel sites and strengthen site to entice future visits/spends in our region.	1413854	1413854	952570								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002599	RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Mortgage Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Provide assistance to homeowners who are in arrears on mortgages and related expenses due to impacts from COVID-19.		1591136.76	1591136.76	317							Yes	Technology and tools	9572.71	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-002600	RCP-036068	Alachua County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Citizen Vaccination Program	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Under the Alachua County Citizen Vaccination Program, all Alachua County residents will be provided an incentive award of $25 for each COVID-19 vaccination regardless of manufacturer, including booster shots. The County will partner with vaccine providers, CVS, Hitchcock’s, Wise’s, Winn-Dixie and the Public Health Department to supply gift cards at the time of vaccination.  The providers will provide list, without identifiable information, of how many vaccines were administered for reimbursement.	502002.57	502002.57	502002.57								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002604	RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	SLC COVID Health Insurance Expenses	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	St. Louis County is self-insured so these are the COVID-related costs the County has incurred.		1889023.16	1889023.16								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002605	RCP-036068	Alachua County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Revenue Recovery	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace lost revenue due to the impact of COVID based on the Treasury calculations.  General governments personal services and operating expenditures were funded as well as some one-time capital expenditures	49574131.74	49574131.74	49574131.74
TPN-002606	RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	License Center Staff Entryway	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Costs of the staff working to only allow so many people into the building at one time to allow for social distancing.		46971.72	46971.72								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002607	RCP-036068	Alachua County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Emergency Medical Services Training Facility, Equipment, and Supplies Program	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Personal protective equipment and supplies for fire rescue first responders.  The items will include masks, gloves, decontamination supplies, disinfecting supplies, etc. which go above and beyond our normal use prior to COVID. The estimated cost will be $205,000.00.  Alachua County Fire Rescue currently has thirty four (34) vehicle mounted mobile radios that due to age are no longer eligible to be maintained by our vendor.  There are no parts available and software upgrades are also not available.  It is critical that the radios are replaced in order to ensure a continuation of communication ability of the fire rescue units.  The estimated cost will be $170,000.00. Over the last several years, the Alachua County Department of Fire Rescue has worked diligently to address the work load issues of our Emergency Medical Services.  The territory serviced by Rescue 80 continues to produce the highest demand for service in the County.  In FY2020, R80 responded to 4,193 call for service in an area that includes stretches of SR93, two free-standing Emergency Rooms, Butler Plaza, Celebration Pointe, the Archer Road corridor, and numerous assisted living facilities and medical offices.  The estimated FY2021 responses for Rescue 80 are 4,642, in addition, Rescue 23 is estimated to exceed 4,100 responses.  This new rescue unit will be added as a second rescue to be housed at Station 80 in an effort to bring the call volume per unit to a manageable level.  Work load has been reported to be a primary contributor to work stress, fatigue, and low morale amongst the crews stationed at this location.  The estimated cost for the additional rescue unit and equipment will be $375,000.00. Alachua County Fire Rescue (ACFR) currently has nineteen (19) front line advanced life support (ALS) transport units covering 965 square miles.  Performing chest compressions for an extended period of time causes fatigue and can have a negative impact on the quality of CPR.  Additional complications with manual COR include interruptions in compressions while moving the patient, physical limitation of the medical providers, and also tying up at least two additional rescuers which are limited in the rural areas of our community.  Medical providers who are transporting from rural location on busy highways are also put at an unnecessary risk when not able to be seat belted while doing chest compressions.  Automatic chest compression devices (ACCD) have recently become the standard for emergency medical service (EMS) agencies.  Currently, only three of ACFR’s transport units are stocked with an ACCD.  With transport distances as much as 30 minutes to the hospital, extended times of doing chest compressions leads to fatigue, is not safe for the medical providers and is not as efficient as using an ACCD.  The use of ACCDs provides continuous high quality chest compressions that is uninterrupted while moving the patient, during ventilations and while defibrillating.  Consistent chest compressions profoundly increases the chance of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and is a lifesaving intervention and the cornerstone of resuscitation from cardiac arrest according to American Heart Association (AHA).  The estimated cost to purchase eighteen (18) devices is $400,000.00. In January of 2022, Alachua County Fire Rescue will acquire a vacant building from the Tax Collector’s Office. This building has been utilized as an in person, customer service center for citizens doing business with the Tax Collector. The building and property are located at 5801NW 34 Boulevard. The department plans to make changes to the interior layout of the building so that it can address several needs related to Emergency Medical Service (EMS) training and new employee onboarding. Approximately half of the building is an open floor plan which will be utilized as an educational classroom, hands-on training, EMS testing assessments, EMS employee skills evaluations, and new employee orientation and training. The building contains several offices in the back that will be occupied by training staff and the Information Technology (IT) section of the department. Additional enhancement will be made to facilitate the additional personnel who are training there as well as base quarters for a future District Chief who will manage EMS and Fire Units stationed in the area.  The estimated cost for these renovations is $450,000.00 of which $350,000.00 will be used from the American Rescue Funding and $100,000.00 from the annual PEMT funds.	647299.49	647299.49	647299.49								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	0	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002608	RCP-053281	City Of Gresham, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA Administration Expense	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Project CWSARPAADM was setup to capture all ARPA related Administrative Expenses. This will generally consist of payroll expenses for City of Gresham employees who are working on ARPA related projects including: administration, planning, tracking, and reporting. These hours will be recorded in our time-keeping system with an attached comment explaining what the employee was working on related to ARPA.	380000	126221.07	126221.07
TPN-002609	RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Local Road Construction	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Local Road Construction CP 0081-493052 Low Prime Grip		1217392.04	1217392.04
TPN-002612	RCP-036068	Alachua County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Alachua County Food Security – Strike Out Hunger, Household Assistance Food Prog	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	The ACBoCC will allocate $300,000 over four years for an annual Strike Out Hunger, Household Assistance Food Program for Disadvantaged Communities.  This annual food assistance event will occur in November, every year and is targeted to disadvantaged communities per Treasure guidance under Negative Economic Impacts (EC 2) Food Programs. Provide emergency food assistance for low-income persons within Alachua County over the holiday season.  On an annual basis for four years, a total of $75,000 will be distributed between local food banks, small local farmers, and non-profits serving marginalized and underserved communities in support of emergency food assistance. Food insecurity is a chronic condition for marginalized communities that is objectively exacerbated by COVID-19 economic impacts on these residents.  Low-income residents that are either under or unemployed due to the pandemic, lack of access to affordable and nutritious food. This in conjunction with an increased likelihood of nutrition-related illness (e.g. hypertension, diabetes) makes this population at greater risk for hospitalization and infection.	87381.88	87381.88	87381.88	2000							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity		Yes	87381.88
TPN-002613	RCP-039449	Washington County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay for Locally Funded Sworn Officers	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The Commonwealth of Virginia’s 2021 General Assembly Special Session II Action impacting Constitutional Officers and the Compensation Board is as follows:  a one time $3,000 premium pay for Compensation Board funded sworn positions in the Sheriff’s offices, including sheriffs and sheriffs’ deputies.  The $3,000 determined by the General Assembly was calculated by taking $13/hour for 231 hours.  The requirement was initially that the sworn officer had to work at least 231 hours before the date the bonus was paid.  It was later determined that all sworn deputies would be eligible for the bonus if they occupy the position on the date the bonus was paid since federal ARPA rules allow premium pay to be retroactive or prospective.  In order to be equitable to all the sworn officers within the Sheriff’s department, the Sheriff requested funding from the County from ARPA to award locally funded sworn officers a one-time premium pay of $3,000.  The Board of Supervisors approved premium pay in the amount of $63,000 for 21 locally funded sworn deputies and $4,819.50 for FICA expense related to the payment of the one time premium pay.		67819.5	67819.5		21
TPN-002615	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	TCSO COVID Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	The Tulsa County Sheriff's Office received $165,119.22 for testing to control the spread of COVID-19 through the jail. Testing was administered by the jail's medical provider, which tracked all tests given to quarantine and care for prisoners who tested positive.	167202.37	167202.37	165119.22								No			15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-002616	RCP-038435	York County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Radio System Capacity Increase	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Increase York County’s 9-1-1 radio system capacity  by adding one additional channel. The York County radio network is utilized to provide the locations of ambulances in the field using GPS and to dispatch those units for COVID-19 and other emergencies. High volume calls times and adding additional ambulances to meet the needs of those suffering from COVID-19 complications placed and continues to place additional strain on the radio network. The additional capacity is needed to keep the information flow expedited and flowing freely to ambulances responding to COVID calls and other emergencies.  This serves the general public.  Outcome is that information flow will be expedited in the 9-1-1 call center for response to COVID patients and other emergencies. This improves the public delivery of 9-1-1 services and first responders.  (Outcome)  Public Safety Communications 9-1-1 now has an additional channel added to the radio system to increase capacity to more efficiently process voice conversations and responder location information to dispatch centers in an effort to help save lives.  This now gives 9-1-1 16 lines vs. 15 lines to provide life-saving communication.  Impacts: General Public.	51800	51800	51800								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	51800	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002617	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Women in Recovery - Court Services/Alt Courts	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	To support the Alternative Courts Program with five case manager employees to facilitate pre-trial release from jail, thereby reducing barriers to entry while increasing success rates and referrals in a centralized location.	656472.7	504068.84	504068.84			*					No
TPN-002619	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	TC - Workday Project	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Tulsa County's County Clerk office received $1,842,660 to implement cloud-based software to automate payroll, accounting, benefits and more. The new application supported remote working for more than 1,000 employees across Tulsa County and its associated departments.	1842660	1842660	1842660								No
TPN-002620	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Management Software Enhancements	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Funding will support the procurement of software tools to facilitate contract oversight and management and to automate certain components of contract reporting. This will enable the team to more efficiently and effectively manage the numerous individual program contracts being supported through ARPA funds. This will help support efforts to administer funding via multiple subrecipient for multiple projects	200000	33871.5	0								No
TPN-002625	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	OEI Eviction Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	The City of Dallas Office of Equity and Inclusion has established the Eviction Assistance Initiative (EAI) that provides assistance in the form of education, training, and legal representation to Dallas tenants who are negatively impacted by COVID-19 and unable to pay rent to remain in their homes. The initiative looks to address the eviction crisis with the goal of keeping families housed and educations tenants and landlords on their rights and responsibilities. Services include outreach & community education, advice & briefs, and full legal representation. The EAI provides benefits to tenants faced with eviction due to the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and improves services to communities most in need. As the COVID-19 pandemic persists, the impact on housing instability has increased. The EAI assists those impacted through education on eviction resources available and legal representation in the event a tenant is faced with evictions.	500000	500000	338355.5	40							No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	1 Imp General Public	No	500000
TPN-002630	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	City Council Fund	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	Our elected officials have a clear understanding of the specific needs in their communities. The allocated funds will allow our Councilmembers to support and expand on the various social services or economic development programs being implemented with ARPA funding and direct or target critical needs or services in specific communities where they may be needed most. These projects will be overseen by staff, however allocated district funds can ensure certain services are delivered within a specific district and/or increase the overall level of support to certain programming.	16000000	1287778.65	782431.39								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	1 Imp General Public	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-002631	RCP-036179	Boulder County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	2.1.1 BCPH FOOD INSECURITY	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	The pandemic has resulted in greater food insecurity within Boulder County, and programs that serve “gap” populations who are not eligible for Federal programs or that supplement insufficient programs are seeing larger waitlists. To best facilitate an urgent response, BCPH will increase pass-through funding to BCPH's Women Infants and Children (WIC) Gap Funding program to provide food benefits to additional families not served by other federal programs and are currently on the waitlist. This program enhances WIC fruit and vegetable benefits, offering a weekly home delivery and a farmer’s market model that provides reliable and consistent nutrition benefits. In a typical year, WIC families may only receive $8 per person per month for fresh produce. This program fills a nutrition gap not offered through the federal program or local programs. This funding will increase direct support to families to enhance food security, while supporting local farmers and agriculture and partners at the Boulder and Longmont Farmers Markets, as well as economic revitalization through multiplier effects and supporting healthy food consumption. Boulder County Farmers Markets (BCFM) will distribute $20 in healthy food incentives to Boulder County WIC families with a Longmont or BOCO sticker one time weekly via home delivery or at in-person farmers markets. BCFM staff will track eligible families for each home delivery or physical farmers market transaction.	130178	130178	68669.33	550							No			16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	Yes	130178
TPN-002632	RCP-037706	Washington County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay Washington Government Workers	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	This program provides premium pay to each employee of Washington County government who worked during the pandemic onsite, thus incurring risk of exposure to the Covid-19 virus.  These employees provided essential services to the public and the essential administrative support necessary to maintain government operations.   Premium pay was only provided to workers who were providing services onsite and not remote working.	3600000	3585205.91	3585205.91		896
TPN-002633	RCP-035897	County Of Orange, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Paid Sick and/or Family Leave	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	This project provided paid sick and paid family and medical leave for public employees to enable compliance with COVID-19 public health precautions.	23352888.68	23352888.68	23352888.68								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002635	RCP-037706	Washington County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Lodging and Accommodations Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Assistance program for local hotels/motels who were impacted by the pandemic.	20000	20000	20000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002636	RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Police Radio Replacement	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	To provide each individual officer with a radio to prevent the spread of COVID-19.	642524.69	642524.69	642524.69								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	642616.67	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002637	RCP-037706	Washington County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay- Fire and Rescue Providers	4-Premium Pay	4.2-Private Sector: Grants to other employers	Premium pay for front-line fire and rescue workers	1023999	904452.25	904452.25		939
TPN-002638	RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Fire Station Upgrades	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Construct individual dorm rooms within the fire station to prevent the spread of COVID-19.	250906.99	250906.99	250906.99								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	325000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002639	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Health Clinic Facility	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The City of Bridgeport has determined that the planned relocation / upgrade of the city’s East Side Health Center will materially assist in addressing the negative consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic in the city, by addressing vital health care needs of our citizenry in a new state-of-the-art health care facility.  Covid-19 adversely impacted the city’s ability to directly provide health care, counselling, and other assistance to its residents.  This reduced delivery of health-care services is both a consequence of limited local resources necessarily being diverted to directly combat the Covid-19 pandemic and a result of the operational burdens created by the need to protect as best as reasonably possible our health care providers and clients from contracting this highly contagious disease.  Lower income city residents who are at the greatest risk for Covid-19 due to population density, elevated levels of pre-existing recognized Covid-19 co-morbidities and long-standing reduced access to quality health care due to their disadvantaged economic status and the effects of systemic racism have a desperate need for Covid-19 testing / treatment, in addition to having their other physical and mental health-care needs timely met.  A rehabilitated East Side Health Center will go a long way to address the health-care needs of the city’s economically disadvantaged and ethnically/racially diverse urban community, with its high migrant and non-English speaking population.   The newly relocated East Side Health Center Rehabilitation will provide the city and its high service needs health care client population with a highly accessible “welcoming to all” and fully functional state-of-the-art public health service facility located in geographic proximity to its service recipients.  Moreover, as a direct consequence of the facility rehabilitation, this service provider will be able to offer and reliably deliver life-saving and other essential medical treatments, even despite the operational challenges imposed by the Covid-19 pandemic.  Unfortunately, due to their financial and environmental circumstances, Bridgeport residents experience, unhealthy diets, obesity, asthma, vitamin deficiencies, and untreated major illnesses.  One of the most effective means to address the Covid-19 health crisis is through direct targeted governmental action, in this instance either via city staff and resources or engagement of competitively procured third-party services.  This government response will directly improve the health and welfare of a vulnerable population of Bridgeport residents.  The most efficient means to address the Covid-19 induced health crisis is through concerted government action.  This project will directly improve the health and quality of life for Bridgeport health-care clients; and will indirectly materially benefit the wider population by facilitating treated patients’ ability to provide for their families and other dependents once their own basic health-care needs are addressed by health-care professionals at a conveniently located safe and accessible site.  Thus, this project will have both an immediate positive impact on Covid-19 local response. Project scope is site work which involves a new parking lot, new drainage, new exterior lighting, retaining walls and landscaping, and a new roof and repointing exterior masonry. The interior consists of a new elevator, new bathrooms, renovating the basement area with offices, break room, community computer room and entertainment area for the Veteran affairs department. The second floor will be new offices, reception/ waiting area, break rooms and health clinic exam rooms, storage areas with IT and security upgrades.	500000	200000	41906.31								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	750000
TPN-002640	RCP-035897	County Of Orange, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Workers' Compensation	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The County's Workers' Compensation Program provides prompt state-mandated benefits and quality medical care to injured County employees. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Workers' Compensation claim costs were increasing due to rising medical costs. This project allowed the County to mitigate Workers' Compensation costs and accelerate the process of returning employees to work.	3938587.53	3938587.53	3938587.53								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002641	RCP-035897	County Of Orange, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Meal Gap Programming	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	Meal gap programming for seniors, persons with disabilities and other individuals experiencing food insecurity as a result of COVID-19 pandemic. Seniors, disabled residents and other at-risk individuals are discouraged from or fearful of leaving their homes and consequently suffer from food insecurity as a result of COVID-19. Establishing this meal program will protect the health and well-being of these vulnerable populations.	0	0	0	52606							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			No	0
TPN-002642	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Resident Relief	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	This funding is for service rendered to the Highland Hills Apartment complex during the COVID pandemic it became critical to maintain the distance for a large congregate area because of an  emergency affecting several units in regards to electrical and burned units. This funding will provide hotel stays and necessary supplies to shelter individuals in response to an emergency. 251 residents across 65 units	395517.07	395517.07	395517.07								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	100000
TPN-002643	RCP-035897	County Of Orange, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Economic Support to Arts-Related Small Businesses and Non-Profits	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Economic support to arts-related small businesses and non-profits within Orange County. The economic support initiatives include but are not limited to arts- related small business and non-profits recovery programs, arts-related small business and non-profits grants, which may be distributed through a third-party administrator. The five supervisorial districts within Orange County may direct the application of the economic recovery funding using all or a portion of the funding for arts-related small businesses or non- profits, as allowable under SLFRF. To reflect the specific needs in each supervisorial district, application and eligibility criteria may vary by district.	0	0	0								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-002644	RCP-035897	County Of Orange, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Revenue Replacement Provision of Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Under the Revenue Replacement category, for the provision of Government Services, County departments' COVID-19 public health response included, but was not limited to, expenditures such as payroll costs for staff that supported the County's COVID-19 public health response; testing and tracing; personal protective equipment, hospital gowns, sanitation and other supplies that complied with COVID-19 measures; disinfection and sanitation of public areas and offices; maintained and improved telework capabilities; public health facility costs; nutrition gap program extension; administrative support for the Affordable Housing, HomeKey and Emergency Housing Voucher programs; emergency shelter; Employee Health software system; Jail Pharmacy reconfiguration for COVID-19 operations; accounting staff time for preparing various ARPA claims and reports; and COVID-19 campaigns, broadcasting and translation services.  In addition, this project includes costs associated with salary and employee benefits for County employees; trial court maintenance of effort and county facilities payments; site development of Veterans portion of Mountain Park Cemetery, in Anaheim, California; purchase of iPads with data plans, subscription for training and online classes and technology support for older adults; restoration of positions deleted to mitigate some of the County's economic impacts from COVID-19; costs associated with development of a new Emergency Medical Services Operating Facility; a second wellness campus to expand mental health and substance use services to treat both adults and youth; providing a safe and secure workspace for all County employees, including a reliable, secure and maintainable remote work solution; purchase of emergency food to address immediate needs related to COVID -19 and purchase of food and water storage equipment to aid in event of a disaster or emergency; program services for enhancing and expanding anti-hate work; temporary isolation shelter services; meal gap programming; economic support to arts-related small businesses and non-profits; landlord incentives and match commitments for housing development; and homelessness.	589549466.79	589549466.79	589549466.79
TPN-002645	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Air Quality Monitors	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Procure, install and provide data from non-regulatory neighborhood air quality monitors.  Equipment will be deployed in /near communities with identified cardio-pulmonary health data correlated with proximate land uses with potential for poor air quality.  Data will be provided in a publicly-facing platform, and will be used to support land use decisions, and appropriate public health interventions.  This supports implementation of CECAP Actions AQ2 and AQ4	1000000	241942.4	217302.4								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			Yes	0
TPN-002647	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Personal Protective Equipment	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Purchase of Personal Protective Equipment for City personnel involved in COVID prevention and other personnel at risk	50000	36000	36000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002648	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Health and Safety costs	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	City Health and Safety Personnel dedicated staff salaries and overtime related to  the response to the COVID 19 pandemic.	0	0	0			8					No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-002649	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Mental Health Community Services Program	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The city of Bridgeport has determined that a Mental Health ARPA funded program will help address the adverse consequences and impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic in the city and address vital needs of our citizens and the community of Bridgeport. The goal of this program is to address the economic impacts of COVID-19 through programs and services to support individuals affected by mental health issues and their families. The COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent economic recession have adversely impacted mental health and created new barriers for people already suffering from mental health illnesses. Residents experienced far greater rates of fear, anxiety, stress and trauma. For many, the pandemic also resulted in loss of employment and even housing. This placed a special burden on mental health services.  These programs and services were  bid and community based organizations chosen for ARPA funding are offering intensive counseling and support services to individuals and families afflicted with mental health issues, which help those in the Bridgeport community facing such issues to live better lives. Some community-based programs had reduced services due to sthe pandemic’s impact and this program is helping to redress such issues. The focus for this program is on expanding the ability to provide safe, needed and prompt access to mental health care where patients can see a provider in person or via telehealth as the public health crisis continues. This program will also help patients manage their conditions as they can flourish in work, school, life, long term and have a positive impact on the economy.	1576500	1576500	768140.8								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	Yes	382000
TPN-002650	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Addiction  Substanec Abuse Prevention program	1-Public Health	1.13-Substance Use Services	The City of Bridgeport has determined that Addiction Services will address the negative consequences and adverse impacts of the COVID-19 on many of its citizens. Due to the pandemic, many individuals do not have access to treatments to aid with their addictions. The Addiction Services ARPA  program is geared towards helping individuals getting on track with reducing and preventing alcohol addiction, drug addiction and other forms of mental health illness, aimed at gaining individual resiliency and responsibility to prevent further usage of substances and to reduce the risk of suicide and other negative outcomes. The focus of these programs ranges from recovery and relapse prevention, life skills development and spiritual formation. Individual and family members access to counselling, work therapy and classroom education. Programs are geared toward low-income and disadvantaged  individuals. Each individual’s journey to recovery is unique, and these programs are design to meet each individual where they are with their mental health needs.  Many families in the City of Bridgeport are unfortunately suffering from relatives having various addictions, whether it be substance abuse or gambling addictions, or whether it be due to medical conditions. With these programs, individuals in need have access to detoxing services, individual and group therapy, and other services to assist with improving their lives. Awardee non profit organizations were selected for ARPA funding through a public procurement process.	900000	600000	400000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	Yes	300000
TPN-002651	RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Rental Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Assist residents earning up to 80 percent of the area median income with housing costs by providing direct payments to landlords.		614493.46	614493.46	124							Yes	Other (please specify)	1723.03	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-002653	RCP-038435	York County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	YORK COUNTY AED DEVICES	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Purchase of 125 AED's throughout York County.  AEDs are relied on heavily during cardiac events in York County.  Research shows that it is possible that COVID-19 impacts the heart in a negative way and causes issues during and after COVID. This device assists first responders and non-first responders by limiting contact with anyone that could have COVID-19 or have been exposed to this virus or another variant during emergency situations.  This device makes the most of the limited manpower at cardiac events by assisting in the early CPR process before EMS arrives on scene.   Additionally, by standardizing to this brand of AED, York County first responders will match the equipment used by Piedmont EMS, allowing for a quicker and seamless transition of the patient during a COVID and/or cardiac event. This serves the general public.   The outcome is that AED’s will be deployed throughout York County buildings and to first responders in order to respond to COVID 19 complications and other medical emergencies and to quickly save lives (COVID & non-COVID) due to AED's will match what the hospital uses. Impacts: General Public. All that is left to receive are 14 rescue mask kits.	536760.14	536760.14	536760.14								No		522133.85	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002654	RCP-038435	York County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Emergency Management Monitor/Defibrillators	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The York County Office of Emergency Management (YCOEM) will purchase two Physio-Control LifePak 15 Monitor/Defibrillators (“LifePak 15” or “LP15”).  The LifePak 15 is a robust patient diagnostic and treatment monitor that allows both Advanced Life Support (ALS) and Basic Life Support (BLS) personnel to assess and treat patients for COVID-19 and a myriad of traumatic and medical emergencies.  The York County Office of Emergency Management will deploy both of the LifePak 15’s with the two National Registry Paramedics (NRP) employed within the office.  This will allow us to minimize the number of responders in close proximity to an infected patient, reducing the number of responders that can be potentially exposed to COVID or other diseases and vice versa.  These machines will be especially pivotal in filling the “care gap” of COVID patients from the 911 call to ambulance arrival during such trying times on EMS.  Serve the general public.  Outcome will be to save lives of those suffering from COVID-19 and LifePak 15 will be deployed in each paramedic’s vehicle to assist with COVID-19 treatment and other emergency medical treatment. Impacts: General Public.	92006	92006	92006								Yes	Medical equipment and facilities	90934.98	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002657	RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Senior Resource Center - Mental Health	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Establish mental health counselors and a mobile health outreach team based at the Senior Resource Center to serve our County’s older adults. Includes 2 full time positions ( total  of 2.0 FTEs)		316649.81	316649.81								Yes	Technology and tools	3671.42	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic			No	0
TPN-002659	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Tenant Relcation Eviction Prevention Rent Assistance Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	The city of Bridgeport has determined that a Rental Relocation Eviction Prevention and Protection  program will address the negative consequences and impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic in the city and address vital needs of our citizens and the community of Bridgeport. In the year and a half since the COVID-19 pandemic began, the pandemic has unfortunately increased economic disparity throughout the Bridgeport area while disrupting the housing for disadvantaged at risk citizens. A combination of job-losses and the unprecedented disruption in the community has created some increase in homelessness and rental and home evictions Bridgeport.  This is affecting our residents at risk for being homeless. The American Rescue Plan Act allows the city of Bridgeport to respond to vulnerable households who faced imminent eviction, by creating the provision of the Rental Relocation Eviction Protection Program. This program allowed income eligible families, at-risk of homelessness, or currently displaced, with first month’s rent and security deposit. Applicants are required to compete the application, provide photo identification, and income statements. This program is run by the City Health Social Services department, with staff who specialize in helping residents of the City to secure and keep their rental housing leases and ability to stay in their homes.	2000000	1400509.39	1400509.39	250							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002663	RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Senior Resource Center - Virtual Outreach Worker	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The Virtual Outreach Worker is based at the County's Senior Resource Center (SRC).  This position develops and maintains virtual programs for the SRC, which allows broader engagement and service delivery to individuals 55 years or older.		94041.85	94041.85								No		1775	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-002664	RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Small Business Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	A local grant program to benefit companies impacted by COVID-19, including companies involved in entertainment, lodging/tourism, and the food and beverage industry.	550000	550000	295000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002665	RCP-038435	York County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Administration of Davis Bacon	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Catawba Regional Council of Governments will allocate staff resources to York County for the management of Davis Bacon activities/guidelines associated with the County's Infrastructure water projects that are over $10 million, and the Countys HVAC projects.  Outcome: Assist York County with administering Davis Bacon correctly.	150000	150000	11099.74
TPN-002666	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Programs for the Arts	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The City of Bridgeport has determined that grants to arts not for profit organizaations for creating and sustaining arts programs will help address the negative consequences and adverse impacts of COVID-19 that has affected the youth, families and senior citizens of the City. The programs will be geared toward benefiting disadvantaged and low-moderate income households and children from kindergarten through high school. The programs will encourage positive development of culture and educational knowledge, and promote healthy lifestyles. These programs will be open to the community and accessible for those in needed of education and knowledge of the arts. To keep youth off the streets,  some programs will be implemented as programs provided to families free of charge. In addition, community art exhibits will be created to improve neighborhood quality of life and visual impacts. Non-profit organizations were selected for ARPA funding through a public procurement process.	750000	750000	485302.56								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-002668	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Faith Based Initiatives	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The City of Bridgeport has determined that Faith-Based initiatives will help address the adverse negative consequences and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the City and address the vital needs of our citizens and the community of Bridgeport.  The City of Bridgeport is awarding assistance to these Faith-Based religious institutional not for profit organizations who were negatively impacted by adverse consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. programs. These initiatives include: funds to provide communications equipment and outreach to congregants and the community who have been restricted due to social distancing public health imperatives, funds for the installation and upgrades to facilities, and funds to purchase of PPE and other measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19.  Some fund are used for audio/visual equipment software to reach congregants unable to attend services due to the pandemic.  Faith-based programs has a huge impact on individuals to motivate them to do what’s best for the individual and the greater community.  These organizations are known for their community-outreach and youth programming and reach a large segment of our community.  The City of Bridgeport is awarding grants to institutions able to sustain programs the greater good of everyone in the community.  The awards under this program are limited to $10,000 to 25,000 per institution awarded ARPA funds. Awardees were selected through a public RFP and then a selection process run by a City appointed  Award Selection Committee.	405000	404867.54	404867.54								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify	11 Imp Classes of NPs designated as negatively economically impacted	10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002670	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Food Insecurity Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	The City of Bridgeport has determined that Food Insecurity Programs within the community will help address the adverse negative consequences and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the City and address the vital needs of our citizens and the community of Bridgeport.  Food Insecurity grants help families, children, homeless, and seniors at risk and living in low and moderate income neighborhoods and assist in addressing nutrition insecurity within the Bridgeport community. Program grants are made to non-profit organizations who have demonstrated an ability to provide food and food delivery assistance to Bridgeport residents in need via a food pantry or food bank, providing healthy foods within nutrition insecure neighborhoods. These programs help in conjunction with SNAP, WIC and senior benefits, hosting nutrition education programs, and/or creating fruit and vegetable prescription programs.  Many of Bridgeport’s citizens became unemployed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and through no fault of their own.  It is very important that the City addresses the adverse economic impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic so improving the quality of life for the citizens within our community. Awardee non profit organizations were selected for ARPA funding through a public procurement process.	970000	966406.91	523764.37	1000							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	Yes	333000
TPN-002671	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Small Business Expansion Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The City of Bridgeport has determined that a Small Business Expansion Grant program will help address the adverse consequences and impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on small businesses located within the city, which as a result address also assists in the vital needs of our citizens to have goods and services available for the community of Bridgeport. Small businesses were heavily impacted by Covid-19, experiencing a drastic downturn in revenues and additional costs for PPE, outfitting, and other expenses. In socio-economically disadvantaged communities like Bridgeport, small businesses did not have the means to sustain or expand and improve their businesses. The Covid-19 pandemic caused an inability to attract and retain customers. Some small businesses within the city had to be temporarily closed.   This program awards small businesses ARPA funds to improve their business models and provide services in different ways. As wholesale price increases increased and customer visits reduced, many small businesses reduced staff. This program awards direct assistance to qualified eligible small Bridgeport-based businesses to sustain operations or expand in order to become economically viable and cover the costs of necessary store repairs and equipment. Awards have been given up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for over 500 small businesses who applied through a request for proposals process. Applicants were vetted by a City Selection Committee. All businesses chosen had to be in business at least a year and employ under 100 employees, and submitted proposals and budgets.	3070000	3066207.22	3066207.22								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted	8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	Yes	3000000
TPN-002672	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Small Business Store Improvement Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The City of Bridgeport has developed a Small Business Storefront and Business Improvement Grant program to help address the adverse consequences and negative impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on small businesses within the city. Small businesses were heavily impacted by Covid-19, experiencing a drastic downturn in revenues and additional costs for PPE, outfitting, and other expenses. In socio-economically disadvantaged communities like Bridgeport, small businesses often did not have the means to sustain or expand and improve their businesses during this pandemic., The Covid-19 pandemic caused an inability to attract and retain customers and many small businesses had to be temporarily closed due to physical distancing and mandated operational restrictions.   This program allows awarded small businesses funds to improve their business facilities and to improve entrances and front of business locations to revitalize disadvantaged commercial sectors, reduce blight and ensure and improve patron safety. This program awards direct assistance to qualified eligible small Bridgeport-based businesses to rehabilitate or to improve business storefronts, windows, facades, and entranceways,  so small businesses are more viable and attractive to customers as well as safer. Awards in this program have been funded to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for over 200 small businesses who applied through a request for proposals process. All small businesses chosen for this program had to be in business at least a year and employ under 100 employees and had to submit proposals and budgets for expending awarded funds.	2235000	2230196.77	2230196.77								No			9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted	8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted	Yes	2500000
TPN-002674	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Workforce Development Jobs Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The City of Bridgeport has determined that Workforce Training development programs will address some of the negative consequences and adverse impact of the COVID-19 on its citizens. Due to the pandemic, employers were force to terminate many of their employees and often must close their businesses. Many citizens were left without a job and are having difficulties getting back into the workforce. With these programs the citizens of Bridgeport will have access to many resources that will aid with their job search and qualifications. The Workforce Training development program contracts with  bonafide Bridgeport based non-profit organizations to implement initiatives including, but not limited to, providing access to job training and education, offering industry-recognized certifications, offering support with resume writing, developing customized training programs such as pre-employment training, connecting individuals to apprenticeships programs, recruiting, screening, and referring job seekers ranging from entry level workers to highly-skilled professionals to prospective employers, assisting long-term unemployed individuals get back into the labor market, hosting job fairs and providing office space for on-site screening and interviewing, and/or assisting employees with job retention.  With the assistance from these programs, many individuals will acquire the job skills and qualifications they need to obtain a stable and rewarding job in the City of Bridgeport. Awardee non profit organizations were selected for ARPA funding through a public procurement process.	6000000	5997270	3812990.32								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	Yes	2000000
TPN-002675	RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	3rd Street Sewer	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Storm Sewer Improvement Project - 3rd Street and Bowman Street.	1048271	1048271	1048271					No
TPN-002676	RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Utility Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	This program provides assistance with utility bills for low-moderate income households that are delinquent as a result of the pandemic.		184588.42	184588.42	241							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-002677	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	County Clerk Payroll	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Tulsa County's County Clerk office received funding for payroll expenses directly related to administration of ARP funding, including accounting and communications.	350241.29	350241.29	350241.29
TPN-002681	RCP-035994	State of Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Back to Business Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	An assistance program for small businesses experiencing losses and/or business interruption as a result of COVID-19 related closures.  This program will reimburse such small businesses that have been affected by significant disruption or closure of their business due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. This Grant will include costs associated with the disbursement of subawards to businesses throughout Illinois that have experienced significant disruption or temporary closure of their business due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These subawards will range from $5,000 to $150,000 to cover operation/staff/overhead costs to help businesses recover from the pandemic and continue operating businesses that create jobs and wealth in their communities. Grant applications for the program will be received, reviewed, and rewarded on a rolling basis while adhering to priorities set by DCEO. There is no cost to participants for these program services.	251537575.29	251537575.29	251503000.2								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002683	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	TAEMA COVID Tests	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Purchase of 1000 Rapid Covid tests	10625	10625	10550								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002684	RCP-039449	Washington County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	William King Museum Expansion & Upgrade of Campus	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	WKMA requests $250,000, which will be used to renovate the grounds, parking areas, and drives surrounding the museum.  The renovation is designed to improve the museum’s accessibility and attraction as a tourism destination.  Currently, the awkward long flight of front steps and driveways are a deterrent to many visitors, particularly those arriving on tour buses as evidenced by comments from tour bus drivers and the omission of the museum on many travel itineraries.  The section of campus within the upper driveway is expected to be completed by March 2022 in time for the opening of an exhibition of prime tourism appeal, The Longrifle in Virginia, which opens April 1 and continues through October 31.  The first phase includes the east parking area and disable ramp, replacement of old water and sewer lines and new generator.  WKMA hopes to move directly into phase two, which will be a terraced entrance that replaces the long flight of entrances steps that have been a continuous access problem for many years.  This renovation project was put on hold due to the negative effect of COVID-19 had on the museum’s fundraising efforts.  The museum’s service area, to which it provides its educational and enrichment programs to schools within ten counties, was already a depressed rural region, as designated by the Appalachian Regional Commission and become more so during the pandemic.  The completion of this renovation project will ensure the museum’s position as a tourism attraction and County asset for economic recovery.  This is aid to a nonprofit due to the negative impact of COVID-19 and aid to a planned expansion/upgrade of tourism delayed due to the pandemic.  Washington County contributed $250,000 to the William King Museum capital project of $1,145,278.  Project is anticipated to be completed by the end of October.		250000	250000								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	1145278	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002685	RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Government services provided by the General Fund, and/or funds supported by the General Fund, including but not limited to, police, fire and other public safety services.	10000000	5864798.72	3150732.79
TPN-002688	RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Fire Station HVAC Improvements	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Replace current HVAC system in the fire station to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.	13337.15	13337.15	13337.15								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	13337.15	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002690	RCP-039765	Loudoun County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Hazard Bonuses	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Provides a one-time hazard bonus to eligible staff who performed critical work for the public and whose jobs require them on a routine basis to be within six feet of other people and where there are no reasonable options for social distancing.  Major categories of eligible positions include medical/healthcare workers in a healthcare setting, public safety positions, care and protective service positions, and human service client care positions.  Bonus tiers were $750, $1500, or $3,000 depending on how many hours eligible staff are scheduled to work and included both regular and temporary employees.	3062250	3062250	3062250		1023
TPN-002691	RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Municipal Court Radios	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	To provide individual radios to municipal court staff to prevent the spread of COVID-19.	16705.84	16705.84	16705.84								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	20000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002692	RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Police Training Facility - HVAC	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	To install HVAC system in the Police Training Facility to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.	30000	30000	30000								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	30000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002693	RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Police Training Facility - Furniture	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	To purchase furniture for the Police Training Facility that will prevent the spread of COVID-19.	29247.02	29000	22325.33								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	29247.02	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002694	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Engineering/TAEMA Traffic	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Support of TAEMA's operation of COVID 19 testing and/or treatment sites. Includes message boards, barricades, traffic drums, and speed bumps	125000	123355.44	123355.44								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002695	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	A Better Cut Lawn Care	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Assistance to small business that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		5000	5000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002696	RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Engineering - Chairs	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Chair replacement within the Engineering Department to prevent the spread of COVID-19.	4358.4	4358.4	4358.4								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	4365	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002697	RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Engineering - Remote Video Equipment	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	To purchase remote video equipment for the Engineering Department to prevent the spread of COVID-19.	3800	3800	3800								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	3800	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002698	RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Airport - HVAC	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	To replace the HVAC system in the airport terminal building to help mitigate the spread of COVID-19.	460000	460000	460000								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	460000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002700	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Assessment & Evaluation Services - Engineering	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Assessment and Evaluation services of building to determine COVID spacing requirements to meet public health recommendations	42000	42000	41687.2								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002702	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	TAEMA - masks	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	purchase of 25,000 child PPE masks	2880	2880	2880								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002703	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	TCSO - vehicles	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	TCSO was awarded $344,799.00 for Ford Explorers that have a disinfecting heating element that can kill COVID-19 germs. We purchased 10 units that were assigned to Patrol to transport in custody suspects. Once the suspect is booked into DLM, the deputy activates the heating process for approximately 15 minutes. The temperature of the vehicle reaches 115 degrees Fahrenheit.	364790	364790	359749								No		364790	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002705	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Court Services Pretrial Release Area	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Tulsa County's court services department received $30,480.63 to add cubicle workstations in the department's limited space within the jail to encourage social distancing. The women in recovery program directly reduces the jail population, so keeping its employees healthy further reduces COVID rates among the jail population.	30480.63	30480.63	19043.25								No			15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts			No	0
TPN-002706	RCP-039449	Washington County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	COVID-19 Testing	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Washington County purchased some over the counter COVID-19 test kits to be used as positive cases were encountered.  County paid for COVID test at medical facility for a solid waste employee.  The Solid Waste employee was required to have the COVID test before coming back to work.		2053.88	2053.88								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002707	RCP-037932	Fitchburg, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	COVID Test, Trace, and Vaccinate	1-Public Health	1.3-COVID-19 Contact Tracing	As part of the city’s ongoing efforts to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic, this project will expand on current public health activities, including a focus on increasing COVID-19 testing, increasing COVID-19 vaccination rates by increasing access to the vaccine, and increasing staff for contact tracing in order to provide sufficient tracking, surveillance, and compliance with isolation and quarantine orders that assist with the prevention of COVID-19 spread. The Commonwealth ended contact tracing on November 30, 2021, and the city has had to pick up that work. Most recently, testing has become difficult for residents to obtain, so the city is acquiring quantities of at-home tests for distribution within the community and has established a regional drive-thru test site at the Fitchburg Airport in cooperation with the City of Leominster and Montachusett Public Health Network.  This project will benefit the health of city residents in particular and of the greater area in general. '	500000	187241.74	187241.74								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002708	RCP-039449	Washington County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Vaccination Clinic-Staffing	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Washington County paid 2 crew members for Washington County Fire & Rescue to be on standby at a Vaccination Clinic.  The Vaccination Clinic was on December 8, 2021 at Abingdon Elementary.  The 2 crew members were on standby at the Clinic in case any of the recipients of the vaccine had any medical issues.		75.06	75.06								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002711	RCP-039427	Sheboygan, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Aid to Tourism, Travel or Hospitality- Room Tax Losses	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The City of Sheboygan has approved using $563,489 of ARPA funds- which is equivalent to the room tax revenue losses within the City during 2020 compared to the baseline of  2019 amounts to address those room tax losses.  Pursuant to the allocation of room tax revenue per state statute, Sheboygan Area Room Tax Commission received $394,442.30 (70% of the funds) and the City retained $169,046.70 (30% of the funds).		563489	563489								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002712	RCP-036637	Alexandria, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Office of Internal Audit Control Assessment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project provides for an external audit firm to assist the City with review of existing controls and to ensure compliance with federal regulations.  The firm will work closely with the ARPA project managers and the City's Office of Internal Audit to ensure that the funds are used in accordance with the guidelines set forth by Treasury, the UGG and the City's own policies.	120000	51537.5	34912.5
TPN-002716	RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	IT Infrastructure	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Tulsa County's Information Technology department received up to $835,000 to implement a cybersecurity analysis and install processes to better insulate Tulsa County against cyber attacks.	835000	835000	766156.56
TPN-002717	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Coroner Safety & Expansion	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Expansion of the BACnet Delta Control System That is designed to monitor room pressurization for lab safety and the safety of others in the coroners building. Additional folding autopsy tables, and carts for added 3 tier side loading mortuary. Sanitation and sterilization supplies were purchased with this as well.		30372.27	30372.27								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	29845.99	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002719	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	County Website Reprogramming	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Revitalizing the County's webpages to improve access of the public to all County information as well as public health information.		43949.68	43949.68								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	43292.68	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002722	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Job Fair	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Many lost or had to leave jobs during the pandemic. The County hosted a booth at a local job fair to advertise staff positions available.		104.58	104.58
TPN-002724	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	County Logo Development	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	In connection with creating a new County website, a new logo was created and adapted for broad use. The new revitalized logo was meant to function in conjuncture with the website to promote a more modern look to make the public feel more comfortable using the webpage as apposed to appearing in person.		115.84	115.84
TPN-002725	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Manteno Community Fire	7-Administrative	7.2-Transfers to Other Units of Government	Disbursement to Manteno Community Fire District based on evidence of lost revenues. A review of their year to year financial statements showed a drop in revenue.		20000	20000
TPN-002726	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Limestone Township Fire Prot	7-Administrative	7.2-Transfers to Other Units of Government	Disbursement to Limestone Township Fire Protection based on evidence of lost revenues. A review of their year to year financial statements showed a drop in revenue.		27212.27	27212.27
TPN-002727	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Bourbonnais Township Park Dist	7-Administrative	7.2-Transfers to Other Units of Government	Disbursement to Bourbonnais Township Park District based on evidence of lost revenues. A review of their year to year financial statements showed a drop in revenue.		9853	9853
TPN-002728	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Bourbonnais Fire Protection	7-Administrative	7.2-Transfers to Other Units of Government	Disbursement to Bourbonnais Fire Protection based on evidence of lost revenues. A review of their year to year financial statements showed a drop in revenue.		8253	8253
TPN-002729	RCP-036810	Thousand Oaks, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Replace Lost Revenue	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue replacement funds will be used to replace lost revenue necessary to safely operate the City's day-to-day business, city-owned theatres and golf course, as well as extraordinary expenses to combat the spread of COVID-19		14008949	14008949
TPN-002731	RCP-038340	Columbus County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	VACINATION INCENTIVE	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	CASH INCENTIVES TO EMPLOYEES TO RECEIVE VACINATION.	38614.93	38614.93	38614.93			600					No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002732	RCP-038340	Columbus County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Personal Protective Equip	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	PURCHASE OF MASKS AND SANITIZING PRODUCTS.	16455	16455	16455								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002733	RCP-038340	Columbus County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BROADBAND INSTALL	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	INSTALL BROADBAND CABLING IN COUNTY.	7756	7756	7756					No
TPN-002735	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Replace AMS Financial System	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	ARPA funds allocated to Office of Budget and Management Services will be used to replace the current AMS financial system utilized by City of Dallas employees. The funds will improve the ability of City of Dallas employees to perform essential financial services and will be used to respond to the negative economic impact of the pandemic experienced City of Dallas residents.	2500000	2500000	0								No
TPN-002736	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Program Admin & Staff	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	ARPA funds allocated to the Office of Budget and Management Services will be used to hire, train, and maintain personnel and the necessary administrative component required, to effectively operate the COVID-19 department, which has been established within the City of Dallas, to help address the negative impact of the pandemic.	2730627	562813.01	516703.61
TPN-002739	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	DFR Paramedic training	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Dallas Fire-Rescue requires that all firefighters be certified as licensed paramedics. The department currently has approximately 200 members that are needing to attend school in order to become licensed as a paramedic. Funding will be utilized to allow the department to send members to attend paramedic school while still maintaining needed levels of service. Once completed, Dallas Fire-Rescue will be positioned to maximize its ability to respond to the COVID-19 public health emergency by having fully trained, licensed staff responding to calls for service.	8500000	5992623.46	5992623.46			190					No
TPN-002740	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	DFR Stretcher, Life Pak 15 and Disinfecting UV Equipment	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Dallas Fire-Rescue serves as the sole provider of emergency medical service within the city of Dallas. The departments strategically staffs ambulances (rescues) at stations throughout the city to ensure that it is positioned to respond to emergencies within specified response times. The department completes in excess of two hundred thousand calls for service each year, and the vehicles quickly reach their useful life due to mileage and wear and tear. The department will utilize funding to fully replace the department’s ambulance fleet that has reached its useful life. The new fleet will ensure that the department is best equipped to continue to provide emergency medical services to persons in Dallas, and that staff have all the resources necessary to do so.	11500000	10268680	641000								No
TPN-002741	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	DFR Equipment and Inventory mgmt. system	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	As the department continues to provide service during the COVID-19 public health crisis, funding used to purchase specialized equipment and software will help to ensure that the needs of citizens are met. Dallas Fire-Rescue will utilize funding to streamline service through the replacement of specialized EMS equipment, a standardized replacement of handheld radios that have reached their useful life, strategically placed medical supply caches and new software that will improve dispatch services. The new equipment and software will help to improve the departments overall efficiency and service deliver.	6200000	3727707.94	2322510.43								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	415000
TPN-002742	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Dallas Real Time Rapid Rehousing Initiative	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	• Dallas Real Time Rapid Rehousing (DRTRR) seeks to house over 2,700 individuals and align with Dallas’ strategy to reduce homeless encampments. To that end, DHA, the City of Dallas, Dallas County, and City of Grand Prairie have aligned all available Emergency Housing Vouchers to the TX-600 Dallas and Irving Continuum of Care AKA the “Homeless Collaborative”.  The Homeless Collaborative seeks to pair EHVs and Rapid Rehousing subsidies with case management services, housing navigation, and landlord incentives to ensure the client’s experience of homelessness is rare, brief, and nonrecurring. • The overall DRTRR Initiative consist of the following 2 major areas: rental assistance, and case management:	1600000	1599390.55	264916.22	2700							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	1 Imp General Public	No	99390.55
TPN-002743	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Signage at Fair Park Testing/Vaccinations site	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Funds have been transferred to transportation to complete this project.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002744	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Wi-Fi for Park and Recreation facilities	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Park and Recreation provides free public Wi-Fi internet in all of its facilities. Due to the increase of internet connectivity demand brought by the social distancing and the need of virtual activities, the internet bandwidth and Wi-Fi capacity can no longer answer the needs of the community. To bridge the Digital Divide during physical distancing between Dallas communities, the Park and Recreation Department will boost and extend the current free public Wi-Fi in 63 of its public facilities. The Park and Recreation Department will increase the internet bandwidth and add/increase the number of outdoor antennas to cover the outdoor public area beginning with 14 public facilities in high priority areas that are not currently covered with reliable WiFi. This will provide a faster and more equitable internet experience. The department with work with CIS to develop a plan.	3000000	765578.58	765578.58
TPN-002745	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Security Assessment Funding	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Dallas focus remains on physical security, operational security and technology. The TNCG assessment identified primary threats affecting the locations from relevant violent and non-violent perpetrators and groups.  The improvements noted are to improve the City of Dallas’ ability to deter criminal activity and acts of violence against City of Dallas, its staff and the public. The Risk Assessment provided recommendations on methods to monitor staff and the public to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.  The efforts are to also increase safety in the public outdoor recreation spaces in responsive to the needs of disproportionately impacted communities by promoting access to outdoor recreation and socialization during the pandemic.	6425750	4497100.59	3367025.1
TPN-002746	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	ARPA - Marshals	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Four additional Deputy City Marshals were provided to enhance security and safety in the city parks during the pandemic.  With the increased use of the parks, particularly in communities disproportionately affected by COVID-19, this addition improves the City’s ability to deter criminal activity and encourage the use of the parks for socialization and social distancing in those communities.	195000	135337.42	135337.42
TPN-002747	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Operations of new Eco Dev Corp incl. 10 non-City positions	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Launch the economic development entity called for in the Economic Development Policy with $7 million over three years to pay formation costs and hire staff to begin the entity’s business and real estate development work, to help address the negative impact of the pandemic, after which it will be self‑sustaining. In FY22, ECO will spend $2.0 million to launch operations, hire a new Economic Development Corporation Director, develop a 3-year work plan, and develop an operational budget for Year 2 and Year 3.	0	0	0
TPN-002748	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Library Strategic and Facility Master Plan	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Library’s previous Facility Master Plan approved by Council in 2001, had a targeted completion year of 2010 but is now out of date and no longer reflects current facility priorities. The last Strategic Plan was awarded in 2015 and implemented for period 2017-2019. COVID has presented new challenges that significantly impact the Library’s existing service model and ability to truly meet evolving needs of the communities it serves. Updated and comprehensive research is needed to better evaluate how Library facilities should be utilized, how they currently perform under new and evolving needs, how operations compare to peer cities and help to identify where gaps in services and resources might be located. Reliance on out-of-date planning documents, such as the 2001 Master Plan, can lead to uninformed decisions in utilizing already limited resources. New and emerging risks and priorities not included in the previous Master Plans also may not receive adequate attention and consideration when comparing to those identified in 2000-2001 and 2015-2016. It is imperative to do a full community engaged study to determine the proper future of Dallas’ Library system.	250000	250000	250000								No
TPN-002749	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Purchase 1 mobile generator	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This funding is for the purchase of 1 mobile HVAC unit. Beginning with the February 2021 Winter Storm and throughout the COVID pandemic it became critical to have the capability to maintain heat/cooling of a large congregate area in the event of power outages or other emergency affecting the power grid. This funding will provide one complete unit that includes a mobile HVAC unit, generator, and all necessary supplies to heat/cool a large area to be used as a shelter for individuals in response to an emergency.	48027.73	48027.73	48027.73
TPN-002750	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Small Business Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The ARPA funds are designated for the Small Business Center to support innovative driven initiatives to provide resources to assist small businesses and new entreprenuers in Dallas pivot through economic recovery. The mayor’s taskforce on Entrepreneurship and Innovation recommendations included support for innovation hubs and leveraging opportunity zones, as well as, the development of a one-stop shop for information and connectivity to resources enabling a thriving ecosystem, removing silos in our ecosystem by shifting our ability from reactive programming and estimation of effectiveness to a data- driven model. The ARPA funding in the amount of $250, 000.00 will be used as a match to ensure alignment needed to expand support from private businesses.	250000	20000	20000
TPN-002751	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Rebuilding International Business	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Dallas is the economic and cultural engine of the fourth-largest metropolitan area in the country, and within a few years, the Dallas region will be the third largest in the United States, behind only New York and Los Angeles. The city has a business-friendly climate, a central location in the United States, and key assets such as the world’s third-busiest international airport.  But as with all major cities around the world, Dallas has suffered during the global pandemic, and the international sector of the city’s economy has been hit hard. There have been no outbound missions and limited in-bound delegations visiting Dallas. People-to-people contact is now more important than ever to rebuilding those strong ties with our closest trading partners.	250000	107130.91	76392.49
TPN-002752	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Artist Residencies	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	OAC will provide a total of five artist residences through its Community Arts Division and its four neighborhood cultural centers: the Bath House, Latino, Oak Cliff, and South Dallas Cultural Center. This program will involve the selection of five ALAAN/BIPOC individual artists and/or artistic or cultural organizations (either visual, performing, dance, multi-disciplinary artists and organizations and/or cultural producers) to provide a total of five 8-week residencies throughout the city targeting typing districts in the city without physical cultural centers or readily accessibility to arts and cultural programs. These artist residency programs will provide residents with artistic and cultural services in their own communities thus providing a safer experience for attendees since programming activities will be held outdoors and/or in spaces that allow social distancing, thereby taking COVID-19 protocols and safety measures in consideration.	125000	0	0
TPN-002753	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Library Black Box Upgrades	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	OAC will renovate and equip the multiform theater spaces in five public branch libraries: Hampton-Illinois, Bachman Lake, Lochwood, Pleasant Grove, and Fretz Park. Their purpose is to provide the community with a multipurpose space that can be used for a wide variety of activities including, but not limited to, theatrical performances. This project will expand their use by adding important infrastructure and equipment to improve and standardize the spaces’ functionality and usability by the widest range of users and user groups.  The upgrades provide affordable space for art groups to rehearse and perform safely and with enough safety precautions and measures in place.	325000	0	0
TPN-002754	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Installation of decomposed granite trail	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Of the 1,362 alley segments (without rear entry), Public Works identified 35 unimproved alleys in COVID-impacted QCT areas within the City that met at least two or more (or all) of the scoring criteria (Equity, High Crime, Illegal Dumping, in route to a School or City Facility (Rec. Center and/or Park), and DART Station. Improvements will allow for social distancing, pedestrian mobility, and enhance city recovery in the wake of the pandemic. Installation of Decomposed Granite to provide a walking path with a removable bollard at each entrance.  Inclusive of all regrading, compacting, backfilling, clearing & grubbing (includes removing and disposing of all unwanted surface material such as trees, brush, grass, weeds, downed trees, and disposing all underground vegetative matter such as stumps, roots, buried logs, and other trash/debris), and application of pesticide/herbicide treatment for a 3-year term. To date, work completed includes: Establish necessary contracts with HOAs/NAs through Council action. For February 2022 thru September 2022, work completed will include: Install decomposed granite trails.	0	0	0
TPN-002755	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Installation of Sidewalks	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Of the 35 unimproved, non-sanitation alleys (without rear entry), 17 were found to be in a Homeowner’s Association (HOA) or Neighborhood Association (NA)  in COVID-impacted QCT areas within the City, therefore, qualified for a 5-foot meandering sidewalk, trail lighting, and basic landscaping. Improvements will allow for social distancing, pedestrian mobility, and enhance city recovery in the wake of the pandemic. Local Homeowners Association or Neighborhood Association agree to enter into a renewable Maintenance Agreement (details pending) to maintain the landscaping and sidewalk.  Installation of a 5-foot wide sidewalk with removable bollards at each entrance, basic landscaping installation to be determined by the Department of Public Works’ Landscape Acrhitect.  Inclusive of all regrading, compacting, backfilling, sodding, clearing & grubbing (includes removal and disposal of all unwanted surface material such as trees, brush, grass, weeds, downed trees, and disposal of all underground vegetative matter such as stumps, roots, buried logs, and other trash/debris), and application of pesticide/herbicide treatment. To date, work completed includes: Establish necessary contracts with HOAs/NAs through Council action and work with the necessary property owners on maintenance agreements for decomposed granite or sidewalk projects. For February 2022 thru September 2022, work completed will include: Install sidewalks.	2000000	1999999.96	1944357.32
TPN-002756	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Pedestrian lighting	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Dallas Public Works Department is rededicating forty (40) under-utilized alley segments into trailways. The Department of Transportation will be coordinating and collaborating with the Public Works Department and the Park and Recreation Department for the construction and/or installation and maintenance of pedestrian lighting in support of the alley improvements initiative.	2000000	1236787.61	1103388.53
TPN-002757	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Non-Emergency Vehicle Purchase	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To help the Dallas Police Department focus on policing activities, DDOT has taken on additional parking enforcement responsibilities including certain street blockage assignments and enforcement of handicap and fire lane violations. As a result, the Department is bringing on an additional 42 parking enforcement positions to be able to have 24-hour coverage. This funding will provide vehicles for these new positions.	575000	461905.95	0
TPN-002762	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Purchase an expandable generator	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Building Services Department (BSD) will use $165,000 in American Rescue Place Act Funds for a generator monitoring system and for a Solar/Energy storage initiative. This initiative supports the effort to make city facilities resilient buildings with sustainable energy (e.g., solar PV, battery storage, and energization and generators) including addressing barriers to installations, like roof replacement and electrical upgrades.	165000	165000	0
TPN-002764	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Cultural Center Program and Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	OAC’s four neighborhood cultural centers, Bath House, Latino, Oak Cliff, and South Dallas Cultural Centers will receive much needed infrastructure upgrades for all areas of the facilities, including but not limited to, galleries, performance spaces, classroom spaces, restrooms and dressing room spaces. These upgrades will enhance the safety and accessibility of each facility. The need for these upgrades will ensure that Black, Latino/a, and other BIPOC/ALAANA residents in Dallas will have access to safe and affordable space with sufficient safety precautions and help mitigate the economic impacts of COVID-19 on the arts and cultural sector.	550000	0	0
TPN-002765	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Replaced Fire Alarm System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The $389,210 amount represents the City's ARPA funds to replace the fire alarm system. The grant will replace and improve the fire alarm system around the public buildings in areas that have had a tremendous negative economic impact, due to COVID. The new system will help improve the conditions of the areas impacted by the negative effects of the pandemic.	389210	389210	259265.76
TPN-002767	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Maintenance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	With the increased use of the parks, particularly in communities disproportionately affected by COVID-19, this addition improves the City’s ability to deter criminal activity and encourage the use of the parks for socialization and social distancing in those communities.	1105000	1099669.69	1099669.69
TPN-002769	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Equipment for Right Care	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	As the department continues to provide service during the COVID-19 public health crisis, funding used to purchase specialized equipment and software will help to ensure that the needs of citizens are met. Dallas Fire-Rescue will utilize funding to streamline service through the replacement of specialized EMS equipment, a standardized replacement of handheld radios that have reached their useful life, strategically placed medical supply caches and new software that will improve dispatch services. The new equipment and software will help to improve the departments overall efficiency and service deliver.	0	0	0
TPN-002770	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Body Worn Cameras - ARPA	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The purchase of 250 new body-worn cameras will allow DPD to fully equip all officers assigned to Patrol at the rank of Sergeant or below. These cameras were originally scheduled to be purchased in FY23, but Command staff wishes to accelerate half of that planned purchase of 500 cameras. The remaining 250 cameras will still be purchased in FY2.	364970	364970	364970
TPN-002771	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Camera equipment for interview rooms	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Recording/storing interviews during investigations provides key evidence to reduce all types of crime and promotes transparency. Warranties for current interview room camera systems expired in March 2021, and DPD has contracted with Axon to replace these systems before they malfunction. Maintaining functioning interview rooms is also necessary for DPD to comply with City of Dallas Ordinance 31192 concerning Internal Affairs Investigations.	763514	209541.4	209541.4
TPN-002773	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Tasers - replace and new purchase	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	DPD currently has 2,804 Taser units deployed, 886 of which have reached or exceeded their recommended service life of 5 years. 403 tasers deployed have a defective display which means the officer has no knowledge of the battery life, errors that may exist with the device, or the seconds the unit in use which may impact the safety of the officer and public. There are approximately 243 DPD officers who currently do not have a taser and may also require one as a part of their daily duties.	2587410.74	2587410.74	0
TPN-002774	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Software for property room	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Dallas Police Department's Property Unit is responsible for maintaining a centralized location and two auxiliary locations to manage the receipt, storage, transfer, and disposal of property and evidence. The Property Unit oversees the storage of over 2 million items of property and evidence. Reviews of items and data stored in the department's tracking system are performed by Property Unit personnel and the DPD Internal Affairs. This investment in new software will increase efficiency and accuracy.	300000	0	0
TPN-002776	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Police Overtime	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Pandemic restrictions forced DPD to reduce the size and number of its classes at the Academy such that hiring could not keep pace with attrition. To maintain service levels to the community, overtime is utilized to make up for the decrease in sworn strength as calls for service have increased in recent years.	25500000	17564931.31	17000000
TPN-002777	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Squad Cars	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Historically, DPD has identified a need for marked squad cars year-over-year based on the mileage and maintenance associated with operating older vehicles, as well as accidents and damage. Funding in recent years has not been sufficient to meet the required replacement rate of older and damaged vehicles. Roughly 52% of the marked fleet is approaching or past the recommended service life (110k miles). As our fleet's average age increases, costs increase not only due to wear and tear but also more extended down-time periods while vehicles are out for repairs. A refresh of marked squad cars is required, or downtime will continue to increase and impact our ability to respond to calls.	24000000	17056608	10951933.13
TPN-002778	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Uniform/Equipment for new Recruits	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	With Council having approved the hiring of additional officers in FY22 and FY23, DPD will need to outfit and equip every new officer with the clothing and gear necessary to represent the Department in the community and respond to calls for service. The full, estimated cost per recruit is roughly $9,950.	1351282	1323837.45	1219255.99
TPN-002781	RCP-038913	Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	YOUTH ENGAGEMENT	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Grant funding to youth providers for summer and year round programming		4366586.36	4085427.36								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002782	RCP-038913	Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	REENTRY WELCOME CENTER	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	Expand the number of city residents eligible to receive support services to ensure their successful reintegration from incarceration into community		300000	269180.05								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002783	RCP-038913	Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	SMALL BUSINESSES-EXPAND IN VACANT SPACES	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Support small businesses ability to expand in vacant spaces.  Correct project # is N2212		3000000	3000000
TPN-002784	RCP-038913	Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	HART-LIFT DOWNTOWN STABILIZATION	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Small business grant support		3000000	2383455.82								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002791	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Bridgeport Afforbable Housing Program Initiative	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	The City of Bridgeport has determined that there is a critical need for housing assistance and with securing affordable housing and rental assistance to help insecure individuals access to places of shelter and to prevent homelessness and address the housing needs of Bridgeport residents..   Direct funding is made through this program to qualified non-profit organizations who can provide these programs and services to expand the City’s reach into the community and reduce the number of Bridgeport’s citizens experiencing homelessness or at risk of losing their housing.  These programs will also fund the development of affordable housing units in areas of the city at need for such housing. This program is geared toward long term results to help with housing insecurity and end homelessness for Bridgeport citizens.   All not for profit organizations awarded funds were chosen through a public procurement process. Those organizations had to provide plans and budgets as well as demonstrate prior success in this field.	1350000	1350000	609212.98								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	Yes	600000
TPN-002792	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Bridgeport 1bHomelessness Prevention Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The City of Bridgeport has determined that programs and services that provide assistance with reducing homelessness, and providing direct temporary and transitional housing  assistance will help to address the housing needs of Bridgeport residents will help address the adverse negative consequences and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the City.   Direct funding awards to non-profit organizations with the experience to deliver these programs and services through the ARPA program will expand the City’s reach into the community to reduce the number of Bridgeport’s citizens experiencing homelessness or at risk of losing their housing.  These services are aimed to reach a larger segment of the community and help to address the and provide assistance and services that will help with housing insecurity and end homelessness for Bridgeport citizens. The lack of affordable housing contributes to homelessness and it is vital to have funding for facilities that can accommodate some of those who lose housing or who have health problems that lead them into homelessness. All not for profit organizations awarded funds were chosen through a public procurement process.	3300000	3300000	1688136.44								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	Yes	985000
TPN-002793	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Family Community Health Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators	The City of Bridgeport has determined that the community health programs will address the negative consequences and adverse impact of the COVID-19 in the City and address the vital needs of our citizens and the community of Bridgeport. Through these community health programs. there will be an increase in the quality, availability, and effectiveness of educational and community-based programs. Citizens will have access to medical, mental health and dental services. These programs are designed to help prevent diseases and injuries, improve health, and enhance quality of life through efforts including, but not limited to, communicable disease interventions (especially regarding COVID-19), chronic disease prevention, oral health services, tobacco cessation, nutrition education, physical activity and wellness, obesity prevention, and/or prescription drug support. With the aid of the community health programs, assistance will be provided to low-income families, senior citizens, and pregnant women to aid with prenatal and post-natal care. Citizens will be better equipped with information to prevent diseases that can be lifechanging. The programs also encourage healthy eating habits to all citizens by providing nutritional information and healthy food choices for those in need. The program will also address the misinformation, fear and stigma surrounding the covid 19 vaccine. The aim is to provide accurate information to the population and a sense of comfort to those in fear of getting vaccinated. Awardee non-profit organizations were selected for ARPA funding through a public procurement process.	1465000	1456271.65	738399.75								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-002794	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Bridgeport Second Chance  Re-entry Employment Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The City of Bridgeport has determined that the Second chance/Re-entry Job programs will address the negative consequences and impact of the COVID-19 on returning and formerly incarcerated citizen of the City. Assistance will be provided to organizations that work with returning citizens and the formerly incarcerated individuals to provide continuum of care services including, but not limited to, housing support, medical health services, mental health services, substance abuse treatment, conflict mediation, restorative justice, mentorship, financial literacy and debt management education, workforce development, job training and placement, and/or education services. Both male and female returning residents will have access to comfortable housing and meals. The programs are also designed to aid juveniles between the age to 17-24 years. Educational programs will be implemented to educate and enhance the skills of those who were incarcerated. Job training will also be providing to those who are willing to re-enter the workforce. Help to also be provided to those who are suffering from mental health issues and those having a hard time adjusting to the outside world. They will also be programs for individuals who are struggling with alcohol abuse, domestic violence and anger management. The programs are design to create a comfortable and a self-improving environment for individuals who were incarcerated adjust to healthy and honest lifestyle.  Awardee non-profit organizations were selected for ARPA funding through a public procurement process.	4300000	4240000	2727269.47								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	Yes	1470000
TPN-002795	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Home Weatherization Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	The City of Bridgeport has determined that a Home Weatherization Improvement Program within the community will help address the adverse negative consequences and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the City and address the vital needs of our citizens and the community of Bridgeport.  Home weatherization grants help families, children, and seniors living in low and moderate income neighborhoods to protect their homes, insulate better, avoid mold and other health hazards within the Bridgeport community. This program grant is made to non-profit organizations who have demonstrated an ability to provide capacity to supervise and manage home weatherization contractors to assist Bridgeport residents whose homes are in need of safety and weatherization improvements  in low income neighborhoods. These programs help reduce leaks in homes, reduce mold and other chemical exposures as well as reduce costs of utility bills for residents.  Many of Bridgeport’s citizens became unemployed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and through no fault of their own.  It is very important that the City addresses the adverse economic impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic by improving the quality of life in homes for the citizens within our community. Awardee non profit organizations were selected for ARPA funding through a public procurement process.	750000	620000	352857.15								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	Yes	0
TPN-002796	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Crime Prevention Patrols in Highest Rish Precincts and Public Housing	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	The City of Bridgeport has determined that Public Safety and Crime Prevention programs will help address the adverse consequences and impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic in the City to reduce the level of crime and violence facing many of our citizens and the community of Bridgeport. Public safety needs increased during the pandemic and certain incidents of violent crime face sectors of the city in particular low to moderate income neighborhoods. The City of Bridgeport has decided to introduce new public safety and crime prevention efforts and programs through initiatives in the Bridgeport community including, but not limited those that target gun violence, gang violence, interventions for youth and young adults, domestic violence, and at-risk populations in public housing complexes and neighborhoods that are preyed upon, as well as other public safety pandemic related issues.  These programs would raise awareness about actions individuals can take to prevent violence in their homes and communities and provide the implementation of community level, evidence-based programs to reduce gun violence.  In the year and a half since the COVID-19 pandemic began, the pandemic has unfortunately increased economic disparity throughout the Bridgeport area while disrupting the work of our public safety departments and community organizations focused on preventing violence. A combination of job-losses increased idle time and the unprecedented disruption in the community has created some increase in crime and violence in Bridgeport.  This is affecting our children and youth’s emotional health, along with other stresses. The goal of this public safety program is to provide the necessary support to the Bridgeport community by reducing and alleviating the impact of community violence.	1550000	1550000	981122.14								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002797	RCP-039542	Scott County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Aid Provided to Shakopee Chamber and Visitors Bureau	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	This project is providing $40,000 of aid to Shakopee Chamber and Visitors Bureau to allow it to provide dollars towards tourism marketing initiatives to help the tourism economic recovery in Shakopee and Scott County.  Travel is an essential economic driver to Shakopee and Scott County, Minnesota.  During 2020 the destination marketing side of the Shakopee Chamber and Visitors Bureau experienced over a 46% decrease in revenues for the lodging tax collected.  The economic impact of travel goes beyond attractions and hotels.  The destination marketing side of the Shakopee Chamber is unique to chambers of commerce in Scott County, and they are the only destination marketing organization in Scott County.	40000	40000	40000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002798	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Student Supplemental Education Assistance Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.27-Addressing Impacts of Lost Instructional Time	The City of Bridgeport has determined that Student Supplemental Education programs help address the negative consequences and adverse impacts of COVID-19 that has affected the youth and families of the City. The programs will benefit disadvantaged and low-moderate income households and children from kindergarten through high school, along with certain at risk college age students. The programs will encourage positive youth development, mentorship, educational programs, healthy lifestyles, and building character and self-esteem. Youth will be provided with role models, mentors, and life skills support to complete school and to live healthy lifestyles. For students at isk of failing into negative lifestyles or crime or violence, these programs provide healthy positive activities and outcomes.  Tutoring services will be accessible for those in needed of help in school and college preparedness skills and knowledge of technology and robotics will be available for youth. To keep youth off the streets, and out of violent situations, some programs will implement after school activities for students to engage in and to be safe. Afterschool programs will provide healthy meals, educational activities and academic activities. Summer school programs will also be provided to families in need. Workforce skills and career path guidance will be provided to young adults. Non-profit organizations were selected for ARPA funding through a public procurement process.	6650000	6619000	4365413.2								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	Yes	2500000
TPN-002799	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Bridgeport Students Social, Emotional and Healthy Activities Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services	The City of Bridgeport has determined that Youth and Student support programs help address the negative consequences and adverse impacts of COVID-19 that has affected the youth and families of the City. The programs will benefit disadvantaged and low-moderate income households and children from kindergarten through high school. The programs encourage positive youth development, mentorship, healthy lifestyles, and building character and self-esteem. Youth will be provided with role models, mentors, and life skills support to complete school and to live healthy lifestyles and positive activities at home and after school hours. For students at isk of failing into negative lifestyles or crime or violence, these programs provide healthy positive activities and outcomes.  Services will be provided to those students at risk or in need of emotional and social support. To keep youth off the streets, and out of violent situations, some programs will implement after school activities for students to engage in and to be safe. Afterschool programs will provide healthy meals, educational activities and recreational activities. Summer school programs will also be provided to families in need. Healthy lifestyle and fitness are also encouraged. Youth will have access to sports such as basketball and soccer and enhance creativity skills through art, music and media. Workforce skills and career path guidance will be provided to some young adults. Non-profit organizations were selected for ARPA funding through a public procurement process.	8300000	8247500	4962188.31								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools	6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	Yes	2500000
TPN-002801	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Domestic Violence Prevention Program for Families	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	The city of Bridgeport has determined that Domestic Violence program will help address the negative consequences and impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic in the city and address vital needs of our citizens and the community of Bridgeport. In the year and a half since the COVID-19 pandemic began, the pandemic has unfortunately increased economic disparity throughout the Bridgeport area while disrupting the work of our public safety departments and community organizations focused on preventing violence. A combination of job-losses increased idle time and the unprecedented disruption in the community has created some increase in domestic violence and crime in Bridgeport.  This is affecting our families and children and youth’s emotional health, along with other stresses.  The goal of this program is to break the cycle of violence by building healthy relationships, empowering communities, and mobilizing bystanders to speak out about abuse and violence. This program will use community based non-profit organizations awarded ARPA funding to address the economic impacts of COVID-19 through programs and services including, but not limited to, providing support for victims of domestic violence, providing counseling for those suffering from emotional, physical, psychological, sexual and other forms of abuse.  For people who experience domestic violence,  often trapped in their homes with abusers isolating them from the people and the resources that could help them. During the height of the pandemic victims faced a lack of available resources  and many medical facilities were overwhelmed, making it significantly difficult for victims to get access to care. These programs will provide resources to help victims avoid domestic violence and  help them restore their lives.	670000	670000	292552.02								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	25 Dis Imp NPs operating in Qualified Census Tracts	Yes	570000
TPN-002802	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Bridgeport Lighthouse After School Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	The City of Bridgeport has determined that Youth After School programs help address the negative consequences and adverse impacts of COVID-19 that has affected the youth and families of the City. The programs will benefit disadvantaged and low-moderate income households and children from kindergarten through middle school. The program encourages positive youth development, mentorship, healthy lifestyles, and building character and self-esteem. Youth are provided with activities to support healthy lifestyles and positive activities after school hours. For students at isk of failing into negative lifestyles or crime or violence, this program provides healthy positive activities and outcomes.  To keep youth off the streets and out of violent situations, these Bridgeport Lighthouse programs implement after school activities for students to engage in and to be safe. This program provides healthy meals, educational and recreational activities. Healthy lifestyle and fitness are also undertaken. Youth will have access to sports and enhance creativity skills through arts. The City of Bridgeport runs these programs through over 15 sites, including at school sites, with the assistance of non profit subcontractors hired by the City.	1550000	1481250	828455.96								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	No	0
TPN-002803	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Cybersecurity Program	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The City of Bridgeport has determined that the cybersecurity needs of the city required upgrade to protect the public and city departments from invasive internet malware.	1105000	1103523.09	1103523.09								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	154872.99
TPN-002804	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	WPCA Wastewater Treatment Plant Rebuild	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	The City of Bridgeport has determined that the planned rebuild of the Bridgeport Water Pollution Control Authority's West Side Wastewater Treatment Plant will materially assist in addressing the negative consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic in the city, by addressing vital health needs of our citizenry and city.  Covid-19 adversely impacted the city’s ability to directly protect the environment.  This reduced delivery of effective wastewater treatement services is both a consequence of limited local resources and a result of the operational burdens.  Lower income City residents are at the greatest risk for Covid-19 due to population density,  pre-existing recognized Covid-19 co-morbidities and long-standing impacts from localized flooding of dirty water.  A rehabilitated West Side Wastewater Treatment Plant will go a long way to address environmental and health needs of the City’s economically disadvantaged and ethnically/racially diverse urban community.   This West Side sewer plant rebuild will provide the city a much higher service fully functional state-of-the-art facility located in geographic proximity to its service recipients.  Moreover, as a direct consequence of the facility rebuild, reduced water pollution into locan neighborhoods and into Long Island Sound will create life-saving healthy living improvements. Bridgeport residents experience a severely elevated level of recognized Covid-19 co-morbidities, including asthma, vitamin deficiencies, and untreated major illnesses. Cleaner water and wastewater runoff will improve public health.  This government response will directly improve the health and welfare of a vulnerable population of Bridgeport residents.	8000000	8000000	4755254.41					Yes
TPN-002805	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	River Waterways Pollution and Stormwater Clean Up	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The City of Bridgeport has determined that a Waterway River Pollution and Stormwater Clean Up Program within the community will help address the adverse negative consequences and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the City and address the vital needs of our citizens and the community of Bridgeport. This Waterways Clean Up program will help protect families, children, and seniors living in low and moderate income neighborhoods by protecting their homes from floods, and avoid mold and other health hazards resulting from stormwater runoff. This program is being conducted in conjunction with surrounding towns, who have also determined to use ARPA funds, in order to hire contractors to clear waterways and build stormwater prevention  detension basins along riverways. This programs will help reduce flood damage and leaks in homes, reduce mold and other environmentaal health exposures.  It is very important that the City addresses the adverse economic impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic by improving the quality of life in homes for the citizens within our community.  Water oollution reduction remains a top priority of the City.	2750000	2750000	703139.88
TPN-002806	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Bridgeport Revenue Lost Budget Health and Public Safety Program	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Bridgeport has determined that a Revenue Loss Budget will help address the adverse negative consequences and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the City and address the vital health and safety needs of our citizens and the community of Bridgeport.  This program provides police protection and fire prevention and response to crime and fires as well as to provide health and social services  to help families, children, and seniors living in low and moderate income neighborhoods by funding neccessary health programs and public safety programs to protect citizens, homes, and other hazards within the Bridgeport community. This program helps the City to manage delivering public safety services to residents at risk and to disadvantaged neighborhoods throughout the city.	40737000	33837000	15000000
TPN-002807	RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA Administrative Implementation Program	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	The Bridgeport ARPA Administrative Services program helps address the adverse negative consequences and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the City and address the vital needs of our citizens and the community of Bridgeport by affording the City the Administrative resources to implement the almost thirty APRA SLFRF programs that the City has approved. It is very important that the City addresses the adverse economic impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic by delivering on the promised of ARPA to improve the quality of life for the citizens within our community. All administrative costs being expended by the City are supplemental to the existing City budget, and include one new hire administrative coordinator to implement programs, and one part time clerk to process purchases and payments. The City has separately contributed in kind stafff services already in the City budget which the City will NOT reimburse through the use of ARPA funding.	1250000	950000	507156.13
TPN-002808	RCP-039079	Erie County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Sanitary Sewer Improvements from Sawmill Creek WWTP to Huron Basin WWTP	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Erie County wishes to eliminate/rehab the Sawmill Creek WWTP and possibly redirect flow tributary to it to the County's Huron Basin WWTP via a new pump station and force main.  If selected, the Huron WWTP will be also be expanded to treat an average daily flow of 5 MGD and a peak flow of 16 MGD.  If not, the Sawmill WWTP will be rehabbed.  The County has engaged a firm to begin design.  Design is complete.   Pre-bid meeting scheduled for 10/31/23.  Bids are due on 11/8/23.		0	0
TPN-002810	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Tracy's Pet Styling	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Assistance to small business that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		7052	7052								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002811	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	County Board Zoom Meetings	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	From the very beginning of the pandemic the County's Board has held meetings on it regular schedule. This has only been made possible by the use of telecommuting and zoom meetings. These Expenses are ongoing.		11594.2	11594.2								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002812	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Kalamazoo Drop-In Child Care Center - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.14-Healthy Childhood Environments: Early Learning	The Kalamazoo Drop-In Child Care Center (KDCCC or the Center) offers free, part-time child care for low-income families. KDCCC cares for up to 20 children each day and families may use our service up to 6 times each month. We are open Monday through Friday from 11am to 3pm. We serve infants through five years old. The goal of our service is to enable low-income parents with young children to navigate the maze of appointments often required to obtain employment, permanent housing, attend medical, dental and other appointments, attend classes or study and eventual self-sufficiency. We also give parents a "healthy" break from the constant demands of parenting young children.	72948.96	72948.96	72948.96								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-002813	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Conduct needs assessment - Veterans	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Broadband Benefit Program and other low-cost and affordable internet subscription plans by assisting families to navigate the system and facilitate their enrollment. Providing call center support to help residents understand and navigate the resources available to them related to digital equity. Supporting residents through digital literacy and skills training and other digital equity initiatives to be outlined later.	75000	0	0
TPN-002814	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Solar/Energy Storage Initiative (ARPA revenue replacement)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Provide solar equipment and battery storage as part of a pilot implementation program to assess the ability of this technology to effectively enhance climate resilience at one- or more City facilities to support continuous facility use for emergency operations and sheltering.   Providing power and battery storage may help facility to be able to maintain effective continuous operations when the local power grid is not working due to storm-related impacts.  This supports implementation of CECAP Actions B1, B15, E1, E7, and E8 towards local renewable power generation, and building greater local climate resilience.	1000000	0	0
TPN-002815	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Tractors (4) w/batwings and hauling trailers	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds will be used to improve the quality of life with mowing and removing litter from TxDOT right-of-ways and from the City’s surplus properties located in underserved COVID-impacted qualified census tract (QCT) areas. These areas are primarily in the Southern sector of the City.  PBW staff will use funds to purchase tractors and trailers to mow and remove litter and illegal dumped items from the areas. As such, completing an additional 2-3 mow cycles citywide annually, weather permitting. Thus, all residents in Dallas will experience clean and beautiful areas along Texas Department of Transportation rights of way within City of Dallas boundaries. The improved service level will provide greater natural appearance, reduce grass and weed height, serve as fire hazard abatement, reduce the number of citizen complaints, increase safety for pedestrians,  drivers, and COVID essential workers as they move safely about the City to respond to COVID emergencies. Funds for this item are budgeted in FY23 and no expenses have occurred yet.	171000	171000	171000
TPN-002816	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	One -time Clean Up	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Non-Sanitation Unimproved Alley Cleanup Program consists of 1362 alleys (129 miles) in COVID-impacted QCT areas within the City that are in need of one time cleanup and maintenance to improve accessibility, prevent crime/illegal dumping, and improve quality of life throughout the City of Dallas. Additionally, the improved accessibility will allow COVID essential workers including Police and Fire responders the ability to move more flexibly to respond to COVID emergencies. The Department of Public Works (PBW) lacks the in-house staff needed to complete these projects; therefore, utilized a current vegetation maintenance contract to complete the clean up. Work began on October 1, 2021. To date, 265 alleys have been cleaned and $1.584 million dollars have been spent. PBW staff monitors alley clean ups and inspects all work completed by the contractor.	4799785.5	4799785.5	4799785.5
TPN-002817	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Purchase of snow and ice brine solution and equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Brine product is a snow and ice solution used for pre-treating road surfaces to reduce the need for sand and salt solutions.  Initial setup will be used on bridges over levies which are primarily in the southern sector/minority sectors of the City.  This enhancement will be used initially on bridges, inclines, and declines during Snow and Ice events for safety purposes. The desired outcome, to pretreat City of Dallas bridges over Trinity River levees, bridges in the southern sector, COVID-impacted QCT areas such as Marsalis, Corinth, Sylvania, Westmoreland, Kiest and others that are in socio -economic communities to improve safety during winter weather events City of Dallas. The need for this expense ties to improving services for safe streets and bridges during Emergency Snow and Ice events to allow essential workers such as healthcare, Police and Fire Rescue workers and residents passable and unimpeded routes to destinations within the City.  Essential Public Works staff will pretreat the roads and bridges with brine solutions to allow other COVID essential workers and residents to move safely about the City during Snow and Ice weather events.	495214.5	495214.5	380662.81
TPN-002818	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	KNHS Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	KNHS Homeownership Services provides foreclosure prevention counseling that meets the requirements for a HUD Housing Counseling Agency and meet the National Industry Standards for Homeownership Counseling for both tax and mortgage foreclosure. KNHS is asking for funding for three things: 1) program delivery to increase foreclosure services as households come out of the COVID foreclosure moratorium and individual forbearance agreements, 2) "rescue funds" to help a household cure mortgage delinquency and enter into a sustainable plan with their loan servicer, 3) "rescue funds" to help a household cure property tax delinquency in order to prevent tax foreclosure. The third service is to be offered in coordination with the County Treasurer.	100000	100000	100000	37							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-002819	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Pledge for Life Prescription Lockboxes	1-Public Health	1.13-Substance Use Services	Pledge for Life Inc requested funds to set up prescription drug lock boxes.		10000	10000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002820	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Street, Alley, and bridge main/repair	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The repair and improvement of street, alley, and bridges is critical for the infrastructure of the City of Dallas.  The improvement in marginalized areas of the communities with QCTS is the priority to bring equity to Dallas residents that have been disproportionality impacted by COVID19. Through the use of the new paving model and the treatment optimization, the City will be able to increase the street condition, rated through the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and extend the life of the existing pavement without the disturbance and inconvenience of lane closures due to full reconstruction.  This will increase the level of service in terms of commute times and traffic volumes our streets can serve. In addition to improving the quality of life in these underserved areas.  Public Works is currently going through our QA/QC process to confirm treatments      needed.  Projects will be preformed as a part of our annual maintenance program and will range from a simple slurry seal to a partial reconstruction.	7500000	0	0
TPN-002821	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Street, Alley, and bridge main/repair	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The repair and improvement of street, alley, and bridges is critical for the infrastructure of the City of Dallas.  The improvement in marginalized areas of the communities with QCTS is the priority to bring equity to Dallas residents that have been disproportionality impacted by COVID19. Through the use of the new paving model and the treatment optimization, the City will be able to increase the street condition, rated through the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and extend the life of the existing pavement without the disturbance and inconvenience of lane closures due to full reconstruction.  This will increase the level of service in terms of commute times and traffic volumes our streets can serve. In addition to improving the quality of life in these underserved areas.  Public Works is currently going through our QA/QC process to confirm treatments      needed.  Projects will be preformed as a part of our annual maintenance program and will range from a simple slurry seal to a partial reconstruction.	1000000	0	0
TPN-002822	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Citywide Market Analysis	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The MVA will fund consultants to update the citywide Market Value Analysis. The published MVA data is used during the review of economic development and housing projects, with an emphasis on the negative impact of the pandemic. It is also referenced in the incentive zoning ordinance as basis for determining density bonuses to provision of affordable housing units and is being used as a basis for strategic identification of infrastructure priorities.	0	0	0
TPN-002823	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Upgrade Traffic Signal Infrastructure	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This funding will be utilized to leverage over $50 million in matching funds to replace/upgrade/improve 100 traffic signals as part of our Vision Zero strategy. These programs include NCTCOG Signal Improvements, Upgrades, and/or replacements, the Highway Safety Improvement Program, and the Dallas County Major Capital Improvement 7th call for projects. These projects will improve various intersections to promote the safety of all right-of-way users including motorist, cyclists, and pedestrians.	14000000	4589390.93	2218589.02
TPN-002824	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Traffic signal equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Recent years’ storm activity has depleted the City’s store of salvaged materials for signal repairs. This funding will be utilized to start replacing these materials so that the Signal knockdowns are able to be efficiently and effectively addressed before negatively impacting the safety of the traveling public. Department of Transportation is currently working on a master agreement for the procurement of these materials.	660000	659989.1	187241.5
TPN-002825	RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	LAWM - Legal Representation for Eviction Defense - UWR	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	The Legal Representation for Eviction Defense project will provide civil legal services to tenants facing eviction in the Kalamazoo District Court, including onsite consultations with LAWM attorneys, assistance with connecting to resources, and representation in disputed eviction cases.	50000	50000	50000	109							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-002826	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Pavement Markings and restriping	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City’s current inventory of pavement markings conditions show that 1,223 out of 1,603 linear miles of lane line striping falls in to Level C (little to no visibility). This funding will be used in conjunction with DDOT’s operating budget to bring 60% of streets to within Level C to proper visibility levels.	5000000	4254937.13	4212784.31
TPN-002827	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Street Light enhancement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	In collaboration with the Mayor’s Task Force on Safe Communities, the Office of Integrated Public Safety Solutions, and the Office of Data and Business Intelligence the Department of Transportation has identified priority locations based on special analysis. This funding will be used to assist with crime fighting measures to improve safety through increasing illumination by converting older lights to LED, placing/installing/constructing new lights, or related improvements.	5000000	3775287.07	3511403.59
TPN-002828	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	School Zone Flashing Beacons	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City’s current School Zone Flashing Beacons utilize 1980s technology which is unsupported. If this system fails, the department will have to manually change 1,000 beacons throughout the City. This funding will be used to upgrade this system to state-of-the-art technology to protect students as they walk to school. The improvements will enable DDOT to remotely change all school flashing beacons as needed depending on a particular school’s schedule.	7031863	1641615	1384255
TPN-002830	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Kankakee Co. Humane Foundation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Assistance to nonprofit organization that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		10000	10000								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002831	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	TV for Probation Virtual Meetings	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The County's Probation Department was in need of video conferencing equipment to properly monitor individuals that were covid positive while actively on probation.		476.29	476.29								Yes	Technology and tools	476.29	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002832	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Merchant Street Art Gallery	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Assistance to nonprofit organization that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility. Including a specialty job training program for teens and adults with Autism.		70856	67736								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002833	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Chatterbox Cafe Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Assistance to small business that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		5000	5000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002834	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Garden Of Prayer Youth Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Assistance to nonprofit organization that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		10000	10000								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002835	RCP-036770	Rockingham County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	EMS Shift Bonus	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	To incentivize existing employees to take on additional unscheduled shifts due to a shortage in EMS staffing caused by COVID 19 infections/exposure and by position vacancies from employees leaving the county EMS service for other positions.  Bonus program is authorized effective September 20, 2021 and for up to six months while County works to increase recruitment efforts to fill vacant positions.  Option to end program early or to extend the program beyond 6 months will be considered based on success in filling vacant positions.  Due to continuing shortage of EMS staff, the program was extended by board action through  March 31, 2023.	252500	252500	252500		100
TPN-002836	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Good Shepard Manor Foundation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Assistance to nonprofit organization that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		10000	10000								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002837	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Child Network Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Assistance to nonprofit organization that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		9229	9229								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002838	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Chiropractic Associates	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Assistance to small business that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		5000	5000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002839	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Momence Park District	7-Administrative	7.2-Transfers to Other Units of Government	Disbursement to Momence Park District based on evidence of lost revenues. A review of their year to year financial statements showed a drop in revenue.		40000	40000
TPN-002840	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Options Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Assistance to nonprofit organization that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		20000	20000								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002841	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Digitizing States Attorney files and records	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The County's States Attorney implemented TechShare, which is a secure portal based database where law enforcement entities upload and share case document, evidence, etc.  This allows remote access to documentation at all levels of law enforcement and reduces most person to person material handling.		109147.5	109147.5								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	68904	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002844	RCP-037734	Mclean County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Courthouse Roof Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The liners in the storm drains on the roof of the Courthouse needed to be replaced to prevent water leakage into the building.	54000	54000	54000
TPN-002845	RCP-037734	Mclean County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Nursing Home Ventilation	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	In an effort to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in the McLean County Nursing Home, improvements are being made to the ventilation system.	251250	251250	251250								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002846	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	3d Wildlife Rescue & Rehab	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Assistance to nonprofit organization that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		1401	1401								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002847	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Camp Shaw-Waw-Nas-See	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Assistance to nonprofit organization that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		10000	10000								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002848	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sunrise Center Inc	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Assistance to nonprofit organization that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		2624	2624								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002849	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	D & D Distributors	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Assistance to small business that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		5000	5000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002850	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Dunlap Vision	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Assistance to small business that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		5000	5000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002851	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Mcelroy Communications	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Assistance to small business that was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Tax documentation was used to determine amount of impact and eligibility.		5000	5000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-002852	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Harbor House Domestic Violence	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	There was a notable increase in domestic violence  cases from 2019 to 2020. Funds will be used to train members of the domestic violence task force to better address the increase in domestic violence due to COVID.		10000	10000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002853	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Taylor Publications: Public Health Advertisment	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Public outreach campaign to educate and motivate the public in the effort to end the COVID pandemic.		10000	9600								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002854	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Knights of Columbus Mar-Dec21	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	To reduce large congregations of people in the courthouse jury assembly area, space is rented form the local Knights of Columbus hall. This has allowed adequate social distancing of jury members awaiting to be placed in a trial. These expenditures are ongoing.		16550	16550								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002855	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Weiser Security Probation Building Screener	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The County Probation offices contracted a security company to perform public screening for temperatures and mask compliance. They also limit the amount of individuals in the building to keep exposure at a minimum. These expenses are ongoing.		115687.73	115687.73								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002856	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Maintenance Payroll	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Two full time maintenance staff were hired for the purpose of constant disinfectant and sterilization of courthouse surfaces. This is for the  salary and fringe expenses through Dec-2022		246562.93	246562.93			*					No
TPN-002857	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Finance Payroll	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other	The County Finance department is responsible for all fiscal and reporting aspects of the ARP funds. As such a portion of the Finance staff salaries are compensated by ARP Funds. This is for the salary and fringe expenses through Dec-2022		121303.86	121303.86			*					No
TPN-002858	RCP-039586	Naperville, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Naperville Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Naperville will utilize Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to support the provision of government services through the revenue replacement allowance.	0	0	0
TPN-002859	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Admin Payroll	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	A full time communications Director was hired for the administration department for the purpose of public outreach and connecting with the public.  This is for the salary and fringe expenses through Dec-2022		163415.83	163415.83			*					No
TPN-002860	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff Payroll	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Members of the corrections department staff were tasked specifically overseeing COVID infected inmates or those at risk of falling ill with COVID .  This is for the salary and fringe expenses through Dec-2022		1103303.75	1103303.75			*					No
TPN-002861	RCP-039542	Scott County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	COVID-19 Vaccination Clinics	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	To help ensure the safety and health of our community, Scott County conducted community vaccination clinics in Scott County.  These community vaccination events were held to provide a central location where large groups of people could be vaccinated quickly and safely.  Costs included for these include supplies needed for clinics, contract to have a doctor available at the clinics and a contract to help engage with the community at large.		39555.59	39555.59								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002863	RCP-039542	Scott County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Personal Protective Equipment	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	To ensure the safety and health of our staff and community personal protective equipment is used in our day to day business to reduce the risk of spread of COVID-19.  The costs for PPE can include gloves, masks, goggles, plexiglass and other sanitary measures to help keep areas clear.  Departments have written standard operating procedures addressing risks and where PPE would be best utilized.		11754.17	11754.17								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002864	RCP-039542	Scott County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Community Outreach Employee: Mental Health Services in BIPOC Communities	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.26-Addressing Educational Disparities: Mental Health Services	Scott County has a limited number of mental health providers from BIPOC communities.  This program will conduct outreach and recruitment to culturally specific mental health providers.  Services will include bringing new mental health providers to Scott County, coordinating the mental health services that are being offered by different offices to BIPOC communities in a coordinated way; working with cultural navigators to link families to services; lead support groups for families from BIPOC communities to support parenting, mental health, and access to services.		3118.36	3118.36								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-002865	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Fast Signs Logo & Big Check	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Large promotional check was purchased for public awareness campaign. People were photographed with their large check showing their award amount. The hope is that this help gets the word out about the aid we can provide.		114.67	114.67
TPN-002866	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Masks with County Logo	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Masks were provided to County staff with an embossed County logo. These masks are required to be worn by all county staff.		5854.95	5854.95
TPN-002867	RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue recovery calculated was used for provision of government services in accordance with rules set forth by Treasury		25518919	25518919
TPN-002868	RCP-039542	Scott County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Community Outreach Employee: Early Literacy	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.14-Healthy Childhood Environments: Early Learning	Our third grade reading attainment data reflects disparate outcomes when comparing white children and children from BIPOC communities.  Recognizing third grade reading attainment as a foundational measure of academic success, early childhood screenings are critical to getting children the support services they need in a way that does not contribute to learning difficulties later.  This project includes outreach to our community - specifically BIPOC communities, to promote early childhood screenings and services for families.  Work includes participation in our Readmobile program; participation on the Educational Readiness group for Live, Learn, Earn to build system strength and integration; education to families on the value of early childhood screenings; help with language translation and cultural interpretation through registration and screening processes; support to staff in Family Resource Centers to work cross-culturally and engage BIPOC community members; coordination with school social workers and cultural liaisons; develop and distribute materials (print and social media) in multiple languages; assistance to families who need hands-on support through screening process.		68114.02	68114.02								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	19 Dis Imp For services to address educational disparities Title I eligible
TPN-002869	RCP-039542	Scott County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Community Outreach Employee: Healthy Childhood Environments	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	This program supports strong families and safe parenting.  Key activities include:  provide education on child development and parenting supports to BIPOC communities; share community resources that support strong, resilient families, many who are adjusting to life as immigrants to the US.  Participate in READMOBILE events that  provide resources to children in languages other than English; conduct parenting support and education classes through the Family Resource Centers;  create and distribute  literacy bags for children leaving foster care; coordinate services with school liaisons to support social and academic success;  link families from BIPOC communities to services provided by social services and public health to support access to healthy foods, medical and dental care; COVID testing and vaccines; and periodic hosting of cultural events (e.g. Three Kings Day).		388.7	388.7								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002870	RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Broadband Infrastructure	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Provide infrastructure related to the Amarillo Connected project which focuses on bringing high-speed internet service to areas of Amarillo where service is not currently located or affordable. The project is focused on disadvantaged areas where the broadband divide became more noticeable during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Service will be provided at low or no cost and will allow residents to do online banking, online government, and online education.		4474021.38	2672124.2
TPN-002871	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	County Board COVID Per Diems	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Covid committee meetings were created to discuss and screen applications requesting ARP funds. This is the expense for the January-March  22 board member per diems associated with those meetings.		13230	13230
TPN-002873	RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	County Administration PPE Mar-Dec21	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	In the March - December timeframe, the County has made several purchases of PPE (masks, gloves, etc).		15893.78	15893.78								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002874	RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Thompson Park Area 4 Playground	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Installation/replacement of playground in neighborhood park. During COVID-19 it became more and more apparent that safe, accessible outdoor areas were key. With the advice to stay home and social distance, neighborhood parks became a vital lifeline for communities. Disproportionately impacted communities often lack modern, safe outdoor places. With this project we aim to improve the outdoor spaces in disproportionately impacted communities.		168319.43	168319.43								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	161319.43	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-002875	RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sanborn Park Playground	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Installation/replacement of playground in neighborhood park. During COVID-19 it became more and more apparent that safe, accessible outdoor areas were key. With the advice to stay home and social distance, neighborhood parks became a vital lifeline for communities. Disproportionately impacted communities often lack modern, safe outdoor places. With this project we aim to improve the outdoor spaces in disproportionately impacted communities.		129063.56	129063.56								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	129063.56	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002876	RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Benton Park Playground	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Installation/replacement of playground in neighborhood park. During COVID-19 it became more and more apparent that safe, accessible outdoor areas were key. With the advice to stay home and social distance, neighborhood parks became a vital lifeline for communities. Disproportionately impacted communities often lack modern, safe outdoor places. With this project we aim to improve the outdoor spaces in disproportionately impacted communities.		150368.76	150368.76								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	150368.76	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002877	RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Glenwood Playground	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Installation/replacement of playground in neighborhood park. During COVID-19 it became more and more apparent that safe, accessible outdoor areas were key. With the advice to stay home and social distance, neighborhood parks became a vital lifeline for communities. Disproportionately impacted communities often lack modern, safe outdoor places. With this project we aim to improve the outdoor spaces in disproportionately impacted communities.		152247.25	152247.25								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	152247.25	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002878	RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	PREP Academy Litter Crew	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Program to provide participants in the City's Coming Home program, a program that takes homeless individuals off the streets and puts them into counseling, job history and experience. Participants will work picking up litter in City parks and will gain working experience and references that can be used for future employment. The goal of the program is take the City's housing first model to the next level by getting individuals into the workforce and off of government assistance.		109300.89	109300.89								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-002879	RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Lifepacks	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	The purchase and deployment to paramedic fire engines of 5 LIFEPAKk-15 cardiac monitors/defibrillators will enhance the capabilities of the Amarillo Fire Department to provide advanced life support medical procedures. COVID-19 and other respiratory diseases have made the deployment of these types of monitors a critical enhancement to patients for prehospital, emergency medicine. For the next 5 years, the AMS ambulance service will loan the AFD these type/brand cardiac monitors for use on some of our fire trucks. AMS and BSA ambulances both use this type/brand of cardiac monitor, which enhances the continuity of patient care from the first responder al the way through transport to the hospital.		175000	175000								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	175000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002880	RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Paramedic Training	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	The Amarillo Fire Dept requests that ARP funding be used to train twelve (12) additional AFD members to a paramedic level certification.  These paramedics will serve to expand the AFD mission of providing the highest quality of compassionate and professional services through daily operations while also serving to enhance the City of Amarillo’s ability to mobilize and react to future threats to public health and safety, whether that comes in the form of a pandemic such as COVID-19, civil unrest, or natural disasters. AFD Paramedics played a crucial part in the City of Amarillo’s navigation of the COVID-19 pandemic. AFD Paramedics were on the front lines treating COVID-19 patients as first responders in our community. Paramedics are highly trained and, when properly equipped, can not only improve the care delivered to our citizens during the Department’s day to day operations but also provide the city flexibility with a skilled workforce that can adapt quickly to meet challenges such as those presented by the coronavirus pandemic. Additionally, Paramedics were called upon in ever-expanding roles as a dependable, highly trained resource to combat the unprecedented impact of COVID-19. These roles included staffing a fox truck dedicated solely to COVID responses to ease the strain of an overburdened 911 system suffering staffing shortages brought on by the pandemic, leading a strike team tasked by the state to perform COVID testing in area nursing homes, and being charged with key roles for both the City’s COVID vaccine clinic and the Bamlanivimab infusion center working directly with the Department of Health.		209796.41	209796.41								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002881	RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Police Regional Crime Center	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	The City of Amarillo has been experiencing a surge in gun violence since the COVID-19 pandemic began. The creation of a regional crime center will allow us to be more proactive in our approach to policing. The crime center would act as a hub to bring in real-time information from multiple sources that will act as a force multiplier. This important new tool will allow us to leverage new technology and will allow us to more efficiently and effectively respond to the rise in gun violence resulting from the Pandemic in our community.	0	0	0								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	0	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002882	RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	CVB Tourism Support	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	The Amarillo Convention and Visitor's Bureau provides support for the hospitality industry as a whole in the City. We will be allocating funds for them to support tourism in the Amarillo area. Their funding from City hotel occupancy tax was drastically cut during the COVID-19 Pandemic. We saw our largest drop in HOT tax collections ever. In response their  budget was drastically cut back and the support they could provide to the local tourism industry was greatly reduced. With these funds they will be able to further support the local travel and tourism industry which was so severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.		100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002883	RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Senior Citizens Support	1-Public Health	1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits	The elderly were disproportionately affected by the pandemic. COVID itself was proven to be much deadlier and serious within our elderly population. Local senior citizen groups provides activities and meals for seniors who have no where else to go. With the COVID-19 pandemic forcing them to alter their programing for an extended period of time it was difficult for the center. The services they provide are essential for the elderly population. With these funds we will provide assistance for providing for social distancing in their facility and the programs to help combat food insecurity in our elderly population.		600000	380903.87								No		500000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-002884	RCP-037717	Waukesha, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Revenue Loss	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Selecting the standard revenue loss allowance of $10M, per the Final rule.  This represented remaining balance of Revenue loss. A plan has been developed to fully utilize the funds.		5987226.45	0
TPN-002885	RCP-036687	Appleton, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Vaccination Clinic & Related Efforts	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Provide COVID-19 vaccination services to all citizens through vaccination clinics or other means.		75498.49	75498.49								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002894	RCP-039848	Long Beach City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Government Services- Public Safety	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City is accounting for police services because aside from these being eligible costs under the ‘Provision of Government Services’ category, Department operations played a critical role in the City’s pandemic response efforts. The Long Beach Police Department operations shifted to support the City’s pandemic response. Police staff The Long Beach Police Department has been heavily involved in the City’s COVID-19 response including opening its emergency Department Operations Center to handle matters such as coordination with the City’s Health and Human Services Department and other city departments including the areas of contact tracing, daily COVID-19 statistics, notification of infected employees, and ensuring equipment needs are met.  The Department provided security to the multiple City-run COVID-19 testing sites and vaccination sites. In addition, during the City’s COVID-19 response, the City’s Health Officer has enacted various measures and health orders to protect the health of residents.  With the enactment of these measures, the Department has been tasked with answering calls for service related to health order violations where their strategy has been to take an “education first” approach to encourage compliance with the City’s COVID-19 Health Orders.  The City of Long Beach also plans to use American Rescue Plan Act funds to pay for Police Department personnel costs of sworn personnel which includes salaries, overtime, medical, retirement and other similar fringe benefits.	100828131.51	100828131.51	100828131.51
TPN-002901	RCP-039542	Scott County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Community Outreach Employee: Other	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	This project focuses on making other support services available to families from BIPOC communities and building a community system of supports that promotes success for families.    This project will bridge BIPOC communities with law library programs for needed legal services, including but not limited to access to legal consults related to immigration.  Staff working on this project will participate in system-wide planning through our Together We Can program to end child abuse and neglect.  Staff will conduct outreach for Public Health to recruit, train and support Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACES) trainers from BIPOC communities.  This program will recruit, train and support election judges from BIPOC communities and will participate in redistricting project.		7839.04	7839.04								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002902	RCP-039542	Scott County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Community Outreach Employee: Social Determinants - Other	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	This program will conduct research and analysis into social determinants of health, with a specific focus on areas where disparities in outcome data exist.  Key activities will include literature reviews; community surveys; lead community focus groups or conversations with people with lived experience; create materials to reflect the work of the Community Outreach staff; identify community service gaps for BIPOC communities.  Other key activities include creation of a venue for sharing information gathered through any of these data collection methods with the leadership of Scott County; with our partners; and with our internal service team assigned to lead the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) staff training within our organization.		26999.18	26999.18								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002903	RCP-039542	Scott County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Evaluation of Housing Trust	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Scott County to develop vacant county land in Shakopee, Minnesota for affordable single family housing units in coordination with the Scott County Community Development Authority (CDA).  The project will utilize County-owned land near the north CH 16 and CH 18 intersection in Shakopee to support single-family entry level homeownership.  Plat and develop the land into 10 residential lots, and construct street and public utilities infrastructure.  Upon completion, the platted lots will be transferred to the CDA and the CDA will build the single-family housing units on the lots as part of the CDA's Community Land Trust program.		1259464.06	419456.51								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002905	RCP-036770	Rockingham County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay-County December 2021	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Provide one time lump sum premium pay-bonus to eligible county employees in December 2021.  Eligible employees must be actively employed in a permanent position with the County at the time the bonus is issued and have worked at least 50 percent of regular time in-person during the eligibility period of July 1, 2020 - June 30, 2021.  Employees with annual earnings over $75,000 during the eligibility period require additional written justification prior to consideration for a bonus.  The County Manager is the final determining authority for all employee bonus tier requirements and may grant exemptions on a case-by-case basis.	535298	535297.26	535297.26		454
TPN-002907	RCP-038545	Ft Myers, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Cleveland Avenue Affordable Housing Development	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	The City of Fort Myers has allocated $2,000,000 to the Housing Authority of the City of Fort Myers to acquire property for the development of affordable housing within a Qualified Census Tract on Cleveland Avenue, within the City of Fort Myers.		2000000	2000000								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	2000000	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-002908	RCP-039860	Barberton, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Police and Fire Department Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Provide premium pay to those individuals in Public Safety for our City.	228687.89	228687.89	228687.89		80
TPN-002911	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Power Backup Generators for Non PRASA Water Systems	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The Municipality will invest in existing infrastructure of Community Non-PRASA Water Systems throughout the city by requesting non-procurement proposals for the acquisition and installation or improvements in backup generators or other needed equipment.  The proposers shall be for non-for-profit entities which have the technical financial, and managerial capability to ensure compliance with the system operating and environmental requirements.  Non-PRASA systems are own and operated by non-profit community organizations.  This type of water system consists of mainly water storage and a pump and distribution system.  The Non-PRASA systems are separately from PRASA and are highly dependent of electricity power for an adequate pump system function.  In addition, they are not financially dependent of PRASA.   The project is intended to strengthen water infrastructure affected by the shortage of electricity and severe weather events in order to provide safe drinking water to Non-PRASA communities.  Although there are seventeen (17) community water systems, some of them have no generators, generators are in poor conditions, or the generator capacity is not enough to fulfill the need of all families in the community.  Due to electricity shortages, usually, communities face difficulties accessing water systems.  This situation places the communities at risk, especially during this pandemic period in which hygiene measures are critical. The implementation of this project allows the Municipality to build a climate resilience for treatment water, transmission, and distribution works by investing in backup generators for water infrastructure during this Pandemic period, recognizing the critical role that clean and drinking water plays in protecting the public health.	500000	500000	0
TPN-002912	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Improvement of Recreational Facilities	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Municipality of Caguas intends to complete the Bid No. 2019-54 to improve the remaing five (5) baseball and soccer courts to increase the availability of the recreational facilities for the community.  The improvement of public outdoor recreational spaces responds to the needs of the communities by promoting healthy living environments to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.  Through this project the Municipality promotes the interaction and direct participation of community and the development of recreational and sports activities that respond to the needs and particular interests of the communities. This activity will allow the Municipality to enhance the government services by providing additional recreational activities for the benefit of its visitor and residents.  Also, this activity would have been postponed or could not have been carried out if not for CLFRF assistance because the revenue collections have been lower due to the pandemic.	1000000	1000000	449317
TPN-002916	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Road and Infrastructure Improvements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Municipality’s Public Works Department (“MPWD”) is responsible, among other services, to maintain and keep all roads, sidewalks, curbs, and bridges in optimal condition.  Among the MPWD's priorities are: • Promote and carry out quality works for the benefit of all. • Comply with the control measures of pollution and protect water bodies. The Permanent Works and Improvement Program administers the Construction and Paving Unit.  This unit provides the following services: • Maintenance of public roads to improve the quality of life of the residents of Caguas. • Cleaning of landslides on municipal roads; collaborative modeling; repair and construction of speed bumps, curb, sidewalks, and curbs; repaving of streets and municipal roads; construction of bridges and roads; construction of ford bridges, retaining walls and handicapped ramps; asphalt on municipal roads, asphalt on local roads and driveways, pothole patching, installation of safety fences, labeling and painting of and painted road markings and curbs. Under this activity, the Municipality will enhance the maintenance and improvement of the infrastructure road within the Municipality jurisdiction.  Specifically, the Municipality will provide road maintenance to include curbs cleaning services, sidewalk repairs, concrete work, cole milling, pavement, road marking and other related activities through a hybrid effort by contracting an independent private supplier and contractor and the use of internal brigade units.  This activity will require: 1. Supplies and materials, mainly asphalt 2. Labor 3. Equipment 4. Inspection services	6176000	6176000	4947051.93
TPN-002918	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Green Infrastructure Maintenance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Municipality’s Ornato and Embellecimiento Department (OED) responsibility is to improve and maintain the Municipality's public green infrastructure, which includes sports and recreational parks and facilities in the Municipality, including the city’s tree maintenance. Among its functions are reforesting, conservation of green spaces, maintenance of avenues, green areas in squares, monuments, and other areas of the urban and rural communities. Under this activity, the Municipality will enhance the maintenance and improvement of the public green infrastructure within the Municipality jurisdiction.  Specifically, the Municipality will provide maintenance such as lawn mowing, tree trimming, cleaning and light trash pickup and cleanup, curb cleaning, maintenance of playgrounds and recreational areas (baseball and soccer) through a hybrid effort by contracting one or more independent private suppliers and contractors and the use of internal brigade units.  The activity will require: 1. Supplies and materials 2. Labor 3. Equipment This activity will allow the Municipality to increase the frequency of public green infrastructure maintenance services for the benefit of its visitor and residents.  Also, this activity would have been postponed or could not have been carried out if not for CLFRF assistance because the revenue collections have been lower due to the pandemic.	3998850	3998850	2511297.75
TPN-002921	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	COVID Contact Tracing	1-Public Health	1.3-COVID-19 Contact Tracing	The COVID Contact Tracing Project is an essential component of the “Apoyo Positivo” Program (the “Program”), designed to prevent and respond the spread of the coronavirus in Caguas.  The Program operates in collaboration with non-profit organizations, and it includes it multi-disciplinary team integrated by different professionals.  The Program mainly consists of three core elements: contact tracing, vaccinations and direct services to individuals and families affected by the coronavirus. This project particularly is aimed at investigating and tracing COVID cases within the Municipality and it includes an outreach and community education component.  Some of the main objectives entail:  • Increase public awareness on COVID-19 preventive measures, to reduce the virus transmission, through educational campaigns and educational and promotional activities. • Investigate cases within 24 hours from BioPortal information and self-referred cases. • Investigate contacts within a 48-hour period and document contacts on the BioPortal.  • Follow up contacts and cases until isolation or quarantine is completed.  • Identify active outbreaks and report in a timely manner to the concerned areas so that they can be addressed and prevent the spread of the virus.  • Divert services to manage the psychosocial needs of cases that request support services to contribute to their recovery process.  The Program also coordinates other municipal services to the participants with the Municipal’s dependencies. The main services provided by the Program include an investigation and case tracking system, outreach activities in the communities, educational intervention, psychological and nutrition services, support for families in isolation or quarantine, referrals for Tele-Medicine, referrals for COVID-19 testing and vaccination, health education, thanatology services, motivational services, and life coaching.	1821076.53	1821076.53	1645061.31								Yes	Public health data systems	12500	1 Imp General Public	18 Dis Imp HHs residing in the U.S. territories or receiving services
TPN-002925	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Rental Office Spaces	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	By October 2021, the Municipality will lease office space at the commercial building located at Ramón E. Betances street for an estimated of 20-months period.  This building will be occupied by the Secretary of Economic Development. Currently, the Secretary provides services in three (3) different sites within the jurisdiction.  With this project, the Secretary will be centralized on the first floor of the building.  The Secretary is responsible for promoting business, commercial and tourism development with a mission of providing economic development opportunities for the city through the strategy of creation and support-retention of companies.  The Municipality’s government services provided at the new location include: 1. Planning and Development of the Traditional Urban Center 2. Promotion to the Tourism,  3. Promotion to Industrial and Commercial Services 4. Film Development Program. In order to face new challenges presented by the pandemic, the Municipality has determined that a more efficient and centralized approach is necessary to accomplish the mission of the Economic Development Department. Having only one facility rented in the downtown area will be beneficial for visitors of the Municipality of Caguas. The fact that all services are congregated in the same place is not only valuable for the Municipality, but it is also beneficial for people overall who will increase the access and availability of services within the same area.  This activity has a public benefit as it helps to revitalize the area of downtown where there are many empty and abandoned businesses.	163919.48	163919.48	160727.82
TPN-002927	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	COVID Vaccination	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	The COVID Vaccination Project is a critical component of the Positive Support or “Apoyo Positivo” in Spanish, a program, designed to mitigate and prevent the spread of the coronavirus in the Municipality of Caguas.  The program is operated in collaboration with authorized vaccine providers with the qualified personnel to administrate and deliver health care services complying with the standards of the Puerto Rico Department of Health.  The program consists of vaccinations to individuals and families affected by the coronavirus.  The project is responsible for the immunization of individuals and families in need of the COVID-19 vaccine within the jurisdiction or other nearby Municipalities and it is undertaken in collaboration with the contact tracing project personnel.  The immunization process take place at the Caguas Center for the Performing Arts at the Carmita Jiménez theater, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.  Additionally, the Municipality will continue the vaccination process in the communities, placing special interest in the most vulnerable population, people with disabilities, elderly, mainly those who are bedridden, and people with limited or no access to services.  The vaccination team is composed by a clinical coordinator, community health promoters and two nurses.  Additional nurses are contracted upon the need.  The project also includes equipment, supplies related to the delivery of vaccination services, ambulance and paramedics services, transportation, among others.  Personnel reports directly to Ms. Aida Ivette González Santiago, PhD, MPH, Secretary of the Secretariat of Human Development.	605895.24	605895.24	548285.84								No			18 Dis Imp HHs residing in the U.S. territories or receiving services	1 Imp General Public	18 Dis Imp HHs residing in the U.S. territories or receiving services
TPN-002931	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Community Association Operating Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The Municipality of Caguas undertakes a collaborative approach with several community associations of their jurisdiction, identifying the needs that arise from the communities to seek solutions.  In the community scenario, the Municipality promotes the participation of community organizations in the development of projects and direct them to comply with all the administrative operational requirements for a responsible fiscal administration.  The community associations are NPO, endorsed by the Municipal Social and Community Self-Development Department, with the right to use and oversee recreational-sports facilities, community centers, gazebos, maintenance of common areas, ensure security services of the communities and generate self-revenues from the rent of community facilities.  During the pandemic, the revenues of these NPO were negatively impacted as a result of the isolation, social distancing, and other restriction measures imposed by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.   The reduction of revenues limited the NPO to cover basic operating expenses such as maintenance, insurance, utilities, supplies and materials, among others.  Under this activity, the Municipality of Caguas will provide aid to the NPO to cover the aforementioned expenses as a grant up to $2,000 by each organization.  The NPO shall meet the eligibility requirements and will be required to submit a proposed budget for the use of such grant.	280000	280000	104000								No			27 Dis Imp NPs operating in the U.S. territories	10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-002937	RCP-035838	Snohomish County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Youth and Family Support Network	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	The Agency shall provide high-quality, evidence-based services to individuals and families who are at or below 60% Area Median Income (AMI) to mitigate socio-economic harm incurred from the COVID-19 pandemic. The Agency shall provide support to eligible beneficiaries including connections to community resources, navigation of public benefits systems, access to employment services, direct financial assistance, and other support that promotes a more equitable recovery for those most impacted by the pandemic.	4277000	4222833.6	1989951.62								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	3997833.6
TPN-002941	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay - Hillsborough County employees	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium Pay to eligible Hillsborough County (recipient government) employees, including Nursing Home staff, Sheriff's Office, Department of Corrections, and other office personnel.  Project was discontinued as of 4/10/2023 upon the termination of the National COVID-19 Public Health Emergency.  Expenditures reflect this period are for hours worked prior to the end date.  Qtr. 2, 2023 includes negative off-setting entry to wages to adjust for fiscal year end dates previously reported. Total adopted budget reduced to reflect actual costs up to the termination of Premium Pay eligibility.	5991621.18	5991621.18	5991621.18		627
TPN-002943	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Facilities Maintenance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Municipality’s Recycling and Sanitation Department (“RSD”) responsibility is for the maintenance of several Municipal’s public facilities, which includes sidewalks, streets, monuments, squares and small squares in Caguas. The maintenance service corresponds to cleaning and pressure washing of facilities determined by the Municipality. Under this activity, the Municipality will enhance the maintenance of public facilities within the Municipality jurisdiction. The activity will be executed by a private independent contractor. Also, it will allow the Municipality to increase the frequency of maintenance services for the benefit of its visitor and residents. Also, this activity would have been postponed or could not have been carried out if not for CLFRF assistance because the revenue collections have been lower due to the pandemic.	690314.65	690314.65	605746.41
TPN-002945	RCP-035838	Snohomish County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Legal Assistance response to COVID-19	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Snohomish County Legal Services (SCLS) will provide free civil legal assessment and assistance to low- moderate-income Snohomish County residents who are marginalized and whose vulnerability impacts their legal needs and ability to obtain those services in the priority areas of housing and individual and family safety. With a focus on those most disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 global pandemic, this project will increase capacity and expand current legal service offerings to meet the emergent legal needs of the community, such as those facing or at-risk of eviction, landlord and tenant disputes, reasonable accommodation requests, and other related legal needs affecting housing instability, such as family law and consumer debtor-credit or bankruptcy issues.	345000	345000	230116.46	0							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	345000
TPN-002946	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA Program Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Direct administrative costs to carry out the ARPA Program.  Costs include salary and related payroll costs for a limited-term position (ARPA Program Manager), office supplies, printing, mileage, etc.	872000	313281.08	313281.08
TPN-002947	RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Building Maintenance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Municipal Secretary Office (the “Office”) is responsible, among others, for the maintenance of several Municipal’s building, which includes, but no limited to, City Hall, City Governmental Building, Central Archives of Public Documents, Police Station and others.  The maintenance service are mainly to daily cleaning, light waste collection and disposal.   Under this activity, the Municipality will enhance the public health safety measures and environment of public buildings in the Municipality. The activity will be executed by a private independent contractor.  Also, it will allow the Municipality to increase the frequency of maintenance services for the benefit of its visitors and residents.  Also, this activity would have been postponed or could not have been carried out if not for CLFRF assistance because the revenue collections have been lower due to the pandemic.	207000	207000	186419.44
TPN-002956	RCP-036081	State Of West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	WV Broadband Investment Plan	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	West Virginia State Broadband Initiative: Developed by the state Office of Broadband and Broadband Council in concert with leading national broadband experts, the state initiative comprises three award programs, each of which will allocate funds through a competitive application process: (a) Line Extension Advancement and Development (LEAD): The LEAD program will award competitive grants to ISPs to expand existing fiber and cable networks. Applications will be accepted in multiple rounds from November 2021 through January 2022, with funding decisions made on a rolling basis through early 2022.  (b) GigReady Initiative: Local governments in West Virginia have been allocated more than $500 million from the ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery Fund, and many of them intend to invest that money in local broadband expansion. The GigReady Initiative will provide matching state funds for local governments that develop projects to pool their broadband investments. Applications will be submitted beginning November 2021 and funding decisions will be made on a rolling basis through early 2022. (c) Major Broadband Project Strategies (MBPS): The MBPS program will focus on large-scale multicounty projects that require additional resources to achieve rapid implementation. Applications will be accepted and funding decisions made in multiple rounds from early 2022 through fall 2022. Counties Impacted: 20 Berkeley Boone Brooke Cabell Grant Hancock Hardy Harrison Kanawha Lewis Marion Marshall Monongalia  Morgan Ohio Pendleton Preston Putnam Randolph Taylor	90000000	56491378.5	7301178.44					No	No	No
TPN-002957	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Mitigation & Prevention - Hillsborough County Depts.	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Mitigation and prevention of the spread of COVID-19 within County Departments.  Costs may include cleaning supplies, PPE, decontamination equipment and services, air filters, UV filters and other system modifications (not to include new systems).	20940	3761.87	3761.87								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002958	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	COVID Court Case Backlog Staff	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	The Prosecutor's office requested to hire additional staff, for a period of two years, to handle a court case backlog. The Circuit Court in Clay County, MO shutdown on several occasions due to COVID. The County now reimburses the payroll expenditures for these personnel, as the Commission approved with Resolution 2021-151.	360000	360000	359181.89			*					No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002959	RCP-037033	Fairfield, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Fire Station Rehabilitation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Fairfield Fire Department is in the second year of a multi-year fire station rehabilitation project. All Stations are 50 or more years old and have not received much maintenance of building envelopes HVAC and electrical systems or the functional interior spaces. The department coordinates closely with Department of Public works who is responsible for maintaining the building envelope, utilities and core building systems. The goal of the rehabilitation program is to modernize and extend the serviceable life of these important municipal facilities. This funding through the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) the department will continue with key elements of the rehabilitation master plan. The next projects to be undertaken include: 1) Renovation of the Administrative Offices of the second floor of the Reef Rd. Firehouse including ADA accessibility 2) Renovation of the 1st Floor living spaces of the Reef Rd Firehouse 3) Construction of storage addition to the Reef Rd Firehouse 4) Design Reef Rd Elevator for ADA compliance (construction contingent on subsequent funding) 5) Design for renovated/construction of Apparatus Maintenance Facilities (construction contingent on subsequent funding) 6) Renovation of Jennings Rd living spaces including; watch room, officers’ quarters and shop offices.	550000	438437.63	333504.62
TPN-002960	RCP-037291	Cape May County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay-County Employees	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium pay was disbursed to County employees who physically worked on premise during the time of 3/19/20 through 6/15/20 when the onset of Covid occurred and the County operated on minimal staffing and operations on 10/29/21. The entire County workforce is deemed essential personnel by the County Board of Commissioners and required to come to work no matter the circumstances. However, due to Covid-19 to mitigate the spread, the County had to operate with minimal staff while providing the level of services required for County operations requiring some County personnel to physically come to work to perform some or all their duties. These employees were compensated $3/hour for hours worked on site.  Remote work for employees were coded differently in payroll and therefore did not receive premium pay for those hours as they were not at risk on site. The decision was made to compensate the employees in August of 2021 and 609 County employees were compensated, except for County Department Heads. The method of calculation is as follows: an excel abstract from our payroll system, Infinium, provided the hours worked by day for each employee excluding remote work for the time 3/19/20-6/15/20.  These hours were then subtotaled by each employee and then $3 per hour was applied to come to a total amount per employee.  No employee was paid at 150% of their annual wage and the maximum payout was no more than $1,500 per employee.	423941.25	423941.25	423941.25		609
TPN-002961	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for LFUCG	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	These funds will be used to purchase Personal Protective Equipment, including but not limited to masks, disinfectant, and gloves for use in LFUCG facilities, during LFUCG functions, or by LFUCG employees.  These items will be provided to the public, as needed, during public meetings, and will be available to public safety employees or those within our public safety facilities, including police, fire protection, emergency services, and community corrections functions. Through June 30, 2023 the funding has purchased 120 boxes of gloves and 25 cases of disinfectant.	225000	5763	5763								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002962	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Operation Safe	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	A consortium of Cerner (private company in health care sector), the Clay County Public Health Center, Liberty Hospital, and North Kansas City Hospital formed in early 2021 to administer both doses of vaccines to the community. They performed this with their own financial resources. They then requested reimbursement from the County's Rescue Plan dollars, and the Commission agreed to a 50% reimbursement shared with the City of Kansas City, MO. North Kansas City Hospital served as fiscal agent for the consortium. Each entity was reimbursed per their own MOU.	1849156	924578	924578								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002963	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) - Mental Health Court Funding FY 2022	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) Lexington is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization that provides assistance to families, caregivers and individuals whose life experience includes living with a serious and persistent mental illness. NAMI Lexington directly serves central Kentucky and partners to serve communities across the Commonwealth of Kentucky. They offer free advocacy, education, outreach and support programs and special events designed to raise community awareness and reduce stigma around mental health issues. Guests of NAMI encounter passionate “lived experience” wisdom in a welcoming environment.  ARPA funding will support the Mental Health Court overseen by NAMI.	170000	170000	170000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	170000
TPN-002964	RCP-037291	Cape May County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Covid Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	The County is using American Rescue Plan funds for Covid-19 testing kits and On-Site Covid testing for Crest Haven Nursing Home, our County owed Nursing Home, to test both employees and residents bi-weekly for Covid-19. The testing is to follow the testing mandates for the State of New Jersey.	120000	114311.92	103641.92								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002965	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Emergency Financial Assistance (EFA) FY 2022	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	The Emergency Financial Assistance (EFA) program is designed to mitigate the acute threat of housing insecurity posed by a resident’s imminent eviction and/or utility service interruption due to a short term financial crisis.  The assistance can be used for rent, mortgage and/or utilities.  EFA is an on-going assistance program for residents of Fayette County that can be utilized every 3 years.  Eligibility counselors process referrals to maintain housing stability for residents.	240846	240846	240846	356							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	240846
TPN-002967	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Recovery Supportive Living Assistance (RSLA) FY 2022	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	LFUCG developed the Recovery Supportive Living Assistance (RSLA) Program in October 2020 in response to the growing number of individuals in early recovery from substance use disorder who were experiencing a financial barrier to entering or continuing in a recovery housing program.  The COVID-19 pandemic was hitting the individuals with substance use disorder or in early recovery from substance use disorder very hard.  Many individuals in early recovery obtain employment in the hospitality industry, an industry that was devastated by COVID-19.   Jobs were lost temporarily or permanently with very little warning.  Hospitality jobs that were traditionally relatively easy to obtain for an individual in early recovery were scarce.   Although it typically took two weeks or less to secure employment upon admission to a recovery residence, in many cases it was taking much longer to secure initial employment or find another job if the first was lost due to the pandemic.  It was not uncommon for everyone living in a recovery residence to miss weeks of work due to COVID-19 infection or exposure.   Entering a recovery residence provides the support and structure crucial to recover from substance use disorder.  It provides a balance of drug-free support, accountability to peers and an opportunity to live in a safe, affordable, sober environment at a critical time in a person’s recovery journey.  RSLA provides up to $400.00 in assistance to individuals continuing in or entering a recovery residence.  Typically, recovery residences charge between $100 and $125 per week.  This fee includes a bedroom, shared access to common areas (kitchen, bathroom, family room, etc.) and utilities. While each residence has its own guidelines, most include a minimum number of mutual support meetings per week, random drug testing, house meetings and alternating chores.  These funds help cover expenses while the individual is seeking employment, which has created a challenge for many during the COVID-19 pandemic.	200000	200000	200000	497							No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate			No	200000
TPN-002968	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Workforce Development Grants to Service Partners FY 2022	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	$400,000 in ARPA dollars have been made available to partner agencies located in Lexington to provide residents with job training and job placement services, or to provide short-term training leading to a recognized certification or licensure. Service agreement awards are based on scoring criteria.  Service agreement dollars are distributed based on performance goals outlined by the agencies in their application. Through June 30, 2023, 657 individuals had received workforce training.	400000	256772	256772								No
TPN-002970	RCP-037291	Cape May County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Covid-19 Liasion	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	In the early onset of the pandemic, the County hired Michael Donohue from Blaney Karavan law firm as a Covid liaison. His responsibilities include: to assist the County Administrator and Board on Covid policies to comply with changing Covid mandates, assist with set up of vaccination clinics, marketing to mitigate the spread of Covid and miscellaneous services needed to assist the County with Covid protocols.	31912	31911.25	31911.25								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002972	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff Radio Encryption	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Sheriff's Office needed to update their radio encryption by the end of 2021.	828985.38	807250.13	807250.13
TPN-002973	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	LexArts Nonprofit Services Contract FY 2022	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	LexArts is a nonprofit in Lexington, Kentucky that focuses on cultural development and advocacy.  The organization’s premier program is an annual arts grant that helps over 50 regional artists and organizations build infrastructure to provide artistic and cultural programming throughout the Lexington community.   Recognizing the importance of this non-profit to the goals of LFUCG, and with the understanding that that COVID-19 created significant financial hardships within the non-profit community, ARPA funding was obligated to pay benefit costs, costs to retain employees, rent, utility costs, and operating costs of the organization.	325000	325000	325000								No			25 Dis Imp NPs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-002974	RCP-035877	Plano City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Recreation Revolving Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Recreation Revolving Fund is an enterprise fund that supports its mission of providing relevant and outstanding recreational opportunities that enhance the health and wellbeing of the community and its members, including quality innovative programs, concerts and special events, athletic leagues, camp programs, learn-to-swim programs, outdoor programs, recreation center classes, free and low cost recreational opportunities, senior programs, sports clinics, free summer playground programs and therapeutic programs that are self-supported by user fees. The Recreation Revolving Fund supports classes and programs for our most vulnerable populations, as well as those most impacted by the pandemic. Activities provide the community respite from the stresses of the pandemic, opportunities to restore physical, mental and emotional health, and restore a sense of community and normalcy in very challenging times.  This project is  complete.  The total amount of SLFRF allocated to this project is $1,500,000.	1500000	1500000	1500000
TPN-002975	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Lyric Theater Assistance FY 2022	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The Lyric is a theater of historical significance, originally built as a movie house in 1948.  The theater was a thriving entertainment centerpiece for Lexington’s African-American families through 1963, but after closing was dormant for nearly 50 years.  Today, it serves as a non-profit theater and cultural arts center dedicated to preserving, promoting, presenting, and celebrating diverse cultures through artistic presentations of the highest quality, educational programming and outreach, film, and opportunities for community inclusion.  The Lyric relies on income from rentals, ticket sales, and concessions as earned income.  Large events were not permitted under pandemic safety measures, leaving the Lyric Theater closed during much of 2020 and creating a significant revenue loss. Recognizing the importance of this non-profit to the goals of LFUCG, and with the understanding that that COVID-19 created significant financial hardships within the non-profit community, ARPA funding was obligated to pay benefit costs, costs to retain employees, utility costs, and operating costs of the organization.	127500	127500	127500								No			25 Dis Imp NPs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-002976	RCP-035877	Plano City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Cartegraph Concrete Sidewalk Repairs - 2022	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	PROJECT CANCELLED - This project is City of Plano Project Number 7378: Cartegraph Concrete Sidewalk Repairs – 2022, which will replace sidewalks and barrier free ramps (BFRs) that do not comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).  The locations included in this project are generated by citizen requests across the entire city.  Key outcomes are to bring sidewalks and BFRs into compliance with ADA.  The total amount of SLFRF funding allocated to this project is $1,650,000.  Project Number 7378 is scheduled to start construction in the fall 2023.	0	0	0
TPN-002977	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Circuit Court Video Conferencing Technology	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	The Circuit Court in Clay County, MO requested technology upgrades to their courtroom divisions to allow for remote video conferencing technology upgrades. This would allow holding administrative court hearings without in-person attendance.	20905	20905	20905								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	20905	1 Imp General Public
TPN-002979	RCP-035877	Plano City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Plano Fire-Rescue Overtime	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The mission of Plano Fire-Rescue (PFR) is to protect and enhance the quality of life in Plano through a comprehensive program of services directed toward public education, prevention, and control in areas of fire, rescue, medical emergencies, hazardous materials incidents and disasters.  PFR offers emergency and non-emergency services, including Emergency Medical Service treatment and patient transport, from thirteen (13) fire stations strategically placed throughout the City.  This project is complete.  The total amount of SLFRF funding allocated to this project is $812,158.	812158	812158	812158
TPN-002980	RCP-035960	Dauphin County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Dauphin County Aid to Tourism	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Funds paid to Dauphin County EDC to administer Tourism Aid.	1559994.16	1559994.16	1559994.16								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors	13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify
TPN-002981	RCP-037291	Cape May County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The revenue replacement was used to offset the cost of our County functions that are in whole or partially funded from revenue outside of taxation. One of our largest County Departments is our County Owned Nursing Home, Crest Haven Nursing Home., which has suffered significant loss from the inability to admit new residents and a decreasing census due to Covid in which $1,200,000.00 of ARP funding was allocated. Additionally, our Sheriff's deapartment was also impacted by COVID-19 as sheriff sales of property have ceased and continue to be signifcantly decreased in comparison to prior years, in whic $900,000.00 was allocated.  We have also suffered other losses as result of the closure of our County Park which relies on Concession revenue for operations in which we allocated $200,00.00. The remaining $200,000.00 was allocated for the increased cost of the health department operations.	2500000	2500000	2500000
TPN-002982	RCP-035877	Plano City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Generator Replacement (Engineering-Facilities)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	PROJECT CANCELLED - The need for improvements to the back-up electrical power generation of vital City facilities that service the community was made evident by Winter Storm Uri. Certain facilities were selected to have their back-up power generation either replaced with newer more reliable units, or have the existing units replaced with larger units allowing for certain services to continue regardless of power grid conditions. By these projects, vital City services such as: water pumping, water utilities, wastewater utilities, road treatment, environmental waste management and Police and Fire services can be provided to all the citizens and businesses of Plano during an interruption of the power grid. One of these projects (7379) has started by the generators being ordered and the other has not. Construction for the first project (7379) is projected to start in the summer of 2023 and the second project (7328) is projected to start in the summer of 2024.  The total amount of SLFRF allocated to this project is $3,650,000.  Work is projected to begin in the summer of 2023 (for 7379) with completion by fall 2023. Work is projected to begin in the summer of 2024 (for 7328) with completion by fall 2024.	0	0	0
TPN-002983	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	VisitLEX/Hospitality Industry Recovery	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	VISITLEX completed a comprehensive marketing plan designed to attract participants in the meeting and convention markets.	1000000	1000000	1000000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002984	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Law Enforcement Resource Training Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The County purchased land to eventually become a Law Enforcement Resource and Training Center for the Sheriff's office. The Commission approved architectural and engineering planning costs associated with said Center.	79188.62	79188.62	79188.62
TPN-002985	RCP-035960	Dauphin County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Dauphin County ARPA Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Funds paid to Dauphin County EDC to cover administrative expenses related to ARPA.	167000	167000	167000
TPN-002987	RCP-039601	Rock County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	New Public Health Staff	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	The need for more public health staff has been evident as Rock County continues to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.  This project includes payroll costs for three new positions in the Public Health Department that were approved by the County Board in 2021 – 1.0 FTE Public Health Planner, 1.0 FTE Public Health Policy Specialist, and 1.0 FTE Public Health Data Scientist, as well as an additional 4.0 FTE Public Health Strategist added in the 2022 budget.  These positions were created to provide the additional capacity needed for the Rock County Public Health Department to effectively design and implement public health programs aimed at pandemic response/recovery.  In addition, the Public Health Strategist positions will focus on addressing pre-existing health inequities in disadvantaged populations in order to lessen the impact of COVID-19 on these populations.  The Public Health Policy Specialist and Public Health Planner positions were filled in 2021, the Public Health Data Scientist and three Public Health Strategists began in Q1 2022 and the final Public Health Strategist began in Q2 2022.  A different source of grant funding was budgeted for these positions in 2023, but ARPA funding may be utilized again in 2024.		565900.8	565900.8			7					No
TPN-002988	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Shropshire Affordable Housing Project Site Improvements	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	LFUCG will partner with the Lexington Housing Authority (LHA) to make public improvements in support of a residential development to be located at Shropshire Avenue and Pemberton Street.  The Lexington Housing Authority will develop a vacant 3 acre strip of land in the Equestrian View development.  This development currently holds more than 100 homes and 270 apartment homes.  Additional single family homes and rental units will be constructed on this land, and additional public services may be co-located in the area.  LFUCG will complete initial site work in the area, including grading, curb and gutter, street surfacing, water, sewer, stormwater, and gas line installation.	750000	750000	422849								Yes	Other (please specify)	750000	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	No	0
TPN-002991	RCP-035877	Plano City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Police Headquarters Repairs and Renovations (Engineering-Facilities)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	PROJECT CANCELLED - With the community of Plano experiencing growth over many years, adjustments to the Plano Police Main Headquarters Building are needed to create efficiencies in police services. Increasing the productivity of our Law Enforcement Department benefits all citizens and businesses, in all aspects of life in Plano. This project has not started construction and is projected to start in the Spring of 2023.  The total amount of SLFRF allocated to this project is $1,450,000.  Work is projected to begin in the spring of 2023 with completion by winter 2023.	0	0	0
TPN-002993	RCP-035877	Plano City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Douglass Community Center Roof Replacement and Repairs	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	PROJECT CANCELLED - The Douglass Community Center is one of the older facilities in the City’s inventory. This building houses many programs that provide vital social services to the City’s population. This project ensures that citizens who benefit from these programs will not see disruptions caused by an older roof that has made it to the end of its life cycle. This project has not started construction and is projected to start in the spring of 2023.  The total amount of SLFRF allocated to this project is $150,000.  Work is projected to begin in spring 2023 with completion by fall 2023.	0	0	0
TPN-002994	RCP-037291	Cape May County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	AID TO TOURISM	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	In September 2021, the Department of Tourism was allocated $250,000 to market Cape May County and recoup some of the $1.54 billion dollars in direct tourism spending lost due to the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting shutdown and restrictions.  The funds were used to produce a 3-minute video promoting the 16 municipalities in Cape May County.  Ads were produced as part of a new campaign highlighting a 'safely together' message to let visitors know there were many outdoor options that would allow for social distancing.  The ads were placed as part of a multi-media campaign that included print, television, radio and social media.  The campaign was designed to promote the County to out of market visitors, targeting return and new visitors within a 200-mile radius.   The campaign resulted in an increase of fall visitors of 24.3% over 2020.  The winter ROI was an increase of 19% over 2020.  Cape May County saw the largest increase in overnight stays statewide based on Occupancy Tax revenue.	250000	249068.2	248940.09								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-002998	RCP-039618	Clifton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	COVID-19 Vaccination	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	City of Clifton’s Health Department has hosted a vaccination clinic as needed since March 2021. Currently the vaccination clinic is open to residents and non-residents at City Hall. Winter 2021 the Health Department hosted a drive thru vaccination clinic at various locations. All costs associated with vaccination clinics have been charged to this account.		1086288.77	1086288.77								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003002	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Code Enforcement Grants for Residents with Low Income FY 2022	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The FY2022 Adopted Budget included ARPA funding to design and administer a pilot funding program, targeted towards homeowners with low income that have received a notice of violation from the City’s Division of Code Enforcement. The Mayor’s Commission for Racial Justice & Equality issued a report in October 2020 that included a recommendation that “the Housing Code of the City of Lexington be reimagined into a Code Agency that places the health, well-being, and protection of residents (especially the most vulnerable) and neighborhoods as its mission.” As part of this recommendation, it was envisioned that the agency would work with residents and neighborhoods to create and sustain flourishing communities rather than a punitive financial tactic.  In reviewing the top ten code violations issued within the LFUCG area, it was noted that the list included items like repairing cornices, cleaning veneer that is peeling or unsightly, and replacing broken or rotted window casings.  LFUCG designed a funding program that provides an avenue for assistance whereby homeowners with low-income can seek assistance to correct certain identified code violations.	200000	200000	200000								No
TPN-003004	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Crow's Creek Lagoon	5-Infrastructure	5.3-Clean Water: Decentralized wastewater	A Smithville Lake camping lagoon, Crow's Creek, that holds waste from campers is no longer sufficient and overflows with flooding. This project will dredge the bottom of the lagoon, stabilize the banks with rip-rap, and build a pump station to better move the waste. Smithville Lake is also a source of drinking water for several municipal water systems--such as the City of Smithville and City of Kansas City, MO.	986121	986121	981038.41
TPN-003005	RCP-037846	Norristown, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Consultant	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Consultant to advise on compliance for expenditures and reporting. Complete reporting as needed.		17025	17025
TPN-003009	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Access to Quality Green Space in QCT - Phoenix Park Inclusive Design	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will study ways to make Phoenix Park a more inclusive park through the addition of innovative park amenities that will encourage intergenerational activities; inclusion of the Downtown Library in the design process to integrate with their services; and design that will incorporate the essence of Downtown Lexington.   This project will make the park more accessible by incorporating universal design best practices. This project will look for opportunities to add shade and benches which will attract more people of all ages and abilities to the park.	150000	148800	82300								No
TPN-003010	RCP-039180	Los Angeles City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Marketing for Tourism and Hospitality	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	The tourism industry was among the hardest hit by the devastating impacts of the pandemic (Oxford Economics): 163,000 lost jobs – nearly 1 in 3 across the sector and 43% of all job losses in LA (CY20); a loss of $22.6 billion in total business sales representing a decline of 60% (CY20). This Marketing for Tourism and Hospitality project focused on a national marketing campaign to assist with the recovery of the tourism, hospitality, and restaurant industries. As the City’s official, non-profit Destination Marketing Organization, Los Angeles Tourism & Convention Board (“LA Tourism”) developed a comprehensive promotional strategy to drive travel demand. Combined with LA Tourism’s other funds, the City’s investment of $5 million enabled Los Angeles to have a total of $9.75MM for a national advertising buy of U.S. advertising markets for a summer campaign – a critical time for the industry’s recovery.	5000000	5000000	5000000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors			No	0
TPN-003013	RCP-037811	Madera, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	GATEWAY/RIVERSIDE RIVER CROSSING	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	WATER PROJECTS SYSTEM UPGRADE AT RIVER CROSSING AT GATEWAY, RIVERSIDE/COLUMBIA TO WATER WELL NO. 18 AT GATEWAY		132	132					No
TPN-003014	RCP-039618	Clifton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	COVID-19 Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	City of Clifton has not hosted any type of COVID-19 testing clinic. Costs associated with testing has been for City employees that had COVID-19 symptoms or employees that has direct contact with a person who tested positive for COVID-19. All employees were sent to our licensed medical facility, Immedicenter, to get tested for COVID-19. All costs associated with testing are charged to this account.		2129	2129								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003015	RCP-039601	Rock County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Dental Services	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	The Rock County Board passed a resolution in October 2021 to allocate $195,000 of the County’s SLFRF funding to HealthNet of Rock County to expand dental services.  HealthNet of Rock County, Inc. is a non-profit clinic that provides medical and dental services to the uninsured and underinsured.  Funding from Rock County will help fund the purchase of dental equipment to expand dental services, and provide dental services to an additional 50 individuals with developmental disabilities from the community who are on Medicaid by December 2023.  These funds will allow HealthNet to provide dental health services to disadvantaged members of the community who were disproportionately affected by COVID-19.  In addition, HealthNet is located in a Qualified Census Tract, which allows them to more easily assist populations with the greatest need.  Dental health is an important but often overlooked aspect of a person’s overall health, which has not been prioritized during the COVID-19 pandemic.  Funding from Rock County will lead to better access to dental care for residents with the most need.		195000	195000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-003016	RCP-036794	Auburn, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Auburn Police Department COVID 19 Enforcement	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	The Auburn Police Department (APD) is a full service community oriented police department committed to creating, nurturing and sustaining an ongoing partnership through positive relationships with the community that we serve.  As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the APD will be utilizing ARPA funds to invest in technology and equipment that will allow law enforcement to more efficiently and effectively respond to the potential rise in gun violence in the community.	530000	526944.54	139179.54								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	530000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003017	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Economic Development Grants to Service Partners	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The FY2022 Adopted Budget included APRA funding for second-year continuation funding to three Economic Development Partner agencies that are responsible for implementing, in part, the Economic Development goals of the LFUCG. These partners and their scope of work were as follows: 1. Euphrates International Investment Company: New business development, which includes creating and implementing a new business recruitment plan for the Lexington Economic Partnership, entrepreneur development and start-up assistance, minority business development, and maintenance of an available economic development property register. 2. Commerce Lexington: Existing business retention and expansion, and workforce development; and 3. EHI Consultants and Urban League of Lexington-Fayette County: Economic development services and referrals for the Lexington Opportunity Zone. Economic Development is considered a general service of LFUCG, and is therefore an eligible expense under EC 6.1 – Provision of Government Services.	298745	298745	298745
TPN-003018	RCP-039601	Rock County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Medication-Assisted Treatment	1-Public Health	1.13-Substance Use Services	The Rock County Board passed a resolution in October 2021 to allocate $5,000 of the County’s SLFRF funding to HealthNet of Rock County to expand medication-assisted treatment.  HealthNet of Rock County, Inc. is a non-profit clinic that provides medical and dental services to the uninsured and underinsured.  This funding will allow HealthNet to provide medication-assisted treatment to an additional 20 women by June 2023.  COVID-19 has had a negative impact on mental health and substance abuse in many communities, including Rock County.  Providing the funding to expand HealthNet’s medication-assisted treatment program to serve an additional 20 women will help to address the increase in substance abuse caused by the pandemic.		5000	5000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-003019	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Critical Government Needs - Broadband (RFP)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This allocation supported an RFP for Central Kentucky Regional Counties. The RFP looked at solutions to expand broadband in rural areas.	19571	19571	19571
TPN-003020	RCP-039338	Racine, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	(2) Pierce Quantum Medical Pumper Units	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The Fire Department is in a critical situation right now.  Response to COVID-19 has increased significantly over the last several months.  This past summer we had the two Medical First Responder engines (Engine 1 and Engine 5) out of service with various mechanical issues due to increased wear and tear because of time, age and call volume.    We have diligently made repairs to both Engine companies however parts are virtually impossible to obtain due to the age of the vehicles.   Parts that are available are expensive.  It’s the age of the vehicles that has become challenging.  Normal life expectancy of fire apparatus is 15 years per National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards.  With respect to age we have the following: • Fire Engine 5 (Humble Park) is a 2001 Pierce Quantum First Responder pumper and is 21 years old now.   This is the oldest front line unit.  This vehicle is heavily used and worn.  • Fire Engine 1 (Downtown) is a 2003 Pierce Quantum First Responder pumper and is 20 years old now.  This vehicle covers all fire calls east of West Blvd both north and south and is a first responder company for Advance Life Support (ALS) and Critical Care Advance Life Support (ALS1) calls.   This vehicle is also heavily used and worn. Vehicles to be delivered in August of 2023	1250000	1250000	1250000								Yes	Medical equipment and facilities	1250000	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-003021	RCP-039618	Clifton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	COVID-19 Contact Tracing	1-Public Health	1.3-COVID-19 Contact Tracing	The City of Clifton’s Health Department follows all State of New Jersey’s Guidance. Employees and additionally hired consultants review and evaluates pending cases to transfer into Commcare for Contact Tracing. Nursing staff and consultants are assigned to manage positive COVID cases. Daily COVID cases are compiled and tallied. Costs associated with contact tracing are charged to this account.		686404.71	686404.71								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003022	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	COVID Leave for County Employees	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	The Families First Coronavirus Response Act leave  option expired on 9/30/2021. So the County approved paid leave for public County employees after that date through 12/31/2022. The leave is for COVID protocols when having to stay home for oneself or to care for family members.	100000	65556.06	65556.06								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003023	RCP-039807	Benton County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FOR HOMELSS POPULATION	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Supporting development and acquisition of permanent supportive housing		75000	75000
TPN-003024	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Neighborhood Recreation Improvements - Berry Hill Park Basketball Court	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project greatly improved Berry Hill Park by demolishing the failing basketball and tennis courts and building a new, improved full court basketball court.   This project addressed the need for additional recreational activities for youth and adults in the community, promoting health and wellness.  These improvements were included in the Lexington Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but have not been funded due to lack of funding availability.   Budgets for FY2020 and FY2021 were greatly impacted by COVID-19, and resulted in projects being held or not funded on a regular schedule. This is considered a park enhancement, and will provide an opportunity to increase usability of an existing recreation space. Construction of parks is considered a general service of LFUCG, and is therefore an eligible expense under EC 6.1 – Provision of Government Services.	175000	175000	175000
TPN-003025	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Neighborhood Recreation Improvements - Buckhorn Phase II Improvements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will greatly enhance Buckhorn Park by adding five new shade trees with a bench, planting a bio-swale along the service road, and adding additional paved walkway to create a walking loop.   This project will make the park more accessible by extending pavement to create a walking loop. Additional shade will attract more people of all ages to the park and the bench will offer a place to sit down for seniors and people with disabilities. These improvements were included in the Lexington Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but have not been funded due to lack of funding availability.  Budgets for FY2020 and FY2021 were greatly impacted by COVID-19, and resulted in projects being held or not funded on a regular schedule. This is considered a park enhancement, and will provide an opportunity to increase usability of an existing recreation space. Construction of parks is considered a general service of LFUCG, and is therefore an eligible expense under EC 6.1 – Provision of Government Services.	45000	44999	43875
TPN-003026	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Neighborhood Improvements - Dogwood Park Basketball Court	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will greatly improve Dogwood Park by building a new half-court basketball court in front of the playground.   This project will address the need for additional recreational activities for youth and adults in the community, promoting health and wellness.  These improvements were included in the Lexington Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but have not been funded due to lack of funding availability.  Budgets for FY2020 and FY2021 were greatly impacted by COVID-19, and resulted in projects being held or not funded on a regular schedule. This is considered a park enhancement, and will provide an opportunity to increase usability of an existing recreation space. Construction of parks is considered a general service of LFUCG, and is therefore an eligible expense under EC 6.1 – Provision of Government Services.	95000	68123	6645
TPN-003027	RCP-037548	Pittsfield, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Contact Tracing	1-Public Health	1.3-COVID-19 Contact Tracing	Contact Tracing	200000	147761.12	147761.12								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003028	RCP-039086	Grand Forks, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Mental Health Matters	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Promoting resilience, strength, and emotional well-being for people in the Grand Forks community through education and collaboration to increase awareness and access to mental health resources.	300000	229416.87	229416.87								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003029	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Neighborhood Recreation Improvements - Gardenside Park Playground	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project greatly enhanced Gardenside Park by replacing the playground that was at the end of life with a new/improved playground.  The park had no playground as the former equipment was removed for safety purposes.   This project encourages fitness and intergenerational play with varying types of playground equipment. This project made the park more accessible by adding accessible equipment and walkways as part of the new playground. Additional shade and seating are attracting more people of all ages to the park and offer a place to relax for seniors and people with disabilities. These improvements were included in the Lexington Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but have not been funded due to lack of funding availability.  Budgets for FY2020 and FY2021 were greatly impacted by COVID-19, and resulted in projects being held or not funded on a regular schedule. This is considered a park enhancement, and is providing an opportunity to increase usability of an existing recreation space. Construction of parks is considered a general service of LFUCG, and is therefore an eligible expense under EC 6.1 – Provision of Government Services.	148746	148746	148746
TPN-003031	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Government Employee Pay Supplements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	One time supplement pay of $3,500 to LFUCG employees not eligible for ARPA Premium Pay. Necessary to support retention of staff at a time when loss of revenue has prevented adequate salary increases making it difficult to retain staffing in most divisions.  A total of 952 employees received the pay supplement.	4436928	4436928	4436928
TPN-003032	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Neighborhood Improvements - Masterson Station Park Playground	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project greatly enhanced Masterson Station Park by adding a new picnic shelter and completing the last phase of the playground improvement project with a climbing net.   This project encourages fitness with the new climbing net in the playground. Additional shade and seating with the new picnic shelter will attract more people of all ages to the park and offer a place to relax for seniors and people with disabilities. These improvements were included in the Lexington Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but have not been funded due to lack of funding availability.  Budgets for FY2020 and FY2021 were greatly impacted by COVID-19, and resulted in projects being held or not funded on a regular schedule. This is considered a park enhancement, and will provide an opportunity to increase usability of an existing recreation space. Construction of parks is considered a general service of LFUCG, and is therefore an eligible expense under EC 6.1 – Provision of Government Services.	147478	147478	147478
TPN-003033	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Neighborhood Recreation Improvements - Meadowthorpe Community Center Roof Repair	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project greatly enhanced Meadowthorpe Park by repairing the roof of the community building that hosts neighborhood meetings and special events.   This project addressed the needs of the community to have a space to hold important neighborhood meetings and special events that bring people of all ages in the neighborhood together during all seasons of the year.  The goals of the project were to increase the number of neighbor meetings and special events that can be held in a safe environment; increase intergenerational opportunities; and improve social, emotional and mental health of the community through increased opportunities for people to gather. These improvements were included in the Lexington Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but have not been funded due to lack of funding availability.  Budgets for FY2020 and FY2021 were greatly impacted by COVID-19, and resulted in projects being held or not funded on a regular schedule. Building repair is considered a general service of LFUCG, and is therefore an eligible expense under EC 6.1 – Provision of Government Services.	78585	78585	78585
TPN-003034	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Neighborhood Recreation Improvements - Raven Run Park Prather House Roof	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project greatly enhanced Raven Run Park by repairing the roof as a critical step to restoring the Prather House, which is of historical significance as one of the oldest brick homes in Central Kentucky.   This project addressed the needs of the community to preserve historic buildings and landmarks.  The goal of the project was to preserve the historic Prather House at Raven Run Park for current and future residents and visitors to the park. Historic buildings are an important part of preserving the history of Fayette County, and the Prather House is a perfect example of a building that has been in disrepair but can be restored as an example of a brick home from the 1800’s. These improvements were included in the Lexington Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but have not been funded due to lack of funding availability.  Budgets for FY2020 and FY2021 were greatly impacted by COVID-19, and resulted in projects being held or not funded on a regular schedule. Building repair is considered a general service of LFUCG, and is therefore an eligible expense under EC 6.1 – Provision of Government Services.	154998	154998	154998
TPN-003035	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Neighborhood Recreation Improvements - Shillito Park Access Improvement Parking	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will greatly enhance Shillito Park by paving informal gravel parking areas and repairing existing parking lots.   This project sees a very high volume of use. Therefore, more paved parking and resurfacing of existing parking lots is needed to accommodate the large number of people that visit the park. This project will make the park more accessible by paving gravel lots and resurfacing parking lots that are in disrepair. The goals of the project are to meet the parking needs of people that attend Shillito Park and improve the accessibility of the park for people of all ages and abilities. These improvements were included in the Lexington Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but have not been funded due to lack of funding availability.  Budgets for FY2020 and FY2021 were greatly impacted by COVID-19, and resulted in projects being held or not funded on a regular schedule. This is considered a park enhancement, and will provide an opportunity to increase usability of an existing recreation space. Construction of parks is considered a general service of LFUCG, and is therefore an eligible expense under EC 6.1 – Provision of Government Services.	297207	297206	33820
TPN-003036	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Neighborhood Rec Improvements - Southland Park Access Improvement Parking	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will greatly enhance Southland Park by repairing the lower lot that services Southland Pool.   This existing parking lot surface has failed and is in need of repair. This project will make the park more accessible by repaving this lot. The goals of the project are to meet the parking needs of people that attend Southland Pool and improve the accessibility of the park for people of all ages and abilities. These improvements were included in the Lexington Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but have not been funded due to lack of funding availability.  Budgets for FY2020 and FY2021 were greatly impacted by COVID-19, and resulted in projects being held or not funded on a regular schedule. This is considered a park enhancement, and will provide an opportunity to increase usability of an existing recreation space. Construction of parks is considered a general service of LFUCG, and is therefore an eligible expense under EC 6.1 – Provision of Government Services.	202794	202794	11469
TPN-003037	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Neighborhood Recreation Improvements - Woodland Park Restroom and Therapeutic	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project greatly enhanced Woodland Park by replacing the existing restroom and therapeutic recreation building. The previous building was beyond the end of life with frequent failures. The previous design was identified as a serious safety concern related to drug use and loitering and was not ADA compliant.  This project made the park more accessible by renovating the existing restrooms and therapeutic recreation building to comply with ADA. These improvements were included in the Lexington Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but have not been funded due to lack of funding availability.  Budgets for FY2020 and FY2021 were greatly impacted by COVID-19, and resulted in projects being held or not funded on a regular schedule. This is considered a park enhancement, and is providing an opportunity to increase usability of an existing recreation space. Construction of parks is considered a general service of LFUCG, and is therefore an eligible expense under EC 6.1 – Provision of Government Services.	527913	527913	527913
TPN-003038	RCP-039086	Grand Forks, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	SIRN Radio and Station Alerting	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Statewide interoperable communication system for public safety to serve and protect citizens	572951.2	505989.13	505989.13
TPN-003040	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay for High Exposure LFUCG Staff	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The Urban County Council allocated premium pay of $5,000 each, to active city employees whom held positions and performed duties during the pandemic that regularly caused such employees to be exposed to a greater risk of contracting Covid-19.	12592084	12592084	12592084		1903
TPN-003041	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	County COVID Health Insurance Claims	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	The County partially self-insures its health insurance plan. For those claims costs not covered by the insurer, and out-of-pocket to the County, the County inquired as to the total amount since March 3rd, 2021. The insurer reported back the total of $168,387.00 through 10/13/2021 when our request was made.	168387	168387	168387								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003042	RCP-039189	Midland County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Safety Covid Response Jail	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	County Jail response to mitigating the impact of Covid on the inmate population.	4671078	4671078	4671078			55					No
TPN-003043	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay for Fayette County Sheriff's Office	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	$5,000 in premium  pay to each eligible sheriff's office employee that performed duties that exposed them to Covid 19.	361923	361923	361923		49
TPN-003044	RCP-039338	Racine, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health Department Salary and Benefits	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	The City of Racine Health Department has been operating above capacity since March of 2020.  The Department is almost exclusively operating in response to the pandemic including, contact tracing, vaccinations, testing, outreach, education and collaboration with the School District.  COVID cases in the City of Racine settled slightly in the summer of 2021, but beginning in mid December of 2021 have spiked to our highest levels.  Our disadvantaged, particularly our black and brown population continues to be hesitant to vaccination and we have about a 52% vaccination rate in the City as of December 2021. January through March of 2022 the public health department continued to focus almost all of their time on COVID mitigation and education.	1136117	1136117	1136117			24					No
TPN-003046	RCP-036945	Randall County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Covid Overtime	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Compensating Employees for overtime due to the COVID-19 pandemic.		78084.46	78084.46			24					No
TPN-003047	RCP-039338	Racine, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Wide Vaccination Incentive Program	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	The "I Did It" vaccination gift card incentive program began on August 18, 2021.  Program provides $50 gift cards to City Residents that receive either a 1st or 2nd vaccination at any one of our vaccination locations/clinics throughout the City.   City residents getting vaccinated get: ● One $50 gift card for first shot of Pfizer or Moderna ● One $50 gift card for second shot of Pfizer or Moderna ● Two $50 gift cards for Johnson & Johnson vaccine Program also distributes gift cards to those who just got vaccinated and to the “Good Neighbors” who brought others in to get vaccinated.   Costs here relate to gift card purchases and administration of the program.  City has sponsored over 40 different pop up vaccination clinic locations including our main locations at the Regency Mall and the City of Racine Health Department.  We have provided over 5,000 vaccinations to City Residents that were disproportionately affected by the COVID Pandemic.	600000	555832	555832								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-003054	RCP-039338	Racine, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Revenue Loss	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Based on various calculations the City of Racine, using the counterfactual Growth factor had lost revenue from 2019-2020 (on a calendar year) of over $8 million dollars.  Additional lost revenue was calculated for 2021 of over $8M again.  City chose to use $12.2M of these funds have been allocated by the Common Council to provide for government services within the City's General Fund.	12300000	12201670	12201670
TPN-003067	RCP-039338	Racine, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Grant Compliance	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Administration costs for grant writing and compliance services associated with the implementation and reporting associated with the ARPA funding.  These will be contracted services to various professional services firms including accounting firms and grant writing agencies over a 4 year period.	500000	108134	59134
TPN-003068	RCP-035877	Plano City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Citywide Wayfinding Signs (Engineering)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	PROJECT CANCELLED - The Citywide Wayfinding Signs Project will provide 137 new signs and kiosks throughout the City, focusing on five main districts, and guiding motorists and pedestrians to and throughout these key districts. Included are the following districts across the City:  1. Downtown Plano  2. Oak Point Park and Recreation Area  3. Park Boulevard and Preston Road   4. Willowbend  5. Legacy District  The objectives of this new wayfinding system are to: connect people with community resources; entice people to discover and visit new sites; reinforce Plano’s City of Excellence brand; create a uniform aesthetic that enhances the look of the community; and consolidate existing signage to have fewer signs on the road. This project is currently finalizing the contract documents for awarding project to the lowest bidder. Construction is estimated to begin April 2023 and estimated to be completed in September 2023.   The total amount of SLFRF allocated to this project is $1,000,000.  Project was advertised for low-bid in February 2023 and Geograph Industries, Inc. provided the low-bid of $948,614. This selection is scheduled to be approved by City Council on April 24th, 2023.  Work is expected to be completed in September 2023.	0	0	0
TPN-003069	RCP-035877	Plano City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Computerized Signal System (Vehicle Detection System-Engineering)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	PROJECT CANCELLED - A fully updated computerized signal system benefits all drivers and other roadway users.  These benefits include reduced traffic congestion, vehicle delay, and emissions; as well as improved motorist, pedestrian, and cyclist safety.  A robust vehicle detection system is the primary source of traffic data gathering within a computerized signal system.  The goals for installing this traffic data collection system are to provide real-time traffic demand data which a) allow the local controller to assign accurate time to each movement; b) provide performance metrics for decision making including identification of accidents and traffic flow predictions; as well as c) contribute to better incident management coordination with emergency responders.  The total amount of SLFRF allocated to this project is $8,000,000.  City is finalizing the Vehicle Detection Equipment specifications and design has started on PS&E set. The anticipated start date for implementation is July 2023 with an anticipated completion date of July 2025.	0	0	0
TPN-003078	RCP-036945	Randall County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	PPE	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	PPE purchases to protect county employees while working.		32434.92	32434.92								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003109	RCP-036794	Auburn, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	City of Auburn Revenue Replacement FY 2020-21	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	As a local government, the City of Auburn experienced general revenue loss from taxes, current charges, and misc. general revenue as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Revenue loss was calculated on a City-wide basis in the General,  Refuse Collection, Power Utility, Solid Waste, and Water  Funds for the City Fiscal Year 2020-21. As the City closes out the FY 2021-22 Budget, the City made a budget transfer of $1,480,000 for revenue losses.	10000000	7750977.66	7750977.66
TPN-003110	RCP-035964	Sarasota County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Covid-19 Public Health - County Self Insurance Medical Expenses	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	Reimbursement of County and Sheriff's Office incurred Covid-19 medical claims, medical and pharmaceutical, for County and Sheriff employees and covered spouses over the eligible period of performance, March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2024. For county, incurred expenses are aligned to County Fund 506, Medical Benefits Insurance Fund, and eligible expenses are derived from Covid-19 billing codes utilized by the respective County health insurance carriers, Aetna (Medical; Pharmaceutical 1/1/22 and Forward) and Benecard (Pharmaceutical, Ending 12/31/21), and reported to the County Human Resources Department. The Sheriff's Office health provider (Aetna) provides identical reporting to support Covid-19 medical and pharmaceutical costs.	5000000	5000000	5000000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003113	RCP-036945	Randall County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Medical Expenses	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	Employee health costs due to COVID 19.		501255.02	501255.02								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003115	RCP-036945	Randall County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Prevention in Congregated Areas	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	COVID cleaning of public building in the county.		33126	33126								No			1 Imp General Public			No	33126
TPN-003116	RCP-036945	Randall County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Judiciary Courts COVID-19 Project	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Updating county court building to combat the spread of COVID 19.		373354.1	373354.1								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	300000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003117	RCP-035964	Sarasota County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Covid-19 Public Health - Mental and Behavioral Health Projects	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Funding of mental and behavioral health projects identified within the Sarasota County Mental Health Needs Assessment Task Force Report 2021 ("Report"), produced by subject matter experts within the fields of mental health and substance abuse ("Mental Health Task Force"). The Report documented a needs assessment performed over the COVID pandemic which concluded that it pushed the behavioral health system to a breaking point and identified several priorities to address the critical mental and behavioral health needs of the community. The Report was accepted by the Board of County Commissioners on 1/11/22 and specific priorities funded utilizing ARPA CLFRF include (13) of the (17) priorities identified by the Mental Health Task Force and approved by the Board of County Commissioners on 3/29/22.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003118	RCP-036945	Randall County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Jail COVID Mitigation	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	COVID 19 Study and work to mitigate COVID in the county jail facility.		846590.99	846590.99								Yes	Adaptations to congregate living facilities	65000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003122	RCP-035964	Sarasota County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Water & Sewer Infrastructure - Knights Trail Utility Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Funding of the design and construction of approximately 12,500 linear feet (LF) of 16-in potable water transmission and 8-in force main (inc. lift station) from Laurel Road, north along Knights Trail Road to the boundary of the property of the planned fire training academy. Project will bring potable water and wastewater transmission to three planned County buildings; the fire training academy, a white fleet facility, and a Utility, Transportation, and Warehouse Operations campus.	4000000	2024863.25	1043517
TPN-003132	RCP-037706	Washington County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Pure Storage	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Digital Data Storage	64206.54	64206.54	64206.54								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003133	RCP-035964	Sarasota County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Revenue Replacement - Funding Continuity Support for Fire / EMS	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Based on Revenue Loss calculations performed under the U.S. Treasury Interim Final Rule, $12,500,000 of calculated revenue loss funds are to be utilized to fund Fire and EMS personnel salaries and benefits incurred within the eligible time period of March 3, 2021 to December 31, 2024.	12500000	12500000	12500000
TPN-003135	RCP-035964	Sarasota County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Revenue Replacement - Recovery of Financial Impacts of County Covid-19 Response	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Based on Revenue Loss calculations performed under the U.S. Treasury Interim Final Rule, $12,749,299.00 is committed to the recovery of the financial impacts of County Covid-19 response expenses on the respective responding department's funds supporting the continuation of delivery of general government services by these departments. Once those impacts are calculated, the cumulative obligation and expenditure data will be updated to include over this and future performance periods.	0	0	0
TPN-003136	RCP-035964	Sarasota County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Administrative - SLFRF Program Administrative Expenses	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	As of December 7, 2021, the Sarasota County Board of County Commissioners (Board) has committed $1,000,000 for Administrative Expenses, to be utilized for eligible personnel salaries and benefits, contracts, and miscellaneous purchases to support the administration of the SLFRF program.  On June 23, 2022, the County Administrator authorized an additional $326,739 for Administrative Expenses, bringing the total Administrative Expense budget to $1,326,739.00.	1326739	272046.72	272046.72
TPN-003153	RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	County Direct/Joint Response - Courts	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The COVID-19 pandemic severely hindered the Travis County court system from functioning. Normal operations for members of the judicial system, defendants, plaintiffs, and jurors required in-person meetings and court proceedings, but the potential spread of the novel COVID-19 virus influenced the Texas Supreme Court to halt court operations until a point in time that the judicial system could be facilitated without said potential spread. As the judicial system has slowly reopened, County departments and offices that participate have purchased telecommunications technology and services including laptops, wireless hotspots, and tablet computers so that jurors, defendants, plaintiffs, and members of the judicial system can take part in the proceedings without concern for contracting COVID-19 and to address to address backlogs resulting from pandemic-related shutdowns.	777244.09	777244.09	554383.16								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003154	RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Targeted Behavioral Health Support for People Experiencing Homelessness	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected individuals experiencing homelessness, particularly those experiencing mental health issues that greatly increase their risk of being unhoused. To address such public health impacts, Travis County partnered with a local entity to expand mental and behavioral health support services to individuals within non-congregate shelters. This project provides resources for ongoing behavioral health support, referrals, and linkages to current and former guests at local protective lodges and bridge shelters. Such support and linkages include mental health intake appointments, psychiatric services, medication management services, substance use treatment appointments, counseling services and care coordination, housing navigation services, and support for rapid rehousing clients. The project is based on a housing first model, which prioritizes providing permanent housing to people experiencing homelessness to serve as a platform from which individuals can pursue personal goals and improve their quality of life. Case workers utilize motivational interviewing, screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment models to assist individuals in the program. Although the project encompasses a variety of responses to the pandemic, such as supportive housing and community benefits navigation, its main funding use is in mental health services for unhoused individuals.	325000	325000	230708.37								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic			No	325000
TPN-003155	RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	County Direct/Joint Response - County Jail Settings	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Congregate work settings and shelters became a tremendous risk for COVID-19 contraction during the pandemic. Travis County’s jails had periodic outbreaks of the virus because of the congregate setting, which required a variety of expenses to keep the jail system operating. To social distance and prevent the further spread of COVID-19 within the Travis County jail system, a shift in operations was required that greatly impacted food services and laundry services normally completed by the inmate population. This project provides funding for these various expenses all focused on the Travis County jail system. Expenses include purchasing food for inmates when kitchens became inoperable, procurement costs related food and kitchen supplies, as well as purchasing laundry services when the jail’s laundry became inoperable due to the spread of COVID-19. It is expected that subsequent outbreaks will also entail additional costs due to further changes in County jail operations.	1150000	1041759.21	241759.21								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	711768	20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate			No	0
TPN-003156	RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	TCTX Thrive	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The project is currently in the planning stages with the aim of assisting small businesses affected by the ongoing COVID-19 public health emergency and its negative economic impacts. It was created with the intention of continuing a program begun during 2020 with funds from the CARES Act that provided resources to small businesses with COVID-19 related expenses on a reimbursement basis. Current plans are to shift to a grant-based, rather than reimbursement-based, assistance program to allow for a wider set of eligible small businesses.	4873737	213750	0								No
TPN-003157	RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	TCTX Serve	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The project is currently in the planning stages with the aim of assisting nonprofit organizations affected by, or responding to, the ongoing COVID-19 public health emergency.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003158	RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Childcare Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	The project is currently in the planning stages but aims to address the need for quality childcare made evident by the COVID-19 pandemic. The onset of the pandemic pushed many organizations to develop work from home initiatives alongside schooling via telecommunications technology that demonstrated an important need for childcare. This project addresses the need by contracting with local organizations to improve the quality and amount of childcare services within Travis County. Services include a non-traditional hours childcare pilot that provides childcare overnight, on weekends, or otherwise outside of traditional business hours; a home-based childcare network that conducts group sessions, individualized coaching, and technical assistance on Quality Childcare Matters program curriculum to family or home-based providers; a shared services program that enables childcare providers to share administrative costs related to operating a childcare program through stipends or fee-based consultation, and; pre-k partnership hubs that centralizes administrative duties for qualified community-based pre-k classrooms to streamline the delivery of pre-k childcare.	6725000	4110415	2200991.11								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-003159	RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Behavioral Health/Mental Health/Substance Use/Homelessness Pre-Planning	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The ongoing COVID-19 public health emergency exacerbated mental health issues within the Travis County community, especially for individuals booked into the County jail system. To alleviate this problem, Travis County is conducting an evaluation of potential solutions. This project affords the locally based Dell Medical Center to lead a community-wide planning process on forensic behavioral health issues. The planning process will create an environmental scan, conduct a data analysis of the community’s behavioral health issues and needs, and develop actionable recommendations for Travis County’s mental health and criminal justice issues. The environmental scan will identify existing pathways into the criminal justice system and determine its current demand, identify current programming and referral options available and their frequency of use, engage community stakeholder coalition efforts, and build out data from initial 911 calls, jail bookings, and re-entry from state hospitals and jails. Programmatic recommendations will include cost estimates and implementation timelines for Travis County to consider in its future planning efforts. The recommendations will aim to reduce demand on the County jail system caused by mental health, substance use, behavioral health issues and, in turn, reduce the need for congregate sheltering in the County and its associated risks as has been seen by the impact of COVID-19 on current County jail operations.	250000	250000	249999.66								No
TPN-003160	RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Broadband Infrastructure Pre-Planning	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for high-speed internet. The increased use of teleworking or schooling via telecommunications technology demonstrated that the local community suffers from a divide in access, affordability, and adoption of internet services. This project provides funding to create a strategic plan in consultation with regional government partners, private industry and philanthropy foundations to expand access to high-speed, broadband internet access within the community. The plan will include a proposed governance structure for collaboration with other entities, and potential investment mechanisms to ensure all residents have access to affordable, quality broadband for necessary remote education, teleworking options, and telehealth services. The gap analysis will also provide a knowledge foundation for Travis County to take advantage of future funding opportunities related to broadband and digital inclusion if they become available.	103812	4729.28	4265.28								No
TPN-003162	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Clay County Health Center 2021 Costs	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	The Health Center made application for County ARPA funds to reimburse their 2021 unduplicated COVID-related costs.	655015.05	535535.39	535535.39								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003163	RCP-039618	Clifton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Prevention Congregate Settings	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The City of Clifton upgraded HVAC equipment for public buildings to improve ventilation. The City of Clifton invested in doors and  windows to improve social distancing measures within public buildings.		1065733.05	1065733.05								Yes	Adaptations to congregate living facilities	912891.23	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	No	0
TPN-003164	RCP-037548	Pittsfield, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Administration of ARPA funding.	1650000	441881.4	441881.4
TPN-003167	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Bidirectional Antenna for Detention Center	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The Sheriff's Office requested ARPA funding for an antenna due to inadequate internal communications capability between their departments. This was especially the case for when patrol deputies needed to bring in inmates for intake at the detention center. It also applied for within detention itself. They required this communication capability in order to follow COVID protocols for inmates. The antenna was needed to facilitate these communications.	163970.08	163970.08	163970.08								Yes	Adaptations to congregate living facilities	163970.08	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003169	RCP-039618	Clifton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Personal Protective Equipment	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	To minimize exposure to COVID-19 and to manage disinfecting of City buildings and vehicles, The City of Clifton purchased masks, sanitizer, disinfectants and other personal protective equipment. This includes all City of Clifton buildings and public library buildings and employees. All costs associated with personal protection equipment are charged to this account.		159652.06	159652.06								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003171	RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Other Support Staff	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.2-Public Sector Workforce: Rehiring Public Sector Staff	Travis County expanded its pre-pandemic assistance programs, or created altogether new programs, to respond to the novel COVID-19 public health emergency and its negative economic impacts. The labor cost of implementing the new and expanded programs was fully absorbed during the short-run implementation of the CARES Act in 2020, but the longer time horizon involved with the implementation of ARPA programs necessitates additional labor-power to meet ongoing programming needs. Short-term solutions to increase workforce capacity, such as by expanding overtime use, cannot be used in the long-term without taking a toll on a workforce also living through a major natural disaster: in fact, it may further reduce the County's capacity in the long run if current workforce members terminate employment due to extended and expanded work requirements. To address the need for additional implementation capacity, Travis County created this project to hire additional staff. Because most of the County's programming to address the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts utilizes the extensive expertise of already-employed staff, the project provides for the payroll and benefit cost of positions that provide backfill support for staff that continue to work on the County's COVID-19 programming. Per the second calculation option in the Final Rule, Travis County can use the authority under 31 CFR §35.6(b)(3)(ii)(E)(2)(ii) to rehire up to a maximum of 406.625 FTEs.	11715839.26	4979882.36	4979882.36				40				No
TPN-003175	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Sheriff's Office Software Solution	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The Sheriff's Office requested a new software system upgrade needed to enhance their COVID response capabilities. One of those would be to add Emergency Medical Dispatch services, which the current software system can't support. In addition, partner municipalities use this same software system, so upgrading to it allows information sharing regarding detention center inmate COVID statuses. It also contains a shared database for a Records Management System (RMS) and Jail Management System (JMS), which further improves public health data systems as well as prevention of COVID in an incarceration setting.	702722.25	649976.21	519980.97								Yes	Technology and tools	649976.21
TPN-003179	RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	County Direct/Joint Response - Social Distancing	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The project provides funding for Travis County’s direct or joint (with the City of Austin and other relevant partners) expenses that promote social distancing to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. It became apparent early in 2020 that social distancing would become a primary effort to keep COVID-19 from spreading throughout congregate work settings, and so Travis County continues to set aside funding to promote social distancing in the event of subsequent COVID-19 variant outbreaks. Expenses include items like teleworking equipment for those offices and departments that can conduct their business from remote work locations, software to facilitate remote telework, equipment and supplies like plexiglass and placards to demarcate social distancing guidelines within facilities, custodial cleaning supplies and services to clean facilities, and other goods, services, or physical plant changes to enable social distancing within Travis County facilities.	2044853.25	2044853.25	1349035.65								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	39514.11	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003181	RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Covid Outreach	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The project is intended to provide funding for public health communication efforts to communicate to Travis County residents information related to COVID-19, including to improve the uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations among vulnerable populations.	50000	8710	8710								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003182	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Inmate Transport SUVs	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The Sheriff's Office lacks any form of transport vehicles to move inmates from cities into the detention center/jail. They requested 6 SUVs to provide that function. Municipalities requested the County have that capability in order to follow COVID protocols for inmates. In addition, the SUVs are fitted with partitions to prevent and mitigate spread of COVID among inmates.	348000	348000	310793.72								Yes	Adaptations to congregate living facilities	348000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003185	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Honor Flight	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Muskingum County veterans have the opportunity to travel to Washington DC each year, funded by the nonprofit "Veterans Appreciation Foundation". Due to Covid-19, 2020 the honor flight for veterans was cancelled. Therefore, in 2021 flights were making twice as many trips to provide the opportunity for those veterans to travel to Washington DC that were not able in 2020.  To help ease the burden of these costs, this project was establish to provide assistance for two Muskingum County residents to participate in 2021.		1000	1000								No		1000	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-003189	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Indiana Internet of Things (IoT) Lab - Statewide Initiatives	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will foster the collaboration of Indiana’s entrepreneurs, startups, and established partners for the development of Internet of Things (IoT) solutions to bring to the market and programming for workforce, education and citizen engagement.	1000000	1000000	200000
TPN-003190	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Detention Center Cameras and Locking System	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The Sheriff Detention Center video cameras began to fail in 2021 an no longer fed into the prisoner control system (PCS). In addition, the PCS itself stopped working on an automatic basis, meaning Sheriff personnel had to manually lock jail cells. The Sheriff's office requested new cameras as well as a touch screen locking system. This would allow monitoring of inmate health status for any COVID indications, as well as socially distanced locking of the cells.	2450853.94	2450853.94	1648913.9								Yes	Adaptations to congregate living facilities	2001137	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003191	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Heroes Landing	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Heroes Landing is a children's justice center located in Muskingum County. Due to Covid19,  child sexual and domestic assaults cases increased putting great strain on the resources needed to serve these victims. Outsourcing to other centers was not option as they experience the same workload.  This CJC will allow for more efficient results in cases and better serve the Muskingum County victims.		500000	500000								No		500000	28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-003192	RCP-035892	County Of Stanislaus, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Job Creation and Economic Development	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Project team has continued data analysis of our local economy, with both qualitative and quantitative data collection. A local consultancy has been secured to manage community engagement process. The project team has conducted individual presentations for all Stanislaus County municipalities and established elective officials roundtable. In terms of leadership infrastructure for the Stanislaus 2030 initiative, SCF has convened both Executive Committee and Leadership Council and begun to review data findings and implications for future strategy development that will lead to new or scaled workforce and economic development programs. Communications platforms, including a website for the initiative, have been developed and several community presentations have been made thus far. The initial SCF research and analysis phase has been completed, resulting in five strategic focus areas identified for the economic recovery and success of Stanislaus County. The County has now contracted for specific plans and projects related to the five strategic focus areas with a goal of promoting equity and success for County residents.	3524500	3524500	1148475.07								No
TPN-003193	RCP-036016	Osceola County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Osceola County's revenue loss for FY21 was calculated at $30,778,689; however, because the total between FY20 and FY21 exceeds the total allocation of $72,985,227 what was included in the reporting field for revenue loss was reduced to $11,156,582 which is the $72,985,227 less the FY20 revenue loss of $61,828,645.  Osceola County’s goal to stabilize the County’s finances and ensure the level of services for County operations are restored. The ability to implement this strategy will allow the County to both provide vital public services and help retain jobs, while allowing additional resources to focus on the continued recovery efforts. While this plan is still evolving, the overall strategy will be for the revenue replacement funds to support human services, transportation, and impacted areas from the decline in revenues, for example the decline in Tourist Development Taxes impacted the County’s sporting facilities and venues. These funds will not be used directly to make a deposit in pension funds, funding debt services, legal settlements, or judgments. Neither will these funds be deposited into rainy day funds or other financial reserves. Nor will not be used as a non-federal match.	72985227	72985227	19551337.65
TPN-003195	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Indiana State Police COVID-19 Hazard Pay Stipends	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	This appropriation shall be used to provide a pandemic related premium pay to 1,285 state troopers and state capitol police officers.	2089879.2	2085009.2	2085009.2		1285
TPN-003196	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Department of Correction COVID-19 Hazard Pay Stipends	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The IDOC will pay each person who acted in the capacity of correctional officer a one-time hazard pay bonus of $1,600. The eligibility for this hazard bonus was primarily derived from the eligibility of the State’s Temporary Conditions Pay and from there, individuals were deemed eligible  if they served in the capacity of a correctional officer between March 2020 and July 1, 2021.	8500000	7619600	7619600		5312
TPN-003199	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Health Department	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	The Muskingum County Health Department has managed contract tracing for all covid-19 cases within the county. In the fall of 2021, those number spiked and additional funds were needed to for full time contact tracers as well as laptops necessary to perform the work. As many as 12-20 contact tracers were working on covid-19 cases alone in the fall of 2021, putting great strain on the staff and budget. A portion of the funds were assigned to the on staff medical officer to continue his services during the pandemic.		75000	75000			*					No		100000
TPN-003200	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	2200 Linden Ave Cleanup	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	This site is filled with asbestos debris on the surface of the superfund site and is a blight to the neighboring QCT and the community as a whole. The material is determined to have friable hazardous material that poses a threat to those families living in the neighboring QCT. Having this site cleaned up will build healthier environments and a better community.		500000	500000								No		500000	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-003201	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Genesis Ventilators	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Genesis Healthcare System will use these new ventilators to provide care to the excessive number of covid patients under the care of Genesis. These ventilators will not only provide additional the much machine, but they also possess new technologies needed to treat patients with the many complexities associated with covid-19. As stated by the staff, some of the older vents they were currently using made it very difficult to treat the patients.		88233.21	88233.21								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	88233.21	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003202	RCP-036794	Auburn, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City of Auburn Landfill Leachate Improvement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.9-Clean Water: Nonpoint source	The City of Auburn owns and operates a municipal solid waste landfill No.2 consisting of 30 acres at 311 N. Division Street, Auburn NY. The NYS DEC has approved the final Stage IV Closure which will include improvements and modification to the leachate collection and pumping system. Collection and treatment of leachate from a sanitary landfill is considered a nonpoint source pollution control activity under CWSRF programs.		1285238	1285238					No
TPN-003204	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Genesis Bonus Retention Program	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Genesis Retention Bonus Program is designed for the 1,263 employees directly fighting the pandemic. The strain put on employees over the length of time the pandemic has lasted is taking its toll on moral. The hospital has been forced to employee traveling employees at higher wages than the current staff. The retention plan is available to Genesis employees designed to keep these local, hardworking folks on staff at the county's largest employer and continue the fight against covid-19.		2300000	2300000								No		2300000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003209	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		MCEO-Revenue Loss	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	These funds were awarded to the Muskingum County Engineer's office to be used for ongoing operations of the office. This amount was determined from the lost gas tax revenue in 2020 due to the pandemic as well as the purchase of storm water piping. The county is responsible for many culverts in the county, management of storm water is critical to resident in our rural county.		593847	593847
TPN-003210	RCP-039518	Boone County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Boone County High Speed Broadband Project	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Construction of fiber-to-the-premises high speed broadband project capable of delivering 1 gig speed service to every household in the county. Affordability also addressed with strategic partnership of incumbent provider authorizing discount on monthly service to individual subscribers.	8600000	8600000	8600000					No	Yes	No
TPN-003217	RCP-039518	Boone County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Boone County Rural water Expansion 2.0	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Expansion of safe drinking water via public water service supply to approximately 24 neighborhoods via installation of new ductile iron water piping.	10000000	10000000	2475136.97					No	No	No
TPN-003218	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Food Bank	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	Funding will provide support for Bring Hope Home, Mobile Drop, and to expand the Partner Feeding Capacity Building program. The funds would be deployed in a manner that effectively enables Orange County partner agencies to access food for their feeding programs at no cost to them paired with direct home delivery to Orange County residents unable to access the food pantries. There will also be an emphasis on communities of color.	15000000	14000000	8196043.65	13937							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			No	0
TPN-003219	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Homeless Diversion/ Prevention – Rental Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Funding will support an expansion of homeless prevention and diversion for Orange County residents. Even with a temporary moratorium on evictions, the number of families and individuals seeking rental assistance because of loss of employment or lack of employment and loss of housing due to COVID-19 has increased. Possible partners include Coalition for the Homeless, Catholic Charities, Salvation Army	1668915	1001914.8	284421.39	63							No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment		No	0
TPN-003222	RCP-039518	Boone County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Boone County Revenue Replacement for Service/Program Delivery	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Use of up to $10,000,000.00 in standard allowance revenue replacement to support critical public services and programs	7346543	7346543	0
TPN-003223	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Wayne Densch Community Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Funding will support an expansion of homeless prevention and diversion for Orange County residents. Even with a temporary moratorium on evictions, the number of families and individuals seeking because of loss of or lack of employment due to COVID-19 has increased	250000	250000	127131.51	0							No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate
TPN-003224	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Job Training and Retraining	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Funding will allow Orange County to provide a comprehensive suite of new employment and retraining services for residents whose careers were negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. This initiative will re-train residents whose jobs were eliminated, or hours were significantly reduced, into new career paths of similar or higher wages. The initiative will seek several educational partners and external organizations’ assistance in resident and employer outreach, as well as work directly with nonprofit organizations who represent large memberships of human resource management departments and potential employers throughout Orange County, who previously have not partnered on similar initiatives.	15300000	15294215	9206100								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact		Yes	15300000
TPN-003225	RCP-035966	Galveston County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Vaccination Hub	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Galveston County setup, managed, and operated a mass vaccination Hub at Walter Hall Park located in Galveston County. This mass vaccination site was able to administer near to 100k Covid 19 vaccinations to residents from Galveston County and South East Taxes. This effort was made possible by a partnership with UTMB, the Galveston County Health District and Galveston County Office of Emergency management. We started this project using non-ARPA funds and will begin using ARPA funds once the other funds run out.  At this time, the project under ARPA has not started.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003226	RCP-035966	Galveston County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Galveston County collaborated with UTMB and the Health District to establish countywide testing program, offering public COVID testing free to all residents. To date over 300,000 residents have been able to utilize this program. During weeks of the Pandemic Galveston County was the highest vaccinated county in Texas as a percentage. We started this project using non-ARPA funds and will begin using ARPA funds once the other funds run out.  At this time, the project under ARPA has not started.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003228	RCP-035966	Galveston County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Air Monitors	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The objective of the Air Monitors project is to equip the Galveston County Office of Emergency Management with wireless air monitoring deployment kits to monitor airborne public health threats in real time. This air monitoring capability enables the Office of Emergency Management (OEM) to make informed decisions and enact proficient responses in regard to potential public health threats. In the event that unsafe air quality is recognized within Galveston County and a mass sheltering advisement is initiated, the Air Monitors project provides data and assurance indicators to efficiently determine discontinuation of mass sheltering operations, thus aiding in the prevention and mitigation of the spread of COVID-19. Treasury indicates recipients may use SLFRF funds to acquire emergency response equipment to improve emergency operations centers.	150127.9	140394.95	0								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	150127.9	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003231	RCP-039915	Lakewood, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Replace Lost Public Sector Revenue	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The ARPA funds being received replace lost revenues and fund government services and projects, including: infrastructure, emergency, and technological improvements.	11300000	2928289	2748114
TPN-003233	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Small Business Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Funding will support a small business cash grant program for companies that have a commercial location and are located within Orange County. If a company meets the eligibility criteria, they would receive a $10,000 grant that can be used towards rent or mortgage, payroll, utility costs or safety improvements tied to the COVID pandemic. The Small Business Grant Program will focus on companies that were only able to obtain $50,000 or less in the Federal PPP program loan. Under the PPP program, $133B, or 25%, of PPP funding had gone to companies in economically disadvantaged areas known as HUB business zones and 27% went to businesses operating in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods according to the SBA. Setting a PPP threshold will ensure that the Small Business Grant Program will reach the companies that received the least amount of assistance previously.	19642050	1144500	319500								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-003234	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Micro Grant Home-Based Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Funding will support a small business cash grant program for Home-Based Businesses without a commercial location would be eligible for a grant in the amount up to $3,000. The Micro Grant for Home-Based Businesses Program will be available for companies that have not received any PPP funding through the Federal program. We intend to use our existing list of applicants from the CARES act programs as well as our Communications Team to market the grants. We will also work with our community chamber, consul and technical service provider networks to help communicate the program to the entire county.	3000000	0	0								No			9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted			No	0
TPN-003236	RCP-039086	Grand Forks, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Alerus Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Purchase and install new contactless POS system for City owned Alerus Center	196250	196250	196250								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	180301	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-003237	RCP-035966	Galveston County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	GCPH Assistance	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Galveston County worked with the Galveston County Health District to provide assistance to hire additional public health staff to improve data gathering and public health response. This assistance included hiring additional Epidemiologists, Nurses, Covid-19 Caseworkers, Data Entry Specialists, etc. These efforts helped in approving contact tracing, communication, and Covid response. We started this project using non-ARPA funds and will begin using ARPA funds once the other funds run out.  At this time, the project under ARPA has not started.	0	0	0								No
TPN-003238	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Small Business Assistance - Nonprofit Technical Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Program will be administered by community partner, Rollins College’s Edyth Bush Institute for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Leadership (EBI). This program will prepare local nonprofits, meeting specific eligibility criteria, to pursue partnerships with the County as well as other local municipalities. The program would be to ensure the continued vibrancy of the sector that serves the citizens of Orange County. We envision further expanding and developing relationships with nonprofits in the years to come, specifically to support and elevate small sized nonprofits and/or nonprofits that are led by “socially and economically disadvantaged individuals” while also elevating the sustainability of mature nonprofits. EBI currently offers workshops, certificates, coaching and other custom programs. There are 6,617 nonprofits in Orange County with over 58,000 employees. EBI would utilize their list of existing Orange County nonprofits to target the marketing towards these groups. Orange County would also work with various economic development partners and internal departments to help communicate the program broadly.	4190665	3203592.63	1010693.28								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-003239	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Small Business Assistance - Gig Worker Grant Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Funding will provide cash grants for Gig workers (independent contractors who typically do short-term work for multiple clients) that couldn’t obtain unemployment or qualify for PPP. Grants are limited to $1,400 per worker per ARP guidelines. According to the US Chamber of Commerce, 1 in 10 workers utilize Gig work as their primary source of income. Many don’t receive benefits due to the structure of these types of jobs. Examples of Gig workers include; Freelancers, rideshare drivers, food delivery drivers, creative workers, web designers, bartenders, actors, musicians, etc. Orange County has worked with various groups in the community to get and understanding of the challenges currently facing Gig workers in various industry groups. Working with the Greater Orlando Performing Arts Relief (GOPAR) to review the results of an industry survey they have conducted to determine the challenges of their workforce during the COVID pandemic. Also reaching out to various other industry associations representing Gig workers.	3000000	0	0								No
TPN-003241	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Childcare	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.14-Healthy Childhood Environments: Early Learning	Funding will provide financial relief to child care providers to help defray unexpected business costs associated with the pandemic, and to help stabilize their operations so that Early Head Start centers may continue to provide care as they have faced increase in staff turnover and a more competitive job market during the pandemic. Funding will enhance recruitment efforts, by allowing potential scholarship to new hires to take the state mandated 45- hour training, as well as the Infant/Toddler Child Development Associate, that must be completed before entering an Early Head Start classroom. To respond to the COVID-19 public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, funding will be used to provide community-based family support services to pregnant and parenting families.	554956	497391.21	268245.66								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations			No	0
TPN-003242	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Childcare Services – Academic Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services	Funding will provide financial relief to providers to help defray unexpected business costs associated with the pandemic, and to help stabilize their operations so that they may continue to provide care as they face less revenue and higher expenses during the pandemic. Funding will provide staff support to provide literacy, STEM, and academic supports to address profound learning loss. During the COVID-19 public health emergency, youth attending afterschool programs have demonstrated that they have experienced trauma and stress that impacts mental health. This funding will also provide for investments in mental health supports for youth via contracts for trauma-informed therapist(s) to treat the chronic emotional and behavioral issues that afflict Orange County youth. Many low-income and minority students were disproportionately served by remote or hybrid education during the pandemic, and lacked the resources to participate fully in remote schooling or live in households without adults available throughout the day to assist with online coursework. It is anticipated that this funding will target these youth.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003245	RCP-037328	Fayette County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Payroll Costs for Public Safety - Fire Services & Emergency Medical Services	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	The shift on our operations to provide response to, and care for COVID-19 patients has impacted the department significantly. EMS calls account for >86% of our total call volume. Each call must be treated with the expectation that the patient likely could be COVID-19 positive. For this reason, we have had to shift our protocols and call operative methodology to accommodate this potential. This has caused a significant increase in supply/equipment purchases for which we were required to re-allocate other budget monies to supplant. Each patient encounter required a minimum PPE ensemble and specialized equipment to care for their needs, and to transport them to the hospital in a manner that maximized protection for the patient, the crew, and the hospital staff. Specific protocols and medicines were enacted to ensure adequate treatment of these patients while minimizing the risk and incidence of cross-contaminations. Units were required to be completely cleaned and decontaminated after each call utilizing specialized solutions and application equipment. This decreased unit availability and increased cleaning costs and turnaround times. We were required to utilize more personnel and equipment to respond to patients while we awaited unit availability from decontamination. Personnel costs were significantly impacted as a direct result of the pandemic. With the increase in call volume came fatigue and increased sick leave utilization from employee and employee family illnesses. Overtime costs drained reserves from daily staffing shortages. Senior staff worked 60+ hours per week ensuring supply availability and manning vaccine clinics with local health departments.		3815000	3815000			110					No
TPN-003246	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Supporting Child/Youth Mental Health in Education Systems	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.26-Addressing Educational Disparities: Mental Health Services	Funding will be utilized for an expansion of evidence-based practices in education settings for children/youth in Orange County experiencing social, emotional and mental health distress that has been exacerbated by COVID-19. Through partnerships with the University of Central Florida (UCF) and Orange County Public Schools (OCPS), and private entities (Disney, Full Sail University, Nemours Children’s Hospital, Advent Health Systems, etc.) the following projects will be implemented: Virtual Reality Playground - a virtual reality playground in which school aged children, ages 3-14, CHERISH Program - promotes children's emotional health and academic readiness, and Sources of Strength - a best practice youth suicide prevention project.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003247	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Neighborhood Recreation Improvements - Ecton Park Restrooms and Concessions	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project greatly enhanced Ecton Park by demolishing the existing Concession and Restroom facilities and building new facilities that will be used by local and travel teams.   This project made the park more accessible by building new restrooms that are ADA compliant. These improvements were included in the Lexington Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but have not been funded due to lack of funding availability.  Budgets for FY2020 and FY2021 were greatly impacted by COVID-19, and resulted in projects being held or not funded on a regular schedule. This is considered a park enhancement, and is providing an opportunity to increase usability of an existing recreation space.	457400	457400	457400
TPN-003248	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Childcare Services – Aid to High Poverty Districts	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.24-Addressing Educational Disparities: Aid to High-Poverty Districts	Funding will provide financial relief to child care providers to help defray unexpected business costs associated with the pandemic, and to help stabilize their operations so that they may continue to provide care as they face less revenue and higher expenses during the pandemic. Funding will expand access to child care assistance by supporting families who earn less than 300% of federal poverty guidelines and are not eligible for current School Readiness vouchers, provide a supplement above the current School Readiness payment to offset the continued cost of COVID, equip child care providers with technology, and provide training and professional development opportunities to child care owners, early learning entrepreneurs, directors, family child care home providers, etc., aimed to strengthen financial skills and build business acumen in support of quality child care for Orange County’s families.	14480000	8359116.39	5535741.82								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-003249	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Breakthrough	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.13-Healthy Childhood Environments: Services to Foster Youth or Families Involved in Child Welfare System	Funding will be used to improve access to community-based services for youth and families involved in or at risk of involvement in Child Welfare systems due to recurrent psychiatric hospitalizations by providing “Family Navigators” (peer support service) and need-based financial assistance. The need and demand for these types of services and interventions has been exacerbated by COVID-19. The project “Breakthrough” fosters access to a network of evidence-based clinical services for youth ages 9 to 16 with two or more involuntary psychiatric hospitalizations. Family navigation services are provided to each youth/family, in the community for approximately eighteen to twenty-four months, based on the needs of the family. Embrace Families, the lead Child Welfare Organization for Orange County partners on this project.	500000	195097.86	42410.68								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	No	0
TPN-003250	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Childcare Services – Healthy Childhood	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	In response to the COVID-19 pandemic funding will be used to provide community-based family support services to pregnant and parenting families. Programming will be designed to promote the well-being of children and families that will increase the strength and stability of families (including adoptive, foster, and extended families); increase parents’ confidence and competence in their parenting abilities; afford children a stable and supportive family environment; and help them to identify where improvement is needed and to obtain assistance with respect to matters such as child development, family budgeting, coping with stress, health, and nutrition. Funding will improve access to such services via home visits and/or mobile units. Information and referral services will be provided to encourage the healthy growth, nutrition, and development of children age newborn to three. The provision of basic essentials will be afforded to eligible families who are experiencing Social Determinants of Health that may hinder their ability to provide basic essentials for their children.	264300	66191.65	0								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003251	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Inmate Property Conveyor System	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The Sheriff Detention Center's current inmate property conveyor system no longer works properly. This causes additional personnel needed in the confined space in order to organize and obtain such property. The requested new conveyor system will require less personnel to operate and social distancing in the detention center. In addition, keeping the property separate promotes sanitation of the detention center and not combining inmate property brought in on their person upon being booked.	54872	54872	54872								Yes	Adaptations to congregate living facilities	54872	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003253	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Homelessness	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Funding will support an expansion of homeless outreach to outer areas of Orange County and will include case management, connection to medical, mental health and housing resources. Outreach to the more rural settings of Orange County has been identified as gaps in the continuum of care in homeless system. Services are rooted in evidence-based practices. These gaps would include the following projects that will address homelessness, medical risk and mental health concerns that have been exacerbated by COVID-19: HOPE Team Expansion Pilot and case management at the Drop In Center. This project will support Orange County residents that are homeless and/or impoverished accessing resources with community partners. Nationally, over 50% of unsheltered homeless are tri-morbid. The goal of these projects is to connect the vulnerable to resources to include medical, housing, and other needed community resources as well as preventing the spread of COVID-19.	2803835	990156.11	286506.23								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	2803835
TPN-003254	RCP-037328	Fayette County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Payroll Costs for Public Safety - Sheriff's Office Field Operations and Jail Svc	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	The shift in our operations to safeguard the health and wellbeing of the Fayette County community, inmates housed within our facilities and Sheriff’s Office employees while still providing a needed service during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the agency significantly.  Deputies and staff, just like all public safety employees, come in to contact with a wide variety of people, places, circumstances, and things in their day to day chosen profession. Each response to a call, initiated traffic stop, interaction with citizenry, and contact with inmates booked into and/or housed within the Jail must be treated with the expectation that the person likely could be COVID-19 positive. For this reason, we have had to shift our protocols and call operative methodology to accommodate this potential. This has caused a significant increase in supply/equipment purchases for which we were required to re-allocate other budget monies to supplant. Each encounter required a minimum PPE ensemble and specialized equipment to protect the needs of victims, suspects; and for the transportation of arrestees to the jail in a manner that maximized protection and minimized exposure for the arrestees, deputies and detention personnel. Specific protocols were enacted to ensure adequate treatment of these individuals while minimizing the risk and incidence of cross-contaminations. Units, intake areas and housing units were required to be completely cleaned and decontaminated after each call, contact, exposure or contamination utilizing specialized solutions and application equipment. Medical screening and designated quarantine areas were implemented to minimize exposures and cross contamination of inmates. As the Sheriff’s Office is a 24/7 operation, this decreased personnel availability and increased cleaning costs while decontamination of each potentially affected area was completed. Personnel costs were significantly impacted as a direct result of the pandemic. With the increase in protocols and exposures came fatigue, increased stress and sick leave utilization from employee and employee family illnesses. Daily staffing shortages have drained reserves and overtime costs have increased.		2220082	2220082			145					No
TPN-003258	RCP-036066	Ramsey County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Right Track Plus	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Right Track Plus was an internship and professional development program for young adults, ages 18-24, who have been economically impacted by the pandemic. In this program, young adults were matched with professional, 200 hour, paid internships with both public and private employers in Ramsey County. In addition to the paid internships, young adults also had the opportunity to participate in a variety of career exploration and professional development activities, including tours, speakers, financial literacy, mock interviewing and more! All young adults served in the program also received ongoing support from a community-based organization who supported them in the completion of their internship, as well as engagement in professional development. Over 200 young adults were placed into internships during the program and received opportunities and pay that they would not have otherwise had access to during this time.	1105589.29	1105589.29	1105589.29								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations			No	1105589.29
TPN-003259	RCP-036794	Auburn, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Auburn Downtown Parking Garage Improvement Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Auburn Downtown  Parking Garage is a municipally owned 3-story double-helix concrete parking garage constructed in 1978. The parking garage serves as the primary downtown parking for the Auburn Downtown Business Improvement District, the NYS Equal Rights Heritage Center and Seward House Museum NHL and the City and Cayuga County Court System.  In order to support the safe reopening of tourism in the downtown business district and to Auburn's many local Historic and Cultural Sites that were closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City is making structural and security improvements to the parking garage in order to continue supporting the local tourism, travel and hospitality industry for decades to come.	1780540	1780540	1671574.58								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	1780540	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003263	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Inmate Mail Screening Device	1-Public Health	1.13-Substance Use Services	The Sheriff detention center has noticed an uptick in attempted illicit substances being sent through inmate mail. They requested a screening image device to help detect those substances as well as reduce the number of personnel needed to process. Such detection also prevents possible exposure incidents. Not only is this seen as a substance abuse mitigation tactic, but also a health service to a disproportionately impacted population from COVID.	186790	186790	186790								Yes	Behavioral health facilities and equipment	186790	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003264	RCP-037341	Woonsocket, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City of Woonsocket Winter Homeless Sheltering Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	This City-managed program gives emergency housing assistance to individuals experiencing homelessness by providing nightly shelter for up to 10 individuals or families at a local motel (Woonsocket Motor Inn) during the frigid winter/spring months beginning January 2022. The program is managed by the City's Director of Human Services and homeless participants are required to have registered with the Rhode Island Coordinated Entry System to help ensure fairness in the selection process that targets individuals disproportionately impacted by the pandemic.  Priorities are given to homeless individuals with acute medical issues and the homeless elderly. The motel is charging the City a flat rate of $75 per room, per night which is below their standard rate. The project will begin in the first week of January, 2022. This is a program managed by the City and the motel is not a subrecipient of City ARPA funds.	70000	67575	67575								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-003279	RCP-037248	St. Charles Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Department of Wastewater Sewer Lining	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Parish-wide sewer pipe lining	1632000	1632000	1559114.6
TPN-003282	RCP-037328	Fayette County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Advanced Metering Infrastructure	5-Infrastructure	5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation	$3,010,144 of funding allocated to this project is designated through EC 6.1. The remaining $6,189,856 is designated in EC 5.8. Fayette County Water System currently serves approximately 32,000 customers in Fayette County GA.  Approximately 20 years ago the Water System installed and continues to use automated meter reading (AMR) infrastructure to determine water usage for each of its customers today.  County staff drives by every meter monthly to collect data with a handheld device.  Accuracy of these meters measuring water usage have reduced over time. FCWS will replace this old metering infrastructure with Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) that improves the accuracy of information used to support water management and conservation.  Specifically, this “smart meter” technology will improve meter reading accuracy, notify customers of suspected leaks, enhance customer service and provide other leak detection benefits.   AMI has many advantages over AMR, such as the ability to obtain hourly interval meter reads on a daily basis, flag a customer-side leak when it occurs (rather than only at the monthly reading) and support proactive customer service capabilities. The method of transmitting the readings to the local water provider can vary depending on the AMI provider and is often proprietary. Some use base stations or towers to collect readings, others use a mesh-network and others use cellular networks. Additionally, some AMI systems feature two-way technologies for remote disconnect or distribution sensing technologies, such as leak detection, pressure sensors and other operational data. New metering technology includes solid state technology using ultrasonic or magnetic flow measuring elements for improved low-flow accuracy, as opposed to the moving parts of traditional metering technologies.		6189856	262637.03
TPN-003283	RCP-037248	St. Charles Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Department of Wastewater Permanent Generator Installations	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Parish-wide installation of permanent generators at priority sewer lift stations	3525000	1360533.24	1360533.24
TPN-003284	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Mobile Incident Command Center	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The Sheriff's Office lacks a functional mobile response vehicle for emergency management purposes. When the County was planning with the Health Center and hospitals, it couldn't therefore provide any such vehicle to the community. The purchase of such a unit will allow community vaccinations and/or testing. It also improves public safety response to potential future pandemics and emergencies.	249085.69	239559.63	239559.63								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	239559.63	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003285	RCP-036179	Boulder County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	2.10.2  WORKFORCE CALL CENTER	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The Virtual Call Center (VCC) is regarded as a “hub” for anyone impacted by unemployment. VCC assists people who lost jobs due to the pandemic and related economic downturn, helping people in our community regain economic and employment stability for themselves and their families. People who lost their jobs due to the pandemic have experienced significant wait-times attempting to reach the State Unemployment Office (UI), and WfBC’s VCC provides a place for people to reach resolution. The scope of work is answering calls, identifying the unique needs of each person, and determining the next best steps towards sustainable employment. VCC agents specialize in understanding the unemployment system, have a working knowledge of the career development process, stay abreast of the internal and external sources available to provide warm referrals, and strive to offer the best in public service.	370000	370000	370000								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment			No	0
TPN-003287	RCP-053281	City Of Gresham, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Homeless Services Expansion	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The project CWSARPAHSV was created to track expenses relating to our Homeless Services Expansion. This will fund the newly hired position of Homeless Services Specialist for the next two years which will help expand Gresham’s ability to assist the Homeless. The remaining funds will be available for Materials and Services to expand the Homeless Services that Gresham offers.	320000	284488.51	284488.51								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-003288	RCP-039086	Grand Forks, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Wastewater Treatment Plant Phase 1	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	City of Grand Forks Wastewater Treatment Plant critical facility plan phase 1	6832998.62	4196683.49	4196683.49					No
TPN-003289	RCP-037347	Vanderburgh County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Broadband Connectivity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	The County will allocate and spend Nine Million Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars as its share of a Thirty-Nine Million Six Hundred Thousand Dollar project with AT&T to install a 10 Gbps symmetric XGSPON fiber network that will offer highspeed broadband service to unserved and underserved residents and businesses.  The project will bring fiber broadband service to rural areas of Vanderburgh County including an additional twenty thousand six hundred thirty-three customer locations.	9900000	9900000	7000000
TPN-003290	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	OHSP Water Quality Acct. Muni. Comp.	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Water Quality Accountability Municipal Compliance Program helps municipalities protect their public water systems from cyber attacks.	5000000	599901.95	598126.95					No
TPN-003291	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Bithlo Rural Area Water- Phase 1 West	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	This project will extend water service to the south west portion of Bithlo Rural Area, south of SR 50 and west of N. 3rd Street to provide central water to 337 Low/Mod income single family residential parcels. The project will serve all single-family residential parcels within the service area. The project area is a Low/Mod income area. Notices of upcoming project will be distributed to all single-family residents of the project area. Community meetings will be held to inform residents of the project. Community meetings will be held and, an email address will be provided for written comments.	9154000	0	0
TPN-003292	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Lake Downey Drive and Frankel Street Water Main Extension	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The project would extend water service to two (2) residential streets in east Orange County, Frankel Street and Lake Downey Drive. Frankel Street is located north of Dean Creek Lane and east of Dean Road and will provide central water to 15 Low/Mod income single family residential parcels. Lake Downey Drive is located south of Flowers Avenue and east of Dean Road and will provide central water to 19 Low/Mod income single family residential parcels. The project will serve all single-family residential parcels within the service area. The project area is a Low/Mod income area. Notices of upcoming project will be distributed to all single-family residents of the project area. Community meetings will be held to inform residents of the project. Project is currently in design phase.	820000	0	0					No
TPN-003293	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Sheriff IT Equipment	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	The Sheriff's Office requested computers and other IT related equipment needed to facilitate remote work, video conferencing, and social distancing. This is all in response to COVID working conditions as a way to prevent and mitigate spread in their essential yet congregate or dense work environments. They sought to replace older computers without such technology as well as acquire ones for departments currently lacking those items.	370776.27	370776.27	341868.32								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	370776.27	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003294	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Fixed Broadband	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Orange County intends to prioritize fixed broadband infrastructure deployment where there currently is none. This initiative will include main fixed assets leading directly to homes and/or businesses for “last mile” service. After new fiber and/or co-axial installations have been fully realized in Orange County, remaining funding will be utilized to target fixed asset upgrade needs throughout low/median income areas of Orange County. The intended outcome is for every eligible residential address, regardless of occupation at the time of installation completion, to have “last mile” broadband infrastructure where there previously was no infrastructure. Furthermore, it is expected that these same residents were adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, with already earning very low/low wages and coming from industries – such as hospitality/tourism- which was most affected by the pandemic.	2505160	2116137	163640
TPN-003295	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Digital Infrastructure Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project proposes an upgrade to all digital infrastructure at Orange County’s 12 community centers managed by Orange County Community Action Division. The centers are one-stop centers for delivery and referral to social services. The community centers are located in Orange County’s low-income census tracts and provide access to social services, computer labs and goods/services to support families. Each center will assess the needs of residents to ensure that desired services are provided and incorporated into the delivery of online and computer services.	425000	419117.96	419117.96
TPN-003296	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Fire Station #80	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project is for the construction of a 3-Bay Fire Station to replace the existing station located at 1841 Bonneville Dr, Orlando, FL 32826. The current station is a prefabricated metal building constructed in 1973. This building has exceeded its functional lifespan and no longer provides an optimal working and living environment for first responders. The design for the new fire station #80 was funded from Orange County. The project is scheduled to be substantially complete by Spring 2023.	6400000	6276979.34	5191497.93
TPN-003297	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Fire Station #32 Land Acquisition	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funding for this project will allow the purchase of a 1.71 parcel located at Avalon Road and “New” Hartzog Road for the permanent construction of Fire Station 32. At present, Fire Station 32 is located and operating from a strip mall plaza suite. The logic to provide emergency services to countywide residents and visitors is predicated on response metrics centered on population density. It is an equitable service delivery model that promotes evidence-based decision-making for where stations are located.	2500000	1310135.7	1310135.7
TPN-003298	RCP-036770	Rockingham County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Detention Officers Call Back Pay October 2021	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Cover payroll costs for detention center officers called in on unscheduled shifts to supervise COVID 19 positive inmates that were admitted to hospitals for treatment of COVID-19 symptoms during an Covid-19 outbreak in the jail.	8423	8422.31	8422.31			14					No
TPN-003299	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Fire Heavy Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project replaces heavy rolling stock apparatus that have exceeded operational life expectancy by measures of age, miles, and maintenance and repair. The project includes the purchase of (5) fire engines and (2) fire aerial apparatus. The designs meet the current configuration and model of OCFRD’s apparatus, lending itself to continuity and standardization. The expected timeline with the project is approximately (1) year from the date the purchase order with the vendor is finalized. The apparatus will be positioned throughout Orange County’s (43) fire stations, which serve a diverse and growing population. The design of the heavy rolling stock apparatus is predicated on a number of best practices, goals to reduce exposure to carcinogens, and internal stakeholders that made up the apparatus committee.	18350000	18162264.01	5157842.17
TPN-003300	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Public Works Heavy Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Orange County has established a list of heavy equipment items needed for future ventures. With this project, funding is intended to bring inventory up to date regarding new and replacement of Heavy Equipment in the Roads & Drainage Division. The Public Works department intends to purchase items such as milling machines, pavers, concrete trucks, and sweeper trucks. The purchase of these items will allow Orange County to replace equipment that has exceeded operational life expectancy.	2800000	220258	220258
TPN-003301	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Essential worker premium pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium pay awarded to all employees reporting to essential jobs or job functions from March, 2020 through May, 2021.  Premium pay was $250.00 per month for each qualifying month.		1600000	1568352.09		354
TPN-003302	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Erect a County – Public Safety Radio Communications Tower	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Orange County current owns and operates a Motorola radio communications system supporting public safety 1st responders and many other agencies throughout Orange County. This critical system provides support to law enforcement, police departments, fire departments, hospitals, Corrections, county departments, medical services, LYNX, O.U.C., Convention Center, local, state, and federal agencies, and the Orange County School Board. Funding will allow the County to secure a property site to erect a new 250’ to 290’ radio communications tower within the county to provide the best roaming coverage. The needed radio communications equipment will be purchased and installed from this fund. Antennas and microwave dishes will also be installed to support connectivity to the radio network. This project serves the community by enabling increased and improved radio communications for 1st Responders who serve the community. This project will also enhance communications in schools and provide mutual aid services for any major incidents at a school. The local transit system known as LYNX, also uses this system which will enhance their capacity to serve the citizens of Orange County.	5400000	5099997.76	3029998.2
TPN-003303	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Cyber Security Infrastructure Upgrade, Technology Security Enhancements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funding will support major initiatives that will enhance and strengthen Orange County’s cyber and electronic security operations and infrastructure county-wide. The investment will greatly increase the County’s ability by securing access to the network, the ability to respond to potential threats, safeguard data and facilities, and train our current and future workforce through certifications and specialized training. With these funds, Orange County will implement and enhance its current Information Security program to protect systems that all Orange County citizens rely on.	4250000	3729479.18	2978204.66
TPN-003304	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Broadband Literacy & Skills	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funding for the digital literacy effort will be divided into two components; broadband technology access issues triaging educational campaign and in-person group training for small groups of residents at Community Action Centers. The public education campaign on broadband literacy is expected to tackle broadband access issues within the household or business’ building. The goal would be to teach County residents and small businesses some basics on improving their internet connections/speeds/etc. and other internet literacy topics. For in-person broadband training, the County will support senior residents, and where needed, other residents with tele-capability needs, in a more thorough course beyond that of the public education campaign. These efforts are an attempt to support marginalized parts of the County’s population with either no formal training or previous access to broadband capabilities. Once taught how to improve performance (especially speeds) via the main educational campaign, or further taught the basics of access and use of broadband technologies, it is expected that residents will be able to pursue education, health, jobs, and/or other opportunities available through the internet.	2050000	250000	250000
TPN-003305	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Fair Livestock Sale Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Provided economic support to youth livestock sale.  The live event was canceled due to COVID restrictions.		31000	31000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003306	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Digital Devices Computers & Tablets	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funding will allow the County to acquire mobile devices for citizens that were identified by various service providers throughout the County (i.e. senior citizens, Ryan White program patients, Head Start families, and/or residents pursuing workforce training or new job opportunities) that cannot access broadband available services because they cannot afford a device. Devices will be available, with data plans, at no charge to at least 3,000 unique households and pre-loaded with necessary applications and/or links to County services as well as complementary partners’ services. Each device will also maintain an embedded application to provide updates, new service applications, push notifications on behalf of the County, and to help locate lost devices. This program is intended for residents who are the most marginalized and have significant health, financial and/or other burdens to bear. This demographic represents residents most adversely affected by the pandemic, again whether financially, due to health concerns or both.	3435000	0	0
TPN-003308	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Virtual Mental Health	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This funding will support Orange County’s upcoming investments in virtual and/or online mental health-based technology that complements our employee mental wellbeing program, Orange County Mind Matters. The initiative aims to support employees to thrive in their positions, while also supporting their families, as the mental burdens of the pandemic continue. The pilot projects selected for this initial phase of the initiative were selected because if they prove successful, can be scaled for all employees and their families to use at low to no cost. These projects include: Immersive De-Escalating Virtual Environment Simulator – a virtual walk through nature, OCELOT – an empathy learning and occupational therapy training system, Relaxzootion – a mobile application for assisting children with relaxation and meditation techniques and a professionally curated stress, anxiety, depression and substance abuse reduction resources project. These projects aim to develop and deploy immersive, mixed reality-based solutions to learn, practice, and transfer empathy-related cognitive, affective, and behavior processes in dealing with high-stress, dynamic real-world emergency and/or crisis scenarios.	1322715	564400	564000
TPN-003309	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Emergency Operation Center Renovation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funding is for the renovation of the Orange County Emergency Operation Center. The renovations will include technology upgrades, replacing the access flooring, adding new furnishings and millwork, and providing security upgrades to the facility. The American Rescue Plan Act funding is partial funding for the project and Orange County is funding the balance of the project.	1200000	1200000	852522.79
TPN-003310	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Dr. Phillips Front Yard Festival	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funding will support the nonprofit Dr. Phillips Center for the Performing Arts and the outdoor Front Yard Festival. The investment will allow them to keep the temporary performance space with distanced seating and COVID-mindful safety protocols going through December 2021. The Front Yard Festival performances have and will continue to include performers and content reflective of our diverse community and to offer the cultural stimulus and balm that is desperately needed in our community and to employ hundreds of arts workers and creatives. The Front Yard Festival will host FusionFest with its emphasis on diversity and many other diverse offerings. With increased safety measures in place from C.A.R.E.S. funds, the investment of the A.R.P.A. funds, will allow the Front Yard Festival to continue to serve our populace is the safest way possible.	500000	500000	500000
TPN-003311	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Central Water Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Provide funding for water transmission line to reduce reliance on groundwater.		2000000	2000000					No
TPN-003312	RCP-036083	City Of Mesa, Arizona, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Purchase of Ambulance	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Purchase of 5 Ambulances: The Mesa Fire and Medical Department (MFMD) has provided emergency medical transportation services as a safety net since 2015. MFMD currently shares the 911 transport system with AMR, with 12 MFMD ambulances operating daily.	1800000	1668251.89	1668251.89								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	1800000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003313	RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Art Agency Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	Funding will support nonprofit arts organizations who were the first to close and the last to reopen. The investment will allow them to keep from folding and to offer the cultural stimulus and balm that is desperately needed in our community and to employ hundreds of arts workers and creatives. The goal is to bring employment and attendance levels back to pre-COVID levels so the arts and cultural community can once again begin to serve our populace.	1000000	999328.69	965255.11								No			13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify			No	0
TPN-003314	RCP-036179	Boulder County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	7.1.2  ARPA PLANNING CONTRACTOR	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Consultant for the Boulder County Commissioners’ Office will synthesize input from a diverse set of internal and external stakeholders on pandemic response and recovery needs. The consultant will deliver a report to the BOCC that analyzes data on how the pandemic has impacted Boulder County and input gathered to date from the community, staff, and other partners. This will include input specifically related to use of SLFRF funds as well as other existing data and reports that reflect the priorities and needs of different parts of the Boulder County community. In addition to summarizing common themes and priorities, the gap analysis will identify information gaps where specific communities are not represented.	60119.21	60119.21	60119.21
TPN-003315	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Public Works Projects	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Support for transportation projects within Umatilla County.		1500000	1500000
TPN-003316	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Economic Development Marketing Promotion	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Provide funding to Economic Development Marketing Promotion.		50000	50000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003318	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Summer Intern Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Fund stipends for interns.		30000	8250								No			1 Imp General Public			Yes	0
TPN-003319	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Facilities Upgrades / Lease Costs	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	This includes administrative staff costs, facility upgrades to provide office space for additional staff, and client management software. Highland Hills District Office.  OCC staff expanded beyond City Hall.  Additional space needed. Funding will support procurement of technology items for contract management, client management and provision of assistance, as well as costs related to staffing needs and facilities needs for service provision, such as creating additional workspaces for added staff members	250000	162981.57	125498.57								No
TPN-003320	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	County Fair Economic Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Provide funding to promote County Fair and replace lost revenue for cancelled event.		150000	150000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003321	RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	SBC- Workforce Development	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The ARPA funds are designated for the Small Business Center to address the workforce strategic recovery efforts and planning to provide upskilling to dislocated workers, under -skilled individuals who must retrain in high growth fields and address enhanced skills training for current employees focused on health and safety. Additionally, workforce drivers include industry pathways that are adversely impacting the Dallas economic stability and growth. Implementation of City-led workforce training programs and data tracking analysis to address the rapid changes in labor market trends in Dallas will be vital to workforce recovery and addressing skill gaps for an effective labor force and strong economy.    The mayor’s committee on Workforce Development recommendations included implementing a process of greater accountability for city-led initiatives and opportunities to align with ongoing support of workforce developments. The ARAP funding in the amount of $500,000 will be used to accomplish these priorities.	500000	0	0								No
TPN-003322	RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Vicarious Trauma Training for Community Justice Alternatives Staff	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Larimer County is utilizing FRF funds to provide vicarious trauma training to staff in the Community Justice Alternatives (CJA) Department and the Office of the Coroner. This training is designed to improve the mental health of employees who have been put in an exceptionally difficult situation by the COVID-19 pandemic. These employees work in a 24/7 congregate facility with individuals coming into and out of the criminal justice system (CJA), or investigate unexplained deaths, often in tragic situations. During the pandemic, CJA staff came to work each day in a congregate setting while most other people, especially in the initial stages of the pandemic, were safely at home. Staff were afraid of being infected at work while providing mentally and emotionally draining services such as addiction and other trauma therapy to clients, sometimes in a new way such as online. This program helps employees deal with the behavioral traumas of the jobs to which they are dedicated. The budget for this project was increased to $144,750 in the 3rd quarter of 2023 to allow the contract to run through 2025 and to incorporate the Office of the Coroner.	144750	144750	65000								No			1 Imp General Public			No	32100
TPN-003323	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	East County Fire Station	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Provide funding to assist in construction of fire station.		500000	500000								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	500000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003324	RCP-037460	Santa Cruz, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Safe Sleeping and Shelter	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	To provide shelter and services for 75 people utilizing a repurposed armory; create two transitional tent camps with health and hygiene services for up to 80 participants; and continue operations at an existing tent camp for the unhoused.	3061418	2981418	2350388								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-003325	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Echo Flood Control Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Funding to assist Echo with flood control measures.	0	0	0					No
TPN-003326	RCP-037460	Santa Cruz, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Safe Parking	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	To create safe parking options for up to 30 oversized vehicles that are used as residential shelters.	0	0	0								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-003327	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Kearney Senior Center HVAC Improvements	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	The Kearney Community Foundation requested ARPA funding from the County to improve the filtration HVAC system at their Kearney Senior Center, a public facility, as a way to prevent and mitigate against COVID. The Kearney Senior Center provides meals to low or moderate income seniors.	12000	11000	11000	135							Yes	Food banks and other facilities	11000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			No	0
TPN-003328	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Adams Park - Healthy Space	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Provide funding for healthy community space.		35000	35000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003329	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Camas Prairie Cowboy Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Provide economic support tourism in a remote local community.		37500	37500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003330	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	West County Trails	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Provide support to enhance public health.		250000	250000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003331	RCP-037460	Santa Cruz, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Safe Storage Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	To provide storage facilities that will allow the unhoused to secure and store their belongings, thus increasing their ability to access other programs and services.	20000	0	0								No
TPN-003332	RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Adena Mansion & Gardens Society	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Provide WiFi connectivity throughout the Adena Mansion & Gardens historical site.	132800	132800	37962.39								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	132800	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003334	RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Liberty Hospital Vaccination Promotion Campaign	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Liberty Hospital sought County ARPA funds to start a vaccination campaign in the community from January to May of 2022. The approved project is essentially a marketing campaign promoting vaccines with social media buys, billboards, print, and digital displays.	100000	95470.58	95470.58								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003335	RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	The Assistance House	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Provide cash assistance to low-income working families.	20000	20000	20000	35							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003336	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Echo Water System	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Provided funding toward a study to improve the Echo city water system.		50000	50000					No
TPN-003338	RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Adena Health System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Implement a Mobile Unit to deliver wellness checks, vaccines, and other primary care to area students.  7/25/23 Update: Adena provided paperwork indicating that mobile unit was purchased Q2 2022 -- previous reports do not indicate.  Updated this record to reflect expenditure of funds and completed status accordingly.	200000	200000	200000								No
TPN-003339	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Milton Freewater Walking Trail	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Assist with walking trail to create healthy community space.		100000	100000								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-003340	RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Ross County Community Action Commission	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Provide temporary emergency shelter for men, women, and children affected by COVID-19.	250000	250000	194280.42								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003341	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Pendleton Jump Start	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Provide funding for community business revitalization program.		75000	75000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-003342	RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Ross County Agricultural Society	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Provide high-speed network connectivity to all buildings, public spaces, and organizations that wish to use the Ag Society's grounds.	726000	726000	479941.88								No			1 Imp General Public		1 Imp General Public
TPN-003343	RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Ross County Coalition Against Domestic Violence	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	Relocate and renovate a domestic violence shelter for victims of violent crimes. 7/25 Update to reflect direct costs associated with assisting victims (backed by receipts provided)	45000	45000	17864								Yes	Other (please specify)	45000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003344	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Jail Control Upgrade	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Funding for enhancements to jail control center, reducing inmate/employee contact.		300000	0								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	300000
TPN-003345	RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Ross-Chillicothe Convention & Visitors Bureau	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Assist domestic and international visitors to Ross County through improved signage or a smartphone application that directs them throughout the county. 10/25/23 Note: Updated cumulative spending total to reflect previous quarters' spending	150000	150000	84562.14								Yes	Other (please specify)	150000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003346	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Jail Camera Upgrade	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Funding to enhance facility cameras to provide safety and security to inmates and staff.		250000	0								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	250000
TPN-003347	RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Ross County Probate Court	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Digitize records of the Court to ensure safe access and prevent the spread of COVID-19 due to in-person congregating visitors.	330000	330000	150000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003348	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Courthouse HVAC upgrade	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Replace current, outdated HVAC system to provide healthier airflow.		860547	849523.83								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	860547	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003349	RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Ross County Recorder	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Hire temporary staff to perform back-scanning of records in order to ensure safe access and prevent the spread of COVID-19 due to in-person congregating visitors.	225000	225000	102208.27								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003350	RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Ross County YMCA	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	Add 2 additional pre-school classrooms servicing up to 28 additional children and increase child care services at Chillicothe Intermediate School.	436456.93	436456.93	388510.61								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003351	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Sheriff Office Chiller Upgrade	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Upgrade facility chiller to enhance air quality.		100000	73473								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	100000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003352	RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Scioto Valley Habitat for Humanity	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Provide an affordable house for a low-income Ross County family who qualified for the program but could not obtain a loan.	130000	130000	57251.92								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003353	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Stafford Hansell Chiller Upgrade	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Upgrade chiller in Stafford Hansell Government Center to enhance air quality.		126438	126437								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	126437	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003354	RCP-040197	Mason County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	EDC Small Business Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Grants to Small Businesses in Mason County who have experienced a negative economic impact due to COVID 19 to enable them to retain the level of employees as close to March 2020 as possible and to cover the cost of business interruption cased by required closures related to the COVID 19 pandemic mitigation.		500000	500000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003355	RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Maintenance Facility	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace inadequate maintenance facility.		1290000	1118472.68
TPN-003356	RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Society of St Vincent de Paul	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Provide rent and utility assistance to low-income families.	100000	100000	100000	3670							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003357	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Broadband Infrastructure Expansion	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	These funds will be utilized to provide engineering, permitting and construction resources for last-mile infrastructure investments to bring high-speed internet service to underserved rural communities in Box Elder County. This will help stabilize rural access to remote education, health care, and economic opportunity where privately-funded expansion is not feasible due to distances and low density.	1500000	1500000	1500000
TPN-003366	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Clinical Therapy - BEFSC	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant economic stressors for low-income households and demand for counseling services has increased dramatically. Additionally, while pandemic-related workplace restrictions have been lifted, many families still struggle to find affordable child care. This is particularly true for early and late shift work that does not always coincide with traditional 9-5 work hours. This funding will allow for after-hours child care services and a full-time clinical support service program to support families impacted by COVID 19 and pandemic-related issues. These funds will be passed through to the Box Elder Family Support Center to provide service to eligible clientele.	90000	90000	90000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003370	RCP-037686	Amherst Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Government Services for the provision of Public Safety; Emergency Services Department and Police Department (Officers) pursuant to sections 602 (c)(1)(C) and 603 (c)(1)(C) of the Act, a recipients reduction in revenue.	8824375.92	8824375.92	8824375.92
TPN-003371	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	PremiumPay_County	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium pay to the employees of Box Elder County.	494750	494750	494750		201
TPN-003373	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Perry City	7-Administrative	7.2-Transfers to Other Units of Government	Update the Perry City Office to make it more healthy with wipeable services, flooring, COVID friendly office furniture, etc. This includes a new building as part of the project.	162160	162160	162160
TPN-003374	RCP-037076	Norwich, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Law enforcement, including reduction of gun violence	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Add up to three officers on Community Policing detail and add overtime funding to help reduce gun violence which has increased since the pandemic began.	865482	150285.75	150285.75			*					No
TPN-003398	RCP-040197	Mason County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	HCC Residential Utility Arrearages	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Hood Canal Communication residential customer utility arrearages for phone and internet caused by negative economic impact due to COVID pandemic.		110000	22739.17	180							No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003400	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Fair COVID-19 Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Rapid COVID-19 testing at the Washington State Fairgrounds to allow for a safe re-opening of the fairgrounds to the public. Testing support provided each day the fair was operating.	139697.5	139697.5	139697.5								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003401	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	ARPA - COVID-19 Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Additional funding put forth to continue testing efforts throughout Pierce County. To ensure the broadest access to testing, Pierce County continues to support mobile and mass testing sites. Mobile testing allows greater access to testing and support throughout underserved and vulnerable populations. Testing locations are open to all members of the community.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003402	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Bailiffs for Jury Orientation	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the court system experienced an unprecedented court backlog. To offset the impacts experience by the court backlog, funding was put forth to hire additional Bailiffs for Jury Orientation within the Superior Court. The additional support allowed Superior Court to work through the court backlog at a faster rate.	251698.54	251698.54	251698.54								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-003403	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Courts Electronic Home Monitoring	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Pretrial Services has been contracting with Friendship Diversion for electronic home monitoring since 2016. In March 2020, when the pandemic impacted the jail population and court procedures and processing, the referrals to Pretrial Services more than doubled the budgeted capacity. The referrals continue at a rate above budgeted capacity. Electronic home monitoring is provided to persons charged in Pierce County Superior Court with felony cases who are deemed indigent. Without this service, indigent persons would be remanded into custody with a monetary bail requirement that disproportionately impacts those who do not have the financial means to secure monetary release.	108727.5	108727.5	108727.5								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	108727.5
TPN-003404	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Safety Ambassador	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the court system experienced an unprecedented court backlog. To offset the impacts experienced by the court backlog, funding was put forth for a Safety Ambassador within the District Court. The additional support will allow court services to continue safely and efficiently.	49581.45	49581.45	49581.45								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003405	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Facilities Janitorial Services	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, additional COVID-19 prevention and mitigation strategies were required. To meet these new requirements, funding was put forth to increase Janitorial Services for County buildings and temporary court locations. The additional Janitorial Services allowed for reduced spread throughout County and temporary court buildings.	542443.68	542443.68	542443.68								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003406	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Off-Site Court Locations	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the court system experienced an unprecedented court backlog. To offset the impacts experienced by the court backlog, alternate locations were required to move court services forward. Funding provided to backfill for Lakewood Senior Center rental costs due to court backlog and for Armory rental costs to allow off-site Jury Orientation.	413443.01	413443.01	413443.01								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003407	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Facilities Security Services	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the court system experienced an unprecedented court backlog. To offset the impacts experienced by the court backlog, funding was put forth for a Security Mobile Patrol. The additional support will allow court services to continue safely. Additionally, funding was provided for security at Temporary Court Locations (Armory, Lakewood Community Center, and Remann Hall)	31673.52	31673.52	31673.52								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003408	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	ARPA - Corrections Electronic Home Detention	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	To help reduce the jail population that has been overwhelmed throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, funding has been put forth to the Electronic Home Detention program. The jail confinement alternative program allows us to maintain public health and safety during the pandemic, stem the spread of the virus by controlling the population coming through the jail, and ensure individuals are held accountable to court-imposed sanctions while alleviating pressure from the backlog of cases in the courts.	687302	682882	682882								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	468244
TPN-003409	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Jail Quarantine Backfill	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	As a result of COVID-19 related absences, functions of the corrections services were negatively impacted. Funding provided to the Sheriff's corrections services for quarantine staff backfill.	243351.11	243351.11	243351.11								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	0
TPN-003410	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Technology Equipment and Support for Offsite Locations	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the court system experienced an unprecedented court backlog. To offset the impacts experienced by the court backlog, alternate locations were required to move court services forward. Funding provided for technology equipment and support for offsite Superior Court locations.	74387.5	74387.5	74387.5								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	68415.35	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003412	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - TPCHD - COVID-19 School Assistance	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Funding provided to the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department to provide COVID-19 testing, case, and contact investigation to school districts in Pierce County to help them meet Washington State school guidance under the "Test to Stay" and "Learn to Return" programs.	2626870.75	2626870.75	2626870.75								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003413	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	ARPA - Jail Remote Court Appearance	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the court system experienced an unprecedented court backlog along with an increased need for mitigation and prevention tactics. To assist with mitigation, rooms will be created, and equipment installed for remote court appearances. This will allow individuals to safely attend court appearances without increased exposure or spread of COVID-19.	0	0	0								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	2425000	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003414	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Personal Protective Equipment	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Project covers the expenses associated Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). To accommodate the increase in PPE inventory, funding will go towards the storing of PPE in a storage facility. Additionally, PPE for COVID-19 related investigations and autopsies provided within the Medical Examiner's office with be covered.	863564	813236.89	813236.89								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003415	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Facilities Building Adaptations	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, additional COVID-19 prevention and mitigation strategies were required. To meet these new requirements, funding was put forth for modifications to County facilities. The modifications allowed for reduced spread throughout County facilities.	48352.21	48352.21	48352.21								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003416	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Law Enforcement Activities	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic the need for security services increased to address public safety and improve working conditions for public safety employees. Funding was put forth to add additional patrols at North Lake Tapps Park due to an increase in visitors, additional patrols were provided anti-street racing and enhancements were made to group training equipment for 7 shared locations.	315215.7	315215.7	315215.7								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003417	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - TPCHD Support	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	The Tacoma Pierce County Health Department (TPCHD) experienced an increase in demand, along with periods of closure. To combat the challenges experience by TPCHD, funding for this project went towards the reopening of TPCHD to the public, treatment services related to COVID-19 for staff and patients, wrap-around services related to COVID-19 isolation and quarantine and other public health needs as they evolve throughout the pandemic.	3110163.53	3110163.53	3110163.53								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003418	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - TPCHD - Other Public Health Emergency Response Costs	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Additional funding provided to the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department (TPCHD) to cover ongoing public health response costs. TPCHD is in the process of providing a detailed project plan that will be submitted within the first 2 months of 2022, though public health response continues at very high levels due to new variants and the COVID-19 impact on local school systems.	10785000	10785000	5304105.89								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003419	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Family Resource Centers	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	The Tacoma Pierce County Health Department (TPCHD) Family Resource Centers assist communities with getting the help and resources they need to achieve family goals. TPCHD Family Resource Centers provide resources such as parenting classes and support groups, health and well-being programs, food needs, domestic violence referrals, behavioral health and social connections.	1000000	1000000	352250.78								No			1 Imp General Public	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-003420	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	ARPA - COVID-19 After Action Report	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Funding to complete a COVID-19 After Action Report on the County's pandemic response.	250000	236566.19	192484.69								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003421	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Isolation and Quarantine	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Continued support for the Tacoma Pierce County Health Department's COVID-19 Isolation & Quarantine services.	1800000	1800000	1519510.04								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003446	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Workforce Development	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Workforce Central champions a comprehensive approach to workforce development as a vital component to a strong economy. Funding provided for a summer jobs program through Pierce County Recovery Corp and for Reskill-Upskill-Business Fund, Rapid Employer-Driven Cohort Training for individuals experiencing work impacts due to the COVID-19 pandemic.	41505.25	41505.25	41505.25								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-003447	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Washington Service Corps	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The Parks and Recreation Service Corp work crew supports forest management, restoration activities, invasive weed control and outreach for Specialized Recreation. Program provides workforce training for young adults, helping them qualify for living wage jobs by providing experience as well as an educational stipend.	576750	541537.95	400237.95								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	40000	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment			No	0
TPN-003448	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Workforce Development Internship	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Workforce Central champions a comprehensive approach to workforce development as a vital component to a strong economy. Funding provided for Workforce Central internships for individuals experiencing work impacts due to the COVID-19 pandemic.	870000	858818	858818								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment			No	0
TPN-003450	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Program Coordinators - Economic Stabilization	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	Resources to connect business to federal and state funded programs and assist with the application process.	108760	9760	9760								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-003451	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	ARPA - Entrepreneur & Technical Assistance Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.32-Business Incubators and Start-Up or Expansion Assistance	In response to the pandemic and the adverse impacts on underserved communities in Pierce County, funding was allocated to launch the Pierce County Business Accelerator (PCBA) program. The goal of the program is to foster innovation and create wealth-building opportunities in Pierce County. The PCBA will provide business training to 200 business owners with an emphasis on BIPOC, veteran, and women entrepreneurs. Instructors are representative of the diversity of each cohort. Upon graduation, participants will be equipped to raise external funding, connected to the PCBA network, financially resourced, professionally coached and empowered to accelerate their business.	9731215	5845336.87	5146090.55								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-003452	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Rollback Relief Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	To provide financial support to qualifying businesses impacted by modified COVID-19 restrictions in May 2021, Pierce County created a grant program to help offset the costs of business disruption. Small businesses were eligible to receive a need-based grant of up to $10,000 to use towards negative economic impacts.	6910000	6910000	6910000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-003453	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Innovation Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Grants to small businesses in unincorporated Pierce County for one-time capital expenditures. Grants will be based on a match from the business applying. Additional funding will be set aside for childcare businesses in unincorporated Pierce County.	3450000	1897708.23	1897708.23								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	4000000	8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-003454	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	ARPA - Professional Services for Small Businesses	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.30-Technical Assistance Counseling or Business Planning	Grants to small businesses in unincorporated Pierce County to provide professional services, including bookkeeping, tax advice, graphic design, web design, marketing strategies, and legal advice.	0	0	0								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-003455	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Key Peninsula Partnership for a Healthy Community	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The KP Healthy Community project connects Key Peninsula non-profits, social service organizations, community members, and governmental departments and agencies for the purpose of assessing challenges, leveraging resources, and developing community-driven visions and solutions. In total, the KP Healthy Community group works in concert with more than 20 agencies and organizations to overcome obstacles faced by the residents in the Key Peninsula community. Funding will assist with filling community gaps in transportation, health and wellness, and food insufficiency. Many residents have been unable to meet basic needs for dental and health care, have had limited access to social services and are unemployed.	90000	90000	90000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-003456	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Lindquist Dental Clinic	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Lindquist Dental Clinic for Children (LDCC) is a non-profit dental clinic that provides care for children and youth 0-20 years old. LDCC's programs and services provide a safety net for the most vulnerable Pierce County children and youth and help them receive the dental care they need to be healthy. LDCC is the only local private non-profit dental clinic solely dedicated to serving children 0-20, as well as offering the unique combination of treatment in affordable dental clinics and through the community and school-based dental outreach services. Funding will be used to support the general operational needs along with other COVID-19 driven expenses such as PPE and recovering from a backlog due to youth that were not regularly visiting the dentist throughout the pandemic.	200000	200000	200000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003457	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Washington Horsemen	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The Washington Horsemen Tacoma Unit provides a place for youth programs such as 4-H, Washington and High School Equestrian teams as well as disability programs like Rascal Rodeo which helps those with physical and developmental disabilities discover unknown abilities in a unique, safe and modified rodeo environment. Funding will assist with general maintenance and operating costs to allow the facility to continue operating through the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic.	55000	55000	55000								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-003458	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Compassion Connect Puget Sound	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Compassion Connect Puget Sound unites community members to serve together to address issues throughout their communities. Funding will allow Compassion Connect Puget Sound to provide the community with free medical/dental services & combat human trafficking. Funding will also help to remove barriers to housing, food, clothing, and transportation for clients.	66000	66000	66000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-003459	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	ARPA - Food Bank Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately impacted groups that were already vulnerable, including those food insecure. Individuals were unable to maintain employment, homelessness increased, and food insecurity rose at high rates. Funding was provided to local food banks to support the disproportionately impacted communities. The Emergency Food Network (EFN) supports members of Pierce County and had over 1.9 million visits and 19.5 million pounds of food distributed in 2020. EFN experienced a 40% increase in visits during 2020 compared to 2019.	3146000	3134000	2894000								Yes	Food banks and other facilities	213324	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	0
TPN-003460	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Farmers Market Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	Funding provided for Tacoma Farmers Market and Other Farmers Markets to assist with offsetting the negative economic impacts of the pandemic on the food industry. Assistance provided to offset decrease in attendance at farmers markets and lost revenue due to periods of closure.	188277.46	188277.46	188277.46								No			13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify			No	0
TPN-003461	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Fairs and Community Events	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	Funding provided to support the safe re-opening of the Pierce County Fair. In 2020 the Pierce County Fair was held virtually and received minimal revenue. To help offset the closure impacts, funding was provided for entertainment, security, equipment, and maintenance items.	58403.63	58403.63	58403.63								No			13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify			No	0
TPN-003462	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Tacoma Farmers Market	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	Support will be provided to the Tacoma Farmers Market to purchase the "Farmers Truck," a vehicle designed for mobile markets that will help Tacoma Farmers Market's Fresh Express Mobile Farmers Market increase sales of Pierce County produced farm and processed products. By decreasing set up/break down time, displaying products in cold cases, and facilitating cooking demonstrations and sampling with built-in food safety infrastructure, the Farmers Truck will allow the Fresh Express to visit more communities each week and present consumers with both higher quality products and improved education about how to use them. Not only producers and processors will benefit, but the Low-Income, Low-Supermarket Access communities visited by the Fresh Express will also have an improved shopping experience, and more communities can be visited. By providing a new wholesale outlet, Tacoma Farmers Market is helping small and beginning farmers diversity their outreach while making high quality, locally made and sustainably grown products affordable for income-constrained community members. Total expected capital expenditure to be updated once program begins.	150000	150000	150000								Yes	Food banks and other facilities	150000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			No	0
TPN-003463	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Financial Coaching	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Program will implement the Bethel Center for Strong Families program. Centers for Strong Families (CSFs) focus on improving the financial bottom line for low- to moderate-income families and helping people in a way that encourages a long-term commitment to increasing income, decreasing expenses, building credit, and acquiring assets. Families receive high-quality, one-on-one financial and employment coaching services. Coaching may be offered virtually or in-person. Funding will be used to serve Pierce County residents at the Bethel Center for Strong Families to provide employment coaching and financial coaching services.	467342.96	425000	273485.59								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-003464	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Court Backlog	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the court system experienced an unprecedented court backlog. To offset the impacts experience by the court backlog, funding was put forth for the Department of Assigned Counsel, Prosecuting Attorney and Superior Court to assist with reducing the court backlog and increasing its total staffing during the pandemic period.	5311586	4409130.9	4409130.9								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	0
TPN-003465	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Live Streaming Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Live Streaming Project to support remote capabilities for services to mitigate COVID-19 spread by reducing in person services that are not necessary to be in person.	33849.05	33849.05	33849.05								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003466	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Court Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the court system experienced an unprecedented court backlog. To offset the impacts experience by the court backlog, funding was put forth for Phone Tree Translation Services, and additional support personnel to assist with COVID related issues.	71722.18	71722.18	71722.18								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	0
TPN-003467	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Transportation Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Harbor Hope Center (HHC) will provide pre-paid gas cards in response to the COVID-19 impact to individuals. HHC is a nonprofit organization focused on providing housing and support services to homeless students and families living in the Gig Harbor/Key Peninsula area.	30000	30000	30000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools		No	0
TPN-003468	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	ARPA - Rebuilding Together South Sound	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Rebuilding Together seeks to advance health equity by improving health and housing outcomes for neighbors in need in economically distressed communities. Funds will be used to provide free home repairs and modifications for 70 low-income (at or below 50% of Area Median Income) homeowners/families who are seniors, have a disability or have children in the home with the intention of keeping them safe in their homes.	400000	400000	0								No
TPN-003472	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Sewer/Municipal Partnerships	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Ordinance No. 2021-115s outlines a two-part sewer and water program to financially partner with cities and other local units of government, tribal governments, and qualified housing organizations to make strategic investments in infrastructure to improve public health, preserve existing infrastructure, support an increase in affordable housing options, and create jobs to ensure more equitable recovery and mitigate long-term effects of the pandemic. This project is only for the administration portion of the allocation, individual projects are split out under different project ids	399735	49988.68	49988.68						Yes
TPN-003473	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Broadband	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Program will leverage partnerships, grant opportunities, franchise language, and Broadband Development District incentives to expand access to broadband in the unserved and underserved areas of Pierce County. In July 2019, Pierce County Council passed R2019-74 declaring Broadband an essential infrastructure. In April 2022, the first ARPA Broadband partnership award was made. This project is just for the administration, as projects are assigned they are split out into their own ARPA project ID.	10700000	61488.57	61488.57					No	Yes
TPN-003475	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Project includes general Human Services administration, processing, and reporting of COVID-19 relief funding. Limited duration positions are included in the project costs, along with costs associated with Workers Compensation claims. Positions were added to manage the ARPA workload and overhead for existing staff administering ARPA funds.	290931.85	229087.14	229087.14								No
TPN-003476	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Foreclosure Prevention Housing Counseling	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	The purpose of the funding is to expand capacity among our local Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and Washington State Housing Finance Commission (“WSHFC”) approved housing counseling agencies. The goal is to enable local housing counseling agencies in Pierce County to recruit, hire, and train staff to expand foreclosure prevention counseling and foreclosure mediation services. This will be especially critical for Pierce County homeowners in need of foreclosure prevention and/or mediation assistance but are limited by technology hardware and/or literary, and those with limited English language proficiency.	350000	350000	121184.04	0							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-003477	RCP-037686	Amherst Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Councilmembers Meeting Chambers	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Investment in public facilities for Town Board meetings, Zoning Board meetings, BID openings, various other public meetings, Departmental meetings, and community program meetings, such as HEAP and Home Counseling. The re-modeling removed fixed seating and purchased movable chairs and tables to allow for social distancing to follow CDC, New York State, and Erie County guidelines for COVID-19 mitigation. The project was done in house by Town Employees and purchases included tables, chairs, and flooring, both of which we under $50,000.		32276.14	32276.14								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	32276.14	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003478	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Communities in Schools	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services	Communities in Schools (CIS) is committed to equity for all students and works to ensure every student, regardless of race, zip code, or socioeconomic background has what they need to realize their potential in school and beyond. CIS connects students to caring adults and community resources that assist them in confronting and overcoming barriers that stand between them and a brighter future. Funding will provide support to four CIS affiliates who are working collaboratively to serve over 11,000 students across the schools and neighborhoods of Key Peninsula, Lakewood, Puyallup, and Tacoma.	108000	82116.74	82116.74								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	No	108000
TPN-003479	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - City of Buckley - Learning Lab	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services	The Learning Lab at the Buckley Youth Activities Center is a place for teens to finish schoolwork, expand knowledge and work on job-based skill development. The funds associated with this project will upgrade the facility to provide more resources for youth to use at the center. The goal for the space is to make it accessible to all youth to be able to participate in learning activities and programs. Updated equipment will open opportunities for youth to engage in county and statewide support and leadership groups related to mental health, substance abuse, and areas of special interest.	25000	25000	25000								Yes	Schools and other educational facilities	25000	6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	No	0
TPN-003480	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Program Coordinators - Community Response	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators	Resources to connect residents to federal and state funded programs and assist with the application process.	17882.38	17882.38	17882.38								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-003481	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Metro Parks Tacoma Programs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	Metro Parks Tacoma (MPT), Tacoma Public Schools (TPS), and the education and advocacy nonprofit Greentrike are directing a new initiative with community partners to create a comprehensive childcare solution on-site at elementary and middle schools during out-of-school-time. The "Beyond the Bell" elementary program and "Club Beyond" middle school program, which launched in September 2021, are intended to serve as a model to be expanded by Greentrike and other school districts and providers in the county which will have a special emphasis on children in marginalized and disadvantaged circumstances. Funding will directly support service delivery and go towards training for high school mentors, financial aid, and therapeutic recreation.	1000000	1000000	1000000								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools			No	0
TPN-003482	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Child Care Resources - Homeless Child Care Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	Child Care Resources (CCR) will provide resources and referral services for families living homeless, essential personnel and families impacted by COVID-19 in Pierce County. The program will provide outreach to families and child care providers in Pierce County, provide childcare subsidies for families experiencing homelessness and ineligible for Washington State's Working Connections Child Care (WCCC) subsidy.	16166.87	16166.87	16166.87								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity		No	16166.87
TPN-003483	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Youth Summer Programs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	To support our youth throughout the COVID-19 pandemic funding provided to Graduate Tacoma includes more than 350 community partners aligning together with Tacoma schools to impact student success. To address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on students, funding provided to support the Graduate Tacoma program. Additionally, funding provided for Pierce County Parks and Recreation to administer a program named Kids Need to Play! to provide discounts for kids’ summer camps and programs. While remaining safety-conscious, many camps and programs for preschool (ages 3-4) and school-age (ages 5-18) kids were discounted at 60-90% off for all youth across Pierce County. Several public and private recreation providers collaborated on the initiative to bring kids accessible opportunities to learn, socialize, create, explore, and compete.	2285143.89	2285143.89	2285143.89								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools			No	0
TPN-003484	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Youth Diversion Programs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Funding for Pierce County Juvenile Court (PCJC) to provide services for justice involved youth through multiple programs. The goal of the program is to provide beneficial services and accountability from Juvenile Court and Community Based Organizations within 24-48 hours of law enforcement contact for family related violence. Programs will increase positive social engagement, learn strategies and tools to help them succeed, create relationships with caring mentors, and create a safe place to facilitate growth while breaking down barriers to help participants identify their full potential.	150000	129448.66	129448.66								No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate			No	150000
TPN-003485	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - First Five FUNdamentals - Diaper Bank	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	The Help Me Grow Pierce County Diaper Bank Network is made up of 10 locations across Pierce County that collectively serves approximately 500 families and 1,000 children per month with diapers, wipes, and referrals to additional community resources. Nine of the 10 locations are embedded at Family Resource Centers (FRCs), and free diapers have become a key outreach strategy to reaching additional families through the additional services provided by FRCs. As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to create economic instability for families with young children, the need continues to grow.	199998.82	199998.82	199998.82								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-003486	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Multicultural Child and Family Hope Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Multicultural Child and Family Hope Center (MCFHC) is a non-profit human services agency with a mission to provide culturally relevant support services to children and families. Funding will help support basic needs and distribution to hungry, low-income, and often homeless individuals and families throughout Pierce County. The current vehicle used for transportation has 350,000 and if lost would pause distribution of meals to Pierce County families. Funding will go towards purchase of a new vehicle for food deliveries and for HVAC filtration improvements to facility.	50000	50000	50000								Yes	Mitigation measures in small businesses, nonprofits and impacted industries	50000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	0
TPN-003487	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - WSU PC Extension - 4H	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Funding will help supplement the renewal of the longstanding partnership between Washington State University Extension and Pierce County in support of WSU faculty and staff to conduct outreach programs for the citizens of Pierce County. Washington State University Pierce County Extension provides outreach and applied research in agriculture and natural resources, 4-H Youth Development, Master Gardeners, and nutrition programs.  As the outreach arm of the WSU College and Agriculture, Human and Natural Resource Sciences, WSU Extension brings the resources of Washington State University to address local issues in Pierce County.	100000	100000	99999.79								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	No	0
TPN-003488	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	ARPA - Foundation for Tacoma Students	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Funds allocated to the Foundation for Tacoma Students will support programming that focuses on children's social-emotional, mental health, and academic needs. Expanding learning opportunities will be offered with a focus on social-emotional learning outcomes for low-income youth and children and youth of color throughout Pierce County. Resources will be provided for a variety of program types, (e.g., academics, arts, STEAM, athletics, leadership development), and programs will be prioritized to support the holistic social-emotional learning (SEL) needs of children and youth. The intended result for this program is to narrow the gaps in access and participation in summer programming across lines of race, income, and geography in Pierce County.	650000	650000	0								No
TPN-003489	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Tacoma Boat Builders	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Tacoma Boat Builders (TBB) creates transformational opportunities for marginalized and underserved youth through positive mentorship, woodworking, and traditional wooden boat building. Funds will be used to support prevention and diversion programs for court-connected youth. Results include diverting youth away from further entanglement with the justice system and increased protective factors such as positive adult mentors, increased belonging in the community, social emotional learning, soft and hard skills for trade related work. TBB programs are aimed at violence prevention and are designed to be trauma responsive and culturally sensitive to the unique needs of marginalized youth, including those who are court-connected. As a result of the pandemic, the social-emotional development and mental health of young people have been severely impacted. TBB provides a unique opportunity to youth who are typically excluded from programs due to barriers of access such as low income, behavior and mental health challenges, and systemic inequalities that lead to their exclusion.	60000	60000	42824.66								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-003490	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	ARPA - Changing Rein EAAT	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Changing Rein offers Equine Assisted Learning (EAL) as a therapeutic process for individuals of all ages, specializing with at-risk youth. EAL promotes understanding healthy connections and how those connections are the foundation of healthy relationships. Funding will support outdoor enclosure improvements to more than double the number of individuals that can be served at one time.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003491	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - 2021 Affordable Housing Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Human Services in partnership with the Pierce County Community Development Corporation provides financing for the development and preservation of affordable rental housing and the development of homeownership opportunities all to benefit low-income households in Pierce County. Funding is allocated at least once per year through a competitive Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). In 2021 affordable housing allocations provided to the Low Income Housing Institute, Shiloh Baptist Church/Tacoma Housing Authority, Tacoma Pierce County Habitat for Humanity, McDonald Ladd, and the Metropolitan Development Council to rehabilitate and preserve existing affordable housing and to build new affordable housing.	7550000	3460425	2120554.59								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	7550000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			No	7550000
TPN-003492	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	ARPA - 2022-23 Affordable Housing Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Housing NOFA 2022 and 2023. Human Services in partnership with the Pierce County Community Development Corporation provides financing for the development and preservation of affordable rental housing and the development of homeownership opportunities all to benefit low-income households in Pierce County. Funding is allocated at least once per year through a competitive Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). Projects will be determined throughout 2022 and 2023.	12350000	2020274	0					Yes	Yes		Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	12350000
TPN-003493	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	ARPA - Affordable Housing Action Strategy Consultant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	The ongoing pandemic paired with increasing costs of living continues to greatly impact the pre-existing affordable housing crisis facing low-income households. In order to successfully assess affordable housing opportunities, funding has been provided for County Council to hire an Affordable Housing Action Strategy Consultant.	150000	0	0								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			No	0
TPN-003494	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	ARPA - Community Land Trust	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	As Pierce County looks to recover from COVID-19, there is a crucial opportunity to rebuild more equitably than before and realize many new units of affordable housing. Land Trusts serve as a repository for land to support existing organizations in addressing the longstanding affordable housing needs that have plagued Pierce County for decades efficiently, justly, and effectively as well as contracting for development to add large numbers of units to the affordable housing inventory quickly.  This stewardship furthers stability and equity in communities across Pierce County. Funds will support the production of housing, in partnership with non- and for-profit developers, ensuring quality, project speed, and cost to the future homeowners to ensure long-term affordability.	200000	0	0								No		0
TPN-003495	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Homelessness Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Pierce County continues to focus on supporting unhoused communities through multiple homelessness services. Funding will go towards supporting homeless services including enhanced outreach, camper relocation, site restoration, hygiene services, day centers, and youth homelessness support through Comprehensive Life Resources programs.	1676865	1615588.07	1615588.07								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations			No	0
TPN-003496	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Hotel/Motel Acquisition	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Pierce County Human Services (PCHS) will partner with City of Tacoma and City of Lakewood to support the purchase of the Comfort Inn hotel property by Low Income Housing Institute (LIHI).  This project will bring online approximately 90 units for homeless individuals, couples, and/or small families.	5000000	3386250	3386250								No		5000000	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity		No	0
TPN-003497	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	ARPA - Hotel/Motel Acquisition - Pierce County	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Pierce County will acquire (and if needed make property improvements) an existing hotel or motel for use as a non-congregate emergency shelter for homeless persons. The target area for the shelter is in the City of Fife. Pierce County will coordinate the project with the City of Fife and other Cities and Towns in east Pierce County that wish to contribute funding to the project, with an overall goal to identify a geographic location that will be easily accessible to the targeted population. Individuals utilizing the housing will be those meeting the federal definition of homelessness. The vision for the project's shelter staff will be to include them in Pierce County's dedication to Coordinated Entry/Diversion. This heavily implemented intervention has proven to streamline permanent housing options and prioritize resources to appropriate programs.	0	0	0								No		5000000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	5000000
TPN-003498	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	ARPA - Shelter Facility - Tiny House	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Pierce County Tiny Home Communities have helped to sustain temporary housing for households that fall under 50% of the local AMI. Onsite, each property includes homes for previously homeless households, laundry facilities, and access to essential needs. In addition, Homeless Diversion services are offered with hopes of residents obtaining and maintaining permanent, stable housing. To assist with an equitable recovery, one Tiny Home Community has been placed within a neighborhood that traditionally occupies a strong Native American presence. Although opened for all qualified households, this location has been mostly utilized by its neighborhood, thus helping to simultaneously address homelessness and gaps of equity in our overall system.	750000	0	0								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	750000
TPN-003499	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Community First Village	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Support for a microhome village modeled after the Austin, Texas “Community First! Village.” Planning is in the initial stages and funding was recently appropriated for the proposal and site analysis of the program. The funding provided under this contract will address homelessness by funding the initial proposal and site analysis for a Community First Village that will serve chronically homeless individuals in Pierce County. The final proposal is due to Pierce County Human Services by August 26, 2022. The proposal will include information on site acquisition, project location, architectural master plan, and other associated costs.	22300000	22266350	7716350					Yes	Yes		Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	22300000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			No	0
TPN-003500	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	ARPA - Tacoma Rescue Mission Expansion	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The Rescue Mission will renovate and expand their Men’s Shelter Building (which contains a kitchen, dining hall, and men’s shelter) to increase overnight shelter capacity from 90 beds to 160 beds without the use of floor mats or bunk beds. By moving away from bunk beds and sleeping mats toward semi-private sleeping spaces (with more storage for personal items), guests will be provided with more dignified, hygienic, and physically distanced accommodations in the congregate shelter setting. The conversion of the dining hall from temporary dorms back to its intended use will increase the size of the dining area to safely accommodate more guests as they eat. Funding will also ensure the kitchen continues to serve an increase of guests; and increase bathroom square footage and HVAC capacity.	5500000	0	0								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	0
TPN-003501	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Comprehensive Plan to End Homelessness	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	According to the Pierce County Department of Human Services, 10,971 people passed through Coordinated Entry, emergency shelter, and transitional housing or enrolled in a rapid rehousing program in 2020.  In order to address homelessness in Pierce County, Resolution No. R2021-82 established the Comprehensive Plan to End Homelessness. The Comprehensive Plan designs a system to end homelessness and achieve “functional zero,” a state where any person starting a new homeless episode has immediate access to shelter and a permanent housing intervention. The Plan shall serve as a guiding policy for county operations going forward.	8949000	2493204.16	971791.76								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			Yes	0
TPN-003502	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Shelter Facility - Safe Parking	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The Safe Parking Program provides safe parking spaces for unsheltered families and individuals who are living in their vehicles. Parking spaces, bathroom, and hand washing stations are available through partnerships and collaboration with faith-based organizations and non-profit agencies. Participants are provided a safe place to sleep, and connection to mainstream services as well as the homeless Coordinated Entry System. The goal of the Safe Parking Network Program is to connect households to permanent housing and out of their vehicles. As the program progresses the plan is to be extremely intentional with equity in providing aid to underserved populations.	450000	427226.63	286828.14								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations		No	450000
TPN-003503	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Comprehensive Life Resources - HYPE Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The Helping Young People Excel (HYPE) center provides a crucial component of the Pierce County services landscape for Youth and Young Adult Homelessness. HYPE Center is a low barrier drop-in center and a life-skills building program for people between the ages of 12 and 24. HYPE Center provides services such as group meetings on various topics, case management, supported employment and housing and mental health and substance use support. Funds will be used to support annual operational costs of the program.	350000	327395.67	327395.67								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations		No	0
TPN-003505	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	ARPA - Domestic & Family Violence Support	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	The COVID-19 pandemic displaced people from their employment, resulting in the need for emergency assistance for victims and survivors of domestic violence who may be forced to remain in homes with their abusers and/or flee from an unsafe situation. Funding for Crystal Judson Family Justice Center, YWCA, Rebuilding Hope, Catherine Place and Our Sister’s House provided support to those who experienced domestic violence as a direct result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Support included phone cards, hotel stays, domestic violence advocacy services, enhanced legal support, emotional support, emergency vouchers, and Children’s Advocacy and therapy.	299408.49	249754	249754								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	0
TPN-003506	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - Community Navigator Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	The Community Navigator Program was designed to reach disadvantaged and marginalized business communities throughout Pierce County.  Through the administering of CARES funding, it was identified that the marginalized business community was not gaining access to traditional channels of financial and professional resources.  This program's mission is to reach out to these communities via established non-profit organizations that represent those communities affected.  The organizations will be given training and connections to business resources with the goal to reaching out to businesses that have not accessed assistance in the past to assist with business growth throughout the area.	2500000	1973776	1036224.83								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted		No	0
TPN-003507	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Program Coordinators - Council	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Program Coordinator for County Council to assist with functions directly related to American Rescue Plan allocations.	68987.83	68987.83	68987.83
TPN-003508	RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA - COVID-19 Operational Impacts	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Funding to support administration of ARPA funding and other COVID-19 operational impacts.	915000	552046.18	552046.18
TPN-003510	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Healthy Food Access Strategic Plan & Implementation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	The Manchester Health Department (MHD) has engaged the Manchester Food Collaborative (MFC) as a key partner in the Healthy Food Access Strategic Planning Initiative.  The Collaborative includes a broad range of stakeholders in the health and wellbeing of Manchester residents, including healthcare systems, managed care organizations, refugee and immigrant resettlement organizations, public schools, universities, several City departments, senior-service agencies, behavioral health service providers, New Hampshire Food Bank, and others.  The MFC meets monthly and will dedicate 30 minutes of each meeting to the strategic planning effort.  MFC members have also agreed to participate in stakeholder interviews, which will be conducted during the second quarter and used to identify priorities for addressing healthy food access in Manchester. MHD is partnering with Dartmouth College to develop a plan for resident engagement, including focus groups, resident interviews, and surveys aimed at collecting input from a diverse population of community members.  Data collection will take place during the third quarter and be incorporated into the final strategic plan.  Priorities for action will be adjusted, if necessary, to reflect resident recommendations. MHD is conducting a review of best practices in healthy food access to present to the strategic planning team as potential options for addressing the priorities identified through the planning process.  We are also working with MFC partners to conduct a landscape analysis of existing healthy food access programs and resources in Manchester and identify critical gaps in services or populations served.		412404	102801.8								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-003511	RCP-038252	Ocala, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	WRF # 3 Force Main Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Force main upgrades to Lift Station 91 WRF # 3.	1250000	1250000	1175215.9
TPN-003512	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Healthy Corner Stores Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	MHD has engaged Fresh Start Farms, a program of the Organization for Refugee and Immigrant Success (ORIS), to serve as the Fresh Food Hub for the Healthy Corner Stores (HCS) Initiative.  Fresh Start Farms, established in 2008, expands access to healthy, affordable, culturally appropriate food. ORIS develops local markets and trains farmers in business planning, which builds competency and integration into New Hampshire’s vibrant and growing local food system. Markets include Community Supported Agriculture (CSA), farmers markets, and wholesale contracts. MHD and ORIS have adopted the HCS best practice model of DC Central Kitchen (dccentralkitchen.org), which has nearly 70 participating stores in Washington, DC. This model is being utilized to craft policies and procedures for a HCS project in Manchester. A draft of policies/procedures will be created by the end of the second quarter. Marketing materials are also in development for promotional purposes, as well as to provide point of decision prompts in stores to denote healthy choices. In addition, a listing of 35 corner stores has been identified within Manchester’s 7 Qualified Census Tracts as potential participants in a local HCS model. Outreach to these stores has begun and will continue through the end of January 2022.  Store owners who indicate a willingness to participate in the program will undergo an in-depth assessment to better understand the store's food landscape and business sustainability. Each store will be assigned a priority score for inclusion.  The HCS project anticipates on-boarding at least 5 stores annually, which will appropriately pace project growth while providing the adequate level of ongoing technical assistance and feedback required of the DC Central Kitchen model.  The first cohort of stores will be announced by the end of the second quarter.		572200	130906.58								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-003513	RCP-038252	Ocala, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	State Road 464 Force Main Replacement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Replacement project for Force Main on State Road 464	2178482	2178482	2020365.4
TPN-003514	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Community Health Worker Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators	The Community Health Worker (CHW) Program initiated staff hiring efforts. Thus far, MHD successfully hired for a Supervisor position and 4 CHWs. The new team is multicultural and collectively speaks 11 languages, in addition to English (Spanish, French, Nepali, Hindi, Swahili, Kinyarwanda, Kurundi, Mandinka, Fula, Wolof, and Yoruba). In addition, the MPD successfully hired for a Coordinator position.  The primary work of this quarter (and next quarter) focused in on-boarding staff via trainings and skill development. From January-February 2022, the CHW staff are participating in a CHW Certificate program hosted by the Southern NH AHEC. The Program will also be working closely with the Harvard School of Public Health to provide occupational health and safety training and technical assistance. Additionally, staff are proactively learning more about their assigned neighborhood areas in the City, including conducting asset mapping, reaching out to local community groups and organizations, and beginning to get a sense of neighborhood concerns and needs. The CHW Program also conducted research on other model practices across the country to inform local policies and procedures, and will create a draft of policies/procedures for the Program in the second quarter. This will include a set of metrics for program evaluation and performance measurement. The Program will be utilizing a results-based accountability framework to support ongoing monitoring toward objectives and performance targets. Lastly, as this Program is a joint effort between the MHD and MPD, the two Departments will be creating a structure to support linkages and coordination of efforts across their respective disciplines of public health and public safety.		5389625	1148950								No			15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-003515	RCP-038252	Ocala, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Loss Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To replace loss revenues due to Covid-19's loss/reduction of state revenues. Final project to spend ARPA funding has not been approved through the City's budget process yet.	8173669	8173669	3072589
TPN-003517	RCP-038252	Ocala, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Aid to Non-Profits - Community Foundation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Community Foundation is a 501-3c and serves as a conduit between donors, other 501-3c organizations, and local community leaders to get assistance/help to the residents of the City of Ocala and Marion County.  Ocala partnered with Community Foundation to provide non-matching grants to 501-3c organizations within the local community to give funding where it is most needed.  Residents of all ages with many different type of needs have benefited from the allocation of ARPA funding disbursed to all these different, non-profit organizations.	600000	600000	600000								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-003518	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	BPU School and Small Business Energy Efficiency	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The School and Small Business Energy Efficiency Stimulus Program ensures school and small business HVAC systems are upgraded to safely prepare schools and small businesses for operation during the COVID-19 pandemic and to improve the general health and safety of those environments.	184500000	183482733.74	27972896.17					No	Yes	No	Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	183025612.49	1 Imp General Public			Yes	0
TPN-003519	RCP-039609	Ashtabula County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Court Security & COVID Policy Enforcement	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Payroll costs for safety staff response to COVID-19 in the form of enhanced Court Security obligations and COVID policy enforcement. Ashtabula County issued a mask mandate for all of its county buildings on prior to 3/1/21 as a safety measure to help respond to and mitigate the spread of Covid-19. At the Ashtabula County Courthouse complex, Court Security staff members are charged with performing all check-ins for persons entering the courthouse, as well as maintaining security of court rooms and responding to calls for assistance in the courthouse.  Due to the mask mandate, Court Security staff were charged with the enforcement of this order as persons were entering the courthouse, as well as monitoring the hallways and courtrooms for compliance throughout a person’s stay while conducting county business.   The mask mandate was a new job task for Court Security staff due to Covid-19 that greatly impacted their daily job duties.  They were tasked with making sure all visitors to the complex were complying with the mask mandate, and were also tasked with providing assistance in court rooms and hallways if individuals stopped complying with the mandate after going through security.  Ashtabula County has elected to use ARPA funds to pay for 75% of Court Security staff wages from the work dates of March 14, 2021 – June 5, 2021 as this time period defines the beginning of the reporting period when ARPA monies can be used through when the mask mandate was lifted.		38679.23	38679.23			*					No
TPN-003521	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	DCA DHCR Eviction & Homelessness Prevent	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	The Eviction and Homelessness Prevention Program provides rental and utility assistance to very low, low, and moderate income tenants who struggle to pay rent because of financial hardship directly or indirectly incurred as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.	787500000	575086572.49	552662242.64	24651							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			Yes	0
TPN-003522	RCP-053228	City Of Edinburg, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	2.29 Stimulus Program Aimed at Recovery from COVID (SPARC)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The City of Edinburg received American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds from the Federal Government for round two of the SPARC program. The City saw great economic impact in injecting more than $1,000,000 directly into the Edinburg economy by providing financial assistance to businesses and residents in round one. In utilizing 2021 ARPA funds, the City was able to provide additional recovery from the continued COVID-19 pandemic by investing back into the local economy once again. This provided eligible Edinburg residents with additional financial stimulus. The City awarded 465 businesses $2,000 grants and distributed more than 10,000 SPARC gift cards to eligible residents of the city of Edinburg. More than 200 businesses participated in the gift card program. The City of Edinburg implemented the Facade Improvement Program for eligible businesses to beautify their business through a physical exterior improvement.	2717757.39	2717757.39	2667757.39								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted
TPN-003523	RCP-037167	Blair County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	County Wide Provision of Governmental Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project is for county wide provision of governmental services to the extent that lost revenue is incurred. This category's current and expected expenditures include salaries, benefits, professional services, and equipment. The County is in the process of gathering additional expenditures to charge against the obligation.	22855935.24	22855935.24	2937260.54
TPN-003524	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	DCA DHCR Eviction & Homelessness Prevention Office	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The Office of Eviction Prevention provides navigation services for at-risk tenants.	5000000	5000000	3581972.35								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			Yes	0
TPN-003525	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	DRM Atlantic Health - Overlook Hosp.	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The grant to Atlantic Health funds capital improvements at Overlook Hospital which will address significant mechanical infrastructure needs to critically limit airborne contaminants during the COVID-19 pandemic.	1000000	1000000	1000000								Yes	Medical equipment and facilities	1000000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003526	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	DRM Trinitas Hospital	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The grant to Trinitas Medical Center contributes to the expansion of the inpatient unit for adults who suffer from a Dual Disorder.	1000000	1000000	500000								Yes	Behavioral health facilities and equipment	1000000	1 Imp General Public			Yes	1000000
TPN-003528	RCP-039263	Cabell County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Modernization Cybersecurity	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	SOPHOS Firewall hardware, software, and licensing to protect users/county from cyber attacks.		38671.06	38671.06
TPN-003529	RCP-037937	Kennebec County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	KC - Jail Body Scanner	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Purchase of inmate full body scanner for jail to reduce person to person contact. The population served includes the visitors, inmates, and employees of the Kennebec County jail. The desired outcome from the project is a reduction in the spread of COVID-19 through decreased contact between individuals at the jail.		137500	137500								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	137500	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003530	RCP-039770	Camden County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay Award	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	A one-time premium pay award of $1,500 was provided in May, 2021 to each full-time County employee who was employed from April 1, 2020 - March 31, 2021. The premium pay amount was prorated for employees that had not been employed for the entire year, or worked part time.  County employees were eligible for premium pay because their work required in-person interactions with patients, the public, or coworkers while performing the work. In addition, County employees were required to physically handle items that were handled by, patients, the public, or coworkers of the individual while performing the work.	542722.64	542722.64	542722.64		371
TPN-003531	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	FMERA Water and Sewer - Fort Monmouth	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The grant to Fort Monmouth is being used to replace antiquated pipes and install new pump stations, intersectors and water mains as part of the redevelopment of this former U.S. Army military base.	10500000	10500000	10483816.13					No	Yes
TPN-003532	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	DRM-ADMIN PROGRAM	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Administrative funds are used to oversee subrecipients and beneficiaries of SFRF funds and to submit regular reporting.	45000000	23871199.85	17577410.09
TPN-003537	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	EDA Support for Entities -  Microbusinesses	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The Small Business Emergency Assistance Grant Program - Microbusinesses provides working capital grants to eligible microbusinesses.	90237500	78691500	77288500								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-003539	RCP-039601	Rock County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Small Business Grant Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Using ARPA funding, Rock County created a grant program for small businesses in the County that have suffered economic losses due to the pandemic.  Small businesses can apply for grants of up to $10,000 per applicant.  Applicants must certify that the pandemic has had an adverse economic impact on their business and be able to demonstrate that they need ARPA funding in order to stabilize, sustain, strengthen, or restart operations.  Funding must be used to offset COVID-19 related losses by using the grant award to pay rent, payroll costs, utilities, and other necessary operating expenses.  The program also includes a partnership with the Arrowhead Library System and Lakeshores Library System to make technology resources available to business owners who don’t have access to the internet or the technology they need, including laptops, hotspots, and business planning software.  These resources will be available through the seven public libraries in Rock County.  Starting with the 2022 Q1 report, this project will only include the expenditures for the grants and related administration costs.  Expenditures related to business planning resources will be reported under the new expenditure category 2.30 moving forward.		657793.39	657793.39								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-003540	RCP-036654	Roanoke City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Mental Health and Substance Addiction -Collective Response	1-Public Health	1.13-Substance Use Services	Mental Health and Substance Addiction Treatment and Recovery Services, Direct fund Roanoke Valley-Alleghany Regional Commission, who will be the employer of the position.	390600	390600	390600								No			20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate
TPN-003543	RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	EDA Support for Entities - Child Care Provider	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The Small Business Emergency Assistance Grant Program - Child Care Providers gives working capital grants to eligible child care providers.	2100000	1541500	1486500								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-003544	RCP-039601	Rock County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Non-Profit Grant Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Using ARPA funding, Rock County created a grant program for non-profits in the County that have suffered economic losses due to the pandemic.  Non-profits can apply for grants of up to $10,000 per applicant.  Applicants must certify that the pandemic has had an adverse economic impact on them and be able to demonstrate that they need ARPA funding in order to stabilize, sustain, strengthen, or restart operations.  Funding must be used to offset COVID-19 related losses by using the grant award to pay rent, payroll costs, utilities, and other necessary operating expenses.  Administrative costs for the non-profit grant program are included in the small business grant program project.		45892	45892								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-003548	RCP-036654	Roanoke City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	LEAP Food System/Food Hub	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	Big-Lift - Food System/Food Hub - An enhancement of current food access programs to include an expansion of existing food hubs, the urban agriculture network, expanded farmer's markets, expansion of financial incentives for low-income shoppers, etc.  LEAP to enhance current food system initiatives, expand the West End Food Hub, enhance urban agricultural network, and expand financial assistance programs.	2500000	2500000	2500000	50							Yes	Food banks and other facilities	1726000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-003549	RCP-036654	Roanoke City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	EDA Small Business Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Small business assistance through the Economic Development Authority non-profit. Open to Roanoke City small businesses. Application process with flat rate award of $5,000.	500000	500000	500000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-003550	RCP-036654	Roanoke City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Housing - TAP Affordable, Accessible and Safe Housing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Acquisition and rehabilitation of properties, permanent supportive housing, etc. - An initiative offering a comprehensive approach at addressing affordable, accessible and safe housing in our community. The initiative may include job training/skills development in construction/trades, land acquisition, and funding for rehabilitation and/or new construction of owner-occupied affordable housing and permanent supportive housing for those transitioning out of homelessness. The initiative may involve partnership with other public, non-profit and for-profit partners. This initiative will be focused in the southeast portion of the City in an area that is a Census Qualified Tract and home to a population with high rates of unemployment and poverty.	570685	570685	570685								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-003551	RCP-037678	Hood County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Hood County Jail- Prevention in Congregate Settings	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Hood County set aside funding to assist with prevention and spread of COVID-19 in the congregate jail setting.	2603	2603	2603								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-003552	RCP-039601	Rock County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Uniquely Wisconsin Tourism Campaign	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Although the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected many industries, the tourism industry has been among the most severely affected.  In order to increase tourism in the county and the state, Rock County was asked to participate in the “Uniquely Wisconsin” tourism campaign with up to 19 other Wisconsin counties.  Each county will contribute $60,000, creating a total campaign of $1.2 million.  This campaign was initiated by the Wisconsin Counties Association (WCA) in partnership with Discover Wisconsin.  The campaign will use a variety of methods to reach tourists, including full-length episodes of Discover Wisconsin, social media outreach, commercials, and podcasts.  Participating in this campaign will maximize exposure, and is more cost effective for Rock County than engaging in its own campaign.  By contributing to the “Uniquely Wisconsin” tourism campaign, Rock County will help bring more tourists back to Wisconsin, which will lead to increased revenue and employment in the tourism, travel, and hospitality industries that were negatively impacted by the pandemic.		60000	60000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-003553	RCP-036794	Auburn, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Auburn Historic and Cultural Sites Marketing Initiative	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The City of Auburn Historic and Cultural Sites were negatively impacted by the COVID 19 pandemic due to facility closures and significant loss of program and admission income. The Auburn Historic and Cultural Sites are collectively made up of the following facilities: The Seward House Museum, Cayuga Museum, Schweinfurth Memorial Art Center, Auburn Public Theater, Willard Memorial Chapel and the NYS Equal Rights Heritage Center. The Auburn Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) is a partner of the City and provides administrative support to the Auburn Historic and Cultural Sites. The City intends to partner with the Auburn Downtown BID to administer and deliver a downtown-wide marketing program entitled "Visit Auburn Initiative" as well as plan and support the Harriet Tubman Bicentennial Celebration of 2022 in cooperation with the National Park Service. To provide additional support to the downtown businesses, the City of Auburn intends to augment the annual Founder's Day Festival for the next 3 years.	250000	212040.22	175739.93								No			1 Imp General Public	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-003554	RCP-039601	Rock County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Broadband Consulting Services	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Broadband coverage is currently lacking in some of the more rural parts of Rock County, and expanding broadband coverage to more of the county’s residents is now a possibility with the use of ARPA funding.  However, Rock County has not been involved with broadband projects in the past, and staff do not have the expertise necessary to determine where and how broadband expansion will take place in the county.  In order to make informed decisions, the County’s Ad Hoc Broadband Committee decided that a consultant with knowledge and experience in broadband was needed.  Nokomis Networking was chosen as the consultant for Rock County.  This is the first step in the County’s plan to expand broadband coverage to more residents.  The County Board approved a contract for up to 158 hours of consulting, not to exceed a cost of $15,000.		6315.37	6315.37
TPN-003555	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Rehabilitation of Existing Detention Basins	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	First and foremost, when ARPA funding was released, the need for Infrastructural projects was glaringly apparent. But in order to solicit community input, a series of town hall meetings were conducted both virtually and socially distanced in the City owned movie theatre.  In addition, City Council members canvassed their wards to determine additional needs. Thus, In 2019 and just prior to the Pandemic the City of Granite City experienced  a heavy rain of 8-9 inches that fell in a two hour period, causing massive flooding. Rehabilitation of the existing Detention Basins is necessary as a result of massive flooding and severe damage to the storm water and sewer structure of the City. The items in this project that will insure clean drinking water, improve wastewater and storm water infrastructure include: grading and shaping ditches, reforestation removal, inlet cleaning, pump station cleaning, mowing, site restoration, fence removal and replacement and cleaning and televising the completed project area. This investment will support high quality infrastructure, avert disruptive and costly delays and promote efficiency in the infrastructure of the stormwater system in the City. The engineering costs of 15% are included in the cost of this project. The construction of this project will augment the existing infrastructure and avert disruptive and costly delays, repairs and promote efficiency in flood prevention/storm water flow.		201206.63	68445.94					No
TPN-003557	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Director of Homelessness Initiatives	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	To extend the funding for an existing grant-funded Director of Homelessness Initiatives position, administered by the Fire Department, to facilitate housing and social service opportunities for individuals experiencing homelessness.		566847.36	2342.8			*					No
TPN-003558	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Saratoga/Westmoreland Detention Basin Construction	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	In order to provide additional infrastructural support to the City, the construction of an extension and additional detention basin in the section of town known as the Saratoga and Westmoreland  catch basin was desperately needed.  In rebuilding the infrastructural landscape of the city, we insure that massive flooding and access to the minimum level of service and restoration will be completed to rehabilitate the storm water improvements. The addition of this specific catch basin includes excavation and detention basin, reforestation removal, a pump station, v-gutter ditch and seeding of Class 1 acerage. The engineering costs of 15% are included in the cost of this project.		45274.25	45059.75					No
TPN-003559	RCP-039402	Shelby County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Emergency Response Communication System	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Emergency Response Communication System infrastructure project designed to improve radio system infrastructure covering the entire county by expanding number of talk paths (capacity) available to 1st responders and improving the coverage area by adding 3 new sites in Pelham, Alabaster & Dunnavant/Vandiver.		4416473.94	4416473.94								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	6861820	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003560	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Buenger Rd Drainage Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The failing drainage system that exists in the city requires improvement as a result of years of flooding and infrastructural disrepair. The Buenger Road and Village Lane drainage improvement encompasses a large area in the center of the city. This project allows undergirding and repair of the existing structured drainage area. ARPA funding restores and repairs this critical area of improvement by providing several rehabilitative improvements including: mobilization and demobilization of drainage sewers, 12" water quality storm sewer, connection to existing structures, catch basin removal and full replacement, trench backfill, class B Pavement Patch, Type III, 10", PCC Driveway removal and replacement, 8", landscaping allotment, surface restoration and traffic control protection while project is under construction in this high traffic area of the city. All engineering costs of 15% are included in this project.		55795.52	55795.52					No
TPN-003561	RCP-037115	State Of Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	ARP Funding - CNA Training	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Minnesota Department of Military Affairs (DMA) and Minnesota National Guard (MNNG) is in the process of activating 1,000 service members (SMs) to augment critical health care areas of need is identified by the Minnesota Department of Health. The critical need area is for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). DMA and the MNNG have been tasked to provide CNAs to support of Long Term Care Facilities (LTCF), Transitional Care Facilitates (TCF), and anticipate augmenting other health care service organizations. The funding request is to fund the training and relevant licensure of SMs so that they can provide critical care functions back to the State of Minnesota during the COVID-19 pandemic.	882588.4	882588.4	882588.4								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003562	RCP-036022	Pinal County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Pinal County Final Mile Project	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Pinal County in partnership with the Pinal County Education Service Agency (PCESA) and Zayo Group, will used fixed wireless (CBRS) to deliver broadband service, instead of fiber, to each home within the county by installing thirty-eight 60 foot private LTE towers throughout Pinal County.	5000000	0	0
TPN-003563	RCP-037686	Amherst Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Emergency Operations Command Center Generator Installation	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Investment in Emergency Operations Command Center generator installation to respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic which serves as the location of Emergency Services Department. The Emergency Services Department main task is mitigating and preventing and responding to COVID-19 challenges. The EOC serves as a vaccination clinic and distribution center for Personal Protective Equipment and COVID test kits. It is available for use as a shelter that covers nearby LMI Districts.		243063.04	243063.04								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	243063.04	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003564	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Snowbird Lane Drainage Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Snowbird Lane Drainage project involves an extension of the storm sewer to allow for the overabundance of increased stormwater, as a result of a population growth in this area.  This will produce high-quality infrastructural investment in water, sewer and storm drainage, promoting efficiency and avoiding ongoing costly delays. This project begins with installation of the Catch Basin and connection to existing structures. The 12" quality storm sewers  and trench backfill will allow for smooth flow and surface restoration, ditch grading to complete the project. Class B Pavement patch, type III, 10" will finish up this rebuilt infrastructural landscape. The 12% engineering costs are included in this project.		63761	63761					No
TPN-003565	RCP-036401	City Of Austin, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Colony Park Sustainable Community Health Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This $1.5M ARPA allocation will support the development of the Colony Park Sustainable Community, which is a City and community led effort to develop 208 acres of City-owned property in northeast Austin. Specifically, the $1.5M will be used to construct street and public utility infrastructure for a Health and Wellness Center to be built by Central Health within the Loyola Town Center section of Colony Park Sustainable Community. The adjacent communities are among the most devastated by the COVID-19 pandemic, and there is currently no brick-and-mortar healthcare facility in this area of Austin.	1500000	0	0
TPN-003566	RCP-036794	Auburn, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Auburn Vacant, Abandoned, and Deteriorated (VAD) Property Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.23-Strong Healthy Communities: Demolition and Rehabilitation of Properties	The City of Auburn Vacant, Abandoned, and Deteriorated (VAD) Property Program was created to address VAD properties in the City's neighborhoods that have been disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 health and economic crisis. The City of Auburn intends to focus the VAD Property Program in the Qualifying Census Tract (QCT) #421. Based upon the Final Rule, the City may designate additional neighborhoods and/ or Census Tracts within the City that have been "disproportionately impacted classes" beyond the QCT as eligible areas for the VAD Property Program.	507679.6	399467.51	399467.51								No			15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003567	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Nameoki Ditch Roadway Structures & Drainage Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	One of the longest and largest ditch improvements, the Nameoki ditch structure, runs through the middle of the city from North to South and is situated near a highly trafficed area of the city.  Critical to rebuilding and stabilization of the infrastructural landscape of the city, this project entails a multi-faceted approach and will drive some of the biggest change in storm water improvements and flood prevention. Beginning with the Earth excavation and removal and replacement of 10 inch pavement, 8" driveways and 4" PCC sidewalk surrounding the area, the temp erosion control will serve to augment the structure. Seeding will be Class 2A along with the removal and replacement of curb and gutter structure and mobilization removal of the three existing structures. Traffic COntrol and protection is a critical component of this project along with the 15% engineering costs included in this project cost.		708153.54	708153.54					No
TPN-003568	RCP-036401	City Of Austin, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Arts Industry Support	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	These funds will support local arts and cultural contractors impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Current cultural contractors in the City of Austin’s Core and Cultural Heritage Festivals who received less than $10,000 in relief funding will receive 100% of their FY21 contract amount. Current cultural contractors in the City of Austin’s Core and Cultural Heritage Festivals who received less than $1,000,000 but more than $10,000 in relief funding will receive 85% of their FY21 contract amount.  Note: $506,400 from 5500-A341 will be used to offset additional Arts & Culture Non-Profit Relief Grants (See Project 5500-A340).	6000000	5988317.82	5905609.73
TPN-003569	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	23rd Street Ditch Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This is anticipated to be a 15 month project, as a result of the necessary stabilization and restructuring of the storm water ditch and flow to Horseshoe Lake, located on the perimeter of Granite City limits.  This ditch is critical to the improvement of wastewater and storm water infrastructural system overall in the city. These ARPA funds will help restore and repair this over taxed, aged and much needed improvement to the entire city. The beginning of this project will entail earth excavation and removal and replacement of a ^' chain link fence with a 12" chain link gate.  Special waste removal/disposal will be necessary as well as tree removal. An erosion control blanket will be installed along with temperature erosion control devices a silt fence and temp ditch checks. Inlet and pipe protection and a concrete flume replacement is necessary as well to insure safety. Seeding Class 2A. This will cover the Southwest end of the city. The costs of this project includes the 15% engineering, design and construction collectively.		30690.6	30690.6					No
TPN-003570	RCP-040330	Quincy, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Aid to nonprofit organizations	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Financial aid to nonprofit organizations due to negative economic impacts in the community		2704849	2704849								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-003572	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Twin 48s and Twin 60s Sewer Lining	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	At the beginning of the pandemic, a series of town hall virtual meetings and in-person canvassing took place to determine additional needs. In order to avert disruptive and costly delays, and promote efficiency in the overall upgrading of the storm sewer infrastructure, it is necessary to repair and replace the "Twin 48's and Twin 60's Sewer Lining of these two parallel pipes running through this municipality. This includes the mobilization and demobilization of these pipes, televising and cleaning of both the 48" and 60" sewer pre/post linings and the CIPP Lining for both the 48" and 60" sewers.  The construction also includes furnishing and installing both 8" and 6" Set-over Manholes.  As a result of this extensive project, traffic control and protection of workers is critical to insure safety of same.  The costs of this project is inclusive of design, construction and engineering fees of 15%.		231.75	231.75					No
TPN-003573	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	City-Wide Curb and Gutter / Inlet Removal and Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	As a result of the extensive City Wide Catch Basin removal and replacement and the many infrastructural projects for storm water improvements, City Wide curb and gutter/inlet removal and replacement is also necessary. Rebuilding the infrastructural landscape of the City is further mitigated by recent extensive flooding and heavy rains of-8-9 inches in a two hour period just prior to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, the deterioration of the curbs and gutters within the city is extensive, as a result of flooding.  In allowing for the broad range of necessary investments that improve access to clean drinking water, storm drainage and wastewater infrastructure, the ARPA funding will restore and repair these inlets, curbs and gutters. Included in these replacement and repairs include removal of existing damaged curb, gutter and storm water catch basin concrete. In addition the replacement would include trench and backfill, repair with class B pavement patch 10" and Landscape allotment, combination curb and gutter replacement to existing sidewalks, and pavement infrastructure. Cleaning and televising of same is necessary.  Also traffic control and protection is critical.  Tree and stump removal and reforestation is vital to finalize the completion of this project.  The project costs also include the Engineering fees of 15%.		182228.95	182228.95					No
TPN-003574	RCP-036401	City Of Austin, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Community Navigator Program	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Community Navigators will help support local businesses, non-profit organizations, and creative professionals impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic by offering application assistance and technical assistance for local, state, and federal relief programs. EDD will track the number of service hours provided to beneficiaries, as well as the amount of any local, state, and federal relief secured by beneficiaries that receive assistance through the program.	500000	426719	266436.76
TPN-003576	RCP-036401	City Of Austin, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Childcare/Childhood/Family Connects	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project was replaced with 9100-A351.	0	0	0
TPN-003578	RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Baker Tilly - Pandemic Response Advisors	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	St Louis County contracted with Baker Tilly to confirm that all the projects we do will be in line with the guidance.		78557.35	78557.35
TPN-003579	RCP-036401	City Of Austin, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Re:WorkNOW 2.0	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Austin entered into a contract with Workforce Solutions Capital Area (WFS) to offer workforce development training for low-income Austin residents experiencing unemployment or underemployment due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The target population for workforce development services include City of Austin residents who are unemployed, underemployed, or who are earning less than 85% of State Median Income. The workforce development training program works with individuals to determine training interests, enroll them in safe, short-term job training courses, on-the-job training and apprenticeship opportunities, and provides job search and placement assistance, including subsidized employment. The Program also provides an array of supportive services including childcare, transportation assistance, digital access, and educational assistance stipends. Training courses align with the Targeted Occupation List identified for Central Texas by WFS and the Texas Workforce Commission. Examples of short-term training courses previously provided include Software Developer, Commercial Driver’s License, Multi-Craft Core Curriculum, Certified Production Technician, Phlebotomy, HVAC, Administrative/Office, and Medical Assistant. The target population for these services include City of Austin residents who are unemployed, underemployed, or who are earning less than 85% of State Median Income.	6600000	6600000	4491751.75
TPN-003581	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Agenda and Meeting Minutes Management	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The Covid-19 pandemic has underscored the importance of communication during a public health crisis and the necessity of same, and has forced local governments to change how we internally operate and interact with citizens. The City began convassing residents through aldermanic council members going door to door within their wards to survey citizens on what needs they thought existed. In addition, a series of virtual town hall meetings were utilized to further assess and understand what the community felt might be critical to insure common purpose in building up the city and work towards a common purpose and goal in the process. One of the extreme problems created by the public health crisis involved a great deal of social distancing and has required the City to engage in using ARPA funding for  a city council agenda and meeting management system which enables both city officials, community stakeholders/citizens and to recover information and lost revenues by using this system for both information and enforcement of code. Clerical staff has had to work remotely throughout the pandemic and additionally, the need for citizens to access governmental agendas and documents has had to go online. This purchase of the Virtual City Hall CivicClerk management system enables us to operate more effectively for the community and citizens. The use of this software program further addresses the needs of the municipality during pandemic recovery and creates this virtual city hall that is easily accessible without having to be in person at city hall. We are confident that this purchase represents not only a solution to the short-term pandemic needs but the functionality for continuity of the flow of business and operating expense stabilization, making for an effective communication flow city wide during and after the public health crisis.		58220.02	58220.02								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003582	RCP-036401	City Of Austin, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Community-Owned Food Retail Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Community-Owned Food Retail Initiative supports the development of a cooperative and/or non-profit grocery store in an underserved area of Austin. Funding is used to contract with a consulting team that can lead community organizing, conduct a business and feasibility analysis, and pilot a community-owned grocery store concept. Critical milestones include: (1) recruiting and training a committed Leadership Team to act as a starting Board of Directors for the store, (2) recruiting a founding membership cohort of at least 300 households and/or community organizations, and (3) demonstrating a viable business plan and store vision.	500000	500000	47060
TPN-003583	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Virtual City Hall	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The COVID-19 health crisis has necessitated the communication systems of local government to change the way information is disseminated to the general public and citizenry.  Moreover, and as a result of the pandemic and the need to close City Hall for a long period of time, there has been a high growth in virtual information received and sent to the public. In order to efficiently communicate and expedite business, including billing, city licenses, aldermanic council communique and all city clerk, city treasurer tax information, the current servers needed to be enhanced and it was necessary to stabilize the system.  In augmenting the current system, this serves to minimize interaction with the public and provide a safer virtual environment in which to conduct the business of the people.  Adding a third node to the Virtual Machine Servers or VMware at City Hall and the Police and Fire departments is critical to supporting this project.  Two new physical servers were added to the virtual machine environment,  which increased the number of physical servers from 2 to 3 at each site, providing better fault tolerance and greater processing resources for the dozens of virtual machines operating at each site.  These virtual machines are responsible for running all of the application software that is necessary to meet the needs of the general public.  This is a huge improvement in information flow to the public and we are confident that this will benefit service delivery, not only during a pandemic but ongoing as this has sustainability. The utilization of ARPA funds for the purchase of this VMware and this expenditure will definitely impact the City of Granite City for years to come.		69510.19	69510.19								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003584	RCP-039691	Grand Rapids City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Workplace safety at city buildings	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	This project is focused on ensuring safety in all buildings at City Hall as well as for workers who need the capability to work remotely. Purchases include labels for health screening checks as well as mobile hot spot devices for employees to continue remote work.		67655.97	67655.97								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003585	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Small Business Grant Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	After the City was notified of the existing ARPA funding, the quest began to identify the needs of the community through a couple of venues, including a series of virtual town hall meetings, canvassing of citizens by aldermanic council members for each of their wards and a survey.  After careful review of the interim rule, and experiencing severe economic hardship, it was decided to begin with taking a look at assisting local businesses in recovery from the public health crisis.  Rebuilding our local business economy through small business support/non-profits and undergirding the economic infrastructure is critical to the revitalization of the city. The City of Granite City is providing financial support through an ARPA Small Business Grant Program for qualified small businesses to rebuild our local economy that has been negatively impacted by the on-going State and Federal Executive orders, business restrictions and slowdown/closure of businesses as a result of COVID-19.  The first step, prior to letting out the grants,  was identifying the need to meet the pandemic response needs of businesses and to engage in best practice by developing a procedure and policy approved by the City Council.  The overall goal of the city was to provide interventions to allow sustainability to the business community and to mitigate the harmful consequences of COVID-19.  The Community Development office of Madison County, Illinois conducted a survey and questionnaire in concert with the City of Granite City to determine economic impact and need. Therefore in the initial grant stages, the program provided a maximum of $15,000 grant to help offset costs of existing business and businesses that opened during the pandemic to assist in handling COVID related expenses and retaining employees. Grants were distributed in increments of $5,000 for 1-5 FTE; $10,000 for 6-10 FTE and $15,000 for 11+ employees.  Food service establishments, retail and other non-essential businesses were heavily impacted by Illinois State Orders. Funds were only to be used for business related costs, wages, vendor payments, rent, utilities, or other business related expenses such as PPE or facility changes necessitated by COVID-19 to mitigate the financial impact and spread of the virus.  A business eligibilty checklist was distributed which includes criterion such as location within city limits, business license, demonstration of ongoing business, not a home-based business, HUD income guidelines for owners income, located within Low to Moderate Income area. Disproportionately represented individuals were given enhanced priority. An application packet was provided on the Granite City website and in-person at City Hall. A help/assistance hotline was also provided and visits to local businesses to assist in the application process has been ongoing.  Business continue to experience hardships of diverse nature and a follow polling of businesses has assessed just how many closed permanently and which are still financially fragile and struggling.  These potential long-term economic consequences underscore the continued need for robust policy support. Thus far, out of 29 applicants, 25 small businesses have received funding.  These collective businesses employ 163 people and primarily received monies in the CARES Act and each have received funding through the ARPA monies thus far.		210000	210000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-003588	RCP-039691	Grand Rapids City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	PPE for workplace safety	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	"Purchase of masks, gowns, wipes, gloves and hand sanitizer for workplace safety for employees in the field and at workstations in City facilities."		45588.58	45588.58								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003589	RCP-039691	Grand Rapids City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Insurance fund reimbursement for COVID related medical costs	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	Reimbursement for costs of medical expenditures related to COVID treatment for City employees.		1494380.8	1494380.8								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003590	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Affordable Housing Development Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Through the process of determining need by conducting virtual city hall meetings, attendance of citizens at Ward meetings, and meeting with area realtors, bankers and rehabbers, the City developed a pilot program for Residential Rehab and In-fill new construction using the property tax abatement component of the Southwestern Granite City Enterprise Zone. This program looked to incentivize significant rehab of existing older homes for the disproportionately impacted neighborhood and purchase lots to provide areas for new construction on these in-fill lots. These lots would provide opportunity for large scale subdivision development in an over 80% low to Mod area with a 19.3% Rate of Poverty in the Downtown area where a large population designated as a disproportionately impacted diverse  group of residents was impacted heavily by COVID-19. The purpose of utilizing ARPA funds to address the needs of this population was to provide affordable housing opportunity to them and make an impact in this area by stabilizing, strengthening and revitalizing these neighborhoods.  In addition the intent is to prevent substandard rentals, reduce vagrancy, squatting and other unsafe housing by incentivizing owner occupied use.  This would in turn reduce ownership of properties by City and County and reduce operational costs to Granite City with reduced police, fire and building and zoning calls or complaints. The 13 properties that have been purchased thus far will serve to support affordable housing options  for these residents, creating sustainable and safe neighborhoods. We hope to continue in this housing development and offer incentives in the Enterprise Zone of Granite City.		13410	13410								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	60000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003595	RCP-036417	Anoka County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Employee Assistance Program	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Anoka County recognizes the strain the pandemic has placed on employees' mental health, dealing with secondary trauma, family events, etc. To enhance the Employee Assistance Program a contracted onsite professional was added to support employees and their families through the following: assessments and program advocacy, referrals, management consultations, critical incident response support & training.	1000000	436136.73	436136.73								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003597	RCP-039691	Grand Rapids City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Safety workers responding to COVID incidents	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Payroll expenses for public health and safety employees.		2865825.01	2865825.01			201					No
TPN-003600	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Drone for Housing Inspections	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	When the COVID-19 public health crisis was emergent, already existing Low to Moderate owned dwellings and areas of the city had experienced a great deal of blight and decay. A large number of vacant buildings were being utilized and inhabited by homeless in addition to being vandalized to the point of disrepair. The City of Granite City has the understanding that these areas and dwellings are essential to the revitalization of the City and the first step to providing assistance, was to identify the need of the homeowners and derelict building owners through a series of town hall meetings and by canvassing the low to mod income neighborhoods via the Aldermanic Council members. Aldermen met with ward members and canvassed their wards to determine the impact of the once in a century COVID-19 pandemic effects. In determining needs, the city inspection department also began to canvass homeowners and owners of the derelict buildings only to discover the severe impact on households within the city limits as a result of the pandemic. One of the primary needs to was to view some of the unsafe and uninhabitable structures from above to determine safety to neighboring structures. In order to assess the severity of these buildings in a safely distanced manner so as to minimize contact and personal interaction with the public, a drone was purchased. This would also allow the City to determine ARPA funding to be spent on purchase of properties, blight removal and safe housing support and other housing assistance to homeowners, landlords and tenants, including in particular in low-income workers and the city's diverse and underserved diverse population.  The city would then desire to purchase properties to assist in the re-building, but first needed to assess in a safe manner. The Drone has served to view unhoused persons makeshift dwellings in order to offer other housing assistance to same.  The Drone will continue to be utilized to review the dwellings and support homeowners and landlords in the rehabilitative process throughout the entire city.		7999.99	7999.99								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	7999.99	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003601	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Children's Justice Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This is in an effort to prevent/mitigate COVID-19. ARPA funds are allowed to be used for capital investments in public facilities to meet pandemic operational needs, such as physical plant improvements to public hospitals and health clinics or adaptations to public buildings to implement COVID–19 mitigation tactics. The Children's Justice Court had been located in a shared space with the State of Utah. This space made social distancing nearly impossible.  County made decision to buy a home within Brigham City and remodel it to meet the needs of the Children's Justice Center.	266716.7	266716.7	266716.7
TPN-003602	RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Grant Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Upon the release of the ARPA/SLFRF funding, the newly elected mayor of Granite City established a committee of individuals to review the funding opportunity and review the Interim Rule that supported relief efforts for COVID-19.  In doing so, members included the Mayor,  a representative from the City Comptroller's office, Economic Development Director, Aldermen, City Grant Coordinator/Consultant and City Attorney, to discuss a course of action to begin the process of supporting the economic stability for households and businesses heavily impacted by the historical pandemic. The City ARPA team decided the best course of action was to utilize the services of those most experienced with grant administration and economic development, which included the Grant Coordinator and the Economic Development Director for the City of Granite City. In addition, a project manager to oversee most of the infrastructural projects was named in the person of the Chief Administrator to the Mayor. Therefore, three individuals are responsible for the oversight and development of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund programming, aligning closely related activities for the purpose of achieving a common goal.  In addition, they determine what existing services needed attention or funding in whole or in part by the SLFRF and whether or not each of the projects approved by the City Mayor and Aldermanic Council align with the standards of ARPA and the Interim Rule. The next step in determining the needs and providing assistance was to bring community stakeholders to the table in the form of a series of virtual and in-person town hall meetings and canvassing neighborhoods through Ward meetings with the individual aldermanic council members.  One fact important to note is that in August of 2019, the City experienced a flood with 8-9 inches of rain in a 2 hour period of time. This flood precipitated 847 claims against the city which was an already struggling community.  Extensive loss of wages, property and loss of services continued for several weeks for the citizens of this town. Less than 5 months after this devastating flood, COVID-19 again paralyzed the community, so addressing the many needs including support for households, small businesses, impacted industry, essential workers, and the much needed investment in water, sewer and broadband infrastructure had been magnified.  The  team felt the necessary actions to control the pandemic had to be navigated by those most familiar with the City.  The City did not engage an outside agency to administer or report the ARPA compliance and documentation. It is important to note that the adopted budget is 2% of the overall ARPA funding received.		490909.26	489559.26
TPN-003603	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	DMV Building	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This is in an effort to prevent/mitigate COVID-19. ARPA funds are allowed to be used for capital investments in public facilities to meet pandemic operational needs, such as physical plant improvements to public hospitals and health clinics or adaptations to public buildings to implement COVID–19 mitigation tactics. This building will have a drive-thru and will allow for great social distancing inside this building and also at the justice court/attorney's office.	1526888.92	1526888.92	1526888.92
TPN-003604	RCP-039691	Grand Rapids City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Assistance to local nonprofits	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Assistance to nonprofits to help run events. Grants provided on an as needed basis.		680533.08	680533.08								No
TPN-003605	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Rodeo Grounds - Ticket Booth/Concession Stand/Bathrooms	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This is in an effort to prevent/mitigate COVID-19. ARPA funds are allowed to be used for capital investments in public facilities to meet pandemic operational needs, such as physical plant improvements to public hospitals and health clinics or adaptations to public buildings to implement COVID–19 mitigation tactics. These improvements will also provide aid to impacted industries. ARPA recognizes that certain industries, such as tourism, travel, and hospitality, were disproportionately and negatively impacted by the COVID–19 public health emergency. Aid may include assistance to implement COVID–19 mitigation and infection prevention measures to enable safe resumption of tourism, travel, and hospitality services. Funds may be spent as aid for a planned expansion or upgrade of tourism, travel, and hospitality facilities delayed due to the pandemic. Will replace the current building used by the Lions Club.	770500	128870.85	128870.85
TPN-003607	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Commission Room AV Revamp	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Increase AV capabilities in the Commission Chambers - allow for streaming of meetings.  Mitigate exposure to COVID 19 through technology.	48340.17	48340.17	48340.17
TPN-003613	RCP-036417	Anoka County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	COVID-19 Vaccination	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project is necessary as part of the county’s COVID-19 response, mitigation, and prevention activities and includes costs for supplies, materials, and contracts with vendors. Current expenditures include costs related to providing vaccinations for COVID-19 to the community through county administration as well as through contracts with outside parties to administer vaccines.	233001	233000.54	233000.54								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003614	RCP-036417	Anoka County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	General Physical Facility Modifications	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project allows the county to take the appropriate steps necessary to implement safety measures that mitigate the transmission of the virus including, including but not limited to items such as replacing outdated HVAC systems with new ones and the installation of aerosol monitors.	51208.57	51208.57	51208.57								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003615	RCP-036417	Anoka County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	COVID Workers Comp Claims	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To claim workers comp related expenses from claims that are incurred due to an employee having COVID-19 as the county is a self-funded plan.	263832.18	263832.18	263832.18								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003616	RCP-036417	Anoka County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	COVID Health Ins Claims	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To claim health insurance related expenses from claims that are incurred due to an employee having COVID-19 as the county is a self-funded plan.	3214420.5	3214420.5	3214420.5								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003617	RCP-036417	Anoka County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Personal Protective Measures	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project allows the county to take the appropriate steps necessary to implement safety measures that mitigate the transmission of the virus including, but not limited to, materials and supplies for personal protection, enhanced cleaning for minimizing exposure, materials, and supplies for ongoing telework, and other supplies for additional protective measures as needed. To keep employees and citizens safe by providing the ability for employees to work remotely, citizens to visit remotely and other personal protective equipment purchases.	148195.04	148195.04	148195.04								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003618	RCP-039691	Grand Rapids City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	National Research Center Inc	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	"Purchasing of survey tool to improve service delivery of City projects. Online portal accessible to the public to collect feedback effectiveness of City services to better meet community needs related to public safety, access to City services, etc. "		24700	24700								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	30000
TPN-003619	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	AM Radio Transmitter	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To increase coverage over the entire county for radio communication coverage.  We have installed 7 Low power AM Radio Emergency Transmitters and have one mounted in an auxiliary communications trailer.	12061	12061	12061
TPN-003639	RCP-037699	Sioux City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	38th St Booster Station	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The 38th Street Reservoirs were built in 1937. In 1969 the structure housing the main piping was converted to an actual booster station to feed the Indian Hills Water Tower. This structure is three stories underground and over the years the pumps, piping, and electrical have deteriorated due to the humid conditions of the building. Rather than rehabilitate the old structure in an unsafe environment a new booster station has been proposed which will sit northwest of the existing structure on park property.	3300000	2573445.29	1316206.09					No
TPN-003660	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	TTAB Grants	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Box Elder County’s Tourism Tax Advisory Board (TTAB) has created a small grants program. TTAB will award these funds to events that can demonstrate an ability to draw out of town visitors to their event.	215303	215303	215303
TPN-003661	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Golden Spike	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The County Is home to the Golden Spike National Historical Park. This historic park witnessed one of the most important accomplishments of the 19th century. On May 10, 1869, officials of the Central Pacific Railroad and Union Pacific Railroad met here to drive four symbolic spikes (two gold), celebrating the completion of the first transcontinental railroad. The Last Spike Ceremony is reenacted every year on the May 10th anniversary. The County is working with a non-profit to construct a large golden spike monument to celebrate the County's heritage. Hope is that it will increase tourism to the County.	200000	200000	200000
TPN-003662	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Attorney	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	County has hired outside party (Corey Sherwin) to assist with backlog of cases.	1551.6	1551.6	1551.6
TPN-003663	RCP-037637	Wyoming, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Treasurer's Office Drive Thru	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Improvements to the existing Treasurer’s office transaction window and site improvements to the existing drive-up lane and curb island at City Hall to provide a safer and more efficient experience for guests, citizens and staff to conduct City business.		73646.84	73646.84								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	73646.84	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003664	RCP-039691	Grand Rapids City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Homeless Outreach Team	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Provide social workers to accompany fires and police offers on mental health related calls for homeless populations. Provides immediate support and quicker processing to access mental health services.		332963.55	223976.12								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-003665	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	BRAG - Regional Planning & Project Development	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This activity will build economic resilience against future pandemic events and other economic disruptions by supporting industry diversification, workforce development, and workforce housing availability and affordability. Funds will be used to provide staff to work with regional stakeholders to leverage existing and future funding opportunities that address critical community needs.	200000	200000	200000
TPN-003666	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sewer_Family Support Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace main sewer line at the Box Elder Family Support Center.	12000	12000	12000
TPN-003667	RCP-040556	Municipality Of Bayamon, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Esc. Orama Padilla	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This activity consists of performing repairs to a public school in the Municipality. The Municipality identified certain safety hazards in the design and construction of a public school (Carlos Orama Padilla School) within its boundaries. Thus, the Municipality will perform structural repairs that are necessary to mitigate the safety hazards identified.  Carlos Orama Padilla- Magnolia Gardens School: It is made up of 5 one-story buildings. The contractor will remedy the short column condition as follows: 62 columns will be impacted with the “infill” procedure using 2 different methods called “infill” A and “infill” B: “Infill A” - 26 columns: remove 2 windows per column (one on each side), cut 3-foot wall (or the width of the existing window to be removed) in the area below the window, and build 6-foot structural wall ”Thick in these spaces (approx. 9 ft. High) with # 4 rebar layer in both directions without rings. These walls will be anchored to the existing footings. The top of the existing shoe is approximately 37 ”below the interior floor level. They are 13 ”deep and continuous. The concrete will be 3,000 psi and must comply with the tests required by the "American Concrete Institute" as established by the current codes in Puerto Rico.	187000	187000	187000
TPN-003687	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	County Website	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Update the County's website - make it easier for citizens to access County without physically coming to the different county buildings.	41300	41300	41300
TPN-003688	RCP-039691	Grand Rapids City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Expansion of broadband in City	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	"Monthly costs associated with providing free wifi access in parks. Plan to expand public wifi access to all parks in Grand Rapids to support healthcare, work, educational activities, and other community needs."		12169.8	12169.8					No			No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003690	RCP-036417	Anoka County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	EA Move - Blaine Building	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project renovates existing government property to create a safer environment for staff and citizens, including creating workstations with glass barriers between the worker and the public.	3408791.43	1522061.7	1522061.7								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-003692	RCP-037699	Sioux City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Asset Renewal #2	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Asset Renewal #2 will add complete mixed mesophilic anaerobic bioreactor capacity by refurbishing two (2) secondary reactors into primary reactors. The additional bioreactor capacity will improve solids destruction and biogas production. This project also includes a high strength waste (HSW) receiving station. The HSW receiving station allows for the separation of waste to ensure the D5 and D3 biogas types are completely separated.	9088687	585739	251633.48					No
TPN-003693	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Off-Site Storage	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	County wants to locate its data at an off-site location.	26145.69	26145.69	26145.69
TPN-003713	RCP-037699	Sioux City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	UV Treatment	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Ultraviolet (UV) light is a disinfection method for destroying disease-causing organisms in wastewater. The UV light destroys the genetic material of microorganisms which prevents them from reproducing, this is the last treatment step before discharge to the Missouri River. The UV Disinfection CIP will replace the existing sodium hypochlorite and sodium bisulfite disinfection system.	8500000	8500000	727028.4					No
TPN-003714	RCP-037637	Wyoming, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Court Building Upgrades	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Adding additional attorney offices, a conference room, a workroom and lobby space in the existing basement of the District Court Building to provide designs to improve work areas, better utilize existing space, and provide a safer and more efficient experience for guests, citizens and staff to  conduct City business.		441846.14	441846.14								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	441846.14	1 Imp General Public	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-003715	RCP-037341	Woonsocket, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Water Meter Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation	Replacement of approximately 9,450 outdated water meters ranging in size from 5/8 inch to 2 inch with new water meters complete with encoder registers and RF modules. The new water meters will employ Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) that enables functionality beyond normal meter reading, such as reads on water meters in real time and leak and tamper detection.  Water meter replacement is listed as an eligible project in both the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Handbook (DWSRF) and the Clean Water State Revolving Fund Handbook (CWSRF) and thus, is eligible for ARPA funding. The CWSRF describes water meter replacement as reducing demand for water capacity through reduced water consumption. The DWSRF qualifies water meter replacement as a “Green Project” that improves water system management and conservation by accounting for, and thereby reducing water losses and decreasing energy usage. The project is expected to go out to RFP during the spring of 2022, and once vendors are selected, take approximately two years to complete.	4000000	0	0
TPN-003735	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Fairgrounds EOC Backup	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Add capabilities at the fairgrounds so that it can serve as a backup EOC. The fine arts building will serve as the backup EOC	97271.7	97271.7	97271.7
TPN-003736	RCP-040556	Municipality Of Bayamon, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Road and Infrastructure Improvements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Under this activity, the Municipality will enhance the maintenance and improvement of its road infrastructure.  Specifically, the Municipality will provide cole milling, pavement, road marking, and other related activities through an independent contractor. This activity will allow the Municipality to increase the public road infrastructure maintenance and improvements for the benefit of its visitor and residents.	10000000	10000000	10000000
TPN-003739	RCP-035997	Escambia County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Escambia County Pensacola Bay Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Provided the Pensacola Bay Center with an increase to the fiscal Year 2021 Budget in the amount of $350,000 for lost revenue in 2020. The Pensacola Bay Center is an indoor arena located in Pensacola FL. It is owned by Escambia County and operated by ASM Global. The Bay Center has capacity of 8,049 for hockey games and as much as 10,000 for non-hockey events. During the Coronavirus pandemic in 2020 the Pensacola Bay Center lost substantial revenue due to canceled games and events. • Total of 250 events canceled or rescheduled o 20 Assembly o 5 Banquet o 5 Concerts o 1 Entertainment o 6 Family Events o 164 Meetings o 44 Saenger Theater o 5 Hockey Games • In addition to lost revenue they lost 12 employees and had to furlough the remaining 12 staff members and lost approximately 15,384 in staff hours. • We have allocated the Pensacola Bay Center $350,000 in the Expenditure Category Negative Economic Impacts although their Revenue Loss was much larger: o 2019 Revenue = $6,023,822.57 o 2020 Projected Revenue based on 4.10% growth = $6,270,799.30 o 2020 Actual Revenue = $2,064,747.36 o Lost Revenue in 2020 = $4,206,051.94	350000	350000	350000								No			1 Imp General Public	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-003741	RCP-037637	Wyoming, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Hall Kiosk	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	The addition of the security kiosk station will improve safety while communicating information more efficiently to citizens and guests that visit City Hall.  The kiosk will also serve as a screening station during a public health emergency.		17826.1	17826.1								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	20000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003786	RCP-037699	Sioux City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Outer Dr Pressure & Storage	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	This CIP allows for new water infrastructure to be placed along Outer Drive extended, 28th Street, the Hwy 75 bypass, and South to accommodate expected growth soon. As development is beginning along Outer Drive and 28th Street, concerns have been raised regarding water pressure in the area with the construction of the new jail. With that, there are several other parcels in this area that will be developed in the near future creating the need for water infrastructure in order to provide a reliable source of pressure.	0	0	0					No
TPN-003787	RCP-037699	Sioux City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Southbridge Drainage Ditch	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Southbridge Drainage Ditch will provide for a stormwater outlet for the development of the north area of the Southbridge Industrial Park to reach its maximum potential.	1000000	673807	226350.72					No
TPN-003789	RCP-040556	Municipality Of Bayamon, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Premium Pay to Municipality's Eligibly Workers	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The Municipality will compensate “premium pay” based on the followings: 1. Eligible workers providing eligible duties as declared by the Mayor; 2. Eligible workers duties will be calculated for 3 months: August 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020; and 3. Payment will be based at $10 by eligible hours.	0	0	0		1236
TPN-003791	RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Justice Center Remodel	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This is in an effort to prevent/mitigate COVID-19. ARPA funds are allowed to be used for capital investments in public facilities to meet pandemic operational needs, such as physical plant improvements to public hospitals and health clinics or adaptations to public buildings to implement COVID–19 mitigation tactics. As the DMV is moved to its new building, the County will remodel the old space. This space will be used the County Attorney's Office and other departments.	0	0	0
TPN-003792	RCP-037637	Wyoming, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Police Flock Camera System	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	Purchase stationary license plate and vehicle recognition cameras to enhance the efforts of the Department of Public Safety to reduce violent crime and, specifically, shooting incidents.		30000	30000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	30000
TPN-003794	RCP-037699	Sioux City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	41st St Storm Sewer	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project consists of extending a storm sewer outfall in the 41st Street right-of-way from Hamilton Blvd. west to Perry Creek. This project borders the north boundary of the Country Club Golf Course. The current drainage way consists of a small ravine that is eroding.	273834.38	273834.38	273834.38					No
TPN-003795	RCP-037699	Sioux City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Floyd Park Golf Course Storm Sewer Impr	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project consists of the rerouting of the underground drainage coming from Glenn Avenue to a ground surface drainage way. The existing metal storm sewer on the golf course is failing and causing erosion on the course that is not easily repaired by staff. This project will provide a more natural drainage way that will better protect the golf course and will be able to be maintained through normal maintenance operations.	287603	287603	287603					No
TPN-003798	RCP-039752	Monroe, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Police/Fire Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	"Premium Pay of $2,000 per year for essential sworn police officers and firefighters that have put their physical well being at risk to meet the daily needs of the community and provide care for others."		101276	101276		60
TPN-003799	RCP-037699	Sioux City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	S Royce and Meyer Ave	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project consists of replacement of approximately 150 feet of 60-inch storm sewer and outlet at S. Royce St. and Myers Ave. During routine inspection, Field Services crews discovered that the 60” storm sewer that transects this intersection has deteriorated and requires replacement.  The outfall at the southwest corner of the intersection has also eroded and needs rip rap or some other flow dissipater to prevent further erosion along with grouting and floor rehabilitation.	545107	545107	545107
TPN-003801	RCP-036785	Rockingham County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The County is using Revenue Replacement for the provision of government services, mainly emergency response expenditures.	10000000	10000000	10000000
TPN-003804	RCP-035997	Escambia County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Escambia County Volunteer Fire Fighters	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Escambia County’s full time Fire Fighters received $1,000 in hazard pay if they met the below criteria so we felt it was only fair for our Volunteer Firefighters who met the same criteria to also receive the same hazard pay. To qualify for the $1,000 hazard payment, the firefighters had to meet the following criteria:   • Been a firefighter on or before March 1, 2020 through August 31, 2021. • Meet the threshold of 25% of the first 850 calls (or total calls for the above time if station calls do not total 850 calls) for the station for the above timeframe. • Have a minimum of 96 hours of training complete. • Not suspended during the above period. All reporting was gathered and reviewed, and we had 38 volunteer firefighters receive the $1,000 hazard pay for a total of $38,000.	40907	40907	40907		38
TPN-003805	RCP-038826	Montebello, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Provision of Government Services, Fiscal Year 2021-22	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Provision of government services for the period of July 1 - December 31, 2021 based on a revenue loss calculation performed using the calendar year method, total SLFRF award to the City of Montebello was $16,764,058, with the first tranch received in May, 2021 of $8,382,029.  Total expenditures for the July - December 2021 period represent 50% of the first tranch amount.		0	0
TPN-003808	RCP-037699	Sioux City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Amer Relief Plan Supplemental Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Supplemental pay for eligible employees	249938	249938	249938		788
TPN-003810	RCP-035997	Escambia County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Escambia County Employees Increased Health Plan Costs 2022	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Escambia County like many others are experiencing an increase in Medical Plan costs to their employees in 2022 due to the COVID19 Pandemic.  After researching and receiving carrier quotes our board was faced with a difficult decision of keeping the budget balanced and not increasing the employee’s costs significantly.  The board voted on the better option for the employees and authorized the difference in plan costs in the amount of $340,043.00 to be paid through our American Rescue Plan funds. Escambia County currently has 1,578 active employees on one of our Medical Plans.    Escambia County budgeted $24,976,936.00 in 2021 for our share of employee medical plans with a choice to increase the budget in 2022 by either Plan A at 12.3% or Plan B at 10.9%.  While both plans would not only increase the cost to the county but also to the employee the board voted to incur more of the cost to allow less of the impact to the employees.  To allow us to do that they board approved the payment of the difference between Plan A and Plan B of $340,043.00 to be paid by the American Rescue Plan funds.	340043	340043	340043
TPN-003811	RCP-037581	Dekalb County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	2021 Revenue Loss Calculation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue loss calculation based on 2019 to 2020 fiscal year.		4160670	4160670
TPN-003812	RCP-035851	Yonkers City, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Provisions of Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	PROVISIONS OF GOVERNMENT SERVICES		87486480	87486480
TPN-003817	RCP-036147	City of Modesto, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	RadCard Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The Relief Across Downtown card may be used by consumers at participating businesses located within  the Modesto Downtown area which is a qualified tract number 06099001800 (18.00).  Project funds were awarded to the Downtown Modesto Partnership (DUNS 116896514), a California Non-Profit Public Benefit Corporation. The sponsoring agency transferred a lump sum payment to subrecipient awardee for the purposes of promoting small businesses within the downtown area, a qualifying area designated by HUD as disadvantaged 18.00. The Relief Across Downtown (RAD) Program, made a redeemable “gift card” available to downtown customers. Local consumers load funds to an app on their mobile device which were automatically matched up to $100 on a 1:1 ratio (doubled) with ARPA funds. The RAD card may be used at participating business that is located within a the disadvantaged area designated HUD tract 18.00.		708500	708500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003818	RCP-035997	Escambia County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	City of Pensacola Roger Scott Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Website - https://www.rogerscotttennis.com/ Roger Scott Tennis Center is Northwest Florida’s largest Tennis facility located in both Escambia County and the City of Pensacola.  We entered an Interlocal agreement for the Roger Scott Tennis Center Improvement Project, in the amount of $1,302,545.50, with the City of Pensacola paying the remaining project costs. Escambia County entered an Interlocal agreement with the City of Pensacola to help cover the costs for the Roger Scott Tennis Center Improvement project.  The City is the owner of the Roger Scott Tennis Center within the city limits however it is also in Escambia County and utilized by citizens outside of the city limits.  The County and the City have determined that it is in the best interest of the citizens to provide for the renovations. Roger Scott Tennis Center is not only a Tennis Center for Escambia County and the City of Pensacola it also holds several adult clinics, junior activities, leagues, tournaments, summer camps and partners with Tennis-4-Everyone.  Some of these include: • Tennis-4-Everyone, Inc. is a nonprofit organization founded in 2001 that provides free services to our local youth.  They do not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion (creed), gender, gender expression, age, national origin (ancestry), disability, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or military status, in any of its activities or operations.   Each summer, Tennis-4-Everyone assists with a free Racquet Round Up at several local courts including Roger Scott Tennis Center, reaching over 500 children from the local community.  In the summer of 2015, Tennis-4-Everyone offered scholarships for 14 foster and guardian ad litem children to attend a week of Roger Scott Tennis Center summer camp. • Summer camp for ages 5 to 12 years old for 5 days that includes tennis instruction, swimming, and lunches. • Pink Ribbon Tennis Tournament supporting the Pink Ribbon charitable organization supporting the local fight against breast cancer.  • Bud Light Charity Challenge is one of Pensacola’s largest and most anticipated tournaments of the year!  This even benefits Arc Gateway, an organization that provides the best possible life experiences for more than 800 children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and Pensacola Sports, a private 501©3 non-profit agency that focuses on education, inspiration and participation in various team, individual, amateur and professional sports activities. The estimated project cost is $3,554,399.75.  This specification includes resurfacing 12 asphalt tennis courts on the south and central rows and recoating 5 tennis courts on the north row.	1302545.5	1302545.5	0								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	3554399.75	1 Imp General Public	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-003822	RCP-039037	Jackson County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Premium Pay Ambulance	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	No new expenditures for this report. This project provides Premium Pay to Jackson County Ambulance Service employees. These healthcare workers have continued to provide critical patient care throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. This financial assistance addresses the significantly increased risk these employees faced while transporting and treating patients with suspected and confirmed cases of COVID-19. Employees were provided Premium Pay proportionate to the total time they worked, therefore addressing the amount of risk they endured. These Ambulance service workers served and continue to serve as frontline workers throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and are paramount to the continued function of critical healthcare during this time. This project will continue to address the ongoing pandemic by providing further payments of premium pay to Jackson County Ambulance Service employees on an annual basis for the subsequent 3 years. The funds for upcoming premium pay payments have already been obligated by the Jackson County Board, and no individual employee will receive more than $7,500 throughout the duration of the program. All employees who were granted premium pay either receive below 150 percent of annual wages for all occupations or are not exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and therefore are eligible for premium pay under the American Rescue Plan Act’s Final Rule.		413124.72	219978.43		55
TPN-003824	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Emergency Management Coordinator	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Extension of funding to support the Emergency Management Coordinator through 2026.		601518.8	242494.3			*					No
TPN-003826	RCP-036650	Petersburg, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Community Recovery Needs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	To provide economic assistance to individuals and small businesses.	153949.9	153949.9	153949.9								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	153949.9
TPN-003827	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Multi Agency Academic Cooperative (MAAC) Firefighter Regional Training Pilot	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project shall provide training opportunities for firefighters, first responders, and EMS through the offerings of combined classroom and practical application programs that provide advanced levels of critical thinking and functioning in preparedness and response.  It is a collaborative process that allows for better coordination of efforts.	500000	500000	500000
TPN-003828	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Job Resource Coaching & Higher Education Partnership	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	This program, beginning in partnership with Southern New Hampshire University, will be designed to bring college education within reach for every Manchester public high school student, regardless of finances, to give students who normally wouldn’t have the opportunity, the chance to pursue higher education and job training within fields located right here in our city. The program will provide a holistic approach to the application process by offering assistance with financial aid and admissions applications, class selection and registration. After other aid programs are applied toward tuition, this program will fill in the gaps. Conversations are ongoing to extend this program to other colleges, community colleges, and universities within the City, as well as incorporating a job training component for students interested in pursuing a trade. $3,000,000.00 (Funded through December 2026)		2240234	360342.13								No			25 Dis Imp NPs operating in Qualified Census Tracts	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003830	RCP-039324	Vallejo, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Economic Development	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Funds will be used for a variety of ED efforts including an Economic Development strategic plan, Downtown Facade Improvements, small business grants, and other projects to provide economic support to businesses in the community.	1300000	1300000	913606.2								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003831	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Affordable Housing Trust Fund	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Makes investments in the existing Affordable Housing Trust Fund, to increase access to safe affordable housing. These funds can be made available to organizations to develop new affordable, transitional, and supportive non-congregate housing projects, as well as provide grants for individuals to apply for assistance in order to stay in their homes as they age, grants for emergency home repairs for low income individuals, grants for landlords to make improvements to their properties if their properties remain affordable for a prearranged time, make their units eligible for the Housing Choice Voucher Program, and other eligible uses to increase the amount of affordable housing within the City.		900000	476695.51								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	1000000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-003833	RCP-039517	Macon County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Macon County, IL, Employees Premium Pay Project	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium pay to Macon County, IL, employees who provided essential public services during the Covid 19 pandemic.	732275.26	732275.26	732275.26		605
TPN-003834	RCP-040197	Mason County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Delinquent Property Taxes/liens Households subject to foreclosure	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Household assistance to provide housing stability in community of Mason County for individuals with delinquent property taxes/liens subject to foreclosure		174932	148199.56	17							No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003837	RCP-037249	Grand Forks County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Commission Conference Room	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	ARPA funds were utilized to reconfigure the Commissioner’s conference room/office space to accommodate physical distancing and provide teleconference capabilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic and reduce COVID-19 spread.	26529.37	26529.37	26529.37								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	26529.37	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	No	1
TPN-003839	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Southern-Sundale	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Southern-Sundale project is an infrastructure project that will provide clean drinking water to over 100 homes in the eastern portion of Muskingum County. Many of these homes are considered to be in a rural location which makes accessing clean drinking water more a challenge without this county infrastructure.		1723455.75	1723455.75					No
TPN-003841	RCP-037249	Grand Forks County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Prevention in Congregate Settings	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The County utilized ARPA funding to support remote working and virtual meetings in response to the pandemic. This included virtual presence network capabilities, Zoom meeting subscriptions, and mobile phone capabilities.		7484.19	7484.19								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	4579	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	No	0
TPN-003842	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Big B-Mutton Ridge	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Big B- Mutton Ridge project is an infrastructure project that will provide clean drinking water to over 25 homes in the eastern portion of Muskingum County. Many of these homes are considered to be in a rural location which makes accessing clean drinking water more a challenge without this county infrastructure.		358300.47	358300.47					No
TPN-003843	RCP-039517	Macon County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Macon County, IL, County Administrator	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	Advertising expenses associated with the search to secure an County Administrator for Macon County, Illinois.		599	599								No
TPN-003844	RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Neighborhood Recreation Improvements - Lakeside Irrigation Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project greatly extended the life of Lakeside Golf Course by the much needed replacement of the course’s irrigation system. This golf course is a local favorite and an attraction to visitors because of its large greens, rolling terrain and the longest par-5 in Kentucky. The irrigation replacement project will be complete by the fall of 2023.   These improvements were included in the Lexington Parks and Recreation Master Plan, but have not been funded due to lack of funding availability.  Budgets for FY2020 and FY2021 were greatly impacted by COVID-19, and resulted in projects being held or not funded on a regular schedule. This is considered a park enhancement, and provided an opportunity to increase usability of an existing recreation space.	1442000	1442000	1442000
TPN-003845	RCP-040197	Mason County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Delinquent Property Taxes/liens - Small Business subject to foreclosure	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Assistance to Small Businesses in community of Mason County with delinquent property taxes/liens subject to foreclosure		25067.94	25067.94								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	Yes	24635
TPN-003846	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Twin Hills Drive	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Twin Hills Drive project is an infrastructure project that will provide clean drinking water to over 30 homes in the eastern portion of Muskingum County. Many of these homes are considered to be in a rural location which makes accessing clean drinking water more a challenge without this county infrastructure.		368243.78	368243.78					No
TPN-003849	RCP-037249	Grand Forks County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The County utilized ARPA funds to provide premium pay to essential workers to recognize the extraordinary efforts taken by essential staff. Those include: • Public health and public safety staff • Healthcare • Custodians and sanitation staff • Emergency Management staff • Correctional Officers  Each position within the qualifying category was reviewed to determine if it met the requirements. Positions where telework was available and/or in-person interaction was limited were eliminated. Part time positions were identified to receive renumeration at 50% of a full-time position. A ten-month eligibility period was used. July 01, 2020 – April 30, 2021 was identified based on the following: • July 2020 was when reports of positive test results and illness in both the County as a whole and in the employee, population specifically started to increase impacting employees in the qualifying employee categories • April 30, 2021 was when we saw a steady decrease in positive test results and illness in the County as a whole and in the employee population specifically • COVID-19 vaccinations were widely available and provided through Public Health starting in February 2021, and several vaccination events were held at the Correctional Center for Law Enforcement personnel A maximum amount of $2,000 for any individual working all 10 months would be provided.  This amount falls within the Interim Final Rule of no more than $13 per hour additional wages, maximum of $25,000 per individual, and not to exceed 150% of the residing state’s average annual wage.  • $2000/10 months = $200 per month for full time employees  • $1000/10 months = $100 per month for part time employees Each qualifying employee was reviewed to determine the number of months in the 10-month eligibility period they worked, and the compensation amount was calculated based on the formula above.		278565.05	278565.05		175
TPN-003851	RCP-035971	Wake County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	CV51 - ARP PH Vaccinations	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Vaccine Contracts, Staff/Temp Staff working vaccination clinics, promotions materials related to vaccines	1810000	1796922.13	1796922.13								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003853	RCP-039324	Vallejo, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Navigation Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Funds will be contributed to the construction costs to build a facility with 125 beds to assist the unhoused community in the City of Vallejo.	2000000	2000000	1070571								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003854	RCP-040197	Mason County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	PUD 1 Residential Utility Arrearages	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Utility assistance to Households with negative economic impacts due to COVID pandemic.		25000	25000	15							No			1 Imp General Public			Yes	6577.62
TPN-003855	RCP-038397	Stanly County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Jail HVAC UV Installation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Installation of new HVAC systems with UV lights to improve ventilation in order to mitigate the spread of COVID and other communicable diseases in the jail's congregate living space.	54419.28	54419.28	54419.28
[truncated: output stopped at 2057508 bytes; size cap per file]

File and source

File

October-2023-Quarterly-Reporting-Data-through-September-30-2023.xlsx

Size

19,732,988 bytes

SHA-256

fd37dafa1a20a861ab74e84b0897272b991427eb0f154b15eaec32d0c98ce175

Our copy

October-2023-Quarterly-Reporting-Data-through-September-30-2023.xlsx

Original

home.treasury.gov